language and cognition colombo, june 2011 day 1 introduction to linguistic theory, part 2

32
Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Post on 21-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Language and CognitionColombo, June 2011

Day 1Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Page 2: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Plan

• Identifying syntactic categories• Words and morphemes• Brown’s stages of morphosyntactic

development• MLU (mean length of utterance)

Page 3: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Nouns• can have a plural –s inflection• cannot take any of the following inflectional and derivational

affixes:present tense –ingcomparative –ernegating un- or in-adverbializing –lynominalizing –ness

• can be premodified by adjectives or a determiner• can complete a sentence like We have no ------

• Semantic information: mass nouns vs. count nouns

Page 4: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Verbs• can have a present tense –ing inflection• some can take an un- or in- negating prefix (e.g. untie,

invalidate)• cannot take any of the following inflectional or derivational

affixes:plural –scomparative –eradverbializing –lynominalizing –ness

• can occur after infinitival to• can complete a sentence like They / it can ------• can be modified by an adverb• can be transitive, intransitive or ditransitive

Page 5: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Adjectives• can take the following derivational affixes:

comparative –er negating prefixes un- or in- adverbializing suffix –lynominalizing suffix –ness

• cannot take the following inflectional affixes: plural –spresent tense –ing

• can occur after very (if gradable)• can be stacked• can occur in structures like She is very ------

Page 6: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Adverbs• tend to end in –ly• can take the following derivational affixes:

comparative –ernegating un- or in- nominalizing –ness

• cannot take the following inflectional and derivational affixes:plural –spresent tense –ing

adverbializing –ly

• can occur after very (if gradable)• can appear in structures like She ran very -----• cannot appear in structures like She is very ----• can postmodify the verb in structures like She behaved ----

He treats her ----

Page 7: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Determiners• premodify nouns, and determine the referential or

quantificational properties of the noun expressions that follow them

• determiners come in two main types, defined semantically:referential determiners – tell us about referential properties of the nounarticles: the, a possessives: my, your, hisdemonstratives: this, that, these, thosesome other things – e.g. both, either

• quantificational determiners – tell us about quantificational properties of the noun

some, many, most, every, all

Page 8: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Determiners• determiners cannot be stacked ( so are not like adjectives)• sometimes two determiners can appear together, but such constructions

are very restricted and seem to be limited to the co-occurrence of a quantifier and another Det

the many books, all my children

• determiners (apart from possessives and the) seem to have individual restrictions as to the kinds of noun they can modify – again, this shows that Det are not like Adj:

a modifies a singular count nounmuch modifies a mass nounseveral modifies a plural count nounmore modifies a plural count noun or a mass noundemonstratives agree for number

Page 9: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Pronouns• the most familiar kind is personal pronouns: these do not = people • they encode the grammatical properties of PERSON and NUMBER, and they also

vary with regard to GENDER and CASE

PERSON NUMBER GENDER CASENOMINATIVE ACCUSATIVE

1 Singular M / F I me1 Plural M / F we us2 Sing / Pl M / F you you3 Singular Masculine he him3 Singular Feminine she her3 Singular Neutral it it3 Plural M / F they them

Page 10: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Pronouns• so pronouns do not pick out an entity in the world, like nouns do; they

encode bundles of grammatical features

• some words belong to the class of both determiners and pronouns; because most of these do not change their form depending on their use, we have to use substitution to decide which class they belong to in a particular sentence

• Some children were ill / Some were ill• Both cats were sick / Both were sick• I prefer this book / I prefer this• I don’t have any cigarettes / I don’t have any• No student failed the test / None failed the test• It’s my teddy / It’s mine

Page 11: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Auxiliaries

• can only be followed by another verb• mark grammatical properties of the following verb:

tenseaspectvoicemood

• can undergo inversion to form yes/no questions • can be directly negated by a following not• can appear in sentence-final ‘tag questions’

Page 12: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Infinitival to• infinitival to is like an Aux as well: Chomsky compared it to

the auxiliary should– they appear in the same positions in a clause– they both take an infinitival verb as a complement– they both allow ellipsis of their complement

• infinitival to is not like a preposition: it takes a verb phrase as its complement (P takes a nominal element), and it can’t be modified by right or straight

• infinitival to and Aux are both labelled I, or INFL (for INFLECTIONAL ELEMENT)

Page 13: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Complementizers• are grammatical markers that indicate a complement

clauseThe report that war had broken outI don’t know whether she smokesI am anxious for you to do well

• they indicate whether the clause they introduce is tensed or not

• they mark illocutionary force of the complement clause – i.e. its semantic / pragmatic function:

declarativeinterrogativeresultative

Page 14: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Complementizers

• not like prepositions: they take a whole clause as a complement (prepositions take a nominal complement)

I am hoping for a pay rise = PI am hoping for you to enjoy this class = C

• not like determiners: phonological evidenceI’m not sure that you did it rightI want that book

Page 15: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Prepositions• note that prepositions fall in many ways between the

lexical vs functional divide• many prepositions do have antonyms, and therefore

could be thought of as having descriptive content (e.g. under/over, to/from, with/without, in/out, up/down)

• but many prepositions do not have antonyms, and do not seem to pick out any particular spatial or temporal relationship; they perform a function, such as case assignment (e.g. of, by, for…..)

• prepositions are a closed class

Page 16: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Prepositions

• do not vary their form, so cannot take any of the following inflectional and derivational affixes:

plural –spresent tense –ingcomparative –ernegating prefixes un- or in-adverbializing –lynominalizing –ness

• can often be intensified by a word like right or straight

• can be transitive or intransitive

Page 17: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Substitution

• When you’re not sure what kind of phrase or word an item is, use substitution

• This just means taking a word or phrase you are sure of, and inserting it in place

• If you end up with a grammatical sentence, you know the category of the item you’re working with

• If not, try something else (morphosyntactic evidence, semantic or phonological information, educated guesswork…)

Page 18: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Exercise• Identify the word class of each of the italicized words in the

following sentences. Give reasons for your analysis and identify any problems.

1. This hedgehog is eating a beetle. 2. The car came round the corner. 3. The moon is round tonight. 4. The exams have come round again. 5. I gave you a book for her. 6. Fred asked if he should explain things to her. 7. He is anxious for her to do well. 8. He must really squirm. 9. Have you got any idea what that was about? 10. Karen said that she hadn’t got any.

Page 19: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Change of pace…

• We’re starting to have some background and a vocabulary that allows us to discuss problems of language in a relatively technical way

• Before we continue to develop those tools, we’re going to lay some foundations for putting all this information into perspective

• On to some background/revision about child language acquisition, especially with reference to morphology and syntax

Page 20: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Roger Brown – Studied Adam, Eve and Sarah– Wrote: “A First Language” (1973)– MLU– 14 grammatical morphemes– Trained ~90% of the top language

acquisition researchers

• Divided the language development into 5 stages

• (mainly focused on I, II)

Page 21: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Brown’s five stages

• I: 1.0 -- 2.0 MLU• II: 2.0 -- 2.5 MLU• III: 2.5 – 3.0 MLU• IV: 3.0 – 3.5 MLU• V: 3.5 – 4.0 MLU

Page 22: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

One-word speech

• FIrst utterances are single words– plus occasional “unanalyzed” phrases– Look-at-that Open-the-door

• rarely use words simply for naming objects• Often expresses relations and predicates

(aboutness)• “Daddy” = Daddy’s slippers• When using language in everyday speech we do

not simply name things, but we say things about them.

Page 23: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Semantic Relations in 1-word stage

• POSSESSION: “Daddy” (=slippers)• IMPERATIVE “Open” = open the jar

“blow” = blow my nose• NEGATIVE “no” = negate actions• LOCATION “down” = getting down

from high chair• RECURRENCE “more”• DISAPPEARANCE “allgone”

Page 24: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Stage 1

• MLU = 1.75 : First Word Combinations• Productive use of combinations• Lack of inflection – MLU (morphemes) = MLU (Words)

• Lack of function words

• Assignment: Calculate MLU for one of the Adam files in CLASSWEB

Page 25: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Stage 2

• MLU = 2.25 : Development of inflections• MLU (morphemes) > MLU (words)• Telegraphic

Page 26: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Telegraphic Speech

• Tends to be missing the functors (= closed class words = grammatical morphemes)

– Redundant– Have very little semantic content– Children focus on meaning (?)– only use content words

Page 27: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

2-Word Combinations

want daddy Daddy gowant that truck gowant here that upwant more mommy up

Page 28: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Acquisition Order for Grammatical Morphemes (Brown, 1973)

Order Morpheme Example1 Present Progressive I driving2-3 Prepositions in, on4 Plural balls5 Irregular Past Tense broke, fell6 Possessive Daddy's chair7 Uncontractible Copula This is hot8 Articles a, the9 Regular past tense She walked10 3rd person present tense, reg He works11 3rd preson present tense, irreg She does12 Uncontractible auxilliary Ross is winning13 Contractible copula He's a clown14 Contractible auxiliary She's drinking

Page 29: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

14 Grammatical Morphemes

• Development of the closed class - Brown’s 14 morphemes.

• 90% obligatory contexts• consistency• Parental frequency - not correlated• semantic & syntactic complexity - yes

Page 30: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

90% Obligatory Contexts

Page 31: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

Calculating MLU• MLU is based on the average length of a child’s

sentences• The length is determined by morphemes rather

than by words• What does addition of a morpheme indicate?• MLU calculation procedure:– Transcribe children’s conversation– Divide the conversation into utterances– Divide the utterances into morphemes– Count the number of morphemes in the first 100

utterances, then divide the total by 100

Page 32: Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 1 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 2

MLU calculations

• Speech sample: • “Mommy, want cookie. No dinner! Drink

juice.”

• How many utterances?• How many morphemes?• What is the MLU?