landing slide category analysis. tv builds brands but does it drive response?

31
Landing Slide Category Analysi

Upload: cierra-stile

Post on 31-Mar-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

Landing Slide

Category Analysis

Page 2: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

Page 3: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

Historically There Have Been Perceived Obstacles to Using TV as a Response

Medium

Airtime Cost

Production costs

Lead times

Page 4: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

We Set Out to Examine the Relationship Between TV and Other Media

Page 5: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

…The Objective Of Which Was To Measure Media Channels Received and

Responsiveness To Them

Page 6: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

We can now quantify the impact by category of using TV as part of

multi-media campaigns to amplify the response

from consumers

Page 7: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

The story so far…

• TV (66%), direct mail (54%) and press (53%) are the most received communications in terms of recall

• TV ads (46%) are the most accepted of marketing channels, followed by press (34%) and then radio (30%)

• More adults expected that they would respond to a TV commercial (15%). This was followed by press with 14% and direct mail with 13%

Source: British Marketing Survey May – Jul 2010, 3,007 UK adults

Page 8: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

Men 25-44 are Especially Responsive to TV

7%

11%

11%

12%

14%

14%

19%

Posters

Radio

Leaflets through door

Internet

Newspaper/magazineads

Direct Mail

TV ads

Source: British Marketing Survey May – Jul 2010, 505 UK men 25-44

Will respond to in future

Page 9: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

Looking at Communication Channels in Combination Highlights the Strength of

TV

Radio

DMOnline

Print

TV

Page 10: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

TV significantly increases responsiveness for other media

Source: British Marketing Survey May – Jul 2010, 3,007 UK adults

+96%

+92%

+164%

Page 11: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

TV significantly increases responsiveness for other media for

the finance sector

Source: British Marketing Survey May – Jul 2010, 1,967 UK adults

+61%

+77%

+133%

Fin

ance

Page 12: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

Compare The Market - 100% Metric Growth From Integrated Media

Campaign

100% increase in

website traffic

100% increase in insurance

quotes

Cost per acquisition reduced by 73%

Source: WARC

Page 13: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

TV significantly increases the responsiveness for all other media for the

supermarkets sector

Source: British Marketing Survey May – Jul 2010, 1,536 UK adults

+76%

+41%

+107%

Sup

erm

arke

ts

Page 14: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

TV significantly increases the responsiveness for all other media for the

motoring sector

Source: British Marketing Survey May – Jul 2010, 544 UK adults

+43%

+46%

+267%

Mot

ors

Page 15: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

Citroen Saw Exceptional Results From Their Integrated Campaign For The C5

Source:Thinkbox

Success of TV in driving responses meant September Registrations were up 230%

Year-on-Year

Page 16: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

TV significantly increases the responsiveness for all other media for the

telecomms & utilities sector

Source: British Marketing Survey May – Jul 2010, 1,471 UK adults

+77%

+67%

+138%

Tel

ecom

ms

& u

tiliti

es

Page 17: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

T Mobile Saw Exceptional Results From Their Integrated Flexibility Campaign

Source:Thinkbox

Success of TV in driving responses meant initial £50k a month investment increased to

£300k a month

Page 18: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

TV significantly increases the responsiveness for all other media for the

charity sector

Source: British Marketing Survey May – Jul 2010, 1,391 UK adults

+59%

+66%

+194%

Cha

ritie

s

Page 19: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

RSPCA Saw Excellent Results From Their Integrated Animal Rescue

Campaign

Source:Thinkbox

Response rates up nearly 300% for the DRTV work

Return on media investment up more than 40% on previous work

Page 20: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

TV significantly increases the responsiveness for all other media for the

travel sector

Source: British Marketing Survey May – Jul 2010, 1,067 UK adults

+46%

+80%

+115%

Tra

vel

Page 21: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

National Express Saw Exceptional Results From Their Integrated Summer

Breeze Campaign

Source:DMA

£2million direct response

Return on media investment 350%

Page 22: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

TV significantly increases the responsiveness for all other media for the

homes & DIY sector

Source: British Marketing Survey May – Jul 2010, 1,100 UK adults

+38%

+34%

+110%

Hom

es&

DIY

Page 23: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

Colour Catcher Saw Exceptional Results From Their Integrated Campaign

Source:DMA

Sales lifted 300%

Post-campaign sales settled at 60% above baseline

Page 24: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

TV significantly increases the responsiveness for all other media for the

appliances & electronics sector

Source: British Marketing Survey May – Jul 2010, 587 UK adults

+45%

+58%

+106%

App

lianc

es &

ele

ctro

nics

Page 25: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

Thinkbox Evidence Echoes Our Findings - That TV Ads Elicit Direct Responses

Online

20%

30%

44%

Bought productonline

Bought product in-store

Researchedcompany/product

online

Source: Deloitte/YouGov September 2009

TV advertising drives on & offline behaviour

Page 26: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

Source: Thinkbox study with Mediacom 2009

In Fact TV Drives Nearly Half Of All Advertising Driven Responses

50% of all online

responses

Page 27: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

Not only have we the evidence to show the

amplification effect of TV, but there are many other

compelling reasons why TV is the perfect complement to

DM campaigns

Page 28: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

TV Airtime Is Better Value Than For Almost 20 Years

£0

£1

£2

£3

£4

£5

£6

£7

£8

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Co

st

Pe

r T

ho

us

an

d

Page 29: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

Producing Creative That Best Suits Your Needs Doesn’t Have To Cost The Earth

£6.50 £300.00

Page 30: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

Econometric Modelling Can Now Show Effect Of TV On Cost Of Other

Media

Source: Mediacom econometric modelling,

Page 31: Landing Slide Category Analysis. TV Builds Brands But Does It Drive Response?

In Summary..• Our research demonstrates there is a clear relationship between the use of TV and media channels to drive response

• TV ad campaigns in conjunction with press, direct mail or online activity uplift response by 92%, 96% and 164% respectively

• Many media agencies are successfully modelling impact of TV campaigns on their overall response rates

• TV airtime is better value than for almost 20 years

•TV production costs don’t have to be exorbitant – there are many examples of successful campaigns, inexpensively produced