laporan keanggotaan pt mustika minanusa aurora · pdf filept mustika minanusa aurora semester...

PT Mustika Minanusa Aurora Semester Report of Seafood Savers Membership

Summary of aquaculture improvement development , Tarakan

January 2016 - December 2016

Mohammad Budi Santosa – Marine Conservation and Sustainable Fisheries Senior Officer

General Information

PT. MMA is one of the initiators of Seafood Savers program, an inniiviative of WWF Indonesia to promote responsible fisheries refering to Marine Stewardship Council and Aquaculture Stewardship Council. The colaboration between WWF-ID and PT. MMA have started in 2006 through a rehabilitation program for mangrove and proboscis monkey conservation (KKMB) in Tarakan. The program is a formal partnership between WWF-ID with the Local Government of Tarakan and PT. MMA. The aim of the partnership was to develop KKMB in a 12 hectare area (2006-2010) and the development of mangrove areas in Boom Panjang Tarakan (2008-2010).

Mangrove and Proboscis Monkey Conservation Development Area (KKMB) in Tarakan

Photo of KKMB pre-expansion (2006) (© PT Mustika Photo of KKMB post-expansion (2014) (© PT Mustika

Minanusa Aurora Tarakan) Minanusa Aurora Tarakan)

Development of mangrove forest area in Boom Panjang Tarakan

Photo of mangrove forest development site in Boom Panjang Tarakan (© PT Mustika Minanusa Aurora Tarakan)

Photo of the inauguration of a monitoring tower in Boom Panjang Tarakan (© PT Mustika Minanusa Aurora Tarakan)

Although the cooperation between PT. MMA and WWF ID started in 2006, this company became a full member of Seafood Savers program in June 2015 by signing Cooperation Agreement (MCC).

Aquaculture Improvement Program (AIP) Profile

1. Location : Tarakan, Tana Tidung Bulungan, North Kalimantan Province

Number of Farmers : 11 Farmers listed in Seafood Savers Program

PT. MMA registered its 11 farmers PT. MMA registered 11 farmers in its production chain to implement

Aquaculture Improvement Program for Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) sertification, they are:

No

Supplier Name

Location

Area of farms listed in the Seafood

Savers Program

1 Suminto Halim Sungai Bara, District Bulungan Spot 5 = 5 Ha

Spot 6 = 2Ha

Spot 7 = 5 Ha

Spot 8 = 5 Ha

Spot 9 = 10 Ha

Total = 27 Ha

2 Akin Sugianto Pulau Tias, District Bulungan Spot 6 = 25 Ha

3 Edy Sulianto / Akhu Tanjung Tiram, District Tana Tidung Spot 1 = 20 Ha

Spot 2 = 20 Ha

Spot 3 = 5 Ha

Spot 4 = 12 Ha

Spot 5 = 6 Ha

Spot 6 = 9 Ha

Total = 72 Ha

4 Rusli / H Nurdin Tias Binai, District Bulungan Spot 1 = 25 Ha

Spot 2 = 25 Ha

Spot 3 = 25 Ha

Spot 4 = 25 Ha

Total = 100 Ha

5 H. Amir Sungai Bara, District Bulungan Spot 1 = 10 Ha

Spot 2 = 10 Ha

Spot 3 = 10 Ha

Total = 30 Ha

6 Sinar Windu Mas Tanjung Tiram, District Tana Tidung Spot 1A = 8 Ha

Spot 12A = 7 Ha

Total = 15 Ha

7 Peter G /Akiang Pulau Tibi, District Bulungan Spot 1 = 25 Ha

8 H. Ramli Pulau Tibi, District Bulungan Spot 1 = 10 Ha

Spot 2 = 7 Ha

Spot 3 = 5 Ha

Total = 22 Ha

9 H. Iwan Pulau Mangkudulis Kecil, Kab Tana Tidung Spot 1 = 10 Ha

Spot 2 = 6 Ha

Total = 16 Ha

10 H. Aco / Pak Lama PasPayau, District Tana Tidung Spot 1 = 10 Ha

Spot 2 = 10 Ha

Spot 3 = 10 Ha

Spot 4 = 10 Ha

Total = 40 Ha

11 H. Japar Betayau, District Tana Tidung Spot 1 = 9 Ha

Spot 2 = 9 Ha

Spot 3 = 3 Ha

Total = 21 Ha

Map showing suppliers of PT. MMA listed in the SS Program

Map showing suppliers of PT. MMA listed in Seafood Savers Program

(©WWF – Indonesia)

Based on the availability of human resource, technical and non-technical factors, in 2016 PT. MMA decided to have accompaniment for its 2

production chains. They were Rusli Nurdin whose farm is in Tias island, Bulungan District and Suminto Halim whose farm is in Bara river,

Bulungan district.

Cultivation Practice

- Commodity Name : Black Tiger Shrimp (Penaeus monodon sp.)

- Method of Cultivation : Traditional cultivation (without feed and aeration)

- Price Range : IDR. 200.000 - 280.000 per kg

In North Kalimantan the Shrimp farms are managed traditionally, without the use of artificial feed or machinery and relying on plankton as natural

feed for the Shrimps. Embankments in the Shrimp farms range from 5 to 50 hectares per plot, however, only channels around the plots are used

for raising the Shrimps. Each channel is 3-5 meters wide and 1-2 meters deep. A cultivation cycle lasts 3-4 months, and harvesting occurs during

lowest tide. Sale of the shrimps follows the free market system whereby farmers are not obliged to sell their harvest to a particular and designated

buyer. This can be done in two ways; the farmer sells the harvest directly to a processing firm, or to a collector (middle man) who in turn sells to

the processing firms in Tarakan.

Photos of the status of shrimp farms in North Kalimantan

Aerial photograph of shrimp farms in North Kalimantan (©WWF – Indonesia / M Budi

SANTOSA)

Shrimp farm channel in Tarakan (© WWF - Shrimp farm in the Bara River area,

Indonesia / M Budi SANTOSA) Bulungan district (© WWF - Indonesia /

M Budi SANTOSA)

Size comparison between traditionally farmed black tiger shrimps from North Kalimantan and shrimps from semi-intensive and intensive farms.

Traditional tiger shrimp size from North Kalimantan (© PT Mustika Minanusa Aurora Tarakan)

Flowchart of shrimp sales system in North Kalimantan

3. Production Capacity

PT. MMA have a production capacity of approximately 3,600 tons per year (in the form of frozen blocks of shrimp products). Various products produced by PT. MMA include:

Summary of AIP implementation in fulfilling ASC-Shrimp standards conducted by PT. MMA over the period of July – December 2015 as below :

In 2016, the comfortability Aquaculture Improvement Program practice done by PT. MMA with ASC-Shrimp standart was 90%. The summary of the AIP is:

Principle 1 : COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE NATIONAL AND LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS

a. PT. MMA has facilitated compliance in aquaculture administration document which are SIUP, land use permits and deposit property tax payment b. PT. MMA has facilitated the registration mark Registration of Business Enterprises fish farming (TPUPI) for Suminto / H. Da’s farm

Principle 2 : SITE FARMS IN ENVIRONMENTALLY SUITABLE LOCATIONS WHILE CONSERVING BIODIVIRSITY AND IMPORTANT NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS

a. PT. MMA has committed to draft the Biological Ecological Impact Assesment (BEIA) and Participatory Social Impact Assesment (PSIA) documents as a part of the solid requirement towards achieving the ASC certification.

To suport AIP for its two farmers, from Maret until June 2016 PT. MMA facilitated DEIA and PSIA document draft. The documents covered assessment

results for biological condition, ecology and social and also impacts occured due to those farms activities. The drafting was done by experienced

academics from Universitas Surya Tangerang and through process conditioned by ASC such as; literature studies, assessment in the field, focus group

discussion with the stakeholder, public consultation and result presentation towards the stakeholder.

The main recommendation of BEIA document were about mangrove area restoration, procedures for handling and use of hazardous chemicals, as

well as procedures for handling shrimp disease and death. Meanwhile, PSIA document did not find important aspects for the farmers. Based on the

document recommendation, PT. MMA and its farmers performed several improvements to meet the requirement for ASC sertificatiion.

b. PT. MMA and its farmers has commited not to hunt protected animal PT. MMA altogether with its farmers registered for ASC commited not to disturb, hunt and kill protected animals which may live iin the farms. The commitment were written in a letter signed by the owner of famrs. Later on, PT. MMA and the farmers socialize it to othe farm guide.

c. PT. MMA has made signpost of prohibition in hunting protected animals in the farms

This company has made signpost of prohibition in exploiting and killing protected animals. The signpost is 3 x 1.5 meter made of iron and zinc intstaled in Rusli Nurdin and Suminto’s farms.

d. PT. MMA and the farmers have created handbook of list and picture of protected animals which may live around farms in Bulungan district. The handbook is designed according to the farms guide’s ability which evenly under elementary school graduate. So, this is planned that the guide will understand about protected animals by looking at the pictures.

Principle 3 : DEVELOP AND OPERATE FARMS WITH CONSIDERATION FOR SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES

a. PT. MMA have committed to draft the Participatory Social Impact Assesment (PSIA) document to ensure that farms operational have considered social needs of surrounded area

b. This company and its armers have done several efforts to ensure that famrs operational do not have conflivt with local people by providing suggestion box and management conflict SOP. Moreover, PT. MMA creates commitment to always being opened for any solutions of possible conflicts.

Principle 4 : OPERATE FARMS WITH RESPONSIBLE PRACTICES

a. PT. MMA Has collected the data to be made as administration data of farm’s guide b. PT. MMA has provided employment contract for the farm guide, salary list and others legal commitment between the owner and the farm guide c. PT. MMA has provided safety equipments for the farm’s guide d. PT. MMA has provided First Aid Box e. PT. MMA has built proper toilet for farmers

Principle 5 : MANAGE SHRIMP HEALTH AND WELFARE IN A RESPONSIBLE MANNER

a. PT. MMA has provided water quality control monitoring equipment for famers who implemented AIP and held training of using the equipments for

farm’s guide

b. PT. MMA has started a monitoring program for shrimp’s health altogether with the farmers and WWF-Indonesia

c. PT. MMA built relation with local Department of Fisheries to held socialtization concerning friendly shrimp fishing and proper instruction for shrimo

wth disease

Principle 6 : MANAGE BROODSTOCK ORIGIN, STOCK SELECTION AND EFFECTS OF STOCK MANAGEMENT

a. PT. MMA has provided good quality seeds with a certificate of origin for farmers who came from hatchery PT. MMA

b. PT. MMA has facilitated the collection and shipment of samples shrimp to have disease test in DKP Tarakan City

Principle 7 : USE RESOURCES IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY EFFICIENT AND RESPONSIBLE MANNER

a. PT. MMA does not conduct activities related to shrimp feed, because the pond in North Borneo is operated without feed and aeration b. PT. MMA has facilitated the collection of data and documents concerningthe use of energy in pond

Additional Information 1. Partisipasi dalam ASC-Group Certification Standard Pilot Testing

In 2016, ASC drafted Group Certification standart, a certification standard of ASC reserved for group/groups of farmers. Indonesia was being one of the chosen location for that pilot testing standard. The location chosen were Tarakan and Pinrang. In Tarakan, the location were in the ponds of Rusli Nurdin and Suminto who both of them joined AIP for ASC. The pilot testing was conducted by Control Union, which had been experienced in aquaculture certification audit. This pilot testing included examination in completion of documents, observation in the ponds and interview with various stakeholders related to activities in the pond. Generally, the results had been delivered by Control Union to ASC along with comment and feedback to enhance the Group Certification draft. Follow the link below to download the report of ASC-Group Certification Standard Pilot Testing: http://bit.ly/ASCGroupCertificationResultsTarakan

Water quality control of Rusli Nurdin’s pond in Tias island, Bulungan district (©WWF – Indonesia / M Budi SANTOSA)

Data completion test for Rusli Nurdin and Suminto Halim (©WWF – Indonesia / M Budi SANTOSA)

2. Product traceability system for farmers enrolled in the SS program

http://bit.ly/ASCGroupCertificationResultsTarakan

Schematic of coding products from farms listed in the SS Program (© PT Mustika

Minanusa Aurora Tarakan)

Simple trace code labelling on a product ready for export (© PT Mustika Minanusa Aurora Tarakan)

3. Mangrove planting activities on embankments conducted by PT. MMA

PT. MMA is actively involved in mangrove planting activities, either in conjunction with the Government of Tarakan and WWF-ID, or independently. These include: 1. Planting mangroves on Suminto's embankments, Bara River, Bulungan district, 2011 2. Planting of 1,000 mangroves on the Liago embankment Bulungan District, September 2 2012 3. Tarakan KKMB development in 2006-2010, and mangrove planting for a greener city forest in the KKMB area and Boom Panjang Tarakan

2011-2014 4. Mangrove planting of 600 trees on the Group of Independent Shrimp Farmers embankment, Tarakan, June 2013 5. Mangrove planting of 1100 trees on the Liago embankment, Bulungan District, January 21 2014 6. Planting 4,000 mangroves on embankments of farmers listed in the SS program, 2014 7. Plangting 4150 mangroves in Liago embankment in Bulungan district, Supplier pond of PT.MMA dan KKMB Tarakan city

KKMB mangrove planting in Tarakan (© Planting mangrove on the group of independent Planting mangrove on Rusli Nurdin’s

WWF - Indonesia / M Budi SANTOSA) shrimp farmers embankments, Tarakan (© WWF - embankments in Bulungan district Tias

Island

Indonesia / M Budi SANTOSA) (© WWF - Indonesia / M Budi SANTOSA)

SOP socialization to pond’s workers of Rusli Nurdin in Tias island, Bulungan district (©WWF – Indonesia / M Budi SANTOSA)

Water quality control training in Suminto Halim’s pond in Bara river, Bulungan district (©WWF – Indonesia / M Budi SANTOSA)

Detail Development of Aquaculture Improvement Program (AIP) implementation:

The detail of AIP development is listed below:

OUTPUT DAN INDICATOR ACTION LEAD &

PARTNERS

SEAFOOD SAVERS

stage

AIP EVALUATION RESULT FOLLOW-UP

PLAN/DIFFICULTIES

Inte

rmed

iate

Ad

van

ce

Principle 1 : COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE

NATIONAL AND LOCAL LAWS AND

REGULATIONS

Criteria 1.1: Document of compliance with local and national legal requirements

Bappeda Prov Kaltara, KLHK, KemenPU&ATR

1.1.1 Compliance to local and national valid regulations and legislations

1. Coordination with local government to socialize rules and regulations related to the land use of farm

2. Facilitation of farm operational procedure establishment

3. Facilitation of farm operational record establishment

Rusli Nurdin has complete SIUP and NPWP.

Suminto Halim still have 2 spots constrained SIUP

Farm operational record consisted of stocking data, water quality, and farmers harvests

Will be registered cultivation / TPUPI to the Department of Marine and Fisheries Tarakan city

HCV study has been conducted by WWF-ID, study result will be used to help the North Kalimantan Provincial Government in drafting Thr Province’s RTRW, including the cultivation area determination

1.1.2 Transparance of compliance to legal regulations.

1. Socialization of SIUP and CBIB certification to farm owners

2. Facilitation of the making of farm SIUP

3. Establishment of farmers administration logbook, and the training of logbook filling and monitoring-evaluation

Administration logbook is available and is stored and maintained by PT. MMA

WWF facilitate the make of TPUPI to Suminto Halim’s spot

Training on filling logbook to workers and owners Pond of Rusli Nurdin and Suminto Halim

Principle 2 : SITE FARMS IN

ENVIRONMENTALLY SUITABLE LOCATIONS

WHILE CONSERVING BIODIVIRSITY AND

IMPORTANT NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS

Kriteria 2.1: Biodiversity Environmental Impact Assessment (B-EIA)

PT. MMA

2.1.1 The farm has to conduct an assesment to determine the impact to environment and biodiversity (BEIA) and openly publish the result in an understandable manner of language (the process and BEIA document has to follow the guide listed on section I)

1. Provision of B-EIA drafting consultant

2. B-EIA implementation 3. Socialization of B-IEA

study to the local community surrounding the farm location and related parties

Document Beia PSIA has been sent to stakeholders (owners of ponds, DKP Kaltara, Tarakan, Builungan, BLH Bulungan, Tarakan, a local NGO, WWF, etc Borneo Tarakan)

Receipt of documents available

Recommendations PSIA and Beia has been done by Rusli (dg MMA) among others socialization about Beia continuously PSIA minimum per 2 weeks

It has to be disseminated about the results of the study to workers ponds, pond owners and communities around the pond.

Documentation and reports are available in the logbook of PT.MMA

Workers are keep changing, the socialization and training are conducted repeatedly

Kriteria 2.2: Conservation of protected areas or critical habitats

2.2.1 Farm placement on a protected areas

Facilitation of overlay maps of farm areas that are to be certified for farm owners, that also consisted of valid regulations to prove that the farm location has complied to the related regulation regarding the area designation

Farm location overlay map is now available (PT. MMA uses the overlay map drafted by WWF-ID)

Done

2.2.2 Farm placement within mangrove ecosystem and other important natural wetlands with crucial ecological values stipulated by BEIA or legitimate regulations.

1. Provision of farm documentation (letter, permits, photos, dll)

2. Facilitation of mangrove rehabilitation in the farm area

Farm location overlay map is now available (PT. MMA uses the overlay map drafted by WWF-ID)

PT. MMA have set a mangrove nursery to provide mangrove seeds in regards to the rehabilitation of mangrove requirement, with production capacity of 10.000 seeds per cycle

PT. MMA and farmers have planted, in total, 9440 mangrove, with a total area of 0,99 Ha (0,46% from the total area that needs to be rehabilitated 214 Ha)

Many mangrove planting activities had been held by PT. MMA but not well documented

Follow up: mangrove planting will be done continuously on farms enrolled in the SS program and in the special ponds rehabilitation in Bulungan district Liago

Criteria 2.3: Critically endangered habitat and species consideration

2.3.1 Farm constructed within the habitat of critically endangered species or species listed on IUCN Red List, national regulations, and other regulations

1. Provision of B-EIA drafting consultant 2. B-EIA implementation 3. Socialization of B-IEA study to the local community surrounding the farm location and related parties

Have done the preparation of documents belonging to Rusli Nurdin BIEA ponds on the Tias island and ponds belonging Suminto Halim in Bara River.

Document Beia PSIA has been sent to stakeholders (owners of ponds, DKP Kaltara, Tarakan, Builungan, BLH Bulungan, Tarakan, a local NGO, WWF, etc Borneo Tarakan)

Proof of receipt of documents available

Recommendations PSIA and Beia has been done by Rusli (dg MMA) among others socialization about Beia PSIA continuously minimum per 2 weeks

It has to be disseminated about the results of the study to workers

DONE

ponds, pond owners and communities around the pond.

Documentation and reports are available in the logbook PT.MMA

2.3.2 Conservation of critically endangered habitat and protected species within the area of farm and implementation of protection efforts in the surrounding area of the farm

1. Provision of a RSCIP research report that was devised at a WWF-EIA-WIIP consortium in 2011

2. Socialization to farmers on PP No. 7 of1999 and the IUCN Red List

3. Provision of animal species research data from an ASC assessment performed by WWF-ID in 2014

4. Socialization on habitat protection to farm owners

5. Construction and installation of signs prohibiting the damaging/taking/exploiting of protected species

6. Signing of a commitment agreement by farm

PT. MMA utilized the RSCIP research report on the cultivation of black tiger shrimp in east Kalimantan, that was devised at a WWF-EIA-WIIP consortium in 2011, report was made available

PP No 2 of 1999 was made available

PT. MMA utilized the RSCIP research report on the cultivation of black tiger shrimp in east Kalimantan, that was devised at a WWF-EIA-WIIP consortium in 2011; ASC gap assessment report compiled by WWF-ID in 2014; and HCV Study Reports on farms and mangrove areas in the Bulungan estuary

DONE

owners to not damage/capture/kill protected species. Opening of a mangrove forest for a new farm

(embankment) in North Kalimantan, compiled by WWF-ID in 2015

Signs prohibiting the exploitation of protected species have not been constructed

The commitment agreement of farm owners to not damage/capture/kill protected species has not been signed. The mangrove forest has not been opened

Kriteria 2.4: Ecological buffers, barriers and corridors

2.4.1 Coastal barriers: Minimal permanent beach barrier between the area of farm and sea (could be in form of construction or natural barrier).

1. Provision of mangrove seeds to be planted in by the river border

2. Total mangrove plantation area as recommended by ASC gap assessment result

3. Monitoring-evaluation and documentation of mangrove growth

4. Provision of riparian buffer map sketch as regulated by the relevant law

PT. MMA have set a mangrove nursery to provide mangrove seeds in regards to the rehabilitation of mangrove requirement, with production capacity of 10.000 seeds per cycle

PT. MMA and farmers have planted, in total, 9440 mangrove, with a total area of 0,99 Ha (0,46% from the total

DONE

area that needs to be rehabilitated 214 Ha

Mangrove growth has yet to be implemented on the embankments

Farm buffer map is available, adopted from ASC gap assessment report drafted by WWF-ID in 2014

2.4.2 Riparian buffers: Minimum width of untouchable natural vegetation between the farm and water territorial.

Provision of riparian buffer map sketch as regulated by the relevant law

Farm buffer map is available, adopted from ASC gap assessment report drafted by WWF-ID in 2014

DONE

2.4.3 Corridor: minimum width of untouchable natural vegetation in the farm area that provides moving space for people or a crossing for native species (wildlife) to access the farm area

Provision of riparian buffer map sketch as regulated by the relevant law

Farm buffer map is available, adopted from ASC gap assessment report drafted by WWF-ID in 2014 There will be study about corridor for willd animal in BIEA report

DONE

Criteria 2.5: Prevention of salinization of freshwater and soil resources

2.5.1 Loss of water authorized by pearmeation of water from the pond

N/A BEIA document which explains water resources

Done

2.5.2 Likelihood of groundwater usage to reduce farm salinity

N/A N/A

2.5.3 Electricity conductivity or chloride concentration of well water used to reduce salinity of farm water; or well located in the farm area and soil water surface closed to the farm area or water waste from the farm. Requirement: DHL waters < 1,500 µmhos/cm or water chloride concentration < 300 mg/L

N/A There is no measurement for chloride According to BEIA reports, NOT APPLICABLE. not be measured because of the location of the pond is not on the ground, do not worry about going intrusion

Done

2.5.4 Electricity conductivity or soil chloride concentration in the existing ecosystem and agriculture farmland.

N/A No measurement of chloride According to reports Beia, NOT APPLICABLE. not be measured because of the location of the pond is not on the ground, do not worry about going intrusion

Done

2.5.5 Electricity conductivity or chloride concentration from the sediment ready to be disposed outside the farm. The amount of electricity conductiviy or mud chloride to be disposed should not be higher than soil in mud waste area.

N/A No measurement of chloride According to reports Beia, NOT APPLICABLE. not be measured because of the location of the pond is not on the ground, do not worry about going intrusion

Done

Principle 3 : DEVELOP AND OPERATE FARMS

WITH CONSIDERATION FOR SURROUNDING

COMMUNITIES

Beside, AIP progress done by PT. MMA altogether with farmers registered to get ASC serification, other review has been done also by certification body for

completion of ASC document and aquaculture fisheries. The results shows that the document, SOP, notes and examination are still required to be checked

again. To be specific, BEIA document concerning maps and scetch of ponds; wasted muds; employment contract and otheroperational SOP.

criteria 3.1: All impacts toward the surrounding community, ecosystem users and land owners need to be taken into account, or invited for a negotiation in an open and accountable manner

PT. MMA

3.1.1 Farm owner is mandated to do Social Impact Assesssment (p-SIA) participatively and spread the reult transparently in native language (which the community speaks and understands). Local goverment and at least one civil NGO which the community singlehandedly chose should have the copy of this document. The document and P-SIA process, impact and risks of the analysis will be done participatively with the communicty and other interest groups. Emerging participative factors are included in the repost. Agreed result regarding risk management and impacts are also included in the report.

1. Facilitation of the establishment of management conflict

2. Provision of P-SIA report for chosen farms

PSIA Documents are available

Management conflict format is available and stored in the logbook in PT. MMA

Has been done to produce form recording conflict in the pond, but there are no conflicts in the area of pond

Have done the preparation of the document p-SIA ponds belonging Rusli Nurdin in Tias Island and ponds belonging Suminto Halim in Bara River.

The document is available in the logbook PT.MMA

Done

criteria 3.2: Resolution of complain released by the impacted party

.

3.2.1 Farm owners shall develop and apply conflict resolution diverification policy for the community. the policy should state how identified conflicts in the p-SIA and new complaints will be transparently tracked, mediation for three parties could be a part of the process and explain how to respond complaints well. Complaint box, register complaint, and complaint acceptance using local native language.

Facilitation of the establishment and socialization o maanagement conflict

Management conflict format is available and stored in PT. MMA logbook

Resolution for the conflict has not been informed to farm owners as well as their workers

DONE

3.2.2. Conflict area or dispute is recorded and passed to farmers, local government, and community representatives.at least 50% from conflict should be resolved within a year from the issued date, and total 75% on the period between 2 consecutive audits.

Facilitation of the establishment and socialization of conflict resolution

Format of the conflict resolution was made available, recorded in PT. MMA's logbook

Resolution for the conflict has not been disseminated to farm owners as well as their workers

DONE

criteria 3.3. Transaparancy in providing job opportunities to the local community

3.3.1 Farm owners should document advertisement evidence showed to workers who have the access to the farm within 1 day of travel and workers who could not travel from and to their homes every day.

Facilitating the making of vacancy adverts for prospective farm guards

Format for the vacancy adverts was created and installed in around the company and the ponds

Done

The documentation is daved in PT. MMA’s logbook

3.3.2 Recruitment process has to be done in accordance to the available job vacancy and to be based open the profile and the ability of the employee (skills, experienced concordant to the CV).

1. Facilitation of logbooks containing information of farm workers

2. Facilitation of logbooks containing information of potential recruits

3. Facilitation of minutes of the recruitment process

Data of Rusli Nurdin's farm guards hs been created, kept in PT. MMA's logbook

The data of the workers had been renewed

There was documentation in Rusl and Suminto worker’s recruitment

Done

3.4.1 employment contract availability

Facilitating the drafting of contracts for farm employees

The signing of employment contract had been done by the workers and the owners of ponds (copied contract sheet had been given to the workers)

Done

3.4.2 Contract requirements

Facilitating the drafting of contracts for farm employees

The signing of employment contract had been done by the workers and the owners of ponds (copied contract sheet had been given to the workers)

Done

3.4.3 Transparency in the negotiation process.

Maintaining notes of the meeting between farm employees and farm owners

The notes of meeting between the workers and the owner had been done The notes is in PT. MMA’s logbook

Done

Principle 4 : OPERATE FARMS WITH

RESPONSIBLE PRACTICES

criteria 4.1. Child labor and young workers PT. MMA

4.1.1. Trained workers precentage in the work health and safety standard, and relevant procedure and policy. Provision of functioning safety equipment needs to be maintained

Facilitation of logbooks containing information of farm workers

Data of Rusli Nurdin's farm guards was made available, kept in PT. MMA's logbook

Done

criteria 4.2. Forced labor, rights and responsibilities

4.2.1. Rights for full payment and benefit. 1. Socialization for owners and employees in the importance of employment contract, covering the rights and obligations of both parties

2. Training on how to draft a workers' contract

3. Drafting a written workers' contract for farm employees

The signing of employment contract had been done by the workers and the owners of ponds

Socialization in writing employment contracts for pond owners and workers

The writing of payroll training had been done to the workers with the details of amount of salary,

Done

4. Applicability of these contracts as per agreement

5. Accompanying farm owners to make a record of salary payments, bonuses and other benefits

6. Facilitating the making of proof of payment (of salary) and other benefits

7. Socialization to farm owners and employees on forced labor (labor to settle a debt)

salary cut and the total net

The statement for not to do violence in the pondsworking are had been created

4.2.2. Workers have the right to protect their identity document and work permit.

Socialization to farm owners to allow its workers for going outside after working hours

A statement of allowing workers to go outside after working hours and not holding the original identification card of workers The statement is stored in PT. MMA’s logbook

Done

4.2.3. The employee of the farm have the rights to do their own activity outside the working hours.

Socialization to farm owners requesting them to allow their workers to leave the farm outside working hours

Have been fabricated affidavit containing pond owners do not hold ID cards original pond workers. Affidavit stored in logbook PT.MMA

Done

criteria 4.3: Hostile work environment

4.3.1 The rights of anti-discrimination in a workplace, which is not limited to the way of anticipating the discrimination in a workplace, but also in the process of achieving the same access in regards to work in relation to gender, age, origin (local vs foreigners), race or religion. A company have a clear and transparent procedure to show their response to address complains

1. The establishment of anti discrimination rights.

2. Socialisation of the rights of anti discrimination between the owner and the worker of the farm.

3. The monitoring of rights implementation with a random interview for the workers of the farm.

Anti-discrimination policy format has been established

Socialization about discrimination in workplace for workers has been held.

Done

4.3.2 Number of reported discrimination Produce a complaint record (including the complaints concerning discrimination).

Anti-discrimination policy format has been established

Done

4.3.3 Working opportunity and salary equality. Employee that has been employed by the farm (with the same role and position) received the same salary, there is no difference in regards to gender, origin, race or religion, equal access to promotion, regulation of

Entry note in regards to work salary changes, promotion and opportunity to trained.

Salary and bonus changes had been recorded, Suminto’s bonus from 20% became 22%

done

work safety and the work training opportunity

4.3.4 Respecting maternity rights.

Not applicable, the farm in North Kalimantan does not have female employee



Criteria 4.4: Safe and healthy work environment

4.4.1. Precentage of trained worker in health and safety sector with a set of relevant procedure and policy with work. The accessibility of functioning safety equipments.

1. Socialization of the neccessity of training for the safety of workers to farm owner.

2. Safety equipments facilitation for farm workers.

3. Identification of entitled authority to perform work safety training.

4. Work safety training execution

Socialization of work safety has not been conducted

Safety equipments have not been provided at the farm

Done

4.4.2. Corective actions for observed accidents and incidents

Work accident and corrective action entry writing facilitation.

Have been fabricated and form filling work accidents in the pond, and there is no work accidents in the pond. Data is available in the logbook PT.MMA

Done

4.4.3. Medical bills coverage

1. ensure that work accident related medical bills coverage is listed on contract.

2. ensure that medical bills are covered in accordance with contract.

3. Medical bills coverage by farm owner entry drafting guidance.

Commitment and written statement from the farm owner regarding safety and work accident insurance has been released (until this recent time there ) The signing of employmet contract attaching medical insurance for accident in working area

Done

Criteria 4.5: Minimum wage or fair and adequate amount of sallary

4.5.1 Minimum wage level in accordance with each of employee's specific jobdesk

1. Socialization of the importance of written sallary entry of workers and sallary payment receipts as a Proof of record to farm owner.

The record of income in each periode has been done by Rusli’s workers. The record covers total amount of fish and shrimp catched, crab’s selling and major needs during the harvest

Done

2. Sallary payment, cuts and loan entry drafting as a proven track record guidance to farm owner.

3. Double checking the amount of sallary workers receive to ensure that it complied to the level of legitimate minimum wage.

The record of income is stored in PT. MMA’s logbbook. The result shows that the average income of worke is above the Tarakan city’s minimum wage

There is salary invoice

4.5.2 Permanent workers receive fair sallary. In a case where current worker's sallary does not meet the standards of how a 'fair amount of sallary' should be, sallary needs to be improved gradually to a level where the amount of sallary, plus added bonus or pension allowance, can cover the related worker's basic needs.

4. Socialization of the importance of written sallary entry of workers and sallary payment receipts as a Proof of record to farm owner.

5. Sallary payment, cuts and loan entry drafting as a proven track record guidance to farm owner.

6. Double checking the amount of sallary workers receive to ensure

The record of income in each periode has been done by Rusli’s workers. The record covers total amount of fish and shrimp catched, crab’s selling and major needs during the harvest


There is salary invoice

Done

that it complied to the level of legitimate minimum wage.

4.5.3. Worker penalty through rights violation or injustice sallary handling.

ASC requirements socialization in regards of physical violence and sallary reduction prohibition.

The statement of commitment for not to hire under 18 years old workers; not to do discrimination; violence; hold salary; allow organization; provide holiday and accident insurance to pond’s guards has been signed by Rusli as the owner.

Done

4.5.4. A set of mechanism in stipulating sallary and allowance (including, sallary combination and fair distribution of harvest bonus

1. Facilitation of sallary stipulation mechanism policy drafting

2. Facilitation of sallary stipulation listed on contract

3. Socialization of sallary stipulation mechanism to workers.

Has done work contracts stating that the distribution yield by 25% in the ponds belong to Rusli Nurdin and 22% at the fishpond belonging Suminto Halim

The record of income in each

Done

periode has been done by Rusli’s workers. The record covers total amount of fish and shrimp catched, crab’s selling and major needs during the harvest periode


The owner provides payroll

Socialization in harvest calculation and the the amount of distribution to the workers has been done

4.5.5. Repeated working contract scheme to avoid full time placement of a worker (permanent) and worker's access to fair remuneration.

Facilitation of working contract establishment for farm workers.

The signing of the contract between workers and pond owners Rusli Nurdin and Suminto Halim has been done

Done

Criteria 4.6: Access on workers freedom to associate and collective bargain

4.6.1. The precentage of workers with access to workers union, organizations, or workers own ability to control one self supported with the ability to participate in a discussion, ] or to have acess to a representative party chosen by workers without any interruption by the management.

Socialization of workers right to associate. Sosialisasi hak pekerja tambak untuk berserikat Facilitation of contract writing that specifically mention explicitly workers rights to associate. Facilitation of the making of the company management declaration (verbal and written) of workers right to associate and collective bargaining


Done

4.6.2 Prohibition of any form of discrimination towards workers union member by the farm owner

Execution of monitoring to ensure that workers fully receive their rights to associate.

The statement of commitment for not to hire under 18 years old workers; not to do discrimination; violence; hold salary; allow organization; provide holiday and accident insurance to pond’s guards has been created by PT. MMA

Done

Criteria: 4.7: Disturbance and disciplinary practice within work environment that may cause temporary or permanent physical and mental damage

4.7.1. Justification of disciplinary actions Record of disciplinary action done by workers and agreed solution to decrease the risk of the error occurance needs to be established

A form of undisciplined actions has been created

Done

4.7.2. Transparent policy and fair disciplinary procedure

Facilitation of anti-violence and disciplinary action policy making, known and agreed by workers and farm owner.

A form of anti-discrimination has been created and apllied in Rusli and Suminto’s ponds

Done

4.7.3. Prohibition of harrasment

Provision of record of harrasment and disturbance (have such event occurred)

A statement for not doing harrasment in working area

Done

Criteria 4.8. Overtime compensation and work hours

4.8.1. Maximum numbers of total working hours. Eight hours/day or 48 hours/weel (with maximum average of 17 weeks period), includes "stand-by" hours; with at least full one day off (with two nights off included) in ever seven days

Facilitation of the writing of working schedule, known and signed by the workers.

• Has been fabricated the work schedule during one cycle of cultivation (3 Months) agreed upon by the worker and the owner of the pond • Has done work contracts whose contents include workers' duties and responsibilities of workers

Done

4.8.2. Rights to leave the farm when the daily task is done

Facilitation of the writing of working presence list and work execution monitoring (cross checking the time sheet and the actual working hours execution

Employment contracts stating workers' duties and responsibilities of workers has been created

Done

4.8.3. Workers rights to holidays and days off, but leaving the farm site is not compulsari, in a case where there is a certain agreement, some holidays can be ditampung di tambak.

1. ensure that workers rights to move and leave the farm outside of working hours are clearly stated on their contract

2. Monitoring of these rights are done through the time sheet

Employment contracts stating workers' duties and responsibilities of workers has been created

Done

4.8.4. Transportation given for workers (in a case where the farm site is located in a rural area) to allow them to have days off at their blablabla place

1. Socialization of transportation Provision at designated time for workers to use.

2. Facilitation of the writing of transportation Provision on contract

The owner of ponds has provided transportation for its workers. The documentation is recorded in PT. MMA’s logbook

Done

4.8.5. Extrahours are volunteery and does not surpass the 12 hours/week limitation

ensure that workers are paid appropriately for their extra hours and/or

There is no regulation about extra hour’s salary for workers.

Done

works that are not listed on the contract

NOTE : culturally and behaviorally, the term “extra hours” does not exist for local workers

4.8.6. Extrahours are voluntary and does not surpass the 12 hours/week limitation.

1. Facilitation of the writing of time sheet and socialization of the fillinf of the time sheet to workers

2. Facilitation of extrahours pay report writing based on time sheet

3. Extrahours payment monitoring as listed on contract

Written record of extra hours bonus has not been established NOTE : culturally and behaviorally, the term “extra hours” does not exist for local workers

Done

4.8.7 Rights of maternal leave, including daily break or working hours reduction to fulfill child perawatan anak.

N/A N/A

Criteria 4.9. Work contract transparancy

4.9.1. Work contract is not repeated frequently by the farm owner to avoid a set of responsibility of rights need to be given to permanent worker

1. Facilitation of fair and transparent contract writing that does not apply the internship


Done

scheme repeatedly

The socialization about written employment contract for workers and the owner has been done

4.9.2. All workers own a legitimate working permit that is valid in the country where the farm is operating.

N/A N/A

4.9.3. Workers are fully aware the condition and circumstances of their job at the farm and stated their understanding (written or verbal). Policy and procedure of employment needs to be written if there are more than five personels employed at the farm

1. Facilitation of contract drafting training with clear and fair agreed rights and responsibilities of the workers listed on the contract 2. Facilitation of the making of written contract 3. ensure that every worker holds a copy of their contract


The socialization about written employment contract for workers and the owner has been done

Done

4.9.4. Probation period stated on contract

N/A N/A

4.9.5 In a case where sub-contract is applicable and done by a third party, farm owner has to make sure that the contracts are in compliance with every applicable sets of legitimate regulations regarding labor, social insurance in compliance with ILO.

N/A N/A

Criteria 4.10: Transparant employee management system

4.10.1. Farm owner has to make sure that all workers have free access to communicate with farm's manager in regards with workers rights and working conditions

1. Socialization of the importance of suggestion/complain box to farm owners

2. Complain box set ups facilitation

3. Socialization of complain box to employees

4. Complains recapitulation 2 times minimum per year

5. Complain discussion needs to be executed at least twice a year, documented into a written report.

6. Notes of discussion and problem solving activity

Installation of complain box that may be used as a communication platform for workers or the surrounding community to deliver their complain

Done

4.10.2. Execution of bi-annual meeting between the management and the workers based on written agenda, and documented into a written report

1. Provide a list of complains derived from the complain box and an entry of responses in regards with the complains needs to be provided

2. ensure that all complains are well responded


Done

by the farm owner by conducting various routine interviews with the workers.

4.10.3. Work plan and time scheduling to find a solution to complains and errors

Facilitation of resolutive actions based on the complains received and the making of time schedule of the problems resolution to farm owner


Done

4.10.4 Precentage of numbers of complains resolved in less than three months since the complains were received

Provide a written agreement between the farm owner and the workers regarding to the complain's resolution.


Done

Criteria 4.11: Living condition of workers living at the farm site

4.11.1. Proper living conditions of workers living at the farm site

Socialization to farm owner in regards to Provision of appropriate living condition for the workers (bathroom with clean water and partitions

Proper toilet facility has been provided, and the purchase of things needed to build the toilet had been funded by PT. MMA, the building process was done by the farmers

Done

4.11.2. Appropriate facilities for female workers




Principle 5 : MANAGE SHRIMP HEALTH AND WELFARE IN A RESPONSIBLE MANNER

Criteria 5.1: Disease prevention PT. MMA

5.1.1. Operational health plan maintanance: 1) Patogen originated from the surrounding environment (e.g: predator control and vektor) 2) Patogen spread to farm from the surrounding environment (e.g: filteration/sterilization disposa and garbage from various kind of sources such as dead shrimp management) 3) Patogen spread within the farm site. It is critical to avoid cross contamination, detect, and prevent the patogen occurence by monitoring signs of external patology and wildlife that are in critical condition

1. Writing of SOP of prevention and resolutive action to diseases related to predators/vektor control, prevention of patogen infection getting out of the farm, and prevention of disease dispersion within the farm site 2. Facilitation of SOP training to farm workers 3. Shrimp's health record writing and monitoring (routine sampling) 4. Execution of a set of prevention and resolutive action in regards to SOP

Has been fabricated SOP shrimp disease control

Has been fabricated SOP predator control

Note the measurement of water quality and condition of shrimp in ponds Rusli and Suminto Halim available, stored in the logbook PT. MMA

Has been on record regarding the monitoring of shrimp each cycle

Done

5.1.2. Water filtration process to minimalize patogen from contaminating the farm. ensure that all inlet of the farm has nets, filters, screens or blocks suitable with the size of the net mesh

ensure that farm uses double filter on the inlet with a reasonable size of the mesh (the mesh size of the second screen has to be in a smaller size to block predators from getting in and prevent shrimps from escaping))

Pembudidaya sudah menggunakan 2 lapis jaring untuk mencegah udang keluar

SELESAI

5.1.3. Average yearly survival rate (SR)[86] , revolving around three different systems Requirements: 1) Feed and aerasi absence, SR > 25% (2) Feed application with areasi absence[87] , SR > 45%, dan (3) Application of both food and aerasi, SR > 60%.

1. Farmers mentoring to double check the total amount of stocked PL

2. Farmers mentoring to calculate the total amount of harvested shrimps (Total harvest biomass / average size of shrimps)

3. Farmers mentoring to calculate amount of SR of each cycle

4. Facilitation of monitoring logbook

5. Record writing of harvest result including quantity of shrimps per size variation

6. Facilitation of monitoring record of numbers and weight measurement of dead shrimps

• Have done recording the number of fry in stocking and harvest Rusli Nurdin and Suminto Halim form of a memorandum of sale are available on until November 2016, the data stored in the logbook PT. MMA • Has been on record harvests, variations in the size / size shrimp, shrimp died and the size and magnitude of each cycle of cultivation • Have done recording monitoring each cycle of shrimp farming

Done

5.1.4. PL precentage of Specific Pathogen Free (SPF) [88] or Specific Pathogen Resistant (SPR) [89] towards all important diseases (e.g: whether it's SPF-WSSV, or SPF to several viruses) [90] .

1. 1. Facilitation of storage for SPF and SPR proof of purchased seeds from hatchery

2. 2. Providing information

SOP of disease prevention and handling has been established

Done

regarding disease identification and charateristics ((WSSV, IMNV, IHHNV, YHV, TSV) into the Disease Prevention SOP

3. 3. Farmers must own the SOP archive

4. 4. Routine monitoring of shrimps health, written into report.

5. 5. In a case where an unknown disease is found, report needs to be made to local DKP

Criteria 5.2 Predator Control

5.2.1 Restriction on controlling deadly predator listed as protected animals as red list of the International Union of Conservation of Nature (IUCN)[94], national list [95] and other legal lists [96]

1. Facilitation of predator control equipment list writing, and Provision of specific safe for the equipments

2. Facilitation of the list of protected animals to

• PT. MMA has put a ban signpost for killing protected animals, in ponds Rusli Nurdin • A list of protected species are available in a report commissioned by WWF-ID letter of commitment from the

Done

ensure that farmers do not recklessly kill the animals have they come across one

farmers for not using harmful chemicals are readily available, stored in the logbook PT. MMA • Has been fabricated list / poster of an animal protected by the IUCN • Have done making tools predator control • Workers ponds do not use a shot against predators, • It has also recorded the use of materials and drugs used in pond

5.2.2. Prohibition on gun and/or chemical substances usage on controlling predators.

1. ensure the farmers do not use fire weapon as a method of predator control on protected species

2. Provision of list of chemical substances used at the farm site

3. Identification of prohibited drugs and chemical substances

• PT. MMA has put a ban signpost for killing protected animals, in ponds Rusli Nurdin • A list of protected species are available in a report commissioned by WWF-ID letter of commitment from the farmers for not using harmful chemicals are readily available, stored in the logbook PT. MMA

Done

4. Putting a stop to the usage of prohibited drugs and chemical substances

• Has been fabricated list / poster of an animal protected by the IUCN • Have done making tools predator control • Workers ponds do not use a shot against predators, • It has also recorded the use of materials and drugs used in pond

5.2.3. Have the deadly method of the predator control occurred, a set of monitoring needs to be executed, providing a documentation of the numbers of predators, species of the predators, numbers of visits done by the predators

Documentation of predator control

Interview with farm owners dan guards regarding predator control that has been conducted, however documentation has not been established

D

Criteria 5.3. Disease treatment and management

5.3.1. Dispensation on antibiotics or animal food with drugs related effect and function on products labeled with ASC

1. Provide a draft listing all animals medication, chemical and biological products used at the farm site in the last 12 months

2. Allocated storage for saponin

Entry of chemical substances and medications usage has been established

Done

3. Pesticides discontinuation (in this case; Thiodan)Thiodan)

5.3.2. Dispensation on usage of restricted antibiotics listed by WHO, where the national regulation allows

Provision of training to farmers in regards to allowed and restricted medication usage procedures

Has done posters ban on the use of drugs that are not allowed in the pond.

Done

5.3.3. Provision of storage and usage of chemical substances information

1. Facilitation of the making of allocated storage designated for farm's inputs

2. Provision of workers in regards to all medication, chemical and biological substances storage in compliance with the appropriate procedure Labels of each input added on allocated storage

3. Reassurance of activity table, type of inputs and dosage

- Have done pembutan chemical storage and installing storage SOP Chemicals in ponds Rusli and Suminto - Documentation is available in the logbook PT.MMA - Have done recording the use of drugs and chemicals in the pond

Done

applied as contents

4. Facilitation of routine entry writing on every additional input applied at the farm

5. Input applied at the farm needs to be in compliance with the legitimate regulations

5.3.4. Correct chemical usage done by the workers

1. SOP drafting in regards to correct procedure of chemical usage

2. SOP training of chemical usage

3. SOP Provision at the guard house accessible by workers

Chemical substances usage SOP has been made available, stored in PT. MMA logbook

Done

5.3.5. Dispensation on pesticides usage on water that is strictly restricted by the Rotterdam Convention regarding the Prior Informed Consent (PIC), or Stockholm Convention regarding Persistent Organic Pollutant (POP), or

1. Entry of allowed chemical substances usage

2. A statement letter by the farm owner and workers stating their

PT. MMA already made a commitment letter format for farmers not to use dangerous chemicals and weapons to control predators. and has been signed

Done

categorized as very dangerous by WHO.

commitment of their compliance in regards to the usage of restricted chemical substances and pesticides

• PT. MMA has made a poster for not using harmful chemicals are mounted in the area of PT. MMA • SOP use of chemicals available, stored in the logbook PT. MMA Socialization has been made use of chemicals

5.3.6. Dispensation on the disposal of dangerous chemical waste without passing the nautralization phase

1. Entry of allowed chemical substances usage

2. A statement letter by the farm owner and workers stating their commitment of their compliance in regards to the usage of restricted chemical substances and pesticides

PT. MMA already made a commitment letter format for farmers not to use dangerous chemicals and weapons to control predators. and has been signed • PT. MMA has made a poster for not using harmful chemicals are mounted in the area of PT. MMA • SOP use of chemicals available, stored in the logbook PT. MMA Socialization has been made use of chemicals

Done

5.3.7. Strain probiotic bacteria usage, without including the usage of fermented product to produce Penggunaan strain bakteri probiotik tidak termasuk penggunaan produk fermentasi

Facilitation of entry writing on logbook in regards to probiotics usage at the farm site (have the case occurred)

PT.MMA has made a record drug use, probiotics and fertilizers used ponds Rusli Nurdin and Suminto Halim

Done

untuk membibitkan sejumlah berikutnya.

Principle 6 : MANAGE BROODSTOCK ORIGIN,

STOCK SELECTION AND EFFECTS OF STOCK

MANAGEMENT

criteria 6.1. Existence of exotic shrimp species (non-native to the location of the farm)

PT. MMA, DKP Prov Kaltara, DKP Tarakan, Hatchery

6.1.1 Cultivation of non-native species of Shrimp [104]

1. Facilitation of record keeping of the PL transaction providing the name of the cultivated species: Penaus Monodon Photo

2. documentation of the cultivated species

3. Execution of cultivated shrimp identification based on the identification criterias by FAO, assistance from

• farmers use local juveniles from Tarakan • Local fries purchased from hatcheries PT.MMA have tested PCR, PCR test results stored in the logbook PT.MMA • PT.MMA has done manufacture Benur certificate of origin issued by the Parent and hatchery PT.MMA • Documentation and purchase orders of fries are available in logbook PT.MMA

Donee

fisheries university students is applicable

4. Gathering of documentation/publication in regards to the cultivated species at the farm

6.1.2. Preventive actions to prevent cultivated species (native and non native) from escaping throughout harvest and maintanance period (A-F) A. Effective application of net usage with reasonable size of meshes in regards to the size of smallest occupant; the application of double nets for non-native species cultivation

1. PL measurement, supported with written record

2. Utilization of two differnet sized double net mesh with the smaller mesh being smaller than the size of socked PL

3. Facilitation of data provided by the Indonesian Agency for Metereology ( BMKG) of Tarakan

4. Facilitation of entry writing of farm's permanent registry for

• Farmers already use two layers of netting with a mesh size of 1mm and 4mm to prevent the shrimp out • Has been done to produce form recording shrimp that escaped from nets • Have done PL measurement of Hatchery PT.MMA • Has been fabricated statements from BMKG the last 25 years the water level. • available data from BMKG about tide • Have done monev and inspection AIP developments in pond

Done

periodic and regular inspection of mesh sizes utilized in production unit

5. Facilitation of inspection on the farm to determine the development progress of AIP

6.1.3. Preventive actions to prevent escapes from reoccuring

Have a case of escape occurred, the occurrence and resolutive actions taken have to be reported into a written record to prevent reoccurence of the reported event. Entry of first audit has to feature one full cycle

FINISHED FINISHED

Criteria 6.2. Source/origin of parent

6.2.1. PL and parent of PL sports an appropriate disease-free status in accordance with the regional, national and international import guards (e.g: OIE, ICES)

1. The farm needs to requets a proof of disease-free status of the purchased PL from the hatchery supplier, or to conduct and

• farmers use local juveniles from Tarakan • Local fries purchased from hatcheries PT.MMA have tested PCR, PCR test results stored in the logbook PT.MMA • PT.MMA has been working on creating the

Done

independent trial on PLs

2. The trial result or proof of diease-free status needs to be kept by the farm

3. Facilitation of copy of disease-free trial result letter of the PLs parent released by the hatchery

certificate of origin Benur and Parent • Documentation and purchase orders of fries are available in logbook PT.MMA

6.2.2. Total precentage of PL from closed hatchery (PL parent cultivated within the farm)

1. The farm needs to request a declaration released by the hatchery regarding latin names and parent source informations

2. The declaration of the PL purchase in the last 6 months needs to be stored

• farmers use local juveniles from Tarakan • Local fries purchased from hatcheries PT.MMA have tested PCR, PCR test results stored in the logbook PT.MMA • PT.MMA has been working on creating the certificate of origin Benur and Parent • Documentation and purchase orders of fries are available in logbook PT.MMA

Done

6.2.3. PL source/parent is a natural capture

3. The farm needs to request a declaration released by the hatchery

• farmers use local juveniles from Tarakan • Local fries purchased from hatcheries PT.MMA have tested PCR, PCR test

Done

regarding latin names and parent source informations

4. The declaration of the PL purchase in the last 6 months needs to be stored

results stored in the logbook PT.MMA • PT.MMA has been working on creating the certificate of origin Benur and Parent • Documentation and purchase orders of fries are available in logbook PT.MMA

6.2.4. Naturally captured PL cultivation at the pond system

Facilitation of PL purchase receipt storage

• Has been fabricated statement / affidavit regarding the origin of the parent and hatchery fry by PT.MMA • Purchase orders of fries stored in the logbook

Done

6.3.1 Cultivation of transgenic shrimps (including genetically planned PL)

Not applicable, shrimp

cultivation activity in

North Kalimantan does

not use artificial feed









Principle 7 : USE RESOURCES IN AN

ENVIRONMENTALLY EFFICIENT AND

RESPONSIBLE MANNER









Criteria 7.1 Traceability of raw material of feed

7.1.1 Proof of traceability of animal feed composition, inclusing source, species, country of origin, and capture method needs to be

N / A N / A N / A

provided by the animal food producer

7.1.2 ISEAL membership or certification scheme in compliance with ISO 65 in accountability with the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries from FAO as a chain of responsibilities and feed products traceability needs to be provided

N / A N / A N / A

Criteria 7.2 Origin of aquatic and non aquatic feed

7.2.1a The timeline to get a 100% mass balance. Fish flour and fish oil as parts of the compositions of the feed have to be supplied from a fisheries company certified by ISEAL member, with specific protocols on promoting ecology sustainability through sustainable feed fisheries

N / A N / A N / A

7.2.1.b FishSource value [124][125] for fisheries where 80% of the fish flour and fish oil are sourced (see Appendix III, chapter 3 for explanation of FishSource) a. For FishSource criteria 4 (biomass spawning assessment) b. For criteria 1,2,3,5 of FishSource

N / A N / A N / A

7.2.2 Precentage of non-marine source of compositions certified by the ISEAL membership scheme

N / A N / A

Criteria 7.3: Usage of Genetically Modified material in feeds

7.3.1 Genetically modified substance usage in feed fisheries composition is permitted only when informations regarding the GMed substance usage are made accessible for retailers and consumers, including: a. Disclosure of audit report regarding the usage of GMO as a part of the feed fisheries compositions fed to shrimps b. Disclosure of GMO substances usage on shrimps labeled with ASC certification to suppliers to retailers. Full disclosure of the revised audit report is published on ASC website. The database is made accessible upon request for the retailers and consumers c. Usage of suitable, fast and efficient form of communication as a medium to inform retailers regarding all certified products' informations.

N / A N / A N / A

7.3.2 List of(foot note) ingredient that does not contain GMO

N / A N / A N / A

7.3.3 Traceability of GMO free feeds arranged by producer of the feed and the farm

N / A N / A N / A

7.3.4 Extracted random sampling by auditor, with negative result of PCR trial

N / A N / A N / A

Criteria 7.4: Eficient wild capture fish usage [136] on fish flour and fish oil

7.4.1 Feed Fish Equivalence Ratio – FFER [137] L. vannamei P. Monodon













7.4.2a Economic Feed Conversion Ratio – eFCR













7.4.2b Protein Retention Efficiency (PRE) Not applicable, shrimp












Criteria 7.5: Contaminant Concentration in Waste

7.5.1 Indicator: Total amount of Nitrogen (N Total) released from the cultivation process of 1 ton of produced shrimps Requirement: < 25.2 kg N total/1 ton L. vannamei shrimp

1. Provision of monitoring logbook featuring monitoring datas of water qualities, treatment (types

Overlay map of the farm availability

Logbook availability, stored by PT. MMA

Done

< 32.4 kg N total/ 1 ton P. monodon. shrimp

of treatment and input given) and records of the amount of stocks and harvests, also map location layout and waterflow scheme

2. Ensure that the table records have include daily water change information on logbook

3. Facilitation of documentation of feed/fertiliser label containing information of N concentration of the products

4. Facilitation of farm's layout map establishment

5. Facilitation of calculation of farm area based on the available layout

Water quality measurement record of Rusli Nurdin’s farm is available, stored in logbook

Stocking and harvesting data from 6 suppliers is now available, stored in logbook

Cultivation activity logging on site, including water quality, soil, and shrimp’s health condition

Documentation of fertilizer usage

Water level board installation on site

6. Facilitation of water level measurement stick installation to determine the water level of the farm to support the calculation of water volume

7. Facilitation of daily record writing of water folumed based on observation of water level measurement

8. Facilitation of stocks and harvests record writing into monitoring logbook

9. Facilitation of annual data recapitulation to determine the cycle of every 12 months

10. Identification of N source from provided aquainput

11. Calculation of N concentration based on input (fertilisers and feed)

12. Calculation of N concentration disposal of every ton of shrimps produced.

13. Facilitation of record writing of logbook

7.5.2 Total amount of Phosphore (Total P)released from the cultivation process of 1 ton of produced shrimps

Documentation of feed/fertilizer labels that consisted of N content information of products

- Has performed manure storage content of the documentation. Available in logbook PT.MMA - Has been tested N and P in pond

Done

7.5.3 Correct handling pf mud and sedimentation disposal from pond and canal

1. Facilitation of sedimentation disposal plan making, complemented with 2. thickness and size of disposed sedimentation b. disposal location map

2. Ensure that sedimentation disposal is in

SOP has been fabricated and registration form sludge disposal pond

Constrainedto be done due embankment land that is so broad that costly

accordance with the sedimentation disposal plan/ not dumped into the waterflow system or natural ecosystem

3. Facilitation of the making of sedimentation disposal layout and photo documentation showing the location of disposal

7.5.4 Water disposal from aerated pond / IPAL pond

Not applicable, the farm is not categorized as an intensive farm



7.5.5 Precentage of dissolved oxygen change (DO) relative to DO saturation on sea waters located 200m from the location of disposal (on certain temperature and salinity)

1. Facilitation of measurement and record writing of DO substances of at least 2 times/month in the morning and in the afternoon on sea waters located 200m from the location of disposal

- DO measurement has been performed in ponds Rusli Nurdin and Suminto Halim every day morning and afternoon. - DO measurements have been conducted on marine waters within 200 meters from the sewage ponds - Has performed daily water quality measurements and

Done

2. Facilitation of salinity and temperature measured at the time of DO measurement

3. routine calibration on equipments as suggested by manufacturer mannual

4. Execution of DO difference on farm site and outside of farm side (place of water disposal) on each observation

5. Ensure that the DO difference is ≤ 65%

6. Facilitation of DO measurement at the time of audit

recorded dilogbook ditambak PT.MMA - Perform DO calculations with DO saturation ≤ 65%

Criteria 7.6. Energy Efficiency

7.6.1. Energy Consumption (142) of sources (142) throughout 12 months period of time

1. Provision of energy consuming activity list (e.g.: aeration, water pump, office,

- It has been done recording the activities that use energy for 12 months / 4 periods of activity Saved in logbook PT.MMA

Done

internal transport, etc.), list needs to be included into calculation of energy consumption of the farm

2. Provision of written record of energy consumption in 12 months

3. Facilitation of documents as proof of fuel purchase to support farm’s activity

4. Calculation of annual and per cycle cumulative energy demand

7.6.2. Annual cumulative energy demand (megajoul/ton of produced shrimps) (144) throughout 12 months period of time

1. Pembuatan kalkulasi kebutuhan energi kumulatif tahunan (megajoule / ton udang)

2. Penyimpanan data kalkulasi beserta bukti-bukti penggunaan energi

- It has been done recording the activities that use energy for 12 months / 4 periods of activity Saved in logbook PT.MMA

Done

Criteria 7.7. Handling and Storing of Chemical and Dangerous Substances

7.7.1 Safe storing and correct handling of chemical substances and dangerous substances

1. Identification of all chemical and dangerous substances usage

2. Preparation of safe storage procedure for all chemical and dangerous substances on site

3. Ensure the availibility of safe storage for chemical and dangerous substance

4. Ensure all workers get the proper training regarding storage procedure of chemical and dangerous substances

Farmers have not used dangerous chemical substances on site, however documentation has not been established in the logbook

Commitment letter from farmers to not use dangerous chemical substances is available, stored in PT. MMA logbook

Records on guns usage for predator control, and substances and medications usage on site

Done

7.7.2. Correct handling and responsible disposal of waste based on risk assesment and recycle possibilities

1. 1. Provision of garbage bin allocated for different types of waste (plastics,

Garbage bin for Rusly Nurdin guard house has been provided

SOP for waste handling has not ben established

glasses, and organics)

2. 2. Execution of waste management based on the national guidelines

3. Facilitation of plan/procedure making for handling and disposal of waste (including recycle plan)

Mr. H. Rusli (farmer 1) Mr Suminto/ H Dahari

(farmer 2)

Evaluation (Per

indicator, select one category in the drop-

down menu)

Justification of classification of

NC Provide an

explanation of the reason(s)

for the classification of any NCs or non-

applicability

Tindak lanjut yang sudah dilakukan

PRINCIPLE 1. COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE NATIONAL AND LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS

Criterion 1.1: Documented compliance with local and national legal requirements

Pak H. Rusli (4 ponds) Fisheries Bussiness Licensese (Surat Ijin Usaha perikanan 20 Ha), No.523.3/2021/B.3/Diskan/2006; 523.3/0585/B.3/Diskan/2006 (20 Ha); 523.3/2025/B.3/Diskan/2006 (20 Ha); need 1 more licenses Issue and/or expire date: 5 April 2006 ; 5 April 2006, 5 april 2006, Last update/inspection: N/A Land License permitt : 2711/Tapem-Tambak/1/2004 (21.11 Ha); 855/Tapem-Tambak/IX/2003 (23 (Ha); 2712/Tapem-Tambak/I/2004 (22.8 Ha), need 1 more license. issued and/or expire date : 2 Januari 2004; 2 Januari 2004, 16 Sept. 2003, need 1 more license.

pak Suminto (3 ponds) Fisheries Bussiness Licensese (Surat Ijin Usaha perikanan 10 Ha), 523.3/0458/B.3/Diskan/2005. Issue and/or expire date: 17 Dec. 2005. Last update/inspection: N/A need 2 license for 2 ponds Land License permitt : 503.523/363/EK-I/1987 issued and/or expire date :25 Sept. 1987 however not define coverage Area (Ha) NPWP :

Minor

Rusli cant provide licenses for pond no.4

Suminto cant provide license for his 2 ponds - and land permit license for pak Suming.

Rusli : DONE

SIUP dan Surat Izin penggunaan tanah untuk usaha tambak Rusli Nurdin tersedia lengkap.

NPWP Rusli Nurdin tersedia.

SIUP tambak no 4 tersedia Suminto / H Dahari : ON PROGRES

Mencatatkan TPUPI ke DKP, pihak MMA dan Suminto/H Dahari mendokumentasikan penyerahan berkas pencatatan TPUPI ke DKP sebagai bukti

NPWP :

B. Verify farm has aquaculture farming license (as applicable). Fisheries Bussiness Licensese (Surat Ijin Usaha perikanan 20 Ha), No.523.3/2021/B.3/Diskan/2006; 523.3/0585/B.3/Diskan/2006 (20 Ha); 523.3/2025/B.3/Diskan/2006 (20 Ha); need 1 more licenses Issue and/or expire date: 5 April 2006 ; 5 April 2006, 5 april 2006, Last update/inspection: N/A

B. Verify farm has aquaculture farming license (as applicable). Fisheries Bussiness Licensese (Surat Ijin Usaha perikanan 10 Ha), 523.3/0458/B.3/Diskan/2005. Issue and/or expire date: 17 Dec. 2005. Last update/inspection: N/A need 2 license for 2 ponds

C. Verify farm has a commercial license (as applicable). License number: N/A. commercial license not require in small farmer. Issue and expire date: N/A

C. Verify farm has a commercial license (as applicable). License number: N/A. commercial license not require in small farmer. Issue and expire date: N/A

D. Verify compliance. Land permit/title: Land License permitt : 2711/Tapem-Tambak/1/2004 (21.11 Ha); 855/Tapem-Tambak/IX/2003 (23 (Ha); 2712/Tapem-Tambak/I/2004 (22.8 Ha), need 1 more license. issued and/or expire date : 2 Januari 2004; 2 Januari 2004, 16 Sept. 2003, need 1 more license.

D. Verify compliance. Land permit/title: Land License permitt : 503.523/363/EK-I/1987 issued and/or expire date :25 Sept. 1987 however not define coverage Area (Ha)

E. Verify that the list is available and complete. List of procedures available? yes. Mention main procedures related to environment, animal welfare and workers health and safety: (all procedure are authorised by farm owner and GMB. 1. Complaint procedure at farm area, Sop:01/Konflik/12/2015 2. SOP Shrimp aquaculture (traditional farming), No.02/SOP-Budidaya udang/12/2015. 3.SOP Chemical storing, no. 04/SOp-Penyimpanan bahan kimia/12/2015 4. SOP Shrimp health plan, Np.03/SOP-pengendalian penyakit udang/12/2015. 5. SOP handling discharge and waste. No. 05/SOP-penanganan sampah/12/2015.

E. Verify that the list is available and complete. List of procedures available? yes. Mention main procedures related to environment, animal welfare and workers health and safety: (all procedure are authorised by farm owner and GMB. 1. Complaint procedure at farm area, Sop:01/Konflik/12/2015 2. SOP Shrimp aquaculture (traditional farming), No.02/SOP-Budidaya udang/12/2015. 3.SOP Chemical storing, no. 04/SOp-Penyimpanan bahan kimia/12/2015 4. SOP Shrimp health plan, Np.03/SOP-pengendalian penyakit udang/12/2015. 5. SOP handling discharge and waste. No. 05/SOP-penanganan sampah/12/2015.

A. Verify farm has made legal compliance publicly available. Place of publication: Not available Documents availble: N/A If documents are online, website address: no website is functional and easy to access? N/A

A. Verify farm has made legal compliance publicly available. Place of publication: Not available Documents availble: N/A If documents are online, website address: no website is functional and easy to access? N/A

Minor government permits and licenses not publicly available

Rusli : DONE

Rusli has installed SIUP, IUP and other permission letter, SOP and the annoucement is in public area

Suminto / H Dahari : ON PROGRES

B.Government-issued operational permits are publicly available one month after issued by government authorities through the means they chose to provide public information Updated documents available? N/A A format to record information request is available? N/A If request are available Person: N/A Information requested: N/A response taken and time: N/A Justification for more than 14 days: N/A

B.Government-issued operational permits are publicly available one month after issued by government authorities through the means they chose to provide public information Updated documents available? N/A A format to record information request is available? N/A If request are available Person: N/A Information requested: N/A response taken and time: N/A Justification for more than 14 days: N/A

Suminto / H Dahari will use note TPUPI as a provement in achieving legalization principles before TPUPI being processed and revoked by the DKP berusaha memenuhi prinsip tentang legalitas, sebelum TPUPI diproses dan dikeluarkan oleh DKP

PRINCIPLE 2. SITE FARMS IN ENVIRONMENTALLY SUITABLE LOCATIONS WHILE CONSERVING BIODIVERSITY AND IMPORTANT NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS

Criterion 2.1: Biodiversity Environmental Impact Assessment (B-EIA)

A. Verify farm has a B-EIA report and that the methodology adopted complied with Appendix I. Go through Appendix A checklist point by point. Ensure farm is following B-EIA recommendations and monitoring protocol. Verify the farm is familiar with Appendix A, the B-EIA and that they have been implementing the findings. Verify that workers are aware of the B-EIA content and the measures needed to palliate/compensate the operation effects on the environment. Additional comment: During local community interviews, verify that stakeholders were consulted in the B-EIA research by the ecologist. Records

A. Verify farm has a B-EIA report and that the methodology adopted complied with Appendix I. Go through Appendix A checklist point by point. Ensure farm is following B-EIA recommendations and monitoring protocol. Verify the farm is familiar with Appendix A, the B-EIA and that they have been implementing the findings. Verify that workers are aware of the B-EIA content and the measures needed to palliate/compensate the operation effects on the environment. Additional comment: During local community interviews, verify that stakeholders were consulted

Minor BEIA Shall be inform to worker, in regard of awarness to all workers

Rusli : DONE Suminto / H Dahari : DONE Socialization and training concerning BEIA have been done to owner and workers of the ponds

from meeting with stakeholders (community) to collect information for the B-EIA development. During surveillance audits verify the implementation of the B-EIA action/monitoring plan. BEIA Author: Cut Desyana, S.Si, M.Mar.St (Master of MArine Sciences). ASC Shrimp raining at 2-4 Dec. 2013. Dr. Idm Darma Setiawan (MAster of Economic and Agriculture ) Firman Zulfikar, M.Si (MAster of Coastal Resource management). Dandy Eko Prasetiyo, M.Si (Master of Science and Biology Conservation) Sulastiti Ismuningrum, S.Sos (Bachelor Degree in Social) Date of issue: March 2015 Appendix A checklist complete? yes Workers were trained and aware in relation to BEIA? no Date: january 2016 and feb. 2016 If monitoring done, date and result: N/A Stake holders consulted? yes. Date of meeting : MArch 2016 and 13 June 2016.

in the B-EIA research by the ecologist. Records from meeting with stakeholders (community) to collect information for the B-EIA development. During surveillance audits verify the implementation of the B-EIA action/monitoring plan. BEIA Author: Cut Desyana, S.Si, M.Mar.St (Master of MArine Sciences). ASC Shrimp raining at 2-4 Dec. 2013. Dr. Idm Darma Setiawan (MAster of Economic and Agriculture ) Firman Zulfikar, M.Si (MAster of Coastal Resource management). Dandy Eko Prasetiyo, M.Si (Master of Science and Biology Conservation) Sulastiti Ismuningrum, S.Sos (Bachelor Degree in Social) Date of issue: March 2015 Appendix A checklist complete? yes Workers were trained and aware in relation to BEIA? no Date: january 2016 and feb. 2016 If monitoring done, date and result: N/A Stake holders consulted? yes. Date of meeting : MArch 2016 and 13 June 2016.

Criterion 2.2: Conservation of protected areas [13] or critical habitats

A. Verify that the declaration is accurate during local community interviews. If mangrove or wetland conversion

A. Verify that the declaration is accurate during local community interviews. If mangrove or wetland

Minor farm owner (Pak Rusli and pak Sumin cant

Rusli : DONE Suminto / H Dahari : DONE

occurred after May 1999 for reasons other than establishment of pumping stations or canals, raise a NC. Auditor should use land use maps of the area before and after 1999, and should refer to the B-EIA which should include the baseline ecological conditions prior to farm establishment. These documents are usually available at the local government offices (Planning department). Satelite images before and after 1999 are also admissable when available. Farm Construction year: 1996 There was mangroove destruction after may 2009? no Confirmed by (maps, sattelite images): cant provide map. Local community declaration: 1990

conversion occurred after May 1999 for reasons other than establishment of pumping stations or canals, raise a NC. Auditor should use land use maps of the area before and after 1999, and should refer to the B-EIA which should include the baseline ecological conditions prior to farm establishment. These documents are usually available at the local government off+H27ices (Planning department). Satelite images before and after 1999 are also admissable when available. Farm Construction year:1991 There was mangroove destruction after may 2009? no Confirmed by (maps, sattelite images): cant provide map/satelite images. however owner provide local authority statement, with the map of ponds area. he has permit to convert mangrove into shrimp ponds (No.C.2/523.3/406/1987K,by province east Kalimantan, District Bulungan on 1987. Local community declaration: 1987

provide satelite map/imegery of their pond area (before 1999 and after 1999) farm cant provide provide location and description (including surface area) of the area being rehabilitated.

The document given to the auditors is BEIA document

The map of farming location is available

The map of location, area, type, description concerning Mangrove plantation by PT. MMA is savailable

A declaration about the opening of ponds by the farmers is available

A.Review search results for adequacy and completeness and that workers are aware of the endangered species and protection measures Number of endangered species in the area: 1 (Nasalis larvatus ) arround north

A.Review search results for adequacy and completeness and that workers are aware of the endangered species and protection measures Number of endangered species in the area: n1 (Nasalis larvatus ) arround

Minor

farm cant provide literature to identify endangered species that


PT. MMA has owned report of RSCIP proposed by WWF Telapak-WIIP consortium

kalimantan island. Source of information: cant provide literature/local newspaper regarding any species that accur in the area Worker are aware of presence of endangered species and protection measures? yes

north kalimantan island. Source of information: cant provide literature/local newspaper regarding any species that accur in the area Worker are aware of presence of endangered species and protection measures? yes

occur in the area. only based on BEIA report

including protected animals data

PT. MMA has owned study of ASC assessment gap of WWF ID including protected animals data

PT.MMA has provided protected animal poster issued by the local Marine and Fisheries Department of North Kalimantan around the ponds location (according to IUCN redlist and PP no 7 thn 1999)

- There is protected animals handbook as farmers guidance

PT. MMA have produced redlist IUCN handbook including types and the references of protected animals

Pt. MMA has made signpost stating prohibiton in hunting protected animals

Suminto/H Dahari has signed statement not to exploit protected animals

Criterion 2.4: Ecological buffers, barriers and corridors

A. Consulting legislation applicable at the time of construction and the BEIA report, verify that the width and status (by direct observation) of the buffer is

A. Consulting legislation applicable at the time of construction and the BEIA report, verify that the width and status (by direct observation) of the buffer is

Minor coastal buffer at least 100 m (BEIA Report)

Rusli : DONE

Rusli has planted mangrove in front of ponds heading to the sea

adequate. Barrier wide in m: 26 m (refer to BEIA) Conditions of barrier (material, vegetation): natural vegetation.

adequate. Barrier wide in m: .90 m (refer to BEIA) Conditions of barrier (material, vegetation): natural vegetation.

Rusli has signed statement letter not to take out planted mangrove and allow mangrove in the riverside to live normally

Suminto / H Dahari : DONE

Suminto / H Dahari has planted mangrove in front of ponds heading to the sea

Suminto/H Dahari has signed statement letter not to take out planted mangrove and allow mangrove in the riverside to live normally

A. Consulting legislation applicable at the time of construction and the BEIA report, verify that the width and status (by direct observation) of the buffer is adequate. Barrier wide in m: 15-26 m (observation and BEIA report) Conditions of barrier (material, vegetation): natural vegetation

A. Consulting legislation applicable at the time of construction and the BEIA report, verify that the width and status (by direct observation) of the buffer is adequate. Barrier wide in m: 40-60 m (observation and BEIA report) Conditions of barrier (material, vegetation): natural vegetation

Minor riparian buffer at least 100 m (BEIA Report)

Rusli has signed statement letter not to take out planted mangrove and allow mangrove in the riverside to live normally

Suminto / H Dahari : DONE

Suminto / H Dahari has planted mangrove in front of ponds heading to the sea

Suminto/H Dahari has signed statement letter not to take out planted mangrove and allow

mangrove in the riverside to live normally

A. Consulting legislation applicable at the time of construction, B-EIA report and P-SIA report, verify that the width and status (by direct observation) of the corridors (if any) is adequate. It is appropriate that issues of "corridors" within farm boundries be discussed in periodic town meetings. Map available: no Area or number of corridor sites : 1 Corridor vegetation type : bund

A. Consulting legislation applicable at the time of construction, B-EIA report and P-SIA report, verify that the width and status (by direct observation) of the corridors (if any) is adequate. It is appropriate that issues of "corridors" within farm boundries be discussed in periodic town meetings. Map available: no Area or number of corridor sites : 1 Corridor vegetation type : bund

Minor

cant Provide a map or sketch of the farm indicating corridors and measurements of corridor width for human or native wildlife movement across agricultural landscapes

Rusli : DONE Suminto / H Dahari : DONE BEIA report has been improved by inputing corridor measurement and buffer around the pond

Criterion 2.5: Prevention of salinization of freshwater and soil resources

A. Confirm the farm has complete and accurate records of specific conductance and that specific conductance did not show any net increase (fluctuations that do not indicate an increasing trend are not considered a net increase). A cross check should be conducted to verify that the B-EIA reports sampling stations and frequency of monitoring are adhered to. Auditors should validate monitored data at least four points within the farm perimeter (one station per perimeter side). Monitored station should remain

A. Confirm the farm has complete and accurate records of specific conductance and that specific conductance did not show any net increase (fluctuations that do not indicate an increasing trend are not considered a net increase). A cross check should be conducted to verify that the B-EIA reports sampling stations and frequency of monitoring are adhered to. Auditors should validate monitored data at least four points within the farm perimeter (one

Minor

no records of specific conductance measured in in adjacent land ecosystems and agricultural field. Sampling station shall be define at BEIA report

Rusli : DONE Suminto / H Dahari : DOME

According BEIA document this point is NOT APPLICABLE, therefore this measurement is not conducted. In addition, the farming location is in frith not in land, so there is no intrusion

the same across years and identified on farm map. Number of sampling stations: not available Map available: not Sampling frequency: no measure Initial value: parameter (conductivity) no data of soil conductivity measure available Last year values: N/A Increasing trend? initial audit (N/A)

station per perimeter side). Monitored station should remain the same across years and identified on farm map. Number of sampling stations: not available Map available: not Sampling frequency: no measure Initial value: parameter (conductivity) no data of soil conductivity measure available Last year values: N/A Increasing trend? initial audit (N/A)

According to ASC, footnote 44, if salinity measurement is under 1, there is no need in using conductivity, while salinity condition in the pond is above 18 ppm

In footnote 47, this phenomenon happens because of the location not becasue of intrusion

B. Auditor supervises measurement and confirms compliance to the requirements Audit values: cannot arrange specifc conductance measurement, due to they don’t have equipment.

B. Auditor supervises measurement and confirms compliance to the requirements Audit values: cannot arrange specifc conductance measurement, due to they don’t have equipment.

C. Provide evidence from an independent official organization (government agency, university) that such increase was due to a phenomenon outside the control of the farmer. Phenomenon that cause the net increase: No data provided

C. Provide evidence from an independent official organization (government agency, university) that such increase was due to a phenomenon outside the control of the farmer. Phenomenon that cause the net increase: No data provided

PRINCIPLE 4: OPERATE FARMS WITH RESPONSIBLE LABOR PRACTICES [60]

Criterion 4.4: Work environment health and safety

Health and Safety training date/s: not performed yet Trained by: not available Trainer references: not available

Health and Safety training date/s: not performed yet Trained by: not available Trainer references: not available

Major

During the interview with workers, confirmed that no training related to safey aspect and hazardous work. There is a training for PPE use, however sighted that one workers going into the pond without safety equipment eg. Boot, long sleeve etc. farmer shall define a risk analysis base on activity.

Rusli : DONE Suminto / H Dahari : DONE PT. MMA continously held training about employment safety for workers in Rusli and Sumintos’ ponds

Activities observed requiring PPE: no PPE used when perform activity on the pond. PPE used: not used PPE available in a sufficient quanity for workers? no PPE operative? no

Activities observed requiring PPE: no PPE used when perform activity on the pond. PPE used: not used PPE available in a sufficient quanity for workers? no PPE operative? no

There is an accidents and corrective actions format available? Yes for accident record and not for corrective action format Number of recorded accidents cases in the last 6 months: not filled in by the farmer Example of case and corrective action: NA

There is an accidents and corrective actions format available? Yes for accident record, and corrective action format Number of recorded accidents cases in the last 6 months: Jan-June filled in by the farmer, no accident found in the record

Minor

records of of all accidents and corrective actions not completely filled by farmer


There is form of accident in pond’s guard house, but there is no accident happenerd

Example of case and corrective action: NA

There is a book that records data of hospitalized workers including name, date, medical bill, disease and also the signature.

Corrective action reviewed at a. implemented on site? None Example of recurrent accident: NA Initial number of cases: NA Actual number of cases: NA

Corrective action reviewed at a. implemented on site? None Example of recurrent accident: NA Initial number of cases: NA Actual number of cases: NA

Criterion 4.10: Fair and transparent worker-management systems [83]

Records code: not available Period reviewed: not available Example of complaint and action taken:

Records code: not available Period reviewed: not available Example of complaint and action taken:

Minor no recording for such issues raised by workers and including the plan (including actions and timeframe) for addressing yet to be resolved conflicts.


There is form of conflict resolution filled by pond’s guard

There is SOP of management conflict signed by everyone who gets into the ponds

Records code: not available Period reviewed: Example of complaint and action taken: not available Action was adhered to plan?

Records code: not available Period reviewed: Example of complaint and action taken: not available Action was adhered to plan?

Criterion 4.11: Living conditions for workers accommodated on the farm

Habitation construction of: wood and stage Is rainproof? yes Sanitary considered as natural Clean? As similar as available in common houses in this area. toilet is not adequate yet

Habitation construction of: wood and stage Is rainproof? yes Sanitary considered as natural Clean? As similar as available in common houses in this area. toilet is not adequate yet

Minor

there should be water test for potable water Also toilet is not adequate yet


There is proper toilet for the worker

There is First Aid box and medicine for workers

The Tarakan Department of Health controls accumulated Privacy is given by: room Privacy is given by: room

Potable water source (pipe, well, commercial brands): rainfall, cooked first When is treated in the farm test results and date: none Food for workers is provided by: them selve

Potable water source (pipe, well, commercial brands): rainfall, cooked first When is treated in the farm test results and date: none Food for workers is provided by: them selve

rain water and finds out that the water is still consumable

PRINCIPLE 5: MANAGE SHRIMP HEALTH AND WELFARE IN A RESPONSIBLE MANNER

Criterion 5.1: Disease prevention

A. review farm post-larvae counting work sheets. Farm post larvae work sheets shall not exceed 5% margin of error. If company is integrated (larvae supplier + farm) 1 count is sufficient. Auditor will need to confirm the accuracy of the method used by the farm. Receipts number : invoices date 13 january 2016 Period reviewed: 13 january 2016 Total number of shrimp stocked: 979,160 pcs (4 ponds, 244,790/pond) Counting method used by farm : scooping (use scoop net to count the amount of PL).

A. review farm post-larvae counting work sheets. Farm post larvae work sheets shall not exceed 5% margin of error. If company is integrated (larvae supplier + farm) 1 count is sufficient. Auditor will need to confirm the accuracy of the method used by the farm. Receipts number : 0615, Period reviewed: 9 feb. 2015 Total number of shrimp stocked: 60,000 pcs (1 ponds) Counting method used by farm : scooping (use scoop net to count the amount of PL).

Minor

SR not comply with SC requirement (be more than 25% for extensive farm)


The report of total harvest and SR measurement is available

There is explanation in shrimp harvesting system in traditional farm in North Kalimantan which supports low SR condition

The baseline of shrimp farming study which states the SR is around 10-15%

B. Review records. Confirm that farm records are sufficient to determine number of shrimp harvested from each enclosure. Receipts number : invoices date 13 january 2016 Period reviewed: 13 january 2016

B. Review records. Confirm that farm records are sufficient to determine number of shrimp harvested from each enclosure. Receipts number : 0615, Period reviewed: 9 feb. 2015

Total number of shrimps harvested: 42,433 pcs ( 1,000.30 kg)

Total number of shrimps harvested: no data provided

C. Review farm's calculations to verfiy accuracy cross reference with the hatchery counts. Categorise the farming system into 1 of the 3 categories and confirm that average real percentage mortality confirms to the requirement Farm Category: 1 Lower pond survival rate in the dataset: 2.86% Higher pond survival rate in the dataset: 5.99% Annual Average Survival Rate: 2.759%

C. Review farm's calculations to verfiy accuracy cross reference with the hatchery counts. Categorise the farming system into 1 of the 3 categories and confirm that average real percentage mortality confirms to the requirement Farm Category: 1 Lower pond survival rate in the dataset: no data provided Higher pond survival rate in the dataset: no data provided Annual Average Survival Rate: no data provided

Criterion 5.3: Disease management and treatment

A. Review farm's list of medicines, chemicals and biological products. Farm's list of medicines, chemicals and biological products code: list of medicine/chemical not available. Main Medicines: not use medicine Main Chemicals products: Dolomite, Urea, TSP. Main Biological products: saponin

A. Review farm's list of medicines, chemicals and biological products. Farm's list of medicines, chemicals and biological products code: list of medicine/chemical not available. Main Medicines: not use medicine Main Chemicals products: Dolomite, Urea, TSP. Main Biological products: saponin

Minor

there are no list of chemical, medicine and biologilal product that used in farm


There is record in the used of chemical ingredients in the farms

The form to record the chemical products is available

Farm’s guard is trained to record chemical product used in the pond

B. Review records to confirm farm usage of products. During on-site inspection, verify there is no evidence for unrecorded use of any veterinary medicines, chemicals or biological

B. Review records to confirm farm usage of products. During on-site inspection, verify there is no evidence for unrecorded use of any veterinary medicines, chemicals or biological

products (i.e. no empty containers or non-inventoried warehouse supplies). Record reviewed: shrimp ponds record Medicines used: N/A. Chemicals products used: , Urea, TSP, EM4 Biological products used: Saponin

products (i.e. no empty containers or non-inventoried warehouse supplies). Record reviewed: shrimp ponds record Medicines used: N/A. Chemicals products used: , Urea, TSP, EM4 Biological products used: Saponin

C. Capture sufficient evidence that an organization operates an accurate traceability system. If farm uses/used any antibiotics or medicated feed is used, check validity of farm's Chain of Custody. Antibiotics used: N/A (not use antibiotic) Medicated pond Traceability excersice (pond, date of harvest, segregation form): N/A farm not use any antibiotic or pesticide. ASC CoC code: N/A farm not use any antibiotic or pesticide.

C. Capture sufficient evidence that an organization operates an accurate traceability system. If farm uses/used any antibiotics or medicated feed is used, check validity of farm's Chain of Custody. Antibiotics used: N/A (not use antibiotic) Medicated pond Traceability excersice (pond, date of harvest, segregation form): N/A farm not use any antibiotic or pesticide. ASC CoC code: N/A farm not use any antibiotic or pesticide.

A. Review SOP for content of the safe use and implementationof veterinary medicines, chemicals and biological products. SOP code:not available (only SOP for store chemical) Verify by: not availble SOPs for all chemiicals? Not available

A. Review SOP for content of the safe use and implementationof veterinary medicines, chemicals and biological products. SOP code:not available (only SOP for store chemical) Verify by: not availble SOPs for all chemiicals? Not available

Minor NO SOP for handling chemical and biological product. Thereis only SOP for storing chemical. There must be documented information to


The SOP of management and storation of chemical product in pond has been created (No. 018/SOP/MMA-ASC/XII/2016)

Training to record, manage, use and store chemical

B. Verify through interviews that employees are aware of procedures for proper chemical usage and that they have access to current instructions.

B. Verify through interviews that employees are aware of procedures for proper chemical usage and that they have access to current instructions.

Number of interviews: 6 Comments: worker aware hpw tp handle chemical during activities at farm however no training record for handling chemical

Number of interviews: 6 Comments: no training record for handling chemical

workers how to handling chemical at farm.

products in the pond has been held

Training documentation is available

C. During on-site visits, verify there is no

evidence of failure to comply with the SOP. Chemicals use observed: worker know how to handle chemical during activities at farm

C. During on-site visits, verify there is no evidence of failure to comply with the SOP. Chemicals use observed: worker know how to handle chemical during activities at farm

A. Review SOP for appropriatness. Chemicals that need neutralization : Dolomite, urea SOP code: no SOP Verify by: not available Is that include procedure of neutralization? . Not available

A. Review SOP for appropriatness. Chemicals that need neutralization : Dolomite, urea SOP code: no SOP Verify by: not available Is that include procedure of neutralization? . Not available

Minor no procedure for neutralization

Rusli : DONE Suminto / H Dahari : DONE SOP of neutralization of water in ponds has been created (no.021/SOP/MMA-ASC/XII/2016)

B. Interview employees and assess compliance. Number of interviews: 6 Comments: don’t know

B. Interview employees and assess compliance. Number of interviews: 6 Comments: don’t know

C. During on-site visits, verify there is no evidence of failure to comply with the SOP. Neutralized chemicals observed: Dolomit , Urea

C. During on-site visits, verify there is no evidence of failure to comply with the SOP. Neutralized chemicals observed: Dolomit , Urea

PRINCIPLE 6: MANAGE BROODSTOCK ORIGIN, STOCK SELECTION AND EFFECTS OF STOCK MANAGEMENT

Criterion 6.1: Presence of exotic or introduced shrimp species

A. Confirm that the farmed species is accurately identified in purchase records. Receipt number: cant provide declaration from seed Supplier

A. Confirm that the farmed species is accurately identified in purchase records. Receipt number: Declaration letter from

Minor

No documented information from


Record reviewed: Jan 2016 - April 2016 Specie identified: P. Monodon

PT. MMA date 15 Arpil 2016. Record reviewed: feb 2016 - May 2016 Specie identified: P. Monodon

postlarvae supplier that identifying the species (Latin name) of shrimp farmed. (pak Rusli) No documentation shows whether farmed species is indigenous or non-indigenous to the water system.

There is broodstock origin letter which states that the species fared is Penaeus monodon produced by Hatchery of PT. MMA

B. Confirm that documentation shows the farmed species is indigenous to the water system if the farmed species is indigenous to the water system, provide documentary evidence (peer-reviewed papers, IUCN, FAO or other international organization). If species is not indigenous, please refer to c and d (below). Evidence reviewed: no documentary evidence provided.

B. Confirm that documentation shows the farmed species is indigenous to the water system if the farmed species is indigenous to the water system, provide documentary evidence (peer-reviewed papers, IUCN, FAO or other international organization). If species is not indigenous, please refer to c and d (below). Evidence reviewed: no documentary evidence provided.

C. Confirm that documentation shows the farmed species is commercially farmed locally if the species is not indigenous, provide Prepare documentary evidence (peer-reviewed papers, official government [competent authority] statements or other comparable references that the species is commercially produced locally. Specie commercially farmed locally evidence: species is indigenous (from tarakan, Indonesia).

C. Confirm that documentation shows the farmed species is commercially farmed locally if the species is not indigenous, provide Prepare documentary evidence (peer-reviewed papers, official government [competent authority] statements or other comparable references that the species is commercially produced locally. Specie commercially farmed locally evidence: species is indigenous (from tarakan, Indonesia).

D. Review, as a minimum, evidience of no negiative impact and assess its accuracy and appropriatenes by means such as an internet review, including, as a minimum, a Google search. Note: These documents have to assert

D. Review, as a minimum, evidience of no negiative impact and assess its accuracy and appropriatenes by means such as an internet review, including, as a minimum, a Google search. Note: These documents have to assert

explicitly that there is no negative enviromental impact. Uploaded a copy on CUSI. No negative impact evidence: no Peer-reviewed papers: N/A Link of google search: -- Official government statements/ competent authority: -- Link of google search: -- Other reference: -- Link of google search: -- based on interview, species used in farm is indigenous species from North KAlimantan province, Indonesia. however no evidence provided.

explicitly that there is no negative enviromental impact. Uploaded a copy on CUSI. No negative impact evidence: no Peer-reviewed papers: N/A Link of google search: -- Official government statements/ competent authority: -- Link of google search: -- Other reference: -- Link of google search: -- based on interview, species used in farm is indigenous species from North KAlimantan province, Indonesia. however no evidence provided.

E. Review evidence and assess its accuracy and appropriateness including hatchery documentation on OIE compliance and regional and national importantion laws. Hatchery permits: not available Import licenses: N/A species used in farm is indigenous species from North Kalimantan Province, Indonesia.

E. Review evidence and assess its accuracy and appropriateness including hatchery documentation on OIE compliance and regional and national importantion laws. Hatchery permits: 170914600477 (until 1 dec. 2019) Import licenses: N/A species used in farm is indigenous species from North Kalimantan Province, Indonesia.

A. Review records covering ≥ 25 years or statement from government agencies to establish the maximum height of high water when flooding occurs. Maximum level in the last 25 years: no

A. Review records covering ≥ 25 years or statement from government agencies to establish the maximum height of high water when flooding occurs. Maximum level in the last 25 years: no

Minor farm cant provide official records or statement showing local maximum


There is letter form BMKG station of Tarakan stating

evidence provided Reference: not available

evidence provided Reference: not available

water level (river levels, tide levels, flooding levels, etc) in the previous 25 years. No statement and map of height of bund at farm.

that the maximum height of tide is below the embankment

Scetch of location is created to show the height of embankment is above height of tide

B. Review statement and map. During the on-site visit. Review evidence and verify that the lowest bund height is sufficient to cope with 25 years height. Lowest bund height, : no record reference Declaration date: no record reference Organization name: no record reference

B. Review statement and map. During the on-site visit. Review evidence and verify that the lowest bund height is sufficient to cope with 25 years height. Lowest bund height, : no record reference Declaration date: no record reference Organization name: no record reference

A. Review records to verify inspections are regular and timely. Record code: record not available Time frame: daily check verified by interview. Responsable name: Aliyas, Agus and damin

A. Review records to verify inspections are regular and timely. Record code: record not available Time frame: daily check erified by interview. Responsable name: Yonan and Osias.

Minor

farm cant provide records inspection of net mesh or grills (also can be mention in SOP)


Escape trap/nets in the gate of pond have been checked

SOP of proper shrimp test is available and informed to pond’s guard

The form for monitoring mes has been made. Monitoring is done once a week

The form and SOP of escape shrimp protocols have been made and recorded (Escape shrimp protocols) No. 022/SOP/MMA-ASC/XII/2016

Disease test and PL measurement in Suminto’s seed have been done. The seed will be spreaded in laboratorium of DKP of

B. Witness the farm performing an inspection of meshes and grills to confirm that the program is effective. How do they do the inspection?: visual observe Is it appropriate? Yes

B. Witness the farm performing an inspection of meshes and grills to confirm that the program is effective. How do they do the inspection?: visual observe Is it appropriate? Yes

Tarakan City with negative t WSSV

Green nets has been instaled in the pond’s gate

A. Review the register to verify repairs are performed and recorded. Records of mitigation and repairs code: daily check without recording/documentation. Verify by: Usman Responsable name:Aliyas, Agus and Damin

A. Review the register to verify repairs are performed and recorded. Records of mitigation and repairs code: daily check without recording/documentation. Verify by: Usman Responsable name: Yonan and Osias.

Minor farm cant provide records of mitigation and repairs in their farm.


Notes on damage and improvement of embankment pond’s gate is available

A. Review escape recovery protocols and assess that protocols are implemented, there are records of escapes, records of actions taken and reocrds of procedural modifications to prevent reoccurrence. Protocol code: no recovery protocol Verify by: --- Is the procotolo appropriate? ---

A. Review escape recovery protocols and assess that protocols are implemented, there are records of escapes, records of actions taken and reocrds of procedural modifications to prevent reoccurrence. Protocol code: no recovery protocol Verify by: --- Is the procotolo appropriate? ---

Minor No documented information for scape recovery protocols (SOP)

Rusli : DONE Suminto / H Dahari : DONE SOP of mitigation and improvement of the ponds have been made

A. Review the suitability of any actions taken by the farm to prevent reoccurrence. Actions taken: N/A (no shrimp found at trap of escapee) Record code: record not available

A. Review the suitability of any actions taken by the farm to prevent reoccurrence. Actions taken: N/A (no shrimp found at trap of escapee) Record code: record not available

Minor Farm cant provide record any actions taken to prevent escapee at farm.


Rescontruction trap has been done

Escape shrimp data is checked continously

The form of risk assesment concerning escape species potential has been made

The documentation of the used of trap anf escape species record id available

The data of pond’s gate test is available

There will be trap measuring 1mm in the pond’s gate

Criterion 6.2: Origin of postlarvae or broodstock

A. Review evidence and confirm its accuracy. Test of pathogens code : Laboratory name:Laboratorium of Departement of Fisheries and Marine (Local Authority laboratorium) Verify by: Head of lab. Departement fisheries and marine.

A. Review evidence and confirm its accuracy. Test of pathogens code : not available Laboratory name: not available Verify by: not available

Minor - no documentary evidence proving testing of postlarvae for all relevant pathogens (pak Suming) - no evidence (paper, journal or local authority statement/regulation) why indigenoues specie (P. Monodon) only tested for WSSV,


DKP Trakan records the result of WSSV test of Rusli and Suminto’s ponds

The statement of Quarantine fish concerning WSSV test of shrimp is available

B. Review evidence and confirm its accuracy. Receipt number: o3/monitoring/pcr/labkesling/2016 Evidence: only WSSV test, by departement of fisheries and marine

B. Review evidence and confirm its accuracy. Receipt number: Not available Evidence: not available

C. Assess farm management's working knowledge of guidelines. Record of training : N/A Number of interviews: N/A Comments: N/A not integrated farming

C. Assess farm management's working knowledge of guidelines. Record of training : N/A Number of interviews: N/A Comments: N/A not integrated farming

A. Review declarations and verify that only captive-reared broodstock is used for all species other than P. monodon and from the 1st January 2019, also for

A. Review declarations and verify that only captive-reared broodstock is used for all species other than P. monodon and from the 1st January 2019, also

Minor Farm cant provide declaration from postlarvae


P. monodon broodstock. Declaration number : not available Postlarvae supplier : CV. TSW Specie of shrimp: Peneaus Monodon Record code: not available

for P. monodon broodstock. Declaration number : 02/asal-benur/mma/III/2016 Postlarvae supplier : Hatchery PT. MMA Specie of shrimp: Peneaus Monodon Record code: 15 April 2016

supplier identifying the species (Latin name) of shrimp farmed and the source of broodstock

There is broodstock origin letter which states that the species fared is Penaeus monodon produced by Hatchery of PT. MMA

A. Verify that farm has statements from seed suppliers. Declaration number or code : not available. PL from hatchery Seed supplier : CV TSW (hatchery) Seed origin : Surabaya, indonnesia PL from hatchery, not wild cought cant provide statement letter from supplier(s) seed is not wild-caught.

A. Verify that farm has statements from seed suppliers. Declaration number or code : 02/asal-benur/MMA/III/2016 Seed supplier : Hatchery, PT. MMA Seed origin : Tarakan, Indonesia provide statement letter from seed supplier(s) indicating seed from Hatchery PT. MMA.

Minor Farm cant provide statement from seed supplier(s) that the seed is not wild-caught (Pak Rusli)

Rusli : DONE Suminto / H Dahari : DONE There is broodstock and seeds origin issued by hatchery of PT. MMA stating that the seed is pure is available

B. Verify the farm maintains accurate records for sourcing of seed. Recipt number : SPJ030415.01 Frequency of seed buy : monthly

B. Verify the farm maintains accurate records for sourcing of seed. Recipt number : 00615 Frequency of seed buy : Monthly

PRINCIPLE 7: USE RESOURCES IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY EFFICIENT AND RESPONSIBLE MANNER

Criterion 7.5 : Effluent contaminant load

A. Verify farm keeps records showing daily water exchange rates including diagram showing general water flows through the farm. Average daily water exchange: yes verified by: observation and interview during site visit. Last updating:

A. Verify farm keeps records showing daily water exchange rates including diagram showing general water flows through the farm. Average daily water exchange: yes verified by: observation and interview during site visit. Last updating:

Major Farm cant provide data for total Nitrogent effluent and data of daily water exchange in their ponds

Rusli : ON PROGRESS Suminto / H Dahari : ON PROGRES

The quality is recorded

A column to record water addition in monev form in water wuality control is added B. Confirm the farm has complete and

accurate records for feed used. Period: cant provide data record

B. Confirm the farm has complete and accurate records for feed used. Period: cant provide data record

Total feed used Kg: no data available Total fertilizer used Kg: no data available Veriified by: --

Total feed used Kg: no data available Total fertilizer used Kg: no data available Veriified by: --

There is diagram showing height of water quality

A layout map of Sumito’s pond and documentation in instalating board of water level measurement is available

The total extent of pond with SIUP and IUP is available

Board of water level measurement in Rusli and Suminto’s ponds is available

Water quality test and water level measurement are checked continously

Record of harvesting has been done is each periode

The result of Nitrogen test from UPTD Disperindagkop shows that it is below the limit

Water sample for Nitrogen and Phospat testing has been done in canal 200 m from the gate. However, the result is not showed yet

The calculation of total N and P has not been done

C. Verify the farm keeps records showing weight of shrimp harvested. Period: 15/3/2015 - 27/8/2015 Total shrimp harvested MT: 266.1 kg

C. Verify the farm keeps records showing weight of shrimp harvested. Period: record not available Total shrimp harvested MT: record not available

D. Verify the farm posseses evidence. Independent ISO 17025 accredited laboratory name: N/A accredited laboratory. N/A Feed N content : NA Fertilizer N content: N/A not using any feed in to the ponds)

D. Verify the farm posseses evidence. Independent ISO 17025 accredited laboratory name: N/A accredited laboratory. N/A Feed N content : NA Fertilizer N content: N/A not using any feed in to the ponds)

E. Confirm the laboratory is suitably qualified to conduct water testing. Review test results Independent ISO 17025 accredited laboratory name: Results of N concentration in effluent water: not using any feed in to the ponds

E. Confirm the laboratory is suitably qualified to conduct water testing. Review test results Independent ISO 17025 accredited laboratory name: Results of N concentration in effluent water: not using any feed in to the ponds

F. Verify the farm keeps complete records of water intake. Records date: Record code: Verified by: not using any feed in to the ponds

F. Verify the farm keeps complete records of water intake. Records date: Record code: Verified by: not using any feed in to the ponds)

G. Verify accuracy through direct observation. For first time audits: auditors should cross-check the accuracy of the farm's map of at least 1 pond chosen randomly using Google Maps, satellite images or similar means (if detailed information is available). Farm Volume m3: Pond verified: Verified by: not using any feed in to the ponds

G. Verify accuracy through direct observation. For first time audits: auditors should cross-check the accuracy of the farm's map of at least 1 pond chosen randomly using Google Maps, satellite images or similar means (if detailed information is available). Farm Volume m3: Pond verified: Verified by: not using any feed in to the ponds

H. Review records and verify accuracy of the calculation Records date: Record code: Verify by: N/A not change the water until harvesting

H. Review records and verify accuracy of the calculation Records date: Record code: Verify by: N/A not change the water until harvesting

I. Confirm the laboratory is suitably qualified to conduct water testing. Review test results Independent ISO 17025 accredited laboratory/university name: Results of N concentration in pond: N/A not change the water until harvesting

I. Confirm the laboratory is suitably qualified to conduct water testing. Review test results Independent ISO 17025 accredited laboratory/university name: Results of N concentration in pond: N/A not change the water until harvesting

J. Review evidence and confirm accuracy Average daily water exchange: verified by: Last updating:

J. Review evidence and confirm accuracy Average daily water exchange: verified by: Last updating:

N/A not change the water until harvesting


A. Confirm the farm has complete and accurate records for feed used. Average daily water exchange: verified by: ponds record Last updating: N/A Farm does not change water until harvesting time.

A. Confirm the farm has complete and accurate records for feed used. Average daily water exchange: verified by: ponds record Last updating: N/A Farm does not change water until harvesting time.

Major fam cant provide data for total Phosporus effluent and data of daily water exchange in their ponds

Rusli : ON PROGRESS Suminto / H Dahari : ON PROGRES

The quality is recorded

A column to record water addition in monev form in water wuality control is added

There is diagram showing height of water quality

A layout map of Sumito’s pond and documentation in instalating board of water level measurement is available

The total extent of pond with SIUP and IUP is available

Board of water level measurement in Rusli and Suminto’s ponds is available

Water quality test and water level measurement are checked continously

Record of harvesting has been done is each periode

The result of Nitrogen test from UPTD Disperindagkop

B. Verify the farm keeps records showing weight of shrimp harvested. Period: Total feed used Kg: no record available Total fertilizer used Kg: no record available Veriified by: no record available

B. Verify the farm keeps records showing weight of shrimp harvested. Period: Total feed used Kg: no record available Total fertilizer used Kg: no record available Veriified by: no record available

C. Verify the farm possesses evidence. Period: 15/3/2015 until 27/8/2015 Total shrimp harvested MT: 266.1 kg

C. Verify the farm possesses evidence. Period: no record Total shrimp harvested MT: no record

D. Confirm the laboratory is suitably qualified to conduct water testing. Review test results Independent ISO 17025 accredited laboratory name: accredited laboratory. N/A Feed P content : N/A Fertilizer P content: n/a

D. Confirm the laboratory is suitably qualified to conduct water testing. Review test results Independent ISO 17025 accredited laboratory name: accredited laboratory. N/A Feed P content : N/A Fertilizer P content: n/a

E. Verify the farm keeps complete records of water intake. Records date: Record code: Verified by:

E. Verify the farm keeps complete records of water intake. Records date: Record code: Verified by:

N/A not change the water until harvesting feed used : phronima suppa (kind of micro-organism that live in ponds)


shows that it is below the limit

Water sample for Nitrogen and Phospat testing has been done in canal 200 m from the gate. However, the result is not showed yet

The calculation of total N and P has not been done

F. Verify accuracy through direct observation. Cross-check the accuracy of the farm map or diagram using Google Map, satellite images or similar means (if detailed information is available). Farm Volume m3: Pond verified: Verified by: N/A not change the water until harvesting feed used : phronima suppa (kind of micro-organism that live in ponds)

F. Verify accuracy through direct observation. Cross-check the accuracy of the farm map or diagram using Google Map, satellite images or similar means (if detailed information is available). Farm Volume m3: Pond verified: Verified by: N/A not change the water until harvesting

G. Review records and verify accuracy of the calculation Records date: Record code: Verify by: feed used : phronima suppa (kind of micro-organism that live in ponds)

G. Review records and verify accuracy of the calculation Records date: Record code: Verify by: N/A not change the water until harvesting

H. Confirm the laboratory is suitably qualified to conduct water testing. Review test results Independent ISO 17025 accredited laboratory/university name: Results of P concentration in pond: feed used : phronima suppa (kind of micro-organism that live in ponds)

H. Confirm the laboratory is suitably qualified to conduct water testing. Review test results Independent ISO 17025 accredited laboratory/university name: Results of P concentration in pond: N/A not change the water until harvesting

I. Review evidence and confirm accuracy Average daily water exchange: verified by: Last updating: N/A not change the water until harvesting

I. Review evidence and confirm accuracy Average daily water exchange: verified by: Last updating: N/A not change the water until harvesting

J. Review farm's calculations to confirm the farm complies with the Requirement. formula used: P load kg/ton shrimp = N/A Kg P / TM shrimp: N/A feed used : phronima suppa (kind of micro-organism that live in ponds)

J. Review farm's calculations to confirm the farm complies with the Requirement. formula used: P load kg/ton shrimp = N/A Kg P / TM shrimp: N/A

A. Review the farm's sludge/sediment management plan. Farm's sludge/sediment management plan code: SOP Sludge Management not available Record date: no record Last updating: no record however sludge and sediment used for bund strengtening and land filling after harvesting finished, verified by interviewed farmers.

A. Review the farm's sludge/sediment management plan. Farm's sludge/sediment management plan code: SOP Sludge Management not available Record date: no record Last updating: no record however sludge and sediment used for bund strengtening and land filling after harvesting finished, verified by interviewed farmers.

Minor Farm cant provide sludge and sediment management plan. And record of using sludge or sludge waste.


The SOP and form of restoring sediment has been created but not implemented (No.24/SOP/MMA-ASC/XII/2016)

A form to record sediment wasted is available

A scetch of disposal sediment has been created B. Review records to confirm appropriate

disposal according to plan. Records available: no record Records date: No record last updating : --

B. Review records to confirm appropriate disposal according to plan. Records available: no record Records date: No record last updating : --

C. If yes to (c), confirm farm has appropriate documentary evidence. Declaration code:

C. If yes to (c), confirm farm has appropriate documentary evidence. Declaration code:

sending date: use: N/A. sludge and sediment used for bund strengtening and land filling after harvesting finished

sending date: use: N/A. sludge and sediment used for bund strengtening and land filling after harvesting finished

D. If yes to (d), inspect sludge repository during on-site visit. Map available: yes. Legal access verified by : N/A. sludge and sediment used for bund strengtening and land filling after harvesting finished

D. If yes to (d), inspect sludge repository during on-site visit. Map available: yes. Legal access verified by : N/A. sludge and sediment used for bund strengtening and land filling after harvesting finished

E. During local community and employee interviews, verify there is no evidence that the farm discharged sludge/sediments directly into receiving waters on natural ecosystems at least for the previous 1 year interviews declarations: no evidence that the farm discharged sludge/sediments directly into receiving waters on natural ecosystems

E. During local community and employee interviews, verify there is no evidence that the farm discharged sludge/sediments directly into receiving waters on natural ecosystems at least for the previous 1 year interviews declarations: no evidence that the farm discharged sludge/sediments directly into receiving waters on natural ecosystems

A. Review dataset to confirm that monitoring covers the required timeframe. Period dates: jan. 2016 - april 2016 Minimum DO: 4.3 Maximum DO: 8.7 Reference: Diurnal DO Measurement Name of the reviewed document: farm owner

A. Review dataset to confirm that monitoring covers the required timeframe. Period dates: DO record March - April 2016 Minimum DO: 3.05 Maximum DO: 6.9 Reference: DO Measurement Name of the reviewed document: farm owner

Major Calculation of percent change in DO for each monitoring not correct

Rusli : ON PROGRESS Suminto / H Dahari : ON PROGRESS

Water quality measurement and data is concerning DO, temperature, salinitasion, pH, the water coloour and water level

B. Verify the farm technicians calibrate equipment as required. Manufacturer name: Lutron Frequency recommended: -- Method recommended : -- Is it in compliance by manufacturer?: -- DO measurement daily

B. Verify the farm technicians calibrate equipment as required. Manufacturer name: Lutron Frequency recommended: -- Method recommended : -- Is it in compliance by manufacturer?: -- DO measurement daily

A calibration SOP of equipment has been made, conducted once a year when data shows anomali

Saturation DO has not been done

C. Review calculations to confirm accuracy. Accurate calculations? Incorrect, Records code or name: -- Date of recording: -- DDDO calclation not correct

C. Review calculations to confirm accuracy. Accurate calculations? Incorrect, Records code or name: -- Date of recording: -- DDDO calclation not correct

D. Confirm the average percent change in DO is ≤ 65%. Period: DO record not correct Average Percent change in DO:

D. Confirm the average percent change in DO is ≤ 65%. Period: DO record not correct Average Percent change in DO:

E. Witness the farm measuring DO to confirm compliance with procedures. On-site values should fall within range of farm data for DO. If an out of range measurement is observed, raise a non-conformity. Audit DO : morning= 4.5 , evening = 8.3 Falls in farm range data set? yes

E. Witness the farm measuring DO to confirm compliance with procedures. On-site values should fall within range of farm data for DO. If an out of range measurement is observed, raise a non-conformity. Audit DO : morning= 3.2 , evening = 6.4 Falls in farm range data set? yes

Criterion 7.6: Energy efficiency

A. Review list for completeness Energy sources: diesel Mention the main farm´s activities: internal transportation (home to ponds, roundtrip)

A. Review list for completeness Energy sources: diesel Mention the main farm´s activities: internal transportation (home to ponds, roundtrip)

Minor Records of farm energy consumption not available.


B. Review calculations. Verify the farm keeps records of energy consumption. Record date: not available Farm energy consumption in the last year (or 3 month) : record not available

B. Review calculations. Verify the farm keeps records of energy consumption. Record date: not available Farm energy consumption in the last year (or 3 month) : record not available

Energy used in one periode farming has been recorded

The will be invoce in fuel purchasing

Consumption of energy has not been calculated according to ASC standart

A. Review calculations. Verify the farm keeps records of energy consumption. And ascertain that the production period of the tonnage produced corresponds to the energy consumption. Period: record not available MJ / MT shrimp: record not available

A. Review calculations. Verify the farm keeps records of energy consumption. And ascertain that the production period of the tonnage produced corresponds to the energy consumption. Period: record not available MJ / MT shrimp: record not available

Minor records of farm energy consumption not available.


Energy used in one periode farming has been recorded

The will be invoce in fuel purchasing

Consumption of energy has not been calculated according to ASC standart

Criterion 7.7: Handling and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes

A. During on-site inpections, verify that the farm's list of chemicals and hazardous materials is accurate. Mention the main chemicals and hazardous material: Dolomite Saponin, TSP Last updating: no record

A. During on-site inpections, verify that the farm's list of chemicals and hazardous materials is accurate. Mention the main chemicals and hazardous material: Dolomite Saponin, TSP Last updating: no record

Minor Farm cant provide record of all chemicals and hazardous materials used on the farm. As well as record training of handling and storing chemical.


Status of ingredients/chemical products handbook has been made

Socialization on storage and managementt of chemical products in ponds has been

B. Review the farms procedure. Verify implementation during the on-site audit. Procedure available: yes Record date: not available Record code: SOP.04/SOP-Penyimpanan

B. Review the farms procedure. Verify implementation during the on-site audit. Procedure available: yes Record date: not available

Bahan Kimia/12/2015 Verified by: farm owner and GMB

Record code: SOP.04/SOP-Penyimpanan Bahan Kimia/12/2015 Verified by: farm owner and GMB

held Penanganan/Penyimpanan bahan kimia tersedia

There is no storage, documentation and data records of chemical products.

C. Inspect storage areas to verify that chemicals are stored safely. Briefly describe the storage conditions: storage condition is safe, and well arrange

C. Inspect storage areas to verify that chemicals are stored safely. Briefly describe the storage conditions: storage condition is safe, and well arrange

D. Interview farm staff to verify that employees have received training and procedures are followed. Record training code: worker know very well how to store and handle chemical. however record of handling chemical training not available, training date: not available Given by: owner and GMB

D. Interview farm staff to verify that employees have received training and procedures are followed. Record training code: worker know very well how to store and handle chemical. however record of handling chemical training not available, training date: not available Given by: owner and GMB