language abgdezhqiklmnxoprstufcyw top left: greek
DESCRIPTION
What is language? A form of communication that is a systematic set of arbitrary symbols shared among a group and passed on from generation to generationTRANSCRIPT
LANGUAGE abgdezhqiklmnxoprstufcyw Top left: Greek
Bottom left: Cherokee Middle:Arabic Top right: Russian What is
language? A form of communication that is a systematic set of
arbitrary symbols shared among a group and passed on from
generation to generation A form of Communication
What is Conveyed or transmitted? Other forms of
communication:
Direct:facial expression, body stance, gesture, tone of voice
Indirect:writing, algebra, music, painting, signs System sounds
system of sounds that when put together according to certain rules
results in meanings Systematic nature of language is usually
unconscious arbitrary symbols Rabbit Conejo Usagi Kanninchen
Cuniglio
associations between words/sounds and the things they represent are
arbitrary not natural or self-evident meaning. meaning provided by
tradition and consensus Because symbols are arbitrary they have to
be learned. Rabbit Conejo Usagi Kanninchen Cuniglio Eng Sp Jp Gr It
grab hold of this look at this lobster Descriptive symbols Shared
profoundly social we use language to send social messages
about
who we are where we come from who we associate with we may judge a
person's background, character, and intentions based upon the
person's language, dialect, or, in some instances, even the choice
of a single word. Eh! Sociolingusitics the study of language(s) in
relation to society. The Social Uses of Language Language
expresses, symbolizes and maintains the social order Social
variables influence a person's use of language Class Gender Status
Age National/ethnic/regional identity education A child learning a
language also acquires social competence i.e. the ability to
recognize and interpret the social activity taking place. e.g.
opening or closing a conversation taking conversational turns
Social Identity language use is fundamental to the creation and
expression of social identity and difference. the social prestige
or stigma attached to linguistic varieties often supports and
expresses the value attached to social identities. Eg. the Queens
English vs Cockney English distinctive aspects of language from
pronunciation to syntax, to slang, i.e. any aspect of linguistic
code Glottal stop City = Ciywater= wa'er Dropped h house = ouse,
hammer = ammer TH fronting three = freebath = barf Vowel
loweringdinner = dinna,marrow= marra Least Prestigious form
associated with low status, low education.
Most prestigious form will be that of the most powerful group in
society because this group controls education and the media.
Prestige form often forms the standard language a national language
permits internal cohesion and fosters external distinction forms a
powerful base for national identity minority languages serve to
mark off ethnic difference within multiethnic societies.
Restoration of languages in decline may be taken as an aspect of
ethnic revival eg. Irish
English was the language of social prestige in the mid 16th century
when the English colonized Ireland and Irish went into decline
Irish was the language of the poor In the mid 19th century Irish
nationalist movement emerged and sought to encourage and revive the
original language part of a national movement which led to the
Irish Free State Irish was made the official language support for
it in the form of compulsory education, bilingual publications etc.
90% of Paraguans speak Guarani, yet until 1992 Spanish was the
official language, the language of prestige and was used in
government, schools, and commerce. Guarani is used in informal
settings with friends and relatives, in talking with status
inferiors. Guaran raises feelings of pride and linguistic loyalty
in the people EBONICS A slang dialect used by certain groups of the
African-American community. Yo, Big Daddy upstairs, You be chillin
So be yo hood You be sayin' it, I be doin' it In this here hood and
yo's Gimme some eats And cut me some slack, Blood Sos I be doin' it
to dem dat diss meDon't be pushing me into no jive Ang keep dem
crips away Cause you always be da man, G Straight up. Aa-men.
English First English First is a national, non-profit grassroots
lobbying organization founded in The goal is to Make English
America's official language Indexicals items that mark features of
the speakers and for the hearers identity include pronouns, kinship
terms, forms of address, and speech levels they create and sustain
a relational social identity The grammar of English names
Three word-classes: Title(Mr, Prof, ) Given name (John, Mary, )
Family name (Holdsworth, Smith, ) Normal order: Title Given Family
Mr John Smith Possible combinations:
T G F Professor Christopher Holdsworth T FProfessor Holdsworth G F
Christopher /Chris Holdsworth GChristopher / Chris TDoctorok for
some titles FHoldsworth NB: old-fashioned! Not:T F Professor Chris
ungrammatical!! Terms of address Who am I? Christopher John
Holdsworth
Christopher Holdsworth Chris Holdsworth Holdsworth, Christopher
Christopher John Professor Holdsworth Dr. Holdsworth Dr C. J
Holdsworth Holdsworth Christopher Chris Dad What contextual
elements influence the form used?
Terms of address What contextual elements influence the form used?
Is the formality of the setting relevant? Is the kinship relation
or other social relationship relevant? Is age or generation
relevant in selecting the appropriate form? Is relative status or
rank relevant in selecting an appropriate term? The
sociolinguistics of English names
Classification:Sex (Mr/Mrs; John/Mary) The Solidarity hierarchy The
Power hierarchy Solidarity relations to a:
Stranger Acquaintance Friend/relative Power relations to a:
Superior Equal Subordinate To a close equal: a young friend To a
close equal: an old friend To an even closer equal To a close
subordinate: a child Even more subordinate: a pet To equal
acquaintances To a superior stranger What name do you use? To
superior stranger: TF (Mr Smith)
To subordinate relative:G(John) To superior relative:T (Dad) To
equal acquaintance: G To superior acquaintance:? Inequality reigns
dentist is superior to patient
teacher is superior to student salesman is subordinate to customer
Power Semantic Determines which pronoun will be used on the basis
of the difference in social status (or power) between the speaker
and addressee. wealth, age, sex, institutionalised role in the
church, the state, the army, the family ... The T of "intimacy"
versus the V of "formality" (French tu or vous) Based on an
asymmetrical relation and is non-reciprocal. Does naming matter? To
the hearer: Yes. To the speaker: Yes.
A wrong choice can offend or hurt. Decisions are difficult. The
better you speak English, the more a wrong choice will offend.
Forms of address vary with the nature of the relationship between
speakers the reciprocal use of first names generally signifies an
informal intimate relationship between two persons a title and a
last name used reciprocally indicates a more formal or businesslike
relationship between individuals of roughly equal status
nonreciprocal use of first names and titles is reserved for
speakers who recognize a marked difference in status between
themselves this status can be a function of age (as when a child
refers to her mother's friend as Mrs Miller and is in returned
referred to as Sally) or it can be along occupational lines as when
as person refers to his boss by title and last name and is in
return addressed as John Politeness Use of polite language was one
aspect of the enactment of social hierarchy in the Thai court
politeness entailed the correct use of formal modes of addressing
royalty with linguistic terms that exalted royalty and humbled
those of lower status. The first person pronoun used when
addressing the king meant `I the slave of the Lord Buddha' second
person meant `the dust beneath the sole of your august feet'meaning
that the speaker did not dare address the king directly but to the
dirt on the floor. The Thai person who addresses his comments to
the dirt beneath the king's shoe is invoking a cultural image of
`low status' but he is also indexing relative identity in the
social interaction of discourse. Language and gender Three
issues:
Do women and men speak a different language / genderlect? Do women
and men behave differently in conversations? How sexist is the
English language? Do Men and Women Use Language Differently?
Who talks more? Who interrupts more? Who introduces topics? Who
asks questions? Who is more supportive? Men and women in
conversation
Who talks more? Stereotype says that women talk more than men
Proverbs: A woman's tongue wags like a lamb's tail. Foxes are all
tail and women are all tongue. The North Sea will sooner be found
wanting in water than a woman be at a loss for a word. But In
numerous studies it has been shown that it is the men who do most
of the talking. Who Interrupts and overlaps more?
Survey of faculty meeting X interrupts Y Inter-ruptions Over-laps %
of utterances that involved interruptions and overlaps MM 43% 35%
FF 57% 45% MF 96% 100% FM 4% 0% Zimmerman and West (1975) Turn
taking behaviour in mixed sex conversations
Turn-length: men take more and longer turns interruptions: mainly
by men Silence (after speakers turn before addressee continues):
women's silence far longer back-channels: (e.g. um hmm, oh really?)
women use more (supportive behaviour) questions: 70 per cent by
women, e.g. as a means for topic introduction ("Dya know what?")
topics: men tried 29 times and succeed 28 times; women tried 47
times and succeeded 17 times women talk to other women about family
and interpersonal matters; while men talk to male friends about
cars, sports, work, motorcycles, carpentry, and politics women are
more sensitive to social connotations of speech (Tannen 1992: 75)
Genderlects What a divine idea! What a terrific idea! Oh dear!
Youve put the peanut butter in the fridge again!
Genderlects Shit! Youve put the peanut butter in the fridge again!
Oh dear! Youve put the peanut butter in the fridge again! Male
speakers often use socially disfavored variants of sociolinguistic
variables while women tend to avoid these in favor of socially more
favored variants. women's language which consists of polite
deferential ways of speaking which ultimately subordinate women in
society THE CUP Give me the cup The Cup Could you please give me
the cup Would you give me the cup? Give me the cup, wont you Can
you give me the cup? I cant reach that cup I want that cup Can you
get that cup for me? I need that cup Some explanations for
differences
Subordinate groups must be polite Womans role as guardian of
societys values Vernacular forms express machismo Women have less
access to power and status: theymake up for this by their
preferences for the prestige (standard) linguistic forms. This is
thought togive them respect and some status. Women and men are
socialised in different ways which is reflected in their language
use patterns. women may be more status conscious than men because:
society sets more standards for women and Womens typical activities
do not confer status itself. this insecurity offers a parallel with
the insecurity of the lower middle class (7) Women and men have
different networks which lead to women and men using different ways
of speaking. Japanese differences Womens form Mens form otoosan
oyaji father
onaka hara stomach oishii umai delicious taberu kuu eat Sexism in
the English language
The feminine as a marked category dog - bitch (masc. = neutral
term) lion - lioness (masc. = neutral term) actor - actress (fem.
nowadays often avoided) manager - manageress(fem. suggests lower
status, e.g. of laundrette but not of bank) King queen (fem.
Derogartory) Generally, masculine terms often unmarked in the sense
that it is the feminine term that takes an ending only the
masculine term can be used both for males and females. Semantic
derogation/pejoration
Semantic derogation: words referring to women tend to take on
derogatory or pejorative meanings through time What was the
original meaning of these words? Woman in charge of spinning A
young child of either sex A lover of either sex A fellow of either
sex housewife Term of endearment for young women a female sovereign
ruler a youthful female person; a woman who has power, authority,
or ownership Queen Hussy Spinster Tart Girl Mistress Wench Whore
Harlot Generic use of man and he
The term generic means referring generally (e.g. The tiger is a
friendly beast to refer to tigers in general) The words he and man
are sometimes used to refer to humans in general -man used as a
kind of suffix (Bolinger 1980, quoted by Graddol and Swann 1989:
103) Lexicon: lexical Asymetries
Mistressvmaster queen v King Spinstervbachelor Witch v warlock
governess v governor Lady v lord Cow v bull the lexical bias
reflects a social bias in the culture What happens when you try to
correct lexical bias? Once alternatives have been offered, each
speaker is faced with a choice of which form to use. Which word
seems to go with each picture?
taketa naluma consonants are sonorants perceived as softer and more
feminine
Sound Symbolism: The vast majority of people pair taketa with the
angular illustration and naluma with the curved one. taketa Because
the consonants are hard it is perceived as harder and more
masculine naluma consonants are sonorants perceived as softer and
more feminine Clorox, a hard-working laundry product Chanel, a
perfume Does Language determine how we Perceive the world?
Is Our thinking and Our Behaviour determined by our language?
Sapir-Whorf hypothesis
'Human beings do not live in the objective world alone, nor alone
in the world of social activity as ordinarily understood, but are
very much at the mercy of the particular language which has become
the medium of expression for their society. It is quite an illusion
to imagine that one adjusts to reality essentially without the use
of language and that language is merely an incidental means of
solving specific problems of communication and reflection. The fact
of the matter is that the "real world" is to a large extent
unconsciously built up on the language habits of the group.' 1929
Sapir-Whorf hypothesis
two basic principles: 1. linguistic determinism the language we use
to some extent determines the way in which we view and think about
the world Strong determinism language actually determines thought,
that language and thought are identical. Weak determinism thought
is merely affected by or influenced by our language, 2. linguistic
relativity
distinctions encoded in one language are unique to that language
alone. Eg. The Colour spectrum, is a continuum, each colour
gradually blending into the next; there are no sharp boundaries.
But we impose boundaries; we talk of red, orange, yellow, green,
blue, indigo, and violet. these discriminations are arbitrary and
indeed in other languages the boundaries are different Dani (New
Guinea) have only two colour categories
Colour Terms Dani (New Guinea) have only two colour categories mili
which means dark, cold colours such as black mola which means warm,
bright colours such as white languages with three colour terms add
Red those with four add yellow English has 11 (red, yellow, black,
white, green, blue, purple, pink, brown, orange, grey) Sapir-Whorf
hypothesis
Sapir Whorf says habitual thought might be influenced, if not
determined, by linguistic structures. We perceive the world through
language - the colors we see is predetermined by what our culture
prepares us to see do we see blue and green colours because our
language has two different names for these two neighbouring parts
of the colour spectrum? Can the Tiv perceive or distinguish between
Red and yellow? Sapir-Whorf hypothesis
The physiology of our eyes is essentially the same. All normal
humans share similar sense perceptions of color despite differences
in color terminology from one language to another. People can see
subtle gradations of color and can comprehend other ways of
dividing up the spectrum of visible light. However, as a society's
economy and technology increase in complexity, the number of color
terms usually also increases. i.e. the spectrum of visible light
gets subdivided into more categories. As the environment changes,
culture and language typically respond by creating new terminology
to describe it. Which belong together? The green things and the
blue things Or the circles and the bars ? Carroll and Casagrande
looked at Navaho Indians
they place great stress on form and shape, rigidity and material
from which an object is constructed they gave three groups of
children one Navaho speaking one English speaking one bilingual
showed them a green stick,a green rope and a blue rope asked them
which objects went together Navaho speakers said objects with the
same form i.e. ropes went together English speakers categorize by
colour rather than form put green stick and green rope together
confirms the relativity of language hypothesis Language and Gender
Concept
do children learn to recognize themselves as boys or girls when
their language emphasizes gender? Alexander Guiora looked at
children in Hebrew speaking homes, Finnish, speaking homes and
English speaking homes Hebrew has the most gender emphasis of the
three languages - nouns are either masculine or feminine and even
second person and plurals are differentiated by gender English
emphasizes gender less, only in third person singular his and hers
Finish emphasizes gender least, only man and woman convey gender
Consistent with the idea that language may influence thought Hebrew
speaking children acquired the concept of gender identity the
earliest on the average and Finnish speaking children the latest
Criticisms of Sapir Whorf
If language determines thought then language must precede thought -
but even pre-linguistic babies can think - not all activities
involve language but do involve thought Differences are not in
thought but in ways of expressing the same thoughts if this were
not so then it would be impossible to translate Sapir-Whorf
hypothesis not generally accepted that language channels thought
general view now is that language sets up a filter between the
human being and the world he or she perceives that heightens
certain perceptions and dims others.