lake oswego tigard water partnership monthly council program...
TRANSCRIPT
Lake Oswego Tigard Water Partnership Monthly Council Program Metrics Report
Report Date January 11, 2016
Oversight Committee Report Number 31
Reporting Period Reporting Period (Tyler): 7/01/2009 through 11/30/2015 Reporting Period (PMWeb): 7/01/2009 through 12/31/2015
TOC – Page 1 of 1
LOTWP – Monthly Council Program Metrics Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TOC Item Changes from Last Period
1. Title Sheet Updated
2. TOC Updated
3. Program Map No change since last reporting period
4. Financial and Permitting Section Updated
4.1. Program Cumulative Cash Flow vs. Baseline Updated
4.2. Costs Contributed to Date by City Updated
4.3. Summary Schedule vs. Baseline Updated
4.4. Total Estimate and Contingency Updated
4.4.1.1. Sponsor/staff costs (wages, transfers, materials and services)
Updated
4.4.1.2. Design/planning/consultant costs Updated
4.4.1.3. Capital construction costs Updated
4.4.1.4. Legal, land use, ROW and other professional services costs
Updated
4.4.1.5. Sponsor Contingency Updated
4.4A Current Total Project Estimate Cost Detail for Categories 2 and 3
Updated
4.5. Construction Cost Estimate Contingency Graph All projects bid – section will no longer appear in this report
4.6. Permit Status Updated
5. Risk Register Updated
6. Construction Status Reports Updated
7. Appendix A – Key Terms No change since last reporting period
Section 3 - System Map
LOTWP – Monthly Council Program Metrics Report
L O T W P S y s t e m M a p
4.1 – Program Cumulative Expenditures vs. Baseline* (Plan)
4.2 Cost Contributed to Date by City
*Program Baseline – July 1, 2014 (start of FY15) at $254M
Reporting Period (Tyler): 7/1/2009 through 11/30/2015
Reporting Period (PMWeb) 7/1/2009 through 12/31/2015
Tigard: $128,352,601
Lake Oswego: $85,777,881
Total: $214,130,482
4.3 – Summary Schedule vs. Baseline*
*Program Baseline – July 1, 2015
4.3 Summary Schedule vs. Baselin
e
Reporting Period (Tyler): 7/1/2009 through 11/30/2015
Reporting Period (PMWeb) 7/1/2009 through 12/31/2015
4.4 – Current Total Project Estimate
Reporting Period (Tyler): 7/1/2009 through 11/30/2015
Reporting Period (PMWeb): 7/1/2009 through 12/31/2015
4.4 Current Total
Project Estimate
4.4A – Current Total Project Estimate Cost Detail for Categories 2 and 3
Reporting Period (Tyler): 7/1/2009 through 11/30/2015
Reporting Period (PMWeb): 7/1/2009 through 12/31/2015
4.4A Current To
tal Project Estim
ate Cost Detail for Categories 2 and 3
4.5 Designer Cost Estimate Contingency
4.6 Permit Status
4.5 and 4.6 Design Cost
Estimate Contingency
and Permit Status
Reporting Period (Tyler): 7/1/2009 through 11/30/2015
Reporting Period (PMWeb): 7/1/2009 through 12/31/2015
Cost Estimate Contingency
All projects have been bid and awarded.
This section will no longer be provided in future
reports.
Water Rights
Final orders on water right extensions have
been sent back to the Oregon Water Resources
Board (OWRD) for further consideration
relating to fish protection.
Top Risks
Rank
New or
Updated
This Period?
Item
Number Risk Description Prob. Impact
Impact
Value Status Strategy Owner Notes
70 WTP extended duration increases cost of construction management/inspection 100 3 3.00 Open Mitigate PMT/SponsorsWork closely with contractor to increase likelihood of schedule recovery to minimize any program‐level
impacts.
35 Noise, vibration and potential construction damage to residences 100 2 2.00 Open Transfer Contractor Contractor modified approach to future shoring causes delays, increases costs.
37Permit non compliance results in a stop‐work, slow down work, delays schedule, increases
cost50 3 1.50 Open Mitigate PMT/Sponsors Prequal, inspection, adequate CM Staffing, design that addresses COAs, etc.
6 Added cost to purchase water from Portland if Tigard deadline of 7/1/16 is missed 50 3 1.50 Open Mitigate PMT/Sponsors
Expedite program execution, maintain updated detailed schedule to prevent surprises, and allow 6‐8 months
for Tigard system flushing, WTP start‐up, and delays; cost is approximately $600k per month to purchase
water from Portland.
33 Theft or vandalism at construction sites 100 1 1.00 Open Transfer ContractorDesigner/contractor to jointly develop mitigation strategy, contractor to execute. Installation of security
components (e.g., fences, cameras) immediately upon construction startup for facilities.
39 Claims ‐ property damage, lost business, severed utilities, etc. 50 2 1.00 OpenAccept
(Funded)PMT
Proactive construction management, contract language to place appropriate risk on contractors, Owner
contingency.
14
Inadequate startup coordination for entire system (intake, plant, pipes, SCADA, testing)
causes delay30 3 0.90 Open Mitigate PMT Program design manager and construction manager to ensure bid documents address.
42 Water quality as it relates to water age at the extreme ends of the distribution systems 25 3 0.75 Open Mitigate PMTModeling to determine areas of potential concern to be addressed by WTP design and operations, and, if
needed, supplemental chemical dosing in Tigard.
69Schedule 4 challenges (pipe bridge, potential boulders, cultural resources) increase
schedule/cost30 2 0.60 Open Mitigate PMT
Thorough evaluation of all alignment challenges. Address via contract documents and thorough
construction management.
30Deferred maintenance of new system results in reduced reliability or premature
replacement10 4 0.40 Open Mitigate PMT/Sponsors
Thorough asset management program including condition assessment, O&M manuals, and funding of
needed repairs. Asset management program to be implemented during construction phase.
62 Inadequate coordination between overlapping projects during the construction phase 15 2 0.30 Open Mitigate PMTMitigate via ongoing workshops to analyze overlapping projects and incorporate the appropriate sequencing
constraints in contract documents.
29 Existing supply system failure before construction of new is complete 5 5 0.25 Open Mitigate PMT/ContractorContract documents require protection of existing facilities and proper sequencing, construction
management to enforce.
24Insolvency of Contractor or design firm during design/construction results in increased
costs from delay or redesign5 4 0.20 Open Mitigate PMT/Sponsors
Competitive selection of reputable, established firms, including contractor prequalification with financial
stability evaluation.
26Contractor claims for differing site conditions or unclear design may cause delays and/or
increase costs10 2 0.20 Open Mitigate PMT Carefully review any proposals to determine whether risk is increased without suitable mitigation.
66Inadequate coordination with local agency operations staff for shut‐downs and testing
affects service, strains relations, or causes delays10 2 0.20 Open Mitigate PMT/Sponsors
Address in construction administration plan. Provide communication protocols and required lead
times/staffing.
25 Contractor breach of contract 5 3 0.15 Open Mitigate PMT Contractor prequalification, proactive construction management.
45 Defensible record‐keeping for the entire program 3 4 0.12 Open Mitigate PMT PMIS accounting system, Program management plan, designer reporting, electronic filing system.
22 Weather/natural disaster/act of god‐type delays 2 5 0.10 OpenAccept
(Unfunded)PMT Flood, earthquake, fire ‐ deal with it if it happens.
44 Inadvertent contamination of water leaving the plant 2 5 0.10 Open Mitigate Sponsors Monitoring at the plant, prepare and adopt an appropriate emergency response plan.
36 Untenable contractor ‐ resident engineer conflicts 5 1 0.05 Open Mitigate PMTCommunication, engagement/oversight by senior PMT staff, contractor prequalification process with
references.
40 Injury or death at a jobsite 1 5 0.05 Open Mitigate PMT/Sponsors Construction management, site safety contract requirements.
27Project Management Information System goes down or vendor becomes insolvent ‐
backup procedures1 4 0.04 Open Mitigate PMT Data escrow provision. Data can be migrated into another PMIS system.
34 Vulnerability associated with sharing water system info with the public online 2 2 0.04 Open Mitigate Sponsors/Designer Site security systems at WTP and RIPS.
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
WTP extended duration increases cost of construction management/inspection
Noise, vibration and potential construction damage to residences
Permit non compliance results in a stop‐work, slow down work, delays schedule, increases cost
Added cost to purchase water from Portland if Tigard deadline of 7/1/16 is missed
Theft or vandalism at construction sites
Claims ‐ property damage, lost business, severed utilities, etc.
Impact ValueLOTWP Risk Register ‐ Top Program Risks*
* ‐ Top risks include all risks with an impact value of "1.0" or greater.
Section 5 ‐ Risk Register 1 of 1
Project Name: River Intake Pump Station (RIPS) Contractor: Slayden Construction Group Inc.
Project No: 204 Reporting Per: December, 2015 Construction Mgr.: Jerome Duletzke
Scope On-TargetSchedule On-TargetBudget On-Target
Original Contract $10,566,000.00
Approved COs $422,139.48
Total Contract $10,988,139.48
Paid-to-Date $10,475,861.51 (through November, 2015)
Work this Period $0.00
Balance-to-Finish $512,277.97 (retainage)
Description:
Section 1. Contract Financial
Status:
Section 2. Period Summary
and Work Performed
Section 3. Schedule Progress
Section 4. Project Key Schedule
Milestones
• Final completion date November 30, 2015
Construction of a new River Intake Pump Station (RIPS) located at River Mile 0.8 along the right bank of the Clackamas River in Gladstone, Oregon. The intake includes concrete foundation, rock anchors, concrete tower, pump room, motor room, control room and HVAC equipment.
1. In Water Work Period (IWWP) #1 ‐ construct work bridges & install cofferdam2. Construct and test new RIPS including fish screens3. IWWP #2 ‐ upstream channelization work and cofferdam removal
4. New RIPS startup and commissioning5. New RIPS complete6. IWWP #3 ‐ Demolish existing RIPS 7. Final Completion ‐ 11/30/15 (CO13)
$10,475.9k
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
Monthly: $000's
Cumulative: $000's
Monthly Cashflow Projection Monthly Contractor Payments Cumulative Cashflow Projection Cumulative Contractor Payments
RIPS Construction Status ‐ 1 of 2
Project Name: River Intake Pump Station (RIPS) Contractor: Slayden Construction Group Inc.
Project No: 204 Reporting Per: December, 2015 Construction Mgr.: Jerome Duletzke
Section 6. Risks/Issues
Section 7. Changes
Section 8. Construction Photographs
Section 5. Three Month Look
Ahead
RIPS Construction Status ‐ 2 of 2
Project Name: Pipelines ‐ Schedules 1‐2‐3A Contractor: Frank Coluccio Construction
Project No: 205 ‐ 123A Company
Reporting Per: December, 2015 Construction Mgr.: Jerome Duletzke
Scope On-TargetSchedule On-TargetBudget On-Target
Original Contract $31,669,205.00
Approved COs 991,307.60$
Total Contract $32,660,512.60
Paid-to-Date $30,937,792.30 (through November, 2015)
Work this Period $0.00
Balance-to-Finish $1,722,720.30 (Includes retainage)
Description:
Section 1. Contract Financial
Status:
Section 2. Period Summary
and Work Performed
Section 3. Schedule Progress
Section 4. Project Key Schedule
Milestones
• Substantial Completion (late) ‐ Contractor forecast: 2/10/16• Final Completion (late) ‐ Contractor forecast: 3/14/16
Construction of raw and finished water pipeline (ranging from 36‐inch to 48‐inch welded steel pipe (WSP)) including valves, fittings and appurtenances; construction of potable water pipeline; related work including Cathodic protection facilities, grinding and overlaying roadways, constructing new structural road sections and concrete curb and driveways, abandoning existing pipeline,connections to existing facilities, site restoration, landscaping, and pipeline cleaning, testing, disinfection. New pipeline will be installed from the River Intake Pump Station (RIPS) in Gladstone to the water treatment facility in West Linn. Project includes: 4,000 feet of horizontal directional drill (HDD) under the Willamette River and 600 feet of trenchless construction under Highway 99E. In
• Contractor installed the product pipe in the casing at the Trillium Creek Crossing• RWP connection to WTP completed• RWP commissioned into service on 12/22/15• Contractor has completed the 8" sewer main relocation on Mapleton• Contractor has installed approx. 825 LF of FWP on Mapleton Drive (of 1,882 LF )
1. Clackamas Blvd Connections ‐ 10/01/14 2. 6" Water Clackamas Blvd ‐ 10/01/143. RIPS Connection at 176+67 ‐ 10/17/14 11/26/144. MBP and Jensen Road Work ‐ 02/28/155. Final Asphalt Paving ‐ 06/30/15
6. Substantial Completion ‐ 11/12/15 12/14/15 12/24/1501/06/16 (CO18)
7. Final Completion ‐ 12/12/15 01/11/16 01/21/1602/03/16 (CO18)
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
Monthly: $000's
Cumulative: $000's
Monthly Cashflow Projection Monthly Contractor Payments Cumulative Cashflow Projection Cumulative Contractor Payments
$30,937.8k
FWP ‐ Schedule 1‐2‐3A ‐ 1 of 2
Project Name: Pipelines ‐ Schedules 1‐2‐3A Contractor: Frank Coluccio Construction
Project No: 205 ‐ 123A Company
Reporting Per: December, 2015 Construction Mgr.: Jerome Duletzke
Section 5. Three Month Look
Ahead
Section 6. Risks/Issues
Section 7. Changes
Section 8. Construction Photographs
• CO‐18 executed: Time Extension for holiday break and weather delay (2 days 12/7‐8/15) ‐ $0 change
• Complete paving punchlist in Gladstone and grind/overlay of Hwy 99E: work is weather dependent• Mapleton Drive (work proceeding east from WTP) :
Contractor's sub, Corrpro, to complete cathodic protection work on RWP Mapleton Avenue Connection to Schedule 3B pipe ‐ early February 2016 Pressure test Mapleton FWP
• Neighborhood impact including: construction noise, truck traffic, vibration, etc. • Schedule
Removing shoring plates at Trillium Creek
8‐inch sewer main relocation
Crew compacting around pipe installed under Trillium Creek
General site view of sewer line relocation:
FWP ‐ Schedule 1‐2‐3A ‐ 2 of 2
Project Name: Pipelines ‐ Schedule 3B Contractor: Emery and Sons, Inc.
Project No: 207 ‐ 3B Reporting Per: November, 2015 ‐ COMPLETE Construction Mgr.: Jerome Duletzke
Scope On-TargetSchedule On-TargetBudget On-Target
Original Contract $11,194,098.00
Approved COs $369,488.63
Total Contract $11,563,586.63
Paid-to-Date $11,563,586.65 (through October, 2015)
Work this Period $0.00
Balance-to-Finish $0.00 (retainage only)
Description:
Section 1. Contract Financial
Status:
Section 2. Period Summary
and Work Performed
Section 3. Schedule Progress
Section 4. Project Key Schedule
Milestones
Construct potable welded steel water pipeline, connect to existing pump station on Old River Road in West Linn , and related work such as cathodic protection facilities, grinding and overlaying roadways, removal and replacement of Portland Concrete cement(PCC)panels, abandoning existing pipelines, connections to existing facilities, site restoration, landscaping, pipeline cleaning, testing and disinfection. Approximately 14,000 feet of new water pipeline will be installed from West Linn to Lake Oswego. The majority of the pipeline alignment is along Highway 43, which will include night work for construction activities.
Notice to Proceed (NTP) ‐ 04/28/141. Substantial Completion ‐ 04/28/15 07/10/15 09/15/152. Final Completion ‐ 06/27/15 09/14/15 10/23/15
$11,563.6k
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
May‐14 Jun‐14 Jul‐14 Aug‐14 Sep‐14 Oct‐14 Nov‐14 Dec‐14 Jan‐15 Feb‐15 Mar‐15 Apr‐15May‐15 Jun‐15 Jul‐15 Aug‐15 Sep‐15 Oct‐15
Monthly: $000's
Cumulative: $000's
Monthly Cashflow Projection Monthly Contractor Payments Cumulative Cashflow Projection Cumulative Contractor Payments
FWP ‐ Schedule 3B Construction Status ‐ 1 of 2
Project Name: Pipelines ‐ Schedule 3B Contractor: Emery and Sons, Inc.
Project No: 207 ‐ 3B Reporting Per: November, 2015 ‐ COMPLETE Construction Mgr.: Jerome Duletzke
Section 5. Three Month Look
Ahead
Section 6. Risks/Issues
Section 7. Changes
Section 8. Construction Photographs
FWP ‐ Schedule 3B Construction Status ‐ 2 of 2
Project Name: Finished Water Pipeline ‐ Schedule 4 Contractor: Emery & Sons Construction, Inc.
Project No: 207‐Sch4 Reporting Per: December, 2015 Construction Mgr.: Jerome Duletzke
Scope On-Target
Schedule On-TargetBudget On-Target
Original Contract $6,146,383.00
Approved COs $383,231.00
Total Contract $6,529,614.00
Paid-to-Date $4,896,440.28 (through November, 2015)
Work this Period $0.00
Balance-to-Finish $1,633,173.72 (Includes retainage)
Description:
Section 1. Contract Financial
Status:
Section 2. Period Summary
and Work Performed
Section 3. Schedule Progress
Section 4. Project Key Schedule
Milestones
• Work is on schedule
Construction of a potable water pipeline (42‐inch diameter welded steel), including valves, fittings, and appurtenances. Related work includes a cathodic protection system, pavement restoration, connections into existing water facilities, a new fire hydrant, abandonment of old pipeline, new pavement markings and striping, and minor curb and sidewalk replacement work. This pipeline consists of approximately 5,200 feet of welded steel pipe, which includes a 200 foot self‐supporting pipeline bridge crossing over Oswego Creek. At a second location, the new waterline will cross under the railroad near State Street inside a 54‐inch steel casing. This work will require a 48‐hour continuous construction window to complete within the allowable permit with the railroad. Additional miscellaneous work includes: concrete panel removal and replacement within ODOT right‐of‐way (i.e. State Street) and pipeline cleaning prior to Commissioning into service.
• Contactor has installed approx. 4,800 feet of welded steel pipe (WSP) • WSP installation progessing on McVey Avenue (night work): rock excavation• Contractor has poured footings at the Oswego Creek Bridge Crossing• Contractor continues ADA ramps upgrades on Durham and Church Streets• Processing of submittals and RFIs
Notice to Proceed ‐ 02/12/151. Complete Oswego Village ‐ 10/31/15 (complete)
Complete RR Crossing Work ‐ 11/1/152. Complete G. Rogers Park, Green & Ladd Streets ‐ 2/28/16
3. Final Asphalt Paving: Schedules 1 thru 5 ‐ 2/28/164. Final Asphalt Paving: Schedules 6 ‐ 5/26/165. Substantial Completion ‐ 3/14/166. Final Completion ‐ 6/10/16
$4,896.4k
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
‐$500
$500
$1,500
$2,500
$3,500
$4,500
$5,500
$6,500
Mar‐15
Apr‐15
May‐15
Jun‐15
Jul‐15
Aug‐15
Sep‐15
Oct‐15
Nov‐15
Dec‐15
Jan‐16
Feb‐16
Mar‐16
Apr‐16
May‐16
Monthly: $000's
Cumulative: $000's
Monthly Cashflow Projection Monthly Contractor Payments Cumulative Cashflow Projection Cumulative Contractor Payments
Pipeline Schedule 4 Construction Status ‐ 1 of 2
Project Name: Finished Water Pipeline ‐ Schedule 4 Contractor: Emery & Sons Construction, Inc.
Project No: 207‐Sch4 0
Reporting Per: December, 2015 Construction Mgr.: Jerome Duletzke
Section 6. Risks/Issues
Section 7. Changes
Section 8. Construction Photographs
Section 5. Three Month Look
Ahead
• CO‐03 executed: SOW transfers from Schedules 3B and 5 to Schedule 4 = $100,119.00
• Complete ADA ramps • Final restoration of George Rogers Park January 2016• Erect structural steel at Oswego Creek • Pour final closure retaining walls after pipeline bridge is installed• Pressure test new pipeline
• Night work• Neighborhood and business impacts
Night work: setting the pipe on Foothills Road
Typical boulder size near the Bay Roc apartments
Wrapping gas line to protect during rock backfillDigging around the corner to McVey:
existing 4” and 6” gas lines under shoring
Tent set up during night work to protect welders in the trench
Pipeline Schedule 4 Construction Status ‐ 2 of 2
Project Name: Pipelines ‐ Schedule 5 Contractor: Emery & Sons Construction
Project No: 207 ‐ 5 Reporting Per: November, 2015 ‐ COMPLETE Construction Mgr.: Jerome Duletzke
Scope On-Target
Schedule On-Target
Budget On-Target
Original Contract $12,135,505.00
Approved COs $1,582,593.64
Total Contract $13,718,098.64
Paid-to-Date $13,718,099.64 (through October, 2015)
Work this Period $0.00
Balance-to-Finish $0.00 (includes retainage)
Description:
Section 1. Contract
Financial Status:
Section 2. Period Summary
and Work Performed
Section 3. Schedule Progress
Section 4. Project Key Schedule
Milestones
Construct Finished Water Pipeline (Schedule 5): Schedule 5 is 3.1 miles of 36” and 42” welded steel potable (WSP) water pipeline with 1,220 LF of 24” ductile iron pipe (DIP). Additional pipelines include: 260 LF of 8” DIP; 108 LF of 12” diameter; 379 LF of 8” diameter; 165LF of 6” diameter PVC sewer pipeline (including manholes and appurtenances) and 175 LF of 12” diameter HDPE storm drain pipeline.
1. Waluga Park ‐ Construction: Oct‐13 thru Feb‐14 (complete)2. Lake Grove Elementary & Twin Fir ‐ Construction window:
6/13/14 thru 9/2/14 (complete)
3. Substantial Completion ‐ 3/2/15 5/1/15 6/26/15 10/21/154. Final Completion ‐ 4/1/15 7/31/15 10/30/15 (CO 20)
$13,718.1k
‐
287.76
‐$500
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
Monthly Axis: $000's
Cumulative Axis: $000's
Monthly Projection Monthly Incurred Cumulative Cashflow Projection Cumulative Payment
Pipeline Schedule 5 Construction Status ‐ 1 of 2
Project Name: Pipelines ‐ Schedule 5 Contractor: Emery & Sons Construction
Project No: 207 ‐ 5 Reporting Per: November, 2015 ‐ COMPLETE Construction Mgr: Jerome Duletzke
Section 8. Construction Photographs
Section 5. Three Month Look Ahead
Section 6. Risks/Issues
Section 7. Changes
Pipeline Schedule 5 Construction Status ‐ 2 of 2
Project Name: Finished Water Pipeline ‐ Schedule 6 Contractor: Landis and Landis Construction, LLC
Project No: 207‐Sch6 Reporting Per: December, 2015 Construction Mgr.: Rob Murchison
Scope On-TargetSchedule On-TargetBudget On-Target
Original Contract $2,616,879.00
Approved COs $239,216.33
Total Contract $2,856,095.33
Paid-to-Date $2,617,530.52 (through November, 2015)
Work this Period $0.00
Balance-to-Finish $238,564.81 (Includes retainage)
Description:
Section 1. Contract Financial
Status:
Section 2. Period Summary
and Work Performed
Section 3. Schedule Progress
Section 4. Project Key Schedule
Milestones
• Project work is behind schedule due to weather delays• Contractor delays in submitting asset management documents• Anticipated change order to extend the final completion date, compensating for weather delays
Schedule 6 (Milton Court, Tigard to perpendicular Road, Lake Oswego) scope includes: 626 linear feet (LF) of 30‐inch diameter ductile iron Finished Water Pipeline (FWP) and approximately 2318 LF of 24‐inch ductile iron FWP including valves, fittings and appurtenances. Related work will include: cathodic protection facilities; grinding and overlaying roadways; replacing concrete curb and sidewalks; abandoning existing pipelines; connecting to existing facilities; pipe cleaning , testing and disinfection; site restoration and landscaping; and abandonment of existing water pump station.
• Parking lot restoration in front of Paul Schatz Furniture and Atiyeh Brothers• Final landscaping• 80% of the Punchlist items
Notice to Proceed ‐ 2/03/151. Mobilization ‐ 3/26/152. Demo Pump Station ‐ 4/06/153. Auger Borings (RR Crossing, Culvert, I‐5) ‐
4/24/15 through 6/12/154. Open Cuts (West End to Pump Stn, to I‐5, East End to Tie‐in) ‐ 7/01/15 through 7/31/15
5. Testing (Pressure & Cathodic), Disinfection ‐ 8/5 ‐ 8/25/156. Substantial Completion ‐ 8/31/15 9/30/15 10/21/15 (CO 4 & 5) 7. Final Completion ‐ 9/30/15 10/30/15 11/20/15 (CO 4 & 5)
11/25 11/30 12/05/15 (CO 7, 8 & 9)
$2,617.5k
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
Mar‐15 Apr‐15 May‐15 Jun‐15 Jul‐15 Aug‐15 Sep‐15 Oct‐15 Nov‐15
Monthly: $000's
Cumulative: $000's
Monthly Cashflow Projection Monthly Contractor Payments Cumulative Cashflow Projection Cumulative Contractor Payments
Pipeline Schedule 6 Construction Status ‐ 1 of 2
Project Name: Finished Water Pipeline ‐ Schedule 6 Contractor: Landis and Landis Construction, LLC
Project No: 207‐Sch6 0
Reporting Per: December, 2015 Construction Mgr.: Rob Murchison
Section 6. Risks/Issues
Section 7. Changes
Section 8. Construction Photographs
Section 5. Three Month Look
Ahead
• Additional Pipe Fittings (CO7) ‐ $30.7K addition (Executed)• Concrete Median (CO8) ‐ $11.5K addition (Executed)• Misc small changes (CO9) ‐ $8.6K addition (Executed)• Three water quality sampling stations (CO10) ‐ $7.3K addition (Executed)
• Punchlist items • Final cleanup/demobilization• Project closeout
• Traffic control and public safety• Heavy rains caused localized flooding at the intersection of 72nd and Bonita Rd.
xxx
Parking Lot PavingParking Lot Paving Preparation
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxFinal LandscapingFlooding at 72nd and Bonita Road
Pipeline Schedule 6 Construction Status ‐ 2 of 2
Project Name: Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Contractor: Slayden Construction Group, Inc.
Project No: 206 Reporting Per: December, 2015 Construction Mgr: Tom Lebo
Scope On-TargetSchedule See Section 3 for narrativeBudget On-Target
Original Contract $66,101,464.87
Approved COs $1,970,616.13
Total Contract $68,072,081.00
Paid-to-Date $51,026,628.71 (through November, 2015)
Work this Period $0.00
Balance-to-Finish $17,045,452.29 (includes retainage)
Description:
Section 1. Contract Financial
Status:
Section 2. Period Summary
and Work Performed
Section 3. Schedule Progress
Section 4. Project Key Schedule
Milestones
• Contractor is currently behind schedule• December schedule update indicates a 13 day delay (Phase B) due to weather
Upgrade and expansion of Lake Oswego's existing WTP, located between Kenthorpe Way and Mapleton Drive, to a capacity of 38 MGD. The upgraded plant will supply Lake Oswego and Tigard, and will continue to serve as West Linn’s sole source of emergency andbackup water supply.
• Continued work on the Admin Building walls and interior• Continued work on the new filter walls and deck• Completed the Washwater Structure walls and began water test• Continued mechanical work in the filters• Continued mechanical, HVAC, and electrical work in the new FWPS
NTP 8/14/13Milestone A ‐ Complete: demo of lagoons 1, 2 & lime silo; construct portion of ballasted floc, clearwell, finished water pump station, gravity thickeners & sludge storage tank, mechanical de‐watering building, chemical building
Bold Dates per Contractor's July '15 ScheduleBlue Dates per Contract, i.e. Change Ordered revised dates
Milestone B ‐ 04/20/16 (04/22/16): demo alum storage facility; construct remaining ballasted floc, filtration, electrical building, washwater handling facilities, admin building
Milestone C ‐ 01/16/17 (03/13/17): construct ozone, LOX facilities, final site paving, landscaping, street resurfacingFinal Completion (D) ‐ 02/10/17 (04/07/17)
Cumulative Cashflow Projection$51,026.6k
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
$4,500
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
Monthly Axis: $000's
Cumulative Axis: $000's
Monthly Cashflow Projection Monthly Contractor Payments Cumulative Cashflow Projection Cumulative Contractor Payments
WTP Construction Status ‐ 1 of 2
Project Name: Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Contractor: Slayden Construction Group, Inc.
Project No: 206 Reporting Per: December, 2015 Construction Mgr: Tom Lebo
Section 6. Risks/Issues
Section 7. Changes
Section 8. Construction Photographs
Section 5. Three Month Look
Ahead
• Change Order 22 approved this month: $126,832• Changes included: steel joists; delete control room desk; change floor type in conference room; dewatering, piping changes;
added concrete pavement; misc changes to Admin Building
• Complete Admin Building roofs and exterior• Complete Washwater walls and Pump Station structure• Complete installing filter components and equipment• Complete Phase A punchlist• Install overflow piping from clearwell
Washwater Structure
• Weather could slow construction progress• Claims from residents declaring property damage due to construction activities• Schedule delays / Contractor schedule revisions
New Admin Building
New Filter Structure Admin Building Lobby
WTP Construction Status ‐ 2 of 2
Project Name: Waluga Reservoir 2 (WR2) Contractor: Ward‐Henshaw Construction
Project No: 208 Company, Inc.
Reporting Per: December, 2015 Construction Mgr.: Rob Murchison
Scope On-TargetSchedule On-TargetBudget On-Target
Original Contract $7,309,541.00
Approved COs $253,734.88
Total Contract $7,563,275.88
Paid-to-Date $7,563,275.88 (through November, 2015)
Work this Period $0.00
Balance-to-Finish $0.00 (retainage released)
Description:
Section 1. Contract Financial
Status:
Section 2. Period Summary
and Work Performed
Section 3. Schedule Progress
Section 4. Project Key Schedule
Milestones
• Project is now complete
Construction of a new 3.5 million gallon drinking water reservoir ‐Waluga Reservoir 2 (WR2) ‐ new outlet piping and control valves; modifications to existing Waluga Reservoir 1 (WR1); new distribution piping within the reservoir site; new reservoir level sensing instrumentation at both reservoirs; new control panels and communications to City of Lake Oswego Water Treatment Plant; new electrical service; new storm water drainage piping and detention basin; upgrades to existing roadway into site.
• Final punchlist items ‐ Installing air valve vents, and valve can adjustments• Final bare root plantings (these types of plants are not available until late December or January)
Notice to Proceed ‐ 05/08/141. Video Jobsite, Obtain Permits, Tree Trim, Site work ‐May'142. Site work ‐ 5/16/14 through 7/31/153. WR2 Super & Sub‐Structure ‐ 7/2/14 through 4/29/15
5. WR1 Super Structure (including testing, commission) ‐ 5/13/15 through 8/24/15
6. Substantial Completion WR2 ‐ 6/24/157. Final Completion ‐ 9/25/15 9/30/15 11/6/15
$7,563.3k
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
Monthly: $000's
Cumulative: $000's
Monthly Cashflow Projection Monthly Contractor Payments Cumulative Cashflow Projection Cumulative Contractor Payments
WR2 Construction Status ‐ 1 of 2
Project Name: Waluga Reservoir 2 (WR2) Contractor: Ward‐Henshaw Construction
Project No: 208 Company, Inc.
Reporting Per: December, 2015 Construction Mgr.: Rob Murchison
Section 6. Risks/Issues
Section 7. Changes
Section 8. Construction Photographs
Section 5. Three Month Look
Ahead
Installing Air Valve VentsFinal Plantings North of WR2
Final Plantings Near WR2Looking South at WR2
WR2 Construction Status ‐ 2 of 2
Project Name: Bonita Pump Station (BPS) Contractor: Pacific Excavation, Inc.
Project No: 209 Reporting Per: December, 2015 Construction Mgr.: Rob Murchison
Scope On-TargetSchedule On-TargetBudget On-Target
Original Contract $5,850,305.00
Approved COs $196,848.63
Total Contract $6,047,153.63
Paid-to-Date $6,039,273.63 (through November, 2015)
Work this Period $0.00
Balance-to-Finish $7,880.00 (Includes retainage)
Description:
Section 1. Contract Financial
Status:
Section 2. Period Summary
and Work Performed
Section 3. Schedule Progress
Section 4. Project Key Schedule
Milestones
• Testing schedule extended because the new pumps can push more water into the Tigard system daily than is currently consumed
• A small pipeline replacement was added to the BPS contract• Anticipated change order to extend the final completion date, compensating for testing delays, and additional work
Construction of a new Bonita Pump Station (BPS) located in Tigard, Oregon. This potable water pump station and site includes: five barrel‐mounted vertical turbine pumps; a standby power generator; yard piping ; meter vault; electrical duct banks and transformers; heating , ventilation and conditioning equipment; on‐site paving, curb, gutter and sidewalks, and fencing.
• Testing into the Tigard 470 system• Small punchlist items
Notice to Proceed ‐ 06/02/141. Site Excavation/Rock ‐ 06/20/14 (complete)2. Pump Barrel Delivery ‐ 08/13/14 (complete)3. Planting Window ‐ 10/01/14 (complete)4. Building Slab ‐ Nov 24, 2014 01/30/15 (complete)5. Roof Complete ‐ Feb 28, 2015 03/19/15 (complete)6. Install Pumps ‐ 04/22/15 (complete)
7. Install VFDs ‐ June 3, 2015 05/25/15 (complete)8. Ops Readiness Test 1 ‐ 06/25/15 06/09/15 (complete)9. Ops Readiness Test 2 ‐ 07/29/15 07/13/15 (complete)10. Substantial Completion 07/10/15 08/14/15 11/13/15 (CO8 )11. Final Completion July 31 09/30/15 12/18/15 (CO8 )
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
Jun‐14
Jul‐14
Aug‐14
Sep‐14
Oct‐14
Nov‐14
Dec‐14
Jan‐15
Feb‐15
Mar‐15
Apr‐15
May‐15
Jun‐15
Jul‐15
Aug‐15
Sep‐15
Oct‐15
Nov‐15
Monthly: $000's
Cumulative: $000's
Monthly Cashflow Projection Monthly Contractor Payments Cumulative Cashflow Projection Cumulative Contractor Payments
$6,039.3k
BPS Construction Status ‐ 1 of 2
Project Name: Bonita Pump Station (BPS) Contractor: Pacific Excavation, Inc.
Project No: 209 Reporting Per: December, 2015 Construction Mgr.: Rob Murchison
Section 5. Three Month Look
Ahead
Section 6. Risks/Issues
Section 7. Changes
Section 8. Construction Photographs
• Future CO to extend Final Completion date ‐ $0K time extension (Anticipated)
• Complete testing • Complete final punchlist• Complete O&M Manual
• Risks include: Startup delays
Project Engineer discussing punchlist items with General Contractor
xxxxxx xxxxxx
xxx
xxxxxx
xxx
xxxxxx
xxx
xxxxxx
xxx
xxxxxx
xxx
xxxxxx SCADA screen while pump #2 is runningFlow meter during testing (2,234 gpm)
Final punchlist items in the pump room
BPS Construction Status ‐ 2 of 2
Appendix A – Key Terms
LOTWP – Monthly Council Program Metrics Report
Appendix A – Key Terms
Current Estimate at Completion Current Estimate at Completion Current Estimate at Completion Current Estimate at Completion The current total program cost estimate.
Construction Cost Construction Cost Construction Cost Construction Cost
Estimate Contingency Estimate Contingency Estimate Contingency Estimate Contingency
This allowance for indeterminates accounts for the
miscellaneous unknowns that contractors include in their bids.
It recognizes the impossibility of preparing a sufficiently
detailed estimate or bid that covers every last detail. The
allowance is higher early in the design process and decreases
as design progresses. The allowance goes to zero for each
project when contractor bids are received.
Construction ContingencyConstruction ContingencyConstruction ContingencyConstruction Contingency The Sponsors’ (Owners’) reserve amount that will fund
construction change orders required as a result of risk events,
changes, or unknown conditions that may be encountered
during construction.
Design ContDesign ContDesign ContDesign Contract Amendmentsract Amendmentsract Amendmentsract Amendments The amount Sponsors (Owners) have paid or can expect to pay
designers for out-of-scope work required as a result of changes
or risk events encountered during the design phase.
Mitigation ContingencyMitigation ContingencyMitigation ContingencyMitigation Contingency RemainingRemainingRemainingRemaining The Sponsors’ (Owners’) reserve amount that will fund further
mitigation measures anticipated as part of land use and
environmental permit approvals. Requirements already
identified, or to make projects more acceptable, have already
been incorporated in construction cost estimates.
PMWebPMWebPMWebPMWeb A web-based Program Management Information System (PMIS)
used as a management tool to track and forecast costs in a
more real-time fashion than a typical municipal accounting
system.
TTTTyleryleryleryler The City of Lake Oswego’s accounting system software.
Total CostTotal CostTotal CostTotal Cost The total amount expended to date.
Lake Oswego/Tigard Water Supply Partnership
TO: Oversight Committee FROM: Joel B. Komarek, P.E., Project Director Technical Committee DATE: January 7, 2016 SUBJECT: Waluga Reservoir No. 1 – Roof Replacement
PURPOSE
The purpose of this memorandum is to:
1. Summarize the findings, conclusions and recommendations from a report prepared by Peterson Structural Engineers, Inc. (PSE) relating to a recent inspection, condition assessment, and seismic evaluation of an existing 4 million gallon (MG) concrete water storage reservoir (“WR1”).
2. Discuss how WR1 operates in tandem with the Partnerships new water storage reservoir (“WR2”).
3. Discuss why WR1 is a beneficial water supply asset to Tigard.
4. Recommend an approach and schedule for replacement of the roof on WR1.
BACKGROUND
The Waluga Reservoir No. 1 was constructed for the City of Lake Oswego between 1980 – 1982. The reservoir is approximately 190-feet in diameter and 21-feet tall and stores approximately 4 MG of potable water when full. The reservoir type is known typically as a circular, wire-wrapped, pre-stressed concrete tank. Hundreds, if not thousands, of these style tanks are in service throughout the US and abroad. Standards for design of these types of tanks are published in the American Water Works Association (AWWA) Manual D-110.
WR1 is the City’s “terminal” reservoir for the water distribution system north of Oswego Lake. Water supply from the City’s water treatment plant to the north side of Oswego Lake passes through WR1 first before being pumped to other higher reservoirs within the City’s distribution system. Since its construction in 1982, surplus water provided to Tigard flows first through WR1.
In 2013, after design for the new WR2 had begun, the City commissioned an inspection of the interior of WR1 while in service by means of a scuba diver with a video camera. The underwater inspection revealed concrete delamination from the underside of the reservoir roof and exposed, corroded rebar.
Memorandum Oversight Committee P a g e | 2
The inspection also revealed severe corrosion on internal metal structures (e.g., access ladder, overflow pipe and supports, etc.). As a result, in 2013, the City amended the design contract for WR2 to include design of a new access hatch, access ladder, overflow pipe and mixing manifold for WR1.
In 2015, construction of WR2 was completed and put into service. As planned, WR1 was then completely drained to allow a thorough and comprehensive inspection and condition assessment of the tank and to make modifications to the tank. Structural engineers from PSE conducted their examination of WR1 on 6/5/15 and then again on 6/23/15. Findings, conclusions and recommendations from PSE regarding WR1 are summarized below:
Interior/exterior walls and floor slab – PSE concludes the condition of the core wall (interior/exterior surfaces) and floor slab are generally in good condition with no apparent leaks or cracks that would cause concern.
Roof support columns – PSE concludes the slender, square columns are generally in good condition, except for several observed defects which are likely the result of poor concrete form work and inadequate inspection. PSE opines these defects do not appear to have significantly compromised the stability of the roof.
Roof – PSE concludes that construction related defects and inadequate or poorly placed reinforcing in the roof slab have resulted in observed deformation of the roof slab, particularly at the supporting columns. Structural analysis of the roof structure as designed and constructed, reveals “…the existing roof slab analytically fails in almost all respects of its capacity.”
PSE concludes their report with the following statement:
“Our visual observations and structural analysis reveals the water bearing elements (floor and wall) of the existing 4.0MG reservoir are in fairly good condition and should continue to serve the City well for decades to come under all currently expected loading conditions. However, the roof system we believe represents a significant vulnerability and should be addressed as soon as is reasonably possible. We feel that if the recommended repairs are made and the reservoir continues to be maintained, the City can expect the reservoir system to remain a functional structure for a period exceeding 50-years.”
DISCUSSION
The Partnership Intergovernmental Agreement (“Agreement”) obligates Tigard to “purchase” its allocable share of Lake Oswego’s existing water supply system assets to the extent such assets have excess capacity useful in supplying water to Tigard. Exhibit 1 to the Agreement documents the valuation of those assets as of 2008 and identifies which of the assets are beneficial to Tigard and thus subject to the buy-in provisions of the Agreement (see Article IV). Those assets are enumerated in Exhibit 6 of the Agreement (as amended), and for convenience, are repeated below:
Land and easements owned by Lake Oswego and located at the river intake pump station, water treatment plant, and Waluga reservoir site.
Raw water pipeline.
At the time of the initial valuation and buy-in (2008-2009) no other water system assets owned by Lake Oswego (e.g., WR1, WTP RIPS) had excess capacity to serve Tigard, and so were not subject to the buy-in provisions of Article IV.
The design of WR2 includes a complex system of on-site piping and valving that allows both WR1 and the new WR2 to operate together, or individually should there be a need to temporarily remove WR1 or
Memorandum Oversight Committee P a g e | 3
WR2 from service. In normal service mode, water from the WTP flows into WR2 first before flowing into WR1 where it can then be withdrawn for supply to Tigard’s new Bonita Pump Station (BPS). With WR1 out of service, Tigard supply is met through WR2. Within the next few months, WR2 will be temporarily drained to facilitate repair of a small crack and during this time water stored in WR1 will be made available to Tigard. During replacement of the WR1 roof, supply to Tigard will occur through WR2. The duration of the construction for a new roof on WR1 is estimated to be 6 months.
Because of the critical function these two reservoirs provide to the Partnership in terms of capacity and operational redundancy, staff believe that the existing WR1 should be considered a mutually beneficial asset owned by the partner cities and costs for the planned roof replacement should be shared. The fact that WR1 is the facility supplying water to Tigard in normal operating mode or the source of supply when WR2 is offline was the basis for staff’s conclusion that a cost sharing arrangement for the repair of the roof was appropriate.
APPROACH TO ROOF REPLACEMENT
Design Services – The design firm Black & Veatch (BV) was retained through a competitive qualifications based selection process (QBS) to provide reservoir design services for WR2 and subsequently for design of improvements to WR1. Legal counsel for Lake Oswego has advised that amending BV’s existing design contract to include design of the new roof will comply with state and City public contracting rules, subject to the development of written findings supporting this approach.1
Land Use - The City’s planning department has advised that replacement of the reservoir roof would be subject to land use review/approval as a minor development. Any change to the roof geometry, removal of trees, or painting of the existing tank would also require modifications to prior land use approvals.
Construction – Over the next six months certain program activities including crack repair on WR2 and commissioning of the new filters at the WTP in April/May will restrict the City’s ability to take WR1 offline for roof replacement until after the 2016 peak summer supply season. Staff proposes to complete the design, secure land use approvals, develop construction documents and solicit competitive proposals from qualified contractors beginning early August 2016. A notice to proceed with construction would then follow in October. A six month duration extends the completion date to April 2017.
IGA Amendment – Staff recommends the existing Agreement and exhibits 1, 6, and 7 be amended to reflect the inclusion of WR1 into the Partnerships shared facilities mix. Whether Tigard contributes an additional “buy-in” amount toward the depreciated replacement value of WR1 in addition to sharing the cost for the roof repair, is a matter to be discussed by the OVC and their respective councils.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The existing WR1 has provided reliable, economical water storage service since 1982. Recent modifications made to this reservoir provided a unique opportunity to conduct a thorough investigation of the construction of the tank. The investigators observed construction defects in the tank roof and supporting columns, but believe the tank walls and floor to be in good condition and capable of continued service “…under all currently expected loading conditions.”
To provide redundant and reliable water storage for supply to Lake Oswego and Tigard, design of the new WR2 included a complex system of piping and valves that allow supply to Tigard to be maintained when WR1 or WR2 are out of service. This aspect of the WR2 design was not contemplated in 2008
1 See written findings attached as Exhibit ‘A’.
Memorandum Oversight Committee P a g e | 4
when the Agreement was created and entered into by the two cities, but is a reality today. Staff from both cities believe this reality justifies the inclusion of WR1 into the shared facilities mix for the Partnership and the sharing of costs for the roof replacement.
Based on the foregoing information, staff recommends the OVC:
Review and discuss this memorandum at the upcoming meeting.
Authorize staff to proceed with the design and land use permitting process.
Authorize staff to prepare documents necessary to amend the Agreement and specifically Exhibits 1, 6, and 7 to include WR1 in the Partnerships supply facilities.
Make recommendations to your respective councils supporting the proposed approach to replacing the reservoir roof.
Staff look forward to discussing this matter further with you at the upcoming January 11 meeting. In the meantime, if you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Attachments: Exhibit ‘A’ – Findings in support of a contract amendment
________________ Page 1
Findings in support of an amendment to a personal services contract with Black and Veatch Corporation for engineering services relating to construction of a new roof on the Waluga Reservoir No. 1 for the Lake Oswego-Tigard Water Partnership.
FINDINGS FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH BLACK AND VEATCH CORPORATION FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW ROOF ON THE
WALUGA RESERVOIR NO. 1 FOR THE LAKE OSWEGO-TIGARD WATER PARTNERSHIP WHEREAS, the cities of Lake Oswego and Tigard, pursuant to an Intergovernmental Cooperative Agreement (“Agreement”), are undertaking the planning, design, funding, and construction of improvements and upgrades to Lake Oswego’s water supply system that includes the design and construction of a new reinforced concrete water storage reservoir; and WHEREAS, the Agreement establishes the City of Lake Oswego (“City”) as the managing partner and delegates all contracting authority to the City for procurement of contracts for design and construction of the water supply improvements; and WHEREAS, pursuant to its delegated contracting authority and in accordance with Lake Oswego Public Contract Rule 102-0277, the City initiated a formal competitive proposal process to contract for engineering services for design and construction of a new concrete water storage reservoir (“Waluga Reservoir #2, WR2”); and WHEREAS, on September 6, 2011, the City contracted with Black and Veatch Corporation (“BV”) to provide design services and engineering services during construction for the planned new WR2; and WHEREAS, in April 2013, the original contract with BV was amended to include design and construction services for modifications to the City’s existing water storage reservoir (WR1), located immediately next to the planned new WR2; and WHEREAS, OAR 137-048-0200 authorizes the City Council of the City of Lake Oswego acting as the Lake Oswego Contract Review Board, to enter into a new public contract or contract amendment of an existing contract without initiating a new formal selection procedure if:
“….(A) The services consist of or are related to Architectural, Engineering, Photogrammetric Mapping, Transportation Planning or Land Surveying Services or Related Services that have been substantially described, planned or otherwise previously studied under an earlier Contract with the same Consultant and are rendered for the same Project as the Architectural, Engineering, Photogrammetric Mapping, Transportation Planning or Land Surveying Services or Related Services rendered under the earlier Contract;
(B) The Contracting Agency used either the formal selection procedure under OAR 137-048-0220 (Formal Selection Procedure) or the formal selection procedure applicable to selection of the Consultant at the time of original selection to select the Consultant for the earlier Contract; and
(C) The Contracting Agency makes written findings that entering into a Contract with the Consultant, whether in the form of an amendment to an existing Contract or a separate Contract for the additional scope of services, will:
(i) Promote efficient use of public funds and resources and result in substantial cost savings to the Contracting Agency; and,
________________ Page 2
Findings in support of an amendment to a personal services contract with Black and Veatch Corporation for engineering services relating to construction of a new roof on the Waluga Reservoir No. 1 for the Lake Oswego-Tigard Water Partnership.
(ii) Protect the integrity of the Public Contracting process and the competitive nature of the Procurement by not encouraging favoritism or substantially diminishing competition in the award of the Contract.”; and
WHEREAS, the Project Director for the Partnership has determined that the conditions described in OAR 137-048-0200(1)(d)(A)(B) above, are present and that the public interest is best served by making findings supporting an amendment to BV’s existing contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PROJECT DIRECTOR OF THE CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT OF AN AMENDMENT TO A PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH BLACK AND VEATCH CORPORATION FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW ROOF ON THE WALUGA RESERVOIR NO. 1 FOR THE LAKE OSWEGO-TIGARD WATER PARTNERSHIP
A. OAR 137-048-0200(1)(d)(C)(i) - Promote efficient use of public funds and resources and result in substantial cost savings to the Contracting Agency.
Findings:
a. Through the design, permitting, and construction of WR2 and related improvements to WR1, BV has developed an extensive knowledge of the City’s land use procedures, design standards, accounting procedures and document control systems and procedures as they relate to the design and construction of water supply and storage facilities for the Partnership.
b. It is unlikely that through a new formal solicitation of proposals, the City would receive responses from another firm possessing an equivalent body of local knowledge, expertise, and experience relating to reservoir design and construction in the City than that possessed by BV.
c. Avoiding a new formal selection procedure eliminates costs associated with such an undertaking and costs associated with “training” a new consultant in the standards and procedures adopted by the Partnership for the design and construction of supply facilities. Based on past similar efforts, the estimated cost to undertake a new formal selection procedure range from$25,000 to $50,000.
d. BV is currently under contract and can immediately mobilize to begin the design and land use permitting phase for the WR1 roof replacement. Undertaking a new formal selection procedure and entering into a contract with a different consultant would take approximately three months to complete. Such a delay in initiating the design would necessarily delay the land use permitting process and replacement of the roof.
B. OAR 137-048-0200(1)(d)(C)(ii) - Protect the integrity of the Public Contracting process and the competitive nature of the Procurement by not encouraging favoritism or substantially diminishing competition in the award of the Contract.
Findings:
a. The total budget for engineering design services and related engineering services during construction across the program is approximately $24,707,000. The estimated range of fees for design and services during construction relating to WR1 roof replacement is expected to
________________ Page 3
Findings in support of an amendment to a personal services contract with Black and Veatch Corporation for engineering services relating to construction of a new roof on the Waluga Reservoir No. 1 for the Lake Oswego-Tigard Water Partnership.
range from $175,000 to $250,000 representing approximately 0.7% to 1% of total design contract costs.
b. In response to a request for proposals for design services related to WR2, the City received two proposals from well-known local design firms. It is believed the response to the solicitation was due in large part to the fact that several local and national design firms had keener interest in competing for much larger design contracts for the water treatment plant and pipelines. Based on this prior outcome, the Project Director finds that the relatively small dollar value estimated for the roof replacement design work will likely not generate substantially more competition for the design contract than would have been generated had the roof replacement work been part of the original design scope of services.
1 2 3 Email: WTP Construc 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
Red = City CouncilPink = Website/Social Media
Lake Oswego Tigard WaterPartnership Calendar December 2015
SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY
4-5 PM Environmental Oreg Oregonian: Controversial La Email: West Linn Pipeline C
LO Review: City Notes: Pipe LO Council Digest: Water P
Email: Pipeline Construction Website: Crews set to begin
Website: Night construction Email: After-hours emergen
11-11:45 a.m. West Linn Co 10:30 a.m. Tour of WTP wit Email to WTP neighbors: Vi Website: Work at Trillium Cr
Postcard: Night Constructio Email: Special Lake Osweg Email: West Linn Pipeline C
Email to WTP neighbors: S Website: Night construction
6:00-7:00PM West Linn Nei Leadership LO Tour WTP & Email: West Linn Pipeline C
West Linn Tidings: CouncilDebates ControversialStaging Area for LOTproject
Email: Pipeline Construction
Website: Raw water pipe in s
LO Council Digest:Leadership LO Takes ABehind-the-Scenes Tour ofthe New WTP!
City offices closed 1/2 day City offices closed
2:15 pm Monthly Strategic C West Linn Tidings: The yearin review
Email: WTP Construction U City offices closed 1/2 day
Postcard: Construction Nois LO Council Digest: New rawwater pipe now in service!
Website: Another water prog
Notes
Orange = Meetings/Presentations
Brown = Materials/Tools
Blue = Media Purple = other
Green = TV © 2014 Vertex42.com
http://www.vertex42.com/calendars/perpetual-calendar.html
1 New Year's Day 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 ML King Day 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
LOTWP Outreach Calendar January 2016Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
City offices closed
West Linn pipelineemail update
5:30 pm OversightCommittee Meeting -LO
LO Pipelineconstruction update
WTP constructionupdate
6 - 7 p.m. West LinnNeighborhoodMeeting
West Linn pipelineemail update
City offices closed
2:15 pm MonthlyStrategicCommunicationsmeeting
LO Pipelineconstruction update
WTP constructionupdate
Notes
Red = City CouncilPink = Website/Social Media
Orange =Meetings/Presentations
Brown = Materials/Tools
Blue = Media Purple = otherGreen = TV/Video © 2011 Vertex42 LLC
[42] http://www.vertex42.com/calendars/
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 President's Day 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29
LOTWP Outreach Calendar February 2016Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
7:30 - 8:30 am WestLinn NeighborhoodMeeting
West Linn pipelineemail update
LO Pipelineconstruction update
WTP constructionupdate
City offices closed6:00 - 7:00 pm WestLinn NeighborhoodMeeting
West Linn pipelineemail update
2:15 pm MonthlyStrategicCommunicationsmeeting
LO Pipelineconstruction update
WTP constructionupdate
Red = City CouncilPink = Website/Social Media
Orange =Meetings/Presentations
Brown = Materials/Tools
Blue = Media Purple = otherGreen = TV/Video
Notes
© 2011 Vertex42 LLC
[42] http://www.vertex42.com/calendars/