latency, lysogeny and symbiosis living with the host

32
LATENCY, LYSOGENY and LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

Post on 21-Dec-2015

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

LATENCY, LYSOGENY and LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSISSYMBIOSIS

LIVING WITH THE HOST

Page 2: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

What is latency?What is latency?

• a period of quiescence (restricted or no replication or symptoms) that follows acute infection (virus replication w/wo symptoms that resolve) and has potential for repeat bouts of reactivation.

• host defenses are not effective (reduced or limited)

• “repression” of productive cycle genes – restricted gene expression

• virus genome maintained intact

Page 3: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

Lysogeny occurs only in bacteriaLysogeny occurs only in bacteria

• Common to all prokaryotes• Reactivate to lytic by UV• All dsDNA viruses• Maintained and reproduce with cell• Integrated or cytoplasmic• Lysogenic conversion - new host phenotype due to expressed

genes– Superinfection immunity– Insertional mutagenesis– Cell wall structure– Exotoxins

Page 4: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

Latency vs LysogenyLatency vs Lysogeny

• What cells

• What factors required

• State of the viral genome

• What genes are transcribed

• What proteins are expressed

• What are the conditions for reactivation

Page 5: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

Phage LambdaPhage Lambda

• Nutrient rich medium goes

– lytic (lots of hosts)

• Nutrient poor medium goes lysogenic

• Stages in lysogeny

– Establishment

– Maintenance

– Induction

Page 6: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

Lambda genomeLambda genome

Page 7: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

Lytic cycleLytic cycle

• Transcription from two promotors

• IE products are N protein and cro protein

• N is an antiterminator for readthrough on the left and right

Page 8: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

• Delayed early on right is needed for DNA replication (O, P)

• Q product can turn on late genes

• Still uses host RNA polymerase

Page 9: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

• Same events on Pl and Pr

• Early termination without N

• N binds to transcript (not DNA) with host factors that read through to later termination signal

Page 10: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

Nut - N utilization siteNut - N utilization site

• Forms structure on nascent RNA

• Binds with host proteins and RNA-P

Page 11: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

• Late genes made from new promotor Pr’ in presence of Q

Page 12: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

Establishment of lysogenyEstablishment of lysogeny

• Readthrough from Pr makes CII

• Readthrough from Pl makes CIII

• CIII stabilizes CII from host protease Hfl

• CII binds to Promotor for Repressor Establishment (PRE) and activates CI (repressor) gene

• CII also activates genes for integrationpInt

Page 13: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

CI binds to operators on left and rightCI binds to operators on left and right

• Or 1-3

• Or 1>Or2>Or3

• Or1-2 block Pr and activate PRM (promotor for repressor maintenance)

• Or3 blocks PRM

• Ol blocks Pl

Page 14: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

Decision depends on Right sideDecision depends on Right side

• If CRO reaches high concentration before CI it binds to Or3 and blocks PRM

• At high CRO blocks Pr

Page 15: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

Induction results from destruction of CIInduction results from destruction of CI

• DNA damage stimulates SOS response

• RecA protease cleaves CI

• CRO beats CI

Page 16: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST
Page 17: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST
Page 18: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

What evidence suggests that HSV is a What evidence suggests that HSV is a latent virus?latent virus?

• Can elicit HSV outgrowth by culturing neurons with appropriate cells.

• In situ hybridization• PCRWhy is latency a good strategy?Long term survival and immune escapeMakes for an opportunistic pathogen

Page 19: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

HSV Lytic cycleHSV Lytic cycle

• Five IE genes - use host enzymes and host and viral transcriptional activators– All IE promoters contain a common cis-acting

sequence (TAATGARAT) that reacts with VP16 tegument protein

– VP16 must interact with two cellular proteins, Oct-1 and HCF, to efficiently induce IE promoter activity

• Cell stimulated towards apoptosis but virus stops events through several IE gene products

Page 20: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

HSV establishes latency in terminally HSV establishes latency in terminally differentiated nondividing sensory neuronsdifferentiated nondividing sensory neurons.

• Virus infects and replicates in epithelial tissue, enters the neuron, travels via neuronal flow to cell body (regional ganglion)

• May have some replication• DNA is circular episome; returns via neuron (against the

flow) to epithelial surface.

Page 21: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

• Effective immune system resolves primary infection and enhances establishment of latency. Recurrences diminish with time (Booster affect?)

• Reactivation triggers probably lead to permissive conditions – some host factor? or reduced immune response.

• Evidence that transmission occurs without symptoms – is there true latency? Is there some reactivation at all times?

Page 22: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

Latency associated transcript - major latency Latency associated transcript - major latency productproduct

• 8 kb processed to stable – 2 and 1.5 kb – nontranslated RNA

• Promotor for LAT – has neuron specific

elements.– is antisense to one of the

immediate early proteins, but can still get latency with fragment that does not overlap. Need 5’ 348 bp

• Is neuron IE nonpermissive cell?– ICP4 binds and prevents

LAT transcript in lytic cycle

Page 23: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

• Latency is thought to be passive – no viral products are needed to maintain.

• Reactivation may require transient transcription and at least a few virions produced.This means the signal changes the transcription factors that are present.

• Levels of virus DNA in neuron is same in LAT+ and LAT-

• Conclusion: Lat needed for reactivation not establishment

Page 24: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

• Recent evidence that LAT – infection leads to increased neurovirulence (death of neurons)

• Does LAT protect cell from death during latency establishment or recurrences thus increasing number of infected neurons and allowing viral reactivation?

Page 25: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

LAT protects neuron from apoptosisLAT protects neuron from apoptosis

• LAT – give “large number of TUNEL + neurons at 7 days

• TUNEL – (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine TP nick-end labeling) fluorescent/chromogenic label bind to ends of DNA so fragmented DNA gets more label.

• A and D = uninfected• B and E = WT HSV• C and F = lat- HSV

Page 26: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

Protection from apoptosis inducersProtection from apoptosis inducers

• Infected three different types of cells with a B-gal gene expression plasmid and LAT+ (APALAT) or LAT- (BABE) in the presence and absence of apoptosis inducers.

• If LAT reduces apoptosis then more cells with inducer will live and thus there will be more bgal activity than in absence of LAT gene. Compared to control plasmid with baculovirus antiapoptosis gene(CplAP)

Page 27: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

• The three apoptosis inhibitors work at different points in the pathway

- Protein kinase- TNF- Topoisomerase

- Thus LAT blocks something further in the pathway- Two other HSV genes are antiapoptotic in productive

infections.

Page 28: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

Apoptosis - Programmed cell death

• the death receptor-mediated pathway (Fas or TNF receptor)

• DNA damage through mitochondrial pathway

• ability of LAT to interfere with apoptosis correlates with its ability to promote spontaneous reactivation

• LAT enhances neuronal survival because it has antiapoptotic activity

Page 29: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST
Page 30: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

The concept of viral symbiosis• Parasitoid wasps - use insect hosts

to develop their larvae

• PolyDNAviruses (PDVs) needed for success

• PDVs produced in wasp ovaries and injected into insect with eggs

• Viral gene expression in insect - products manipulate host immune defenses

• No viral replication in insect host

• Endogenous “provirus” integrated in wasp genome and lost ability to be “independent”

• May go back 70 million years ago - vertical transmission

Page 31: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

First PDV genome sequenced Oct 2004

• 570,000 bp• Composed of 30 DNA circles• 156 coding sequences (white)• Only 27% genome is coding• 42% of coding DNA has no known

homology• Some known genes

– Protein tyrosine phosphatases (signal transduction?)

– Transcription factor regulators– Immunosuppressive proteins

• Some genes look like modified host genes

Page 32: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS LIVING WITH THE HOST

So what makes this a virus?

• Particles in insect

– DNA may have been from derived from host

– PDV DNA in wasp DNA at different regions

– May have been able to encapsidate in viral protein

• May be a virus that transferred replicative information to wasp

– Lost unneeded functions