lao budget, pensions, and eraf legislative analyst’s office september 24, 2012
TRANSCRIPT
LAO
Budget, Pensions, and ERAF
Legislative Analyst’s Office
September 24, 2012
www.lao.ca.gov
LAO
Today
2012-13 State Budget Pension Changes Issues Related to ERAF
• Insufficient• Excess• Negative• All at the same time . . .
2
LAO
LAO Staff
Chas Alamo Property and sales tax forecasts
Brian Uhler Property tax allocation, RDA, and local government issues
3
LAO
What Is the LAO?
Created in 1941 Nonpartisan, Independent Staff to the
Legislature Provides Fiscal and Policy Analysis—
Particularly on Budget-Related Matters
4
LAO
May Revision 2012
DOF: 2011-12 to End in Deficit• Fourth Year In a Row
State Faced $15.7 Budget Gap for 2012-13• Total State 2011-12 Revenues $86 Billion
5
LAO
Why Do Deficits Reappear Each Year?
6
An Overreliance on Temporary Solutions
LAO
Basic Contributors
Poor Budgeting Practices Impact of Great Recession Volatile Revenue Structure
7
LAO
The State’s General Fund:2012-13 Revenues
8
LAO
Actions to Close the 2012-13 Budget Gap
9
(In Billions)
Amount
Tax Revenues From Proposition 30 $8.5
Related Proposition 98 Increase -2.9
Other Revenues 0.4
Expenditure Actions 4.6
Borrowing/Funding Shifts/One-Time Revenues 5.8
Total Solutions $16.4
LAO
New State Tax Revenues
$6 Billion Average Annual Revenues Through 2016-17
Revenues Could Change Significantly From Year to Year
10
LAO
“Trigger” Reductions If Proposition 30 Not in Effect
11
(In Billions)
Amount
Proposition 98 $5.4
University of California/California State University 0.5
Other Reductions 0.1
LAO
Comparison of Two Tax Initiatives
Proposition 30 Proposition 38
Taxes affected PIT and sales PIT
Highest PIT rate increase 3% 2.2%
Revenues raised (in billions, full year)
$6 $10 - $11
2012-13 trigger cuts if measure takes effect?
No Yes
Operative time period 7 years (2012-18) 12 years (2013-24)
12
LAO
Key Things to Watch: Risks in 2012-13 Budget Plan
Proposition 30—$8.5 billion RDA funds—$3.2 Billion Revenues
13
LAO
November LAO Fiscal Forecast
Forecast Revenues for Five Years Forecast Expenditures for Five Years Subtract
14
LAO
A Christmas Carolby Charles Dickens
15
LAO
Pensions — AB 340
Moved Fast• Proposed August 28th
• Approved by Legislature on August 31st • Amended by AB 197 on August 31st
“The outline of the changes is clear. Many details are not.”
16
LAO
AB 340 Applies to
Most State Employees • Except UC and Judges
Most Local Employees• Including All in PERS or a 1937 Act System
Excludes Charter Cities • In an Independent Retirement System
• Such as Los Angeles, San Diego and San Francisco
17
LAO
Major Provisions
Current Employees• Increases Contributions
Future Employees• Reduces Benefits• Caps Benefits for High Income Employees
Employer• Prohibits Certain Practices That Have
Increased Unfunded Pension Liabilities
18
LAO
Current Employees
50/50 Cost Split “Standard”• Most state employees meet standard
In 2018, Allows Local CalPERS and 1937 Act Employers (After Bargaining)• Imposes additional employee cost obligations • Caps may limit ability to reach 50/50 standard
No Purchase of Airtime
19
LAO
Future Employees Must Work Longer to Receive Same Benefits
Example—Future Local Safety Workers• Many currently retire at age 54 after 25 years
and get 75 percent of final pay• Under AB 340, must work to age 57 to receive
same pension
Most Differentials: 3 to 5 Years Final Comp Based on 3 Years of Base Pay
With Income Cap
20
LAO
Graceful Pause For Questions
Or to Turn Microphone Over to Brian Uhler to Talk About ERAF
21
LAO
May 2012 Unrealistic Assumptions K-14 Redevelopment Funds
22
(In Millions)
LAO
ERAF Madness
Legislative Analyst’s Office
www.lao.ca.gov
September 24, 2012
LAO
Topics Covered
What is meant by excess ERAF and insufficient ERAF?
How might excess and insufficient ERAF be affected by RDA dissolution?
Why do we care?
24
LAO
Background: ERAF
Established in 1992. $7.3 billion annual revenues. Repurposed to pay for VLF swap and triple
flip.
25
LAO
Background: VLF Swap and Triple Flip
State changes to local government VLF and sales taxes created need for backfill.
Additional property taxes backfill for lost VLF and sales tax revenues.
Backfill is paid from ERAF and school district property taxes.
26
LAO
Background: RDA Dissolution
Former RDA property tax revenues and assets distributed to local governments.
State’s 2012-13 budget assumes state savings of $3.2 billion.
27
LAO
What Is Excess ERAF?
ERAF revenues may exceed local school district funding needs.
Excess ERAF revenues are returned to contributing local governments.
Distributions of excess ERAF are made before VLF swap and triple flip.
28
LAO
Example: Excess ERAF Calculation
29
LAO
RDA Dissolution Will Increase Excess ERAF
Distributions of RDA resources to schools will decrease need for ERAF funding.
Excess ERAF distributions will increase.
30
LAO
Example: Excess ERAF Calculation After RDA Dissolution
31
LAO
Implications for State Budget
Increase in excess ERAF distributions reduces state savings.
State budget does not account for these lost savings.
32
LAO
Legislative Action on Excess ERAF
AB 1484• Included a provision that prohibited growth in
excess ERAF due to RDA dissolution.
SB 1030• Repealed the above mentioned provision of
AB 1484.• Awaiting Governor’s signature/veto.
33
LAO
What Is Insufficient ERAF?
Property taxes designated for VLF swap and triple flip backfill may be inadequate.
No mechanism in place to provide additional funding.
Ratio of basic aid to non-basic aid school districts a primary factor.
34
LAO
RDA Dissolution Could Increase Instances of Insufficient ERAF
More schools likely to become basic aid with distribution of RDA resources.
Large increase in basic aid school districts could result in insufficient ERAF.
35
LAO
Legislative Actions on Insufficient ERAF
Amador County• Most school districts are basic aid, inadequate
funding for VLF swap and triple flip.• State provided funding of $1.5 million in
2012-13 only.
Yearly allocations in state budget currently the only remedy for insufficient ERAF.
36
LAO
Issues to Be Addressed Going Forward
Limited capacity at the state level to predict new cases:• Uncertainty surrounding RDA dissolution.• Lack of firsthand knowledge of local
conditions.• Data limitations.
No ongoing policy regarding insufficient ERAF.
37