l ocal government e nergy audit program e nergy … audit... · entity: bernards public school...

618
LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM: ENERGY AUDIT REPORT PREPARED FOR: BERNARDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS 101 PEACHTREE ROAD BASKING RIDGE, NJ 07920 ATTN: MR. NICK MARKARIAN, BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR PREPARED BY: CONCORD ENGINEERING GROUP 520 S. BURNT MILL ROAD VOORHEES, NJ 08043 TELEPHONE: (856) 427-0200 FACSIMILE: (856) 427-6529 WWW.CEG-INC.NET CEG CONTACT: JESSE OHM, PE, CEM, LEED AP LEAD MECHANICAL ENGINEER EMAIL: JOHM@CEG-INC.NET REPORT ISSUANCE: FINAL, APRIL 15, 2011 PROJECT NO: 9C10088

Upload: others

Post on 14-Jul-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM: ENERGY AUDIT REPORT

PREPARED FOR: BERNARDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS

101 PEACHTREE ROAD BASKING RIDGE, NJ 07920 ATTN: MR. NICK MARKARIAN, BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR

PREPARED BY: CONCORD ENGINEERING GROUP

520 S. BURNT MILL ROAD VOORHEES, NJ 08043 TELEPHONE: (856) 427-0200 FACSIMILE: (856) 427-6529 WWW.CEG-INC.NET

CEG CONTACT: JESSE OHM, PE, CEM, LEED AP

LEAD MECHANICAL ENGINEER EMAIL: [email protected]

REPORT ISSUANCE: FINAL, APRIL 15, 2011

PROJECT NO: 9C10088

Page 2: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 1 of 35

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 3 

II.  INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 11 

III.  METHOD OF ANALYSIS................................................................................................ 13 

IV.  HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST ............................................................... 15 

A. ENERGY USAGE .................................................................................................................. 15 B. ENERGY USE INDEX (EUI) .................................................................................................. 17 C. EPA ENERGY BENCHMARKING SYSTEM ............................................................................. 20

V.  RENEWABLE/DISTRIBUTED ENERGY MEASURES ................................................ 22 

VI.  ENERGY PURCHASING AND PROCUREMENT STRATEGY .................................. 26 

VII.  INSTALLATION FUNDING OPTIONS.......................................................................... 31 

A. INCENTIVE PROGRAMS ........................................................................................................ 31 B. FINANCING OPTIONS ........................................................................................................... 34

VIII.  ENERGY AUDIT ASSUMPTIONS ................................................................................. 35 

Enclosures: Document 1 – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Report

Document 2 – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Report

Document 3 – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Report

Document 4 – Oak Street Elementary School Energy Report Document 5 – Ridge High School Energy Report

Document 6 – William Annin Middle School Energy Report

Page 3: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 2 of 35

REPORT DISCLAIMER

The information contained within this report, including any attachment(s), is intended solely for use by the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or a person designated as responsible for delivering such messages to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to disclose, copy, distribute or retain this report, in whole or in part, without written authorization from Concord Engineering Group, Inc., 520 S. Burnt Mill Road, Voorhees, NJ 08043.

This report may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you have received this report in error, please notify the sender immediately. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation.

Page 4: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 3 of 35

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report presents the findings of the energy audit conducted for:

Entity: Bernards Public School

Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect Elementary School Oak Street Elementary School Ridge High School William Annin Middle School District Contact Persons: Nick Markarian, Business Administrator Connie Coriell, Energy Efficiency Coordinator

Facility Contact Person: Artie Rivera, Head of Facilities

This audit is performed in connection with the New Jersey Clean Energy - Local Government Energy Audit Program for Bernards Public Schools facilities. The purpose of this analysis is to provide the district insight into the energy savings potential that exists within facilities at Bernards Public Schools. Energy Efficiency changes and upgrades requires support from the building occupants, operations personnel and the administrators of the district in order to maximize the savings and overall benefit. The efficiency improvement of public buildings provides a benefit for the environment and the residence of New Jersey. Through this report it has been demonstrated that there is a great potential for energy savings and infrastructure improvements at Bernards Public Schools. Fast Payback Energy Conservation Measures: The Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) identified within the reports represent the potential annual savings at each facility. It is recommended to consider all ECMs as part of the school district’s initiative to save energy, reduce emissions, and lower operating costs. Several ECMs shown within this report represent significant savings relative to the cost to implement. The ECMs shown with a simple payback of 10 years and less are considered very cost effective and should be considered a high priority for the District. The following ECMs are highly recommended:

• Lighting Upgrades (All facilities) Lighting retrofits throughout the school district is a straight forward conservation measure that is prescriptive in nature and provides substantial savings for the investment. Lighting retrofits is a good example of ECMs that can be implemented with “in house” staff to reduce the installation cost and further reduce paybacks. The measure includes replacing existing 700 series T-8 fluorescent lamps with new higher efficiency T-8 lamps in all schools. This upgrade also

Page 5: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 4 of 35

includes installation of high bay T-5 fixtures to replace the existing metal halide fixtures. This provides additional energy savings for rooms such as the gymnasiums and auditoriums. In addition it is recommended to utilize CFL lamps in lieu of all existing incandescent lamps throughout the school district. Overall lighting upgrades represent one of the most easily implemented ECMs and are highly recommended for all facilities.

• Lighting Controls (All facilities) Similar to lighting upgrades, lighting controls are very simple upgrades and can save considerable energy. Lighting controls do not require replacement of the fixture and typically can save more energy than lighting upgrades alone. The maximum savings can be achieved through the implementation of both the lighting upgrades and lighting controls ECMs. Lighting controls will automatically turn off lights when spaces and rooms are not occupied. It is important to note that ECMs are calculated as stand-alone ECMs and therefore the total savings will be slightly less than the sum of both individual ECMs (Lighting Upgrade and Lighting Controls). The discrepancy between additive ECMs is within the tolerances for this level of analysis (+/- 20%). Lighting controls provide the maximum savings in spaces that have changing occupancy schedules throughout the day such as the classrooms after school hours, labs, music rooms, media centers, etc. Lighting controls is highly recommended in addition to the lighting upgrade ECMs for Bernards Public Schools.

• Computer Monitor Replacement (All facilities) Plug loads within buildings is becoming a larger and larger portion of the total energy use all types of facilities. Plug loads are most dominant in combination with computers and computer equipment. Modern computer monitors are flat screen LCD panels that are far more efficiency than older style cathode ray-tube (CRT) monitors. Typical energy use of a flat screen monitor is approximately 1/3 to 1/4 of the energy used by a CRT monitor. The majority of computer monitors throughout the district are CRT style monitors. This represents a significant energy savings potential. It is highly recommended to replace the existing CRT monitors with flat screen monitors to take advantage of the energy savings as well as other ergonomic benefits of modern LCD monitors.

• Hot Water Valve Blanket Insulation (Cedar Hill, Ridge, & William Annin) Hot Water piping insulation is a valuable asset to avoid the loss of heat from the boiler system. Large diameter bare steel pipe can account for significant energy loss over an entire heating season. Since the piping remains hot 24/7, bare pipe heat losses are multiplied by the entire operating hours of the heating system. Pipe & valve insulation reduces the loss compared to bare pipe by a factor of 10 or more. Pipe insulation becomes deteriorated overtime due to the repair of pipe / fitting leaks and service of components. Due to the savings from insulating the system to new condition, this ECM provides a payback within 10 years and is highly recommended.

• VFD HW Pumps (Ridge, William Annin)

Page 6: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 5 of 35

Large constant volume pumping systems require a lot of energy to operate continuously. Systems designed with 3-way control valves do not limit flow when demand for hot water is low. As a result pumping energy remains constant approximately equal to the rating of the pump motor. Variable Frequency Drives provides in combination with 2-way control at terminal devices provides a way to limit pump energy when the system demand is reduced. VFD drives install on larger pumping systems such as the high school and middle school provides the most advantageous paybacks. This ECM assumes retrofit of the existing 3-way control valves to operate as 2-way control valves. This conversion must be verified before implementation. Once the overall scope for the retrofit is determined, it is anticipated this ECM will provide a good payback for the district. Capital Improvement Energy Conservation Measures: The ECMs that have much longer paybacks are considered capital improvement ECMs. These ECMs typically have high installation costs that are more difficult to justify the savings based solely on the energy savings associated with the improvement. Despite the long paybacks, these ECMs in many cases provide valuable and much needed infrastructure improvements for the facility. These ECMs include boiler upgrades, HVAC equipment upgrades, motor replacements, controls upgrades, etc. The savings identified for the following ECMs provides additional incentive for the district’s capital improvement projects.

• Energy Recovery Unit Ventilators (Ridge, William Annin, & Mount Prospect) The existing unit ventilators throughout the newer sections of the schools are heated and cooled with vertical style units made by Airdale without energy recovery. These units can be easily replaced with new vertical style units with additional features options such as energy recovery. Due to the modular style of the Airdale units, this retrofit is more easily implemented. Energy recovery allows the units to provide outside air to the classrooms at about one fourth of the energy required to heat and cool the ventilation air. The installation of these new units provides energy savings as well as avoided cost of replacing the existing unit ventilators, which are close to the end of their rated life. This ECM only includes the replacement of the “Graduate” series units and does not include retrofit of the most recent unit ventilators within the 700 wing of Ridge High School. This ECM does not include retrofit of the existing horizontal cabinet unit ventilators made by Nesbitt. The original building unit ventilators throughout the schools are heating only units and not easily retrofitted to include energy recovery. The savings from the replacement of the old unit ventilators is very difficult to justify its replacement and therefore this ECM is limited to the vertical style heating and cooling unit ventilators throughout the district.

• AC Unit Upgrades (All Facilities except for Mount Prospect) High efficiency AC unit installations will typically have high installation costs. However, the savings over time can be substantial. The simple paybacks for AC units range between 25 yrs and 30 years depending on the existing equipment efficiency, runtime, and size / installation cost. Similar to most capital improvement projects, the energy savings alone does not justify the

Page 7: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 6 of 35

installation. The benefit of replacing the aging AC systems with new equipment provides value through avoided costs for School District that should not be overlooked.

• Condensing Boilers (All Facilities except for Mount Prospect & Oak Street) Condensing boiler replacements are one of the the most significant HVAC system upgrade for a facility. The installation of condensing boilers provides a heating efficiency increase ranging from 10% to 15%. The simple payback for condensing boiler ECMs range from 45 to 62 years depending on the boiler capacity and installation difficulty. These ECMs represent the most substantial upfront cost which creates long paybacks. They also represent significant infrastructure improvements throughout the District.

• Premium Motor Replacements (All Facilities except for Oak Street) The simple payback for premium efficiency motor replacements ranges from 15 to 25 years depending on the horse power, existing efficiency, and run hours of the equipment. This ECM is a one-for-one style replacement with dependable savings that is based on a simple calculation. In addition to the savings, this ECM provides new motors for a variety of existing equipment.

• Kitchen Hood Controls (Ridge & Liberty Corner) Kitchen hood controls allows the exhaust air through the commercial kitchen hood to reduce with respect to the level of heat and smoke produced by the kitchen cooking equipment. This approach automatically slows the hood exhaust and make-up air to minimum levels at light or non use conditions. This ECM provides saving on fan motors as well as energy required to heat and cool the make-up air exhausted by the hood. The savings are extremely dependent on the operating hours of the kitchen hood exhaust fan. Based on the survey and discussions with the operating staff, it was determined that several schools minimize the use of the kitchen hood through the manual switch. In other schools such as Ridge and Liberty Corner, it was noted that the kitchen exhaust was operating for many hours beyond the needs of the cooking equipment. The payback range for this ECM can vary greatly based on the operating hours. Ridge provides a payback within 10 years while Liberty Corner has a simple payback of 28 years. It is recommended to review the operating hours of the kitchen exhaust fan for all schools and refine the savings as a result. At a minimum a district wide hood operation schedule should be implemented for the use of the kitchen hood exhaust to limit over ventilation when it is not needed.

• Kitchen Domestic Booster Heater (Ridge, William Annin) Large schools including Ridge High School and William Annin Middle School require significant hot water for cleaning and sterilization of the kitchen dishes and serving trays. Commercial kitchen dishwashing equipment requires hot water at sterilization temperatures far above the buildings typical domestic hot water supply. The dishwasher utilizes a large capacity electric booster heater to boost the domestic hot water to the adequate temperature. The proposed installation utilizes a natural gas hot water heater in lieu of the existing electric booster heater. The savings are based on switching fuels from electric to natural gas. The simple payback of this

Page 8: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 7 of 35

ECM is approximately 13 years based on a dishwasher run time of 1 hour per day. One hour per day is a conservative estimate to show realistic savings. If additional runtime is calculated on the kitchen dishwashing equipment, the savings would increase respectively. Combined Project Approach: Although only individual projects with a simple payback of 10 years and less are considered financially self sustaining, it is important to consider how multiple projects can be combined together. When ECMs are aggregated into a single project, the lower cost ECMs provides valuable savings to offset the higher cost ECMs. Likewise when multiple facilities are aggregated together into a single entity energy efficiency project, the same benefits are seen on a larger scale. The Energy Savings Improvement Program (ESIP) allows for financing of any combination of energy efficiency projects across multiple facilities into one large project. The term of the financing must be under 15 years and the savings provides the revenue for the financing cost. The combination of all facilities into one large energy efficiency project provides Bernards Public Schools with the opportunity to implement a large portion of the ECMs identified with an overall simple payback of 11.2 years. Any ECMs not included in the total project summary are highlighted within the individual facility reports. This combined option allows the Bernards Public Schools to implement much needed infrastructure improvements such as new air conditioning equipment, motors, lighting, lighting controls, and etc. The program financing allows for the implementation with no upfront cost for district. Implementation of an ESIP provides significant benefits and should be strongly considered. The total Entity Project Summary table below shows the savings, costs, incentives and paybacks for all ECMs at Bernards Public Schools.

Page 9: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 8 of 35

Table 1 ESIP -Total Entity Project Summary

Cedar Hill Elementary $23,456 $334,068 $9,800 $324,106 13.8

Liberty Corner Elementary $21,035 $236,326 $6,681 $229,646 10.9

Mount Prospect Elementary $30,031 $273,373 $5,380 $267,993 8.9

Oak Street Elementary $24,205 $252,103 $8,598 $243,505 10.1

Ridge High School $66,387 $661,236 $22,961 $638,275 9.6

William Annin Middle School $76,985 $1,030,395 $19,829 $1,010,566 13.1

Total Entity Project $242,099 $2,787,502 $73,249 $2,714,092 11.2

Total District Energy Utilities: $1,586,265Est. Total District Energy Savings: $242,099

Overall District Percent Reduction: 15.3%

SMART START INCENTIVES

ENERGY SAVINGS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - POTENTIAL PROJECT

FACILITY ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROJECTS

ANNUAL ENERGY

SAVINGS ($)

PROJECT COST ($)

CUSTOMER COST

SIMPLE PAYBACK

Implementation of all ECMs identified within the ESIP – Entity Total Project Summary table represents a total annual savings of approximately $242,099 for the district. The individual facility project summaries are shown within each facility energy audit report. The ESIP program allows for a maximum financing term of 15 years. Based on the project costs and savings identified above, there is the potential for re-arranging the ECMs into a scope of work that includes the Condensing Boilers, which could be a large future capital cost for the district. This would allow the new boilers to be installed through the ESIP program in lieu of the district financing the improvements with other means. Further review through the development of an Energy Savings Plan (ESP) is needed to verify all potential options.

Page 10: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 9 of 35

Other Considerations:

• Maintenance and Operational Measures In addition to the ECMs, there are maintenance and operational measures that can provide energy savings and provide immediate benefit. The ECMs listed above represent investments that can be made to the facility which are justified by the savings seen overtime. However, the maintenance items and small operational improvements below are typically achievable with on site staff or maintenance contractors and in turn have the potential to provide on operational costs. The following are recommendations which should be considered a priority when moving forward with energy efficiency upgrades:

1. Chemically clean the condenser and evaporator coils periodically to optimize efficiency.

Poorly maintained heat transfer surfaces can reduce efficiency 5-10%. 2. Maintain all weather stripping on entrance doors to limit unnecessary infiltration. 3. Clean all light fixtures to maximize light output to provide better light output and avoid the

use of task lighting where otherwise not necessary. 4. Provide more frequent air filter changes to decrease overall system power usage and maintain

better IAQ. 5. Verify proper operation of all outside air dampers throughout the school district. Older

equipment may have ventilation dampers that are either stuck open or shut, either contributing to excessive energy use or poor indoor air quality. Outside air damper measurements are also extremely valuable when verifying the potential energy savings for energy recovery and demand control ventilation ECMs.

6. Inspect the vertical style unit ventilators to be air tight with the outside air connection to the exterior wall louver. It was noted during the survey that cold air was leaking into the unit cabinet due to poor connection with the outside air louver. Leakage of cold outside air can account for unnecessary energy use as well as create the potential for freezing piping.

• Renewable Energy Measures

Renewable Energy Measures (REMs) were also reviewed for implementation at Bernards Public Schools. CEG utilized a combination of roof mounted solar arrays and canopy style parking lot solar arrays to house PV systems throughout Bernards Public Schools buildings. The total solar electric production potential for these systems is approximately 1,540,128 kWh, which would reduce the district’s electric grid purchased electric energy by 22%. The system’s calculated simple payback of approximately 15 years is past the standard 10 year simple payback threshold; however, with alternative funding this payback could be lessened. CEG recommends the Owner review all funding options available with the implementation of this renewable energy measure.

• System Controls The information provided by the operations and maintenance personnel identified various control systems installed at the school district. In addition multiple control system contractors are utilized to maintain the various control systems. It was noted that in many cases the existing

Page 11: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 10 of 35

control are not functioning correctly resulting in poor control of the building space temperatures. In some instances such as Ridge High School and William Annin Middle School, windows were opened in the winter in order to cool rooms that were significantly overheated by the lack of control of the system. The detailed information regarding the control system status, set points, schedules and operation was not available, however it is evident that the interrelation of multiple control systems and lack of direct access to its functions, negatively affects the building’s operations and ability for the staff to maintain and correct HVAC issues. Controls issues are often difficult to identify and pinpoint the fault or device malfunctioning. Retro Commissioning provides a method to test and re-establish building systems back to their correct operation. In many cases Retro-Commissioning alone has show to reduce heating and cooling energy costs by 15% by correcting items identified through the commissioning process. For future project planning, it is important to consider commissioning as a means to verify that the intent of the energy efficiency upgrade is accomplished and savings will be achieved. Commissioning is highly recommended for all aspects of energy efficiency upgrades including equipment upgrades as well as control system upgrades. Ensuring that schedules, set points, and adjustability is programmed correctly is vital with a new control system upgrade. Overall Assessment: Overall, Bernards Public Schools are maintained and operating fairly efficiently with room for improvement. There are numerous ECMs that can be implemented to further reduce energy use and save on the facility’s operating costs. The total energy cost of $1,586,265 could be reduced by approximately 15.3% through the implementation of the ECMs recommended in the combined project approach summary table. Bernards Public Schools is in a beneficial position to implement energy efficiency improvements and still include large capital projects. When the total project is capable of being funded through the savings, CEG highly recommends the school district to take advantage of this opportunity.

Page 12: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 11 of 35

II. INTRODUCTION The comprehensive energy audit covers the following facilities at Bernards Public Schools:

• Cedar Hill Elementary School • Liberty Corner Elementary School • Mount Prospect Elementary School • Oak Street Elementary School • Ridge High School • William Annin Middle School

This audit is performed in connection with the New Jersey Clean Energy - Local Government Energy Audit Program. The energy audit is conducted to promote the mission of the office of Clean Energy, which is to use innovation and technology to solve energy and environmental problems in a way that improves the State’s economy. This can be achieved through the wiser and more efficient use of energy. Electrical and natural gas utility information is collected and analyzed for one full year’s energy use of each building. The utility information allows for analysis of the building’s operational characteristics; calculate energy benchmarks for comparison to industry averages, estimated savings potential, and baseline usage/cost to monitor the effectiveness of implemented measures. A computer spreadsheet is used to calculate benchmarks and to graph utility information (see the utility profiles below). The Energy Use Index (EUI) is established for the building. Energy Use Index (EUI) is expressed in British Thermal Units/square foot/year (BTU/ft2/yr), which is used to compare energy consumption to similar building types or to track consumption from year to year in the same building. The EUI is calculated by converting the annual consumption of all energy sources to BTU’s and dividing by the area (gross square footage) of the building. Blueprints (where available) are utilized to verify the gross area of the facility. The EUI is a good indicator of the relative potential for energy savings. A low EUI indicates less potential for energy savings, while a high EUI indicates poor building performance therefore a high potential for energy savings. Existing building architectural and engineering drawings (where available) are utilized for additional background information. The building envelope, lighting systems, HVAC equipment, and controls information gathered from building drawings allow for a more accurate and detailed review of the building. The information is compared to the energy usage profiles developed from utility data. Through the review of the architectural and engineering drawings a building profile can be defined that documents building age, type, usage, major energy consuming equipment or systems, etc. The preliminary audit information is gathered in preparation for the site survey. The site survey provides critical information in deciphering where energy is spent and opportunities exist within a facility. The entire site is surveyed to inventory the following to gain an understanding of how each facility operates:

Page 13: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 12 of 35

• Building envelope (roof, windows, etc.) • Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning equipment (HVAC) • Lighting systems and controls • Facility-specific equipment

The building site visit is performed to survey all major building components and systems. The site visit includes detailed inspection of energy consuming components. Summary of building occupancy schedules, operating and maintenance practices, and energy management programs provided by the building manager are collected along with the system and components to determine a more accurate impact on energy consumption.

Page 14: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 13 of 35

III. METHOD OF ANALYSIS

This audit is consistent with an ASHRAE level 2 audit. The cost and savings for each measure is ± 20%. The evaluations are based on engineering estimations and industry standard calculation methods. More detailed analyses would require engineering simulation models, hard equipment specifications, and contractor bid pricing. Post site visit work includes evaluation of the information gathered, researching possible conservation opportunities, organizing the audit into a comprehensive report, and making recommendations on HVAC, lighting and building envelope improvements. Data collected is processed using energy engineering calculations to anticipate energy usage for each of the proposed energy conservation measures (ECMs). The actual building’s energy usage is entered directly from the utility bills provided by the owner. The anticipated energy usage is compared to the historical data to determine energy savings for the proposed ECMs. It is pertinent to note, that the savings noted in this report are not additive. The savings for each recommendation is calculated as standalone energy conservation measures. Implementation of more than one ECM may in some cases affect the savings of each ECM. The savings may in some cases be relatively higher if an individual ECM is implemented in lieu of multiple recommended ECMs. For example implementing reduced operating schedules for inefficient lighting will result in a greater relative savings. Implementing reduced operating schedules for newly installed efficient lighting will result in a lower relative savings, because there is less energy to be saved. The project / Entity summary tables are based on the implementation of multiple measures. The analysis is reviewed and determined if the nature of the ECMs will cause a major conflict of the overall savings. When additive measures do not cause a major effect on the overall savings the ECMs are included. Where a major conflict is identified, the combined savings is evaluated appropriately to ensure the overall estimates are ± 20%. ECMs are determined by identifying the building’s unique properties and deciphering the most beneficial energy saving measures available that meet the specific needs of the facility. The building construction type, function, operational schedule, existing conditions, and foreseen future plans are critical in the evaluation and final recommendations. Energy savings are calculated base on industry standard methods and engineering estimations. Energy consumption is calculated based on manufacturer’s cataloged information when new equipment is proposed. Cost savings are calculated based on the actual historical energy costs for the facility. Installation costs include labor and equipment costs to estimate the full up-front investment required to implement a change. Costs are derived from Means Cost Data, industry publications, and local contractors and equipment suppliers. The NJ Smart Start Building® program incentives savings (where applicable) are included for the appropriate ECM’s and subtracted from the installed cost. Maintenance savings are calculated where applicable and added to the energy savings for each ECM. The life-time for each ECM is estimated based on the typical life of the equipment being replaced or altered. The costs and savings are applied and a simple payback, simple lifetime savings, and simple return on investment are calculated. See below for calculation methods:

Page 15: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 14 of 35

ECM Calculation Equations:

⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛=

SavingsYearlyCostNetPaybackSimple

( )LifetimeECMSavingsYearlySavingsLifetimeSimple ×=

CostNetCostNetSavingsLifetimeSimpleROILifetimeSimple )( −

=

( )LifetimeECMSavingsenanceMaYearlySavingsenanceMaLifetime ×= intint

( )∑=

⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

+=

N

nnIRRPeriodofFlowCashturnofRateInternal

0 1Re

( )∑=

⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

+=

N

nnDRPeriodofFlowCashValueesentNet

0 1Pr

Net Present Value calculations based on Interest Rate of 3%.

Page 16: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 15 of 35

IV. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST A. Energy Usage The energy usage for the facilities is tabulated and plotted in graph form as depicted within each facility report (see the individual facility energy audit reports for details). Each energy source has been identified and monthly consumption and cost noted per the information provided by the Owner. The electric and natural gas utilities are shown below in Table 2 & 3 for all facilities:

Table 2 Electric Utility Summary

DESCRIPTION USAGE (KWH) COST ($) AVE RATE ($/KWH)

Cedar Hill Elementary 551,680 $89,477 $0.162

Liberty Corner Elementary 545,280 $88,078 $0.162

Mount Prospect Elementary 941,200 $155,627 $0.165

Oak Street Elementary 546,000 $88,618 $0.162

Ridge High School 2,955,900 $469,584 $0.159

William Annin Middle School 1,359,222 $219,161 $0.161

Total 6,899,282 $1,110,544 $0.161

FACILITYFACILITY ANNUAL ELECTRIC UTILITY

ELECTRIC UTILITY USAGE PER FACILITY

Page 17: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 16 of 35

Table 3 Natural Gas Summary

DESCRIPTION USAGE (THERMS) COST ($) AVE RATE

($/THERM)

Cedar Hill Elementary 35,210 $42,496 $1.21

Liberty Corner Elementary 35,951 $44,924 $1.25

Mount Prospect Elementary 29,831 $39,251 $1.32

Oak Street Elementary 43,314 $55,340 $1.28

Ridge High School 138,756 $172,937 $1.25

William Annin Middle School 96,233 $120,773 $1.26

Total 379,294 $475,720 $1.25

NATURAL GAS UTILTY USAGE PER FACILITY

FACILITY ANNUAL NATURAL GAS UTILITY

Page 18: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 17 of 35

B. Energy Use Index (EUI) Energy Use Index (EUI) is a measure of a building’s annual energy utilization per square foot of building. This calculation is completed by converting all utility usage consumed by a building for one year, to British Thermal Units (BTU) and dividing this number by the building square footage. EUI is a good measure of a building’s energy use and is utilized regularly for comparison of energy performance for similar building types. The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Buildings Technology Center under a contract with the U.S. Department of Energy maintains a Benchmarking Building Energy Performance Program. The ORNL website determines how a building’s energy use compares with similar facilities throughout the U.S. and in a specific region or state. Source use differs from site usage when comparing a building’s energy consumption with the national average. Site energy use is the energy consumed by the building at the building site only. Source energy use includes the site energy use as well as all of the losses to create and distribute the energy to the building. Source energy represents the total amount of raw fuel that is required to operate the building. It incorporates all transmission, delivery, and production losses, which allows for a complete assessment of energy efficiency in a building. The type of utility purchased has a substantial impact on the source energy use of a building. The EPA has determined that source energy is the most comparable unit for evaluation purposes and overall global impact. Both the site and source EUI ratings for the building are provided to understand and compare the differences in energy use. The site and source EUI for this facility is calculated as follows:

FootageSquareBuildingkBtuinUsageGaskBtuinUsageElectricEUISiteBuilding )( +

=

FootageSquareBuildingRatioSSXkBtuinUsageGasRatioSSXkBtuinUsageElectricEUISourceBuilding )( +

=

Page 19: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 18 of 35

Table 4

Energy Use Index Summary

DESCRIPTION (SF) SITE (KBTU/SF/YR)

SOURCE (KBTU/SF/YR)

ELECTRIC (KWH/SF/YR)

Cedar Hill Elementary 68,022 79 147 8.1

Liberty Corner Elementary 82,240 66 121 6.6

Mount Prospect Elementary 97,908 63 142 9.6

Oak Street Elementary 69,272 89 155 7.9

Ridge High School 297,152 81 162 9.9

William Annin Middle School 162,713 88 157 8.4

See the Appendix C - Statement of Energy Performance for comparason to other facilities

FACILITY ENERGY USE INDEX

ENERGY USE INDEX PER FACILITY

BUILDING AREA

Figure 1 through 4 below depicts a national EUI grading for the source energy use of various building types similar to the buildings at Bernards Public Schools.

Figure 1

Source Energy Use Intensity Distributions: Elementary Schools

Mt Prospect, Cedar Hill

Liberty Corner

Oak Street

Page 20: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 19 of 35

Figure 2 Source Energy Use Intensity Distributions: High Schools

Overall the Bernards Public School buildings are below average as far as their energy use performance based on the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Buildings Technology Center.

Ridge HS / William Annin MS

Page 21: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 20 of 35

C. EPA Energy Benchmarking System The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in an effort to promote energy management has created a system for benchmarking energy use amongst various end users. The benchmarking tool utilized for this analysis is entitled Portfolio Manager. The Portfolio Manager tool allows tracking and assessment of energy consumption via the template forms located on the ENERGY STAR website (www.energystar.gov). The importance of benchmarking for local government municipalities is becoming more important as utility costs continue to increase and emphasis is being placed on carbon reduction, greenhouse gas emissions and other environmental impacts. Based on information gathered from the ENERGY STAR website, Government agencies spend more than $10 billion a year on energy to provide public services and meet constituent needs. Furthermore, energy use in commercial buildings and industrial facilities is responsible for more than 50 percent of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions. It is vital that local government municipalities assess facility energy usage, benchmark energy usage utilizing Portfolio Manager, set priorities and goals to lessen energy usage and move forward with priorities and goals. The ENERGY STAR account for the school district was created by the school district. This account allows for access and monitoring the facility’s yearly energy usage as it compares to facilities of similar type. The login page for the account can be accessed at the following web address; the username and password are also listed below:

https://www.energystar.gov/istar/pmpam/index.cfm?fuseaction=login.login The login information is unavailable since it is controlled by the district.

Page 22: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 21 of 35

Table 5 Energy Star Performance Summary

DESCRIPTION SCORE AVERAGE POTENTIAL CERTIFICATIONS

Cedar Hill Elementary 72 50 LEED EBOM

Liberty Corner Elementary 73 50 LEED EBOM

Mount Prospect Elementary 72 50 LEED EBOM

Oak Street Elementary 63 50 N/A

Ridge High School 62 50 N/A

William Annin Middle School 42 50 N/A

See the Appendix C - Statement of Energy Performance for comparative facilitiesScore: "N/A" represents facility that could not receive a rating. See Energy Star website for details.

ENERGY STAR PERFORMANCE RATING PER FACILITY

FACILITY ENERGY STAR PERFORMANCE RATING

Refer to Statement of Energy Performance Appendix for the detailed energy summary for each facility.

Page 23: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 22 of 35

V. RENEWABLE/DISTRIBUTED ENERGY MEASURES Globally, renewable energy has become a priority affecting international and domestic energy policy. The State of New Jersey has taken a proactive approach, and has recently adopted in its Energy Master Plan a goal of 30% renewable energy by 2020. To help reach this goal New Jersey created the Office of Clean Energy under the direction of the Board of Public Utilities and instituted a Renewable Energy Incentive Program to provide additional funding to private and public entities for installing qualified renewable technologies. A renewable energy source can greatly reduce a building’s operating expenses while producing clean environmentally friendly energy. CEG has assessed the feasibility of installing renewable energy measures (REM) for the municipality utilizing renewable technologies and concluded that there is potential for solar energy generation. Solar Generation Solar energy produces clean energy and reduces a building’s carbon footprint. This is accomplished via photovoltaic panels which are mounted on all south and southwestern facades of the building. Flat roof, as well as sloped areas can be utilized; flat areas will have the panels turned to an optimum solar absorbing angle. (A structural survey of the roof would be necessary before the installation of PV panels is considered). Parking lots can also be utilized for the installation of a solar array. A truss system can be installed that is high enough to park vehicles under the array and no parking lot area is lost. The state of NJ has instituted a program in which one Solar Renewable Energy Certificate (SREC) is given to the Owner for every 1000 kWh of generation. SREC’s can be sold anytime on the market at their current market value. The value of the credit varies upon the current need of the power companies. The average value per credit is around $350, this value was used in our financial calculations. This equates to $0.35 per kWh generated. CEG has reviewed the existing roof area and parking lot canopy area potential of the remaining facilities being audited for the purposes of determining a potential for a photovoltaic system. The facilities with structural deficiencies were not considered for a roof mounted system. Instead where applicable a parking lot canopy system was reviewed. A depiction of the area utilized at each facility is shown in Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculation Appendix. The system sizes are shown below for each building where installation of a solar PV system is feasible. The total KWH production for all facilities combined is 1,540,128 kWh annually, reducing the overall utility bill for the district by approximately 22% percent.. A detailed financial analysis can be found in the Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculation Appendix within each facility report. This analysis illustrates the payback of the system over a 25 year period. The eventual degradation of the solar panels and the price of accumulated SREC’s are factored into the payback.

Page 24: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 23 of 35

Table 6 Renewable Energy Summary

DESCRIPTIONELECTRIC

PRODUCTION (KWH)

TOTAL FACILITY USE

(KWH)% REDUCTION

Cedar Hill Elementary 207,571 551,680 38%

Liberty Corner Elementary 136,596 545,280 25%

Mount Prospect Elementary 366,558 941,200 39%

Oak Street Elementary 245,079 546,000 45%

Ridge High School 204,297 2,955,900 7%

William Annin Middle School 380,027 1,359,222 28%

Total 1,540,128 6,899,282 22%

POWER PRODUCTION SUMMARY - PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM PER FACILITY

FACILITY PRODUCTION SUMMARY

The proposed photovoltaic array layout is designed based on the specifications for the Sun Power SPR-230 panel. This panel has a “DC” rated full load output of 230 watts, and has a total panel conversion efficiency of 18%. Although panels rated at higher wattages are available through Sun Power and other various manufacturers, in general most manufacturers who produce commercially available solar panels produce a similar panel in the 200 to 250 watt range. This provides more manufacturer options to the public entity if they wish to pursue the proposed solar recommendation without losing significant system capacity. The array system capacity was sized based on available roof space or canopy style system area available at each existing facility. Estimated solar array generation is calculated based on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory PVWatts Version 1.0 Calculator. In order to calculate the array generation an appropriate location with solar data on file must be selected. In addition the system DC rated kilowatt (kW) capacity must be inputted, a DC to AC de-rate factor, panel tilt angle, and array azimuth angle. The DC to AC de-rate factor is based on the panel nameplate DC rating, inverter and transformer efficiencies (95%), mismatch factor (98%), diodes and connections (100%), dc and ac wiring(98%, 99%), soiling, (95%), system availability (95%), shading (if applicable), and age(new/100%). The overall DC to AC de-rate factor has been calculated at an overall rating of 81%. The PVWatts Calculator program then calculates estimated system generation based on average monthly solar irradiance and user provided inputs.

Page 25: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 24 of 35

The monthly energy generation and offset electric costs from the PVWatts calculator is shown in the Renewable/Distributed Energy Measures Calculation Appendix. The proposed solar array for each facility is qualified by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Net Metering Guidelines as a Class I Renewable Energy Source. These guidelines allow onsite customer generation using renewable energy sources such as solar and wind with a capacity of 2 megawatts (MW) or less. This limits a customer system design capacity to being a net user and not a net generator of electricity on an annual basis. Although these guidelines state that if a customer does net generate (produce more electricity than they use), the customer will be credited those kilowatt-hours generated to be carried over for future usage on a month to month basis. Then, on an annual basis if the customer is a net generator the customer will then be compensated by the utility the average annual PJM Grid LMP price per kilowatt-hour for the over generation. Due to the aforementioned legislation, the customer is at limited risk if they generate more than they use at times throughout the year. With the inefficiency of today’s energy storage systems, such as batteries, the added cost of storage systems is not warranted and was not considered in the proposed design. Direct purchase involves the district paying for 100% of the total project cost upfront via one of the methods noted in the Installation Funding Options section below. Calculations include a utility inflation rate as well as the degradation of the solar panels over time. The financial summary per facility is as follows:

Page 26: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 25 of 35

Table 7 Renewable Financial Summary

DESCRIPTION INSTALATION COST ($)

TOTAL SAVINGS ($)

INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN

Cedar Hill Elementary $1,616,670 $106,276 4.9%

Liberty Corner Elementary $1,066,050 $69,937 4.9%

Mount Prospect Elementary $2,883,510 $188,777 4.9%

Oak Street Elementary $1,898,190 $125,480 4.9%

Ridge High School $1,608,390 $103,987 4.7%

William Annin Middle School $3,022,200 $194,194 4.7%

Total $12,095,010 $788,651

FINANCIAL SUMMARY - PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM PER FACILITY

FACILITY DIRECT PURCHASE FINANCIAL SUMMARY

CEG recommends the district review all options available for installation of solar PV systems at their facilities including a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA). This option utilizes providers who will own, operate, and maintain the system for a period of 15 years. During this time the PPA Provider would sell all of the electric generated by the Solar Arrays to the school district at a reduced rate compared to their existing electric rate. Wind Generation In addition to the Solar Analysis, CEG also conducted a review of the applicability of wind energy for the facility. Wind energy production is another option available through the Renewable Energy Incentive Program. Wind turbines of various types can be utilized to produce clean energy on a per building basis. Cash incentives are available per kWh of electric usage. Based on CEG’s review of the applicability of wind energy for the facility, it was determined that the average wind speed of <4.5 m/s is not adequate for purchase of a commercial wind turbine. Therefore, wind energy is not a viable option to implement.  

Page 27: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 26 of 35

VI. ENERGY PURCHASING AND PROCUREMENT STRATEGY Load Profile: Load Profile analysis was performed to determine the seasonal energy usage of the facility. Irregularities in the load profile will indicate potential problems within the facility. Consequently based on the profile a recommendation will be made to remedy the irregularity in energy usage. For this report, the facility’s energy consumption data was gathered in table format and plotted in graph form to create the load profile. Refer to The Electric and Natural Gas Usage Profiles included within this report to reference the respective electricity and natural gas usage load profiles. Electricity: The electricity usage profile demonstrates a steady year long load profile for school facilities that have occupancy during the summer months. Largest consumption months were December, January, June and August. The historical usage profile is beneficial and will allow for more competitive energy prices when shopping for alternative suppliers mainly due to the relatively flat load profile. Third Party Supplier (TPS) electric commodity contracts that offer’s a firm, fixed price for 100% of the facilities electric requirements and are lower than the JCP&L’s BGS-FP default rate are recommended. Natural Gas: The Natural Gas Usage Profile demonstrates a very typical natural gas (heat load) profile for school buildings. The summer months June – August have very little consumption. This load profile will yield less favorable natural gas pricing when shopping for alternative suppliers. This is because the higher winter month consumption will yield higher pricing which will not be offset by the summer month consumption. Nymex commodity pricing is generally higher in the winter months of November – March and lower in the summer months of April – October. Obtaining a flat load profile, (usage is similar each month), will yield optimum natural gas pricing when shopping for alternative suppliers. Third Party Supplier (TPS) natural gas commodity contracts that offer a product structures that offer either 1) a fixed basis rate with a market based Nymex/commodity rate or 2) a fixed basis rate with fixed Nymex/commodity winter rate (Nov – March) and market based Nymex/commodity rate for the summer months (April – October) for 100% of the facilities metered natural gas requirements are both recommended due to current market pricing.

Page 28: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 27 of 35

Tariff Analysis: Electricity: The school facilities receive electrical service through Jersey Central Power & Light (JCP&L) on a GS-Sec (General Service Secondary) rate and are master account billed which eliminates individual customer service charges. The facilities have contracted a Third Party Supplier (TPS) to provide electric commodity service on a fixed price through South Jersey Energy as of May 2009. The current electric supply contract expires May 2012. For electric supply (generation) service, the client has a choice to either use JCP&L’s default service rate BGS-FP or contract with a Third Party Supplier (TPS) to supply electric. Each year since 2002, the four New Jersey Electric Distribution Companies (EDCs) - Public Service Gas & Electric Company (PSE&G), Atlantic City Electric Company (ACE), Jersey Central Power & Light Company (JCP&L), and Rockland Electric Company (RECO) - have procured several billion dollars of electric supply to serve their Basic Generation Service (BGS) customers through a statewide auction process held in February. BGS refers to the service of customers who are not served by a third party supplier or competitive retailer. This service is sometimes known as Standard Offer Service, Default Service, or Provider of Last Resort Service. The Auction Process has consisted of two auctions that are held concurrently, one for larger customers on an hourly price plan (BGS-CIEP) and one for smaller commercial and residential customers on a fixed-price plan (BGS-FP). This facility’s rate structure is based on the fixed-price plan (BGS-FP). The facility’s current BGS-FP average price to compare for GS-Secondary rate is $0.1190/kWh. The utility, JCP&L will continue to be responsible for maintaining the existing network of wires, pipes and poles that make up the delivery system, which will serve all consumers, regardless of whom they choose to purchase their electricity or natural gas from. JCP&L’s Delivery Service rate includes the following charges: Customer Charge, Supplemental Customer Charge, Distribution Charge (kW Demand), kWh Charge, Non-utility Generation Charge, TEFA, SBC, SCC, Standby Fee and RGGI. Natural Gas: This facility currently receives natural gas distribution service through Public Service Electric and Gas Company (PSE&G) on rate schedules Large Volume Service (LVG) and General Service Gas (GSG) and has contracted a Third Party Supplier (TPS) to provide natural gas commodity service on a fixed basis rate plus market based commodity through Woodruff Energy. The current natural gas contract expires July 2011.

Page 29: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 28 of 35

PSE&G provides basic gas supply service (BGSS) to customers who choose not to shop from a Third Party Supplier (TPS) for natural gas commodity. The option is essential to protect the reliability of service to consumers as well as protecting consumers if a third party supplier defaults or fails to provide commodity service. Please refer to the link below for a recap of natural gas BGSS charges from PSE&G for rate schedule LVG and GSG. http://www.pseg.com/companies/pseandg/schedules/pdf/commodity.pdf The utility, PSE&G is responsible for maintaining the existing network of wires, pipes and poles that make up the delivery system, which will serve all consumers, regardless of whom they choose to purchase their electricity or natural gas from. PSE&G’s delivery service rate includes the following charges: Customer Service Charge, Distribution Charge, & Societal Benefits Charge (SBC).

Electric and Natural Gas Commodities Market Overview:

Current electricity and natural gas market pricing has remained relatively stable over the last year. Commodity pricing in 2008 marked historical highs in both natural gas and electricity commodity. Commodity pricing commencing spring of 2009 continuing through 2010, has decreased dramatically over 2008 historic highs and continues to be favorable for locking in long term (2-5 year) contracts with 3rd Party Supplier’s for both natural gas and electricity supply requirements.

It is important to note that both natural gas and electric commodity market prices are moved by supply and demand, political conditions, market technicals and trader sentiment. This market is continuously changing Energy commodity pricing is also correlated to weather forecasts. Because weather forecasts are dependable only in the short-term, prolonged temperature extremes can really cause extreme price swings.

Page 30: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 29 of 35

Short Term Energy Outlook - US Energy Information Administration (1/11/2011):

U.S. Natural Gas Prices. The Henry Hub spot price averaged $4.25 per MMBtu during December, an increase of about 54 cents from November's price of $3.71 per MMBtu. EIA expects the higher forecast production during the first half of 2011 compared with the same period last year, combined with a decline in consumption, to moderate natural gas spot prices. The projected spot price falls to a low of $3.73 per MMBtu in June then rises to $4.61 in December, averaging $4.02 per MMBtu for all of 2011, which is $0.37 per MMBtu lower than the 2010 average and $0.31 per MMBtu lower than in last month's Outlook. In 2012, the spot price rises to an average of $4.50 per MMBtu.

Uncertainty over future natural gas prices is slightly lower this year compared with last year at this time. Natural gas futures for March 2011 delivery (for the 5-day period ending January 6) averaged $4.39 per MMBtu, and the average implied volatility over the same period was 43 percent. This produced lower and upper bounds for the 95-percent confidence interval for March 2011 contracts of $3.21 per MMBtu and $6.02 per MMBtu, respectively. At this time last year, the natural gas March 2010 futures contract averaged $5.73 per MMBtu and implied volatility averaged 57 percent. The corresponding lower and upper limits of the 95-percent confidence interval were $3.88 per MMBtu and $8.47 per MMBtu.

U.S. Electricity Retail Prices. EIA expects the U.S. retail price for electricity distributed to the residential sector during 2010 to average 11.6 cents per kilowatt-hour, about the same level as in 2009. EIA expects the U.S. residential price to increase only slightly over the forecast period--by 0.6 percent in 2011 and by 1.0 percent in 2012.

Page 31: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 30 of 35

Recommendations:

1. CEG recommends a continued aggregated approach for 3rd party commodity supply procurement strategies for electric and natural gas supply service. Aggregating the usage of all school facilities for electricity and natural gas supply service, would allow the facilities to achieve a reduction in commodity supply costs. Energy commodities are among the most volatile of all commodities, however at this point and time, energy is extremely competitive. Contracts due to expire in the near term would yield more favorable pricing than previously realized. It is important to aggregate usage where available and take advantage of these current market prices quickly, before energy increases.

Overall, after review of the utility consumption, billing, and current commodity pricing outlook, CEG recommends that the school facilities continue to participate in the existing energy supply aggregation groups (ACES & Middlesex Regional). Both aggregation groups utilize the advisement of 3rd party unbiased Energy Consulting Firm experienced in the aggregation of and procurement of retail electricity and natural gas commodity. It is important to note that the Energy Consulting Firm should incorporate a rational, defensible strategy for purchasing commodity in volatile markets based upon the following:

• Budgets that reflect sound market intelligence • An understanding of historical prices and trends • Awareness of seasonal opportunities (e.g. shoulder months) • Negotiation of fair contractual terms • An aggressive, market based price

Recent legislation recommends school districts participate in an approved NJ cooperative purchasing program for the purchase of energy commodities. Current cooperative pricing energy supply systems can be found at: http://www.nj.gov/dca/lgs/lpcl/power_coops_list.pdf.

2. CEG recommends that the school district consider utilizing a third party utility billing-

auditing service to further analyze historical utility invoices such as water, sewer, natural gas and electric for incorrect billings and rate tariff optimization services. This service can be based on a shared savings model with no cost to the school district. The service could provide refunds on potential incorrect billings that may have been passed through by the utilities and paid by the school.

Page 32: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 31 of 35

VII. INSTALLATION FUNDING OPTIONS CEG has reviewed various funding options for the facility owner to utilize in subsidizing the costs for installing the energy conservation measures noted within this report. Below are a few alternative funding methods: A. Incentive Programs: Pay For Performance The New Jersey Smart Start Pay for Performance program includes incentives based on savings resulted from implemented ECMs. The program is available for all buildings that were audited as part of the NJ Clean Energy’s Local Government Energy Audit Program. The facility’s participation in the program is assisted by an approved program partner. An “Energy Reduction Plan” is created with the facility and approved partner to shown at least 15% reduction in the building’s current energy use. Multiple energy conservation measures implemented together are applicable toward the total savings of at least 15%. No more than 50% of the total energy savings can result from lighting upgrades / changes.

Total incentive is capped at 50% of the project cost. The program savings is broken down into three benchmarks; Energy Reduction Plan, Project Implementation, and Measurement and Verification. Each step provides additional incentives as the energy reduction project continues. The benchmark incentives are as follows:

1. Energy Reduction Plan – Upon completion of an energy reduction

plan by an approved program partner, the incentive will grant $0.10 per square foot between $5,000 and $50,000, and not to exceed 50% of the facility’s annual energy expense. (Benchmark #1 is not provided in addition to the local government energy audit program incentive.)

2. Project Implementation – Upon installation of the recommended measures along with the “Substantial Completion Construction Report,” the incentive will grant savings per KWH or Therm based on the program’s rates. Minimum saving must be 15%. (Example $0.11 / kWh for 15% savings, $0.12/ kWh for 17% savings, … and $1.10 / Therm for 15% savings, $1.20 / Therm for 17% saving, …) Increased incentives result from projected savings above 15%.

3. Measurement and Verification – Upon verification 12 months after implementation of all recommended measures, that actual savings have been achieved, based on a completed verification report, the incentive will grant additional savings per kWh or Therm based on the program’s rates. Minimum savings must be 15%. (Example $0.07 / kWh for 15% savings, $0.08/ kWh for 17% savings, … and

Page 33: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 32 of 35

$0.70 / Therm for 15% savings, $0.80 / Therm for 17% saving, …) Increased incentives result from verified savings above 15%.

The following facilities are potential candidates for Pay for Performance:

• Cedar Hill Elementary School • Liberty Corner Elementary School • Mount Prospect Elementary School • Oak Street Elementary School • William Annin Middle School

Direct Install Program The New Jersey Clean Energy’s Direct Install Program is a state funded program that targets small commercial and industrial facilities with peak demand of less than 100 kW. This turnkey program is aimed at providing owners a seamless, comprehensive process for analysis, equipment replacement and financial incentives to reduce consumption, lower utility costs and improve profitability. The program covers up to 60% of the cost for eligible upgrades including lighting, lighting controls, refrigeration, HVAC, motors, variable speed drives, natural gas and food service. Participating contractors (refer to www.njcleanenergy.com) conduct energy assessments in addition to your standard local government energy audit and install the cost-effective measures. The following measures are potential candidates for Direct Install:

• Lighting Upgrade – All Facilities (High Bay Lighting & CFL Lighting) • Lighting Controls – All Facilities • AC Unit upgrades – All Facilities (15 Tons and under) • Premium Efficiency Motors – All Facilities (10 HP and under) • Demand Control Ventilation – (All Facilities)

Smart Start Program

Prescriptive Measures - The New Jersey Clean Energy’s Smart Start prescriptive measures incentives include unit pricing incentives for installation of energy efficient equipment and controls. Proposed equipment and controls must meet the minimum efficiency requirements as well as other application requirements. The Smart Start prescriptive incentives applicable for new construction, renovations, remodeling and equipment replacements, for a wide range of equipment including:

• Electric Chillers • Gas Cooling • Electric Unitary HVAC • Ground Source Heat Pumps • Gas Heating • Variable Frequency Drives • Gas Water Heating

Page 34: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 33 of 35

• Premium Motors • Prescriptive Lighting • Lighting Controls • Technical Studies

Custom Measures - The New Jersey Clean Energy’s Smart Start prescriptive measures incentives include all measures not identified in the prescriptive measures category or measures that must have savings verified through additional analysis such as energy model simulations. Custom measures are intended to include savings as a result of unique energy efficiency measures, which are typically facility specific such as waste heat recovery. Custom incentives are provided based on the amount of energy saved and minimum internal rate of return in order to be eligible.

Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants The EECGB rebate provides supplemental funding up to $50,000 for counties and local government entities to implement energy conservation measures. The EECGB funding is provided through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). The local government must be among the eligible local government entities listed on the NJ Clean Energy website as follows - http://njcleanenergy.com/commercial-industrial/programs/eecbg-eligible-entities. This program is limited to municipalities and counties that have not already received grants directly through the US department of Energy. Bernards Public Schools is not eligible directly for this grant however, Bernards Twp is eligible, and has the option to pass along funding to school districts at their discretion. If Bernards Public Schools can acquire EECBG or other ARRA funding through the district, then maximum KW limit for the Direct Install program is waived. It is recommended to look into an agreement with the township to see if utilizing this funding is an option.

CEG recommends the Owner review the use of the above-listed incentive options in addition to utilizing their standard method of financing for facilities upgrades in order to fund the proposed energy conservation measures.

Page 35: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 34 of 35

B. Financing Options: Municipal Bonds Municipal bonds are a bond issued by a city or other local government, or their agencies. Potential issuers of municipal bonds include cities, counties, redevelopment agencies, school districts, publicly owned airports and seaports, and any other governmental entity (or group of governments) below the state level. Municipal bonds may be general obligations of the issuer or secured by specified revenues. Interest income received by holders of municipal bonds is often exempt from the federal income tax and from the income tax of the state in which they are issued, although municipal bonds issued for certain purposes may not be tax exempt. Power Purchase Agreement Public Law 2008, Chapter 3 authorizes contracts of up to fifteen (15) years for energy purchase contracts commonly known as “power purchase agreements.” These are programs where the contracting unit (Owner) procures a contract for, in most cases, a third party to install, maintain, and own a renewable energy system. These renewable energy systems are typically solar panels, windmills or other systems that create renewable energy. In exchange for the third party’s work of installing, maintaining and owning the renewable energy system, the contracting unit (Owner) agrees to purchase the power generated by the renewable energy system from the third party at agreed upon energy rates. Energy Savings Improvement Program (ESIP): Public Law 2009, Chapter 4 authorizes government entities to make energy related improvements to their facilities and pay for the costs using the value of energy savings that result from the improvements. The “Energy Savings Improvement Program (ESIP)” law provides a flexible approach that can allow all government agencies in New Jersey to improve and reduce energy usage with minimal expenditure of new financial resources. This program provides public entities to make valuable facility infrastructure improvements that are associated with energy savings. All energy savings projects are eligible as long as the financing period does not extend beyond 15 years. The financing can be utilized for all aspects of energy efficiency project implementation including, energy savings plan development, engineering, construction management, construction management, commissioning, and measurement and verification. This program provides the much needed financing for energy efficiency projects without the burden of increased debt. The program allows for procurement of financing without voter approval or extending existing dept. The program requires evaluation to ensure a positive cash-flow through the entire 15 year financing period. The first phase of implementing an ESIP is the development of an Energy Savings Plan (ESP) to verify the energy savings, construction costs, and overall financial model. See ESIP summary table within the Executive Summary. The underlining program requirement is the limitation of the project term to 15 years. The ESIP project size is open for multiple buildings to be included within one project. In addition all applicable incentive programs can also be utilized to help reduce the overall construction cost.

Page 36: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools Executive Energy Report

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 35 of 35

VIII. ENERGY AUDIT ASSUMPTIONS The assumptions utilized in this energy audit include but are not limited to following:

A. Cost Estimates noted within this report are based on industry accepted costing data such as RS MeansTM Cost Data, contractor pricing and engineering estimates. All cost estimates for this level of auditing are +/- 20%. Prevailing wage rates for the specified region has been utilized to calculate installation costs. The cost estimates indicated within this audit should be utilized by the owner for prioritizing further project development post the energy audit. Project development would include investment grade auditing and detailed engineering.

B. Energy savings noted within this audit are calculated utilizing industry standard procedures and accepted engineering assumptions. For this level of auditing, energy savings are not guaranteed.

C. Information gathering for each facility is strongly based on interviews with operations personnel. Information dependent on verbal feedback is used for calculation assumptions including but not limited to the following:

a. operating hours b. equipment type c. control strategies d. scheduling

D. Information contained within the major equipment list is based on the existing owner documentation where available (drawings, O&M manuals, etc.). If existing owner documentation is not available, catalog information is utilized to populate the required information.

E. Equipment incentives and energy credits are based on current pricing and status of rebate programs. Rebate availability is dependent on the individual program funding and applicability.

F. Equipment (HVAC, Plumbing, Electrical, & Lighting) noted within an ECM recommendation is strictly noted as a basis for calculation of energy savings. The owner should use this equipment information as a benchmark when pursuing further investment grade project development and detailed engineering for specific energy conservation measures.

G. Utility bill annual averages are utilized for calculation of all energy costs unless otherwise noted. Accuracy of the utility energy usage and costs are based on the information provided. Utility information including usage and costs is estimated where incomplete data is provided.

Page 37: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

BERNARDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS CEDAR HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

100 PEACHTREE ROAD

BASKING RIDGE, NJ 07920

FACILITY ENERGY REPORT

Page 38: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 1 of 43

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.  HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST ................................................................. 2 

II.  FACILITY DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................ 7 

III.  MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST ............................................................................................ 10 

IV.  ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES ..................................................................... 11 

V.  ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................... 43 

Appendix A – ECM Cost & Savings Breakdown

Appendix B – New Jersey Smart Start® Program Incentives

Appendix C – Portfolio Manager “Statement of Energy Performance”

Appendix D – Major Equipment List

Appendix E – Investment Grade Lighting Audit

Appendix F – Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculations

Page 39: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 2 of 43

I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has been tabulated and plotted in graph form as depicted within this section. Each energy source has been identified and monthly consumption and cost noted per the information provided by the Owner. Electric Utility Provider: Jersey Central Power & Light (JCP&L) Electric Utility Rate Structure: General Service Secondary (GSS) Third Party Supplier: South Jersey Energy Natural Gas Utility Provider: Public Service Electric and Gas (PSE&G) Utility Rate Structure: General Service Gas (GSG) Third Party Supplier: Woodruff The electric usage profile represents the actual electrical usage for the facility. The electric utility measures consumption in kilowatt-hours (KWH) and maximum demand in kilowatts (KW). One KWH usage is equivalent to 1000 watts running for one hour. One KW of electric demand is equivalent to 1000 watts running at any given time. The basic usage charges are shown as generation service and delivery charges along with several non-utility generation charges. Rates used in this report reflect the historical data received for the facility. The gas usage profile within each facility report shows the actual natural gas energy usage for the facility. The gas utility measures consumption in cubic feet x 100 (CCF), and converts the quantity into Therms of energy. One Therm is equivalent to 100,000 BTUs of energy.

Page 40: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 3 of 43

Table 1 Electricity Billing Data

Utility Provider: Jersey State Power & Light (JCP&L)Rate: General Service Secondary

Meter No: G28133644Customer ID No: 100008236968

Third Party Utility Provider: -TPS Meter / Acct No: -

MONTH OF USECONSUMPTION

KWH TOTAL BILL

Nov-09 54,560 $8,354 Dec-09 55,040 $8,465 Jan-10 52,640 $8,141 Feb-10 37,120 $6,018 Mar-10 48,160 $7,714 Apr-10 43,680 $7,180 May-10 45,760 $7,673 Jun-10 44,480 $7,376 Jul-10 44,640 $7,524

Aug-10 44,320 $7,382 Sep-10 38,400 $6,554 Oct-10 42,880 $7,098

Totals 551,680 207.5 Max $89,477

AVERAGE DEMAND 179.4 KW averageAVERAGE RATE $0.162 $/kWh

193.4204.3193.6

189.6207.0189.3207.5

ELECTRIC USAGE SUMMARY

DEMAND

142.7149.4149.4148.2177.9

Page 41: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 4 of 43

Figure 1 Electricity Usage Profile

Page 42: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 5 of 43

Table 4 Natural Gas Billing Data

Utility Provider: Public Service Electric & Gas (PSEG)Rate: Large Volume Gas (LVG)

Meter No: 2600173Point of Delivery ID: 6588988109

Third Party Utility Provider: Woodruff EnergyTPS Meter No:

MONTH OF USE CONSUMPTION (THERMS) TOTAL BILL

Nov-09 4,763.20 $6,591.89Dec-09 9,605.80 $12,012.59Jan-10 7,224.30 $7,224.30Feb-10 6,525.90 $8,620.36Mar-10 2,145.90 $2,360.89Apr-10 1,689.30 $1,883.67May-10 149.10 $253.75Jun-10 135.10 $135.10Jul-10 113.40 $224.40

Aug-10 130.80 $229.28Sep-10 186.70 $244.61Oct-10 2,540.20 $2,714.78

TOTALS 35,209.70 $42,495.62

AVERAGE RATE: $1.21 $/THERM

N/A

NATURAL GAS USAGE SUMMARY

Page 43: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 6 of 43

Figure 2 Natural Gas Usage Profile

Page 44: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 7 of 43

II. FACILITY DESCRIPTION

The 68,022 SF Cedar Hill Elementary School is a single story facility comprised of classrooms, library, computer room, cafeteria, kitchen, gymnasium, administration offices, restrooms, boiler rooms, custodial spaces and storage spaces. The School was built in 1956 with additions added in 1991 and 1994. In 1994 the 500 wing was added to the building

Building Profile

The hours of operation for the school students and teachers are between 8:30 AM and 3:30 PM on the weekdays. The facility remains occupied between 3:30 PM and 6:00 PM for aftercare during the weekdays. Custodial services are performed between the hours of 6:00 PM and 11:00 PM. The facility is closed on weekends. The student enrollment at Cedar Hill School is approximately 586 students and 73 teachers.

Building Envelope

The facility exterior is constructed of 8-inch sinter blocks with 4-inch stone and brick façade. Insulation within the original building is estimated to consist of an air space between the block wall and brick façade. The new 500 wing (1994 addition) to building is estimated to have 1”-2” of rigid insulation within the wall. The roof on the building is a flat built up style roof with tar coating and crushed stone on top. The gymnasium has a newer style built up flat roof with rigid insulation (estimated 2” minimum) and a black rubber roof membrane. The windows throughout the facility are double pane aluminum frame windows. These are in good condition and appear to be providing a tight weather barrier. Blinds for the windows integral to the double pane window system and appear to be in good working order.

HVAC Systems

Heating is provided by a central hot water heating system. The facility utilizes two cast iron sectional style boilers. Each of the Weil McLain 88 Series boilers has an input capacity of 4,474 MBH. These boilers provide heating hot water to baseboards, unit ventilators, and heating and ventilation units throughout the school. The boilers are in good condition and appear to be maintained. At the time of the survey, one boiler was not operational due to a false flame out signal from the burner. This is scheduled to be fixed.

Terminal heating equipment consists of unit ventilators made by Nesbitt in combination with hydronic baseboard heat. These units serve the various classrooms throughout the school with the exception of the 500 wing. The unit ventilators appear to be original and poor condition. The unit ventilators have since been retrofitted with electronic controls that include electronic temperature sensors, damper actuators, and control valves.

The building also utilizes large heating and ventilation units that provide heat for the large open areas such as the gymnasium and cafeteria. These units appear to be original to the building and in poor condition, however, these units are operational and adequately providing heat for the space.

Page 45: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 8 of 43

In addition to the hot water system, several spaces utilized packaged roo0ftop heating and cooling units for heat with gas fired heat exchangers. Packaged units with natural gas heat provides heat for various classrooms in the 300 wing, the 600 area offices, as well as all of the 500 wing.

Cooling is provided for only a portion of the rooms at Cedar Hill Elementary. Approximately 1/3rd of the rooms within the original building have some form of cooling. All of the 500 wing includes cooling. Air conditioning is provided by a combination of packaged rooftop unit, split systems, ductless split systems, and a few window AC units. All packaged rooftop units with gas heat include DX cooling, while additional packaged units are cooling only. Packaged cooling rooftop units provide cooling for the 600 area offices, various rooms in the 300 wing, all of the 500 wing, and main office. Split system AC units are provided for the faculty room, and nurses office. A large split system AC unit is provided for the music room. Various ductless split systems were installed for various classrooms as well as the technology IT room. All units were noted to be operational.

The packaged units throughout the 500 wing are in fair condition and appear to be working properly. The remaining units over the original building are in fair or poor condition. The ductless split systems are in fair or good condition depending on the age of the equipment. The two small split systems serving the faculty and nurse’s office are in poor condition. The music room AC unit appears to be oversized for the space and it was noted that the space used to be the school computer room. The condensing unit for the music room split system appears to have been replaced and good condition.

Exhaust System

Exhaust is provided by roof top mounted exhaust fans primarily located over the hallways. The exhaust fans are utilized to relieve the excess building pressure due to outside air brought in through the unit ventilators and packaged rooftop units. It is unknown if these units operate based on a time schedule and shut down in occupied mode. Bathrooms and toilet rooms are exhausted through smaller rooftop exhaust fans typically interlocked with the bathroom wall switch.

The kitchen includes a 4ft x 12ft commercial exhaust hood, which provides exhaust for cooking equipment. The kitchen hood is manually controlled with a wall switch. It is reported that the exhaust hood operates approximately 6 hours per day.

HVAC System Controls

The building HVAC systems are controlled by a Staefa Control System. Since 1998 this system has become a brand of Siemens Building Technologies. The Staefa Control System appears to have been retrofitted throughout the building unit ventilators to provide improved control over the unit ventilator outside air dampers, hot water control valves, and temperature sensors.

The building also utilizes a pneumatic air compressor for an pneumatic system. It is unknown what this system is currently controlling or if all pneumatic controls throughout the building have

Page 46: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 9 of 43

been replaced. The air compressor is typically operational. At the time of the survey, the air compressor was down for service.

Domestic Hot Water

Domestic hot water is provided to the school by two domestic hot water tanks. The main facility utilizes a 65 gallon natural gas hot water heater made by Bradford White in excellent condition. The main building HWH is located in the main boiler room and appears to have been recently replaced. The central boiler system includes a heat exchanger and large domestic hot water tank that is no longer used for domestic hot water production. Domestic hot water is circulated to the bathrooms and sinks by a small re-circ pump controlled by an aqua stat.

The 500 wing has a dedicated tank type natural gas hot water heater that provides hot water to the bathroom group within the 500 wing, which is in good condition.

Lighting Typical lighting throughout school building is fluorescent tube lay-in fixtures with T-12 lamps and magnetic ballasts. Some of the storage rooms and closets including the boiler room is lit with a mixture of incandescent lamps and compact fluorescent lamps. The gym lighting is provided with 400W metal halide fixtures. .

Page 47: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 10 of 43

III. MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST

The equipment list contains major energy consuming equipment that through implementation of energy conservation measures could yield substantial energy savings. The list shows the major equipment in the facility and all pertinent information utilized in energy savings calculations. An approximate age was assigned to the equipment in some cases if a manufactures date was not shown on the equipment’s nameplate. The ASHRAE service life for the equipment along with the remaining useful life is also shown in the Appendix.

Refer to the Major Equipment List Appendix for this facility.

Page 48: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 11 of 43

IV. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES Energy Conservation Measures are developed specifically for this facility. The energy savings and calculations are highly dependent on the information received from the site survey and interviews with operations personnel. The assumptions and calculations should be reviewed by the owner to ensure accurate representation of this facility. The following ECMs were analyzed:

Table 1 ECM Financial Summary

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)

ECM #1 Lighting Upgrade $14,444 $5,927 2.4 515.5%

ECM #2 Lighting Controls $13,910 $3,480 4.0 275.3%

ECM #3 Computer Monitors $14,300 $3,475 4.1 264.5%

ECM #4 AC Unit Replacements $176,560 $6,407 27.6 -45.6%

ECM #5 Demand Control Ventilation Gym

$28,000 $1,539 18.2 -17.6%

ECM #6 Hot Water Valve Blanket Insulation

$3,940 $466 8.5 77.4%

ECM #7 Condensing Boiler $243,750 $5,328 45.7 -34.4%

ECM #8 Nema Premium $9,598 $542 17.7 13.0%

ECM #9 Variable Frequency Drive Pumps

$19,780 $1,620 12.2 22.9%

REM #1 Solar Photovoltaic System $697,590 $52,752 13.2 13.4%

Notes:

ANNUAL SAVINGS

SIMPLE PAYBACK

(Yrs)

SIMPLE LIFETIME

ROI

A. Cost takes into consideration applicable NJ Smart StartTM incentives.B. Savings takes into consideration applicable maintenance savings.

ANNUAL SAVINGSB

NET INSTALLATION

COSTA

RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's)

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

NET INSTALLATION

COST

ECM NO.

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

SIMPLE PAYBACK

(Yrs)

SIMPLE LIFETIME

ROI

Page 49: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 12 of 43

Table 2 ECM Energy Summary

ECM #1 Lighting Upgrade 12.7 36,586 0

ECM #2 Lighting Controls 0 21,480 0

ECM #3 Computer Monitors 7.2 21,450 0

ECM #4 AC Unit Replacements 35.5 46,428 0

ECM #5 Demand Control Ventilation Gym

0.0 0 1,272

ECM #6 Hot Water Valve Blanket Insulation

0.0 0 385

ECM #7 Condensing Boiler 0.0 0 4,403

ECM #8 Nema Premium 1.4 3,343 0

ECM #9 Variable Frequency Drive Pumps

0.0 10,000 0

REM #1 Solar Photovoltaic System 145.5 207,571 0

NATURAL GAS (THERMS)

ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

NATURAL GAS (THERMS)

ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION

(KWH)

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTION

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTIONRENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's)

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)

ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)

ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION

(KWH)

Page 50: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 13 of 43

Table 3 Facility Project Summary

Lighting Upgrade $5,927 $14,444 $0 $14,444 2.4

Lighting Controls $3,480 $15,600 $1,690 $13,910 4.0

Computer Monitors $3,475 $14,300 $0 $14,300 4.1

AC Unit Replacements $6,407 $184,250 $7,690 $176,560 27.6

Demand Control Ventilation Gym

$1,539 $28,000 $0 $28,000 18.2

Hot Water Valve Blanket Insulation

$466 $3,940 $0 $3,940 8.5

Condensing Boiler $5,328 $249,750 $6,000 $243,750 45.7

Nema Premium $542 $10,018 $420 $9,598 17.7

Variable Frequency Drive Pumps

$1,620 $19,942 $162 $19,780 12.2

Design / Construction Extras (15%)

$43,574 $43,574

Total Project $23,456 $334,068 $9,800 $324,106 13.8Incentive Values crossed out represent ECMs that conflict with other incentives already accounted for.Highlighted ECMs are not included in total

ENERGY CONSERVATION

MEASURES

ANNUAL ENERGY

SAVINGS ($)

PROJECT COST ($)

CUSTOMER COST

SIMPLE PAYBACK

SMART START

INCENTIVES

ENERGY SAVINGS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - POTENTIAL PROJECT

Page 51: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 14 of 43

ECM #1: Lighting Upgrade – Interior and Exterior Description: The majority of the interior lighting throughout Cedar Hill Elementary School building is provided with fluorescent fixtures with older generation, 700 series 32W T8 lamps and electronic ballasts. Although 700 series T8 lamps are considered fairly efficient, further energy savings can be achieved by replacing the existing T8 lamps with new generation, 800 series 28W T8 lamps without compromising light output. CEG recommends, re-lamping all of the fixtures with 28W T8 lamps. In addition, some of the storage areas, locker room and gym areas, offices, auditorium, classrooms, restrooms and kitchen areas still have a variety of older fluorescent fixtures with magnetic ballasts and incandescent lamps. It is recommended to retrofit or replace all of the older fluorescent fixtures and the incandescent lights in these areas with high efficiency fluorescent T8 or T5 fixtures with electronic ballasts or compact fluorescent lamps. This ECM includes re-lamping of the existing fluorescent fixtures with 800 series, 28W T8 lamps. The ECM also includes retrofit of all older fluorescent fixtures with T8 or T5 fluorescent fixtures with electronic ballasts in the building. The new, energy efficient T8 fixtures will provide adequate lighting and will save on electrical costs due to better performance of the lamp and ballasts. This ECM also includes maintenance savings through the reduced number of lamps replaced per year. The expected lamp life of a T8 lamp is approximately 30,000 burn-hours, in comparison to the existing T12 lamps which is approximately 20,000 burn-hours. The facility will need approximately 33% less lamps replaced per year for each one for one fixture replaced. The ECM also includes replacement of any incandescent lamps with compact fluorescent lamps. Compact fluorescent lamps (CFL’s) were designed to be direct replacements for the standard incandescent lamps which are common to table lamps, spot lights, hi-hats, bathroom vanity lighting, etc. The light output of the CFL has been designed to resemble the incandescent lamp. The color rendering index (CRI) of the CFL is much higher than standard fluorescent lighting, and therefore provides a much “truer” light. The CFL is available in a myriad of shapes and sizes depending on the specific application. Typical replacements are: a 13-Watt CFL for a 60-Watt incandescent lamp, an 18-Watt CFL for a 75-Watt incandescent lamp, and a 26-Watt CFL for a 100-Watt incandescent lamp. The CFL is also available for a number of “brightness colors” that is indicated by the Kelvin rating. A 2700K CFL is the “warmest” color available and is closest in color to the incandescent lamp. CFL’s are also available in 3000K, 3500K, and 4100K. The 4100K would be the “brightest” or “coolest” output. A CFL can be chosen to screw right into your existing fixtures, or hardwired into your existing fixtures. Where the existing fixture is controlled by a dimmer switch, the CFL bulb must be compatible with a dimmer switch. In some locations the bulb replacement will need to be tested to make sure the larger base of the CFL will fit into the existing fixture. The energy usage of an incandescent compared to a compact fluorescent approximately 3 to 4 times greater. In addition to the energy savings, compact fluorescent fixtures burn-hours are 8 to 15 times longer than incandescent fixtures ranging from 6,000 to 15,000 burn-hours compared to incandescent fixtures ranging from 750 to 1000 burn-hours. However, the maintenance savings due to reduced lamp replacement is offset by the higher cost of the CFL’s compared to the incandescent lamps.

Page 52: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 15 of 43

Energy Savings Calculations: The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix outlines the hours of operation, proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods for each set of fixtures in the each building. Rebates and Incentives: There are no incentives or maintenance savings available for the retrofits in this ECM. Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $14,444

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0Net Installation Cost ($): $14,444

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $5,927Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $5,927

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 2.4

Simple Lifetime ROI 515.5%Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $88,905Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 41%Net Present Value (NPV) $56,312.14

ECM #1 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 53: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 16 of 43

ECM #2: Lighting Controls Upgrade – Occupancy Sensors Description: Some of the lights in the school building are left on unnecessarily. In many cases the lights are left on because of the inconvenience to manually switch lights off when a room is left or on when a room is first occupied. This is common in rooms that are occupied for only short periods and only a few times per day. In some instances lights are left on due to the misconception that it is better to keep the lights on rather than to continuously switch lights on and off. Although increased switching reduces lamp life, the energy savings outweigh the lamp replacement costs. The payback timeframe for when to turn the lights off is approximately two minutes. If the lights are expected to be off for at least a two minute interval, then it pays to shut them off.

Lighting controls come in many forms. Sometimes an additional switch is adequate to provide reduced lighting levels when full light output is not needed. Occupancy sensors detect motion and will switch the lights on when the room is occupied. Occupancy sensors can either be mounted in place of a current wall switch, or on the ceiling to cover large areas. The U.S. Department of Energy sponsored a study to analyze energy savings achieved through various types of building system controls. The referenced savings is based on the “Advanced Sensors and Controls for Building Applications: Market Assessment and Potential R&D Pathways,” document posted for public use April 2005. The study has found that commercial buildings have the potential to achieve significant energy savings through the use of building controls. The average energy savings are as follows based on the report:

• Occupancy Sensors for Lighting Control 20% - 28% energy savings.

Savings resulting from the implementation of this ECM for energy management controls are estimated to be 20% of the total light energy controlled by occupancy sensors and daylight sensors (The majority of the savings is expected to be after school hours when rooms are left with lights on) This ECM includes installation of ceiling or switch mount sensors for individual offices, classrooms, large bathrooms, and libraries. Sensors shall be manufactured by Sensorswitch, Watt Stopper or equivalent. The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix of this report includes the summary of lighting controls implemented in this ECM and outlines the proposed controls, costs, savings, and payback periods. The calculations adjust the lighting power usage by the applicable percent savings for each area that includes lighting controls. Energy Savings Calculations:

( )( )kWh/YrEnergyLightControlledSavings%SavingsEnergy ×=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWh$CostElecAvekWhSavingsEnergySavings.

Page 54: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 17 of 43

Cost and Incentives:

Installation cost per dual-technology sensors (Basis: Sensor switch or equivalent) are as follows:

Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mount $250 per installation Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mount $150 per installation Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor with 2 Pole Powerpack

Remote mount $300 per installation Cost includes material and labor. From the NJ Smart Start® Program Incentives Appendix, the installation of a lighting control device warrants the following incentive: Occupancy Sensor Fixture Mounted (existing facility only) = $20 per sensor Occupancy Sensor Remote Mounted (existing facility only) = $35 per sensor

( ) $35)mountceilingof(#20$mountwallof#IncentiveStartSmart ×+×=® ( ) $1,690$35)mountceiling (3820$mountwall18IncentiveStartSmart =×+×=®

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $15,600

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $1,690

Net Installation Cost ($): $13,910

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $3,480

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $3,480

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 4.0

Simple Lifetime ROI 275.3%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $52,200Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 24%Net Present Value (NPV) $27,634.01

ECM #2 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 55: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 18 of 43

ECM #3: Computer Monitor Replacement Description: The computers throughout the facility utilize a mixture of CRT computer monitors and LCD computer monitors. The CRT computer monitors within the offices and classrooms are outdated and have several disadvantages such as; significantly increased energy consumption, uses large amount of desk space, poor picture quality, distortions and flickering image, secular glare problems, high weight, and electromagnetic emissions. Many of these drawbacks are difficult to quantify except for the energy use. CRT monitors use considerably more energy than an alternative flat panel LCD monitor. Replacement of the existing CRT monitors with LCD monitors saves considerable energy as well as provides other ergonomic benefits. Based on the site survey it was noted that there are 21 LCD monitor and 143 CRT monitors. Some of the monitors were left in screen saver mode, which only saves the computer screen from image burn in, however it does not save on energy consumption. The average operating hours for all computers and monitors is estimated based on the site survey observations. Energy consumption of computer monitors is based on averages for power usage of various computer monitors. This ECM includes replacement of all existing CRT monitors with LCD flat panel monitors throughout the facility. Installation costs were neglected for this ECM with the intention that this ECM would be replaced by the school district. The calculations are based on the following operating assumptions: Energy Savings Calculations: No. of CRT Monitors: 143 Operating Weeks per Yr: 42 Hrs per Week: 60 (12 hrs per day estimated average)

( ) ( )

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

××=

KWW

HrsOperationWPowerMonitorComputersofUsageElectric1000

#

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWhCostElecAvekWhUsageElectricCostEnergy $

Page 56: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 19 of 43

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSECM INPUTS CRT Monitors LCD Monitor

# of Computers 143 143

Monitor Power Cons. (W) 75 25

Operating Hrs per Week 60 60

Operating Weeks per Yr 50 50

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.162 0.162

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Electric Usage (kWh) 32,175 10,725 21,450

Energy Cost ($) $5,212 $1,737 $3,475

COMMENTS:

COMPUTER MONITOR CALCULATIONS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

CRT Monitor consumption based on Dell CRT monitor M/N: CRT-E771MM. Operating hours estimated.

Installation cost of new monitors is estimated based on current pricing for a 17” LCD monitor on the market today. No labor costs were included for replacing the existing monitors with the new monitors. No incentives are available for installation of computer monitors. Net cost per monitor was estimated to be $100. Installation Costs: # Monitors X Cost per Monitor

143 Monitors X $100 per Monitor $14,300

Page 57: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 20 of 43

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $14,300

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $14,300

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $3,475

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $3,475

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 4.1

Simple Lifetime ROI 264.5%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $52,125Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 23%Net Present Value (NPV) $27,184.32

ECM #3 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 58: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 21 of 43

ECM #4: Air Conditioning Unit Upgrades

Description:

Cedar Hill Elementary is air conditioned by split system AC units and packaged rooftop units. The majority of the units at the elementary schools with the exception of the ductless split systems, are in poor condition and in need of replacement. The units currently installed are inefficiency compared to modern equipment and can be replaced with new high efficiency units. New air conditioners provide higher full load and part load efficiencies due to advances in inverter motor technologies, heat exchangers and refrigerants. This ECM includes one-for-one replacement of the older air conditioning units with new higher efficiency systems. It is recommended to fully evaluate the capacity needed for all new systems prior to moving forward with this ECM. A summary of the unit replacements for this ECM can be found in the table below:

ECM INPUTS SERVICE FORNUMBER OF UNITS

COOLING CAPACITY,

BTU/HR

TOTAL CAPACITY,

TONSREPLACE UNIT WITH

RTU-8 Rm 302 1 42,000 3.5 Carrier 50XL-A

RTU-6&7 Rm 304 & 306 2 30,000 5.0 Carrier 50XL-A

RTU 500 Wing 4 144,000 48.0 Trane YCD-151

RTU-9 Rm 300 1 120,000 10.0 Trane YHC-120

RTU-17 Library 1 120,000 10.0 Trane YHC-120

RTU-16 Main Office 1 60,000 5.0 Carrier 50XL-A

CU-12 Tech IT Room 1 42,000 3.5 Mitsubishi Mr. Slim

CU-10 & 11 Nurses / Faculty 2 24,000 4.0 Carrier 24ACB3

CU-15 Rm 100 1 18,000 1.5 Fujitsu 18CL

CU Music Room 1 72,000 4.0 (2) Fujitsu 24CLTotal 15 672,000 94.5Some unit sizes are estimated. See Major Equipoment List Appendix.

*Highlighted cell represents installation of smaller unit to replace existing unit.

IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY

The manufacturers used as the basis for design are Trane, Carrier, Mitsubishi, and Fujitsu. This ECM includes replacement of the outdoor condensing units and associated indoor air handling units or cooling coils where appropriate. The RTU replacements include full unit replacements. All units are one for one style replacements with matching capacity of the new units to the old units with the exception of the Music room. Based on review of the existing music room size and estimated cooling load, it was determined that the existing cooling unit is oversized for the load. The music room savings is based on two (2) 2.0 ton ductless split style units in lieu of the existing 6 ton Split System. The operating efficiency of the oversized cooling unit is estimated based on the current operating condition. Energy Savings Calculations:

Page 59: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 22 of 43

Cooling Energy Savings: Seasonal energy consumption of the air conditioners at the cooling mode is calculated with the equation below:

Energy Savings, kWh Cooling Capacity,BTUHr

1SEERO

1SEERN

Operation Hours

1000 WkWh

Demand Savings, kW Energy Savings kWh

Hours of Cooling

Cooling Cost Savings Energy Savings, kWh Cost of Electricity $

kWh

ECM INPUTSCOOLING

CAPACITY, BTU/Hr

ANNUAL COOLING

HOURS

EXISTING UNITS (S)EER

SPLIT UNITS (S)EER

# OF UNITS

ENERGY SAVINGS

kWh

DEMAND SAVINGS

kWRTU-8 42,000 1,200 10 SEER 15 SEER 1 1,680 1.4

RTU-6&7 30,000 1,200 10 SEER 15 SEER 2 2,400 2.0

RTU 144,000 1,200 9.6 EER 12.6 EER 4 17,143 14.3

RTU-9 120,000 1,200 10.1 EER 12.5 EER 1 2,737 2.3

RTU-17 120,000 1,200 8.0 EER 12.5 EER 1 6,480 5.4

RTU-16 60,000 1,200 10 SEER 15 SEER 1 2,400 2.0

CU-12 42,000 4,500 10 SEER 14 SEER 1 5,204 1.2

CU-10 & 11 24,000 1,200 9 SEER 15 SEER 2 3,360 2.8

CU-15 18,000 1,200 10 SEER 19 SEER 1 1,023 0.9

CU 24,000 1,200 8 SEER 18 SEER 2 4,000 3.3Total 16 46,428 35.5

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

Project Cost, Incentives and Maintenance Savings From the NJ Smart Start® Program appendix, the replacement of split system AC units and unitary systems with high efficiency AC systems falls under the category “Unitary HVAC Split System” and warrants an incentive based on efficiency (EER/SEER). The program incentives are calculated as follows:

( )Incentive$/TonTonsCoolingIncentiveStartSmart ×=®

Page 60: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 23 of 43

UNIT DESCRIPTION

UNIT EFFICIENCY

REBATE $/TON

PROPOSED CAPACITY

TONS

TOTAL REBATE

$≥20 to 30 tons 10.5 EER 79 $0 ≥ 11.25 to < 20

tons11.5 EER 79 48 $3,792

≥ 5.4 to < 11.25 tons

11.5 EER 73 20 $1,460

5.4 tons or less Unitary AC and

Split System≥14 SEER $92 26.5 $2,438

TOTAL 94.5 $7,690

SPLIT SYSTEM AC UNITS REBATE SUMMARY

Summary of cost, savings and payback for this ECM is below.

ECM INPUTSINSTALLED

COST# OF

UNITSTOTAL COST REBATES

NET COST

ENERGY SAVING

PAY BACK

YEARSRTU-8 $9,250 1 $9,250 $322 $8,928 $272 32.8

RTU-6&7 $7,500 2 $15,000 $460 $14,540 $389 37.4

RTU $17,500 4 $70,000 $3,792 $66,208 $2,777 23.8

RTU-9 $17,500 1 $17,500 $730 $16,770 $443 37.8

RTU-17 $17,500 1 $17,500 $730 $16,770 $1,050 16.0

RTU-16 $12,500 1 $12,500 $460 $12,040 $389 31.0

CU-12 $9,500 1 $9,500 $322 $9,178 $843 10.9

CU-10 & 11 $6,000 2 $12,000 $368 $11,632 $544 21.4

CU-15 $5,000 1 $5,000 $138 $4,862 $166 29.3

CU $8,000 2 $16,000 $368 $15,632 $648 24.1Total 16 $184,250 $7,690 $176,560 $7,521 23.5

COST & SAVINGS SUMMARY

There is no significant maintenance savings due to implementation of this ECM.

Page 61: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 24 of 43

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $184,250

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $7,690Net Installation Cost ($): $176,560

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $6,407Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $6,407

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 27.6

Simple Lifetime ROI -45.6%Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $96,105Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -7%Net Present Value (NPV) ($100,073.65)

ECM #4 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 62: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 25 of 43

ECM #5: Demand Controlled Ventilation Demand Controlled Ventilation (DCV) is a means to provide active, zone level control of ventilation for spaces within a facility. The basic premise behind DCV is monitoring indoor CO2 levels versus outdoor CO2 levels in order to provide proper ventilation to the spaces within the facility as well as saving costly dollars treating unconditioned ventilation air. Carbon dioxide ventilation control or demand controlled ventilation (DCV) allows for the measurement and control of outside air ventilation levels to a target cfm/person ventilation rate in the space (i.e., 15 cfm/person) based on the number of people in the space. It is a direct measure of ventilation effectiveness and is a method whereby buildings can regain active and automatic zone level ventilation control, without having to open windows. The fixed ventilation approach depends on a set-it-and-forget-it methodology that is completely unresponsive to changes in the way spaces are utilized/occupied or how equipment is maintained. A DCV system utilizes various control algorithms to maintain a base ventilation rate. The system monitors space CO2 levels and the algorithm automatically adjusts the outdoor and return air dampers to provide the quantity of outdoor air to maintain the required CO2 level in the space. System designs are normally designed for maximum occupancy and the ventilation rates are designed for this (maximum) occupancy. In areas where occupancy swings are prevalent there is ample opportunity to reduce outdoor air quantity to satisfy the needs of the actual number of occupants present. By installing the DCV controls, energy savings are realized by the reduced quantities of outdoor air that do not require heating energy from the boiler plant. There are large heating and ventilation units (H&V) providing heating and air conditioning to the gymnasium. When operating, these units provide minimum amount of outside air to the space. The outside air volume is typically based on the maximum occupancy of the space conditioned. When a given space is not fully occupied the outside air quantity delivered to the space is greater than the amount needed for adequate ventilation. This ECM includes the installation of CO2 sensors integrated into a demand control ventilation system, for the units mentioned above. The components required for the demand control ventilation system installation include damper actuators, CO2 sensors, wiring, controls equipment and programming. The gymnasium would require one CO2 sensor installed per unit to monitor occupancy levels. Often heating and air conditioning units switch to occupied mode several hours before the actual occupancy in order to provide pre-heating or pre-cooling of the space. Energy savings achieved through “Demand Control Ventilation” is calculated based on actual occupancy of the spaces and the hours the units are in occupied mode. Energy Savings Calculations:

Page 63: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 26 of 43

( )( ) ( )

( ) ( )%EfficiencyHeatingTherms

BtuValueHeatFuelF65

0.60DayHr. FDayHDD

Hr.BtuCapacity HeatingAir Outside

ThermsEnergy Heating×⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×°

×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×°×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

Therms$CostFuelAveThermsEnergyHeatingCost Heating

ECM INPUTS DCVEquipment Gymnasium H&V UnitsTotal Outside Air CFM (Est) 3200OA Heating Capacity, MBh 225

Net Heating Efficiency (Gas) 75%

Heating Degree Days (65°F) 4599

Occupied Hours per day 8

O.A Heating Energy Saving (Est) 75%

Natural Gas Cost ($/Therm) $1.21

ECM RESULTS DCV

Original O.A. Heating Energy (Therms) 1,695

O.A. Heating Energy Savings (Therms) 1,272Total Gas Cost Savings ($) $1,539

DEMAND CONTROLLED VENTILATION

ENERGY SAVINGS

COMMENTS: HDD estimated based on Newark Liberty Airport, Outside Air Heating Capacity based on total outside air at 65°F design temperature difference

Cost and Incentives: Estimated installed cost for demand controlled ventilation for the two Gymnasium units is $28,000. ($3,000 Materials) There are currently no Smart Start ® incentives available for a Demand Control Ventilation System.

Page 64: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 27 of 43

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $28,000

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0Net Installation Cost ($): $28,000

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $1,539Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $1,539

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 18.2

Simple Lifetime ROI -17.6%Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $23,085Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -2%Net Present Value (NPV) ($9,627.52)

ECM #5 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 65: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 28 of 43

ECM #6: Valve Blanket and Pipe Insulation

Description: The boiler plant supplies heating hot water to the facility for heating season. The piping remains heated at approximately 180°F continuously during this period (approximately 6 months). Un-insulated piping has significant heat losses due to the exposure of the steel piping to the surrounding air. Insulated piping has a heat loss which is a small fraction of the heat loss from un-insulated piping. It was noted that significant piping within the boiler room was missing piping insulation including numerous valves throughout the system. Based on the site survey approximately 9 large diameter pipe valves/fittings and 10 feet of 6” steel pipe was not insulated. Valve blankets are designed to provide insulation value over large hydronic valves that must remain accessible. This ECM includes installation of valve blankets on all exposed boiler system valves and insulation of all un-insulated piping within the boiler room. Energy Savings Calculations: Heat Loss for un-insulated steel piping is based on ASHRAE 2009 Fundamentals – “Insulation for Mechanical Systems” Bare Steel Piping Heat Loss 6” pipe: 373 BTU/HR per Linear FT

Heat LossBTUHR per Linear FT

1R Value Pipe Dia FT 3.14 Pipe Temp °F Ambient Temp °F

Heat LossBTUHR Heat Loss

BTUHR per Linear FT Length of Uninsulated Pipe

Energy Use, Therms Heat Loss BTU

HR Operating Hrs

Heating System Eff. % Fuel Heat Value BTUTherm

Heating Energy Cost Savings Energy Use, Therms Cost of Nat Gas $

Therm

Page 66: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 29 of 43

There is no maintenance savings due to implementation of this ECM.

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSECM INPUTS Bare Pipe Insulation BlanketLength of Un-Insulated Pipe Including Valves

19 19

Pipe Diameter (In) 6 6

Blanket Insulation R-value 0 6 6

Temperature Difference Pipe to Ambient (°F)

100 100

Pipe Heat Loss - 8" Pipe (BTU/Hr per FT)

373 26 347

Heat Loss (BTU/Hr) 7,087 497 6,590

Heating System Operating Hrs

4380 4380

Energy Loss (kBtus) 31,041 2,178 28,863

Heating System Eff (%) 75% 75%

Fuel Heat Value (BTU/Therm)

100,000 100,000

Nat Gas Cost ($/Therm) 1.21 1.21

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSNat Gas Usage Usage (Therms)

414 29 385

Energy Cost ($) $501 $35 $466

COMMENTS:

VALVE BLANKET INSULATION CALCULATIONS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

Bare Pipe Heat Loss value is based on ASHRAE 2009 Fundamentals "Insulation for Mechanical Systems"

Page 67: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 30 of 43

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $3,940

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0Net Installation Cost ($): $3,940Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $466Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $466Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 8.5Simple Lifetime ROI 77.4%Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings 0

Simple Lifetime Savings $6,990Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 8%Net Present Value (NPV) $1,623.08

ECM #6 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 68: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 31 of 43

ECM #7: Condensing Boiler Installation Description: Space heating for the perimeter offices and classrooms in the majority of the school is provided with unit ventilators and cabinet heaters with hot water coils and hot water radiators. The source of hot water for this equipment is two (2) hot water boilers located in the main boiler room. The input capacity of the boilers is 4.474 MMBH (106 BTU/H) each. The boilers appear to be close to their rated life; however, this is not necessarily a good indicator of the end of useful life particularly when boilers are well maintained. This ECM provides insight into the energy efficiency benefit of condensing boiler technology compared to standard cast iron boilers. Standard (non-condensing) boilers provide lower than nominal efficiency compared to condensing boilers. Standard boilers suffer further efficiency losses at part load operating conditions mainly due to limitations in the reduction of the flue gas temperature. Current average combustion efficiency of each boiler is estimated to be 75% due to standard non-condensing boiler technology, limited turn down ratio, cycling losses and outdated design and controls. A new condensing boiler could substantially improve the operating efficiency of the heating system of the building. Condensing boiler’s peak efficiency tops out at 99% depending on return water temperature. This ECM is based on the replacement of the two (2) boilers with condensing hot water boilers to provide the building with heating throughout the year. The annual average operating efficiency of the proposed boiler set is expected to be 90%, which gives the heating system a 15% increase in efficiency. This ECM is based on variable supply water temperature adjusted based on outdoor temperature. This ECM includes installation of three (3) new condensing gas fired boilers to replace two (2) existing hot water boilers. The basis for this ECM is Aerco Benchmark 2.0 condensing hot water boilers or equivalent. New boilers shall be setup and programmed to be the primary source of heating for the building during entire year. The owner is recommended to retain a professional engineer to confirm equipment sizing and finalize design.

Energy Savings Calculations: Currently there are multiple boilers and gas fired rooftop units on the building gas meter. The boilers’ gas usage is not separately metered. Therefore, annual energy consumption of the boilers has to be estimated. This calculation is based on the energy consumption of the boilers in proportion with the ratio of the total heating capacity of each gas fired piece of equipment. First, domestic hot water usage is estimated and subtracted from the total usage in order to estimate the net natural gas usage for space heating. Current total hot water usage can be found in the table below:

Page 69: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 32 of 43

Baseline Domestic Hot Water Gas Use = 142 Therms (Average from June-September Gas Use) Existing Natural Gas Use for Heating = 35,210 Therms – (142 Therms x 12 Months) = 33,512 Therms Below calculation is performed to estimate annual gas usage of the boilers: Total facility heating capacity: (2) Hot water boilers = 4.47 MMBH (One operating / One Standby) (1) Hot water heater = 0.37 MMBH (1) Hot water heater = 0.18 MMBH (2) Gas Fired RTUs = 0.12 MMBH (Est) (4) Gas Fired RTUs = 0.23 MMBH (1) Gas Fired RTUs = 0.30 MMBH Total = 5.67 MMBH Total facility heating capacity: 5.67 MMBH Total Capacity - Boilers only: 4.47 MMBH Percent usage by boilers: 79% of Total Estimated natural gas usage 79% of 33,512 Therms Estimated natural gas usage 26,420 Therms

Bldg Heat Required Heating Nat. Gas Therm Heating Eff % Fuel Heat Value BTU

Therm

Nov-09 4,763.20 142 4,622 $5,592Dec-09 9,605.80 142 9,464 $11,452Jan-10 7,224.30 142 7,083 $8,570Feb-10 6,525.90 142 6,384 $7,725Mar-10 2,145.90 142 2,004 $2,425Apr-10 1,689.30 142 1,548 $1,873May-10 149.10 142 8 $9Jun-10 135.10 142 0 $0Jul-10 113.40 142 0 $0

Aug-10 130.80 142 0 $0Sep-10 186.70 142 0 $0Oct-10 2,540.20 142 2,399 $2,902

TOTAL 35,210 1,698 33,512 $40,549

HEATING ONLYDOMESTIC HW USAGE

ANNUAL GAS USAGE

MONTHTOTAL USAGE

THERMS COST

Page 70: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 33 of 43

Proposed Heating Gas UsageBldg. Heat Required BTU

New Heating Eff % Fuel Heat Value BTUTherm

Energy Cost Heating Gas Usage Therms Ave Fuel Cost $

Therm Energy savings calculations are summarized in the table below:

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

ECM INPUTSExisting Hot Water

BoilersNew Condensing

Boilers -

Existing Nat Gas (Therms) 26,420 - -

Boiler Efficiency (%) 75% 90% 15%

Nat Gas Heat Value (BTU/Therm) 100,000 100,000 -

Equivalent Building Heat Usage (MMBTUs) 1,982 1,982 -

Ave. Gas Cost ($/Therm) 1.21 1.21 -

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Natural Gas Usage (Therms) 26,420 22,017 4,403

Energy Cost ($) $31,968 $26,640 $5,328

COMMENTS:

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

CONDENSING BOILER CALCULATIONS

Project Cost, Incentives and Maintenance Savings Estimated cost for removing the existing boilers and installing three (3) 2.0 MMBH condensing hot water boilers with advanced controls is $249,750. ($111,000 Materials) From the New Jersey Smart Start® Program Incentives Appendix, installation of a high efficiency hot water boiler falls under the category “Gas Heating” and warrants an incentive based on efficiency at or above 84% for this type of equipment. The program incentives are calculated as follows:

Page 71: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 34 of 43

UNIT DESCRIPTION

UNIT EFFICIENCY

REBATE $/MBH

PROPOSED CAPACITY, MBH

NUMBER OF UNITS

TOTAL REBATE, $

≥ 300 MBH - 1500 MBH

84% AFUE for Hot Water boilers $1.75 1,500 0 $0

>1500 - ≤ 4000 MBH

84% AFUE for Hot Water boilers $1 2,000 3 $6,000

>1500 - ≤ 4000 MBH

84% AFUE for Hot Water boilers $1 3,000 0 $0

TOTAL $6,000

GAS FIRED BOILER REBATE SUMMARY

Maintenance savings associated with this ECM is estimated to be minimal.

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $249,750

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $6,000

Net Installation Cost ($): $243,750

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $5,328

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $5,328

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 30

Simple Payback 45.7

Simple Lifetime ROI -34.4%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $159,840Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -3%Net Present Value (NPV) ($139,318.85)

ECM #7 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 72: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 35 of 43

ECM #8: Install NEMA Premium® Efficiency Motors Description: The improved efficiency of the NEMA Premium® efficient motors is primarily due to better designs with use of better materials to reduce losses. Surprisingly, the electricity used to power a motor represents 95 % of its total lifetime operating cost. Because many motors operate continuously 24 hours a day, even small increases in efficiency can yield substantial energy and dollar savings. The electric motors driving the hot water pumps and supply fans in some of the HVAC equipment are candidates for replacing with premium efficiency motors. These standard efficiency motors run considerable amount of time over a year. This energy conservation measure replaces existing inefficient electric motors with NEMA Premium® efficiency motors. NEMA Premium® is the most efficient motor designation in the marketplace today.

IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY

EQMTID FUNCTION

MOTOR HP

HOURS OF OPERATION

EXISTING EFFICIENCY

NEMA PREMIUM

EFFICIENCYHWP-1 Hot Water Pump 7.5 2,160 84.0% 91.7%HWP-2 Hot Water Pump 7.5 2,160 85.5% 91.7%RTU - 500 Wing Supply Fan 5 3,000 87.5% 90.2%RTU - 500 Wing Supply Fan 5 3,000 87.5% 90.2%RTU - 500 Wing Supply Fan 5 3,000 87.5% 90.2%RTU - 500 Wing Supply Fan 5 3,000 87.5% 90.2%

Energy Savings Calculations:

Electric usage, kWhHP LF 0.746 Hours of Operation

Motor Efficiency

where, HP Motor Nameplate Horsepower Rating LF Load Factor Motor Efficiency Motor Nameplate Efficiency

ProposedExisting UsageElectricUsageElectrickWhSavings,UsageElectric −=

Electric Usage Savings, kWh Electric UsageE Electric UsageP

Page 73: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 36 of 43

Electric cost savings Electric Usage Savings Electric Rate $

kWh

The calculations were carried out and the results are tabulated in the table below: PREMIUM EFFICIENCY MOTOR CALCULATIONS

EQMTID

MOTOR HP

LOAD FACTOR

EXISTING EFFICIENCY

NEMA PREMIUM

EFFICIENCY

POWER SAVINGS

kW

ENERGY SAVINGS

kWH

COST SAVINGS

HWP-1 7.5 90% 84.0% 91.7% 0.50 1,093 $177HWP-2 7.5 90% 85.5% 91.7% 0.40 865 $140

RTU - 500 Wing 5 90% 87.5% 90.2% 0.11 346 $56RTU - 500 Wing 5 90% 87.5% 90.2% 0.11 346 $56RTU - 500 Wing 5 90% 87.5% 90.2% 0.11 346 $56RTU - 500 Wing 5 90% 87.5% 90.2% 0.11 346 $56TOTAL 1.4 3,343 $542

Equipment Cost and Incentives

Below is a summary of SmartStart Building® incentives for premium efficiency motors:

HORSE POWER

NJ SMART START

INCENTIVE5 $60

7.5 $9010 $10015 $11520 $12525 $130

INCENTIVES

The following table outlines the summary of motor replacement costs and incentives:

Page 74: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 37 of 43

EQMTID

MOTOR POWER

HP

INSTALLED COST

SMART START

INCENTIVENET COST

TOTAL SAVINGS

SIMPLE PAYBACK

HWP-1 7.5 $1,971 $90 $1,881 $177 10.6HWP-2 7.5 $1,971 $90 $1,881 $140 13.4RTU - 500 Wing 5 $1,519 $60 $1,459 $56 26.0RTU - 500 Wing 5 $1,519 $60 $1,459 $56 26.0RTU - 500 Wing 5 $1,519 $60 $1,459 $56 26.0RTU - 500 Wing 5 $1,519 $60 $1,459 $56 26.0TOTAL Totals: $10,018 $420 $9,598 $542 17.7

MOTOR REPLACEMENT SUMMARY

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $10,018

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $420

Net Installation Cost ($): $9,598

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $542

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $542

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 17.7

Simple Lifetime ROI -15.3%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $8,134Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -2%Net Present Value (NPV) ($3,124.66)

ECM #8 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 75: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 38 of 43

ECM #9: Install Pump VFD’s Description: The heating system at Cedar Hill utilizes constant speed pumps to circulate hot water throughout the building. Based on the survey of the existing equipment is appears that the majority of the existing unit ventilators and large air handling units utilize 2-way control valves for flow control. It was noted that the gymnasium units have 3-way control valves which allow continuous flow through the piping loop. 2-way control valves provide flow through the heat exchanger equipment only when there is a call for heating or cooling, unlike 3-way control valves that allow constant flow of the water loop. 3-way control valves require full pumping energy continuously, while 2-way control valves allow the system to reduce flow when it is not needed. The result of this mixed control system forces the system flow to vary with load, however the pump speed remains the same. The overall pump energy is increased due to the constant speed of the pump. This measure includes capping off the bypass port on the 3-way control valves which effectively turns the valves into “2-way” control valves. When the unit ventilator or heating and ventilation unit is not calling for heating, the control valve closes reducing overall flow of the system. Variable frequency drives allow the pumps to slow down in response to a reduction in overall system flow. The reduction in operating flow allows the pumps to reduce energy consumption for all hours that the heating system is not at its peak load. This ECM also includes the installation of Variable Frequency Drives on the two (2) existing 7.5 horsepower hot water pumps in conjunction with piping modifications at all units with 3-way control valves to cap off the bypass port. The VFD control is based on a differential pressure sensor in the water loop to measure demand for water. The furthest unit ventilators from the loop pumps would remain as 3-way control valves (constant flow) to eliminate dead heading potential. This ECM also includes replacement of the existing pump motors with inverter duty motors that meet NEMA Premium Efficiency Standard, which also helps to reduce energy consumption. Energy and cost savings calculations are based on calculation software “PumpSave v4.2,” provided by ABB. The PumpSave calculation software is used to estimate the pumping energy for variable speed pump systems. The boiler water loop pump operation is estimated to be 4,380 Hrs per year since this system is used for about 6 months total. The pump flow, HD, and resultant energy are calculated based on the existing pump horse power installed. Energy Savings Calculations: The existing energy consumption is based a typical pump energy curve for “Throttled flow control.” The throttled flow control is compared with variable speed control as a result of the VFD installation.

Page 76: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 39 of 43

( ) ( ) ( )Hrs.Operation HPKW 0.746HPPower kWhCons.Energy ×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWh$CostElectricAvekWh UsageEnergyCostEnergy

Existing Boiler Hot Water Pumping Energy (Throttled Control):

4.2 Energy saving calculator for pumps

Liquid density 62 lb/ft³ Static head 1 ft

Calculated by: CEG Nominal volume flow 350 gpm Efficiency 80% Calculated for: Cedar Hill ES

Pump ID: #1 & 2 Nominal head 60 ft Max head 75 ft

Supply voltage 200/208/230/240 V 3-phRequired motor power:

Motor power 7.5 Hp 7.3 Hp Resultsincluding 10% safety margin

Motor efficiency 85.0 % Saving percentage 44.8 %Annual energy consumption:with existing control method 21 MWh

Annual running time 4,380 h with improved control method 12 MWhAnnual energy saving 9 MWh

5 % = 219 h at nom. flow Annual CO2 reduction 5 t15 % = 657 h at 90% flow CO2 emission/unit 0.5 lb/kWh20 % = 876 h at 80% flow30 % = 1314 h at 70% flow Currency unit $20 % = 876 h at 60% flow Energy price 0 $/kWh10 % = 438 h at half flow Investment cost 0 $ Annual saving 0 $0 % = 0 h at 40% flow Interest rate 4% Payback period 0.0 years0 % = 0 h at 30% flow Service life 10 years Net present value 0 $0 % = 0 h at 20% flow

100 0

ACS550-U1-031A-2

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Flow rate

Power (kW)

Throttling #REF!

0 20 40

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

Throttling VSD

Energy Consumed (kWh)

FLO

W (g

pm)

Operating Profile

Economic Data

Improved Control by ABB Drive :

Motor and Supply Data

Pump Data

System Data

Throttling control

230 V (3-ph)

ACS550

Existing flow control method

System Data

Pump Data

Motor and Supply Data

Operating Profile

Economic Data

Measurement Units

Economic Results

Energy Consumption

Existing Flow Control

Page 77: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 40 of 43

Proposed Boiler Hot Water Pumping Energy (VFD Controlled):

4.2 Energy saving calculator for pumps

Liquid density 62 lb/ft³ Static head 1 ft

Calculated by: CEG Nominal volume flow 350 gpm Efficiency 80% Calculated for: Cedar Hill ES

Pump ID: #1 & 2 Nominal head 60 ft Max head 75 ft

Supply voltage 200/208/230/240 V 3-phRequired motor power:

Motor power 7.5 Hp 7.3 Hp Resultsincluding 10% safety margin

Motor efficiency 91.7 % Saving percentage 44.8 %Annual energy consumption:with existing control method 20 MWh

Annual running time 4,380 h with improved control method 11 MWhAnnual energy saving 9 MWh

5 % = 219 h at nom. flow Annual CO2 reduction 4 t15 % = 657 h at 90% flow CO2 emission/unit 0.5 lb/kWh20 % = 876 h at 80% flow30 % = 1314 h at 70% flow Currency unit $20 % = 876 h at 60% flow Energy price 0 $/kWh10 % = 438 h at half flow Investment cost 0 $ Annual saving 0 $0 % = 0 h at 40% flow Interest rate 4% Payback period 0.0 years0 % = 0 h at 30% flow Service life 10 years Net present value 0 $0 % = 0 h at 20% flow

100 0

ACS550-U1-031A-2

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Flow rate

Power (kW)

Throttling #REF!

0 20 40

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

Throttling VSD

Energy Consumed (kWh)

FLO

W (g

pm)

Operating Profile

Economic Data

Improved Control by ABB Drive :

Motor and Supply Data

Pump Data

System Data

Throttling control

230 V (3-ph)

ACS550

Existing flow control method

System Data

Pump Data

Motor and Supply Data

Operating Profile

Economic Data

Measurement Units

Economic Results

Energy Consumption

Existing Flow Control

Page 78: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 41 of 43

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSECM INPUTS CV Pumps VFD Pumps

Flow Control Throttle VFD -

Flow* (GPM) 350 350 -

Head* (Ft) 60 60 -

Pump Efficiency (%) 80% 80% -

Motor Efficiency (%) 85% 91.7% 6.7%

Operating Hrs 4380 4380 -

Estimated Power (HP) 7.8 7.2 0.57

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.162 0.162 -

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Electric Energy (kWh) 21,000 11,000 10,000

Electric Energy Cost ($) $3,402 $1,782 $1,620

BOILER HOT WATER PUMPS VFD CALULATION

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

COMMENTS: - VFD pump energy is based on ABB energy savings calculator for pumps, "Pump Save," version 4.2. Flow rate for VFD Pump calculation is summarized in the operating profile shown in the Pump Save output.- Hot water flow & head estimated based on pump HP

Installation cost for two (2) VFDs, piping work, re-balancing, capping of 3-way valves and controls is estimated to be $19,942 ($5,832 Materials). Currently there are no NJ Smart Start® Program Incentives for installation of hot water pump Variable Frequency Drives. From the NJ Smart Start® Program Incentives Appendix, the installation of premium efficiency motors warrants the following incentive:

Page 79: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 42 of 43

Premium Efficiency Motor (7.5 HP) = $81 per motor

( )18$motors premium5.7#IncentiveStartSmart ×=® HP ( ) $16218$2IncentiveStartSmart =×=®

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $19,942

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $162Net Installation Cost ($): $19,780

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $1,620Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $1,620

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 12.2

Simple Lifetime ROI 22.9%Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $24,300Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 3%Net Present Value (NPV) ($440.55)

ECM #9 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 80: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 43 of 43

V. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations include no cost/low cost measures, Operation & Maintenance (O&M) items, and water conservation measures with attractive paybacks. These measures are not eligible for the Smart Start Buildings incentives from the office of Clean Energy but save energy none the less.

A. Chemically clean the condenser and evaporator coils periodically to optimize efficiency. Poorly maintained heat transfer surfaces can reduce efficiency 5-10%.

B. Maintain all weather stripping on windows and doors.

C. Clean all light fixtures to maximize light output to avoid use of task lighting.

D. Provide more frequent air filter changes to decrease overall system power usage and maintain better IAQ.

E. Turn off computers when not in use. Ensure computers are not running in screen saver mode which saves the monitor screen not energy.

F. Ensure outside air dampers are functioning properly and only open during occupied mode.

It was noted at the site survey that the HVAC systems in several rooms were not controlling temperature correctly. The result of the controls issues causes space temperatures to become uncomfortable and drastic measures such as opening windows on extremely cold days. This type of issue requires a whole system controls evaluation for the building to determine where control problems are taking place. Based on information provided by the operations personnel, there are several control systems within the building which operate different section or systems throughout the building. In addition, multiple control vendors are utilized to maintain the control systems. The use of multiple control systems and control vendors to support the systems will very likely cause issues with the overall function of the building. The systems and controls throughout the district represent a large potential “energy leak” throughout the building. It is recommended to quantify the control system points and verify their proper operation through Retro-Commissioning. Retro-Commissioning allows facility owners to re-establish the operation of the HVAC systems back to the original specifications. A third party evaluation is highly recommended to review the controls of the systems and provide insight into the corrections needed. It is also recommended to consider the renovation of all control systems into one central control system to avoid the overlap and communication gap when utilizing multiple control systems. This renovation should be consistent across all facility throughout Bernards Public Schools to maximize the benefit of central controls.

Page 81: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX A1 of 1

LIFETIME ENERGY SAVINGS

LIFETIME MAINTENANCE

SAVINGSLIFETIME ROI SIMPLE PAYBACK INTERNAL RATE OF

RETURN (IRR)NET PRESENT VALUE

(NPV)

MATERIAL LABOR REBATES, INCENTIVES

NET INSTALLATION

COSTENERGY MAINT. / SREC TOTAL (Yearly Saving * ECM Lifetime)

(Yearly Maint Svaing * ECM Lifetime)

(Lifetime Savings - Net Cost) / (Net Cost) (Net cost / Yearly Savings)

($) ($) ($) ($) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) (Yr) ($) ($) (%) (Yr) ($) ($)

ECM #1 Lighting Upgrade $14,444 $0 $0 $14,444 $5,927 $0 $5,927 15 $88,905 $0 515.5% 2.4 40.79% $56,312.14

ECM #2 Lighting Controls $15,600 $0 $1,690 $13,910 $3,480 $0 $3,480 15 $52,200 $0 275.3% 4.0 24.03% $27,634.01

ECM #3 Computer Monitors $14,300 $0 $0 $14,300 $3,475 $0 $3,475 15 $52,125 $0 264.5% 4.1 23.24% $27,184.32

ECM #4 AC Unit Replacements $115,750 $68,500 $7,690 $176,560 $6,407 $0 $6,407 15 $96,105 $0 -45.6% 27.6 -6.79% ($100,073.65)

ECM #5 Demand Control Ventilation Gym $2,500 $25,500 $0 $28,000 $1,539 $0 $1,539 15 $23,085 $0 -17.6% 18.2 -2.32% ($9,627.52)

ECM #6 Hot Water Valve Blanket Insulation $1,016 $2,924 $0 $3,940 $466 $0 $466 15 $6,990 $0 77.4% 8.5 8.20% $1,623.08

ECM #7 Condensing Boiler $111,000 $138,750 $6,000 $243,750 $5,328 $0 $5,328 30 $159,840 $0 -34.4% 45.7 -2.53% ($139,318.85)

ECM #8 Nema Premium $10,018 $0 $420 $9,598 $542 $0 $542 20 $10,845 $0 13.0% 17.7 1.19% ($1,530.69)

ECM #9 Variable Frequency Drive Pumps $5,832 $14,110 $162 $19,780 $1,620 $0 $1,620 15 $24,300 $0 22.9% 12.2 2.69% ($440.55)

REM #1 Solar Photovoltaic System $697,590 $0 $0 $697,590 $17,246 $35,506 $52,752 15 $791,279 $532,592 13.4% 13.2 1.62% ($67,841.00)

Notes: 1) The variable Cn in the formulas for Internal Rate of Return and Net Present Value stands for the cash flow during each period.2) The variable DR in the NPV equation stands for Discount Rate3) For NPV and IRR calculations: From n=0 to N periods where N is the lifetime of ECM and Cn is the cash flow during each period .

REM RENEWABLE ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY

ECM COST & SAVINGS BREAKDOWNCONCORD ENGINEERING GROUP

Bernards Public Schools – Cedar Hill Elementary School

INSTALLATION COST YEARLY SAVINGSECM

LIFETIMEDESCRIPTIONECM NO.

ECM ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 82: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 1 of 4

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 520 BURNT MILL ROAD VOORHEES, NEW JERSEY 08043 PHONE: (856) 427-0200 FAX: (856) 427-6508

SmartStart Building Incentives The NJ SmartStart Buildings Program offers financial incentives on a wide variety of building system equipment. The incentives were developed to help offset the initial cost of energy-efficient equipment. The following tables show the current available incentives as of February 15, 2011:

Electric Chillers Water-Cooled Chillers $12 - $170 per ton

Air-Cooled Chillers $8 - $52 per ton Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Gas Cooling Gas Absorption Chillers $185 - $400 per ton

Gas Engine-Driven Chillers Calculated through custom measure path)

Desiccant Systems $1.00 per cfm – gas or electric

Electric Unitary HVAC Unitary AC and Split Systems $73 - $92 per ton

Air-to-Air Heat Pumps $73 - $92 per ton Water-Source Heat Pumps $81 per ton

Packaged Terminal AC & HP $65 per ton Central DX AC Systems $40- $72 per ton

Dual Enthalpy Economizer Controls $250 Occupancy Controlled Thermostat

(Hospitality & Institutional Facility) $75 per thermostat

Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Gas Heating Gas Fired Boilers < 300 MBH $300 per unit

Gas Fired Boilers ≥ 300 - 1500 MBH $1.75 per MBH

Gas Fired Boilers ≥1500 - ≤ 4000 MBH $1.00 per MBH

Gas Fired Boilers > 4000 MBH (Calculated through Custom Measure Path)

Gas Furnaces $300 - $400 per unit, AFUE ≥ 92%

Page 83: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 2 of 4

Ground Source Heat Pumps

Closed Loop $450 per ton, EER ≥ 16 $600 per ton, EER ≥ 18 $750 per ton, EER ≥ 20

Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Variable Frequency Drives Variable Air Volume $65 - $155 per hp Chilled-Water Pumps $60 per VFD rated hp

Compressors $5,250 to $12,500 per drive Cooling Towers ≥ 10 hp $60 per VFD rated hp

Natural Gas Water Heating

Gas Water Heaters ≤ 50 gallons, 0.67 energy factor or better $50 per unit

Gas-Fired Water Heaters > 50 gallons $1.00 - $2.00 per MBH Gas-Fired Booster Water Heaters $17 - $35 per MBH Gas Fired Tankless Water Heaters $300 per unit

Prescriptive Lighting Retro fit of T12 to T-5 or T-8 Lamps

w/Electronic Ballast in Existing Facilities

$10 per fixture (1-4 lamps)

Replacement of T12 with new T-5 or T-8 Lamps w/Electronic Ballast in

Existing Facilities $25 per fixture (1-4 lamps)

Replacement of incandescent with screw-in PAR 38 or PAR 30 (CFL)

bulb $7 per bulb

T-8 reduced Wattage (28w/25w 4’, 1-4 lamps)

Lamp & ballast replacement $10 per fixture

Hard-Wired Compact Fluorescent $25 - $30 per fixture

Metal Halide w/Pulse Start Including Parking Lot $25 per fixture

T-5 and T-8 High Bay Fixtures $16 - $200 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Retrofit with induction lamp, power coupler and generator

(must be 30% less watts/fixture than HID system)

$50 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Replacement with new HID ≥ 100w $70 per fixture

Page 84: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 3 of 4

Prescriptive Lighting - LED

LED New Exit Sign Fixture Existing Facility < 75 kw Existing Facility > 75 kw

$20 per fixture $10 per fixture

LED Display Case Lighting $30 per display case

LED Shelf-Mtd. Display & Task Lights $15 per linear foot

LED Portable Desk Lamp $20 per fixture

LED Wall-wash Lights $30 per fixture

LED Recessed Down Lights $35 per fixture LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Area

and Roadway Luminaries $175 per fixture

LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Decorative Luminaries $175 per fixture

LED Outdoor Wall-Mounted Area Luminaries $100 per fixture

LED Parking Garage Luminaries $100 per fixture

LED Track or Mono-Point Directional Lighting Fixtures $50 per fixture

LED High-Bay and Low-Bay Fixtures for Commercial & Industrial Bldgs. $150 per fixture

LED High-Bay-Aisle Lighting $150 per fixture

LED Bollard Fixtures $50 per fixture

LED Linear Panels (2x2 Troffers only) $100 per fixture

LED Fuel Pump Canopy $100 per fixture

LED Refrigerator/Freezer case lighting replacement of fluorescent in medium

and low temperature display case

$42 per 5 foot $65 per 6 foot

Page 85: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 4 of 4

Lighting Controls – Occupancy Sensors

Wall Mounted $20 per control Remote Mounted $35 per control

Daylight Dimmers $25 per fixture Occupancy Controlled hi-low

Fluorescent Controls $25 per fixture controlled

Lighting Controls – HID or Fluorescent Hi-Bay Controls Occupancy hi-low $75 per fixture controlled Daylight Dimming $75 per fixture controlled

Daylight Dimming - office $50 per fixture controlled

Premium Motors Three-Phase Motors $45 - $700 per motor

Fractional HP Motors Electronic Communicated Motors (replacing shaded pole motors in

refrigerator/freezer cases)

$40 per electronic communicated motor

Other Equipment Incentives

Performance Lighting

$1.00 per watt per SF below program incentive threshold, currently 5% more energy efficient than ASHRAE 90.1-

2007 for New Construction and Complete Renovation

Custom Electric and Gas Equipment Incentives not prescriptive

Custom Measures

$0.16 KWh and $1.60/Therm of 1st year savings, or a buy down to a 1 year

payback on estimated savings. Minimum required savings of 75,000 KWh or 1,500 Therms and a IRR of at

least 10%. Multi Measures Bonus 15%

Page 86: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

OMB No. 2060-0347

STATEMENT OF ENERGY PERFORMANCEBT Cedar Hill Elementary School

Building ID: 2490932 For 12-month Period Ending: October 31, 20101

Date SEP becomes ineligible: N/A Date SEP Generated: March 04, 2011

FacilityBT Cedar Hill Elementary School100 Peachtree RoadBasking Ridge, NJ 07920

Facility OwnerBernards Public Schools101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Primary Contact for this FacilityConnie Coriell101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Year Built: 1956Gross Floor Area (ft2): 68,020

Energy Performance Rating2 (1-100) 72

Site Energy Use Summary3

Electricity - Grid Purchase(kBtu) 1,896,076 Natural Gas (kBtu)4 3,594,500 Total Energy (kBtu) 5,490,576

Energy Intensity5 Site (kBtu/ft2/yr) 81 Source (kBtu/ft2/yr) 148 Emissions (based on site energy use) Greenhouse Gas Emissions (MtCO2e/year) N/A Electric Distribution Utility N/A National Average Comparison National Average Site EUI 100 National Average Source EUI 185 % Difference from National Average Source EUI -20% Building Type K-12

School

Stamp of Certifying Professional

Based on the conditions observed at thetime of my visit to this building, I certify that

the information contained within thisstatement is accurate.

Meets Industry Standards6 for Indoor EnvironmentalConditions:Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality N/A Acceptable Thermal Environmental Conditions N/A Adequate Illumination N/A

Certifying ProfessionalMichael Fischette520 S. Burnt Mill Road Voorhees, NJ 08043

Notes: 1. Application for the ENERGY STAR must be submitted to EPA within 4 months of the Period Ending date. Award of the ENERGY STAR is not final until approval is received from EPA.2. The EPA Energy Performance Rating is based on total source energy. A rating of 75 is the minimum to be eligible for the ENERGY STAR.3. Values represent energy consumption, annualized to a 12-month period.4. Natural Gas values in units of volume (e.g. cubic feet) are converted to kBtu with adjustments made for elevation based on Facility zip code.5. Values represent energy intensity, annualized to a 12-month period.6. Based on Meeting ASHRAE Standard 62 for ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality, ASHRAE Standard 55 for thermal comfort, and IESNA Lighting Handbook for lighting quality.

The government estimates the average time needed to fill out this form is 6 hours (includes the time for entering energy data, Licensed Professional facility inspection, and notarizing the SEP) andwelcomes suggestions for reducing this level of effort. Send comments (referencing OMB control number) to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S., EPA (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,NW, Washington, D.C. 20460.

EPA Form 5900-16

Appendix CPage 1 of 7

Page 87: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

ENERGY STAR®

Data Checklistfor Commercial Buildings

In order for a building to qualify for the ENERGY STAR, a Professional Engineer (PE) or a Registered Architect (RA) must validate the accuracy of the data underlyingthe building's energy performance rating. This checklist is designed to provide an at-a-glance summary of a property's physical and operating characteristics, as well asits total energy consumption, to assist the PE or RA in double-checking the information that the building owner or operator has entered into Portfolio Manager.

Please complete and sign this checklist and include it with the stamped, signed Statement of Energy Performance.NOTE: You must check each box to indicate that each value is correct, OR include a note.

CRITERION VALUE AS ENTERED INPORTFOLIO MANAGER VERIFICATION QUESTIONS NOTES

Building Name BT Cedar Hill Elementary

School Is this the official building name to be displayed inthe ENERGY STAR Registry of LabeledBuildings?

Type K-12 School Is this an accurate description of the space inquestion?

Location 100 Peachtree Road,

Basking Ridge, NJ 07920 Is this address accurate and complete? Correctweather normalization requires an accurate zipcode.

Single Structure Single Facility

Does this SEP represent a single structure? SEPscannot be submitted for multiple-buildingcampuses (with the exception of acute care orchildren's hospitals) nor can they be submitted asrepresenting only a portion of a building

BT Cedar Hill Elementary School (K-12 School)

CRITERION VALUE AS ENTERED INPORTFOLIO MANAGER VERIFICATION QUESTIONS NOTES

Gross Floor Area 68,020 Sq. Ft.

Does this square footage include all supportingfunctions such as kitchens and break rooms usedby staff, storage areas, administrative areas,elevators, stairwells, atria, vent shafts, etc. Alsonote that existing atriums should only include thebase floor area that it occupies. Interstitial(plenum) space between floors should not beincluded in the total. Finally gross floor area is notthe same as leasable space. Leasable space is asubset of gross floor area.

Open Weekends? Yes

Is this building normally open at all on theweekends? This includes activities beyond thework conducted by maintenance, cleaning, andsecurity personnel. Weekend activity could includeany time when the space is used for classes,performances or other school or communityactivities. If the building is open on the weekend aspart of the standard schedule during one or moreseasons, the building should select ?yes? for openweekends. The ?yes? response should applywhether the building is open for one or both of theweekend days.

Number of PCs 259 Is this the number of personal computers in theK12 School?

Number of walk-inrefrigeration/freezer

units 1

Is this the total number of commercial walk-in typefreezers and coolers? These units are typicallyfound in storage and receiving areas.

Presence ofcooking facilities Yes

Does this school have a dedicated space in whichfood is prepared and served to students? If theschool has space in which food for students is onlykept warm and/or served to students, or has only agalley that is used by teachers and staff then theanswer is "no".

Percent Cooled 80 % Is this the percentage of the total floor space withinthe facility that is served by mechanical coolingequipment?

Percent Heated 100 % Is this the percentage of the total floor space withinthe facility that is served by mechanical heatingequipment?

Months 12(Optional) Is this school in operation for at least 8 months ofthe year?

Page 1 of 4

Appendix CPage 2 of 7

Page 88: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

High School? No

Is this building a high school (teaching grades 10,11, and/or 12)? If the building teaches to highschool students at all, the user should check 'yes'to 'high school'. For example, if the school teachesto grades K-12 (elementary/middle and highschool), the user should check 'yes' to 'highschool'.

Page 2 of 4

Appendix CPage 3 of 7

Page 89: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

ENERGY STAR®

Data Checklistfor Commercial Buildings

Energy ConsumptionPower Generation Plant or Distribution Utility:

Fuel Type: Electricity

Meter: Electricity (kWh (thousand Watt-hours))Space(s): Entire Facility

Generation Method: Grid Purchase

Start Date End Date Energy Use (kWh (thousand Watt-hours))

10/01/2010 10/31/2010 41,760.00

09/01/2010 09/30/2010 42,096.00

08/01/2010 08/31/2010 46,417.00

07/01/2010 07/31/2010 45,927.00

06/01/2010 06/30/2010 43,579.00

05/01/2010 05/31/2010 48,055.00

04/01/2010 04/30/2010 45,171.00

03/01/2010 03/31/2010 43,955.00

02/01/2010 02/28/2010 41,727.00

01/01/2010 01/31/2010 56,524.00

12/01/2009 12/31/2009 54,336.00

11/01/2009 11/30/2009 46,161.00

Electricity Consumption (kWh (thousand Watt-hours)) 555,708.00

Electricity Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 1,896,075.70

Total Electricity (Grid Purchase) Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 1,896,075.70

Is this the total Electricity (Grid Purchase) consumption at this building including allElectricity meters?

Fuel Type: Natural Gas

Meter: Natural Gas (therms)Space(s): Entire Facility

Start Date End Date Energy Use (therms)

10/01/2010 10/31/2010 1,890.00

09/01/2010 09/30/2010 164.00

08/01/2010 08/31/2010 120.00

07/01/2010 07/31/2010 125.00

06/01/2010 06/30/2010 139.00

05/01/2010 05/31/2010 879.00

04/01/2010 04/30/2010 1,902.00

03/01/2010 03/31/2010 4,203.00

02/01/2010 02/28/2010 6,207.00

01/01/2010 01/31/2010 8,268.00

Page 3 of 4

Appendix CPage 4 of 7

Page 90: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

12/01/2009 12/31/2009 7,459.00

11/01/2009 11/30/2009 4,589.00

Natural Gas Consumption (therms) 35,945.00

Natural Gas Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 3,594,500.00

Total Natural Gas Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 3,594,500.00

Is this the total Natural Gas consumption at this building including all Natural Gas meters?

Additional FuelsDo the fuel consumption totals shown above represent the total energy use of this building?Please confirm there are no additional fuels (district energy, generator fuel oil) used in this facility.

On-Site Solar and Wind EnergyDo the fuel consumption totals shown above include all on-site solar and/or wind power located atyour facility? Please confirm that no on-site solar or wind installations have been omitted from thislist. All on-site systems must be reported.

Certifying Professional (When applying for the ENERGY STAR, the Certifying Professional must be the same PE or RA that signed and stamped the SEP.)

Name: _____________________________________________ Date: _____________

Signature: ______________________________________ Signature is required when applying for the ENERGY STAR.

Page 4 of 4

Appendix CPage 5 of 7

Page 91: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

FOR YOUR RECORDS ONLY. DO NOT SUBMIT TO EPA.

Please keep this Facility Summary for your own records; do not submit it to EPA. Only the Statement of Energy Performance(SEP), Data Checklist and Letter of Agreement need to be submitted to EPA when applying for the ENERGY STAR.

FacilityBT Cedar Hill Elementary School100 Peachtree RoadBasking Ridge, NJ 07920

Facility OwnerBernards Public Schools101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Primary Contact for this FacilityConnie Coriell101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

General InformationBT Cedar Hill Elementary School

Gross Floor Area Excluding Parking: (ft2) 68,020 Year Built 1956 For 12-month Evaluation Period Ending Date: October 31, 2010

Facility Space Use SummaryBT Cedar Hill Elementary School

Space Type K-12 School

Gross Floor Area(ft2) 68,020

Open Weekends? Yes

Number of PCs 259

Number of walk-in refrigeration/freezerunits 1

Presence of cooking facilities Yes

Percent Cooled 80

Percent Heated 100

Monthso 12

High School? No

School Districtod N/A

Energy Performance ComparisonEvaluation Periods Comparisons

Performance Metrics Current(Ending Date 10/31/2010)

Baseline(Ending Date 07/31/2010) Rating of 75 Target National Average

Energy Performance Rating 72 69 75 N/A 50

Energy Intensity

Site (kBtu/ft2) 81 84 79 N/A 100

Source (kBtu/ft2) 148 153 144 N/A 185

Energy Cost

$/year $ 122,860.12 $ 127,841.88 $ 119,526.82 N/A $ 152,844.56

$/ft2/year $ 1.81 $ 1.88 $ 1.76 N/A $ 2.25

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

MtCO2e/year N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

kgCO2e/ft2/year N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

More than 50% of your building is defined as K-12 School. Please note that your rating accounts for all of the spaces listed. The National Average column presentsenergy performance data your building would have if your building had an average rating of 50. Notes:o - This attribute is optional.d - A default value has been supplied by Portfolio Manager.

Appendix CPage 6 of 7

Page 92: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

2010BT Cedar Hill Elementary School100 Peachtree RoadBasking Ridge, NJ 07920

Portfolio Manager Building ID: 2490932

The energy use of this building has been measured and compared to other similar buildings using theEnvironmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Energy Performance Scale of 1–100, with 1 being the least energyefficient and 100 the most energy efficient. For more information, visit energystar.gov/benchmark.

This building’sscore

72

100

Most Efficient

This building uses 148 kBtu per square foot per year.*

*Based on source energy intensity for the 12 month period ending October 2010

Date of certification

Date Generated: 03/04/2011

Statement ofEnergy Performance

1

Least Efficient

50

Average

Buildings with a score of75 or higher may qualifyfor EPA’s ENERGY STAR.

I certify that the information contained within this statement is accurate and in accordance with U.S.Environmental Protection Agency’s measurement standards, found at energystar.gov

Appendix CPage 7 of 7

Page 93: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 1 of 10

BoilersTag Boiler-1 & 2

Unit Type Sectional cast iron

Qty 2

Location Boiler Room

Area Served Whole Bldg (except 500 wing)

Manufacturer Weil McLain

Model # 1488 (88 Series)

Serial # N/A

Input Capacity (MBH) 4,474

Rated Output Capacity (MBH) 3,550

Approx. Efficiency % 75%

Fuel Natural Gas

Burner Make & Model Industrial CombustionFPLG-42

Max / Min Firing Rate Turndown Ration

3753 / 900 MBH4.2

Approx Age Unknown

ASHRAE Service Life 30

Remaining Life Unknown

Comments Boiler in good condition, Combusion Fan Motor 3 HP,

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Cedar Hill School

Page 94: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 2 of 10

Domestic Water HeatersTag HWH-1 HWH-2

Unit Type Tank type Tank type

Qty 1 1

Location Boiler Room Mech Closet (500 Wing)

Area Served Dom HW (Except 500 wing) 500 wing bathrooms

Manufacturer Bradford White A.O. Smith

Model # D65T3703N BTC 179 920

Serial # DE9197910 MF94-0349052-920

Size (Gallons) 65 86

Input Capacity (MBH/KW)

370 MBH 179 MBH

Recovery (Gal/Hr) 358.8 162.7

Efficiency % 81% 76%

Fuel Natural Gas Natural Gas

Approx Age 6 9

ASHRAE Service Life 12 12

Remaining Life 6 3

Comments HWH good condition, HW Recirc pump controlled by aqua stat, flue damper included

HWH fair condition, damper actuator not working

correctly during survey, HW re-circ pump running

continuously

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Cedar Hill School

Page 95: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 3 of 10

PumpsTag HWP-1 & 2 HWP 3 & 4 HWP 5 & 6

Unit Type Floor Mounted End suction Pipe mounted in line Pipe mounted in line

Qty 2 2 2

Location Boiler Room Boiler Room Boiler Room

Area Served Unit ventilators, baseboard radiators Gymnasium Unknown

Manufacturer Bell & Gossett Bell & Gossett Taco

Model # 1510 (style) 60 / 90 Series (style) 1632C3E2 5.65

Serial # N/A N/A N/A

Horse Power 7.5 0.75 0.75

Flow N/A N/A N/A

Motor Info Baldor Bell & Gossett Emerson

Electrical Power 208 / 3 / 60 208 / 3 / 60 115 / 230, 1PH, 60 HZ

RPM 1760, 1735 1750 1725

Motor Efficiency % 84%, 85.5% N/A N/A

Approx Age Unknown Unknown 5

ASHRAE Service Life 20 15 15

Remaining Life #N/A #N/A 10

Comments

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Cedar Hill School

Page 96: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 4 of 10

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU - 8 RTU - 6 & 7 RTU

Unit Type Packaged rooftop Packaged rooftop Packaged rooftop

Qty 1 2 4

Location Roof (300 Wing) Roof (300 Wing) Roof (500 Wing)

Area Served Computer Lab (Rm 302) Rm 304 & 306 Rm 500 thru 509

Manufacturer Lennox Carrier Carrier

Model # CHA16-513-3Y 4899 - 030060501 48HJD014---521NB

Serial # 5692E03959 J4B1010240 2994G30451, 2994G30450, 2994G30449, 2994G30447

Cooling Type Packaged DX Packaged DX Packaged DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 3.5 2.5 (Est) 12.0

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

10.1 EER 8 EER (Est) 9.6 EER

Heating Type None Gas Heat Exchanger Gas Heat Exchanger

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A 225 MBH

Efficiency N/A 80% (Est) 82%

Fuel N/A Nat Gas Nat Gas

Approx Age 15 (Est) 15 (Est) 9 (Est)

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 0 0 7

Comments Units in Fair / Poor Condition, 1/2 HP Fan

t

Unit in poor condition Unit in fair condition, 5 HP Fan motor, 87.5% Eff

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Cedar Hill School

Page 97: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 5 of 10

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU - 9 RTU - 17 RTU - 16

Unit Type Packaged rooftop Packaged rooftop Packaged rooftop

Qty 1 1 1

Location Roof (300 Wing) Roof (Library) Roof (100 Wing)

Area Served Office Area Rm 601 thru 606 Library Main Office

Manufacturer Trane Snyder General Snyder General

Model # SFCB-C106-HB N/A RD5430553D

Serial # C83E-05905 N/A 0449219-P51-9000

Cooling Type Packaged DX Packaged DX Packaged DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 10 (Est) 10 (Est) 5 (Est)

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

10.1 EER 8 EER (Est) 8 EER (Est)

Heating Type Gas Heat Exchanger None None

Heating Input (MBH) 300 MBH N/A N/A

Efficiency 75% N/A N/A

Fuel Nat Gas N/A N/A

Approx Age 15 (Est) 15 (Est) Unknown

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 0 0 Unknown

Comments Poor Condition, Fan motor 3 HP 81.4% Eff (Est)

Unit in poor condition, 3 HP Fan motor (Est), 87.5% Eff.

(Est.)

Unit in poor condition, 1.5 HP Fan motor (Est), 84%

Eff. (Est)

Page 98: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 6 of 10

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag CU CU - 12 CU-10 & 11

Unit Type Ductless Split Sys Ductless Split Sys Split System

Qty 1 1 2

Location Roof (400 wing) Roof (100 wing) Roof (200 wing)

Area Served Rm 408 Technology Lab Rm 108

Nurse 209, Faculty Rm 207

Manufacturer Sanyo Mitubishi Electric Aerco Aire

Model # C2472 PU42EK2 N/A

Serial # 64262 92E0040613 N/A

Cooling Type Split System DX Split System DX Split System DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 2.0 3.5 2.0 (Est)

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

17 SEER 10 SEER, 9.7 EER 8 EER (Est)

Heating Type None None None

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A N/A

Fuel N/A N/A N/A

Approx Age 4 Unknown Unknown

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 11 Unknown Unknown

Comments Good Condition R-410A Unit in fair condition Unit in very poor condition

Page 99: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 7 of 10

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag CU - 13 & 14 CU - 15 CU - 18

Unit Type Ductless Split Sys Ductless Split Sys Ductless Split Sys

Qty 2 1 1

Location Roof (100 wing) Roof (100 wing) Grade (next to Rm 101)

Area Served Rm 102 & 104 Rm 100 Rm 101

Manufacturer Sanyo Sanyo Friedrich

Model # C3072R C1822 MR24C3F

Serial # 0019962, 0126284 126284 LHBC02840

Cooling Type Split System DX Split System DX Split System DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 2.5 1.5 2.0

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

15 SEER 10.2 SEER, 9.0 EER 18 SEER

Heating Type None None None

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A N/A

Fuel N/A N/A N/A

Approx Age 4 10 (Est) 5 (Est)

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 11 5 10

Comments Good Condition R-410A Unit in fair condition R-22 Good Condition R-410A

Page 100: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 8 of 10

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag CU

Unit Type Split System

Qty 1

Location Grade (next to Rm 203)

Area Served Music Rm 203

Manufacturer Trane

Model # 2TTA0072A3000AA

Serial # 42750JB2F

Cooling Type Split System DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 6.0

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

10 SEER

Heating Type None

Heating Input (MBH) N/A

Efficiency N/A

Fuel N/A

Approx Age 6

ASHRAE Service Life 15

Remaining Life 9

Comments Good Condition R-22

Page 101: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix D

Unit Ventilators

Tag UV

Unit Type Unit Ventilator

Qty 33 (Est)

Location Classrooms

Manufacturer ITT Nesbitt

Model # N/A

Serial # N/A

Cooling Capacity (Tons) None

Estimated Cooling Efficiency (EER)

N/A

Heating Type Hot Water Coil

Heating Input (MBH) N/A

Approx Age 54

Ashrae Service Life 15

Remaining Life (39)

Comments Units retrofitted with electronic controls.

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Cedar Hill School

9 of 10

Page 102: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix D

Heating and Ventilation Units

Tag HV HV

Unit Type Heating and Ventilation Heating and Ventilation

Qty 1 2

Location Receiving Room (next to Cafeteria) Gymnasium

Area Served Cafeteria Gymnasium

Manufacturer ITT Nesbitt ITT Nesbitt

Model # N/A N/A

Serial # N/A N/A

Fan HP 1.5 1.5 (Est)

Cooling Type None None

Heating Type Hot Water Coil Hot Water Coil

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A

Approx Age 54 54

Ashrae Service Life 15 15

Remaining Life (39) (39)

CommentsFan Motor Efficiency

(79.1% - Est.), 2-way control valve

Fan Motor Efficiency, (79.1% - Est.), 3-way control

valve,

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Cedar Hill School

10 of 10

Page 103: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E1 of 14

CEG Job #: 9C10088

Project: Bernards Public Schools KWH COST: $0.162

100 Peachtree Road

Basking Ridge, NJBldg. Sq. Ft.

ECM #1: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.21 Main Office 2600 6 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.37 967.2 $156.69 6 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.30 780 $126.36 $14.00 $84.00 0.07 187.2 $30.33 2.77

222.21 Principal Office 2600 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $104.46 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $84.24 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $20.22 2.77

222.21 Class Rm 100 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $235.03 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $189.54 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.49 2.77

222.21 Class Rm 102 2600 11 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.68 1,773.2 $287.26 11 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.55 1430 $231.66 $14.00 $154.00 0.13 343.2 $55.60 2.77

222.21 Class Rm 104 2600 10 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.62 1,612.0 $261.14 10 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.50 1300 $210.60 $14.00 $140.00 0.12 312 $50.54 2.77

3520 Class Rm 104 Rest Room 2600 2 2 Ceiling Mount White Globe,

(2) 100w A Lamp 200 0.40 1,040.0 $168.48 2 2 26w CFL Lamp 52 0.10 270.4 $43.80 $30.00 $60.00 0.30 769.6 $124.68 0.48

222.21 Class Rm 106 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

222.21 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $52.23 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $42.12 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $10.11 2.77

6917 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.10 260.0 $42.12 1 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 67.6 $10.95 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 192.4 $31.17 0.64

222.21 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $52.23 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $42.12 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $10.11 2.77

6917 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.10 260.0 $42.12 1 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 67.6 $10.95 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 192.4 $31.17 0.64

221.11 Custodial Closet 2600 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 161.2 $26.11 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 130 $21.06 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 31.2 $5.05 2.77

222.21 Class Rm 101 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

222.21 Class Rm 108 Tech 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

Girls Rest Room

Cedar Hill Elementary School

68,022

Boys Rest Room

Page 104: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E2 of 14

ECM #1: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.21 Class Rm 103 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

222.21 Class Rm 110 2600 6 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.37 967.2 $156.69 6 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.30 780 $126.36 $14.00 $84.00 0.07 187.2 $30.33 2.77

222.21 Class Rm 105 SGI 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

222.21 Class Rm 112 2600 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $104.46 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $84.24 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $20.22 2.77

221.11 Art Storage 1200 3 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.19 223.2 $36.16 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 180 $29.16 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 43.2 $7.00 6.00

222.21 Lift Area 2600 17 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 1.05 2,740.4 $443.94 17 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.85 2210 $358.02 $14.00 $238.00 0.20 530.4 $85.92 2.77

222.21 Class Rm 114 2600 5 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.31 806.0 $130.57 5 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.25 650 $105.30 $14.00 $70.00 0.06 156 $25.27 2.77

221.11 Girls Rest Room 2600 5 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.31 806.0 $130.57 5 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.25 650 $105.30 $14.00 $70.00 0.06 156 $25.27 2.77

221.11 Boys Rest Room 2600 5 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.31 806.0 $130.57 5 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.25 650 $105.30 $14.00 $70.00 0.06 156 $25.27 2.77

221.31 Class Rm 407 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.93 2,418.0 $391.72 15 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.75 1950 $315.90 $14.00 $210.00 0.18 468 $75.82 2.77

221.31 Class Rm 408 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.93 2,418.0 $391.72 15 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.75 1950 $315.90 $14.00 $210.00 0.18 468 $75.82 2.77

222.11 Class Rm 409 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

221.31 Class Rm 406 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.93 2,418.0 $391.72 15 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.75 1950 $315.90 $14.00 $210.00 0.18 468 $75.82 2.77

284.25 Gym 2600 23 84x4, 8 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., White Diffuser

214 4.92 12,797.2 $2,073.15 23 8 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 192 4.42 11481.6 $1,860.02 $56.00 $1,288.00 0.51 1315.6 $213.13 6.04

221.31 Class Rm 405 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.93 2,418.0 $391.72 15 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.75 1950 $315.90 $14.00 $210.00 0.18 468 $75.82 2.77

Page 105: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E3 of 14

ECM #1: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.21 Girls Rest Room 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $52.23 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $42.12 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $10.11 2.77

222.21 Boys Rest Room 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $52.23 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $42.12 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $10.11 2.77

221.11 Custodial Closet 2600 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 161.2 $26.11 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 130 $21.06 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 31.2 $5.05 2.77

221.11 Communication Closet 2600 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.06 161.2 $26.11 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 130 $21.06 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 31.2 $5.05 2.77

222.22 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.70 1,809.6 $293.16 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.10 249.6 $40.44 4.15

227.211 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.03 88.4 $14.32 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.22 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.70 1,809.6 $293.16 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.10 249.6 $40.44 4.15

227.211 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.03 88.4 $14.32 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.22 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.70 1,809.6 $293.16 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.10 249.6 $40.44 4.15

227.211 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.03 88.4 $14.32 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.22 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.70 1,809.6 $293.16 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.10 249.6 $40.44 4.15

227.211 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.03 88.4 $14.32 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.22 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.70 1,809.6 $293.16 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.10 249.6 $40.44 4.15

227.211 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.03 88.4 $14.32 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.22 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.70 1,809.6 $293.16 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.10 249.6 $40.44 4.15

227.211 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.03 88.4 $14.32 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.22 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.70 1,809.6 $293.16 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.10 249.6 $40.44 4.15

227.211 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.03 88.4 $14.32 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Class Rm 503

Class Rm 501

Class Rm 506

Class Rm 508

Class Rm 509

Class Rm 507

Class Rm 505

Page 106: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E4 of 14

ECM #1: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.22 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.70 1,809.6 $293.16 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.10 249.6 $40.44 4.15

227.211 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.03 88.4 $14.32 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.22 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.70 1,809.6 $293.16 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.10 249.6 $40.44 4.15

227.211 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.03 88.4 $14.32 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Class Rm 504 2600 15 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.29 3,354.0 $543.35 15 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 1.08 2808 $454.90 $21.00 $315.00 0.21 546 $88.45 3.56

221.11 Storage 2600 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.12 322.4 $52.23 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $42.12 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $10.11 2.77

561 4400 8 2 Recessed Down Light, (2) 26w Quad PL Lamp 52 0.42 1,830.4 $296.52 8 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.22 4400 26 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 1.51 6,635.2 $1,074.90 26 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.30 5720 $926.64 $14.00 $364.00 0.21 915.2 $148.26 2.46

221.21 4400 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

58 1.16 5,104.0 $826.85 20 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.00 4400 $712.80 $14.00 $280.00 0.16 704 $114.05 2.46

221.11 4400 71 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 4.40 19,368.8 $3,137.75 71 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 3.55 15620 $2,530.44 $14.00 $994.00 0.85 3748.8 $607.31 1.64

611 4400 4 1 Wall Mnt. Globe, (1) 100w A19 Lamps 100 0.40 1,760.0 $285.12 4 1 (1) 26w CFL Lamp 13 0.05 228.8 $37.07 $20.00 $80.00 0.35 1531.2 $248.05 0.32

221.31 Class Rm 404 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.93 2,418.0 $391.72 15 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.75 1950 $315.90 $14.00 $210.00 0.18 468 $75.82 2.77

221.31 Class Rm 403 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.93 2,418.0 $391.72 15 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.75 1950 $315.90 $14.00 $210.00 0.18 468 $75.82 2.77

221.31 Class Rm 402 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.93 2,418.0 $391.72 15 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.75 1950 $315.90 $14.00 $210.00 0.18 468 $75.82 2.77

221.31 Class Rm 401 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.93 2,418.0 $391.72 15 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.75 1950 $315.90 $14.00 $210.00 0.18 468 $75.82 2.77

221.31 Class Rm 400 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.93 2,418.0 $391.72 15 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.75 1950 $315.90 $14.00 $210.00 0.18 468 $75.82 2.77

222.21 Class Rm 306 2600 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $104.46 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $84.24 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $20.22 2.77

Class Rm 500

Class Rm 502

Corridors

Page 107: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E5 of 14

ECM #1: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.11 Class Rm 307 2600 9 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.56 1,450.8 $235.03 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $189.54 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.49 2.77

222.21 Class Rm 304 2600 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $104.46 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $84.24 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $20.22 2.77

222.21 Class Rm 305 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $235.03 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $189.54 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.49 2.77

222.21 Class Rm 302 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $235.03 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $189.54 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.49 2.77

222.21 Class Rm 303 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

6917 Storage 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.10 260.0 $42.12 1 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 67.6 $10.95 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 192.4 $31.17 0.64

221.21 2600 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

58 0.12 301.6 $48.86 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $42.12 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 41.6 $6.74 4.15

6917 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.10 260.0 $42.12 1 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 67.6 $10.95 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 192.4 $31.17 0.64

221.21 2600 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

58 0.12 301.6 $48.86 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $42.12 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 41.6 $6.74 4.15

6917 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.10 260.0 $42.12 1 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 67.6 $10.95 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 192.4 $31.17 0.64

232.21 Class Rm 300 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.03 2,683.2 $434.68 12 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.86 2246.4 $363.92 $21.00 $252.00 0.17 436.8 $70.76 3.56

222.21 Class Rm 301 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

221.11 Class Rm 203 2600 25 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 1.55 4,030.0 $652.86 25 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.25 3250 $526.50 $14.00 $350.00 0.30 780 $126.36 2.77

222.21 Copy Rm 205 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

M t P i ti L62 0.12 322.4 $52.23 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $42.12 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $10.11 2.77

222.21 Faculty Rm 207 2600 8 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

M t P i ti L

62 0.50 1,289.6 $208.92 8 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.40 1040 $168.48 $14.00 $112.00 0.10 249.6 $40.44 2.77

222.21 Nurse 209 2600 6 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed 62 0.37 967.2 $156.69 6 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.30 780 $126.36 $14.00 $84.00 0.07 187.2 $30.33 2.77

3520 Rest Room 2600 2 2 Ceiling Mount White Globe, (2) 100w A Lamp 200 0.40 1,040.0 $168.48 2 2 26w CFL Lamp 52 0.10 270.4 $43.80 $30.00 $60.00 0.30 769.6 $124.68 0.48

222.21 2600 23 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 1.43 3,707.6 $600.63 23 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.15 2990 $484.38 $14.00 $322.00 0.28 717.6 $116.25 2.77

221.21 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

58 0.70 1,809.6 $293.16 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.10 249.6 $40.44 4.15

Girls Rest Room

Boys Rest Room

Media Center

Page 108: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E6 of 14

ECM #1: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.21 Media Center Office 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $104.46 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $84.24 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $20.22 2.77

221.11 Stage 1200 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.74 892.8 $144.63 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 720 $116.64 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 172.8 $27.99 6.00

222.21 Cafeteria 2600 36 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 2.23 5,803.2 $940.12 36 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.80 4680 $758.16 $14.00 $504.00 0.43 1123.2 $181.96 2.77

221.11 2600 4 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.25 644.8 $104.46 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $84.24 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $20.22 2.77

222.21 2600 5 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.31 806.0 $130.57 5 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.25 650 $105.30 $14.00 $70.00 0.06 156 $25.27 2.77

617 2600 4 1 Hood Light w/Globe & Cage, 100w A19 Lamp 100 0.40 1,040.0 $168.48 4 1 (1) 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.10 270.4 $43.80 $20.00 $80.00 0.30 769.6 $124.68 0.64

221.11 Electric Room 1200 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.12 148.8 $24.11 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 120 $19.44 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 28.8 $4.67 6.00

221.11 Receiving Rm 2600 5 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.31 806.0 $130.57 5 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.25 650 $105.30 $14.00 $70.00 0.06 156 $25.27 2.77

613.1 Boiler Room 2600 7 1 Industrial Fixture, 200w A19 Lamp 200 1.40 3,640.0 $589.68 7 2 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Pendant Mount,

No Lens 62 0.43 1128.4 $182.80 $180.00 $1,260.00 0.97 2511.6 $406.88 3.10

222.21 2600 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $104.46 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $84.24 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $20.22 2.77

222.211 2600 3 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.19 483.6 $78.34 3 0 Remove Fixture 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $45.00 $135.00 0.19 483.6 $78.34 1.72

222.21 Rm 601 CST 2600 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $104.46 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $84.24 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $20.22 2.77

222.21 Class Rm 602 2600 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $104.46 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $84.24 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $20.22 2.77

222.21 Office 603 2600 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $104.46 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $84.24 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $20.22 2.77

222.21 Therapy Rm 604 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $52.23 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $42.12 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $10.11 2.77

Guidance Hall

Kitchen

Page 109: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E7 of 14

ECM #1: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.21 Kitchenette 605 2600 1 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.06 161.2 $26.11 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 130 $21.06 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 31.2 $5.05 2.77

222.21 OT/PT 606 2600 3 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.19 483.6 $78.34 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 390 $63.18 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 93.6 $15.16 2.77

222.21 Office 600 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $52.23 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $42.12 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $10.11 2.77

621 Front Canopy 4400 4 1 1x1 Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens, (2) 100w A Lamp 200 0.80 3,520.0 $570.24 4 2 (2) 26w CFL Lamp 52 0.21 915.2 $148.26 $40.00 $160.00 0.59 2604.8 $421.98 0.38

713 Side Canopy 4400 8 1 100w HPS 1x1 w/Prismatic Lens 125 1.00 4,400.0 $712.80 8 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Totals 867 204 171,840 $27,838 867 183 45.5 128,228 $20,773 $14,444 12.7 36,586 $5,927 2.44

Page 110: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E8 of 14

CEG Job #: 9C10088Project: Bernards Public Schools KWH COST: $0.162

Address: 100 Peachtree RoadBasking Ridge, NJ

Building SF:

ECM #2: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.21 Main Office 2600 6 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.372 967.2 $156.69 6 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.30 20% 773.76 $125.35 $150.00 $150.00 0.07 193.44 $31.34 4.79

222.21 Principal Office 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 $104.46 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.20 20% 515.84 $83.57 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 128.96 $20.89 7.18

222.21 Class Rm 100 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $235.03 9 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $188.02 $300.00 $300.00 0.11 290.16 $47.01 6.38

222.21 Class Rm 102 2600 11 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.682 1773.2 $287.26 11 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.55 20% 1418.56 $229.81 $300.00 $300.00 0.14 354.64 $57.45 5.22

222.21 Class Rm 104 2600 10 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.62 1612 $261.14 10 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.50 20% 1289.6 $208.92 $300.00 $300.00 0.12 322.4 $52.23 5.74

3520 Class Rm 104 Rest Room 2600 2 2 Ceiling Mount White

Globe, (2) 100w A Lamp 200 0.4 1040 $168.48 2 0 No Change 200 0.40 0% 1040 $168.48 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Class Rm 106 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 $313.37 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

222.21 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 $52.23 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 322.4 $52.23 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

6917 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.1 260 $42.12 1 0 No Change 100 0.10 0% 260 $42.12 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 $52.23 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 322.4 $52.23 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

6917 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.1 260 $42.12 1 0 No Change 100 0.10 0% 260 $42.12 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Custodial Closet 2600 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 161.2 $26.11 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 161.2 $26.11 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Class Rm 101 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 $313.37 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

222.21 Class Rm 108 Tech 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 $313.37 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

222.21 Class Rm 103 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 $313.37 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

Cedar Hill Elementary School

68,022

Boys Rest Room

Girls Rest Room

Page 111: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E9 of 14

ECM #2: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.21 Class Rm 110 2600 6 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.372 967.2 $156.69 6 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.30 20% 773.76 $125.35 $150.00 $150.00 0.07 193.44 $31.34 4.79

222.21 Class Rm 105 SGI 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 $313.37 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

222.21 Class Rm 112 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 $104.46 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.20 20% 515.84 $83.57 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 128.96 $20.89 7.18

221.11 Art Storage 1200 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 223.2 $36.16 3 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.15 20% 178.56 $28.93 $150.00 $150.00 0.04 44.64 $7.23 20.74

222.21 Lift Area 2600 17 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 1.054 2740.4 $443.94 17 0 No Change 62 1.05 0% 2740.4 $443.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Class Rm 114 2600 5 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.31 806 $130.57 5 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.25 20% 644.8 $104.46 $150.00 $150.00 0.06 161.2 $26.11 5.74

221.11 Girls Rest Room 2600 5 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.31 806 $130.57 5 0 No Change 62 0.31 0% 806 $130.57 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Boys Rest Room 2600 5 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.31 806 $130.57 5 0 No Change 62 0.31 0% 806 $130.57 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Class Rm 407 2600 15 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.93 2418 $391.72 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.74 20% 1934.4 $313.37 $300.00 $300.00 0.19 483.6 $78.34 3.83

221.31 Class Rm 408 2600 15 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.93 2418 $391.72 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.74 20% 1934.4 $313.37 $300.00 $300.00 0.19 483.6 $78.34 3.83

222.11 Class Rm 409 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 $313.37 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

221.31 Class Rm 406 2600 15 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.93 2418 $391.72 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.74 20% 1934.4 $313.37 $300.00 $300.00 0.19 483.6 $78.34 3.83

284.25 Gym 2600 23 84x4, 8 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., White Diffuser

214 4.922 12797.2 $2,073.15 23 2

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 214 3.94 20% 10237.76 $1,658.52 $300.00 $600.00 0.98 2559.44 $414.63 1.45

221.31 Class Rm 405 2600 15 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.93 2418 $391.72 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.74 20% 1934.4 $313.37 $300.00 $300.00 0.19 483.6 $78.34 3.83

222.21 Girls Rest Room 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 $52.23 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 322.4 $52.23 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Page 112: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E10 of 14

ECM #2: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.21 Boys Rest Room 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 $52.23 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 322.4 $52.23 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Custodial Closet 2600 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 161.2 $26.11 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 161.2 $26.11 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Communication Closet 2600 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 161.2 $26.11 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 161.2 $26.11 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.22 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.696 1809.6 $293.16 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.56 20% 1447.68 $234.52 $300.00 $300.00 0.14 361.92 $58.63 5.12

227.211 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.034 88.4 $14.32 1 0 No Change 34 0.03 0% 88.4 $14.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.22 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.696 1809.6 $293.16 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.56 20% 1447.68 $234.52 $300.00 $300.00 0.14 361.92 $58.63 5.12

227.211 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.034 88.4 $14.32 1 0 No Change 34 0.03 0% 88.4 $14.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.22 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.696 1809.6 $293.16 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.56 20% 1447.68 $234.52 $300.00 $300.00 0.14 361.92 $58.63 5.12

227.211 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.034 88.4 $14.32 1 0 No Change 34 0.03 0% 88.4 $14.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.22 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.696 1809.6 $293.16 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.56 20% 1447.68 $234.52 $300.00 $300.00 0.14 361.92 $58.63 5.12

227.211 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.034 88.4 $14.32 1 0 No Change 34 0.03 0% 88.4 $14.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.22 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.696 1809.6 $293.16 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.56 20% 1447.68 $234.52 $300.00 $300.00 0.14 361.92 $58.63 5.12

227.211 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.034 88.4 $14.32 1 0 No Change 34 0.03 0% 88.4 $14.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.22 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.696 1809.6 $293.16 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.56 20% 1447.68 $234.52 $300.00 $300.00 0.14 361.92 $58.63 5.12

227.211 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.034 88.4 $14.32 1 0 No Change 34 0.03 0% 88.4 $14.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.22 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.696 1809.6 $293.16 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.56 20% 1447.68 $234.52 $300.00 $300.00 0.14 361.92 $58.63 5.12

227.211 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.034 88.4 $14.32 1 0 No Change 34 0.03 0% 88.4 $14.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Class Rm 505

Class Rm 503

Class Rm 501

Class Rm 506

Class Rm 508

Class Rm 509

Class Rm 507

Page 113: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E11 of 14

ECM #2: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.22 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.696 1809.6 $293.16 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.56 20% 1447.68 $234.52 $300.00 $300.00 0.14 361.92 $58.63 5.12

227.211 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.034 88.4 $14.32 1 0 No Change 34 0.03 0% 88.4 $14.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.22 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.696 1809.6 $293.16 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.56 20% 1447.68 $234.52 $300.00 $300.00 0.14 361.92 $58.63 5.12

227.211 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.034 88.4 $14.32 1 0 No Change 34 0.03 0% 88.4 $14.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Class Rm 504 2600 15 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.29 3354 $543.35 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 86 1.03 20% 2683.2 $434.68 $300.00 $300.00 0.26 670.8 $108.67 2.76

221.11 Storage 2600 2 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 $52.23 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 322.4 $52.23 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

561 4400 8 2 Recessed Down Light, (2) 26w Quad PL Lamp 52 0.416 1830.4 $296.52 8 0 No Change 52 0.42 0% 1830.4 $296.52 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.22 4400 26 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 1.508 6635.2 $1,074.90 26 0 No Change 58 1.51 0% 6635.2 $1,074.90 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.21 4400 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

58 1.16 5104 $826.85 20 0 No Change 58 1.16 0% 5104 $826.85 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 4400 71 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 4.402 19368.8 $3,137.75 71 0 No Change 62 4.40 0% 19368.8 $3,137.75 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

611 4400 4 1 Wall Mnt. Globe, (1) 100w A19 Lamps 100 0.4 1760 $285.12 4 0 No Change 100 0.40 0% 1760 $285.12 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Class Rm 404 2600 15 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.93 2418 $391.72 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.74 20% 1934.4 $313.37 $300.00 $300.00 0.19 483.6 $78.34 3.83

221.31 Class Rm 403 2600 15 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.93 2418 $391.72 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.74 20% 1934.4 $313.37 $300.00 $300.00 0.19 483.6 $78.34 3.83

221.31 Class Rm 402 2600 15 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.93 2418 $391.72 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.74 20% 1934.4 $313.37 $300.00 $300.00 0.19 483.6 $78.34 3.83

221.31 Class Rm 401 2600 15 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.93 2418 $391.72 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.74 20% 1934.4 $313.37 $300.00 $300.00 0.19 483.6 $78.34 3.83

221.31 Class Rm 400 2600 15 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.93 2418 $391.72 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.74 20% 1934.4 $313.37 $300.00 $300.00 0.19 483.6 $78.34 3.83

222.21 Class Rm 306 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 $104.46 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.20 20% 515.84 $83.57 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 128.96 $20.89 7.18

Class Rm 500

Class Rm 502

Corridors

Page 114: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E12 of 14

ECM #2: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.11 Class Rm 307 2600 9 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $235.03 9 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $188.02 $300.00 $300.00 0.11 290.16 $47.01 6.38

222.21 Class Rm 304 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 $104.46 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.20 20% 515.84 $83.57 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 128.96 $20.89 7.18

222.21 Class Rm 305 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $235.03 9 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $188.02 $300.00 $300.00 0.11 290.16 $47.01 6.38

222.21 Class Rm 302 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $235.03 9 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $188.02 $300.00 $300.00 0.11 290.16 $47.01 6.38

222.21 Class Rm 303 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 $313.37 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

6917 Storage 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.1 260 $42.12 1 0 No Change 100 0.10 0% 260 $42.12 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.21 2600 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

58 0.116 301.6 $48.86 2 0 No Change 58 0.12 0% 301.6 $48.86 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

6917 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.1 260 $42.12 1 0 No Change 100 0.10 0% 260 $42.12 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.21 2600 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

58 0.116 301.6 $48.86 2 0 No Change 58 0.12 0% 301.6 $48.86 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

6917 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.1 260 $42.12 1 0 No Change 100 0.10 0% 260 $42.12 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Class Rm 300 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.032 2683.2 $434.68 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 86 0.83 20% 2146.56 $347.74 $300.00 $300.00 0.21 536.64 $86.94 3.45

222.21 Class Rm 301 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 $313.37 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

221.11 Class Rm 203 2600 25 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 1.55 4030 $652.86 25 2

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 1.24 20% 3224 $522.29 $300.00 $600.00 0.31 806 $130.57 4.60

222.21 Copy Rm 205 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 $52.23 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 322.4 $52.23 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Faculty Rm 207 2600 8 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.496 1289.6 $208.92 8 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.40 20% 1031.68 $167.13 $150.00 $150.00 0.10 257.92 $41.78 3.59

222.21 Nurse 209 2600 6 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.372 967.2 $156.69 6 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.30 20% 773.76 $125.35 $150.00 $150.00 0.07 193.44 $31.34 4.79

3520 Rest Room 2600 2 2 Ceiling Mount White Globe, (2) 100w A Lamp 200 0.4 1040 $168.48 2 0 No Change 200 0.40 0% 1040 $168.48 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Girls Rest Room

Boys Rest Room

Page 115: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E13 of 14

ECM #2: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.21 2600 23 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 1.426 3707.6 $600.63 23 2

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 1.14 20% 2966.08 $480.50 $300.00 $600.00 0.29 741.52 $120.13 4.99

221.21 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

58 0.696 1809.6 $293.16 12 0 No Change 58 0.70 0% 1809.6 $293.16 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Media Center Office 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 $104.46 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.20 20% 515.84 $83.57 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 128.96 $20.89 7.18

221.11 Stage 1200 12 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 892.8 $144.63 12 0 No Change 62 0.74 0% 892.8 $144.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Cafeteria 2600 36 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 2.232 5803.2 $940.12 36 3

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 1.79 20% 4642.56 $752.09 $300.00 $900.00 0.45 1160.64 $188.02 4.79

221.11 2600 4 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 $104.46 4 0 No Change 62 0.25 0% 644.8 $104.46 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 2600 5 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.31 806 $130.57 5 0 No Change 62 0.31 0% 806 $130.57 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

617 2600 4 1 Hood Light w/Globe & Cage, 100w A19 Lamp 100 0.4 1040 $168.48 4 0 No Change 100 0.40 0% 1040 $168.48 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Electric Room 1200 2 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 148.8 $24.11 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 148.8 $24.11 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Receiving Rm 2600 5 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.31 806 $130.57 5 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.25 20% 644.8 $104.46 $150.00 $150.00 0.06 161.2 $26.11 5.74

613.1 Boiler Room 2600 7 1 Industrial Fixture, 200w A19 Lamp 200 1.4 3640 $589.68 7 0 No Change 200 1.40 0% 3640 $589.68 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 $104.46 4 0 No Change 62 0.25 0% 644.8 $104.46 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.211 2600 3 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 483.6 $78.34 3 0 No Change 62 0.19 0% 483.6 $78.34 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Rm 601 CST 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 $104.46 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.20 20% 515.84 $83.57 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 128.96 $20.89 7.18

222.21 Class Rm 602 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 $104.46 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.20 20% 515.84 $83.57 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 128.96 $20.89 7.18

222.21 Office 603 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 $104.46 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.20 20% 515.84 $83.57 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 128.96 $20.89 7.18

222.21 Therapy Rm 604 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 $52.23 2 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.10 20% 257.92 $41.78 $150.00 $150.00 0.02 64.48 $10.45 14.36

Kitchen

Guidance Hall

Media Center

Page 116: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E14 of 14

ECM #2: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.21 Kitchenette 605 2600 1 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 161.2 $26.11 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 161.2 $26.11 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 OT/PT 606 2600 3 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 483.6 $78.34 3 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.15 20% 386.88 $62.67 $150.00 $150.00 0.04 96.72 $15.67 9.57

222.21 Office 600 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 $52.23 2 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.10 20% 257.92 $41.78 $150.00 $150.00 0.02 64.48 $10.45 14.36

621 Front Canopy 4400 4 1 1x1 Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens, (2) 100w A Lamp 200 0.8 3520 $570.24 4 0 No Change 200 0.80 0% 3520 $570.24 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

713 Side Canopy 4400 8 1 100w HPS 1x1 w/Prismatic Lens 125 1 4400 $712.80 8 0 No Change 125 1.00 0% 4400 $712.80 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Totals 867 204 60.0 171,839.6 $27,838 867 61 51.7 150,359.5 $24,358.24 $15,600 8.28 21,480 $3,480 4.48

Page 117: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix FPage 1 of 3

Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Cedar Hill Elementary School

Location: Basking Ridge, NJ 07920Description: Photovoltaic System 95% Financing - 25 year

Simple Payback Analysis

Total Construction Cost $1,616,670Annual kWh Production 207,571

Annual Energy Cost Reduction $33,627Annual SREC Revenue $72,650

First Cost Premium $1,616,670

Simple Payback: Years

Life Cycle Cost AnalysisAnalysis Period (years): 25 Financing %: 95%Financing Term (mths): 300 Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0%

Average Energy Cost ($/kWh) $0.162 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0%Financing Rate: 7.00% SREC Value ($/kWh) $0.350

Period Additional Energy kWh Energy Cost Additional SREC Interest Loan Net Cash CumulativeCash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Expense Principal Flow Cash Flow

0 $80,834 0 0 0 $0 0 0 (80,834) 01 $0 207,571 $33,627 $0 $72,650 $106,764 $23,495 ($23,983) ($104,817)2 $0 206,533 $34,635 $0 $72,287 $105,066 $25,194 ($23,338) ($128,155)3 $0 205,500 $35,674 $0 $71,925 $103,244 $27,015 ($22,660) ($150,815)4 $0 204,473 $36,745 $0 $71,566 $101,292 $28,968 ($21,950) ($172,764)5 $0 203,451 $37,847 $2,096 $71,208 $99,197 $31,062 ($23,301) ($196,065)6 $0 202,433 $38,982 $2,085 $70,852 $96,952 $33,308 ($22,511) ($218,576)7 $0 201,421 $40,152 $2,075 $70,497 $94,544 $35,716 ($21,685) ($240,261)8 $0 200,414 $41,356 $2,064 $70,145 $91,962 $38,297 ($20,823) ($261,083)9 $0 199,412 $42,597 $2,054 $69,794 $89,194 $41,066 ($19,922) ($281,006)10 $0 198,415 $43,875 $2,044 $69,445 $86,225 $44,035 ($18,983) ($299,989)11 $0 197,423 $45,191 $2,033 $69,098 $83,042 $47,218 ($18,004) ($317,993)12 $0 196,436 $46,547 $2,023 $68,753 $79,628 $50,631 ($16,984) ($334,976)13 $0 195,454 $47,943 $2,013 $68,409 $75,968 $54,291 ($15,921) ($350,897)14 $0 194,476 $49,382 $2,003 $68,067 $72,044 $58,216 ($14,814) ($365,711)15 $0 193,504 $50,863 $1,993 $67,726 $67,835 $62,425 ($13,663) ($379,375)16 $0 192,536 $52,389 $1,983 $67,388 $63,322 $66,937 ($12,466) ($391,841)17 $0 191,574 $53,961 $1,973 $67,051 $58,484 $71,776 ($11,221) ($403,062)18 $0 190,616 $55,579 $1,963 $66,716 $53,295 $76,965 ($9,928) ($412,990)19 $0 189,663 $57,247 $1,954 $66,382 $47,731 $82,529 ($8,584) ($421,575)20 $0 188,714 $58,964 $1,944 $66,050 $41,765 $88,495 ($7,189) ($428,764)21 $0 187,771 $60,733 $1,934 $65,720 $38,051 $81,354 $5,114 ($423,649)22 $0 186,832 $62,555 $1,924 $65,391 $30,748 $66,947 $28,327 ($395,322)23 $0 185,898 $64,432 $1,915 $65,064 $0 $0 $127,581 ($267,741)24 $0 184,968 $66,365 $1,905 $64,739 $0 $0 $129,199 ($138,542)25 $0 184,044 $68,356 $1,896 $64,415 $0 $0 $130,875 ($7,667)

Totals: 4,889,532 $1,225,998 $41,874 $1,711,336 $1,686,354 $1,135,939 $73,167 ($7,093,634)Net Present Value (NPV)

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

Photovoltaic System 95% Financing - 25 year

($175,374)-0.1%

15.21

Page 118: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix FPage 2 of 3

Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Cedar Hill Elementary School

Location: Basking Ridge, NJ 07920Description: Photovoltaic System - Direct Purchase

Simple Payback AnalysisPhotovoltaic System - Direct Purchase

Total Construction Cost $1,616,670Annual kWh Production 207,571

Annual Energy Cost Reduction $33,627Annual SREC Revenue $72,650

First Cost Premium

Simple Payback: Years

Life Cycle Cost AnalysisAnalysis Period (years): 25 Financing %: 0%Financing Term (mths): 0 Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0%

Average Energy Cost ($/kWh) $0.162 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0%Financing Rate: 0.00% SREC Value ($/kWh) $0.350

Period Additional Energy kWh Energy Cost Additional SREC Net Cash CumulativeCash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Flow Cash Flow

0 $1,616,670 0 0 0 $0 (1,616,670) 01 $0 207,571 $33,627 $0 $72,650 $106,276 ($1,510,394)2 $0 206,533 $34,635 $0 $72,287 $106,922 ($1,403,472)3 $0 205,500 $35,674 $0 $71,925 $107,600 ($1,295,872)4 $0 204,473 $36,745 $0 $71,566 $108,310 ($1,187,562)5 $0 203,451 $37,847 $2,096 $71,208 $106,959 ($1,080,603)6 $0 202,433 $38,982 $2,085 $70,852 $107,749 ($972,854)7 $0 201,421 $40,152 $2,075 $70,497 $108,575 ($864,279)8 $0 200,414 $41,356 $2,064 $70,145 $109,437 ($754,842)9 $0 199,412 $42,597 $2,054 $69,794 $110,337 ($644,505)

10 $0 198,415 $43,875 $2,044 $69,445 $111,277 ($533,229)11 $0 197,423 $45,191 $2,033 $69,098 $112,256 ($420,973)12 $0 196,436 $46,547 $2,023 $68,753 $113,276 ($307,697)13 $0 195,454 $47,943 $2,013 $68,409 $114,339 ($193,358)14 $0 194,476 $49,382 $2,003 $68,067 $115,445 ($77,913)15 $0 193,504 $50,863 $1,993 $67,726 $116,596 $38,68416 $0 192,536 $52,389 $1,983 $67,388 $117,794 $156,47817 $0 191,574 $53,961 $1,973 $67,051 $119,038 $275,51618 $0 190,616 $55,579 $1,963 $66,716 $120,332 $395,84719 $0 189,663 $57,247 $1,954 $66,382 $121,675 $517,52320 $0 188,714 $58,964 $1,944 $66,050 $123,071 $640,59321 $1 187,771 $60,733 $1,934 $65,720 $124,519 $765,11222 $2 186,832 $62,555 $1,924 $65,391 $126,022 $891,13423 $3 185,898 $64,432 $1,915 $65,064 $127,581 $1,018,71624 $4 184,968 $66,365 $1,905 $64,739 $129,199 $1,147,91425 $5 184,044 $68,356 $1,896 $64,415 $130,875 $1,278,790

Totals: 4,889,532 $1,225,998 $41,874 $1,711,336 $2,895,460 ($4,121,245)Net Present Value (NPV)

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

15.21

$1,616,670

$1,278,8154.9%

Page 119: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix FPage 3 of 3

Building Roof Area (sq ft) Panel Qty Panel Sq Ft Panel Total Sq

FtTotal KWDC

Total Annual kWh

Panel Weight (33 lbs) W/SQFT

Cedar Hill Elementary

School12750 Sunpower

SPR230 781 14.7 11,484 179.63 207,571 25,773 15.64

.= Proposed PV Layout

Notes:

1. Estimated kWH based on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory PVWatts Version 1 Calculator Program.

Page 120: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

BERNARDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS LIBERTY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

61 CHURCH STREET

LIBERTY CORNER, NJ 07938

FACILITY ENERGY REPORT

Page 121: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 1 of 47

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.  HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST ................................................................. 2 

II.  FACILITY DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................ 7 

III.  MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST ............................................................................................ 10 

IV.  ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES ..................................................................... 11 

V.  ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................... 47 

Appendix A – ECM Cost & Savings Breakdown

Appendix B – New Jersey Smart Start® Program Incentives

Appendix C – Portfolio Manager “Statement of Energy Performance”

Appendix D – Major Equipment List

Appendix E – Investment Grade Lighting Audit

Appendix F – Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculations

Appendix G – Kitchen Hood Energy Analysis

Page 122: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 2 of 47

I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has been tabulated and plotted in graph form as depicted within this section. Each energy source has been identified and monthly consumption and cost noted per the information provided by the Owner. Electric Utility Provider: Jersey Central Power & Light (JCP&L) Electric Utility Rate Structure: General Service Secondary (GSS) Third Party Supplier: South Jersey Energy Natural Gas Utility Provider: Public Service Electric and Gas (PSE&G) Utility Rate Structure: General Service Gas (GSG) Third Party Supplier: Woodruff The electric usage profile represents the actual electrical usage for the facility. The electric utility measures consumption in kilowatt-hours (KWH) and maximum demand in kilowatts (KW). One KWH usage is equivalent to 1000 watts running for one hour. One KW of electric demand is equivalent to 1000 watts running at any given time. The basic usage charges are shown as generation service and delivery charges along with several non-utility generation charges. Rates used in this report reflect the historical data received for the facility. The gas usage profile within each facility report shows the actual natural gas energy usage for the facility. The gas utility measures consumption in cubic feet x 100 (CCF), and converts the quantity into Therms of energy. One Therm is equivalent to 100,000 BTUs of energy.

Page 123: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 3 of 47

Table 1 Electricity Billing Data

Utility Provider: Jersey State Power & Light (JCP&L)Rate: General Service Secondary

Meter No: G28387447Customer ID No: 100008621219

Third Party Utility Provider: -TPS Meter / Acct No: -

MONTH OF USECONSUMPTION

KWH TOTAL BILL

Nov-09 44,160 $7,055 Dec-09 42,720 $6,818 Jan-10 50,400 $7,918 Feb-10 42,080 $6,787 Mar-10 53,920 $8,406 Apr-10 38,080 $6,320 May-10 47,840 $7,670 Jun-10 54,560 $9,770 Jul-10 30,240 $4,841

Aug-10 48,160 $7,644 Sep-10 44,480 $7,083 Oct-10 48,640 $7,764

Totals 545,280 192.3 Max $88,078

AVERAGE DEMAND 160.8 KW averageAVERAGE RATE $0.162 $/kWh

155.7157.9175.4

174.7165.8192.3103.8

ELECTRIC USAGE SUMMARY

DEMAND

161.0154.4162.1162.7163.5

Page 124: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 4 of 47

Figure 1 Electricity Usage Profile

Page 125: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 5 of 47

Table 4 Natural Gas Billing Data

Utility Provider: Public Service Electric & Gas (PSEG)Rate: Large Volume Gas (LVG)

Meter No: 1874115Point of Delivery ID: 6660858504

Third Party Utility Provider: Woodruff EnergyTPS Meter No:

MONTH OF USE CONSUMPTION (THERMS) TOTAL BILL

Nov-09 4,891.30 $6,511.70Dec-09 8,213.70 $10,423.14Jan-10 6,888.30 $8,920.84Feb-10 6,805.20 $8,824.59Mar-10 4,149.40 $4,455.14Apr-10 671.10 $811.47May-10 362.80 $482.09Jun-10 142.60 $248.50Jul-10 85.80 $185.65

Aug-10 97.50 $196.06Sep-10 297.00 $332.79Oct-10 3,346.10 $3,531.77

TOTALS 35,950.80 $44,923.74

AVERAGE RATE: $1.25 $/THERM

N/A

NATURAL GAS USAGE SUMMARY

Page 126: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 6 of 47

Figure 2 Natural Gas Usage Profile

Page 127: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 7 of 47

II. FACILITY DESCRIPTION

The 82,240 SF Elementary School is a two story facility with additional lower level comprised of classrooms, library, computer room, cafeteria, kitchen, gymnasium, administration offices, restrooms, boiler rooms, custodial spaces and storage spaces.

The original facility was built in 1905 and expanded significantly in 1979 and 1995 to its current capacity. Original structure is a two story facility with an additional lower level housing boiler room, storage spaces and a classroom. In 1979, the facility was expanded towards north to include more classrooms and a gymnasium. Finally, in 1995, the north-west structure was added to house library, computer room, additional classrooms and office spaces.

The hours of operation for the school students and teachers are between 8:30 AM and 3:30 PM on the weekdays. The facility remains occupied between 3:30 PM and 6:00 PM for aftercare during the weekdays. Custodial services are performed between the hours of 6:00 PM and 11:00 PM. The facility is closed on weekends. The student enrollment at Liberty Corner School is approximately 566 students and 85 staff.

The facility exterior is constructed of 8-inch sinter blocks with 4-inch stone and brick façade. Estimated insulation within the new section wall structure is 2-inches. Insulation within the 1905 building is now known. 1905 structure is covered with pitched roof with asphalt shingle covering. Remaining roof areas are built up flat with tar and gravel covering with estimated 2-inches of foam insulation underneath.

Majority of the windows throughout the facility consists of double pane, tinted glasses with aluminum frames. Overall condition of the windows throughout the facility is excellent. Blinds are utilized throughout the perimeter spaces. The blinds are valuable because they help to reduce heat loss in the winter and reduce solar heat in the summer. Only a small portion of the 1905 structure has the original single pane windows.

HVAC Systems

Heating for the Liberty Corner School is supplied by three (3) cast iron hot water boilers located in two (2) different boiler rooms.

First boiler room is located in the lower level of the 1905 building. This boiler room houses two (2) Weil McLain 88 series sectional cast iron hot water boilers, providing heating hot water for the facility except 1995 addition. The boilers were installed in 2004 and appear to be in excellent condition. Each boiler has 3,753 MBH input and 3,000 MBH output capacities resulting in approximately 80% thermal efficiency. The boilers are fitted with PowerFlame variable capacity natural gas burners with a maximum 4.2 turndown ratio. The hot water is circulated by two (2) floor mounted, 7.5 HP constant volume pumps made by Bell & Gossett. The pumps are driven with standard efficiency motors. Only one pump runs at a time. The pumps provide heating hot water for the unit ventilators in the classrooms, hot water baseboard heaters in some of the stairwells and common areas.

Page 128: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 8 of 47

Second boiler room is located in a mechanical room below the administration building, which was constructed in 1995. This boiler room houses one (1) Weil McLain 88 series sectional cast iron hot water boiler, providing heating hot water for the 1995 addition. The boiler was installed in 1995 and appears to be in good condition. The boiler has 1,357 MBH input and 1,084 MBH output capacity resulting in approximately 80% thermal efficiency. The boiler is fitted with a Webster variable capacity natural gas burner with a maximum 3.5 turndown ratio. The hot water is circulated by two (2) pipe mounted 1.5 HP constant volume pumps. Only one pump runs at a time. The pumps provide heating hot water for the unit ventilators in the classrooms, hot water baseboard heaters in some of the stairwells and common areas, and the air handling units.

Heating and ventilation in the classrooms are provided with unit ventilators located below each classroom window. The unit ventilators are original to the 1979 addition and made by Nesbitt. There are approximately forty (40) classroom units in the facility. All of the unit ventilators are heating only and they are equipped with hot water coils. Several spaces in the old section including the guidance office, classrooms 100, 103, 200, 200A and 203 are cooled with 1-ton window air conditioners. The window units remain installed on the windows during winter.

Majority of the spaces in the building added in 1995 are both heated and air conditioned. Nurse’s office, administration offices, and two of the kindergarten classrooms are conditioned by AHU (Air Handling Unit) #1. Similarly, main hallways and the music room are conditioned by the AHU #2. Both air handling units are equipped with hot water coils for heating and DX coils for cooling. DX cooling is provided by two (2) split condensing units located on the roof of this structure with 15 Ton and 5 Ton cooling capacities respectively.

Computer lab and the library are conditioned with two dedicated rooftop air conditioners with 4-Ton and 9-Ton cooling capacities. A third rooftop unit with 7.5-ton cooling capacity feeds the classrooms 218 and 220. The fourth packaged air conditioning unit is located on a low roof between the new section and the gymnasium with limited access. The unit is similar to the computer lab unit with 4-ton cooling capacity and gas heating. All four rooftop units are equipped with gas burners for ventilation air heating coils and air side economizers. The units are made by Trane and installed in 1995. The units appear to be in good condition with no apparent or reported problems.

In addition to the air handling units and the packaged rooftop units, there are two (2) 2-Ton ductless split heat pump units made by Mitsubishi and Sanyo providing supplemental heating and air conditioning to the computer room and a classroom. The units are in good condition. The gymnasium heating and ventilation is provided with two (2) built-up H&V (Heating and Ventilation) units located in an adjacent mechanical room. The H&V units are made by Nesbitt and appear to be in good condition. Each unit is equipped with hot water coils for heating. Cafeteria heating is achieved with unit ventilators. Ceiling hung fans are utilized for comfort since cafeteria is not air conditioned.

The school houses a small commercial kitchen for light cooking. The kitchen appliances include gas cooking ranges, gas ovens and warmers, a small commercial grade dishwasher, reach in refrigerators and a walk-in freezer. The walk-in units appear to be in good condition.

Page 129: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 9 of 47

Exhaust System

Unit ventilators in the classroom provide the minimum outside air intake and exhaust in the majority of the classrooms. The toilet rooms have dedicated roof exhausters. Hallway ventilation is achieved with multiple large gravity ventilators.

The kitchen includes a 4ft x 12ft commercial exhaust hood, which provides exhaust for cooking equipment. The kitchen hood is manually controlled with a wall switch. It is reported that the exhaust hood operates approximately 6 hours per day.

HVAC System Controls

The building HVAC systems are controlled by an I/NET-Seven building automation systems made by T.A.C. The I/NET system is capable of full operation of rooftop HVAC units, split air handling units, hot water boilers and the hot water pumps. The system modulates the hot water supply temperature to the air side units, outside air damper positions of the rooftop units and the classroom units, economizer functionality of the roof top units and also the time of day scheduling for all the heating and air conditioning units in the facility. The unit ventilators in the classrooms are controlled with pneumatic thermostats located in each space.

Domestic Hot Water

Domestic hot water for the restrooms and the faucets in the utility rooms are provided with two (2) domestic hot water heaters located in each boiler room. Domestic hot water heater located in the old section is a 100 gallon, standard efficiency gas-fired domestic hot water heater made by Bradfort White. The unit has 300 MBH input capacity and 80% efficiency. It was installed in 2006 and appears to be in excellent condition. The domestic hot water is circulated throughout the building by a set of hot water circulation pumps. The domestic hot water piping insulation appeared to be in good condition.

Domestic hot water for the new section is provided with an 86 gallon, standard efficiency gas-fired domestic hot water heater made by AO Smith. The unit has 140 MBH input capacity and 75% efficiency. It was installed in 1995 and appears to be in fair condition. The domestic hot water is circulated throughout the building by a set of hot water circulation pumps. The domestic hot water piping insulation appeared to be in good condition.

Lighting Typical lighting throughout school building is fluorescent tube lay-in fixtures with T-8 lamps and electronic ballasts. There are small amount of fixtures in the building with older T12 lamps and magnetic ballasts. Some of the storage rooms and closets lit with a mixture of incandescent lamps and compact fluorescent lamps. The gym lighting is provided with 400W metal halide fixtures. The building exterior is lit with 175W metal halide flood lights.

Page 130: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 10 of 47

III. MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST

The equipment list contains major energy consuming equipment that through implementation of energy conservation measures could yield substantial energy savings. The list shows the major equipment in the facility and all pertinent information utilized in energy savings calculations. An approximate age was assigned to the equipment in some cases if a manufactures date was not shown on the equipment’s nameplate. The ASHRAE service life for the equipment along with the remaining useful life is also shown in the Appendix.

Refer to the Major Equipment List Appendix for this facility.

Page 131: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 11 of 47

IV. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES Energy Conservation Measures are developed specifically for this facility. The energy savings and calculations are highly dependent on the information received from the site survey and interviews with operations personnel. The assumptions and calculations should be reviewed by the owner to ensure accurate representation of this facility. The following ECMs were analyzed:

Table 1 ECM Financial Summary

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)

ECM #1 Lighting upgrade: Interior and exterior

$25,839 $6,531 4.0 279.1%

ECM #2 Lighting upgrade: Gymnasium $3,920 $2,701 1.5 933.4%

ECM #3 Lighting controls $12,540 $4,241 3.0 407.3%

ECM #4 CRT Monitor Replacement $11,200 $2,286 4.9 206.2%

ECM #5 Variable flow kitchen hood $19,000 $663 28.7 -47.7%

ECM #6 Condensing Boiler Installation $439,375 $7,071 62.1 -51.7%

ECM #7 Nema Premium Efficiency Motors

$3,762 $140 26.9 -44.3%

ECM #8 Windows replacement $17,325 $420 41.3 -63.7%

ECM #9 Demand Ventilation (Library, Computer Lab, Rrooms

$70,000 $2,393 29.3 -48.7%

ECM #10 AC Unit Upgrades $52,560 $2,081 25.3 -40.6%

REM #1 kW Solar Photovoltaic System

$1,066,050 $69,937 15.2 64.0%

Notes:

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

SIMPLE PAYBACK

(Yrs)

SIMPLE LIFETIME

ROI

NET INSTALLATION

COSTA

A. Cost takes into consideration applicable NJ Smart StartTM incentives.B. Savings takes into consideration applicable maintenance savings.

ANNUAL SAVINGSB

RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's)

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

NET INSTALLATION

COST

ANNUAL SAVINGS

SIMPLE PAYBACK

(Yrs)

SIMPLE LIFETIME

ROI

Page 132: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 12 of 47

Table 2 ECM Energy Summary

ECM #1 Lighting upgrade: Interior and exterior

14.7 40,045 0

ECM #2 Lighting upgrade: Gymnasium 6.4 16,671 0

ECM #3 Lighting controls 0.0 26,182 0

ECM #4 CRT Monitor Replacement 5.6 14,112 0

ECM #5 Variable flow kitchen hood 0.0 1,750 304

ECM #6 Condensing Boiler Installation 0.0 0 5,383

ECM #7 Nema Premium Efficiency Motors

0.4 862 0

ECM #8 Windows replacement 0.2 308 296

ECM #9 Demand Ventilation (Library, Computer Lab, Rrooms

0.0 3,920 1,406

ECM #10 AC Unit Upgrades 10.7 12,844 0

REM #1 kW Solar Photovoltaic System

95.9 136,596 0

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)

ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION

(KWH)

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTION

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTIONRENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's)

NATURAL GAS (THERMS)

NATURAL GAS (THERMS)

ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION

(KWH)

Page 133: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 13 of 47

Table 3 Facility Project Summary

Lighting upgrade: Interior and exterior

$6,531 $25,889 $50 $25,839 4.0

Lighting upgrade: Gymnasium

$2,701 $6,720 $2,800 $3,920 1.5

Lighting controls $4,241 $14,250 $1,710 $12,540 3.0

CRT Monitor Replacement $2,286 $11,200 $0 $11,200 4.9

Variable flow kitchen hood $663 $19,000 $0 $19,000 28.7

Condensing Boiler Installation

$7,071 $450,000 $10,625 $439,375 62.1

Nema Premium Efficiency Motors

$140 $3,942 $180 $3,762 26.9

Windows replacement $420 $17,325 $0 $17,325 41.3

Demand Ventilation (Library, Computer Lab,

$2,393 $70,000 $0 $70,000 29.3

AC Unit Upgrades $2,081 $54,500 $1,941 $52,560 25.3

Design / Construction Extras (15%)

$30,825 $30,825

Total Project $21,035 $236,326 $6,681 $229,646 10.9Highlighted ECMs are not included in total

CUSTOMER COST

SIMPLE PAYBACK

ENERGY SAVINGS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - POTENTIAL PROJECT

ENERGY CONSERVATION

MEASURES

ANNUAL ENERGY

SAVINGS ($)

PROJECT COST ($)

SMART START

INCENTIVES

Page 134: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 14 of 47

ECM #1: Lighting Upgrade – Interior and Exterior Description: The majority of the interior lighting throughout the Liberty Corner Elementary School building is provided with fluorescent fixtures with older generation, 700 series 32W T8 lamps and electronic ballasts. Although 700 series T8 lamps are considered fairly efficient, further energy savings can be achieved by replacing the existing T8 lamps with new generation, 800 series 28W T8 lamps without compromising light output. CEG recommends, re-lamping all of the fixtures with 28W T8 lamps. In addition, some of the storage areas, locker room and gym areas, offices, auditorium, classrooms, restrooms and kitchen areas still have a variety of older fluorescent fixtures with magnetic ballasts and incandescent lamps. It is recommended to retrofit or replace all of the older fluorescent fixtures and the incandescent lights in these areas with high efficiency fluorescent T8 or T5 fixtures with electronic ballasts or compact fluorescent lamps. This ECM includes re-lamping of the existing fluorescent fixtures with 800 series, 28W T8 lamps. The ECM also includes retrofit of all older fluorescent fixtures with T8 or T5 fluorescent fixtures with electronic ballasts in the building. The new, energy efficient T8 fixtures will provide adequate lighting and will save on electrical costs due to better performance of the lamp and ballasts. This ECM also includes maintenance savings through the reduced number of lamps replaced per year. The expected lamp life of a T8 lamp is approximately 30,000 burn-hours, in comparison to the existing T12 lamps which is approximately 20,000 burn-hours. The facility will need approximately 33% less lamps replaced per year for each one for one fixture replaced. The ECM also includes replacement of any incandescent lamps with compact fluorescent lamps. Compact fluorescent lamps (CFL’s) were designed to be direct replacements for the standard incandescent lamps which are common to table lamps, spot lights, hi-hats, bathroom vanity lighting, etc. The light output of the CFL has been designed to resemble the incandescent lamp. The color rendering index (CRI) of the CFL is much higher than standard fluorescent lighting, and therefore provides a much “truer” light. The CFL is available in a myriad of shapes and sizes depending on the specific application. Typical replacements are: a 13-Watt CFL for a 60-Watt incandescent lamp, an 18-Watt CFL for a 75-Watt incandescent lamp, and a 26-Watt CFL for a 100-Watt incandescent lamp. The CFL is also available for a number of “brightness colors” that is indicated by the Kelvin rating. A 2700K CFL is the “warmest” color available and is closest in color to the incandescent lamp. CFL’s are also available in 3000K, 3500K, and 4100K. The 4100K would be the “brightest” or “coolest” output. A CFL can be chosen to screw right into your existing fixtures, or hardwired into your existing fixtures. Where the existing fixture is controlled by a dimmer switch, the CFL bulb must be compatible with a dimmer switch. In some locations the bulb replacement will need to be tested to make sure the larger base of the CFL will fit into the existing fixture. The energy usage of an incandescent compared to a compact fluorescent approximately 3 to 4 times greater. In addition to the energy savings, compact fluorescent fixtures burn-hours are 8 to 15 times longer than incandescent fixtures ranging from 6,000 to 15,000 burn-hours compared to incandescent fixtures ranging from 750 to 1000 burn-hours. However, the maintenance savings due to reduced lamp replacement is offset by the higher cost of the CFL’s compared to the incandescent lamps.

Page 135: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 15 of 47

Finally, the exterior of the Liberty Corner Elementary School is illuminated with 400W Probe Start Metal Halide fixtures in “Shoe Box” fixtures. It is recommended to retrofit these fixtures with pulse start metal halide lamps and electronic ballasts. Pulse-start MH lamps have a high-voltage ignitor to start the lamp using a series of pulses instead of a starting probe electrode. Pulse start metal halide lamps typically have an increased lumen maintenance levels by up to 33%. This allows utilizing lower wattage lamps while maintaining the minimum lighting levels in the space. This ECM retrofits existing probe start metal halide fixtures with pulse start metal halide fixtures. The bulb replacement cost for the new lamps compared to the existing lamps were found to be approximately equal and therefore not included in the savings calculations. Energy Savings Calculations: The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix outlines the hours of operation, proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods for each set of fixtures in the each building. Rebates and Incentives: There are incentives available from NJ Smart Start® Program for a portion of the retrofits in this ECM. Incentives are calculated as follows: From the Smart Start Incentive appendix, the retrofit of a probe start metal halide with a pulse start system (with a minimum 12% wattage reduction) warrants the following incentive: Pulse Start Metal Halide (for fixtures ≥ 150 watts) = $25 per fixture. SmartStart ® Incentive # of Probe Start Fixtures $25 2 $25 $50 Replacement and Maintenance Savings: Replacement and Maintenance Savings for fluorescent fixtures are calculated as follows:

( )lampper$Laborlampper$nt(replacemeyear)perreplacedlampsinreductionSavings +×=

( ) $44lampper$5lampper$224.6Savings =+×=

Page 136: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 16 of 47

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $25,889NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $50Net Installation Cost ($): $25,839Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $44Energy Savings ($/Yr): $6,487

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $6,531Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 4.0Simple Lifetime ROI 279.1%Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $655Simple Lifetime Savings $97,963Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 24%Net Present Value (NPV) $52,126.24

ECM #1 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 137: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 17 of 47

ECM #2: Lighting Upgrade – Gymnasium Description: The gymnasium at the Liberty Corner Elementary School utilizes 400W low bay mercury vapor fixtures for its lighting. Mercury vapor lamps provide a reasonably efficient option for bay lighting with a few draw-backs that are common. Mercury vapor fixtures often have poor overall efficacy which limits the amount of light actually leaving the fixture. Also mercury vapor lamps require a significant warm-up period and even longer cool down period eliminating the potential for occupancy sensors frequent switching. This symptom encourages the gymnasium lighting to be left on continuously during the day. Another drawback is the reduced lumen output (Lumen Maintenance) of the mercury vapor lamp over its life time. Average bulb output or “mean lumens,” is approximately 25% less than the bulb’s initial lumens for typical mercury vapor lamps. In addition the most rapid rate of light output decline is during the beginning of its life, approximately 20% light loss within the first 20% of its rated life. It is important to note that the light loss has no savings in energy used; therefore the overall light efficiency is continuously decreasing with age. The final drawback is the light quality or Color Rendering Index (CRI). Typical values for coated mercury vapor lamps is approximately 50, which is a measure of how close the light is to true “full spectrum” light produced by sunlight or incandescent lighting. Mercury vapor lamps also show noticeable color shifting when the bulb is reaching the end of its life. Utilizing fluorescent fixtures in low and high bay spaces is a superior option over high intensity discharge fixtures such as mercury vapor fixtures in all areas described above. Although mercury vapor fixtures provide light fairly efficiently at the start of the bulb life, the average efficiency over the life is below that of fluorescent fixtures. This ECM includes replacement of each of the existing gymnasium mercury vapor light fixtures with T5HO fixtures with reflective lenses and wire cage protection. The retrofit for the mercury vapor fixtures includes a one for one fixture replacement. The fluorescent fixtures selected will provide equivalent light compared to the average light output of the existing mercury vapor fixtures. The bulb replacement cost for T-5 HO lamps compared to the existing mercury vapor lamps were found to be approximately equal and therefore not included in the savings calculations. Hours of Operation Gymnasium: 2,600 Hours/Yr Energy Savings Calculations: The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix outlines the proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods. NJ Smart Start® Program Incentives are calculated as follows:

Page 138: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 18 of 47

From the Smart Start Incentive Appendix, the following incentives are warranted: For replacement of HID (400-999W) with new T-5 or T-8 fixtures = $100/Fixture Smart Start ® Incentive # of 400W Mercury Vapor Fixture Replaced $100 Smart Start ® Incentive 28 $100 $2,800 There is no significant replacement or maintenance savings generated with this ECM. Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $6,720NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $2,800Net Installation Cost ($): $3,920Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $2,701Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $2,701Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 1.5Simple Lifetime ROI 933.4%Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $40,511Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 69%Net Present Value (NPV) $28,321.19

ECM #2 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 139: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 19 of 47

ECM #3: Lighting Controls Upgrade – Occupancy Sensors Description: Some of the lights in the school building are left on unnecessarily. In many cases the lights are left on because of the inconvenience to manually switch lights off when a room is left or on when a room is first occupied. This is common in rooms that are occupied for only short periods and only a few times per day. In some instances lights are left on due to the misconception that it is better to keep the lights on rather than to continuously switch lights on and off. Although increased switching reduces lamp life, the energy savings outweigh the lamp replacement costs. The payback timeframe for when to turn the lights off is approximately two minutes. If the lights are expected to be off for at least a two minute interval, then it pays to shut them off.

Lighting controls come in many forms. Sometimes an additional switch is adequate to provide reduced lighting levels when full light output is not needed. Occupancy sensors detect motion and will switch the lights on when the room is occupied. Occupancy sensors can either be mounted in place of a current wall switch, or on the ceiling to cover large areas. The U.S. Department of Energy sponsored a study to analyze energy savings achieved through various types of building system controls. The referenced savings is based on the “Advanced Sensors and Controls for Building Applications: Market Assessment and Potential R&D Pathways,” document posted for public use April 2005. The study has found that commercial buildings have the potential to achieve significant energy savings through the use of building controls. The average energy savings are as follows based on the report:

• Occupancy Sensors for Lighting Control 20% - 28% energy savings.

Savings resulting from the implementation of this ECM for energy management controls are estimated to be 20% of the total light energy controlled by occupancy sensors and daylight sensors (The majority of the savings is expected to be after school hours when rooms are left with lights on) This ECM includes installation of ceiling or switch mount sensors for individual offices, classrooms, large bathrooms, and libraries. Sensors shall be manufactured by Sensorswitch, Watt Stopper or equivalent. The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix of this report includes the summary of lighting controls implemented in this ECM and outlines the proposed controls, costs, savings, and payback periods. The calculations adjust the lighting power usage by the applicable percent savings for each area that includes lighting controls. Energy Savings Calculations:

( )( )kWh/YrEnergyLightControlledSavings%SavingsEnergy ×=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWh$CostElecAvekWhSavingsEnergySavings.

Page 140: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 20 of 47

Cost and Incentives:

Installation cost per dual-technology sensors (Basis: Sensor switch or equivalent) are as follows:

Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mount $250 per installation Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mount $150 per installation Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor with 2 Pole Powerpack

Remote mount $300 per installation Cost includes material and labor. From the NJ Smart Start® Program Incentives Appendix, the installation of a lighting control device warrants the following incentive: Occupancy Sensor Fixture Mounted (existing facility only) = $20 per sensor Occupancy Sensor Remote Mounted (existing facility only) = $35 per sensor

( ) $35)mountceilingof(#20$mountwallof#IncentiveStartSmart ×+×=® ( ) $1,710$35)mountceiling(4220$mountwall12IncentiveStartSmart =×+×=®

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $14,250NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $1,710Net Installation Cost ($): $12,540Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $4,241

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $4,241Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 3.0Simple Lifetime ROI 407.3%Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $63,621Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 33%Net Present Value (NPV) $38,093.63

ECM #3 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 141: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 21 of 47

ECM #4: Computer Monitor Replacement Description: The computers throughout the school utilize a mixture of CRT computer monitors and LCD computer monitors. The CRT computer monitors within the offices and classrooms are outdated and have several disadvantages such as; significantly increased energy consumption, uses large amount of desk space, poor picture quality, distortions and flickering image, secular glare problems, high weight, and electromagnetic emissions. Many of these drawbacks are difficult to quantify except for the energy use. CRT monitors use considerably more energy than an alternative flat panel LCD monitor. Replacement of the existing CRT monitors with LCD monitors saves considerable energy as well as provides other ergonomic benefits. Based on the site survey it was noted that there are 26 LCD monitor and 112 CRT monitors. Some of the monitors were left in screen saver mode, which only saves the computer screen from image burn in, however it does not save on energy consumption. The average operating hours for all computers and monitors is estimated based on the site survey observations. Energy consumption of computer monitors is based on averages for power usage of various computer monitors. This ECM includes replacement of all existing CRT monitors with LCD flat panel monitors throughout the facility. Installation costs were neglected for this ECM with the intention that this ECM would be replaced by the school district. The calculations are based on the following operating assumptions: Energy Savings Calculations: No. of CRT Monitors: 112 Operating Weeks per Yr: 26 Hrs per Week: 60 (12 hrs per day estimated average)

( ) ( )

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

××=

KWW

HrsOperationWPowerMonitorComputersofUsageElectric1000

#

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWhCostElecAvekWhUsageElectricCostEnergy $

Page 142: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 22 of 47

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSECM INPUTS CRT Monitors LCD Monitor

# of Computers 112 112

Monitor Power Cons. (W) 75 25

Operating Hrs per Week 60 60

Operating Weeks per Yr 42 42

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.162 0.162

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Electric Usage (kWh) 21,168 7,056 14,112

Energy Cost ($) $3,429 $1,143 $2,286

COMMENTS:

COMPUTER MONITOR CALCULATIONS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

CRT Monitor consumption based on Dell CRT monitor M/N: CRT-E771MM. Operating hours estimated.

Installation cost of new monitors is estimated based on current pricing for a 17” LCD monitor on the market today. No labor costs were included for replacing the existing monitors with the new monitors. No incentives are available for installation of computer monitors. Net cost per monitor was estimated to be $100. Cost of installation is summarized in the table below.

ECM INPUT # OF UNITS UNIT COST TOTAL COSTCRT MONITORS 112 $100 $11,200Total 112 $11,200

COST & SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 143: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 23 of 47

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $11,200NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0Net Installation Cost ($): $11,200

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $2,286Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $2,286

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 4.9Simple Lifetime ROI 206.2%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $34,290Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 19%Net Present Value (NPV) $16,090.12

ECM #4 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 144: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 24 of 47

ECM #5: Commercial Kitchen Exhaust Hood Controls Description: The kitchen in this facility is equipped with a large commercial kitchen exhaust hood providing exhaust for the cooking equipment. The estimated total kitchen exhaust from the hoods is 4,800 CFM powered by an estimated total 3 HP of exhaust fans. The kitchen make-up air unit and the cafeteria air handling units provide conditioned air to replace all the air exhausted through the exhaust hood. This system operates based on manual switches located in the kitchen. Currently the facility provides 1 meal per day. The installation of kitchen exhaust controls would significantly reduce the total kitchen exhaust and make-up air quantity. The conditioned make up air and exhausted air savings are achieved by monitoring the exhaust hoods and exhaust based on the actual use of the kitchen equipment. Temperature sensors and optical lasers monitor the heat and smoke production at each exhaust hood to reduce the exhaust and make-up airflow based on the need of the kitchen equipment. This ECM includes installation of kitchen exhaust controls for the main kitchen exhaust hood and VFD’s for the constant volume exhaust fans. The hoods would be retrofitted with temperature and laser sensors to monitor the activity of each of all equipment installed below the hoods. The work involves installing a Melink Kitchen Hood Variable Air Volume Controller; variable frequency drive on the kitchen hood exhaust fan; and turn off all the kitchen hood exhaust systems when the kitchen is closed. When the cooking appliances are turned on, the hood exhaust fan speed will increase based on the hood exhaust temperature. During heavy cooking, the kitchen hood exhaust fan increases to 100% speed until the smoke/vapor is removed. Energy savings are also realized when the kitchen equipment is operating at less than full load due to minimal cooking operations. During these times the fan speed decreases, removing only the necessary amount of air, saving exhaust fan energy and make up air conditioning energy. Energy Calculations Summary: Detailed calculations for the proposed kitchen hood control system can be found in the Kitchen Exhaust Calculations Appendix. It is pertinent to note that the calculation assumes the exhaust fans and make-up air unit remain off for approximately 17 hours per day. Installed cost of the kitchen hood control system is $19,000. The calculated energy savings equals approximately $663 per year. Currently, there aren’t any incentives from the Smart Start program for motors smaller than 5 HP. A summary of energy savings can be seen in the table below:

Page 145: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 25 of 47

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

ECM INPUTS Manually Controlled Kitchen Exhaust

MELINK Kitchen Exhaust Controls

Fan Energy Usage (kWh) 1,608 604 1,004Heating Energy Usage (Therms) 950 646 304Cooling Energy Usage (kWh) 2,331 1,585 746

Average Gas Cost ($/Therm) 1.25 1.25Electric Cost ($/KWH) 0.162 0.162

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSTotal Energy Usage (kWh) 3,939 2,189 1,750Total Energy Usage (Therms) 950 646 304Heating Energy Cost ($) $1,187 $807 $380Cooling Energy Cost ($) $638 $355 $283

Total Energy Cost ($) $1,826 $1,162 $663COMMENTS:

KITCHEN EXHAUST CONTROLS CALCULATION

SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

*ECM is based on calculations using spreadsheets privded by MELINK Intelli-hood controls manufacturer.

Page 146: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 26 of 47

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $19,000NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $19,000Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $663

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $663Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 28.6Simple Lifetime ROI -47.6%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $9,951Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -7%Net Present Value (NPV) ($11,080.10)

ECM #5 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 147: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 27 of 47

ECM #6: Condensing Boiler Installation Description: Space heating for the perimeter offices and classrooms in the majority of the school is provided with unit ventilators and cabinet heaters with hot water coils and hot water radiators. The sources of hot water for these equipments are three (3) hot water boilers located in the main boiler room and the new section boiler room. Two (2) of the boilers have 3.75 MMBH (106 BTU/H) input capacity while the third (3rd) boiler has 1.35 MMBH. Two (2) larger boilers are 6 years old and the third boiler is approximately 16 years old. All the boilers are within their expected useful life of 30 years defined by ASHRAE. Typically, standard (non-condensing) boilers provide lower than nominal efficiency compared to condensing boilers. Standard boilers suffer further efficiency losses at part load operating conditions mainly due to limitations in the reduction of the flue gas temperature. Current average combustion efficiency of each boiler is estimated to be 75% due to standard non-condensing boiler technology, limited turn down ratio, cycling losses and outdated design and controls. A new condensing boiler could substantially improve the operating efficiency of the heating system of the building. Condensing boiler’s peak efficiency tops out at 99% depending on return water temperature. CEG recommends replacing the three (3) boilers with condensing hot water boilers to provide building with heating throughout the year. The annual average operating efficiency of the proposed boiler set is expected to be 90%, which gives the heating system a 15% increase in efficiency. This ECM is based on variable supply water temperature adjusted based on outdoor temperature. This ECM includes installation of four (4) new condensing gas fired boilers to replace three (3) existing hot water boilers based on following summary.

BOILER REPLACEMENT SUMMARY EXISTING UNIT LOCATION PROPOSED UNITS

(2) 3.75 MMBH Cast Iron Standard

Boilers Main Boiler Room

(2) 3.0 MMBH (1) 2.0 MMBH

Condensing Boilers (1) 1.4 MMBH Cast Iron Standard Boiler

New Section Boiler Room

(1) 1.5 MMBH Condensing Boilers

The basis for this ECM is Aerco Benchmark 1.5, 2.0 and 3.0 condensing hot water boilers or equivalent. New boilers shall be setup and programmed to be the primary source of heating for the building during entire year. The owner is recommended to retain a professional engineer to confirm equipment sizing and finalize design.

Page 148: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 28 of 47

Energy Savings Calculations: Currently there are multiple boilers and gas fired rooftop units on the building gas meter. The boilers’ gas usage is not separately metered. Therefore, annual energy consumption of the boilers has to be estimated. In this calculation, it is assumed that the energy consumption of the boilers will be in proportion with the ratio of the total heating capacity of each equipment. First, domestic hot water usage is estimated and subtracted from the total usage in order to estimate the net natural gas usage for space heating. Current total hot water usage can be found in the table below:

Nov-09 4,891 156 4,736 $6,304Dec-09 8,214 156 8,058 $10,226Jan-10 6,888 156 6,733 $8,719Feb-10 6,805 156 6,649 $8,623Mar-10 4,149 156 3,994 $4,288Apr-10 671 156 515 $623May-10 363 156 207 $275Jun-10 143 156 0 $0Jul-10 86 156 0 $0

Aug-10 98 156 0 $0Sep-10 297 156 0 $0Oct-10 3,346 156 3,190 $3,367

TOTAL 35,951 1,869 34,082 $42,425

MONTHTOTAL USAGE

THERMS COSTHEATING ONLYDOMESTIC HW USAGE

ANNUAL GAS USAGE

Baseline Domestic Hot Water Gas Use = 156 Therms (Average from June-September Gas Use) Existing Natural Gas Use for Heating = 35,951 Therms – (156 Therms x 12 Months) = 34,082 Therms Below calculation is performed to estimate annual gas usage of the boilers: Total facility heating capacity: (2) Hot water boilers = 7.5 MMBH (1) Hot water boiler = 1.36 MMBH (2) Gas Fired RTUs = 0.24 MMBH (1) Gas Fired RTU = 0.25 MMBH Total = 9.35 MMBH

Page 149: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 29 of 47

Total facility heating capacity: 9.35 MMBH Total Capacity - Boilers only: 8.86 MMBH Percent usage by boilers: 95% of Total Estimated natural gas usage 95% of 34,082 Therms Estimated natural gas usage 32,295 Therms Estimated natural gas cost $40,201

Bldg Heat Required Heating Nat. Gas Therm Heating Eff % Fuel Heat Value BTU

Therm

Proposed Heating Gas UsageBldg. Heat Required BTU

New Heating Eff % Fuel Heat Value BTUTherm

Energy Cost Heating Gas Usage Therms Ave Fuel Cost $

Therm Energy savings calculations are summarized in the table below:

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

ECM INPUTSExisting Hot Water

BoilersNew Condensing

Boilers -

Existing Nat Gas (Therms) 32,295 - -

Boiler Efficiency (%) 75% 90% 15%

Nat Gas Heat Value (BTU/Therm) 100,000 100,000 -

Equivalent Building Heat Usage (MMBTUs) 2,422 2,422 -

Ave. Gas Cost ($/Therm)(Heating season only) 1.24 1.24 -

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Natural Gas Usage (Therms) 32,295 26,913 5,383

Energy Cost ($) $40,201 $33,501 $6,700

COMMENTS:

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

CONDENSING BOILER CALCULATIONS

Page 150: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 30 of 47

Project Cost, Incentives and Maintenance Savings Estimated cost for removing the existing boilers and installing two (2) 3.0 MMBH, (1) 2.0 MMBH and (1) 1.5 MMBH condensing hot water boilers with advanced controls is $450,000. From the New Jersey Smart Start® Program Incentives Appendix, installation of a high efficiency hot water boiler falls under the category “Gas Heating” and warrants an incentive based on efficiency at or above 84% for this type of equipment. The program incentives are calculated as follows:

UNIT DESCRIPTION

UNIT EFFICIENCY

REBATE $/MBH

PROPOSED CAPACITY, MBH

NUMBER OF UNITS

TOTAL REBATE, $

≥ 300 MBH - 1500 MBH

84% AFUE for Hot Water boilers $1.75 1,500 1 $2,625

>1500 - ≤ 4000 MBH

84% AFUE for Hot Water boilers $1 2,000 1 $2,000

>1500 - ≤ 4000 MBH

84% AFUE for Hot Water boilers $1 3,000 2 $6,000

TOTAL $10,625

GAS FIRED BOILER REBATE SUMMARY

Maintenance savings associated with this ECM is estimated to be minimal.

Page 151: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 31 of 47

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $450,000NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $10,625

Net Installation Cost ($): $439,375Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $6,700Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $6,700

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 30Simple Payback 65.6

Simple Lifetime ROI -54.3%Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings 0Simple Lifetime Savings $201,007Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -4%Net Present Value (NPV) ($308,048)

ECM #6 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 152: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 32 of 47

ECM #7: Install NEMA Premium® Efficiency Motors Description: The improved efficiency of the NEMA Premium® efficient motors is primarily due to better designs with use of better materials to reduce losses. Surprisingly, the electricity used to power a motor represents 95 % of its total lifetime operating cost. Because many motors operate continuously 24 hours a day, even small increases in efficiency can yield substantial energy and dollar savings. The electric motors driving the primary hot water pumps in the main boiler room are candidates for replacing with premium efficiency motors. These standard efficiency motors run considerable amount of time over a year. This energy conservation measure replaces existing electric motors over 5 HP or more with NEMA Premium® efficiency motors. NEMA Premium® is the most efficient motor designation in the marketplace today.

IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY

EQMTID FUNCTION

MOTOR HP

HOURS OF OPERATION

EXISTING EFFICIENCY

NEMA PREMIUM

EFFICIENCYHWP-1 Hot Water Pump 7.5 2,160 88.5% 91.7%HWP-2 Hot Water Pump 7.5 2,160 88.5% 91.7%

Energy Savings Calculations:

Electric usage, kWhHP LF 0.746 Hours of Operation

Motor Efficiency

where, HP Motor Nameplate Horsepower Rating LF Load Factor Motor Efficiency Motor Nameplate Efficiency

ProposedExisting UsageElectricUsageElectrickWhSavings,UsageElectric −=

Electric Usage Savings, kWh Electric UsageE Electric UsageP

Electric cost savings Electric Usage Savings Electric Rate $

kWh

The calculations were carried out and the results are tabulated in the table below:

Page 153: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 33 of 47

PREMIUM EFFICIENCY MOTOR CALCULATIONS

EQMTID

MOTOR HP

LOAD FACTOR

EXISTING EFFICIENCY

NEMA PREMIUM

EFFICIENCY

POWER SAVINGS

kW

ENERGY SAVINGS

kWH

COST SAVINGS

HWP-1 7.5 90% 88.5% 91.7% 0.20 431 $70HWP-2 7.5 90% 88.5% 91.7% 0.20 431 $70

TOTAL 0.4 862 $140

Equipment Cost and Incentives

Below is a summary of SmartStart Building® incentives for premium efficiency motors:

HORSE POWER

NJ SMART START

INCENTIVE5 $60

7.5 $9010 $10015 $11520 $12525 $130

INCENTIVES

The following table outlines the summary of motor replacement costs and incentives:

EQMTID

MOTOR POWER

HP

INSTALLED COST

SMART START

INCENTIVENET COST

TOTAL SAVINGS

SIMPLE PAYBACK

HWP-1 7.5 $1,971 $90 $1,881 $70 26.9HWP-2 7.5 $1,971 $90 $1,881 $70 26.9

TOTAL Totals: $3,942 $180 $3,762 $140 26.9

MOTOR REPLACEMENT SUMMARY

Page 154: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 34 of 47

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $3,942NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $180

Net Installation Cost ($): $3,762Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $140Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $140

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 26.9Simple Lifetime ROI -44.3%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $2,096Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -7%Net Present Value (NPV) ($2,094.25)

ECM #7 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 155: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 35 of 47

ECM #8: Window Replacement Description: The majority of the facility envelope consists of double pane windows with aluminum frames. There is only small number of older windows with single pane glass and inefficient frames. The windows account for significant energy use through leakage heat loss and conductive heat loss. The age and condition of the windows contribute to the leakage rate of the building. The single pane construction allows higher thermal (conductive) energy loss. These factors lead to increased energy use in the heating season. The heating loss due to single pane glass is combined with heat loss due to poor seals at each operable window. New double pane windows with low E glazing offer a substantial improvement in thermal performance in the summer months. This ECM includes the replacement of all remaining older windows single pane glass in the facility with double pane windows with low emissivity glass. The proposed windows include reduced outside air leakage. In addition the double pane structure will significantly increase the insulation value compared to the existing single pane window structure. The basis for this ECM is Anderson Windows at $75 per SF of window installed. Below is a list of areas with older and inefficient windows:

ECM INPUTS NUMBER OF WINDOWS

SIZE AREA

OT/PT Room 11 3'x7' 231TOTAL 11 - 231

WINDOW REPLACEMENT SUMMARY

Energy Savings Calculations:

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=⎟⎟

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛2

23

FtCFM Windowof SFper on Infiltrati Estimated FtArea Window

Min.FtonInfiltrati

( )FDifferenceeTemperaturDesignMinFtonInfiltrati1.1

Hr.BtuLoadHeat

3

°×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×=⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

( )

MinFt400

CoolingTon 1MinFtonInfiltratiTonLoadCooling

3

3

⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛=

Page 156: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 36 of 47

( )( ) ( )

( ) ( )%EfficiencyHeatingTherms

BtuValueHeatFuelF65

0.60DayHr.24FDayHDD

Hr.BtuLoadHeat

ThermsEnergyLeakage Heating×⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×°

×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×°×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

=

( )( )

( )EEREfficiencyCooling kWh

W.h1000

Hours Cooling Load Full Hr.Ton Btu 12,000 TonLoad Cooling

kWhEnergyLeakage Cooling×

×⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×

=

( )( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( )%EfficiencyHeatingTherms

BtuValueHeatFuelF65

0.60DayHr.24FDayHDDFtAreaValueU

ThermsEnergyConductive

2

×⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×°

×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×°××−

=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

Therms$CostFuelAveThermsEnergyHeating TotalCostEnergy Heating

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWh$CostFuelAvekWhEnergy Cooling TotalCostEnergy Cooling

Page 157: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 37 of 47

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Description: Existing Single Pane Windows

Double Pane Low-E Windows

-

Window (SF) 231 231 -

U-Value (BTU/HR/SF*°F) 0.8 0.45 0.35Estimated Infiltration, CFM per SF Window

3 2 -

Total Infiltration, CFM 693 462 231Heating System Efficiency (%) 75% 75% -

Heating Degree Days (HDD) 4,599 4,599 -

Design Day Temp Diff (°F) 65 65 -

Heating Hrs Per Day (Hrs) 24 24 -

Full Load Cooling Hours 400 400 -

Average Cooling Efficiency, EER 9.0 9.0 -

Gas Cost ($/Therm) 1.25 1.25 -

Electric Cost ($/kWh) 0.162 0.162 -

Gas Heat Value (BTU/Therm) 100,000 100,000 -

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSHeat Load (BTU/Hr) 49,550 33,033 16,517Leakage Energy (Therms) 673 449 224Conductive Energy (Therms) 163 92 71

Total Heating Energy (Therms) 836 541 296

Cooling Load (Ton) 2 1 1

Cooling Demand (kW) 0.7 0.4 0.2

Total Cooling Energy (kWh) 924 616 308

Gas Energy Cost ($) $1,045 $676 $370

Electric Energy Cost ($) $150 $100 $50

Comments:

WINDOW REPLACEMENT CALCULATIONS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

1. Proposed window U-value Based on ASHRAE 90.1 - 2007

Estimated cost for replacing the inefficient windows at the Elementary School building is $17,325.

Page 158: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 38 of 47

Page 159: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 39 of 47

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $17,325NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $17,325Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $420

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $420Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 41.3Simple Lifetime ROI -63.7%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $6,294Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -11%Net Present Value (NPV) ($12,315.84)

ECM #8 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 160: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 40 of 47

ECM #9: Demand Controlled Ventilation Demand Controlled Ventilation (DCV) is a means to provide active, zone level control of ventilation for spaces within a facility. The basic premise behind DCV is monitoring indoor CO2 levels versus outdoor CO2 levels in order to provide proper ventilation to the spaces within the facility as well as saving costly dollars treating unconditioned ventilation air. Carbon dioxide ventilation control or demand controlled ventilation (DCV) allows for the measurement and control of outside air ventilation levels to a target cfm/person ventilation rate in the space (i.e., 15 cfm/person) based on the number of people in the space. It is a direct measure of ventilation effectiveness and is a method whereby buildings can regain active and automatic zone level ventilation control, without having to open windows. The fixed ventilation approach depends on a set-it-and-forget-it methodology that is completely unresponsive to changes in the way spaces are utilized/occupied or how equipment is maintained. A DCV system utilizes various control algorithms to maintain a base ventilation rate. The system monitors space CO2 levels and the algorithm automatically adjusts the outdoor and return air dampers to provide the quantity of outdoor air to maintain the required CO2 level in the space. System designs are normally designed for maximum occupancy and the ventilation rates are designed for this (maximum) occupancy. In areas where occupancy swings are prevalent there is ample opportunity to reduce outdoor air quantity to satisfy the needs of the actual number of occupants present. By installing the DCV controls, energy savings are realized by the reduced quantities of outdoor air that do not require heating and cooling energy from the steam and chilled water plants. Four (4) packaged rooftop units serving the library, computer lab and rooms #118, 120, 218 and 220 are standard air conditioning units with constant minimum outside air setup. When these units are on unoccupied mode, the outside air dampers shut. The outside air volume is typically based on the maximum occupancy of the space conditioned. When a given space is not fully occupied the outside air quantity delivered to the space is greater than the amount actually needed for adequate ventilation, which results in waste of heating or air conditioning energy. This ECM includes the installation integrated demand control ventilation systems with CO2 sensors, for the units mentioned above. This system allows the air handling unit to respond to changes in occupancy and therefore reduce the amount of outside air that has to be conditioned. Outside air accounts for a large portion of the energy consumption in the HVAC system, especially in high occupancy spaces. The U.S. Department of Energy sponsored a study to analyze energy savings achieved through various types of building system controls. The referenced savings is based on the “Advanced Sensors and Controls for Building Applications: Market Assessment and Potential R&D Pathways,” document posted for public use April 2005. The study has found that commercial buildings have the potential to achieve significant energy savings through the use of building controls. The average energy savings are as follows based on the report:

• Demand Control Ventilation - 10% - 15%.

Energy savings achieved through “Demand Control Ventilation” average 10%-15%. Savings resulting from the implementation of this ECM for energy management controls are estimated to be 15% of the total HVAC energy cost for this system.

Page 161: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 41 of 47

The components included to install for a demand control ventilation system include damper actuators (if not exist), Variable Frequency Drives (if not exist), CO2 sensors, wiring, Energy Management System equipment expansion and programming. Each occupied zone would require minimum one CO2 sensor installed to monitor occupancy levels.

IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY

INPUTS ServiceMin # of CO2

SENSORSHVAC

Unit

Cooling Capaity,

Tons

Heating Capacity,

MBHDCV-1 Computer Lab 1 RTU 4 120

DCV-2 Library 2 RTU 9 250

DCV-3 Room 118, 120 2 RTU 4 120

DCV-4 Room 218, 220 2 RTU 7.5 200*

Total 25 690* Estimated

Energy Savings Calculations:

( )

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×

=

WhBtuEER

kWhWh1000

Hrs.Cooling Load Full AnnualhrTon

Btu12,000TonsCoolingeEnergyUsag Cooling

( ) 5%1kwhEnergy CoolingSavingsEnergy ×=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWh$CostElectricAvekWhUsageEnergyCostCooling

( )( ) ( )

( ) ( )%EfficiencyHeatingTherms

BtuValueHeatFuelF65

0.60DayHr.24FDayHDD

Hr.BtuCapacity Heating

ThermsEnergy Heating×⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×°

×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×°×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

Therms$CostFuelAveThermsEnergyHeatingCost Heating

( ) 5%1ThermsEnergy HeatingSavingsEnergy ×=

Results of the energy savings calculations are summarized in the table below:

Page 162: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 42 of 47

ECM INPUTS DCV-1, 2, 3, 4Equipment 4 RTUsTotal Cooling Capacity, Tons 25Efficiency (EER) 9Annual Full Load Cooling Hours 800Total Heating Capacity, MBh 690Heating Efficiency (Gas) 75%Heating Degree Days (65°F) 4599Energy Savings 15.0%Elec Cost ($/kWh) $0.162Natural Gas Cost ($/Therm) $1.25

ECM RESULTS DCV-1, 2, 3, 4Cooling Energy Cnsmption, kWh 26,133 Heating Energy (Therms) 9,373Cooling Energy Savings kWh 3,920 Heating Energy Savings (Therms) 1,406Electric Energy Cost Savings ($) $635Total Gas Cost Savings ($) $1,758Total Cost Savings ($) $2,393COMMENTS: HDD estimated based on

Newark,NJ.

DEMAND CONTROLLED VENTILATION

ENERGY SAVINGS

Cost and Incentives: Estimated installed cost for demand controlled ventilation for the rooftop heating and air conditioning units serving the library, computer lab and the rooms #118, 120, 218 and 220 areas is $70,000. Estimated cost includes CO2 sensors, control wiring, electrical wiring, control system equipment expansion and programming. There are currently no Smart Start ® incentives available for a Demand Control Ventilation System.

Page 163: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 43 of 47

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $70,000NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $70,000Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $2,393Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $2,393

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 29.3

Simple Lifetime ROI -48.7%Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $35,888Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -7%Net Present Value (NPV) ($41,437.71)

ECM #9 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 164: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 44 of 47

ECM #10: Air Conditioning Unit Upgrades

Description:

Liberty Corner Elementary School is air conditioned by split system AC units and packaged rooftop units. The majority of the units at the elementary schools are in fair condition and they have surpassed the end of their useful life of 15 years, which is defined by ASHRAE. The units currently installed are inefficient compared to modern equipment and can be replaced with new high efficiency units. New air conditioners provide higher full load and part load efficiencies due to advances in inverter motor technologies, heat exchangers and refrigerants. This ECM includes one-for-one replacement of the older air conditioning units with new higher efficiency systems. It is recommended to fully evaluate the capacity needed for all new systems prior to moving forward with this ECM. A summary of the unit replacements for this ECM can be found in the table below:

ECM INPUTS SERVICE FORNUMBER OF UNITS

COOLING CAPACITY,

BTU/HR

TOTAL CAPACITY,

TONS

REPLACE UNIT WITH

RTU Computer Lab 1 48,000 4.0 Carrier 50XL-A

RTU Room 118, 120 1 48,000 4.0 Carrier 50XL-A

RTU Library 1 108,000 9.0 Trane YHC-120

RTU Room 218, 220 1 90,000 7.5 Trane YHC-92

Total 4 294,000 24.5

IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY

The manufacturers used as the basis for design are Carrier and Trane. All units are one for one style replacements with matching capacity of the new units to the old units. Energy Savings Calculations: Cooling Energy Savings: Seasonal energy consumption of the air conditioners at the cooling mode is calculated with the equation below:

Energy Savings, kWh Cooling Capacity,BTUHr

1SEERO

1SEERN

Operation Hours

1000 WkWh

Demand Savings, kW Energy Savings kWh

Hours of Cooling

Page 165: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 45 of 47

Cooling Cost Savings Energy Savings, kWh Cost of Electricity $

kWh

ECM INPUTS

COOLING CAPACITY,

BTU/Hr

ANNUAL COOLING

HOURS

EXISTING UNITS (S)EER

SPLIT UNITS (S)EER

# OF UNITS

ENERGY SAVINGS

kWh

DEMAND SAVINGS

kWRTU 48,000 1,200 9 EER 15 EER 1 2,560 2.1

RTU 48,000 1,200 9 EER 15 EER 1 2,560 2.1

RTU 108,000 1,200 9 EER 12.5 EER 1 4,032 3.4

RTU 90,000 1,200 9 EER 13 EER 1 3,692 3.1

Total 4 12,844 10.7

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

Project Cost, Incentives and Maintenance Savings From the NJ Smart Start® Program appendix, the replacement of split system AC units and unitary systems with high efficiency AC systems falls under the category “Unitary HVAC Split System” and warrants an incentive based on efficiency (EER/SEER). The program incentives are calculated as follows:

( )Incentive$/TonTonsCoolingIncentiveStartSmart ×=®

UNIT DESCRIPTION

UNIT EFFICIENCY

REBATE $/TON

PROPOSED CAPACITY

TONS

TOTAL REBATE

$≥ 5.4 to < 11.25

tons11.5 EER 73 16.5 $1,205

5.4 tons or less Unitary AC and

Split System≥14 SEER $92 8 $736

TOTAL 24.5 $1,941

SPLIT SYSTEM AC UNITS REBATE SUMMARY

Page 166: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 46 of 47

Summary of cost, savings and payback for this ECM is below.

ECM INPUTSINSTALLED

COST# OF

UNITSTOTAL COST REBATES

NET COST

ENERGY SAVING

PAY BACK YEARS

RTU $11,000 1 $11,000 $368 $10,632 $415 25.6

RTU $11,000 1 $11,000 $368 $10,632 $415 25.6

RTU $16,250 1 $16,250 $657 $15,593 $653 23.9

RTU $16,250 1 $16,250 $548 $15,703 $598 26.3

Total 54,500 4 $54,500 $1,941 $52,560 $2,081 25.3

COST & SAVINGS SUMMARY

There is no significant maintenance savings due to implementation of this ECM. Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $54,500NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $1,941Net Installation Cost ($): $52,560Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $2,081Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $2,081Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 25.3Simple Lifetime ROI -40.6%Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $31,212Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -6%Net Present Value (NPV) ($27,719.31)

ECM #10 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 167: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Liberty Corner Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 47 of 47

V. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations include no cost/low cost measures, Operation & Maintenance (O&M) items, and water conservation measures with attractive paybacks. These measures are not eligible for the Smart Start Buildings incentives from the office of Clean Energy but save energy none the less.

A. Chemically clean the condenser and evaporator coils periodically to optimize efficiency. Poorly maintained heat transfer surfaces can reduce efficiency 5-10%.

B. Maintain all weather stripping on windows and doors.

C. Clean all light fixtures to maximize light output to avoid use of task lighting.

D. Provide more frequent air filter changes to decrease overall system power usage and maintain better IAQ.

E. Turn off computers when not in use. Ensure computers are not running in screen saver mode which saves the monitor screen not energy.

F. Ensure outside air dampers are functioning properly and only open during occupied mode.

It was noted at the site survey that the HVAC systems in several rooms were not controlling temperature correctly. The result of the controls issues causes space temperatures to become uncomfortable and drastic measures such as opening windows on extremely cold days. This type of issue requires a whole system controls evaluation for the building to determine where control problems are taking place. Based on information provided by the operations personnel, there are several control systems within the building which operate different section or systems throughout the building. In addition, multiple control vendors are utilized to maintain the control systems. The use of multiple control systems and control vendors to support the systems will very likely cause issues with the overall function of the building. The systems and controls throughout the district represent a large potential “energy leak” throughout the building. It is recommended to quantify the control system points and verify their proper operation through Retro-Commissioning. Retro-Commissioning allows facility owners to re-establish the operation of the HVAC systems back to the original specifications. A third party evaluation is highly recommended to review the controls of the systems and provide insight into the corrections needed. It is also recommended to consider the renovation of all control systems into one central control system to avoid the overlap and communication gap when utilizing multiple control systems. This renovation should be consistent across all facility throughout Bernards Public Schools to maximize the benefit of central controls.

Page 168: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX A1 of 1

LIFETIME ENERGY SAVINGS

LIFETIME MAINTENANCE

SAVINGSLIFETIME ROI SIMPLE PAYBACK INTERNAL RATE OF

RETURN (IRR)NET PRESENT VALUE

(NPV)

MATERIAL LABOR REBATES, INCENTIVES

NET INSTALLATION

COSTENERGY MAINT. / SREC TOTAL (Yearly Saving * ECM Lifetime)

(Yearly Maint Svaing * ECM Lifetime)

(Lifetime Savings - Net Cost) / (Net Cost) (Net cost / Yearly Savings)

($) ($) ($) ($) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) (Yr) ($) ($) (%) (Yr) ($) ($)

ECM #1 Lighting upgrade: Interior and exterior $10,356 $15,533 $50 $25,839 $6,487 $44 $6,531 15 $97,963 $655 279.1% 4.0 24.31% $52,126.24

ECM #2 Lighting upgrade: Gymnasium $2,688 $4,032 $2,800 $3,920 $2,701 $0 $2,701 15 $40,511 $0 933.4% 1.5 68.87% $28,321.19

ECM #3 Lighting controls $5,700 $8,550 $1,710 $12,540 $4,241 $0 $4,241 15 $63,621 $0 407.3% 3.0 33.37% $38,093.63

ECM #4 CRT Monitor Replacement $11,200 $0 $0 $11,200 $2,286 $0 $2,286 15 $34,290 $0 206.2% 4.9 18.89% $16,090.12

ECM #5 Variable flow kitchen hood $19,000 $0 $0 $19,000 $663 $0 $663 15 $9,945 $0 -47.7% 28.7 -7.18% ($11,085.15)

ECM #6 Condensing Boiler Installation $162,000 $288,000 $10,625 $439,375 $7,071 $0 $7,071 30 $212,127 $0 -51.7% 62.1 -4.17% ($300,782.20)

ECM #7 Nema Premium Efficiency Motors $3,942 $0 $180 $3,762 $140 $0 $140 15 $2,096 $0 -44.3% 26.9 -6.56% ($2,094.25)

ECM #8 Windows replacement $17,325 $0 $0 $17,325 $420 $0 $420 15 $6,294 $0 -63.7% 41.3 -10.61% ($12,315.84)

ECM #9 Demand Ventilation (Library, Computer Lab, Rrooms 118,120, 218,220) $70,000 $0 $0 $70,000 $2,393 $0 $2,393 15 $35,888 $0 -48.7% 29.3 -7.38% ($41,437.71)

ECM #10 AC Unit Upgrades $36,500 $18,000 $1,941 $52,560 $2,081 $0 $2,081 15 $31,212 $0 -40.6% 25.3 -5.90% ($27,719.31)

REM #1 kW Solar Photovoltaic System $1,066,050 $0 $0 $1,066,050 $22,129 $47,809 $69,937 25 $1,748,429 $1,195,215 64.0% 15.2 4.23% $151,775.96

Notes: 1) The variable Cn in the formulas for Internal Rate of Return and Net Present Value stands for the cash flow during each period.2) The variable DR in the NPV equation stands for Discount Rate3) For NPV and IRR calculations: From n=0 to N periods where N is the lifetime of ECM and Cn is the cash flow during each period .

REM RENEWABLE ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY

ECM COST & SAVINGS BREAKDOWNCONCORD ENGINEERING GROUP

Liberty Corner School

INSTALLATION COST YEARLY SAVINGSECM

LIFETIMEDESCRIPTIONECM NO.

ECM ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 169: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 1 of 4

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 520 BURNT MILL ROAD VOORHEES, NEW JERSEY 08043 PHONE: (856) 427-0200 FAX: (856) 427-6508

SmartStart Building Incentives The NJ SmartStart Buildings Program offers financial incentives on a wide variety of building system equipment. The incentives were developed to help offset the initial cost of energy-efficient equipment. The following tables show the current available incentives as of February 15, 2011:

Electric Chillers Water-Cooled Chillers $12 - $170 per ton

Air-Cooled Chillers $8 - $52 per ton Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Gas Cooling Gas Absorption Chillers $185 - $400 per ton

Gas Engine-Driven Chillers Calculated through custom measure path)

Desiccant Systems $1.00 per cfm – gas or electric

Electric Unitary HVAC Unitary AC and Split Systems $73 - $92 per ton

Air-to-Air Heat Pumps $73 - $92 per ton Water-Source Heat Pumps $81 per ton

Packaged Terminal AC & HP $65 per ton Central DX AC Systems $40- $72 per ton

Dual Enthalpy Economizer Controls $250 Occupancy Controlled Thermostat

(Hospitality & Institutional Facility) $75 per thermostat

Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Gas Heating Gas Fired Boilers < 300 MBH $300 per unit

Gas Fired Boilers ≥ 300 - 1500 MBH $1.75 per MBH

Gas Fired Boilers ≥1500 - ≤ 4000 MBH $1.00 per MBH

Gas Fired Boilers > 4000 MBH (Calculated through Custom Measure Path)

Gas Furnaces $300 - $400 per unit, AFUE ≥ 92%

Page 170: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 2 of 4

Ground Source Heat Pumps

Closed Loop $450 per ton, EER ≥ 16 $600 per ton, EER ≥ 18 $750 per ton, EER ≥ 20

Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Variable Frequency Drives Variable Air Volume $65 - $155 per hp Chilled-Water Pumps $60 per VFD rated hp

Compressors $5,250 to $12,500 per drive Cooling Towers ≥ 10 hp $60 per VFD rated hp

Natural Gas Water Heating

Gas Water Heaters ≤ 50 gallons, 0.67 energy factor or better $50 per unit

Gas-Fired Water Heaters > 50 gallons $1.00 - $2.00 per MBH Gas-Fired Booster Water Heaters $17 - $35 per MBH Gas Fired Tankless Water Heaters $300 per unit

Prescriptive Lighting Retro fit of T12 to T-5 or T-8 Lamps

w/Electronic Ballast in Existing Facilities

$10 per fixture (1-4 lamps)

Replacement of T12 with new T-5 or T-8 Lamps w/Electronic Ballast in

Existing Facilities $25 per fixture (1-4 lamps)

Replacement of incandescent with screw-in PAR 38 or PAR 30 (CFL)

bulb $7 per bulb

T-8 reduced Wattage (28w/25w 4’, 1-4 lamps)

Lamp & ballast replacement $10 per fixture

Hard-Wired Compact Fluorescent $25 - $30 per fixture

Metal Halide w/Pulse Start Including Parking Lot $25 per fixture

T-5 and T-8 High Bay Fixtures $16 - $200 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Retrofit with induction lamp, power coupler and generator

(must be 30% less watts/fixture than HID system)

$50 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Replacement with new HID ≥ 100w $70 per fixture

Page 171: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 3 of 4

Prescriptive Lighting - LED

LED New Exit Sign Fixture Existing Facility < 75 kw Existing Facility > 75 kw

$20 per fixture $10 per fixture

LED Display Case Lighting $30 per display case

LED Shelf-Mtd. Display & Task Lights $15 per linear foot

LED Portable Desk Lamp $20 per fixture

LED Wall-wash Lights $30 per fixture

LED Recessed Down Lights $35 per fixture LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Area

and Roadway Luminaries $175 per fixture

LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Decorative Luminaries $175 per fixture

LED Outdoor Wall-Mounted Area Luminaries $100 per fixture

LED Parking Garage Luminaries $100 per fixture

LED Track or Mono-Point Directional Lighting Fixtures $50 per fixture

LED High-Bay and Low-Bay Fixtures for Commercial & Industrial Bldgs. $150 per fixture

LED High-Bay-Aisle Lighting $150 per fixture

LED Bollard Fixtures $50 per fixture

LED Linear Panels (2x2 Troffers only) $100 per fixture

LED Fuel Pump Canopy $100 per fixture

LED Refrigerator/Freezer case lighting replacement of fluorescent in medium

and low temperature display case

$42 per 5 foot $65 per 6 foot

Page 172: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 4 of 4

Lighting Controls – Occupancy Sensors

Wall Mounted $20 per control Remote Mounted $35 per control

Daylight Dimmers $25 per fixture Occupancy Controlled hi-low

Fluorescent Controls $25 per fixture controlled

Lighting Controls – HID or Fluorescent Hi-Bay Controls Occupancy hi-low $75 per fixture controlled Daylight Dimming $75 per fixture controlled

Daylight Dimming - office $50 per fixture controlled

Premium Motors Three-Phase Motors $45 - $700 per motor

Fractional HP Motors Electronic Communicated Motors (replacing shaded pole motors in

refrigerator/freezer cases)

$40 per electronic communicated motor

Other Equipment Incentives

Performance Lighting

$1.00 per watt per SF below program incentive threshold, currently 5% more energy efficient than ASHRAE 90.1-

2007 for New Construction and Complete Renovation

Custom Electric and Gas Equipment Incentives not prescriptive

Custom Measures

$0.16 KWh and $1.60/Therm of 1st year savings, or a buy down to a 1 year

payback on estimated savings. Minimum required savings of 75,000 KWh or 1,500 Therms and a IRR of at

least 10%. Multi Measures Bonus 15%

Page 173: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

OMB No. 2060-0347

STATEMENT OF ENERGY PERFORMANCEBT Liberty Corner Elementary School

Building ID: 2490933 For 12-month Period Ending: October 31, 20101

Date SEP becomes ineligible: N/A Date SEP Generated: March 04, 2011

FacilityBT Liberty Corner Elementary School61 Church StreetLiberty Corner, NJ 07938

Facility OwnerBernards Public Schools101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Primary Contact for this FacilityConnie Coriell101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Year Built: 1925Gross Floor Area (ft2): 82,840

Energy Performance Rating2 (1-100) 73

Site Energy Use Summary3

Electricity - Grid Purchase(kBtu) 1,899,082 Natural Gas (kBtu)4 3,612,900 Total Energy (kBtu) 5,511,982

Energy Intensity5 Site (kBtu/ft2/yr) 67 Source (kBtu/ft2/yr) 122 Emissions (based on site energy use) Greenhouse Gas Emissions (MtCO2e/year) N/A Electric Distribution Utility N/A National Average Comparison National Average Site EUI 83 National Average Source EUI 153 % Difference from National Average Source EUI -20% Building Type K-12

School

Stamp of Certifying Professional

Based on the conditions observed at thetime of my visit to this building, I certify that

the information contained within thisstatement is accurate.

Meets Industry Standards6 for Indoor EnvironmentalConditions:Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality N/A Acceptable Thermal Environmental Conditions N/A Adequate Illumination N/A

Certifying ProfessionalMichael Fischette520 S. Burnt Mill Road Voorhees, NJ 08043

Notes: 1. Application for the ENERGY STAR must be submitted to EPA within 4 months of the Period Ending date. Award of the ENERGY STAR is not final until approval is received from EPA.2. The EPA Energy Performance Rating is based on total source energy. A rating of 75 is the minimum to be eligible for the ENERGY STAR.3. Values represent energy consumption, annualized to a 12-month period.4. Natural Gas values in units of volume (e.g. cubic feet) are converted to kBtu with adjustments made for elevation based on Facility zip code.5. Values represent energy intensity, annualized to a 12-month period.6. Based on Meeting ASHRAE Standard 62 for ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality, ASHRAE Standard 55 for thermal comfort, and IESNA Lighting Handbook for lighting quality.

The government estimates the average time needed to fill out this form is 6 hours (includes the time for entering energy data, Licensed Professional facility inspection, and notarizing the SEP) andwelcomes suggestions for reducing this level of effort. Send comments (referencing OMB control number) to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S., EPA (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,NW, Washington, D.C. 20460.

EPA Form 5900-16

Appendix CPage 1 of 7

Page 174: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

ENERGY STAR®

Data Checklistfor Commercial Buildings

In order for a building to qualify for the ENERGY STAR, a Professional Engineer (PE) or a Registered Architect (RA) must validate the accuracy of the data underlyingthe building's energy performance rating. This checklist is designed to provide an at-a-glance summary of a property's physical and operating characteristics, as well asits total energy consumption, to assist the PE or RA in double-checking the information that the building owner or operator has entered into Portfolio Manager.

Please complete and sign this checklist and include it with the stamped, signed Statement of Energy Performance.NOTE: You must check each box to indicate that each value is correct, OR include a note.

CRITERION VALUE AS ENTERED INPORTFOLIO MANAGER VERIFICATION QUESTIONS NOTES

Building Name BT Liberty Corner

Elementary School Is this the official building name to be displayed inthe ENERGY STAR Registry of LabeledBuildings?

Type K-12 School Is this an accurate description of the space inquestion?

Location 61 Church Street, Liberty

Corner, NJ 07938 Is this address accurate and complete? Correctweather normalization requires an accurate zipcode.

Single Structure Single Facility

Does this SEP represent a single structure? SEPscannot be submitted for multiple-buildingcampuses (with the exception of acute care orchildren's hospitals) nor can they be submitted asrepresenting only a portion of a building

BT Liberty Corner Elementary School (K-12 School)

CRITERION VALUE AS ENTERED INPORTFOLIO MANAGER VERIFICATION QUESTIONS NOTES

Gross Floor Area 82,840 Sq. Ft.

Does this square footage include all supportingfunctions such as kitchens and break rooms usedby staff, storage areas, administrative areas,elevators, stairwells, atria, vent shafts, etc. Alsonote that existing atriums should only include thebase floor area that it occupies. Interstitial(plenum) space between floors should not beincluded in the total. Finally gross floor area is notthe same as leasable space. Leasable space is asubset of gross floor area.

Open Weekends? Yes

Is this building normally open at all on theweekends? This includes activities beyond thework conducted by maintenance, cleaning, andsecurity personnel. Weekend activity could includeany time when the space is used for classes,performances or other school or communityactivities. If the building is open on the weekend aspart of the standard schedule during one or moreseasons, the building should select ?yes? for openweekends. The ?yes? response should applywhether the building is open for one or both of theweekend days.

Number of PCs 243 Is this the number of personal computers in theK12 School?

Number of walk-inrefrigeration/freezer

units 1

Is this the total number of commercial walk-in typefreezers and coolers? These units are typicallyfound in storage and receiving areas.

Presence ofcooking facilities Yes

Does this school have a dedicated space in whichfood is prepared and served to students? If theschool has space in which food for students is onlykept warm and/or served to students, or has only agalley that is used by teachers and staff then theanswer is "no".

Percent Cooled 40 % Is this the percentage of the total floor space withinthe facility that is served by mechanical coolingequipment?

Percent Heated 100 % Is this the percentage of the total floor space withinthe facility that is served by mechanical heatingequipment?

Months 12(Optional) Is this school in operation for at least 8 months ofthe year?

Page 1 of 4

Appendix CPage 2 of 7

Page 175: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

High School? No

Is this building a high school (teaching grades 10,11, and/or 12)? If the building teaches to highschool students at all, the user should check 'yes'to 'high school'. For example, if the school teachesto grades K-12 (elementary/middle and highschool), the user should check 'yes' to 'highschool'.

Page 2 of 4

Appendix CPage 3 of 7

Page 176: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

ENERGY STAR®

Data Checklistfor Commercial Buildings

Energy ConsumptionPower Generation Plant or Distribution Utility:

Fuel Type: Electricity

Meter: Electricity (kWh (thousand Watt-hours))Space(s): Entire Facility

Generation Method: Grid Purchase

Start Date End Date Energy Use (kWh (thousand Watt-hours))

10/01/2010 10/31/2010 50,846.00

09/01/2010 09/30/2010 42,360.00

08/01/2010 08/31/2010 49,934.00

07/01/2010 07/31/2010 37,757.00

06/01/2010 06/30/2010 52,294.00

05/01/2010 05/31/2010 45,535.00

04/01/2010 04/30/2010 44,299.00

03/01/2010 03/31/2010 52,601.00

02/01/2010 02/28/2010 42,027.00

01/01/2010 01/31/2010 48,786.00

12/01/2009 12/31/2009 44,576.00

11/01/2009 11/30/2009 45,574.00

Electricity Consumption (kWh (thousand Watt-hours)) 556,589.00

Electricity Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 1,899,081.67

Total Electricity (Grid Purchase) Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 1,899,081.67

Is this the total Electricity (Grid Purchase) consumption at this building including allElectricity meters?

Fuel Type: Natural Gas

Meter: Natural Gas (therms)Space(s): Entire Facility

Start Date End Date Energy Use (therms)

10/01/2010 10/31/2010 2,507.00

09/01/2010 09/30/2010 220.00

08/01/2010 08/31/2010 92.00

07/01/2010 07/31/2010 115.00

06/01/2010 06/30/2010 228.00

05/01/2010 05/31/2010 487.00

04/01/2010 04/30/2010 2,158.00

03/01/2010 03/31/2010 5,023.00

02/01/2010 02/28/2010 6,385.00

01/01/2010 01/31/2010 7,754.00

Page 3 of 4

Appendix CPage 4 of 7

Page 177: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

12/01/2009 12/31/2009 6,815.00

11/01/2009 11/30/2009 4,345.00

Natural Gas Consumption (therms) 36,129.00

Natural Gas Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 3,612,900.00

Total Natural Gas Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 3,612,900.00

Is this the total Natural Gas consumption at this building including all Natural Gas meters?

Additional FuelsDo the fuel consumption totals shown above represent the total energy use of this building?Please confirm there are no additional fuels (district energy, generator fuel oil) used in this facility.

On-Site Solar and Wind EnergyDo the fuel consumption totals shown above include all on-site solar and/or wind power located atyour facility? Please confirm that no on-site solar or wind installations have been omitted from thislist. All on-site systems must be reported.

Certifying Professional (When applying for the ENERGY STAR, the Certifying Professional must be the same PE or RA that signed and stamped the SEP.)

Name: _____________________________________________ Date: _____________

Signature: ______________________________________ Signature is required when applying for the ENERGY STAR.

Page 4 of 4

Appendix CPage 5 of 7

Page 178: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

FOR YOUR RECORDS ONLY. DO NOT SUBMIT TO EPA.

Please keep this Facility Summary for your own records; do not submit it to EPA. Only the Statement of Energy Performance(SEP), Data Checklist and Letter of Agreement need to be submitted to EPA when applying for the ENERGY STAR.

FacilityBT Liberty Corner Elementary School61 Church StreetLiberty Corner, NJ 07938

Facility OwnerBernards Public Schools101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Primary Contact for this FacilityConnie Coriell101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

General InformationBT Liberty Corner Elementary School

Gross Floor Area Excluding Parking: (ft2) 82,840 Year Built 1925 For 12-month Evaluation Period Ending Date: October 31, 2010

Facility Space Use SummaryBT Liberty Corner Elementary School

Space Type K-12 School

Gross Floor Area(ft2) 82,840

Open Weekends? Yes

Number of PCs 243

Number of walk-in refrigeration/freezerunits 1

Presence of cooking facilities Yes

Percent Cooled 40

Percent Heated 100

Monthso 12

High School? No

School Districtod N/A

Energy Performance ComparisonEvaluation Periods Comparisons

Performance Metrics Current(Ending Date 10/31/2010)

Baseline(Ending Date 07/31/2010) Rating of 75 Target National Average

Energy Performance Rating 73 75 75 N/A 50

Energy Intensity

Site (kBtu/ft2) 67 66 65 N/A 83

Source (kBtu/ft2) 122 118 120 N/A 153

Energy Cost

$/year $ 123,352.55 $ 121,118.37 $ 120,720.14 N/A $ 154,385.34

$/ft2/year $ 1.49 $ 1.46 $ 1.46 N/A $ 1.86

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

MtCO2e/year N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

kgCO2e/ft2/year N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

More than 50% of your building is defined as K-12 School. Please note that your rating accounts for all of the spaces listed. The National Average column presentsenergy performance data your building would have if your building had an average rating of 50. Notes:o - This attribute is optional.d - A default value has been supplied by Portfolio Manager.

Appendix CPage 6 of 7

Page 179: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

2010BT Liberty Corner Elementary School61 Church StreetLiberty Corner, NJ 07938

Portfolio Manager Building ID: 2490933

The energy use of this building has been measured and compared to other similar buildings using theEnvironmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Energy Performance Scale of 1–100, with 1 being the least energyefficient and 100 the most energy efficient. For more information, visit energystar.gov/benchmark.

This building’sscore

73

100

Most Efficient

This building uses 122 kBtu per square foot per year.*

*Based on source energy intensity for the 12 month period ending October 2010

Date of certification

Date Generated: 03/04/2011

Statement ofEnergy Performance

1

Least Efficient

50

Average

Buildings with a score of75 or higher may qualifyfor EPA’s ENERGY STAR.

I certify that the information contained within this statement is accurate and in accordance with U.S.Environmental Protection Agency’s measurement standards, found at energystar.gov

Appendix CPage 7 of 7

Page 180: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 1 of 9

BoilersTag Boiler-1 & 2 Boiler 3

Unit Type Sectional cast iron Sectional cast iron

Qty 2 1

Location Boiler room - Old Section

Boiler room - New section

Area Served 1905 and 1979 sections New (1995) section

Manufacturer Weil McLain Weil McLain

Model # 1288 588

Serial # CP12170402, CP4944631 CP21874582

Input Capacity (MBH) 3,750 1,357

Rated Output Capacity (MBH) 3,000 1,084

Approx. Efficiency % 80% 80%

Fuel Natural Gas Natural Gas

Burner Make & Model Power FlameCR3-GO-20

WebsterB1G 03 RM7840L M20

Max / Min Firing Rate Turndown Ration

3753 / 900 MBH4.2

1357 / 388 MBH3.5

Approx Age 6 16

ASHRAE Service Life 30 30

Remaining Life 24 14

CommentsBoiler in good condition Boiler in good condition

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Liberty Corner School

Page 181: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 2 of 9

Domestic Water HeatersTag HWH-1 HWH-2

Unit Type Tank type Tank type

Qty 1 1

Location Boiler room - Old Section

Boiler room: New Section

Area Served Old section bathrooms faucets

New section bathroom faucets

Manufacturer Bradfort White A.O. Smith

Model # D100L3003N BT 139 880

Serial # ZJ3713035 MF95 0441034-880

Size (Gallons) 100 86

Input Capacity (MBH/KW)

300 MBH 140 MBH

Recovery (Gal/Hr) 290.3 127.3

Efficiency % 80% 80%

Fuel Natural Gas Natural Gas

Approx Age 5 16

ASHRAE Service Life 12 12

Remaining Life 7 (4)

CommentsStandard efficiency hot water heater.Heater in good condition

Unit equipped with external burner made by Economite. Overall unit appears to be in

fair condition.

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Liberty Corner School

Page 182: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 3 of 9

PumpsTag HWP-1 & 2 HWP 3 HWP 4 & 5

Unit Type Floor Mounted End suction Pipe mounted in line Pipe mounted in line

Qty 2 1 2

Location Boiler room - Old Section

Boiler room - Old Section

Boiler room - New section

Area Served Unit ventilators, baseboard radiators

Unit ventilators, baseboard radiators

Air handling units, hot water radiators

Manufacturer Bell Gossett Bell Gossett Taco

Model # 1510 38T H40 -

Serial # CS8939 - 02, 1140 105133 -

Horse Power 7.5 1 1.5

Flow - - -

Motor Info Marathon Electric - Baldor

Electrical Power 460 / 3/ 60 460 / 3/ 60 460 / 3/ 60

RPM 1760 1725 1725

Motor Efficiency % 88.5% - -

Approx Age 6 6 3

ASHRAE Service Life 20 15 15

Remaining Life 14 9 12

Comments

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Liberty Corner School

Page 183: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 4 of 9

PumpsTag

Unit Type Pipe mounted Domestic Hot Water Circulators

Qty 4

Location Boiler rooms, old and new

Area Served Bathrooms faucets, kitchen

Manufacturer Bell Gossett

Model # -

Serial # -

Horse Power Fractional

Flow -

Motor Info -

Electrical Power -

RPM 1800

Motor Efficiency % -

Approx Age 5

ASHRAE Service Life 15

Remaining Life 10

Comments Circulators are in good condition

Page 184: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 5 of 9

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU RTU RTU

Unit Type Packaged rooftop Packaged rooftop Packaged rooftop

Qty 2 1 1

LocationNew section roof

and lower roof near room 118

New section roof New section roof

Area Served #1: Computer Lab#2: Room 118, 120 Library Room 218, 220

Manufacturer Trane Trane Trane

Model # YCD049C3HOBC YCD103B3HFDB TYCD091D3HFBC

Serial # N/A J4B1010240 J4910D1720

Cooling Type Packaged DX Packaged DX Packaged DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 4 9 7.5

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

9 EER (Est) 9 EER 9 EER

Heating Type Natural Gas Furnace Natural Gas Furnace Natural Gas Furnace

Heating Input (MBH) 120 250 N/A

Efficiency 81% 81% 81%

Fuel Natural Gas Natural Gas Natural Gas

Approx Age 16 16 16

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life (1) (1) (1)

Comments Units in good condition Unit in good condition Unit in good condition

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Liberty Corner School

Page 185: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 6 of 9

Split AC UnitsTag AHU #1 AH #2

Unit Type Split AC unit Split AC unit

Qty 1 1

Location New section mechanical room

New section mechanical room

Area Served Admin offices, nurses office

Hallways and music room

Manufacturer Trane Trane

Model # TWE180B300BC -

Serial # J45179073 -

Cooling Type DX DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 15 5

Supply Flow, CFM 6,000 (Est) 2000 (Est)

Heating Type / Input Hot Water Coil / - Hot Water Coil / -

Ecomonizer 100% Outside air 100% Outside air

Supply Motor HP 3 1 (Est)

Supply Motor Efficiency Standard Standard

Volts / Phase 208 / 3 208 / 3

Approx. Age 16 16

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15

Comments

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Liberty Corner School

Page 186: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 7 of 9

Condensing UnitsTag CU #1 CU #2

Qty 1 1

Unit Served AHU #1 AHU #2

Location Roof Roof

Manufacturer Trane Trane

Model # TTA180B300BA TTP060C100A1

Serial # J50198336 J50286018

Cooling Capacity 15 Ton 5 Ton

Cooling Eff., EER 10.3 EER 9.7 EER

Refrigerant R22 R22

Volts / Phase / Amps 208 / 3 208 / 3

Approx Age 16 16

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15

Remaining Life (1) (1)

Comments - -

Page 187: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix D

Unit Ventilators

Tag UV

Unit Type Heating and Cooling

Qty 40 (Est)

Location Classrooms, cafeteria

Manufacturer ITT Nesbitt

Model # -

Serial # -

Flow Capacity -

Cooling Type None

Cooling Capacity (Tons) -

Estimated Cooling Efficiency (EER)

-

Heating Type Hot Water Coil

Heating Input (MBH) -

Approx Age 30

Ashrae Service Life 15

Remaining Life (15)

Comments -

-

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Liberty Corner School

8 of 9

Page 188: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix D

Heating and Ventilation Units

Tag HV

Unit Type Heating and Ventilation

Qty 2

Location Gym

Area Served Gym

Manufacturer ITT Nesbitt

Model # -

Serial # -

Fan HP 2

Cooling Type None

Heating Type Hot Water Coil

Heating Input (MBH) -

Efficiency -

Approx Age 15

Ashrae Service Life 15

Remaining Life 0

Comments -

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Liberty Corner School

9 of 9

Page 189: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E-11 of 14

CEG Job #: 9C10088

Project: Liberty Corner School KWH COST: $0.162

61 Church Street

Liberty Corner, NJ 07938Bldg. Sq. Ft.

ECM #1 & 2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.21 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $235.03 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $189.54 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.49 2.77

137.21 2600 3 3

2x2, 3 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

105 0.32 819.0 $132.68 3 3 2x2, 3 Lamp, 14w T5, Indirect; Fixture 44 0.13 343.2 $55.60 $215.00 $645.00 0.18 475.8 $77.08 8.37

222.21 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $235.03 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $189.54 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.49 2.77

137.21 2600 3 3

2x2, 3 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

105 0.32 819.0 $132.68 3 3 2x2, 3 Lamp, 14w T5, Indirect; Fixture 44 0.13 343.2 $55.60 $215.00 $645.00 0.18 475.8 $77.08 8.37

222.21 2600 24 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 1.49 3,868.8 $626.75 24 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.20 3120 $505.44 $14.00 $336.00 0.29 748.8 $121.31 2.77

222.22 2600 5 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.29 754.0 $122.15 5 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.25 650 $105.30 $14.00 $70.00 0.04 104 $16.85 4.15

137.21 Library Office 2600 2 3

2x2, 3 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

105 0.21 546.0 $88.45 2 3 2x2, 3 Lamp, 14w T5, Indirect; Fixture 44 0.09 228.8 $37.07 $215.00 $430.00 0.12 317.2 $51.39 8.37

222.21 Server Room 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $52.23 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $42.12 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $10.11 2.77

200 Restroom Library 2600 1 21x2, 1 Lamp, 17w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.03 88.4 $14.32 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.22 Classroom 214 2600 12 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 1.25 3,244.8 $525.66 12 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 86 1.03 2683.2 $434.68 $28.00 $336.00 0.22 561.6 $90.98 3.69

222.11 Classroom 213 2600 15 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.93 2,418.0 $391.72 15 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.75 1950 $315.90 $14.00 $210.00 0.18 468 $75.82 2.77

227.11 Restroom 213 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.38 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $20.64 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.74 3.56

222.31 Mech Room 214 1200 6 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.35 417.6 $67.65 6 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.30 360 $58.32 $14.00 $84.00 0.05 57.6 $9.33 9.00

Liberty Corner School

82,240

Classroom 220

Classroom 218

Library

Page 190: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E-12 of 14

221.31 Classroom 211 2600 9 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.56 1,450.8 $235.03 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $189.54 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.49 2.77

221.31 Classroom 212 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

221.31 Classroom 210 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

221.31 Classroom 208 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

221.31 CST 206 2600 5 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.31 806.0 $130.57 5 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.25 650 $105.30 $14.00 $70.00 0.06 156 $25.27 2.77

221.31 Classroom 204 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

221.31 Classroom 205 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

227.11 Boys Restroom 2600 2 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.13 338.0 $54.76 2 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.10 254.8 $41.28 $24.00 $48.00 0.03 83.2 $13.48 3.56

221.45 Mens Restroom 2600 1 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Indirect 58 0.06 150.8 $24.43 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 130 $21.06 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 20.8 $3.37 4.15

227.11 Girls Restroom 2600 2 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.13 338.0 $54.76 2 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.10 254.8 $41.28 $24.00 $48.00 0.03 83.2 $13.48 3.56

221.45 Womens Restroom 2600 1 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Indirect 58 0.06 150.8 $24.43 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 130 $21.06 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 20.8 $3.37 4.15

222.41 Custodial Closet 1200 1 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.06 69.6 $11.28 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 60 $9.72 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 9.6 $1.56 9.00

221.31 Classroom 207 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

221.31 Classroom 209 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

222.11 Stairwell 4400 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.25 1,091.2 $176.77 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 880 $142.56 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 211.2 $34.21 1.64

222.21 Classroom 203 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

Page 191: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E-13 of 14

222.21 Classroom 200A 2600 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $104.46 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $84.24 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $20.22 2.77

222.21 Classroom 200 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

242.11 Classroom 201 2600 9 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

107 0.96 2,503.8 $405.62 9 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.88 2293.2 $371.50 $28.00 $252.00 0.08 210.6 $34.12 7.39

221.11 Office 200B 2600 4 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.25 644.8 $104.46 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $84.24 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $20.22 2.77

222.11 Classroom 202 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.56 1,450.8 $235.03 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $189.54 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.49 2.77

227.11 Stairwell 4400 3 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.20 858.0 $139.00 3 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.15 646.8 $104.78 $24.00 $72.00 0.05 211.2 $34.21 2.10

211.34 Boiler Room 4400 5 11x4, 1 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

30 0.15 660.0 $106.92 5 1 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 25 0.13 550 $89.10 $7.00 $35.00 0.03 110 $17.82 1.96

222.21 Classroom 100 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

222.21 Classroom 101 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $235.03 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $189.54 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.49 2.77

222.21 Teacher's Lounge 2600 6 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.37 967.2 $156.69 6 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.30 780 $126.36 $14.00 $84.00 0.07 187.2 $30.33 2.77

222.21 Classroom 102 2600 8 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.50 1,289.6 $208.92 8 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.40 1040 $168.48 $14.00 $112.00 0.10 249.6 $40.44 2.77

237.21 Restroom 102 2600 1 32x2, 3 Lamp, 31w T8 Ulamp,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

92 0.09 239.2 $38.75 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Classroom 103 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

221.11 Office 103A 2600 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.12 322.4 $52.23 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $42.12 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $10.11 2.77

242.15 Cafeteria 2600 25 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

107 2.68 6,955.0 $1,126.71 25 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 2.45 6370 $1,031.94 $28.00 $700.00 0.23 585 $94.77 7.39

221.11 Kitchen 2600 14 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.87 2,256.8 $365.60 14 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.70 1820 $294.84 $14.00 $196.00 0.17 436.8 $70.76 2.77

617 Kitchen Hood 2600 3 1 Hood Light w/Globe & Cage, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.08 202.8 $32.85 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Page 192: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E-14 of 14

242.15 Copy Room 2600 1 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

107 0.11 278.2 $45.07 1 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.10 254.8 $41.28 $28.00 $28.00 0.01 23.4 $3.79 7.39

221.11 Switch Gear 2600 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 161.2 $26.11 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 130 $21.06 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 31.2 $5.05 2.77

221.11 Storage/ Server Room 2600 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.06 161.2 $26.11 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 130 $21.06 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 31.2 $5.05 2.77

227.21 Girls Restroom 2600 3 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.20 507.0 $82.13 3 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.15 382.2 $61.92 $24.00 $72.00 0.05 124.8 $20.22 3.56

221.45 Womens Restroom 2600 1 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Indirect 58 0.06 150.8 $24.43 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 130 $21.06 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 20.8 $3.37 4.15

221.45 Mens Restroom 2600 1 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Indirect 58 0.06 150.8 $24.43 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 130 $21.06 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 20.8 $3.37 4.15

227.21 Boys Restroom 2600 2 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.13 338.0 $54.76 2 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.10 254.8 $41.28 $24.00 $48.00 0.03 83.2 $13.48 3.56

221.11 Custodial Closet 1200 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 74.4 $12.05 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 60 $9.72 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 14.4 $2.33 6.00

221.11 Receiving 2600 3 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.19 483.6 $78.34 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 390 $63.18 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 93.6 $15.16 2.77

221.31 Classroom 104 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

221.31 Classroom 105 2600 13 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.81 2,095.6 $339.49 13 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.65 1690 $273.78 $14.00 $182.00 0.16 405.6 $65.71 2.77

3520 Restroom 105 2600 2 2 Ceiling Mount White Globe, (2) 26w CFL Lamp 52 0.10 270.4 $43.80 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 105 Rear Exit 2600 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 161.2 $26.11 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 130 $21.06 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 31.2 $5.05 2.77

221.11 Classroom 106 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

221.11 Classroom 107 2600 13 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.81 2,095.6 $339.49 13 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.65 1690 $273.78 $14.00 $182.00 0.16 405.6 $65.71 2.77

221.11 Classroom 108 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

221.11 Classroom 110 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

Page 193: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E-15 of 14

222.21 Classroom 109 2600 6 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.37 967.2 $156.69 6 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.30 780 $126.36 $14.00 $84.00 0.07 187.2 $30.33 2.77

222.11 Classroom 111 2600 15 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.93 2,418.0 $391.72 15 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.75 1950 $315.90 $14.00 $210.00 0.18 468 $75.82 2.77

227.21 Restroom 111 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.38 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $20.64 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.74 3.56

3520 Storage 111 1200 1 2 Ceiling Mount White Globe, (2) 26w CFL Lamp 52 0.05 62.4 $10.11 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Storage/ Electric Rm 1200 4 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 297.6 $48.21 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 240 $38.88 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 57.6 $9.33 6.00

222.21 Classroom 112 2600 6 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.37 967.2 $156.69 6 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.30 780 $126.36 $14.00 $84.00 0.07 187.2 $30.33 2.77

222.21 Classroom 114 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

222.21 2600 8 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.50 1,289.6 $208.92 8 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.40 1040 $168.48 $14.00 $112.00 0.10 249.6 $40.44 2.77

127.21 2600 4 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

78 0.31 811.2 $131.41 4 2 2x2, 2 Lamp, 14w T5, Indirect; Fixture 31 0.12 322.4 $52.23 $215.00 $860.00 0.19 488.8 $79.19 10.86

127.21 Main Office 2600 12 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

78 0.94 2,433.6 $394.24 12 2 2x2, 2 Lamp, 14w T5, Indirect; Fixture 31 0.37 967.2 $156.69 $215.00 $2,580.00 0.56 1466.4 $237.56 10.86

127.21 Copy Area 2600 3 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

78 0.23 608.4 $98.56 3 2 2x2, 2 Lamp, 14w T5, Indirect; Fixture 31 0.09 241.8 $39.17 $215.00 $645.00 0.14 366.6 $59.39 10.86

127.21 2600 9 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

78 0.70 1,825.2 $295.68 9 2 2x2, 2 Lamp, 14w T5, Indirect; Fixture 31 0.28 725.4 $117.51 $215.00 $1,935.00 0.42 1099.8 $178.17 10.86

558 2600 10 1 Recessed Down Light, 100w R30 Lamp 100 1.00 2,600.0 $421.20 10 1 Energy Star Rated, Dimmable

26w CFL Lamp 26 0.26 676 $109.51 $20.00 $200.00 0.74 1924 $311.69 0.64

122.41 Main Office Restroom 2600 1 2

2x4, 2-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens78 0.08 202.8 $32.85 1 2 Reballast & Relamp; Sylvania

Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 130 $21.06 $80.00 $80.00 0.03 72.8 $11.79 6.78

222.21 2600 14 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.87 2,256.8 $365.60 14 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.70 1820 $294.84 $14.00 $196.00 0.17 436.8 $70.76 2.77

137.21 2600 1 3

2x2, 3 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

105 0.11 273.0 $44.23 1 3 2x2, 3 Lamp, 14w T5, Indirect; Fixture 44 0.04 114.4 $18.53 $215.00 $215.00 0.06 158.6 $25.69 8.37

222.21 2600 14 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.87 2,256.8 $365.60 14 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.70 1820 $294.84 $14.00 $196.00 0.17 436.8 $70.76 2.77

Nurse 116

Principal's Office

Classroom 120

Classroom 118

Page 194: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E-16 of 14

137.21 2600 1 3

2x2, 3 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

105 0.11 273.0 $44.23 1 3 2x2, 3 Lamp, 14w T5, Indirect; Fixture 44 0.04 114.4 $18.53 $215.00 $215.00 0.06 158.6 $25.69 8.37

137.21 2600 3 3

2x2, 3 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

105 0.32 819.0 $132.68 3 3 2x2, 3 Lamp, 14w T5, Indirect; Fixture 44 0.13 343.2 $55.60 $215.00 $645.00 0.18 475.8 $77.08 8.37

222.21 2600 18 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 1.12 2,901.6 $470.06 18 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.90 2340 $379.08 $14.00 $252.00 0.22 561.6 $90.98 2.77

232.21 Restroom 18 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.22 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.33 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $5.90 3.56

127.21 18 Side Room 2600 2 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

78 0.16 405.6 $65.71 2 2 2x2, 2 Lamp, 14w T5, Indirect; Fixture 31 0.06 161.2 $26.11 $215.00 $430.00 0.09 244.4 $39.59 10.86

127.21 Boiler Room 4400 5 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

78 0.39 1,716.0 $277.99 5 2 2x2, 2 Lamp, 14w T5, Indirect; Fixture 31 0.16 682 $110.48 $215.00 $1,075.00 0.24 1034 $167.51 6.42

221.31 Mech Room 1200 4 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.25 297.6 $48.21 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 240 $38.88 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 57.6 $9.33 6.00

221.31 Storage 1200 4 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.25 297.6 $48.21 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 240 $38.88 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 57.6 $9.33 6.00

221.31 2600 14 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.87 2,256.8 $365.60 14 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.70 1820 $294.84 $14.00 $196.00 0.17 436.8 $70.76 2.77

127.21 2600 2 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

78 0.16 405.6 $65.71 2 2 2x2, 2 Lamp, 14w T5, Indirect; Fixture 31 0.06 161.2 $26.11 $215.00 $430.00 0.09 244.4 $39.59 10.86

232.21 Restroom 16 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.22 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.33 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $5.90 3.56

221.31 2600 14 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.87 2,256.8 $365.60 14 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.70 1820 $294.84 $14.00 $196.00 0.17 436.8 $70.76 2.77

127.21 2600 2 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

78 0.16 405.6 $65.71 2 2 2x2, 2 Lamp, 14w T5, Indirect; Fixture 31 0.06 161.2 $26.11 $215.00 $430.00 0.09 244.4 $39.59 10.86

232.21 Restroom 14 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.22 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.33 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $5.90 3.56

560 Custodial Closet 1200 1 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 31.2 $5.05 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Storage 1200 3 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.19 223.2 $36.16 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 180 $29.16 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 43.2 $7.00 6.00

221.31 Valve Room 1200 3 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.19 223.2 $36.16 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 180 $29.16 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 43.2 $7.00 6.00

Classroom 118

Classroom 18

Classroom 16

Classroom 14

Page 195: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E-17 of 14

221.21 2600 17 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 1.05 2,740.4 $443.94 17 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.85 2210 $358.02 $14.00 $238.00 0.20 530.4 $85.92 2.77

227.21 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.38 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $20.64 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.74 3.56

127.21 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

78 0.08 202.8 $32.85 1 2 2x2, 2 Lamp, 14w T5, Indirect; Fixture 31 0.03 80.6 $13.06 $215.00 $215.00 0.05 122.2 $19.80 10.86

222.21 Girls Restroom 2600 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $104.46 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $84.24 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $20.22 2.77

222.21 Boys Restroom 2600 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $104.46 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $84.24 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $20.22 2.77

227.21 Custodial Closet 1200 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 78.0 $12.64 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 58.8 $9.53 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 19.2 $3.11 7.72

766 Gym 2600 28 1 400w Merc Vapor, Prismatic Lens 465 13.02 33,852.0 $5,484.02 28 4 2x4 54w T5HO 4 Lamp

w/Reflective Lens, Wire Cage 236 6.61 17180.8 $2,783.29 $240.00 $6,720.00 6.41 16671.2 $2,700.73 2.49

613.1 Stage 1200 12 1 Industrial Fixture, 200w A19 Lamp 200 2.40 2,880.0 $466.56 12 2 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Dimming

Ballast, Pendant Mount, No Lens 62 0.74 892.8 $144.63 $195.00 $2,340.00 1.66 1987.2 $321.93 7.27

221.11 Gym Storage 2600 6 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.37 967.2 $156.69 6 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.30 780 $126.36 $14.00 $84.00 0.07 187.2 $30.33 2.77

221.11 PE Office 2600 4 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.25 644.8 $104.46 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $84.24 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $20.22 2.77

121.14 Maintenance Storage 2600 8 2

1x4, 2-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Surface Mnt., No

Lens78 0.62 1,622.4 $262.83 8 2 Reballast & Relamp; Sylvania

Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.40 1040 $168.48 $80.00 $640.00 0.22 582.4 $94.35 6.78

221.21 Corridors 4400 98 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 6.08 26,734.4 $4,330.97 98 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 4.90 21560 $3,492.72 $14.00 $1,372.00 1.18 5174.4 $838.25 1.64

725 4400 8 1 150w HPS Wallpack 188 1.50 6,617.6 $1,072.05 8 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

767 4400 2 1 400w Probe Start MH "Shoebox" Parking Lot Light 460 0.92 4,048.0 $655.78 2 1

Venture Lighting Optiwave Ballast V90U7421K and 320w

MH Lamp349 0.70 3071.2 $497.53 $160.00 $320.00 0.22 976.8 $158.24 2.02

622 4400 6 1 Double Head Flood, (2) 90w PAR Lamps 180 1.08 4,752.0 $769.82 6 2 (2) 26w CFL PAR Lamp 52 0.31 1372.8 $222.39 $40.00 $240.00 0.77 3379.2 $547.43 0.44

Totals 842 233 198,309 $32,126 842 226 48.2 134,081 $21,721 $32,609 21.1 56,716 $9,188 3.55

Exterior

Classroom 21

Page 196: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E-28 of 14

CEG Job #: 9C10088Project: Liberty Corner School KWH COST: $0.162

Address: 61 Church StreetLiberty Corner, NJ 07938

Building SF:

ECM #2: Lighting Controls not rebate eligible

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.21 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 235.0296 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $188.02 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $47.01 5.32

137.21 2600 3 3

2x2, 3 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

105 0.315 819 132.678 3 0 No Change 105 0.32 0% 819 $132.68 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 235.0296 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $188.02 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $47.01 5.32

137.21 2600 3 3

2x2, 3 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

105 0.315 819 132.678 3 0 No Change 105 0.32 0% 819 $132.68 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 2600 24 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 1.488 3868.8 626.7456 24 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 1.19 20% 3095.04 $501.40 $300.00 $300.00 0.30 773.76 $125.35 2.39

222.22 2600 5 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.29 754 122.148 5 0 No Change 58 0.29 0% 754 $122.15 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

137.21 Library Office 2600 2 3

2x2, 3 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

105 0.21 546 88.452 2 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 105 0.17 20% 436.8 $70.76 $150.00 $150.00 0.04 109.2 $17.69 8.48

222.21 Server Room 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 52.2288 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 322.4 $52.23 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

200 Restroom Library 2600 1 21x2, 1 Lamp, 17w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.034 88.4 14.3208 1 0 No Change 34 0.03 0% 88.4 $14.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.22 Classroom 214 2600 12 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 1.248 3244.8 525.6576 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 104 1.00 20% 2595.84 $420.53 $300.00 $300.00 0.25 648.96 $105.13 2.85

222.11 Classroom 213 2600 15 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.93 2418 391.716 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.74 20% 1934.4 $313.37 $300.00 $300.00 0.19 483.6 $78.34 3.83

227.11 Restroom 213 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 27.378 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.38 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.31 Mech Room 214 1200 6 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

58 0.348 417.6 67.6512 6 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 58 0.28 20% 334.08 $54.12 $150.00 $150.00 0.07 83.52 $13.53 11.09

221.31 Classroom 211 2600 9 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 235.0296 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $188.02 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $47.01 5.32

221.31 Classroom 212 2600 12 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 313.3728 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

Classroom 218

Library

Liberty Corner School

82,240

Classroom 220

Page 197: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E-29 of 14

221.31 Classroom 210 2600 12 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 313.3728 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

221.31 Classroom 208 2600 12 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 313.3728 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

221.31 CST 206 2600 5 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.31 806 130.572 5 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.25 20% 644.8 $104.46 $150.00 $150.00 0.06 161.2 $26.11 5.74

221.31 Classroom 204 2600 12 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 313.3728 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

221.31 Classroom 205 2600 12 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 313.3728 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

227.11 Boys Restroom 2600 2 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.13 338 54.756 2 0 No Change 65 0.13 0% 338 $54.76 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.45 Mens Restroom 2600 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Indirect

58 0.058 150.8 24.4296 1 0 No Change 58 0.06 0% 150.8 $24.43 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.11 Girls Restroom 2600 2 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.13 338 54.756 2 0 No Change 65 0.13 0% 338 $54.76 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.45 Womens Restroom 2600 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Indirect

58 0.058 150.8 24.4296 1 0 No Change 58 0.06 0% 150.8 $24.43 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.41 Custodial Closet 1200 1 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

58 0.058 69.6 11.2752 1 0 No Change 58 0.06 0% 69.6 $11.28 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Classroom 207 2600 12 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 313.3728 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

221.31 Classroom 209 2600 12 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 313.3728 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

222.11 Stairwell 4400 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 1091.2 176.7744 4 0 No Change 62 0.25 0% 1091.2 $176.77 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Classroom 203 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 313.3728 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

222.21 Classroom 200A 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 104.4576 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.20 20% 515.84 $83.57 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 128.96 $20.89 7.18

222.21 Classroom 200 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 313.3728 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

242.11 Classroom 201 2600 9 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.963 2503.8 405.6156 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 107 0.77 20% 2003.04 $324.49 $250.00 $250.00 0.19 500.76 $81.12 3.08

Page 198: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E-210 of 14

221.11 Office 200B 2600 4 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 104.4576 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.20 20% 515.84 $83.57 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 128.96 $20.89 7.18

222.11 Classroom 202 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 235.0296 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $188.02 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $47.01 5.32

227.11 Stairwell 4400 3 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700

series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

L

65 0.195 858 138.996 3 0 No Change 65 0.20 0% 858 $139.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

211.34 Boiler Room 4400 5 11x4, 1 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

30 0.15 660 106.92 5 0 No Change 30 0.15 0% 660 $106.92 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Classroom 100 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 313.3728 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

222.21 Classroom 101 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 235.0296 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $188.02 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $47.01 5.32

222.21 Teacher's Lounge 2600 6 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.372 967.2 156.6864 6 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.30 20% 773.76 $125.35 $150.00 $150.00 0.07 193.44 $31.34 4.79

222.21 Classroom 102 2600 8 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.496 1289.6 208.9152 8 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.40 20% 1031.68 $167.13 $250.00 $250.00 0.10 257.92 $41.78 5.98

237.21 Restroom 102 2600 1 3

2x2, 3 Lamp, 31w T8 Ulamp, Elect. Ballast,

Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

92 0.092 239.2 38.7504 1 0 No Change 92 0.09 0% 239.2 $38.75 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Classroom 103 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 313.3728 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

221.11 Office 103A 2600 2 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 52.2288 2 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.10 20% 257.92 $41.78 $150.00 $150.00 0.02 64.48 $10.45 14.36

242.15 Cafeteria 2600 25 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 2.675 6955 1126.71 25 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 107 2.14 20% 5564 $901.37 $300.00 $300.00 0.54 1391 $225.34 1.33

221.11 Kitchen 2600 14 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.868 2256.8 365.6016 14 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.69 20% 1805.44 $292.48 $300.00 $300.00 0.17 451.36 $73.12 4.10

617 Kitchen Hood 2600 3 1 Hood Light w/Globe & Cage, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.078 202.8 32.8536 3 0 No Change 26 0.08 0% 202.8 $32.85 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.15 Copy Room 2600 1 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.107 278.2 45.0684 1 0 No Change 107 0.11 0% 278.2 $45.07 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Switch Gear 2600 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 161.2 26.1144 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 161.2 $26.11 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Storage/ Server Room 2600 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 161.2 26.1144 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 161.2 $26.11 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 Girls Restroom 2600 3 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.195 507 82.134 3 0 No Change 65 0.20 0% 507 $82.13 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Page 199: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E-211 of 14

221.45 Womens Restroom 2600 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Indirect

58 0.058 150.8 24.4296 1 0 No Change 58 0.06 0% 150.8 $24.43 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.45 Mens Restroom 2600 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Indirect

58 0.058 150.8 24.4296 1 0 No Change 58 0.06 0% 150.8 $24.43 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 Boys Restroom 2600 2 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.13 338 54.756 2 0 No Change 65 0.13 0% 338 $54.76 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Custodial Closet 1200 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 74.4 12.0528 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 74.4 $12.05 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Receiving 2600 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 483.6 78.3432 3 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.15 20% 386.88 $62.67 $150.00 $150.00 0.04 96.72 $15.67 9.57

221.31 Classroom 104 2600 12 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 313.3728 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

221.31 Classroom 105 2600 13 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.806 2095.6 339.4872 13 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.64 20% 1676.48 $271.59 $300.00 $300.00 0.16 419.12 $67.90 4.42

3520 Restroom 105 2600 2 2 Ceiling Mount White Globe, (2) 26w CFL Lamp 52 0.104 270.4 43.8048 2 0 No Change 52 0.10 0% 270.4 $43.80 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 105 Rear Exit 2600 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 161.2 26.1144 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 161.2 $26.11 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Classroom 106 2600 12 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 313.3728 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

221.11 Classroom 107 2600 13 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.806 2095.6 339.4872 13 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.64 20% 1676.48 $271.59 $300.00 $300.00 0.16 419.12 $67.90 4.42

221.11 Classroom 108 2600 12 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 313.3728 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

221.11 Classroom 110 2600 12 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 313.3728 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

222.21 Classroom 109 2600 6 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.372 967.2 156.6864 6 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.30 20% 773.76 $125.35 $150.00 $150.00 0.07 193.44 $31.34 4.79

222.11 Classroom 111 2600 15 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.93 2418 391.716 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.74 20% 1934.4 $313.37 $300.00 $300.00 0.19 483.6 $78.34 3.83

227.21 Restroom 111 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 27.378 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.38 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

3520 Storage 111 1200 1 2 Ceiling Mount White Globe, (2) 26w CFL Lamp 52 0.052 62.4 10.1088 1 0 No Change 52 0.05 0% 62.4 $10.11 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Page 200: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E-212 of 14

221.11 Storage/ Electric Rm 1200 4 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 297.6 48.2112 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. not rebate

eligible

62 0.20 20% 238.08 $38.57 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 59.52 $9.64 15.56

222.21 Classroom 112 2600 6 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.372 967.2 156.6864 6 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.30 20% 773.76 $125.35 $150.00 $150.00 0.07 193.44 $31.34 4.79

222.21 Classroom 114 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 313.3728 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

222.21 2600 8 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.496 1289.6 208.9152 8 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.40 20% 1031.68 $167.13 $250.00 $250.00 0.10 257.92 $41.78 5.98

127.21 2600 4 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

78 0.312 811.2 131.4144 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 78 0.25 20% 648.96 $105.13 $150.00 $150.00 0.06 162.24 $26.28 5.71

127.21 Main Office 2600 12 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

78 0.936 2433.6 394.2432 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 78 0.75 20% 1946.88 $315.39 $300.00 $300.00 0.19 486.72 $78.85 3.80

127.21 Copy Area 2600 3 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

78 0.234 608.4 98.5608 3 0 No Change 78 0.23 0% 608.4 $98.56 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

127.21 2600 9 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

78 0.702 1825.2 295.6824 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 78 0.56 20% 1460.16 $236.55 $250.00 $250.00 0.14 365.04 $59.14 4.23

558 2600 10 1 Recessed Down Light, 100w R30 Lamp 100 1 2600 421.2 10 0 No Change 100 1.00 0% 2600 $421.20 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

122.41 Main Office Restroom 2600 1 2

2x4, 2-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

78 0.078 202.8 32.8536 1 0 No Change 78 0.08 0% 202.8 $32.85 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 2600 14 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.868 2256.8 365.6016 14 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.69 20% 1805.44 $292.48 $300.00 $300.00 0.17 451.36 $73.12 4.10

137.21 2600 1 3

2x2, 3 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

105 0.105 273 44.226 1 0 No Change 105 0.11 0% 273 $44.23 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 2600 14 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.868 2256.8 365.6016 14 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.69 20% 1805.44 $292.48 $300.00 $300.00 0.17 451.36 $73.12 4.10

137.21 2600 1 3

2x2, 3 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

105 0.105 273 44.226 1 0 No Change 105 0.11 0% 273 $44.23 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

137.21 2600 3 3

2x2, 3 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

105 0.315 819 132.678 3 0 No Change 105 0.32 0% 819 $132.68 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 2600 18 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 1.116 2901.6 470.0592 18 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.89 20% 2321.28 $376.05 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 580.32 $94.01 3.19

232.21 Restroom 18 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.2232 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.22 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

127.21 18 Side Room 2600 2 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

78 0.156 405.6 65.7072 2 0 No Change 78 0.16 0% 405.6 $65.71 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Nurse 116

Principal's Office

Classroom 120

Classroom 118

Classroom 18

Page 201: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E-213 of 14

127.21 Boiler Room 4400 5 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

78 0.39 1716 277.992 5 0 No Change 78 0.39 0% 1716 $277.99 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Mech Room 1200 4 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 297.6 48.2112 4 0 No Change 62 0.25 0% 297.6 $48.21 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Storage 1200 4 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 297.6 48.2112 4 0 No Change 62 0.25 0% 297.6 $48.21 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 2600 14 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.868 2256.8 365.6016 14 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.69 20% 1805.44 $292.48 $300.00 $300.00 0.17 451.36 $73.12 4.10

127.21 2600 2 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

78 0.156 405.6 65.7072 2 0 No Change 78 0.16 0% 405.6 $65.71 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Restroom 16 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.2232 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.22 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 2600 14 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.868 2256.8 365.6016 14 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.69 20% 1805.44 $292.48 $300.00 $300.00 0.17 451.36 $73.12 4.10

127.21 2600 2 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

78 0.156 405.6 65.7072 2 0 No Change 78 0.16 0% 405.6 $65.71 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Restroom 14 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.2232 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.22 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

560 Custodial Closet 1200 1 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.026 31.2 5.0544 1 0 No Change 26 0.03 0% 31.2 $5.05 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Storage 1200 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 223.2 36.1584 3 0 No Change 62 0.19 0% 223.2 $36.16 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Valve Room 1200 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 223.2 36.1584 3 0 No Change 62 0.19 0% 223.2 $36.16 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.21 2600 17 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 1.054 2740.4 443.9448 17 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.84 20% 2192.32 $355.16 $300.00 $300.00 0.21 548.08 $88.79 3.38

227.21 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 27.378 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.38 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

127.21 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 31w FBO31/T35, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

78 0.078 202.8 32.8536 1 0 No Change 78 0.08 0% 202.8 $32.85 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Girls Restroom 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 104.4576 4 0 No Change 62 0.25 0% 644.8 $104.46 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Boys Restroom 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 104.4576 4 0 No Change 62 0.25 0% 644.8 $104.46 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 Custodial Closet 1200 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 78 12.636 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 78 $12.64 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Classroom 21

Classroom 14

Classroom 16

Page 202: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E-214 of 14

766 Gym 2600 28 1 400w Merc Vapor, Prismatic Lens 465 13.02 33852 5484.024 28 2

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 465 10.42 20% 27081.6 $4,387.22 $300.00 $600.00 2.60 6770.4 $1,096.80 0.55

613.1 Stage 1200 12 1 Industrial Fixture, 200w A19 Lamp 200 2.4 2880 466.56 12 0 No Change 200 2.40 0% 2880 $466.56 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Gym Storage 2600 6 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.372 967.2 156.6864 6 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. not rebate

eligible

62 0.30 20% 773.76 $125.35 $150.00 $150.00 0.07 193.44 $31.34 4.79

221.11 PE Office 2600 4 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 104.4576 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.20 20% 515.84 $83.57 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 128.96 $20.89 7.18

221.21 Corridors 4400 98 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 6.076 26734.4 4330.9728 98 0 No Change 62 6.08 0% 26734.4 $4,330.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

725 4400 8 1 150w HPS Wallpack 188 1.504 6617.6 1072.0512 8 0 No Change 188 1.50 0% 6617.6 $1,072.05 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

767 4400 2 1400w Probe Start MH "Shoebox" Parking Lot

Light460 0.92 4048 655.776 2 0 No Change 460 0.92 0% 4048 $655.78 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

622 4400 6 1 Double Head Flood, (2) 90w PAR Lamps 180 1.08 4752 769.824 6 0 No Change 180 1.08 0% 4752 $769.82 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Totals 842 233 70.6 196,686.4 $31,863 834 56 60.4 170,504.9 $27,621.79 $14,250 0.00 26,182 $4,241 3.36

Exterior

Page 203: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix FPage 1 of 3

Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Liberty Corner Elementary School

Location: Basking Ridge, NJ 07938Description: Photovoltaic System 95% Financing - 25 year

Simple Payback Analysis

Total Construction Cost $1,066,050Annual kWh Production 136,596

Annual Energy Cost Reduction $22,129Annual SREC Revenue $47,809

First Cost Premium $1,066,050

Simple Payback: Years

Life Cycle Cost AnalysisAnalysis Period (years): 25 Financing %: 95%Financing Term (mths): 300 Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0%

Average Energy Cost ($/kWh) $0.162 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0%Financing Rate: 7.00% SREC Value ($/kWh) $0.350

Period Additional Energy kWh Energy Cost Additional SREC Interest Loan Net Cash CumulativeCash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Expense Principal Flow Cash Flow

0 $53,303 0 0 0 $0 0 0 (53,303) 01 $0 136,596 $22,129 $0 $47,809 $70,402 $15,493 ($15,958) ($69,260)2 $0 135,913 $22,792 $0 $47,570 $69,282 $16,613 ($15,533) ($84,793)3 $0 135,233 $23,476 $0 $47,332 $68,081 $17,814 ($15,087) ($99,879)4 $0 134,557 $24,180 $0 $47,095 $66,793 $19,102 ($14,619) ($114,499)5 $0 133,885 $24,906 $1,379 $46,860 $65,412 $20,483 ($15,508) ($130,007)6 $0 133,215 $25,653 $1,372 $46,625 $63,931 $21,963 ($14,988) ($144,995)7 $0 132,549 $26,423 $1,365 $46,392 $62,343 $23,551 ($14,445) ($159,440)8 $0 131,886 $27,215 $1,358 $46,160 $60,641 $25,254 ($13,878) ($173,318)9 $0 131,227 $28,032 $1,352 $45,929 $58,815 $27,079 ($13,285) ($186,603)10 $0 130,571 $28,873 $1,345 $45,700 $56,858 $29,037 ($12,667) ($199,270)11 $0 129,918 $29,739 $1,338 $45,471 $54,759 $31,136 ($12,023) ($211,293)12 $0 129,268 $30,631 $1,331 $45,244 $52,508 $33,387 ($11,351) ($222,644)13 $0 128,622 $31,550 $1,325 $45,018 $50,094 $35,800 ($10,652) ($233,296)14 $0 127,979 $32,497 $1,318 $44,793 $47,506 $38,388 ($9,924) ($243,219)15 $0 127,339 $33,471 $1,312 $44,569 $44,731 $41,163 ($9,166) ($252,386)16 $0 126,702 $34,476 $1,305 $44,346 $41,756 $44,139 ($8,378) ($260,764)17 $0 126,069 $35,510 $1,299 $44,124 $38,565 $47,330 ($7,559) ($268,323)18 $0 125,438 $36,575 $1,292 $43,903 $35,143 $50,751 ($6,708) ($275,031)19 $0 124,811 $37,672 $1,286 $43,684 $31,474 $54,420 ($5,824) ($280,855)20 $0 124,187 $38,803 $1,279 $43,465 $27,540 $58,354 ($4,906) ($285,761)21 $0 123,566 $39,967 $1,273 $43,248 $25,091 $53,646 $3,205 ($282,556)22 $0 122,948 $41,166 $1,266 $43,032 $20,276 $44,145 $18,510 ($264,046)23 $0 122,334 $42,401 $1,260 $42,817 $0 $0 $83,957 ($180,088)24 $0 121,722 $43,673 $1,254 $42,603 $0 $0 $85,022 ($95,067)25 $0 121,113 $44,983 $1,247 $42,390 $0 $0 $86,125 ($8,942)

Totals: 3,217,649 $806,791 $27,556 $1,126,177 $1,112,000 $749,051 $44,361 ($4,726,337)Net Present Value (NPV)

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

Photovoltaic System 95% Financing - 25 year

($117,173)-0.2%

15.24

Page 204: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix FPage 2 of 3

Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Liberty Corner Elementary School

Location: Basking Ridge, NJ 07938Description: Photovoltaic System - Direct Purchase

Simple Payback AnalysisPhotovoltaic System - Direct Purchase

Total Construction Cost $1,066,050Annual kWh Production 136,596

Annual Energy Cost Reduction $22,129Annual SREC Revenue $47,809

First Cost Premium

Simple Payback: Years

Life Cycle Cost AnalysisAnalysis Period (years): 25 Financing %: 0%Financing Term (mths): 0 Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0%

Average Energy Cost ($/kWh) $0.162 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0%Financing Rate: 0.00% SREC Value ($/kWh) $0.350

Period Additional Energy kWh Energy Cost Additional SREC Net Cash CumulativeCash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Flow Cash Flow

0 $1,066,050 0 0 0 $0 (1,066,050) 01 $0 136,596 $22,129 $0 $47,809 $69,937 ($996,113)2 $0 135,913 $22,792 $0 $47,570 $70,362 ($925,751)3 $0 135,233 $23,476 $0 $47,332 $70,808 ($854,943)4 $0 134,557 $24,180 $0 $47,095 $71,276 ($783,667)5 $0 133,885 $24,906 $1,379 $46,860 $70,386 ($713,281)6 $0 133,215 $25,653 $1,372 $46,625 $70,906 ($642,375)7 $0 132,549 $26,423 $1,365 $46,392 $71,450 ($570,925)8 $0 131,886 $27,215 $1,358 $46,160 $72,017 ($498,908)9 $0 131,227 $28,032 $1,352 $45,929 $72,610 ($426,299)

10 $0 130,571 $28,873 $1,345 $45,700 $73,228 ($353,071)11 $0 129,918 $29,739 $1,338 $45,471 $73,872 ($279,199)12 $0 129,268 $30,631 $1,331 $45,244 $74,544 ($204,656)13 $0 128,622 $31,550 $1,325 $45,018 $75,243 ($129,413)14 $0 127,979 $32,497 $1,318 $44,793 $75,971 ($53,442)15 $0 127,339 $33,471 $1,312 $44,569 $76,728 $23,28716 $0 126,702 $34,476 $1,305 $44,346 $77,516 $100,80317 $0 126,069 $35,510 $1,299 $44,124 $78,335 $179,13818 $0 125,438 $36,575 $1,292 $43,903 $79,187 $258,32519 $0 124,811 $37,672 $1,286 $43,684 $80,071 $338,39620 $0 124,187 $38,803 $1,279 $43,465 $80,989 $419,38521 $1 123,566 $39,967 $1,273 $43,248 $81,942 $501,32722 $2 122,948 $41,166 $1,266 $43,032 $82,931 $584,25823 $3 122,334 $42,401 $1,260 $42,817 $83,957 $668,21524 $4 121,722 $43,673 $1,254 $42,603 $85,022 $753,23725 $5 121,113 $44,983 $1,247 $42,390 $86,125 $839,362

Totals: 3,217,649 $806,791 $27,556 $1,126,177 $1,905,412 ($2,766,310)Net Present Value (NPV)

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

15.24

$1,066,050

$839,3874.9%

Page 205: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix FPage 3 of 3

Building Roof Area (sq ft) Panel Qty Panel Sq Ft Panel Total Sq

FtTotal KWDC

Total Annual kWh

Panel Weight (33 lbs) W/SQFT

Liberty Corner School 8400 Sunpower

SPR230 515 14.7 7,573 118.45 136,596 16,995 15.64

Proposed PV Layout

Note: Estimated kWH based on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory PVWatts Version 1 Calculator Program.

Page 206: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

ENERGY SAVINGS REPORT

INTELLI-HOOD VARIABLE EXHAUST CONTROLLER

CUSTOMER: Bernards BOE

COMPANY: CEGRETROFIT

ADDRESS: Liberty Corner ES

ENERGY SAVINGS REPORT

Basking Ridge, NJ Feb-07-11

APPLICATION: Kitchen

- MOTOR OPERATING SAVINGS: $163 /YEAR

- HEATING SAVINGS: $380 /YEAR

- COOLING SAVINGS: $121 /YEAR

- TOTAL SAVINGS: $663 /YEAR

INSTALLED COST $19 000- INSTALLED COST: $19,000

- PAYBACK PERIOD: 28.6 YEARS

- RATE OF RETURN - 5 YEARS: N/A

10 YEARS: -11.3 %

The projected savings shown above are based on the above store's

operating hours, HVAC system, cooking load, and geographic location.

Page 207: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

I. MOTOR OPERATING SAVINGS

INPUT DATA:

A Operating Hours Per Day 7 HRS/DAY

B Operating Days Per Week 5 DAYS/WK

C Operating Weeks Per Year 42 WKS/YR

D Horsepower of Fan Motor(s) 1.5 HP

E Load Factor of Fan Motor(s) 0.88

F Cost Per Kilowatt Hour 0.162 $/KWHR

CONSTANT EXHAUST VOLUME ANALYSIS:

G Total Time (A x B x C) 1470 HRS/YR

H Total KWHR/HP/YR (0.746/0.9 x G) 1218.5 KWHR/HP/YR

VARIABLE EXHAUST VOLUME ANALYSIS:

% Rated % Run Time Output System Input KWHR/RPM Time HRS/YR KW/HP Effic. KW/HP HP/YR

H I J=FxI K L M=K/L N=JxM

100 5 73.5 0.746 0.9 0.829 60.9

90 15 220.5 0.544 0.9 0.604 133.3

80 15 220.5 0.382 0.9 0.424 93.6

70 20 294 0.256 0.9 0.284 83.6

60 25 367.5 0.161 0.9 0.179 65.7

50 10 147 0.093 0.9 0.103 15.2

40 5 73.5 0.048 0.9 0.053 3.9

30 5 73.5 0.020 0.9 0.022 1.6

20 0 0 0.015 0.9 0.017 0.0

10 0 0 0.010 0.90 0.011 0.0 _________

O Total KWH/HP/YR (Total of Column N) 457.9

CALCULATION:

SAVINGS = (H - O) x D x E x F = $163 /YEAR ============

PAGE 1

Page 208: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

II. CONDITIONED MAKE-UP AIR - HEATING

INPUT DATA:

A Previous Net Exhaust Volume 4800 CFM

B New Net Exhaust Volume (1) 3264 CFM

C Winter Building Temperature 70 F

D Previous Net Heat Load (2) 126651 kBTU

E New Net Heat Load (2) 86123 kBTU

F Operating Hours Per Day 7.00 HRS/DAY

G Operating Days Per Week 5 DAYS/WK

- Heating Fuel Type Gas

H Cost Per Fuel Unit (3) 1.25 $/UNIT

J BTU Per Fuel Unit (4) 100 kBTU/UNIT

K System Efficiency (4) 80%

CALCULATION:

SAVINGS = (D - E) x 0.6 x H / (J x K)

= $380 /YEAR ==========

NOTES:TABLE 1

(1) Determine the New ExhaustVolume by completing TABLE 1. % Rated % RunThe New Exhaust Volume equals RPM (F) Time (I) F x Ithe AVG % RPM x the PreviousExhaust Volume. 100 5 5

90 15 14(2) Using design weather data 80 15 12via the Outdoor Airload Calculator 70 20 14and multiplied by days/year ratio. 60 25 15

50 10 5(3) Using local energy costs. 40 5 2

30 5 2(4) Using typical system 20 0 0efficiency. 10 0 0

AVG % RPM = 68%

PAGE 2

Page 209: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

III. CONDITIONED MAKE-UP AIR SAVINGS - COOLING

INPUT DATA:

A Previous Net Exhaust Volume 4800 CFM

B New Net Exhaust Volume (1) 3264 CFM

C Previous Net Cooling Load (2) 34962 kBTU

D New Net Cooling Load (2) 23774 kBTU

E AC Correction Factor (3) 1

F Cost Per Fuel Unit (5) 0.162 $/kWH

G COP (6) 2.6

CALCULATION:

SAVINGS = (C - D) x 0.6 x E x F / (3.413 x G)

= $121 /YEAR ============

NOTES:

(1) Using New Exhaust Volume from CONDITIONED MAKE-UP AIRSAVINGS - HEATING on page 2. See Note 1.

(2) Obtained from Outdoor Airload Calculator

(3) Using design weather data.

(4) The multiplier corrects for actual % outside air.

(5) Using local energy costs.

(6) Using typical system efficiency.

PAGE 3

Page 210: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

AFTER-TAX CASH FLOW ANALYSIS

INPUT DATA:

FIRST YEAR SAVINGS $663 /YEAR

INITIAL COST PLUS INSTALLATION $19,000

MARGINAL TAX RATE 0%

ESTIMATED ANNUAL INCREASE IN ENERGY COSTS 6%

NETDEPREC. DEPREC. AFTER-TAX

YEAR SAVINGS COST % $ CASH FLOW

0 -19,000 -19,0001 663 - 29 5510 6632 703 - 20 3800 7033 745 - 13 2470 7454 790 - 10 1900 7905 838 - 9 1710 8386 888 - 9 1710 8887 941 - 9 1710 9418 998 - 9989 1057 - 1057

10 1121 - 1121

CALCULATIONS:

NET PRESENT VALUE = -$14,377 ; INTERNAL RATE 5 YEARS @ 15% OF RETURN (IRR) = #NUM! %

NET PRESENT VALUE = -$12,949 ; INTERNAL RATE 10 YEARS @ 15% OF RETURN (IRR) = -11.3 %

NOTE:

Net After-tax Cash Flow is calculated as follows: NATCF = SAVINGS - COSTS - TAX RATE(SAVINGS - COSTS - DEPRECIATION)

Net Present Value is calculated as follows: NPV = C(0) + C(1)/(1 + r) + C(2)/(1 + r)^2 + ... + C(n)/(1 + r)^n (where C(n) is the net cash flow for the nth year and r is the opportunity cost of capital)

IRR is calculated by trial and error using the formula: NPV = C(0) + C(1)/(1 + IRR) + C(2)/(1 + IRR)^2 + ... + C(n)/(1 + IRR)^n

PAGE 4

Page 211: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

BERNARDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS MOUNT PROSPECT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

111 HANSOM ROAD

BASKING RIDGE, NJ 07920

FACILITY ENERGY REPORT

Page 212: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 1 of 43

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.  HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST ................................................................. 2 

II.  FACILITY DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................ 7 

III.  MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST ............................................................................................ 10 

IV.  ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES ..................................................................... 11 

V.  ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................... 43 

Appendix A – ECM Cost & Savings Breakdown

Appendix B – New Jersey Smart Start® Program Incentives

Appendix C – Portfolio Manager “Statement of Energy Performance”

Appendix D – Major Equipment List

Appendix E – Investment Grade Lighting Audit

Appendix F – Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculations

Page 213: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 2 of 43

I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has been tabulated and plotted in graph form as depicted within this section. Each energy source has been identified and monthly consumption and cost noted per the information provided by the Owner. Electric Utility Provider: Jersey Central Power & Light (JCP&L) Electric Utility Rate Structure: General Service Secondary (GSS) Third Party Supplier: South Jersey Energy Natural Gas Utility Provider: Public Service Electric and Gas (PSE&G) Utility Rate Structure: General Service Gas (GSG) Third Party Supplier: Woodruff The electric usage profile represents the actual electrical usage for the facility. The electric utility measures consumption in kilowatt-hours (KWH) and maximum demand in kilowatts (KW). One KWH usage is equivalent to 1000 watts running for one hour. One KW of electric demand is equivalent to 1000 watts running at any given time. The basic usage charges are shown as generation service and delivery charges along with several non-utility generation charges. Rates used in this report reflect the historical data received for the facility. The gas usage profile within each facility report shows the actual natural gas energy usage for the facility. The gas utility measures consumption in cubic feet x 100 (CCF), and converts the quantity into Therms of energy. One Therm is equivalent to 100,000 BTUs of energy.

Page 214: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 3 of 43

Table 1 Electricity Billing Data

Utility Provider: Jersey State Power & Light (JCP&L)Rate: General Service Secondary

Meter No: G17852436Customer ID No: 100021587256

Third Party Utility Provider: -TPS Meter / Acct No: -

MONTH OF USECONSUMPTION

KWH TOTAL BILL

Nov-09 90,400 $14,366 Dec-09 76,400 $12,373 Jan-10 86,000 $13,579 Feb-10 72,800 $11,819 Mar-10 86,800 $13,820 Apr-10 71,600 $12,284 May-10 68,400 $11,511 May-10 112,800 $18,516 Jun-10 40,400 $6,974 Jul-10 96,800 $15,702

Aug-10 61,200 $11,441 Sep-10 77,600 $13,242 Totals 941,200 479.2 Max $155,627

AVERAGE DEMAND 368.9 KW averageAVERAGE RATE $0.165 $/kWh

361.6479.2412.0

390.4378.4452.8442.8

ELECTRIC USAGE SUMMARY

DEMAND

317.6304.0287.2293.2307.6

Page 215: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 4 of 43

Figure 1 Electricity Usage Profile

Page 216: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 5 of 43

Table 4 Natural Gas Billing Data

Utility Provider: Public Service Electric & Gas (PSEG)Rate: Large Volume Gas (LVG)

Meter No: 2279765Point of Delivery ID: 6717707704

Third Party Utility Provider: Woodruff EnergyTPS Meter No:

MONTH OF USE CONSUMPTION (THERMS) TOTAL BILL

Nov-09 3,272.80 $5,121.53Dec-09 8,454.60 $11,034.99Jan-10 6,271.80 $8,180.71Feb-10 6,467.10 $8,405.33Mar-10 2,469.60 $2,699.33Apr-10 545.20 $677.07May-10 335.50 $452.90Jun-10 118.90 $222.56Jul-10 20.80 $118.82

Aug-10 46.00 $177.07Sep-10 151.20 $327.30Oct-10 1,677.40 $1,833.62

TOTALS 29,830.90 $39,251.23

AVERAGE RATE: $1.32 $/THERM

N/A

NATURAL GAS USAGE SUMMARY

Page 217: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 6 of 43

Figure 2 Natural Gas Usage Profile

Page 218: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 7 of 43

II. FACILITY DESCRIPTION

The 97,908 SF Elementary School is a two story facility comprised of classrooms, library, computer room, auditorium, cafeteria, kitchen, gymnasium, administration offices, restrooms, boiler room, custodial spaces and storage spaces.

The facility was built in 1998 and expanded towards north-west to accommodate 12 additional classrooms in 2006. The hours of operation for the school students and teachers are between 8:45 am and 3:00 pm on the weekdays. The facility remains occupied between 3:30 and 6:00 PM for the afterschool programs during the weekdays. Custodial services are performed between the hours of 6:00 PM and 10:00 PM. The facility is closed on weekends. The student enrollment at Mt. Prospect Elementary School is approximately 716 students and 150 staff.

U-shaped facility houses the classrooms in the two wings and the major activity areas such as cafeteria and gymnasium in the base. The building exterior constructed of is 8-inch sinter blocks with 4-inch brick façade. Estimated insulation within the wall structure is 2-inches.

The roof structure of the classroom wings are pitched with asphalt shingle covering. Remaining roof areas are built up flat with tar and gravel covering. The amount of insulation within the roof structures is not known. Windows throughout the facility consists of double pane glasses with aluminum frames. Overall condition of the windows throughout the building is excellent. Built-in blinds are utilized throughout the perimeter spaces. The blinds are valuable because they help to reduce heat loss in the winter and reduce solar heat in the summer.

HVAC Systems

The Building heating system consists of two (2) cast iron hot water boilers, which serve the building’s heating hot water loop. The boilers have 4,853 MBH input and 3,830 MBH output capacities resulting in approximately 78% thermal efficiency. Boilers are fitted with PowerFlame variable capacity burners with a maximum 2.5 turndown ratio. The hot water is circulated by two (2) floor mounted, 15 HP constant volume pumps made by Taco. The pumps are driven with standard efficiency motors. Only one pump runs at a time. The pumps provide heating hot water for the classrooms air conditioning units, hot water baseboard heaters and the rooftop heating and air conditioning units.

Heating and ventilation in the classrooms are provided with packaged vertical classroom air conditioning units made by Airedale. There are approximately forty-four (44) classroom units in the building with 3 to 6 ton cooling capacity. All of the units are equipped with hot water coils for heating and packaged direct expansion (DX) unit for cooling. Thirty two (32) of the HVAC units are in the classrooms in the original construction. Two (2) of these units have 6 ton cooling capacity while remaining units have 4 ton cooling capacity. All of the units in the original building are built in 1998 and use R22 refrigerant. Remaining twelve (12) units in the 2006 addition are newer and higher efficiency Airdale models with 3 ton cooling capacity and R410 refrigerant.

Cafeteria, library, kitchen, hallways, gymnasium, nurse’s office, administration offices and some of the classrooms are heated and air conditioned with constant volume, packaged rooftop heating

Page 219: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 8 of 43

and air conditioning units located on the southwest roof of the building. Majority of the rooftop units are equipped with hot water coils for heating and DX coils for cooling. Some of the smaller units are equipped with electric preheat coils. All of the units were made by TRANE with capacity ranging from 6 to 30 tons. Larger units are equipped with air side economizer functionality. The units were installed 1998 and in good condition. In addition to the rooftop units, there is a 2 Ton ductless split heat pump unit providing heating and air conditioning to the teacher’s lounge via a ceiling cassette type indoor unit. The unit is in good condition.

The school houses a small commercial kitchen for light cooking. The kitchen appliances include gas cooking ranges, gas warmers, a commercial grade dishwasher, reach in refrigerators, a walk-in refrigerator and a freezer. The walk-in units appear to be in good condition.

Exhaust System

Airdale classroom air conditioning units provide the minimum outside air intake and exhaust in the majority of the classrooms. Some of the classrooms and the office spaces have dedicated exhaust fans located on the roof. The toilet rooms have dedicated roof exhausters as well.

The kitchen includes a 4ft x 16ft commercial exhaust hood, which provides exhaust for cooking equipment. The kitchen hood is manually controlled with a wall switch. It is reported that the exhaust hood operates seldom because of the low cooking activity in the kitchen.

HVAC System Controls

The building HVAC systems are controlled by an I/NET-Seven building automation systems made by T.A.C. The I/NET system is capable of full operation of the classroom HVAC units, rooftop HVAC units, hot water boilers and the hot water pumps. The system modulates the hot water supply temperature to the air side units, outside air damper positions of the rooftop units and the classroom units, economizer functionality of the roof top units and also the time of day scheduling for all the heating and air conditioning units in the facility.

Domestic Hot Water

Domestic hot water for the restrooms and the faucets in the utility rooms is provided with a 300 gallon, gas fired hot water heater made by A.O. Smith. The unit is installed in 1998 during the original construction. The domestic hot water is circulated throughout the building by a hot water circulation pumps. The domestic hot water piping insulation appeared to be in good condition.

The hot water circulators weren’t running during the survey even though the supply pipe was nearly at room temperature.

Page 220: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 9 of 43

Lighting Typical lighting throughout school building is fluorescent tube lay-in fixtures with T-8 lamps and electronic ballasts. There are small amount of fixtures in the building with older T12 lamps and magnetic ballasts. Some of the storage rooms and closets lit with a mixture of incandescent lamps and compact fluorescent lamps. The gym lighting is provided with 400W metal halide fixtures. The building exterior is lit with 175W metal halide flood lights.

Page 221: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 10 of 43

III. MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST

The equipment list contains major energy consuming equipment that through implementation of energy conservation measures could yield substantial energy savings. The list shows the major equipment in the facility and all pertinent information utilized in energy savings calculations. An approximate age was assigned to the equipment in some cases if a manufactures date was not shown on the equipment’s nameplate. The ASHRAE service life for the equipment along with the remaining useful life is also shown in the Appendix.

Refer to the Major Equipment List Appendix for this facility.

Page 222: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 11 of 43

IV. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES Energy Conservation Measures are developed specifically for this facility. The energy savings and calculations are highly dependent on the information received from the site survey and interviews with operations personnel. The assumptions and calculations should be reviewed by the owner to ensure accurate representation of this facility. The following ECMs were analyzed:

Table 1 ECM Financial Summary

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)

ECM #1 Lighting upgrade - Interior spaces

$20,822 $5,389 3.9 288.2%

ECM #2 Lighting upgrade - Multi purpose room

$5,040 $3,544 1.4 954.8%

ECM #3 Lighting controls upgrade $18,600 $7,379 2.5 495.1%

ECM #4 CRT Computer monitors $12,800 $2,661 4.8 211.8%

ECM #5 Demand ventilation (single zone RTUs)

$120,000 $6,484 18.5 -19.0%

ECM #6 Unit ventilator upgrade $480,000 $14,443 33.2 -54.9%

ECM #7 Water cooled chiller to replace DX cooling

$1,384,100 $25,647 54.0 -62.9%

ECM #8 Premium efficiency pump motors

$7,074 $437 16.2 23.7%

ECM #9 Eliminate 3-way valves & install VFD

$48,000 $4,136 11.6 29.3%

ECM #10 0 $0 $0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

REM #1 Solar PV $2,883,510 $168,250 17.1 -12.5%

Notes: A. Cost takes into consideration applicable NJ Smart StartTM incentives.B. Savings takes into consideration applicable maintenance savings.

ANNUAL SAVINGSB

RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's)

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

NET INSTALLATION

COST

ANNUAL SAVINGS

SIMPLE PAYBACK

(Yrs)

SIMPLE LIFETIME

ROI

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

SIMPLE PAYBACK

(Yrs)

SIMPLE LIFETIME

ROI

NET INSTALLATION

COSTA

Page 223: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 12 of 43

Table 2 ECM Energy Summary

ECM #1 Lighting upgrade - Interior spaces

11.7 32,592 0

ECM #2 Lighting upgrade - Multi purpose room

8.2 21,434 0

ECM #3 Lighting controls upgrade 0 44,625 0

ECM #4 CRT Computer monitors 0 2,661 0

ECM #5 Demand ventilation (single zone RTUs)

0 15,733 2,813

ECM #6 Unit ventilator upgrade 23.0 58,682 3,607

ECM #7 Water cooled chiller to replace DX cooling

203.3 162,667 0

ECM #8 Premium efficiency pump motors

1.2 2,651 0

ECM #9 Eliminate 3-way valves & install VFD

0 25,069 0

REM #1 Solar PV 259.5 366,558 0

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTION

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTIONRENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's)

NATURAL GAS (THERMS)

NATURAL GAS (THERMS)

ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION

(KWH)

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)

ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION

(KWH)

Page 224: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 13 of 43

Table 3 Facility Project Summary

Lighting upgrade - Interior spaces

$5,389 $20,822 $0 $20,822 3.9

Lighting upgrade - Multi purpose room

$3,544 $8,640 $3,600 $5,040 1.4

Lighting controls upgrade $7,379 $20,150 $1,550 $18,600 2.5

CRT Computer monitors $2,661 $12,800 $0 $12,800 4.8

Demand ventilation (single zone RTUs)

$6,484 $120,000 $0 $120,000 18.5

Unit ventilator upgrade $14,443 $480,000 $0 $480,000 33.2

Water cooled chiller to replace DX cooling

$25,647 $1,400,000 $15,900 $1,384,100 54.0

Premium efficiency pump motors

$437 $7,304 $230 $7,074 16.2

Eliminate 3-way valves & install VFD

$4,136 $48,000 $0 $48,000 11.6

Design / Construction Extras (15%)

$35,657 $35,657

Total Project $30,031 $273,373 $5,380 $267,993 8.9Highlighted ECMs are not included in total

CUSTOMER COST

SIMPLE PAYBACK

ENERGY SAVINGS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - POTENTIAL PROJECT

ENERGY CONSERVATION

MEASURES

ANNUAL ENERGY

SAVINGS ($)

PROJECT COST ($)

SMART START

INCENTIVES

Page 225: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 14 of 43

ECM #1: Lighting Upgrade – Interior spaces Description: The majority of the interior lighting throughout the Mount Prospect Elementary School is provided with fluorescent fixtures with older generation, 700 series 32W T8 lamps and electronic ballasts. Although 700 series T8 lamps are considered fairly efficient, further energy savings can be achieved by replacing the existing T8 lamps with new generation, 800 series 28W T8 lamps without compromising light output. CEG recommends, re-lamping all of the fixtures with 28W T8 lamps. In addition, some of the storage areas, locker room and gym areas, offices, auditorium, classrooms, restrooms and kitchen areas still have a variety of older fluorescent fixtures with magnetic ballasts and incandescent lamps. It is recommended to retrofit or replace all of the older fluorescent fixtures and the incandescent lights in these areas with high efficiency fluorescent T8 or T5 fixtures with electronic ballasts or compact fluorescent lamps. This ECM includes re-lamping of the existing fluorescent fixtures with 800 series, 28W T8 lamps. The ECM also includes retrofit of all older fluorescent fixtures with T8 or T5 fluorescent fixtures with electronic ballasts in the building. The new, energy efficient T8 fixtures will provide adequate lighting and will save on electrical costs due to better performance of the lamp and ballasts. Energy Savings Calculations: The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix outlines the hours of operation, proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods for each set of fixtures in the each building. Rebates and Incentives: There are no incentives available from NJ Smart Start® Program for the retrofits in this ECM. Replacement and Maintenance Savings: There is no significant replacement and maintenance savings due to implementation of this ECM.

Page 226: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 15 of 43

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $20,822NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0Net Installation Cost ($): $20,822Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $5,389Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $5,389Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 3.9Simple Lifetime ROI 288.2%Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $80,837Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 25%Net Present Value (NPV) $43,512.99

ECM #1 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 227: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 16 of 43

ECM #2: Lighting Upgrade – Multipurpose room Description: The multipurpose room at the Mt. Prospect Elementary School utilizes 400W metal halide fixtures for its lighting. Metal halide bulbs provide a reasonably efficient option for bay lighting however a few draw-backs that are common. Metal halide fixtures often have poor overall efficacy which limits the amount of light actually leaving the fixture. Also metal halide bulbs require a significant warm-up period and even longer cool down period eliminating the potential for occupancy sensors frequent switching. This symptom encourages the gymnasium lighting to be left on continuously during the day. Another drawback is the reduced lumen output (Lumen Maintenance) of the metal halide bulb over its life time. Average bulb output or “mean lumens,” is approximately 25% less than the bulb’s initial lumens for typical metal halide lamps. In addition the most rapid rate of light output decline is during the beginning of its life, approximately 15-20% light loss within the first 20% of its rated life. It is important to note that the light loss has no savings in energy used; therefore the overall light efficiency is continuously decreasing with age. The final drawback is the light quality or Color Rendering Index (CRI). Typical values for metal halide bulbs is 65, which is a measure of how close the light is to true “full spectrum” light produced by sunlight or incandescent lighting. Metal halide bulbs also show noticeable color shifting when the bulb is reaching the end of its life. Utilizing fluorescent fixtures in low and high bay spaces is a superior option over metal halide fixtures in all areas described above. Although metal halide fixtures provide light very efficiently at the start of the bulb life, the average efficiency over the life is below that of fluorescent fixtures. This ECM includes replacement of each of the existing gymnasium high bay metal halide light fixtures with T5HO fixtures with reflective lenses. The retrofit for the metal halide fixtures includes a one for one fixture replacement. The fluorescent fixtures selected will provide equivalent light compared to the average light output of the existing metal halide fixtures. The bulb replacement cost for T-5 HO lamps compared to the existing metal halide lamps were found to be approximately equal and therefore not included in the savings calculations. Hours of Operation Gymnasium: 2,600 Hours/Yr Energy Savings Calculations: The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix outlines the proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods. NJ Smart Start® Program Incentives are calculated as follows: From the Smart Start Incentive Appendix, the following incentives are warranted:

Page 228: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 17 of 43

For replacement of HID (400-999W) with new T-5 or T-8 fixtures = $100/Fixture Smart Start ® Incentive # of 400W Metal Halide Fixture Replaced $100 Smart Start ® Incentive 36 $100 $3600 There is no significant replacement or maintenance savings generated with this ECM. Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $8,640NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $3,600

Net Installation Cost ($): $5,040Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $3,544Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $3,544

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 1.4Simple Lifetime ROI 954.8%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $53,163Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 70%Net Present Value (NPV) $37,270.18

ECM #2 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 229: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 18 of 43

ECM #3: Lighting Controls Upgrade – Occupancy Sensors Description: Some of the lights in the school building are left on unnecessarily. In many cases the lights are left on because of the inconvenience to manually switch lights off when a room is left or on when a room is first occupied. This is common in rooms that are occupied for only short periods and only a few times per day. In some instances lights are left on due to the misconception that it is better to keep the lights on rather than to continuously switch lights on and off. Although increased switching reduces lamp life, the energy savings outweigh the lamp replacement costs. The payback timeframe for when to turn the lights off is approximately two minutes. If the lights are expected to be off for at least a two minute interval, then it pays to shut them off.

Lighting controls come in many forms. Sometimes an additional switch is adequate to provide reduced lighting levels when full light output is not needed. Occupancy sensors detect motion and will switch the lights on when the room is occupied. Occupancy sensors can either be mounted in place of a current wall switch, or on the ceiling to cover large areas. The U.S. Department of Energy sponsored a study to analyze energy savings achieved through various types of building system controls. The referenced savings is based on the “Advanced Sensors and Controls for Building Applications: Market Assessment and Potential R&D Pathways,” document posted for public use April 2005. The study has found that commercial buildings have the potential to achieve significant energy savings through the use of building controls. The average energy savings are as follows based on the report:

• Occupancy Sensors for Lighting Control 20% - 28% energy savings.

Savings resulting from the implementation of this ECM for energy management controls are estimated to be 20% of the total light energy controlled by occupancy sensors and daylight sensors (The majority of the savings is expected to be after school hours when rooms are left with lights on) This ECM includes installation of ceiling or switch mount sensors for individual offices, classrooms, large bathrooms, and libraries. Sensors shall be manufactured by Sensorswitch, Watt Stopper or equivalent. The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix of this report includes the summary of lighting controls implemented in this ECM and outlines the proposed controls, costs, savings, and payback periods. The calculations adjust the lighting power usage by the applicable percent savings for each area that includes lighting controls. Energy Savings Calculations:

( )( )kWh/YrEnergyLightControlledSavings%SavingsEnergy ×=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWh$CostElecAvekWhSavingsEnergySavings.

Page 230: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 19 of 43

Cost and Incentives:

Installation cost per dual-technology sensors (Basis: Sensor switch or equivalent) are as follows:

Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mount $250 per installation Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mount $150 per installation Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor with 2 Pole Powerpack

Remote mount $300 per installation Cost includes material and labor. From the NJ Smart Start® Program Incentives Appendix, the installation of a lighting control device warrants the following incentive: Occupancy Sensor Fixture Mounted (existing facility only) = $20 per sensor Occupancy Sensor Remote Mounted (existing facility only) = $35 per sensor

( ) $35)mountceilingof(#20$mountwallof#IncentiveStartSmart ×+×=® ( ) $1,550$35)mountceiling(3820$mountwall11IncentiveStartSmart =×+×=®

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $20,150NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $1,550Net Installation Cost ($): $18,600Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $7,379Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $7,379Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 2.5Simple Lifetime ROI 495.1%Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $110,682Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 39%Net Present Value (NPV) $69,487.71

ECM #3 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 231: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 20 of 43

ECM #4: Computer Monitor Replacement Description: There are a total 126 computers in the classrooms and offices with CRT desktop monitors. These computer monitors are outdated and have several disadvantages such as; significantly increased higher energy consumption, uses large amount of desk space, poor picture quality, distortions and flickering image, secular glare problems, and high weight, and electromagnetic emissions. Many of the drawbacks are difficult to quantify except for the energy use. CRT monitors use considerably more energy than an alternative flat panel LCD monitor. Replacement of the existing CRT monitors with LCD monitors saves considerable energy as well as provides other ergonomic benefits as well. Based on the site survey it was noted that a number of the computers were left on and they may be allowed to run 24 / 7. Some of the monitors were left in screen saver mode, which is deceiving since this mode only saves the computer screen from image burn in, however it does not save on energy consumption. The average operating hours for all computers and monitors is estimated based on the site survey observations. Energy consumption of computer monitors is based on manufacture’s specifications. This ECM includes replacement of all existing CRT monitors with LCD flat panel monitors throughout the building. Installation costs were neglected for this ECM with the intention that this ECM would be replaced by the facility IT technicians. The calculations are based on the following operating assumptions: Energy Savings Calculations: # of CRT Monitors: 128 Weeks per Yr: 42 Hrs per Week: 60 (12 hrs per day estimated average)

( ) ( )

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

××=

KWW1000

HrsOperationWPowerMonitorComputersof#UsageElectric

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWh$CostElecAvekWhUsageElectricCostEnergy

Page 232: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 21 of 43

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

ECM INPUTS CRT Monitors LCD Monitor -

# of CRT Monitors 128 128 -

Monitor Power Cons. (W) 75 25 50

Operating Hrs per Week 60 60 -

Operating Weeks per Yr 42 42 -

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.165 0.165 -

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Electric Usage (kWh) 24,192 8,064 16,128

Energy Cost ($) $3,992 $1,331 $2,661

COMMENTS:

COMPUTER MONITOR CALCULATIONS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

Installation cost of new monitors is estimated based on current pricing for a 17” LCD monitor on the market today. No labor costs were included for replacing the existing monitors with the new monitors. No incentives are available for installation of computer monitors. Net cost per monitor was estimated to be $100. Cost of installation is summarized in the table below.

ECM INPUT # OF UNITS UNIT COST TOTAL COSTCRT MONITORS 128 $100 $12,800Total 128 $12,800

COST & SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 233: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 22 of 43

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $12,800

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0Net Installation Cost ($): $12,800

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $2,661Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $2,661

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 4.8

Simple Lifetime ROI 211.8%Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $39,915Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 19%Net Present Value (NPV) $18,966.85

ECM #4 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 234: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 23 of 43

ECM #5: Demand Controlled Ventilation Demand Controlled Ventilation (DCV) is a means to provide active, zone level control of ventilation for spaces within a facility. The basic premise behind DCV is monitoring indoor CO2 levels versus outdoor CO2 levels in order to provide proper ventilation to the spaces within the facility as well as saving costly dollars treating unconditioned ventilation air. Carbon dioxide ventilation control or demand controlled ventilation (DCV) allows for the measurement and control of outside air ventilation levels to a target cfm/person ventilation rate in the space (i.e., 15 cfm/person) based on the number of people in the space. It is a direct measure of ventilation effectiveness and is a method whereby buildings can regain active and automatic zone level ventilation control, without having to open windows. The fixed ventilation approach depends on a set-it-and-forget-it methodology that is completely unresponsive to changes in the way spaces are utilized/occupied or how equipment is maintained. A DCV system utilizes various control algorithms to maintain a base ventilation rate. The system monitors space CO2 levels and the algorithm automatically adjusts the outdoor and return air dampers to provide the quantity of outdoor air to maintain the required CO2 level in the space. System designs are normally designed for maximum occupancy and the ventilation rates are designed for this (maximum) occupancy. In areas where occupancy swings are prevalent there is ample opportunity to reduce outdoor air quantity to satisfy the needs of the actual number of occupants present. By installing the DCV controls, energy savings are realized by the reduced quantities of outdoor air that do not require heating and cooling energy from the steam and chilled water plants. There are packaged rooftop air conditioning units (RTUs) providing heating and air conditioning to the cafeteria, stage area, north hall, gymnasium, library, south hall, classrooms #157, 147, and 149. When operating, these units provide minimum amount of outside air to the space. The outside air volume is typically based on the maximum occupancy of the space conditioned. When a given space is not fully occupied the outside air quantity delivered to the space is greater than the amount needed for adequate ventilation. This ECM includes the installation of CO2 sensors integrated into a demand control ventilation system, for the units mentioned above. This system allows the air handling unit to respond to changes in occupancy and therefore reduce the amount of outside air that has to be conditioned. Outside air accounts for a large portion of the energy consumption in the HVAC system, especially in high occupancy spaces. The components required for the demand control ventilation system installation include damper actuators, Variable Frequency Drives, CO2 sensors, wiring, Energy Management System equipment expansion and programming. Each occupied zone would require minimum one CO2 sensor installed to monitor occupancy levels. Often heating and air conditioning units switch to occupied mode several hours before the actual occupancy in order to provide pre-heating or pre-cooling of the space. Energy savings achieved through “Demand Control Ventilation” is calculated based on actual occupancy of the spaces and the hours the units are in occupied mode. Energy Savings Calculations:

Page 235: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 24 of 43

Following table summarizes the estimated occupancy characteristics of the spaces and the HVAC equipment at this school.

ECM INPUTS DCVAverage Full Occupancy Hours 9:00 AM - 3:00 PMFull Occupancy Hours per Day 6 HVAC Eqp. On Occupied Mode 6:00 AM - 6:00 PMOccupied Hours per day 12HVAC occupied / spaces not occupied 6Est. Conditioned outside air savings 50%

ENERGY SAVINGS

Following is a list of HVAC equipment and corresponding spaces identified for Demand Controlled Ventilation. IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY

DCV-1 Cafeteria 3 RTU 20 4 112

DCV-2 Stage 2 RTU 9 1.8 51

DCV-3 North Hall 2 RTU 10 2 56

DCV-4 Gymnasium 2 RTU 60 12 337

DCV-5 Library 2 RTU 20 4 112

DCV-6 South Hall 2 RTU 10 2 56

DCV-7 Classroom 157 1 RTU 5 1 28DCV-8 Classroom 147 1 RTU 6 1.2 34DCV-9 Classroom 149 1 RTU 7.5 1.5 42

Total 16 30 828

# of CO2 SENSORS

HVAC Unit Type

Total Cooling Capaity,

Tons

Outside Air Heating,

MBH

Assumptions: 400 CFM/Ton, 20% average fresh air, 65°F design day ΔT

Outside Air Cooling,

Tons INPUTS Service

Max outside air heating capacity = 1.08 x Fresh Air CFM x design day ΔT

Page 236: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 25 of 43

( )

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×

=

WhBtuEER

kWhWh1000

Hrs.Cooling Load Full AnnualhrTon

Btu12,000TonsCoolingeEnergyUsag Cooling

( ) 5%1kwhEnergy CoolingSavingsEnergy ×=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWh$CostElectricAvekWhUsageEnergyCostCooling

( )( ) ( )

( ) ( )%EfficiencyHeatingTherms

BtuValueHeatFuelF65

0.60DayHr. 21FDayHDD

Hr.BtuCapacity HeatingAir Outside

ThermsEnergy Heating×⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×°

×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×°×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

Therms$CostFuelAveThermsEnergyHeatingCost Heating

Page 237: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 26 of 43

ECM INPUTS DCVEquipment Rooftop UnitsOA Cooling Capacity, Tons 30Average Efficiency (EER) 9Annual Full Load Cooling Hours 800

OA Heating Capacity, MBh 828

Net Heating Efficiency (Gas) 75%

Heating Degree Days (65°F) 4599

Occupied Hours per day 12

Heating Energy Saving 50%

A/C Energy Savings 50%Elec Cost ($/kWh) $0.165

Natural Gas Cost ($/Therm) $1.38

ECM RESULTS DCV

Cooling Energy Cnsmption, kWh 31,467

Heating Energy (Therms) 5,627

Cooling Energy Savings kWh 15,733

Heating Energy Savings (Therms) 2,813

Electric Energy Cost Savings ($) $2,602Total Gas Cost Savings ($) $3,882Total Cost Savings ($) $6,484

DEMAND CONTROLLED VENTILATION

ENERGY SAVINGS

COMMENTS: HDD estimated based on Newark Liberty AirportOA: Outside Air

Cost and Incentives: Estimated installed cost for demand controlled ventilation for the Cafeteria Areas is $120,000. Estimated cost includes CO2 sensors, control wiring, electrical wiring, control system equipment expansion and programming. There are currently no Smart Start ® incentives available for a Demand Control Ventilation System.

Page 238: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 27 of 43

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $120,000NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0Net Installation Cost ($): $120,000

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $6,484

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $6,484Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 18.5Simple Lifetime ROI -19.0%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $97,257Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -3%Net Present Value (NPV) ($42,596.68)

ECM #5 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 239: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 28 of 43

ECM #6: Install New Unit Ventilators Description: The heating and air conditioning for the Mt. Prospect Elementary School classrooms are provided by Airedale unit ventilators, which are original to the building. The unit ventilators in the original section of the building are approximately 13 years old and near the end of expected useful service life, which is fifteen (15) years per ASHRAE. There are a total of 32 unit ventilators in the original section of the facility. The units are packaged with 4-ton (30 units) and 6-ton (2 units) cooling capacities and hot water heating coils. Currently, the units are monitored and controlled by the building management system. It is recommended to replace older unit ventilators with modern unit unit ventilators with built-in energy recovery wheels. The advantage of this setup is the utilization of the energy recovery system to recover the energy in the exhaust air in order to reduce the heating and cooling demand of the classrooms. This ECM replaces existing 32 older unit ventilators with new unit ventilators with high efficiency R410A compressors, hot water heating coils and built-in energy recovery wheels. The basis for this ECM is Airedale Classmate CHX-4&5 model unit ventilator with 450 CFM Energy Recovery ventilators and higher EER cooling modules. Energy Savings Calculations: The energy savings calculations are based improved full load cooling efficiency of the unit ventilators and the energy recovery capacity of the recovery wheels. There will be no heating energy savings due to the upgrade since both existing units and new units utilize hot water coils. Cooling energy consumption, electric demand and operation cost of each unit are calculated using the formulas below:

( )

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×

=

WhBtuEER

kWhWh1000

Hrs.CoolingLoadullFhrTon

Btu12,000TonsCoolingnConsumptioEnergy Cooling

kWh

Wh1,000 (EER) Efficiency Cooling

Ton 1BTU/Hr 12,000 (Tons)Capacity Cooling

Demand⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×

=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWh$CostElectricAvekWhUsageEnergyCostCooling

Page 240: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 29 of 43

Nominal recovery capacity of the proposed unit is obtained from the manufacturer. Total energy recovery of each unit at cooling and heating modes are calculated using heating degree days and full load cooling hours of the facility using the formulas below:

( ) ( )

( ) ( )%EfficiencyHeatingTherms

BtuValueHeatFuelF65

0.60DayHr.12FDayHDD

Hr.Btu RateRecovery

UnitYr ThermsRecoveredEnergy Heating

×⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×°

×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×°×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

=⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

×

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

×⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

=⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

×WhBtuEER

kWhWh1000

Hrs.CoolingLoadullFhr

BtuCooling RateRecovery

UnitYr kWh RecoveredEnergy Cooling

Results of the calculations can be found in the table below:

Page 241: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 30 of 43

ECM INPUTS EXISTING UNITS

PROPOSED UNITS

SAVINGS

ECM INPUTS Existing Unit Ventilators UVs

New UVs with ERVs

Number of 4 Ton Units 30 30 -Number of 6 Ton Units 2 2 -Total Cooling Capacity (Tons) 132 132 -Cooling Efficiency (EER) 8 10.35 2.35Full Load Cooling Hours 800 800 -Cooling Energy Recovery, MBH/Unit - 16.3 16.3Air Side Economizer - Enthalpy based Enthalpy basedHeating Energy Recovery, MBH/Unit - 17.7 17.7ERV Operation Hours / Day - 12 -Heating Degree Days 4599 4599 -Net Heating System Efficiency 80% 80% -Electric Cost ($/KWH) $0.165 $0.165 0.165Natural Gas Cost ($/Therm) $1.320 $1.320 1.320

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED UNITS

SAVINGS

Cooling Energy Consumption (kWh) 158,400 122,435 35,965Total Demand (kW) 198 153 45Cooling Energy Cost ($) $26,136 $20,202 $5,934Cooling Energy Recovered (kWh) - 40,317 40,317Heating Energy Recovered (Therms) - 3,607 3,607Cooling Energy Recovered ($) - $6,652 $6,652Heating Energy Recovered ($) - $4,761 $4,761Total ($) $26,136 $8,789 $17,347COMMENTS:

UNIT VENTILATOR CALCULATIONS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

Project cost, incentives and maintenance savings:

Total installed cost for 32 unit ventilators with hot water coils, high efficiency R410a compressors and energy recovery ventilators (ERV) is 480,000. The selected equipment does not qualify for any of the NJ Smart Start rebates. There is no significant maintenance savings associated to this ECM.

Page 242: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 31 of 43

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $480,000NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0Net Installation Cost ($): $480,000

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $17,347

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $17,347Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 27.7Simple Lifetime ROI -45.8%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings 0Simple Lifetime Savings $260,212Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -7%Net Present Value (NPV) ($272,907.17)

ECM #6 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 243: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 32 of 43

ECM #7: Water Cooled Chiller Installation Description: Cooling for the Mount Prospect Elementary School is achieved by unit ventilators in the classrooms with direct expansion cooling and packaged HVAC equipment in the offices and meeting areas. Air cooled cooling equipment uses more energy than water cooled systems. Therefore, water cooled chillers provide significant energy savings over air cooled unitary equipment due to the efficiency increase. The average full load efficiency of the existing air cooled unitary equipments is approximately 9 EER, which corresponds to 1.33 KW/Ton. The efficiency of a water cooled chiller is approximately 0.38 KW/Ton (IPLV). The ancillary pumping energy and cooling tower fan energy is approximately 0.14 KW/Ton. Cooling tower make-up water requirements is estimated to be 2.5 Gal/Ton-Hr. This ECM includes the installation of two new water cooled chillers to provide chilled water to the existing rooftop HVAC units and the unit ventilators. The equipment includes an outdoor water-cooled chiller package with condenser water pumps, a cooling tower, chilled water pumps and chilled water coils for the rooftop units and the unit ventilators. The installation also includes all associated piping, labor, and controls. The ECM is based on two (2) 150 Ton McQuay model number WMC 150D Magnitude™ Water-Cooled Frictionless Centrifugal Chillers or equivalent. Sizing indicated within the calculation of this ECM is based on replacement of the total existing equipment capacity. The owner should have a Professional Engineer verify heating and cooling loads to verify actual building cooling requirements. Parameters:

INPUT

Full Load Cooling Hrs.

Average Cost of Electricity

Total Cooling Capacity

Existing Unit Eff. (Ave)

New Unit Eff.*

800

0.52 kW/Ton*New unit efficiency includes ancillary equipment energy

WATER COOLED CHILLER PARAMETERS

Elec Cost ($/kWh)

250

9 EER (1.33 kW/Ton)

Page 244: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 33 of 43

Energy Savings Calculations: Cooling Energy:

( ) Hrs.LoadFullTonkWEff.TonsCoolingEnergyCooling ×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

( )HrsLoadFull

kWhSavingsEnergySavingsDemand =

( ) HrsLoadFullTonsCapacityCoolingHrTon

galwaterupMakeUsageWater ××⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛−=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

Gal$CostWaterAvegalnconsumptiowaterCostWater

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWh$CostElecAvekWhEnergyElecSavingsElec

Energy savings calculations are summarized in the table below.

Page 245: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 34 of 43

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

ECM INPUTSExisting Air Cooled

Chillers

Water Cooled Chiller & Cooling

Tower-

Operating Capacity (Tons) 250 250 -

Total System Efficiency (KW/Ton)

1.33 0.52 -

Full Load Cooling Hrs (Est.) 800 800 -

Make-Up Water Use (Gal/Ton Hr)

0 2.5 -

Cooling Energy (kWh) 266,667 104,000 -

Water Cost ($/Gallon) 0.0025 0.0025 -

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.165 0.165 -

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Water Usage (Gallons) 0.0 500,000 (500,000)

Electric Energy (kWh) 266,667 104,000 162,667

Electric Demand (KW) 333.3 130 203

Water Cost ($) $0 1,250 (1,250)

Electric Energy Cost ($) $44,093 $17,196 $26,897

Total Energy Cost ($) $44,093 $18,446 $25,647

COMMENTS: New chiller efficiency based on water cooled, centrifugual, magnetic bearing chillers

WATER COOLED CHILLER CALCULATIONS

ANNUAL ENERGY AND COST SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

Page 246: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 35 of 43

Installation cost and Equipment Incentives Installation cost for the packaged water cooled chiller, chilled water and condenser water pumps, cooling tower and controls is estimated to be $1,400,000 From the NJ Smart Start® Program appendix, the unit falls under the category “Electric Chiller” and warrants an incentive based on part load efficiency (EER) at 0.38 KW/Ton. The program incentives are calculated as follows:

( )( ) $15,900$53/TonTons1502

Incentive$/TonTonsCoolingIncentiveStartSmart =××=

×=®

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $1,400,000NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $15,900

Net Installation Cost ($): $1,384,100Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): ($1,250)Energy Savings ($/Yr): $26,897

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $25,647Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 20

Simple Payback 54.0Simple Lifetime ROI -62.9%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings ($25,000)Simple Lifetime Savings $512,939Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -8%Net Present Value (NPV) ($1,002,538.24)

ECM #7 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 247: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 36 of 43

ECM #8: Install NEMA Premium® Efficiency Motors Description: The improved efficiency of the NEMA Premium® efficient motors is primarily due to better designs with use of better materials to reduce losses. Surprisingly, the electricity used to power a motor represents 95 % of its total lifetime operating cost. Because many motors operate continuously 24 hours a day, even small increases in efficiency can yield substantial energy and dollar savings. The electric motors driving the primary hot water pumps in the main boiler room are candidates for replacing with premium efficiency motors. These standard efficiency motors run considerable amount of time over a year. This energy conservation measure replaces existing electric motors over 5 HP or more with NEMA Premium® efficiency motors. NEMA Premium® is the most efficient motor designation in the marketplace today.

IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY

EQMTID FUNCTION

MOTOR HP

HOURS OF OPERATION

EXISTING EFFICIENCY

NEMA PREMIUM

EFFICIENCYHWP-1 Hot Water Pump 15 2,160 87.5% 92.4%HWP-2 Hot Water Pump 15 2,160 87.5% 92.4%

Energy Savings Calculations:

Electric usage, kWhHP LF 0.746 Hours of Operation

Motor Efficiency

where, HP Motor Nameplate Horsepower Rating LF Load Factor Motor Efficiency Motor Nameplate Efficiency

ProposedExisting UsageElectricUsageElectrickWhSavings,UsageElectric −=

Electric Usage Savings, kWh Electric UsageE Electric UsageP

Electric cost savings Electric Usage Savings Electric Rate $

kWh

The calculations were carried out and the results are tabulated in the table below:

Page 248: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 37 of 43

PREMIUM EFFICIENCY MOTOR CALCULATIONS

EQMTID

MOTOR HP

LOAD FACTOR

EXISTING EFFICIENCY

NEMA PREMIUM

EFFICIENCY

POWER SAVINGS

kW

ENERGY SAVINGS

kWH

COST SAVINGS

HWP-1 15 90% 87.5% 92.4% 0.61 1,325 $219HWP-2 15 90% 87.5% 92.4% 0.61 1,325 $219

TOTAL 1.2 2,651 $437

Equipment Cost and Incentives

Below is a summary of SmartStart Building® incentives for premium efficiency motors:

HORSE POWER

NJ SMART START

INCENTIVE5 $60

7.5 $9010 $10015 $11520 $12525 $130

INCENTIVES

The following table outlines the summary of motor replacement costs and incentives:

EQMTID

MOTOR POWER

HP

INSTALLED COST

SMART START

INCENTIVENET COST

TOTAL SAVINGS

SIMPLE PAYBACK

HWP-1 15 $3,652 $115 $3,537 $219 16.2HWP-2 15 $3,652 $115 $3,537 $219 16.2

TOTAL Totals: $7,304 $230 $7,074 $437 16.2

MOTOR REPLACEMENT SUMMARY

Page 249: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 38 of 43

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $7,304NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $230

Net Installation Cost ($): $7,074Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $437Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $437

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 20Simple Payback 16.2

Simple Lifetime ROI 23.7%Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $8,748Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 2%Net Present Value (NPV) ($566.59)

ECM #8 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 250: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 39 of 43

ECM #9: Install Pump VFD’s Description: The packaged rooftop air conditioners and the unit ventilators are utilizing a constant volume pumping design. The units have 3-way control valves which allow continuous flow through the piping loop throughout the building. As a result the water loop pumps must provide full power output to circulate the water through all unit ventilators and the rooftop units continuously. 2-way control valves provide flow through the heat exchanger equipment only when there is a call for heating or cooling, unlike 3-way control valves that allow constant flow of the water loop. 3-way control valves require full pumping energy continuously, while 2-way control valves allow the system to reduce flow when it is not needed. This measure includes capping off the bypass port on the 3-way control valves which effectively turns the valves into “2-way” control valves. When the unit ventilator is not calling for heating, the control valve closes reducing overall flow of the system. Variable frequency drives allow the pumps to slow down in response to a reduction in overall system flow. The reduction in operating flow allows the pumps to reduce energy consumption for all hours that the heating system is not at its peak load. This ECM includes the installation of Variable Frequency Drives on the two (2) existing 15 horsepower hot water pumps in conjunction with piping modifications at each unit ventilator and the rooftop unit to cap off the bypass port on the 3-way control valves. The VFD’s would be controlled by a differential pressure sensor in the water loop to measure demand for water. The furthest unit ventilators from the loop pumps would remain as 3-way control valves (constant flow) to eliminate dead heading potential. This ECM also includes replacement of the existing pump motors with inverter duty motors that meet NEMA Premium Efficiency Standard, which also helps to reduce energy consumption. Energy and cost savings calculations are based on calculation software “PumpSave v4.2,” provided by ABB. The PumpSave calculation software is used to estimate the pumping energy for variable speed pump systems. The boiler water loop pump operation is estimated to be 4,380 Hrs per year since this system is used for about 6 months total. The pump flow, HD, and resultant energy are calculated based on the existing pump horse power installed. Energy Savings Calculations:

( )( )

( ) ( )% EfficiencyMotor% EfficiencyPump3960

Ft HeadminGalRateFlowGravitySpecific

HPPower VolumeCons.××

×⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×

=

( ) ( ) ( )Hrs.Operation HPKW 0.746HPPower kWhCons.Energy ×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

Page 251: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 40 of 43

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWh$CostElectricAvekWh UsageEnergyCostEnergy

Boiler Hot Water VFD Pumping Energy:

Page 252: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 41 of 43

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSECM INPUTS CV Pumps VFD Pumps

Flow Control CV VFD -

Flow* (GPM) 380 380 -

Head* (Ft) 100 100 -

Pump Efficiency (%) 80% 80% -

Motor Efficiency (%) 88% 92.4% 4.9%

Operating Hrs 4320 4320 -

Estimated Power (HP) 13.7 13.0 0.73

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.165 0.165 -

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Electric Energy (kWh) 44,179 19,110 25,069

Electric Energy Cost ($) $7,289 $3,153 $4,136

BOILER HOT WATER PUMPS VFD CALULATION

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

COMMENTS: - VFD pump energy is based on ABB energy savings calculator for pumps, "Pump Save," version 4.2. Flow rate for VFD Pump calculation is summarized in the operating profile shown in the Pump Save output.- Hot water flow & head estimated based on boiler capacity

Installation cost for four (2) VFDs, piping work, re-balancing, capping of 3-way valves and controls is estimated to be $48,000. Currently there are no NJ Smart Start® Program Incentives for installation of hot water pump Variable Frequency Drives.

Page 253: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 42 of 43

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $48,000

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0Net Installation Cost ($): $48,000

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $4,136Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $4,136

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 11.6

Simple Lifetime ROI 29.3%Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $62,046Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 3%Net Present Value (NPV) $1,379.83

ECM #9 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 254: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Mount Prospect Elementary School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 43 of 43

V. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations include no cost/low cost measures, Operation & Maintenance (O&M) items, and water conservation measures with attractive paybacks. These measures are not eligible for the Smart Start Buildings incentives from the office of Clean Energy but save energy none the less.

A. Chemically clean the condenser and evaporator coils periodically to optimize efficiency. Poorly maintained heat transfer surfaces can reduce efficiency 5-10%.

B. Maintain all weather stripping on windows and doors.

C. Clean all light fixtures to maximize light output to avoid use of task lighting.

D. Provide more frequent air filter changes to decrease overall system power usage and maintain better IAQ.

E. Turn off computers when not in use. Ensure computers are not running in screen saver mode which saves the monitor screen not energy.

F. Ensure outside air dampers are functioning properly and only open during occupied mode.

It was noted at the site survey that the HVAC systems in several rooms were not controlling temperature correctly. The result of the controls issues causes space temperatures to become uncomfortable and drastic measures such as opening windows on extremely cold days. This type of issue requires a whole system controls evaluation for the building to determine where control problems are taking place. Based on information provided by the operations personnel, there are several control systems within the building which operate different section or systems throughout the building. In addition, multiple control vendors are utilized to maintain the control systems. The use of multiple control systems and control vendors to support the systems will very likely cause issues with the overall function of the building. The systems and controls throughout the district represent a large potential “energy leak” throughout the building. It is recommended to quantify the control system points and verify their proper operation through Retro-Commissioning. Retro-Commissioning allows facility owners to re-establish the operation of the HVAC systems back to the original specifications. A third party evaluation is highly recommended to review the controls of the systems and provide insight into the corrections needed. It is also recommended to consider the renovation of all control systems into one central control system to avoid the overlap and communication gap when utilizing multiple control systems. This renovation should be consistent across all facility throughout Bernards Public Schools to maximize the benefit of central controls.

Page 255: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX A1 of 1

LIFETIME ENERGY SAVINGS

LIFETIME MAINTENANCE

SAVINGSLIFETIME ROI SIMPLE PAYBACK INTERNAL RATE OF

RETURN (IRR)NET PRESENT VALUE

(NPV)

MATERIAL LABOR REBATES, INCENTIVES

NET INSTALLATION

COSTENERGY MAINT. / SREC TOTAL (Yearly Saving * ECM Lifetime)

(Yearly Maint Svaing * ECM Lifetime)

(Lifetime Savings - Net Cost) / (Net Cost) (Net cost / Yearly Savings)

($) ($) ($) ($) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) (Yr) ($) ($) (%) (Yr) ($) ($)

ECM #1 Lighting upgrade - Interior spaces $8,329 $12,493 $0 $20,822 $5,389 $0 $5,389 15 $80,837 $0 288.2% 3.9 24.97% $43,512.99

ECM #2 Lighting upgrade - Multi purpose room $3,456 $5,184 $3,600 $5,040 $3,544 $0 $3,544 15 $53,163 $0 954.8% 1.4 70.30% $37,270.18

ECM #3 Lighting controls upgrade $8,060 $12,090 $1,550 $18,600 $7,379 $0 $7,379 15 $110,682 $0 495.1% 2.5 39.40% $69,487.71

ECM #4 CRT Computer monitors $12,800 $0 $0 $12,800 $2,661 $0 $2,661 15 $39,915 $0 211.8% 4.8 19.32% $18,966.85

ECM #5 Demand ventilation (single zone RTUs) $120,000 $0 $0 $120,000 $6,484 $0 $6,484 15 $97,257 $0 -19.0% 18.5 -2.52% ($42,596.68)

ECM #6 Unit ventilator upgrade $320,000 $160,000 $0 $480,000 $14,443 $0 $14,443 15 $216,652 $0 -54.9% 33.2 -8.62% ($307,574.93)

ECM #7 Water cooled chiller to replace DX cooling $1,400,000 $0 $15,900 $1,384,100 $26,897 ($1,250) $25,647 20 $512,939 -$25,000 -62.9% 54.0 -8.03% ($1,002,538.24)

ECM #8 Premium efficiency pump motors $7,304 $0 $230 $7,074 $437 $0 $437 20 $8,748 $0 23.7% 16.2 2.11% ($566.59)

ECM #9 Eliminate 3-way valves & install VFD $48,000 $0 $0 $48,000 $4,136 $0 $4,136 15 $62,046 $0 29.3% 11.6 3.39% $1,379.83

REM #1 Solar PV $2,883,510 $0 $0 $2,883,510 $39,955 $128,295 $168,250 15 $2,523,752 $1,924,430 -12.5% 17.1 -1.62% ($874,950.97)

Notes: 1) The variable Cn in the formulas for Internal Rate of Return and Net Present Value stands for the cash flow during each period.2) The variable DR in the NPV equation stands for Discount Rate3) For NPV and IRR calculations: From n=0 to N periods where N is the lifetime of ECM and Cn is the cash flow during each period .

REM RENEWABLE ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY

ECM COST & SAVINGS BREAKDOWNCONCORD ENGINEERING GROUP

Bernards Township - Mount Prospect School

INSTALLATION COST YEARLY SAVINGSECM

LIFETIMEDESCRIPTIONECM NO.

ECM ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 256: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 1 of 4

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 520 BURNT MILL ROAD VOORHEES, NEW JERSEY 08043 PHONE: (856) 427-0200 FAX: (856) 427-6508

SmartStart Building Incentives The NJ SmartStart Buildings Program offers financial incentives on a wide variety of building system equipment. The incentives were developed to help offset the initial cost of energy-efficient equipment. The following tables show the current available incentives as of February 15, 2011:

Electric Chillers Water-Cooled Chillers $12 - $170 per ton

Air-Cooled Chillers $8 - $52 per ton Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Gas Cooling Gas Absorption Chillers $185 - $400 per ton

Gas Engine-Driven Chillers Calculated through custom measure path)

Desiccant Systems $1.00 per cfm – gas or electric

Electric Unitary HVAC Unitary AC and Split Systems $73 - $92 per ton

Air-to-Air Heat Pumps $73 - $92 per ton Water-Source Heat Pumps $81 per ton

Packaged Terminal AC & HP $65 per ton Central DX AC Systems $40- $72 per ton

Dual Enthalpy Economizer Controls $250 Occupancy Controlled Thermostat

(Hospitality & Institutional Facility) $75 per thermostat

Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Gas Heating Gas Fired Boilers < 300 MBH $300 per unit

Gas Fired Boilers ≥ 300 - 1500 MBH $1.75 per MBH

Gas Fired Boilers ≥1500 - ≤ 4000 MBH $1.00 per MBH

Gas Fired Boilers > 4000 MBH (Calculated through Custom Measure Path)

Gas Furnaces $300 - $400 per unit, AFUE ≥ 92%

Page 257: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 2 of 4

Ground Source Heat Pumps

Closed Loop $450 per ton, EER ≥ 16 $600 per ton, EER ≥ 18 $750 per ton, EER ≥ 20

Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Variable Frequency Drives Variable Air Volume $65 - $155 per hp Chilled-Water Pumps $60 per VFD rated hp

Compressors $5,250 to $12,500 per drive Cooling Towers ≥ 10 hp $60 per VFD rated hp

Natural Gas Water Heating

Gas Water Heaters ≤ 50 gallons, 0.67 energy factor or better $50 per unit

Gas-Fired Water Heaters > 50 gallons $1.00 - $2.00 per MBH Gas-Fired Booster Water Heaters $17 - $35 per MBH Gas Fired Tankless Water Heaters $300 per unit

Prescriptive Lighting Retro fit of T12 to T-5 or T-8 Lamps

w/Electronic Ballast in Existing Facilities

$10 per fixture (1-4 lamps)

Replacement of T12 with new T-5 or T-8 Lamps w/Electronic Ballast in

Existing Facilities $25 per fixture (1-4 lamps)

Replacement of incandescent with screw-in PAR 38 or PAR 30 (CFL)

bulb $7 per bulb

T-8 reduced Wattage (28w/25w 4’, 1-4 lamps)

Lamp & ballast replacement $10 per fixture

Hard-Wired Compact Fluorescent $25 - $30 per fixture

Metal Halide w/Pulse Start Including Parking Lot $25 per fixture

T-5 and T-8 High Bay Fixtures $16 - $200 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Retrofit with induction lamp, power coupler and generator

(must be 30% less watts/fixture than HID system)

$50 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Replacement with new HID ≥ 100w $70 per fixture

Page 258: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 3 of 4

Prescriptive Lighting - LED

LED New Exit Sign Fixture Existing Facility < 75 kw Existing Facility > 75 kw

$20 per fixture $10 per fixture

LED Display Case Lighting $30 per display case

LED Shelf-Mtd. Display & Task Lights $15 per linear foot

LED Portable Desk Lamp $20 per fixture

LED Wall-wash Lights $30 per fixture

LED Recessed Down Lights $35 per fixture LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Area

and Roadway Luminaries $175 per fixture

LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Decorative Luminaries $175 per fixture

LED Outdoor Wall-Mounted Area Luminaries $100 per fixture

LED Parking Garage Luminaries $100 per fixture

LED Track or Mono-Point Directional Lighting Fixtures $50 per fixture

LED High-Bay and Low-Bay Fixtures for Commercial & Industrial Bldgs. $150 per fixture

LED High-Bay-Aisle Lighting $150 per fixture

LED Bollard Fixtures $50 per fixture

LED Linear Panels (2x2 Troffers only) $100 per fixture

LED Fuel Pump Canopy $100 per fixture

LED Refrigerator/Freezer case lighting replacement of fluorescent in medium

and low temperature display case

$42 per 5 foot $65 per 6 foot

Page 259: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 4 of 4

Lighting Controls – Occupancy Sensors

Wall Mounted $20 per control Remote Mounted $35 per control

Daylight Dimmers $25 per fixture Occupancy Controlled hi-low

Fluorescent Controls $25 per fixture controlled

Lighting Controls – HID or Fluorescent Hi-Bay Controls Occupancy hi-low $75 per fixture controlled Daylight Dimming $75 per fixture controlled

Daylight Dimming - office $50 per fixture controlled

Premium Motors Three-Phase Motors $45 - $700 per motor

Fractional HP Motors Electronic Communicated Motors (replacing shaded pole motors in

refrigerator/freezer cases)

$40 per electronic communicated motor

Other Equipment Incentives

Performance Lighting

$1.00 per watt per SF below program incentive threshold, currently 5% more energy efficient than ASHRAE 90.1-

2007 for New Construction and Complete Renovation

Custom Electric and Gas Equipment Incentives not prescriptive

Custom Measures

$0.16 KWh and $1.60/Therm of 1st year savings, or a buy down to a 1 year

payback on estimated savings. Minimum required savings of 75,000 KWh or 1,500 Therms and a IRR of at

least 10%. Multi Measures Bonus 15%

Page 260: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

OMB No. 2060-0347

STATEMENT OF ENERGY PERFORMANCEBT Mt. Prospect Elementary School

Building ID: 2490934 For 12-month Period Ending: September 30, 20101

Date SEP becomes ineligible: N/A Date SEP Generated: March 04, 2011

FacilityBT Mt. Prospect Elementary School111 Hansom RoadBasking Ridge, NJ 07920

Facility OwnerBernards Public Schools101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Primary Contact for this FacilityConnie Coriell101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Year Built: 1998Gross Floor Area (ft2): 97,908

Energy Performance Rating2 (1-100) 72

Site Energy Use Summary3

Electricity - Grid Purchase(kBtu) 3,268,423 Natural Gas (kBtu)4 3,048,700 Total Energy (kBtu) 6,317,123

Energy Intensity5 Site (kBtu/ft2/yr) 65 Source (kBtu/ft2/yr) 144 Emissions (based on site energy use) Greenhouse Gas Emissions (MtCO2e/year) N/A Electric Distribution Utility N/A National Average Comparison National Average Site EUI 80 National Average Source EUI 179 % Difference from National Average Source EUI -19% Building Type K-12

School

Stamp of Certifying Professional

Based on the conditions observed at thetime of my visit to this building, I certify that

the information contained within thisstatement is accurate.

Meets Industry Standards6 for Indoor EnvironmentalConditions:Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality N/A Acceptable Thermal Environmental Conditions N/A Adequate Illumination N/A

Certifying ProfessionalMichael Fischette520 S. Burnt Mill Road Voorhees, NJ 08043

Notes: 1. Application for the ENERGY STAR must be submitted to EPA within 4 months of the Period Ending date. Award of the ENERGY STAR is not final until approval is received from EPA.2. The EPA Energy Performance Rating is based on total source energy. A rating of 75 is the minimum to be eligible for the ENERGY STAR.3. Values represent energy consumption, annualized to a 12-month period.4. Natural Gas values in units of volume (e.g. cubic feet) are converted to kBtu with adjustments made for elevation based on Facility zip code.5. Values represent energy intensity, annualized to a 12-month period.6. Based on Meeting ASHRAE Standard 62 for ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality, ASHRAE Standard 55 for thermal comfort, and IESNA Lighting Handbook for lighting quality.

The government estimates the average time needed to fill out this form is 6 hours (includes the time for entering energy data, Licensed Professional facility inspection, and notarizing the SEP) andwelcomes suggestions for reducing this level of effort. Send comments (referencing OMB control number) to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S., EPA (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,NW, Washington, D.C. 20460.

EPA Form 5900-16

Appendix CPage 1 of 7

Page 261: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

ENERGY STAR®

Data Checklistfor Commercial Buildings

In order for a building to qualify for the ENERGY STAR, a Professional Engineer (PE) or a Registered Architect (RA) must validate the accuracy of the data underlyingthe building's energy performance rating. This checklist is designed to provide an at-a-glance summary of a property's physical and operating characteristics, as well asits total energy consumption, to assist the PE or RA in double-checking the information that the building owner or operator has entered into Portfolio Manager.

Please complete and sign this checklist and include it with the stamped, signed Statement of Energy Performance.NOTE: You must check each box to indicate that each value is correct, OR include a note.

CRITERION VALUE AS ENTERED INPORTFOLIO MANAGER VERIFICATION QUESTIONS NOTES

Building Name BT Mt. Prospect Elementary

School Is this the official building name to be displayed inthe ENERGY STAR Registry of LabeledBuildings?

Type K-12 School Is this an accurate description of the space inquestion?

Location 111 Hansom Road, Basking

Ridge, NJ 07920 Is this address accurate and complete? Correctweather normalization requires an accurate zipcode.

Single Structure Single Facility

Does this SEP represent a single structure? SEPscannot be submitted for multiple-buildingcampuses (with the exception of acute care orchildren's hospitals) nor can they be submitted asrepresenting only a portion of a building

BT Mt. Prospect Elementary School (K-12 School)

CRITERION VALUE AS ENTERED INPORTFOLIO MANAGER VERIFICATION QUESTIONS NOTES

Gross Floor Area 97,908 Sq. Ft.

Does this square footage include all supportingfunctions such as kitchens and break rooms usedby staff, storage areas, administrative areas,elevators, stairwells, atria, vent shafts, etc. Alsonote that existing atriums should only include thebase floor area that it occupies. Interstitial(plenum) space between floors should not beincluded in the total. Finally gross floor area is notthe same as leasable space. Leasable space is asubset of gross floor area.

Open Weekends? Yes

Is this building normally open at all on theweekends? This includes activities beyond thework conducted by maintenance, cleaning, andsecurity personnel. Weekend activity could includeany time when the space is used for classes,performances or other school or communityactivities. If the building is open on the weekend aspart of the standard schedule during one or moreseasons, the building should select ?yes? for openweekends. The ?yes? response should applywhether the building is open for one or both of theweekend days.

Number of PCs 250 Is this the number of personal computers in theK12 School?

Number of walk-inrefrigeration/freezer

units 2

Is this the total number of commercial walk-in typefreezers and coolers? These units are typicallyfound in storage and receiving areas.

Presence ofcooking facilities Yes

Does this school have a dedicated space in whichfood is prepared and served to students? If theschool has space in which food for students is onlykept warm and/or served to students, or has only agalley that is used by teachers and staff then theanswer is "no".

Percent Cooled 100 % Is this the percentage of the total floor space withinthe facility that is served by mechanical coolingequipment?

Percent Heated 100 % Is this the percentage of the total floor space withinthe facility that is served by mechanical heatingequipment?

Months 12(Optional) Is this school in operation for at least 8 months ofthe year?

Page 1 of 4

Appendix CPage 2 of 7

Page 262: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

High School? No

Is this building a high school (teaching grades 10,11, and/or 12)? If the building teaches to highschool students at all, the user should check 'yes'to 'high school'. For example, if the school teachesto grades K-12 (elementary/middle and highschool), the user should check 'yes' to 'highschool'.

Page 2 of 4

Appendix CPage 3 of 7

Page 263: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

ENERGY STAR®

Data Checklistfor Commercial Buildings

Energy ConsumptionPower Generation Plant or Distribution Utility:

Fuel Type: Electricity

Meter: Electricity (kWh (thousand Watt-hours))Space(s): Entire Facility

Generation Method: Grid Purchase

Start Date End Date Energy Use (kWh (thousand Watt-hours))

09/01/2010 09/30/2010 58,902.00

08/01/2010 08/31/2010 97,774.00

07/01/2010 07/31/2010 47,076.00

06/01/2010 06/30/2010 102,545.00

05/01/2010 05/31/2010 85,584.00

04/01/2010 04/30/2010 70,458.00

03/01/2010 03/31/2010 88,813.00

02/01/2010 02/28/2010 73,897.00

01/01/2010 01/31/2010 89,041.00

12/01/2009 12/31/2009 76,127.00

11/01/2009 11/30/2009 86,798.00

10/01/2009 10/31/2009 80,905.00

Electricity Consumption (kWh (thousand Watt-hours)) 957,920.00

Electricity Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 3,268,423.04

Total Electricity (Grid Purchase) Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 3,268,423.04

Is this the total Electricity (Grid Purchase) consumption at this building including allElectricity meters?

Fuel Type: Natural Gas

Meter: Natural Gas (therms)Space(s): Entire Facility

Start Date End Date Energy Use (therms)

09/01/2010 09/30/2010 112.00

08/01/2010 08/31/2010 37.00

07/01/2010 07/31/2010 58.00

06/01/2010 06/30/2010 190.00

05/01/2010 05/31/2010 438.00

04/01/2010 04/30/2010 1,253.00

03/01/2010 03/31/2010 3,915.00

02/01/2010 02/28/2010 6,112.00

01/01/2010 01/31/2010 7,240.00

12/01/2009 12/31/2009 6,452.00

Page 3 of 4

Appendix CPage 4 of 7

Page 264: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

11/01/2009 11/30/2009 2,949.00

10/01/2009 10/31/2009 1,731.00

Natural Gas Consumption (therms) 30,487.00

Natural Gas Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 3,048,700.00

Total Natural Gas Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 3,048,700.00

Is this the total Natural Gas consumption at this building including all Natural Gas meters?

Additional FuelsDo the fuel consumption totals shown above represent the total energy use of this building?Please confirm there are no additional fuels (district energy, generator fuel oil) used in this facility.

On-Site Solar and Wind EnergyDo the fuel consumption totals shown above include all on-site solar and/or wind power located atyour facility? Please confirm that no on-site solar or wind installations have been omitted from thislist. All on-site systems must be reported.

Certifying Professional (When applying for the ENERGY STAR, the Certifying Professional must be the same PE or RA that signed and stamped the SEP.)

Name: _____________________________________________ Date: _____________

Signature: ______________________________________ Signature is required when applying for the ENERGY STAR.

Page 4 of 4

Appendix CPage 5 of 7

Page 265: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

FOR YOUR RECORDS ONLY. DO NOT SUBMIT TO EPA.

Please keep this Facility Summary for your own records; do not submit it to EPA. Only the Statement of Energy Performance(SEP), Data Checklist and Letter of Agreement need to be submitted to EPA when applying for the ENERGY STAR.

FacilityBT Mt. Prospect Elementary School111 Hansom RoadBasking Ridge, NJ 07920

Facility OwnerBernards Public Schools101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Primary Contact for this FacilityConnie Coriell101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

General InformationBT Mt. Prospect Elementary School

Gross Floor Area Excluding Parking: (ft2) 97,908 Year Built 1998 For 12-month Evaluation Period Ending Date: September 30, 2010

Facility Space Use SummaryBT Mt. Prospect Elementary School

Space Type K-12 School

Gross Floor Area(ft2) 97,908

Open Weekends? Yes

Number of PCs 250

Number of walk-in refrigeration/freezerunits 2

Presence of cooking facilities Yes

Percent Cooled 100

Percent Heated 100

Monthso 12

High School? No

School Districtod N/A

Energy Performance ComparisonEvaluation Periods Comparisons

Performance Metrics Current(Ending Date 09/30/2010)

Baseline(Ending Date 07/31/2010) Rating of 75 Target National Average

Energy Performance Rating 72 72 75 N/A 50

Energy Intensity

Site (kBtu/ft2) 65 64 63 N/A 80

Source (kBtu/ft2) 144 143 140 N/A 179

Energy Cost

$/year $ 146,783.67 $ 145,846.54 $ 142,324.65 N/A $ 182,000.83

$/ft2/year $ 1.50 $ 1.49 $ 1.45 N/A $ 1.86

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

MtCO2e/year N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

kgCO2e/ft2/year N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

More than 50% of your building is defined as K-12 School. Please note that your rating accounts for all of the spaces listed. The National Average column presentsenergy performance data your building would have if your building had an average rating of 50. Notes:o - This attribute is optional.d - A default value has been supplied by Portfolio Manager.

Appendix CPage 6 of 7

Page 266: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

2010BT Mt. Prospect Elementary School111 Hansom RoadBasking Ridge, NJ 07920

Portfolio Manager Building ID: 2490934

The energy use of this building has been measured and compared to other similar buildings using theEnvironmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Energy Performance Scale of 1–100, with 1 being the least energyefficient and 100 the most energy efficient. For more information, visit energystar.gov/benchmark.

This building’sscore

72

100

Most Efficient

This building uses 144 kBtu per square foot per year.*

*Based on source energy intensity for the 12 month period ending September 2010

Date of certification

Date Generated: 03/04/2011

Statement ofEnergy Performance

1

Least Efficient

50

Average

Buildings with a score of75 or higher may qualifyfor EPA’s ENERGY STAR.

I certify that the information contained within this statement is accurate and in accordance with U.S.Environmental Protection Agency’s measurement standards, found at energystar.gov

Appendix CPage 7 of 7

Page 267: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 1 of 9

BoilersTag Boiler-1 & 2

Unit Type Cast iron hot water boilers

Qty 2

Location Boiler room

Area Served Entire facility

Manufacturer Smith

Model # 28A-15

Serial # N98-520

Input Capacity (MBH) 4,853

Rated Output Capacity (MBH) 3,830

Approx. Efficiency % 79%

Fuel Natural Gas

Burner Make & Model Power FlameC3-G-25BHBS-15

Max / Min Firing Rate Turndown Ration

4853 / 1923 MBH2.5

Approx Age 13

ASHRAE Service Life 30

Remaining Life 17

Comments

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Bernards Township: Mt. Prospect Elementary School

Page 268: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 2 of 9

PumpsTag HWP-1 & 2 -

Unit Type Base mounted end suction

Pipe mounted circulators

Qty 2 2

Location Boiler room Boiler Room

Area Served Hot water coils in RTUs and classroom Bathrooms

Manufacturer TACO -

Model # FE2510E2G1F2L0A -

Serial # - -

Horse Power 15 1/3

Flow - -

Motor Info Baldor Motor Emerson

Electrical Power 460/3/60 120/1/60

RPM 1760 3450

Motor Efficiency % 87.5% -

Approx Age 13 13

ASHRAE Service Life 20 20

Remaining Life 7 7

Comments Circulators did not run during survey

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Bernards Township: Mt. Prospect Elementary School

Page 269: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 3 of 9

Domestic Water HeatersTag HWH-1

Unit Type Gas fired tank / heater

Qty 1

Location Boiler room

Area Served Bathroom faucets, kitchen and custodial

Manufacturer AO Smith

Model # BTP 300-1000

Serial # SM98-76599Y3

Size (Gallons) 300

Input Capacity (MBH/KW)

1,000 MBH

Recovery (Gal/Hr) 970 GPH @100°F rise

Efficiency % 81%

Fuel Natural Gas

Burner make / model Power Flame J30A-12

Input Capacity, MBH (Max/Min)

1,260 / 600

Approx Age 13

ASHRAE Service Life 12

Remaining Life (1)

Comments

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Bernards Township: Mt. Prospect Elementary School

Page 270: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 4 of 9

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU RTU RTU

Unit Type Packaged Rooftop HVAC Unit

Packaged Heating and Ventilation Unit

Packaged Rooftop HVAC

Qty 1 1 1

Location Southwest roof Southwest roof Southwest roof

Area Served Kitchen Area Electrical and boiler room Cafeteria

Manufacturer TRANE TRANE TRANE

Model # TCD121C40AAA GRAA40PFKBOL6JQ302A0CELNPQRV

SLHFC2043R36C29D1001ABDEGKLRT68

Serial # N46103204D A98L48625 J98J73425

Cooling Type Direct Expansion (DX) None Direct Expansion (DX)

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 10 - 20

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

9.5 EER (Est) - 9.5 EER12.7 IPLV

Heating Type Electric coil Gas furnace Hot Water

Heating Input (MBH) 18 kW 400 -

Efficiency 100% 80% -

Fuel Electric Natural Gas -

Approx Age 13 13 13

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 2 2 2

Comments High efficiency UnitEquipped with air side

economizer

5 HP Supply Fan Motor Efficiency 87.5%

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Bernards Township: Mt. Prospect Elementary School

Page 271: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 5 of 9

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU Mini Split RTU

Unit Type Packaged Rooftop HVAC Unit

Ductless Mini Split Unit

Packaged Rooftop HVAC Unit

Qty 1 1 1

Location Lower roof south west Lower roof south west Southwest roof

Area Served Classroom 157 Teachers lounge Stage Area

Manufacturer TRANE Airdale TRANE

Model # N/A SCC24DFA0A0AA0A N/A

Serial # - 1 98 M 0690 53 -

Cooling Type Direct Expansion Direct Expansion Direct Expansion

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 5 (Est) 2 9 (Est)

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

- 13 SEER 9.5 EER (Est)

Heating Type - Heat pump -

Heating Input (MBH) - 24 (Est) -

Efficiency - - -

Fuel - - -

Approx Age 13 13 13

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 2 2 2

CommentsEquipment tag not available Ceiling casette type indoor

unit

Unit equipped with power exhaust for 100% Outside

Air economizer

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Bernards Township: Mt. Prospect Elementary School

Page 272: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 6 of 9

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag CU RTU RTU

Unit Type Split HVAC Unit Packaged Rooftop HVAC Unit

Packaged Rooftop HVAC Unit

Qty 1 2 1

Location Southwest roof Southwest roof Southwest roof

Area Served North Hall Gymnasium Library

Manufacturer TRANE TRANE TRANE

Model # Condensing unit: TTA120B400BC

SLHFC3043R36C39D1001ABDEGKRT68 TCH241C400AB

Serial # CU: N464NY7AH AHU: K98K05359A

#1 J98J73426#2 J98J73427 N47101448D

Cooling Type Direct expansion Direct expansion Direct expansion

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 10 30 20

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

10.3 EER with AHU 9.5 EER (Est)12.5 IPLV (Est)

11 EER 11.7 IEER

Heating Type Hot water Hot water -

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A -

Efficiency - - -

Fuel - - -

Approx Age 13 13 13

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 2 2 2

Comments

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Bernards Township: Mt. Prospect Elementary School

Page 273: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 7 of 9

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag CU RTU RTU

Unit Type Split HVAC Unit Packaged Rooftop HVAC Unit

Packaged Rooftop HVAC Unit

Qty 1 1 1

Location Southwest roof Southwest roof Lower roof south west

Area Served South Hall Classroom 147 Main office

Manufacturer TRANE TRANE TRANE

Model # Condensing unit: TTA120B400BC TCD074C40CBC N/A

Serial # CU: N463LP8AH N47101240D -

Cooling Type Direct expansion Direct expansion Direct Expansion

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 10 6 7.5 (Est)

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

10.3 EER with AHU 9.5 EER (Est) -

Heating Type Hot water - -

Heating Input (MBH) N/A - -

Efficiency - - -

Fuel - - -

Approx Age 13 13 13

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 2 2 2

CommentsEquipment tag not available

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Bernards Township: Mt. Prospect Elementary School

Page 274: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 8 of 9

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag CU RTU

Unit Type Packaged Rooftop HVAC Unit

Packaged Rooftop HVAC Unit

Qty 1 1

Location Lower roof south west Lower roof south west

Area Served Nurse's office Room C149

Manufacturer TRANE TRANE

Model # TCD091D40CBC TCD091D40CBC

Serial # N47101253D N47101252D

Cooling Type Direct Expansion Direct Expansion

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 7.5 7.5

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

9.5 EER (Est) 9.5 EER (Est)

Heating Type Electrical coil Electrical coil

Heating Input (MBH) - -

Efficiency - -

Fuel - -

Approx Age 13 13

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15

Remaining Life 2 2

Comments- -

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Bernards Township: Mt. Prospect Elementary School

Page 275: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix D

Unit Ventilators

Tag UV UV UV

Unit Type Heating and Cooling Heating and Cooling Heating and Cooling

Qty 2 30 12

Location Classrooms - original building

Classrooms - original building

Classroom - 2006 Addition

Manufacturer Airedale Airedale Airedale

Model # SCX-6 SCX-4 CHX3/2-460-410

Serial # PA1313-U4590 PA1313-U4567 9856649S310500338151407-1688

Flow Capacity 2400 CFM (est) 1600 CFM (est) 1200 CFM (Est)

Cooling Type Packaged DX Packaged DX Packaged DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 6 4 3

Estimated Cooling Efficiency (EER)

9 9 10.1

Heating Type Hot water Hot water Hot water

Heating Input (MBH) - - -

Approx Age 13 13 5

Ashrae Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 2 2 10

Comments - - -

- - -

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Bernards Township: Mt. Prospect Elementary School

9 of 9

Page 276: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E-11 of 18

CEG Job #: 9C10088

Project: Mount Prospect Elementary School KWH COST: $0.165

111 Hansom Road

Basking Ridge, NJBldg. Sq. Ft.

ECM #1: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.37 2600 22 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.28 3,317.6 $548.57 22 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.10 2860 $472.90 $14.00 $308.00 0.18 457.6 $75.66 4.07

227.21 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.94 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $21.07 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.88 3.49

221.37 2600 22 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.28 3,317.6 $548.57 22 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.10 2860 $472.90 $14.00 $308.00 0.18 457.6 $75.66 4.07

227.21 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.94 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $21.07 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.88 3.49

221.37 2600 22 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.28 3,317.6 $548.57 22 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.10 2860 $472.90 $14.00 $308.00 0.18 457.6 $75.66 4.07

227.21 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.94 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $21.07 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.88 3.49

221.37 2600 22 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.28 3,317.6 $548.57 22 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.10 2860 $472.90 $14.00 $308.00 0.18 457.6 $75.66 4.07

227.21 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.94 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $21.07 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.88 3.49

221.37 2600 22 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.28 3,317.6 $548.57 22 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.10 2860 $472.90 $14.00 $308.00 0.18 457.6 $75.66 4.07

227.21 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.94 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $21.07 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.88 3.49

222.21 Corridor 107-127 4400 17 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 1.05 4,637.6 $766.83 17 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.85 3740 $618.41 $14.00 $238.00 0.20 897.6 $148.42 1.60

242.21 Copy Room 2600 2 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.21 556.4 $92.00 2 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.20 509.6 $84.26 $28.00 $56.00 0.02 46.8 $7.74 7.24

222.21 120 Storage/Office 2600 3 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.19 483.6 $79.96 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 390 $64.49 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 93.6 $15.48 2.71

227.21 Men's Restroom 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.94 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $21.07 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.88 3.49

Mount Prospect Elementary School

97,908

Classroom 122

Classroom 124

Classroom 125

Classroom 126

Classroom 127

Page 277: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E-12 of 18

227.21 Women's Restroom 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.94 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $21.07 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.88 3.49

221.31 Custodial Closet 1200 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 74.4 $12.30 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 60 $9.92 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 14.4 $2.38 5.88

242.21 147 Choir 2600 20 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 2.14 5,564.0 $920.01 20 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.96 5096 $842.62 $28.00 $560.00 0.18 468 $77.38 7.24

242.21 3 Practice Room 1200 3 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.32 385.2 $63.69 3 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.29 352.8 $58.34 $28.00 $84.00 0.03 32.4 $5.36 15.68

242.21 149 Band 2600 20 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 2.14 5,564.0 $920.01 20 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.96 5096 $842.62 $28.00 $560.00 0.18 468 $77.38 7.24

221.11 Storage 1200 3 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.19 223.2 $36.91 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 180 $29.76 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 43.2 $7.14 5.88

242.11 154 Stage 2600 15 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

107 1.61 4,173.0 $690.01 15 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.47 3822 $631.97 $28.00 $420.00 0.14 351 $58.04 7.24

221.11 Stage Stairway 1200 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 74.4 $12.30 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 60 $9.92 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 14.4 $2.38 5.88

766 Multi Purpose Room 2600 36 1 400w MH, Prismatic Lens 465 16.74 43,524.0 $7,196.70 36 4 2x4 54w T5HO 4 Lamp

w/Reflective Lens, Wire Cage 236 8.50 22089.6 $3,652.52 $240.00 $8,640.00 8.24 21434.4 $3,544.18 2.44

232.21 PE Office 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.26 670.8 $110.92 3 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.22 561.6 $92.86 $21.00 $63.00 0.04 109.2 $18.06 3.49

222.21 Cafeteria 2600 50 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 3.10 8,060.0 $1,332.72 50 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 2.50 6500 $1,074.78 $14.00 $700.00 0.60 1560 $257.95 2.71

242.21 2600 18 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 1.93 5,007.6 $828.01 18 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.76 4586.4 $758.36 $28.00 $504.00 0.16 421.2 $69.65 7.24

617 1200 4 1 Hood Light w/Globe & Cage, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.10 124.8 $20.64 4 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Teacher's Café 2600 4 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.34 894.4 $147.89 4 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.29 748.8 $123.81 $21.00 $84.00 0.06 145.6 $24.07 3.49

221.31 Boiler Room 4400 6 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.37 1,636.8 $270.64 6 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.30 1320 $218.26 $14.00 $84.00 0.07 316.8 $52.38 1.60

221.37 Classroom 174 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.16 3,016.0 $498.70 20 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.00 2600 $429.91 $14.00 $280.00 0.16 416 $68.79 4.07

221.37 Classroom 176 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.16 3,016.0 $498.70 20 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.00 2600 $429.91 $14.00 $280.00 0.16 416 $68.79 4.07

221.37 Classroom 178 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.16 3,016.0 $498.70 20 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.00 2600 $429.91 $14.00 $280.00 0.16 416 $68.79 4.07

Kitchen

Page 278: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E-13 of 18

221.37 Classroom 180 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.16 3,016.0 $498.70 20 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.00 2600 $429.91 $14.00 $280.00 0.16 416 $68.79 4.07

221.37 Classroom 179 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.16 3,016.0 $498.70 20 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.00 2600 $429.91 $14.00 $280.00 0.16 416 $68.79 4.07

221.37 Computer Lab 177 2600 34 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.97 5,127.2 $847.78 34 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.70 4420 $730.85 $14.00 $476.00 0.27 707.2 $116.94 4.07

222.21 Boy's Restroom 2600 3 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.19 483.6 $79.96 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 390 $64.49 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 93.6 $15.48 2.71

222.21 Girl's Restroom 2600 3 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.19 483.6 $79.96 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 390 $64.49 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 93.6 $15.48 2.71

221.31 Custodial Closet 1200 3 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.19 223.2 $36.91 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 180 $29.76 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 43.2 $7.14 5.88

227.21 182 Viewing Room 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.94 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $21.07 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.88 3.49

227.21 182 Restroom 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.94 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $21.07 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.88 3.49

221.33 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Direct/ Indirect

58 0.87 2,262.0 $374.02 15 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.17 447.2 $73.94 2 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.14 374.4 $61.91 $21.00 $42.00 0.03 72.8 $12.04 3.49

227.21 184 Viewing Room 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.94 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $21.07 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.88 3.49

227.21 184 Restroom 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.94 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $21.07 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.88 3.49

221.33 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Direct/ Indirect

58 0.87 2,262.0 $374.02 15 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.17 447.2 $73.94 2 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.14 374.4 $61.91 $21.00 $42.00 0.03 72.8 $12.04 3.49

227.21 186 Viewing Room 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.94 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $21.07 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.88 3.49

227.21 186 restroom 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.94 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $21.07 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.88 3.49

221.33 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Direct/ Indirect

58 0.87 2,262.0 $374.02 15 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.17 447.2 $73.94 2 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.14 374.4 $61.91 $21.00 $42.00 0.03 72.8 $12.04 3.49

182 Classroom

184 Classroom

186 Classroom

Page 279: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E-14 of 18

227.21 185 Viewing Room 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.94 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $21.07 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.88 3.49

227.21 185 Restroom 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.94 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $21.07 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.88 3.49

221.33 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Direct/ Indirect

58 0.87 2,262.0 $374.02 15 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.17 447.2 $73.94 2 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.14 374.4 $61.91 $21.00 $42.00 0.03 72.8 $12.04 3.49

227.21 183 Viewing room 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.94 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $21.07 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.88 3.49

227.21 183 restroom 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.94 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $21.07 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.88 3.49

221.33 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Direct/ Indirect

58 0.87 2,262.0 $374.02 15 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.17 447.2 $73.94 2 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.14 374.4 $61.91 $21.00 $42.00 0.03 72.8 $12.04 3.49

227.21 181 Viewing Room 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.94 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $21.07 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.88 3.49

227.21 181 Restroom 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.94 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $21.07 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.88 3.49

221.33 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Direct/ Indirect

58 0.87 2,262.0 $374.02 15 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.17 447.2 $73.94 2 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.14 374.4 $61.91 $21.00 $42.00 0.03 72.8 $12.04 3.49

232.21 Office 187 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.17 447.2 $73.94 2 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.14 374.4 $61.91 $21.00 $42.00 0.03 72.8 $12.04 3.49

242.21 2600 35 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 3.75 9,737.0 $1,610.01 35 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 3.43 8918 $1,474.59 $28.00 $980.00 0.32 819 $135.42 7.24

221.14 2600 16 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., No Lens

58 0.93 2,412.8 $398.96 16 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.80 2080 $343.93 $14.00 $224.00 0.13 332.8 $55.03 4.07

242.21 122A Office 2600 4 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.43 1,112.8 $184.00 4 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.39 1019.2 $168.52 $28.00 $112.00 0.04 93.6 $15.48 7.24

242.21 121 Tech Room 2600 4 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.43 1,112.8 $184.00 4 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.39 1019.2 $168.52 $28.00 $112.00 0.04 93.6 $15.48 7.24

242.21 123 Work Room 2600 6 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.64 1,669.2 $276.00 6 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.59 1528.8 $252.79 $28.00 $168.00 0.05 140.4 $23.22 7.24

181 Classroom

Media Center

185 Classroom

183 Classroom

Page 280: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E-15 of 18

222.21 Media Center Corridor 4400 16 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.99 4,364.8 $721.72 16 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.80 3520 $582.03 $14.00 $224.00 0.19 844.8 $139.69 1.60

563 Lobby 4400 9 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.23 1,029.6 $170.24 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 102 Main Office Counter Area 2600 21 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 1.37 3,549.0 $586.83 21 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 1.03 2675.4 $442.38 $24.00 $504.00 0.34 873.6 $144.45 3.49

227.21 102 Main Office Hall 2600 8 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.52 1,352.0 $223.55 8 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.39 1019.2 $168.52 $24.00 $192.00 0.13 332.8 $55.03 3.49

242.21 102 Main Office Copy 2600 1 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.11 278.2 $46.00 1 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.10 254.8 $42.13 $28.00 $28.00 0.01 23.4 $3.87 7.24

242.21 Conference Room 109 2600 5 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.54 1,391.0 $230.00 5 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.49 1274 $210.66 $28.00 $140.00 0.05 117 $19.35 7.24

232.21 Principal's Office 117 2600 4 3

2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens86 0.34 894.4 $147.89 4 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.29 748.8 $123.81 $21.00 $84.00 0.06 145.6 $24.07 3.49

232.21 VP Office 116 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.26 670.8 $110.92 3 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.22 561.6 $92.86 $21.00 $63.00 0.04 109.2 $18.06 3.49

232.21 Main Office Storage 1200 1 3

2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens86 0.09 103.2 $17.06 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 86.4 $14.29 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 16.8 $2.78 7.56

232.21 Office 114 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.17 447.2 $73.94 2 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.14 374.4 $61.91 $21.00 $42.00 0.03 72.8 $12.04 3.49

232.21 Office 113 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.17 447.2 $73.94 2 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.14 374.4 $61.91 $21.00 $42.00 0.03 72.8 $12.04 3.49

232.21 Conference Room 111 2600 3 3

2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens86 0.26 670.8 $110.92 3 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.22 561.6 $92.86 $21.00 $63.00 0.04 109.2 $18.06 3.49

232.21 Office 110 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.26 670.8 $110.92 3 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.22 561.6 $92.86 $21.00 $63.00 0.04 109.2 $18.06 3.49

222.21 4400 3 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.19 818.4 $135.32 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 660 $109.13 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 158.4 $26.19 1.60

221.11 4400 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.12 545.6 $90.21 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 440 $72.75 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 105.6 $17.46 1.60

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $473.76 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $408.41 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $65.35 4.07

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.97 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.95 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $6.02 3.49

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $473.76 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $408.41 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $65.35 4.07

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.97 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.95 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $6.02 3.49

Stair 2

Classroom 220

Classroom 218

Page 281: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E-16 of 18

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $473.76 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $408.41 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $65.35 4.07

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.97 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.95 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $6.02 3.49

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $473.76 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $408.41 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $65.35 4.07

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.97 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.95 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $6.02 3.49

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $473.76 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $408.41 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $65.35 4.07

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.97 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.95 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $6.02 3.49

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $473.76 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $408.41 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $65.35 4.07

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.97 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.95 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $6.02 3.49

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $473.76 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $408.41 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $65.35 4.07

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.97 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.95 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $6.02 3.49

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $473.76 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $408.41 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $65.35 4.07

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.97 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.95 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $6.02 3.49

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $473.76 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $408.41 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $65.35 4.07

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.97 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.95 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $6.02 3.49

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $473.76 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $408.41 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $65.35 4.07

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.97 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.95 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $6.02 3.49

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $473.76 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $408.41 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $65.35 4.07

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.97 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.95 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $6.02 3.49

221.14 Storage 1200 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., No Lens

58 0.12 139.2 $23.02 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 120 $19.84 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 19.2 $3.17 8.82

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $473.76 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $408.41 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $65.35 4.07

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.97 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.95 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $6.02 3.49

Classroom 219

Classroom 217

Classroom 215

Classroom 213

Classroom 214

Classroom 216

Classroom 211

Classroom 209

Resource Room 212

Classroom 207

Page 282: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E-17 of 18

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $473.76 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $408.41 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $65.35 4.07

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.97 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.95 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $6.02 3.49

222.21 4400 3 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.19 818.4 $135.32 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 660 $109.13 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 158.4 $26.19 1.60

221.11 4400 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.12 545.6 $90.21 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 440 $72.75 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 105.6 $17.46 1.60

222.21 2nd Floor Corridors 4400 68 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 4.22 18,550.4 $3,067.31 68 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 3.40 14960 $2,473.64 $14.00 $952.00 0.82 3590.4 $593.67 1.60

232.21 Girl's Restroom 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.26 670.8 $110.92 3 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.22 561.6 $92.86 $21.00 $63.00 0.04 109.2 $18.06 3.49

232.21 Boy's Restroom 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.26 670.8 $110.92 3 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.22 561.6 $92.86 $21.00 $63.00 0.04 109.2 $18.06 3.49

232.21 Classroom 238 2600 6 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.52 1,341.6 $221.83 6 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.43 1123.2 $185.72 $21.00 $126.00 0.08 218.4 $36.11 3.49

242.21 Work Room 237 2600 4 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.43 1,112.8 $184.00 4 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.39 1019.2 $168.52 $28.00 $112.00 0.04 93.6 $15.48 7.24

221.31 Storage 1200 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.12 148.8 $24.60 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 120 $19.84 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 28.8 $4.76 5.88

221.37 Classroom 250 2600 24 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.39 3,619.2 $598.43 24 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.20 3120 $515.89 $14.00 $336.00 0.19 499.2 $82.54 4.07

242.21 Teacher's Lounge 251 2600 9 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.96 2,503.8 $414.00 9 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.88 2293.2 $379.18 $28.00 $252.00 0.08 210.6 $34.82 7.24

242.21 Teacher's Restroom 251 1200 2 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.21 256.8 $42.46 2 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.20 235.2 $38.89 $28.00 $56.00 0.02 21.6 $3.57 15.68

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $473.76 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $408.41 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $65.35 4.07

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.97 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.95 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $6.02 3.49

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $473.76 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $408.41 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $65.35 4.07

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.97 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.95 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $6.02 3.49

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $473.76 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $408.41 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $65.35 4.07

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.97 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.95 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $6.02 3.49

Classroom 205

Stair 4

Classroom 252

Classroom 254

Classroom 256

Page 283: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E-18 of 18

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $473.76 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $408.41 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $65.35 4.07

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.97 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.95 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $6.02 3.49

222.21 4400 3 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.19 818.4 $135.32 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 660 $109.13 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 158.4 $26.19 1.60

221.11 4400 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.12 545.6 $90.21 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 440 $72.75 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 105.6 $17.46 1.60

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $473.76 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $408.41 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $65.35 4.07

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.97 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.95 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $6.02 3.49

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $473.76 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $408.41 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $65.35 4.07

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.97 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.95 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $6.02 3.49

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $473.76 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $408.41 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $65.35 4.07

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.97 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.95 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $6.02 3.49

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $473.76 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $408.41 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $65.35 4.07

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.97 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.95 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $6.02 3.49

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $473.76 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $408.41 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $65.35 4.07

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.97 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.95 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $6.02 3.49

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $473.76 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $408.41 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $65.35 4.07

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.97 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.95 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $6.02 3.49

242.21 Classroom 257 2600 20 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 2.14 5,564.0 $920.01 20 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.96 5096 $842.62 $28.00 $560.00 0.18 468 $77.38 7.24

242.21 Kiln Room 2600 2 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.21 556.4 $92.00 2 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.20 509.6 $84.26 $28.00 $56.00 0.02 46.8 $7.74 7.24

242.21 Storage 1200 2 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.21 256.8 $42.46 2 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.20 235.2 $38.89 $28.00 $56.00 0.02 21.6 $3.57 15.68

Classroom 258

Stair 3

Classroom 259

Classroom 260

Classroom 262

Classroom 264

Classroom 263

Classroom 261

Page 284: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E-19 of 18

242.21 Classroom 255 2600 8 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.86 2,225.6 $368.00 8 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.78 2038.4 $337.05 $28.00 $224.00 0.07 187.2 $30.95 7.24

242.21 Classroom 253 2600 4 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.43 1,112.8 $184.00 4 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.39 1019.2 $168.52 $28.00 $112.00 0.04 93.6 $15.48 7.24

232.21 Boy's Restroom 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.26 670.8 $110.92 3 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.22 561.6 $92.86 $21.00 $63.00 0.04 109.2 $18.06 3.49

232.21 Girl's Restroom 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.26 670.8 $110.92 3 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.22 561.6 $92.86 $21.00 $63.00 0.04 109.2 $18.06 3.49

221.31 Custodial Closet 1200 3 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.19 223.2 $36.91 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 180 $29.76 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 43.2 $7.14 5.88

725 4400 13 1 150w HPS Wallpack 188 2.44 10,753.6 $1,778.11 13 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

713 4400 8 1 100w HPS 1x1 w/Prismatic Lens 125 1.00 4,400.0 $727.54 8 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

760 4400 8 1 400w MH Pulse Start "Shoebox" 420 3.36 14,784.0 $2,444.54 8 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Totals 1,397 386 112.75 316,833 $52,388 1,397 372 80.5 218,143 $36,070 $29,462 19.9 54,027 $8,933 3.30

Exterior

Page 285: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E-210 of 18

CEG Job #: 9C10088Project: Mount Prospect Elementary School KWH COST: $0.165

Address: 111 Hansom RoadBasking Ridge, NJ

Building SF:

ECM #3: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly Simple

Type Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.37 2600 22 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.276 3317.6 548.56537 22 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.02 20% 2654.08 $438.85 $300.00 $300.00 #REF! 663.52 $109.71 2.73

227.21 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 27.944161 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 22 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.276 3317.6 548.56537 22 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.02 20% 2654.08 $438.85 $300.00 $300.00 0.26 663.52 $109.71 2.73

227.21 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 27.944161 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 22 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.276 3317.6 548.56537 22 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.02 20% 2654.08 $438.85 $300.00 $300.00 0.26 663.52 $109.71 2.73

227.21 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 27.944161 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 22 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.276 3317.6 548.56537 22 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.02 20% 2654.08 $438.85 $300.00 $300.00 0.26 663.52 $109.71 2.73

227.21 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 27.944161 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 22 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.276 3317.6 548.56537 22 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.02 20% 2654.08 $438.85 $300.00 $300.00 0.26 663.52 $109.71 2.73

227.21 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 27.944161 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Corridor 107-127 4400 17 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 1.054 4637.6 766.82746 17 0 No Change 62 1.05 0% 4637.6 $766.83 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Copy Room 2600 2 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.214 556.4 92.000775 2 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 107 0.17 20% 445.12 $73.60 $150.00 $150.00 0.04 111.28 $18.40 8.15

222.21 120 Storage/Office 2600 3 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 483.6 79.963291 3 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.15 20% 386.88 $63.97 $150.00 $150.00 0.04 96.72 $15.99 9.38

227.21 Men's Restroom 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 27.944161 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Classroom 126

Classroom 127

Classroom 125

Classroom 124

Mount Prospect Elementary School

97,908

Classroom 122

Page 286: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E-211 of 18

227.21 Women's Restroom 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 27.944161 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Custodial Closet 1200 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 74.4 12.302045 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 74.4 $12.30 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 147 Choir 2600 20 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 2.14 5564 920.00775 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 107 1.71 20% 4451.2 $736.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.43 1112.8 $184.00 1.63

242.21 3 Practice Room 1200 3 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.321 385.2 63.692845 3 0 No Change 107 0.32 0% 385.2 $63.69 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 149 Band 2600 20 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 2.14 5564 920.00775 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 107 1.71 20% 4451.2 $736.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.43 1112.8 $184.00 1.63

221.11 Storage 1200 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 223.2 36.906134 3 0 No Change 62 0.19 0% 223.2 $36.91 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.11 154 Stage 2600 15 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 1.605 4173 690.00582 15 0 No Change 107 1.61 0% 4173 $690.01 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Stage Stairway 1200 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 74.4 12.302045 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 74.4 $12.30 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

766 Multi Purpose Room 2600 36 1 400w MH, Prismatic Lens 465 16.74 43524 7196.6962 36 3

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 465 13.39 20% 34819.2 $5,757.36 $300.00 $900.00 3.35 8704.8 $1,439.34 0.63

232.21 PE Office 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.258 670.8 110.91682 3 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 86 0.21 20% 536.64 $88.73 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 134.16 $22.18 6.76

222.21 Cafeteria 2600 50 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 3.1 8060 1332.7215 50 3

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 2.48 20% 6448 $1,066.18 $300.00 $900.00 0.62 1612 $266.54 3.38

242.21 2600 18 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 1.926 5007.6 828.00698 18 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 107 1.54 20% 4006.08 $662.41 $300.00 $300.00 0.39 1001.52 $165.60 1.81

617 1200 4 1 Hood Light w/Globe & Cage, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.104 124.8 20.635688 4 0 No Change 26 0.10 0% 124.8 $20.64 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Teacher's Café 2600 4 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.344 894.4 147.8891 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 86 0.28 20% 715.52 $118.31 $150.00 $150.00 0.07 178.88 $29.58 5.07

221.31 Boiler Room 4400 6 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.372 1636.8 270.64498 6 0 No Change 62 0.37 0% 1636.8 $270.64 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 Classroom 174 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.16 3016 498.69579 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.93 20% 2412.8 $398.96 $300.00 $300.00 0.23 603.2 $99.74 3.01

221.37 Classroom 176 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.16 3016 498.69579 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.93 20% 2412.8 $398.96 $300.00 $300.00 0.23 603.2 $99.74 3.01

Kitchen

Page 287: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E-212 of 18

221.37 Classroom 178 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.16 3016 498.69579 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.93 20% 2412.8 $398.96 $300.00 $300.00 0.23 603.2 $99.74 3.01

221.37 Classroom 180 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.16 3016 498.69579 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.93 20% 2412.8 $398.96 $300.00 $300.00 0.23 603.2 $99.74 3.01

221.37 Classroom 179 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.16 3016 498.69579 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.93 20% 2412.8 $398.96 $300.00 $300.00 0.23 603.2 $99.74 3.01

221.37 Computer Lab 177 2600 34 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.972 5127.2 847.78285 34 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.58 20% 4101.76 $678.23 $300.00 $300.00 0.39 1025.44 $169.56 1.77

222.21 Boy's Restroom 2600 3 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 483.6 79.963291 3 0 No Change 62 0.19 0% 483.6 $79.96 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Girl's Restroom 2600 3 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 483.6 79.963291 3 0 No Change 62 0.19 0% 483.6 $79.96 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Custodial Closet 1200 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 223.2 36.906134 3 0 No Change 62 0.19 0% 223.2 $36.91 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 182 Viewing Room 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 27.944161 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 182 Restroom 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 27.944161 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.33 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Direct/ Indirect

58 0.87 2262 374.02184 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.70 20% 1809.6 $299.22 $300.00 $300.00 0.17 452.4 $74.80 4.01

232.21 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.172 447.2 73.944549 2 0 No Change 86 0.17 0% 447.2 $73.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 184 Viewing Room 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 27.944161 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 184 Restroom 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 27.944161 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.33 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Direct/ Indirect

58 0.87 2262 374.02184 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.70 20% 1809.6 $299.22 $300.00 $300.00 0.17 452.4 $74.80 4.01

232.21 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.172 447.2 73.944549 2 0 No Change 86 0.17 0% 447.2 $73.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 186 Viewing Room 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 27.944161 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 186 restroom 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 27.944161 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

182 Classroom

184 Classroom

Page 288: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E-213 of 18

221.33 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Direct/ Indirect

58 0.87 2262 374.02184 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.70 20% 1809.6 $299.22 $300.00 $300.00 0.17 452.4 $74.80 4.01

232.21 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.172 447.2 73.944549 2 0 No Change 86 0.17 0% 447.2 $73.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 185 Viewing Room 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 27.944161 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 185 Restroom 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 27.944161 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.33 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Direct/ Indirect

58 0.87 2262 374.02184 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.70 20% 1809.6 $299.22 $300.00 $300.00 0.17 452.4 $74.80 4.01

232.21 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.172 447.2 73.944549 2 0 No Change 86 0.17 0% 447.2 $73.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 183 Viewing room 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 27.944161 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 183 restroom 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 27.944161 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.33 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Direct/ Indirect

58 0.87 2262 374.02184 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.70 20% 1809.6 $299.22 $300.00 $300.00 0.17 452.4 $74.80 4.01

232.21 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.172 447.2 73.944549 2 0 No Change 86 0.17 0% 447.2 $73.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 181 Viewing Room 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 27.944161 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 181 Restroom 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 27.944161 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.33 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Direct/ Indirect

58 0.87 2262 374.02184 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.70 20% 1809.6 $299.22 $300.00 $300.00 0.17 452.4 $74.80 4.01

232.21 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.172 447.2 73.944549 2 0 No Change 86 0.17 0% 447.2 $73.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Office 187 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.172 447.2 73.944549 2 0 No Change 86 0.17 0% 447.2 $73.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Media Center 2600 35 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 3.745 9737 1610.0136 35 3

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 107 3.00 20% 7789.6 $1,288.01 $300.00 $900.00 0.75 1947.4 $322.00 2.80

242.21 122A Office 2600 4 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.428 1112.8 184.00155 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 107 0.34 20% 890.24 $147.20 $150.00 $150.00 0.09 222.56 $36.80 4.08

242.21 121 Tech Room 2600 4 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.428 1112.8 184.00155 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 107 0.34 20% 890.24 $147.20 $150.00 $150.00 0.09 222.56 $36.80 4.08

186 Classroom

185 Classroom

183 Classroom

181 Classroom

Page 289: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E-214 of 18

242.21 123 Work Room 2600 6 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.642 1669.2 276.00233 6 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 107 0.51 20% 1335.36 $220.80 $250.00 $250.00 0.13 333.84 $55.20 4.53

222.21 Media Center Corridor 4400 16 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.992 4364.8 721.71996 16 0 No Change 62 0.99 0% 4364.8 $721.72 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

563 Lobby 4400 9 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.234 1029.6 170.24443 9 0 No Change 26 0.23 0% 1029.6 $170.24 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 102 Main Office Counter Area 2600 21 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 1.365 3549 586.82738 21 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 65 1.09 20% 2839.2 $469.46 $300.00 $300.00 0.27 709.8 $117.37 2.56

227.21 102 Main Office Hall 2600 8 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.52 1352 223.55329 8 0 No Change 65 0.52 0% 1352 $223.55 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 102 Main Office Copy 2600 1 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.107 278.2 46.000388 1 0 No Change 107 0.11 0% 278.2 $46.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Conference Room 109 2600 5 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.535 1391 230.00194 5 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 107 0.43 20% 1112.8 $184.00 $150.00 $150.00 0.11 278.2 $46.00 3.26

232.21 Principal's Office 117 2600 4 3

2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens86 0.344 894.4 147.8891 4 1 Dual Technology Occupancy

Sensor - Switch Mnt. 86 0.28 20% 715.52 $118.31 $150.00 $150.00 0.07 178.88 $29.58 5.07

232.21 VP Office 116 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.258 670.8 110.91682 3 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 86 0.21 20% 536.64 $88.73 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 134.16 $22.18 6.76

232.21 Main Office Storage 1200 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 103.2 17.064127 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 103.2 $17.06 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Office 114 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.172 447.2 73.944549 2 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 86 0.14 20% 357.76 $59.16 $150.00 $150.00 0.03 89.44 $14.79 10.14

232.21 Office 113 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.172 447.2 73.944549 2 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 86 0.14 20% 357.76 $59.16 $150.00 $150.00 0.03 89.44 $14.79 10.14

232.21 Conference Room 111 2600 3 3

2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens86 0.258 670.8 110.91682 3 1 Dual Technology Occupancy

Sensor - Switch Mnt. 86 0.21 20% 536.64 $88.73 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 134.16 $22.18 6.76

232.21 Office 110 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.258 670.8 110.91682 3 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 86 0.21 20% 536.64 $88.73 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 134.16 $22.18 6.76

222.21 4400 3 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 818.4 135.32249 3 0 No Change 62 0.19 0% 818.4 $135.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 4400 2 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 545.6 90.214995 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 545.6 $90.21 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 473.761 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $379.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $94.75 3.17

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.972274 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 473.761 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $379.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $94.75 3.17

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.972274 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Stair 2

Classroom 220

Classroom 218

Page 290: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E-215 of 18

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 473.761 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $379.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $94.75 3.17

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.972274 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 473.761 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $379.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $94.75 3.17

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.972274 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 473.761 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $379.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $94.75 3.17

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.972274 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 473.761 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $379.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $94.75 3.17

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.972274 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 473.761 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $379.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $94.75 3.17

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.972274 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 473.761 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $379.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $94.75 3.17

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.972274 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 473.761 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $379.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $94.75 3.17

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.972274 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 473.761 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $379.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $94.75 3.17

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.972274 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 473.761 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $379.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $94.75 3.17

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.972274 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Classroom 216

Classroom 211

Classroom 209

Resource Room 212

Classroom 219

Classroom 217

Classroom 215

Classroom 213

Classroom 214

Page 291: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E-216 of 18

221.14 Storage 1200 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., No Lens

58 0.116 139.2 23.016729 2 0 No Change 58 0.12 0% 139.2 $23.02 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 473.761 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $379.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $94.75 3.17

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.972274 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 473.761 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $379.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $94.75 3.17

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.972274 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 4400 3 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 818.4 135.32249 3 0 No Change 62 0.19 0% 818.4 $135.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 4400 2 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 545.6 90.214995 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 545.6 $90.21 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 2nd Floor Corridors 4400 68 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 4.216 18550.4 3067.3098 68 0 No Change 62 4.22 0% 18550.4 $3,067.31 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Girl's Restroom 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.258 670.8 110.91682 3 0 No Change 86 0.26 0% 670.8 $110.92 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Boy's Restroom 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.258 670.8 110.91682 3 0 No Change 86 0.26 0% 670.8 $110.92 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Classroom 238 2600 6 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.516 1341.6 221.83365 6 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 86 0.41 20% 1073.28 $177.47 $250.00 $250.00 0.10 268.32 $44.37 5.63

242.21 Work Room 237 2600 4 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.428 1112.8 184.00155 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 107 0.34 20% 890.24 $147.20 $150.00 $150.00 0.09 222.56 $36.80 4.08

221.31 Storage 1200 2 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 148.8 24.604089 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 148.8 $24.60 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 Classroom 250 2600 24 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.392 3619.2 598.43495 24 2

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.11 20% 2895.36 $478.75 $300.00 $600.00 0.28 723.84 $119.69 5.01

242.21 Teacher's Lounge 251 2600 9 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.963 2503.8 414.00349 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 107 0.77 20% 2003.04 $331.20 $250.00 $250.00 0.19 500.76 $82.80 3.02

242.21 Teacher's Restroom 251 1200 2 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.214 256.8 42.461896 2 0 No Change 107 0.21 0% 256.8 $42.46 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 473.761 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $379.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $94.75 3.17

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.972274 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 473.761 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $379.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $94.75 3.17

Classroom 205

Stair 4

Classroom 252

Classroom 254

Classroom 207

Page 292: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E-217 of 18

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.972274 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 473.761 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $379.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $94.75 3.17

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.972274 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 473.761 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $379.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $94.75 3.17

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.972274 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 4400 3 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 818.4 135.32249 3 0 No Change 62 0.19 0% 818.4 $135.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 4400 2 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 545.6 90.214995 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 545.6 $90.21 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 473.761 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $379.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $94.75 3.17

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.972274 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 473.761 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $379.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $94.75 3.17

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.972274 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 473.761 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $379.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $94.75 3.17

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.972274 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 473.761 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $379.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $94.75 3.17

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.972274 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 473.761 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $379.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $94.75 3.17

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.972274 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 473.761 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $379.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $94.75 3.17

Classroom 263

Classroom 261

Classroom 259

Classroom 258

Stair 3

Classroom 260

Classroom 262

Classroom 264

Classroom 256

Page 293: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E-218 of 18

232.21 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 36.972274 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Classroom 257 2600 20 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 2.14 5564 920.00775 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 107 1.71 20% 4451.2 $736.01 $300.00 $300.00 0.43 1112.8 $184.00 1.63

242.21 Kiln Room 2600 2 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.214 556.4 92.000775 2 0 No Change 107 0.21 0% 556.4 $92.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Storage 1200 2 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.214 256.8 42.461896 2 0 No Change 107 0.21 0% 256.8 $42.46 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Classroom 255 2600 8 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.856 2225.6 368.0031 8 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 107 0.68 20% 1780.48 $294.40 $250.00 $250.00 0.17 445.12 $73.60 3.40

242.21 Classroom 253 2600 4 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.428 1112.8 184.00155 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 107 0.34 20% 890.24 $147.20 $250.00 $250.00 0.09 222.56 $36.80 6.79

232.21 Boy's Restroom 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.258 670.8 110.91682 3 0 No Change 86 0.26 0% 670.8 $110.92 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Girl's Restroom 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.258 670.8 110.91682 3 0 No Change 86 0.26 0% 670.8 $110.92 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Custodial Closet 1200 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 223.2 36.906134 3 0 No Change 62 0.19 0% 223.2 $36.91 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

725 4400 13 1 150w HPS Wallpack 188 2.444 10753.6 1778.1084 13 0 No Change 188 2.44 0% 10753.6 $1,778.11 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

713 4400 8 1 100w HPS 1x1 w/Prismatic Lens 125 1 4400 727.54028 8 0 No Change 125 1.00 0% 4400 $727.54 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

760 4400 8 1 400w MH Pulse Start "Shoebox" 420 3.36 14784 2444.5353 8 0 No Change 420 3.36 0% 14784 $2,444.54 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Totals 1,397 386 111.8 314420.6 51989.5 1381.0 75.0 93.4 266,477.6 $44,062.09 $20,150 17.16 44,625 $7,379 2.73

Exterior

Page 294: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix FPage 1 of 3

Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Bernard Township BOE - Mt. Prospect Elementary School

Location: Basking Ridge, NJ 07920Description: Photovoltaic System 95% Financing - 25 year

Simple Payback Analysis

Total Construction Cost $2,883,510Annual kWh Production 366,558

Annual Energy Cost Reduction $60,482Annual SREC Revenue $128,295

First Cost Premium $2,883,510

Simple Payback: Years

Life Cycle Cost AnalysisAnalysis Period (years): 25 Financing %: 95%Financing Term (mths): 300 Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0%

Average Energy Cost ($/kWh) $0.165 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0%Financing Rate: 7.00% SREC Value ($/kWh) $0.350

Period Additional Energy kWh Energy Cost Additional SREC Interest Loan Net Cash CumulativeCash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Expense Principal Flow Cash Flow

0 $144,176 0 0 0 $0 0 0 (144,176) 01 $0 366,558 $60,482 $0 $128,295 $190,426 $41,907 ($43,555) ($187,731)2 $0 364,725 $62,297 $0 $127,654 $187,396 $44,936 ($42,382) ($230,113)3 $0 362,902 $64,165 $0 $127,016 $184,148 $48,185 ($41,152) ($271,264)4 $0 361,087 $66,090 $0 $126,380 $180,665 $51,668 ($39,862) ($311,126)5 $0 359,282 $68,073 $3,701 $125,749 $176,930 $55,403 ($42,211) ($353,338)6 $0 357,485 $70,115 $3,682 $125,120 $172,925 $59,408 ($40,780) ($394,117)7 $0 355,698 $72,219 $3,664 $124,494 $168,630 $63,703 ($39,283) ($433,400)8 $0 353,919 $74,385 $3,645 $123,872 $164,025 $68,308 ($37,721) ($471,121)9 $0 352,150 $76,617 $3,627 $123,252 $159,087 $73,246 ($36,090) ($507,212)10 $0 350,389 $78,915 $3,609 $122,636 $153,792 $78,541 ($34,390) ($541,602)11 $0 348,637 $81,283 $3,591 $122,023 $148,114 $84,218 ($32,618) ($574,219)12 $0 346,894 $83,721 $3,573 $121,413 $142,026 $90,306 ($30,771) ($604,991)13 $0 345,159 $86,233 $3,555 $120,806 $135,498 $96,835 ($28,849) ($633,840)14 $0 343,434 $88,820 $3,537 $120,202 $128,498 $103,835 ($26,848) ($660,688)15 $0 341,716 $91,485 $3,520 $119,601 $120,991 $111,341 ($24,767) ($685,455)16 $0 340,008 $94,229 $3,502 $119,003 $112,943 $119,390 ($22,603) ($708,058)17 $0 338,308 $97,056 $3,485 $118,408 $104,312 $128,021 ($20,353) ($728,411)18 $0 336,616 $99,968 $3,467 $117,816 $95,057 $137,275 ($18,016) ($746,428)19 $0 334,933 $102,967 $3,450 $117,227 $85,134 $147,199 ($15,589) ($762,017)20 $0 333,259 $106,056 $3,433 $116,640 $74,493 $157,840 ($13,069) ($775,086)21 $0 331,592 $109,237 $3,415 $116,057 $67,868 $145,103 $8,908 ($766,178)22 $0 329,934 $112,514 $3,398 $115,477 $54,843 $119,407 $50,344 ($715,834)23 $0 328,285 $115,890 $3,381 $114,900 $0 $0 $227,408 ($488,426)24 $0 326,643 $119,367 $3,364 $114,325 $0 $0 $230,327 ($258,099)25 $0 325,010 $122,948 $3,348 $113,753 $0 $0 $233,353 ($24,745)

Totals: 8,634,622 $2,205,132 $73,947 $3,022,118 $3,007,799 $2,026,073 $119,430 ($12,833,498)Net Present Value (NPV)

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

Photovoltaic System 95% Financing - 25 year

($318,301)-0.2%

15.27

Page 295: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix FPage 2 of 3

Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Bernard Township BOE - Mt. Prospect Elementary School

Location: Basking Ridge, NJ 07920Description: Photovoltaic System - Direct Purchase

Simple Payback AnalysisPhotovoltaic System - Direct Purchase

Total Construction Cost $2,883,510Annual kWh Production 366,558

Annual Energy Cost Reduction $60,482Annual SREC Revenue $128,295

First Cost Premium

Simple Payback: Years

Life Cycle Cost AnalysisAnalysis Period (years): 25 Financing %: 0%Financing Term (mths): 0 Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0%

Average Energy Cost ($/kWh) $0.165 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0%Financing Rate: 0.00% SREC Value ($/kWh) $0.350

Period Additional Energy kWh Energy Cost Additional SREC Net Cash CumulativeCash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Flow Cash Flow

0 $2,883,510 0 0 0 $0 (2,883,510) 01 $0 366,558 $60,482 $0 $128,295 $188,777 ($2,694,733)2 $0 364,725 $62,297 $0 $127,654 $189,950 ($2,504,782)3 $0 362,902 $64,165 $0 $127,016 $191,181 ($2,313,601)4 $0 361,087 $66,090 $0 $126,380 $192,471 ($2,121,130)5 $0 359,282 $68,073 $3,701 $125,749 $190,121 ($1,931,009)6 $0 357,485 $70,115 $3,682 $125,120 $191,553 ($1,739,456)7 $0 355,698 $72,219 $3,664 $124,494 $193,049 ($1,546,407)8 $0 353,919 $74,385 $3,645 $123,872 $194,612 ($1,351,795)9 $0 352,150 $76,617 $3,627 $123,252 $196,242 ($1,155,553)

10 $0 350,389 $78,915 $3,609 $122,636 $197,943 ($957,611)11 $0 348,637 $81,283 $3,591 $122,023 $199,715 ($757,896)12 $0 346,894 $83,721 $3,573 $121,413 $201,561 ($556,335)13 $0 345,159 $86,233 $3,555 $120,806 $203,484 ($352,851)14 $0 343,434 $88,820 $3,537 $120,202 $205,484 ($147,367)15 $0 341,716 $91,485 $3,520 $119,601 $207,566 $60,19916 $0 340,008 $94,229 $3,502 $119,003 $209,730 $269,92917 $0 338,308 $97,056 $3,485 $118,408 $211,979 $481,90818 $0 336,616 $99,968 $3,467 $117,816 $214,316 $696,22419 $0 334,933 $102,967 $3,450 $117,227 $216,743 $912,96720 $0 333,259 $106,056 $3,433 $116,640 $219,264 $1,132,23121 $1 331,592 $109,237 $3,415 $116,057 $221,879 $1,354,11022 $2 329,934 $112,514 $3,398 $115,477 $224,593 $1,578,70323 $3 328,285 $115,890 $3,381 $114,900 $227,408 $1,806,11224 $4 326,643 $119,367 $3,364 $114,325 $230,327 $2,036,43925 $5 325,010 $122,948 $3,348 $113,753 $233,353 $2,269,792

Totals: 8,634,622 $2,205,132 $73,947 $3,022,118 $5,153,302 ($7,531,912)Net Present Value (NPV)

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

15.27

$2,883,510

$2,269,8174.9%

Page 296: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix FPage 3 of 3

Building Roof Area (sq ft) Panel Qty Panel Sq

Ft

Panel Total Sq

Ft

Total KWDC

Total Annual

kWh

Panel Weight (33

lbs)W/SQFT

Mt. Prospect E.S. 22,750 Sunpower SPR230

1393 14.7 20,483 320.39 366,558 45,969 15.64

.= Proposed PV Layout

Notes:1. Estimated kWH based on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory PVWatts Version 1 Calculator Program.

Page 297: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

BERNARDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS OAK STREET ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

70 WEST OAK STREET

BASKING RIDGE, NJ 07920

FACILITY ENERGY REPORT

Page 298: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 1 of 31

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.  HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST ................................................................. 2 

II.  FACILITY DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................ 7 

III.  MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST ............................................................................................ 11 

IV.  ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES ..................................................................... 12 

V.  ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................... 31 

Appendix A – ECM Cost & Savings Breakdown

Appendix B – New Jersey Smart Start® Program Incentives

Appendix C – Portfolio Manager “Statement of Energy Performance”

Appendix D – Major Equipment List

Appendix E – Investment Grade Lighting Audit

Appendix F – Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculations

Page 299: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 2 of 31

I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has been tabulated and plotted in graph form as depicted within this section. Each energy source has been identified and monthly consumption and cost noted per the information provided by the Owner. Electric Utility Provider: Jersey Central Power & Light (JCP&L) Electric Utility Rate Structure: General Service Secondary (GSS) Third Party Supplier: South Jersey Energy Natural Gas Utility Provider: Public Service Electric and Gas (PSE&G) Utility Rate Structure: General Service Gas (GSG) Third Party Supplier: Woodruff The electric usage profile represents the actual electrical usage for the facility. The electric utility measures consumption in kilowatt-hours (KWH) and maximum demand in kilowatts (KW). One KWH usage is equivalent to 1000 watts running for one hour. One KW of electric demand is equivalent to 1000 watts running at any given time. The basic usage charges are shown as generation service and delivery charges along with several non-utility generation charges. Rates used in this report reflect the historical data received for the facility. The gas usage profile within each facility report shows the actual natural gas energy usage for the facility. The gas utility measures consumption in cubic feet x 100 (CCF), and converts the quantity into Therms of energy. One Therm is equivalent to 100,000 BTUs of energy.

Page 300: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 3 of 31

Table 1 Electricity Billing Data

Utility Provider: Jersey State Power & Light (JCP&L)Rate: General Service Secondary

Meter No: G28370814Customer ID No: 100008039560

Third Party Utility Provider: -TPS Meter / Acct No: -

MONTH OF USECONSUMPTION

KWH TOTAL BILL

Nov-09 41,280 $6,707 Dec-09 53,120 $8,357 Jan-10 65,680 $10,014 Feb-10 42,400 $6,938 Mar-10 44,320 $7,111 Apr-10 45,200 $7,401 May-10 43,840 $7,435 Jun-10 36,320 $5,648 Jul-10 41,840 $7,226

Aug-10 30,160 $5,425 Sep-10 40,400 $6,880 Oct-10 61,440 $9,476 Totals 546,000 220.8 Max $88,618

AVERAGE DEMAND 188.3 KW averageAVERAGE RATE $0.162 $/kWh

193.1211.7201.7220.8

ELECTRIC USAGE SUMMARY

DEMAND

169.0174.5165.6180.5166.8

190.7213.7171.4

Page 301: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 4 of 31

Figure 1 Electricity Usage Profile

Page 302: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 5 of 31

Table 4 Natural Gas Billing Data

Utility Provider: Public Service Electric & Gas (PSEG)Rate: Large Volume Gas (LVG)

Meter No: 1874124Point of Delivery ID: 6753665803

Third Party Utility Provider: Woodruff EnergyTPS Meter No:

MONTH OF USE CONSUMPTION (THERMS) TOTAL BILL

Nov-09 3,794.30 $6,357.84Dec-09 8,778.20 $10,866.98Jan-10 10,671.90 $13,211.16Feb-10 8,706.70 $10,778.36Mar-10 6,908.30 $8,552.16Apr-10 1,285.90 $1,592.78May-10 522.50 $652.77Jun-10 139.30 $244.72Jul-10 98.60 $199.45

Aug-10 89.00 $176.16Sep-10 89.10 $169.92Oct-10 2,229.70 $2,537.72

TOTALS 43,313.50 $55,340.02

AVERAGE RATE: $1.28 $/THERM

N/A

NATURAL GAS USAGE SUMMARY

Page 303: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 6 of 31

Figure 2 Natural Gas Usage Profile

Page 304: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 7 of 31

II. FACILITY DESCRIPTION

The 69,272 SF Elementary School is a partially two story facility comprised of classrooms, library, computer room, cafeteria, kitchen, gymnasium, auditorium, administration offices, restrooms, boiler rooms, custodial spaces and storage spaces.

The original building was built in 1939 and expanded several times to its current capacity. 1939 vintage building is a two story facility with classrooms, library, auditorium, offices and mechanical spaces. A single story facility was added to the building to house the current 1st and 2nd grade classrooms and the offices in mid 1950s. Kindergarten section was added in 1994 and the gymnasium building was added in 1995. Finally, a new structure was added to the facility to house the current cafeteria in 2007

The majority of the facility except 2007 addition is constructed of 8” brick walls and brick façade. Insulation within the wall is now known. 2007 addition of the facility is constructed of cinder block walls and brick façade with estimated 2” insulation. 1939 building is covered with pitched roof with asphalt shingle covering. Roof of the 1950 and 1995 additions are built up flat with tar and gravel covering with estimated 2-inches of foam insulation underneath. The roofs of gymnasium and cafeteria buildings are also built up with estimated 2” foam insulation and rubber membrane covering.

The windows throughout the facility consist of double pane, tinted glasses with aluminum frames, which were installed recently. Overall condition of the windows throughout the facility is excellent. Blinds are utilized throughout the perimeter spaces. The blinds are valuable because they help to reduce heat loss in the winter and reduce solar heat in the summer.

The student enrollment at Oak Street Elementary School is approximately 627 students and 72 staff. The hours of operation for the students are between 8:45 AM and 3:15 PM on the weekdays. The cafeteria is utilized for morning care and aftercare between 7:00 to 9:00 AM and 3:00 to 6:00 PM. Custodial services are performed between the hours of 6:00 PM and 11:00 PM. The facility is mainly closed on weekends expect gymnasium where recreational activities such as basketball are performed occasionally on Saturdays. The school is open between the first week of September and the third week of June.

HVAC Systems

Boilers

Heating for the Oak Street School is supplied from two separate boiler rooms. First boiler room is located in the lower level of the 1939 building. This boiler room houses two (2) Smith 28A series sectional cast iron steam boilers, providing steam for the original building and the 1st and 2nd grade classrooms. The boilers were installed in 2009 and appear to be in excellent condition. Each boiler has 4,517 MBH input and 3,563 MBH output capacities resulting in approximately 78% thermal efficiency. The boilers are fitted with PowerFlame variable capacity natural gas burners with 1:5 turndown ratio. The steam is provided to the unit ventilators and hot water radiators.

Page 305: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 8 of 31

Second boiler room is located in a mechanical room in the kindergarten section of the building constructed in 1994. This boiler room houses a set of four (4) HydroTherm modular hot water boilers with a total input capacity of 1,200 MBH. The boiler set was installed in 1995 and appears to be in good condition. The boiler delivers 948 MBH hot water output resulting in approximately 79% thermal efficiency. The boiler set is equipped with built-in atmospheric burners. The hot water is circulated by two (2) pipe mounted 1 HP (estimated) constant volume pumps. Only one pump runs at a time. The pumps provide heating hot water for the unit ventilators in the classrooms and hot water cabinet heaters in the common areas.

Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning

Heating and ventilation in the classrooms in the original building are provided with unit ventilators in the classrooms and cast iron steam radiators in the hallways. All of the unit ventilators are heating only and they are equipped with steam coils. All of the unit ventilators in this section of the facility are old and most are missing equipment tags. There are thirteen (13) TRANE unit ventilators built in 1986 and eight (8) HermanNelson unit ventilators made approximately in 1970s. In addition, there is one unit ventilator with electric heat.

Rooms 35, 37 and 39 are air conditioned with three (3) 3-ton rooftop air conditioning units located on the roof of each unit. Two of the units are equipped with 90MBH gas furnaces for heating. The units are installed in 1997 and appear to be in good condition. A separate 1.5-Ton split condensing unit provides direct expansion cooling for the teacher’s lounge air handling unit. In addition, these spaces have ceiling type unit ventilators to provide supplemental heating to these spaces. Since each system can be controlled separately, these spaces are prone to simultaneous heating and cooling if the thermostats are not set properly. Main office heating and cooling is achieved with a packaged terminal air conditioning (PTAC) unit with electric resistance coil for heating. Several spaces including the rooms #1 and #7 are cooled with 1-ton window air conditioners. The window units remain installed on the windows during winter.

Library air conditioning is provided with two (2) 4-ton split air conditioning systems made by TRANE. The condensing units for each system are located on the library roof. One of the condensing units was installed in 1997 while the second unit was installed in 1988. Two (2) more split air conditioning systems provide supplemental cooling for the computer room and the HUB room. The units are made by York (1.5-ton) and Mitsubishi (2-ton) and appear to be in excellent condition. In addition, three (3) Sanyo ductless mini-split air conditioning units serve the offices of the principle and the vice-principle and a conference each unit has approximately 1 ton capacity and appear to be in good condition.

The auditorium is heated with eight (8) recessed steam radiator cabinets. The ventilation air is provided with two (2) heating and ventilation units made by TRANE. The units appear to be in fair condition. It was reported that the units are not used.

Heating and ventilation for the kindergarten classrooms are provided with a total eight (8) unit ventilators made by Trane. These unit ventilators were built in 1994 and appear to be in good condition. Each unit is equipped with hot water coils for heating and a 4-Ton integrated DX packaged system for cooling. Kindergarten hallways are heated with a heating and ventilation

Page 306: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 9 of 31

(HV) unit located in the boiler room. The HV unit is equipped with hot water coil and provides fresh air to the hallway.

The Oak Street School main gymnasium area is heated and air conditioned with four (4) 10-ton packaged roof top air conditioning units (RTU) made by TRANE. Each unit is equipped with direct expansion (DX) cooling and 202 MBH gas fired heating coils for heating. In addition, the auxiliary offices, corridor and the bathrooms are heated and air conditioned with a separate TRANE rooftop unit with 6-ton cooling and 166 MBH gas heating capacities. Another TRANE unit with 6-ton cooling capacity and 166 MBH heating capacity serves the gym storage area. All of the units serving the gymnasium were installed in 1995.

Kitchen and Cafeteria

The school houses a small commercial kitchen for light cooking. The kitchen appliances include electric cooking ranges, ovens, warmers, a small commercial grade dishwasher, two (2) reach in refrigerators, one (1) walk in refrigerator and one (1) walk in freezer.

The Oak Street Elementary School kitchen is conditioned with a rooftop air conditioning unit with gas heating capacity. The unit has 6-ton cooling and 166 MBH heating capacities. In addition, the kitchen has a make-up air unit which is seemingly interlocked with the kitchen exhaust hood and the dishwasher hood.

Finally, the School cafeteria is conditioned with a dedicated split rooftop system, which consists of two (2) condensing units and packaged gas heating unit. Each condensing unit has 15-ton cooling capacity. The main air handling unit includes two main direct expansion cooling coils with a total 30 Ton cooling capacity and a 600 MBH (input) modulating dual gas furnace. The unit provides conditioned make-up air to the cafeteria main seating area. The unit was installed in 2007 and appears to be in excellent condition.

Exhaust System

Unit ventilators in the classroom provide the minimum outside air intake in the majority of the classrooms. The air is exhausted from the hallways via roof exhausters. The toilet rooms have dedicated roof exhausters as well. The cafeteria and the kitchen have dedicated exhaust fans. In addition, the kitchen includes a 4ft x 16ft commercial exhaust hood, which provides exhaust for cooking equipment. The kitchen hood is manually controlled with a wall switch. It is reported that the exhaust hood is seldom used.

HVAC System Controls

It was reported that the major systems in the facility are controlled and monitored remotely through an I/NET-Seven building automation systems made by T.A.C. The system operates and monitors the boilers and unit ventilators in the kindergarten section, gymnasium rooftop units, cafeteria rooftop units and the main boilers in the original section based on an occupancy schedule. A limited temperature override capability is provided via thermostats in some of these spaces. There is no on-site computer interface for the building automation system.

Page 307: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 10 of 31

Pneumatic thermostats and actuators are utilized for the unit ventilators in the original section, while the equipment in the kindergarten, gymnasium and the cafeteria have electronic actuators.

Smaller rooftop units and the split systems in the older section feeding the library, computer room and rooms #35, 37, 39 appear to be controlled with programmable thermostats. It is recommended to incorporate the control of these units to the building automation system or provide locks to eliminate tampering of the set-points and the schedules.

Domestic Hot Water

Domestic hot water for the faucets in the restrooms and the utility rooms, cafeteria, kitchen and the gymnasium are provided with three (3) domestic hot water heaters located in two boiler rooms and gymnasium mechanical room.

Domestic hot water heater located in the old section boiler room is a 48 gallon, standard efficiency gas-fired domestic hot water heater made by Bradfort White. The unit has 65 MBH input capacity and 80% efficiency. It was installed in 2009 and appears to be in excellent condition. The domestic hot water is circulated throughout the rest rooms in the original building by a set of hot water circulation pumps. The domestic hot water piping insulation appeared to be in good condition.

Domestic hot water for the bathrooms and utility areas in the kindergarten wing is provided with a 75 gallon, standard efficiency gas-fired domestic hot water heater made by Rheem. The unit has 75 MBH input capacity and 80% efficiency. It was installed in 1994 and appears to be in good condition. The domestic hot water is circulated throughout the building by a hot water circulation pump. The domestic hot water piping insulation appeared to be in good condition.

Domestic hot water heater for the cafeteria, kitchen and the gymnasium is located in the gymnasium mechanical room. It is a 65 gallon, standard efficiency gas-fired domestic hot water heater made by Bradfort White. The unit has 370 MBH input capacity and 80% efficiency. It was installed in 2007 (estimated) and appears to be in excellent condition. The domestic hot water is circulated throughout the kitchen, cafeteria and gymnasium by a hot water circulation pump. The domestic hot water piping insulation appeared to be in good condition

Lighting Typical lighting throughout school building is fluorescent tube lay-in fixtures with T-8 lamps and electronic ballasts. There are small amount of fixtures in the building with older T12 lamps and magnetic ballasts. Some of the storage rooms and closets lit with a mixture of incandescent lamps and compact fluorescent lamps. The gym lighting is provided with 400W metal halide fixtures. The building exterior is lit with 175W metal halide flood lights.

Page 308: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 11 of 31

III. MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST

The equipment list contains major energy consuming equipment that through implementation of energy conservation measures could yield substantial energy savings. The list shows the major equipment in the facility and all pertinent information utilized in energy savings calculations. An approximate age was assigned to the equipment in some cases if a manufactures date was not shown on the equipment’s nameplate. The ASHRAE service life for the equipment along with the remaining useful life is also shown in the Appendix.

Refer to the Major Equipment List Appendix for this facility.

Page 309: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 12 of 31

IV. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES Energy Conservation Measures are developed specifically for this facility. The energy savings and calculations are highly dependent on the information received from the site survey and interviews with operations personnel. The assumptions and calculations should be reviewed by the owner to ensure accurate representation of this facility. The following ECMs were analyzed:

Table 1 ECM Financial Summary

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)

ECM #1 Lighting Equipment Upgrade $12,870 $4,460 2.9 419.8%

ECM #2 Lighting Equipment Upgrade -Aud & Gym

$7,200 $3,275 2.2 582.3%

ECM #3 Lighting Controls Upgrade $12,940 $5,436 2.4 530.1%

ECM #4 CRT Monitors $9,700 $1,980 4.9 206.2%

ECM #5 Demand Controlled Ventilation - Cafeteria

$63,000 $5,455 11.5 29.9%

ECM #6 AC Unit Upgrades $104,912 $3,599 29.1 -48.5%

REM #1 Solar PV System $1,898,190 $119,599 15.9 -5.5%

Notes:

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

SIMPLE PAYBACK

(Yrs)

SIMPLE LIFETIME

ROI

NET INSTALLATION

COSTA

A. Cost takes into consideration applicable NJ Smart StartTM incentives.B. Savings takes into consideration applicable maintenance savings.

ANNUAL SAVINGSB

RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's)

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

NET INSTALLATION

COST

ANNUAL SAVINGS

SIMPLE PAYBACK

(Yrs)

SIMPLE LIFETIME

ROI

Page 310: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 13 of 31

Table 2 ECM Energy Summary

ECM #1 Lighting Equipment Upgrade 10.2 27,532 0

ECM #2 Lighting Equipment Upgrade -Aud & Gym

7.8 20,218 0

ECM #3 Lighting Controls Upgrade 0.0 33,556 0

ECM #4 CRT Monitors 4.9 12,222 0

ECM #5 Demand Controlled Ventilation - Cafeteria

0.0 9,504 3,057

ECM #6 AC Unit Upgrades 21.7 26,080 0

REM #1 Solar PV System 171 245,079 0

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)

ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION

(KWH)

NATURAL GAS (THERMS)

ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION

(KWH)

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTION

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTION

NATURAL GAS (THERMS)

RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's)

Page 311: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 14 of 31

Table 3 Facility Project Summary

Lighting Equipment Upgrade

$4,460 $12,870 $0 $12,870 2.9

Lighting Equipment Upgrade - Aud & Gym

$3,275 $10,800 $3,600 $7,200 2.2

Lighting Controls Upgrade $5,436 $14,600 $1,660 $12,940 2.4

CRT Monitors $1,980 $9,700 $0 $9,700 4.9

Demand Controlled Ventilation - Cafeteria

$5,455 $63,000 $0 $63,000 11.5

AC Unit Upgrades $3,599 $108,250 $3,338 $104,912 29.1

Design / Construction Extras (15%)

$32,883 $32,883

Total Project $24,205 $252,103 $8,598 $243,505 10.1

ENERGY SAVINGS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - POTENTIAL PROJECT

ENERGY CONSERVATION

MEASURES

ANNUAL ENERGY

SAVINGS ($)

PROJECT COST ($)

CUSTOMER COST

SIMPLE PAYBACK

SMART START

INCENTIVES

Page 312: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 15 of 31

ECM #1: Lighting Upgrade – Interior spaces Description: The majority of the interior lighting throughout Oaks Elementary School is provided with fluorescent fixtures with older generation, 700 series 32W T8 lamps and electronic ballasts. Although 700 series T8 lamps are considered fairly efficient, further energy savings can be achieved by replacing the existing T8 lamps with new generation, 800 series 28W T8 lamps without compromising light output. CEG recommends, re-lamping all of the fixtures with 28W T8 lamps. In addition, some of the storage areas, locker room and gym areas, offices, auditorium, classrooms, restrooms and kitchen areas still have a variety of older fluorescent fixtures with magnetic ballasts and incandescent lamps. It is recommended to retrofit or replace all of the older fluorescent fixtures and the incandescent lights in these areas with high efficiency fluorescent T8 or T5 fixtures with electronic ballasts or compact fluorescent lamps. This ECM includes re-lamping of the existing fluorescent fixtures with 800 series, 28W T8 lamps. The ECM also includes retrofit of all older fluorescent fixtures with T8 or T5 fluorescent fixtures with electronic ballasts in the building. The new, energy efficient T8 fixtures will provide adequate lighting and will save on electrical costs due to better performance of the lamp and ballasts. Energy Savings Calculations: The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix outlines the hours of operation, proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods for each set of fixtures in the each building. Rebates and Incentives: There are no incentives available from NJ Smart Start® Program for the retrofits in this ECM. Replacement and Maintenance Savings: There is no significant replacement and maintenance savings due to implementation of this ECM.

Page 313: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 16 of 31

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $12,870

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0Net Installation Cost ($): $12,870Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $4,460

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $4,460Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 2.9Simple Lifetime ROI 419.8%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $66,900Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 34%Net Present Value (NPV) $40,373.19

ECM #1 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 314: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 17 of 31

ECM #2: Lighting Upgrade – Gym & Auditorium Description: The Auditorium and Gymnasium at Oak Elementary School utilizes 400W metal halide fixtures for its lighting. Metal halide bulbs provide a reasonably efficient option for bay lighting however a few draw-backs that are common. Metal halide fixtures often have poor overall efficacy which limits the amount of light actually leaving the fixture. Also metal halide bulbs require a significant warm-up period and even longer cool down period eliminating the potential for occupancy sensors frequent switching. This symptom encourages the gymnasium lighting to be left on continuously during the day. Another drawback is the reduced lumen output (Lumen Maintenance) of the metal halide bulb over its life time. Average bulb output or “mean lumens,” is approximately 25% less than the bulb’s initial lumens for typical metal halide lamps. In addition the most rapid rate of light output decline is during the beginning of its life, approximately 15-20% light loss within the first 20% of its rated life. It is important to note that the light loss has no savings in energy used; therefore the overall light efficiency is continuously decreasing with age. The final drawback is the light quality or Color Rendering Index (CRI). Typical values for metal halide bulbs is 65, which is a measure of how close the light is to true “full spectrum” light produced by sunlight or incandescent lighting. Metal halide bulbs also show noticeable color shifting when the bulb is reaching the end of its life. Utilizing fluorescent fixtures in low and high bay spaces is a superior option over metal halide fixtures in all areas described above. Although metal halide fixtures provide light very efficiently at the start of the bulb life, the average efficiency over the life is below that of fluorescent fixtures. This ECM includes replacement of each of the existing gymnasium high bay metal halide light fixtures with T5HO fixtures with reflective lenses. The retrofit for the metal halide fixtures includes a one for one fixture replacement. The fluorescent fixtures selected will provide equivalent light compared to the average light output of the existing metal halide fixtures. The bulb replacement cost for T-5 HO lamps compared to the existing metal halide lamps were found to be approximately equal and therefore not included in the savings calculations. Hours of Operation Gymnasium: 2,600 Hours/Yr Energy Savings Calculations: The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix outlines the proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods. NJ Smart Start® Program Incentives are calculated as follows: From the Smart Start Incentive Appendix, the following incentives are warranted:

Page 315: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 18 of 31

For replacement of HID (400-999W) with new T-5 or T-8 fixtures = $100/Fixture Smart Start ® Incentive # of 400W Metal Halide Fixture Replaced $100 Smart Start ® Incentive 36 $100 $3600 There is no significant replacement or maintenance savings generated with this ECM. Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $10,800

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $3,600Net Installation Cost ($): $7,200Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $3,275

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $3,275Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 2.2Simple Lifetime ROI 582.3%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $49,125Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 45%Net Present Value (NPV) $31,896.74

ECM #2 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

ECM #3: Lighting Controls Upgrade – Occupancy Sensors

Page 316: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 19 of 31

Description: Some of the lights in the school building are left on unnecessarily. In many cases the lights are left on because of the inconvenience to manually switch lights off when a room is left or on when a room is first occupied. This is common in rooms that are occupied for only short periods and only a few times per day. In some instances lights are left on due to the misconception that it is better to keep the lights on rather than to continuously switch lights on and off. Although increased switching reduces lamp life, the energy savings outweigh the lamp replacement costs. The payback timeframe for when to turn the lights off is approximately two minutes. If the lights are expected to be off for at least a two minute interval, then it pays to shut them off.

Lighting controls come in many forms. Sometimes an additional switch is adequate to provide reduced lighting levels when full light output is not needed. Occupancy sensors detect motion and will switch the lights on when the room is occupied. Occupancy sensors can either be mounted in place of a current wall switch, or on the ceiling to cover large areas. The U.S. Department of Energy sponsored a study to analyze energy savings achieved through various types of building system controls. The referenced savings is based on the “Advanced Sensors and Controls for Building Applications: Market Assessment and Potential R&D Pathways,” document posted for public use April 2005. The study has found that commercial buildings have the potential to achieve significant energy savings through the use of building controls. The average energy savings are as follows based on the report:

• Occupancy Sensors for Lighting Control 20% - 28% energy savings.

Savings resulting from the implementation of this ECM for energy management controls are estimated to be 20% of the total light energy controlled by occupancy sensors and daylight sensors (The majority of the savings is expected to be after school hours when rooms are left with lights on) This ECM includes installation of ceiling or switch mount sensors for individual offices, classrooms, large bathrooms, and libraries. Sensors shall be manufactured by Sensorswitch, Watt Stopper or equivalent. The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix of this report includes the summary of lighting controls implemented in this ECM and outlines the proposed controls, costs, savings, and payback periods. The calculations adjust the lighting power usage by the applicable percent savings for each area that includes lighting controls. Energy Savings Calculations:

( )( )kWh/YrEnergyLightControlledSavings%SavingsEnergy ×=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWh$CostElecAvekWhSavingsEnergySavings.

Page 317: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 20 of 31

Cost and Incentives:

Installation cost per dual-technology sensors (Basis: Sensor switch or equivalent) are as follows:

Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mount $250 per installation Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mount $150 per installation Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor with 2 Pole Powerpack

Remote mount $300 per installation Cost includes material and labor. From the NJ Smart Start® Program Incentives Appendix, the installation of a lighting control device warrants the following incentive: Occupancy Sensor Fixture Mounted (existing facility only) = $20 per sensor Occupancy Sensor Remote Mounted (existing facility only) = $35 per sensor

( ) $35)mountceilingof(#20$mountwallof#IncentiveStartSmart ×+×=® ( ) $1,660$35)mountceiling (4020$mountwall13IncentiveStartSmart =×+×=®

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $14,600

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $1,660Net Installation Cost ($): $12,940Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $5,436

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $5,436Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 2.4Simple Lifetime ROI 530.1%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $81,540Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 42%Net Present Value (NPV) $51,954.62

ECM #3 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 318: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 21 of 31

ECM #4: Computer Monitor Replacement Description: The computers throughout the school utilize a mixture of CRT computer monitors and LCD computer monitors. The CRT computer monitors within the offices and classrooms are outdated and have several disadvantages such as; significantly increased energy consumption, uses large amount of desk space, poor picture quality, distortions and flickering image, secular glare problems, high weight, and electromagnetic emissions. Many of these drawbacks are difficult to quantify except for the energy use. CRT monitors use considerably more energy than an alternative flat panel LCD monitor. Replacement of the existing CRT monitors with LCD monitors saves considerable energy as well as provides other ergonomic benefits. Based on the site survey it was noted that there are 29 LCD monitor and 97 CRT monitors. Some of the monitors were left in screen saver mode, which only saves the computer screen from image burn in, however it does not save on energy consumption. The average operating hours for all computers and monitors is estimated based on the site survey observations. Energy consumption of computer monitors is based on averages for power usage of various computer monitors. This ECM includes replacement of all existing CRT monitors with LCD flat panel monitors throughout the facility. Installation costs were neglected for this ECM with the intention that this ECM would be replaced by the school district. The calculations are based on the following operating assumptions: Energy Savings Calculations: No. of CRT Monitors: 97 Operating Weeks per Yr: 29 Hrs per Week: 60 (12 hrs per day estimated average)

( ) ( )

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

××=

KWW

HrsOperationWPowerMonitorComputersofUsageElectric1000

#

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWhCostElecAvekWhUsageElectricCostEnergy $

Page 319: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 22 of 31

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSECM INPUTS CRT Monitors LCD Monitor

# of Computers 97 97

Monitor Power Cons. (W) 75 25

Operating Hrs per Week 60 60

Operating Weeks per Yr 42 42

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.162 0.162

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Electric Usage (kWh) 18,333 6,111 12,222

Energy Cost ($) $2,970 $990 $1,980

COMMENTS:

COMPUTER MONITOR CALCULATIONS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

CRT Monitor consumption based on Dell CRT monitor M/N: CRT-E771MM. Operating hours estimated.

Installation cost of new monitors is estimated based on current pricing for a 17” LCD monitor on the market today. No labor costs were included for replacing the existing monitors with the new monitors. No incentives are available for installation of computer monitors. Net cost per monitor was estimated to be $100. Cost of installation is summarized in the table below.

ECM INPUT # OF UNITS UNIT COST TOTAL COSTCRT MONITORS 97 $100 $9,700Total 97 $9,700

COST & SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 320: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 23 of 31

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $9,700

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $9,700

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $1,980

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $1,980

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 4.9

Simple Lifetime ROI 206.2%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $29,700Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 19%Net Present Value (NPV) $13,937.11

ECM #4 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 321: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 24 of 31

ECM #5: Demand Controlled Ventilation Demand Controlled Ventilation (DCV) is a means to provide active, zone level control of ventilation for spaces within a facility. The basic premise behind DCV is monitoring indoor CO2 levels versus outdoor CO2 levels in order to provide proper ventilation to the spaces within the facility as well as saving costly dollars treating unconditioned ventilation air. Carbon dioxide ventilation control or demand controlled ventilation (DCV) allows for the measurement and control of outside air ventilation levels to a target cfm/person ventilation rate in the space (i.e., 15 cfm/person) based on the number of people in the space. It is a direct measure of ventilation effectiveness and is a method whereby buildings can regain active and automatic zone level ventilation control, without having to open windows. The fixed ventilation approach depends on a set-it-and-forget-it methodology that is completely unresponsive to changes in the way spaces are utilized/occupied or how equipment is maintained. A DCV system utilizes various control algorithms to maintain a base ventilation rate. The system monitors space CO2 levels and the algorithm automatically adjusts the outdoor and return air dampers to provide the quantity of outdoor air to maintain the required CO2 level in the space. System designs are normally designed for maximum occupancy and the ventilation rates are designed for this (maximum) occupancy. In areas where occupancy swings are prevalent there is ample opportunity to reduce outdoor air quantity to satisfy the needs of the actual number of occupants present. By installing the DCV controls, energy savings are realized by the reduced quantities of outdoor air that do not require heating and cooling energy from the steam and chilled water plants. The split rooftop unit serving the cafeteria and four (4) rooftop units serving the gymnasium are standard air conditioning systems with constant minimum outside air setup. When these units are on occupied mode, the outside air dampers open and remain open until the units switch to unoccupied mode. The outside air volume quantity is typically based on the maximum occupancy of the space conditioned. When a given space is not fully occupied the outside air quantity delivered to the space is greater than the amount actually needed for adequate ventilation, which results in waste of heating or air conditioning energy. This ECM includes the installation integrated demand control ventilation systems with CO2 sensors, for the unit mentioned above. This system allows the air handling unit to respond to changes in occupancy and therefore reduce the amount of outside air that has to be conditioned. Outside air accounts for a large portion of the energy consumption in the HVAC system, especially in high occupancy spaces. The U.S. Department of Energy sponsored a study to analyze energy savings achieved through various types of building system controls. The referenced savings is based on the “Advanced Sensors and Controls for Building Applications: Market Assessment and Potential R&D Pathways,” document posted for public use April 2005. The study has found that commercial buildings have the potential to achieve significant energy savings through the use of building controls. The average energy savings are as follows based on the report:

• Demand Control Ventilation - 10% - 15%.

Page 322: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 25 of 31

Energy savings achieved through “Demand Control Ventilation” average 10%-15%. Savings resulting from the implementation of this ECM for energy management controls are estimated to be 15% of the total HVAC energy cost for this system. The components included to install for a demand control ventilation system include damper actuators, Variable Frequency Drives, CO2 sensors, wiring, Energy Management System equipment expansion and programming. Each occupied zone would require minimum one CO2 sensor installed to monitor occupancy levels.

IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY

INPUTS Service# of CO2

SENSORSHVAC

Unit

Cooling Capaity,

Tons

Heating Capacity,

MBHDCV-1 Cafeteria 2 RTU 30 600

DCV-2 Gymnasium 4 RTU 36 1,000

Total 66 1,600 Energy Savings Calculations:

( )

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×

=

WhBtuEER

kWhWh1000

Hrs.Cooling Load Full AnnualhrTon

Btu12,000TonsCoolingeEnergyUsag Cooling

( ) 5%1kwhEnergy CoolingSavingsEnergy ×=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWh$CostElectricAvekWhUsageEnergyCostCooling

( )( ) ( )

( ) ( )%EfficiencyHeatingTherms

BtuValueHeatFuelF65

0.60DayHr.24FDayHDD

Hr.BtuCapacity Heating

ThermsEnergy Heating×⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×°

×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×°×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

Therms$CostFuelAveThermsEnergyHeatingCost Heating

( ) 5%1ThermsEnergy HeatingSavingsEnergy ×=

Results of the energy savings calculations are summarized in the table below:

Page 323: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 26 of 31

ECM INPUTS DCV-1Equipment Cafeteria RTUTotal Cooling Capacity, Tons 66Efficiency (EER) 10Annual Full Load Cooling Hours 800Total Heating Capacity, MBh 1600Heating Efficiency (Gas) 80%Heating Degree Days (65°F) 4599Energy Savings 15%Elec Cost ($/kWh) $0.162Natural Gas Cost ($/Therm) $1.28

ECM RESULTS DCV-1Cooling Energy Cnsmption, kWh 63,360 Heating Energy (Therms) 20,377Cooling Energy Savings kWh 9,504 Heating Energy Savings (Therms) 3,057Electric Energy Cost Savings ($) $1,543Total Gas Cost Savings ($) $3,912Total Cost Savings ($) $5,455COMMENTS: HDD estimated based on Newark,NJ.

DEMAND CONTROLLED VENTILATION

ENERGY SAVINGS

Cost and Incentives: Estimated installed cost for demand controlled ventilation for the cafeteria main seating area and the gymnasium is $63,000. Estimated cost includes CO2 sensors, control wiring, electrical wiring, control system equipment expansion and programming. There are currently no Smart Start ® incentives available for a Demand Control Ventilation System.

Page 324: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 27 of 31

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $63,000

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0Net Installation Cost ($): $63,000Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $5,455

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $5,455Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 11.5

Simple Lifetime ROI 29.9%Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $81,825Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 3%Net Present Value (NPV) $2,121.44

ECM #5 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 325: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 28 of 31

ECM #6: Air Conditioning Unit Upgrades

Description:

Oak Street Elementary is air conditioned by split system AC units and packaged rooftop units. The majority of the units at the elementary schools are in fair condition and near the end of their useful life of 15 years, which is defined by ASHRAE. The units currently installed are inefficient compared to modern equipment and can be replaced with new high efficiency units. New air conditioners provide higher full load and part load efficiencies due to advances in inverter motor technologies, heat exchangers and refrigerants. This ECM includes one-for-one replacement of the older air conditioning units with new higher efficiency systems. It is recommended to fully evaluate the capacity needed for all new systems prior to moving forward with this ECM. A summary of the unit replacements for this ECM can be found in the table below:

ECM INPUTS SERVICE FORNUMBER OF UNITS

COOLING CAPACITY,

Tons

TOTAL CAPACITY,

TONS

REPLACE UNIT WITH

Rooftop Unit Rm #37 (2) and 39 (1) 3 3 9 Carrier 50XL-A

Rooftop Unit Gym hallway, restrooms, office (1) Kitchen (1) Gym Storage (1)

3 6 18 Carrier 48HC

Split Unit Library 2 4 8 (2) Fujitsu 24CL

Window Unit Various offices 5 1 5 Fujitsu 12CLTotal 13 14 40.0

IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY

The manufacturers used as the basis for design are Carrier and Fujitsu. This ECM includes replacement of the outdoor condensing units and associated indoor air handling units or cooling coils where appropriate. The RTU replacements include full unit replacements. All units are one for one style replacements with matching capacity of the new units to the old units. Energy Savings Calculations: Cooling Energy Savings: Seasonal energy consumption of the air conditioners at the cooling mode is calculated with the equation below:

Energy Savings, kWh Cooling Capacity,BTUHr

1SEERO

1SEERN

Operation Hours

1000 WkWh

Demand Savings, kW Energy Savings kWh

Hours of Cooling

Page 326: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 29 of 31

Cooling Cost Savings Energy Savings, kWh Cost of Electricity $

kWh

ECM INPUTSCOOLING

CAPACITY, BTU/Hr

ANNUAL COOLING

HOURS

EXISTING UNITS (S)EER

SPLIT UNITS (S)EER

# OF UNITS

ENERGY SAVINGS

kWh

DEMAND SAVINGS

kWRooftop Unit 36,000 1,200 10 SEER 15 SEER 3 4,320 3.6

Rooftop Unit 72,000 1,200 10 SEER 15 SEER 3 8,640 7.2

Split Unit 48,000 1,200 8 SEER 18 SEER 2 8,000 6.7

Window Unit 12,000 1,200 9 EER 25 EER 5 5,120 4.3Total 13 26,080 21.7

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

Project Cost, Incentives and Maintenance Savings From the NJ Smart Start® Program appendix, the replacement of split system AC units and unitary systems with high efficiency AC systems falls under the category “Unitary HVAC Split System” and warrants an incentive based on efficiency (EER/SEER). The program incentives are calculated as follows:

( )Incentive$/TonTonsCoolingIncentiveStartSmart ×=®

UNIT DESCRIPTION

UNIT EFFICIENCY

REBATE $/TON

PROPOSED CAPACITY

TONS

TOTAL REBATE

$≥20 to 30 tons 10.5 EER 79 0 $0

≥ 11.25 to < 20 tons 11.5 EER 79 0 $0

≥ 5.4 to < 11.25 tons 11.5 EER 73 18 $1,314 5.4 tons or less Unitary AC and Split System

≥14 SEER $92 22.0 $2,024

TOTAL 40 $3,338

SPLIT SYSTEM AC UNITS REBATE SUMMARY

Page 327: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 30 of 31

Summary of cost, savings and payback for this ECM is below.

ECM INPUTSINSTALLED

COST# OF

UNITSTOTAL COST REBATES

NET COST

ENERGY SAVING

PAY BACK YEARS

Rooftop Unit $9,250 3 $27,750 $828 $26,922 $596 45.2

Rooftop Unit $14,000 3 $42,000 $1,314 $40,686 $1,192 34.1

Split Unit $8,000 2 $16,000 $736 $15,264 $1,104 13.8

Window Unit $4,500 5 $22,500 $460 $22,040 $707 31.2Total 13 $108,250 $3,338 $104,912 $3,599 29.1

COST & SAVINGS SUMMARY

There is no significant maintenance savings due to implementation of this ECM. Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $108,250NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $3,338Net Installation Cost ($): $104,912Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $3,599Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $3,599Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 29.1Simple Lifetime ROI -48.5%Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings 0

Simple Lifetime Savings $53,986Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -7%Net Present Value (NPV) ($61,946.89)

ECM #6 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 328: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Oak Street School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 31 of 31

V. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations include no cost/low cost measures, Operation & Maintenance (O&M) items, and water conservation measures with attractive paybacks. These measures are not eligible for the Smart Start Buildings incentives from the office of Clean Energy but save energy none the less.

A. Chemically clean the condenser and evaporator coils periodically to optimize efficiency. Poorly maintained heat transfer surfaces can reduce efficiency 5-10%.

B. Maintain all weather stripping on windows and doors.

C. Clean all light fixtures to maximize light output to avoid use of task lighting.

D. Provide more frequent air filter changes to decrease overall system power usage and maintain better IAQ.

E. Turn off computers when not in use. Ensure computers are not running in screen saver mode which saves the monitor screen not energy.

F. Ensure outside air dampers are functioning properly and only open during occupied mode.

It was noted at the site survey that the HVAC systems in several rooms were not controlling temperature correctly. The result of the controls issues causes space temperatures to become uncomfortable and drastic measures such as opening windows on extremely cold days. This type of issue requires a whole system controls evaluation for the building to determine where control problems are taking place. Based on information provided by the operations personnel, there are several control systems within the building which operate different section or systems throughout the building. In addition, multiple control vendors are utilized to maintain the control systems. The use of multiple control systems and control vendors to support the systems will very likely cause issues with the overall function of the building. The systems and controls throughout the district represent a large potential “energy leak” throughout the building. It is recommended to quantify the control system points and verify their proper operation through Retro-Commissioning. Retro-Commissioning allows facility owners to re-establish the operation of the HVAC systems back to the original specifications. A third party evaluation is highly recommended to review the controls of the systems and provide insight into the corrections needed. It is also recommended to consider the renovation of all control systems into one central control system to avoid the overlap and communication gap when utilizing multiple control systems. This renovation should be consistent across all facility throughout Bernards Public Schools to maximize the benefit of central controls.

Page 329: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX A1 of 1

LIFETIME ENERGY SAVINGS

LIFETIME MAINTENANCE

SAVINGSLIFETIME ROI SIMPLE PAYBACK INTERNAL RATE OF

RETURN (IRR)NET PRESENT VALUE

(NPV)

MATERIAL LABOR REBATES, INCENTIVES

NET INSTALLATION

COSTENERGY MAINT. / SREC TOTAL (Yearly Saving * ECM Lifetime)

(Yearly Maint Svaing * ECM Lifetime)

(Lifetime Savings - Net Cost) / (Net Cost) (Net cost / Yearly Savings)

($) ($) ($) ($) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) (Yr) ($) ($) (%) (Yr) ($) ($)

ECM #1 Lighting Equipment Upgrade $6,435 $6,435 $0 $12,870 $4,460 $0 $4,460 15 $66,900 $0 419.8% 2.9 34.24% $40,373.19

ECM #2 Lighting Equipment Upgrade - Aud & Gym $5,400 $5,400 $3,600 $7,200 $3,275 $0 $3,275 15 $49,125 $0 582.3% 2.2 45.32% $31,896.74

ECM #3 Lighting Controls Upgrade $7,300 $7,300 $1,660 $12,940 $5,436 $0 $5,436 15 $81,540 $0 530.1% 2.4 41.79% $51,954.62

ECM #4 CRT Monitors $9,700 $0 $0 $9,700 $1,980 $0 $1,980 15 $29,700 $0 206.2% 4.9 18.89% $13,937.11

ECM #5 Demand Controlled Ventilation - Cafeteria $63,000 $0 $0 $63,000 $5,455 $0 $5,455 15 $81,825 $0 29.9% 11.5 3.46% $2,121.44

ECM #6 AC Unit Upgrades $108,250 $0 $3,338 $104,912 $3,599 $0 $3,599 15 $53,986 $0 -48.5% 29.1 -7.35% ($61,946.89)

REM #1 Solar PV System $1,898,190 $0 $0 $1,898,190 $33,821 $85,778 $119,599 15 $1,793,978 $1,286,665 -5.5% 15.9 -0.70% ($470,430.25)

Notes: 1) The variable Cn in the formulas for Internal Rate of Return and Net Present Value stands for the cash flow during each period.2) The variable DR in the NPV equation stands for Discount Rate3) For NPV and IRR calculations: From n=0 to N periods where N is the lifetime of ECM and Cn is the cash flow during each period .

REM RENEWABLE ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY

ECM COST & SAVINGS BREAKDOWNCONCORD ENGINEERING GROUP

Oak Street Elementary School

INSTALLATION COST YEARLY SAVINGSECM

LIFETIMEDESCRIPTIONECM NO.

ECM ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 330: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 1 of 4

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 520 BURNT MILL ROAD VOORHEES, NEW JERSEY 08043 PHONE: (856) 427-0200 FAX: (856) 427-6508

SmartStart Building Incentives The NJ SmartStart Buildings Program offers financial incentives on a wide variety of building system equipment. The incentives were developed to help offset the initial cost of energy-efficient equipment. The following tables show the current available incentives as of February 15, 2011:

Electric Chillers Water-Cooled Chillers $12 - $170 per ton

Air-Cooled Chillers $8 - $52 per ton Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Gas Cooling Gas Absorption Chillers $185 - $400 per ton

Gas Engine-Driven Chillers Calculated through custom measure path)

Desiccant Systems $1.00 per cfm – gas or electric

Electric Unitary HVAC Unitary AC and Split Systems $73 - $92 per ton

Air-to-Air Heat Pumps $73 - $92 per ton Water-Source Heat Pumps $81 per ton

Packaged Terminal AC & HP $65 per ton Central DX AC Systems $40- $72 per ton

Dual Enthalpy Economizer Controls $250 Occupancy Controlled Thermostat

(Hospitality & Institutional Facility) $75 per thermostat

Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Gas Heating Gas Fired Boilers < 300 MBH $300 per unit

Gas Fired Boilers ≥ 300 - 1500 MBH $1.75 per MBH

Gas Fired Boilers ≥1500 - ≤ 4000 MBH $1.00 per MBH

Gas Fired Boilers > 4000 MBH (Calculated through Custom Measure Path)

Gas Furnaces $300 - $400 per unit, AFUE ≥ 92%

Page 331: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 2 of 4

Ground Source Heat Pumps

Closed Loop $450 per ton, EER ≥ 16 $600 per ton, EER ≥ 18 $750 per ton, EER ≥ 20

Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Variable Frequency Drives Variable Air Volume $65 - $155 per hp Chilled-Water Pumps $60 per VFD rated hp

Compressors $5,250 to $12,500 per drive Cooling Towers ≥ 10 hp $60 per VFD rated hp

Natural Gas Water Heating

Gas Water Heaters ≤ 50 gallons, 0.67 energy factor or better $50 per unit

Gas-Fired Water Heaters > 50 gallons $1.00 - $2.00 per MBH Gas-Fired Booster Water Heaters $17 - $35 per MBH Gas Fired Tankless Water Heaters $300 per unit

Prescriptive Lighting Retro fit of T12 to T-5 or T-8 Lamps

w/Electronic Ballast in Existing Facilities

$10 per fixture (1-4 lamps)

Replacement of T12 with new T-5 or T-8 Lamps w/Electronic Ballast in

Existing Facilities $25 per fixture (1-4 lamps)

Replacement of incandescent with screw-in PAR 38 or PAR 30 (CFL)

bulb $7 per bulb

T-8 reduced Wattage (28w/25w 4’, 1-4 lamps)

Lamp & ballast replacement $10 per fixture

Hard-Wired Compact Fluorescent $25 - $30 per fixture

Metal Halide w/Pulse Start Including Parking Lot $25 per fixture

T-5 and T-8 High Bay Fixtures $16 - $200 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Retrofit with induction lamp, power coupler and generator

(must be 30% less watts/fixture than HID system)

$50 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Replacement with new HID ≥ 100w $70 per fixture

Page 332: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 3 of 4

Prescriptive Lighting - LED

LED New Exit Sign Fixture Existing Facility < 75 kw Existing Facility > 75 kw

$20 per fixture $10 per fixture

LED Display Case Lighting $30 per display case

LED Shelf-Mtd. Display & Task Lights $15 per linear foot

LED Portable Desk Lamp $20 per fixture

LED Wall-wash Lights $30 per fixture

LED Recessed Down Lights $35 per fixture LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Area

and Roadway Luminaries $175 per fixture

LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Decorative Luminaries $175 per fixture

LED Outdoor Wall-Mounted Area Luminaries $100 per fixture

LED Parking Garage Luminaries $100 per fixture

LED Track or Mono-Point Directional Lighting Fixtures $50 per fixture

LED High-Bay and Low-Bay Fixtures for Commercial & Industrial Bldgs. $150 per fixture

LED High-Bay-Aisle Lighting $150 per fixture

LED Bollard Fixtures $50 per fixture

LED Linear Panels (2x2 Troffers only) $100 per fixture

LED Fuel Pump Canopy $100 per fixture

LED Refrigerator/Freezer case lighting replacement of fluorescent in medium

and low temperature display case

$42 per 5 foot $65 per 6 foot

Page 333: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 4 of 4

Lighting Controls – Occupancy Sensors

Wall Mounted $20 per control Remote Mounted $35 per control

Daylight Dimmers $25 per fixture Occupancy Controlled hi-low

Fluorescent Controls $25 per fixture controlled

Lighting Controls – HID or Fluorescent Hi-Bay Controls Occupancy hi-low $75 per fixture controlled Daylight Dimming $75 per fixture controlled

Daylight Dimming - office $50 per fixture controlled

Premium Motors Three-Phase Motors $45 - $700 per motor

Fractional HP Motors Electronic Communicated Motors (replacing shaded pole motors in

refrigerator/freezer cases)

$40 per electronic communicated motor

Other Equipment Incentives

Performance Lighting

$1.00 per watt per SF below program incentive threshold, currently 5% more energy efficient than ASHRAE 90.1-

2007 for New Construction and Complete Renovation

Custom Electric and Gas Equipment Incentives not prescriptive

Custom Measures

$0.16 KWh and $1.60/Therm of 1st year savings, or a buy down to a 1 year

payback on estimated savings. Minimum required savings of 75,000 KWh or 1,500 Therms and a IRR of at

least 10%. Multi Measures Bonus 15%

Page 334: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

OMB No. 2060-0347

STATEMENT OF ENERGY PERFORMANCEBT Oak Street Elementary School

Building ID: 2490935 For 12-month Period Ending: October 31, 20101

Date SEP becomes ineligible: N/A Date SEP Generated: March 04, 2011

FacilityBT Oak Street Elementary School70 West Oak StreetBasking Ridge, NJ 07920

Facility OwnerBernards Public Schools101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Primary Contact for this FacilityConnie Coriell101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Year Built: 1938Gross Floor Area (ft2): 69,279

Energy Performance Rating2 (1-100) 63

Site Energy Use Summary3

Electricity - Grid Purchase(kBtu) 1,881,329 Natural Gas (kBtu)4 4,330,800 Total Energy (kBtu) 6,212,129

Energy Intensity5 Site (kBtu/ft2/yr) 90 Source (kBtu/ft2/yr) 156 Emissions (based on site energy use) Greenhouse Gas Emissions (MtCO2e/year) N/A Electric Distribution Utility N/A National Average Comparison National Average Site EUI 101 National Average Source EUI 177 % Difference from National Average Source EUI -12% Building Type K-12

School

Stamp of Certifying Professional

Based on the conditions observed at thetime of my visit to this building, I certify that

the information contained within thisstatement is accurate.

Meets Industry Standards6 for Indoor EnvironmentalConditions:Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality N/A Acceptable Thermal Environmental Conditions N/A Adequate Illumination N/A

Certifying ProfessionalMichael Fischette520 S. Burnt Mill Road Voorhees, NJ 08043

Notes: 1. Application for the ENERGY STAR must be submitted to EPA within 4 months of the Period Ending date. Award of the ENERGY STAR is not final until approval is received from EPA.2. The EPA Energy Performance Rating is based on total source energy. A rating of 75 is the minimum to be eligible for the ENERGY STAR.3. Values represent energy consumption, annualized to a 12-month period.4. Natural Gas values in units of volume (e.g. cubic feet) are converted to kBtu with adjustments made for elevation based on Facility zip code.5. Values represent energy intensity, annualized to a 12-month period.6. Based on Meeting ASHRAE Standard 62 for ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality, ASHRAE Standard 55 for thermal comfort, and IESNA Lighting Handbook for lighting quality.

The government estimates the average time needed to fill out this form is 6 hours (includes the time for entering energy data, Licensed Professional facility inspection, and notarizing the SEP) andwelcomes suggestions for reducing this level of effort. Send comments (referencing OMB control number) to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S., EPA (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,NW, Washington, D.C. 20460.

EPA Form 5900-16

Appendix CPage 1 of 7

Page 335: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

ENERGY STAR®

Data Checklistfor Commercial Buildings

In order for a building to qualify for the ENERGY STAR, a Professional Engineer (PE) or a Registered Architect (RA) must validate the accuracy of the data underlyingthe building's energy performance rating. This checklist is designed to provide an at-a-glance summary of a property's physical and operating characteristics, as well asits total energy consumption, to assist the PE or RA in double-checking the information that the building owner or operator has entered into Portfolio Manager.

Please complete and sign this checklist and include it with the stamped, signed Statement of Energy Performance.NOTE: You must check each box to indicate that each value is correct, OR include a note.

CRITERION VALUE AS ENTERED INPORTFOLIO MANAGER VERIFICATION QUESTIONS NOTES

Building Name BT Oak Street Elementary

School Is this the official building name to be displayed inthe ENERGY STAR Registry of LabeledBuildings?

Type K-12 School Is this an accurate description of the space inquestion?

Location 70 West Oak Street,

Basking Ridge, NJ 07920 Is this address accurate and complete? Correctweather normalization requires an accurate zipcode.

Single Structure Single Facility

Does this SEP represent a single structure? SEPscannot be submitted for multiple-buildingcampuses (with the exception of acute care orchildren's hospitals) nor can they be submitted asrepresenting only a portion of a building

BT Oak Street Elementary School (K-12 School)

CRITERION VALUE AS ENTERED INPORTFOLIO MANAGER VERIFICATION QUESTIONS NOTES

Gross Floor Area 69,279 Sq. Ft.

Does this square footage include all supportingfunctions such as kitchens and break rooms usedby staff, storage areas, administrative areas,elevators, stairwells, atria, vent shafts, etc. Alsonote that existing atriums should only include thebase floor area that it occupies. Interstitial(plenum) space between floors should not beincluded in the total. Finally gross floor area is notthe same as leasable space. Leasable space is asubset of gross floor area.

Open Weekends? Yes

Is this building normally open at all on theweekends? This includes activities beyond thework conducted by maintenance, cleaning, andsecurity personnel. Weekend activity could includeany time when the space is used for classes,performances or other school or communityactivities. If the building is open on the weekend aspart of the standard schedule during one or moreseasons, the building should select ?yes? for openweekends. The ?yes? response should applywhether the building is open for one or both of theweekend days.

Number of PCs 250 Is this the number of personal computers in theK12 School?

Number of walk-inrefrigeration/freezer

units 2

Is this the total number of commercial walk-in typefreezers and coolers? These units are typicallyfound in storage and receiving areas.

Presence ofcooking facilities Yes

Does this school have a dedicated space in whichfood is prepared and served to students? If theschool has space in which food for students is onlykept warm and/or served to students, or has only agalley that is used by teachers and staff then theanswer is "no".

Percent Cooled 50 % Is this the percentage of the total floor space withinthe facility that is served by mechanical coolingequipment?

Percent Heated 100 % Is this the percentage of the total floor space withinthe facility that is served by mechanical heatingequipment?

Months 12(Optional) Is this school in operation for at least 8 months ofthe year?

Page 1 of 4

Appendix CPage 2 of 7

Page 336: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

High School? No

Is this building a high school (teaching grades 10,11, and/or 12)? If the building teaches to highschool students at all, the user should check 'yes'to 'high school'. For example, if the school teachesto grades K-12 (elementary/middle and highschool), the user should check 'yes' to 'highschool'.

Page 2 of 4

Appendix CPage 3 of 7

Page 337: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

ENERGY STAR®

Data Checklistfor Commercial Buildings

Energy ConsumptionPower Generation Plant or Distribution Utility:

Fuel Type: Electricity

Meter: Electricity (kWh (thousand Watt-hours))Space(s): Entire Facility

Generation Method: Grid Purchase

Start Date End Date Energy Use (kWh (thousand Watt-hours))

10/01/2010 10/31/2010 57,523.00

09/01/2010 09/30/2010 36,124.00

08/01/2010 08/31/2010 34,852.00

07/01/2010 07/31/2010 41,599.00

06/01/2010 06/30/2010 36,718.00

05/01/2010 05/31/2010 47,379.00

04/01/2010 04/30/2010 45,211.00

03/01/2010 03/31/2010 44,709.00

02/01/2010 02/28/2010 49,768.00

01/01/2010 01/31/2010 63,786.00

12/01/2009 12/31/2009 48,161.00

11/01/2009 11/30/2009 45,556.00

Electricity Consumption (kWh (thousand Watt-hours)) 551,386.00

Electricity Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 1,881,329.03

Total Electricity (Grid Purchase) Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 1,881,329.03

Is this the total Electricity (Grid Purchase) consumption at this building including allElectricity meters?

Fuel Type: Natural Gas

Meter: Natural Gas (therms)Space(s): Entire Facility

Start Date End Date Energy Use (therms)

10/01/2010 10/31/2010 1,523.00

09/01/2010 09/30/2010 83.00

08/01/2010 08/31/2010 94.00

07/01/2010 07/31/2010 118.00

06/01/2010 06/30/2010 265.00

05/01/2010 05/31/2010 874.00

04/01/2010 04/30/2010 3,475.00

03/01/2010 03/31/2010 7,379.00

02/01/2010 02/28/2010 9,208.00

01/01/2010 01/31/2010 10,592.00

Page 3 of 4

Appendix CPage 4 of 7

Page 338: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

12/01/2009 12/31/2009 6,468.00

11/01/2009 11/30/2009 3,229.00

Natural Gas Consumption (therms) 43,308.00

Natural Gas Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 4,330,800.00

Total Natural Gas Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 4,330,800.00

Is this the total Natural Gas consumption at this building including all Natural Gas meters?

Additional FuelsDo the fuel consumption totals shown above represent the total energy use of this building?Please confirm there are no additional fuels (district energy, generator fuel oil) used in this facility.

On-Site Solar and Wind EnergyDo the fuel consumption totals shown above include all on-site solar and/or wind power located atyour facility? Please confirm that no on-site solar or wind installations have been omitted from thislist. All on-site systems must be reported.

Certifying Professional (When applying for the ENERGY STAR, the Certifying Professional must be the same PE or RA that signed and stamped the SEP.)

Name: _____________________________________________ Date: _____________

Signature: ______________________________________ Signature is required when applying for the ENERGY STAR.

Page 4 of 4

Appendix CPage 5 of 7

Page 339: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

FOR YOUR RECORDS ONLY. DO NOT SUBMIT TO EPA.

Please keep this Facility Summary for your own records; do not submit it to EPA. Only the Statement of Energy Performance(SEP), Data Checklist and Letter of Agreement need to be submitted to EPA when applying for the ENERGY STAR.

FacilityBT Oak Street Elementary School70 West Oak StreetBasking Ridge, NJ 07920

Facility OwnerBernards Public Schools101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Primary Contact for this FacilityConnie Coriell101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

General InformationBT Oak Street Elementary School

Gross Floor Area Excluding Parking: (ft2) 69,279 Year Built 1938 For 12-month Evaluation Period Ending Date: October 31, 2010

Facility Space Use SummaryBT Oak Street Elementary School

Space Type K-12 School

Gross Floor Area(ft2) 69,279

Open Weekends? Yes

Number of PCs 250

Number of walk-in refrigeration/freezerunits 2

Presence of cooking facilities Yes

Percent Cooled 50

Percent Heated 100

Monthso 12

High School? No

School Districtod N/A

Energy Performance ComparisonEvaluation Periods Comparisons

Performance Metrics Current(Ending Date 10/31/2010)

Baseline(Ending Date 07/31/2010) Rating of 75 Target National Average

Energy Performance Rating 63 62 75 N/A 50

Energy Intensity

Site (kBtu/ft2) 90 90 79 N/A 101

Source (kBtu/ft2) 156 157 138 N/A 177

Energy Cost

$/year $ 131,721.12 $ 133,621.81 $ 116,488.07 N/A $ 148,951.95

$/ft2/year $ 1.90 $ 1.93 $ 1.68 N/A $ 2.15

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

MtCO2e/year N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

kgCO2e/ft2/year N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

More than 50% of your building is defined as K-12 School. Please note that your rating accounts for all of the spaces listed. The National Average column presentsenergy performance data your building would have if your building had an average rating of 50. Notes:o - This attribute is optional.d - A default value has been supplied by Portfolio Manager.

Appendix CPage 6 of 7

Page 340: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

2010BT Oak Street Elementary School70 West Oak StreetBasking Ridge, NJ 07920

Portfolio Manager Building ID: 2490935

The energy use of this building has been measured and compared to other similar buildings using theEnvironmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Energy Performance Scale of 1–100, with 1 being the least energyefficient and 100 the most energy efficient. For more information, visit energystar.gov/benchmark.

This building’sscore

63

100

Most Efficient

This building uses 156 kBtu per square foot per year.*

*Based on source energy intensity for the 12 month period ending October 2010

Date of certification

Date Generated: 03/04/2011

Statement ofEnergy Performance

1

Least Efficient

50

Average

Buildings with a score of75 or higher may qualifyfor EPA’s ENERGY STAR.

I certify that the information contained within this statement is accurate and in accordance with U.S.Environmental Protection Agency’s measurement standards, found at energystar.gov

Appendix CPage 7 of 7

Page 341: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 1 of 12

BoilersTag Main boilers Kindergarten boiler

Unit Type Sectional cast iron steam boiler Modular

Qty 2 1 set of 4

Location Main boiler room Kindergarten boiler room

Area Served Original building Kindergarten section

Manufacturer Smith HydroTherm

Model # 28A-14 Multitemp MR-1200

Serial # 28A-14-081522 MSJ-1688

Input Capacity (MBH) 4,517 1,200

Rated Output Capacity (MBH) 3,563 946

Approx. Efficiency % 79% 79%

Fuel Natural Gas Natural Gas

Burner Make & Model Power Flame Built-in Atmospheric

Min Firing Rate Turndown Ration

9001:5 -

Approx Age 2 16

ASHRAE Service Life 30 30

Remaining Life 28 14

Comments

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Oak Street Elementary School

Page 342: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 2 of 12

Domestic Water HeatersTag HWH HWH HWH

Unit Type Tank Tank Tank

Qty 1 1 1

Location Main boiler room Kindergarten boiler room Gymnasium MER

Area Served Original building Kindergarten section Gym, kitchen, cafeteria

Manufacturer Bradfort White Rheem Bradfort White

Model # 50T65FB3N 21VR75 D65D3703N

Serial # DJ9640930 0294G02262 DE9197908

Size (Gallons) 48 75 65

Input Capacity (MBH/KW)

65 MBH 75 MBH 370 MBH

Recovery (Gal/Hr) 62.4 72 359

Efficiency % 80% 80% 81%

Fuel Natural Gas Natural Gas Natural Gas

Approx Age 5 (Est) 17 4

ASHRAE Service Life 12 12 12

Remaining Life 7 (5) 8

Comments

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Oak Street Elementary School

Page 343: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 3 of 12

PumpsTag Pump Pump Pump

Unit Type Pipe mounted HW circulator

Pipe mounted DHW circulator

Pipe mounted DHW circulator

Qty 2 1 1

Location Kindergarten boiler room Main boiler room Kindergarten boiler room

Area Served Kindergarten section Original building Kindergarten section

Manufacturer B&G B&G B&G

Model # - - -

Serial # - - -

Horse Power 1 HP (est) Fractional Fractional

Flow 100 GPM (Est) - -

Motor Info - - -

Electrical Power - - -

RPM - - -

Motor Efficiency % - - -

Approx Age 15 5 5

ASHRAE Service Life 20 15 15

Remaining Life 5 10 10

Comments

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Oak Street Elementary School

Page 344: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 4 of 12

PumpsTag Pump

Unit Type Pipe mounted DHW circulator

Qty 1

Location Gymnasium MER

Area Served Gym, kitchen, cafeteria

Manufacturer B&G

Model # -

Serial # -

Horse Power Fractional

Flow -

Motor Info -

Electrical Power -

RPM -

Motor Efficiency % -

Approx Age 4

ASHRAE Service Life 15

Remaining Life 11

Comments

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Oak Street Elementary School

Page 345: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 5 of 12

HVAC UnitsTag RTU RTU RTU

Unit Type Packaged rooftop unit Packaged rooftop unit Packaged rooftop unit

Qty 1 2 1

Location Roof ofrooms #35, 37, 39

Roof ofrooms #35, 37, 39 Gymnasium lower roof

Area Served Rooms #39 Room #37 Gymnasium hallway, restrooms, office

Manufacturer YORK YORK TRANE

Model # DAPB-F036AA DAYA-F036N090A YCD074C3H0BC

Serial # MMEM141302 NEFM064663, NAEM001393 -

Cooling Type DX DX DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 3 3 6

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

10 SEER 10 SEER 10 SEER

Heating Type None Gas furnace Gas furnace

Heating Input (MBH) - 90 MBH 205 MBH

Efficiency - 80% 81%

Fuel - Natural Gas Natural Gas

Approx Age 14 14 14

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 1 1 1

Comments

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Oak Street Elementary School

Page 346: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 6 of 12

HVAC UnitsTag RTU RTU-1 Split

Unit Type Packaged rooftop unit Split rooftop unit Spit AC

Qty 2 1 1

Location Cafeteria lower roof Cafeteria upper roof Library roof

Area Served Kitchen (1)Gym Storage (1) Cafeteria seating area Computer room

Manufacturer TRANE TRANE Mitsubishi

Model # YCD074C3H0BC GRBA60GDLF0N7LR1D5E0CEFKLNPQRT PU24EK

Serial # J40101B23DJ40101B24D F07B02411 -

Cooling Type 0 DX split condensing units DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 6 2 x 15 Tons 2

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

10 SEER 11 EER (est) 13 SEER

Heating Type Gas furnace Dual gas furnace -

Heating Input (MBH) 205 MBH 600 MBH -

Efficiency 81% 80% -

Fuel Natural Gas Natural Gas -

Approx Age 14 4 5

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 1 11 10

Comments 2 split condensing units provide refrigeration for the

cooling coils

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Oak Street Elementary School

Page 347: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 7 of 12

HVAC UnitsTag Mini split Split Split

Unit Type Ductless mini split AC units Split AC unit Spit AC

Qty 3 1 1

Location Main office roof Condenser on the roof Library roof

Area Served Principle, vice principle and conf room Teachers Lounge Computer room

Manufacturer Sanyo TRANE TRANE

Model # C0951 (2) C0911 XB-10 TCGD18S21S2XA

Serial # 137232, 0005081 - W0G9038067

Cooling Type DX DX DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 1 1.5 (Est) 2

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

13 SEER 10 SEER 10 SEER

Heating Type - None -

Heating Input (MBH) - - -

Efficiency - - -

Fuel - - -

Approx Age 8 (2)13 (1) 5 to 10 5

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 7, 2 0 to 5 (8)

CommentsIndoor units not accessable

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Oak Street Elementary School

Page 348: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 8 of 12

HVAC UnitsTag Split Split PTAC

Unit Type Spit AC Spit AC Packaged terminal air conditioner

Qty 1 1 1

Location Library roof Library roof Main office

Area Served Library AC Library AC Main office

Manufacturer TRANE TRANE TRANE

Model # XB 1000TTB048C100AC TTB748A100A0 -

Serial # M105KSGBF C39266234 -

Cooling Type DX DX DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 4 4 2 (Est)

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

10 SEER 10 SEER 10 EER

Heating Type - - Electric resistance

Heating Input (MBH) - - -

Efficiency - - -

Fuel - - -

Approx Age 14 23 2 (Est)

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 1 (8) 13

CommentsIndoor units not accessable Indoor units not accessable

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

#N/A

Page 349: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 9 of 12

HVAC UnitsTag Window Unit

Unit Type Window AC Unit

Qty 5

Location Various offices and classrooms

Area Served -

Manufacturer Various

Model # -

Serial # -

Cooling Type DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 12,000

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

8 - 9 EER

Heating Type None

Heating Input (MBH) -

Efficiency -

Fuel -

Approx Age 5 to 10

ASHRAE Service Life 15

Remaining Life 0 to 5

Comments

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Oak Street Elementary School

Page 350: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 10 of 12

Unit Ventilators

Tag UV UV UV

Unit Type Horizontal console Ceiling mount Horizontal console

13 3 8

Location Rm: #34, 36, 40, 41Rm: #20-28 35, 37, 39 -

Manufacturer TRANE TRANE HermanNelson

Model # TUVA15VS2AS11TR14G12 - -

Serial # S86B-02878 - -

Flow Capacity - - -

Cooling Type None None -

Cooling Capacity (Tons) - - -

Estimated Cooling Efficiency (EER)

- - -

Heating Type Steam Steam Steam

Heating Input (MBH) - - -

Approx Age 25 25 30

Ashrae Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life (10) (10) (15)

Comments -Units are very old. Outside air damper

functionality unknown.

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Oak Street Elementary School

Page 351: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 11 of 12

Unit Ventilators

Tag UV UV UV

Unit Type Horizontal console

8

Location Kindergarten classrooms

Manufacturer TRANE

Model # THPA0402A01DOWA0A130

Serial # W94F10330

Flow Capacity 1600 CFM (Est)

Cooling Type DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 4

Estimated Cooling Efficiency (EER)

10 EER

Heating Type Hot water

Heating Input (MBH) -

Approx Age 17

Ashrae Service Life 15

Remaining Life (2)

Comments

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Oak Street Elementary School

Page 352: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 12 of 12

Heating and Ventilation Units

Tag HV HV MUAU

Unit Type Heating and ventilation Makeup Air heating and ventilation Makeup air unit

Qty 1 2 1

Location Kindergarten boiler room Auditorium Kitchen roof

Area Served Kindergarten hallway Auditorium Kitchen

Manufacturer TRANE TRANE TRANE

Model # - - A94SN181D0A6MA00

Serial # - - A94J47302

Fan HP Fractional 2 (Est) 3

Cooling Type None None -

Heating Type Hot water Steam -

Heating Input (MBH) - - -

Efficiency - - -

Approx Age 17 20 17

Ashrae Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life (2) (5) (2)

Comments - Units are not used

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Oak Street Elementary School

Page 353: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E1 of 14

CEG Job #: 9C10088

Project: Oak Street KWH COST: $0.162

70 West Oak Street

Basking Ridge, NJ 07920Bldg. Sq. Ft.

ECM #1 & 2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

242.22 2600 8 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 0.83 2,163.2 $350.44 8 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 86 0.69 1788.8 $289.79 $28.00 $224.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 3.69

264.21 2600 3 6

4x4, 6 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

172 0.52 1,341.6 $217.34 3 6 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 148 0.44 1154.4 $187.01 $42.00 $126.00 0.07 187.2 $30.33 4.15

237.22 2600 49 32x2, 3 Lamp, 31w T8 Ulamp,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

92 4.51 11,720.8 $1,898.77 49 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

264.21 2600 3 6

4x4, 6 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

172 0.52 1,341.6 $217.34 3 6 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 148 0.44 1154.4 $187.01 $42.00 $126.00 0.07 187.2 $30.33 4.15

211.34 2600 21 11x4, 1 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

30 0.63 1,638.0 $265.36 21 1 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 25 0.53 1365 $221.13 $7.00 $147.00 0.11 273 $44.23 3.32

555 2600 2 1 Recessed Down Light, 65w BR30 Lamp 65 0.13 338.0 $54.76 2 1 26w CFL Flood Lamp 26 0.05 135.2 $21.90 $20.00 $40.00 0.08 202.8 $32.85 1.22

558 2600 8 1 Recessed Down Light, 100w R30 Lamp 100 0.80 2,080.0 $336.96 8 1 Energy Star Rated, Dimmable

26w CFL Lamp 26 0.21 540.8 $87.61 $20.00 $160.00 0.59 1539.2 $249.35 0.64

237.21 2600 3 32x2, 3 Lamp, 31w T8 Ulamp,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

92 0.28 717.6 $116.25 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 2600 5 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.54 1,391.0 $225.34 5 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.49 1274 $206.39 $28.00 $140.00 0.05 117 $18.95 7.39

221.11 Office Closet 1200 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 74.4 $12.05 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 60 $9.72 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 14.4 $2.33 6.00

242.21 Copy Room 2600 4 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.43 1,112.8 $180.27 4 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.39 1019.2 $165.11 $28.00 $112.00 0.04 93.6 $15.16 7.39

221.31 IT Room 2600 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.12 322.4 $52.23 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $42.12 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $10.11 2.77

221.21 Faculty Restroom (2) 1200 2 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 148.8 $24.11 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 120 $19.44 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 28.8 $4.67 6.00

232.21 Classroom 35 2600 15 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.29 3,354.0 $543.35 15 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 1.08 2808 $454.90 $21.00 $315.00 0.21 546 $88.45 3.56

232.21 Storage Room 1200 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 103.2 $16.72 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 86.4 $14.00 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 16.8 $2.72 7.72

Library Office

Library 33

Oak Street School

Classroom 31

Page 354: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E2 of 14

ECM #1 & 2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

232.21 Classroom 37 2600 15 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.29 3,354.0 $543.35 15 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 1.08 2808 $454.90 $21.00 $315.00 0.21 546 $88.45 3.56

221.11 Basement 1200 16 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.99 1,190.4 $192.84 16 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.80 960 $155.52 $14.00 $224.00 0.19 230.4 $37.32 6.00

232.21 Classroom 39 2600 15 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.29 3,354.0 $543.35 15 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 1.08 2808 $454.90 $21.00 $315.00 0.21 546 $88.45 3.56

232.21 Classroom 41 2600 14 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.20 3,130.4 $507.12 14 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 1.01 2620.8 $424.57 $21.00 $294.00 0.20 509.6 $82.56 3.56

222.21 Book Room 2600 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $104.46 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $84.24 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $20.22 2.77

242.21 Classroom 40 2600 16 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 1.71 4,451.2 $721.09 16 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.57 4076.8 $660.44 $28.00 $448.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 7.39

222.21 Stairway 4400 3 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.19 818.4 $132.58 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 660 $106.92 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 158.4 $25.66 1.64

221.31 Electrical Room 1200 3 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.19 223.2 $36.16 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 180 $29.16 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 43.2 $7.00 6.00

222.11 Boiler Room 4400 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.25 1,091.2 $176.77 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 880 $142.56 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 211.2 $34.21 1.64

232.21 Girl's Restroom 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.22 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.33 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $5.90 3.56

232.21 Boys Restroom 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.22 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.33 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $5.90 3.56

232.21 Classroom 36 2600 17 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.46 3,801.2 $615.79 17 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 1.22 3182.4 $515.55 $21.00 $357.00 0.24 618.8 $100.25 3.56

232.21 Classroom 34 2600 13 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.12 2,906.8 $470.90 13 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.94 2433.6 $394.24 $21.00 $273.00 0.18 473.2 $76.66 3.56

222.21 Lower Level Corridor 4400 14 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.87 3,819.2 $618.71 14 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.70 3080 $498.96 $14.00 $196.00 0.17 739.2 $119.75 1.64

222.21 Main Stairwell 4400 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 1,091.2 $176.77 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 880 $142.56 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 211.2 $34.21 1.64

232.21 Cafeteria 2600 40 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 3.44 8,944.0 $1,448.93 40 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 2.88 7488 $1,213.06 $21.00 $840.00 0.56 1456 $235.87 3.56

Page 355: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E3 of 14

ECM #1 & 2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.11 Cafeteria Storage 2600 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 161.2 $26.11 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 130 $21.06 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 31.2 $5.05 2.77

232.21 Serving Line 2600 6 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.52 1,341.6 $217.34 6 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.43 1123.2 $181.96 $21.00 $126.00 0.08 218.4 $35.38 3.56

232.21 Kitchen 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.03 2,683.2 $434.68 12 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.86 2246.4 $363.92 $21.00 $252.00 0.17 436.8 $70.76 3.56

617 Kitchen Hood 2600 6 1 Hood Light w/Globe & Cage, 100w A Lamp 100 0.60 1,560.0 $252.72 6 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.16 405.6 $65.71 $20.00 $120.00 0.44 1154.4 $187.01 0.64

232.21 Kitchen Office 2600 4 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.34 894.4 $144.89 4 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.29 748.8 $121.31 $21.00 $84.00 0.06 145.6 $23.59 3.56

222.21 Cafeteria Corridor 4400 8 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.50 2,182.4 $353.55 8 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.40 1760 $285.12 $14.00 $112.00 0.10 422.4 $68.43 1.64

221.11 Custodial Closet 1200 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 74.4 $12.05 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 60 $9.72 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 14.4 $2.33 6.00

560 4400 6 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.16 686.4 $111.20 6 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

563 4400 11 2 Recessed Down Light, (2)26w Quad CFL Lamp 52 0.57 2,516.8 $407.72 11 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

770 Gym 2600 24 1 2x2 Recessed 400w MH, Prismatic Lens 465 11.16 29,016.0 $4,700.59 24 6 2x4 54w T5HO 6 Lamp

w/Reflecter & Wire Guard 354 8.50 22089.6 $3,578.52 $240.00 $5,760.00 2.66 6926.4 $1,122.08 5.13

232.22 Gym Office 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

86 0.26 670.8 $108.67 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Mechanical Room 1200 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.12 148.8 $24.11 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 120 $19.44 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 28.8 $4.67 6.00

221.31 Sprinkler Room 1200 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.12 148.8 $24.11 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 120 $19.44 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 28.8 $4.67 6.00

232.21 Boys Restroom 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.22 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.33 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $5.90 3.56

232.21 Girl's Restroom 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $36.22 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $30.33 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $5.90 3.56

222.21 2600 13 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.81 2,095.6 $339.49 13 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.65 1690 $273.78 $14.00 $182.00 0.16 405.6 $65.71 2.77

610 800 1 21x1 Surface Mount,

Prismatic Lens, (2) 60w A Lamp

120 0.12 96.0 $15.55 1 2 13w CFL Lamps 26 0.03 20.8 $3.37 $25.00 $25.00 0.09 75.2 $12.18 2.05

649 2600 2 21x1 Surface Mount,

Prismatic Lens, (2) 13w CFL Lamp

26 0.05 135.2 $21.90 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Gym Lobby

Classroom 3

Page 356: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E4 of 14

ECM #1 & 2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.21 2600 13 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.81 2,095.6 $339.49 13 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.65 1690 $273.78 $14.00 $182.00 0.16 405.6 $65.71 2.77

610 800 1 21x1 Surface Mount,

Prismatic Lens, (2) 60w A Lamp

120 0.12 96.0 $15.55 1 2 13w CFL Lamps 26 0.03 20.8 $3.37 $25.00 $25.00 0.09 75.2 $12.18 2.05

649 2600 2 21x1 Surface Mount,

Prismatic Lens, (2) 13w CFL Lamp

26 0.05 135.2 $21.90 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Conference Room 2600 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $104.46 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $84.24 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $20.22 2.77

649 Restroom 1200 1 21x1 Surface Mount,

Prismatic Lens, (2) 13w CFL Lamp

26 0.03 31.2 $5.05 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Principal's Office 2600 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $104.46 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $84.24 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $20.22 2.77

222.21 Small Office 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $52.23 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $42.12 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $10.11 2.77

221.11 Storage 1200 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 74.4 $12.05 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 60 $9.72 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 14.4 $2.33 6.00

221.11 Book Storage 1200 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 74.4 $12.05 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 60 $9.72 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 14.4 $2.33 6.00

222.21 Classroom 5 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

222.21 Classroom 7 2600 3 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.19 483.6 $78.34 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 390 $63.18 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 93.6 $15.16 2.77

222.21 Classroom 9 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

222.21 Classroom 11 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

242.22 Classroom 13 2600 6 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 0.62 1,622.4 $262.83 6 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 86 0.52 1341.6 $217.34 $28.00 $168.00 0.11 280.8 $45.49 3.69

242.22 Classroom 15 2600 15 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 1.56 4,056.0 $657.07 15 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 86 1.29 3354 $543.35 $28.00 $420.00 0.27 702 $113.72 3.69

242.22 Classroom 17 2600 15 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 1.56 4,056.0 $657.07 15 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 86 1.29 3354 $543.35 $28.00 $420.00 0.27 702 $113.72 3.69

Classroom 2

Page 357: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E5 of 14

ECM #1 & 2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

242.22 2600 9 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 0.94 2,433.6 $394.24 9 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 86 0.77 2012.4 $326.01 $28.00 $252.00 0.16 421.2 $68.23 3.69

227.211 2600 10 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.34 884.0 $143.21 10 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.22 Office 18 2600 12 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 1.25 3,244.8 $525.66 12 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 86 1.03 2683.2 $434.68 $28.00 $336.00 0.22 561.6 $90.98 3.69

221.11 Bathroom 2600 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 161.2 $26.11 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 130 $21.06 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 31.2 $5.05 2.77

242.22 Classroom 16 2600 6 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 0.62 1,622.4 $262.83 6 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 86 0.52 1341.6 $217.34 $28.00 $168.00 0.11 280.8 $45.49 3.69

242.22 Classroom 14 2600 15 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 1.56 4,056.0 $657.07 15 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 86 1.29 3354 $543.35 $28.00 $420.00 0.27 702 $113.72 3.69

242.22 4400 8 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 0.83 3,660.8 $593.05 8 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 86 0.69 3027.2 $490.41 $28.00 $224.00 0.14 633.6 $102.64 2.18

227.211 4400 16 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.54 2,393.6 $387.76 16 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

601 8760 3 2 (2) 7w CFL Exit Sign 16 0.05 420.5 $68.12 3 1 LED Exit Sign 2 0.01 52.56 $8.51 $65.00 $195.00 0.04 367.92 $59.60 3.27

222.21 4400 13 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.81 3,546.4 $574.52 13 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.65 2860 $463.32 $14.00 $182.00 0.16 686.4 $111.20 1.64

221.31 Boiler Room 4400 4 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.25 1,091.2 $176.77 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 880 $142.56 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 211.2 $34.21 1.64

222.21 Classroom 10 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

222.21 Classroom 8 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

222.21 Classroom 6 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed 62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

221.11 Boys Restroom 2600 3 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.19 483.6 $78.34 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 390 $63.18 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 93.6 $15.16 2.77

221.11 Girl's Restroom 2600 3 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.19 483.6 $78.34 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 390 $63.18 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 93.6 $15.16 2.77

222.21 Classroom 20 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

Classroom 19

"Henry" Corridor

Page 358: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E6 of 14

ECM #1 & 2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.21 Classroom 21 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

222.21 Classroom 22 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

222.21 Classroom 23 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

222.21 Classroom 24 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

222.21 Classroom 25 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

222.21 Classroom 26 2600 11 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.68 1,773.2 $287.26 11 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.55 1430 $231.66 $14.00 $154.00 0.13 343.2 $55.60 2.77

222.21 Classroom 27 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $313.37 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $252.72 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.65 2.77

222.21 2600 11 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.68 1,773.2 $287.26 11 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.55 1430 $231.66 $14.00 $154.00 0.13 343.2 $55.60 2.77

227.211 2600 4 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.14 353.6 $57.28 4 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Classroom 30 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $52.23 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $42.12 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $10.11 2.77

222.21 Girl's Restroom 2600 3 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.19 483.6 $78.34 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 390 $63.18 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 93.6 $15.16 2.77

222.21 Boy's Restroom 2600 3 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.19 483.6 $78.34 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 390 $63.18 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 93.6 $15.16 2.77

222.21 Office 32 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $52.23 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $42.12 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $10.11 2.77

221.11 "Oak Street" Corridor 4400 18 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 1.12 4,910.4 $795.48 18 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.90 3960 $641.52 $14.00 $252.00 0.22 950.4 $153.96 1.64

766 2600 12 1 2x2 Recessed 400w MH, Prismatic Lens 465 5.58 14,508.0 $2,350.30 12 4 2x4 54w T5HO 4 Lamp

w/Prismatic Lens 236 2.83 7363.2 $1,192.84 $240.00 $2,880.00 2.75 7144.8 $1,157.46 2.49

623 2600 6 18 Hanging Chandelier, (18) 25w Cand. Base Lamp 450 2.70 7,020.0 $1,137.24 6 18 3w LED Candalabra Base,

Dimmable Lamp 56 0.34 873.6 $141.52 $360.00 $2,160.00 2.36 6146.4 $995.72 2.17

Classroom 28

Auditorium

Page 359: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E7 of 14

ECM #1 & 2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.31 Stage 2600 6 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.37 967.2 $156.69 6 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.30 780 $126.36 $14.00 $84.00 0.07 187.2 $30.33 2.77

221.11 Storage Rooms 1200 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.12 148.8 $24.11 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 120 $19.44 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 28.8 $4.67 6.00

221.11 400 5 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.31 124.0 $20.09 5 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.25 100 $16.20 $14.00 $70.00 0.06 24 $3.89 18.00

221.31 400 8 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.50 198.4 $32.14 8 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.40 160 $25.92 $14.00 $112.00 0.10 38.4 $6.22 18.00

221.31 Office 29 2600 3 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.19 483.6 $78.34 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 390 $63.18 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 93.6 $15.16 2.77

612 Office Suite Stairwell 4400 1 1 Pendant Mnt., 100w A19

Lamp 100 0.10 440.0 $71.28 1 1 (1) 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 114.4 $18.53 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 325.6 $52.75 0.38

221.41 Passageway Under Aud. 800 7 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Wall Mnt., Prismatic 58 0.41 324.8 $52.62 7 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

237.21 2600 18 32x2, 3 Lamp, 31w T8 Ulamp,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

92 1.66 4,305.6 $697.51 18 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.31 2600 6 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.35 904.8 $146.58 6 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.30 780 $126.36 $14.00 $84.00 0.05 124.8 $20.22 4.15

232.21 Main Office 2600 6 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.52 1,341.6 $217.34 6 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.43 1123.2 $181.96 $21.00 $126.00 0.08 218.4 $35.38 3.56

725 4400 6 1 150w HPS Wallpack 188 1.13 4,963.2 $804.04 6 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

730 4400 4 1 150w MH Flood 188 0.75 3,308.8 $536.03 4 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Totals 882 278 225,400 $36,515 882 254 54.2 144,503 $23,409 $23,670 18.0 47,750 $7,735 3.06

Upper Office Suite

Classroom 1

Exterior

Page 360: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E8 of 14

CEG Job #: 9C10088Project: Oak Street KWH COST: $0.162

Address: 70 West Oak StreetBasking Ridge, NJ 07920

Building SF:

ECM #3: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

242.22 2600 8 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 0.832 2163.2 $350.44 8 104 0.67 20% 1730.56 $280.35 $300.00 0.17 432.64 $70.09

264.21 2600 3 6

4x4, 6 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

172 0.516 1341.6 $217.34 3 172 0.41 20% 1073.28 $173.87 $0.00 0.10 268.32 $43.47

237.22 2600 49 3

2x2, 3 Lamp, 31w T8 Ulamp, Elect. Ballast,

Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

92 4.508 11720.8 $1,898.77 49 92 3.61 20% 9376.64 $1,519.02 $900.00 0.90 2344.16 $379.75

264.21 2600 3 6

4x4, 6 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

172 0.516 1341.6 $217.34 3 172 0.41 20% 1073.28 $173.87 $0.00 0.10 268.32 $43.47

211.34 2600 21 11x4, 1 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

30 0.63 1638 $265.36 21 0 No Change 30 0.63 0% 1638 $265.36 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

555 2600 2 1 Recessed Down Light, 65w BR30 Lamp 65 0.13 338 $54.76 2 0 No Change 65 0.13 0% 338 $54.76 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

558 2600 8 1 Recessed Down Light, 100w R30 Lamp 100 0.8 2080 $336.96 8 0 No Change 100 0.80 0% 2080 $336.96 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

237.21 2600 3 3

2x2, 3 Lamp, 31w T8 Ulamp, Elect. Ballast,

Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

92 0.276 717.6 $116.25 3 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 92 0.22 20% 574.08 $93.00 $150.00 $150.00 0.06 143.52 $23.25 6.45

242.21 2600 5 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.535 1391 $225.34 5 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 107 0.43 20% 1112.8 $180.27 $150.00 $150.00 0.11 278.2 $45.07 3.33

221.11 Office Closet 1200 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 74.4 $12.05 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 74.4 $12.05 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Copy Room 2600 4 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.428 1112.8 $180.27 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 107 0.34 20% 890.24 $144.22 $150.00 $150.00 0.09 222.56 $36.05 4.16

221.31 IT Room 2600 2 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 $52.23 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 322.4 $52.23 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.21 Faculty Restroom (2) 1200 2 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 148.8 $24.11 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 148.8 $24.11 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Classroom 35 2600 15 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.29 3354 $543.35 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 86 1.03 20% 2683.2 $434.68 $300.00 $300.00 0.26 670.8 $108.67 2.76

232.21 Storage Room 1200 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 103.2 $16.72 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 103.2 $16.72 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Oak Street School

-

Classroom 31

Library 33

Library Office

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount3

$300.00 2.64

$300.00 2.13

Page 361: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E9 of 14

ECM #3: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

232.21 Classroom 37 2600 15 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.29 3354 $543.35 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 86 1.03 20% 2683.2 $434.68 $300.00 $300.00 0.26 670.8 $108.67 2.76

221.11 Basement 1200 16 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.992 1190.4 $192.84 16 0 No Change 62 0.99 0% 1190.4 $192.84 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Classroom 39 2600 15 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.29 3354 $543.35 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 86 1.03 20% 2683.2 $434.68 $300.00 $300.00 0.26 670.8 $108.67 2.76

232.21 Classroom 41 2600 14 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.204 3130.4 $507.12 14 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 86 0.96 20% 2504.32 $405.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.24 626.08 $101.42 2.96

222.21 Book Room 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 $104.46 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.20 20% 515.84 $83.57 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 128.96 $20.89 7.18

242.21 Classroom 40 2600 16 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 1.712 4451.2 $721.09 16 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 107 1.37 20% 3560.96 $576.88 $300.00 $300.00 0.34 890.24 $144.22 2.08

222.21 Stairway 4400 3 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 818.4 $132.58 3 0 No Change 62 0.19 0% 818.4 $132.58 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Electrical Room 1200 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 223.2 $36.16 3 0 No Change 62 0.19 0% 223.2 $36.16 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.11 Boiler Room 4400 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 1091.2 $176.77 4 0 No Change 62 0.25 0% 1091.2 $176.77 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Girl's Restroom 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 $36.22 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.22 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Boys Restroom 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 $36.22 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.22 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Classroom 36 2600 17 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.462 3801.2 $615.79 17 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 86 1.17 20% 3040.96 $492.64 $300.00 $300.00 0.29 760.24 $123.16 2.44

232.21 Classroom 34 2600 13 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.118 2906.8 $470.90 13 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 86 0.89 20% 2325.44 $376.72 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 581.36 $94.18 3.19

222.21 Lower Level Corridor 4400 14 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.868 3819.2 $618.71 14 0 No Change 62 0.87 0% 3819.2 $618.71 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Main Stairwell 4400 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 1091.2 $176.77 4 0 No Change 62 0.25 0% 1091.2 $176.77 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Cafeteria 2600 40 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 3.44 8944 $1,448.93 40 2

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 86 2.75 20% 7155.2 $1,159.14 $300.00 $600.00 0.69 1788.8 $289.79 2.07

Page 362: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E10 of 14

ECM #3: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.11 Cafeteria Storage 2600 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 161.2 $26.11 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 161.2 $26.11 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Serving Line 2600 6 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.516 1341.6 $217.34 6 0 No Change 86 0.52 0% 1341.6 $217.34 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Kitchen 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.032 2683.2 $434.68 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 86 0.83 20% 2146.56 $347.74 $300.00 $300.00 0.21 536.64 $86.94 3.45

617 Kitchen Hood 2600 6 1 Hood Light w/Globe & Cage, 100w A Lamp 100 0.6 1560 $252.72 6 0 No Change 100 0.60 0% 1560 $252.72 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Kitchen Office 2600 4 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.344 894.4 $144.89 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 86 0.28 20% 715.52 $115.91 $150.00 $150.00 0.07 178.88 $28.98 5.18

222.21 Cafeteria Corridor 4400 8 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.496 2182.4 $353.55 8 0 No Change 62 0.50 0% 2182.4 $353.55 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Custodial Closet 1200 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 74.4 $12.05 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 74.4 $12.05 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

560 4400 6 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.156 686.4 $111.20 6 0 No Change 26 0.16 0% 686.4 $111.20 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

563 4400 11 2 Recessed Down Light, (2)26w Quad CFL Lamp 52 0.572 2516.8 $407.72 11 0 No Change 52 0.57 0% 2516.8 $407.72 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

770 Gym 2600 24 1 2x2 Recessed 400w MH, Prismatic Lens 465 11.16 29016 $4,700.59 24 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 465 8.93 20% 23212.8 $3,760.47 $300.00 $300.00 2.23 5803.2 $940.12 0.32

232.22 Gym Office 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

86 0.258 670.8 $108.67 3 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 86 0.21 20% 536.64 $86.94 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 134.16 $21.73 6.90

221.31 Mechanical Room 1200 2 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 148.8 $24.11 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 148.8 $24.11 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Sprinkler Room 1200 2 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 148.8 $24.11 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 148.8 $24.11 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Boys Restroom 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 $36.22 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.22 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Girl's Restroom 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 $36.22 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $36.22 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 2600 13 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.806 2095.6 $339.49 13 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.64 20% 1676.48 $271.59 $300.00 $300.00 0.16 419.12 $67.90 4.42

Gym Lobby

Page 363: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E11 of 14

ECM #3: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

610 800 1 21x1 Surface Mount,

Prismatic Lens, (2) 60w A Lamp

120 0.12 96 $15.55 1 0 No Change 120 0.12 0% 96 $15.55 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

649 2600 2 21x1 Surface Mount,

Prismatic Lens, (2) 13w CFL Lamp

26 0.052 135.2 $21.90 2 0 No Change 26 0.05 0% 135.2 $21.90 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 2600 13 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.806 2095.6 $339.49 13 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.64 20% 1676.48 $271.59 $300.00 $300.00 0.16 419.12 $67.90 4.42

610 800 1 21x1 Surface Mount,

Prismatic Lens, (2) 60w A Lamp

120 0.12 96 $15.55 1 0 No Change 120 0.12 0% 96 $15.55 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

649 2600 2 21x1 Surface Mount,

Prismatic Lens, (2) 13w CFL Lamp

26 0.052 135.2 $21.90 2 0 No Change 26 0.05 0% 135.2 $21.90 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Conference Room 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 $104.46 4 0 No Change 62 0.25 0% 644.8 $104.46 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

649 Restroom 1200 1 21x1 Surface Mount,

Prismatic Lens, (2) 13w CFL Lamp

26 0.026 31.2 $5.05 1 0 No Change 26 0.03 0% 31.2 $5.05 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Principal's Office 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 $104.46 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.20 20% 515.84 $83.57 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 128.96 $20.89 7.18

222.21 Small Office 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 $52.23 2 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.10 20% 257.92 $41.78 $150.00 $150.00 0.02 64.48 $10.45 14.36

221.11 Storage 1200 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 74.4 $12.05 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 74.4 $12.05 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Book Storage 1200 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 74.4 $12.05 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 74.4 $12.05 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Classroom 5 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 $313.37 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

222.21 Classroom 7 2600 3 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 483.6 $78.34 3 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.15 20% 386.88 $62.67 $150.00 $150.00 0.04 96.72 $15.67 9.57

222.21 Classroom 9 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 $313.37 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

222.21 Classroom 11 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 $313.37 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

242.22 Classroom 13 2600 6 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 0.624 1622.4 $262.83 6 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 104 0.50 20% 1297.92 $210.26 $150.00 $150.00 0.12 324.48 $52.57 2.85

Classroom 3

Classroom 2

Page 364: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E12 of 14

ECM #3: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

242.22 Classroom 15 2600 15 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 1.56 4056 $657.07 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 104 1.25 20% 3244.8 $525.66 $300.00 $300.00 0.31 811.2 $131.41 2.28

242.22 Classroom 17 2600 15 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 1.56 4056 $657.07 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 104 1.25 20% 3244.8 $525.66 $300.00 $300.00 0.31 811.2 $131.41 2.28

242.22 2600 9 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 0.936 2433.6 $394.24 9 104 0.75 20% 1946.88 $315.39 $300.00 0.19 486.72 $78.85

227.211 2600 10 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.34 884 $143.21 10 34 0.27 20% 707.2 $114.57 $0.00 0.07 176.8 $28.64

242.22 Office 18 2600 12 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 1.248 3244.8 $525.66 12 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 104 1.00 20% 2595.84 $420.53 $250.00 $250.00 0.25 648.96 $105.13 2.38

221.11 Bathroom 2600 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 161.2 $26.11 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 161.2 $26.11 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.22 Classroom 16 2600 6 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 0.624 1622.4 $262.83 6 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 104 0.50 20% 1297.92 $210.26 $250.00 $250.00 0.12 324.48 $52.57 4.76

242.22 Classroom 14 2600 15 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 1.56 4056 $657.07 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 104 1.25 20% 3244.8 $525.66 $300.00 $300.00 0.31 811.2 $131.41 2.28

242.22 4400 8 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 0.832 3660.8 $593.05 8 0 No Change 104 0.83 0% 3660.8 $593.05 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.211 4400 16 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.544 2393.6 $387.76 16 0 No Change 34 0.54 0% 2393.6 $387.76 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

601 8760 3 2 (2) 7w CFL Exit Sign 16 0.048 420.48 $68.12 3 0 No Change 16 0.05 0% 420.48 $68.12 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 4400 13 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.806 3546.4 $574.52 13 0 No Change 62 0.81 0% 3546.4 $574.52 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Boiler Room 4400 4 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 1091.2 $176.77 4 0 No Change 62 0.25 0% 1091.2 $176.77 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Classroom 10 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 $313.37 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

222.21 Classroom 8 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 $313.37 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

222.21 Classroom 6 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 $313.37 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

$300.00 2.79

"Henry" Corridor

Classroom 19

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount1

Page 365: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E13 of 14

ECM #3: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.11 Boys Restroom 2600 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 483.6 $78.34 3 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.15 20% 386.88 $62.67 $150.00 $150.00 0.04 96.72 $15.67 9.57

221.11 Girl's Restroom 2600 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 483.6 $78.34 3 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.15 20% 386.88 $62.67 $150.00 $150.00 0.04 96.72 $15.67 9.57

222.21 Classroom 20 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 $313.37 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

222.21 Classroom 21 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 $313.37 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

222.21 Classroom 22 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 $313.37 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

222.21 Classroom 23 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 $313.37 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

222.21 Classroom 24 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 $313.37 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

222.21 Classroom 25 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 $313.37 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

222.21 Classroom 26 2600 11 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.682 1773.2 $287.26 11 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.55 20% 1418.56 $229.81 $300.00 $300.00 0.14 354.64 $57.45 5.22

222.21 Classroom 27 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 $313.37 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $250.70 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.67 4.79

222.21 2600 11 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.682 1773.2 $287.26 11 62 0.55 20% 1418.56 $229.81 $300.00 0.14 354.64 $57.45

227.211 2600 4 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.136 353.6 $57.28 4 34 0.11 20% 282.88 $45.83 $0.00 0.03 70.72 $11.46

222.21 Classroom 30 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 $52.23 2 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.10 20% 257.92 $41.78 $150.00 $150.00 0.02 64.48 $10.45 14.36

222.21 Girl's Restroom 2600 3 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 483.6 $78.34 3 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.15 20% 386.88 $62.67 $150.00 $150.00 0.04 96.72 $15.67 9.57

222.21 Boy's Restroom 2600 3 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 483.6 $78.34 3 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.15 20% 386.88 $62.67 $150.00 $150.00 0.04 96.72 $15.67 9.57

222.21 Office 32 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 $52.23 2 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.10 20% 257.92 $41.78 $150.00 $150.00 0.02 64.48 $10.45 14.36

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount1 $300.00 4.35Classroom 28

Page 366: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E14 of 14

ECM #3: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.11 "Oak Street" Corridor 4400 18 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 1.116 4910.4 $795.48 18 0 No Change 62 1.12 0% 4910.4 $795.48 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

766 2600 12 1 2x2 Recessed 400w MH, Prismatic Lens 465 5.58 14508 $2,350.30 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 465 4.46 20% 11606.4 $1,880.24 $300.00 $300.00 1.12 2901.6 $470.06 0.64

623 2600 6 18 Hanging Chandelier, (18) 25w Cand. Base Lamp 450 2.7 7020 $1,137.24 6 0 No Change 450 2.70 0% 7020 $1,137.24 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Stage 2600 6 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.372 967.2 $156.69 6 0 No Change 62 0.37 0% 967.2 $156.69 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Storage Rooms 1200 2 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 148.8 $24.11 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 148.8 $24.11 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 400 5 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.31 124 $20.09 5 0 No Change 62 0.31 0% 124 $20.09 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 400 8 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.496 198.4 $32.14 8 0 No Change 62 0.50 0% 198.4 $32.14 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Office 29 2600 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 483.6 $78.34 3 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.15 20% 386.88 $62.67 $150.00 $150.00 0.04 96.72 $15.67 9.57

612 Office Suite Stairwell 4400 1 1 Pendant Mnt., 100w A19

Lamp 100 0.1 440 $71.28 1 0 No Change 100 0.10 0% 440 $71.28 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.41 Passageway Under Aud. 800 7 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt.,

Prismatic58 0.406 324.8 $52.62 7 0 No Change 58 0.41 0% 324.8 $52.62 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

237.21 2600 18 3

2x2, 3 Lamp, 31w T8 Ulamp, Elect. Ballast,

Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

92 1.656 4305.6 $697.51 18 92 1.32 20% 3444.48 $558.01 $300.00 0.33 861.12 $139.50

222.31 2600 6 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

58 0.348 904.8 $146.58 6 58 0.28 20% 723.84 $117.26 $0.00 0.07 180.96 $29.32

232.21 Main Office 2600 6 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.516 1341.6 $217.34 6 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 86 0.41 20% 1073.28 $173.87 $150.00 $150.00 0.10 268.32 $43.47 3.45

725 4400 6 1 150w HPS Wallpack 188 1.128 4963.2 $804.04 6 0 No Change 188 1.13 0% 4963.2 $804.04 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

730 4400 4 1 150w MH Flood 188 0.752 3308.8 $536.03 4 0 No Change 188 0.75 0% 3308.8 $536.03 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Totals 882 278 83.1 225,400.3 $36,515 882 58 70.2 191,844.2 $31,078.75 $14,600 12.91 33,556 $5,436 2.69

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount1 $300.00 1.78

Auditorium

Upper Office Suite

Classroom 1

Exterior

Page 367: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix FPage 1 of 3

Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Bernard Township BOE - Oak Street Elementary School

Location: Basking Ridge, NJ07920Description: Photovoltaic System 95% Financing - 25 year

Simple Payback Analysis

Total Construction Cost $1,898,190Annual kWh Production 245,079

Annual Energy Cost Reduction $39,703Annual SREC Revenue $85,778

First Cost Premium $1,898,190

Simple Payback: Years

Life Cycle Cost AnalysisAnalysis Period (years): 25 Financing %: 95%Financing Term (mths): 300 Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0%

Average Energy Cost ($/kWh) $0.162 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0%Financing Rate: 7.00% SREC Value ($/kWh) $0.350

Period Additional Energy kWh Energy Cost Additional SREC Interest Loan Net Cash CumulativeCash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Expense Principal Flow Cash Flow

0 $94,910 0 0 0 $0 0 0 (94,910) 01 $0 245,079 $39,703 $0 $85,778 $125,356 $27,587 ($27,462) ($122,372)2 $0 243,854 $40,894 $0 $85,349 $123,361 $29,581 ($26,700) ($149,071)3 $0 242,634 $42,121 $0 $84,922 $121,223 $31,719 ($25,900) ($174,971)4 $0 241,421 $43,384 $0 $84,497 $118,930 $34,013 ($25,061) ($200,032)5 $0 240,214 $44,686 $2,474 $84,075 $116,471 $36,471 ($26,656) ($226,688)6 $0 239,013 $46,026 $2,462 $83,655 $113,835 $39,108 ($25,723) ($252,411)7 $0 237,818 $47,407 $2,450 $83,236 $111,008 $41,935 ($24,749) ($277,160)8 $0 236,629 $48,829 $2,437 $82,820 $107,976 $44,966 ($23,730) ($300,890)9 $0 235,446 $50,294 $2,425 $82,406 $104,726 $48,217 ($22,667) ($323,558)10 $0 234,268 $51,803 $2,413 $81,994 $101,240 $51,703 ($21,558) ($345,116)11 $0 233,097 $53,357 $2,401 $81,584 $97,502 $55,440 ($20,402) ($365,518)12 $0 231,932 $54,958 $2,389 $81,176 $93,495 $59,448 ($19,197) ($384,716)13 $0 230,772 $56,607 $2,377 $80,770 $89,197 $63,745 ($17,943) ($402,658)14 $0 229,618 $58,305 $2,365 $80,366 $84,589 $68,354 ($16,636) ($419,295)15 $0 228,470 $60,054 $2,353 $79,965 $79,648 $73,295 ($15,277) ($434,572)16 $0 227,328 $61,856 $2,341 $79,565 $74,349 $78,593 ($13,864) ($448,436)17 $0 226,191 $63,711 $2,330 $79,167 $68,668 $84,275 ($12,394) ($460,830)18 $0 225,060 $65,623 $2,318 $78,771 $62,575 $90,367 ($10,867) ($471,697)19 $0 223,935 $67,591 $2,307 $78,377 $56,043 $96,900 ($9,281) ($480,977)20 $0 222,815 $69,619 $2,295 $77,985 $49,038 $103,905 ($7,633) ($488,610)21 $0 221,701 $71,708 $2,284 $77,595 $44,677 $95,520 $6,822 ($481,788)22 $0 220,593 $73,859 $2,272 $77,207 $36,102 $78,604 $34,087 ($447,701)23 $0 219,490 $76,075 $2,261 $76,821 $0 $0 $150,635 ($297,066)24 $0 218,392 $78,357 $2,249 $76,437 $0 $0 $152,545 ($144,521)25 $0 217,300 $80,708 $2,238 $76,055 $0 $0 $154,524 $10,004

Totals: 5,773,069 $1,447,535 $49,441 $2,020,574 $1,980,008 $1,333,747 $104,913 ($8,090,650)Net Present Value (NPV)

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

Photovoltaic System 95% Financing - 25 year

($198,402)0.1%

15.13

Page 368: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix FPage 2 of 3

Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Bernard Township BOE - Oak Street Elementary School

Location: Basking Ridge, NJ07920Description: Photovoltaic System - Direct Purchase

Simple Payback AnalysisPhotovoltaic System - Direct Purchase

Total Construction Cost $1,898,190Annual kWh Production 245,079

Annual Energy Cost Reduction $39,703Annual SREC Revenue $85,778

First Cost Premium

Simple Payback: Years

Life Cycle Cost AnalysisAnalysis Period (years): 25 Financing %: 0%Financing Term (mths): 0 Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0%

Average Energy Cost ($/kWh) $0.162 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0%Financing Rate: 0.00% SREC Value ($/kWh) $0.350

Period Additional Energy kWh Energy Cost Additional SREC Net Cash CumulativeCash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Flow Cash Flow

0 $1,898,190 0 0 0 $0 (1,898,190) 01 $0 245,079 $39,703 $0 $85,778 $125,480 ($1,772,710)2 $0 243,854 $40,894 $0 $85,349 $126,243 ($1,646,467)3 $0 242,634 $42,121 $0 $84,922 $127,043 ($1,519,424)4 $0 241,421 $43,384 $0 $84,497 $127,882 ($1,391,542)5 $0 240,214 $44,686 $2,474 $84,075 $126,287 ($1,265,256)6 $0 239,013 $46,026 $2,462 $83,655 $127,219 ($1,138,037)7 $0 237,818 $47,407 $2,450 $83,236 $128,194 ($1,009,843)8 $0 236,629 $48,829 $2,437 $82,820 $129,212 ($880,631)9 $0 235,446 $50,294 $2,425 $82,406 $130,275 ($750,355)

10 $0 234,268 $51,803 $2,413 $81,994 $131,384 ($618,971)11 $0 233,097 $53,357 $2,401 $81,584 $132,540 ($486,431)12 $0 231,932 $54,958 $2,389 $81,176 $133,745 ($352,686)13 $0 230,772 $56,607 $2,377 $80,770 $135,000 ($217,686)14 $0 229,618 $58,305 $2,365 $80,366 $136,306 ($81,380)15 $0 228,470 $60,054 $2,353 $79,965 $137,665 $56,28616 $0 227,328 $61,856 $2,341 $79,565 $139,079 $195,36517 $0 226,191 $63,711 $2,330 $79,167 $140,548 $335,91318 $0 225,060 $65,623 $2,318 $78,771 $142,076 $477,98919 $0 223,935 $67,591 $2,307 $78,377 $143,662 $621,65120 $0 222,815 $69,619 $2,295 $77,985 $145,309 $766,96021 $1 221,701 $71,708 $2,284 $77,595 $147,020 $913,97922 $2 220,593 $73,859 $2,272 $77,207 $148,794 $1,062,77423 $3 219,490 $76,075 $2,261 $76,821 $150,635 $1,213,40924 $4 218,392 $78,357 $2,249 $76,437 $152,545 $1,365,95425 $5 217,300 $80,708 $2,238 $76,055 $154,524 $1,520,478

Totals: 5,773,069 $1,447,535 $49,441 $2,020,574 $3,418,668 ($4,600,661)Net Present Value (NPV)

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

15.13

$1,898,190

$1,520,5034.9%

Page 369: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix FPage 3 of 3

Building Roof Area (sq ft) Panel Qty Panel Sq

Ft

Panel Total Sq

Ft

Total KWDC

Total Annual

kWh

Panel Weight (33

lbs)W/SQFT

Oak Street ES 13,475 Sunpower SPR230

917 14.7 13,484 210.91 245,079 30,261 15.64

.= Proposed PV Layout

Notes:1. Estimated kWH based on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory PVWatts Version 1 Calculator Program.

Page 370: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

BERNARDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS RIDGE HIGH SCHOOL

268 SOUTH FINLEY AVENUE BASKING RIDGE, NJ 07920

FACILITY ENERGY REPORT

Page 371: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 1 of 60

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.  HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST ................................................................. 2 

II.  FACILITY DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................ 7 

III.  MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST ............................................................................................ 11 

IV.  ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES ..................................................................... 12 

V.  ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................... 60 

Appendix A – ECM Cost & Savings Breakdown

Appendix B – New Jersey Smart Start® Program Incentives

Appendix C – Portfolio Manager “Statement of Energy Performance”

Appendix D – Major Equipment List

Appendix E – Investment Grade Lighting Audit

Appendix F – Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculations

Appendix G – Kitchen Exhaust Hood Controls Calculation

Page 372: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 2 of 60

I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has been tabulated and plotted in graph form as depicted within this section. Each energy source has been identified and monthly consumption and cost noted per the information provided by the Owner. Electric Utility Provider: Jersey Central Power & Light (JCP&L) Electric Utility Rate Structure: General Service Secondary (GSS) Third Party Supplier: South Jersey Energy Natural Gas Utility Provider: Public Service Electric and Gas (PSE&G) Utility Rate Structure: General Service Gas (GSG) Third Party Supplier: Woodruff The electric usage profile represents the actual electrical usage for the facility. The electric utility measures consumption in kilowatt-hours (KWH) and maximum demand in kilowatts (KW). One KWH usage is equivalent to 1000 watts running for one hour. One KW of electric demand is equivalent to 1000 watts running at any given time. The basic usage charges are shown as generation service and delivery charges along with several non-utility generation charges. Rates used in this report reflect the historical data received for the facility. The gas usage profile within each facility report shows the actual natural gas energy usage for the facility. The gas utility measures consumption in cubic feet x 100 (CCF), and converts the quantity into Therms of energy. One Therm is equivalent to 100,000 BTUs of energy.

Page 373: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 3 of 60

Table 1 Electricity Billing Data

Utility Provider: Jersey Central Power & Light (JCP&L)Rate: General Service Secondary

Meter No: G15164554, G28873683Customer ID No: 100008239418

Third Party Utility Provider: -TPS Meter / Acct No: -

MONTH OF USECONSUMPTION

KWH TOTAL BILL

Nov-09 198,400 $31,662 Dec-09 196,300 $31,245 Jan-10 328,300 $49,299 Feb-10 298,500 $45,655 Mar-10 363,000 $54,064 Apr-10 149,400 $27,098 May-10 276,000 $44,821 Jun-10 232,800 $37,791 Jul-10 212,600 $35,528

Aug-10 248,200 $38,691 Sep-10 182,100 $31,318 Oct-10 270,300 $42,412

Totals 2,955,900 1041.2 Max $469,584

AVERAGE DEMAND 764.0 KW averageAVERAGE RATE $0.159 $/kWh

566.81004.6859.9

1041.21038.1873.6944.2

ELECTRIC USAGE SUMMARY

DEMAND

488.5466.9550.8776.9556.4

Page 374: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 4 of 60

Figure 1 Electricity Usage Profile

Page 375: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 5 of 60

Table 4 Natural Gas Billing Data

Utility Provider: Public Service Electric & Gas (PSEG)Rate: Large Volume Gas (LVG)

Meter No: 2643815, 3342292Point of Delivery ID: 6724563402

Third Party Utility Provider: Woodruff EnergyTPS Meter No:

MONTH OF USE CONSUMPTION (THERMS) TOTAL BILL

Nov-09 17,238.90 $24,708.81Dec-09 38,956.30 $49,170.40Jan-10 20,011.90 $26,502.81Feb-10 27,370.50 $34,868.39Mar-10 15,371.40 $16,303.31Apr-10 5,769.40 $6,259.92May-10 877.40 $1,126.45Jun-10 524.00 $753.94Jul-10 733.60 $858.80

Aug-10 723.70 $798.60Sep-10 711.30 $754.85Oct-10 10,467.20 $10,830.84

TOTALS 138,755.60 $172,937.12

AVERAGE RATE: $1.25 $/THERM

N/A

NATURAL GAS USAGE SUMMARY

Page 376: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 6 of 60

Figure 2 Natural Gas Usage Profile

Page 377: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 7 of 60

II. FACILITY DESCRIPTION

The 297,152 SF Ridge High School is a two story facility comprised of classrooms, library, computer room, media center, cafeteria, kitchen, four gymnasiums, administration offices, auditorium, restrooms, two boiler rooms, custodial spaces and storage spaces. The School was built in 1961 with additions added in 1966, 1982, 1999 and 2008. The additions to the building include the 600 wing and gymnasium as well as the media center in the 1966 & 1982 additions. In 1999 the two story 500 wing was added. In 2008 the two story 700 wing was added in addition to the new auditorium and new gym.

Building Profile

The hours of operation for the school students and teachers are between 8:30 AM and 2:30 PM on the weekdays. The facility remains occupied for after school sports and other programs unit 6:00 PM. Custodial services are performed between the hours of 6:00 PM and 11:00 PM. The facility is closed on weekends with the exception of sporting events. The student enrollment at the high school is approximately 1603 students and 204 teachers.

Building Envelope

The facility exterior construction is primarily CMU block with 4-inch brick façade. Portions of the original building classroom wings utilized curtain wall systems with glass windows and insulated metal panels. Insulation within the original building is estimated to consist of an air space between the block wall and brick façade. The construction in the new additions is estimated to have 1”-2” of rigid insulation within the exterior wall. The roof on the building is a flat built up style roof with tar coating and crushed stone on top. The new additions including a newer style built up flat roof with rigid insulation (estimated 2” minimum) and a black rubber roof membrane. The windows throughout the facility are single pane aluminum framed windows in the original building and double pane aluminum frame windows in the building additions. The older windows appear to be in fair to good condition. The windows in the newer sections are in good condition and appear to be providing a tight weather barrier. Blinds for the windows integral to the double pane window system and appear to be in good working order.

HVAC Systems

Heating is provided by two central hot water heating systems. The original building boiler room provides heat for the majority of the school’s terminal hydronic heating equipment with the exception of the auditorium and 700 wing. The new boiler plant services the new auditorium and 700 wing terminal equipment.

The original boiler plant is comprised of two cast iron sectional style boilers. Each of the Weil McLain 94 Series boilers has an input capacity of 5,950 MBH. These boilers provide heating hot water to baseboards, unit ventilators, and heating and ventilation units throughout the school. The boilers are in good condition and appear to be maintained. The original boiler room also utilizes four (4) Patterson Kelly Thermific series modular style boilers. Each of the four modular boilers have an input capacity of 1,700 MBH. The modular boilers are piped in a primary

Page 378: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 8 of 60

secondary configuration. Each modular boiler utilizes a dedicated primary hot water pump. These boilers are in good condition. The large cast iron boilers utilize two 20 HP constant speed end suction pumps for hot water distribution. The end suction pumps are in good to fair condition. The 4 modular style boilers utilize two 25 HP constant speed inline pumps for hot water distribution. There are some signs of leakage around the pump housing and deterioration with the inline pumps. The inline pumps are in fair condition.

The newer boiler room is comprised of four condensing boilers made by Aerco. Each boiler has an input capacity of 2,000 MBH. The boiler water is circulated through the building by two end suction constant speed pumps driven by 15 HP premium efficiency motors. The new boiler room and equipment within the new boiler plant is in excellent condition.

Terminal heating equipment consists of unit ventilators made by Nesbitt in combination with hydronic baseboard heat. These units serve the classrooms throughout the school and the cafeteria. The unit ventilators in the original portion as well as the older additions, appear to be in poor condition. The unit ventilators are controlled by the building pneumatic system. In many cases these controls are not functioning correctly due to leaks in the system or failure of the control valves resulting in lack of temperature control. As a result of these issues, the poorly controlled classrooms as well as other spaces have windows open in the winter to maintain comfortable temperatures.

The newer classrooms in the building addition utilize vertical style packaged heating and cooling units made by Airedale. Each classroom has a dedicated packaged heating and cooling unit with overhead ductwork for air distribution. The newer Airedale units are installed in the 500 wing and 700 wing. Heat is provided by hot water heating coils fed from the central boiler plant. Cooling is packaged within the unit and heat is rejected through an exterior wall louver. Each unit is installed within an enclosed cabinet in the corner of the classroom. These units can be removed from the cabinet for service. The packaged Airedale units are loud and seem to be in fair / poor condition despite their recent installation within the building additions. There was a lack of temperature control evident within the new sections of the building. The new section of the building is controlled with modern electronic controls. It is unknown if the temperature control issues is a result of the control components or the central control system.

The building also utilizes large heating and ventilation units with hot water coils that provide heat for the large open areas such as the old gymnasiums. These units appear to be original to the building and in poor condition. The H&V units within the gymnasium utilize the pneumatic control system with 3-way control valves.

In addition to the central heating system, several spaces utilized packaged rooftop heating and cooling units for heat with gas fired heat exchangers or hot water heating coils. The packaged units provide heat for various spaces such as; classrooms in the 200 wing, 300 wing, 400 wing, 600 wing, as well as the computer rooms, media center, central offices, cafeteria, new gymnasium, locker rooms, and the new auditorium. The majority of the packaged units are made by AAON, Lennox, McQuay. The units range from new and excellent condition to old and poor condition.

Page 379: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 9 of 60

Cooling is provided for several spaces within the school. All of the new addition classrooms have air conditioning units provided by the package Airedale units. Packaged rooftop units with air conditioning provide cooling for additional spaces such as; various classrooms, the library, media center, computer rooms, media center, central offices, cafeteria, new gymnasium, locker rooms, and the new auditorium. The remaining cooling throughout the building is provided by split systems. The split system AC units provide cooling for other classrooms throughout the building as well as additional office areas and IT closest throughout the school. These units include ductless split systems made by Sanyo and Mitsubishi Electric as well as standard split systems made by Airedale, Trane, and Comfort Aire. These units vary in age and condition.

Exhaust System

Exhaust is provided by roof top mounted exhaust fans primarily located over the hallways. The exhaust fans are utilized to relieve the excess building pressure due to outside air brought in through the unit ventilators and packaged rooftop units. It is unknown if these units operate based on a time schedule and shut down in occupied mode. Bathrooms and toilet rooms are exhausted through smaller rooftop exhaust fans typically interlocked with the bathroom wall switch.

The kitchen includes a 4FT x 22FT commercial exhaust hood, which provides exhaust for cooking equipment. The kitchen hood is manually controlled with a wall switch. The exhaust fan is running based on the needs from the kitchen staff. It was noted that the kitchen exhaust fan in was running well into the after school hours (6:30 PM). At the time of the survey the kitchen was shut down and locked which indicates that the exhaust system would run 24 hours per day. It is estimated that the exhaust fan runs 12 hrs per day at a minimum.

HVAC System Controls

The building HVAC system is a combination of an old pneumatic system that controls the older unit ventilators and H&V units, and newer electronic controls that control the classroom heating and cooling units as well as the newer rooftop equipment in the building additions. The pneumatic control system is in poor condition and in many spaces, significantly lacks in proper temperature control. It was noted that the DDC central control systems also provide poor control of space temperature in several instances. Communication errors, control device failures, and software issues are potential causes for the lack of proper control.

The terminal units throughout the building hot water system is controlled by a combination of two way control valves and three way control valves. Unit ventilators appear to all utilize two way control valves and the larger H&V units as well as rooftop units utilize 3-way control valves. In this scheme, the hot water pumps are not controlled and run at constant speed. Excess water flow in low load conditions is bypassed throughout the building 3-way control valves in lieu of slowing the pumps down.

Domestic Hot Water

Domestic hot water is provided to the school by two domestic hot water systems. The original boiler room utilizes a large storage tank in conjunction with a dedicated domestic boiler made by

Page 380: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 10 of 60

AO Smith. The domestic hot water is circulated throughout the building by a small domestic hot water circulation pump. The domestic hot water systems appears to be recently replaced and in excellent condition. The new boiler room utilizes a packaged 125 gallon domestic hot water boiler made by TurboPower Gas. Domestic hot water is distributed by a small domestic hot water circulation pump. The domestic hot water boiler is in excellent condition.

Lighting Typical lighting throughout school is fluorescent tube lay-in fixtures with T-8 lamps and electronic ballasts. Some of the storage rooms and closets including the boiler room is lit with a mixture of incandescent lamps and compact fluorescent lamps. The older gyms are lit with high bay metal halide fixtures and high bay T-8 fixtures with reflectors. The new gym is lit with high bay metal halide fixtures. The building exterior is lit with high pressure sodium fixtures and metal halide flood lights. Lighting throughout the building is controlled by manual wall switches. There are a few select rooms that are controlled with occupancy sensors.

Page 381: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 11 of 60

III. MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST

The equipment list contains major energy consuming equipment that through implementation of energy conservation measures could yield substantial energy savings. The list shows the major equipment in the facility and all pertinent information utilized in energy savings calculations. An approximate age was assigned to the equipment in some cases if a manufactures date was not shown on the equipment’s nameplate. The ASHRAE service life for the equipment along with the remaining useful life is also shown in the Appendix.

Refer to the Major Equipment List Appendix for this facility.

Page 382: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 12 of 60

IV. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES Energy Conservation Measures are developed specifically for this facility. The energy savings and calculations are highly dependent on the information received from the site survey and interviews with operations personnel. The assumptions and calculations should be reviewed by the owner to ensure accurate representation of this facility. The following ECMs were analyzed:

Table 1 ECM Financial Summary

ECM #1 Lighting Upgrade $55,912 $16,524 3.4 343.3%

ECM #2 Lighting Upgrade (Gym C&D)

$4,620 $1,953 2.4 534.1%

ECM #3 Lighting Controls $27,640 $10,860 2.5 489.4%

ECM #4 Computer Monitors $10,910 $3,726 2.9 412.3%

ECM #5 Unit Ventilator Energy Recovery

$465,000 $16,501 28.2 -46.8%

ECM #6 Valve Blanket & Pipe Insulation

$3,850 $856 4.5 233.5%

ECM #7 VFD HW pumps $106,000 $15,067 7.0 113.2%

ECM #8 AC Unit Replacements $213,849 $8,710 24.6 -38.9%

ECM #9 Demand Controlled Ventilation - GYM

$72,000 $4,419 16.3 -7.9%

ECM #10 Condensing boiler in old boiler room

$441,000 $9,057 48.7 -38.4%

ECM #11 NEMA Premium Eficiency Motors

$24,446 $1,129 21.6 -30.7%

ECM #12 Variable Kitchen Exhuast $23,500 $2,452 9.6 56.5%

ECM #13 Kitchen Domestic Booster Heater

$9,300 $691 13.5 11.5%

REM #1 Solar Photovoltaic System $1,608,390 $139,493 11.5 30.1%

Notes:

ANNUAL SAVINGS

SIMPLE PAYBACK

(Yrs)

SIMPLE LIFETIME

ROI

A. Cost takes into consideration applicable NJ Smart StartTM incentives.B. Savings takes into consideration applicable maintenance savings.

ANNUAL SAVINGSB

NET INSTALLATION

COSTA

RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's)

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

NET INSTALLATION

COST

ECM NO.

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

SIMPLE PAYBACK

(Yrs)

SIMPLE LIFETIME

ROI

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)

Page 383: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 13 of 60

Table 2 ECM Energy Summary

ECM #1 Lighting Upgrade 36.7 103,926 0

ECM #2 Lighting Upgrade (Gym C&D)

4.7 12,285 0

ECM #3 Lighting Controls 0.0 68,304 0

ECM #4 Computer Monitors 9.3 23,436 0

ECM #5 Unit Ventilator Energy Recovery

44.0 39,057 3,727

ECM #6 Valve Blanket & Pipe Insulation

0.0 0 685

ECM #7 VFD HW pumps 0.0 77,203 0

ECM #8 AC Unit Replacements 43.7 53,766 0

ECM #9 Demand Controlled Ventilation - GYM

0.0 9,920 2,223

ECM #10 Condensing boiler in old boiler room

0.0 0 7,252

ECM #11 NEMA Premium Eficiency Motors

3.1 6,971 0

ECM #12 Variable Kitchen Exhuast 0.0 6,884 1,087

ECM #13 Kitchen Domestic Booster Heater

0.0 6,458 (269)

REM #1 Solar Photovoltaic System 144.8 204,297 0

NATURAL GAS (THERMS)

ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

NATURAL GAS (THERMS)

ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION

(KWH)

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTION

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTIONRENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's)

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)

ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)

ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION

(KWH)

Page 384: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 14 of 60

Table 3 Facility Project Summary

Lighting Upgrade $16,524 $55,912 $0 $55,912 3.4

Lighting Upgrade (Gym C&D)

$1,953 $7,920 $3,300 $4,620 2.4

Lighting Controls $10,860 $31,250 $3,610 $27,640 2.5

Computer Monitors $3,726 $18,600 $7,690 $10,910 2.9

Unit Ventilator Energy Recovery

$16,501 $465,000 $0 $465,000 28.2

Valve Blanket & Pipe Insulation

$856 $3,850 $0 $3,850 4.5

VFD HW pumps $15,067 $106,000 $0 $106,000 7.0

AC Unit Replacements $8,710 $221,500 $7,651 $213,849 24.6

Demand Controlled Ventilation - GYM

$4,419 $72,000 $0 $72,000 16.3

Condensing boiler in old boiler room

$9,057 $450,000 $9,000 $441,000 48.7

NEMA Premium Eficiency Motors

$1,129 $25,156 $710 $24,446 21.6

Variable Kitchen Exhuast $2,452 $23,500 $0 $23,500 9.6

Kitchen Domestic Booster Heater

$691 $9,300 $0 $9,300 13.5

Design / Construction Extras (15%)

$86,248 $86,248

Total Project $66,387 $661,236 $22,961 $638,275 9.6Highlighted ECMs are not included in total

ENERGY CONSERVATION

MEASURES

ANNUAL ENERGY

SAVINGS ($)

PROJECT COST ($)

CUSTOMER COST **

SIMPLE PAYBACK

SMART START

INCENTIVES

ENERGY SAVINGS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - POTENTIAL PROJECT

Page 385: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 15 of 60

ECM #1: Lighting Upgrade – Interior spaces Description: The majority of the interior lighting throughout Ridge High School is provided with fluorescent fixtures with older generation, 700 series 32W T8 lamps and electronic ballasts. Although 700 series T8 lamps are considered fairly efficient, further energy savings can be achieved by replacing the existing T8 lamps with new generation, 800 series 28W T8 lamps without compromising light output. CEG recommends, re-lamping all of the fixtures with 28W T8 lamps. In addition, some of the storage areas, locker room and gym areas, offices, auditorium, classrooms, restrooms and kitchen areas still have a variety of older fluorescent fixtures with magnetic ballasts and incandescent lamps. It is recommended to retrofit or replace all of the older fluorescent fixtures and the incandescent lights in these areas with high efficiency fluorescent T8 or T5 fixtures with electronic ballasts or compact fluorescent lamps. This ECM includes re-lamping of the existing fluorescent fixtures with 800 series, 28W T8 lamps. The ECM also includes retrofit of all older fluorescent fixtures with T8 or T5 fluorescent fixtures with electronic ballasts in the building. The new, energy efficient T8 fixtures will provide adequate lighting and will save on electrical costs due to better performance of the lamp and ballasts. Energy Savings Calculations: The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix outlines the hours of operation, proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods for each set of fixtures in the each building. Rebates and Incentives: There are no incentives available from NJ Smart Start® Program for the retrofits in this ECM. Replacement and Maintenance Savings: There is no significant replacement and maintenance savings due to implementation of this ECM.

Page 386: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 16 of 60

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $55,912

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0Net Installation Cost ($): $55,912Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $16,524

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $16,524Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 3.4

Simple Lifetime ROI 343.3%Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $247,860Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 29%Net Present Value (NPV) $141,350.44

ECM #1 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 387: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 17 of 60

ECM #2: Lighting Upgrade – Gym C & D Description: The older Gymnasiums (C&D) at Ridge High School utilizes 400W metal halide fixtures for its lighting. Metal halide bulbs provide a reasonably efficient option for bay lighting however a few draw-backs that are common. Metal halide fixtures often have poor overall efficacy which limits the amount of light actually leaving the fixture. Also metal halide bulbs require a significant warm-up period and even longer cool down period eliminating the potential for occupancy sensors frequent switching. This symptom encourages the gymnasium lighting to be left on continuously during the day. Another drawback is the reduced lumen output (Lumen Maintenance) of the metal halide bulb over its life time. Average bulb output or “mean lumens,” is approximately 25% less than the bulb’s initial lumens for typical metal halide lamps. In addition the most rapid rate of light output decline is during the beginning of its life, approximately 15-20% light loss within the first 20% of its rated life. It is important to note that the light loss has no savings in energy used; therefore the overall light efficiency is continuously decreasing with age. The final drawback is the light quality or Color Rendering Index (CRI). Typical values for metal halide bulbs is 65, which is a measure of how close the light is to true “full spectrum” light produced by sunlight or incandescent lighting. Metal halide bulbs also show noticeable color shifting when the bulb is reaching the end of its life. Utilizing fluorescent fixtures in low and high bay spaces is a superior option over metal halide fixtures in all areas described above. Although metal halide fixtures provide light very efficiently at the start of the bulb life, the average efficiency over the life is below that of fluorescent fixtures. This ECM includes replacement of each of the existing gymnasium high bay metal halide light fixtures with T5HO fixtures with reflective lenses. The retrofit for the metal halide fixtures includes a one for one fixture replacement. The fluorescent fixtures selected will provide equivalent light compared to the average light output of the existing metal halide fixtures. The bulb replacement cost for T-5 HO lamps compared to the existing metal halide lamps were found to be approximately equal and therefore not included in the savings calculations. Hours of Operation Gymnasium: 2,600 Hours/Yr Energy Savings Calculations: The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix outlines the proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods. NJ Smart Start® Program Incentives are calculated as follows: From the Smart Start Incentive Appendix, the following incentives are warranted:

Page 388: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 18 of 60

For replacement of HID (400-999W) with new T-5 or T-8 fixtures = $100/Fixture Smart Start ® Incentive # of 400W Metal Halide Fixture Replaced $100 Smart Start ® Incentive 33 $100 $3300 There is no significant replacement or maintenance savings generated with this ECM. Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $7,920

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $3,300Net Installation Cost ($): $4,620Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $1,953

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $1,953Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 2.4Simple Lifetime ROI 534.1%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $29,295Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 42%Net Present Value (NPV) $18,694.79

ECM #2 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 389: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 19 of 60

ECM #3: Lighting Controls Upgrade – Occupancy Sensors Description: Some of the lights in the school building are left on unnecessarily. In many cases the lights are left on because of the inconvenience to manually switch lights off when a room is left or on when a room is first occupied. This is common in rooms that are occupied for only short periods and only a few times per day. In some instances lights are left on due to the misconception that it is better to keep the lights on rather than to continuously switch lights on and off. Although increased switching reduces lamp life, the energy savings outweigh the lamp replacement costs. The payback timeframe for when to turn the lights off is approximately two minutes. If the lights are expected to be off for at least a two minute interval, then it pays to shut them off.

Lighting controls come in many forms. Sometimes an additional switch is adequate to provide reduced lighting levels when full light output is not needed. Occupancy sensors detect motion and will switch the lights on when the room is occupied. Occupancy sensors can either be mounted in place of a current wall switch, or on the ceiling to cover large areas. The U.S. Department of Energy sponsored a study to analyze energy savings achieved through various types of building system controls. The referenced savings is based on the “Advanced Sensors and Controls for Building Applications: Market Assessment and Potential R&D Pathways,” document posted for public use April 2005. The study has found that commercial buildings have the potential to achieve significant energy savings through the use of building controls. The average energy savings are as follows based on the report:

• Occupancy Sensors for Lighting Control 20% - 28% energy savings.

Savings resulting from the implementation of this ECM for energy management controls are estimated to be 20% of the total light energy controlled by occupancy sensors and daylight sensors (The majority of the savings is expected to be after school hours when rooms are left with lights on) This ECM includes installation of ceiling or switch mount sensors for individual offices, classrooms, large bathrooms, and libraries. Sensors shall be manufactured by Sensorswitch, Watt Stopper or equivalent. The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix of this report includes the summary of lighting controls implemented in this ECM and outlines the proposed controls, costs, savings, and payback periods. The calculations adjust the lighting power usage by the applicable percent savings for each area that includes lighting controls. Energy Savings Calculations:

( )( )kWh/YrEnergyLightControlledSavings%SavingsEnergy ×=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWh$CostElecAvekWhSavingsEnergySavings.

Page 390: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 20 of 60

Cost and Incentives:

Installation cost per dual-technology sensors (Basis: Sensor switch or equivalent) are as follows:

Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mount $250 per installation Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mount $150 per installation Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor with 2 Pole Powerpack

Remote mount $300 per installation Cost includes material and labor. From the NJ Smart Start® Program Incentives Appendix, the installation of a lighting control device warrants the following incentive: Occupancy Sensor Fixture Mounted (existing facility only) = $20 per sensor Occupancy Sensor Remote Mounted (existing facility only) = $35 per sensor

( ) $35)mountceilingof(#20$mountwallof#IncentiveStartSmart ×+×=® ( ) $3,610$35)mountceiling (9420$mountwall16IncentiveStartSmart =×+×=®

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $31,250

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $3,610Net Installation Cost ($): $27,640Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $10,860

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $10,860Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 2.5

Simple Lifetime ROI 489.4%Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $162,900Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 39%Net Present Value (NPV) $102,005.98

ECM #3 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 391: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 21 of 60

ECM #4: Computer Monitor Replacement Description: The computers throughout the school utilize a mixture of CRT computer monitors and LCD computer monitors. The CRT computer monitors within the offices and classrooms are outdated and have several disadvantages such as; significantly increased energy consumption, uses large amount of desk space, poor picture quality, distortions and flickering image, secular glare problems, high weight, and electromagnetic emissions. Many of these drawbacks are difficult to quantify except for the energy use. CRT monitors use considerably more energy than an alternative flat panel LCD monitor. Replacement of the existing CRT monitors with LCD monitors saves considerable energy as well as provides other ergonomic benefits. Based on the site survey it was noted that there are 263 LCD monitor and 186 CRT monitors. Some of the monitors were left in screen saver mode, which only saves the computer screen from image burn in, however it does not save on energy consumption. The average operating hours for all computers and monitors is estimated based on the site survey observations. Energy consumption of computer monitors is based on averages for power usage of various computer monitors. This ECM includes replacement of all existing CRT monitors with LCD flat panel monitors throughout the facility. Installation costs were neglected for this ECM with the intention that this ECM would be replaced by the school district. The calculations are based on the following operating assumptions: Energy Savings Calculations: No. of CRT Monitors: 186 Operating Weeks per Yr: 42 Hrs per Week: 60 (12 hrs per day estimated average)

( ) ( )

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

××=

KWW

HrsOperationWPowerMonitorComputersofUsageElectric1000

#

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWhCostElecAvekWhUsageElectricCostEnergy $

Page 392: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 22 of 60

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSECM INPUTS CRT Monitors LCD Monitor

# of Computers 186 186

Monitor Power Cons. (W) 75 25

Operating Hrs per Week 60 60

Operating Weeks per Yr 42 42

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.159 0.159

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Electric Usage (kWh) 35,154 11,718 23,436

Energy Cost ($) $5,589 $1,863 $3,726

COMMENTS:

COMPUTER MONITOR CALCULATIONS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

CRT Monitor consumption based on Dell CRT monitor M/N: CRT-E771MM. Operating hours estimated.

Installation cost of new monitors is estimated based on current pricing for a 17” LCD monitor on the market today. No labor costs were included for replacing the existing monitors with the new monitors. No incentives are available for installation of computer monitors. Net cost per monitor was estimated to be $100. Cost of installation is summarized in the table below.

ECM INPUT # OF UNITS UNIT COST TOTAL COSTCRT MONITORS 186 $100 $18,600Total 186 $18,600

COST & SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 393: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 23 of 60

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $18,600

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $7,690

Net Installation Cost ($): $10,910

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $3,726

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $3,726

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 2.9

Simple Lifetime ROI 412.3%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $55,890Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 34%Net Present Value (NPV) $33,570.75

ECM #4 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 394: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 24 of 60

ECM #5: Install New Unit Ventilators Description: The heating and air conditioning for the new additions at Ridge High School is provided by upright style Airedale unit ventilators. These unit ventilators are approximately 13 years old and near the end of expected useful service life, which is fifteen (15) years per ASHRAE. There are approximately 31 unit ventilators in the 500 wing that utilize these units. The units are packaged with 4-ton (28 units) and 6-ton (3 units) cooling capacities and hot water heating coils. Currently, the units are monitored and controlled by the building management system. It is recommended to replace older unit ventilators with modern unit ventilators with built-in energy recovery wheels. The advantage of this setup is the utilization of the energy recovery system to recover the energy in the exhaust air in order to reduce the heating and cooling demand of the classrooms. This ECM replaces 31 existing older unit ventilators with new unit ventilators with high efficiency R410A compressors, hot water heating coils and built-in energy recovery wheels. The basis for this ECM is Airedale Classmate CHX-4&5 model unit ventilator with 450 CFM Energy Recovery ventilators and higher EER cooling modules. Energy Savings Calculations: The energy savings calculations are based improved full load cooling efficiency of the unit ventilators and the energy recovery capacity of the recovery wheels. There will be no heating energy savings due to the upgrade since both existing units and new units utilize hot water coils. Cooling energy consumption, electric demand and operation cost of each unit are calculated using the formulas below:

( )

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×

=

WhBtuEER

kWhWh1000

Hrs.CoolingLoadullFhrTon

Btu12,000TonsCoolingnConsumptioEnergy Cooling

kWh

Wh1,000 (EER) Efficiency Cooling

Ton 1BTU/Hr 12,000 (Tons)Capacity Cooling

Demand⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×

=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWh$CostElectricAvekWhUsageEnergyCostCooling

Page 395: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 25 of 60

Nominal recovery capacity of the proposed unit is obtained from the manufacturer. Total energy recovery of each unit at cooling and heating modes are calculated using heating degree days and full load cooling hours of the facility using the formulas below:

( ) ( )

( ) ( )%EfficiencyHeatingTherms

BtuValueHeatFuelF65

0.60DayHr.12FDayHDD

Hr.Btu RateRecovery

UnitYr ThermsRecoveredEnergy Heating

×⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×°

×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×°×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

=⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

×

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

×⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

=⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

×WhBtuEER

kWhWh1000

Hrs.CoolingLoadullFhr

BtuCooling RateRecovery

UnitYr kWh RecoveredEnergy Cooling

Results of the calculations can be found in the table below:

Page 396: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 26 of 60

ECM INPUTS EXISTING UNITS

PROPOSED UNITS

SAVINGS

ECM INPUTS Existing Unit Ventilators UVs

New UVs with ERVs

Number of Units (4 Tons Est) 28 28 -Number of Units (6 Tons Est) 3 3 -Total Cooling Capacity (Tons) 130 130 -Cooling Efficiency (EER) 8 10.35 2.35Full Load Cooling Hours 800 800 -Cooling Energy Recovery, MBH/Unit - 16.3 16.3Air Side Economizer - Enthalpy based Enthalpy basedHeating Energy Recovery, MBH/Unit - 17.7 17.7ERV Operation Hours / Day - 12 -Heating Degree Days 4599 4599 -Net Heating System Efficiency 75% 75% -Electric Cost ($/KWH) $0.159 $0.159Natural Gas Cost ($/Therm) $1.250 $1.250

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED UNITS

SAVINGS

Cooling Energy Consumption (kWh) 156,000 120,580 35,420Total Demand (kW) 195 151 44Cooling Energy Cost ($) $24,804 $19,172 $5,632Cooling Energy Recovered (kWh) - 39,057 39,057Heating Energy Recovered (Therms) - 3,727 3,727Cooling Energy Recovered ($) - $6,210 $6,210Heating Energy Recovered ($) - $4,659 $4,659Total ($) $24,804 $8,303 $16,501COMMENTS:

UNIT VENTILATOR CALCULATIONS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

Project cost, incentives and maintenance savings:

Total installed cost for 25 unit ventilators with hot water coils, high efficiency R410a compressors and energy recovery ventilators (ERV) is 375,000. The selected equipment does not qualify for any of the NJ Smart Start rebates. There is no significant maintenance savings associated to this ECM.

Page 397: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 27 of 60

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $465,000

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $465,000

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $16,501

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $16,501

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 28.2

Simple Lifetime ROI -46.8%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $247,515Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -7%Net Present Value (NPV) ($268,012.13)

ECM #5 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 398: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 28 of 60

ECM #6: Valve Blanket and Pipe Insulation

Description: The old boiler plant supplies heating hot water to the facility for heating season. The piping remains heated at approximately 180°F continuously during this period (approximately 6 months). Un-insulated piping has significant heat losses due to the exposure of the steel piping to the surrounding air. Insulated piping has a heat loss which is a small fraction of the heat loss from un-insulated piping. It was noted that significant piping within the boiler room was missing piping insulation including numerous valves throughout the system. Based on the site survey approximately 6 large diameter pipe valves / Fitting, one air separation tank, and approximately 20 feet of 8” steel pipe was not insulated. Valve blankets are designed to provide insulation value over large hydronic valves that must remain accessible. This ECM includes installation of valve blankets on all exposed boiler system valves and insulation of all un-insulated piping and exposed components within the boiler room. Energy Savings Calculations: Heat Loss for un-insulated steel piping is based on ASHRAE 2009 Fundamentals – “Insulation for Mechanical Systems” Bare Steel Piping Heat Loss 8” pipe: 486 BTU/HR per Linear FT

Heat LossBTUHR per Linear FT

1R Value Pipe Dia FT 3.14 Pipe Temp °F Ambient Temp °F

Heat LossBTUHR Heat Loss

BTUHR per Linear FT Length of Uninsulated Pipe

Energy Use, Therms Heat Loss BTU

HR Operating Hrs

Heating System Eff. % Fuel Heat Value BTUTherm

Heating Energy Cost Savings Energy Use, Therms Cost of Nat Gas $

Therm

Page 399: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 29 of 60

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSECM INPUTS Bare Pipe Insulation BlanketLength of Un-Insulated Pipe Including Valves

26 26

Pipe Diameter (In) 8 8

Blanket Insulation R-value 0 6 6

Temperature Difference Pipe to Ambient (°F)

100 100

Pipe Heat Loss - 8" Pipe (BTU/Hr per FT)

486 35 451

Heat Loss (BTU/Hr) 12,636 907 11,729

Heating System Operating Hrs

4380 4380

Energy Loss (kBtus) 55,346 3,973 51,373

Heating System Eff (%) 75% 75%

Fuel Heat Value (BTU/Therm)

100,000 100,000

Nat Gas Cost ($/Therm) 1.25 1.25

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSNat Gas Usage Usage (Therms)

738 53 685

Energy Cost ($) $922 $66 $856

COMMENTS:

VALVE BLANKET INSULATION CALCULATIONS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

Bare Pipe Heat Loss value is based on ASHRAE 2009 Fundamentals "Insulation for Mechanical Systems"

There is no maintenance savings due to implementation of this ECM.

Page 400: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 30 of 60

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $3,850

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0Net Installation Cost ($): $3,850Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $856

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $856Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 4.5Simple Lifetime ROI 233.5%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings 0Simple Lifetime Savings $12,840Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 21%Net Present Value (NPV) $6,368.87

ECM #6 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 401: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 31 of 60

ECM #7: Install Pump VFD’s Description: The packaged rooftop air conditioners, heating and ventilation units and the unit ventilators are utilizing a constant volume pumping design. The unit ventilators are equipped with 2-way control valves and the rooftop units have 3-way control valves which allow continuous flow through the piping loop throughout the building. As a result the water loop pumps must provide nearly full power output to circulate the water through all rooftop units and unit ventilators continuously. 2-way control valves provide flow through the heat exchanger equipment only when there is a call for heating or cooling, unlike 3-way control valves that allow constant flow of the water loop. 3-way control valves require full pumping energy continuously, while 2-way control valves allow the system to reduce flow when it is not needed. This measure includes capping off the bypass port on the 3-way control valves which effectively turns the valves into “2-way” control valves. When the unit is not calling for heating, the control valve closes reducing overall flow of the system. Variable frequency drives allow the pumps to slow down in response to a reduction in overall system flow. The reduction in operating flow allows the pumps to reduce energy consumption for all hours that the heating system is not at its peak load. This ECM includes the installation of Variable Frequency Drives on the four (4) existing pumps within the old boiler room as well as the two (2) existing pumps in the new boiler room. To control flow through the system, this ECM includes piping modifications at the rooftop units, H&V units, and unit ventilators to cap off the bypass port on the 3-way control valves. The VFD’s would be controlled by a differential pressure sensor in the water loop to measure demand for water (typical for each of the three pump sets). The furthest unit from the loop pumps would remain as 3-way control valves (constant flow) to eliminate dead heading potential. This ECM also includes replacement of the existing pump motors with inverter duty motors that meet NEMA Premium Efficiency Standard, which also helps to reduce energy consumption. Energy and cost savings calculations are based on calculation software “PumpSave v4.2,” provided by ABB. The PumpSave calculation software is used to estimate the pumping energy for variable speed pump systems. Two of the boiler water loop pumps operate approximately 4,320 Hrs per year since this system is used for about 6 month’s total. The pump flow, HD, and resultant energy are calculated based on the existing pump horse power installed. The calculation is based on all existing equipment to be modified to operate as 2-way control valves. Where control valves are already 2-way style, these control valves shall remain. The exact quantity of rooftop equipment with hot water coils is unknown. The operation of all equipment control valves should be verified before implementing this ECM. Energy Savings Calculations:

Page 402: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 32 of 60

( )( )

( ) ( )% EfficiencyMotor% EfficiencyPump3960

Ft HeadminGalRateFlowGravitySpecific

HPPower VolumeCons.××

×⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×

=

( ) ( ) ( )Hrs.Operation HPKW 0.746HPPower kWhCons.Energy ×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWh$CostElectricAvekWh UsageEnergyCostEnergy

Old Boiler Room - Hot Water VFD Pumping Energy:

Page 403: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 33 of 60

New Boiler Room - Hot Water VFD Pumping Energy:

Page 404: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 34 of 60

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSECM INPUTS CV Pumps VFD Pumps

Flow Control CV VFD -

Total Flow* (GPM) 1200 1200 -

Head* (Ft) 100 100 -

Pump Efficiency (%) 80% 80% -

Ave. Motor Efficiency (%) 89.0% 93.0% 4.0%

Operating Hrs 4320 4320 -

Estimated Total Horse Power 42.6 40.7 1.83

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.159 0.159 -

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Electric Energy (kWh) 137,160 59,957 77,203

Electric Energy Cost ($) $21,808 $9,533 $12,275

OLD BOILER ROOM HOT WATER PUMPS VFD CALULATION

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

COMMENTS: - VFD pump energy is based on ABB energy savings calculator for pumps, "Pump Save," version 4.2. Flow rate for VFD Pump calculation is summarized in the operating profile shown in the Pump Save output.- Hot water flow & head estimated based on pump horse power.

Page 405: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 35 of 60

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSECM INPUTS CV Pumps VFD Pumps

Flow Control CV VFD -

Total Flow* (GPM) 370 370 -

Head* (Ft) 80 80 -

Pump Efficiency (%) 80% 80% -

Ave. Motor Efficiency (%) 93.0% 93.0% 0.0%

Operating Hrs 4320 4320 -

Estimated Total Horse Power 10.0 10.0 0.00

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.159 0.159 -

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Electric Energy (kWh) 32,378 14,815 17,563

Electric Energy Cost ($) $5,148 $2,356 $2,792

NEW BOILER ROOM HOT WATER PUMPS VFD CALULATION

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

COMMENTS: - VFD pump energy is based on ABB energy savings calculator for pumps, "Pump Save," version 4.2. Flow rate for VFD Pump calculation is summarized in the operating profile shown in the Pump Save output.- Hot water flow & head estimated based on information provided on pump tag.

Installation cost for six (6) VFDs, (4) premium efficiency motors, piping work, re-balancing, capping of 3-way valves and controls is estimated to be $106,000. Currently there are no NJ Smart Start® Program Incentives for installation of hot water pump Variable Frequency Drives.

Page 406: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 36 of 60

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $106,000

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0Net Installation Cost ($): $106,000Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $15,067

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $15,067Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 7.0Simple Lifetime ROI 113.2%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $226,005Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 11%Net Present Value (NPV) $73,868.87

ECM #7 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 407: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 37 of 60

ECM #8: Air Conditioning Unit Upgrades

Description:

Ridge High School is air conditioned by split system AC units and packaged rooftop units. The condition and age of the units at the high school varies from old and in poor condition to new and in good condition. Many of the units currently installed are inefficiency compared to modern equipment and can be replaced with new high efficiency units. New air conditioners provide higher full load and part load efficiencies due to advances in inverter motor technologies, heat exchangers and refrigerants. This ECM includes one-for-one replacement of the older air conditioning units with new higher efficiency systems. It is recommended to fully evaluate the capacity needed for all new systems prior to moving forward with this ECM. A summary of the unit replacements for this ECM can be found in the table below:

ECM INPUTSSERVICE / LOCATION

NUMBER OF UNITS

COOLING CAPACITY,

BTU/HR

TOTAL CAPACITY,

TONSREPLACE UNIT WITH

RTU-5,6 Rm 313, 314 2 90,000 15.0 Trane YHC-092

RTU-7 300 wing 1 36,000 3.0 Trane YHC-036

RTU-12 Rm 409 1 60,000 5.0 Trane YHC-060

RTU-13 Rm 405 1 42,000 3.5 Trane THC-036

CU-2,3 200 wing rms 2 18,000 3.0 Fujitsu 18CL

CU-4 200 wing rms 1 12,000 1.0 Fujitsu 12RLS

CU-5 200 wing rms 1 18,000 1.5 Fujitsu 18CL

CU-6 200 wing rms 1 18,000 1.5 Fujitsu 18CL

CU-7 200 wing rms 1 12,000 1.0 Fujitsu 12RLS

CU-8,9,10,11 200/300 wing 4 24,000 8.0 Fujitsu 24CL

CU-12 200 wing IT Rm 1 12,000 1.0 Fujitsu 12RLS

CU-13 300/400 wing 1 24,000 2.0 Fujitsu 24CL

CU-14 Rm 613 1 36,000 3.0 Trane XL 15

CU-15,16 616 & Locker 2 24,000 4.0 Fujitsu 24CL

CU-17,18 Shipping & Rec. 2 30,000 5.0 Trane 4TTB Series

CU-20,21 Shipping & Rec. 2 36,000 6.0 Trane 4TTB Series

CU-22 Shipping & Rec. 1 48,000 4.0 Trane XL 15

CU-23 Cafeteria 1 384,000 30.0 Trane CAUJ C30

CU-26,27 500 wing 2 24,000 4.0 Fujitsu 24CLTotal 28 948,000 101.5Some unit sizes are estimated. See Major Equipoment List Appendix.

*Highlighted cell represents installation of smaller unit to replace existing unit.

IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY

Page 408: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 38 of 60

The manufacturers used as the basis for design are Trane, Carrier, Mitsubishi, and Fujitsu. This ECM includes replacement of the outdoor condensing units and associated indoor air handling units or cooling coils where appropriate. The RTU replacements include full unit replacements. All units are one for one style replacements with matching capacity of the new units to the old

units with the exception of the Music room. Based on review of the existing music room size and estimated cooling load, it was determined that the existing cooling unit is oversized for the load.

The music room savings is based on two (2) 2.0 ton ductless split style units in lieu of the existing 6 ton Split System. The operating efficiency of the oversized cooling unit is estimated

based on the current operating condition. Energy Savings Calculations: Cooling Energy Savings: Seasonal energy consumption of the air conditioners at the cooling mode is calculated with the equation below:

Energy Savings, kWh Cooling Capacity,BTUHr

1SEERO

1SEERN

Operation Hours

1000 WkWh

Demand Savings, kW Energy Savings kWh

Hours of Cooling

Cooling Cost Savings Energy Savings, kWh Cost of Electricity $

kWh

Page 409: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 39 of 60

Project Cost, Incentives and Maintenance Savings From the NJ Smart Start® Program appendix, the replacement of split system AC units and unitary systems with high efficiency AC systems falls under the category “Unitary HVAC Split System” and warrants an incentive based on efficiency (EER/SEER). The program incentives are calculated as follows:

( )Incentive$/TonTonsCoolingIncentiveStartSmart ×=®

ECM INPUTSCOOLING

CAPACITY, BTU/Hr

ANNUAL COOLING

HOURS

EXISTING UNITS (S)EER

SPLIT UNITS (S)EER

# OF UNITS

ENERGY SAVINGS

kWh

DEMAND SAVINGS

kWRTU-5,6 90,000 1,200 10 EER 13 EER 2 4,985 4.2

RTU-7 36,000 1,200 10 SEER 15 SEER 1 1,440 1.2

RTU-12 60,000 1,200 10 SEER 15 SEER 1 2,400 2.0

RTU-13 42,000 1,200 9.4 SEER 15 SEER 1 2,002 1.7

CU-2,3 18,000 1,200 10.2 SEER 18 SEER 2 1,835 1.5

CU-4 12,000 1,200 10 SEER 18 SEER 1 640 0.5

CU-5 18,000 1,200 10.6 SEER 18 SEER 1 838 0.7

CU-6 18,000 1,200 10.2 SEER 18 SEER 1 838 0.7CU-7 12,000 1,200 10 SEER 18 SEER 1 640 0.5

CU-8,9,10,11 24,000 1,200 10 SEER 18 SEER 4 5,120 4.3

CU-12 12,000 3,600 10 SEER 18 SEER 1 1,920 0.5

CU-13 24,000 1,200 10 SEER 18 SEER 1 1,280 1.1

CU-14 36,000 1,200 10 SEER 15 SEER 1 1,440 1.2

CU-15,16 24,000 1,200 10 SEER 18 SEER 2 2,560 2.1

CU-17,18 30,000 1,200 9 SEER 13 SEER 2 2,462 2.1

CU-20,21 36,000 1,200 9 SEER 13 SEER 2 2,954 2.5

CU-22 48,000 1,200 11 SEER 15 SEER 1 1,396 1.2

CU-23 384,000 1,200 8 EER 11.2 EER 1 16,457 13.7

CU-26,27 24,000 1,200 10 SEER 18 SEER 2 2,560 2.1Total 28 53,766 43.7

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

Page 410: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 40 of 60

Summary of cost, savings and payback for this ECM is below.

UNIT DESCRIPTION

UNIT EFFICIENCY

REBATE $/TON

PROPOSED CAPACITY

TONS

TOTAL REBATE

$≥20 to 30 tons 10.5 EER 79 30 $2,370 ≥ 11.25 to < 20

tons11.5 EER 79 0 $0

≥ 5.4 to < 11.25 tons

11.5 EER 73 15 $1,095

5.4 tons or less Unitary AC and

Split System≥14 SEER $92 45.5 $4,186

TOTAL 90.5 $7,651

SPLIT SYSTEM AC UNITS REBATE SUMMARY

ECM INPUTSINSTALLED

COST# OF

UNITSTOTAL COST REBATES

NET COST

ENERGY SAVING

PAY BACK

YEARSRTU-5,6 $16,250 2 $32,500 $1,095 $31,405 $808 38.9

RTU-7 $9,250 1 $9,250 $276 $8,974 $233 38.5RTU-12 $12,500 1 $12,500 $460 $12,040 $389 31.0

RTU-13 $9,250 1 $9,250 $322 $8,928 $324 27.5

CU-2,3 $5,000 2 $10,000 $276 $9,724 $297 32.7CU-4 $5,000 1 $5,000 $92 $4,908 $104 47.3

CU-5 $5,000 1 $5,000 $138 $4,862 $136 35.8

CU-6 $5,000 1 $5,000 $138 $4,862 $136 35.8CU-7 $5,000 1 $5,000 $92 $4,908 $104 47.3

CU-8,9,10,11 $5,000 4 $20,000 $736 $19,264 $829 23.2CU-12 $5,000 1 $5,000 $92 $4,908 $311 15.8

CU-13 $5,000 1 $5,000 $184 $4,816 $207 23.2

CU-14 $5,000 1 $5,000 $276 $4,724 $233 20.3CU-15,16 $5,000 2 $10,000 $368 $9,632 $415 23.2

CU-17,18 $5,000 2 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $399 25.1CU-20,21 $5,000 2 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $479 20.9

CU-22 $5,000 1 $5,000 $368 $4,632 $226 20.5

CU-23 $48,000 1 $48,000 $2,370 $45,630 $2,666 17.1CU-26,27 $5,000 2 $10,000 $368 $9,632 $415 23.2Total $165,250 28 $221,500 $7,651 $213,849 $8,710 24.6

COST & SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 411: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 41 of 60

There is no significant maintenance savings due to implementation of this ECM. Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $221,500

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $7,651Net Installation Cost ($): $213,849Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $8,710

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $8,710Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 24.6Simple Lifetime ROI -38.9%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $130,650Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -6%Net Present Value (NPV) ($109,869.59)

ECM #8 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 412: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 42 of 60

ECM #9: Demand Controlled Ventilation - Gymnasium Demand Controlled Ventilation (DCV) is a means to provide active, zone level control of ventilation for spaces within a facility. The basic premise behind DCV is monitoring indoor CO2 levels versus outdoor CO2 levels in order to provide proper ventilation to the spaces within the facility as well as saving costly dollars treating unconditioned ventilation air. Carbon dioxide ventilation control or demand controlled ventilation (DCV) allows for the measurement and control of outside air ventilation levels to a target cfm/person ventilation rate in the space (i.e., 15 cfm/person) based on the number of people in the space. It is a direct measure of ventilation effectiveness and is a method whereby buildings can regain active and automatic zone level ventilation control, without having to open windows. The fixed ventilation approach depends on a set-it-and-forget-it methodology that is completely unresponsive to changes in the way spaces are utilized/occupied or how equipment is maintained. A DCV system utilizes various control algorithms to maintain a base ventilation rate. The system monitors space CO2 levels and the algorithm automatically adjusts the outdoor and return air dampers to provide the quantity of outdoor air to maintain the required CO2 level in the space. System designs are normally designed for maximum occupancy and the ventilation rates are designed for this (maximum) occupancy. In areas where occupancy swings are prevalent there is ample opportunity to reduce outdoor air quantity to satisfy the needs of the actual number of occupants present. By installing the DCV controls, energy savings are realized by the reduced quantities of outdoor air that do not require heating and cooling energy from the steam and chilled water plants. There are heating and ventilation units and packaged rooftop air conditioning units (RTUs) providing heating and air conditioning to the Old and New Gymnasiums. When operating, these units provide minimum amount of outside air to the space. The outside air volume is typically based on the maximum occupancy of the space conditioned. When a given space is not fully occupied the outside air quantity delivered to the space is greater than the amount needed for adequate ventilation. This ECM includes the installation of CO2 sensors integrated into a demand control ventilation system, for the units mentioned above. This system allows the air handling unit to respond to changes in occupancy and therefore reduce the amount of outside air that has to be conditioned. Outside air accounts for a large portion of the energy consumption in the HVAC system, especially in high occupancy spaces. The components required for the demand control ventilation system installation include damper actuators, Variable Frequency Drives, CO2 sensors, wiring, Energy Management System equipment expansion and programming. Each occupied zone would require minimum one CO2 sensor installed to monitor occupancy levels. Often heating and air conditioning units switch to occupied mode several hours before the actual occupancy in order to provide pre-heating or pre-cooling of the space. Energy savings achieved through “Demand Control Ventilation” is calculated based on actual occupancy of the spaces and the hours the units are in occupied mode. Energy Savings Calculations:

Page 413: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 43 of 60

Following table summarizes the estimated occupancy characteristics of the spaces and the HVAC equipment at this school.

ECM INPUTS DCVAverage Full Occupancy Hours 9:00 AM - 3:00 PMFull Occupancy Hours per Day 6 HVAC Eqp. On Occupied Mode 6:00 AM - 6:00 PMOccupied Hours per day 12HVAC occupied / spaces not occupied 6Est. Conditioned outside air savings 50%

ENERGY SAVINGS

Following is a list of HVAC equipment and corresponding spaces identified for Demand Controlled Ventilation. IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY

DCV-1 New Gym 1 RTU 31 810 9.3 243

DCV-2 New Gym 1 RTU 31 810 9.3 243

DCV-3 Old Gym B* (2) 2 HV - 281 - 84

DCV-4 Old Gym C* (2) 2 HV - 281 - 84

Total 6 19 654

Total heating capacity estimated based on each unit with 2,000 CFM flow capacity.

Max outside air heating capacity = 1.08 x Fresh Air CFM x design day ΔT

INPUTS Service # of CO2 SENSORS

HVAC Unit Type

Total Cooling Capaity,

Tons

Outside Air Heating,

MBH

Assumptions: 400 CFM/Ton, 30% average fresh air, 65°F design day ΔT

Outside Air Cooling,

Tons

Total Heating Capaity, Mbh

( )

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×

=

WhBtuEER

kWhWh1000

Hrs.Cooling Load Full AnnualhrTon

Btu12,000TonsCoolingeEnergyUsag Cooling

( ) 5%1kwhEnergy CoolingSavingsEnergy ×=

Page 414: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 44 of 60

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWh$CostElectricAvekWhUsageEnergyCostCooling

( )( ) ( )

( ) ( )%EfficiencyHeatingTherms

BtuValueHeatFuelF65

0.60DayHr. 21FDayHDD

Hr.BtuCapacity HeatingAir Outside

ThermsEnergy Heating×⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×°

×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×°×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

Therms$CostFuelAveThermsEnergyHeatingCost Heating

Page 415: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 45 of 60

ECM INPUTS DCVEquipment Gymnasium HVUs & RTUsOA Cooling Capacity, Tons 19Average Efficiency (EER) 9Annual Full Load Cooling Hours 800

OA Heating Capacity, MBh 654

Net Heating Efficiency (Gas) 75%

Heating Degree Days (65°F) 4599

Occupied Hours per day 12

Heating Energy Saving 50%

A/C Energy Savings 50%Elec Cost ($/kWh) $0.165

Natural Gas Cost ($/Therm) $1.25

ECM RESULTS DCV

Cooling Energy Cnsmption, kWh 19,840

Heating Energy (Therms) 4,445

Cooling Energy Savings kWh 9,920

Heating Energy Savings (Therms) 2,223

Electric Energy Cost Savings ($) $1,640Total Gas Cost Savings ($) $2,778Total Cost Savings ($) $4,419

DEMAND CONTROLLED VENTILATION

ENERGY SAVINGS

COMMENTS: HDD estimated based on Newark Liberty AirportOA: Outside Air

Cost and Incentives: Estimated installed cost for demand controlled ventilation for the Cafeteria Areas is $72,000. Estimated cost includes CO2 sensors, control wiring, electrical wiring, control system equipment expansion and programming. There are currently no Smart Start ® incentives available for a Demand Control Ventilation System.

Page 416: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 46 of 60

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $72,000

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $72,000

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $4,419

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $4,419

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 16.3

Simple Lifetime ROI -7.9%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $66,280Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -1%Net Present Value (NPV) ($19,249.95)

ECM #9 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 417: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 47 of 60

ECM #10: Condensing Boiler Installation Description: Space heating for the perimeter offices and classrooms in the majority of the school is provided with unit ventilators and cabinet heaters with hot water coils and hot water radiators. The sources of hot water for these equipments are two (2) sectional hot water boilers and four (4) smaller modular hot water boilers located in the old boiler room and two (2) condensing hot water boilers in the new addition boiler room. Two (2) of the boilers are 4.75 MMBH (106 BTU/H) Weil McLain standard efficiency, sectional cast iron hot water boilers. These boilers are in fair condition and they are over 50 years old, which is well beyond their useful life of 30 years per ASHRAE. Typically, standard (non-condensing) boilers provide lower than nominal efficiency compared to condensing boilers. Standard boilers suffer further efficiency losses at part load operating conditions mainly due to limitations in the reduction of the flue gas temperature. Current average combustion efficiency of each boiler is estimated to be 75% due to standard non-condensing boiler technology, limited turn down ratio, cycling losses and outdated design and controls. A new condensing boiler could substantially improve the operating efficiency of the heating system of the building. Condensing boiler’s peak efficiency tops out at 99% depending on return water temperature. CEG recommends replacing the two (2) Weil McLain boilers with condensing hot water boilers to provide building with heating throughout the year. The annual average operating efficiency of the proposed boiler set is expected to be 90%, which gives the heating system a 15% increase in efficiency. This ECM is based on variable supply water temperature adjusted based on outdoor temperature. This ECM includes installation of three (3) new condensing gas fired boilers to replace two (2) existing hot water boilers based on following summary.

BOILER REPLACEMENT SUMMARY

EXISTING UNIT LOCATION PROPOSED UNITS

(2) 4.75 MBH Cast Iron Boilers Old Boiler Room (3) 3.0 MMBTU

The basis for this ECM is Aerco Benchmark 3.0 condensing hot water boilers or equivalent. New boilers shall be setup and programmed to be the primary source of heating for the building during entire year. The owner is recommended to retain a professional engineer to confirm equipment sizing and finalize design.

Page 418: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 48 of 60

Energy Savings Calculations: Currently there are multiple boilers and gas fired rooftop units on the building gas meter. The boilers’ gas usage is not separately metered. Therefore, annual energy consumption of the boilers has to be estimated. In this calculation, it is assumed that the energy consumption of the boilers will be in proportion with the ratio of the total heating capacity of each equipment. First, domestic hot water usage is estimated and subtracted from the total usage in order to estimate the net natural gas usage for space heating. Current total hot water usage can be found in the table below:

Nov-09 17,239 714 16,525 $23,685Dec-09 38,956 714 38,242 $48,269Jan-10 20,012 714 19,298 $25,557Feb-10 27,371 714 26,657 $33,959Mar-10 15,371 714 14,657 $15,546Apr-10 5,769 714 5,055 $5,485May-10 877 714 0 $0Jun-10 524 714 0 $0Jul-10 734 714 0 $0

Aug-10 724 714 0 $0Sep-10 711 714 0 $0Oct-10 10,467 714 9,753 $10,092

TOTAL 138,756 8,568 130,188 $162,594

MONTHTOTAL USAGE

THERMS COSTHEATING ONLYDOMESTIC HW USAGE

ANNUAL GAS USAGE

Baseline Domestic Hot Water Gas Use = 714 Therms (Average from May-September Gas Use) Existing Natural Gas Use for Heating = 138,756 Therms – (714 Therms x 12 Months) = 130,188 Therms Below calculation is performed to estimate annual gas usage of the cast iron boilers: Total facility heating capacity (Heating equipment output capacity): (2) Hot cast iron water boilers = 7.0 MMBH (3) Remaining Hot water boiler = 8.6 MMBH (9) Gas Fired RTUs = 5.4 MMBH Total Output Capacity = 21 MMBH

Page 419: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 49 of 60

Total facility heating capacity: 21.0 MMBH Total Capacity – Cast Iron Boilers only: 7.0 MMBH Percent usage by boilers: 33% of Total Estimated natural gas usage 33% of 162,594 Therms Estimated natural gas usage 43,512 Therms

Bldg Heat Required Heating Nat. Gas Therm Heating Eff % Fuel Heat Value BTU

Therm

Proposed Heating Gas UsageBldg. Heat Required BTU

New Heating Eff % Fuel Heat Value BTUTherm

Energy Cost Heating Gas Usage Therms Ave Fuel Cost $

Therm Energy savings calculations are summarized in the table below:

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

ECM INPUTSExisting Hot Water

BoilersNew Condensing

Boilers -

Existing Nat Gas (Therms) 43,512 - -

Boiler Efficiency (%) 75% 90% 15%

Nat Gas Heat Value (BTU/Therm) 100,000 100,000 -

Equivalent Building Heat Usage (MMBTUs) 3,263 3,263 -

Ave. Gas Cost ($/Therm)(Heating season only) 1.25 1.25 -

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Natural Gas Usage (Therms) 43,512 36,260 7,252

Energy Cost ($) $54,343 $45,286 $9,057

COMMENTS:

CONDENSING BOILER CALCULATIONS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

Page 420: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 50 of 60

Project Cost, Incentives and Maintenance Savings Estimated cost for removing the existing boilers and installing three (3) 3.0 MMBH condensing hot water boilers with advanced controls is $450,000. From the New Jersey Smart Start® Program Incentives Appendix, installation of a high efficiency hot water boiler falls under the category “Gas Heating” and warrants an incentive based on efficiency at or above 84% for this type of equipment. The program incentives are calculated as follows:

UNIT DESCRIPTION

UNIT EFFICIENCY

REBATE $/MBH

PROPOSED CAPACITY, MBH

NUMBER OF UNITS

TOTAL REBATE, $

>1500 - ≤ 4000 MBH

84% AFUE for Hot Water boilers $1 3,000 3 $9,000

TOTAL $9,000

GAS FIRED BOILER REBATE SUMMARY

Maintenance savings associated with this ECM is estimated to be minimal. Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $450,000

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $9,000

Net Installation Cost ($): $441,000

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $9,057

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $9,057

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 30

Simple Payback 48.7

Simple Lifetime ROI -38.4%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $271,715Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -3%Net Present Value (NPV) ($263,475.48)

ECM #10 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 421: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 51 of 60

ECM #11: Install NEMA Premium® Efficiency Motors Description: The improved efficiency of the NEMA Premium® efficient motors is primarily due to better designs with use of better materials to reduce losses. Surprisingly, the electricity used to power a motor represents 95 % of its total lifetime operating cost. Because many motors operate continuously 24 hours a day, even small increases in efficiency can yield substantial energy and dollar savings. The electric motors driving the hot water pumps in the old boiler room and supply fans in some of the rooftop equipment are candidates for replacing with premium efficiency motors. These standard efficiency motors run considerable amount of time over a year. This energy conservation measure replaces existing electric motors over 5 HP or more with NEMA Premium® efficiency motors. NEMA Premium® is the most efficient motor designation in the marketplace today.

IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY

EQMTID FUNCTION

MOTOR HP

HOURS OF OPERATION

EXISTING EFFICIENCY

NEMA PREMIUM

EFFICIENCYHWP-1 Hot Water Pump 20 2,160 91.0% 93.0%HWP-2 Hot Water Pump 15 2,160 86.5% 92.4%HWP-3 Hot Water Pump 25 2,160 89.5% 93.6%HWP-4 Hot Water Pump 25 2,160 89.5% 93.6%RTU 8 Supply Fan 5 3,000 87.5% 90.2%RTU 9 Supply Fan 5 3,000 87.5% 90.2%

RTU-17 Supply Fan 7.5 3,000 89.5% 91.7%

Energy Savings Calculations:

Electric usage, kWhHP LF 0.746 Hours of Operation

Motor Efficiency

where, HP Motor Nameplate Horsepower Rating LF Load Factor Motor Efficiency Motor Nameplate Efficiency

ProposedExisting UsageElectricUsageElectrickWhSavings,UsageElectric −=

Electric Usage Savings, kWh Electric UsageE Electric UsageP

Page 422: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 52 of 60

Electric cost savings Electric Usage Savings Electric Rate $

kWh

The calculations were carried out and the results are tabulated in the table below: PREMIUM EFFICIENCY MOTOR CALCULATIONS

EQMTID

MOTOR HP

LOAD FACTOR

EXISTING EFFICIENCY

NEMA PREMIUM

EFFICIENCY

POWER SAVINGS

kW

ENERGY SAVINGS

kWH

COST SAVINGS

HWP-1 20 90% 91.0% 93.0% 0.32 689 $112HWP-2 15 90% 86.5% 92.4% 0.74 1,614 $262HWP-3 25 90% 89.5% 93.6% 0.82 1,784 $289HWP-4 25 90% 89.5% 93.6% 0.82 1,784 $289RTU 8 5 90% 87.5% 90.2% 0.11 346 $56RTU 9 5 90% 87.5% 90.2% 0.11 346 $56

RTU-17 7.5 90% 89.5% 91.7% 0.13 407 $66TOTAL 3.1 6,971 $1,129

Equipment Cost and Incentives

Below is a summary of SmartStart Building® incentives for premium efficiency motors:

HORSE POWER

NJ SMART START

INCENTIVE5 $60

7.5 $9010 $10015 $11520 $12525 $130

INCENTIVES

The following table outlines the summary of motor replacement costs and incentives:

Page 423: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 53 of 60

EQMTID

MOTOR POWER

HP

INSTALLED COST

SMART START

INCENTIVENET COST

TOTAL SAVINGS

SIMPLE PAYBACK

HWP-1 20 $4,635 $125 $4,510 $112 40.4HWP-2 15 $3,652 $115 $3,537 $262 13.5HWP-3 25 $5,930 $130 $5,800 $289 20.1HWP-4 25 $5,930 $130 $5,800 $289 20.1RTU 8 5 $1,519 $60 $1,459 $56 26.0RTU 9 5 $1,519 $60 $1,459 $56 26.0

RTU-17 7.5 $1,971 $90 $1,881 $66 28.5TOTAL Totals: $25,156 $710 $24,446 $1,129 21.6

MOTOR REPLACEMENT SUMMARY

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $25,156

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $710

Net Installation Cost ($): $24,446

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $1,129

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $1,129

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 21.6

Simple Lifetime ROI -30.7%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $16,940Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -4%Net Present Value (NPV) ($10,963.92)

ECM #11 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 424: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 54 of 60

ECM #12: Commercial Kitchen Exhaust Hood Controls Description: The kitchen in this facility is equipped with a large commercial kitchen exhaust hood providing exhaust for the cooking equipment. The estimated total kitchen exhaust from the hoods is 8,800 CFM powered by an estimated total 6 HP of exhaust and makeup air fans. The kitchen make-up air units provide heated air to replace all the air exhausted through the exhaust hood. This system operates based on manual switches located in the kitchen. Currently the facility provides 1 meal per day. The installation of kitchen exhaust controls would significantly reduce the total kitchen exhaust and make-up air quantity. The conditioned make up air and exhausted air savings are achieved by monitoring the exhaust hoods and exhaust based on the actual use of the kitchen equipment. Temperature sensors and optical lasers monitor the heat and smoke production at each exhaust hood to reduce the exhaust and make-up airflow based on the need of the kitchen equipment. This ECM includes installation of kitchen exhaust controls for the main kitchen exhaust hood and VFD’s for the constant volume exhaust fans. The hoods would be retrofitted with temperature and laser sensors to monitor the activity of each of all equipment installed below the hoods. The work involves installing a Melink Kitchen Hood Variable Air Volume Controller; variable frequency drive on the kitchen hood exhaust fan; and turn off all the kitchen hood exhaust systems when the kitchen is closed. When the cooking appliances are turned on, the hood exhaust fan speed will increase based on the hood exhaust temperature. During heavy cooking, the kitchen hood exhaust fan increases to 100% speed until the smoke/vapor is removed. Energy savings are also realized when the kitchen equipment is operating at less than full load due to minimal cooking operations. During these times the fan speed decreases, removing only the necessary amount of air, saving exhaust fan energy and make up air conditioning energy. Energy Calculations Summary: Detailed calculations for the proposed kitchen hood control system can be found in the Kitchen Exhaust Calculations Appendix. It is pertinent to note that the calculation assumes the exhaust fans and make-up air unit remain off for approximately 17 hours per day. Installed cost of the kitchen hood control system is $23,500. The calculated energy savings equals approximately $2,452 per year. Currently, there aren’t any incentives from the Smart Start program for motors smaller than 5 HP. A summary of energy savings can be seen in the table below:

Page 425: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 55 of 60

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

ECM INPUTS Manually Controlled Kitchen Exhaust

MELINK Kitchen Exhaust Controls

Fan Energy Usage (kWh) 11,029 4,145 6,884

Heating Energy Usage (Therms) 3,397 2,310 1,087

Cooling Energy Usage (kWh) 0 0 0

Average Gas Cost ($/Therm) 1.25 1.25

Electric Cost ($/KWH) 0.159 0.159

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSTotal Energy Usage (kWh) 11,029 4,145 6,884

Total Energy Usage (Therms) 3,397 2,310 1,087

Heating Energy Cost ($) $4,246 $2,887 $1,359

Cooling Energy Cost ($) $1,752 $658 $1,094

Total Energy Cost ($) $5,998 $3,546 $2,452COMMENTS:

KITCHEN EXHAUST CONTROLS CALCULATION

SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

*ECM is based on calculations using spreadsheets privded by MELINK Intelli-hood controls manufacturer.

Page 426: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 56 of 60

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $23,500

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $23,500

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $2,452

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $2,452

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 9.6

Simple Lifetime ROI 56.5%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $36,785Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 6%Net Present Value (NPV) $5,775.50

ECM #12 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 427: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 57 of 60

ECM #13: Kitchen Domestic Gas Booster Heater

Description: Tankless style hot water heaters provide improved efficiencies compared to standard hot water heaters. In addition, heating with natural gas is far less expensive than domestic hot water heated with electric heat. The existing commercial dishwasher at Ridge High School utilizes an electric booster heater to provide approximately 180°F hot water for sterilization. Installation and capacity could not be verified in the field. Installation is based on similar style system to the middle school. A tankless hot water heater would allow the utilization of a high efficiency natural gas source of hot water boosting production with minimal space requirements. This ECM includes replacement of the existing domestic water booster heater for the commercial kitchen dishwasher. The kitchen booster heater would be replaced with a Takagi commercial hot water heater model number TATM32 with remote temperature controller. This ECM is based on installation of the hot water heater within the boiler room and piping hot water to the commercial kitchen dishwasher. Energy Savings Calculations:

Booster HW Heat BTU

WasherGalMin 8.33

LbsGal Use

MinWk

WkYr Temp Rise °F

1.0BTU

Lb °F

Elec Booster EnergyBooster HW Heat BTU

Elec Heat Value BTUkWh

Gas Booster EnergyBooster HW Heat BTU

HWH Eff. % Gas Heat Value BTUTherm

Elec Energy Cost Energy Use, kWh Cost of Elec $

kWh

Nat Gas Energy Cost Energy Use, Therms Cost of Nat Gas $

Therm

Page 428: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 58 of 60

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

ECM INPUTS Elec Booster Heater Nat Gas HWH

Estimated Dish Washer Use (GPM)

3.5 3.5

Dish Washer Use (Min/Week)

300 300

Dish Washer Use (Week/Yr) 42 42

Booster Temp Rise (°F) 60 60

Dom. HWH Efficiency (%) 100% 82% -18%

Booster HW Heat Required (MMBTUs)

22,041 22,041

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.159 0.159

Gas Cost ($/Therm) 1.25 1.25

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSProposed Booster Dom. HW Natural Gas Usage (Therms)

0 269 -269

Elec Booster Energy (kWh) 6,458 0 6,458

Elec Energy Cost ($) $1,027 $0 $1,027

Gas Energy Cost ($) $0 $336 -$336

Total Energy Cost ($) $1,027 $336 $691

COMMENTS:

INSTANT DOM. HWH BOOSTER CALCULATIONS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

This ECM is based on savings due to the fuel switching from electric to natural gas and includes affects from efficiency change.

There is no maintenance savings due to implementation of this ECM.

Page 429: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 59 of 60

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $9,300

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0Net Installation Cost ($): $9,300Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $691

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $691Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 13.5Simple Lifetime ROI 11.5%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $10,365Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 1%Net Present Value (NPV) ($1,050.89)

ECM #13 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 430: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – Ridge High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 60 of 60

V. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations include no cost/low cost measures, Operation & Maintenance (O&M) items, and water conservation measures with attractive paybacks. These measures are not eligible for the Smart Start Buildings incentives from the office of Clean Energy but save energy none the less.

A. Chemically clean the condenser and evaporator coils periodically to optimize efficiency. Poorly maintained heat transfer surfaces can reduce efficiency 5-10%.

B. Maintain all weather stripping on windows and doors.

C. Clean all light fixtures to maximize light output to avoid use of task lighting.

D. Provide more frequent air filter changes to decrease overall system power usage and maintain better IAQ.

E. Turn off computers when not in use. Ensure computers are not running in screen saver mode which saves the monitor screen not energy.

F. Ensure outside air dampers are functioning properly and only open during occupied mode.

It was noted at the site survey that the HVAC systems in several rooms were not controlling temperature correctly. The result of the controls issues causes space temperatures to become uncomfortable and drastic measures such as opening windows on extremely cold days. This type of issue requires a whole system controls evaluation for the building to determine where control problems are taking place. Based on information provided by the operations personnel, there are several control systems within the building which operate different section or systems throughout the building. In addition, multiple control vendors are utilized to maintain the control systems. The use of multiple control systems and control vendors to support the systems will very likely cause issues with the overall function of the building. The systems and controls throughout the district represent a large potential “energy leak” throughout the building. It is recommended to quantify the control system points and verify their proper operation through Retro-Commissioning. Retro-Commissioning allows facility owners to re-establish the operation of the HVAC systems back to the original specifications. A third party evaluation is highly recommended to review the controls of the systems and provide insight into the corrections needed. It is also recommended to consider the renovation of all control systems into one central control system to avoid the overlap and communication gap when utilizing multiple control systems. This renovation should be consistent across all facility throughout Bernards Public Schools to maximize the benefit of central controls.

Page 431: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX A1 of 1

LIFETIME ENERGY SAVINGS

LIFETIME MAINTENANCE

SAVINGSLIFETIME ROI SIMPLE PAYBACK INTERNAL RATE OF

RETURN (IRR)NET PRESENT VALUE

(NPV)

MATERIAL LABOR REBATES, INCENTIVES

NET INSTALLATION

COSTENERGY MAINT. / SREC TOTAL (Yearly Saving * ECM Lifetime)

(Yearly Maint Svaing * ECM Lifetime)

(Lifetime Savings - Net Cost) / (Net Cost) (Net cost / Yearly Savings)

($) ($) ($) ($) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) (Yr) ($) ($) (%) (Yr) ($) ($)

ECM #1 Lighting Upgrade $55,912 $0 $0 $55,912 $16,524 $0 $16,524 15 $247,860 $0 343.3% 3.4 28.90% $141,350.44

ECM #2 Lighting Upgrade (Gym C&D) $7,920 $0 $3,300 $4,620 $1,953 $0 $1,953 15 $29,295 $0 534.1% 2.4 42.05% $18,694.79

ECM #3 Lighting Controls $31,250 $0 $3,610 $27,640 $10,860 $0 $10,860 15 $162,900 $0 489.4% 2.5 39.01% $102,005.98

ECM #4 Computer Monitors $18,600 $0 $7,690 $10,910 $3,726 $0 $3,726 15 $55,890 $0 412.3% 2.9 33.71% $33,570.75

ECM #5 Unit Ventilator Energy Recovery $387,500 $77,500 $0 $465,000 $16,501 $0 $16,501 15 $247,515 $0 -46.8% 28.2 -7.01% ($268,012.13)

ECM #6 Valve Blanket & Pipe Insulation $1,050 $2,800 $0 $3,850 $856 $0 $856 15 $12,840 $0 233.5% 4.5 20.95% $6,368.87

ECM #7 VFD HW pumps $106,000 $0 $0 $106,000 $15,067 $0 $15,067 15 $226,005 $0 113.2% 7.0 11.40% $73,868.87

ECM #8 AC Unit Replacements $108,500 $113,000 $7,651 $213,849 $8,710 $0 $8,710 15 $130,650 $0 -38.9% 24.6 -5.61% ($109,869.59)

ECM #9 Demand Controlled Ventilation - GYM $15,000 $57,000 $0 $72,000 $4,419 $0 $4,419 15 $66,280 $0 -7.9% 16.3 -1.02% ($19,249.95)

ECM #10 Condensing boiler in old boiler room $150,000 $300,000 $9,000 $441,000 $9,057 $0 $9,057 30 $271,715 $0 -38.4% 48.7 -2.88% ($263,475.48)

ECM #11 NEMA Premium Eficiency Motors $25,156 $0 $710 $24,446 $1,129 $0 $1,129 15 $16,940 $0 -30.7% 21.6 -4.27% ($10,963.92)

ECM #12 Variable Kitchen Exhuast $23,500 $0 $0 $23,500 $2,452 $0 $2,452 15 $36,785 $0 56.5% 9.6 6.21% $5,775.50

ECM #13 Kitchen Domestic Booster Heater $3,550 $5,750 $0 $9,300 $691 $0 $691 15 $10,365 $0 11.5% 13.5 1.39% ($1,050.89)

REM #1 Solar Photovoltaic System $1,608,390 $0 $0 $1,608,390 $103,987 $35,506 $139,493 15 $2,092,397 $532,592 30.1% 11.5 3.48% $56,869.57

Notes: 1) The variable Cn in the formulas for Internal Rate of Return and Net Present Value stands for the cash flow during each period.2) The variable DR in the NPV equation stands for Discount Rate3) For NPV and IRR calculations: From n=0 to N periods where N is the lifetime of ECM and Cn is the cash flow during each period .

REM RENEWABLE ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY

ECM COST & SAVINGS BREAKDOWNCONCORD ENGINEERING GROUP

Bernards – Ridge High School

INSTALLATION COST YEARLY SAVINGSECM

LIFETIMEDESCRIPTIONECM NO.

ECM ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 432: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 1 of 4

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 520 BURNT MILL ROAD VOORHEES, NEW JERSEY 08043 PHONE: (856) 427-0200 FAX: (856) 427-6508

SmartStart Building Incentives The NJ SmartStart Buildings Program offers financial incentives on a wide variety of building system equipment. The incentives were developed to help offset the initial cost of energy-efficient equipment. The following tables show the current available incentives as of February 15, 2011:

Electric Chillers Water-Cooled Chillers $12 - $170 per ton

Air-Cooled Chillers $8 - $52 per ton Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Gas Cooling Gas Absorption Chillers $185 - $400 per ton

Gas Engine-Driven Chillers Calculated through custom measure path)

Desiccant Systems $1.00 per cfm – gas or electric

Electric Unitary HVAC Unitary AC and Split Systems $73 - $92 per ton

Air-to-Air Heat Pumps $73 - $92 per ton Water-Source Heat Pumps $81 per ton

Packaged Terminal AC & HP $65 per ton Central DX AC Systems $40- $72 per ton

Dual Enthalpy Economizer Controls $250 Occupancy Controlled Thermostat

(Hospitality & Institutional Facility) $75 per thermostat

Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Gas Heating Gas Fired Boilers < 300 MBH $300 per unit

Gas Fired Boilers ≥ 300 - 1500 MBH $1.75 per MBH

Gas Fired Boilers ≥1500 - ≤ 4000 MBH $1.00 per MBH

Gas Fired Boilers > 4000 MBH (Calculated through Custom Measure Path)

Gas Furnaces $300 - $400 per unit, AFUE ≥ 92%

Page 433: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 2 of 4

Ground Source Heat Pumps

Closed Loop $450 per ton, EER ≥ 16 $600 per ton, EER ≥ 18 $750 per ton, EER ≥ 20

Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Variable Frequency Drives Variable Air Volume $65 - $155 per hp Chilled-Water Pumps $60 per VFD rated hp

Compressors $5,250 to $12,500 per drive Cooling Towers ≥ 10 hp $60 per VFD rated hp

Natural Gas Water Heating

Gas Water Heaters ≤ 50 gallons, 0.67 energy factor or better $50 per unit

Gas-Fired Water Heaters > 50 gallons $1.00 - $2.00 per MBH Gas-Fired Booster Water Heaters $17 - $35 per MBH Gas Fired Tankless Water Heaters $300 per unit

Prescriptive Lighting Retro fit of T12 to T-5 or T-8 Lamps

w/Electronic Ballast in Existing Facilities

$10 per fixture (1-4 lamps)

Replacement of T12 with new T-5 or T-8 Lamps w/Electronic Ballast in

Existing Facilities $25 per fixture (1-4 lamps)

Replacement of incandescent with screw-in PAR 38 or PAR 30 (CFL)

bulb $7 per bulb

T-8 reduced Wattage (28w/25w 4’, 1-4 lamps)

Lamp & ballast replacement $10 per fixture

Hard-Wired Compact Fluorescent $25 - $30 per fixture

Metal Halide w/Pulse Start Including Parking Lot $25 per fixture

T-5 and T-8 High Bay Fixtures $16 - $200 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Retrofit with induction lamp, power coupler and generator

(must be 30% less watts/fixture than HID system)

$50 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Replacement with new HID ≥ 100w $70 per fixture

Page 434: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 3 of 4

Prescriptive Lighting - LED

LED New Exit Sign Fixture Existing Facility < 75 kw Existing Facility > 75 kw

$20 per fixture $10 per fixture

LED Display Case Lighting $30 per display case

LED Shelf-Mtd. Display & Task Lights $15 per linear foot

LED Portable Desk Lamp $20 per fixture

LED Wall-wash Lights $30 per fixture

LED Recessed Down Lights $35 per fixture LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Area

and Roadway Luminaries $175 per fixture

LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Decorative Luminaries $175 per fixture

LED Outdoor Wall-Mounted Area Luminaries $100 per fixture

LED Parking Garage Luminaries $100 per fixture

LED Track or Mono-Point Directional Lighting Fixtures $50 per fixture

LED High-Bay and Low-Bay Fixtures for Commercial & Industrial Bldgs. $150 per fixture

LED High-Bay-Aisle Lighting $150 per fixture

LED Bollard Fixtures $50 per fixture

LED Linear Panels (2x2 Troffers only) $100 per fixture

LED Fuel Pump Canopy $100 per fixture

LED Refrigerator/Freezer case lighting replacement of fluorescent in medium

and low temperature display case

$42 per 5 foot $65 per 6 foot

Page 435: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 4 of 4

Lighting Controls – Occupancy Sensors

Wall Mounted $20 per control Remote Mounted $35 per control

Daylight Dimmers $25 per fixture Occupancy Controlled hi-low

Fluorescent Controls $25 per fixture controlled

Lighting Controls – HID or Fluorescent Hi-Bay Controls Occupancy hi-low $75 per fixture controlled Daylight Dimming $75 per fixture controlled

Daylight Dimming - office $50 per fixture controlled

Premium Motors Three-Phase Motors $45 - $700 per motor

Fractional HP Motors Electronic Communicated Motors (replacing shaded pole motors in

refrigerator/freezer cases)

$40 per electronic communicated motor

Other Equipment Incentives

Performance Lighting

$1.00 per watt per SF below program incentive threshold, currently 5% more energy efficient than ASHRAE 90.1-

2007 for New Construction and Complete Renovation

Custom Electric and Gas Equipment Incentives not prescriptive

Custom Measures

$0.16 KWh and $1.60/Therm of 1st year savings, or a buy down to a 1 year

payback on estimated savings. Minimum required savings of 75,000 KWh or 1,500 Therms and a IRR of at

least 10%. Multi Measures Bonus 15%

Page 436: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

OMB No. 2060-0347

STATEMENT OF ENERGY PERFORMANCEBT Ridge High School

Building ID: 2490930 For 12-month Period Ending: October 31, 20101

Date SEP becomes ineligible: N/A Date SEP Generated: March 04, 2011

FacilityBT Ridge High School268 South Finley AvenueBasking Ridge, NJ 07920

Facility OwnerBernards Public Schools101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Primary Contact for this FacilityConnie Coriell101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Year Built: 1961Gross Floor Area (ft2): 297,152

Energy Performance Rating2 (1-100) 62

Site Energy Use Summary3

Electricity - Grid Purchase(kBtu) 10,181,678 Natural Gas (kBtu)4 13,552,504 Total Energy (kBtu) 23,734,182

Energy Intensity5 Site (kBtu/ft2/yr) 80 Source (kBtu/ft2/yr) 162 Emissions (based on site energy use) Greenhouse Gas Emissions (MtCO2e/year) N/A Electric Distribution Utility N/A National Average Comparison National Average Site EUI 90 National Average Source EUI 183 % Difference from National Average Source EUI -11% Building Type K-12

School

Stamp of Certifying Professional

Based on the conditions observed at thetime of my visit to this building, I certify that

the information contained within thisstatement is accurate.

Meets Industry Standards6 for Indoor EnvironmentalConditions:Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality N/A Acceptable Thermal Environmental Conditions N/A Adequate Illumination N/A

Certifying ProfessionalMichael Fischette520 S. Burnt Mill Road Voorhees, NJ 08043

Notes: 1. Application for the ENERGY STAR must be submitted to EPA within 4 months of the Period Ending date. Award of the ENERGY STAR is not final until approval is received from EPA.2. The EPA Energy Performance Rating is based on total source energy. A rating of 75 is the minimum to be eligible for the ENERGY STAR.3. Values represent energy consumption, annualized to a 12-month period.4. Natural Gas values in units of volume (e.g. cubic feet) are converted to kBtu with adjustments made for elevation based on Facility zip code.5. Values represent energy intensity, annualized to a 12-month period.6. Based on Meeting ASHRAE Standard 62 for ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality, ASHRAE Standard 55 for thermal comfort, and IESNA Lighting Handbook for lighting quality.

The government estimates the average time needed to fill out this form is 6 hours (includes the time for entering energy data, Licensed Professional facility inspection, and notarizing the SEP) andwelcomes suggestions for reducing this level of effort. Send comments (referencing OMB control number) to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S., EPA (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,NW, Washington, D.C. 20460.

EPA Form 5900-16

Appendix CPage 1 of 7

Page 437: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

ENERGY STAR®

Data Checklistfor Commercial Buildings

In order for a building to qualify for the ENERGY STAR, a Professional Engineer (PE) or a Registered Architect (RA) must validate the accuracy of the data underlyingthe building's energy performance rating. This checklist is designed to provide an at-a-glance summary of a property's physical and operating characteristics, as well asits total energy consumption, to assist the PE or RA in double-checking the information that the building owner or operator has entered into Portfolio Manager.

Please complete and sign this checklist and include it with the stamped, signed Statement of Energy Performance.NOTE: You must check each box to indicate that each value is correct, OR include a note.

CRITERION VALUE AS ENTERED INPORTFOLIO MANAGER VERIFICATION QUESTIONS NOTES

Building Name BT Ridge High School Is this the official building name to be displayed inthe ENERGY STAR Registry of LabeledBuildings?

Type K-12 School Is this an accurate description of the space inquestion?

Location 268 South Finley Avenue,Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Is this address accurate and complete? Correctweather normalization requires an accurate zipcode.

Single Structure Single Facility

Does this SEP represent a single structure? SEPscannot be submitted for multiple-buildingcampuses (with the exception of acute care orchildren's hospitals) nor can they be submitted asrepresenting only a portion of a building

BT Ridge High School (K-12 School)

CRITERION VALUE AS ENTERED INPORTFOLIO MANAGER VERIFICATION QUESTIONS NOTES

Gross Floor Area 297,152 Sq. Ft.

Does this square footage include all supportingfunctions such as kitchens and break rooms usedby staff, storage areas, administrative areas,elevators, stairwells, atria, vent shafts, etc. Alsonote that existing atriums should only include thebase floor area that it occupies. Interstitial(plenum) space between floors should not beincluded in the total. Finally gross floor area is notthe same as leasable space. Leasable space is asubset of gross floor area.

Open Weekends? Yes

Is this building normally open at all on theweekends? This includes activities beyond thework conducted by maintenance, cleaning, andsecurity personnel. Weekend activity could includeany time when the space is used for classes,performances or other school or communityactivities. If the building is open on the weekend aspart of the standard schedule during one or moreseasons, the building should select ?yes? for openweekends. The ?yes? response should applywhether the building is open for one or both of theweekend days.

Number of PCs 729 Is this the number of personal computers in theK12 School?

Number of walk-inrefrigeration/freezer

units 2

Is this the total number of commercial walk-in typefreezers and coolers? These units are typicallyfound in storage and receiving areas.

Presence ofcooking facilities Yes

Does this school have a dedicated space in whichfood is prepared and served to students? If theschool has space in which food for students is onlykept warm and/or served to students, or has only agalley that is used by teachers and staff then theanswer is "no".

Percent Cooled 80 % Is this the percentage of the total floor space withinthe facility that is served by mechanical coolingequipment?

Percent Heated 100 % Is this the percentage of the total floor space withinthe facility that is served by mechanical heatingequipment?

Months 12(Optional) Is this school in operation for at least 8 months ofthe year?

Page 1 of 4

Appendix CPage 2 of 7

Page 438: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

High School? Yes

Is this building a high school (teaching grades 10,11, and/or 12)? If the building teaches to highschool students at all, the user should check 'yes'to 'high school'. For example, if the school teachesto grades K-12 (elementary/middle and highschool), the user should check 'yes' to 'highschool'.

Page 2 of 4

Appendix CPage 3 of 7

Page 439: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

ENERGY STAR®

Data Checklistfor Commercial Buildings

Energy ConsumptionPower Generation Plant or Distribution Utility:

Fuel Type: Electricity

Meter: Electricity (kWh (thousand Watt-hours))Space(s): Entire Facility

Generation Method: Grid Purchase

Start Date End Date Energy Use (kWh (thousand Watt-hours))

10/01/2010 10/31/2010 245,239.00

09/01/2010 09/30/2010 214,591.00

08/01/2010 08/31/2010 245,220.00

07/01/2010 07/31/2010 229,922.00

06/01/2010 06/30/2010 237,500.00

05/01/2010 05/31/2010 242,693.00

04/01/2010 04/30/2010 238,176.00

03/01/2010 03/31/2010 338,883.00

02/01/2010 02/28/2010 299,276.00

01/01/2010 01/31/2010 288,836.00

12/01/2009 12/31/2009 195,406.00

11/01/2009 11/30/2009 208,337.00

Electricity Consumption (kWh (thousand Watt-hours)) 2,984,079.00

Electricity Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 10,181,677.55

Total Electricity (Grid Purchase) Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 10,181,677.55

Is this the total Electricity (Grid Purchase) consumption at this building including allElectricity meters?

Fuel Type: Natural Gas

Meter: Natural Gas (therms)Space(s): Entire Facility

Start Date End Date Energy Use (therms)

10/01/2010 10/31/2010 7,509.00

09/01/2010 09/30/2010 727.00

08/01/2010 08/31/2010 711.00

07/01/2010 07/31/2010 665.00

06/01/2010 06/30/2010 666.00

05/01/2010 05/31/2010 3,216.00

04/01/2010 04/30/2010 9,695.00

03/01/2010 03/31/2010 19,337.00

02/01/2010 02/28/2010 23,490.00

01/01/2010 01/31/2010 28,969.00

Page 3 of 4

Appendix CPage 4 of 7

Page 440: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

12/01/2009 12/31/2009 29,401.00

Natural Gas Consumption (therms) 124,386.00

Natural Gas Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 12,438,600.00

Total Natural Gas Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 12,438,600.00

Is this the total Natural Gas consumption at this building including all Natural Gas meters?

Additional FuelsDo the fuel consumption totals shown above represent the total energy use of this building?Please confirm there are no additional fuels (district energy, generator fuel oil) used in this facility.

On-Site Solar and Wind EnergyDo the fuel consumption totals shown above include all on-site solar and/or wind power located atyour facility? Please confirm that no on-site solar or wind installations have been omitted from thislist. All on-site systems must be reported.

Certifying Professional (When applying for the ENERGY STAR, the Certifying Professional must be the same PE or RA that signed and stamped the SEP.)

Name: _____________________________________________ Date: _____________

Signature: ______________________________________ Signature is required when applying for the ENERGY STAR.

Page 4 of 4

Appendix CPage 5 of 7

Page 441: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

FOR YOUR RECORDS ONLY. DO NOT SUBMIT TO EPA.

Please keep this Facility Summary for your own records; do not submit it to EPA. Only the Statement of Energy Performance(SEP), Data Checklist and Letter of Agreement need to be submitted to EPA when applying for the ENERGY STAR.

FacilityBT Ridge High School268 South Finley AvenueBasking Ridge, NJ 07920

Facility OwnerBernards Public Schools101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Primary Contact for this FacilityConnie Coriell101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

General InformationBT Ridge High School

Gross Floor Area Excluding Parking: (ft2) 297,152 Year Built 1961 For 12-month Evaluation Period Ending Date: October 31, 2010

Facility Space Use SummaryBT Ridge High School

Space Type K-12 School

Gross Floor Area(ft2) 297,152

Open Weekends? Yes

Number of PCs 729

Number of walk-in refrigeration/freezerunits 2

Presence of cooking facilities Yes

Percent Cooled 80

Percent Heated 100

Monthso 12

High School? Yes

School Districtod N/A

Energy Performance ComparisonEvaluation Periods Comparisons

Performance Metrics Current(Ending Date 10/31/2010)

Baseline(Ending Date 10/31/2010) Rating of 75 Target National Average

Energy Performance Rating 62 62 75 N/A 50

Energy Intensity

Site (kBtu/ft2) 80 80 70 N/A 90

Source (kBtu/ft2) 162 162 143 N/A 183

Energy Cost

$/year $ 571,004.17 $ 571,004.17 $ 502,872.58 N/A $ 643,067.80

$/ft2/year $ 1.92 $ 1.92 $ 1.69 N/A $ 2.16

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

MtCO2e/year N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

kgCO2e/ft2/year N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

More than 50% of your building is defined as K-12 School. Please note that your rating accounts for all of the spaces listed. The National Average column presentsenergy performance data your building would have if your building had an average rating of 50. Notes:o - This attribute is optional.d - A default value has been supplied by Portfolio Manager.

Appendix CPage 6 of 7

Page 442: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

2010BT Ridge High School268 South Finley AvenueBasking Ridge, NJ 07920

Portfolio Manager Building ID: 2490930

The energy use of this building has been measured and compared to other similar buildings using theEnvironmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Energy Performance Scale of 1–100, with 1 being the least energyefficient and 100 the most energy efficient. For more information, visit energystar.gov/benchmark.

This building’sscore

62

100

Most Efficient

This building uses 162 kBtu per square foot per year.*

*Based on source energy intensity for the 12 month period ending October 2010

Date of certification

Date Generated: 03/04/2011

Statement ofEnergy Performance

1

Least Efficient

50

Average

Buildings with a score of75 or higher may qualifyfor EPA’s ENERGY STAR.

I certify that the information contained within this statement is accurate and in accordance with U.S.Environmental Protection Agency’s measurement standards, found at energystar.gov

Appendix CPage 7 of 7

Page 443: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 1 of 24

BoilersTag Boiler-1 & 2 Boiler 3 - 6 Boilers 7 - 10

Unit Type Sectional cast iron Modular Bioler Condensing Boilers

Qty 2 4 4

Location Old Boiler Room Old Boiler Room New Boiler Room

Area Served Bldg Hot Water (except 700 wing addition)

Bldg Hot Water (except 700 wing addition) New Addition 700 wing

Manufacturer Weil McLain Patterson Kelly Aerco

Model # 1488 (88 Series) SN-1700-2 Benchmark 2.0 Series

Serial # N/A CK38-98-9520, thru CK38-98-9523 N/A

Input Capacity (MBH) 4,474 1,700 2,000

Rated Output Capacity (MBH) 3,550 1,445 1840

Approx. Efficiency % 79% 85% 90%

Fuel Natural Gas Natural Gas Natural Gas

Burner Make & Model Industrial CombustionFPLG-42 N/A N/A

Max / Min Firing Rate Turndown Ration

3753 / 900 MBH4.2 1700 / 1020 MBH 1.6 2000 / 100 MBH 20

Approx. Age 50 13 3

ASHRAE Service Life 30 20 20

Remaining Life (20) 7 17

Comments Boiler in Good / Fair condition, Combusion Fan

Motor 3 HP, Boiler in Good Condition

Boilers in excellent condtion

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Ridge High School

Page 444: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 2 of 24

Domestic Water HeatersTag HWH-1 HWH-2

Unit Type Boiler / Storage Tank Domestic Hot Water Boiler

Qty 1 1

Location Old Boiler Room New Boiler Room

Area Served Original Building 700 wing domestic hot water fixtures

Manufacturer AO Smith TurboPower Gas

Model # Dura Max Series 250 N 125A-TP

Serial # NB47094 0707121992

Size (Gallons) 300 (Est) 125

Input Capacity (MBH/KW)

2,289 199

Recovery (Gal/Hr) N/A 250 @ 80°F Rise

Efficiency % 94% 84%

Fuel Natural Gas Natural Gas

Approx Age 11 4

ASHRAE Service Life 20 12

Remaining Life 9 8

Comments Boiler / Tank in Good Condition Excellent Condition

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Ridge High School

Page 445: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 3 of 24

PumpsTag HWP-1 & 2 HWP 3 & 4 HWP 5 & 6

Unit Type Floor Mounted End suction Pipe mounted in line Floor Mounted End

Suction

Qty 2 2 2

Location Old Boiler Room Old Boiler Room New Boiler Room

Area Served Building Hot Water (except 700 wing)

Building Hot Water (except 700 wing)

Building Hot Water - 700 Wing

Manufacturer Crane Pumps & Systems Taco Patterson Pump Company

Model # 7001467 60 / 90 Series (style) E3J9A-1

Serial # 71158377 N/A HVAC - C065581-01, HVAC - C065581-02

Horse Power 20 / 15 25.00 15

Flow N/A N/A 370 GPM @ 80 FT HD

Motor Info Westinghouse / Lincoln Electric Baldor WEG

Electrical Power 460V / 3 / 60 460V / 3 / 60 480V / 3 / 60

RPM 1755 / 1750 1760 1775

Motor Efficiency % 91.0% 86.5% 89.5% 93%

Approx Age Unknown Unknown 3

ASHRAE Service Life 20 20 20

Remaining Life #N/A #N/A 17

Comments Fair Condition Fair / Poor Condition Good Condition

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Ridge High School

Page 446: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 4 of 24

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU-1 RTU-2 RTU-3,4

Unit Type Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop

Qty 1 1 2

Location Roof (200 Wing) Roof (200 Wing) Roof (222, 223)

Area Served 200 Wing 200 Wing Rm (222, 223)

Manufacturer AAON Lennox Lennox

Model # RM-A04-8-0-BA01 LCA072HN1G LCA120HN1G

Serial # 200707-AMCD04712 5698M03035 5698M04733, 5698M04734

Cooling Type Packaged DX Packaged DX Packaged DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 4 tons 6.0 10.0

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

11.4 SEER 10.5 EER 11 EER

Heating Type Hot Water Coil None * None *

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A N/A

Fuel N/A N/A N/A

Approx Age 4 13 13

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 11 2 2

Comments Excellent Condition, 1 HP Fan motor, Nema Premium,

VFD Drive

Fair Condition, *Potential non-factory HW Heat, 2 HP

Fan motor, 84% Eff (Est)

Fair condition, *Potential non-factory HW Heat, 3.0 HP Fan Motor, 87.5% Eff.

(Est)

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Ridge High School

Page 447: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 5 of 24

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU - 5,6 RTU - 7 RTU-8,9

Unit Type Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop

Qty 2 1 2

Location Roof (313, 314 ) Roof (300 wing), next to 313 & 314 Roof (Media Center)

Area Served Rm (313, 314) 300 wing Media Center

Manufacturer Trane Trane Lennox

Model # YCD091D3HGBE YCD… LCA120HN1G

Serial # L31102916D, L31102915D N/A 5698M04736,

5698M04737

Cooling Type Packaged DX Packaged DX Packaged DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 7.5 (Est) 3.0 (Est) 10.0

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

10 EER (Est) 10 SEER (Est) 11 EER

Heating Type Gas Heat Exchanger Gas Heat Exchanger None *

Heating Input (MBH) 205 MBH 48 N/A

Efficiency 81% (new) 79% (new) N/A

Fuel Nat Gas Nat Gas N/A

Approx Age 15 15 13

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 0 0 2

Comments Poor Condition, 1 HP fan motor, 82.5% Eff (Est)

Poor Condition, 1/4 HP Fan motor

Fair condition, *Potential non-factory HW Heat, 5.0 HP Fan Motor, 87.5% Eff.

Page 448: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 6 of 24

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU - 10 RTU-11 RTU-12

Unit Type Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop

Qty 1 1 1

Location Roof (413) Roof ( 411) Roof (409)

Area Served Rm (413) Rm (411) Rm (409)

Manufacturer Lennox Lennox Carrier

Model # LCA060HN1G LCA088HN1G N/A

Serial # 5699C00618 5698M03148 N/A

Cooling Type Packaged DX Packaged DX Packaged DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 5.0 7.5 (Est) 5.0 (Est)

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

12 SEER 10.2 EER 10 SEER (Est)

Heating Type None * None * None

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A N/A

Fuel N/A N/A N/A

Approx Age 12 13 15 (Est)

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 3 2 0

Comments Fair condition, Potential non-factory HW Heat, 1.5 HP Fan motor, 84% Eff (Est)

Fair condition, Potential non-factory HW Heat, 2.0 HP

fan motor, 84%Poor Condition

Page 449: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 7 of 24

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU - 13 RTU-14 RTU-15

Unit Type Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop

Qty 1 1 1

Location Roof (405) Roof (Main Offices) Roof (615)

Area Served Rm (405) Offices at Main Entrance Rm (615)

Manufacturer Fraser Johnson AAON Lennox

Model # DAPB-F042AA RN-040-3-0-BB04 LCA042HN1G

Serial # NLEM126774 200707-BNGV02900 5698M077

Cooling Type Packaged DX Packaged DX Packaged DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 3.5 (Est) 40.0 3.5

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

9.4 EER 10.5 EER 12 SEER

Heating Type Electric Heat Gas Heat Exchanger None *

Heating Input (MBH) N/A 540 N/A

Efficiency N/A 80% N/A

Fuel Electric Heat Nat Gas N/A

Approx Age 15 4 13

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 0 11 2

Comments Poor Condition, Electric Heat capacity unknown, 3/4

HP Fan motor

Excellent Condition, (2) 10 HP Fan motors, (2) 2 HP Exhaust motors, Nema Premium, VFD drive

Fair condition, *Potential non-factory HW Heat, 3/4

HP Fan motor,

Page 450: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 8 of 24

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU - 16 RTU-17 RTU-18

Unit Type Make Up Air Unit Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop

Qty 1 1 1

Location Roof (618) Roof (Cafeteria) Roof (Over Kitchen)

Area Served Rm (618) Cafeteria Kitchen

Manufacturer Reznor Lennox Lennox

Model # N/A LCA300HN1G LCA060HN1G

Serial # N/A 5698M02341 5698M03040

Cooling Type None Packaged DX Packaged DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) N/A 25.0 5.0

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

N/A 10 EER 12 SEER

Heating Type Direct Fired Gas Heat None * None *

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A

Efficiency ~98% N/A N/A

Fuel Nat Gas N/A N/A

Approx Age 15 (Est) 13 13

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 0 2 2

CommentsFair to Poor Condition, 100% Make Up air unit

Fair Condition, *Potential non-factory HW Heat, 7.5

HP Fan motor, 89.5% (Est)

Fair condition, *Potential non-factory HW Heat, 1.5 HP Fan motor, 84% Eff

(Est)

Page 451: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 9 of 24

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU - 19 RTU-20 RTU-21,22

Unit Type Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop

Qty 1 1 2

Location Roof (Over Kitchen) Roof (Athletic Offices) Roof (Locker Rooms)

Area Served Kitchen / Storage Athletic Offices / Main Entrance Locker Rooms

Manufacturer Lennox AAON AAON

Model # LCA120HN1G RM-020-3-0-BB02 RM-016-3-0-0000

Serial # 5698M04735 200710-AMGP37178 200710-AMGM37177 200710-AMGM37176

Cooling Type Packaged DX Packaged DX None

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 10.0 20.0 N/A

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

11 EER 11.5 EER N/A

Heating Type None* Gas Heat Exchanger Gas Heat Exchanger

Heating Input (MBH) N/A 390 480

Efficiency N/A 81% 81%

Fuel N/A Nat Gas Nat Gas

Approx Age 13 4 4

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 2 11 11

Comments Fair Condition, *Potential non-factory HW Heat, 2 HP

Fan motor, 84% (Est)

Excellent Condition, 7.5 HP Fan motor, 5 HP Exhaust Motor, Nema Premium,

VFD Drive

Excellent Condition, 2 HP Fan motor, Nema Premium

Page 452: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 10 of 24

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU - 19 RTU-20 RTU-21,22

Unit Type Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop

Qty 1 1 2

Location Roof (Over Kitchen) Roof (Athletic Offices) Roof (Locker Rooms)

Area Served Kitchen / Storage Athletic Offices / Main Entrance Locker Rooms

Manufacturer Lennox AAON AAON

Model # LCA120HN1G RM-020-3-0-BB02 RM-016-3-0-0000

Serial # 5698M04735 200710-AMGP37178 200710-AMGM37177 200710-AMGM37176

Cooling Type Packaged DX Packaged DX Packaged DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 10.0 20.0 16.0

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

11 EER 11.5 EER 12.2 EER

Heating Type None* Gas Heat Exchanger Gas Heat Exchanger

Heating Input (MBH) N/A 390 480

Efficiency N/A 81% 81%

Fuel N/A Nat Gas Nat Gas

Approx Age 13 4 4

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 2 11 11

Comments Fair Condition, *Potential non-factory HW Heat, 2 HP

Fan motor, 84% (Est)

Excellent Condition, 7.5 HP Fan motor, 5 HP Exhaust Motor, Nema Premium

Excellent Condition, 2 HP Fan motor, Nema Premium

Page 453: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 11 of 24

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU - 23,24 RTU-25, 26 RTU-27

Unit Type Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop

Qty 2 2 1

Location Roof (New Gym) Roof (700 wing) Roof (700 wing)

Area Served New Gym 700 wing 700 / 600 wing lobby

Manufacturer AAON AAON AAON

Model # RN-031-3-0-BB04 RM-A03-3-0-BA01 RM-010-3-0-BB02

Serial # 200710-BNGU03178, 200710-BNGU03177

200707-AMCC04709 200707-AMCC04710 200707-AMCJ04706

Cooling Type Packaged DX Packaged DX Packaged DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 31.0 3.0 10.0

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

11.7 EER 12.8 SEER 10.5 EER

Heating Type Gas Heat Exchanger None None

Heating Input (MBH) 810 N/A N/A

Efficiency 84% N/A N/A

Fuel Nat Gas N/A N/A

Approx Age 4 4 4

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 11 11 11

Comments Excellent Condition, (2) 10 HP Fan motor, (2) 3 HP Exhaust motor, Nema

Premium

Excellent Condition, 1 HP Fan motor, 1 HP Exhaust

Motor, Nema Premium, One motor standard Eff. 82.5%,

VFD Drive

Excellent Condition, 3 HP Fan motor, 2 HP Exhaust motor, Nema Premium,

VFD Drive

Page 454: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 12 of 24

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU - 28 RTU-29 RTU-30,31

Unit Type Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop

Qty 1 1 2

Location Roof (700 wing) Roof (600 wing) Roof (600 wing)

Area Served 700 wing 600 wing 600 wing

Manufacturer AAON AAON McQuay

Model # RM-030-3-0-BB02 RM-A04-3-0-BB01 RDS708BY

Serial # 200707-AMCT04715 200707-AMGD34142 39C00318, 39C00317

Cooling Type Packaged DX Packaged DX None

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 26.0 4.0 N/A

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

9.5 EER 11.4 SEER N/A

Heating Type Hot Water Coil Gas Heat Exchanger Hot Water Coil

Heating Input (MBH) N/A 90 N/A

Efficiency N/A 81% N/A

Fuel N/A Nat Gas N/A

Approx Age 4 4 15 (Est)

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 11 11 0

Comments Excellent Condition, (1) 10 HP Fan motor, (2) 2 HP Return Fan motor, Nema

Premium

Excellent Condition, 1 HP Fan motor Eff 82.5% Eff.

Excellent Condition, 2 HP Fan motor 84% Eff.

Page 455: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 13 of 24

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU - 32 RTU-33 RTU-34

Unit Type Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop

Qty 1 1 1

Location Roof (Rooms behind Auditorium Stage)

Roof (Rooms behind Auditorium Stage) Roof (231)

Area Served Storage Rooms Storage Rooms Rm 231

Manufacturer AAON AAON AAON

Model # RM-020-3-0-BB02 RM-013-3-0-BB02 RM-A05-3-0-BA01

Serial # 200707-AMGP34156 200707-AMCK04707 200707-AMCE04711

Cooling Type Packaged DX Packaged DX Packaged DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 20.0 13.0 5.0

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

11.5 EER 10.8 EER 11.8 SEER

Heating Type Gas Heat Exchanger None None

Heating Input (MBH) 270 N/A N/A

Efficiency 81% N/A N/A

Fuel Nat Gas N/A N/A

Approx Age 4 4 4

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 11 11 11

Comments Excellent Condition, 5 HP Fan motor, 2 HP Exhaust

motor, Nema Premium, VFD Drive

Excellent Condition, 5 HP Fan motor, 2 HP Exhaust Motor, Nema Premium,

VFD Drive

Excellent Condition, 2 HP Fan motor, 84% Eff., 1 HP Exhaust motor, 82.5% Eff,

VFD Drive

Page 456: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 14 of 24

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU - 35 RTU-36 RTU-37

Unit Type Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop

Qty 1 1 1

Location Roof ( 230) Roof (Over Auditorium Entrance)

Roof (Over Auditorium Entrance)

Area Served Rm 230 Auditorium Rm next to Auditorium

Manufacturer AAON AAON AAON

Model # RM-016-3-0-BB02 RN-040-3-0-BB04 RM-010-3-0-BB02

Serial # 200707-AMCM04716 200707-BNCV00927 200707-AMGJ34136

Cooling Type Packaged DX Packaged DX Packaged DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 16.0 40.0 10.0

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

12.2 EER 10.5 EER 11.0 EER

Heating Type None None Gas Heat Exchanger

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A 180

Efficiency N/A N/A 81%

Fuel N/A N/A Nat Gas

Approx Age 4 4 4

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 11 11 11

Comments Excellent Condition, 7.5 HP Fan motor, 2 HP Exhaust

motor, Nema Premium, VFD Drive

Excellent Condition, (2) 7.5 HP Fan motor, (1) 3 HP Exhaust Motor, Nema Premium, VFD Drive

Excellent Condition, 3 HP Fan motor, 1 HP Exhaust motor, Nema Premium,

VFD Drive

Page 457: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 15 of 24

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU - 38 RTU-39

Unit Type Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop

Qty 1 1

Location Roof (Over Auditorium Entrance)

Roof (Over Auditorium Entrance)

Area Served Auditorium Auditorium

Manufacturer AAON AAON

Model # RN-040-3-0-BB04 RM-010-3-0-BB02

Serial # 200707-BNCV00928 200707-AMGJ34135

Cooling Type Packaged DX Packaged DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 40.0 10.0

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

10.5 EER 11.0 EER

Heating Type None Gas Heat Exchanger

Heating Input (MBH) N/A 180

Efficiency N/A 81%

Fuel N/A Nat Gas

Approx Age 4 4

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15

Remaining Life 11 11

Comments Excellent Condition, Energy Recovery Wheel, 20 HP Fan

motor, (2) 5 HP Exhaust motor, Nema Premium, VFD

Drive

Excellent Condition, 3 HP Fan motor, 1 HP Exhaust Motor, Nema Premium,

VFD Drive

Page 458: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 16 of 24

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag CU-1 CU-2,3 CU-4

Unit Type Split System Split System Split System

Qty 1 2 1

Location Roof (200 wing) Roof (200 Wing) Roof (200 Wing)

Area Served 200 Wing Classrooms 200 Wing Classrooms 200 Wing Classrooms

Manufacturer Sanyo Sanyo Sanyo

Model # C2472 C1822 C1211

Serial # 0062562 0069792, 0069692 00856691

Cooling Type Split System DX Split System DX Split System DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 2.0 1.5 1.0

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

17.0 SEER 10.2 SEER 10 SEER

Heating Type None None None

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A N/A

Fuel N/A N/A N/A

Approx Age 5 12 13

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 10 3 2

Comments Good Condition, R-410A, Inverter technology

compressorFair Condition. R-22 Fair Condition. R-22

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Ridge High School

Page 459: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 17 of 24

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag CU-5 CU-6 CU-7

Unit Type Split System Split System Split System

Qty 1 1 1

Location Roof (200 wing) Roof (200 Wing) Roof (200 Wing)

Area Served 200 Wing Classrooms 200 Wing Classrooms 200 Wing Classrooms

Manufacturer Sanyo Sanyo Mitsubishi Electric

Model # C1852 C1822 MU-A12WA

Serial # 0191033 0069992 6002217

Cooling Type Split System DX Split System DX Split System DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 1.5 1.5 1.0

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

10.6 SEER 10.2 SEER 10 SEER

Heating Type None None None

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A N/A

Fuel N/A N/A N/A

Approx Age 8 12 13

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 7 3 2

Comments Fair Condition, R-22 Fair Condition. R-22 Fair Condition. R-410A

Page 460: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 18 of 24

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag CU-8,9,10 CU-11 CU-12

Unit Type Split System Split System Split System

Qty 3 1 1

Location Roof (Over 222,223) Roof (300 Wing) Roof (200 Wing)

Area Served small rooms next to 222, 223 300 Wing Classrooms 200 Wing IT closet

Manufacturer Airedale Airedale Airedale

Model # N/A SCC24DFA0A0AA0A SCC12DAA0A0AA0A

Serial # N/A 1-99-B-5688-9 1-99-A-2304-4

Cooling Type Split System DX Split System DX Split System DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 2.0 2.0 1.0

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

10 SEER (Est) 10 SEER (Est) 10 SEER (Est)

Heating Type None None None

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A N/A

Fuel N/A N/A N/A

Approx Age 12 12 12

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 3 3 3

Comments Fair to Poor Condition, R-22 Fair to Poor Condition, R-22 Fair to Poor Condition. R-22

Page 461: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 19 of 24

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag CU-13 CU-14 CU-15,16

Unit Type Split System Split System Split System

Qty 1 1 2

Location Roof (hallway between 300 & 400 wing) Roof (613) Roof (600 Wing)

Area Served room next to 300 & 400 wing Rm 613 Rm 616 & locker rm

Manufacturer Airedale Carrier Airedale

Model # N/A N/A N/A

Serial # N/A N/A N/A

Cooling Type Split System DX Split System DX Split System DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 2.0 (Est) 3.0 (Est) 2.0 (Est)

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

10 SEER (Est) 10 SEER (Est) 10 SEER (Est)

Heating Type None None None

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A N/A

Fuel N/A N/A N/A

Approx Age 12 15 (Est) 12

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 3 0 3

Comments Fair to Poor Condition, R-22 Poor Condition, R-22 Fair to Poor Condition. R-22

Page 462: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 20 of 24

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag CU-17,18 CU-19 CU-20,21

Unit Type Split System Split System Split System

Qty 2 1 2

Location Roof (over shipping & receiving) Roof (600 wing) Roof (over shipping &

receiving)

Area Served N/A shipping & receiving N/A

Manufacturer Trane Sanyo Trane

Model # RAUE-B256-A C0971 RAUE-B306-A

Serial # C82B-10210, C82B-10211 0110971 C82B-09895,

C82B-10226,

Cooling Type Split System DX Split System DX Split System DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 2.5 (Est) 0.75 (Est) 3.0 (Est)

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

9 SEER (Est) 16 SEER (Est) 9 SEER (Est)

Heating Type None None None

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A N/A

Fuel N/A N/A N/A

Approx Age 15 (Est) 4 15 (Est)

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 0 11 0

Comments Poor Condition, R-22 Good Condition, R-410A Poor Condition. R-22

Page 463: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 21 of 24

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag CU-22 CU-23 CU-24,25

Unit Type Split System Split System Split System

Qty 1 1 2

Location Roof (over shipping & receiving) Roof (next to cafeteria) Roof (700 Wing)

Area Served shipping and receiving Cafeteria Rms in 700 wing

Manufacturer Comfortmaker McQuay Mitsubishi Electric

Model # CA5548VLD4 ALP032CS27-ER10 PUY-A36NHA

Serial # L992591158 STNU990300376 66U00581C, 66U00435C

Cooling Type Split System DX Split System DX Split System DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 4.0 (Est) 32 (Est) 3.0

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

11 SEER (Est) 8.0 EER (Est) 13.1 SEER

Heating Type None None None

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A N/A

Fuel N/A N/A N/A

Approx Age 12 23 6 (Est)

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 3 (8) 9

Comments Fair to Poor Condition, R-22 Fair to Poor Condition, R-22 Good Condition. R-410A

Page 464: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 22 of 24

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag CU-26,27 CU-28

Unit Type Split System Split System

Qty 2 1

Location Roof (500 wing) Roof (back end of Auditorium)

Area Served Rms in (500 wing) Rm behind auditorium

Manufacturer Airedale Mitsubishi Electric

Model # SCC24DFA0A0AA0A PUMY-A18NHA

Serial # 1-99-B-5687-9, 1-99-C-7329-12 62U02442B

Cooling Type Split System DX Split System DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 2.0 (Est) 1.5

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

10 SEER (Est) 14.1 SEER

Heating Type None None

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A

Fuel N/A N/A

Approx Age 12 6 (Est)

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15

Remaining Life 3 9

Comments Fair to Poor Condition, R-22 Good Condition, R-410A

Page 465: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix D

Unit Ventilators

Tag Horizontal UV Vertical UV

Unit Type Unit Ventilator Upgright Packeged AC / Heating Unit

Qty 45 (Est) 54 (Est)

Location 200, 300, 400, & 600 wing Classrooms

500 & 700 wing Classrooms

Manufacturer ITT Nesbitt Airedale

Model # N/A ClassMate HE Series

Serial # N/A N/A

Cooling Capacity (Tons) None 5.0 (Est)

Estimated Cooling Efficiency (EER)

N/A 9.2 EER

Heating Type Hot Water Coil Hot Water Coil

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A

Approx Age 50 5

Ashrae Service Life 15 15

Remaining Life (35) 10

Comments Units utilizing pneumatic controls.

Packaged AC / Heat Pump unit, R-410A

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Ridge High School

23 of 24

Page 466: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix D

Heating and Ventilation Units

Tag H&V H&V H&V

Unit Type Heating and Ventilation Heating and Ventilation Heating and Ventilation

Qty 4 1 1

Location Old Gym B, C Old Gym D Shipping & Receiving

Area Served Old Gym B, C Old Gym D Kitchin Make Up

Manufacturer ITT Nesbitt ITT Nesbitt ITT Nesbitt

Model # N/A N/A N/A

Serial # N/A N/A N/A

Fan HP N/A N/A 1.5

Cooling Type None None None

Heating Type Hot Water Coil Hot Water Coil Hot Water Coil

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A N/A

Approx Age 54 54 54

Ashrae Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life (39) (39) (39)

Comments pneumatically controlled 3-way control valves

pneumatically controlled 3-way control valves

pneumatically controlled 3-way control valves

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Ridge High School

24 of 24

Page 467: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E1 of 32

CEG Job #: 9C10088

Project: Bernards Public Schools KWH COST: $0.159

268 South Finley Ave

Basking Ridge, NJBldg. Sq. Ft.

ECM #1&2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

232.21 Men's Rest Room 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 223.6 $35.55 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $29.76 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $5.79 3.63

232.21 Women's Rest Room 2600 1 3

2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens86 0.09 223.6 $35.55 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 187.2 $29.76 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 36.4 $5.79 3.63

222.21 2600 6 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.37 967.2 $153.78 6 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.30 780 $124.02 $14.00 $84.00 0.07 187.2 $29.76 2.82

555 2600 2 1 Recessed Down Light, 65w BR30 Lamp 65 0.13 338.0 $53.74 2 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.05 135.2 $21.50 $20.00 $40.00 0.08 202.8 $32.25 1.24

232.21 Assistant Principal 2600 6 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.52 1,341.6 $213.31 6 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.43 1123.2 $178.59 $21.00 $126.00 0.08 218.4 $34.73 3.63

222.11 Class Rm 205 2600 6 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.37 967.2 $153.78 6 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.30 780 $124.02 $14.00 $84.00 0.07 187.2 $29.76 2.82

222.11 Class Rm 207 2600 15 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.93 2,418.0 $384.46 15 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.75 1950 $310.05 $14.00 $210.00 0.18 468 $74.41 2.82

222.21 Rm 209 Teacher's Lounge 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $230.68 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $186.03 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $44.65 2.82

222.11 Class Rm 211 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.56 1,450.8 $230.68 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $186.03 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $44.65 2.82

222.21 Class Rm 213 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $230.68 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $186.03 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $44.65 2.82

222.21 Class Rm 214 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $230.68 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $186.03 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $44.65 2.82

222.11 Class Rm 212 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.56 1,450.8 $230.68 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $186.03 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $44.65 2.82

222.21 Class Rm 210 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $230.68 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $186.03 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $44.65 2.82

232.21 Office 208 2600 6 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.52 1,341.6 $213.31 6 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.43 1123.2 $178.59 $21.00 $126.00 0.08 218.4 $34.73 3.63

Ridge High School

297,152

Nurse

Page 468: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E2 of 32

ECM #1&2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.21 Class Rm 206 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $230.68 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $186.03 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $44.65 2.82

211.11 200 Wing Corridor 4400 32 11x4, 1 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

33 1.06 4,646.4 $738.78 32 1 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 25 0.80 3520 $559.68 $7.00 $224.00 0.26 1126.4 $179.10 1.25

227.21 SAC office 2600 16 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 1.04 2,704.0 $429.94 16 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.78 2038.4 $324.11 $24.00 $384.00 0.26 665.6 $105.83 3.63

227.21 Resource Officer 202 2600 4 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.26 676.0 $107.48 4 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.20 509.6 $81.03 $24.00 $96.00 0.06 166.4 $26.46 3.63

232.21 Office 200 2600 4 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.34 894.4 $142.21 4 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.29 748.8 $119.06 $21.00 $84.00 0.06 145.6 $23.15 3.63

222.21 Boy's Rest Room 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $51.26 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $41.34 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $9.92 2.82

222.21 Girl's Rest Room 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $51.26 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $41.34 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $9.92 2.82

242.31 Custodial Closet 1200 1 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

107 0.11 128.4 $20.42 1 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.10 117.6 $18.70 $28.00 $28.00 0.01 10.8 $1.72 16.31

232.21 Band 222 2600 21 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.81 4,695.6 $746.60 21 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 1.51 3931.2 $625.06 $21.00 $441.00 0.29 764.4 $121.54 3.63

222.21 Instrument Storage 1200 3 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.19 223.2 $35.49 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 180 $28.62 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 43.2 $6.87 6.11

221.11 Practice Rm 1&2 1200 4 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.25 297.6 $47.32 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 240 $38.16 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 57.6 $9.16 6.11

222.21 223 Orchestra 2600 29 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 1.80 4,674.8 $743.29 29 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.45 3770 $599.43 $14.00 $406.00 0.35 904.8 $143.86 2.82

222.21 Practice Rm 3,4,5 1200 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 297.6 $47.32 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 240 $38.16 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 57.6 $9.16 6.11

222.21 Office 300 2600 3 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.19 483.6 $76.89 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 390 $62.01 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 93.6 $14.88 2.82

222.21 Girl's Rest Room 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $51.26 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $41.34 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $9.92 2.82

222.21 Boy's Rest Room 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $51.26 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $41.34 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $9.92 2.82

Page 469: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E3 of 32

ECM #1&2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.11 Custodial Closet 1200 1 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 74.4 $11.83 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 60 $9.54 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 14.4 $2.29 6.11

222.11 Class Rm 301 2600 11 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.68 1,773.2 $281.94 11 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.55 1430 $227.37 $14.00 $154.00 0.13 343.2 $54.57 2.82

211.15 Faculty Rest Room 2600 1 11x4, 1 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

33 0.03 85.8 $13.64 1 1 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 25 0.03 65 $10.34 $7.00 $7.00 0.01 20.8 $3.31 2.12

222.21 Prep Rm 303 2600 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $102.52 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $82.68 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $19.84 2.82

222.21 Class Rm 305 2600 11 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.68 1,773.2 $281.94 11 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.55 1430 $227.37 $14.00 $154.00 0.13 343.2 $54.57 2.82

242.21 Class Rm 307 2600 12 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 1.28 3,338.4 $530.81 12 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.18 3057.6 $486.16 $28.00 $336.00 0.11 280.8 $44.65 7.53

242.21 Office 2600 4 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.43 1,112.8 $176.94 4 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.39 1019.2 $162.05 $28.00 $112.00 0.04 93.6 $14.88 7.53

242.21 Class Rm 309 2600 12 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 1.28 3,338.4 $530.81 12 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.18 3057.6 $486.16 $28.00 $336.00 0.11 280.8 $44.65 7.53

232.22 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

86 0.26 670.8 $106.66 3 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.22 561.6 $89.29 $21.00 $63.00 0.04 109.2 $17.36 3.63

132.22 2600 2 32x4, 3-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

127 0.25 660.4 $105.00 2 2 Reballast & Relamp; Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $41.34 $100.00 $200.00 0.15 400.4 $63.66 3.14

132.22 Class Rm 313 2600 14 32x4, 3-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

127 1.78 4,622.8 $735.03 14 2 Reballast & Relamp; Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.70 1820 $289.38 $100.00 $1,400.00 1.08 2802.8 $445.65 3.14

132.22 2600 8 32x4, 3-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

127 1.02 2,641.6 $420.01 8 2 Reballast & Relamp; Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.40 1040 $165.36 $100.00 $800.00 0.62 1601.6 $254.65 3.14

232.22 2600 4 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

86 0.34 894.4 $142.21 4 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.29 748.8 $119.06 $21.00 $84.00 0.06 145.6 $23.15 3.63

132.22 Prep Rm 316 2600 4 32x4, 3-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

127 0.51 1,320.8 $210.01 4 2 Reballast & Relamp; Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $82.68 $100.00 $400.00 0.31 800.8 $127.33 3.14

232.21 4400 7 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.60 2,648.8 $421.16 7 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.50 2217.6 $352.60 $21.00 $147.00 0.10 431.2 $68.56 2.14

211.11 4400 25 11x4, 1 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

33 0.83 3,630.0 $577.17 25 1 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 25 0.63 2750 $437.25 $7.00 $175.00 0.20 880 $139.92 1.25

Office 311

Class Rm 314

Corridor 300

Page 470: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E4 of 32

ECM #1&2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.21 Class Rm 308 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $230.68 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $186.03 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $44.65 2.82

222.21 Class Rm 306 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $307.57 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $248.04 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $59.53 2.82

222.11 Class Rm 302 2600 18 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 1.12 2,901.6 $461.35 18 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.90 2340 $372.06 $14.00 $252.00 0.22 561.6 $89.29 2.82

221.11 Ramp 4400 9 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.56 2,455.2 $390.38 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1980 $314.82 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 475.2 $75.56 1.67

725 Courtyard 4400 2 1 150w HPS Wallpack 188 0.38 1,654.4 $263.05 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Publications 419 2600 8 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.50 1,289.6 $205.05 8 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.40 1040 $165.36 $14.00 $112.00 0.10 249.6 $39.69 2.82

221.45 Faculty Rest Room 2600 1 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Indirect 58 0.06 150.8 $23.98 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 130 $20.67 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 20.8 $3.31 4.23

221.11 Class Rm 402 2600 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 161.2 $25.63 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 130 $20.67 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 31.2 $4.96 2.82

222.21 Class Rm 404A 2600 15 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.93 2,418.0 $384.46 15 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.75 1950 $310.05 $14.00 $210.00 0.18 468 $74.41 2.82

221.11 Class Rm 405 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.74 1,934.4 $307.57 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $248.04 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $59.53 2.82

651 Custodial Closet 1200 1 1 "Industrial" Relector, 26w CFL 26 0.03 31.2 $4.96 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $51.26 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $41.34 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $9.92 2.82

227.21 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $26.87 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $20.26 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.61 3.63

222.21 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $51.26 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $41.34 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $9.92 2.82

227.21 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $26.87 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $20.26 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.61 3.63

221.11 Class Rm 406 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.74 1,934.4 $307.57 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $248.04 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $59.53 2.82

221.11 Copy Rm 407 2600 4 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.25 644.8 $102.52 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $82.68 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $19.84 2.82

Boy's Rest Room

Girl's Rest Room

Page 471: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E5 of 32

ECM #1&2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.11 Class Rm 408 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.74 1,934.4 $307.57 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $248.04 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $59.53 2.82

221.11 Class Rm 409 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.74 1,934.4 $307.57 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $248.04 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $59.53 2.82

221.11 Class Rm 410 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.74 1,934.4 $307.57 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $248.04 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $59.53 2.82

221.37 Class Rm 411 2600 24 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.39 3,619.2 $575.45 24 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.20 3120 $496.08 $14.00 $336.00 0.19 499.2 $79.37 4.23

221.11 Class Rm 412 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.74 1,934.4 $307.57 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $248.04 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $59.53 2.82

211.11 400 Corridor 4400 30 11x4, 1 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

33 0.99 4,356.0 $692.60 30 1 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 25 0.75 3300 $524.70 $7.00 $210.00 0.24 1056 $167.90 1.25

221.11 Class Rm 414 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.74 1,934.4 $307.57 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $248.04 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $59.53 2.82

221.31 Com. Closet 1200 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.12 148.8 $23.66 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 120 $19.08 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 28.8 $4.58 6.11

242.21 Storage 1200 2 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.21 256.8 $40.83 2 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.20 235.2 $37.40 $28.00 $56.00 0.02 21.6 $3.43 16.31

242.21 500 D Storage 1200 3 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.32 385.2 $61.25 3 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.29 352.8 $56.10 $28.00 $84.00 0.03 32.4 $5.15 16.31

561 2600 12 2 Recessed Down Light, (2) 26w Quad PL Lamp 52 0.62 1,622.4 $257.96 12 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

2 2600 60 3 2x2 3 Lamp 40w Biax Lamp 126 7.56 19,656.0 $3,125.30 60 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Video 500A 2600 1 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed 107 0.11 278.2 $44.23 1 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.10 254.8 $40.51 $28.00 $28.00 0.01 23.4 $3.72 7.53

242.21 Office 500C 2600 3 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.32 834.6 $132.70 3 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.29 764.4 $121.54 $28.00 $84.00 0.03 70.2 $11.16 7.53

242.21 Office 500C 2600 1 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.11 278.2 $44.23 1 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.10 254.8 $40.51 $28.00 $28.00 0.01 23.4 $3.72 7.53

222.21 Stairwell 4 4400 5 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.31 1,364.0 $216.88 5 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.25 1100 $174.90 $14.00 $70.00 0.06 264 $41.98 1.67

Media Center

Page 472: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E6 of 32

ECM #1&2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.37 Class Rm 502 2600 28 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.62 4,222.4 $671.36 28 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.40 3640 $578.76 $14.00 $392.00 0.22 582.4 $92.60 4.23

221.37 Prep Rm 504 2600 6 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 0.35 904.8 $143.86 6 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.30 780 $124.02 $14.00 $84.00 0.05 124.8 $19.84 4.23

221.37 Class Rm 506 2600 28 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.62 4,222.4 $671.36 28 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.40 3640 $578.76 $14.00 $392.00 0.22 582.4 $92.60 4.23

222.21 Stairwell 5 4400 5 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.31 1,364.0 $216.88 5 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.25 1100 $174.90 $14.00 $70.00 0.06 264 $41.98 1.67

221.37 Class Rm 508 2600 20 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.16 3,016.0 $479.54 20 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.00 2600 $413.40 $14.00 $280.00 0.16 416 $66.14 4.23

221.31 Electric Rm 1200 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.12 148.8 $23.66 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 120 $19.08 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 28.8 $4.58 6.11

221.31 Com Closet 1200 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 74.4 $11.83 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 60 $9.54 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 14.4 $2.29 6.11

221.37 Class Rm 510 2600 23 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.33 3,468.4 $551.48 23 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.15 2990 $475.41 $14.00 $322.00 0.18 478.4 $76.07 4.23

221.37 Class Rm 512 2600 23 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.33 3,468.4 $551.48 23 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.15 2990 $475.41 $14.00 $322.00 0.18 478.4 $76.07 4.23

221.37 Class Rm 514 2600 23 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.33 3,468.4 $551.48 23 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.15 2990 $475.41 $14.00 $322.00 0.18 478.4 $76.07 4.23

221.37 Class Rm 516 2600 23 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.33 3,468.4 $551.48 23 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.15 2990 $475.41 $14.00 $322.00 0.18 478.4 $76.07 4.23

222.21 Stairwell 7 4400 5 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.31 1,364.0 $216.88 5 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.25 1100 $174.90 $14.00 $70.00 0.06 264 $41.98 1.67

221.37 Class Rm 519 2600 23 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.33 3,468.4 $551.48 23 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.15 2990 $475.41 $14.00 $322.00 0.18 478.4 $76.07 4.23

221.37 Class Rm 517 2600 23 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.33 3,468.4 $551.48 23 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.15 2990 $475.41 $14.00 $322.00 0.18 478.4 $76.07 4.23

221.37 Class Rm 515 2600 23 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.33 3,468.4 $551.48 23 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.15 2990 $475.41 $14.00 $322.00 0.18 478.4 $76.07 4.23

222.21 500 Corridor 4400 30 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 1.86 8,184.0 $1,301.26 30 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.50 6600 $1,049.40 $14.00 $420.00 0.36 1584 $251.86 1.67

232.21 Work Rm 513 2600 8 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.69 1,788.8 $284.42 8 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.58 1497.6 $238.12 $21.00 $168.00 0.11 291.2 $46.30 3.63

221.37 Class Rm 511 2600 23 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.33 3,468.4 $551.48 23 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.15 2990 $475.41 $14.00 $322.00 0.18 478.4 $76.07 4.23

Page 473: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E7 of 32

ECM #1&2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.37 Class Rm 509 2600 28 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.62 4,222.4 $671.36 28 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.40 3640 $578.76 $14.00 $392.00 0.22 582.4 $92.60 4.23

242.21 Prep Rm 2600 3 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.32 834.6 $132.70 3 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.29 764.4 $121.54 $28.00 $84.00 0.03 70.2 $11.16 7.53

221.37 Class Rm 505 2600 28 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.62 4,222.4 $671.36 28 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.40 3640 $578.76 $14.00 $392.00 0.22 582.4 $92.60 4.23

222.21 Boy's Rest Room 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $51.26 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $41.34 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $9.92 2.82

222.21 Girl's Rest Room 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $51.26 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $41.34 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $9.92 2.82

221.31 Custodial Closet 1200 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 74.4 $11.83 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 60 $9.54 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 14.4 $2.29 6.11

232.21 Class Rm 706 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.03 2,683.2 $426.63 12 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.86 2246.4 $357.18 $21.00 $252.00 0.17 436.8 $69.45 3.63

232.21 Class Rm 708 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.03 2,683.2 $426.63 12 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.86 2246.4 $357.18 $21.00 $252.00 0.17 436.8 $69.45 3.63

232.21 Class Rm 710 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.03 2,683.2 $426.63 12 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.86 2246.4 $357.18 $21.00 $252.00 0.17 436.8 $69.45 3.63

232.21 Class Rm 712 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.03 2,683.2 $426.63 12 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.86 2246.4 $357.18 $21.00 $252.00 0.17 436.8 $69.45 3.63

222.21 700 Corridor 4400 28 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 1.74 7,638.4 $1,214.51 28 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.40 6160 $979.44 $14.00 $392.00 0.34 1478.4 $235.07 1.67

221.41 Stairwell 4400 7 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Prismatic 58 0.41 1,786.4 $284.04 7 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.35 1540 $244.86 $14.00 $98.00 0.06 246.4 $39.18 2.50

232.22 Class Rm 713 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

86 1.03 2,683.2 $426.63 12 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.86 2246.4 $357.18 $21.00 $252.00 0.17 436.8 $69.45 3.63

232.21 Class Rm 711 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.03 2,683.2 $426.63 12 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.86 2246.4 $357.18 $21.00 $252.00 0.17 436.8 $69.45 3.63

232.21 Class Rm 709 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.03 2,683.2 $426.63 12 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.86 2246.4 $357.18 $21.00 $252.00 0.17 436.8 $69.45 3.63

232.21 Class Rm 705 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.03 2,683.2 $426.63 12 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.86 2246.4 $357.18 $21.00 $252.00 0.17 436.8 $69.45 3.63

232.21 Class Rm 703 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.03 2,683.2 $426.63 12 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.86 2246.4 $357.18 $21.00 $252.00 0.17 436.8 $69.45 3.63

221.41 Stairwell 4400 8 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Prismatic 58 0.46 2,041.6 $324.61 8 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.40 1760 $279.84 $14.00 $112.00 0.06 281.6 $44.77 2.50

Page 474: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E8 of 32

ECM #1&2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

232.22 Class Rm 701 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

86 1.03 2,683.2 $426.63 12 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.86 2246.4 $357.18 $21.00 $252.00 0.17 436.8 $69.45 3.63

221.31 Electric Rm 1200 5 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.31 372.0 $59.15 5 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.25 300 $47.70 $14.00 $70.00 0.06 72 $11.45 6.11

222.21 Corridor 4400 15 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.93 4,092.0 $650.63 15 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.75 3300 $524.70 $14.00 $210.00 0.18 792 $125.93 1.67

242.21 Teacher's Lounge 2600 6 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.64 1,669.2 $265.40 6 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.59 1528.8 $243.08 $28.00 $168.00 0.05 140.4 $22.32 7.53

2.1 4400 9 2 2x2 2 Lamp 40w Biax Lamp 88 0.79 3,484.8 $554.08 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

560 4400 9 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w Quad PL Lamp 26 0.23 1,029.6 $163.71 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

100 Display Cases 4400 6 2 (2) 2' 1-Lamp, 20w T12, Mag. Ballast, No Lens 43 0.26 1,135.2 $180.50 6 1 1 28w T8, 4' Channel, No Lens 25 0.15 660 $104.94 $120.00 $720.00 0.11 475.2 $75.56 9.53

2.1 2nd Floor Starway Landing 4400 9 2 2x2 2 Lamp 40w Biax Lamp 88 0.79 3,484.8 $554.08 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 Class Rm 522 2600 23 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.33 3,468.4 $551.48 23 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.15 2990 $475.41 $14.00 $322.00 0.18 478.4 $76.07 4.23

221.37 Class Rm 524 2600 23 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.33 3,468.4 $551.48 23 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.15 2990 $475.41 $14.00 $322.00 0.18 478.4 $76.07 4.23

221.37 Class Rm 526 2600 23 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.33 3,468.4 $551.48 23 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.15 2990 $475.41 $14.00 $322.00 0.18 478.4 $76.07 4.23

221.37 Class Rm 528 2600 12 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 0.70 1,809.6 $287.73 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $248.04 $14.00 $168.00 0.10 249.6 $39.69 4.23

221.31 Book Rm 2600 3 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.19 483.6 $76.89 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 390 $62.01 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 93.6 $14.88 2.82

221.31 Storage 1200 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 74.4 $11.83 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 60 $9.54 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 14.4 $2.29 6.11

221.31 Electric Rm 1200 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.12 148.8 $23.66 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 120 $19.08 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 28.8 $4.58 6.11

221.37 Class Rm 530 2600 23 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.33 3,468.4 $551.48 23 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.15 2990 $475.41 $14.00 $322.00 0.18 478.4 $76.07 4.23

221.37 Class Rm 532 2600 23 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.33 3,468.4 $551.48 23 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.15 2990 $475.41 $14.00 $322.00 0.18 478.4 $76.07 4.23

221.37 Class Rm 534 2600 23 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.33 3,468.4 $551.48 23 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.15 2990 $475.41 $14.00 $322.00 0.18 478.4 $76.07 4.23

221.37 Class Rm 539 2600 23 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.33 3,468.4 $551.48 23 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.15 2990 $475.41 $14.00 $322.00 0.18 478.4 $76.07 4.23

Main Stairs Lobby Area

Page 475: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E9 of 32

ECM #1&2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.37 Class Rm 537 2600 23 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.33 3,468.4 $551.48 23 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.15 2990 $475.41 $14.00 $322.00 0.18 478.4 $76.07 4.23

221.37 Class Rm 535 2600 23 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.33 3,468.4 $551.48 23 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.15 2990 $475.41 $14.00 $322.00 0.18 478.4 $76.07 4.23

221.37 Class Rm 531 2600 23 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.33 3,468.4 $551.48 23 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.15 2990 $475.41 $14.00 $322.00 0.18 478.4 $76.07 4.23

221.37 Class Rm 529 2600 23 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.33 3,468.4 $551.48 23 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.15 2990 $475.41 $14.00 $322.00 0.18 478.4 $76.07 4.23

221.37 Class Rm 527 2600 8 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 0.46 1,206.4 $191.82 8 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.40 1040 $165.36 $14.00 $112.00 0.06 166.4 $26.46 4.23

221.37 Class Rm 525 2600 23 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.33 3,468.4 $551.48 23 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.15 2990 $475.41 $14.00 $322.00 0.18 478.4 $76.07 4.23

221.11 Storage 1200 6 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface 62 0.37 446.4 $70.98 6 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.30 360 $57.24 $14.00 $84.00 0.07 86.4 $13.74 6.11

222.21 Boy's Rest Room 2600 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $102.52 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $82.68 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $19.84 2.82

222.21 Girl's Rest Room 2600 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $102.52 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $82.68 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $19.84 2.82

221.31 Custodial Closet 1200 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 74.4 $11.83 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 60 $9.54 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 14.4 $2.29 6.11

222.21 2nd Floor 500 Corridor 4400 28 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 1.74 7,638.4 $1,214.51 28 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.40 6160 $979.44 $14.00 $392.00 0.34 1478.4 $235.07 1.67

222.21 2nd Floor 700 Corridor 4400 30 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 1.86 8,184.0 $1,301.26 30 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.50 6600 $1,049.40 $14.00 $420.00 0.36 1584 $251.86 1.67

222.21 Girl's Rest Room 2600 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $102.52 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $82.68 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $19.84 2.82

222.21 Boy's Rest Room 2600 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $102.52 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $82.68 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $19.84 2.82

221.31 Custodial Closet 1200 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.12 148.8 $23.66 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 120 $19.08 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 28.8 $4.58 6.11

232.21 Class Rm 724 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.03 2,683.2 $426.63 12 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.86 2246.4 $357.18 $21.00 $252.00 0.17 436.8 $69.45 3.63

232.21 Class Rm 726 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.03 2,683.2 $426.63 12 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.86 2246.4 $357.18 $21.00 $252.00 0.17 436.8 $69.45 3.63

Page 476: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E10 of 32

ECM #1&2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

232.21 Class Rm 728 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.03 2,683.2 $426.63 12 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.86 2246.4 $357.18 $21.00 $252.00 0.17 436.8 $69.45 3.63

232.21 Class Rm 730 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.03 2,683.2 $426.63 12 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.86 2246.4 $357.18 $21.00 $252.00 0.17 436.8 $69.45 3.63

232.21 Class Rm 731 2600 8 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.69 1,788.8 $284.42 8 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.58 1497.6 $238.12 $21.00 $168.00 0.11 291.2 $46.30 3.63

232.21 Class Rm 729 2600 8 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.69 1,788.8 $284.42 8 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.58 1497.6 $238.12 $21.00 $168.00 0.11 291.2 $46.30 3.63

242.21 Class Rm 727 2600 16 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 1.71 4,451.2 $707.74 16 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.57 4076.8 $648.21 $28.00 $448.00 0.14 374.4 $59.53 7.53

242.21 Class Rm 725 2600 16 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 1.71 4,451.2 $707.74 16 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.57 4076.8 $648.21 $28.00 $448.00 0.14 374.4 $59.53 7.53

242.21 Prep Rm 2600 4 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.43 1,112.8 $176.94 4 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.39 1019.2 $162.05 $28.00 $112.00 0.04 93.6 $14.88 7.53

242.21 Class Rm 723 2600 16 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 1.71 4,451.2 $707.74 16 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.57 4076.8 $648.21 $28.00 $448.00 0.14 374.4 $59.53 7.53

242.21 Prep Rm 2600 4 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.43 1,112.8 $176.94 4 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.39 1019.2 $162.05 $28.00 $112.00 0.04 93.6 $14.88 7.53

232.21 Class Rm 721 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.03 2,683.2 $426.63 12 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.86 2246.4 $357.18 $21.00 $252.00 0.17 436.8 $69.45 3.63

221.31 IDF Closet 1200 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 74.4 $11.83 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 60 $9.54 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 14.4 $2.29 6.11

232.21 Class Rm 720 2600 14 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.20 3,130.4 $497.73 14 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 1.01 2620.8 $416.71 $21.00 $294.00 0.20 509.6 $81.03 3.63

242.21 Work Rm 2600 10 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 1.07 2,782.0 $442.34 10 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.98 2548 $405.13 $28.00 $280.00 0.09 234 $37.21 7.53

222.21 Work Rm Rest Room 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $51.26 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $41.34 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $9.92 2.82

221.31 Mech Rm 1200 8 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.50 595.2 $94.64 8 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.40 480 $76.32 $14.00 $112.00 0.10 115.2 $18.32 6.11

221.31 Electric Rm 1200 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.12 148.8 $23.66 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 120 $19.08 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 28.8 $4.58 6.11

Page 477: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E11 of 32

ECM #1&2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

232.22 PAC Office 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

86 0.26 670.8 $106.66 3 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.22 561.6 $89.29 $21.00 $63.00 0.04 109.2 $17.36 3.63

232.22 Green Room 2600 4 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

86 0.34 894.4 $142.21 4 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.29 748.8 $119.06 $21.00 $84.00 0.06 145.6 $23.15 3.63

221.31 Custodial Closet 1200 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 74.4 $11.83 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 60 $9.54 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 14.4 $2.29 6.11

222.21 Storage 1200 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 297.6 $47.32 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 240 $38.16 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 57.6 $9.16 6.11

232.21 Set Shop 2600 20 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.72 4,472.0 $711.05 20 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 1.44 3744 $595.30 $21.00 $420.00 0.28 728 $115.75 3.63

222.21 Auditorium Corridors 4400 41 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 2.54 11,184.8 $1,778.38 41 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 2.05 9020 $1,434.18 $14.00 $574.00 0.49 2164.8 $344.20 1.67

550.1 2600 50 1 Recessed Down Light, 100w MH Lamp 120 6.00 15,600.0 $2,480.40 50 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

650 2600 14 2 Wall Sconce, (2) 26w PL Quad Lamp 54 0.76 1,965.6 $312.53 14 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.31 Stage 2600 6 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

107 0.64 1,669.2 $265.40 6 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.59 1528.8 $243.08 $28.00 $168.00 0.05 140.4 $22.32 7.53

550.1 Under Stage 1200 14 1 Recessed Down Light, 100w MH Lamp 120 1.68 2,016.0 $320.54 14 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 2600 25 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 2.15 5,590.0 $888.81 25 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 1.80 4680 $744.12 $21.00 $525.00 0.35 910 $144.69 3.63

550.1 2600 8 1 Recessed Down Light, 100w MH Lamp 120 0.96 2,496.0 $396.86 8 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Dance Studio 231 2600 13 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 1.39 3,616.6 $575.04 13 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.27 3312.4 $526.67 $28.00 $364.00 0.12 304.2 $48.37 7.53

232.22 Dance Office Office 2600 2 3

2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Parabolic Lens86 0.17 447.2 $71.10 2 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.14 374.4 $59.53 $21.00 $42.00 0.03 72.8 $11.58 3.63

221.31 Storage 1200 4 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.25 297.6 $47.32 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 240 $38.16 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 57.6 $9.16 6.11

221.31 Custodial Closet 1200 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 74.4 $11.83 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 60 $9.54 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 14.4 $2.29 6.11

221.31 Storage 1200 4 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.25 297.6 $47.32 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 240 $38.16 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 57.6 $9.16 6.11

550.1 Auditorium Lobby 4400 22 1 Recessed Down Light, 100w MH Lamp 120 2.64 11,616.0 $1,846.94 22 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

550.1 Auditorium Vestibule 4400 25 1 Recessed Down Light, 100w

MH Lamp 120 3.00 13,200.0 $2,098.80 25 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Auditorium

Choral Rm 230

Page 478: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E12 of 32

ECM #1&2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

211.11 4400 17 11x4, 1 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

33 0.56 2,468.4 $392.48 17 1 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 25 0.43 1870 $297.33 $7.00 $119.00 0.14 598.4 $95.15 1.25

227.21 4400 2 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.13 572.0 $90.95 2 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.10 431.2 $68.56 $24.00 $48.00 0.03 140.8 $22.39 2.14

264.21 2600 18 64x4, 6 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

172 3.10 8,049.6 $1,279.89 18 6 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 148 2.66 6926.4 $1,101.30 $42.00 $756.00 0.43 1123.2 $178.59 4.23

780 2600 2 8 8 Lamp, 42w CFL LoBay 336 0.67 1,747.2 $277.80 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

770 Gym C 2600 24 1 400w MH, LoBay Prismatic Lens 465 11.16 29,016.0 $4,613.54 24 6 2x4 54w T5HO 6 Lamp

w/Reflecter 354 8.50 22089.6 $3,512.25 $240.00 $5,760.00 2.66 6926.4 $1,101.30 5.23

221.26 Girl's LR L4 2600 11 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Vapor-Tite Acrylic Lens

58 0.64 1,658.8 $263.75 11 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.55 1430 $227.37 $14.00 $154.00 0.09 228.8 $36.38 4.23

242.21 Gym Office 2600 11 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 1.18 3,060.2 $486.57 11 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.08 2802.8 $445.65 $28.00 $308.00 0.10 257.4 $40.93 7.53

222.21 Girl's LR L6 2600 16 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.99 2,579.2 $410.09 16 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.80 2080 $330.72 $14.00 $224.00 0.19 499.2 $79.37 2.82

766 Gym D 2600 9 1 400w MH, Prismatic Lens 465 4.19 10,881.0 $1,730.08 9 4 2x4 54w T5HO 4 Lamp w/Reflective Lens, Wire Cage 236 2.12 5522.4 $878.06 $240.00 $2,160.00 2.06 5358.6 $852.02 2.54

222.21 Boy's Rest Room 2600 3 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.19 483.6 $76.89 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 390 $62.01 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 93.6 $14.88 2.82

222.21 Girl's Rest Room 2600 3 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.19 483.6 $76.89 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 390 $62.01 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 93.6 $14.88 2.82

221.11 Electric Rm 1200 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 74.4 $11.83 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 60 $9.54 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 14.4 $2.29 6.11

121.11 Custodial Closet 1200 2 21x4, 2-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

78 0.16 187.2 $29.76 2 2 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast; retrofit 58 0.12 139.2 $22.13 $100.00 $200.00 0.04 48 $7.63 26.21

222.21 Boy's LR L5 2600 16 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.99 2,579.2 $410.09 16 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.80 2080 $330.72 $14.00 $224.00 0.19 499.2 $79.37 2.82

222.21 Work Rm 616 2600 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $102.52 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $82.68 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $19.84 2.82

770 Wood Shop 618 2600 12 1 400w MH, LoBay Prismatic Lens 465 5.58 14,508.0 $2,306.77 12 6 2x4 54w T5HO 6 Lamp

w/Reflecter 354 4.25 11044.8 $1,756.12 $240.00 $2,880.00 1.33 3463.2 $550.65 5.23

222.21 Graphics 623 2600 15 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.93 2,418.0 $384.46 15 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.75 1950 $310.05 $14.00 $210.00 0.18 468 $74.41 2.82

221.31 Storage 1200 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.12 148.8 $23.66 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 120 $19.08 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 28.8 $4.58 6.11

Gym B

Gym Corridor

Page 479: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E13 of 32

ECM #1&2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.37 Graphics 622 2600 23 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 1.33 3,468.4 $551.48 23 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.15 2990 $475.41 $14.00 $322.00 0.18 478.4 $76.07 4.23

242.21 Class Rm 621 2600 18 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 1.93 5,007.6 $796.21 18 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.76 4586.4 $729.24 $28.00 $504.00 0.16 421.2 $66.97 7.53

242.21 Art 620 2600 20 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 2.14 5,564.0 $884.68 20 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.96 5096 $810.26 $28.00 $560.00 0.18 468 $74.41 7.53

221.11 Basement 2600 36 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 2.23 5,803.2 $922.71 36 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.80 4680 $744.12 $14.00 $504.00 0.43 1123.2 $178.59 2.82

222.21 4400 3 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.19 818.4 $130.13 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 660 $104.94 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 158.4 $25.19 1.67

221.11 4400 3 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.19 818.4 $130.13 3 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.15 660 $104.94 $14.00 $42.00 0.04 158.4 $25.19 1.67

222.21 4400 13 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.81 3,546.4 $563.88 13 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.65 2860 $454.74 $14.00 $182.00 0.16 686.4 $109.14 1.67

211.11 4400 41 11x4, 1 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

33 1.35 5,953.2 $946.56 41 1 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 25 1.03 4510 $717.09 $7.00 $287.00 0.33 1443.2 $229.47 1.25

242.21 Art 619 2600 20 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 2.14 5,564.0 $884.68 20 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.96 5096 $810.26 $28.00 $560.00 0.18 468 $74.41 7.53

242.21 Art 615 2600 16 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 1.71 4,451.2 $707.74 16 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.57 4076.8 $648.21 $28.00 $448.00 0.14 374.4 $59.53 7.53

242.21 Class Rm 614 2600 16 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 1.71 4,451.2 $707.74 16 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.57 4076.8 $648.21 $28.00 $448.00 0.14 374.4 $59.53 7.53

222.21 Assistant Principal 613 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $102.52 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $82.68 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $19.84 2.82

222.21 Office 613A 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $307.57 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $248.04 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $59.53 2.82

222.21 Class Rm 612 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $307.57 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $248.04 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $59.53 2.82

222.21 Class Rm 611 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $307.57 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $248.04 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $59.53 2.82

Exit 9

600 Corridor

Page 480: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E14 of 32

ECM #1&2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.26 Boy's LR L3 2600 16 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Vapor-Tite Acrylic Lens

58 0.93 2,412.8 $383.64 16 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.80 2080 $330.72 $14.00 $224.00 0.13 332.8 $52.92 4.23

242.21 Class Rm 630 2600 20 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 2.14 5,564.0 $884.68 20 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.96 5096 $810.26 $28.00 $560.00 0.18 468 $74.41 7.53

211.11 Gym/Boiler Rm Corridor 4400 15 1

1x4, 1 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface

Mnt., Prismatic Lens33 0.50 2,178.0 $346.30 15 1 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 25 0.38 1650 $262.35 $7.00 $105.00 0.12 528 $83.95 1.25

221.26 2600 16 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Vapor-Tite Acrylic Lens

58 0.93 2,412.8 $383.64 16 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.80 2080 $330.72 $14.00 $224.00 0.13 332.8 $52.92 4.23

242.11 2600 2 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

107 0.21 556.4 $88.47 2 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.20 509.6 $81.03 $28.00 $56.00 0.02 46.8 $7.44 7.53

242.21 Office LR 2600 2 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.21 556.4 $88.47 2 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.20 509.6 $81.03 $28.00 $56.00 0.02 46.8 $7.44 7.53

222.21 Music 624 2600 13 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.81 2,095.6 $333.20 13 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.65 1690 $268.71 $14.00 $182.00 0.16 405.6 $64.49 2.82

222.21 Girl's Rest Room 2600 1 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.06 161.2 $25.63 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 130 $20.67 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 31.2 $4.96 2.82

222.21 Office 626 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $51.26 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $41.34 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $9.92 2.82

232.21 Weight Rm 625 2600 28 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 2.41 6,260.8 $995.47 28 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 2.02 5241.6 $833.41 $21.00 $588.00 0.39 1019.2 $162.05 3.63

232.21 Trainer 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.26 670.8 $106.66 3 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.22 561.6 $89.29 $21.00 $63.00 0.04 109.2 $17.36 3.63

221.31 Receiving 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.74 1,934.4 $307.57 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $248.04 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $59.53 2.82

746 Gym A Lobby 2600 18 1 250w MH LoBay w/Prismatic Lens 295 5.31 13,806.0 $2,195.15 18 3 2x4 54w T5HO 3 Lamp,

Prismatic Lens 177 3.19 8283.6 $1,317.09 $220.00 $3,960.00 2.12 5522.4 $878.06 4.51

232.22 AD Office 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

86 0.17 447.2 $71.10 2 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.14 374.4 $59.53 $21.00 $42.00 0.03 72.8 $11.58 3.63

232.21 Trainers 2600 8 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.69 1,788.8 $284.42 8 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.58 1497.6 $238.12 $21.00 $168.00 0.11 291.2 $46.30 3.63

232.21 Official's Lockers 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.17 447.2 $71.10 2 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.14 374.4 $59.53 $21.00 $42.00 0.03 72.8 $11.58 3.63

222.21 Boy's Rest Room 2600 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $102.52 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $82.68 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $19.84 2.82

Boy's LR L1

Page 481: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E15 of 32

ECM #1&2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.31 Boy's LR L7 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.74 1,934.4 $307.57 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $248.04 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $59.53 2.82

222.21 PE Office 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $51.26 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $41.34 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $9.92 2.82

221.31 Boy's LR L9 2600 6 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.37 967.2 $153.78 6 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.30 780 $124.02 $14.00 $84.00 0.07 187.2 $29.76 2.82

222.21 Gym Hall 4400 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 3,273.6 $520.50 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 2640 $419.76 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 633.6 $100.74 1.67

765 Gym A 2600 38 1 400w MH Pulse Start HiBay 465 17.67 45,942.0 $7,304.78 38 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Girl's LR L10 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.74 1,934.4 $307.57 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $248.04 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $59.53 2.82

221.31 Girl's LR L8 2600 6 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.37 967.2 $153.78 6 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.30 780 $124.02 $14.00 $84.00 0.07 187.2 $29.76 2.82

222.21 PE Office 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $51.26 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $41.34 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $9.92 2.82

221.11 101 Receiving 2600 6 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.37 967.2 $153.78 6 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.30 780 $124.02 $14.00 $84.00 0.07 187.2 $29.76 2.82

242.21 Serving Line 2600 11 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 1.18 3,060.2 $486.57 11 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.08 2802.8 $445.65 $28.00 $308.00 0.10 257.4 $40.93 7.53

227.21 Teacher's Lunch Rm 2600 22 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 1.43 3,718.0 $591.16 22 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 1.08 2802.8 $445.65 $24.00 $528.00 0.35 915.2 $145.52 3.63

221.11 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 1.18 3,062.8 $486.99 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $392.73 $14.00 $266.00 0.23 592.8 $94.26 2.82

242.21 2600 12 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 1.28 3,338.4 $530.81 12 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.18 3057.6 $486.16 $28.00 $336.00 0.11 280.8 $44.65 7.53

617 Hood 2600 6 1 Hood Light w/Globe & Cage, 100w A19 Lamp 100 0.60 1,560.0 $248.04 6 1 (1) 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.16 405.6 $64.49 $20.00 $120.00 0.44 1154.4 $183.55 0.65

237.21 2600 34 32x2, 3 Lamp, 31w T8 Ulamp, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens92 3.13 8,132.8 $1,293.12 34 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

551 2600 11 1 Recessed Down Light, 100w R40 Lamp 100 1.10 2,860.0 $454.74 11 1 26w R40 CFL Lamp 26 0.29 743.6 $118.23 $20.00 $220.00 0.81 2116.4 $336.51 0.65

Kitchen

Page 482: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E16 of 32

ECM #1&2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

626 4400 6 2Architectual Cylinder,

Up/Dwn Light, (2) 90w PAR Lamp

180 1.08 4,752.0 $755.57 6 2 23w PAR38 Energy Star Rated Floodlight Lamp 46 0.28 1214.4 $193.09 $44.00 $264.00 0.80 3537.6 $562.48 0.47

750 4400 3 1 250w HPS Indirect 295 0.89 3,894.0 $619.15 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

561 2600 6 2 Recessed Down Light, (2) 26w Quad PL Lamp 52 0.31 811.2 $128.98 6 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 2600 31 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 2.02 5,239.0 $833.00 31 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 1.52 3949.4 $627.95 $24.00 $744.00 0.50 1289.6 $205.05 3.63

227.21 Main Lobby 2600 18 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 1.17 3,042.0 $483.68 18 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.88 2293.2 $364.62 $24.00 $432.00 0.29 748.8 $119.06 3.63

232.22 Guidence Office 2600 14 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

86 1.20 3,130.4 $497.73 14 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 1.01 2620.8 $416.71 $21.00 $294.00 0.20 509.6 $81.03 3.63

227.211 Guidence Hall 2600 16 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.54 1,414.4 $224.89 16 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.22 Guidence Side Offices (20) 2600 68 3

2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Parabolic Lens86 5.85 15,204.8 $2,417.56 68 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 4.90 12729.6 $2,024.01 $21.00 $1,428.00 0.95 2475.2 $393.56 3.63

221.37 Conf Rm 2600 4 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 0.23 603.2 $95.91 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $82.68 $14.00 $56.00 0.03 83.2 $13.23 4.23

221.21 Main Office Corridor 4400 22 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Prismatic58 1.28 5,614.4 $892.69 22 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.10 4840 $769.56 $14.00 $308.00 0.18 774.4 $123.13 2.50

232.22 2600 19 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

86 1.63 4,248.4 $675.50 19 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 1.37 3556.8 $565.53 $21.00 $399.00 0.27 691.6 $109.96 3.63

242.22 2600 4 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 0.42 1,081.6 $171.97 4 0 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 2600 12 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.78 2,028.0 $322.45 12 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.59 1528.8 $243.08 $24.00 $288.00 0.19 499.2 $79.37 3.63

561 2600 5 2 Recessed Down Light, (2) 26w Quad PL Lamp 52 0.26 676.0 $107.48 5 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 4 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect 58 0.23 603.2 $95.91 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $82.68 $14.00 $56.00 0.03 83.2 $13.23 4.23

560 2600 8 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w Quad PL Lamp 26 0.21 540.8 $85.99 8 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.22 Principal's Office 2600 4 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 0.42 1,081.6 $171.97 4 0 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

725 4400 14 1 150w HPS Wallpack 188 2.63 11,580.8 $1,841.35 14 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00735 4400 6 1 175w MH, Wallpack 210 1.26 5,544.0 $881.50 6 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Totals 756,922 $120,351 3,145 597 174.2 480,408 $76,385 $63,832 41.5 116,211 $18,478 3.45

Exterior

Cafeteria

Conf Rm

Main Office

Page 483: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E17 of 32

CEG Job #: 9C10088Project: Bernards Public Schools KWH COST: $0.159

Address: 268 South Finley AveBasking Ridge, NJ

Building SF:

ECM #2: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

232.21 Men's Rest Room 2600 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 223.6 35.5524 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $35.55 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Women's Rest Room 2600 1 3

2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens86 0.086 223.6 35.5524 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 223.6 $35.55 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 2600 6 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.372 967.2 153.7848 6 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.30 20% 773.76 $123.03 $250.00 $250.00 0.07 193.44 $30.76 8.13

555 2600 2 1 Recessed Down Light, 65w BR30 Lamp 65 0.13 338 53.742 2 0 No Change 65 0.13 0% 338 $53.74 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Assistant Principal 2600 6 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.516 1341.6 213.3144 6 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 86 0.41 20% 1073.28 $170.65 $250.00 $250.00 0.10 268.32 $42.66 5.86

222.11 Class Rm 205 2600 6 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.372 967.2 153.7848 6 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.30 20% 773.76 $123.03 $250.00 $250.00 0.07 193.44 $30.76 8.13

222.11 Class Rm 207 2600 15 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.93 2418 384.462 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.74 20% 1934.4 $307.57 $300.00 $300.00 0.19 483.6 $76.89 3.90

222.21 Rm 209 Teacher's Lounge 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 230.6772 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $184.54 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.14 5.42

222.11 Class Rm 211 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 230.6772 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $184.54 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.14 5.42

222.21 Class Rm 213 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 230.6772 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $184.54 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.14 5.42

222.21 Class Rm 214 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 230.6772 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $184.54 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.14 5.42

222.11 Class Rm 212 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 230.6772 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $184.54 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.14 5.42

222.21 Class Rm 210 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 230.6772 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $184.54 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.14 5.42

232.21 Office 208 2600 6 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.516 1341.6 213.3144 6 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 86 0.41 20% 1073.28 $170.65 $250.00 $250.00 0.10 268.32 $42.66 5.86

222.21 Class Rm 206 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 230.6772 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $184.54 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.14 5.42

211.11 200 Wing Corridor 4400 32 1

1x4, 1 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

33 1.056 4646.4 738.7776 32 0 No Change 33 1.06 0% 4646.4 $738.78 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Ridge High School

297,152

Nurse

Page 484: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E18 of 32

ECM #2: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

227.21 SAC office 2600 16 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 1.04 2704 429.936 16 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 65 0.83 20% 2163.2 $343.95 $250.00 $250.00 0.21 540.8 $85.99 2.91

227.21 Resource Officer 202 2600 4 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.26 676 107.484 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 65 0.21 20% 540.8 $85.99 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 135.2 $21.50 6.98

232.21 Office 200 2600 4 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.344 894.4 142.2096 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 86 0.28 20% 715.52 $113.77 $150.00 $150.00 0.07 178.88 $28.44 5.27

222.21 Boy's Rest Room 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 51.2616 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 322.4 $51.26 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Girl's Rest Room 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 51.2616 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 322.4 $51.26 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.31 Custodial Closet 1200 1 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700

Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

107 0.107 128.4 20.4156 1 0 No Change 107 0.11 0% 128.4 $20.42 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Band 222 2600 21 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.806 4695.6 746.6004 21 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 86 1.44 20% 3756.48 $597.28 $300.00 $300.00 0.36 939.12 $149.32 2.01

222.21 Instrument Storage 1200 3 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 223.2 35.4888 3 0 No Change 62 0.19 0% 223.2 $35.49 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Practice Rm 1&2 1200 4 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 297.6 47.3184 4 0 No Change 62 0.25 0% 297.6 $47.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 223 Orchestra 2600 29 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 1.798 4674.8 743.2932 29 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 1.44 20% 3739.84 $594.63 $300.00 $300.00 0.36 934.96 $148.66 2.02

222.21 Practice Rm 3,4,5 1200 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 297.6 47.3184 4 0 No Change 62 0.25 0% 297.6 $47.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Office 300 2600 3 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 483.6 76.8924 3 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.15 20% 386.88 $61.51 $150.00 $150.00 0.04 96.72 $15.38 9.75

222.21 Girl's Rest Room 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 51.2616 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 322.4 $51.26 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Boy's Rest Room 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 51.2616 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 322.4 $51.26 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.11 Custodial Closet 1200 1 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 74.4 11.8296 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 74.4 $11.83 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.11 Class Rm 301 2600 11 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.682 1773.2 281.9388 11 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.55 20% 1418.56 $225.55 $300.00 $300.00 0.14 354.64 $56.39 5.32

Page 485: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E19 of 32

ECM #2: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

211.15 Faculty Rest Room 2600 1 1

1x4, 1 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

33 0.033 85.8 13.6422 1 0 No Change 33 0.03 0% 85.8 $13.64 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Prep Rm 303 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 102.5232 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.20 20% 515.84 $82.02 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 128.96 $20.50 7.32

222.21 Class Rm 305 2600 11 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.682 1773.2 281.9388 11 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.55 20% 1418.56 $225.55 $0.00 $0.00 0.14 354.64 $56.39 0.00

242.21 Class Rm 307 2600 12 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 1.284 3338.4 530.8056 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 107 1.03 20% 2670.72 $424.64 $300.00 $300.00 0.26 667.68 $106.16 2.83

242.21 Office 2600 4 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.428 1112.8 176.9352 4 0 No Change 107 0.43 0% 1112.8 $176.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Class Rm 309 2600 12 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 1.284 3338.4 530.8056 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 107 1.03 20% 2670.72 $424.64 $300.00 $300.00 0.26 667.68 $106.16 2.83

232.22 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

86 0.258 670.8 106.6572 3 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 86 0.21 20% 536.64 $85.33 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 134.16 $21.33 7.03

132.22 2600 2 32x4, 3-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

127 0.254 660.4 105.0036 2 0 No Change 127 0.25 0% 660.4 $105.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

132.22 Class Rm 313 2600 14 32x4, 3-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

127 1.778 4622.8 735.0252 14 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 127 1.42 20% 3698.24 $588.02 $300.00 $300.00 0.36 924.56 $147.01 2.04

132.22 2600 8 32x4, 3-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

127 1.016 2641.6 420.0144 8 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 127 0.81 20% 2113.28 $336.01 $250.00 $250.00 0.20 528.32 $84.00 2.98

232.22 2600 4 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

86 0.344 894.4 142.2096 4 0 No Change 86 0.34 0% 894.4 $142.21 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

132.22 Prep Rm 316 2600 4 32x4, 3-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

127 0.508 1320.8 210.0072 4 0 No Change 127 0.51 0% 1320.8 $210.01 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 4400 7 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.602 2648.8 421.1592 7 0 No Change 86 0.60 0% 2648.8 $421.16 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

211.11 4400 25 1

1x4, 1 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

33 0.825 3630 577.17 25 0 No Change 33 0.83 0% 3630 $577.17 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Class Rm 308 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 230.6772 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $184.54 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.14 5.42

222.21 Class Rm 306 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 307.5696 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $246.06 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $61.51 4.88

222.11 Class Rm 302 2600 18 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 1.116 2901.6 461.3544 18 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.89 20% 2321.28 $369.08 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 580.32 $92.27 3.25

Office 311

Class Rm 314

Corridor 300

Page 486: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E20 of 32

ECM #2: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.11 Ramp 4400 9 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 2455.2 390.3768 9 0 No Change 62 0.56 0% 2455.2 $390.38 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

725 Courtyard 4400 2 1 150w HPS Wallpack 188 0.376 1654.4 263.0496 2 0 No Change 188 0.38 0% 1654.4 $263.05 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Publications 419 2600 8 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.496 1289.6 205.0464 8 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.40 20% 1031.68 $164.04 $250.00 $250.00 0.10 257.92 $41.01 6.10

221.45 Faculty Rest Room 2600 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Indirect

58 0.058 150.8 23.9772 1 0 No Change 58 0.06 0% 150.8 $23.98 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Class Rm 402 2600 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 161.2 25.6308 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 161.2 $25.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Class Rm 404A 2600 15 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.93 2418 384.462 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.74 20% 1934.4 $307.57 $300.00 $300.00 0.19 483.6 $76.89 3.90

221.11 Class Rm 405 2600 12 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 307.5696 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $246.06 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $61.51 4.88

651 Custodial Closet 1200 1 1 "Industrial" Relector, 26w CFL 26 0.026 31.2 4.9608 1 0 No Change 26 0.03 0% 31.2 $4.96 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 51.2616 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 322.4 $51.26 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 26.871 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $26.87 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 51.2616 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 322.4 $51.26 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 26.871 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $26.87 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Class Rm 406 2600 12 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 307.5696 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $246.06 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $61.51 4.88

221.11 Copy Rm 407 2600 4 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 102.5232 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.20 20% 515.84 $82.02 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 128.96 $20.50 7.32

221.11 Class Rm 408 2600 12 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 307.5696 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $246.06 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $61.51 4.88

221.11 Class Rm 409 2600 12 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 307.5696 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $246.06 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $61.51 4.88

221.11 Class Rm 410 2600 12 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 307.5696 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $246.06 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $61.51 4.88

Girl's Rest Room

Boy's Rest Room

Page 487: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E21 of 32

ECM #2: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.37 Class Rm 411 2600 24 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.392 3619.2 575.4528 24 2

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.11 20% 2895.36 $460.36 $300.00 $600.00 0.28 723.84 $115.09 5.21

221.11 Class Rm 412 2600 12 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 307.5696 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $246.06 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $61.51 4.88

211.11 400 Corridor 4400 30 1

1x4, 1 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

33 0.99 4356 692.604 30 0 No Change 33 0.99 0% 4356 $692.60 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Class Rm 414 2600 12 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 307.5696 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $246.06 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $61.51 4.88

221.31 Com. Closet 1200 2 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 148.8 23.6592 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 148.8 $23.66 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Storage 1200 2 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.214 256.8 40.8312 2 0 No Change 107 0.21 0% 256.8 $40.83 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 500 D Storage 1200 3 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.321 385.2 61.2468 3 0 No Change 107 0.32 0% 385.2 $61.25 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

561 2600 12 2 Recessed Down Light, (2) 26w Quad PL Lamp 52 0.624 1622.4 257.9616 12 0 No Change 52 0.62 0% 1622.4 $257.96 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

2 2600 60 3 2x2 3 Lamp 40w Biax Lamp 126 7.56 19656 3125.304 60 0 No Change 126 7.56 0% 19656 $3,125.30 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Video 500A 2600 1 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.107 278.2 44.2338 1 0 No Change 107 0.11 0% 278.2 $44.23 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Office 500C 2600 3 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.321 834.6 132.7014 3 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 107 0.26 20% 667.68 $106.16 $150.00 $150.00 0.06 166.92 $26.54 5.65

242.21 Office 500C 2600 1 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.107 278.2 44.2338 1 0 No Change 107 0.11 0% 278.2 $44.23 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Stairwell 4 4400 5 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.31 1364 216.876 5 0 No Change 62 0.31 0% 1364 $216.88 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 Class Rm 502 2600 28 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.624 4222.4 671.3616 28 2

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.30 20% 3377.92 $537.09 $300.00 $600.00 0.32 844.48 $134.27 4.47

221.37 Prep Rm 504 2600 6 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 0.348 904.8 143.8632 6 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 58 0.28 20% 723.84 $115.09 $150.00 $150.00 0.07 180.96 $28.77 5.21

221.37 Class Rm 506 2600 28 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.624 4222.4 671.3616 28 2

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.30 20% 3377.92 $537.09 $300.00 $600.00 0.32 844.48 $134.27 4.47

222.21 Stairwell 5 4400 5 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.31 1364 216.876 5 0 No Change 62 0.31 0% 1364 $216.88 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Media Center

Page 488: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E22 of 32

ECM #2: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.37 Class Rm 508 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.16 3016 479.544 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.93 20% 2412.8 $383.64 $300.00 $300.00 0.23 603.2 $95.91 3.13

221.31 Electric Rm 1200 2 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 148.8 23.6592 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 148.8 $23.66 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Com Closet 1200 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 74.4 11.8296 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 74.4 $11.83 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 Class Rm 510 2600 23 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.334 3468.4 551.4756 23 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.07 20% 2774.72 $441.18 $300.00 $300.00 0.27 693.68 $110.30 2.72

221.37 Class Rm 512 2600 23 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.334 3468.4 551.4756 23 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.07 20% 2774.72 $441.18 $300.00 $300.00 0.27 693.68 $110.30 2.72

221.37 Class Rm 514 2600 23 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.334 3468.4 551.4756 23 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.07 20% 2774.72 $441.18 $300.00 $300.00 0.27 693.68 $110.30 2.72

221.37 Class Rm 516 2600 23 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.334 3468.4 551.4756 23 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.07 20% 2774.72 $441.18 $300.00 $300.00 0.27 693.68 $110.30 2.72

222.21 Stairwell 7 4400 5 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.31 1364 216.876 5 0 No Change 62 0.31 0% 1364 $216.88 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 Class Rm 519 2600 23 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.334 3468.4 551.4756 23 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.07 20% 2774.72 $441.18 $300.00 $300.00 0.27 693.68 $110.30 2.72

221.37 Class Rm 517 2600 23 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.334 3468.4 551.4756 23 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.07 20% 2774.72 $441.18 $300.00 $300.00 0.27 693.68 $110.30 2.72

221.37 Class Rm 515 2600 23 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.334 3468.4 551.4756 23 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.07 20% 2774.72 $441.18 $300.00 $300.00 0.27 693.68 $110.30 2.72

222.21 500 Corridor 4400 30 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 1.86 8184 1301.256 30 0 No Change 62 1.86 0% 8184 $1,301.26 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Work Rm 513 2600 8 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.688 1788.8 284.4192 8 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 86 0.55 20% 1431.04 $227.54 $150.00 $150.00 0.14 357.76 $56.88 2.64

221.37 Class Rm 511 2600 23 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.334 3468.4 551.4756 23 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.07 20% 2774.72 $441.18 $300.00 $300.00 0.27 693.68 $110.30 2.72

Page 489: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E23 of 32

ECM #2: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.37 Class Rm 509 2600 28 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.624 4222.4 671.3616 28 2

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.30 20% 3377.92 $537.09 $300.00 $600.00 0.32 844.48 $134.27 4.47

242.21 Prep Rm 2600 3 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.321 834.6 132.7014 3 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 107 0.26 20% 667.68 $106.16 $150.00 $150.00 0.06 166.92 $26.54 5.65

221.37 Class Rm 505 2600 28 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.624 4222.4 671.3616 28 2

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.30 20% 3377.92 $537.09 $300.00 $600.00 0.32 844.48 $134.27 4.47

222.21 Boy's Rest Room 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 51.2616 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 322.4 $51.26 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Girl's Rest Room 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 51.2616 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 322.4 $51.26 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Custodial Closet 1200 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 74.4 11.8296 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 74.4 $11.83 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Class Rm 706 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.032 2683.2 426.6288 12 0 No Change 86 1.03 0% 2683.2 $426.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Class Rm 708 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.032 2683.2 426.6288 12 0 No Change 86 1.03 0% 2683.2 $426.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Class Rm 710 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.032 2683.2 426.6288 12 0 No Change 86 1.03 0% 2683.2 $426.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Class Rm 712 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.032 2683.2 426.6288 12 0 No Change 86 1.03 0% 2683.2 $426.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 700 Corridor 4400 28 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 1.736 7638.4 1214.5056 28 0 No Change 62 1.74 0% 7638.4 $1,214.51 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.41 Stairwell 4400 7 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Prismatic

58 0.406 1786.4 284.0376 7 0 No Change 58 0.41 0% 1786.4 $284.04 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.22 Class Rm 713 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

86 1.032 2683.2 426.6288 12 0 No Change 86 1.03 0% 2683.2 $426.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Class Rm 711 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.032 2683.2 426.6288 12 0 No Change 86 1.03 0% 2683.2 $426.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Class Rm 709 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.032 2683.2 426.6288 12 0 No Change 86 1.03 0% 2683.2 $426.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Class Rm 705 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.032 2683.2 426.6288 12 0 No Change 86 1.03 0% 2683.2 $426.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Class Rm 703 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.032 2683.2 426.6288 12 0 No Change 86 1.03 0% 2683.2 $426.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.41 Stairwell 4400 8 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Prismatic

58 0.464 2041.6 324.6144 8 0 No Change 58 0.46 0% 2041.6 $324.61 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.22 Class Rm 701 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

86 1.032 2683.2 426.6288 12 0 No Change 86 1.03 0% 2683.2 $426.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Page 490: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E24 of 32

ECM #2: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.31 Electric Rm 1200 5 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.31 372 59.148 5 0 No Change 62 0.31 0% 372 $59.15 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Corridor 4400 15 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.93 4092 650.628 15 0 No Change 62 0.93 0% 4092 $650.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Teacher's Lounge 2600 6 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.642 1669.2 265.4028 6 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 107 0.51 20% 1335.36 $212.32 $250.00 $250.00 0.13 333.84 $53.08 4.71

2.1 4400 9 2 2x2 2 Lamp 40w Biax Lamp 88 0.792 3484.8 554.0832 9 0 No Change 88 0.79 0% 3484.8 $554.08 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

560 4400 9 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w Quad PL Lamp 26 0.234 1029.6 163.7064 9 0 No Change 26 0.23 0% 1029.6 $163.71 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

100 Display Cases 4400 6 2 (2) 2' 1-Lamp, 20w T12, Mag. Ballast, No Lens 43 0.258 1135.2 180.4968 6 0 No Change 43 0.26 0% 1135.2 $180.50 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

2.1 2nd Floor Starway Landing 4400 9 2 2x2 2 Lamp 40w Biax

Lamp 88 0.792 3484.8 554.0832 9 0 No Change 88 0.79 0% 3484.8 $554.08 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 Class Rm 522 2600 23 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.334 3468.4 551.4756 23 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.07 20% 2774.72 $441.18 $300.00 $300.00 0.27 693.68 $110.30 2.72

221.37 Class Rm 524 2600 23 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.334 3468.4 551.4756 23 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.07 20% 2774.72 $441.18 $300.00 $300.00 0.27 693.68 $110.30 2.72

221.37 Class Rm 526 2600 23 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.334 3468.4 551.4756 23 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.07 20% 2774.72 $441.18 $300.00 $300.00 0.27 693.68 $110.30 2.72

221.37 Class Rm 528 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 0.696 1809.6 287.7264 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.56 20% 1447.68 $230.18 $300.00 $300.00 0.14 361.92 $57.55 5.21

221.31 Book Rm 2600 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 483.6 76.8924 3 0 No Change 62 0.19 0% 483.6 $76.89 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Storage 1200 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 74.4 11.8296 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 74.4 $11.83 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Electric Rm 1200 2 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 148.8 23.6592 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 148.8 $23.66 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 Class Rm 530 2600 23 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.334 3468.4 551.4756 23 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.07 20% 2774.72 $441.18 $300.00 $300.00 0.27 693.68 $110.30 2.72

221.37 Class Rm 532 2600 23 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.334 3468.4 551.4756 23 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.07 20% 2774.72 $441.18 $300.00 $300.00 0.27 693.68 $110.30 2.72

221.37 Class Rm 534 2600 23 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.334 3468.4 551.4756 23 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.07 20% 2774.72 $441.18 $300.00 $300.00 0.27 693.68 $110.30 2.72

Main Stairs Lobby Area

Page 491: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E25 of 32

ECM #2: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.37 Class Rm 539 2600 23 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.334 3468.4 551.4756 23 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.07 20% 2774.72 $441.18 $300.00 $300.00 0.27 693.68 $110.30 2.72

221.37 Class Rm 537 2600 23 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.334 3468.4 551.4756 23 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.07 20% 2774.72 $441.18 $300.00 $300.00 0.27 693.68 $110.30 2.72

221.37 Class Rm 535 2600 23 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.334 3468.4 551.4756 23 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.07 20% 2774.72 $441.18 $300.00 $300.00 0.27 693.68 $110.30 2.72

221.37 Class Rm 531 2600 23 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.334 3468.4 551.4756 23 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.07 20% 2774.72 $441.18 $300.00 $300.00 0.27 693.68 $110.30 2.72

221.37 Class Rm 529 2600 23 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.334 3468.4 551.4756 23 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.07 20% 2774.72 $441.18 $0.00 $0.00 0.27 693.68 $110.30 0.00

221.37 Class Rm 527 2600 8 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 0.464 1206.4 191.8176 8 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.37 20% 965.12 $153.45 $300.00 $300.00 0.09 241.28 $38.36 7.82

221.37 Class Rm 525 2600 23 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.334 3468.4 551.4756 23 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.07 20% 2774.72 $441.18 $300.00 $300.00 0.27 693.68 $110.30 2.72

221.11 Storage 1200 6 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.372 446.4 70.9776 6 0 No Change 62 0.37 0% 446.4 $70.98 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Boy's Rest Room 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 102.5232 4 0 No Change 62 0.25 0% 644.8 $102.52 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Girl's Rest Room 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 102.5232 4 0 No Change 62 0.25 0% 644.8 $102.52 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Custodial Closet 1200 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 74.4 11.8296 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 74.4 $11.83 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 2nd Floor 500 Corridor 4400 28 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 1.736 7638.4 1214.5056 28 0 No Change 62 1.74 0% 7638.4 $1,214.51 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 2nd Floor 700 Corridor 4400 30 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 1.86 8184 1301.256 30 0 No Change 62 1.86 0% 8184 $1,301.26 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Girl's Rest Room 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 102.5232 4 0 No Change 62 0.25 0% 644.8 $102.52 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Boy's Rest Room 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 102.5232 4 0 No Change 62 0.25 0% 644.8 $102.52 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Page 492: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E26 of 32

ECM #2: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.31 Custodial Closet 1200 2 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 148.8 23.6592 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 148.8 $23.66 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Class Rm 724 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.032 2683.2 426.6288 12 0 No Change 86 1.03 0% 2683.2 $426.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Class Rm 726 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.032 2683.2 426.6288 12 0 No Change 86 1.03 0% 2683.2 $426.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Class Rm 728 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.032 2683.2 426.6288 12 0 No Change 86 1.03 0% 2683.2 $426.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Class Rm 730 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.032 2683.2 426.6288 12 0 No Change 86 1.03 0% 2683.2 $426.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Class Rm 731 2600 8 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.688 1788.8 284.4192 8 0 No Change 86 0.69 0% 1788.8 $284.42 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Class Rm 729 2600 8 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.688 1788.8 284.4192 8 0 No Change 86 0.69 0% 1788.8 $284.42 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Class Rm 727 2600 16 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 1.712 4451.2 707.7408 16 0 No Change 107 1.71 0% 4451.2 $707.74 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Class Rm 725 2600 16 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 1.712 4451.2 707.7408 16 0 No Change 107 1.71 0% 4451.2 $707.74 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Prep Rm 2600 4 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.428 1112.8 176.9352 4 0 No Change 107 0.43 0% 1112.8 $176.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Class Rm 723 2600 16 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 1.712 4451.2 707.7408 16 0 No Change 107 1.71 0% 4451.2 $707.74 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Prep Rm 2600 4 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.428 1112.8 176.9352 4 0 No Change 107 0.43 0% 1112.8 $176.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Class Rm 721 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.032 2683.2 426.6288 12 0 No Change 86 1.03 0% 2683.2 $426.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 IDF Closet 1200 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 74.4 11.8296 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 74.4 $11.83 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Class Rm 720 2600 14 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.204 3130.4 497.7336 14 0 No Change 86 1.20 0% 3130.4 $497.73 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Work Rm 2600 10 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 1.07 2782 442.338 10 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 107 0.86 20% 2225.6 $353.87 $150.00 $150.00 0.21 556.4 $88.47 1.70

222.21 Work Rm Rest Room 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 51.2616 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 322.4 $51.26 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Mech Rm 1200 8 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.496 595.2 94.6368 8 0 No Change 62 0.50 0% 595.2 $94.64 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Electric Rm 1200 2 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 148.8 23.6592 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 148.8 $23.66 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Page 493: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E27 of 32

ECM #2: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

232.22 PAC Office 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

86 0.258 670.8 106.6572 3 0 No Change 86 0.26 0% 670.8 $106.66 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.22 Green Room 2600 4 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

86 0.344 894.4 142.2096 4 0 No Change 86 0.34 0% 894.4 $142.21 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Custodial Closet 1200 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 74.4 11.8296 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 74.4 $11.83 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Storage 1200 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 297.6 47.3184 4 0 No Change 62 0.25 0% 297.6 $47.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Set Shop 2600 20 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.72 4472 711.048 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 86 1.38 20% 3577.6 $568.84 $300.00 $300.00 0.34 894.4 $142.21 2.11

222.21 Auditorium Corridors 4400 41 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 2.542 11184.8 1778.3832 41 0 No Change 62 2.54 0% 11184.8 $1,778.38 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

550.1 2600 50 1 Recessed Down Light, 100w MH Lamp 120 6 15600 2480.4 50 0 No Change 120 6.00 0% 15600 $2,480.40 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

650 2600 14 2 Wall Sconce, (2) 26w PL Quad Lamp 54 0.756 1965.6 312.5304 14 0 No Change 54 0.76 0% 1965.6 $312.53 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.31 Stage 2600 6 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700

Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

107 0.642 1669.2 265.4028 6 0 No Change 107 0.64 0% 1669.2 $265.40 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

550.1 Under Stage 1200 14 1 Recessed Down Light, 100w MH Lamp 120 1.68 2016 320.544 14 0 No Change 120 1.68 0% 2016 $320.54 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 2600 25 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 2.15 5590 888.81 25 2

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 86 1.72 20% 4472 $711.05 $300.00 $600.00 0.43 1118 $177.76 3.38

550.1 2600 8 1 Recessed Down Light, 100w MH Lamp 120 0.96 2496 396.864 8 0 No Change 120 0.96 0% 2496 $396.86 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Dance Studio 231 2600 13 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 1.391 3616.6 575.0394 13 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 107 1.11 20% 2893.28 $460.03 $300.00 $300.00 0.28 723.32 $115.01 2.61

232.22 Dance Office Office 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

86 0.172 447.2 71.1048 2 0 No Change 86 0.17 0% 447.2 $71.10 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Storage 1200 4 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 297.6 47.3184 4 0 No Change 62 0.25 0% 297.6 $47.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Custodial Closet 1200 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 74.4 11.8296 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 74.4 $11.83 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Storage 1200 4 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 297.6 47.3184 4 0 No Change 62 0.25 0% 297.6 $47.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

550.1 Auditorium Lobby 4400 22 1 Recessed Down Light, 100w MH Lamp 120 2.64 11616 1846.944 22 0 No Change 120 2.64 0% 11616 $1,846.94 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

550.1 Auditorium Vestibule 4400 25 1 Recessed Down Light,

100w MH Lamp 120 3 13200 2098.8 25 0 No Change 120 3.00 0% 13200 $2,098.80 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

211.11 4400 17 1

1x4, 1 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

33 0.561 2468.4 392.4756 17 0 No Change 33 0.56 0% 2468.4 $392.48 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Auditorium

Choral Rm 230

Gym Corridor

Page 494: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E28 of 32

ECM #2: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

227.21 4400 2 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.13 572 90.948 2 0 No Change 65 0.13 0% 572 $90.95 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

264.21 2600 18 6

4x4, 6 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

172 3.096 8049.6 1279.8864 18 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 172 2.48 20% 6439.68 $1,023.91 $300.00 $300.00 0.62 1609.92 $255.98 1.17

780 2600 2 8 8 Lamp, 42w CFL LoBay 336 0.672 1747.2 277.8048 2 0 No Change 336 0.67 0% 1747.2 $277.80 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

770 Gym C 2600 24 1 400w MH, LoBay Prismatic Lens 465 11.16 29016 4613.544 24 2

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 465 8.93 20% 23212.8 $3,690.84 $300.00 $600.00 2.23 5803.2 $922.71 0.65

221.26 Girl's LR L4 2600 11 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Vapor-Tite Acrylic

Lens

58 0.638 1658.8 263.7492 11 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.51 20% 1327.04 $211.00 $300.00 $300.00 0.13 331.76 $52.75 5.69

242.21 Gym Office 2600 11 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 1.177 3060.2 486.5718 11 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 107 0.94 20% 2448.16 $389.26 $0.00 $0.00 0.24 612.04 $97.31 0.00

222.21 Girl's LR L6 2600 16 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.992 2579.2 410.0928 16 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.79 20% 2063.36 $328.07 $300.00 $300.00 0.20 515.84 $82.02 3.66

766 Gym D 2600 9 1 400w MH, Prismatic Lens 465 4.185 10881 1730.079 9 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 465 3.35 20% 8704.8 $1,384.06 $300.00 $300.00 0.84 2176.2 $346.02 0.87

222.21 Boy's Rest Room 2600 3 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 483.6 76.8924 3 0 No Change 62 0.19 0% 483.6 $76.89 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Girl's Rest Room 2600 3 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 483.6 76.8924 3 0 No Change 62 0.19 0% 483.6 $76.89 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Electric Rm 1200 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 74.4 11.8296 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 74.4 $11.83 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

121.11 Custodial Closet 1200 2 21x4, 2-Lamp, 34w T12,

Mag. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

78 0.156 187.2 29.7648 2 0 No Change 78 0.16 0% 187.2 $29.76 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Boy's LR L5 2600 16 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.992 2579.2 410.0928 16 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.79 20% 2063.36 $328.07 $300.00 $300.00 0.20 515.84 $82.02 3.66

222.21 Work Rm 616 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 102.5232 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.20 20% 515.84 $82.02 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 128.96 $20.50 7.32

770 Wood Shop 618 2600 12 1 400w MH, LoBay Prismatic Lens 465 5.58 14508 2306.772 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 465 4.46 20% 11606.4 $1,845.42 $300.00 $300.00 1.12 2901.6 $461.35 0.65

Gym Corridor

Gym B

Page 495: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E29 of 32

ECM #2: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.21 Graphics 623 2600 15 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.93 2418 384.462 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.74 20% 1934.4 $307.57 $300.00 $300.00 0.19 483.6 $76.89 3.90

221.31 Storage 1200 2 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 148.8 23.6592 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 148.8 $23.66 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 Graphics 622 2600 23 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.334 3468.4 551.4756 23 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.07 20% 2774.72 $441.18 $300.00 $300.00 0.27 693.68 $110.30 2.72

242.21 Class Rm 621 2600 18 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 1.926 5007.6 796.2084 18 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 107 1.54 20% 4006.08 $636.97 $300.00 $300.00 0.39 1001.52 $159.24 1.88

242.21 Art 620 2600 20 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 2.14 5564 884.676 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 107 1.71 20% 4451.2 $707.74 $300.00 $300.00 0.43 1112.8 $176.94 1.70

221.11 Basement 2600 36 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 2.232 5803.2 922.7088 36 2

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 1.79 20% 4642.56 $738.17 $300.00 $600.00 0.45 1160.64 $184.54 3.25

222.21 4400 3 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 818.4 130.1256 3 0 No Change 62 0.19 0% 818.4 $130.13 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 4400 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.186 818.4 130.1256 3 0 No Change 62 0.19 0% 818.4 $130.13 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 4400 13 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.806 3546.4 563.8776 13 0 No Change 62 0.81 0% 3546.4 $563.88 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

211.11 4400 41 1

1x4, 1 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

33 1.353 5953.2 946.5588 41 0 No Change 33 1.35 0% 5953.2 $946.56 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Art 619 2600 20 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 2.14 5564 884.676 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 107 1.71 20% 4451.2 $707.74 $300.00 $300.00 0.43 1112.8 $176.94 1.70

242.21 Art 615 2600 16 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 1.712 4451.2 707.7408 16 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 107 1.37 20% 3560.96 $566.19 $300.00 $300.00 0.34 890.24 $141.55 2.12

242.21 Class Rm 614 2600 16 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 1.712 4451.2 707.7408 16 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 107 1.37 20% 3560.96 $566.19 $300.00 $300.00 0.34 890.24 $141.55 2.12

222.21 Assistant Principal 613 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 102.5232 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.20 20% 515.84 $82.02 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 128.96 $20.50 7.32

Exit 9

600 Corridor

Page 496: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E30 of 32

ECM #2: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.21 Office 613A 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 307.5696 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $246.06 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $61.51 4.88

222.21 Class Rm 612 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 307.5696 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $246.06 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $61.51 4.88

222.21 Class Rm 611 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 307.5696 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $246.06 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $61.51 4.88

221.26 Boy's LR L3 2600 16 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Vapor-Tite Acrylic

Lens

58 0.928 2412.8 383.6352 16 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.74 20% 1930.24 $306.91 $300.00 $300.00 0.19 482.56 $76.73 3.91

242.21 Class Rm 630 2600 20 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 2.14 5564 884.676 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 107 1.71 20% 4451.2 $707.74 $300.00 $300.00 0.43 1112.8 $176.94 1.70

211.11 Gym/Boiler Rm Corridor 4400 15 1

1x4, 1 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

33 0.495 2178 346.302 15 0 No Change 33 0.50 0% 2178 $346.30 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.26 2600 16 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Vapor-Tite Acrylic

Lens

58 0.928 2412.8 383.6352 16 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.74 20% 1930.24 $306.91 $0.00 $0.00 0.19 482.56 $76.73 0.00

242.11 2600 2 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.214 556.4 88.4676 2 0 No Change 107 0.21 0% 556.4 $88.47 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Office LR 2600 2 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.214 556.4 88.4676 2 0 No Change 107 0.21 0% 556.4 $88.47 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Music 624 2600 13 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.806 2095.6 333.2004 13 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.64 20% 1676.48 $266.56 $300.00 $300.00 0.16 419.12 $66.64 4.50

222.21 Girl's Rest Room 2600 1 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 161.2 25.6308 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 161.2 $25.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Office 626 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 51.2616 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 322.4 $51.26 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Weight Rm 625 2600 28 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 2.408 6260.8 995.4672 28 2

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 86 1.93 20% 5008.64 $796.37 $300.00 $600.00 0.48 1252.16 $199.09 3.01

232.21 Trainer 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.258 670.8 106.6572 3 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 86 0.21 20% 536.64 $85.33 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 134.16 $21.33 7.03

221.31 Receiving 2600 12 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 307.5696 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $246.06 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $61.51 4.88

Boy's LR L1

Page 497: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E31 of 32

ECM #2: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

746 Gym A Lobby 2600 18 1 250w MH LoBay w/Prismatic Lens 295 5.31 13806 2195.154 18 0 No Change 295 5.31 0% 13806 $2,195.15 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.22 AD Office 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

86 0.172 447.2 71.1048 2 0 No Change 86 0.17 0% 447.2 $71.10 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Trainers 2600 8 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.688 1788.8 284.4192 8 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 86 0.55 20% 1431.04 $227.54 $250.00 $250.00 0.14 357.76 $56.88 4.39

232.21 Official's Lockers 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.172 447.2 71.1048 2 0 No Change 86 0.17 0% 447.2 $71.10 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Boy's Rest Room 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 102.5232 4 0 No Change 62 0.25 0% 644.8 $102.52 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Boy's LR L7 2600 12 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 307.5696 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $246.06 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $61.51 4.88

222.21 PE Office 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 51.2616 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 322.4 $51.26 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Boy's LR L9 2600 6 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.372 967.2 153.7848 6 0 No Change 62 0.37 0% 967.2 $153.78 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Gym Hall 4400 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 3273.6 520.5024 12 0 No Change 62 0.74 0% 3273.6 $520.50 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

765 Gym A 2600 38 1 400w MH Pulse Start HiBay 465 17.67 45942 7304.778 38 0 No Change 465 17.67 0% 45942 $7,304.78 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Girl's LR L10 2600 12 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 307.5696 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $246.06 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $61.51 4.88

221.31 Girl's LR L8 2600 6 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.372 967.2 153.7848 6 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.30 20% 773.76 $123.03 $150.00 $150.00 0.07 193.44 $30.76 4.88

222.21 PE Office 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 51.2616 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 322.4 $51.26 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 101 Receiving 2600 6 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.372 967.2 153.7848 6 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.30 20% 773.76 $123.03 $150.00 $150.00 0.07 193.44 $30.76 4.88

242.21 Serving Line 2600 11 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 1.177 3060.2 486.5718 11 0 No Change 107 1.18 0% 3060.2 $486.57 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 Teacher's Lunch Rm 2600 22 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 1.43 3718 591.162 22 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 65 1.14 20% 2974.4 $472.93 $300.00 $300.00 0.29 743.6 $118.23 2.54

221.11 2600 19 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 1.178 3062.8 486.9852 19 0 No Change 62 1.18 0% 3062.8 $486.99 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 2600 12 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 1.284 3338.4 530.8056 12 0 No Change 107 1.28 0% 3338.4 $530.81 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Kitchen

Page 498: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E32 of 32

ECM #2: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

617 Hood 2600 6 1 Hood Light w/Globe & Cage, 100w A19 Lamp 100 0.6 1560 248.04 6 0 No Change 100 0.60 0% 1560 $248.04 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

237.21 2600 34 3

2x2, 3 Lamp, 31w T8 Ulamp, Elect. Ballast,

Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

92 3.128 8132.8 1293.1152 34 0 No Change 92 3.13 0% 8132.8 $1,293.12 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

551 2600 11 1 Recessed Down Light, 100w R40 Lamp 100 1.1 2860 454.74 11 0 No Change 100 1.10 0% 2860 $454.74 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

626 4400 6 2Architectual Cylinder,

Up/Dwn Light, (2) 90w PAR Lamp

180 1.08 4752 755.568 6 0 No Change 180 1.08 0% 4752 $755.57 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

750 4400 3 1 250w HPS Indirect 295 0.885 3894 619.146 3 0 No Change 295 0.89 0% 3894 $619.15 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

561 2600 6 2 Recessed Down Light, (2) 26w Quad PL Lamp 52 0.312 811.2 128.9808 6 0 No Change 52 0.31 0% 811.2 $128.98 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 2600 31 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 2.015 5239 833.001 31 0 No Change 65 2.02 0% 5239 $833.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 Main Lobby 2600 18 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 1.17 3042 483.678 18 0 No Change 65 1.17 0% 3042 $483.68 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.22 Guidence Office 2600 14 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

86 1.204 3130.4 497.7336 14 0 No Change 86 1.20 0% 3130.4 $497.73 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.211 Guidence Hall 2600 16 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.544 1414.4 224.8896 16 0 No Change 34 0.54 0% 1414.4 $224.89 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.22 Guidence Side Offices (20) 2600 68 3

2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Parabolic Lens86 5.848 15204.8 2417.5632 68 0 No Change 86 5.85 0% 15204.8 $2,417.56 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 Conf Rm 2600 4 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 0.232 603.2 95.9088 4 0 No Change 58 0.23 0% 603.2 $95.91 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.21 Main Office Corridor 4400 22 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic58 1.276 5614.4 892.6896 22 0 No Change 58 1.28 0% 5614.4 $892.69 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.22 2600 19 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

86 1.634 4248.4 675.4956 19 0 No Change 86 1.63 0% 4248.4 $675.50 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.22 2600 4 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 0.416 1081.6 171.9744 4 0 No Change 104 0.42 0% 1081.6 $171.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 2600 12 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.78 2028 322.452 12 0 No Change 65 0.78 0% 2028 $322.45 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

561 2600 5 2 Recessed Down Light, (2) 26w Quad PL Lamp 52 0.26 676 107.484 5 0 No Change 52 0.26 0% 676 $107.48 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 2600 4 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 0.232 603.2 95.9088 4 0 No Change 58 0.23 0% 603.2 $95.91 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

560 2600 8 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w Quad PL Lamp 26 0.208 540.8 85.9872 8 0 No Change 26 0.21 0% 540.8 $85.99 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.22 Principal's Office 2600 4 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

104 0.416 1081.6 171.9744 4 0 No Change 104 0.42 0% 1081.6 $171.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

725 4400 14 1 150w HPS Wallpack 188 2.632 11580.8 1841.3472 14 0 No Change 188 2.63 0% 11580.8 $1,841.35 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00735 4400 6 1 175w MH, Wallpack 210 1.26 5544 881.496 6 0 No Change 210 1.26 0% 5544 $881.50 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Totals 0 0 269.5 756,922.0 $120,351 3,145 119 243.3 688,618.4 $109,490.33 $31,250 26.27 68,304 $10,860 2.88

Main Office

Exterior

Conf Rm

Cafeteria

Page 499: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix FPage 1 of 4

Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Bernards Township Ridge High School

Location: Basking Ridge, NJ 07920Description: Photovoltaic System 95% Financing - 25 year

Simple Payback Analysis

Total Construction Cost $1,608,390Annual kWh Production 204,297

Annual Energy Cost Reduction $32,483Annual SREC Revenue $71,504

First Cost Premium $1,608,390

Simple Payback: Years

Life Cycle Cost AnalysisAnalysis Period (years): 25 Financing %: 95%Financing Term (mths): 300 Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0%

Average Energy Cost ($/kWh) $0.159 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0%Financing Rate: 7.00% SREC Value ($/kWh) $0.350

Period Additional Energy kWh Energy Cost Additional SREC Interest Loan Net Cash CumulativeCash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Expense Principal Flow Cash Flow

0 $80,420 0 0 0 $0 0 0 (80,420) 01 $0 204,297 $32,483 $0 $71,504 $106,217 $23,375 ($25,605) ($106,025)2 $0 203,276 $33,458 $0 $71,146 $104,528 $25,065 ($24,988) ($131,013)3 $0 202,259 $34,461 $0 $70,791 $102,716 $26,877 ($24,340) ($155,354)4 $0 201,248 $35,495 $0 $70,437 $100,773 $28,820 ($23,660) ($179,014)5 $0 200,242 $36,560 $2,062 $70,085 $98,689 $30,903 ($25,010) ($204,024)6 $0 199,240 $37,657 $2,052 $69,734 $96,455 $33,137 ($24,254) ($228,278)7 $0 198,244 $38,787 $2,042 $69,385 $94,060 $35,533 ($23,462) ($251,740)8 $0 197,253 $39,950 $2,032 $69,039 $91,491 $38,101 ($22,635) ($274,376)9 $0 196,267 $41,149 $2,022 $68,693 $88,737 $40,856 ($21,772) ($296,148)10 $0 195,285 $42,383 $2,011 $68,350 $85,783 $43,809 ($20,871) ($317,019)11 $0 194,309 $43,655 $2,001 $68,008 $82,617 $46,976 ($19,931) ($336,950)12 $0 193,337 $44,964 $1,991 $67,668 $79,221 $50,372 ($18,951) ($355,901)13 $0 192,371 $46,313 $1,981 $67,330 $75,579 $54,013 ($17,931) ($373,832)14 $0 191,409 $47,703 $1,972 $66,993 $71,675 $57,918 ($16,868) ($390,700)15 $0 190,452 $49,134 $1,962 $66,658 $67,488 $62,105 ($15,762) ($406,462)16 $0 189,500 $50,608 $1,952 $66,325 $62,998 $66,594 ($14,612) ($421,074)17 $0 188,552 $52,126 $1,942 $65,993 $58,184 $71,409 ($13,415) ($434,490)18 $0 187,609 $53,690 $1,932 $65,663 $53,022 $76,571 ($12,172) ($446,661)19 $0 186,671 $55,301 $1,923 $65,335 $47,487 $82,106 ($10,880) ($457,541)20 $0 185,738 $56,960 $1,913 $65,008 $41,551 $88,041 ($9,538) ($467,079)21 $0 184,809 $58,668 $1,904 $64,683 $37,856 $80,937 $2,655 ($464,424)22 $0 183,885 $60,428 $1,894 $64,360 $30,591 $66,604 $25,700 ($438,724)23 $0 182,966 $62,241 $1,885 $64,038 $0 $0 $124,395 ($314,330)24 $0 182,051 $64,108 $1,875 $63,718 $0 $0 $125,951 ($188,379)25 $0 181,141 $66,032 $1,866 $63,399 $0 $0 $127,565 ($60,813)

Totals: 4,812,410 $1,184,314 $41,214 $1,684,344 $1,677,717 $1,130,121 $19,606 ($7,700,352)

Net Present Value (NPV)Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

Photovoltaic System 95% Financing - 25 year

($194,892)-0.9%

15.47

Page 500: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix FPage 2 of 4

Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Bernards Township Ridge High School

Location: Basking Ridge, NJ 07920Description: Photovoltaic System - Direct Purchase

Simple Payback AnalysisPhotovoltaic System - Direct Purchase

Total Construction Cost $1,608,390Annual kWh Production 204,297

Annual Energy Cost Reduction $32,483Annual SREC Revenue $71,504

First Cost Premium

Simple Payback: Years

Life Cycle Cost AnalysisAnalysis Period (years): 25 Financing %: 0%Financing Term (mths): 0 Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0%

Average Energy Cost ($/kWh) $0.159 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0%Financing Rate: 0.00% SREC Value ($/kWh) $0.350

Period Additional Energy kWh Energy Cost Additional SREC Net Cash CumulativeCash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Flow Cash Flow

0 $1,608,390 0 0 0 $0 (1,608,390) 01 $0 204,297 $32,483 $0 $71,504 $103,987 ($1,504,403)2 $0 203,276 $33,458 $0 $71,146 $104,604 ($1,399,799)3 $0 202,259 $34,461 $0 $70,791 $105,252 ($1,294,547)4 $0 201,248 $35,495 $0 $70,437 $105,932 ($1,188,614)5 $0 200,242 $36,560 $2,062 $70,085 $104,582 ($1,084,032)6 $0 199,240 $37,657 $2,052 $69,734 $105,339 ($978,693)7 $0 198,244 $38,787 $2,042 $69,385 $106,130 ($872,563)8 $0 197,253 $39,950 $2,032 $69,039 $106,957 ($765,606)9 $0 196,267 $41,149 $2,022 $68,693 $107,821 ($657,785)

10 $0 195,285 $42,383 $2,011 $68,350 $108,722 ($549,064)11 $0 194,309 $43,655 $2,001 $68,008 $109,661 ($439,402)12 $0 193,337 $44,964 $1,991 $67,668 $110,641 ($328,761)13 $0 192,371 $46,313 $1,981 $67,330 $111,662 ($217,100)14 $0 191,409 $47,703 $1,972 $66,993 $112,724 ($104,375)15 $0 190,452 $49,134 $1,962 $66,658 $113,830 $9,45516 $0 189,500 $50,608 $1,952 $66,325 $114,981 $124,43617 $0 188,552 $52,126 $1,942 $65,993 $116,177 $240,61318 $0 187,609 $53,690 $1,932 $65,663 $117,421 $358,03419 $0 186,671 $55,301 $1,923 $65,335 $118,713 $476,74620 $0 185,738 $56,960 $1,913 $65,008 $120,055 $596,80121 $1 184,809 $58,668 $1,904 $64,683 $121,448 $718,24922 $2 183,885 $60,428 $1,894 $64,360 $122,894 $841,14323 $3 182,966 $62,241 $1,885 $64,038 $124,395 $965,53824 $4 182,051 $64,108 $1,875 $63,718 $125,951 $1,091,48925 $5 181,141 $66,032 $1,866 $63,399 $127,565 $1,219,054

Totals: 4,812,410 $1,184,314 $41,214 $1,684,344 $2,827,444 ($4,743,186)Net Present Value (NPV)

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

15.47

$1,608,390

$1,219,0794.7%

Page 501: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix FPage 3 of 4

Building Roof Area (sq ft) Panel Qty Panel Sq

Ft

Panel Total Sq

Ft

Total KWDC

Total Annual

kWh

Panel Weight (33

lbs)W/SQFT

Ridge High School

45,700 Sunpower SPR230

777 14.7 11,425 178.71 204,297 25,641 15.64

.= Proposed PV Layout

Composite.

`

Page 502: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix FPage 4 of 4

1 of 3.

2 of 3.

3 of 3.

Notes:1. Estimated kWH based on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory PVWatts Version 1 Calculator Program.

Page 503: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

ENERGY SAVINGS REPORT

INTELLI-HOOD VARIABLE EXHAUST CONTROLLER

CUSTOMER: Bernards BOE

COMPANY: CEGRETROFIT

ADDRESS: Ridge HS

ENERGY SAVINGS REPORT

Basking Ridge, NJ Mar-04-11

APPLICATION: Kitchen

- MOTOR OPERATING SAVINGS: $1,094 /YEAR

- HEATING SAVINGS: $1,359 /YEAR

- COOLING SAVINGS: $0 /YEAR

- TOTAL SAVINGS: $2,452 /YEAR

INSTALLED COST $23 500- INSTALLED COST: $23,500

- PAYBACK PERIOD: 9.6 YEARS

- RATE OF RETURN - 5 YEARS: -15.0 %

10 YEARS: 5.7 %

The projected savings shown above are based on the above store's

operating hours, HVAC system, cooking load, and geographic location.

Appendix GPage 1 of 5

Page 504: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

I. MOTOR OPERATING SAVINGS

INPUT DATA:

A Operating Hours Per Day 12 HRS/DAY

B Operating Days Per Week 5 DAYS/WK

C Operating Weeks Per Year 42 WKS/YR

D Horsepower of Fan Motor(s) 6 HP

E Load Factor of Fan Motor(s) 0.88

F Cost Per Kilowatt Hour 0.1588632 $/KWHR

CONSTANT EXHAUST VOLUME ANALYSIS:

G Total Time (A x B x C) 2520 HRS/YR

H Total KWHR/HP/YR (0.746/0.9 x G) 2088.8 KWHR/HP/YR

VARIABLE EXHAUST VOLUME ANALYSIS:

% Rated % Run Time Output System Input KWHR/RPM Time HRS/YR KW/HP Effic. KW/HP HP/YR

H I J=FxI K L M=K/L N=JxM

100 5 126 0.746 0.9 0.829 104.4

90 15 378 0.544 0.9 0.604 228.5

80 15 378 0.382 0.9 0.424 160.4

70 20 504 0.256 0.9 0.284 143.4

60 25 630 0.161 0.9 0.179 112.7

50 10 252 0.093 0.9 0.103 26.0

40 5 126 0.048 0.9 0.053 6.7

30 5 126 0.020 0.9 0.022 2.8

20 0 0 0.015 0.9 0.017 0.0

10 0 0 0.010 0.90 0.011 0.0 _________

O Total KWH/HP/YR (Total of Column N) 785.0

CALCULATION:

SAVINGS = (H - O) x D x E x F = $1,094 /YEAR ============

PAGE 1

Appendix GPage 2 of 5

Page 505: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

II. CONDITIONED MAKE-UP AIR - HEATING

INPUT DATA:

A Previous Net Exhaust Volume 8800 CFM

B New Net Exhaust Volume (1) 5984 CFM

C Winter Building Temperature 70 F

D Previous Net Heat Load (2) 424584 kBTU

E New Net Heat Load (2) 288717 kBTU

F Operating Hours Per Day 12.00 HRS/DAY

G Operating Days Per Week 5 DAYS/WK

- Heating Fuel Type Gas

H Cost Per Fuel Unit (3) 1.25 $/UNIT

J BTU Per Fuel Unit (4) 100 kBTU/UNIT

K System Efficiency (4) 75%

CALCULATION:

SAVINGS = (D - E) x 0.6 x H / (J x K)

= $1,359 /YEAR ==========

NOTES:TABLE 1

(1) Determine the New ExhaustVolume by completing TABLE 1. % Rated % RunThe New Exhaust Volume equals RPM (F) Time (I) F x Ithe AVG % RPM x the PreviousExhaust Volume. 100 5 5

90 15 14(2) Using design weather data 80 15 12via the Outdoor Airload Calculator 70 20 14and multiplied by days/year ratio. 60 25 15

50 10 5(3) Using local energy costs. 40 5 2

30 5 2(4) Using typical system 20 0 0efficiency. 10 0 0

AVG % RPM = 68%

PAGE 2

Appendix GPage 3 of 5

Page 506: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

III. CONDITIONED MAKE-UP AIR SAVINGS - COOLING

INPUT DATA:

A Previous Net Exhaust Volume 8800 CFM

B New Net Exhaust Volume (1) 5984 CFM

C Previous Net Cooling Load (2) 0 kBTU

D New Net Cooling Load (2) 0 kBTU

E AC Correction Factor (3) 1

F Cost Per Fuel Unit (5) 0.1588632 $/kWH

G COP (6) 2.6

CALCULATION:

SAVINGS = (C - D) x 0.6 x E x F / (3.413 x G)

= $0 /YEAR ============

NOTES:

(1) Using New Exhaust Volume from CONDITIONED MAKE-UP AIRSAVINGS - HEATING on page 2. See Note 1.

(2) Obtained from Outdoor Airload Calculator

(3) Using design weather data.

(4) The multiplier corrects for actual % outside air.

(5) Using local energy costs.

(6) Using typical system efficiency.

PAGE 3

Appendix GPage 4 of 5

Page 507: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

AFTER-TAX CASH FLOW ANALYSIS

INPUT DATA:

FIRST YEAR SAVINGS $2,452 /YEAR

INITIAL COST PLUS INSTALLATION $23,500

MARGINAL TAX RATE 0%

ESTIMATED ANNUAL INCREASE IN ENERGY COSTS 6%

NETDEPREC. DEPREC. AFTER-TAX

YEAR SAVINGS COST % $ CASH FLOW

0 -23,500 -23,5001 2452 - 29 6815 24522 2599 - 20 4700 25993 2755 - 13 3055 27554 2921 - 10 2350 29215 3096 - 9 2115 30966 3282 - 9 2115 32827 3479 - 9 2115 34798 3687 - 36879 3909 - 3909

10 4143 - 4143

CALCULATIONS:

NET PRESENT VALUE = -$12,505 ; INTERNAL RATE 5 YEARS @ 15% OF RETURN (IRR) = -15.0 %

NET PRESENT VALUE = -$7,230 ; INTERNAL RATE 10 YEARS @ 15% OF RETURN (IRR) = 5.7 %

NOTE:

Net After-tax Cash Flow is calculated as follows: NATCF = SAVINGS - COSTS - TAX RATE(SAVINGS - COSTS - DEPRECIATION)

Net Present Value is calculated as follows: NPV = C(0) + C(1)/(1 + r) + C(2)/(1 + r)^2 + ... + C(n)/(1 + r)^n (where C(n) is the net cash flow for the nth year and r is the opportunity cost of capital)

IRR is calculated by trial and error using the formula: NPV = C(0) + C(1)/(1 + IRR) + C(2)/(1 + IRR)^2 + ... + C(n)/(1 + IRR)^n

PAGE 4

Appendix GPage 5 of 5

Page 508: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

BERNARDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS WILLIAM ANNIN MIDDLE SCHOOL

70 QUINCY STREET

BASKING RIDGE, NJ 07920

FACILITY ENERGY REPORT

Page 509: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 1 of 55

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.  HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST ................................................................. 2 

II.  FACILITY DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................ 7 

III.  MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST ............................................................................................ 10 

IV.  ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES ..................................................................... 11 

V.  ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................... 55 

Appendix A – ECM Cost & Savings Breakdown

Appendix B – New Jersey Smart Start® Program Incentives

Appendix C – Portfolio Manager “Statement of Energy Performance”

Appendix D – Major Equipment List

Appendix E – Investment Grade Lighting Audit

Appendix F – Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculations

Page 510: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 2 of 55

I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has been tabulated and plotted in graph form as depicted within this section. Each energy source has been identified and monthly consumption and cost noted per the information provided by the Owner. Electric Utility Provider: Jersey Central Power & Light (JCP&L) Electric Utility Rate Structure: General Service Secondary (GSS) Third Party Supplier: South Jersey Energy Natural Gas Utility Provider: Public Service Electric and Gas (PSE&G) Utility Rate Structure: General Service Gas (GSG) Third Party Supplier: Woodruff The electric usage profile represents the actual electrical usage for the facility. The electric utility measures consumption in kilowatt-hours (KWH) and maximum demand in kilowatts (KW). One KWH usage is equivalent to 1000 watts running for one hour. One KW of electric demand is equivalent to 1000 watts running at any given time. The basic usage charges are shown as generation service and delivery charges along with several non-utility generation charges. Rates used in this report reflect the historical data received for the facility. The gas usage profile within each facility report shows the actual natural gas energy usage for the facility. The gas utility measures consumption in cubic feet x 100 (CCF), and converts the quantity into Therms of energy. One Therm is equivalent to 100,000 BTUs of energy.

Page 511: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 3 of 55

Table 1 Electricity Billing Data

Utility Provider: Jersey State Power & Light (JCP&L)Rate: General Service Secondary

Meter No: G28166313Customer ID No: 100009338425

Third Party Utility Provider: -TPS Meter / Acct No: -

MONTH OF USECONSUMPTION

KWH TOTAL BILL

Nov-09 129,600 $20,293 Dec-09 127,600 $20,013 Jan-10 126,822 $19,997 Feb-10 121,600 $19,347 Mar-10 136,400 $21,409 Apr-10 111,200 $18,046 May-10 132,800 $21,217 Jun-10 101,600 $17,370 Jul-10 85,600 $13,308

Aug-10 74,800 $13,517 Sep-10 105,600 $17,322 Oct-10 105,600 $17,322

Totals 1,359,222 507.6 Max $219,161

AVERAGE DEMAND 447.9 KW averageAVERAGE RATE $0.161 $/kWh

478.8452.8452.8

446.8449.2507.6497.6

ELECTRIC USAGE SUMMARY

DEMAND

408.4406.8409.6428.8435.6

Page 512: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 4 of 55

Figure 1 Electricity Usage Profile

Page 513: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 5 of 55

Table 4 Natural Gas Billing Data

Utility Provider: Public Service Electric & Gas (PSEG)Rate: Large Volume Gas (LVG)

Meter No: 2523066, 3498509Point of Delivery ID: 6591621601

Third Party Utility Provider: Woodruff EnergyTPS Meter No:

MONTH OF USE CONSUMPTION (THERMS) TOTAL BILL

Nov-09 12,071.00 $17,095.73Dec-09 25,029.00 $31,880.35Jan-10 19,460.00 $25,067.93Feb-10 19,484.00 $25,083.58Mar-10 9,164.00 $9,697.21Apr-10 4,281.00 $4,592.51May-10 422.00 $545.80Jun-10 253.00 $367.06Jul-10 213.00 $316.67

Aug-10 237.00 $313.73Sep-10 425.00 $437.92Oct-10 5,194.00 $5,374.20

TOTALS 96,233.00 $120,772.69

AVERAGE RATE: $1.26 $/THERM

N/A

NATURAL GAS USAGE SUMMARY

Page 514: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 6 of 55

Figure 2 Natural Gas Usage Profile

Page 515: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 7 of 55

II. FACILITY DESCRIPTION

The 162,713 SF William Annin Middle School is a two story facility comprised of classrooms, library, computer room, media center, cafeteria, kitchen, two gymnasiums, auditorium, administration offices, restrooms, boiler room, custodial spaces and storage spaces. The School was built in 1968 with additions added in 1999 and 2004. The additions to the building include enlarging the 300 / 400 wing with 20 new classrooms, a new Media Center & small cafeteria for staff, and a new gymnasium addition that also included additional classrooms in the 100 wing and 200 wing.

Building Profile

The hours of operation for the school students and teachers are between 8:30 AM and 3:30 PM on the weekdays. The facility remains occupied between 3:30 PM and 6:00 PM for after school programs during the weekdays. Custodial services are performed between the hours of 6:00 PM and 11:00 PM. The facility is closed on weekends. The student enrollment at the middle school is approximately 1327 students and 166 teachers.

Building Envelope

The facility exterior construction is primarily CMU block with 4-inch brick façade. Portions of the original building classroom wings utilized curtain wall systems with glass windows and insulated metal panels. Insulation within the original building is estimated to consist of an air space between the block wall and brick façade. The construction in the new additions is estimated to have 1”-2” of rigid insulation within the exterior wall. The roof on the building is a flat built up style roof with tar coating and crushed stone on top. The new additions including a newer style built up flat roof with rigid insulation (estimated 2” minimum) and a black rubber roof membrane. The windows throughout the facility are single pane aluminum framed windows in the original building and double pane aluminum frame windows in the building additions. The older windows appear to be in fair to good condition. The windows in the newer sections are in good condition and appear to be providing a tight weather barrier. Blinds for the windows integral to the double pane window system and appear to be in good working order.

HVAC Systems

Heating is provided by a central hot water heating system. The facility utilizes two cast iron sectional style boilers. Each of the Weil McLain 94 Series boilers has an input capacity of 8,371 MBH. These boilers provide heating hot water to baseboards, unit ventilators, and heating and ventilation units throughout the school. The boilers are in good condition and appear to be maintained. During the survey it was noted that both boilers were operating simultaneously to provide heat. The two boilers were cycling to maintain set point for the building.

Three large hot water pumps circulate boiler water throughout the building for two major building zones. One zone serves the 300 & 400 classroom wing, and the other zone serves the rest of the building. All pumps are connected to a header in order for the third pump to serve as a back-up pump for either zone. All three pumps are 10 HP each. Both zones run continuously in the heating season. The pumps are in fair to good condition. One pump motor has been replaced.

Page 516: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 8 of 55

Terminal heating equipment consists of unit ventilators made by Nesbitt in combination with hydronic baseboard heat. These units serve the classrooms throughout the school and the cafeteria. The unit ventilators appear to be original and in poor condition. The unit ventilators are controlled by the building pneumatic system. In many cases these controls are not functioning correctly due to leaks in the system or failure of the control valves resulting in lack of temperature control. As a result of these issues, the poorly controlled classrooms as well as other spaces have windows open in the winter to maintain comfortable temperatures.

The newer classrooms in the building addition utilize vertical style packaged heating and cooling units made by Airedale. Each classroom has a dedicated unit with overhead ductwork for air distribution. Heat is provided by hot water heating coils fed from the central boiler plant. Cooling is packaged within the unit and heat is rejected through an exterior wall louver. Each unit is installed within an enclosed cabinet in the corner of the classroom. These units can be removed from the cabinet for service. The packaged Airedale units are loud and seem to be in fair / poor condition despite their recent installation within the building additions.

The building also utilizes large heating and ventilation units with hot water coils that provide heat for the large open areas such as the gymnasium and auditorium. These units appear to be original to the building and in poor condition. The H&V units within the auditorium have been retrofitted to include electronic controls with electronic actuators and control valves. The auditorium H&V units are also retrofitted with variable frequency drives on the supply air fan motors. It is unknown what control scheme is utilized to control the variable frequency drive speed. At the time of the survey, the VFDs were running at 30 Hz (1/2 speed) when the auditorium was unoccupied.

In addition to the hot water system, several spaces utilized packaged roo0ftop heating and cooling units for heat with gas fired heat exchangers or hot water heating coils. The packaged units provide heat for various classrooms and spaces such as the library, computer room, media center, and small cafeteria.

Cooling is provided for several spaces within the school. All of the new addition classrooms have air conditioning units provided by the package Airedale units. Packaged rooftop units with air conditioning provide cooling for various classrooms, the library, media center, computer room, and small cafeteria. These units are made by Lennox and are in fair to good condition. The remaining cooling throughout the building is provided by split systems and a few spaces utilize window air conditioners. The split system AC units provide cooling for other classrooms throughout the building as well as office areas. These units include ductless split systems made by Sanyo and Mitsubishi Electric as well as standard split systems made by Trane. These unit vary in age and condition.

Exhaust System

Exhaust is provided by roof top mounted exhaust fans primarily located over the hallways. The exhaust fans are utilized to relieve the excess building pressure due to outside air brought in through the unit ventilators and packaged rooftop units. It is unknown if these units operate based on a time schedule and shut down in occupied mode. Bathrooms and toilet rooms are

Page 517: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 9 of 55

exhausted through smaller rooftop exhaust fans typically interlocked with the bathroom wall switch.

The kitchen includes a 4FT x 20FT commercial exhaust hood, which provides exhaust for cooking equipment. The kitchen hood is manually controlled with a wall switch. The exhaust fan is running based on the needs from the kitchen staff. It is estimated that the exhaust fan runs 6 hrs per day.

HVAC System Controls

The building HVAC system is a combination of an old pneumatic system that controls the older unit ventilators and H&V units, and newer electronic controls that control the equipment in the building additions. The pneumatic control system is in poor condition and in many spaces, significantly lacks in proper temperature control. The terminal units throughout the building hot water system is controlled by a combination of two way control valves and three way control valves. Unit ventilators appear to all utilize two way control valves and the larger H&V units as well as make up air rooftop unit utilize 3-way control valves. In this scheme, the hot water pumps are not controlled and run at constant speed. Excess water flow in low load conditions is bypassed throughout the building 3-way control valves in lieu of slowing the pumps down.

Domestic Hot Water

Domestic hot water is provided to the school by one domestic hot water heater. The school utilizes a 98 gallon natural gas hot water heater made by Bradford White in good condition. The main building HWH is located in the main boiler room and appears to have been recently replaced. Domestic hot water is circulated to the bathrooms and sinks by a small re-circ pump controlled by an aqua stat.

The kitchen utilizes a domestic hot water booster pump that increases the water temperature to approximately 180°F for the kitchen dishwasher. The hot water booster heater is an instantaneous style electric booster heater with a capacity of 36 KW. The dishwasher runtime is estimated to be 2-3 hrs per day.

Lighting Typical lighting throughout school building is fluorescent tube lay-in fixtures with T-12 lamps and magnetic ballasts. Some of the storage rooms and closets including the boiler room is lit with a mixture of incandescent lamps and compact fluorescent lamps. The gym is lit with 400W metal halide fixtures. The building exterior is lit with 175W metal halide flood lights.

Page 518: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 10 of 55

III. MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST

The equipment list contains major energy consuming equipment that through implementation of energy conservation measures could yield substantial energy savings. The list shows the major equipment in the facility and all pertinent information utilized in energy savings calculations. An approximate age was assigned to the equipment in some cases if a manufactures date was not shown on the equipment’s nameplate. The ASHRAE service life for the equipment along with the remaining useful life is also shown in the Appendix.

Refer to the Major Equipment List Appendix for this facility.

Page 519: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 11 of 55

IV. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES Energy Conservation Measures are developed specifically for this facility. The energy savings and calculations are highly dependent on the information received from the site survey and interviews with operations personnel. The assumptions and calculations should be reviewed by the owner to ensure accurate representation of this facility. The following ECMs were analyzed:

Table 1 ECM Financial Summary

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)

ECM #1 Lighting Upgrade $28,100 $12,980 2.2 592.9%

ECM #2 Lighting Controls $25,655 $10,843 2.4 534.0%

ECM #3 Computer Monitors $20,100 $4,884 4.1 264.5%

ECM #4 AC Unit Replacements $26,586 $903 29.4 -32.1%

ECM #5 Energy Recovery Unit Ventilators

$375,000 $13,596 27.6 -45.6%

ECM #6 Hot Water Valve Blanket Insulation

$13,488 $1,958 6.9 117.7%

ECM #7 VFD HW pumps $33,000 $5,085 6.5 131.1%

ECM #8 Kitchen Domestic Booster Heater

$9,300 $701 13.3 13.1%

ECM #9 Demand Controlled Ventilation

$70,000 $5,607 12.5 20.2%

ECM #10 Condensing Boiler Upgrade $325,000 $18,523 17.5 -14.5%

ECM #11 premium efficiency motors $5,607 $12 0.0 73.9%

ECM #12 double pane windows in middle school

$18,523 $18 0.0 435.4%

ECM #13 Lighting Upgrade Gym & Auditorium

$15 $0 0.0 823700.0%

REM #1 Solar Photovoltaic System $697,590 $52,752 13.2 13.4%

Notes:

ANNUAL SAVINGS

SIMPLE PAYBACK

(Yrs)

SIMPLE LIFETIME

ROI

A. Cost takes into consideration applicable NJ Smart StartTM incentives.B. Savings takes into consideration applicable maintenance savings.

ANNUAL SAVINGSB

NET INSTALLATION

COSTA

RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's)

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

NET INSTALLATION

COST

ECM NO.

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

SIMPLE PAYBACK

(Yrs)

SIMPLE LIFETIME

ROI

Page 520: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 12 of 55

Table 2 ECM Energy Summary

ECM #1 Lighting Upgrade 28.4 80,619 0

ECM #2 Lighting Controls 0 67,350 0

ECM #3 Computer Monitors 10.1 30,150 0

ECM #4 AC Unit Replacements 4.6 5,577 0

ECM #5 Energy Recovery Unit Ventilators

37.0 31,498 3,006

ECM #6 Hot Water Valve Blanket Insulation

0.0 0 1,554

ECM #7 VFD HW pumps 0.5 31,539 0

ECM #8 Kitchen Domestic Booster Heater

0.0 6,458 (269)

ECM #9 Demand Controlled Ventilation

0.0 0 4,450

ECM #10 Condensing Boiler Upgrade 0.0 0 14,701

ECM #11 premium efficiency motors 1.3 4,032 0

ECM #12 double pane windows in middle school

3.5 4,853 4,661

ECM #13 Lighting Upgrade Gym & Auditorium

14.4 37,539 0

REM #1 Solar Photovoltaic System 272.0 380,027 0

NATURAL GAS (THERMS)

ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

NATURAL GAS (THERMS)

ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION

(KWH)

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTION

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTIONRENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's)

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)

ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)

ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION

(KWH)

Page 521: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 13 of 55

Table 3 Facility Project Summary

Lighting Upgrade $12,980 $28,100 $0 $28,100 2.2

Lighting Controls $10,843 $29,250 $3,595 $25,655 2.4

Computer Monitors $4,884 $20,100 $0 $20,100 4.1

AC Unit Replacements $903 $27,000 $414 $26,586 29.4

Energy Recovery Unit Ventilators

$13,596 $375,000 $0 $375,000 27.6

Hot Water Valve Blanket Insulation

$1,958 $13,488 $0 $13,488 6.9

VFD HW pumps $5,085 $33,000 $0 $33,000 6.5

Kitchen Domestic Booster Heater

$701 $9,300 $0 $9,300 13.3

Demand Controlled Ventilation

$5,607 $70,000 $0 $70,000 12.5

Condensing Boiler Upgrade

$18,523 $333,000 $8,000 $325,000 17.5

premium efficiency motors $650 $15,838 $620 $15,218 23.4

double pane windows in middle school

$6,612 $273,000 $0 $273,000 41.3

Lighting Upgrade Gym & Auditorium

$8,238 $43,920 $7,200 $36,720 4.5

Design / Construction Extras (15%)

$134,399 $134,399

Total Project $76,985 $1,030,395 $19,829 $1,010,566 13.1Highlighted ECMs are not included in total

ENERGY CONSERVATION

MEASURES

ANNUAL ENERGY

SAVINGS ($)

PROJECT COST ($)

CUSTOMER COST **

SIMPLE PAYBACK

SMART START

INCENTIVES

ENERGY SAVINGS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - POTENTIAL PROJECT

Page 522: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 14 of 55

ECM #1: Lighting Upgrade – Interior spaces Description: The majority of the interior lighting throughout William Annin Middle School is provided with fluorescent fixtures with older generation, 700 series 32W T8 lamps and electronic ballasts. Although 700 series T8 lamps are considered fairly efficient, further energy savings can be achieved by replacing the existing T8 lamps with new generation, 800 series 28W T8 lamps without compromising light output. CEG recommends, re-lamping all of the fixtures with 28W T8 lamps. In addition, some of the storage areas, locker room and gym areas, offices, auditorium, classrooms, restrooms and kitchen areas still have a variety of older fluorescent fixtures with magnetic ballasts and incandescent lamps. It is recommended to retrofit or replace all of the older fluorescent fixtures and the incandescent lights in these areas with high efficiency fluorescent T8 or T5 fixtures with electronic ballasts or compact fluorescent lamps. This ECM includes re-lamping of the existing fluorescent fixtures with 800 series, 28W T8 lamps. The ECM also includes retrofit of all older fluorescent fixtures with T8 or T5 fluorescent fixtures with electronic ballasts in the building. The new, energy efficient T8 fixtures will provide adequate lighting and will save on electrical costs due to better performance of the lamp and ballasts. Energy Savings Calculations: The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix outlines the hours of operation, proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods for each set of fixtures in the each building. Rebates and Incentives: There are no incentives available from NJ Smart Start® Program for the retrofits in this ECM. Replacement and Maintenance Savings: There is no significant replacement and maintenance savings due to implementation of this ECM.

Page 523: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 15 of 55

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $28,100

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0Net Installation Cost ($): $28,100Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $12,980

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $12,980Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 2.2Simple Lifetime ROI 592.9%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $194,700Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 46%Net Present Value (NPV) $126,854.40

ECM #1 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 524: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 16 of 55

ECM #2: Lighting Controls Upgrade – Occupancy & Daylight Sensors Description: Some of the lights in the school building are left on unnecessarily. In many cases the lights are left on because of the inconvenience to manually switch lights off when a room is left or on when a room is first occupied. This is common in rooms that are occupied for only short periods and only a few times per day. In some instances lights are left on due to the misconception that it is better to keep the lights on rather than to continuously switch lights on and off. Although increased switching reduces lamp life, the energy savings outweigh the lamp replacement costs. The payback timeframe for when to turn the lights off is approximately two minutes. If the lights are expected to be off for at least a two minute interval, then it pays to shut them off.

Lighting controls come in many forms. Sometimes an additional switch is adequate to provide reduced lighting levels when full light output is not needed. Occupancy sensors detect motion and will switch the lights on when the room is occupied. Occupancy sensors can either be mounted in place of a current wall switch, or on the ceiling to cover large areas. The U.S. Department of Energy sponsored a study to analyze energy savings achieved through various types of building system controls. The referenced savings is based on the “Advanced Sensors and Controls for Building Applications: Market Assessment and Potential R&D Pathways,” document posted for public use April 2005. The study has found that commercial buildings have the potential to achieve significant energy savings through the use of building controls. The average energy savings are as follows based on the report:

• Occupancy Sensors for Lighting Control 20% - 28% energy savings.

Savings resulting from the implementation of this ECM for energy management controls are estimated to be 20% of the total light energy controlled by occupancy sensors. Daylight sensor savings is estimated to be 40%. (The majority of the occupancy sensor savings is expected to be after school hours when rooms are left with lights on) This ECM includes installation of ceiling or switch mount sensors for individual offices, classrooms, large bathrooms, and libraries. Sensors shall be manufactured by Sensorswitch, Watt Stopper or equivalent. The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix of this report includes the summary of lighting controls implemented in this ECM and outlines the proposed controls, costs, savings, and payback periods. The calculations adjust the lighting power usage by the applicable percent savings for each area that includes lighting controls. Energy Savings Calculations:

( )( )kWh/YrEnergyLightControlledSavings%SavingsEnergy ×=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWh$CostElecAvekWhSavingsEnergySavings.

Page 525: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 17 of 55

Cost and Incentives:

Installation cost per dual-technology sensors (Basis: Sensor switch or equivalent) are as follows:

Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mount $250 per installation Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mount $150 per installation Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor with 2 Pole Powerpack

Remote mount $300 per installation Cost includes material and labor. From the NJ Smart Start® Program Incentives Appendix, the installation of a lighting control device warrants the following incentive: Occupancy Sensor Fixture Mounted (existing facility only) = $20 per sensor Occupancy Sensor Remote Mounted (existing facility only) = $35 per sensor

( ) $35)mountceilingof(#20$mountwallof#IncentiveStartSmart ×+×=® ( ) $3,595$35)mountceiling (9720$mountwall01IncentiveStartSmart =×+×=®

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $29,250

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $3,595Net Installation Cost ($): $25,655Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $10,843

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $10,843Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 2.4Simple Lifetime ROI 534.0%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $162,645Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 42%Net Present Value (NPV) $103,788.03

ECM #2 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 526: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 18 of 55

ECM #3: Computer Monitor Replacement Description: The computers throughout the facility utilize a mixture of CRT computer monitors and LCD computer monitors. The CRT computer monitors within the offices and classrooms are outdated and have several disadvantages such as; significantly increased energy consumption, uses large amount of desk space, poor picture quality, distortions and flickering image, secular glare problems, high weight, and electromagnetic emissions. Many of these drawbacks are difficult to quantify except for the energy use. CRT monitors use considerably more energy than an alternative flat panel LCD monitor. Replacement of the existing CRT monitors with LCD monitors saves considerable energy as well as provides other ergonomic benefits. Based on the site survey it was noted that there are 121 LCD monitor and 201 CRT monitors. Some of the monitors were left in screen saver mode, which only saves the computer screen from image burn in, however it does not save on energy consumption. The average operating hours for all computers and monitors is estimated based on the site survey observations. Energy consumption of computer monitors is based on averages for power usage of various computer monitors. This ECM includes replacement of all existing CRT monitors with LCD flat panel monitors throughout the facility. Installation costs were neglected for this ECM with the intention that this ECM would be replaced by the school district. The calculations are based on the following operating assumptions: Energy Savings Calculations: No. of CRT Monitors: 201 Operating Weeks per Yr: 42 Hrs per Week: 60 (12 hrs per day estimated average)

( ) ( )

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

××=

KWW

HrsOperationWPowerMonitorComputersofUsageElectric1000

#

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWhCostElecAvekWhUsageElectricCostEnergy $

Page 527: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 19 of 55

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSECM INPUTS CRT Monitors LCD Monitor

# of Computers 201 201

Monitor Power Cons. (W) 75 25

Operating Hrs per Week 60 60

Operating Weeks per Yr 50 50

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.162 0.162

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Electric Usage (kWh) 45,225 15,075 30,150

Energy Cost ($) $7,326 $2,442 $4,884

COMMENTS:

COMPUTER MONITOR CALCULATIONS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

CRT Monitor consumption based on Dell CRT monitor M/N: CRT-E771MM. Operating hours estimated.

Installation cost of new monitors is estimated based on current pricing for a 17” LCD monitor on the market today. No labor costs were included for replacing the existing monitors with the new monitors. No incentives are available for installation of computer monitors. Net cost per monitor was estimated to be $100. Installation Costs: # Monitors X Cost per Monitor

201 Monitors X $100 per Monitor $20,100

Page 528: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 20 of 55

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $20,100

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $20,100

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $4,884

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $4,884

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 4.1

Simple Lifetime ROI 264.5%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $73,260Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 23%Net Present Value (NPV) $38,204.87

ECM #3 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 529: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 21 of 55

ECM #4: Air Conditioning Unit Upgrades

Description:

William Annin is air conditioned by split system AC units and packaged rooftop units. The rooftop AC units vary in age from units close to the end of their rated life to new and in good condition. The split system AC units also have a wide range of condition and age. The rooftop units were analyzed for their efficiency and overall condition. The majority of the rooftop units with the exception of the new wings utilize packaged AC systems made by Lennox. These units were found to be the high efficiency model when purchased approximately 13 years ago. Although newer more efficient units are available, there is a minimal efficiency increase from the existing equipment to new units.

The split system AC units currently installed are vary in efficiency levels. Some units are high efficiency models where other split systems are old and inefficient compared to modern equipment. The older units and can be replaced with new high efficiency units. New air conditioners provide higher full load and part load efficiencies due to advances in inverter motor technologies, heat exchangers and refrigerants. This ECM includes one-for-one replacement of the older split system air conditioning units with new higher efficiency systems. It is recommended to fully evaluate the capacity needed for all new systems prior to moving forward with this ECM. A summary of the unit replacements for this ECM can be found in the table below:

The manufacturers used as the basis for design are Trane, Carrier, and Fujitsu. This ECM includes replacement of the outdoor condensing units and associated indoor air handling units or cooling coils where appropriate. No rooftop units are included in this ECM. All units are one for one style replacements with matching capacity of the new units to the old units. Energy Savings Calculations: Cooling Energy Savings: Seasonal energy consumption of the air conditioners at the cooling mode is calculated with the equation below:

ECM INPUTS SERVICE FORNUMBER OF UNITS

COOLING CAPACITY,

BTU/HR

TOTAL CAPACITY,

TONSREPLACE UNIT WITH

CU-3 Rm 201 1 36,000 3.0 Carrier 50XL-A

CU-5 Main Office 1 90,000 7.5 Trane TTA090D

CU-6 Rm 114 1 18,000 1.5 Fujitsu 18CLTotal 3 144,000 12.0

IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY

Page 530: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 22 of 55

Energy Savings, kWh Cooling Capacity,BTUHr

1SEERO

1SEERN

Operation Hours

1000 WkWh

Demand Savings, kW Energy Savings kWh

Hours of Cooling

Cooling Cost Savings Energy Savings, kWh Cost of Electricity $

kWh

Project Cost, Incentives and Maintenance Savings From the NJ Smart Start® Program appendix, the replacement of split system AC units and unitary systems with high efficiency AC systems falls under the category “Unitary HVAC Split System” and warrants an incentive based on efficiency (EER/SEER). The program incentives are calculated as follows:

( )Incentive$/TonTonsCoolingIncentiveStartSmart ×=®

Summary of cost, savings and payback for this ECM is below.

ECM INPUTSCOOLING CAPACITY,

BTU/Hr

ANNUAL COOLING

HOURS

EXISTING UNITS (S)EER

SPLIT UNITS (S)EER

# OF UNITS

ENERGY SAVINGS

kWh

DEMAND SAVINGS

kWCU-3 36,000 1,200 10 SEER 15 SEER 1 1,440 1.2

CU-5 90,000 1,200 8.5 EER 11.2 EER 1 3,063 2.6

CU-6 18,000 1,200 9.5 SEER 18 SEER 1 1,074 0.9Total 3 5,577 4.6

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

UNIT DESCRIPTION

UNIT EFFICIENCY

REBATE $/TON

PROPOSED CAPACITY

TONS

TOTAL REBATE

$≥20 to 30 tons 10.5 EER 79 0 $0 ≥ 11.25 to < 20

tons11.5 EER 79 0 $0

≥ 5.4 to < 11.25 tons

11.5 EER 73 0 $0

5.4 tons or less Unitary AC and

Split System≥14 SEER $92 4.5 $414

TOTAL 4.5 $414

SPLIT SYSTEM AC UNITS REBATE SUMMARY

Page 531: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 23 of 55

There is no significant maintenance savings due to implementation of this ECM.

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $27,000

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $414

Net Installation Cost ($): $26,586

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $903

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $903

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 20

Simple Payback 29.4

Simple Lifetime ROI -32.1%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $18,060Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -3%Net Present Value (NPV) ($13,151.64)

ECM #4 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

ECM INPUTSINSTALLED

COST# OF

UNITSTOTAL COST REBATES

NET COST

ENERGY SAVING

PAY BACK

YEARSCU-3 $7,250 1 $7,250 $276 $6,974 $233 29.9

CU-5 $14,750 1 $14,750 $0 $14,750 $496 29.7CU-6 $5,000 1 $5,000 $138 $4,862 $174 28.0Total $27,000 3 $27,000 $414 $26,586 $903 29.4

COST & SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 532: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 24 of 55

ECM #5: Install New Unit Ventilators Description: The heating and air conditioning for the new additions at William Annin Middle School is provided by upright style Airedale unit ventilators. These unit ventilators are approximately 13 years old and near the end of expected useful service life, which is fifteen (15) years per ASHRAE. There are approximately 25 unit ventilators in the original section of the facility. The units are packaged with 4-ton (21 units) and 6-ton (4 units) cooling capacities and hot water heating coils. Currently, the units are monitored and controlled by the building management system. It is recommended to replace older unit ventilators with modern unit ventilators with built-in energy recovery wheels. The advantage of this setup is the utilization of the energy recovery system to recover the energy in the exhaust air in order to reduce the heating and cooling demand of the classrooms. This ECM replaces 25 existing older unit ventilators with new unit ventilators with high efficiency R410A compressors, hot water heating coils and built-in energy recovery wheels. The basis for this ECM is Airedale Classmate CHX-4&5 model unit ventilator with 450 CFM Energy Recovery ventilators and higher EER cooling modules. Energy Savings Calculations: The energy savings calculations are based improved full load cooling efficiency of the unit ventilators and the energy recovery capacity of the recovery wheels. There will be no heating energy savings due to the upgrade since both existing units and new units utilize hot water coils. Cooling energy consumption, electric demand and operation cost of each unit are calculated using the formulas below:

( )

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×

=

WhBtuEER

kWhWh1000

Hrs.CoolingLoadullFhrTon

Btu12,000TonsCoolingnConsumptioEnergy Cooling

kWh

Wh1,000 (EER) Efficiency Cooling

Ton 1BTU/Hr 12,000 (Tons)Capacity Cooling

Demand⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×

=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWh$CostElectricAvekWhUsageEnergyCostCooling

Page 533: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 25 of 55

Nominal recovery capacity of the proposed unit is obtained from the manufacturer. Total energy recovery of each unit at cooling and heating modes are calculated using heating degree days and full load cooling hours of the facility using the formulas below:

( ) ( )

( ) ( )%EfficiencyHeatingTherms

BtuValueHeatFuelF65

0.60DayHr.12FDayHDD

Hr.Btu RateRecovery

UnitYr ThermsRecoveredEnergy Heating

×⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×°

×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×°×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

=⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

×

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

×⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

=⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

×WhBtuEER

kWhWh1000

Hrs.CoolingLoadullFhr

BtuCooling RateRecovery

UnitYr kWh RecoveredEnergy Cooling

Results of the calculations can be found in the table below:

Page 534: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 26 of 55

ECM INPUTS EXISTING UNITS

PROPOSED UNITS

SAVINGS

ECM INPUTS Existing Unit Ventilators UVs

New UVs with ERVs

Number of Units (4 Tons Est) 21 21 -Number of Units (6 Tons Est) 4 4 -Total Cooling Capacity (Tons) 108 108 -Cooling Efficiency (EER) 8 10.35 2.35Full Load Cooling Hours 800 800 -Cooling Energy Recovery, MBH/Unit - 16.3 16.3Air Side Economizer - Enthalpy based Enthalpy basedHeating Energy Recovery, MBH/Unit - 17.7 17.7ERV Operation Hours / Day - 12 -Heating Degree Days 4599 4599 -Net Heating System Efficiency 75% 75% -Electric Cost ($/KWH) $0.161 $0.161Natural Gas Cost ($/Therm) $1.260 $1.260

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED UNITS

SAVINGS

Cooling Energy Consumption (kWh) 129,600 100,174 29,426Total Demand (kW) 162 125 37Cooling Energy Cost ($) $20,866 $16,128 $4,738Cooling Energy Recovered (kWh) - 31,498 31,498Heating Energy Recovered (Therms) - 3,006 3,006Cooling Energy Recovered ($) - $5,071 $5,071Heating Energy Recovered ($) - $3,787 $3,787Total ($) $20,866 $7,270 $13,596COMMENTS:

UNIT VENTILATOR CALCULATIONS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

Project cost, incentives and maintenance savings:

Total installed cost for 25 unit ventilators with hot water coils, high efficiency R410a compressors and energy recovery ventilators (ERV) is 375,000. The selected equipment does not qualify for any of the NJ Smart Start rebates. There is no significant maintenance savings associated to this ECM.

Page 535: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 27 of 55

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $375,000

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $375,000

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $13,596

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $13,596

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 27.6

Simple Lifetime ROI -45.6%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $203,940Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -7%Net Present Value (NPV) ($212,691.83)

ECM #5 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 536: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 28 of 55

ECM #6: Valve Blanket and Pipe Insulation

Description: The boiler plant supplies heating hot water to the facility for heating season. The piping remains heated at approximately 180°F continuously during this period (approximately 6 months). Un-insulated piping has significant heat losses due to the exposure of the steel piping to the surrounding air. Insulated piping has a heat loss which is a small fraction of the heat loss from un-insulated piping. It was noted that significant piping within the boiler room was missing piping insulation including numerous valves throughout the system. Based on the site survey approximately 24 large diameter pipe valves and 40 feet of 8” steel pipe was not insulated. Valve blankets are designed to provide insulation value over large hydronic valves that must remain accessible. This ECM includes installation of valve blankets on all exposed boiler system valves and insulation of all un-insulated piping within the boiler room. Energy Savings Calculations: Heat Loss for un-insulated steel piping is based on ASHRAE 2009 Fundamentals – “Insulation for Mechanical Systems” Bare Steel Piping Heat Loss 8” pipe: 486 BTU/HR per Linear FT

Heat LossBTUHR per Linear FT

1R Value Pipe Dia FT 3.14 Pipe Temp °F Ambient Temp °F

Heat LossBTUHR Heat Loss

BTUHR per Linear FT Length of Uninsulated Pipe

Energy Use, Therms Heat Loss BTU

HR Operating Hrs

Heating System Eff. % Fuel Heat Value BTUTherm

Heating Energy Cost Savings Energy Use, Therms Cost of Nat Gas $

Therm

Page 537: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 29 of 55

There is no maintenance savings due to implementation of this ECM.

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSECM INPUTS Bare Pipe Insulation BlanketLength of Un-Insulated Pipe Including Valves

59 59

Pipe Diameter (In) 8 8

Blanket Insulation R-value 0 6 6

Temperature Difference Pipe to Ambient (°F)

100 100

Pipe Heat Loss - 8" Pipe (BTU/Hr per FT)

486 35 451

Heat Loss (BTU/Hr) 28,674 2,058 26,616

Heating System Operating Hrs

4380 4380

Energy Loss (kBtus) 125,592 9,016 116,576

Heating System Eff (%) 75% 75%

Fuel Heat Value (BTU/Therm)

100,000 100,000

Nat Gas Cost ($/Therm) 1.26 1.26

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSNat Gas Usage Usage (Therms)

1,675 120 1,554

Energy Cost ($) $2,110 $151 $1,958

COMMENTS:

VALVE BLANKET INSULATION CALCULATIONS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

Bare Pipe Heat Loss value is based on ASHRAE 2009 Fundamentals "Insulation for Mechanical Systems"

Page 538: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 30 of 55

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $13,488

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0Net Installation Cost ($): $13,488Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $1,958

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $1,958Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 6.9Simple Lifetime ROI 117.7%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings 0Simple Lifetime Savings $29,370Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 12%Net Present Value (NPV) $9,886.48

ECM #6 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 539: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 31 of 55

ECM #7: Install Pump VFD’s Description: The packaged rooftop air conditioners, heating and ventilation units and the unit ventilators are utilizing a constant volume pumping design. The unit ventilators are equipped with 2-way control valves and the rooftop units have 3-way control valves which allow continuous flow through the piping loop throughout the building. As a result the water loop pumps must provide nearly full power output to circulate the water through all rooftop units and unit ventilators continuously. 2-way control valves provide flow through the heat exchanger equipment only when there is a call for heating or cooling, unlike 3-way control valves that allow constant flow of the water loop. 3-way control valves require full pumping energy continuously, while 2-way control valves allow the system to reduce flow when it is not needed. This measure includes capping off the bypass port on the 3-way control valves which effectively turns the valves into “2-way” control valves. When the unit is not calling for heating, the control valve closes reducing overall flow of the system. Variable frequency drives allow the pumps to slow down in response to a reduction in overall system flow. The reduction in operating flow allows the pumps to reduce energy consumption for all hours that the heating system is not at its peak load. This ECM includes the installation of Variable Frequency Drives on the three (3) existing 10 horsepower hot water pumps in conjunction with piping modifications at the rooftop units and H&V units to cap off the bypass port on the 3-way control valves. The VFD’s would be controlled by a differential pressure sensor in the water loop to measure demand for water. The furthest unit from the loop pumps would remain as 3-way control valves (constant flow) to eliminate dead heading potential. This ECM also includes replacement of the existing pump motors with inverter duty motors that meet NEMA Premium Efficiency Standard, which also helps to reduce energy consumption. Energy and cost savings calculations are based on calculation software “PumpSave v4.2,” provided by ABB. The PumpSave calculation software is used to estimate the pumping energy for variable speed pump systems. Two of the boiler water loop pumps operate approximately 4,380 Hrs per year since this system is used for about 6 month’s total. The pump flow, HD, and resultant energy are calculated based on the existing pump horse power installed. Calculation is based on all existing unit ventilators to remain with 2-way control valves. This should be verified before implementing this ECM. Energy Savings Calculations:

( )( )

( ) ( )% EfficiencyMotor% EfficiencyPump3960

Ft HeadminGalRateFlowGravitySpecific

HPPower VolumeCons.××

×⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×

=

Page 540: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 32 of 55

( ) ( ) ( )Hrs.Operation HPKW 0.746HPPower kWhCons.Energy ×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWh$CostElectricAvekWh UsageEnergyCostEnergy

Boiler Hot Water VFD Pumping Energy:

Page 541: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 33 of 55

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSECM INPUTS CV Pumps VFD Pumps

Flow Control CV VFD -

Total Flow* (GPM) 500 500 -

Head* (Ft) 100 100 -

Pump Efficiency (%) 80% 80% -

Ave. Motor Efficiency (%) 89.7% 92.4% 2.7%

Operating Hrs 4320 4320 -

Estimated Total Horse Power 17.6 17.1 0.51

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.161 0.161 -

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Electric Energy (kWh) 56,683 25,144 31,539

Electric Energy Cost ($) $9,140 $4,054 $5,085

BOILER HOT WATER PUMPS VFD CALULATION

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

COMMENTS: - VFD pump energy is based on ABB energy savings calculator for pumps, "Pump Save," version 4.2. Flow rate for VFD Pump calculation is summarized in the operating profile shown in the Pump Save output.- Hot water flow & head estimated based on pump horse power.

Installation cost for four (3) VFDs, (3) premium efficiency motors, piping work, re-balancing, capping of 3-way valves and controls is estimated to be $33,000. Currently there are no NJ Smart Start® Program Incentives for installation of hot water pump Variable Frequency Drives.

Page 542: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 34 of 55

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $33,000

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $33,000

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $5,085

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $5,085

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 6.5

Simple Lifetime ROI 131.1%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $76,279Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 13%Net Present Value (NPV) $27,707.89

ECM #7 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 543: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 35 of 55

ECM #8: Kitchen Domestic Gas Booster Heater

Description: Tankless style hot water heaters provide improved efficiencies compared to standard hot water heaters. In addition, heating with natural gas is far less expensive than domestic hot water heated with electric heat. The existing commercial dishwasher at William Annin utilizes an electric booster heater to provide approximately 180°F hot water for sterilization. A tankless hot water heater would allow the utilization of a high efficiency natural gas source of hot water boosting production with minimal space requirements. This ECM includes replacement of the existing domestic water booster heater for the commercial kitchen dishwasher. The kitchen booster heater would be replaced with a Takagi commercial hot water heater model number TATM32 with remote temperature controller. This ECM is based on installation of the hot water heater within the boiler room and piping hot water to the commercial kitchen dishwasher. Energy Savings Calculations:

Booster HW Heat BTU

WasherGalMin 8.33

LbsGal Use

MinWk

WkYr Temp Rise °F

1.0BTU

Lb °F

Elec Booster EnergyBooster HW Heat BTU

Elec Heat Value BTUkWh

Gas Booster EnergyBooster HW Heat BTU

HWH Eff. % Gas Heat Value BTUTherm

Elec Energy Cost Energy Use, kWh Cost of Elec $

kWh

Nat Gas Energy Cost Energy Use, Therms Cost of Nat Gas $

Therm

Page 544: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 36 of 55

There is no maintenance savings due to implementation of this ECM.

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

ECM INPUTSExisting Propane

HWH & Elec Booster Heater

New Condensing HWHs

Estimated Dish Washer Use (GPM)

3.5 3.5

Dish Washer Use (Min/Week) *1 Hr Per Day

300 300

Dish Washer Use (Week/Yr) 42 42

Booster Temp Rise (°F) 60 60

Dom. HWH Efficiency (%) 100% 82% -18%

Booster HW Heat Required (kBTUs)

22,041 22,041

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.161 0.161

Gas Cost ($/Therm) 1.26 1.26

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSProposed Booster Dom. HW Natural Gas Usage (Therms)

0 269 -269

Elec Booster Energy (kWh) 6,458 0 6,458

Elec Energy Cost ($) $1,040 $0 $1,040

Gas Energy Cost ($) $0 $339 -$339

Total Energy Cost ($) $1,040 $339 $701

COMMENTS:

INSTANT DOM. HWH BOOSTER CALCULATIONS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

This ECM is based on savings due to the fuel switching from electric to natural gas and includes affects from efficiency change.

Page 545: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 37 of 55

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $9,300

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0Net Installation Cost ($): $9,300Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $701

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $701Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 13.3Simple Lifetime ROI 13.1%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $10,515Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 2%Net Present Value (NPV) ($931.51)

ECM #8 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 546: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 38 of 55

ECM #9: Demand Controlled Ventilation Demand Controlled Ventilation (DCV) is a means to provide active, zone level control of ventilation for spaces within a facility. The basic premise behind DCV is monitoring indoor CO2 levels versus outdoor CO2 levels in order to provide proper ventilation to the spaces within the facility as well as saving costly dollars treating unconditioned ventilation air. Carbon dioxide ventilation control or demand controlled ventilation (DCV) allows for the measurement and control of outside air ventilation levels to a target cfm/person ventilation rate in the space (i.e., 15 cfm/person) based on the number of people in the space. It is a direct measure of ventilation effectiveness and is a method whereby buildings can regain active and automatic zone level ventilation control, without having to open windows. The fixed ventilation approach depends on a set-it-and-forget-it methodology that is completely unresponsive to changes in the way spaces are utilized/occupied or how equipment is maintained. A DCV system utilizes various control algorithms to maintain a base ventilation rate. The system monitors space CO2 levels and the algorithm automatically adjusts the outdoor and return air dampers to provide the quantity of outdoor air to maintain the required CO2 level in the space. System designs are normally designed for maximum occupancy and the ventilation rates are designed for this (maximum) occupancy. In areas where occupancy swings are prevalent there is ample opportunity to reduce outdoor air quantity to satisfy the needs of the actual number of occupants present. By installing the DCV controls, energy savings are realized by the reduced quantities of outdoor air that do not require heating energy from the boiler plant. There are large heating and ventilation units (H&V) providing heating and air conditioning to the gymnasium. When operating, these units provide minimum amount of outside air to the space. The outside air volume is typically based on the maximum occupancy of the space conditioned. When a given space is not fully occupied the outside air quantity delivered to the space is greater than the amount needed for adequate ventilation. This ECM includes the installation of CO2 sensors integrated into a demand control ventilation system, for the units mentioned above. The components required for the demand control ventilation system installation include damper actuators, CO2 sensors, wiring, controls equipment and programming. The gymnasium would require one CO2 sensor installed per unit to monitor occupancy levels. Often heating and air conditioning units switch to occupied mode several hours before the actual occupancy in order to provide pre-heating or pre-cooling of the space. Energy savings achieved through “Demand Control Ventilation” is calculated based on actual occupancy of the spaces and the hours the units are in occupied mode.

Page 547: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 39 of 55

Energy Savings Calculations:

( )( ) ( )

( ) ( )%EfficiencyHeatingTherms

BtuValueHeatFuelF65

0.60DayHr. FDayHDD

Hr.BtuCapacity HeatingAir Outside

ThermsEnergy Heating×⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×°

×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×°×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

Therms$CostFuelAveThermsEnergyHeatingCost Heating

ECM INPUTS DCVEquipment Gymnasium H&V UnitsTotal CFM (Est) 28000Outside Air CFM (Est) 11200OA Heating Capacity, MBh 786

Net Heating Efficiency (Gas) 75%

Heating Degree Days (65°F) 4599

Occupied Hours per day 8

O.A Heating Energy Saving (Est) 75%

Natural Gas Cost ($/Therm) $1.26

ECM RESULTS DCV

Original O.A. Heating Energy (Therms) 5,934

O.A. Heating Energy Savings (Therms) 4,450Total Gas Cost Savings ($) $5,607

DEMAND CONTROLLED VENTILATION

ENERGY SAVINGS

COMMENTS: HDD estimated based on Newark Liberty Airport, Outside Air Heating Capacity based on total outside air at 65°F design temperature difference.Total CFM estimated based on 3 units with 4,000 CFM and 2 units with 8,000 CFM capacities.

Cost and Incentives: Estimated installed cost for demand controlled ventilation for the five (5) Gymnasium units is $70,000 ($7,500 Materials).

Page 548: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 40 of 55

There are currently no Smart Start ® incentives available for a Demand Control Ventilation System. Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $70,000

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $70,000

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $5,607

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $5,607

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 12.5

Simple Lifetime ROI 20.2%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $84,112Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 2%Net Present Value (NPV) ($3,058.58)

ECM #9 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 549: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 41 of 55

ECM #10: Condensing Boiler Installation Description: Space heating for the perimeter offices and classrooms in the majority of the school is provided with unit ventilators and cabinet heaters with hot water coils and hot water radiators. The source of hot water for this equipment is two (2) hot water boilers located in the main boiler room. The input capacity of the boilers is 8.371 MMBH (106 BTU/H) each. The boilers appear to be close to their rated life; however, this is not necessarily a good indicator of the end of useful life particularly when boilers are well maintained. This ECM provides insight into the energy efficiency benefit of condensing boiler technology compared to standard cast iron boilers. Standard (non-condensing) boilers provide lower than nominal efficiency compared to condensing boilers. Standard boilers suffer further efficiency losses at part load operating conditions mainly due to limitations in the reduction of the flue gas temperature. Current average combustion efficiency of each boiler is estimated to be 75% due to standard non-condensing boiler technology, limited turn down ratio, cycling losses and outdated design and controls. A new condensing boiler could substantially improve the operating efficiency of the heating system of the building. Condensing boiler’s peak efficiency tops out at 99% depending on return water temperature. This ECM is based on the replacement of the two (2) boilers with condensing hot water boilers to provide the building with heating throughout the year. The annual average operating efficiency of the proposed boiler set is expected to be 90%, which gives the heating system a 15% increase in efficiency. This ECM is based on variable supply water temperature adjusted based on outdoor temperature. This ECM includes installation of four (4) new condensing gas fired boilers to replace two (2) existing hot water boilers. The basis for this ECM is Aerco Benchmark 2.0 condensing hot water boilers or equivalent. New boilers shall be setup and programmed to be the primary source of heating for the building during the entire year. The owner is recommended to retain a professional engineer to confirm equipment sizing and finalize design.

Energy Savings Calculations: Currently there are multiple boilers and gas fired rooftop units on the building gas meter. The boilers’ gas usage is not separately metered. Therefore, annual energy consumption of the boilers has to be estimated. This calculation is based on the energy consumption of the boilers in proportion with the ratio of the total heating capacity of each gas fired piece of equipment. First, domestic hot water usage is estimated and subtracted from the total usage in order to estimate the net natural gas usage for space heating. Current total hot water usage can be found in the table below:

Page 550: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 42 of 55

Nov-09 12,071.00 282 11,789 $14,265Dec-09 25,029.00 282 24,747 $29,944Jan-10 19,460.00 282 19,178 $23,205Feb-10 19,484.00 282 19,202 $23,234Mar-10 9,164.00 282 8,882 $10,747Apr-10 4,281.00 282 3,999 $4,839May-10 422.00 282 140 $169Jun-10 253.00 282 0 $0Jul-10 213.00 282 0 $0

Aug-10 237.00 282 0 $0Sep-10 425.00 282 0 $0Oct-10 5,194.00 282 4,912 $5,944

TOTAL 96,233 3,384 92,849 $112,347

HEATING ONLYDOMESTIC HW USAGE

ANNUAL GAS USAGE

MONTHTOTAL USAGE

THERMS COST

Baseline Domestic Hot Water Gas Use = 282 Therms (Average from June-September Gas Use) Existing Natural Gas Use for Heating = 96,233 Therms – (282 Therms x 12 Months) = 92,849 Therms Below calculation is performed to estimate annual gas usage of the boilers: Total facility heating capacity: (2) Hot water boilers = 8.37 MMBH (One operating / One Standby) (1) Hot water heater = 0.20 MMBH (1) MUA = 0.25 MMBH (Est) Total = 8.82 MMBH Total facility heating capacity: 8.82 MMBH Total Capacity - Boilers only: 8.37 MMBH Percent usage by boilers: 95% of Total Estimated natural gas usage 95% of 92,849 Therms Estimated natural gas usage 88,207 Therms

Bldg Heat Required Heating Nat. Gas Therm Heating Eff % Fuel Heat Value BTU

Therm

Proposed Heating Gas UsageBldg. Heat Required BTU

New Heating Eff % Fuel Heat Value BTUTherm

Page 551: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 43 of 55

Energy Cost Heating Gas Usage Therms Ave Fuel Cost $

Therm Energy savings calculations are summarized in the table below:

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

ECM INPUTSExisting Hot Water

BoilersNew Condensing

Boilers -

Existing Nat Gas (Therms) 88,207 - -

Boiler Efficiency (%) 75% 90% 15%

Nat Gas Heat Value (BTU/Therm) 100,000 100,000 -

Equivalent Building Heat Usage (MMBTUs) 6,616 6,616 -

Ave. Gas Cost ($/Therm) 1.26 1.26 -

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Natural Gas Usage (Therms) 88,207 73,506 14,701

Energy Cost ($) $111,141 $92,617 $18,523

COMMENTS:

CONDENSING BOILER CALCULATIONS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

Project Cost, Incentives and Maintenance Savings Estimated cost for removing the existing boilers and installing three (4) 2.0 MMBH condensing hot water boilers with advanced controls is $333,000. ($148,000 Materials) From the New Jersey Smart Start® Program Incentives Appendix, installation of a high efficiency hot water boiler falls under the category “Gas Heating” and warrants an incentive based on efficiency at or above 84% for this type of equipment. The program incentives are calculated as follows:

Page 552: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 44 of 55

UNIT DESCRIPTION

UNIT EFFICIENCY

REBATE $/MBH

PROPOSED CAPACITY, MBH

NUMBER OF UNITS

TOTAL REBATE, $

≥ 300 MBH - 1500 MBH

84% AFUE for Hot Water boilers $1.75 1,500 0 $0

>1500 - ≤ 4000 MBH

84% AFUE for Hot Water boilers $1 2,000 4 $8,000

>1500 - ≤ 4000 MBH

84% AFUE for Hot Water boilers $1 3,000 0 $0

TOTAL $8,000

GAS FIRED BOILER REBATE SUMMARY

Maintenance savings associated with this ECM is estimated to be minimal.

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $333,000

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $8,000

Net Installation Cost ($): $325,000

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $18,523

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $18,523

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 17.5

Simple Lifetime ROI -14.5%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $277,845Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -2%Net Present Value (NPV) ($103,873.63)

ECM #10 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 553: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 45 of 55

ECM #11: Install NEMA Premium® Efficiency Motors Description: The improved efficiency of the NEMA Premium® efficient motors is primarily due to better designs with use of better materials to reduce losses. Surprisingly, the electricity used to power a motor represents 95 % of its total lifetime operating cost. Because many motors operate continuously 24 hours a day, even small increases in efficiency can yield substantial energy and dollar savings. The electric motors driving the hot water pumps in the old boiler room and supply fans in some of the rooftop equipment are candidates for replacing with premium efficiency motors. These standard efficiency motors run considerable amount of time over a year. This energy conservation measure replaces existing electric motors over 5 HP or more with NEMA Premium® efficiency motors. NEMA Premium® is the most efficient motor designation in the marketplace today.

IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY

EQMTID FUNCTION

MOTOR HP

HOURS OF OPERATION

EXISTING EFFICIENCY

NEMA PREMIUM

EFFICIENCYHWP-1 Hot Water Pump 10 4,320 89.5% 92.4%HWP-2 Hot Water Pump 10 2,160 90.2% 92.4%HWP-3 Hot Water Pump 10 2,160 89.5% 92.4%RTU 9 Supply Fan 10 3,000 89.5% 92.4%RTU 9 Return Fan 5 3,000 87.5% 90.2%RTU 10 Supply Fan 10 3,000 89.5% 92.4%RTU 10 Return Fan 5 3,000 87.5% 90.2%RTU 1 Supply Fan 5 3,000 87.5% 90.2%

Energy Savings Calculations:

Electric usage, kWhHP LF 0.746 Hours of Operation

Motor Efficiency

where, HP Motor Nameplate Horsepower Rating LF Load Factor Motor Efficiency Motor Nameplate Efficiency

ProposedExisting UsageElectricUsageElectrickWhSavings,UsageElectric −=

Page 554: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 46 of 55

Electric Usage Savings, kWh Electric UsageE Electric UsageP

Electric cost savings Electric Usage Savings Electric Rate $

kWh

The calculations were carried out and the results are tabulated in the table below: PREMIUM EFFICIENCY MOTOR CALCULATIONS

EQMTID

MOTOR HP

LOAD FACTOR

EXISTING EFFICIENCY

NEMA PREMIUM

EFFICIENCY

POWER SAVINGS

kW

ENERGY SAVINGS

kWH

COST SAVINGS

HWP-1 10 90% 89.5% 92.4% 0.24 1,023 $165HWP-2 10 90% 90.2% 92.4% 0.18 385 $62HWP-3 10 90% 89.5% 92.4% 0.24 511 $82RTU 9 10 90% 89.5% 92.4% 0.24 710 $114RTU 9 5 90% 87.5% 90.2% 0.11 346 $56

RTU 10 10 90% 89.5% 92.4% 0.24 710 $114RTU 10 5 90% 87.5% 90.2% 0.11 346 $56RTU 1 5 90% 87.5% 90.2% 0.11 346 $56

TOTAL 1.3 4,032 $650

Equipment Cost and Incentives

Below is a summary of SmartStart Building® incentives for premium efficiency motors:

HORSE POWER

NJ SMART START

INCENTIVE5 $60

7.5 $9010 $10015 $11520 $12525 $130

INCENTIVES

The following table outlines the summary of motor replacement costs and incentives:

Page 555: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 47 of 55

EQMTID

MOTOR POWER

HP

INSTALLED COST

SMART START

INCENTIVENET COST

TOTAL SAVINGS

SIMPLE PAYBACK

HWP-1 10 $2,560 $100 $2,460 $165 14.9HWP-2 10 $2,560 $100 $2,460 $62 39.6HWP-3 10 $2,560 $100 $2,460 $82 29.8RTU 9 10 $2,560 $100 $2,460 $114 21.5RTU 9 5 $1,519 $60 $1,459 $56 26.1

RTU 10 10 $2,560 $100 $2,460 $114 21.5RTU 10 5 $1,519 $60 $1,459 $56 26.1RTU 1 5 $1,519 $60 $1,459 $56 26.1

TOTAL Totals: $15,838 $620 $15,218 $650 23.4

MOTOR REPLACEMENT SUMMARY

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $15,838

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $620

Net Installation Cost ($): $15,218

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $650

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $650

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 23.4

Simple Lifetime ROI -35.9%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $9,751Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -5%Net Present Value (NPV) ($7,874.80)

ECM #11 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 556: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 48 of 55

ECM #12: Window Replacement Description: Some areas of William Annin Middle School façade includes older windows with single pane glass and inefficient frames. Older single pane windows can account for significant energy use through leakage heat loss and conductive heat loss. The age and condition of the windows contribute to the leakage rate of the building. The single pane construction allows higher thermal (conductive) energy loss. These factors lead to increased energy use in the heating and cooling season. The heating loss due to single pane glass is combined with heat loss due to poor seals at each operable window / door. New double pane windows with low E glazing offer a substantial improvement in thermal performance in the winter and summer months. This ECM includes the replacement of the older single pane windows within the connecting hallways between the 200 wing and the two story 300/400 wing. This ECM is based on new double pane windows with low emissivity glass. The proposed windows include reduced outside air leakage. In addition the double pane structure will significantly increase the insulation value compared to the existing single pane window structure. The basis for this ECM is Anderson Windows at an estimated installation cost of $75 per SF of window installed. The proposed installation is for the older portion of the building with the existing curtain wall system. Below is a list of areas with older and inefficient windows:

Energy Savings Calculations:

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=⎟⎟

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛2

23

FtCFM Windowof SFper on Infiltrati Estimated FtArea Window

Min.FtonInfiltrati

( )FDifferenceeTemperaturDesignMinFtonInfiltrati1.1

Hr.BtuLoadHeat

3

°×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×=⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

ECM INPUTS NUMBER OF WINDOWS

SIZE AREA

Connecting Hallway 4 50'x7' 1400300 / 400 Wing Curtainwall 160 3.5'x4' 2240TOTAL 164 - 3640

WINDOW REPLACEMENT SUMMARY

Page 557: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 49 of 55

( )

MinFt400

CoolingTon 1MinFtonInfiltratiTonLoadCooling

3

3

⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛=

( )( ) ( )

( ) ( )%EfficiencyHeatingTherms

BtuValueHeatFuelF65

0.60DayHr.24FDayHDD

Hr.BtuLoadHeat

ThermsEnergyLeakage Heating×⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×°

×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×°×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

=

( )( )

( )EEREfficiencyCooling kWh

W.h1000

Hours Cooling Load Full Hr.Ton Btu 12,000 TonLoad Cooling

kWhEnergyLeakage Cooling×

×⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×

=

( )( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( )%EfficiencyHeatingTherms

BtuValueHeatFuelF65

0.60DayHr.24FDayHDDFtAreaValueU

ThermsEnergyConductive

2

×⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×°

×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×°××−

=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

Therms$CostFuelAveThermsEnergyHeating TotalCostEnergy Heating

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWh$CostFuelAvekWhEnergy Cooling TotalCostEnergy Cooling

Page 558: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 50 of 55

Estimated cost for replacing the inefficient windows at the Middle School building is $273,000.

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Description: Existing Single Pane Windows

Double Pane Low-E Windows

-

Window (SF) 3,640 3,640 -U-Value (BTU/HR/SF*°F) 0.8 0.45 0.35Estimated Infiltration, CFM per SF Window

3 2 -

Total Infiltration, CFM 10920 7280 3,640Heating System Efficiency (%) 75% 75% -Heating Degree Days (HDD) 4,599 4,599 -

Design Day Temp Diff (°F) 65 65 -Heating Hrs Per Day (Hrs) 24 24 -

Full Load Cooling Hours 400 400 -Average Cooling Efficiency, EER 9.0 9.0 -

Gas Cost ($/Therm) 1.25 1.25 -Electric Cost ($/kWh) 0.162 0.162 -

Gas Heat Value (BTU/Therm) 100,000 100,000 -

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSHeat Load (BTU/Hr) 780,780 520,520 260,260Leakage Energy (Therms) 10,607 7,071 3,536Conductive Energy (Therms) 2,571 1,446 1,125

Total Heating Energy (Therms) 13,178 8,517 4,661

Cooling Load (Ton) 27 18 9

Cooling Demand (kW) 10.4 6.9 3.5

Total Cooling Energy (kWh) 14,560 9,707 4,853

Gas Energy Cost ($) $16,473 $10,647 $5,826

Electric Energy Cost ($) $2,359 $1,572 $786

Comments:

WINDOW REPLACEMENT CALCULATIONS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

1. Proposed window U-value Based on ASHRAE 90.1 - 2007

Page 559: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 51 of 55

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $273,000

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0Net Installation Cost ($): $273,000Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0Energy Savings ($/Yr): $6,612

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $6,612Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 41.3

Simple Lifetime ROI -63.7%Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0Simple Lifetime Savings $99,180Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -11%Net Present Value (NPV) ($198,310.36)

ECM #12 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 560: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 52 of 55

ECM #13: Lighting Upgrade – Gymnasium & Auditorium Description: The two gymnasiums at William Annin Middle School utilize 400W metal halide fixtures for its lighting. Metal halide bulbs provide a reasonably efficient option for bay lighting however a few draw-backs that are common. Metal halide fixtures often have poor overall efficacy which limits the amount of light actually leaving the fixture. Also metal halide bulbs require a significant warm-up period and even longer cool down period eliminating the potential for occupancy sensors frequent switching. This symptom encourages the gymnasium lighting to be left on continuously during the day. Another drawback is the reduced lumen output (Lumen Maintenance) of the metal halide bulb over its life time. Average bulb output or “mean lumens,” is approximately 25% less than the bulb’s initial lumens for typical metal halide lamps. In addition the most rapid rate of light output decline is during the beginning of its life, approximately 15-20% light loss within the first 20% of its rated life. It is important to note that the light loss has no savings in energy used; therefore the overall light efficiency is continuously decreasing with age. The final drawback is the light quality or Color Rendering Index (CRI). Typical values for metal halide bulbs is 65, which is a measure of how close the light is to true “full spectrum” light produced by sunlight or incandescent lighting. Metal halide bulbs also show noticeable color shifting when the bulb is reaching the end of its life. Utilizing fluorescent fixtures in low and high bay spaces is a superior option over metal halide fixtures in all areas described above. Although metal halide fixtures provide light very efficiently at the start of the bulb life, the average efficiency over the life is below that of fluorescent fixtures. The Middle School also utilizes dimmable incandescent fixtures within the Auditorium. These fixtures are the primary source of light for the auditorium. Incandescent fixtures are extremely inefficient compared to other sources of light; however these fixtures can be dimmed easily. LED fixtures provide a comparable replacement for fixtures that require dimming. LED fixtures require substantially less energy than incandescent. In addition the operating hours for LED fixtures are approximately 50 time greater than incandescent bulbs. This ECM includes replacement of each of the existing gymnasium high bay metal halide light fixtures with T5HO fixtures with reflective lenses. The retrofit for the metal halide fixtures includes a one for one fixture replacement. The fluorescent fixtures selected will provide equivalent light compared to the average light output of the existing metal halide fixtures. The bulb replacement cost for T-5 HO lamps compared to the existing metal halide lamps were found to be approximately equal and therefore not included in the savings calculations. This ECM also includes replacement of the incandescent fixtures within the auditorium with recessed dimmable LED fixtures. The intent of this ECM is to utilize the existing dimming controls to operate the new LED fixtures. The compatibility of the existing lighting controls with the new LED fixtures should be verified before implementation of this ECM. Hours of Operation

Page 561: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 53 of 55

Gymnasium / Auditorium: 2,600 Hours/Yr Energy Savings Calculations: The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix outlines the proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods. NJ Smart Start® Program Incentives are calculated as follows: From the Smart Start Incentive Appendix, the following incentives are warranted: For replacement of HID (400-999W) with new T-5 or T-8 fixtures = $100/Fixture Smart Start ® Incentive # of 400W Metal Halide Fixture Replaced $100 Smart Start ® Incentive 58 $100 $5800 For replacement of Incandescent with new Recessed LED fixtures = $35/Fixture Smart Start ® Incentive # Recessed LED Fixtures $35 Smart Start ® Incentive 40 $35 $1400 There is no significant replacement or maintenance savings generated with the replacement of HID fixtures with T-5 HO fixtures. The maintenance savings as a result of the incandescent fixture replacement with LED fixtures is as follows: Estimated Lamp Replacement Cost for 300W Incandescent = ($9 Materials + $15 Labor) Estimated Lamp Replacement Cost for 100W LED = ($500 Materials + $45 Labor)

Replacement Cost# Fixtures Operating Hrs per Yr

Lamp Life Hrs Replacement Cost$

Fixture

Incandescent Replacement Cost40 2600 Hrs per Yr

750 Hrs $9 $15 $3,328

LED Replacement Cost40 2600 Hrs per Yr

50,000 Hrs $500 $45 $1,134

Annual LED Maintenance Savings $3,328 $1,134 $2,194

Page 562: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 54 of 55

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $43,920

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $7,200Net Installation Cost ($): $36,720Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $2,194Energy Savings ($/Yr): $6,044

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $8,238Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15Simple Payback 4.5Simple Lifetime ROI 236.5%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $32,910Simple Lifetime Savings $123,570Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 21%Net Present Value (NPV) $56,337.05

ECM #13 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 563: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Bernards Public Schools – William Annin Middle School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C10088 April 15, 2011– FINAL Page 55 of 55

V. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations include no cost/low cost measures, Operation & Maintenance (O&M) items, and water conservation measures with attractive paybacks. These measures are not eligible for the Smart Start Buildings incentives from the office of Clean Energy but save energy none the less.

A. Chemically clean the condenser and evaporator coils periodically to optimize efficiency. Poorly maintained heat transfer surfaces can reduce efficiency 5-10%.

B. Maintain all weather stripping on windows and doors.

C. Clean all light fixtures to maximize light output to avoid use of task lighting.

D. Provide more frequent air filter changes to decrease overall system power usage and maintain better IAQ.

E. Turn off computers when not in use. Ensure computers are not running in screen saver mode which saves the monitor screen not energy.

F. Ensure outside air dampers are functioning properly and only open during occupied mode.

It was noted at the site survey that the HVAC systems in several rooms were not controlling temperature correctly. The result of the controls issues causes space temperatures to become uncomfortable and drastic measures such as opening windows on extremely cold days. This type of issue requires a whole system controls evaluation for the building to determine where control problems are taking place. Based on information provided by the operations personnel, there are several control systems within the building which operate different section or systems throughout the building. In addition, multiple control vendors are utilized to maintain the control systems. The use of multiple control systems and control vendors to support the systems will very likely cause issues with the overall function of the building. The systems and controls throughout the district represent a large potential “energy leak” throughout the building. It is recommended to quantify the control system points and verify their proper operation through Retro-Commissioning. Retro-Commissioning allows facility owners to re-establish the operation of the HVAC systems back to the original specifications. A third party evaluation is highly recommended to review the controls of the systems and provide insight into the corrections needed. It is also recommended to consider the renovation of all control systems into one central control system to avoid the overlap and communication gap when utilizing multiple control systems. This renovation should be consistent across all facility throughout Bernards Public Schools to maximize the benefit of central controls.

Page 564: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX A1 of 1

LIFETIME ENERGY SAVINGS

LIFETIME MAINTENANCE

SAVINGSLIFETIME ROI SIMPLE PAYBACK INTERNAL RATE OF

RETURN (IRR)NET PRESENT VALUE

(NPV)

MATERIAL LABOR REBATES, INCENTIVES

NET INSTALLATION

COSTENERGY MAINT. / SREC TOTAL (Yearly Saving * ECM Lifetime)

(Yearly Maint Svaing * ECM Lifetime)

(Lifetime Savings - Net Cost) / (Net Cost) (Net cost / Yearly Savings)

($) ($) ($) ($) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) (Yr) ($) ($) (%) (Yr) ($) ($)

ECM #1 Lighting Upgrade $28,100 $0 $28,100 $12,980 $0 $12,980 15 $194,700 $0 592.9% 2.2 46.03% $126,854.40

ECM #2 Lighting Controls $29,250 $3,595 $25,655 $10,843 $0 $10,843 15 $162,645 $0 534.0% 2.4 42.05% $103,788.03

ECM #3 Computer Monitors $20,100 $0 $0 $20,100 $4,884 $0 $4,884 15 $73,260 $0 264.5% 4.1 23.24% $38,204.87

ECM #4 AC Unit Replacements $12,500 $14,500 $414 $26,586 $903 $0 $903 20 $18,060 $0 -32.1% 29.4 -3.43% ($13,151.64)

ECM #5 Energy Recovery Unit Ventilators $312,500 $62,500 $0 $375,000 $13,596 $0 $13,596 15 $203,940 $0 -45.6% 27.6 -6.80% ($212,691.83)

ECM #6 Hot Water Valve Blanket Insulation $3,525 $9,963 $0 $13,488 $1,958 $0 $1,958 15 $29,370 $0 117.7% 6.9 11.79% $9,886.48

ECM #7 VFD HW pumps $33,000 $0 $0 $33,000 $5,085 $0 $5,085 15 $76,279 $0 131.1% 6.5 12.92% $27,707.89

ECM #8 Kitchen Domestic Booster Heater $3,550 $5,750 $0 $9,300 $701 $0 $701 15 $10,515 $0 13.1% 13.3 1.58% ($931.51)

ECM #9 Demand Controlled Ventilation $7,500 $62,500 $0 $70,000 $5,607 $0 $5,607 15 $84,112 $0 20.2% 12.5 2.39% ($3,058.58)

ECM #10 Condensing Boiler Upgrade $148,000 $185,000 $8,000 $325,000 $18,523 $0 $18,523 15 $277,845 $0 -14.5% 17.5 -1.90% ($103,873.63)

ECM #11 premium efficiency motors $15,838 $0 $620 $15,218 $650 $0 $650 15 $9,751 $0 -35.9% 23.4 -10387362.84% $0.00

ECM #12 double pane windows in middle school $273,000 $0 $0 $273,000 $6,612 $0 $6,612 15 $99,180 $0 -63.7% 41.3 0.00% $0.00

ECM #13 Lighting Upgrade Gym & Auditorium $43,920 $0 $7,200 $36,720 $6,044 $2,194 $8,238 15 $123,570 $32,910 236.5% 4.5 0.00% $0.00

REM #1 Solar Photovoltaic System $697,590 $0 $0 $697,590 $17,246 $35,506 $52,752 15 $791,279 $532,592 13.4% 13.2 1.62% ($67,841.00)

Notes: 1) The variable Cn in the formulas for Internal Rate of Return and Net Present Value stands for the cash flow during each period.2) The variable DR in the NPV equation stands for Discount Rate3) For NPV and IRR calculations: From n=0 to N periods where N is the lifetime of ECM and Cn is the cash flow during each period .

REM RENEWABLE ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY

ECM COST & SAVINGS BREAKDOWNCONCORD ENGINEERING GROUP

Bernards – William Annin Middle School

INSTALLATION COST YEARLY SAVINGSECM

LIFETIMEDESCRIPTIONECM NO.

ECM ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 565: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 1 of 4

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 520 BURNT MILL ROAD VOORHEES, NEW JERSEY 08043 PHONE: (856) 427-0200 FAX: (856) 427-6508

SmartStart Building Incentives The NJ SmartStart Buildings Program offers financial incentives on a wide variety of building system equipment. The incentives were developed to help offset the initial cost of energy-efficient equipment. The following tables show the current available incentives as of February 15, 2011:

Electric Chillers Water-Cooled Chillers $12 - $170 per ton

Air-Cooled Chillers $8 - $52 per ton Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Gas Cooling Gas Absorption Chillers $185 - $400 per ton

Gas Engine-Driven Chillers Calculated through custom measure path)

Desiccant Systems $1.00 per cfm – gas or electric

Electric Unitary HVAC Unitary AC and Split Systems $73 - $92 per ton

Air-to-Air Heat Pumps $73 - $92 per ton Water-Source Heat Pumps $81 per ton

Packaged Terminal AC & HP $65 per ton Central DX AC Systems $40- $72 per ton

Dual Enthalpy Economizer Controls $250 Occupancy Controlled Thermostat

(Hospitality & Institutional Facility) $75 per thermostat

Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Gas Heating Gas Fired Boilers < 300 MBH $300 per unit

Gas Fired Boilers ≥ 300 - 1500 MBH $1.75 per MBH

Gas Fired Boilers ≥1500 - ≤ 4000 MBH $1.00 per MBH

Gas Fired Boilers > 4000 MBH (Calculated through Custom Measure Path)

Gas Furnaces $300 - $400 per unit, AFUE ≥ 92%

Page 566: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 2 of 4

Ground Source Heat Pumps

Closed Loop $450 per ton, EER ≥ 16 $600 per ton, EER ≥ 18 $750 per ton, EER ≥ 20

Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Variable Frequency Drives Variable Air Volume $65 - $155 per hp Chilled-Water Pumps $60 per VFD rated hp

Compressors $5,250 to $12,500 per drive Cooling Towers ≥ 10 hp $60 per VFD rated hp

Natural Gas Water Heating

Gas Water Heaters ≤ 50 gallons, 0.67 energy factor or better $50 per unit

Gas-Fired Water Heaters > 50 gallons $1.00 - $2.00 per MBH Gas-Fired Booster Water Heaters $17 - $35 per MBH Gas Fired Tankless Water Heaters $300 per unit

Prescriptive Lighting Retro fit of T12 to T-5 or T-8 Lamps

w/Electronic Ballast in Existing Facilities

$10 per fixture (1-4 lamps)

Replacement of T12 with new T-5 or T-8 Lamps w/Electronic Ballast in

Existing Facilities $25 per fixture (1-4 lamps)

Replacement of incandescent with screw-in PAR 38 or PAR 30 (CFL)

bulb $7 per bulb

T-8 reduced Wattage (28w/25w 4’, 1-4 lamps)

Lamp & ballast replacement $10 per fixture

Hard-Wired Compact Fluorescent $25 - $30 per fixture

Metal Halide w/Pulse Start Including Parking Lot $25 per fixture

T-5 and T-8 High Bay Fixtures $16 - $200 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Retrofit with induction lamp, power coupler and generator

(must be 30% less watts/fixture than HID system)

$50 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Replacement with new HID ≥ 100w $70 per fixture

Page 567: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 3 of 4

Prescriptive Lighting - LED

LED New Exit Sign Fixture Existing Facility < 75 kw Existing Facility > 75 kw

$20 per fixture $10 per fixture

LED Display Case Lighting $30 per display case

LED Shelf-Mtd. Display & Task Lights $15 per linear foot

LED Portable Desk Lamp $20 per fixture

LED Wall-wash Lights $30 per fixture

LED Recessed Down Lights $35 per fixture LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Area

and Roadway Luminaries $175 per fixture

LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Decorative Luminaries $175 per fixture

LED Outdoor Wall-Mounted Area Luminaries $100 per fixture

LED Parking Garage Luminaries $100 per fixture

LED Track or Mono-Point Directional Lighting Fixtures $50 per fixture

LED High-Bay and Low-Bay Fixtures for Commercial & Industrial Bldgs. $150 per fixture

LED High-Bay-Aisle Lighting $150 per fixture

LED Bollard Fixtures $50 per fixture

LED Linear Panels (2x2 Troffers only) $100 per fixture

LED Fuel Pump Canopy $100 per fixture

LED Refrigerator/Freezer case lighting replacement of fluorescent in medium

and low temperature display case

$42 per 5 foot $65 per 6 foot

Page 568: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix B Page 4 of 4

Lighting Controls – Occupancy Sensors

Wall Mounted $20 per control Remote Mounted $35 per control

Daylight Dimmers $25 per fixture Occupancy Controlled hi-low

Fluorescent Controls $25 per fixture controlled

Lighting Controls – HID or Fluorescent Hi-Bay Controls Occupancy hi-low $75 per fixture controlled Daylight Dimming $75 per fixture controlled

Daylight Dimming - office $50 per fixture controlled

Premium Motors Three-Phase Motors $45 - $700 per motor

Fractional HP Motors Electronic Communicated Motors (replacing shaded pole motors in

refrigerator/freezer cases)

$40 per electronic communicated motor

Other Equipment Incentives

Performance Lighting

$1.00 per watt per SF below program incentive threshold, currently 5% more energy efficient than ASHRAE 90.1-

2007 for New Construction and Complete Renovation

Custom Electric and Gas Equipment Incentives not prescriptive

Custom Measures

$0.16 KWh and $1.60/Therm of 1st year savings, or a buy down to a 1 year

payback on estimated savings. Minimum required savings of 75,000 KWh or 1,500 Therms and a IRR of at

least 10%. Multi Measures Bonus 15%

Page 569: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

OMB No. 2060-0347

STATEMENT OF ENERGY PERFORMANCEBT William Annin Middle School

Building ID: 2490931 For 12-month Period Ending: October 31, 20101

Date SEP becomes ineligible: N/A Date SEP Generated: March 04, 2011

FacilityBT William Annin Middle School70 Quincy RoadBasking Ridge, NJ 07920

Facility OwnerBernards Public Schools101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Primary Contact for this FacilityConnie Coriell101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Year Built: 1968Gross Floor Area (ft2): 162,713

Energy Performance Rating2 (1-100) 42

Site Energy Use Summary3

Electricity - Grid Purchase(kBtu) 4,699,354 Natural Gas (kBtu)4 9,476,381 Total Energy (kBtu) 14,175,735

Energy Intensity5 Site (kBtu/ft2/yr) 87 Source (kBtu/ft2/yr) 157 Emissions (based on site energy use) Greenhouse Gas Emissions (MtCO2e/year) N/A Electric Distribution Utility N/A National Average Comparison National Average Site EUI 81 National Average Source EUI 147 % Difference from National Average Source EUI 7% Building Type K-12

School

Stamp of Certifying Professional

Based on the conditions observed at thetime of my visit to this building, I certify that

the information contained within thisstatement is accurate.

Meets Industry Standards6 for Indoor EnvironmentalConditions:Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality N/A Acceptable Thermal Environmental Conditions N/A Adequate Illumination N/A

Certifying ProfessionalMichael Fischette520 S. Burnt Mill Road Voorhees, NJ 08043

Notes: 1. Application for the ENERGY STAR must be submitted to EPA within 4 months of the Period Ending date. Award of the ENERGY STAR is not final until approval is received from EPA.2. The EPA Energy Performance Rating is based on total source energy. A rating of 75 is the minimum to be eligible for the ENERGY STAR.3. Values represent energy consumption, annualized to a 12-month period.4. Natural Gas values in units of volume (e.g. cubic feet) are converted to kBtu with adjustments made for elevation based on Facility zip code.5. Values represent energy intensity, annualized to a 12-month period.6. Based on Meeting ASHRAE Standard 62 for ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality, ASHRAE Standard 55 for thermal comfort, and IESNA Lighting Handbook for lighting quality.

The government estimates the average time needed to fill out this form is 6 hours (includes the time for entering energy data, Licensed Professional facility inspection, and notarizing the SEP) andwelcomes suggestions for reducing this level of effort. Send comments (referencing OMB control number) to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S., EPA (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,NW, Washington, D.C. 20460.

EPA Form 5900-16

Appendix CPage 1 of 7

Page 570: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

ENERGY STAR®

Data Checklistfor Commercial Buildings

In order for a building to qualify for the ENERGY STAR, a Professional Engineer (PE) or a Registered Architect (RA) must validate the accuracy of the data underlyingthe building's energy performance rating. This checklist is designed to provide an at-a-glance summary of a property's physical and operating characteristics, as well asits total energy consumption, to assist the PE or RA in double-checking the information that the building owner or operator has entered into Portfolio Manager.

Please complete and sign this checklist and include it with the stamped, signed Statement of Energy Performance.NOTE: You must check each box to indicate that each value is correct, OR include a note.

CRITERION VALUE AS ENTERED INPORTFOLIO MANAGER VERIFICATION QUESTIONS NOTES

Building Name BT William Annin Middle

School Is this the official building name to be displayed inthe ENERGY STAR Registry of LabeledBuildings?

Type K-12 School Is this an accurate description of the space inquestion?

Location 70 Quincy Road, Basking

Ridge, NJ 07920 Is this address accurate and complete? Correctweather normalization requires an accurate zipcode.

Single Structure Single Facility

Does this SEP represent a single structure? SEPscannot be submitted for multiple-buildingcampuses (with the exception of acute care orchildren's hospitals) nor can they be submitted asrepresenting only a portion of a building

BT William Annin Middle School (K-12 School)

CRITERION VALUE AS ENTERED INPORTFOLIO MANAGER VERIFICATION QUESTIONS NOTES

Gross Floor Area 162,713 Sq. Ft.

Does this square footage include all supportingfunctions such as kitchens and break rooms usedby staff, storage areas, administrative areas,elevators, stairwells, atria, vent shafts, etc. Alsonote that existing atriums should only include thebase floor area that it occupies. Interstitial(plenum) space between floors should not beincluded in the total. Finally gross floor area is notthe same as leasable space. Leasable space is asubset of gross floor area.

Open Weekends? Yes

Is this building normally open at all on theweekends? This includes activities beyond thework conducted by maintenance, cleaning, andsecurity personnel. Weekend activity could includeany time when the space is used for classes,performances or other school or communityactivities. If the building is open on the weekend aspart of the standard schedule during one or moreseasons, the building should select ?yes? for openweekends. The ?yes? response should applywhether the building is open for one or both of theweekend days.

Number of PCs 508 Is this the number of personal computers in theK12 School?

Number of walk-inrefrigeration/freezer

units 2

Is this the total number of commercial walk-in typefreezers and coolers? These units are typicallyfound in storage and receiving areas.

Presence ofcooking facilities Yes

Does this school have a dedicated space in whichfood is prepared and served to students? If theschool has space in which food for students is onlykept warm and/or served to students, or has only agalley that is used by teachers and staff then theanswer is "no".

Percent Cooled 50 % Is this the percentage of the total floor space withinthe facility that is served by mechanical coolingequipment?

Percent Heated 100 % Is this the percentage of the total floor space withinthe facility that is served by mechanical heatingequipment?

Months 12(Optional) Is this school in operation for at least 8 months ofthe year?

Page 1 of 4

Appendix CPage 2 of 7

Page 571: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

High School? No

Is this building a high school (teaching grades 10,11, and/or 12)? If the building teaches to highschool students at all, the user should check 'yes'to 'high school'. For example, if the school teachesto grades K-12 (elementary/middle and highschool), the user should check 'yes' to 'highschool'.

Page 2 of 4

Appendix CPage 3 of 7

Page 572: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

ENERGY STAR®

Data Checklistfor Commercial Buildings

Energy ConsumptionPower Generation Plant or Distribution Utility:

Fuel Type: Electricity

Meter: Electricity (kWh (thousand Watt-hours))Space(s): Entire Facility

Generation Method: Grid Purchase

Start Date End Date Energy Use (kWh (thousand Watt-hours))

10/01/2010 10/31/2010 105,600.00

09/01/2010 09/30/2010 105,600.00

08/01/2010 08/31/2010 74,800.00

07/01/2010 07/31/2010 92,607.00

06/01/2010 06/30/2010 107,873.00

05/01/2010 05/31/2010 134,858.00

04/01/2010 04/30/2010 117,862.00

03/01/2010 03/31/2010 134,667.00

02/01/2010 02/28/2010 114,921.00

01/01/2010 01/31/2010 138,754.00

12/01/2009 12/31/2009 129,571.00

11/01/2009 11/30/2009 120,189.00

Electricity Consumption (kWh (thousand Watt-hours)) 1,377,302.00

Electricity Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 4,699,354.42

Total Electricity (Grid Purchase) Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 4,699,354.42

Is this the total Electricity (Grid Purchase) consumption at this building including allElectricity meters?

Fuel Type: Natural Gas

Meter: Natural Gas (therms)Space(s): Entire Facility

Start Date End Date Energy Use (therms)

10/01/2010 10/31/2010 3,755.00

09/01/2010 09/30/2010 352.00

08/01/2010 08/31/2010 219.00

07/01/2010 07/31/2010 232.00

06/01/2010 06/30/2010 321.00

05/01/2010 05/31/2010 2,108.00

04/01/2010 04/30/2010 6,149.00

03/01/2010 03/31/2010 12,983.00

02/01/2010 02/28/2010 18,428.00

01/01/2010 01/31/2010 22,833.00

Page 3 of 4

Appendix CPage 4 of 7

Page 573: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

12/01/2009 12/31/2009 19,595.00

Natural Gas Consumption (therms) 86,975.00

Natural Gas Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 8,697,500.00

Total Natural Gas Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 8,697,500.00

Is this the total Natural Gas consumption at this building including all Natural Gas meters?

Additional FuelsDo the fuel consumption totals shown above represent the total energy use of this building?Please confirm there are no additional fuels (district energy, generator fuel oil) used in this facility.

On-Site Solar and Wind EnergyDo the fuel consumption totals shown above include all on-site solar and/or wind power located atyour facility? Please confirm that no on-site solar or wind installations have been omitted from thislist. All on-site systems must be reported.

Certifying Professional (When applying for the ENERGY STAR, the Certifying Professional must be the same PE or RA that signed and stamped the SEP.)

Name: _____________________________________________ Date: _____________

Signature: ______________________________________ Signature is required when applying for the ENERGY STAR.

Page 4 of 4

Appendix CPage 5 of 7

Page 574: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

FOR YOUR RECORDS ONLY. DO NOT SUBMIT TO EPA.

Please keep this Facility Summary for your own records; do not submit it to EPA. Only the Statement of Energy Performance(SEP), Data Checklist and Letter of Agreement need to be submitted to EPA when applying for the ENERGY STAR.

FacilityBT William Annin Middle School70 Quincy RoadBasking Ridge, NJ 07920

Facility OwnerBernards Public Schools101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Primary Contact for this FacilityConnie Coriell101 Peachtree Road Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

General InformationBT William Annin Middle School

Gross Floor Area Excluding Parking: (ft2) 162,713 Year Built 1968 For 12-month Evaluation Period Ending Date: October 31, 2010

Facility Space Use SummaryBT William Annin Middle School

Space Type K-12 School

Gross Floor Area(ft2) 162,713

Open Weekends? Yes

Number of PCs 508

Number of walk-in refrigeration/freezerunits 2

Presence of cooking facilities Yes

Percent Cooled 50

Percent Heated 100

Monthso 12

High School? No

School Districtod N/A

Energy Performance ComparisonEvaluation Periods Comparisons

Performance Metrics Current(Ending Date 10/31/2010)

Baseline(Ending Date 10/31/2010) Rating of 75 Target National Average

Energy Performance Rating 42 42 75 N/A 50

Energy Intensity

Site (kBtu/ft2) 87 87 64 N/A 81

Source (kBtu/ft2) 157 157 115 N/A 147

Energy Cost

$/year $ 296,767.99 $ 296,767.99 $ 216,410.36 N/A $ 276,738.19

$/ft2/year $ 1.82 $ 1.82 $ 1.33 N/A $ 1.70

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

MtCO2e/year N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

kgCO2e/ft2/year N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

More than 50% of your building is defined as K-12 School. Please note that your rating accounts for all of the spaces listed. The National Average column presentsenergy performance data your building would have if your building had an average rating of 50. Notes:o - This attribute is optional.d - A default value has been supplied by Portfolio Manager.

Appendix CPage 6 of 7

Page 575: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

2010BT William Annin Middle School70 Quincy RoadBasking Ridge, NJ 07920

Portfolio Manager Building ID: 2490931

The energy use of this building has been measured and compared to other similar buildings using theEnvironmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Energy Performance Scale of 1–100, with 1 being the least energyefficient and 100 the most energy efficient. For more information, visit energystar.gov/benchmark.

This building’sscore

42

100

Most Efficient

This building uses 157 kBtu per square foot per year.*

*Based on source energy intensity for the 12 month period ending October 2010

Date of certification

Date Generated: 03/04/2011

Statement ofEnergy Performance

1

Least Efficient

50

Average

Buildings with a score of75 or higher may qualifyfor EPA’s ENERGY STAR.

I certify that the information contained within this statement is accurate and in accordance with U.S.Environmental Protection Agency’s measurement standards, found at energystar.gov

Appendix CPage 7 of 7

Page 576: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 1 of 13

BoilersTag Boiler-1 & 2

Unit Type Sectional cast iron

Qty 2

Location Boiler Room

Area Served Whole Bldg (except 500 wing)

Manufacturer Weil McLain

Model # 2494 (88 Series)

Serial # N/A

Input Capacity (MBH) 8,371

Rated Output Capacity (MBH) 6,680

Approx. Efficiency % 75%

Fuel Natural Gas

Burner Make & Model(2)Industrial Combustion

MN:MPLG-84;SN:31891-1,319891-2

Max / Min Firing Rate Turndown Ration

3753 / 900 MBH4.2

Approx Age 10

ASHRAE Service Life 30

Remaining Life 20

Comments Combusion Fan on one Boiler is rattling

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

William Annin Middle School

Page 577: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 2 of 13

Domestic Water HeatersTag HWH-1

Unit Type Tank type

Qty 1

Location Boiler Room

Area Served Dom HW (Except 500 wing)

Manufacturer Bradford White

Model # D100T1993N

Serial # BB5889495

Size (Gallons) 98

Input Capacity (MBH/KW)

200 MBH

Recovery (Gal/Hr) 193.9

Efficiency % 81%

Fuel Natural Gas

Approx Age 6

ASHRAE Service Life 12

Remaining Life 6

Comments HWH good condition, HW Recirc pump controlled by aqua stat, flue damper included

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

William Annin Middle School

Page 578: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 3 of 13

PumpsTag HWP-1 HWP-2 HWP-3

Unit Type Floor Mounted End Suction

Floor Mounted End Suction

Floor Mounted End Suction

Qty 1 1 1

Location Boiler Room Boiler Room Boiler Room

Area Served Bldg Hot Water Zone 1

Bldg Hot Water Zone 2 (300-400 Wing)

Bldg Hot Water Zone 2 (300-400 Wing)

Manufacturer Taco Taco Taco

Model # FI5009E2GAJ LOA FI5009E2GAJ LOA FI5009E2GAJ LOA

Serial # Shop Order No:EC035I9/29

Shop Order No:EC035I9/29

Shop Order No:EC035I9/29

Horse Power 10 10 10

Flow N/A N/A N/A

Motor Info Baldor GE Baldor

Electrical Power 208 / 3 / 60 208 / 3 / 60 208 / 3 / 60

RPM 1760 1750 1760

Motor Efficiency % 89.5% 90.2% 89.5%

Approx Age Unknown Unknown Unknown

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life N/A N/A N/A

Comments

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

William Annin Middle School

Page 579: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 4 of 13

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU-10 RTU-2(MUA-1) RTU-4

Unit Type Packaged rooftop Packaged rooftop Packaged rooftop

Qty 1 1 1

Location Second Floor Roof (400 Wing)

Second Floor Roof (400 Wing)

Second Floor Roof (400 Wing)

Area Served 400 wing West 400 wing East 400 wing East

Manufacturer McQuay Modine Lennox

Model # RDS708BY N/A LCA120HN1G

Serial # 38M0154903 N/A 5698L02197

Cooling Type None None Packaged DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) N/A N/A 10.0

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

N/A N/A 11 EER

Heating Type Hot Water Coil Gas Heat Exchanger None

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A N/A

Fuel N/A Nat Gas N/A

Approx Age 15 (Est) 15 (Est) 13

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 0 0 2

Comments Fair Condition, 3-way control valve, 1.5 HP Fan,

84% EffUnit OFF Fair Condition, 3 HP Fan,

87.5% Eff

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

William Annin Middle School

Page 580: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 5 of 13

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU-11 RTU - 6 RTU - 14

Unit Type Packaged rooftop Packaged rooftop Packaged rooftop

Qty 1 1 1

Location Roof (200 Wing East) Roof (200 Wing) Roof (200 Wing)

Area Served 200 Wing East Rms 212-224 Rms 212-224

Manufacturer McQuay Lennox Lennox

Model # RDS708BY LCA102HN1G LCA048HN1G

Serial # 38M0155003 5698L02204 5698L04184

Cooling Type None Packaged DX Packaged DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) N/A 8.5 4.0

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

N/A 11 EER 12 SEER

Heating Type Hot Water Coil None None

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A N/A

Fuel N/A N/A N/A

Approx Age 15 (Est) 13 13

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 0 2 2

Comments Fair Condition, 2-way control valve, 1 HP Fan

Motor, 82.5% Eff

Fair Condition, 2 HP Fan motor, 84% Eff.

Fair Condition, unit running, 3/4HP Fan motor

Page 581: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 6 of 13

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU-7 RTU-12 RTU-9 & 10

Unit Type Packaged rooftop Packaged rooftop Packaged rooftop

Qty 1 1 2

Location Roof (200 Wing) Roof (200 Wing West) Gym Roof(West)

Area Served Rms 212-224 200 Wing West Gym(West)

Manufacturer Lennox Lennox McQuay

Model # LCA060HN1G LCA072SN1G RDS800CYY

Serial # 5698L02405 5698L02426 38M0154700, 38M0154800

Cooling Type Packaged DX Packaged DX None

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 5.0 6.0 N/A

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

12 SEER 10.5 EER N/A

Heating Type None None Hot Water Coil

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A N/A

Fuel N/A N/A N/A

Approx Age 13 13 15 (Est)

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 2 2 0

CommentsFair Condition, 1.5 HP Fan

motor, 84% EffFair Condition, 1.5 HP Fan

motor, 84% Eff.

Fair Condition, 3-way control valve, 10 HP Fan motor, 89.5% Eff. 5HP

Return Fan motor, 87.5% Eff.

Page 582: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 7 of 13

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU-13 RTU-5 RTU-

Unit Type Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop

Qty 1 1 1

Location Roof (100 wing) Roof (Sm Cafe) Roof (200 Wing East)

Area Served Rm 100-108 Sm Café, Faculty Café 200 Wing East & Media Center

Manufacturer Lennox Lennox Lennox

Model # LCA036HN1G LCA156HN1G LCA048HN1G

Serial # 5698L04178 5698L07521 5698L04183

Cooling Type Packaged DX Packaged DX Packaged DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 3.0 13.0 4.0

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

12 SEER 11.5 EER 12 SEER

Heating Type None None None

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A N/A

Fuel N/A N/A N/A

Approx Age 13 13 13

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 2 2 2

Comments Fair Condition, Unit Running, 1.5 HP Fan motor,

84% Eff.

Fair Condition, Unit Running, 3 HP Fan motor,

87.5% Eff

Fair Condition, Unit Running, 3/4 HP Fan motor

Page 583: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 8 of 13

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU-1 RTU-3 CU-1

Unit Type Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop Split HVAC Unit

Qty 1 1 1

Location Roof (200 Wing East) Roof (300 Wing East) Roof (400 Wing West)

Area Served Media Center 300 Wing East & Media Center 400 Wing West

Manufacturer Lennox Lennox Mitsubishi Mr. Slim

Model # LCA180SN1G LCA048HN1G MUY-A24NA

Serial # 5698L07571 5698L04185 6004240

Cooling Type Packaged DX Packaged DX Split Sytem DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 15.0 4.0 2.0

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

11.5 EER 12 SEER 16 SEER

Heating Type None None N/A

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A N/A

Fuel N/A N/A N/A

Approx Age 13 13 5 (Est)

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 2 2 10

Comments Fair Condition, 5 HP Fan motor, 87.5% Eff.

Fair Condition, Unit Running, 3/4HP Fan motor Good Condition

Page 584: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 9 of 13

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag CU-2 CU-3 CU-4

Unit Type Split HVAC Unit Split HVAC Unit Split HVAC Unit

Qty 1 1 1

Location Roof (400 Wing West) Roof (200 Wing West) Roof (100 Wing West)

Area Served 400 Wing West Rm (201) 100 Wing West

Manufacturer Sanyo Trane Sanyo

Model # CL1872 2TTB0036A1000AA C0971

Serial # 19581 40458073F 8181

Cooling Type Split Sytem DX Split Sytem DX Split Sytem DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 1.5 3.0 0.75

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

20 SEER 10 SEER 16 SEER

Heating Type N/A N/A N/A

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A N/A

Fuel N/A N/A N/A

Approx Age 3 7 3

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 12 8 12

Comments Good Condition Good Condition Good Condition

Page 585: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 10 of 13

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag CU-5 CU-6 CU-7

Unit Type Split HVAC Unit Split HVAC Unit Split HVAC Unit

Qty 1 1 1

Location Roof (100 Wing) Roof (100 Wing East) Grade (300 Wing West)

Area Served Main Office Rm 114 (approx) 300 Wing West

Manufacturer Trane Sanyo Trane

Model # 2TTA090 C1812 2TTB3018A1000AA

Serial # N/A 186204 7165KM75F

Cooling Type Split Sytem DX Split Sytem DX Split Sytem DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 7.5 1.5 1.5

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

8.5 EER (Est) 9.5 SEER 13 SEER

Heating Type N/A N/A N/A

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A N/A

Fuel N/A N/A N/A

Approx Age 21 21 4

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life (6) (6) 11

Comments Poor Condition Good Condition

Page 586: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix DPage 11 of 13

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag CU-8 CU-9 CU-10

Unit Type Split HVAC Unit Split HVAC Unit Split HVAC Unit

Qty 1 1 1

Location Grade(300 Wing West) Grade(300 Wing East) Grade(300 Wing West)

Area Served 300 Wing West 300 Wing East 300 Wing West

Manufacturer Trane Sanyo Mitsubishi Mr. Slim

Model # 2TTB3018A1000AA CH1872 MUY-A24NA

Serial # 7165KP15F 146474 6001099

Cooling Type Split Sytem DX Split Sytem DX Split Sytem DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 1.5 1.5 2.0

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

13 SEER 20 SEER 16 SEER

Heating Type N/A N/A Heat Pump

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A 20 MBH

Efficiency N/A N/A 10 HSPF

Fuel N/A N/A Electric

Approx Age 21 4 5 (Est)

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life (6) 11 10

Comments Poor Condition Good Condition Good Condition

Page 587: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix D

Unit Ventilators

Tag UV UV

Unit Type Unit Ventilator Unit Ventilator

Qty 33 (Est) 25 (Est)

Location Classrooms Classrooms

Manufacturer ITT Nesbitt Airedale

Model # N/A Graduate Series

Serial # N/A N/A

Cooling Capacity (Tons) None Approx 4-6 tons

Estimated Cooling Efficiency (EER)

N/A 8.0 EER

Heating Type Hot Water Coil Hot Water Coil

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A

Approx Age 54 13

Ashrae Service Life 15 15

Remaining Life (39) 2

Comments Units retrofitted with electronic controls.

Fair Condition, Upright style unit

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

William Annin Middle School

12 of 13

Page 588: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix D

Heating and Ventilation Units

Tag HV HV

Unit Type Heating and Ventilation Heating and Ventilation

Qty 3 2

Location Gymnasium Auditorium Loft

Area Served Gymnasium Auditorium

Manufacturer ITT Nesbitt ITT Nesbitt

Model # N/A N/A

Serial # N/A N/A

Fan HP 1.5 5

Cooling Type None None

Heating Type Hot Water Coil Hot Water Coil

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A

Approx Age 54 54

Ashrae Service Life 15 15

Remaining Life (39) (39)

CommentsPoor Condition, 3-way

control valve, Fan Motor Efficiency (79.1% - Est.)

Poor Condition, 3-way control valve, Fan Motor

Efficiency (89.5%, 83.3%)

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

William Annin Middle School

13 of 13

Page 589: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E1 of 21

CEG Job #: 9C10088

Project: William Annin Middle School KWH COST: $0.161

70 Quincy Raod

Basking Ridge, NJ 07920Bldg. Sq. Ft.

ECM #1 & 2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.37 Classroom 415 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.16 3,016.0 $485.58 20 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.00 2600 $418.60 $14.00 $280.00 0.16 416 $66.98 4.18

221.37 Classroom 417 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.16 3,016.0 $485.58 20 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.00 2600 $418.60 $14.00 $280.00 0.16 416 $66.98 4.18

221.37 Classroom 419 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.16 3,016.0 $485.58 20 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.00 2600 $418.60 $14.00 $280.00 0.16 416 $66.98 4.18

221.37 Classroom 421 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.16 3,016.0 $485.58 20 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.00 2600 $418.60 $14.00 $280.00 0.16 416 $66.98 4.18

222.21 Stairwell 4400 6 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.37 1,636.8 $263.52 6 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.30 1320 $212.52 $14.00 $84.00 0.07 316.8 $51.00 1.65

221.37 Classroom 426 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.16 3,016.0 $485.58 20 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.00 2600 $418.60 $14.00 $280.00 0.16 416 $66.98 4.18

222.21 Storage 1200 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 148.8 $23.96 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 120 $19.32 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 28.8 $4.64 6.04

221.37 Classroom 422 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.16 3,016.0 $485.58 20 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.00 2600 $418.60 $14.00 $280.00 0.16 416 $66.98 4.18

221.37 Classroom 420 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.16 3,016.0 $485.58 20 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.00 2600 $418.60 $14.00 $280.00 0.16 416 $66.98 4.18

221.37 Classroom 418 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.16 3,016.0 $485.58 20 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.00 2600 $418.60 $14.00 $280.00 0.16 416 $66.98 4.18

221.37 Classroom 416 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.16 3,016.0 $485.58 20 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.00 2600 $418.60 $14.00 $280.00 0.16 416 $66.98 4.18

222.21 Classroom 414 2600 11 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.68 1,773.2 $285.49 11 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.55 1430 $230.23 $14.00 $154.00 0.13 343.2 $55.26 2.79

222.21 Classroom 412 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

222.21 Conference Room 410 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $103.81 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $83.72 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $20.09 2.79

222.21 Classroom 408 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

William Annin Middle School

Page 590: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E2 of 21

ECM #1 & 2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

227.21 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.21 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $20.51 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.70 3.58

232.21 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.26 670.8 $108.00 3 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.22 561.6 $90.42 $21.00 $63.00 0.04 109.2 $17.58 3.58

6917 Women's Restroom 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed Light, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.10 260.0 $41.86 1 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 67.6 $10.88 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 192.4 $30.98 0.65

613 Custodial Closet 2600 1 1 Industrial Fixture, 100w A19 Lamp 100 0.10 260.0 $41.86 1 1 (1) 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 67.6 $10.88 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 192.4 $30.98 0.65

221.41 Roof Access/Crawl Space 2600 1 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Wall Mnt., Prismatic 58 0.06 150.8 $24.28 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 130 $20.93 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 20.8 $3.35 4.18

6917 Men's Restroom 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed Light, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.10 260.0 $41.86 1 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 67.6 $10.88 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 192.4 $30.98 0.65

227.21 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.21 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $20.51 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.70 3.58

232.21 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.26 670.8 $108.00 3 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.22 561.6 $90.42 $21.00 $63.00 0.04 109.2 $17.58 3.58

222.21 Classroom 406 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

222.11 Storage 404 1200 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.25 297.6 $47.91 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 240 $38.64 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 57.6 $9.27 6.04

222.21 Classroom 200 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

222.21 Classroom 400 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

221.33 2600 18 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Direct/ Indirect

58 1.04 2,714.4 $437.02 18 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.90 2340 $376.74 $14.00 $252.00 0.14 374.4 $60.28 4.18

560 2600 2 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.05 135.2 $21.77 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.33 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Direct/ Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $461.30 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $397.67 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $63.63 4.18

560 2600 2 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.05 135.2 $21.77 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Stairwell A 4400 6 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.52 2,270.4 $365.53 6 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.43 1900.8 $306.03 $21.00 $126.00 0.08 369.6 $59.51 2.12

221.33 2600 22 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Direct/ Indirect

58 1.28 3,317.6 $534.13 22 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.10 2860 $460.46 $14.00 $308.00 0.18 457.6 $73.67 4.18

560 2600 2 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.05 135.2 $21.77 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

400B Boy's Restroom

Classroom 400B

Classroom 400D

Classroom 400A

400G Girl's Restroom

Page 591: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E3 of 21

ECM #1 & 2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.33 2600 21 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Direct/ Indirect

58 1.22 3,166.8 $509.85 21 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.05 2730 $439.53 $14.00 $294.00 0.17 436.8 $70.32 4.18

560 2600 2 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.05 135.2 $21.77 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

211.11 Stairwell B 4400 6 11x4, 1 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

33 0.20 871.2 $140.26 6 1 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 25 0.15 660 $106.26 $7.00 $42.00 0.05 211.2 $34.00 1.24

222.21 Classroom 401 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

222.21 Classroom 403 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

222.21 Classroom 405 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

222.21 Electrical 407 1200 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 297.6 $47.91 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 240 $38.64 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 57.6 $9.27 6.04

222.21 Classroom 409 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

222.21 Classroom 411 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

222.21 Classroom 413 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

211.11 Stairwell C 4400 6 11x4, 1 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

33 0.20 871.2 $140.26 6 1 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 25 0.15 660 $106.26 $7.00 $42.00 0.05 211.2 $34.00 1.24

222.21 4400 42 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 2.60 11,457.6 $1,844.67 42 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 2.10 9240 $1,487.64 $14.00 $588.00 0.50 2217.6 $357.03 1.65

560 4400 4 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.10 457.6 $73.67 4 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 Classroom 321 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.16 3,016.0 $485.58 20 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.00 2600 $418.60 $14.00 $280.00 0.16 416 $66.98 4.18

221.37 Classroom 317 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $461.30 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $397.67 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $63.63 4.18

221.37 Classroom 315 2600 25 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.45 3,770.0 $606.97 25 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.25 3250 $523.25 $14.00 $350.00 0.20 520 $83.72 4.18

Classroom 400C

Corridor

Page 592: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E4 of 21

ECM #1 & 2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.21 Classroom 313 2600 15 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.93 2,418.0 $389.30 15 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.75 1950 $313.95 $14.00 $210.00 0.18 468 $75.35 2.79

222.21 Prep Room 2600 6 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.37 967.2 $155.72 6 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.30 780 $125.58 $14.00 $84.00 0.07 187.2 $30.14 2.79

222.21 Classroom 309 2600 15 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.93 2,418.0 $389.30 15 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.75 1950 $313.95 $14.00 $210.00 0.18 468 $75.35 2.79

227.21 2600 4 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.26 676.0 $108.84 4 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.20 509.6 $82.05 $24.00 $96.00 0.06 166.4 $26.79 3.58

222.21 2600 8 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.50 1,289.6 $207.63 8 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.40 1040 $167.44 $14.00 $112.00 0.10 249.6 $40.19 2.79

222.21 Prep Room 2600 4 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $103.81 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $83.72 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $20.09 2.79

223.21 Classroom 303 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $218.51 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.07 187.2 $30.14 4.18

223.21 Classroom 301 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $218.51 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.07 187.2 $30.14 4.18

221.33 2600 21 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Direct/ Indirect

58 1.22 3,166.8 $509.85 21 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.05 2730 $439.53 $14.00 $294.00 0.17 436.8 $70.32 4.18

560 2600 3 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.08 202.8 $32.65 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.33 2600 21 2 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. 58 1.22 3,166.8 $509.85 21 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp 50 1.05 2730 $439.53 $14.00 $294.00 0.17 436.8 $70.32 4.18

560 2600 3 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.08 202.8 $32.65 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.33 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Direct/ Indirect

58 1.10 2,865.2 $461.30 19 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.95 2470 $397.67 $14.00 $266.00 0.15 395.2 $63.63 4.18

560 2600 3 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.08 202.8 $32.65 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.33 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Direct/ Indirect

58 1.16 3,016.0 $485.58 20 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.00 2600 $418.60 $14.00 $280.00 0.16 416 $66.98 4.18

560 2600 3 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.08 202.8 $32.65 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Classroom 300 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

222.21 Classroom 302 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

Classroom 307

Classroom 300 C

Classroom 300 D

Classroom 300 B

Classroom 300 A

Page 593: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E5 of 21

ECM #1 & 2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.21 Classroom 304 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

227.21 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.21 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $20.51 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.70 3.58

232.21 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.26 670.8 $108.00 3 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.22 561.6 $90.42 $21.00 $63.00 0.04 109.2 $17.58 3.58

227.21 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.21 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $20.51 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.70 3.58

232.21 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.26 670.8 $108.00 3 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.22 561.6 $90.42 $21.00 $63.00 0.04 109.2 $17.58 3.58

6917 Men's Restroom 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed Light, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.10 260.0 $41.86 1 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 67.6 $10.88 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 192.4 $30.98 0.65

6917 Women's Restroom 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed Light, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.10 260.0 $41.86 1 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 67.6 $10.88 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 192.4 $30.98 0.65

613 Custodial Closet 1200 1 1 Industrial Fixture, 100w A19 Lamp 100 0.10 120.0 $19.32 1 1 (1) 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 31.2 $5.02 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 88.8 $14.30 1.40

222.21 Classroom 306 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

222.21 Classroom 308 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

222.21 Classroom 310 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

221.37 Classroom 312 2600 28 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.62 4,222.4 $679.81 28 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.40 3640 $586.04 $14.00 $392.00 0.22 582.4 $93.77 4.18

242.21 Prep Room 2600 3 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 0.32 834.6 $134.37 3 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 0.29 764.4 $123.07 $28.00 $84.00 0.03 70.2 $11.30 7.43

221.37 Classroom 316 2600 28 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.62 4,222.4 $679.81 28 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.40 3640 $586.04 $14.00 $392.00 0.22 582.4 $93.77 4.18

222.21 4400 42 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 2.60 11,457.6 $1,844.67 42 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 2.10 9240 $1,487.64 $14.00 $588.00 0.50 2217.6 $357.03 1.65

560 4400 4 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.10 457.6 $73.67 4 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Girls Rest Room 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.26 670.8 $108.00 3 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.22 561.6 $90.42 $21.00 $63.00 0.04 109.2 $17.58 3.58

232.21 Boys Rest Room 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.26 670.8 $108.00 3 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.22 561.6 $90.42 $21.00 $63.00 0.04 109.2 $17.58 3.58

Girls Rest Room

Corridor 300

Boys Rest Room

Page 594: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E6 of 21

ECM #1 & 2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

232.21 Custodial Closet 1200 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.09 103.2 $16.62 1 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.07 86.4 $13.91 $21.00 $21.00 0.01 16.8 $2.70 7.76

232.21 SGI Room 318 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.17 447.2 $72.00 2 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.14 374.4 $60.28 $21.00 $42.00 0.03 72.8 $11.72 3.58

221.31 Electrical 320 1200 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.06 74.4 $11.98 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 60 $9.66 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 14.4 $2.32 6.04

222.21 4400 14 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.87 3,819.2 $614.89 14 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.70 3080 $495.88 $14.00 $196.00 0.17 739.2 $119.01 1.65

563 4400 6 2 Recessed Down Light, (2)26w Quad CFL Lamp 52 0.31 1,372.8 $221.02 6 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.37 Classroom 322 2600 20 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 1.16 3,016.0 $485.58 20 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.00 2600 $418.60 $14.00 $280.00 0.16 416 $66.98 4.18

221.37 Media Center M-7 2600 16 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 0.93 2,412.8 $388.46 16 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.80 2080 $334.88 $14.00 $224.00 0.13 332.8 $53.58 4.18

232.21 Media Center 2600 46 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 3.96 10,285.6 $1,655.98 46 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 3.31 8611.2 $1,386.40 $21.00 $966.00 0.64 1674.4 $269.58 3.58

232.21 Media Center M-4 2600 6 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.52 1,341.6 $216.00 6 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.43 1123.2 $180.84 $21.00 $126.00 0.08 218.4 $35.16 3.58

221.37 Classroom 227 2600 21 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.22 3,166.8 $509.85 21 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.05 2730 $439.53 $14.00 $294.00 0.17 436.8 $70.32 4.18

222.21 Media Center M-3 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $51.91 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $41.86 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $10.05 2.79

222.21 Media Center M-6 2600 5 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.31 806.0 $129.77 5 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.25 650 $104.65 $14.00 $70.00 0.06 156 $25.12 2.79

222.21 Faculty 225 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

222.21 Classroom 223 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $311.44 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $251.16 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.28 2.79

222.21 Classroom 221 2600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.74 1,934.4 $311.44 12 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.60 1560 $251.16 $14.00 $168.00 0.14 374.4 $60.28 2.79

222.21 Classroom 219 2600 17 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 1.05 2,740.4 $441.20 17 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.85 2210 $355.81 $14.00 $238.00 0.20 530.4 $85.39 2.79

Media Center Corridor

Page 595: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E7 of 21

ECM #1 & 2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.21 Classroom 217 2600 13 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.81 2,095.6 $337.39 13 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.65 1690 $272.09 $14.00 $182.00 0.16 405.6 $65.30 2.79

232.21 Boys Rest Room 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.17 447.2 $72.00 2 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.14 374.4 $60.28 $21.00 $42.00 0.03 72.8 $11.72 3.58

232.21 Girls Rest Room 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.26 670.8 $108.00 3 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.22 561.6 $90.42 $21.00 $63.00 0.04 109.2 $17.58 3.58

613 Custodial Closet 1200 1 1 Industrial Fixture, 100w A19 Lamp 100 0.10 120.0 $19.32 1 1 (1) 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 31.2 $5.02 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 88.8 $14.30 1.40

232.21 Classroom 210 2600 8 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.69 1,788.8 $288.00 8 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.58 1497.6 $241.11 $21.00 $168.00 0.11 291.2 $46.88 3.58

222.21 Classroom 212 2600 8 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.50 1,289.6 $207.63 8 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.40 1040 $167.44 $14.00 $112.00 0.10 249.6 $40.19 2.79

222.21 Classroom 214 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

222.21 Classroom 216 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

222.21 Classroom 117 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

222.21 Classroom 115 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

222.21 Classroom 113 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

222.21 Classroom 111 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

222.21 Classroom 116 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

222.21 Classroom 118 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

222.21 Classroom 120 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.56 1,450.8 $233.58 9 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.45 1170 $188.37 $14.00 $126.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 2.79

222.21 Cafeteria Corridor 4400 46 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 2.85 12,548.8 $2,020.36 46 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 2.30 10120 $1,629.32 $14.00 $644.00 0.55 2428.8 $391.04 1.65

Page 596: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E8 of 21

ECM #1 & 2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

6917 Men's Restroom 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed Light, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.10 260.0 $41.86 1 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 67.6 $10.88 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 192.4 $30.98 0.65

221.31 Boiler Room 4400 16 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.99 4,364.8 $702.73 16 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.80 3520 $566.72 $14.00 $224.00 0.19 844.8 $136.01 1.65

6917 Women's Restroom 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed Light, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.10 260.0 $41.86 1 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 67.6 $10.88 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 192.4 $30.98 0.65

222.21 Kitchen Washing Area 2600 5 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.31 806.0 $129.77 5 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.25 650 $104.65 $14.00 $70.00 0.06 156 $25.12 2.79

221.15 2600 29 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., No Lens

58 1.68 4,373.2 $704.09 29 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

617 2600 6 1 Hood Light w/Globe & Cage, 100w A Lamp 100 0.60 1,560.0 $251.16 6 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.16 405.6 $65.30 $20.00 $120.00 0.44 1154.4 $185.86 0.65

221.31 Storage 129A 1200 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.12 148.8 $23.96 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 120 $19.32 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 28.8 $4.64 6.04

242.21 2600 21 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 2.25 5,842.2 $940.59 21 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 2.06 5350.8 $861.48 $28.00 $588.00 0.19 491.4 $79.12 7.43

227.21 2600 1 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens65 0.07 169.0 $27.21 1 2 Sylvania Lamp

FBO30/841XP/6//SS/ECO 49 0.05 127.4 $20.51 $24.00 $24.00 0.02 41.6 $6.70 3.58

563 2600 15 2 Recessed Down Light, (2)26w Quad CFL Lamp 52 0.78 2,028.0 $326.51 15 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 Faculty Dining 134 2600 12 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 1.28 3,338.4 $537.48 12 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.18 3057.6 $492.27 $28.00 $336.00 0.11 280.8 $45.21 7.43

625 2600 12 1 Pendant Mount Down Light, 500w A Lamp 500 6.00 15,600.0 $2,511.60 12 1 (1) 150w CFL Lamp 150 1.80 4680 $753.48 $85.00 $1,020.00 4.20 10920 $1,758.12 0.58

625 2600 12 1 Pendant Mount Down Light, 500w A Lamp 500 6.00 15,600.0 $2,511.60 12 1 (1) 150w CFL Lamp 150 1.80 4680 $753.48 $85.00 $1,020.00 4.20 10920 $1,758.12 0.58

227.211 2600 13 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.44 1,149.2 $185.02 13 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.11 Main Lobby 4400 16 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

107 1.71 7,532.8 $1,212.78 16 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.57 6899.2 $1,110.77 $28.00 $448.00 0.14 633.6 $102.01 4.39

624 Auditorium 2600 40 1 Recessed Auditorium Light, 300w A Lamp Incandescent 300 12.00 31,200.0 $5,023.20 40 1 100w LED AltLed RO2 Series

Recessed 100 4.00 10400 $1,674.40 $750.00 $30,000.00 8.00 20800 $3,348.80 8.96

221.11 Stage 1200 16 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.99 1,190.4 $191.65 16 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.80 960 $154.56 $14.00 $224.00 0.19 230.4 $37.09 6.04

222.21 Office 224 2600 1 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.06 161.2 $25.95 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 130 $20.93 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 31.2 $5.02 2.79

Kitchen

Small Cafeteria

Cafeteria

Page 597: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E9 of 21

ECM #1 & 2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.37 Classroom 215 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 0.87 2,262.0 $364.18 15 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.75 1950 $313.95 $14.00 $210.00 0.12 312 $50.23 4.18

222.21 Classroom 215 Rest Room 2600 1 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.06 161.2 $25.95 1 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.05 130 $20.93 $14.00 $14.00 0.01 31.2 $5.02 2.79

613 Storage 222 1200 2 1 Industrial Fixture, 100w A19 Lamp 100 0.20 240.0 $38.64 2 1 (1) 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.05 62.4 $10.05 $20.00 $40.00 0.15 177.6 $28.59 1.40

232.21 Classroom 213 2600 22 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.89 4,919.2 $791.99 22 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 1.58 4118.4 $663.06 $21.00 $462.00 0.31 800.8 $128.93 3.58

221.37 Guidance Office 2600 24 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.39 3,619.2 $582.69 24 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.20 3120 $502.32 $14.00 $336.00 0.19 499.2 $80.37 4.18

232.21 Office 218 B 2600 4 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.34 894.4 $144.00 4 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.29 748.8 $120.56 $21.00 $84.00 0.06 145.6 $23.44 3.58

222.21 Auditorium Corridors 4400 69 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 4.28 18,823.2 $3,030.54 69 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 3.45 15180 $2,443.98 $14.00 $966.00 0.83 3643.2 $586.56 1.65

221.11 Classroom 211 2600 18 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 1.12 2,901.6 $467.16 18 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.90 2340 $376.74 $14.00 $252.00 0.22 561.6 $90.42 2.79

221.11 Classroom 207 2600 18 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 1.12 2,901.6 $467.16 18 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.90 2340 $376.74 $14.00 $252.00 0.22 561.6 $90.42 2.79

242.21 Classroom 203 2600 20 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 2.14 5,564.0 $895.80 20 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.96 5096 $820.46 $28.00 $560.00 0.18 468 $75.35 7.43

242.21 Classroom 201 2600 16 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens107 1.71 4,451.2 $716.64 16 4 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 98 1.57 4076.8 $656.36 $28.00 $448.00 0.14 374.4 $60.28 7.43

211.11 Boys Locker Room 2600 23 11x4, 1 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

33 0.76 1,973.4 $317.72 23 1 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 25 0.58 1495 $240.70 $7.00 $161.00 0.18 478.4 $77.02 2.09

211.11 Girls Locker Room 2600 23 11x4, 1 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

33 0.76 1,973.4 $317.72 23 1 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 25 0.58 1495 $240.70 $7.00 $161.00 0.18 478.4 $77.02 2.09

769 Main Gym 2600 30 1 400w MH, Clear Lens 465 13.95 36,270.0 $5,839.47 30 6 2x4 54w T5HO 6 Lamp w/Prismatic Lens 354 10.62 27612 $4,445.53 $240.00 $7,200.00 3.33 8658 $1,393.94 5.17

769 Aux Gym 2600 28 1 400w MH, Clear Lens 465 13.02 33,852.0 $5,450.17 28 6 2x4 54w T5HO 6 Lamp w/Prismatic Lens 354 9.91 25771.2 $4,149.16 $240.00 $6,720.00 3.11 8080.8 $1,301.01 5.17

221.37 Office 100 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.16 3,016.0 $485.58 20 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.00 2600 $418.60 $14.00 $280.00 0.16 416 $66.98 4.18

221.37 Classroom 102 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.16 3,016.0 $485.58 20 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.00 2600 $418.60 $14.00 $280.00 0.16 416 $66.98 4.18

221.37 Tech Room 104 2600 24 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Indirect

58 1.39 3,619.2 $582.69 24 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.20 3120 $502.32 $14.00 $336.00 0.19 499.2 $80.37 4.18

Page 598: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Investment Grade Lighting Audit APPENDIX E10 of 21

ECM #1 & 2: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.11 Classroom 106 2600 18 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 1.12 2,901.6 $467.16 18 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.90 2340 $376.74 $14.00 $252.00 0.22 561.6 $90.42 2.79

221.11 Office 106 2600 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 0.12 322.4 $51.91 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $41.86 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $10.05 2.79

221.11 Classroom 108 2600 24 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series

T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

62 1.49 3,868.8 $622.88 24 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 1.20 3120 $502.32 $14.00 $336.00 0.29 748.8 $120.56 2.79

232.21 Girls Rest Room 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.26 670.8 $108.00 3 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.22 561.6 $90.42 $21.00 $63.00 0.04 109.2 $17.58 3.58

232.21 Boys Rest Room 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.26 670.8 $108.00 3 3 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp FO28/841/SS/ECO 72 0.22 561.6 $90.42 $21.00 $63.00 0.04 109.2 $17.58 3.58

6917 Mens Rest Room 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed Light, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.10 260.0 $41.86 1 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 67.6 $10.88 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 192.4 $30.98 0.65

6917 Womens Rest Room 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed Light, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.10 260.0 $41.86 1 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 67.6 $10.88 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 192.4 $30.98 0.65

613 Custodial Closet 1200 1 1 Industrial Fixture, 100w A19 Lamp 100 0.10 120.0 $19.32 1 1 (1) 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 31.2 $5.02 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 88.8 $14.30 1.40

222.21 Conference Room 110 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.25 644.8 $103.81 4 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.20 520 $83.72 $14.00 $56.00 0.05 124.8 $20.09 2.79

222.21 Conference Room A 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.12 322.4 $51.91 2 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.10 260 $41.86 $14.00 $28.00 0.02 62.4 $10.05 2.79

222.21 Main Office Reception & Hallway 2600 17 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 1.05 2,740.4 $441.20 17 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.85 2210 $355.81 $14.00 $238.00 0.20 530.4 $85.39 2.79

222.21 Main Office Side Offices (typ for 8) 2600 16 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens62 0.99 2,579.2 $415.25 16 2 Relamp - Sylvania Lamp

FO28/841/SS/ECO 50 0.80 2080 $334.88 $14.00 $224.00 0.19 499.2 $80.37 2.79

610 Exterior 4400 12 21x1 Surface Mount,

Prismatic Lens, (2) 60w A Lamp

120 1.44 6,336.0 $1,020.10 12 2 13w CFL Lamps 26 0.31 1372.8 $221.02 $25.00 $300.00 1.13 4963.2 $799.08 0.38

725 Exterior 4400 26 1 150w HPS Wallpack 188 4.89 21,507.2 $3,462.66 26 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00Totals 1,955 332 482,903 $77,747 1,955 323 118.7 332,047 $53,460 $72,020 42.9 118,158 $19,023 3.79

Page 599: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E11 of 21

CEG Job #: 9C10088Project: William Annin Middle School KWH COST: $0.161

Address: 70 Quincy RaodBasking Ridge, NJ 07920

Building SF:

ECM #3: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.37 Classroom 415 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.16 3016 $485.58 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.93 20% 2412.8 $388.46 $300.00 $300.00 0.23 603.2 $97.12 3.09

221.37 Classroom 417 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.16 3016 $485.58 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.93 20% 2412.8 $388.46 $300.00 $300.00 0.23 603.2 $97.12 3.09

221.37 Classroom 419 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.16 3016 $485.58 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.93 20% 2412.8 $388.46 $300.00 $300.00 0.23 603.2 $97.12 3.09

221.37 Classroom 421 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.16 3016 $485.58 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.93 20% 2412.8 $388.46 $300.00 $300.00 0.23 603.2 $97.12 3.09

222.21 Stairwell 4400 6 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.372 1636.8 $263.52 6 0 No Change 62 0.37 0% 1636.8 $263.52 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 Classroom 426 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.16 3016 $485.58 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.93 20% 2412.8 $388.46 $300.00 $300.00 0.23 603.2 $97.12 3.09

222.21 Storage 1200 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 148.8 $23.96 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 148.8 $23.96 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 Classroom 422 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.16 3016 $485.58 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.93 20% 2412.8 $388.46 $300.00 $300.00 0.23 603.2 $97.12 3.09

221.37 Classroom 420 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.16 3016 $485.58 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.93 20% 2412.8 $388.46 $300.00 $300.00 0.23 603.2 $97.12 3.09

221.37 Classroom 418 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.16 3016 $485.58 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.93 20% 2412.8 $388.46 $300.00 $300.00 0.23 603.2 $97.12 3.09

221.37 Classroom 416 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.16 3016 $485.58 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.93 20% 2412.8 $388.46 $300.00 $300.00 0.23 603.2 $97.12 3.09

222.21 Classroom 414 2600 11 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.682 1773.2 $285.49 11 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.55 20% 1418.56 $228.39 $300.00 $300.00 0.14 354.64 $57.10 5.25

222.21 Classroom 412 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

222.21 Conference Room 410 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 $103.81 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.20 20% 515.84 $83.05 $300.00 $300.00 0.05 128.96 $20.76 14.45

222.21 Classroom 408 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $300.00 $300.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 6.42

William Annin Middle School

-

Page 600: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E12 of 21

ECM #3: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

227.21 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 $27.21 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.21 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.258 670.8 $108.00 3 0 No Change 86 0.26 0% 670.8 $108.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

6917 Women's Restroom 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed Light, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.1 260 $41.86 1 0 No Change 100 0.10 0% 260 $41.86 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

613 Custodial Closet 2600 1 1 Industrial Fixture, 100w A19 Lamp 100 0.1 260 $41.86 1 0 No Change 100 0.10 0% 260 $41.86 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.41 Roof Access/Crawl Space 2600 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt.,

Prismatic58 0.058 150.8 $24.28 1 0 No Change 58 0.06 0% 150.8 $24.28 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

6917 Men's Restroom 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed Light, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.1 260 $41.86 1 0 No Change 100 0.10 0% 260 $41.86 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 $27.21 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.21 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.258 670.8 $108.00 3 0 No Change 86 0.26 0% 670.8 $108.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Classroom 406 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

222.11 Storage 404 1200 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 297.6 $47.91 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.20 20% 238.08 $38.33 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 59.52 $9.58 15.65

222.21 Classroom 200 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

222.21 Classroom 400 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

221.33 2600 18 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Direct/ Indirect

58 1.044 2714.4 $437.02 18 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.84 20% 2171.52 $349.61 $300.00 $300.00 0.21 542.88 $87.40 3.43

560 2600 2 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.052 135.2 $21.77 2 0 No Change 26 0.05 0% 135.2 $21.77 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.33 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Direct/ Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 $461.30 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $369.04 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $92.26 3.25

560 2600 2 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.052 135.2 $21.77 2 0 No Change 26 0.05 0% 135.2 $21.77 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

400G Girl's Restroom

400B Boy's Restroom

Classroom 400A

Classroom 400B

Page 601: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E13 of 21

ECM #3: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

232.21 Stairwell A 4400 6 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.516 2270.4 $365.53 6 0 No Change 86 0.52 0% 2270.4 $365.53 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.33 2600 22 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Direct/ Indirect

58 1.276 3317.6 $534.13 22 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.02 20% 2654.08 $427.31 $300.00 $300.00 0.26 663.52 $106.83 2.81

560 2600 2 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.052 135.2 $21.77 2 0 No Change 26 0.05 0% 135.2 $21.77 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.33 2600 21 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Direct/ Indirect

58 1.218 3166.8 $509.85 21 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.97 20% 2533.44 $407.88 $300.00 $300.00 0.24 633.36 $101.97 2.94

560 2600 2 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.052 135.2 $21.77 2 0 No Change 26 0.05 0% 135.2 $21.77 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

211.11 Stairwell B 4400 6 1

1x4, 1 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

33 0.198 871.2 $140.26 6 0 No Change 33 0.20 0% 871.2 $140.26 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Classroom 401 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

222.21 Classroom 403 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

222.21 Classroom 405 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

222.21 Electrical 407 1200 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 297.6 $47.91 4 0 No Change 62 0.25 0% 297.6 $47.91 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Classroom 409 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

222.21 Classroom 411 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

222.21 Classroom 413 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

211.11 Stairwell C 4400 6 1

1x4, 1 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

33 0.198 871.2 $140.26 6 0 No Change 33 0.20 0% 871.2 $140.26 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 4400 42 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 2.604 11457.6 $1,844.67 42 0 No Change 62 2.60 0% 11457.6 $1,844.67 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

560 4400 4 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.104 457.6 $73.67 4 0 No Change 26 0.10 0% 457.6 $73.67 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Corridor

Classroom 400D

Classroom 400C

Page 602: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E14 of 21

ECM #3: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.37 Classroom 321 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.16 3016 $485.58 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.93 20% 2412.8 $388.46 $300.00 $300.00 0.23 603.2 $97.12 3.09

221.37 Classroom 317 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 $461.30 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $369.04 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $92.26 3.25

221.37 Classroom 315 2600 25 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.45 3770 $606.97 25 2

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.16 20% 3016 $485.58 $300.00 $600.00 0.29 754 $121.39 4.94

222.21 Classroom 313 2600 15 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.93 2418 $389.30 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.74 20% 1934.4 $311.44 $300.00 $300.00 0.19 483.6 $77.86 3.85

222.21 Prep Room 2600 6 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.372 967.2 $155.72 6 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.30 20% 773.76 $124.58 $150.00 $150.00 0.07 193.44 $31.14 4.82

222.21 Classroom 309 2600 15 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.93 2418 $389.30 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.74 20% 1934.4 $311.44 $300.00 $300.00 0.19 483.6 $77.86 3.85

227.21 2600 4 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.26 676 $108.84 4 0 No Change 65 0.26 0% 676 $108.84 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 2600 8 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.496 1289.6 $207.63 8 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.40 20% 1031.68 $166.10 $250.00 $250.00 0.10 257.92 $41.53 6.02

222.21 Prep Room 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 $103.81 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.20 20% 515.84 $83.05 $300.00 $300.00 0.05 128.96 $20.76 14.45

223.21 Classroom 303 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

58 0.522 1357.2 $218.51 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 58 0.42 20% 1085.76 $174.81 $250.00 $250.00 0.10 271.44 $43.70 5.72

223.21 Classroom 301 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

58 0.522 1357.2 $218.51 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 58 0.42 20% 1085.76 $174.81 $250.00 $250.00 0.10 271.44 $43.70 5.72

221.33 2600 21 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Direct/ Indirect

58 1.218 3166.8 $509.85 21 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.97 20% 2533.44 $407.88 $300.00 $300.00 0.24 633.36 $101.97 2.94

560 2600 3 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.078 202.8 $32.65 3 0 No Change 26 0.08 0% 202.8 $32.65 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.33 2600 21 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Direct/ Indirect

58 1.218 3166.8 $509.85 21 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.97 20% 2533.44 $407.88 $300.00 $300.00 0.24 633.36 $101.97 2.94

560 2600 3 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.078 202.8 $32.65 3 0 No Change 26 0.08 0% 202.8 $32.65 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.33 2600 19 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Direct/ Indirect

58 1.102 2865.2 $461.30 19 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.88 20% 2292.16 $369.04 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 573.04 $92.26 3.25

Classroom 307

Classroom 300 C

Classroom 300 D

Classroom 300 B

Page 603: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E15 of 21

ECM #3: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

560 2600 3 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.078 202.8 $32.65 3 0 No Change 26 0.08 0% 202.8 $32.65 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.33 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Direct/ Indirect

58 1.16 3016 $485.58 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.93 20% 2412.8 $388.46 $300.00 $300.00 0.23 603.2 $97.12 3.09

560 2600 3 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.078 202.8 $32.65 3 0 No Change 26 0.08 0% 202.8 $32.65 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Classroom 300 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

222.21 Classroom 302 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

222.21 Classroom 304 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

227.21 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 $27.21 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.21 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.258 670.8 $108.00 3 0 No Change 86 0.26 0% 670.8 $108.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 $27.21 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.21 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.258 670.8 $108.00 3 0 No Change 86 0.26 0% 670.8 $108.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

6917 Men's Restroom 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed Light, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.1 260 $41.86 1 0 No Change 100 0.10 0% 260 $41.86 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

6917 Women's Restroom 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed Light, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.1 260 $41.86 1 0 No Change 100 0.10 0% 260 $41.86 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

613 Custodial Closet 1200 1 1 Industrial Fixture, 100w A19 Lamp 100 0.1 120 $19.32 1 0 No Change 100 0.10 0% 120 $19.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Classroom 306 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

222.21 Classroom 308 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

222.21 Classroom 310 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

Classroom 300 B

Classroom 300 A

Boys Rest Room

Girls Rest Room

Page 604: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E16 of 21

ECM #3: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.37 Classroom 312 2600 28 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.624 4222.4 $679.81 28 2

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.30 20% 3377.92 $543.85 $300.00 $600.00 0.32 844.48 $135.96 4.41

242.21 Prep Room 2600 3 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 0.321 834.6 $134.37 3 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 107 0.26 20% 667.68 $107.50 $150.00 $150.00 0.06 166.92 $26.87 5.58

221.37 Classroom 316 2600 28 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.624 4222.4 $679.81 28 2

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.30 20% 3377.92 $543.85 $300.00 $600.00 0.32 844.48 $135.96 4.41

222.21 4400 42 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 2.604 11457.6 $1,844.67 42 0 No Change 62 2.60 0% 11457.6 $1,844.67 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

560 4400 4 1 Recessed Down Light, 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.104 457.6 $73.67 4 0 No Change 26 0.10 0% 457.6 $73.67 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Girls Rest Room 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.258 670.8 $108.00 3 0 No Change 86 0.26 0% 670.8 $108.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Boys Rest Room 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.258 670.8 $108.00 3 0 No Change 86 0.26 0% 670.8 $108.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Custodial Closet 1200 1 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.086 103.2 $16.62 1 0 No Change 86 0.09 0% 103.2 $16.62 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 SGI Room 318 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.172 447.2 $72.00 2 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 86 0.14 20% 357.76 $57.60 $150.00 $150.00 0.03 89.44 $14.40 10.42

221.31 Electrical 320 1200 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 74.4 $11.98 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 74.4 $11.98 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 4400 14 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.868 3819.2 $614.89 14 0 No Change 62 0.87 0% 3819.2 $614.89 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

563 4400 6 2 Recessed Down Light, (2)26w Quad CFL Lamp 52 0.312 1372.8 $221.02 6 0 No Change 52 0.31 0% 1372.8 $221.02 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.37 Classroom 322 2600 20 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

58 1.16 3016 $485.58 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.93 20% 2412.8 $388.46 $300.00 $300.00 0.23 603.2 $97.12 3.09

221.37 Media Center M-7 2600 16 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 0.928 2412.8 $388.46 16 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 58 0.74 20% 1930.24 $310.77 $250.00 $250.00 0.19 482.56 $77.69 3.22

232.21 Media Center 2600 46 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 3.956 10285.6 $1,655.98 46 2

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 86 3.16 20% 8228.48 $1,324.79 $300.00 $600.00 0.79 2057.12 $331.20 1.81

232.21 Media Center M-4 2600 6 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.516 1341.6 $216.00 6 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 86 0.41 20% 1073.28 $172.80 $250.00 $250.00 0.10 268.32 $43.20 5.79

Corridor 300

Media Center Corridor

Page 605: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E17 of 21

ECM #3: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.37 Classroom 227 2600 21 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.218 3166.8 $509.85 21 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.97 20% 2533.44 $407.88 $300.00 $300.00 0.24 633.36 $101.97 2.94

222.21 Media Center M-3 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 $51.91 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 322.4 $51.91 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Media Center M-6 2600 5 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.31 806 $129.77 5 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.25 20% 644.8 $103.81 $150.00 $150.00 0.06 161.2 $25.95 5.78

222.21 Faculty 225 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

222.21 Classroom 223 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 $311.44 12 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $249.15 $300.00 $300.00 0.15 386.88 $62.29 4.82

222.21 Classroom 221 2600 12 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.744 1934.4 $311.44 12 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.60 20% 1547.52 $249.15 $250.00 $250.00 0.15 386.88 $62.29 4.01

222.21 Classroom 219 2600 17 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 1.054 2740.4 $441.20 17 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.84 20% 2192.32 $352.96 $300.00 $300.00 0.21 548.08 $88.24 3.40

222.21 Classroom 217 2600 13 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.806 2095.6 $337.39 13 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.64 20% 1676.48 $269.91 $250.00 $250.00 0.16 419.12 $67.48 3.70

232.21 Boys Rest Room 2600 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.172 447.2 $72.00 2 0 No Change 86 0.17 0% 447.2 $72.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Girls Rest Room 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.258 670.8 $108.00 3 0 No Change 86 0.26 0% 670.8 $108.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

613 Custodial Closet 1200 1 1 Industrial Fixture, 100w A19 Lamp 100 0.1 120 $19.32 1 0 No Change 100 0.10 0% 120 $19.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Classroom 210 2600 8 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.688 1788.8 $288.00 8 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 86 0.55 20% 1431.04 $230.40 $250.00 $250.00 0.14 357.76 $57.60 4.34

222.21 Classroom 212 2600 8 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.496 1289.6 $207.63 8 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.40 20% 1031.68 $166.10 $250.00 $250.00 0.10 257.92 $41.53 6.02

222.21 Classroom 214 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

222.21 Classroom 216 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

222.21 Classroom 117 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

Page 606: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E18 of 21

ECM #3: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

222.21 Classroom 115 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

222.21 Classroom 113 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

222.21 Classroom 111 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

222.21 Classroom 116 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

222.21 Classroom 118 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

222.21 Classroom 120 2600 9 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.558 1450.8 $233.58 9 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 62 0.45 20% 1160.64 $186.86 $250.00 $250.00 0.11 290.16 $46.72 5.35

222.21 Cafeteria Corridor 4400 46 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 2.852 12548.8 $2,020.36 46 0 No Change 62 2.85 0% 12548.8 $2,020.36 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

6917 Men's Restroom 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed Light, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.1 260 $41.86 1 0 No Change 100 0.10 0% 260 $41.86 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Boiler Room 4400 16 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.992 4364.8 $702.73 16 0 No Change 62 0.99 0% 4364.8 $702.73 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

6917 Women's Restroom 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed Light, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.1 260 $41.86 1 0 No Change 100 0.10 0% 260 $41.86 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Kitchen Washing Area 2600 5 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.31 806 $129.77 5 0 No Change 62 0.31 0% 806 $129.77 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.15 2600 29 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., No Lens

58 1.682 4373.2 $704.09 29 2

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.35 20% 3498.56 $563.27 $300.00 $600.00 0.34 874.64 $140.82 4.26

617 2600 6 1 Hood Light w/Globe & Cage, 100w A Lamp 100 0.6 1560 $251.16 6 0 No Change 100 0.60 0% 1560 $251.16 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Storage 129A 1200 2 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 148.8 $23.96 2 0 No Change 62 0.12 0% 148.8 $23.96 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 2600 21 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 2.247 5842.2 $940.59 21 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 107 1.80 20% 4673.76 $752.48 $300.00 $300.00 0.45 1168.44 $188.12 1.59

227.21 2600 1 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

65 0.065 169 $27.21 1 0 No Change 65 0.07 0% 169 $27.21 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Kitchen

Small Cafeteria

Page 607: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E19 of 21

ECM #3: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

563 2600 15 2 Recessed Down Light, (2)26w Quad CFL Lamp 52 0.78 2028 $326.51 15 1 Dual Technology Occupancy

Sensor - Remote Mnt. 52 0.62 20% 1622.4 $261.21 $250.00 $250.00 0.16 405.6 $65.30 3.83

242.21 Faculty Dining 134 2600 12 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 1.284 3338.4 $537.48 12 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 107 1.03 20% 2670.72 $429.99 $250.00 $250.00 0.26 667.68 $107.50 2.33

625 2600 12 1 Pendant Mount Down Light,500w A Lamp 500 6 15600 $2,511.60 12 1 Dual Technology Occupancy

Sensor - Remote Mnt. 500 4.80 20% 12480 $2,009.28 $250.00 $250.00 1.20 3120 $502.32 0.50

625 2600 12 1 Pendant Mount Down Light,500w A Lamp 500 6 15600 $2,511.60 12 2

Daylight Sensor (Sensorswitch PP-20 & CM-

PC or equal)500 3.60 40% 9360 $1,506.96 $300.00 $600.00 2.40 6240 $1,004.64 0.60

227.211 2600 13 22x2, 2 Lamp, 17w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

34 0.442 1149.2 $185.02 13 0 No Change 34 0.44 0% 1149.2 $185.02 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.11 Main Lobby 4400 16 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 1.712 7532.8 $1,212.78 16 0 No Change 107 1.71 0% 7532.8 $1,212.78 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

624 Auditorium 2600 40 1 Recessed Auditorium Light, 300w A Lamp Incandescent 300 12 31200 $5,023.20 40 0 No Change 300 12.00 0% 31200 $5,023.20 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Stage 1200 16 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.992 1190.4 $191.65 16 0 No Change 62 0.99 0% 1190.4 $191.65 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Office 224 2600 1 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 161.2 $25.95 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 161.2 $25.95 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.37 Classroom 215 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 0.87 2262 $364.18 15 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.70 20% 1809.6 $291.35 $300.00 $300.00 0.17 452.4 $72.84 4.12

222.21 Classroom 215 Rest Room 2600 1 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.062 161.2 $25.95 1 0 No Change 62 0.06 0% 161.2 $25.95 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

613 Storage 222 1200 2 1 Industrial Fixture, 100w A19 Lamp 100 0.2 240 $38.64 2 0 No Change 100 0.20 0% 240 $38.64 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Classroom 213 2600 22 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.892 4919.2 $791.99 22 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 86 1.51 20% 3935.36 $633.59 $300.00 $300.00 0.38 983.84 $158.40 1.89

221.37 Guidance Office 2600 24 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.392 3619.2 $582.69 24 0 No Change 58 1.39 0% 3619.2 $582.69 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Office 218 B 2600 4 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.344 894.4 $144.00 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 86 0.28 20% 715.52 $115.20 $150.00 $150.00 0.07 178.88 $28.80 5.21

222.21 Auditorium Corridors 4400 69 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 4.278 18823.2 $3,030.54 69 0 No Change 62 4.28 0% 18823.2 $3,030.54 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Cafeteria

Page 608: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E20 of 21

ECM #3: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.11 Classroom 211 2600 18 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 1.116 2901.6 $467.16 18 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.89 20% 2321.28 $373.73 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 580.32 $93.43 3.21

221.11 Classroom 207 2600 18 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 1.116 2901.6 $467.16 18 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.89 20% 2321.28 $373.73 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 580.32 $93.43 3.21

242.21 Classroom 203 2600 20 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 2.14 5564 $895.80 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 107 1.71 20% 4451.2 $716.64 $300.00 $300.00 0.43 1112.8 $179.16 1.67

242.21 Classroom 201 2600 16 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

107 1.712 4451.2 $716.64 16 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 107 1.37 20% 3560.96 $573.31 $300.00 $300.00 0.34 890.24 $143.33 2.09

211.11 Boys Locker Room 2600 23 1

1x4, 1 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

33 0.759 1973.4 $317.72 23 2 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 33 0.61 20% 1578.72 $254.17 $250.00 $500.00 0.15 394.68 $63.54 7.87

211.11 Girls Locker Room 2600 23 1

1x4, 1 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

33 0.759 1973.4 $317.72 23 2 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Remote Mnt. 33 0.61 20% 1578.72 $254.17 $250.00 $500.00 0.15 394.68 $63.54 7.87

769 Main Gym 2600 30 1 400w MH, Clear Lens 465 13.95 36270 $5,839.47 30 2

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 465 11.16 20% 29016 $4,671.58 $300.00 $600.00 2.79 7254 $1,167.89 0.51

769 Aux Gym 2600 28 1 400w MH, Clear Lens 465 13.02 33852 $5,450.17 28 2

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 465 10.42 20% 27081.6 $4,360.14 $300.00 $600.00 2.60 6770.4 $1,090.03 0.55

221.37 Office 100 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.16 3016 $485.58 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.93 20% 2412.8 $388.46 $300.00 $300.00 0.23 603.2 $97.12 3.09

221.37 Classroom 102 2600 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.16 3016 $485.58 20 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 0.93 20% 2412.8 $388.46 $300.00 $300.00 0.23 603.2 $97.12 3.09

221.37 Tech Room 104 2600 24 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,Indirect

58 1.392 3619.2 $582.69 24 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 58 1.11 20% 2895.36 $466.15 $300.00 $300.00 0.28 723.84 $116.54 2.57

221.11 Classroom 106 2600 18 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 1.116 2901.6 $467.16 18 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.89 20% 2321.28 $373.73 $300.00 $300.00 0.22 580.32 $93.43 3.21

221.11 Office 106 2600 2 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 $51.91 2 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.10 20% 257.92 $41.53 $150.00 $150.00 0.02 64.48 $10.38 14.45

221.11 Classroom 108 2600 24 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 1.488 3868.8 $622.88 24 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 1.19 20% 3095.04 $498.30 $300.00 $300.00 0.30 773.76 $124.58 2.41

232.21 Girls Rest Room 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.258 670.8 $108.00 3 0 No Change 86 0.26 0% 670.8 $108.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 Boys Rest Room 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.258 670.8 $108.00 3 0 No Change 86 0.26 0% 670.8 $108.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Page 609: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

APPENDIX E21 of 21

ECM #3: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

6917 Mens Rest Room 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed Light, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.1 260 $41.86 1 0 No Change 100 0.10 0% 260 $41.86 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

6917 Womens Rest Room 2600 1 1 1x1 Recessed Light, (1) 100w A Lamp 100 0.1 260 $41.86 1 0 No Change 100 0.10 0% 260 $41.86 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

613 Custodial Closet 1200 1 1 Industrial Fixture, 100w A19 Lamp 100 0.1 120 $19.32 1 0 No Change 100 0.10 0% 120 $19.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 Conference Room 110 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.248 644.8 $103.81 4 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.20 20% 515.84 $83.05 $150.00 $150.00 0.05 128.96 $20.76 7.22

222.21 Conference Room A 2600 2 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.124 322.4 $51.91 2 1 Dual Technology OccupancySensor - Switch Mnt. 62 0.10 20% 257.92 $41.53 $150.00 $150.00 0.02 64.48 $10.38 14.45

222.21Main Office Reception &

Hallway2600 17 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 1.054 2740.4 $441.20 17 1

Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor w/2 Pole Powerpack -

remote mount 62 0.84 20% 2192.32 $352.96 $300.00 $300.00 0.21 548.08 $88.24 3.40

222.21 Main Office Side Offices (typ for 8) 2600 16 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w 700 Series T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic

Lens

62 0.992 2579.2 $415.25 16 0 No Change 62 0.99 0% 2579.2 $415.25 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

610 Exterior 4400 12 21x1 Surface Mount,

Prismatic Lens, (2) 60w A Lamp

120 1.44 6336 $1,020.10 12 0 No Change 120 1.44 0% 6336 $1,020.10 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

725 Exterior 4400 26 1 150w HPS Wallpack 188 4.888 21507.2 $3,462.66 26 0 No Change 188 4.89 0% 21507.2 $3,462.66 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Totals 1,955 332 170.4 482,902.6 $77,747 1,955 109 144.4 415,553.0 $66,904.03 $29,250 25.93 67,350 $10,843 2.70

Page 610: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix F1Page 1 of 3

Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Bernard Township BOE - William Annin Middle School

Location: Basking Ridge, NJ07920Description: Photovoltaic System 95% Financing - 25 year

Simple Payback Analysis

Total Construction Cost $1,511,100Annual kWh Production 186,083

Annual Energy Cost Reduction $29,959Annual SREC Revenue $65,129

First Cost Premium $1,511,100

Simple Payback: Years

Life Cycle Cost AnalysisAnalysis Period (years): 25 Financing %: 95%Financing Term (mths): 300 Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0%

Average Energy Cost ($/kWh) $0.161 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0%Financing Rate: 7.00% SREC Value ($/kWh) $0.350

Period Additional Energy kWh Energy Cost Additional SREC Interest Loan Net Cash CumulativeCash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Expense Principal Flow Cash Flow

0 $75,555 0 0 0 $0 0 0 (75,555) 01 $0 186,083 $29,959 $0 $65,129 $99,792 $21,961 ($26,665) ($102,220)2 $0 185,153 $30,858 $0 $64,803 $98,205 $23,549 ($26,092) ($128,312)3 $0 184,227 $31,784 $0 $64,479 $96,503 $25,251 ($25,490) ($153,803)4 $0 183,306 $32,737 $0 $64,157 $94,677 $27,076 ($24,859) ($178,662)5 $0 182,389 $33,720 $1,879 $63,836 $92,720 $29,034 ($26,076) ($204,738)6 $0 181,477 $34,731 $1,869 $63,517 $90,621 $31,133 ($25,375) ($230,113)7 $0 180,570 $35,773 $1,860 $63,199 $88,370 $33,383 ($24,641) ($254,754)8 $0 179,667 $36,846 $1,851 $62,883 $85,957 $35,797 ($23,874) ($278,628)9 $0 178,769 $37,952 $1,841 $62,569 $83,369 $38,384 ($23,074) ($301,703)10 $0 177,875 $39,090 $1,832 $62,256 $80,595 $41,159 ($22,239) ($323,942)11 $0 176,985 $40,263 $1,823 $61,945 $77,619 $44,134 ($21,369) ($345,311)12 $0 176,100 $41,471 $1,814 $61,635 $74,429 $47,325 ($20,461) ($365,772)13 $0 175,220 $42,715 $1,805 $61,327 $71,007 $50,746 ($19,516) ($385,289)14 $0 174,344 $43,996 $1,796 $61,020 $67,339 $54,415 ($18,533) ($403,821)15 $0 173,472 $45,316 $1,787 $60,715 $63,405 $58,348 ($17,509) ($421,330)16 $0 172,605 $46,676 $1,778 $60,412 $59,187 $62,566 ($16,444) ($437,774)17 $0 171,742 $48,076 $1,769 $60,110 $54,665 $67,089 ($15,337) ($453,111)18 $0 170,883 $49,518 $1,760 $59,809 $49,815 $71,939 ($14,186) ($467,298)19 $0 170,029 $51,004 $1,751 $59,510 $44,614 $77,139 ($12,991) ($480,289)20 $0 169,179 $52,534 $1,743 $59,212 $39,038 $82,716 ($11,750) ($492,038)21 $0 168,333 $54,110 $1,734 $58,916 $35,566 $76,041 ($315) ($492,353)22 $0 167,491 $55,733 $1,725 $58,622 $28,740 $62,575 $21,315 ($471,039)23 $0 166,654 $57,405 $1,717 $58,329 $0 $0 $114,017 ($357,021)24 $0 165,820 $59,127 $1,708 $58,037 $0 $0 $115,457 ($241,565)25 $0 164,991 $60,901 $1,699 $57,747 $0 $0 $116,949 ($124,616)

Totals: 4,383,362 $1,092,296 $37,539 $1,534,177 $1,576,233 $1,061,761 ($49,061) ($8,095,503)Net Present Value (NPV)

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

Photovoltaic System 95% Financing - 25 year

($210,178)-1.8%

15.89

Page 611: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix F1Page 2 of 3

Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Bernard Township BOE - William Annin Middle School

Location: Basking Ridge, NJ07920Description: Photovoltaic System - Direct Purchase

Simple Payback AnalysisPhotovoltaic System - Direct Purchase

Total Construction Cost $1,511,100Annual kWh Production 186,083

Annual Energy Cost Reduction $29,959Annual SREC Revenue $65,129

First Cost Premium

Simple Payback: Years

Life Cycle Cost AnalysisAnalysis Period (years): 25 Financing %: 0%Financing Term (mths): 0 Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0%

Average Energy Cost ($/kWh) $0.161 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0%Financing Rate: 0.00% SREC Value ($/kWh) $0.350

Period Additional Energy kWh Energy Cost Additional SREC Net Cash CumulativeCash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Flow Cash Flow

0 $1,511,100 0 0 0 $0 (1,511,100) 01 $0 186,083 $29,959 $0 $65,129 $95,088 ($1,416,012)2 $0 185,153 $30,858 $0 $64,803 $95,662 ($1,320,350)3 $0 184,227 $31,784 $0 $64,479 $96,263 ($1,224,087)4 $0 183,306 $32,737 $0 $64,157 $96,894 ($1,127,192)5 $0 182,389 $33,720 $1,879 $63,836 $95,677 ($1,031,515)6 $0 181,477 $34,731 $1,869 $63,517 $96,379 ($935,136)7 $0 180,570 $35,773 $1,860 $63,199 $97,113 ($838,024)8 $0 179,667 $36,846 $1,851 $62,883 $97,879 ($740,145)9 $0 178,769 $37,952 $1,841 $62,569 $98,679 ($641,465)

10 $0 177,875 $39,090 $1,832 $62,256 $99,514 ($541,951)11 $0 176,985 $40,263 $1,823 $61,945 $100,385 ($441,566)12 $0 176,100 $41,471 $1,814 $61,635 $101,292 ($340,274)13 $0 175,220 $42,715 $1,805 $61,327 $102,237 ($238,037)14 $0 174,344 $43,996 $1,796 $61,020 $103,221 ($134,816)15 $0 173,472 $45,316 $1,787 $60,715 $104,245 ($30,571)16 $0 172,605 $46,676 $1,778 $60,412 $105,310 $74,73817 $0 171,742 $48,076 $1,769 $60,110 $106,417 $181,15518 $0 170,883 $49,518 $1,760 $59,809 $107,567 $288,72219 $0 170,029 $51,004 $1,751 $59,510 $108,763 $397,48520 $0 169,179 $52,534 $1,743 $59,212 $110,004 $507,48921 $1 168,333 $54,110 $1,734 $58,916 $111,293 $618,78122 $2 167,491 $55,733 $1,725 $58,622 $112,630 $731,41123 $3 166,654 $57,405 $1,717 $58,329 $114,017 $845,42924 $4 165,820 $59,127 $1,708 $58,037 $115,457 $960,88525 $5 164,991 $60,901 $1,699 $57,747 $116,949 $1,077,834

Totals: 4,383,362 $1,092,296 $37,539 $1,534,177 $2,588,934 ($5,317,213)Net Present Value (NPV)

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

15.89

$1,511,100

$1,077,8594.5%

Page 612: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix F1Page 3 of 3

Building Roof Area (sq ft) Panel Qty Panel Sq

Ft

Panel Total Sq

Ft

Total KWDC

Total Annual

kWh

Panel Weight (33

lbs)W/SQFT

William Annin Middle School

11,925 Sunpower SPR230

730 14.7 10,734 167.90 186,083 24,090 15.64

.= Proposed PV Layout

1. Estimated kWH based on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory PVWatts Version 1 Calculator Program.

Page 613: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix F2Page 1 of 3

Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Bernard Township BOE - William Annin Middle School

Location: Basking Ridge, NJ07920Description: Photovoltaic System 95% Financing - 25 year

Simple Payback Analysis

Total Construction Cost $1,511,100Annual kWh Production 193,944

Annual Energy Cost Reduction $31,225Annual SREC Revenue $67,880

First Cost Premium $1,511,100

Simple Payback: Years

Life Cycle Cost AnalysisAnalysis Period (years): 25 Financing %: 95%Financing Term (mths): 300 Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0%

Average Energy Cost ($/kWh) $0.161 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0%Financing Rate: 7.00% SREC Value ($/kWh) $0.350

Period Additional Energy kWh Energy Cost Additional SREC Interest Loan Net Cash CumulativeCash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Expense Principal Flow Cash Flow

0 $75,555 0 0 0 $0 0 0 (75,555) 01 $0 193,944 $31,225 $0 $67,880 $99,792 $21,961 ($22,648) ($98,203)2 $0 192,974 $32,162 $0 $67,541 $98,205 $23,549 ($22,051) ($120,254)3 $0 192,009 $33,127 $0 $67,203 $96,503 $25,251 ($21,424) ($141,678)4 $0 191,049 $34,120 $0 $66,867 $94,677 $27,076 ($20,766) ($162,444)5 $0 190,094 $35,144 $1,958 $66,533 $92,720 $29,034 ($22,035) ($184,478)6 $0 189,144 $36,198 $1,948 $66,200 $90,621 $31,133 ($21,303) ($205,782)7 $0 188,198 $37,284 $1,938 $65,869 $88,370 $33,383 ($20,539) ($226,320)8 $0 187,257 $38,403 $1,929 $65,540 $85,957 $35,797 ($19,740) ($246,060)9 $0 186,321 $39,555 $1,919 $65,212 $83,369 $38,384 ($18,906) ($264,965)10 $0 185,389 $40,742 $1,910 $64,886 $80,595 $41,159 ($18,035) ($283,001)11 $0 184,462 $41,964 $1,900 $64,562 $77,619 $44,134 ($17,128) ($300,129)12 $0 183,540 $43,223 $1,890 $64,239 $74,429 $47,325 ($16,182) ($316,311)13 $0 182,622 $44,519 $1,881 $63,918 $71,007 $50,746 ($15,198) ($331,509)14 $0 181,709 $45,855 $1,872 $63,598 $67,339 $54,415 ($14,172) ($345,681)15 $0 180,800 $47,231 $1,862 $63,280 $63,405 $58,348 ($13,105) ($358,786)16 $0 179,896 $48,648 $1,853 $62,964 $59,187 $62,566 ($11,995) ($370,781)17 $0 178,997 $50,107 $1,844 $62,649 $54,665 $67,089 ($10,841) ($381,623)18 $0 178,102 $51,610 $1,834 $62,336 $49,815 $71,939 ($9,642) ($391,265)19 $0 177,211 $53,158 $1,825 $62,024 $44,614 $77,139 ($8,396) ($399,661)20 $0 176,325 $54,753 $1,816 $61,714 $39,038 $82,716 ($7,103) ($406,764)21 $0 175,444 $56,396 $1,807 $61,405 $35,566 $76,041 $4,387 ($402,377)22 $0 174,567 $58,088 $1,798 $61,098 $28,740 $62,575 $26,073 ($376,305)23 $0 173,694 $59,830 $1,789 $60,793 $0 $0 $118,834 ($257,471)24 $0 172,825 $61,625 $1,780 $60,489 $0 $0 $120,334 ($137,137)25 $0 171,961 $63,474 $1,771 $60,186 $0 $0 $121,889 ($15,247)

Totals: 4,568,535 $1,138,440 $39,125 $1,598,987 $1,576,233 $1,061,761 $60,308 ($6,724,231)Net Present Value (NPV)

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

Photovoltaic System 95% Financing - 25 year

($166,922)-0.2%

15.25

Page 614: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix F2Page 2 of 3

Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Bernard Township BOE - William Annin Middle School

Location: Basking Ridge, NJ07920Description: Photovoltaic System - Direct Purchase

Simple Payback AnalysisPhotovoltaic System - Direct Purchase

Total Construction Cost $1,511,100Annual kWh Production 193,944

Annual Energy Cost Reduction $31,225Annual SREC Revenue $67,880

First Cost Premium

Simple Payback: Years

Life Cycle Cost AnalysisAnalysis Period (years): 25 Financing %: 0%Financing Term (mths): 0 Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0%

Average Energy Cost ($/kWh) $0.161 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0%Financing Rate: 0.00% SREC Value ($/kWh) $0.350

Period Additional Energy kWh Energy Cost Additional SREC Net Cash CumulativeCash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Flow Cash Flow

0 $1,511,100 0 0 0 $0 (1,511,100) 01 $0 193,944 $31,225 $0 $67,880 $99,105 ($1,411,995)2 $0 192,974 $32,162 $0 $67,541 $99,703 ($1,312,292)3 $0 192,009 $33,127 $0 $67,203 $100,330 ($1,211,962)4 $0 191,049 $34,120 $0 $66,867 $100,988 ($1,110,974)5 $0 190,094 $35,144 $1,958 $66,533 $99,719 ($1,011,255)6 $0 189,144 $36,198 $1,948 $66,200 $100,450 ($910,805)7 $0 188,198 $37,284 $1,938 $65,869 $101,215 ($809,590)8 $0 187,257 $38,403 $1,929 $65,540 $102,014 ($707,576)9 $0 186,321 $39,555 $1,919 $65,212 $102,848 ($604,728)

10 $0 185,389 $40,742 $1,910 $64,886 $103,718 ($501,010)11 $0 184,462 $41,964 $1,900 $64,562 $104,626 ($396,384)12 $0 183,540 $43,223 $1,890 $64,239 $105,571 ($290,813)13 $0 182,622 $44,519 $1,881 $63,918 $106,556 ($184,257)14 $0 181,709 $45,855 $1,872 $63,598 $107,581 ($76,675)15 $0 180,800 $47,231 $1,862 $63,280 $108,648 $31,97316 $0 179,896 $48,648 $1,853 $62,964 $109,758 $141,73117 $0 178,997 $50,107 $1,844 $62,649 $110,912 $252,64418 $0 178,102 $51,610 $1,834 $62,336 $112,111 $364,75519 $0 177,211 $53,158 $1,825 $62,024 $113,357 $478,11220 $0 176,325 $54,753 $1,816 $61,714 $114,651 $592,76321 $1 175,444 $56,396 $1,807 $61,405 $115,994 $708,75722 $2 174,567 $58,088 $1,798 $61,098 $117,388 $826,14523 $3 173,694 $59,830 $1,789 $60,793 $118,834 $944,97924 $4 172,825 $61,625 $1,780 $60,489 $120,334 $1,065,31325 $5 171,961 $63,474 $1,771 $60,186 $121,889 $1,187,202

Totals: 4,568,535 $1,138,440 $39,125 $1,598,987 $2,698,302 ($3,945,942)Net Present Value (NPV)

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

15.25

$1,511,100

$1,187,2274.9%

Page 615: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix F2Page 3 of 3

Building Roof Area (sq ft) Panel Qty Panel Sq

Ft

Panel Total Sq

Ft

Total KWDC

Total Annual

kWh

Panel Weight (33

lbs)W/SQFT

William Annin Middle School

11,925 Sunpower SPR230

730 14.7 10,734 167.90 193,944 24,090 15.64

.= Proposed PV Layout

1. Estimated kWH based on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory PVWatts Version 1 Calculator Program.

Page 616: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix F3Page 1 of 3

Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Bernard Township BOE - William Annin Middle School

Location: Basking Ridge, NJ07920Description: Photovoltaic System 95% Financing - 25 year

Simple Payback Analysis

Total Construction Cost $3,022,200Annual kWh Production 380,027

Annual Energy Cost Reduction $61,184Annual SREC Revenue $133,009

First Cost Premium $3,022,200

Simple Payback: Years

Life Cycle Cost AnalysisAnalysis Period (years): 25 Financing %: 95%Financing Term (mths): 300 Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0%

Average Energy Cost ($/kWh) $0.161 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0%Financing Rate: 7.00% SREC Value ($/kWh) $0.350

Period Additional Energy kWh Energy Cost Additional SREC Interest Loan Net Cash CumulativeCash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Expense Principal Flow Cash Flow

0 $151,110 0 0 0 $0 0 0 (151,110) 01 $0 380,027 $61,184 $0 $133,009 $199,585 $43,922 ($49,313) ($200,423)2 $0 378,127 $63,020 $0 $132,344 $196,410 $47,097 ($48,143) ($248,566)3 $0 376,236 $64,910 $0 $131,683 $193,005 $50,502 ($46,914) ($295,480)4 $0 374,355 $66,858 $0 $131,024 $189,354 $54,153 ($45,625) ($341,106)5 $0 372,483 $68,864 $3,837 $130,369 $185,440 $58,068 ($48,111) ($389,217)6 $0 370,621 $70,929 $3,817 $129,717 $181,242 $62,265 ($46,678) ($435,895)7 $0 368,768 $73,057 $3,798 $129,069 $176,741 $66,767 ($45,179) ($481,074)8 $0 366,924 $75,249 $3,779 $128,423 $171,914 $71,593 ($43,614) ($524,688)9 $0 365,089 $77,507 $3,760 $127,781 $166,739 $76,769 ($41,980) ($566,668)10 $0 363,264 $79,832 $3,742 $127,142 $161,189 $82,318 ($40,275) ($606,943)11 $0 361,448 $82,227 $3,723 $126,507 $155,238 $88,269 ($38,497) ($645,440)12 $0 359,640 $84,693 $3,704 $125,874 $148,857 $94,650 ($36,644) ($682,084)13 $0 357,842 $87,234 $3,686 $125,245 $142,015 $101,492 ($34,714) ($716,798)14 $0 356,053 $89,851 $3,667 $124,619 $134,678 $108,829 ($32,705) ($749,502)15 $0 354,273 $92,547 $3,649 $123,995 $126,811 $116,696 ($30,614) ($780,116)16 $0 352,501 $95,323 $3,631 $123,375 $118,375 $125,132 ($28,439) ($808,556)17 $0 350,739 $98,183 $3,613 $122,759 $109,329 $134,178 ($26,178) ($834,734)18 $0 348,985 $101,128 $3,595 $122,145 $99,629 $143,878 ($23,829) ($858,562)19 $0 347,240 $104,162 $3,577 $121,534 $89,228 $154,279 ($21,387) ($879,950)20 $0 345,504 $107,287 $3,559 $120,926 $78,075 $165,432 ($18,852) ($898,802)21 $0 343,776 $110,506 $3,541 $120,322 $71,132 $152,082 $4,072 ($894,731)22 $0 342,058 $113,821 $3,523 $119,720 $57,481 $125,150 $47,387 ($847,343)23 $0 340,347 $117,236 $3,506 $119,122 $0 $0 $232,851 ($614,492)24 $0 338,646 $120,753 $3,488 $118,526 $0 $0 $235,790 ($378,701)25 $0 336,952 $124,375 $3,471 $117,933 $0 $0 $238,838 ($139,863)

Totals: 8,951,898 $2,230,736 $76,664 $3,133,164 $3,152,467 $2,123,522 $11,247 ($14,819,734)Net Present Value (NPV)

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

Photovoltaic System 95% Financing - 25 year

($377,123)-1.0%

15.56

Page 617: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix F3Page 2 of 3

Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Bernard Township BOE - William Annin Middle School

Location: Basking Ridge, NJ07920Description: Photovoltaic System - Direct Purchase

Simple Payback AnalysisPhotovoltaic System - Direct Purchase

Total Construction Cost $3,022,200Annual kWh Production 380,027

Annual Energy Cost Reduction $61,184Annual SREC Revenue $133,009

First Cost Premium

Simple Payback: Years

Life Cycle Cost AnalysisAnalysis Period (years): 25 Financing %: 0%Financing Term (mths): 0 Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0%

Average Energy Cost ($/kWh) $0.161 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0%Financing Rate: 0.00% SREC Value ($/kWh) $0.350

Period Additional Energy kWh Energy Cost Additional SREC Net Cash CumulativeCash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Flow Cash Flow

0 $3,022,200 0 0 0 $0 (3,022,200) 01 $0 380,027 $61,184 $0 $133,009 $194,194 ($2,828,006)2 $0 378,127 $63,020 $0 $132,344 $195,364 ($2,632,642)3 $0 376,236 $64,910 $0 $131,683 $196,593 ($2,436,049)4 $0 374,355 $66,858 $0 $131,024 $197,882 ($2,238,167)5 $0 372,483 $68,864 $3,837 $130,369 $195,396 ($2,042,771)6 $0 370,621 $70,929 $3,817 $129,717 $196,829 ($1,845,941)7 $0 368,768 $73,057 $3,798 $129,069 $198,328 ($1,647,614)8 $0 366,924 $75,249 $3,779 $128,423 $199,893 ($1,447,720)9 $0 365,089 $77,507 $3,760 $127,781 $201,527 ($1,246,193)

10 $0 363,264 $79,832 $3,742 $127,142 $203,232 ($1,042,961)11 $0 361,448 $82,227 $3,723 $126,507 $205,010 ($837,950)12 $0 359,640 $84,693 $3,704 $125,874 $206,863 ($631,087)13 $0 357,842 $87,234 $3,686 $125,245 $208,793 ($422,294)14 $0 356,053 $89,851 $3,667 $124,619 $210,802 ($211,491)15 $0 354,273 $92,547 $3,649 $123,995 $212,893 $1,40216 $0 352,501 $95,323 $3,631 $123,375 $215,068 $216,47017 $0 350,739 $98,183 $3,613 $122,759 $217,329 $433,79918 $0 348,985 $101,128 $3,595 $122,145 $219,679 $653,47719 $0 347,240 $104,162 $3,577 $121,534 $222,120 $875,59720 $0 345,504 $107,287 $3,559 $120,926 $224,655 $1,100,25221 $1 343,776 $110,506 $3,541 $120,322 $227,287 $1,327,53822 $2 342,058 $113,821 $3,523 $119,720 $230,018 $1,557,55623 $3 340,347 $117,236 $3,506 $119,122 $232,851 $1,790,40824 $4 338,646 $120,753 $3,488 $118,526 $235,790 $2,026,19825 $5 336,952 $124,375 $3,471 $117,933 $238,838 $2,265,036

Totals: 8,951,898 $2,230,736 $76,664 $3,133,164 $5,287,236 ($9,263,155)Net Present Value (NPV)

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

15.56

$3,022,200

$2,265,0614.7%

Page 618: L OCAL GOVERNMENT E NERGY AUDIT PROGRAM E NERGY … Audit... · Entity: Bernards Public School Facilities: Cedar Hill Elementary School Liberty Corner Elementary School Mount Prospect

Appendix F3Page 3 of 3

BuildingRoof +

Parking Lot Area (sq ft)

Panel Qty Panel Sq Ft

Panel Total Sq

Ft

Total KWDC

Total Annual

kWh

Panel Weight (33

lbs)W/SQFT

William Annin Middle School

23,850 Sunpower SPR230

1460 14.7 21,468 335.80 380,027 48,180 15.64

.= Proposed PV Layout

1. Estimated kWH based on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory PVWatts Version 1 Calculator Program.