labour values and the theory of the firm
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
1/36Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1489383
Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
Part I: The Competitive Firm
Klaus Hagendorf
eurodos@gmail!om
"niversit# Paris $uest % &anterre La '#fense( 'e!ember )**+
,bstra!t: This paper is the first part of a Marxian critique of the theory of the firm, focusing on
the analysis of labour values. Starting from Adam Smith's example of the deer hunter marginal
analysis is introduced, culminating in the derivation of the Labour alue !unction as the supply
curve of the competitive firm in terms of labour values. The analysis is based on a ne" definition of
labour value, "hich is Marxian in spirit and respects explicitly production conditions and by this
becomes an integral part of modern mathematical optimi#ation methods not found in Marx. The
analysis offers a further development and coherent interpretation of Marx's value theory. The
analysis is limited to the case of the competitive firm.
Key-ords: Marxian economics; labour theory of value; value theory; marginal analysis;
microeconomics; theory of the firm; marginal cost; the labour value function; supply function;
Adam Smith;
./L !lassifi!ation: ,012 3042 3)42 3502 ')02 '402 '46
I Introdu!tion
Marxists have been particularly week in providing a critique of orthodox microeconomic theory.
This is mainly due to the failure of not having developed a consistent approach to the labour theory
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected] -
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
2/36Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1489383
of value. This paper is part of an effort to put forward a Marxian theory of production based on a
definition of labour value! which is Marxian in spirit and modern in that it takes properly account of
production conditions and by this becomes an integral part of modern mathematical optimi"ation
methods! which have been absent in Marx#s work.
This article begins with examining Adam Smith#s example of the deer and beaver hunters! $ustifying
labour as being the natural determinant of price. Surely one would have wished Adam Smith to be
more elaborate on his example! but %&hm'%awerk#s claim! Smith had only asserted the labour
theory of value without having provided a proof! is simply un$ustified! as is the claim that the labour
theory of value applies only to the #early and rude state of society#. This is shown in generali"ing
Adam Smith#s example by introducing diminishing marginal productivity of labour. (e show that
this is sufficient to explain surplus labour. )n a further step! we introduce capital and provide an
analysis of labour values within the theory of the firm for the case of perfect competition. The core
of the paper is the derivation of the Labour alue !unctionas the minimum labour value! required
to produce a commodity! depending on the quantity of output and the factor price ratio. (e show
that marginal cost is labour value expressed in monetary terms. *inally! implications of the analysis
for the theory of capital are briefly addressed.
II The 7orishima % Pasinetti 'efinition of Labour Value is False8
The elimination of Marxism and Marxists from economic theory proper must end. (estern +old
(ar Marxism! including Sraffians and neo',icardians certainly had the effect of creating great
confusion in the labour movement and within the ever growing strata of the population acquiring
higher education ' and this not only in the (est ' but it did not have any serious impact on orthodox
-
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
3/36
economics! neither did it contribute in any way to practical ameliorations of the conditions of the
labouring classes.
n the other hand! bourgeois economics was challenged by scientific socialist developments! but
here again #+ambridge Marxists# were very effective in denouncing /antorovich and other
progressists! as #anti'Marxist#. At the core of this #+ambridge Marxism# is a definition of labour
value which has a strong appeal to Marx# original concept! but which is simply false in that it whips
out the absolutely important distinction between labour valueand labour po"er! the difference of
which issurplus labour.
(hat the +ambridge Marxists declare as labour value ' 9 an;I % ,
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
4/36
concept stemming from feudal times. The modern Morishima'2asinetti definition 0the vertical
integrated labour coefficients1 is simply a summing'up of labour time used directly or indirectly to
produce a commodity. )ts ma$or shortcoming is the neglect of the production conditions. A certain
progress has been made by Sraffa with his concept of quantities of dated labourwhich is based on
Sraffa#s cost of productionor in conventional terms on average cost. More generally production
conditions are properly taken account of only! if one uses marginal cost. (e propose the following
definition of labour value$
The labour value of a commodity is the increment of labour, necessary to increase output by one
more unit, leaving all other factors of production constant. The minimum labour value for a given
socially determined quantity of a commodity is its socially necessary labour.
)n mathematical terms! the increment of labour is >Land the increment of output is >?. The labour
value of that increment of output is =% L
%& or for infinitesimal changes =L
& . (e use
partial derivatives to indicate that other factors of production remain constant. otice that labour
valueis $ust the inverse of the marginal productivity of labour =
& /L.The usefulness of
the definition will become apparent in the following! establishing the validity of the labour theory
of value for perfectly competitive markets by applying this definition of labour values to the
analysis of the theory of the firm and the determination of equilibrium prices.
@ years before the publication of apital08941!
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
5/36
economic principle to the use of labour. As labour ' apart from ature-' is the onlysource of value,
its use in any working process has to be optimi"ed and marginal analysis as one of the most
important methods of mathematical optimi"ation is the method naturally to be employed.
The problem is that 2olitical 7conomy is a social as well as a political science; it is the science
which is at the bottom of the analysis of the class struggle and therefore bourgeois economists have
banned labour values in their efficient marginal definition! systematically from economics.
Cnfortunately there are no socialist or Marxist economists! who had understood the concept
properly. There is no account in the economic literature on Devons# remark that commodities
exchange according to labour values6 0Devons! 84! p. 841! a remark which is based on the
marginal concept of labour value.
ow we shall develop some of the straight forward properties of the marginal concept of labour
values! using Adam Smith#s example of the hunters chasing deer and beaver.
III The Classi!al Vision of Produ!tion1
Adam Smith consideredE
F)n that early and rude state of society which precedes both theaccumulation of stock and the appropriation of land! the proportion betweenthe quantities of labour necessary for acquiring different ob$ects seems to be
the only circumstance which can afford any rule for exchanging them forone another. )f among a nation of hunters! for example! it usually costs twicethe labour to kill a beaver which it does to kill a deer! one beaver shouldnaturally exchange for or be worth two deer. )t is natural that what is usuallythe produce of two days or two hours labour! should be worth double ofwhat is usually the produce of one day#s or one hour#s labour.G
0Smith!449! %ook. )! +hapter H)1
- )n this discussion we ignore atures contribution to the creation of value! assuming its services to be costless. Thisis of course absolutely inadmissible for our times and the reader is invited to advance the discussion on this point in
particular.
@ f course this section is a caricature of the +lassics to unveil the anti'thesis Marxism I Marginalism as bourgeoisideology. ne only has to think of Turgot#s S'shaped production function in agriculture.
:
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
6/36
Applying to this example the modern tool of the production function! we recogni"e at once that
Adam Smith makes a very special assumption of fixed coefficients of production. This appeared to
him to be sufficient as he considered a primitive form of production under usual circumstances.
This view has been taken over also by Marx. %ut even under primitive circumstances! there are no
usual production conditions which is why the hunter'gatherers were nomads.
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
7/36
&*=A*L* )
&*amount of beaver,A*average productivity of labour,
L*amount of labour power used to hunt beaver
0aA
)t is very important to reali"e that the input of the production process is labour po"er! or the amount
of labour force! which has to be distinguished carefully from labour value0Marx! 894! +hapter 8!
5er Arbeitstag! p. -8; *isher! 3J9! p. 4:! footnote1.
Figure )shows the average labour productivities of producing deer and beaver. *or the case of
fixed coefficients these are equal to the marginal labour productivities. They are constant and
independent of the quantity of output and of labour power employed.
4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
Figure 2: Average and Marginal Productivities of Labourfor Deer and Beaver Hunting
Labour
Average,
MarginalProductivity
A(=&(
L(=&(L(
A*=&*
L*=&*
L*
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
8/36
To obtain expressions for labour values! we have to take the reciprocals of the average and marginal
productivities of labour. These are presented in Figure 1(showing labour values as understood by
+lassical economists and Marx. The labour values are independent of output; but this is a very
special case indeed.
Figure 4shows the production possibility function for deer and beaver for this special case of a
constant average productivity of labour. The function shows the feasible combinations of amounts
of deer and beaver which can be obtained using a given amount of labour power efficiently.
Therefore the negative of the slope of this function!=B! shows the price which has to be paid in
terms of one good if the other good is increased by one unit. The price is to be understood as the
opportunity cost of producing a particular good. The price ratio is equal to the ratio of average or
marginal labour values and equal to the inverse of the ratio of average productivities of labour.
This very special case of production conditions ' labour power being the only factor of production and its outputelasticity! a K ! with a hori"ontal supply curve of constant labour value! which represents therefore the sociallynecessary labourwhatever the demand conditions ' offers the standard unit of measurement of labour value . hourof labour power employed under these production conditions is equal to unit of labour value. This standard unit of
value is also independent of distribution! i.e. remains constant whatever the values of the wage rate or the rate ofinterest.
8
0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 4,5 5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
4,5
Figure 3: Average and Marginal Labour Valuesfor Deer and Beaver Hunting
Output
Average,
MarginalLabou
rValues
(=L(
&(=L(
&(
*=L*
&*=L*
&*
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
9/36
The derivation of the equation for the production possibility frontier is straight forward. *rom 0A
and 0aAwe derive the inverses
L(=&(
A()A
and
L*=&*
A*)aA
A given amount of labour power! L(can be employed either in deer or in beaver hunting.
L=L(L* 1A
)A and)aA substituted in1A isE
L=&(
A(
&*
A*4A
,esolved for QD
3
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
10/36
&(=A(L +A(
A*&* 5A
The slope of the production possibility frontier 5A is the ratio of the average productivities of
labour and this is equal to the inverse of the price ratio as shown in equation 6A.
*
(=
A(
A*=
&(/L(&*/L*
=L*/&*L(/&(
=L*/&*L(/&(
6A
Csing vto designate labour power 0per unit of output1 and 9 forlabour values 0per unit of output1
respectively and defining vandas
v=L/& )=L /& A
we can express 6Aas
*
(=
A(
A*=
&(/L(&*/L*
=v*
v(=*(
6aA
An important consequence of the constancy of average labour productivities and labour values is
that the production possibility frontier is a straight line. (hatever efficient combination of output is
chosen! the ratio of prices 0labour values1 remains constant. This is a condition where #demand# has
no impact on labour values and therefore also no impact on prices6 ne can interpret the hori"ontal
lines of average and marginal labour values in Figure 1as supply curves in terms of labour values.
The supply curves in terms of money are obtained by multiplying the labour values with the wage
rate. (herever these curves are cut by a demand curve the price remains constant. The commodities
exchange according to their labour values. )f we multiply the ratio of prices as shown in the
equation 6Awith the ratio of outputs we obtain the ratio of total values! L3DL'.
* &*
( &(=
L*
L(=
L*&*
&*
L(&(
&(
EA
J
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
11/36
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
12/36
Figure 5shows production functions for deer and beaver with diminishing marginal productivities
of labour.
The average and marginal productivities of labour for deer and beaver hunting! which are now
changing with the level of employment! are shown in Figure 6aand Figure 6b respectively.
-
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Figure 5: Production Functionsfor Deer and Beaver Hunting
Labour Power
De
er,Beaver
&(=A(L(a(
&*=A*L*a*
5eer
%eaver
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
Figure 6a: Average and Marginal Productivities of Labourfor Deer Hunting
Labour Power
Average,
MarginalProductivity
&(
L(
&(L(
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
13/36
To obtain the functions of average and marginal labour values! the production functions have to be
inverted and average and marginal labour values have to be constructed on the basis of these
functions as demonstrated in Figure aand Figure b. ne should notice that the marginal labour
values are necessarily greater than the average labour values.
@
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Figure 6b: Average and Marginal Productivities of Labourfor Beaver Hunting
Labour Power
Ave
rage,
MarginalProductivity
&*L*
&*
L*
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
Figure a: Average and Marginal Labour Valuesfor Deer Hunting
Output
Average,
MarginalLabourValues
(=L(&(
L(
&(
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
14/36
)n fact! the marginal labour value as a function of output is nothing else but the supply function in
terms of labour values.
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
Figure !a: "#e Labour Value Functionfor Deer Hunting
Output
MarginalLabourValues
(=L(&(
=f&(
9'
?'
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Figure b: Average and Marginal Labour Valuesfor Beaver Hunting
Output
Average,
MarginalLabourValues
*=L*
&*
L*
&*
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
15/36
This function shall be named the Labour alue !unction.
fQ 00A
All points on the Labour alue !unction represent the minimum labour value required for the
production of the corresponding level of output. The point where the demand function- intersects
this function defines thesocially necessary labourfor the production of the commodity.
ow we leave Adam Smith#s example for a moment and consider a market situation for which we
have derived the ?abour Halue *unction. The multiplication of the labour values of the ?abour
Halue *unction with the wage rate! -! gives the marginal cost curve! showing marginal cost as a
function of output.d'
d&="=" f & 0)A
wheredC
dQI marginal cost! -I wage rate!
: A demand function in terms of labour values attributes to each quantity of a commodity an amount of labour the
consumer is willing to sacrifice in order to obtain an additional unit of the commodity =L
&
=f& .
These labour values are #labour commanded#! 0 pD-1 in the sense of the +lassics.
:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Figure !b: "#e Labour Value Functionfor Beaver Hunting
Output
MarginalLabourValues
*=L*
&*=f&*
93
?3
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
16/36
Figure +shows an ordinary diagram with thesupplyand demand functionsof an industry for the
case of perfect competition. The equilibrium price is well determined by the labour values. )n
equilibrium! labour commanded! pe/w! is equal to labour embodied!e. The equilibrium price!
pe(is the socially necessary labour,e,multiplied by the wage rate! w.
Cnder perfect competition the price is proportional to the labour value. The supply function of the
industry is the sum of the quantities supplied by the firms of the industry.
ow we derive the roduction ossibility !rontier for the general case of diminishing marginal
productivities of labour. The procedure is the same as beforeE
*rom the production functions
&(=A(L(a(
01aA
9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Figure $: %u&&l' and De(and Functionsof an )ndustr'
Output (in Thousands
Price
=d
d&=S&="=" f&
P
?
=( &
e="e
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
17/36
and &*=A*L*a* 01bA
we derive the demand functions for labour po"er.
L(=&(
A(
/a(
04aA
and L*=&*
A*/a*
04bA
A given quantity of labour po"ercan be employed alternatively in deer or beaver huntingE
L=L(L* 05A
04aA and04bA substituted in05A gives
L=&(
A( /a(
&*
A* /a*
06A
and this resolved for?'is
&(=[A( /a(LA(/a
(
A*/a
*
&* /a*]
a(
0A
0 2 4 6 8 10
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Figure *+: Production Possibilit' Frontier forDeer and Beaver Hunting
Beaver
Deer
=*
(=*
(=L*/&*L(/&(
L
2
4
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
18/36
The negative of the slope of the roduction ossibility !rontier! known as the marginal rate of
transformation! 0M,T1! represents the ratio of prices in the sense of opportunity cost as discussed
above.
MT=d&(
d&*=a([A(
/a(LA( /a
(
A* /a
*
&*/a*
]a(
[a*
A(/a(
A*/a
*
&* /a*
] 0EA%ut this slope is also equal to the ratio of marginal costand also equal to the ratio of labour values.
This holds for all points of the roduction ossibility !rontier. The point selected by the demand
conditions represents the equilibrium price ratio and also the ratio of labour values which are the
expressions of the socially necessary labourfor the production of the corresponding commodities.
All these conditions are valid only under perfect competition. This state of affairs is #areto
efficient#. )n aareto efficient equilibrium prices are proportional to labour values as we have
stated in equation 0*A above.
MT=*
(=*(
=
L*&*L(&(
0*A
(hat distinguishes the general case of variable marginal labour values from the special case of
Adam Smith#s example of constant marginal labour values is the occurrence ofsurplus labour. As is
shown very clearly in Figures aand b! there is a difference between marginal and average labour
values. This difference between the marginal labour value! ! and average labour value! v! is
surplus labour0per unit of output1! s=Ls
&:
s=v 0+A
or more explicitly
8
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
19/36
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
20/36
conditions and the monopolistic firm. The competitive firm faces an environment where the price of
the product! p! as well as the prices of the inputs9! -and r! are taken as given and the firm has no
power to influence these prices. )ts output is negligible in relation to overall output of the industry
and its demand for the factors of production is also not sufficient to influence the prices of these
factors.
)n order to maximi"e profits the firm equali"es its marginal costto the price. This results from the
maximi"ation of the profit function.
=.&'& )4A
where I profits! I revenue! CI cost
,evenue is p?! and under perfect competition pis constant. ThereforeE
d .
d &=p )5A
+ost consists of the cost of the inputs. )n general! some cost are fixed and some cost depend on the
level of output. The following expression distinguishes the variable inputs labour power!L! in terms
of working hours! and capital! K! in terms of money! and an amount of fixed cost! CFin terms of
money. The cost equationisE
="Lr1! )6A
where -' the wage rate! r' the price of the services of capital 0the interest rate1
The first order condition for maximi"ing profits isE
dd &
=d
d &
d
d &=J )A
and therefore
d
d &=
d
d &)EA
9 (hen we consider ras a price of the input capitalthis does not mean the price of the capital good as a commoditybut the price for using the value of the capital good for the length of the production period. Csually one speaks of
theprice of the services of capital. (e do not discuss the determination of r; this will be the sub$ect of another paperdealing with /antorovich#s norm of effectiveness.
-J
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
21/36
As from )5Aat the point of maximum profits! price! p! is equal to dDd?and substituted in )EA
p=d
d &)+A
*or the competitive firm! generally! marginal cost is an increasing function of output. The firm
expands its output until marginal cost equals the price.
)n order to calculate marginal cost! dCDd?! we have to transform the cost equation )6A into a
function of output only! the resulting function is called the classical cost function, C f?A.
The firm faces its production conditions represented by its production function! ? gK( LA! and
tries to minimi"e cost. The cost minimi#ation problemcan be expressed in form of the ?agrangianE
2="Lr1[&Jg1 , L] 1*A
The first order conditions for cost minimi#ationareE
2
L="
g1 , L
L =J
2
1=r
g1 , L
1 =J
2
=&Jg1 , L=J
10A
*rom this we obtain the following expression for the optimal factor input combinationas a function
of the prices of the inputsE
"
r=g1 , L/L
g1 , L/11)A
otice! that the marginal productivitiesare functions of thefactor input combination. This can be
expressed as an implicit function which is called the expansion path
"
rg1 , L/L
g1 , L/1=J 11A
-
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
22/36
The expansion pathis the locus of the optimal factor combinationsfor different levels of output on
the capital labour plane. The total differentialof a given level of output isE
d&=&
LdL
&
1d1=J 14A
which givesE
d1
dL=
&
L
&
1
15A
Braphically this can be shown as followsE
Figure 00 shows a production function of type +obb'5ouglas in three'dimensional space. The
border lines between different colours represent isoquants! points with the same level of output.
Figure 0)shows the same production function on the capital labour plane. )n addition! an iso'cost
line and the expansion pathare presented.
n the capital labour plane an isoquant! 14A! represents a level of output produced by different
factor combinations. The factor costs are represented by an iso3cost line, the slope of which is the
--
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
23/36
factor price ratio, w/(1+r). The iso3cost lineisE
1= '
r
"
rL 16A
The optimal factor combinationis there where the iso3cost curveis tangent to the isoquant. Along
the iso3cost lineit is here! where output is highest. All the points of tangency for different levels of
cost! 0different iso'cost lines which are parallel1 represent the expansion path.
The expansion path allows us to express the optimal amount of one factor input! Lor K(as a
function of the other. )n our case we have - functions! L fKAand K fLA. Substituting capital
for labour we can express cost as a function of capital only! C fK1! and substituting labour for
capital we can express cost as a function of labour only! C fLA. Then we derive the inverses of
these functions and obtain another - functions expressing the optimal amounts of factor inputs as
functions of cost! L fCA and K fCA. These expressions can now be substituted into the
production function which gives us output in terms of cost only. The inverse of this function is the
classical cost function, C f?Aand the marginal cost function can be derived from this. The
-@
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
24/36
marginal cost function
d
d&=f '& 1A
is thesupply function of the firmunder conditions of perfect competition. *or a presentation of the
derivation of the marginal cost function see 0 uandt! 38J! p. 8@ ff1.
)n this type of derivation of the marginal cost curvethere does not seem to be any labour values
involved. utput is the result of the combined effects of the factor inputs. To attribute the result of
the production process to the labourer only seems to contradict the facts of economic analysis. %ut
surely! the only one who produces is the labourer. The other factors of production only increase his
productivity. To reveal this! we shall derive the Labour alue !unction.
VI The 'erivation of the Labour Value Fun!tion
The cost minimi#ation conditionsreveal also that theLagrange multiplier! N(is marginal cost. This
can be shown as follows. The total differential of cost is
d=L
dL1
d1 1EA
and the total differential of output is
d&=&
LdL
&
1d1 1+A
*rom the cost equation )6Awe can derive the derivatives of cost with respect to labour and capitalrespectively asE
'
L="
'
1=r
4*A
and substituted into 1EAwe get
-
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
25/36
d'=" dLrd1 40A
*rom the first order conditions 10Awe get
"=&
L
r=&1
4)A
and these expressions substituted into 40AisE
d=&
LdL
&
1d1 41A
which is equal to
d'=[&
LdL&
1d1]44A
%ut the term in brackets is d?from 1+A. Therefore
=d
d&45A
?ooking again at 4)A we see that
"=&L
46A
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
26/36
certain output! ?! can be produced with minimum cost. The labour valueof a unit of that output is
the marginal labour value, MLDM?( calculated on the basis of the optimal factor combination!
0/O! ?O1.
(e shall use an example presenting the derivation of the Labour alue !unctionE
?et the production function be
&=A 1aL
b) and a ,b ) ab 4+A
and the cost function
="Lr1 5*A
*rom the first order conditions for cost minimi"ation we have as in10A
"=&
L; r=
&
150A
and as the marginal productivities of labour and capital for the production function 4+Aare
&
L=b
&
L
&1
=a&
1
5)A
we can derive the optimal factor combination for a given factor price ratio as in 1)A
"
r=
&
L
&
1
=b
a
1
L51A
This gives us the optimal quantity of labour power! L! as a function of Kand Kas a function of
L.
L O=r
"
b
a1
1O="
ra
bL
54A
7xpressing Kin the production function 4+Aas a function of Lwe get
-9
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
27/36
&=A[ "ra
b L]
a
Lb
55A
The inverse of this function is the demand for labour po"eras a function of output
LO=
[
A [ "r ab ]
a
&
]/ ab
56A
ow we express marginal labour valueas the reciprocal of the marginal productivity of labour
from 5)A for an optimal amount of labour power! L! that is for a point on the expansion path.
L
&=
b
LO
&5A
and substitute labour by the expression of labour demand from 56Awhich gives us labour value as
a function of output only! which is the Labour alue !unction.
=L
&=
b
A
ab [ "r
a
b ]aab &
ab
5EA
7xpressing the complicated constant term as AO the function becomes
=L
&
=AO&
ab
5+A
AO=
b
A
ab [ "ra
b ]a
ab
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
28/36
These labour values multiplied with the wage rate give the marginal cost function. The labour value
which corresponds to the equilibrium point where the!unction of Labour ommanded0the demand
function in terms of labour values1 cuts theLabour alue !unctionis the socially necessary labour
to produce the commodity! PO. )n fact! it is the reciprocal of the real wage.
O=p
"60A
TheLabour alue !unctionresolves a long'lasting dispute about labour valuesand changes in the
factor price ratio. )n fact! the function reveals that labour values are not only dependent on the level
of output but also on thefactor price ratio. )n the analysis above this ratio is treated as a constant.
%ut changes in thefactor price ratioresult in changes of the labour values. This is rather natural
because prices are proportional to labour values! they reflect labour values. A change in thefactor
price ratioindicates changing cost of the use of inputs in terms of labour values and this must lead
to a different optimal factor input combination. Therefore a requirement that labour valuesmust be
independent of thefactor price ratiois simply unreasonable.
-8
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
29/36
n the other hand! the standard unit of measurement of labour value should not and does not
depend neither on the factor price ratiowhich reflect the dynamics of an economic system nor on
demand conditions. )t is the time of labour employed in the very special production process which
uses labour po"eronly and which has constant returns to scale! that is! where the productivity of
labour does not depend on the level of output but is constant. uantities of labour values are
always expressed in terms of thisstandard labour value.
VII The Gtandard "nit of 7easurement of Labour Value
The production process which offers a definition of thestandard unit of measurement of labour
valueis a process which has the following production functionE
&i=AiL 6)A
where ?iI amount of output of commodity i! ,iI average labour productivity which is a constant
and therefore equal to the marginal labour productivity. There is no surplus labour in this
production process. )n this production process the value of a unit of labour po"eris equal to a unit
of labour value! for example hour of work in this process is unit of labour power as well as
unit of labour value. This is the standard unit of measurement of labour value.
The total amount of labour value0hours worked1 in the standard production process is equal to the
labour value 0per unit of output1! 9itimes output. This is equal to average labour value! 0D,i(times
output.
L=i& i=
Ai& i 61A
-3
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
30/36
)n a perfectly organi"ed economy where all factors of production are fully used and optimally
allocated to the production processes of the economy! which is usually termed perfect competition!
prices are the monetary expressions of labour values.
i& i="iO&i=" L& i&i 64A
The total labour valuerepresented by some quantity ?of commodity iisE
iO
& i=,i & i
" =
L
&i&i 65A
(hen we say that the production of a quantity of commodity i! ?i! has cost*iQi, in terms of
labour, this refers to the standard unit of labour valuewhich is labour time producing commodity
according to production function of type 6)A This does not mean that there have been*iQihours
of work involved! but usually less. The difference is surplus labour! LG! as shown already above in
equations 0+A and )*A. This also means that the hours worked are being weighted according to
their capital intensity.
LS=[v ]&=
[L
&
L
&
]& )*A
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
31/36
(e have established that the price of a commodity divided by the wage rate equals its labour value
60A. The labour value can be divided into the value of labour po"erused up in the production! this
value is represented as v! the vector of vertically integrated labour coefficientsandsurplus labour! s.
=sv 66A
)ts relation to price is
p="="s" v 6A
ow we regard the production process as the consumption of labour po"er! Li! and some constant
capital, ci,which is a sum of commodities! the capital goods! to create a new commodity.
&i Lici ) ci=x i4 6EA
)n monetary terms this is the cost of production equation
p i& i="Li p4x i4 6+A
The value of output is the sum of profits! the wages for the direct labour power employed! as well as
the value of the commodities which constitute constant capital. 7xpressing profits as surplus labour
in monetary terms 0 = ws1
p i & i="si"Li p4x i4 *A
This holds not only for the commodity i! but also for all the other commodities constituting
constant capital! the iN (e know that their labour value depends on the factor price ratioas it is
expressed in their Labour alue !unctions. (hen the factor price ratio changes so changes the
optimal factor input combinationas well as thesurplus labour. So the value of constant capital
changes.
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
32/36
There has been a big debate! if it is possible to relate factor price ratiosunequivocally to optimal
factor combinations. )t has been proven that for the case of ?eontief production functions using also
constant capitalwhere there are no possibilities of substitution! re'switching of factor combinations
can occur so that a certain factor combination is optimal at two different levels of the factor price
ratio. This has been considered as a great defect of neoclassical economic theory. %ut although this
has been shown to be a valid criticism for the special case offixed coefficient production functions
there has not been presented an example for a production system which allows for substitution
amongst the factors of production.
n the other hand! it has been proven that for the case of the static ?eontief model the #pure# labour
theory of value holds! which means that there is nosurplus labourand therefore the rate of interest!
r( is "ero. This reflects precisely Schumpeter#s position that in a stationary economy the interest rate
must be "ero. And this implies that in a stationary economy there is no factor price ratio. So the re'
switching debate is based on the Sraffian system which is basically flawed as one cannot assume a
static! stationary economy without marginal changes and at the same time introduce a positive rate
of profit which occurs only under dynamic conditions.
VIII Gome $bservations on 'emand
*inally! we want to make some observations on labour values and demand in a perfect economy. )n
Figure +we have already introduced a demand function in terms of labour values4
= f & ; =L
&0A
4 See the comments and the footnote to Figure + above. There will be another paper F?abour Halues and the Theoryof +onsumer %ehaviourG
@-
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
33/36
)n such a demand function represents labour commanded ! =p
"! which means that amount
of labour power which can be bought by a sum of money. This has to be distinguished from the
labour values! 9! in the supply function =f& ! which represent labour embodied. Cnder
perfect competition prices are nothing else but monetary expressions of embodied labour value; all
revenue is also nothing but labour value and so is demand as expressed on the markets; labour
commanded is equal to labour embodied! 0 91. %ut this does not mean that all revenue has been
gained through labour. The owners of capital may not have worked at all! receiving nevertheless
profits.
These profits are representing labour values only in a perfect economy; if there are mark'ups due to
monopoly power this is no longer the case. So! considering demand! we have to distinguish between
at least @ different situations.
)f the economy is not perfect! there is monopoly power and there are mark'ups increasing the prices
above their embodied labour values! 0 O 9 orp - O -91! and consequently the revenue derived
exceeds the monetary value of embodied labour values! and the demand based upon this revenue in
terms of labour commanded! ! is greater than the 0embodied1 labour values created in production
0 O 91.8
Cnder conditions of perfect competition! 0 9A( one needs to distinguish between - cases. *irst!
there is no relation between the property of capital and work effort or the amount of labour power
provided for production. This means! there is no relation between earnings from labour and income
from profits for the individuals. Cnder these conditions demand does not express purely the wants
of the labourers although all demand represents embodied labour values.
8 This shall be dealt with in another article on imperfect competition.
@@
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
34/36
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
35/36
edge approach to the social sciences.
)n the follow'up part )) of this paper we shall be leaving the perfect world. )n the real world we live
in! there exist indeed serious problems of reaching an efficient organi"ation of production processes.
+onsidering monopoly capitalism! the failures of the markets are becoming more and more apparent
and this on a global scale! in particular concerning the proper management of the eco'systems and
natural resources. The solutions of these problems seem to be well above the scope of capitalistic
organi"ation! its costs are increasing permanently! the real limitation being wage labour.
Cniversit= 2aris uest! 3.-.-JJ3
/laus
-
8/12/2019 Labour Values and the Theory of the Firm
36/36
2AS)7TT)! ?. ?. 03441.Lectures on the Theory of roduction.
?ondon and %asingstokeE The Macmillan 2ress ?td.
SM)T
?ondonE Strahan and +adell. 7dited by +ampbell and Skinner.
xfordE +larendon 2ress; 349.