landingin v republic

2
Landingin vs. Republic, GR No. 164948, June 27, 2006, (Special Proc eedings – Adoption: Consent and Abandonment) Facts: Diwata Ramos La ndingin, a US citien o! Fili pino parentage "led a petition !or t#e adoption o! $ minors, nat%ral c#ildren o! &an%el Ramos, t#e !ormer's brot #er, and Amelia Ramos S#e alleged in #er petition t#at w#en #er brot#er died, t#e c#ildren were le!t to t#eir paternal grandmot#er !or t#eir biological mot#er went to tal*, re+married t#ere and now #as c#ildren b* #er second marriage and no longer comm%nicates !rom t#e time s#e le!t %p to t#e instit%tion o! t#e adoption A!ter t#e paternal grandmot#er passed awa*, t#e minors were being s%pported b* t#e petitioner and #er c#ildren abroad and ga-e t#eir written consent !or t#eir adoption A Social .or/er o! t#e DS.D s%bmitted a Report recommending !or t#e adoption and narrated t#at Amelia, t#e biological mot#er was cons%lted wit# t#e adoption plan a nd a!ter weig#ing t#e bene"ts o! adoption to #er c#ildren, s#e -ol%ntaril* consented 0owe-er, petitioner !ailed to present t#e said social wor/er as witness and o1er in e-idence t#e -ol%ntar* consent o! Amelia Ramos to t#e adoption Petitioner also !ailed to present an* doc%mentar* e-idence to pro-e t#at Amelia assent to t#e adoption ss%e: .23 a petition !or adoption be granted wit#o%t t#e written consent o! t#e adoptee's biological mot#er 0eld: 3o Section 4, par (b) o! RA 566, pro-ides t#at t#e consent o! t#e biological parent(s) o! t#e c#ild, i! /nown is necessar* to t#e adoption 7#e written consent o! t#e legal g%ardian will s%8ce i! t#e written consent o! t#e biological parents cannot be obtained  7#e general r e9%ireme nt o! consent and notice to t#e nat%ral par ents is intended to protect t#e na t%ral parental relations#ip !rom %nwarr anted inter!er ence b* interlopers, and to ins%re t#e opport%nit* to sa!eg%ard t#e best interests o! t#e c#ild in t#e manner o! t#e proposed adoption  7#e written consent o! t#e bio logical parents is indi spensable !or t#e -alidit* o! t#e decree o! adoption ndeed, t#e nat%ral rig#t o! a parent to #is c#ild re9%ir es t#at #is consent m%st be obtained be!ore #is parental rig#ts and d%ties ma* be terminated and re+establis# in adopti-e parents n t#is case, petitioner !ailed to s%bmit t#e written consent o! Amelia Ramos to t#e adoption &oreo-e r, abandonment means neglect and re!%sal to per!orm t#e "lial and legal obligations o! lo-e and s%pport &erel* permitting t#e c#ild to remain !or a time %ndist%rbed in t#e care o! ot#ers is not s%c# abandonment 7 o dispense wit# t#e re9%irements o! consent, t#e abandonment m%st be s#own to #a-e eisted at t#e time o! adoption

Upload: karla-espinosa

Post on 01-Jun-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Landingin v Republic

8/9/2019 Landingin v Republic

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/landingin-v-republic 1/2

Landingin vs. Republic, GR No. 164948, June 27,2006,

(Special Proceedings – Adoption: Consent and Abandonment)

Facts: Diwata Ramos Landingin, a US citien o! Filipino parentage "led apetition !or t#e adoption o! $ minors, nat%ral c#ildren o! &an%el Ramos, t#e!ormer's brot#er, and Amelia Ramos S#e alleged in #er petition t#at w#en#er brot#er died, t#e c#ildren were le!t to t#eir paternal grandmot#er !ort#eir biological mot#er went to tal*, re+married t#ere and now #as c#ildrenb* #er second marriage and no longer comm%nicates !rom t#e time s#e le!t%p to t#e instit%tion o! t#e adoption A!ter t#e paternal grandmot#er passedawa*, t#e minors were being s%pported b* t#e petitioner and #er c#ildrenabroad and ga-e t#eir written consent !or t#eir adoptionA Social .or/er o! t#e DS.D s%bmitted a Report recommending !or t#eadoption and narrated t#at Amelia, t#e biological mot#er was cons%lted wit#t#e adoption plan and a!ter weig#ing t#e bene"ts o! adoption to #er c#ildren,s#e -ol%ntaril* consented0owe-er, petitioner !ailed to present t#e said social wor/er as witness ando1er in e-idence t#e -ol%ntar* consent o! Amelia Ramos to t#e adoptionPetitioner also !ailed to present an* doc%mentar* e-idence to pro-e t#atAmelia assent to t#e adoption

ss%e: .23 a petition !or adoption be granted wit#o%t t#e written consent o!t#e adoptee's biological mot#er

0eld: 3o Section 4, par (b) o! RA 566, pro-ides t#at t#e consent o! t#ebiological parent(s) o! t#e c#ild, i! /nown is necessar* to t#e adoption 7#ewritten consent o! t#e legal g%ardian will s%8ce i! t#e written consent o! t#ebiological parents cannot be obtained 7#e general re9%irement o! consent and notice to t#e nat%ral parents isintended to protect t#e nat%ral parental relations#ip !rom %nwarrantedinter!erence b* interlopers, and to ins%re t#e opport%nit* to sa!eg%ard t#ebest interests o! t#e c#ild in t#e manner o! t#e proposed adoption 7#e written consent o! t#e biological parents is indispensable !or t#e -alidit*o! t#e decree o! adoption ndeed, t#e nat%ral rig#t o! a parent to #is c#ildre9%ires t#at #is consent m%st be obtained be!ore #is parental rig#ts and

d%ties ma* be terminated and re+establis# in adopti-e parents n t#is case,petitioner !ailed to s%bmit t#e written consent o! Amelia Ramos to t#eadoption&oreo-er, abandonment means neglect and re!%sal to per!orm t#e "lial andlegal obligations o! lo-e and s%pport &erel* permitting t#e c#ild to remain!or a time %ndist%rbed in t#e care o! ot#ers is not s%c# abandonment 7odispense wit# t#e re9%irements o! consent, t#e abandonment m%st be s#ownto #a-e eisted at t#e time o! adoption

Page 2: Landingin v Republic

8/9/2019 Landingin v Republic

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/landingin-v-republic 2/2