larp accelerator systems status & plans 13 july 2009 doe review, fnal tom markiewicz/slac bnl -...

LARP Accelerator Systems Status & Plans

13 July 2009

DOE Review, FNAL

Tom Markiewicz/SLAC

BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC

US LHC Accelerator Research Program

LARP DOE Review - 13 July 2009 Acc.Systems Status - T. MarkiewiczSlide n° 2 / 35

The FY10 LARP Accelerator Systems Program

Instrumentation

– Beam Commissioning of Tune & Coupling feedback systems, Schottky Monitor, AC Dipole and Synchrotron Light Monitor

– Luminosity Monitor

– LLRF modeling and commissioning

Collimation

– Rotatable Collimator as a Phase II Secondary Collimator candidate

– T980 Crystal Collimation Study at the Tevatron

– UA9 Crystal Collimation Study at CERN’s SPS

– Hollow electron lens as a scraper for LHC

Accelerator Physics

– Electron lens as a Beam-Beam interaction compensator

– Control of E-cloud induced beam instability in SPS through RF feedback

– Crab Cavity R&D program

– PS2 Design Study


Task List & FY09

Budget as of

May’09 rev.

BNL FNAL LBNL SLAC Total

Accelerator Systems 575 521 1,005 1,350 3,451 Instrumentation 50 35 800 40 925Phase I 50 35 800 40 925Chromaticity Feedback (15) 15 0Luminosity Monitor 800 800Schottky 20 20AC Dipole 65 0 65LLRF 40 40

Collimation 180 211 0 1015 1406Phase I 0 0 0 0 0Cleaning Efficiency Study 0 0Phase II 180 211 0 1015 1406Rotatable Collimators 950 950Tertiary Collimation Study 0Crystal Collimation 180 211 0 65 456

T980 at Tevatron 0 166 0 166CRYSTAL at SPS 180 45 65 290

Irradiation Studies 0

Accelerator Physics 345 275 205 295 1,120 Studies 345 275 205 295 1,120

Electron cloud - - 90 65 155 Simulations - - 50 - 50 Ecloud FB at SPS 40 40 80 Grooved Chambers 25 25

Beam-beam 120 230 - 40 390 Simulation - 210 40 250 Wire Beam-Beam compensation 50 - - - 50 Electrons lens 70 20 - - 90

Discretionary 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 100 Crab cavities 200 20 40 40 300 PS2 Studies 50 125 175


Themes for this Presentation

2008 Review Recommendations– Develop a more strongly coupled and transparent relationship with

CERN management• Drop activities not deemed high priority by CERN

– Ensure that any “item to be delivered to CERN” is delivered• Manage such items as a separate project

– Develop a clear and open system to prioritize LARP projects

2009 Review Charge– Determine the priorities and levels of R&D effort LARP should

apply to position the U.S. for participation in the upcoming LHC upgrades• Multi-year plan• Timeline & resource requirements• Scientific and Technical risks


Program Oversight through Increased Communication

Accelerator Systems Advisory Committee created to parallel Magnet SC– Bruning (CERN), Fischer, Markiewicz, Prebys, Ratti, Peggs

ASAC meets (Webex) ~biweekly on general matters or as crisis management team– Task prioritization & Budget allocation– LARP Collaboration Meeting (CM) Planning– Luminosity Monitor Project Management

LARP Tasks have been coalesced into units large enough to warrant regular Webex meetings and see to it that these are held with additional participation of Program Leader, Deputy, L1, relevant L2 AND CERN Points of Contact– As opposed to reports of isolated work to general LARP

membership at semi-annual CMs


CERN and LARP Communication

Occurs at various CERN levels– CERN Point(s) of Contact:

• eg. Assmann (Collimation); Bravin (Lumi); Benedikt(PS2), …– CERN LARP contact: Oliver Bruning

• tasked with assimilating POC reports and upper management priorities – CERN middle managers: Ostijic (IR Upgrade Czar)– CERN key managers: Evans/Myers– CERN Director

Roughly mapping onto LARP– LARP Task Leader

• Markiewicz (Collimation); Ratti (Lumi); Wienands(PS2), … – LARP L1 (Markiewicz)– LARP APUL czar (Wanderer)– LARP Program Leader (Prebys)– OHEP (Strauss, Kovar)

• Oral “story” sometimes inconsistent and full set of players never in same room• Inadequate written correspondence• Improvement in both these areas required


CERN Input to FY10 LARP ProgramBruning Report to ASAC

Context:1) Lumi Mon assumed to be done by FY10 and not part of list; otherwise 1st priority2) Other "Done" projects, plus Lumi, will require some amount of funding for commissioning

activities: these include Schottky, AC Dipole, Chromaticity Feedback and any continued work on the Synchrotron Light Monitor

3) Bruning will go back again to CERN LLRF group & Myers to clarify CERN position on LLRF task

Ordered List:1) Rotatable Collimator2) PS23) SPS Ecloud control through RF feedback or other means4) Elens as collimation scraper5) R&D that will happen even if not supported by LARP:

- Elens Beam-Beam compensation (BNL & RHIC)- T980 (FNAL)- UA9 (existing CERN-Russian-Italian-US collaboration)

6) Crab: in this position because it requires a non-LARP framework to fund it7) H- emittance monitor for Linac 48) LLRF studies (despite "last place" rank LARP contribution appreciated as valuable &

support for commissioning should be provided; CERN management perspective is that CERN, not LARP, must "own" this role)


Extra-ordinary Meetings

US-CERN Meeting (2009 Jan 14)– Heuer, Myers, Evans, Bruning, Ostijic, Assmann, ..– Relevant AS take away point for LARP

• Crab activity perceived as LARP-driven. For CERN to proceed questions to be answered must include

– What is impact to LHC?– What can be measured?– What will be learned?– What is risk to LHC?

Phase II Collimation Conceptual Review (2009 April 2-3)– Full participation of Rotatable collimator team plus LARP management

• LHC will require– “Cryo-collimators” (collimators embedded in cold regions of LHC)– A new “High Radiation Materials Test Beam” (TT60 line) as part of MTP– Phase II secondaries of a type to be determined only after experience with

LHC and prototype testing in TT60


CERN Mid-Term-Planning Timeline

Priorities Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q41 LHC Operation assumed O O O O O Sh Sh O O Sh O O O Sh O O Sh Sh Sh O O1 SPS operation and exploitation O O O O O Sh O O O Sh O O O Sh O O Sh Sh Sh O O1 PS Operation and Exploitation O O O O O Sh O O O Sh O O O Sh O O Sh Sh Sh O O1 Booster Exploitation and Operation O O O O O Sh O O O Sh O O O Sh O O Sh Sh Sh O O1 Source/LINAC2 op and exploitation O O O O O Sh O O O Sh O O O Sh O O Sh Sh Sh Sh Sh

Linac3/LEIR/Ions Operation Sh Sh O O O Sh O O O Sh O O O Sh O O Sh Sh Sh O O1 LHC 3-4 magnet repair for spares C C C C1 Consolidation all accelerators C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C2 LINAC4 assumed C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C Sh Sh Sh O O2 Inner Triplets assumed C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C Sh Sh Sh O O1 AD assumed Sh Sh O O O Sh O O O Sh O O O Sh O O Sh Sh Sh O O1 AEGIS C? C? C? C? O? O? O? O? O? O? O? O? ? ?1 ELENA ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??1 CNGS Sh Sh O O O Sh O O O Sh O O O Sh O O O Sh Sh O O1 East Hall (PS) Sh Sh O O O Sh O O O Sh O O O Sh O O O Sh Sh O? 0?1 ISOLDE (REX) Sh Sh O O O Sh O O O Sh O O O Sh O O O Sh Sh O? 0?1 nToF Sh Sh O O O Sh O O O Sh O O O Sh O O O Sh Sh O? 0?1 North Area (Compass etc) Sh Sh O O O Sh O O O Sh O O O Sh O O O Sh Sh O? 0?2 CAST/OSQAR ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??2 CTF3 Operation O O O O O O O? O? Sh O? O? O? Sh O? O? O? Sh O? O? O?2 CLIC/ILC St St St St St St St *St? St? Td? Td? Td? Td? Td? Td? Td? Td? Td? Td? Td? Td?2 Collimation Phase 2 St St St St St St St St St C? C? C? C? C? C? C? C?2 PS2 Study St St St St St St St St St St St *2 PS2 Construction C? C? C? C? C? C? C? C?2 SPL (LP) St St St St St St St St St St St *2 SPL Construction C? C? C? C? C? C? C? C?3 HIE ISOLDE C? C? C? C? C? C? C? C? C? C? C? C?3 High Field Quadrupoles R&D St St St St St St St St St St St St St St St St St St St St St3 Medical Applications St St St St St St St St St St St St St St St St St St St St3 Radiation Facilities (HiRadMat) C? C? C? C? C? C? C? C? C? O? O? O? Sh Sh O? O?

O Operation C Construction Sh Shutdown St StudiesO? * Council decision

20142010 2011 2012 2013

scar

city

of p

roto

ns


LARP Management OversightInstrumentation Task Meetings

Chromaticity FB, Schottky, AC Dipole, Synchrotron Light Monitor– No regularly scheduled “public” meetings– Contact between LARP & CERN POCs, esp. during commissioning trips– Reports at parallel sessions of CMs– No direct management oversight

Luminosity Monitor– Regular LBL staff mtgs and Ratti/Bravin mtgs during CERN trips– Biweekly status meetings since June 2008 with

• Prebys, Markiewicz, Bruning, Peggs, Ratti, Bravin, Corlett (LBL mgmt), 2 LBL EEs• Written status report distributed after each meeting

– Full grilling by AS at CM#11,CM#12 followed by plenary report to LARPLLRF

– SLAC 5 person group plus 2 CERN POCs call/exchange email– Many working trips to CERN– Work status presented at LARP CMs and at SLAC ARD seminars– No direct management oversight


LARP Management OversightCollimation Task Meetings

Rotatable Collimator

– Weekly staff (5) mtg at SLAC with web-posted progress report

– Biweekly webex/video with CERN collimation group (5-10 people)• Notes & slides posted

– Reports at parallel session of CM mtgs & included in plenary summary

– CERN-organized meetings (P-II Conceptual Review, Beams’07,..)

Crystal Collimation

– Bi-Weekly Webex meeting to which all members of both T980 (Fermilab expt.) and CERN SPS UA9 are invited

• Typically SLAC(5), BNL(1), Markiewicz, Prebys, Peggs & Scandale (CERN) attend• Approx. monthly reports from Mokhov on T980

– Unknown but large number of bi-lateral UA9 meetings in Europe

– Regular meetings of FNAL T-980 staff & FNAL resident visitors

– Semi annual mini crystal workshops & LARP CM presentations


LARP Accelerator Physics Task Meetings

Electron Lens for Beam-Beam Compensation– No regular working meetings (to my knowledge)– Annual mini-wkshps (eg. 12/3/08 at BNL) & reports at parallel session of

CMsEcloud

– Monthly Webex attended by CERN (3-4), SLAC (3) and LBL(3) and typically Fischer, Prebys & Markiewicz

– Semi-annual meetings in context of global Ecloud effort (eg. EC Mitigation-08 CERN, 12/08) and CARE series of workshops

– Reports in parallel session of CMsCrab Cavity

– Monthly international webex with large participation• UK, KEK, CERN (incl. LARP-residents), BNL, SLAC, FNAL, LBL, AES• Prebys, Markiewicz, Peggs, Strait

– Annual mini-workshop, ~quarterly mtgs at CERN, LARP CMs & CARE PS2

– Weekly/biweekly webex with BNL, FNAL, LBL & SLAC w/ Prebys & Markiewicz

– CM and CERN organized workshops


LARP Accelerator Systems Highlights

Luminosity Monitor: – All hardware is at CERN and all hardware that can be installed is installed

Rotatable Collimator:– First prototype jaw passes thermal mechanical tests– Majority of hardware for 3 more jaws (2 full collimators) in hand; fabrication in progress

PS2– 5 year plan focused on intensity-related effects involving the 4 LARP labs coordinated

with CERN; early resultsSPS Ecloud

– SPS measurements during 3 MD periods show effects that can be simulated; RF modeling to control instabilities has begun

Crab Cavity– Baseline design of cavity/coupler exists and SBIR to fabricate a cavity approved– Multinational, multilab effort working/meeting regularly to develop plan

Other– Crystal experiments UA9 and T980 installed full-time & taking data regularly– E-lenses for RHIC approved & feedback for LHC expected– LLRF model used to commission LHC system without beam;

beam commissioning planned– HW commissioning for Schottky, AC Dipole & Tune/Chromaticity FB complete– New Synchrotron Light Monitor designed, assembled & installed with LARP effort


Project Management

LARP Acc. Systems is producing hardware for CERN in 3 areas– Lumi Monitor– Rotatable Collimator– Roman Pot for SPS Crystal Collimation Expt #UA9

And is (was) considering delivering a crab cavity prototype

My thoughts:– Each of these would ideally be managed outside of LARP– Mission creep and external schedule slippage compound internal problems– Annual reviews necessary but not sufficient

• Aug. 2007 Lumi review & April ’08 CM10 did not foresee June’08 ‘crisis’– Monthly budget reporting with “earned value” necessary but not sufficient– Lumi has convinced me that some external manager(s) must follow

progress ~biweekly to fully understand the project in real time so that surprises do not happen

– TWM is trying to do this for the UA9 RP (reporting to Eric)– No one forces TWM to do this for RC


Luminosity Monitors2 per IP + One Spare

Detector Interface ChassisGAS Distribution/Monitoring Panel

PC for Local Monitoring1 per IP

DAQ Firmware

Shaper (& Chassis)Preamp/HV Assembly


Luminosity Monitor “Crisis” & Response

As Lumi is/will be the first LARP produced hardware installed in LHC it is essential that we deliver

June 2008 letter from CERN luminosity monitoring group leader Enrico Bravin raised concern that– Lumi might be be late for 2008 run– PMT system would be deployed for 2008– As long as robust system ready for 2009, no harm

Response:1. Major LARP support in FY09, before CY2009 run, to fully complete the

system (electronics fabrication, firmware, software & integration)2. Biweekly meetings of LARP ASAC w/Ratti-Bravin since June 29, 2008

– 20 meetings held with written reports (TWM)3. Greatly increased involvement of LBL management (Corlett + EE Head)

– MS Project maintained by LBL EE & kept up to date4. Ongoing discussions on how to minimize commissioning cost & handoff


Lumi Status: All Hardware Installed

Hardware Commissioning in Progress

All required Hardware Installed in LHC points 1 and 5:– Detectors (4) (plus spare at LBNL)– Preamps (4)– Shapers (4)– Detector Interface Units (2)– Gas Panels

Detailed list of noise issues, damaged RTDs, faulty power supplies, gas system leaks, unequal cable lengths, temperamental gas controllers all being worked on

Firmware– Phase I (Low Luminosity “Counting”) complete & being tested– Phase II (High Lum pulse height with centroid deconvolution) a

future project

System Modeling: New Toohig Fellow Ryoichi Miyamoto

LARP Rotatable Collimators for LHC Phase II Collimation

Gene Anzalone (CAD), Eric Doyle (ME-FEA, ret.), Lew Keller (FLUKA, ret.), Steve Lundgren (ME), Tom Markiewicz (Phys), Reggie Rogers (Mech Tech)

& Jeff Smith (PD)

BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC

US LHC Accelerator Research Program

1) Adapt rotatable NLC design concept to LHC: “RC”

2) Build and test one collimator jaw with 10kW resistive heaters to verify thermo-mechanical performance

• Minimize deflection when absorbs with 60kW for 10 sec

3) Build a collimator that can be destructively beam tested at new TT60 facility yet which still rotates, provides clean collimation surfaces, whose cooling system survives and which is UHV

4) Build a fully functional collimator & test it at LHC


beam

LARP Rotatable Collimator

In TT60 vacuum tank:

•ports for camera to observe surface damage

•ports for laser micrometers to measure permanent distortion due to thermal shock

•DN250 end flanges for easy access to jaws after tests and cool-down

•CERN/LHC rack & pinion drives with water & cable quick-connects


LHC Phase II Base Concept

Glidcop Jaw - Cu Mandrel wrapped with CuNi coil – Hollow Glidcop Hub / Molybdenum Shaft with 2mm gap from Mandrel

• Beam spacing: 136mm OD

• Length 1.47 m flange–flange:

•930mm overall

•2 x 38mm 15° tapers

• 854mm long facets

Cu coolant supply tubes twist to allow jaw rotation

Hub area

Glidcop Cu Mo

Cantilever Mo shaft @ both ends

20 facets

Molybdenum Shaft

Copper Mandrel

Copper tubing wound in groove

Molybdenum Shaft

Copper Mandrel

Copper tubing wound in groove

Helical cooling channels 23mm below surface with 16m long 10mm square CuNi tube

2mm gap between shaft OD and mandrel ID


Glidcop Jaw – CuNi Coil- Cu Mandrel – Glidcop Hub - Molybdenum Shaft Design

365m

880m: Leff: 95cm→33cm

7ANSYS of Final Design

Proposal is to set 1st copper jaw at 8.5 (or to use C-C in this location)

Simulations show that remainder of system maintains efficiency

2mm gap


RC0 10kW Distortion Test


Second Generation Version of Collimator Assembly Support, Rotation Mechanism, and

RF transition to Vacuum Tank

Possible BPM location

RF Transition


Plan to Make 3 More Cylinder Jawsfor total of 4→Two Full Collimators

1st of 3 new mandrels finished March 28

6 Moly Half-shafts at SLAC

Plan:

RC1-SPS/TT60 end of 2009

RC2-LHC in 201n


Status of RC Program

1. Jaw support & rotation mechanism COMPLETE (June 2007)2. First full single jaw-hub-shaft unit COMPLETE (May 2008)3. Thermal distortion tests indicate performance in accord with FEA to ~10% (July

2008)4. Vacuum & flatness measurements all good

Since June 2009 DOE Review1. RF design finalized2. New concepts for vacuum tank, jaw support, braze process developed3. Copper mandrels for 3 new jaws bored and grooved4. Molybdenum support half-shafts and central glidcop hubs for 3 new jaws made5. Glidcop for 3 jaws obtained ($56k) and machined parts for 1 jaw ready6. 2nd jaw-hub-shaft unit being assembled & brazed week of July 13-17, 2009

Work to complete RC1:1. Finish 2nd jaw & modify 1st jaw so it is useable in collimator vessel2. Build supports & rotator mechanism and assemble with RF features in new vacuum

tank3. Metrology & vacuum tests at SLAC4. Mechanical motion tests on existing CERN system5. Ship to CERN


LARP RC Timeline for Discussion

2009 Build fully functional prototype

Vacuum & mechanical tests at SLAC

2010 Ship to CERN

Vacuum & mechanical tests at CERN

SPS Tests of impedance and BPMs

2011 Modest involvement in Phase I collimation commissioning

2012 Develop diagnostics for damage assessment

2013 Test prototype in TT60

2014 Apply lessons learned to production design

Build 2nd prototype for testing in LHC

- recent planning has always assumed a 2nd test in LHC

Given uncertainties: Build for 2010 SPS test and wait and see


Roman Pots & Flanges with Detector Housings with thin widows produced

by LARP/SLAC for UA9


Stepper Motor

400step/tour = 0.9o resolutionResolver with reduction gear

Slide Ball Screw(2mm lead)

Sliding Guidesfull metal

LVDT position sensors

Coulisse

switches

Movement resolution 2 mm/400 steps = 5 m (/16)

Stepper Motor

400step/tour = 0.9o resolutionResolver with reduction gear

Slide Ball Screw(2mm lead)

Sliding Guidesfull metal

LVDT position sensors

Coulisse

switches

Movement resolution 2 mm/400 steps = 5 m (/16)

Support Structure and Linear Screws Still to be Delivered to UA9 by

LARP/SLAC


Long Term PlanningGeneral Comments

• At CM12 a first cut of program and budget requests was submitted by each task

• One round of discussions with lab POCs and task leaders has occurred to better pin down– Lab-to-lab split– LARP-to-Off-project labor split– Individuals by name & status (staff, PD, GS) and their FTEs

• identify unitarity problems

• At this point, usual spreadsheet approach in $ assuming– One very coarse overhead loaded salary ($250k) used to convert

LARP funded FTEs to dollars– M&S and travel requests assumed to include lab overhead

• FY09 numbers have been constructed to reflect the actual budget (before contingency allocation)


FY09-FY14 Plan

LARP LABOR RATE $250k

FY MilestoneLARP Labor (FTE)

non-LARP Labor (FTE)

LARP M&S (k$)

LARP Travel (k$)

LARP Cost (k$)

LUMI Monitor 2.5 0 $200k $275k $1,100kSchottky 0 0 $0k $60k $60kTune & Chromaticity Feedback 0 0 $0k $50k $50kAC Dipole 0.2 0 $0k $90k $140kLLRF 3 5 $0k $220k $970kSLM Development and Studies 1 0.5 $0k $50k $300kH- Development for Linac4 2.25 0 $75k $90k $728kRotatable Collimator Task 7 0 $400k $130k $2,280kT-980 Crystal Collimation at Tevatron 2.7 5.5 $361k $105k $1,141kUA9 Crystal Collimation at SPS 0 1.5 $20k $225k $245kElectron Lens as Collimation Scraper 0 0 $75k $0k $75kE-lens for Beam-Beam Compensation 8.3 0 $20k $50k $2,145kSPS E-Cloud Study 10.2 10.625 $775k $300k $3,625kPS2 10.7 13.3 $230k $565k $3,470kCrab Cavities 5.8 0 $0k $250k $1,700kDiscretionary 0 0 $100k $0k $100kTotal Accelerator Systems 53.65 36.425 $2,256k $2,460k $18,129k


Accelerator Systems

5 Year Spending Profile

$0k

$500k

$1,000k

$1,500k

$2,000k

$2,500k

$3,000k

$3,500k

$4,000k

$4,500k

$5,000k

FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14

Electron Lens as Collimation Scraper

Discretionary

Crab Cavities

PS2

SPS E-Cloud Study

E-lens for Beam-Beam Compensation

UA9 Crystal Collimation at SPS

T-980 Crystal Collimation at Tevatron

Rotatable Collimator Task

H- Development for Linac4

SLM Development and Studies

LLRF

AC Dipole

Tune & Chromaticity Feedback

Schottky

LUMI Monitor

Not too bad for 1st try!


PS2 Plan w/ time, manpower, subtasks


PS2 Outyears


PS2 Program Milestones by subtask & year


PS2



LARP M&S (k$)

LARP Travel (k$)

LARP Cost (k$)

PS2 10.7 13.3 $230k $565k $3,470kFY09 Prep for Design Report 2.6 $100k $100kFY10 Prep for Design Report 2.9 2.9 $115k $110k $950kFY11 Design Report Delivered 2.8 2.8 $115k $135k $950kFY12 Further Development Possible but not costed 1.75 1.75 $80k $518kFY13 Further Development Possible but not costed 1.75 1.75 $80k $518kFY14 Further Development Possible but not costed 1.5 1.5 $60k $435k


$0k

$100k

$200k

$300k

$400k

$500k

$600k

$700k

$800k

$900k

$1,000k

1 2 3 4 5 6

PS2


Rama’s Input to this Excercise


CRAB



LARP M&S (k$)

LARP Travel (k$)

LARP Cost (k$)

Crab Cavities 5.8 0 $0k $250k $1,700k

FY09Downselect of cavity design & CERN commitment to provide test location and infrastructure (Sept. 09)

0.8 $100k $300k

FY10 TDR in Fall 2010 2.5 $75k $700kFY11 Support for Cavity & Cryostat Construction 2.5 $75k $700k

FY12Continued Support for Cavity & Cryostat Construction

$0k

FY13Continued Support for Cavity & Cryostat Construction; Cavity Installation & Commissioning

$0k

FY14 Participation in & analysis of beam test $0k


$0k

$100k

$200k

$300k

$400k

$500k

$600k

$700k

$800k

1 2 3 4 5 6

Crab Cavities


Rotatable Collimator



LARP M&S (k$)

LARP Travel (k$)

LARP Cost (k$)

Rotatable Collimator Task 7 0 $400k $130k $2,280kFY09 Deliver TT60 RC Prototype to CERN 3 $200k $0k $950k

FY10Deliver LHC RC Prototype to CERN; SPS beam test of LHC Prototype BPM system

2 $100k $30k $630k

FY11 Test TT60 RC in TT60 1 $50k $50k $350k

FY12LHC Beam Test of LHC Prototype RC; Technology Choice of Phase II Collimators

1 $50k $50k $350k

FY13 Build RCs as part of APUL 0 $0kFY14 Build/Install RCs as part of APUL 0 $0k


$0k

$100k

$200k

$300k

$400k

$500k

$600k

$700k

$800k

$900k

$1,000k

1 2 3 4 5 6

Rotatable Collimator Task

Plan based on schedule shown by Assmann at

April 2009 Collimation

Review


Luminosity Monitor



LARP M&S (k$)

LARP Travel (k$)

LARP Cost (k$)

LUMI Monitor 2.5 0 $200k $275k $1,100k

FY09Finish electronics & Installation, finish DAQ (Phase 2) software

2 $200k $100k $800k

FY10 Significant Commissioning 0.5 $75k $200kFY11 Commissioning $25k $25kFY12 Commissioning $25k $25kFY13 Commissioning $25k $25kFY14 Commissioning $25k $25k


$0k

$100k

$200k

$300k

$400k

$500k

$600k

$700k

$800k

$900k

FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14

LUMI Monitor


SPS Ecloud Feedback



LARP M&S (k$)

LARP Travel (k$)

LARP Cost (k$)

SPS E-Cloud Study 10.2 10.625 $775k $300k $3,625k

FY09Beam tests June 2009 and model analysis leading to design study;

0.2 1.125 $25k $80k $155k

FY10

Continue SPS measurements; develop MATLAB model of Feedback; build back-end drive system to facilitate SPS measurements; decision on whether to proceed with a FB HW project

2 1.5 $75k $50k $625k

FY11Prototype technology development of FB HW system: measurement equipment; power amps, HF signal processing HW

2 2 $125k $50k $675k

FY12Prototype technology development of FB HW system

2 2 $175k $40k $715k

FY13Prototype technology development of FB HW system

2 2 $175k $40k $715k

FY14Prototype evaluated on SPS, detailed system design proposal (TDR) for installed

2 2 $200k $40k $740k

Scrubbing exercise reveals 2 FTE/year are presumed to be students (Good!), unitarity mildly violated (especially when discussed with lab POC & other work

planned) and 25% “padded”. Good discussion of how much off project help each lab could contribute by name. Out year program a wish-list (not necessarily bad).


FY10 Challenges in Accelerator Systems

• Commission Luminosity Monitor and scale back task• Deliver RC Prototype to SPS and scale back task• Launch Crab Cavity with correct level of effort ($),

matching CERN interests & schedule• Launch PS2 program• Measure & understand SPS Ecloud & to begin to model a

RF correction• Keep T980 and UA9 crystal efforts LHC application

focused.• Use LARP provided LLRF models to beam commission

LHC• Successfully beam commission all HW to which LARP

contributed• Decide if & how to begin E-Lens scraper task• Keep LHC beam-beam study personnel intellectually

involved while RHIC constructs E-lenses