latest appeal order - ncte

F.No.89-236/2012 Appeal/9th Meeting-2012 NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION

Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002 09/10/2012

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Kaushalyabai Salve D.Ed. College, Nasik, Maharashtra dated 12/05/2012 is against the Order No. WRC/WRCAPP1218/ 159TH /2012 /87278 /88597 dated 02/04/2012 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the grounds ”1) Plot area is insufficient as per the NCTE norms. 2) Approved Building plan not submitted. 3) FDR of Rs. 3.00 lakhs for Reserve Fund not submitted”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Kaushalyabai Salve D.Ed. College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 14/05/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Shirajarao Salve, President and Shri. B.K. Mhatre, Architect, Kaushalyabai Salve D.Ed. College, Nasik, Maharashtra presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the address ‘Plot No.07, Street No.421/0337/S, land title- Shivraj Co-operative housing society, village Manik Nagar, Ambad’ is only for official use, and the building of D.Ed college is situated in Plot No.1-2, survey no. 305/BO/38-39/A Ambad, Shivar, Patardi Phata. This plot's building plan was submitted while furnishing details in online procedure. On the plot No. 2 building was constructed by the Developer Shri. Chandrasen R Ghule and others as a owner. Entire First Floor of the building was on lease to Priyadarshani Indira Gandhi Education Society's Kaushalyabai Salve Adhyapak Vidyalaya. As per the plan the area of 1st floor was about 438.23 Sq.mt (4695 sq.ft.) excluding stair case and other service area and this area was more than required as per norms. They submitted the plan approved by Nasik Municipal Corporation along with sanction of building permit & commencement Certification dated 08/08/2006 under no. LND/BP/WS/CO/232/288. In this plan the approval was granted for shops on ground floor and for office on upper floors. The first floor of building is permitted to be used for educational purpose by Developer on certain conditions of agreement, for the noble cause of education; b) Since their trust has Minority status, they submitted only 5.00 lakhs FDR of Nationalized bank along with application. In case appeal is accepted, they would submit the FDR of 3.00 lakhs . AND WHEREAS the Council noted that (a) the appellant in the ‘Online’ application dated 29-09-2010 mentioned 3500 sq.mtr. of land and 2700 sq.mtr. of built up area earmarked for the institution. As per the submission made by the appellant, first floor of a building at Plot No. 2 was taken on lease from Shri Chandrasen R Ghule. The

total area of the floor was only 438.25 sq.mtr as against the requirement of 1500 sq.mtr as per norms. Moreover lease from private party is not permissible as per Regulations, 2009; (b) the building plan submitted was in favour of Shri Chandrasen R Ghule. The appellant did not submit building plan in favour of trust/institution; (c) as admitted by the appellant, he did not submit FDR of Rs. 3.00 lakh towards endowment fund. As per Regulations 2009, it is mandatory to submit reserve fund FDR alongwith the application, except for Govt institutions. the Council taking into consideration all aspects of the matter concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected and WRC order dated 02-04-2012 is confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.

(R. Jaya) Member Secretary

1. The President/Secretary, Kaushalyabai Salve D.Ed. College, Plot No. -7, Street No. -421/0337/S, Land Title- Shivraj Co-Op Hou Society, Village- Manik Nagar Ambad, PO+City- Nasik,Tehsil- Cidco Pathadi Phata,, Nasik - 400017, Maharashtra 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Priyadarshini Indira Gandhi Education Society, Mumbai, Maharashtra dated 25/06/2012 is against the Order No. WRC/ WRCAPP1219/ 160/2012/ 89523 dated 24/04/2012 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the ground “ the institution has only 2449 sq.mtr land in its name on which there are other educational institutions and the institution has 929.36 sq.mtr of land only on 15 years lease from the Govt. hence the land available is in piecemeal”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Priyadarshini Indira Gandhi Education Society (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 28/06/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Shirajarao Salve, President and Shri. B.K. Mhatre, Architect ,Priyadarshini Indira Gandhi Education Society, Mumbai, Maharashtra presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that their architect has designed institute building so that 2 classroom are provided for Jr.Kg to Sr.Kg of Marathi Medium, 5 classrooms for VI to X standard having morning session and the same for classes I to V in afternoon session and the classrooms are provided on Ist floor only. The appellant has also submitted that the building comprising of stilts and ground and seven upper floors with an area of 5136.36 sq mts is designed for all future courses like B.Ed and D.Ed and no building can be used for teacher training course only. He also submitted that he furnished certified copy of land documents for a plot area of 2449 sq. mts; in addition the Govt. has given 929.36 sq.mts of land for use as play ground; this land is on 99 years lease renewable every 15 years as per Govt. procedure and this land is contiguous to the main plot. In a letter dated 17-09-2012 given on the day of presentation the appellant stated that ground and three upper floors have been constructed and first and second floors are given for B.Ed College. In another letter of the same date, the appellant stated that they will ensure that only B. Ed and no other course will be conducted on the said plot. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that while in the appeal they have admitted that the building on the allotted land is designed for running a school and other courses like B. Ed and D. Ed, in the course of presentation they suddenly changed their stand and stated that only B.Ed will be conducted in the said plot. This type of hurriedly given assurance is not acceptable.The fact is that the land area is meant for other institutions

including the proposed B.Ed. The play ground taken on lease, perhaps for all the educational institutions to be run in the building on the other plot, cannot be counted as an-exclusive one for B.Ed. the Council, therefore, concluded that the grounds on which recognition was refused are valid, and therefore the appeal deserved to be rejected and the order of the WRC confirmed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected and WRC order dated 24-04-2012 is confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The President/Secretary, Priyadarshini Indira Gandhi Education Society, Plot No. 61, Near Eastern Express Highway, Yashwant Nagar, PO.- Chembur, Tal. Vastrao Naik Mahamarg, , Mumbai - , Maharashtra 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of R K Gupta Memorial Institute of Technology and Management, Agra, Uttar Pradesh dated 14/07/2012 is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/NRCAPP1355/198 Meeting/2012/20732 dated 14/05/2012 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the ground “The institution has submitted a tampered photocopy of the building plan submitted earlier in which total covered area was shown 2792.88 sq. meters. Figures 111.52 sq. m. and 964.05 sq.m. on ground floor and first floor have been changed to 221.70 sq.m and 1074.23 sq.m. on the photocopy of the original building plan. Hence submitted building plan is not acceptable”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, R K Gupta Memorial Institute of Technology and Management (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 17/07/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Santosh Goyal, Secretary and Shri Gaurav Singh, Treasurer, R K Gupta Memorial Institute of Technology and Management, Agra, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that in the earlier building plan approved by the Agra Development Authority on 04-05-2011 the proposed additional covered area in the ground and first floors was 111.52sq. mts each and the proposed covered area in the second floor was 817.34 sq. mts. He further submitted that in the revised building plan, which was also approved by the Agra Development Authority, the proposed covered area in the ground and first floors has been enhanced from 111.52 sq. mt to 221.70 sq. mts each and there was no tampering as alleged. The appellant has shown the original of the approved building plan. In the appeal the appellant has given the calculations of both pre-enhancement and post enhancement covered areas. AND WHEREAS the Council taking into account the submissions made by the appellant concluded that there was no tampering of the figures of covered area in the building plans and therefore the appeal deserved to be accepted and the matter remanded to the NRC for further processing as per the NCTE regulations. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council

concluded that there was adequate ground to remand the case to the NRC for further processing as per the NCTE regulations. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of R K Gupta Memorial Institute of Technology and Management, Agra, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, R K Gupta Memorial Institute of Technology and Management, Plot No. 123, Street Road- UPSlDC Road, Village- Mohammad Pur,PO- Sikandra, Tehsil- Sadar,, Agra - , Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, 20/198, Kaveri Path, Mansarover Nagar, Near Mansarover Stadium, Mansarover, Jaipur - 302020, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of R.N. College, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh dated 25/06/2012 is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/NRCAPP-1259/195th Meeting/2012/20151 dated 01/05/2012 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the grounds “Certified copy of registered land documents issued by the competent authority as required in the clause 8 (7) (i) of NCTE, Regulations, 2009 and Notarized copy of change of land use certificate issued by the competent authority have not been submitted by the institution”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, R.N. College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 28/06/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Dr. P. N. Singh, Chairman, R.N. College, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation and through a letter dated 17-09-2012 presented at the time of hearing it was submitted that Certified copy of Registered Land documents issued by the Competent Authority as required in the clause 8(7) (i) of NCTE Regulations, 2009 and notarized copy of change of Land Use Certificate issued by the Competent Authority were submitted to NRC thrice by the institution with the letter Nos. RNC/D.El.Ed.-NCTE-04 dated 28/02/2011, RNC/D.El.Ed.-NCTE-05 dated 12/12/2011 and intimated the same in the letter RNC/D.El.Ed.-NCTE-06 dated 24/02/2012. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the documents sent by the appellant with their letters dated 28-02-2011 (in response to the deficiency letter issued on 04-02-2011) and 12-12-2011 (in response to the show cause notice dated 07-12-2011) are available in the file of the appellant institution. These include certified copy of registered land document and land use certificate. In these circumstances, the Council concluded that the appeal deserved to be accepted and the matter remanded to NRC for further processing as per NCTE regulations. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and remand the case to the NRC for further processing as per NCTE regulations.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of R.N. College, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, R.N. College, Plot No. 725, Street/Road-0, Village/Town/City- Hastinapur, PO- Mawana, , Meerut - 250404, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, 20/198, Kaveri Path, Mansarover Nagar, Near Mansarover Stadium, Mansarover, Jaipur - 302020, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Rahat College of Education, Deoghar, Jharkhand dated 19/06/2012 is against the Order No. ERC/7-130.5(i).5/2012/11172 dated 21/04/2012 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the ground “the Council deliberated and considered the case in detail and decided that keeping in view the negative recommendation of the State Govt. of Jharkhand vide its letter No. 12/A.4-56/2008/2681 dated 18/05/2010, application of institution regarding recognition for B.Ed. course is refused under section 14(3) (b) of NCTE Act-1993." AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Rahat College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 20/06/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Tarique Anwer, Jt. Secretary, Rahat College of Education, Deoghar, Jharkhand presented the case of the appellant institution on 26-07-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that Rahat College of Education, Madhupur had received negative recommendation from the State Govt; which was based on inspection by Regional Education Deputy Director, Dumka (Jharkhand) due to non-completion of multi-purpose hall of the college building; the College submitted the building completion certificate to National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi with their earlier appeal dated 09/07/2010 and the said appeal was accepted on 22/09/2010; the college had submitted the building completion certificate to State Govt. and requested for re-inspection of the premises; the Regional Education Deputy Director, Dumka (Jharkhand) had visited the premises on 13/04/2012 for inspection and gave a positive report (attached as Annexure II to the appeal) to the Director, Secondary Education, Human Resource Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi recommending for issuance of No Objection Certificate to Rahat College of Education, Madhupur, and the College is expected to receive the No-Objection Certificate from State Govt. shortly. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the Regional Deputy Director of Education, Dumka forwarded his report on the inspection of the appellant institution to the Director, Secondary Education, Human Resource Development Deptt, Govt. of Jharkhand on 02-05-2012 recommending grant of No Objection certificate. In view of this development, the Council concluded that the appellant may be given an other opportunity to submit the No Objection Certificate for further consideration of the Council in their next meeting. Shri Tarique Anwer, Joint Secretary, Rahat College of

Education appeared before the Council on 17-09-2012 and gave a copy of the No Objection Certificate dated 28-08-2012 issued by the Human Resources Development Deptt, Govt. of Jharkhand addressed to the Regional Director, E.R.C., Bhubaneswar. The appellant forwarded a copy of the certificate to the NCTE, New Delhi on 30-08-2012. AND WHEREAS in view of the above position, the Council concluded that the appeal deserved to be accepted and the matter remanded to the ERC for further processing as per the NCTE regulations. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT report and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and remand the case to the ERC for further processing of the case as per the NCTE regulations. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Rahat College of Education, Deoghar, Jharkhand to the ERC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Jt. Secretary, Rahat College of Education, Plot No. 42, At/PO.- Madhupur, Tehsil/Taluka- Barbad, Town- Madhupur,, Deoghar - 815353, Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar - 751 012. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Raja Rajeshwari D.Ed. College, East Godavari , Andhra Pradesh dated 26/06/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP1649/D.EL.ED/AP/2012-13/41885 dated 30/05/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the ground the institution has not submitted reply for deficiency letter even after stipulated period of 60 days from the date of issue of deficiency letter. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Raja Rajeshwari D.Ed. College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 16/07/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Ms. S. Usha Rani, Secretary, Raja Rajeshwari D.Ed. College, East Godavari , Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that they have submitted all the documents within the stipulated time i.e. within 60 days to the SRC, Bangalore. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that SRC issued a deficiency letter dated 29-12-2011 to the institution directing them to submit a report regarding the removal of the deficiencies within 60 days from the date of receipt of communication. The deficiency letter posted on 13-01-2012 was received by the appellant on 16-01-2012 and the latter delivered their reply dated 13-03-2012 by hand in the SRC office on 14-03-2012. Since the reply has been received within the stipulated time of 60 days and it was available when the SRC considered this case on 19-20 April, 2012, the Council concluded that the appeal deserved to be accepted and the matter remanded to the SRC for considering the reply of the institution and taking further action. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and remand the case to the SRC for considering the reply of the institution and taking further action.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Raja Rajeshwari D.Ed. College, East Godavari , Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary/Correspondance, Raja Rajeshwari D.Ed. College, Khasra No. 503/11, Plot No. 9-122, Gowtaminag Street, Kothapeta Village, Kothapeta P.O.,, East Godavari - 533223, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Shimla College of Education, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh dated 25/07/2012 is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/NRCAPP-59/200TH MEETING/2012/25870 dated 12/07/2012 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the grounds “ 1) The trust runs a school in the same premises. 2) Constructed existing building is not according to building plan as per Visiting Team Report. 3) Multipurpose hall is small in size and not as per NCTE norms. 4) The photographs show that the work is still going on and still not completed. 5) The paper attached as a proof with reply are not signed by Principal/Chairman but rubber stamp of Principal, has been affixed”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shimla College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 26/07/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Dr. R.K. Shandil, Chairman, Shimla College of Education, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18-08-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the trust does not run a school in the Institution premises and a certificate from the village Panchayat to this effect has already been submitted in the reply to the NRC; a fresh certificate from the village Panchayat, and an affidavit are re-attached in support of the same; the institution submitted approved building plan at the time of application and building of the institution was constructed according to the same plan; the building completion certificate has been issued by the Competent Authority which also shows that the building was constructed as per plan; it has not been specified in the Refusal Order that in what way the constructed existing building does not match with the plan submitted; multipurpose hall has been developed according to norms and standards of NCTE mentioned in the Regulation 2009 and this multipurpose hall has a seating capacity of 200 persons with an area of 2000 sq.ft. and a dias, at the time of VT visit, this hall was shown but they did not take this into account as the painting in the hall was not done and some glasses were also not fixed; this hall is ready and complete in all respects since February 2012 and the compliance of it has already been reported to NRC in their reply dated 29/03/2012; the NRC erred in not taking into account this reply and passed the Refusal Order, which tantamounts to disobeying the H.P. High Court judgement dated 25/04/2012 which clearly mentioned that the NRC shall look into all the steps taken by the Management while passing order in their case; the photographs submitted relate to furniture, the work for which was started on the advice of VT

members for improved furniture and multipurpose hall; the enclosures and proofs were forwarded through a college letterhead and affidavit signed by the Chairman of the Trust namely Dr. R.K. Shandil; and there is no such provision in NCTE Regulations 2009 about the attestation and signing of each and every enclosed document sent through Affidavits on Non-Judicial Stamp Paper. AND WHEREAS in the course of personal presentation, the appellant gave a letter dated 18-08-2012 requesting for another opportunity for production of documents in support of his claim. the Council acceding to his request decided to list the case for consideration on a subsequent date. AND WHEREAS Dr. R.K. Shandil, Chairman appeared before the Council on 17-09-2012 and gave a letter dated 17-09-2012 enclosing certain documents in support of his claim. These include a copy of a certificate dated 01-09-2012 issued by the Dy, Director (Higher Education) Distt. Shimla that in the premises on the land of Shimla Educational Society Trust, no school classes are running and the building is exclusively earmarked for B.Ed classes. The applicant has enclosed a building plan drawn on one sheet, which was earlier drawn in two separate sheets, showing 3465 sq. mts of built-up area. the Council taking into consideration the submissions made by the appellant in his appeal and during personal presentations on 18-08-2012 and 17-09-2012 concluded that the appeal deserved to be accepted and the matter remanded to the NRC with a direction to conduct re-inspection of the institution on payment of Rs.40,000/- by the appellant and take further necessary. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT report and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and remand the case to the NRC with a direction to conduct re-inspection of the institution on payment of Rs.40,000/- by the appellant and take further necessary action thereafter. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Shimla College of Education, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Principal, Shimla College of Education, Plot No. 38/39/40, Street- Sheetlakunj, Village- Chamyana, PO.- Kamla Nagar, City/Town- Sanjauli,, Shimla - 171006, Himachal Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, 20/198, Kaveri Path, Mansarover Nagar, Near Mansarover Stadium, Mansarover, Jaipur - 302020, Rajasthan.

4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Sundarban Minority Welfare Trust, South 24 Parganas, West Bengal dated 28/05/2012 is against the Order No. ERC/7-131.8(i).130/2012/10959 dated 29/03/2012 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the ground “the land is in the name of individual”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Sundarban Minority Welfare Trust (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 28/05/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS the appellant was asked to present the appeal of the institution before the Council on 27-06-2012, 23-07-2012 and also on 17-09-2012 giving three opportunities as per Rules. As nobody appeared on all the occasions, the Council decided to dispose of the appeal on the basis of representation made in the appeal alongwith the documents annexed with it vis-à-vis available in NRC’s file. AND WHEREAS the appellant in his appeal memorandum stated that the institution was in possession of required land in the name of the Registered Trust under which it exists. Registered Deed of Gifts in favour of the Trust were produced in the appeal. AND WHEREAS the Council perused the gift deed dt 29-12-2009 submitted by the appellant and noted that it was in the name of an individual i.e. Rafique Laskar. the Council observed that clause 8(7)(i) of Regulations, 2009, stipulates that the institution or trust/society sponsoring the institution should be in possession of required land on the date of application either on ownership basis or on long term lease from Govt/Govt institutions. The appellant trust/institution did not possess the land on ownership basis on the date of application and therefore the institution was not eligible for grant of recognition as per Regulations. the Council therefore concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal and affidavit, and after considering the documents available on record, the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected and ERC order dated 29-03-2012 is confirmed.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Secretary, Sundarban Minority Welfare Trust, Plot No. 827, 5153, 5154, 5157, Village- Dakshin Gangadharpur, PO.- Malaya,, South 24 Parganas - 743399, West Bengal 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar - 751 012. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of West Bengal, Kolkata.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Nauman College of Elementary Teacher Education , Nalgonda, Andhra Pradesh dated 01/08/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP1718/D.EL.ED/AP/2012-13/38715 dated 01/03/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the grounds “(1) The processing fee, as provided under rule 9 of the National Council for Teacher Education Rules, 1997 is not furnished on or before the date of submission of online application. 2) Hard copy in triplicate of the online application is not dispatched within 7 days of the submission of the online application and 3) Copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent authority indicating that the society/institution applying for the course possessed land on the date of application is not dispatched within 7 days of the submission of the online application”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Nauman College of Elementary Teacher Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 06/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS the appeal of the institution has been submitted late by three months and nine days beyond the prescribed time limit of 60 days. The appellant stated that as they did not find the status of their application on the web-site, till 24-07-2012, they approached SRC on 24-07-2012 and got the refusal order only on 25-07-2012. In view of this explanation, the Council decided to condone the delay and consider the appeal on merit. AND WHEREAS Md. Abdul Hameed, Vice President and Shri. D. Amarendar, Admn. Officer, Nauman College of Elementary Teacher Education , Nalgonda, Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that they have submitted a DD bearing No. 397766 Dt. 28/09/2011 for Rs. 40,000/- drawn at SBH, Kodad branch as application processing fee towards the proposed D.El.Ed. institution, and the same was entered in the online process on i.e. 01/10/2011; the concerned original DD along with the hard copy of online application and its documents were forwarded to SRC. The hard copy in triplicate of the online application submitted on 01/10/2011 was dispatched to the SRC NCTE, Bangalore on 02/10/2011; due to the Telengana Sakala Janula Samme all the field offices of Telangana Region were closed and this may be the cause for the

delay in the delivery and they have dispatched the copy of the registered land documents in favour of the society with the hard copy of the application. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the SRC received the appellant’s letter dated 01-10-2011 on 10-10-2011 and thereafter SRC was communicating with the institution for submission of proof of dispatch and the institution furnished the same. Since the land document in favour of the society and processing fee were furnished by the appellant as required under Regulations, the Council concluded that there was adequate justification to accept the appeal and remand the case to the SRC for further processing of the application as per Regulations.. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and remand the case to the SRC for further processing of the case as per the NCTE regulations. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Nauman College of Elementary Teacher Education , Nalgonda, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The President, Nauman College of Elementary Teacher Education , Sy. no. 374, Kodad, Kodad, , Nalgonda - 508206, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Sakshi D.Ed. College, Sidhi, Madhya Pradesh is against the Order No. WRC/WRCAPP1387/161/2012/89998 dated 07/05/2012 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the grounds "The case file was examined very carefully, particularly in the light of the objections raised in the show cause notice dt. 28/01/2012, and the reply of the institution was received in WRC on 31/01/2012. While the applicant is insisting that there is no mis-match between the building plan and the building on ground, the building plan available on the file does not match the actual building. The building plan shows ground + one, whereas the building in the CD shows only ground floor. Hence recognition is refused under 14(3) (b) of NCTE Act." AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Sakshi D.Ed. College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 06/06/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Devendra Mishra, Chairman and Shri. A.K. Tiwari, Vice-Principal, Sakshi D.Ed. College, Sidhi, Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 25-07-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that due to negligence of office clerk nomenclature of Ground floor + First Floor was typed in the building plan, factually the institution was having only ground floor with a built-up area of 17880 sq. ft. In support they produced two building completion certificates dt. 28/09/2010 and 03/01/2012. AND WHEREAS the Council deferred the decision on that day for want of some information from WRC. It again considered the case on 17-09-2012.the Council viewed the CD and noted that building had only ground floor and first floor was not constructed. The plan was for ground and first floor and it mentioned 7860 sq.ft. on ground floor, 7220 sq.ft. on first floor and 2000 sq.ft. of verandah. Total constructed (built- up) area, as per the plan on the ground floor including verandah comes to 9860 sq.ft. only. The visiting team inter-alia mentioned that only ground floor of the building was constructed and flooring of the room and fixing of the windows was yet to be done and it recorded availability of only 916 sq.mt of built up area as against the requirement of 1500 sq.mt as per NCTE norms.. In the light of these observations, the claim of the appellant, that the institution was having 17880 sq.ft. of built up area on the ground floor itself was not acceptable. the Council, therefore, concluded that there was no justification to accept the appeal.

AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT report and after considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected and WRC order dated 07-05-2012 is confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Chairman, Sakshi D.Ed. College, Plot No. 1320, Vill.+PO+City- Badhaura, Tehsil- Sidhi,, Sidhi - 486771, Madhya Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Sri Dhanalakshmi ( Sri Dhanalakshmi Educational Society), West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh dated nil and received on 18/07/2012 and another dated 21-08-2012 on-line format is against the Order No. SRCAPP1090 (2012-13)/D.P.Ed/AP/2011-12/36214 dated 23/01/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the grounds “ Hard copy submitted after the stipulated period of 7 days from the date of on-line submission”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Sri Dhanalakshmi (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 18/07/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS the appellant aggrieved by the order of the SRC filed a Writ Petition No. 23159 of 2012 before the Hon’ble High court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad and the Hon’ble High court in their order dated 30-07-2012 permitted the petitioner to file an appeal within four weeks from that day and directed that if the appeal is filed within that period the appellate authority will dispose of the same on merits without raising any objection regarding the limitation. AND WHEREAS Shri. Medapati Vijaya Reddy, Secretary and correspondent, Sri Dhanalakshmi ( Sri Dhanalakshmi Educational Society), West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that on account of intervening festival holidays in the first week of October 2011 they could dispatch the hard copy of the application by speed post on 10-10-2011. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the delay in dispatch occurred on account of intervening holidays and the hard copy of the application was received in the SRC on 13-10-2011. In these circumstances the Council concluded that the appeal deserved to be accepted and the matter remanded to SRC for further processing of the application on merit as per the Regulations. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and remand the case to the SRC for further processing of the application on merit as per the regulations.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Sri Dhanalakshmi, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Appellant, Sri Dhanalakshmi, R.S. No. 325/1 (Old R.S. 6/1), TTD Road-1, Tadepalligudem Village and Post, , West Godavari - 554101, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Sri Nagoji Rao Diploma In Elementary Educational Institution, Mahabubnagar, Andhra Pradesh dated 17/08/2012 is against the Order F.No SRCAPP1255/D.El.Ed/AP/2012-13/45495 dated 27-08-2012of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the ground “ On the date of submission of online application the land is mortgaged to a Bank, which is not permissible as per NCTE norms”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Sri Nagoji Rao Diploma In Elementary Educational Institution (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 28/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. M.J. Rana, Secretary and Shri. Venkataiah, Member, Sri Nagoji Rao Diploma In Elementary Educational Institution, Mahabubnagar, Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that 30 guntas of land had been allocated for the proposed institution and the appellant had not taken any loan against this land. The appellant also submitted that the Encumbrance Certificate (EC) from 01-01-1983 till the date of application is also clear. AND WHEREAS the Council noting that non- encumbrance certificate issued by the concerned state Govt. authority is available and it does not mention any mortgage. The committee, however asked the appellant to submit a certificate from the concerned bank also, certifying that the area of 30 guntas is not under mortgage with them. AND WHEREAS the appellant institution has submitted a certificate dated 20-09-2012 from Vijaya Bank, Mahboob Nagar stating that the land in question is not mortgaged with them. In view of the above, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and remand the matter to SRC for further processing of the case as per Regulations. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and remand the case to the SRC for further processing as per Regulations.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Sri Nagoji Rao Diploma In Elementary Educational Institution, Mahabubnagar, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, Sri Nagoji Rao Diploma In Elementary Educational Institution, 319/E, 319/VU, 318/1, 318/2, 321/1, DRY Land, 2247, Appananapally, Mahabubnagar,, Mahabubnagar - 509002, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Subhash B.Ed. College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat dated 04/06/2012 is against the Order No. WRC/323251/159/2012/89085 dated 16/04/2012 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “the VT had observed that the college did not have any classrooms but only two halls. The halls which are supposed to be multipurpose halls are small, being only 800 Sq.ft. The VT also found that furniture in the rooms as well as in the hall is inappropriate, the building is in a residential public area, which is not appropriate, and the labs do not have the required tools and equipments. The teachers are paid in cash, the library is ill-managed, and books are in short supply, and accession registers etc. are not maintained. In short, the building location and infrastructure are well below the required level. In the light of the VT observations, the previous order of the WRC stands as it is. Now therefore, WRC’s earlier order of withdrawal of recognition for B.Ed. course dated 30-09-2011 stands confirmed”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Subhash B.Ed. College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 07/06/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Amaitbhai C. Prajapati, Managing Trustee and Shri. Shubhas A. Prajapati, Trustee, Subhash B.Ed. College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat presented the case of the appellant institution on 25-07-2012. The appellant in the appeal did not specifically furnish any explanation, on the withdrawal ground of WRC as contained in Para `9’ of fresh order dated 16-04-2012. He made submission on the issues of appointment of Principal and Lecturers in Music/Fine Arts and Physical Education and approval of the faculty list for the session 2011-12. AND WHEREAS the Council, therefore felt that the appellant may be given another opportunity for submitting his point-wise explanation particularly with reference to the para `9’ of the fresh withdrawal order dated 16-04-2012, alongwith the necessary supporting documents. Accordingly, notice dt 03-09-2012 was issued to the appellant for presenting his case before the Council on 17-09-2012. AND WHEREAS Shri. Amaitbhai C. Prajapati, Managing Trustee and Shri. Shubhas A. Prajapati, Trustee appeared before the Council on 17-09-2012 and submitted that (a) the institution has 19 classrooms,each measuring 600 sq.ft. (30x20 ft),and multipurpose hall of 1229 sq.ft. (30x40.9 ft. Building plan showing classrooms

and hall is produced; (b) in the multipurpose hall 35 benches, black board, loud speaker, display were provided. Class rooms and halls had all necessary furniture. Stock register of furniture was produced. The College building is located along National Highway No. 8, not in commercial or industrial area ;( c) laboratories had all necessary tools as per norms. Stock register and bills were produced in proof ;(d) teachers were paid salary through cheque; (e) library is of 600 sq.ft. size and it has 3462 books including books of B.Ed course, reference books and encyclopedia. It has four tables and 35 chairs and display board. They also subscribed for 10 more magazines and journals. Stock register and bills were produced in support; (f) college building was placed on RCC structure and it had 1542.50 sq.mt of built up area; (g) computer lab was of 600 sq.ft. and it had required facilities. Psychology lab and ET lab were also provided with required facilities. the Council noted that (a) the visiting team in their report dt. 18-05-2011 inter-alia mentioned that “the college submitted a concocted map of building plan which had wrong dimensions A fresh map is also enclosed, which was collected on demand. They tried to misinform VT”. Four sheets of the building plan at page 547-550 (for ground, first, second and third floors) submitted alongwith the VT report mentioned class rooms / room size as (20X20)=400 sq.ft. only. But the plan now submitted in the appeal is altogether different. It is for basement plus 3 floors i.e. ground, first and second floors and it showed each room/class rooms size as (30X20)=600 sq.ft and hall size as (30X40.9)=1227 sq.ft. Though the appellant claimed that the institution’s building has built up area of 1542.50 sq.mt, but the plan submitted in the appeal did not mention the built up area and further he did not also submit building completion certificate in support of availability of 1542.50 sq.mt built up area, as claimed by the appellant; (b) VT categorically mentioned that equipment in educational technology lab and psychology laboratory was not available, books were in short supply, no accession register was maintained, and no journals were subscribed etc. The appellant in the appeal produced copies of stock register pertaining to equipment in the laboratories, books in the library and furniture. The appellant stated in the appeal that in proof of procurement of the equipment/tools/books, bills are also produced, but he enclosed only 05 bills in total- one bill from sheet chemic instruments for purchasing 23 articles on 2-04-2006, three bills from Umiya Sales Corporation for purchasing 30 articles in total (1+2+27) on 15-04-2006. These bills do not substantiate the claim of the appellant that he has equipped lab and library adequately as per norms. In view of the above, the Council, concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and VT report and after considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected and WRC order dated 16-04-2012 is confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Managing Trustee/Principal, Subhash B.Ed. College, Shukan Education Trust, T.B. Nagar Char Rasta,, Ahmedabad - 380052, Gujarat 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of System College of Elementary Teacher Education, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh dated 08/08/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP1507/D.EL.ED/AP/2012-13/41851 dated 30/05/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the grounds “ The institution has not submitted reply to the deficiency letter even after stipulated period of 60 days and till date”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, System College of Elementary Teacher Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 09/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. R. Ganapathi Rao, Administrative Officer and Shri. M. Bhasker Rao, Management Executive, System College of Elementary Teacher Education, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that according to the deficiency letter dated 30-12-2011, within 60 days from the date of communication of deficiency they had to submit the reply to the deficiency letter. They received the deficiency letter in January, 2012. Due to the delay caused in registration of the land by the concerned department they failed to submit the reply to the deficiency letter in time i.e. within the stipulated period. But they submitted the reply on 17-05-21012. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that SRC vide their deficiency letter dated 30-12-2011 asked the institution to comply with the deficiencies within 60 days of receipt of deficiency letter. The appellant did not furnish any reply till the date SRC took a decision in their meeting held on 19-20th April, 2012 to reject the application on the ground of non submission of reply. the Council therefore concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal as the decision taken by the SRC was justified. AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected and SRC order dated 30-05-2012 is confirmed.



1. The Secretary/Correspondance, System College of Elementary Teacher Education, 224-1, 223-18, Jirayathi, 224-1, Ponduru, Ponduru,, Srikakulam - 532168, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of T P College , Madhepura, Bihar dated 18/08/2012 is against the Order No. NCTE/ERCAPP706/2010/6242 dated 24/01/2011 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the ground “ Copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent authority indicating the society/institution applying for recognition of teacher education course, possessed land on the date of application not submitted”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, T P College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 21/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the above appeal of the institution was not preferred within the stipulated period of 60 days as per Appeal Rules and it was late by 1 year 4 months and 8 days. AND WHEREAS Dr. R.K. P. Raman, Principal and Dr. Uday Krishna, Lecturer, T P College , Madhepura, Bihar presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that all land records and certificates issued by the competent authority are up to date and are attached with the appeal, as on page 8-101. (a) T.P. College Madhepura is a old college, established in 1953 and made constituent college of B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura-852113 (Bihar) since 1975. It proposed to conduct B.Ed course on self finance basis; (b) T.P. College Madhepura has enough infrastructure such as separate building in spacious campus to run the B.Ed. Programme smoothly; (c) in August 2008 a devastating flood came in Madhepura, Bihar, which had been declared as National Calamity. All schools, colleges and Govt offices of the district remained paralyzed and all records of the institution including land deeds were damaged. Therefore, they had to apply for the certified copies of the land deed, which they got on 21-04-2012. So, they failed to produce land documents in favour of the institution to ERC and that lead to refusal of recognition. (d) With regard to the delay caused in preferring the appeal, it was submitted that they requested ERC vide their letter dated 7-09-2011for reconsideration of the case by sending the land records like khatauni. ERC informed them that their case was rejected and they may file appeal. After obtaining certified copies of land documents they submitted appeal on 18-8-2012.

AND WHEREAS the Council noted with regard to reasons of delay that their application for B.Ed course was rejected by ERC vide order dated 24-01-2011. The natural calamity occurred in the year 2008 and that lead to destruction of records of institution (as submitted by the appellant). The appellant would have made the efforts to re-construct the lost records within the 2 year time gap i.e. by 2009-2010. Further, the appellant vide letter dated 1-02-2011 pursued the matter with ERC for reconsideration saying that the college possessed 20 acres of campus. Alongwith the letter he sent the land documents of plot no. 1769. ERC in their reply letter dated 7-09-2011 informed the appellant to prefer appeal in the NCTE, New Delhi. The appellant would have filed the appeal immediately, which he did not and finally submitted appeal after almost 1 year 5 months after refusal order and 11 months after directions of ERC. AND WHEREAS in view of the above, the Council concluded that the reasons adduced by the appellant for condonation of 1 year and 5 months delay were not acceptable and hence it decided not to admit the appeal by condoning the delay. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby decides not to admit the appeal by condoning the delay.


1. The Principal, T P College , 1769, T.P. College, Madhepura, Madhepura, , Madhepura - 852113, Bihar 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar - 751 012. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Bihar, Patna.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Vishwa Bharathi D.Ed. College, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh dated 13/08/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP580/D.EL.Ed/AP/2012-13/43664 dated 11/07/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the grounds “ 1) As per VCD, the front full view of the building is not shown, entrance to the building looks like Godown only. Window shutters not fixed in first floor and the building construction is incomplete. No windows in frontage, lack of ventilation and building is not suitable for education purpose. 2) As per VT report total built-up area is 16881 sq.ft., whereas the total outcome as per essential data sheet of page No. 5 is 7468 sq. ft. only. 3) As seen from VCD, all class rooms are having temporary partition walls, which is not permissible. 4) As per BCC, there are two buildings, one building consists of Ground + 1st floor and 2nd building consists of 1+2 floors, where as in VCD only one building with Ground + 1st floor is shown; which is incomplete. The management/institution is trying to mislead NCTE & trying to suppress the correct information”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Vishwa Bharathi D.Ed. College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 22/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Dr. K. Srisailam, President, Vishwa Bharathi D.Ed. College, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the building is purely institutional building. On one side of the building windows were not shown in original plan. As such without windows, the building was looking plain. As per the comments made in the deficiencies some alterations have been made to the building i.e., portico measuring 324 sq. fts. have been constructed and 8 windows have been newly erected for the building and all existing windows shutter are fixed. Now it can be observed that the building is newly constructed and is for the institutional purpose. They are submitting the photographs, VCD and Certificate from the Govt. Engineer regarding the additions and modifications made in the building. ; The data sheet of Page No. 5 shows 7,468 sq.fts. only. The data sheet of page no. 5 has certain columns which were filled by the inspection team after due scrutiny. The data sheet also mentions the total built up area is 16,881 sq.fts as is mentioned in the show cause notice. There is no discrepancy since the figure 7,468 sq.fts. which is computed to certain specifications in data sheet in page no. 5 & doesn't include available built up area (store rooms, administrative area, waiting halls, common room, canteen, toilets, corridor etc.) the

management submits that it has 16,881 area as per the requirements (accommodation statement is enclosed.) ; The partitions shown in VCD belonged to store rooms and waiting halls. Even these partitions are being replaced with permanent structures. They are submitting herewith the photographs, VCD and Certificate from the Govt. Engineer regarding the additions and modifications made in the building. ; there are in fact two separate buildings as per the BCC given. Perhaps the VCD did not capture the two buildings separately. Both the buildings are complete in all respects. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that there are two buildings as per the plan. The first Building is for ground plus two floors. Each floor is measuring 634.89 sq.mt. The appellant constructed only ground plus one floor in the first building. And as per the building completion certificates the total constructed area of 1st building was 13668 sq.ft. (6834 + 6834 sq.ft.). Building 2 is for ground plus two floors. Each floor is measuring 90.61 sq.ft. As per the building completion certificate the total area of 2nd building is 2906.28 sq.ft. Total constructed area of both the buildings meets the NCTE requirement . (b) The essential data sheet under column five does not include the area of washrooms, common room for students, verandah, waiting room, canteen and store room etc. So, obviously summation of the dimensions of the rooms mentioned under column ‘5’ would be much less than actual built up area. So, built up area mentioned by the VT has to be relied upon i.e. 16881 sq.ft. and this area meets the requirement of NCTE. (c) However, as admitted by the appellant with regard to new windows and portico provisions made in the building and to verify the observations of SRC that the institution was misleading or suppressing the correct information, re-inspection of the institution is necessary. the Council therefore concluded that the case may be remanded to SRC for re-inspection of the institution after obtaining payment of Rs. 40,000/- from the institution and for taking further decision thereafter. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT report and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to remand the case to the SRC for re-inspection of the institution after obtaining payment of Rs. 40,000/- from the institution and for taking further decision thereafter. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Vishwa Bharathi D.Ed. College, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary/Correspondance, Vishwa Bharathi D.Ed. College, SVR Educational Development Society, H No. 9-4-84/9, Above Corporation Bank, Kakatiya Nagar & Post Office, Mehdipatnam,, Hyderabad - 500028, Andhra Pradesh

2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of B P Azad College of Education, Gaya, Bihar dated 01/08/2012 is against the Order No. ERC/7-133.8.6/2012/11636 dated 17/05/2012 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “The institution submitted the same document as submitted earlier instead of original FDRs of Rs. 5 lakh and Rs. 3 Lakh. 2) The institution submitted land use certificate signed by Anumandal Padadhikari without seal and same is silent about conversion of land from agriculture to non-agriculture purpose”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, B P Azad College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 07/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. B.P. Azad, Chairman and Shri. S.N. Thakur, Advisor, B P Azad College of Education, Gaya, Bihar presented the case of the appellant institution on 18-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that (a) they submitted with application advice of STDR under CBS system issued by SBI, Bihar Vidhan Mandal Branch, Patna for Rs. 5 lakh and Rs. 3 lakh for endowment and reserve fund bearing a/c no. 31391410679 & 31391425642 (Copy enclosed). In compliance of deficiency letter no. ERC/NCTE/ERCAPP639/6996 dt 18-4-2011, they explained that under CBS banking system, STDR were kept in bank in soft form and only advice from the same was issued. They also submitted certificate obtained from State Bank of India, Bihar Vidhan Mandal Br. Patna vide its letter no. BVM/MISC/16/11-12 dt 29-9-2011 that FDR had been issued under CBS system and advice was issued to account holder as per statement in hard copy. On their request, bank arranged TDR format from old stock and reissued mentioning the same a/c no. and name; (b) they submitted land use certificate issued from Anchal Adhikari (Revenue Circle Officer), Sadar Gaya alongwith application. On the basis of Anchal Adhikari’s letter, Anumandal Padadhikari issued land use certificate. By mistake seal of Anumandal Padadhikari was not fixed on the letter by office. Further, ERC did not point out the same while processing their file and also issuing show cause notice. As regards, conversion of land from agriculture to non-agriculture purpose, there is a provision u/s 8 (c) of ‘The Bihar Agriculture Land (Conversion for no agriculture purpose) Act, 2010’ that permission for conversion is not required in respect of land that is used for religious, social or charitable purpose. Since their trust was a charitable organization, it does not require permission for using the land for education purpose. However, since one of the points of refusal is CLU, they

obtained the same in specified format 7 issued from Anumandal Padadhikkari (SDM), Sadar Gaya. (Copy enclosed) AND WHEREAS the Council noted that (a) STDR advice issued by the Bank Manager towards endowment and reserve funds would have been verified in case of doubt by ERC. Now, the appellant submitted in the appeal TDRs of Rs.5 lakh and Rs.3 lakh, which mentioned the same account No. as that of STDR; (b) `CLU’ document now submitted in the appeal bears the stamp of the Anumandal Adhikari Office. AND WHEREAS in view of the above and also observing the status of teacher education in the State of Bihar, the Council concluded that there was adequate justification to accept the appeal and remand the case to the ERC for further processing as per Regulations. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and remand the case to the ERC for further processing as per Regulations. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of B P Azad College of Education, Gaya, Bihar to the ERC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Chairman, B P Azad College of Education, Plot No. 225, Bahadurbighar, Gaya,, Gaya - 823002, Bihar 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar - 751 012. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Bihar, Patna.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Emmanuel College of Teacher Training, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh dated 26/07/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP1082/D.EL.Ed/AP/2012-13/41902 dated 30/05/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the ground “ The institution has not submitted reply for deficiency letter even after stipulated period of 60 days from the date of issue of deficiency letter”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Emmanuel College of Teacher Training (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 31/07/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Jeevan Roy, Correspondent Secretary, Emmanuel College of Teacher Training, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that they could not reply to the deficiency letter within the stipulated period of time, as the building of the institution was under construction and it was completed only on 29th May 2012. After completion of the building they went to SRC office at Bangalore, where they were told to file appeal in NCTE, New Delhi. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that SRC vide their deficiency letter dated 29-12-2011 asked the institution to furnish certain essential documents within 60 days of receipt of deficiency letter. The appellant did not furnish any reply till the date SRC took a decision in their meeting held on 19-20th April, 2012 to reject the application on the ground of non submission of reply. the Council therefore concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal as the decision taken by the SRC was justified. AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected and SRC order dated 30-05-2012 is confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The General/Secretary, Emmanuel College of Teacher Training, Survey No. 5-9/1, Emmanuel Ministries Association, 5-9/1, Tamaram, Visaskhapatnam, , Visakhapatnam - 531113, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Ibotombi Institute of Education, Imphal, Manipur dated 05/06/2012 is against the Order No. ERC/ER-131.8(i).53/2012/11139 dated 16/04/2012 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the ground “The land is not in the name of Institution/Society”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Ibotombi Institute of Education, (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 05/06/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. M. Meenakumari, Secretary, Ibotombi Institute of Education, Imphal, Manipur presented the case of the appellant institution on 18-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the reason for refusal is erroneous as the issue of the land not being in the name of Institution/Society is not contemplated under Section 14(3) (b) of NCTE, Act, 1993. Smt. Moirangthem Ningol Soibam Ongbi Helen Devi, the trustee was in possession of land on ownership basis as per the certificate dated 24-11-2011. The trustee by an affidavit handed over the land to the Secretary of the trust for establishing and running the proposed institution without any condition. If NCTE makes it mandatory, then the land in question shall be registered either in the name of the institution or trust within a time frame. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that Clause 8(7) (i) of NCTE Regulations 2009 stipulates that “no institution shall be granted recognition unless the institution or trust/society sponsoring it is in possession of required land on the date of application either on ownership basis or on long term lease from Govt./Govt. institutions”. The appellant registered `online application on 29-09-2011 and alongwith the hard copy of the application, submitted land ownership certificate in favour of an individual i.e. Smt. Helen Devi. The appellant requested for giving more time for transferring the land in the name of the trust or institution. However, the institution was not eligible for grant of recognition as it did not possess land as required under Clause 8(7)(i) of Regulations. the Council therefore concluded that there was no justification to accept the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected and ERC order dated 16-04-2012 is confirmed.



1. The Secretary/Managing Trustee, Ibotombi Institute of Education,, Plot No. 171 (Old) 173 (New), Street No. Kha Naorem, VIII-64, Naorem Leikai, PO.- Canchipur, Tehsil/Talika- Singijamei, Town/City-Imphal,, Imphal - , West Bengal 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar - 751 012. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of West Bengal, Kolkata.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of J Beera College of Education, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh dated 23/07/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP1239/D.El.Ed/AP/2012-13/45121 dated 30/08/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the ground “The reply to the show cause notice was received after expiry of the stipulated period. Hence recognition is refused”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, J Beera College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 03/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. N. Sunshine, Lecturer and Shri. J. Finny Joseph, Director, J Beera College of Education, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the show cause notice posted by SRC on 22/05/2012, was received by them on 25/05/2012. Reply to the show cause notice could not be submitted within the stipulated period of 21 days as there was delay in issuance of the land conversion certificate from the local Revenue Divisional Officer (Sub-Collector) due to bye-elections in their constituency. `CLU’ had to be sent in reply to this notice alongwith other documents and therefore there was delay of 8 days in the submission of reply. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the representation of the appellant dated 19-06-2012 in reply to the show cause notice was received in the office of SRC on 21-06-2012 and it was available for consideration of the SRC in their 226th meeting held on 9-10th July 2012. the Council also noted that the appellant failed to reply within the stipulated period of 21 days, on account of certain delay caused in obtaining `CLU’ document, due to bye-election in their constituency. AND WHEREAS taking all aspects of the matter into consideration, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and remand the matter to SRC with a direction to consider the appellant’s reply to the show cause notice and take a fresh decision in the matter. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and remand the case

to the SRC with a direction to consider the appellant’s reply to the show cause notice and take a fresh decision in the matter. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of J Beera College of Education, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Appellant, J Beera College of Education, 2-73/3, Hope Campus, 2-73/3, Seetharamapuram, Narasapur, , West Godavari - 534280, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Jai Maa Institute of Education, Mainpuri, Uttar Pradesh is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/NRCAPP-1015/195th Meeting/2012/18985 dated 02/04/2012 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed(B.T.C) course on the ground “Reply of the show cause notice submitted by the institution is not satisfactory on the ground that the building completion certificate issued by the competent government authority as per NCTE Regulations, 2009 has not been submitted to the NCTE”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Jai Maa Institute of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 04/05/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Sandesh Kumar, Secretary and Shri. Soni Gupta, President, Jai Maa Institute of Education, Mainpuri, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that NRC communicated four deficiencies which were removed by submitting required documents.; The ground of refusal of recognition was other than the four grounds communicated through show cause notice.; The building completion certificate had been submitted vide their letter dated 15/01/2012 to the NRC. Thus the deficiency of building completion certificate was neither communicated through show cause notice nor does it exist as the building completion certificate has been submitted. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the appellant submitted building completion certificate issued on 15-01-1012 by the registered architect, which was also signed by Asstt. Engineer, P.W.D. But this certificate was not in the prescribed format of NRC. And also NRC did not issue any show cause notice concerning the ground of refusal of recognition. the Council therefore concluded that there was adequate justification to accept the appeal and remand the matter to NRC for issuance of show cause notice on the ground specified in the refusal order and take further decision thereafter. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and remand the case to the NRC for issuance of show cause notice on the ground specified in the refusal order and take further decision thereafter.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Jai Maa Institute of Education, Mainpuri, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The President, Jai Maa Institute of Education, Plot/Khasra No. 10864, Plot No.0000, Street No.-0000, Village-Kharra, PO- Halpura Nauner, Tehsil/Taluka-Mainpuri,, Mainpuri - 205001, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, 20/198, Kaveri Path, Mansarover Nagar, Near Mansarover Stadium, Mansarover, Jaipur - 302020, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Rayan College of Education, Nalgonda, Andhra Pradesh dated 24/07/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP1138/B.El.Ed/AP/2012-13/44171 dated 23/07/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.El.Ed course on the ground “The institution has registered the land on 25/11/2011, which is after making of the online application, which is not permissible as per NCTE Regulations 2009. The institution in its reply dt. 12/06/2012 states that land could not be registered due to agitation in the State of Andhra Pradesh”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Rayan College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 24/07/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Rafeer Ahmed, Correspondent and Shri. S.K. Md. Ali, A.O., Rayan College of Education, Nalgonda, Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that there was ‘Sakala Janula Samme’ agitation for separate Telangana State between 13/09/2011 and 24/10/2011 in Andhra Pradesh. All the Govt. employees and officers were involved in the strike. All the departments, including the Deptt. of Registration did not process any transaction. Hence they could not register the land within the stipulated time. But they had submitted with the application a notarized agreement of sale deed dt. 26/09/201. AND WHEREAS the Council observed that the appellant made representation to the State Govt. saying that due to Sakala Janula Samme, they failed to register the land before the date of submission of application and that lead to rejection of their application by the SRC. The State Government of Andhra Pradesh has forwarded a letter dated 14.8.2012 recommending relaxation in NCTE Regulations relating to registration of land prior to the date of application owing to the Telangana Strike. This recommendation was placed before the NCTE Committee in its 19th meeting held on 10th September 2012 and the Council relaxed the concerned provision of the Regulations pertaining to the date of the registration of the land documents. the Council, taking into account the facts, circumstances and recommendation of the State Government, decided that the application of the institution be processed by the SRC in accordance with the extant Regulations, as relaxed by the NCTE Committee and to take further decision thereafter.

AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to remand the case to the SRC with a direction to process the application and to take further decision thereafter. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Rayan College of Education, Nalgonda, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, Rayan College of Education, Sy. No. 112, Village- Venkatadripalem. Mo. Miryalguda, Miryalguda,, Nalgonda - 508207, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Renukadevi Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha, Jalgaon, Maharashtra dated 02/07/2012 is against the Order No. WRC/APW06944/1221987/160/2012/89413 dated 23/04/2012 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.Ed (m)(co-ed) course on the grounds “ The land documents are not in order, since the land is in the name of a private person. 2) The CLU from competent authority is not submitted”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Renukadevi Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 09/07/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Virendra Subhash Chaudhari and Shri. G.M. Kamble, Representative, Renukadevi Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha, Jalgaon, Maharashtra presented the case of the appellant institution on 18-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the first objection stating that land documents were not in order and the land was in the name of private person, was not correct because as on the date of submission of the said proposal for grant of recognition for the said course, as per the then prevalent rules it was permissible to utilize the land taken on lease from private party. So the contention that the land was in the name of private person was not applicable as per the then existing rules; (b) the certificate of land use in proper format was submitted vide their letter dated 14-10-2011 to the WRC. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that (a) the appellant submitted application to the WRC on 19-07-2007 for grant of recognition of D.Ed. course; (b) WRC processed the application and also caused inspection of the institution on 10-07-2008. Subsequently it closed the file vide Order dated 22-04-2009 on the ground of policy decision taken by the NCTE, inter-alia considering the recommendation of the State Govt. of Maharashtra not to grant recognition to the D.Ed. course for the session 2010-11 in the State of Maharashtra; (c) aggrieved by the decision of the NCTE, the appellant approached Hon’ble High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad in W.P. No.5050/2009. On the direction of the Court, WRC reopened the case and issued show cause notice on 29-09-2011 followed by a letter dated 05-01-1012 asking the institution to furnish certified copy of the land documents issued by sub-registrar office and notarized `CLU’. WRC after considering their reply, refused recognition on the ground as stated in para above.

AND WHEREAS the Council further noted specifically with regard to withdrawal grounds that (a) the appellant alongwith the application on 19-07-2007, submitted a notarised rent agreement dated 12-06-2007 for 30 years for both land and building. As per the extant Regulations 2005, lease taken from private party was permissible. But the appellant did not submit registered lease deed; for its acceptability and unregistered lease deed or notarized lease deed has no legal sanctity for claiming ownership rights on the immovable property. As on the date of appeal hearing also only notarised rent agreement was available and it was not acceptable as per the Regulations; (b) the appellant submitted a certificate dated 17-09-2008 issued by ` Talathi’ stating that the land was for education purpose and 7/12 extract of property mentioning that the land purchased by Shri. Umesh Sopan Warade was not for cultivation. These two documents were not acceptable as land use certificates as they do not specify that the land belonged to the appellant society and also `Talathi’ is not the competent revenue authority for issuing land conversion certificate or land use certificate. In view of the above, the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected and WRC order dated 23-04-2012 is confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Secretary, Renukadevi Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha, Plot No. 731/B, Village & PO. Nibhora, Tehsil- Ravee,, Jalgaon - 425506, Maharashtra 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Rooprani Kharbanda College, Unnao, Uttar Pradesh dated 12/07/2012 is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/NRCAPP-1351/198th meeting/2012/20703 dated 14/05/2012 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the ground “The institution has not submitted certificate of Minority institution issued by the Competent Authority (Govt. of India or Govt. of U.P. State)”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Rooprani Kharbanda College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 19/07/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Saurabh Cachan, Manager, Rooprani Kharbanda College, Unnao, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that their institution has been granted minority status certificate vide order no. 61242, dated 11/06/2012 passed by National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions, New Delhi in case No. 738 of 2012. AND WHEREAS the Council observed that (a) NCTE by Public Notice issued in July 2009 interalia imposed restrictions not to grant recognition to B.Ed. course for the session 2011-12 in the state of Uttar Pradesh. However, this restriction was not applicable in case of Minority Educational Institutions. (b) It further noted that National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions vide their certificate dated 11-06-2012 declared ‘N.T. Degree College’ as Minority Institution under Section 2(9) of the National Commission for Minority Educational Institution Act 2004. This certificate was not available with the institution at the time of submission of application on 29-09-2010 and it was issued after the date of refusal of recognition. As per the public notice of NCTE only Minority institutions were eligible for submission of application for grant of recognition of B.Ed course in the State of U.P. the Council, therefore, concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected and NRC order dated 14-05-2012 is confirmed.



1. The Chairman/Secretary, Rooprani Kharbanda College, Plot No. 1211 KA, Street NO. NH-25, Village- Jagdishpur, PO- Ajgain, Tehsil/Taluka- Hasanganj, Town/City- Unnao,, Unnao - 209831, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, 20/198, Kaveri Path, Mansarover Nagar, Near Mansarover Stadium, Mansarover, Jaipur - 302020, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Shri Dwarika Prasad Shiksha Mahavidyalaya, Ashok Nagar, Madhya Pradesh dated 01/08/2012 is against the Order No. WRC/WRCAPP466/154/2011/90859 dated 01/06/2012 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the grounds “ Certified copy of land documents of Khasra No. 108/3, 115/2/15 not submitted. 2) CLU of Khasra no. 108/3, 1152/5 not submitted. 3) Undertaking not submitted on stamp paper. 4) Khasra no. & Plot no. not mentioned in building completion certificate”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shri Dwarika Prasad Shiksha Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 02/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Anil Kumar, Representative, Shri Dwarika Prasad Shiksha Mahavidyalaya, Ashok Nagar, Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that in response to show cause notice issued by NCTE Western Regional Committee, the Institution had filed the reply in time alongwith all the supporting documents but the same was not considered by the Western Regional Committee. Copies of the supporting documents are enclosed for ready reference and verification; that the Western Regional Committee has not provided sufficient opportunity of being heard to the institution to produce the relevant documents etc. before passing the Refusal Order. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that (a) WRC vide show cause notice dated 15-06-2011 informed the institution that (i) certified copy of the land documents of Kh.NO.108/3, 115/2/15, is not submitted, (ii) CLU of Kh.NO.108/3, 1152/5 not submitted, (iii) undertaking is not submitted on stamp paper and (iv) Kh.No./Plot No. not mentioned in the building completion certificate. WRC after considering the reply dated 19-07-2011 of the institution refused recognition; (b) the appellant in the online application mentioned land identification Nos as 108/3 and 115/2/15. But the certified copies of the land documents mention Kh.Nos 108/3 and 115. No land document mentioning 115/2/15 was submitted to the WRC; (c) CLU issued U/s 143 of the Land Revenue Act of UP mentioned Kh.No. 183/3 and 115. Hence the appellant did not submit CLU for Kh.No.108/3 and 115/2/5; (d) building completion certificate issued on 30-01-2009 mentioned Sy.No.103/3 and 115/2. Therefore building was not constructed

on the land at Sy.Nos. 108/3 and 115/2/15 as mentioned in the application. Hence there were discrepancies as noted above in various documents with regard to Sy.Nos of the land and observations of WRC were valid. the Council, therefore, concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected and WRC order dated 01-06-2012 is confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Principal, Shri Dwarika Prasad Shiksha Mahavidyalaya, Khasra No. 103/3 & 115/2/15, Plot No. 15, Village- Parasari Tikaram, PO. & Teh.- Ashok Nagar,, Ashok Nagar - 473331, Madhya Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of St. Thomas D.Ed. College, Vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh dated 31/07/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP1063/D.EL.ED/AP/2012-13/41991 dated 01/06/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the ground “The institution has not submitted reply for deficiency letter even after stipulated period of 60 days from the date of issue of deficiency letter”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, St. Thomas D.Ed. College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 31/07/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. P. Chandra Rao, Managing Trustee, St. Thomas D.Ed. College, Vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that deficiency letter dated 30-12-2011 of SRC was received by them within 10 days. They sent the reply on 27-02-2012 through professional courier- C.Note No.167469. The reply to the deficiency letter was submitted within the stipulated period of 60 days, hence refusal of recognition by the SRC on the ground of non-submission of reply was not justified. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the appellant vide his letter dated 26-02-2012 furnished reply alongwith the necessary documents and the reply was sent by courier service. However, the reply of the appellant is not available in SRC’s file. In the circumstances the Council concluded that there was adequate justification to remand the matter to SRC for consideration of the reply to the deficiency letter and take further decision thereafter. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to remand the case to the SRC for consideration of the reply to the deficiency letter and to take further decision thereafter. The institution is directed to send their reply dated 26-02-2012 again to SRC for consideration.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of St. Thomas D.Ed. College, Vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Managing Trustee, St. Thomas D.Ed. College, K.No. 119/7, P.No. 13-16 Dwarapudi Street, K.L. puram Village and Post, Vizianagaram Taluk and District,, Vizianagaram - 535003, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Gayathri College of D.Ed., Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh dated 17/07/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP593/D.EL.Ed/AP/2012-13/43627 dated 09/07/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the grounds “Land documents are in individual name. 2) Building Completion Certificate is in the name of Ramakrishna Home, Nandyal (it is not in trusts name). 3) Column No.9 of Building Completion Certificate is not filled up and is incomplete. 4) Proceedings of RDO is not notarized and Land Use Certificate for educational purpose is not submitted”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Gayathri College of D.Ed. (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 27/07/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Dr. D. Chenchailah, Spl. Exe-Director, Gayathri College of D.Ed., Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that (a) the land registration document shows Sri Pedda Subba Rayudu Setty S/o Raja Chenchaiah, Trustee and President for and on behalf of Rama krishna Paramahamsa Mission and Maruthi Vyayama Mandali, Nandyal. The land was donated by Sri Mallikarjunaiah S/o Ammanamanchi Rama Chandraiah adopted S/o Subramanyam, and his son Venkata Bala Subramanya Sarma minor Guardian father of Mallikharjunaiah. While registering the land the officials registered in the name Pedda Subbarayudu who was acting Trustee and President of the society. The Land belongs to the society and not to the individual. So the society has ownership of the land which is proposed for the "Gayathri College of Diploma in Education", Nandyal, Kurnool (Dt.), Andhra Pradesh; (b) that while issuing building completion certificate the officials mentioned short name of the society as Rama Krishna Home, Nandyal. Within the brackets it is mentioned as "The Ramakrishna Paramahamsa Mission and Maruthi Vyayama Mandali, Nandyal". This fact was ignored by the SRC. The reason why it is mentioned as short form i.e., Rama Krishna Home, Nandyal because in the bye laws page no. 1 of rules, It is clearly stated that the full name of "The Rama Krishna Paramahamsa Mission and Maruthi Vyayama Mandali, Nandyal" shall be called in short as " The Rama Krishna Home, Nandyal". That is why in the building completion certificate it was mentioned as "Rama Krishna Home, Nandyal." "Rama Krishna Home, Nandyal and " The Rama Krishna Paramahamsa Mission and Maruthi Vyayama Mandali, Nandyal" are not different entities. They are one and the same; (c) that column

no.9 of building completion certificate is filed as “for running educational institutions”; (d) in the previous show-cause notice SRC has not asked them to notarize the proceedings of R.D.O. Hence, they did not submit the notarized R.D.O. Proceedings, but they submitted proceedings of R.D.O. This was not the fault of the society. While submitting the proposal, they forwarded the Land use Certificate. But in the show-cause notice SRC had not asked them to produce such certificate. Hence, they did not submit `CLU’ certificate, while submitting explanation to the show-cause notice. AND WHEREAS the Council perused the documents and noted that (a) the gift deed was in favour of the appellant society i.e. `Ramakrishna Mission and Maruthi Vyayama Madali Nandyal’ and Pedda Subbaryaudu Shetty, President of the trust executed the deed for and on behalf of the trust; (b) in the building completion certificate column `9’ clearly mentioned the purpose of the building for running education institution and the owner of the building as the appellant trust and it was also called in short as `Ramakrishna Home’ as per Society bye-laws; (c) as per the proceedings of the Revenue Divisional Office, Nandyal dated 20-01-2012 and land use certificate issued on 12-01-2012 by Mandal Revenue inspector, 0.62 acre of land at Sy.No.1981/1, 1979 of Moolasgaram Village is diverted from agriculture purpose to non-agriculture purpose.. In view of the above the Council concluded that there was adequate justification to accept the appeal and remand the matter to SRC for further processing of the application as per Regulations. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and remand the case to the SRC for further processing as per Regulations. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Gayathri College of D.Ed., Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Director, Gayathri College of D.Ed., Khasra No. 3-1, Plot/Khasra No. 3, Nandyal Village and Post, Nandyal City and Taluk,, Kurnool - 518501, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Harika Elementary Teacher Training Institution, Warangal , Andhra Pradesh dated 27/07/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP1281/D.EL.ED/AP/2012-13/41926 dated 30/05/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the ground “ The institution has not submitted reply for deficiency letter even after stipulated period of 60 days from the date of issue of deficiency letter”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Harika Elementary Teacher Training Institution (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 01/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. K. Venu Gopal, Correspondent, Harika Elementary Teacher Training Institution, Warangal , Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that at time of submission of our application the entire Telangana was under "Sakala Janula Samme" for 49 days. It caused delay in submission of required documents of Land Registration. After the agitation, they submitted the remaining documents except building completion certificate and encumbrance certificate, through courier service vide receipt No. FDC.2562148 dated 05/01/2012. Thereafter they received SRC’s deficiency letter dated 30-12-2011 on 16/01/2012. In reply to this letter they sent all the remaining documents through courier service vide receipt No. FDC.2562148 dated 20/01/2012. Despite submission of reply, refusal of recognition on the ground of non-submission of reply to the deficiency letter was not justified. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the appellant vide his letter dated 19-01-2012 sent reply to the deficiency letter through courier service on 20-01-2012, well within stipulated period of 60 days. However, this reply of the appellant was not available in SRC’s file. In the circumstances, the Council concluded that there was adequate justification to remand the matter to SRC for consideration of reply to the deficiency letter and for taking further decision thereafter. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council

concluded that there was adequate ground to remand the case to the SRC for consideration of reply to the deficiency letter and for taking further decision thereafter. The appellant is directed to furnish the reply to the deficiency letter to SRC again for consideration. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Harika Elementary Teacher Training Institution, Warangal , Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, Harika Elementary Teacher Training Institution, Khasra No. 480/A, 484, 485, Oorugonda Village, Oorugonda City, Atmakur Taluk,, Warangal - 506342, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of JP College of Elementary Education, Nalgonda, Andhra Pradesh dated 01/08/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP1386/D.EL.ED/AP/2012-13/43709 dated 11/07/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the grounds “ Land documents of Gift settlement deed dt. 25.01.2012, which is registered after the date of on-line application, is not permissible as per NCTE Regulations 2009. The management has admitted the same in its reply to the show cause notice. 2) Certified copy of the land documents from Govt. authority is not submitted. 3) The Details of other teacher education programmes run by the institution in the same building/premises is not given. 4) In the building completion certificate submitted, column No. 9 is not duly filled up for proposed course/college name and hence it is incomplete”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, JP College of Elementary Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 03/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. J. Sreekanth, Director, JP College of Elementary Education, Nalgonda, Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that (a) he had explained to the SRC about the Telangana agitation which led to the registration of the gift settlement deed after the date of online application submission. This explanation was provided vide their letter, dt. 01/03/2012. In view of such circumstances caused by the strike of Govt. officials which was beyond the control of the appellant and this was acknowledged by the Registration Department; b) the certified copies of the land documents had been submitted to SRC alongwith the hard copy of the application, dt. 03/10/2011 and also alongwith the reply, dt. 02/03/2012. The rejection of the application on the above ground was therefore vitiated by non-consideration of material on record; (c) that the appellant college had not been running any other teacher education programme in the same building/premises; (d) column no. 9 of the building completion certificate mentions "Teacher Education" . However, column no. 9 does not require the appellant to specify the name of the proposed course/college. In any event, it is submitted that column no.2 of the same building completion certificate conspicuously specifies the name of the proposed college. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the appellant submitted certified copy of the registered land document to the SRC; the institution had not been running any other

teacher education programme and the premises were exclusively meant for the proposed course; column 9 of the building completion certificate was duly filled up specifying the purpose of the building. AND WHEREAS the Council further observed that the appellant made representation to the State Govt . saying that due to Sakala Janula Samme, they failed to register the land before the date of submission of application and that lead to rejection of their application by the SRC. The State Government of Andhra Pradesh has forwarded a letter dated 14.8.2012 recommending relaxation in NCTE Regulations relating to registration of land prior to the date of applications owing to the Telangana Strike. This recommendation was placed before the NCTE Committee in its 19th meeting held on 10th September 2012 and the Council relaxed the concerned provision of the Regulations pertaining to the date of the registration of the land documents. the Council, taking into account the facts, circumstances and recommendation of the State Government, decided that the application of the institution be processed by the SRC in accordance with the extant Regulations, as relaxed by the NCTE committee and to take the further decision thereafter. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to remand the case to the SRC with a direction to process the application and to take the further decision thereafter. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of JP College of Elementary Education, Nalgonda, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary/Correspondance, JP College of Elementary Education, 670, 12278/2006, NA, Cherlapally, Nalgonda,, Nalgonda - 508001, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Kaushalya Devi Educational Society, Firozpur, Punjab is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/NRCAPP-881/199th meeting/2012/22697-699 dated 13/06/2012 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the grounds “The land has been given to the Kaushalya Devi Educational Society on private lease for a period of 99 years which is not permissible under clause 8(7) (i) of NCTE Regulation, 2009”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Kaushalya Devi Educational Society (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 19/06/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Rajeev Chugh, General Secretary and Shri. Lokesh Mittal, Secretary, Kaushalya Devi Educational Society, Firozpur, Punjab presented the case of the appellant institution on 18-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that they registered the land in the name of Kaushalya Devi Educational Society and submitted the certified land papers in the Regional Office, Jaipur through speed post on 02/04/2012. Photocopy of the letter and receipt of speed post is produced. AND WHEREAS the Council observed that Clause 8(7) (i) of Regulations, 2009, stipulate that “ No institution shall be granted recognition unless the institution or trust/society sponsoring the institution is in possession of required land on the date of application either on ownership basis or on long term lease from Govt./Govt. institution. (b) The appellant registered online application on 27-09-2010 for grant of recognition of D.El.Ed. course and with the hard copy of the application he submitted private lease deed dated 16-09-2010 in favour of the appellant society (Lease from private party is not permissible as per Regulations 2009). Land was registered in favour of the appellant society only on 29-03-2012, that was much after the date of submission of application. As the appellant trust/institution did not possess the land on ownership basis as on the date of application, it was not eligible for grant of recognition as per Regulations. the Council, therefore, concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected and NRC’s order dated 13-06-2012 is confirmed.



1. The Appellant, Kaushalya Devi Educational Society, St. 3, Circular Road, House no. 1044, Abohar, Firozpur,, Firozpur - 152116, Punjab 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, 20/198, Kaveri Path, Mansarover Nagar, Near Mansarover Stadium, Mansarover, Jaipur - 302020, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Punjab, Chandigarh.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Krantisurya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Jalna, Maharashtra dated 20/06/2012 is against the Order No. WRC/WRCAPP1719/161/2012/90487 dated 19/05/2012 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the ground “The institution has not replied to the show cause notice”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Krantisurya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 25/06/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Mahendra Tayade, Chairman and Shri. Abhijit M. Tayade, Member, Krantisurya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Jalna, Maharashtra presented the case of the appellant institution on 18-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that show cause notice dt 02-01-2012 of WRC was not received by the appellant, therefore they could not submit reply to the notice. The appellant being Minority institution is protected under article 30 of the Indian Constitution and the institution has been running since 2009-10. The appellant further submitted with regard to the points of show cause notice, as mentioned under Para `2’ of the refusal order dated 19-05-2012 that the change in the name of the trust i.e. Krantisurya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal is shown in the registration certificate of the society. Shri. Shailendra Mohanrao Tayade, Vice-Chairman of the trust gave 0.80 R land on 33 years lease to the institution. And on this leased premises WRC granted recognition vide order dated 09-09-2008 for D.Ed. course in the name of Matoshri Tulsabai D,Ed. College. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the show cause notice and the final refusal order were sent by WRC at the same address of the Society and of the institution but the appellant has taken the stand that the show cause notice was not received by them. In the normal course, the institution should have received the notice. the Council further noted that the WRC has refused recognition exclusively on the ground of non-receipt of reply. In the appeal, the appellant has furnished reply to all the grounds mentioned in the show cause notice. the Council felt that in the interest of natural justice the matter deserved to be remanded to WRC for consideration of the reply and to examine the matter on merit. The institution is directed to send reply to the WRC.

AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was justification to remand the matter to WRC for consideration of the reply and to take decision thereafter as per regulations. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Krantisurya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Jalna, Maharashtra to the WRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, Krantisurya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Gut No. 83/2, Plot No. 65, MHS6, Village- Varudi, PO- Gewrai Bazar, Tehsil- Badnapur,, Jalna - 421203, Maharashtra 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Mother Gnanamma Catholic College of Tamilnadu, Kanyakumari, Tamilnadu dated 26/07/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP1641/B.ED/TN/2011-12/42343 dated 11/06/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “The institution has not submitted valid minority certificate issued by the competent authority from the State Govt. as B.Ed. is banned in the State of Tamilnadu. 2) In the building completion certificate submitted, Ground floor roofing is of asbestos sheets, which is not permissible as per NCTE Regulation 2009. 3) Sy.No 55/1 which is reflected in building completion certificate, is not shown in land document and No. certified land documents for Sy.No. 55/1 is given. 4) Notarised Bye-laws of the Society is submitted, but minority status certificate has not been submitted. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Mother Gnanamma Catholic College of Tamilnadu (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 31/07/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. S. Justin Antony, Principal in-charge, Mother Gnanamma Catholic College of Tamilnadu, Kanyakumari, Tamilnadu presented the case of the appellant institution on 18-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that (a) Govt. of Tamilnadu is not issuing minority certificate. As per Govt. order G.O. (1D) No. 200 dated 28/11/2011 and G.O. (1D) No.9 dated 20/01/2012, the ban is lifted for starting new college of Education in Tamil Nadu; (b) now asbestos sheet on roof was removed and three storeys, terrace building with RCC roof is constructed and building completion report was obtained from competent authority, Panchayat Engineer; (c) building is located on the same land, bearing Sy.No. 55/1 and this Sy.No. which was mentioned in the registered land document; (d) supplement notarized trust bye law para B states that, the trust is a "Christian Minority Trust". AND WHEREAS the Council noted that (a) the appellant submitted to SRC certified copies of registered land documents for various Sy.Nos. including Sy. No.55/1.; (b) the Council however noted that NCTE by their public notice issued in July 2010 inter-alia imposed restrictions not to grant recognition to B.Ed. course for the session 2010-11 in the State of Tamil Nadu, except to the minority educational institution established under article 30 of the constitution. As per the public notice of NCTE only Minority institutions were eligible for submission of application for grant of recognition of

B.Ed. course in the state of Tamil Nadu and appellant institution did not have minority status for making application; (c) building completion certificate issued on 13-04-2012 mentioned that 2362 Sq.ft. asbestos area was available and remaining area work was in progress. So, the institution was not having 1500 Sq.mt. of built-up area with RCC roof as per norms. The building completion certificate dated 13-07-2012 mentioning 18294 Sq.ft. of built-up area, now submitted in appeal was not acceptable as it was issued after the refusal of recognition. the Council, taking into consideration all aspects of the matter concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected and SRC order dated 11-06-2012 is confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The President, Mother Gnanamma Catholic College of Tamilnadu, Plot/Khasra No. 55/1, 42-3B & 871/13, Street No. 1-36, Villukuri Post & Village, Kalkulam Taluk,, Kanyakumari - 629180, Tamilnadu 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Tamilnadu, Chennai.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Shaheed Udham Singh College of Education, Sangrur, Punjab dated 01/03/2012 is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/NRCAPP-1598/192ND MEETING/2012/15149 dated 21/01/2012 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting M.Ed course on the ground “The institution is not accredited by NAAC under clause 8(4) of NCTE Regulations, 2009 at the time of application for M.Ed. course. 2) The institution did not complete the three academic sessions of B.Ed. course as required under clause 8(3) of NCTE Regulations, 2009, on the date of submission of application for M.Ed. course”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shaheed Udham Singh College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 15/03/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Raowinder Singh, Chairman, Shaheed Udham Singh College of Education, Sangrur, Punjab presented the case of the appellant institution on 18-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that (a) the institution had applied for recognition of M.Ed. course on 07/10/2010. All the deficiencies pointed out by NRC from time to time had already been removed. The institution was granted recognition for B.Ed. course with 100 intake in 2005 vide order dated 13-08-2005 and additional unit in 2008. The institution has already completed 3 academic sessions of B.Ed. course since its initial recognition in 2005.; (b) `NAAC’ has awarded Grade `B’ to the institution vide their certificate dated 10-03-2012. As the institution fulfilled Clause 8(3) and 8(4) of Regulations 2009 now , it may be considered for grant of recognition of M.Ed. course. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the appellant had been conducting B.Ed. course since 2005 and submitted application on 01-10-2010 for grant of recognition of M.Ed. course. As admitted by the appellant, the institution was accredited by `NAAC’ only on 10-03-2012. According to the provisions of Clause 8(4) of the NCTE Regulations, 2009, an institution shall be permitted to apply for M.Ed. course after it has been accredited by the NAAC. As the institution did not possess ‘NAAC’ certificate as on the date of submission of application on 01-10-2010, it was not eligible to submit application for M.Ed. course. the Council therefore concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal.

AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected and NRC’s order dated 21-01-2012 is confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The President, Shaheed Udham Singh College of Education, Shaheed Udham Singh Education and Welfare Society (Regd.), Plot No. 348/548, NH-64, Village & PO- Mehlan Chowk, Tehsil- Sunam,, Sangrur - 148001, Punjab 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, 20/198, Kaveri Path, Mansarover Nagar, Near Mansarover Stadium, Mansarover, Jaipur - 302020, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Punjab, Chandigarh.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Sri Jagadaguru Fakeer Channaveereshwar Teacher Training Institute, Gadag, Karnataka dated 31/07/2012 is against the Order No. APS03334/D.ED/KA/2012-13/43630 dated 09/07/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, withdrawing recognition for conducting Elementary Course on the grounds “ The building has asbestos sheets roof in the first floor, this is against the NCTE norms. 2) The Institution was granted recognition in temporary premises to run B.Ed course on 09.10.2000 with a condition that it should shift to its own permanent premises in 3 years. i.e., on or before 09.10.2003. The Institution is still running in temporary premises and has not shifted to new premises even after a lapse of more than 11 years and 08 months. As per NCTE norms and standards and as per regulations, 2009, the institution should have own land and building. 3) As admitted by the institution/management, the institution is running in a dilapidated building, which has developed cracks, roofed tiles are weak and building may collapse at any time. Conducting classes in such a building is unsafe and dangerous to the staff & students. The institution in their reply to the show cause notice, sought permission to shift to another temporary building for a stop-gap arrangement for a period of 2-3 years and requested SRC to conduct inspection. There is no provision for stop-gap arrangement for a period of 2-3 years as per regulations, 2009. 4) The chairman of the institution vide letter dt. 2.3.2012 has requested this office to give permission to shift to the rented new building, by giving various reasons which are not acceptable, as already more than 10 years and 5 months have lapsed since giving recognition. Construction of the new building is not at all started till date. 5) The management has violated all the norms and tried to suppress and mislead NCTE. 6) The management has admitted in its reply that building is not ready and want time to construct new building, which is not permissible as per NCTE norms”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Sri Jagadaguru Fakeer Channaveereshwar Teacher Training Institute (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 31/07/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. S. S. Shettar, Member and Ms. Sridevi Shettar, Representative, Sri Jagadaguru Fakeer Channaveereshwar Teacher Training Institute, Gadag, Karnataka presented the case of the appellant institution on 18-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that a) the old building had only ground floor. There was no first floor in the said old building. The said building did not have asbestos sheet roofing. There is no representation made by this appellant

stating that the said building had asbestos sheet roofing. The said first reason for withdrawal of recognition is contrary to facts and materials on record; (b) that the conditions regarding library, laboratories, books and equipments etc together with filling up of vacant post of Librarian are complied with immediately during 1997. Thus at the time of granting recognition, no adverse remarks had been made regarding the building where the institution (TTI ) was functioning for 35 years prior to recognition. It is submitted that the Teacher training Institution run by Sri Jagadguru Fakireshwara Vidyadhana Samiti, Shirahatti possesses building as required under the NCTE norms issued from time to time; (c) that the recognition of the appellant institution was granted under certificate dated 06-12-1996. Therefore the observation of the SRC that it had granted three years time under Order dated 9-10-2000 to construct the permanent building was erroneous. That the TTI has been running since last 48 years continuously without any interruption. That the President of the said Sameeti of Sri Jagadguru Fakireshwara Vidyadhana Sameeti, Shirahatti is the Peethadhipati of an historical religious institution under the name and style as Sri Jagadguru Fakira Swami Samnsthana Math, Shrihatti. It is submitted that said Math is established in the 16th century at the time of 'Adilshahi Dynasty of Bijapur.' It is a unique religious institution wherein there is no difference between the caste Hindu and Muslims. That the said President as Peethadhipti of Sri Jagadguru Fakira Swami Samnsthana Math, Shirahatti owns new buildings having about 1800 Sq.mt. area. That the Ist floor building constructed in the land bearing R.S. No. 332, measuring 12 Acres 35 Guntas situated at Shirahatti is suitable for running TTI as per the norms of NCTE. Under the circumstances the Sri Jagadguru Fakireshwara Vidyadhana Sameeti, Shirahatti has sought permission to shift teachers training institute for the time being in the said building belonging to Sri Jagadguru Fakira Swami Samnsthana Math, Shirahatti taking it on rental basis till a new building is constructed in place of the earlier old building. That in view of both these institutions i.e. Vidhyadana Sameeti and the Math being under the control of a single person under his headship, the Swamiji is ready to offer a building which is suitable as per norms of NCTE to occupy without expecting any returns, till completion of proposed building by Sri Jagadguru Fakireshwara Vidyadhana Sameeti, Shirahatti.; (d) when things stood right, surprisingly the SRC mentioning the letter submitted by the appellant which was apparently in contradiction to letter itself, issued a Show cause notice dt 21-5-2012. In the said show cause notice, SRC referred to the order dated 9-10-2000 mentioning that a condition is imposed by the SRC to the appellant who had to shift TTI to its own permanent premises within 3 years. It is pertinent to note that no such direction or condition is put forth in the order dt 9-10-2000; (e) there is no suppression of material facts by the appellant and had no intention to mislead NCTE. The appellant has not violated any norms or standards issued by NCTE.; (f) That the new building has to be constructed in the land owned and possessed by the Sri Jagadguru Fakireshwara Vidyadhana Sameeti, Shirahatti in the land bearing R.S. No. 263/2A of Shirahatti. The said land is under ownership of Sameeti and measurs 6 acres 18 Guntas 6 1/2 Annas. The record of rights in respect of R.S. No. 263/2A of Shirahatti is produced. That vast land is owned and possessed by the Management of Institution. That for construction of new building the appellant has obtained building permission from competent authority i.e. from Pattana Panchayat, Shirahatti. The copy of said building permission dt 30-4-2012 is produced.

AND WHEREAS the Council noted that (a) SRC issued certificate of recognition for a period of one year on 06-12-1996 to the institution. Further vide order dated 09-10-2000 granted formal recognition interalia imposing a condition that “the institution shall continue to fulfill the norms laid down under the regulations of the NCTE and submit to the Regional Committee the Annual Report and Performance Appraisal Report at the end of the each academic year”; (b) the Chairman of the institution vide letter dated 02-03-2012 informed SRC that the structural soundness of the tiled roof building was very poor and it was highly unsuitable for conducting the classes as it was almost 50 years old and requested for shifting the building to some other premises taken on rent in order to avoid any unforeseen mishap and loss;(c) as per NCTE Regulations the institution shall not be permitted to shift to rented premises. And running of the institution in the building with tiles roofing (temporary roofing) which is in dilapidated condition is not permissible. The appellant would have taken steps much earlier to construct own building on a small portion of 6 acres 18 guntas of land possessed by the society and shifted from the present old building. But he did not do so and rather requested to shift the institution to another rented building, which is not permissible as per Regulations. . the Council taking into consideration all aspects of the matter concluded that SRC was justified in withdrawing recognition of the institution and hence there was no ground to accept the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT report and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected and SRC’s order dated 09-07-2012 is confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Adminstrative Officer, Sri Jagadaguru Fakeer Channaveereshwar Teacher Training Institute, Shirahatti,, Gadag - 582120, Karnataka 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Karnataka, Bangalore.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of St. Marys College of Education, Tirunelveli, Tamilnadu dated 02/07/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP1132/B.Ed/TN/2011-12/43053 dated 25/06/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the ground “The reply of the institution, is received on 16/03/2012, i.e., after 100 (One Hundred) days from the date of issue of deficiency letter”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, St. Marys College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 06/07/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. K. N. Rajakumar, Director, St. Marys College of Education, Tirunelveli, Tamilnadu presented the case of the appellant institution on 18-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the reply to the deficiency letter was submitted to the SRC after 100 days due to delay in issuing Minority Status Certificate from Govt. of Tamil Nadu. They got direction from Hon’ble High Court Madras vide no. W.P. No. 27535 of 2011 dated 21/12/2011 to issue Minority Status Certificate. They appealed to the Govt. of Tamil Nadu for issuance of Minority status certificate, and the said certificate would be submitted to SRC before commencement of the course. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that SRC vide letter dated 07-12-2011 asked the institution to comply with the deficiencies within 60 days of communication of the deficiencies. The appellant vide letter dated 10-03-2012 submitted the reply to the deficiency letter, which was received by SRC on 16-03-2012.The institution did not produce the Minority status certificate even on the date of appeal hearing. 4. the Council taking into consideration all aspects of the matter concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is rejected and NRC’s order dated 25-06-2012 is confirmed.



1. The Chairman/Managing Trustee, St. Marys College of Education, 174, 174/2, 174/2. 174/2, Ownership, Deed, 13, Vadamalaisamutram, Ambasamudram,, Tirunelveli - 627425, Tamilnadu 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Tamilnadu, Chennai.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Blooms College of Education, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh dated 13/08/2012 is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/HP-96/198th meeting/2012/23079 dated 15/06/2012 of the Northern Regional Committee, withdrawing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “The institution was initially started in a rented building on the address above State Bank of Patiala, Bhojpur, Sunder Nagar, Dist. Mandi, HP in the year of its inspection i.e. 2003 2) Experience certificate issued to Mr. Devender Kumar Sharma on September 2, 2005 shows that Institute had shifted to a new location, "Troat, PO Kanaid, Sunder Nagar, Dist. Mandi (HP) - 175137. 3) VTR of the inspection conducted on 18/08/2009 indicates that college has again shifted to a new location, "Village Kot, PO Chunahan, Sadar Mandi, HP. 4) Institution has thus shifted to new locations twice without prior permission of NRC, which is a gross violation of NCTE Regulations (clause 8(11) of NCTE Regulations, 2009.) 5) Since the institution had not informed the NRC about the changes in locations. The intimation with regard to inspection of the institution u/s 17 (I) was sent on the address `Blooms College, above State Bank of Patiala, Bhajpur, Sunder Nagar, Dist. Mandi, HP. The institution expressed its inability to get the inspection of the institution done on 02/11/2010 on the pretext that it had no prior intimation”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Blooms College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 14/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Praveen Dhiman, President and Dr. Francina, Gen. secretary cum Principal, Blooms College of Education, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 19-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that a) the institution initially started B.Ed course in rented building at the address- ‘Above State Bank of Patiala, Bhojpur, Sundernagar, Distt. Mandi, HP’ in the year 2003.; b) the owner of the above said building opened Sanjeevani Hospital in the same premises where the entrance, toilet and visitors area was made common which was disturbing the studies of students, therefore the college needed to shift to another premises i.e. Troat P.O. Kanaid Sunder Nagar. Prior information was given to NRC, affiliating body etc. (Copy of letter dated 20-05-2012 addressed to RD, NRC produced). Inspection was done in the same building for J.B.T course and NRC vide order dated 18-09-2004 granted recognition for J.B.T course; c) meanwhile the society constructed its own building at Kot, P.O. – Chunahan, Sadar Mandi, H.P. and before shifting to its own premises prior intimation was given to NRC.

Inspection u/s 17 was caused on 18-8-2009 by NRC in their own building. Subsequent to this inspection NRC vide letter dated 15-7-2010 allowed the institution to continue with B.Ed and J.B.T. Course. Website of the institution was created and address of the institution and infrastructure was highlighted. The institution has not violated the NCTE Regulations (clause 8(11) of NCTE Regulations, 2009), they have given prior intimation to NRC, before shifting to new location. Hence the said address is mentioned in the NCTE Website as KOT, P.O. Chunahan, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh 175027 under recognised Institutions details in Himachal Pradesh.; d) it was not agreed that institution had not informed the NRC about the changes in location. They did receive two letters ( of B.Ed. and J.B.T.) with regard to inspection of institution u/s 17 (1), dt. 16 Aug. 2009 on the address Blooms College, above State Bank of Patiala, Bhojpur, Sundernagar, Dist. Mandi, H.P. as they had intimated the Post office regarding change in address, they were redirected to their present address. They never missed any correspondence from NRC till date. Hence, allegation regarding refusal to get the inspection of the institution is denied. Inspection was earlier done u/s 17 on 18-08-2009 and as a result of inspection, NRC vide letter dt 15-7-2010 continued recognition to the institution. But after 4 months of their letter, they received a phone call from anonymous person to hold the inspection the very next day. While enquiring he was not sure that under which section he would inspect the college. Neither they got any letter from NRC about the schedule of inspection nor any information to this regard was displayed on its website. When they called up NRC, it was told that there was no such intimation in the office. Therefore they refused for inspection at that time. NCTE may in future if necessary may inspect their institution with prior intimation and necessary fee will be paid by them. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that (a) NRC vide their orders dt 03-07-2003 granted recognition for B.Ed course in the rented premises at ‘ Above State Bank of Patiala, Bhojpur, Sundernagar, Mandi, H.P.; (b) the appellant submitted application for JBT course on 21-01-2004 in the rented premises at ‘Troat, P.O. Kanaid, Sundernagar, Mandi, H.P’. Inspection for JBT course u/s 15 was done at these premises. However NRC granted recognition for JBT course at the earlier rented premises i.e. Above State Bank of Patiala, Bhojpur; (c) the appellant claimed that they informed NRC by letter dated 20-5-2004 about shifting of the institution from ‘ above State Bank of Patiala, Bhojpur, Mandi’ to another rented premises at ‘Troat, P.O. Kanaid, Sundernagar, Mandi’ and by letter dated 23-06-2006 about shifting of the institution from latter rented premises (Troat, P.O. Kanaid) to its own premises at Kot, P.O. Chunahan Tehsil-Sadar, Distt Mandi. But the two letters are not available in NRC’s files; (d) NRC caused inspection of the institution u/s 17 of the NCTE Act on 18-08-2009. The visiting team inter-alia mentioned that application has already been submitted for change of address on 23-06-2006. It was not clear from the inspection reports about the address / location of the institution which was inspected by them. However, NRC on the basis of the inspection reports extended recognition to the institution for B.Ed and JBT courses vide letter dated 15-7-2010 at the address-Above State Bank of Patiala, Sunder Nagar, Mandi. By referring to this letter, the institution would have brought to the notice of NRC about the changed location of the institution, but it did not do so; (e) NRC received a complaint that the institution had been running multiple courses and the available infrastructure and instructional facilities were inadequate. On the basis of this complaint

NRC caused inspection of the institution u/s 17 of the NCTE Act on 2-11-2010. The institution refused to facilitate the inspection. NRC after issuing show cause notice, withdrew recognition of the institution. (f) the Council further noted that as per NCTE regulations permission of the NRC, NCTE is mandatory for shifting of the premises. NRC has not yet given permission for shifting of the institution to its own premises., There is a complaint against the institution subsequent to the inspection u/s 17 in the 2009. AND WHEREAS in the light of provisions under clause 8(11) of Regulations, 2009 primarily and also complaint leveled against the institution, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to remand the case to NRC for causing inspection of the institution at its own premises and take further decision thereafter. The institution shall remit fee of Rs. 40,000/- and other requisite information for inspection of its own premises as per Regulations. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to remand the case to NRC for causing inspection of the institution at its own premises and take further decision thereafter. The institution shall pay the requisite fee and submit other information for inspection of its own premises. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Blooms College of Education, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The President, Blooms College of Education, Kot, P.O. Chunahan, , Mandi - 175027, Himachal Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, 20/198, Kaveri Path, Mansarover Nagar, Near Mansarover Stadium, Mansarover, Jaipur - 302020, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Blooms College of Education, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh dated 13/08/2012 is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/HP-135/198TH MEETING/2012/23072 dated 15/06/2012 of the Northern Regional Committee, withdrawal recognition for conducting J.B.T course on the grounds “The institution was initially started in a rented building on the address above State Bank of Patiala, Bhojpur, Sunder Nagar, Dist. Mandi, HP in the year of its inspection i.e. 2003. 2) Experience certificate issued to Mr. Devender Kumar Sharma on September 2, 2005 shows that Institute had shifted to a new location, "Troat, PO Kanaid, Sunder Nagar, Dist. Mandi (HP) - 175137. 3) VTR of the inspection conducted on 18/08/2009 indicates that college has again shifted to a new location, "Village Kot, PO Chunahan, Sadar Mandi, HP. 4) Institution has thus shifted to new locations twice without prior permission of NRC, which is a gross violation of NCTE Regulations (clause 8(11) of NCTE Regulations, 2009.) 5) Since the institution had not informed the NCTE (NRC) about the changes in locations. The intimation with regard to inspection of the institution u/s 17 (i) was sent on the address `Blooms College, above State Bank of Patiala, Bhajpur, Sunder Nagar, Dist. Mandi, HP. 6) The institution expressed its inability to get the inspection of the institution done on 02/11/2010 on the pretext that it had no prior intimation”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Blooms College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 14/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Praveen Dhiman, President and Dr. Francina, Gen. secretary cum Principal, Blooms College of Education, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 19-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that a) the institution initially started B.Ed course in rented building at the address- ‘Above State Bank of Patiala, Bhojpur, Sundernagar, Distt. Mandi, HP’ in the year 2003.; b) the owner of the above said building opened Sanjeevani Hospital in the same premises where the entrance, toilet and visitors area was made common which was disturbing the studies of students, therefore the college needed to shift to another premises i.e. Troat P.O. Kanaid Sunder Nagar. Prior information was given to NRC, affiliating body etc. (Copy of letter dated 20-05-2012 addressed to RD, NRC produced). Inspection was conducted in the same building for J.B.T course and NRC vide order dated 18-09-2004 granted recognition for J.B.T course; c) meanwhile the society constructed its own building at Kot, P.O. – Chunahan, Sadar Mandi, H.P. and before shifting to its own premises prior intimation was given to

NRC. Inspection u/s 17 was caused on 18-8-2009 by NRC in their own building. Subsequent to this inspection NRC vide letter dated 15-7-2010 allowed the institution to continue with B.Ed and J.B.T. Course. Website of the institution was created and address of the institution and infrastructure was highlighted. The institution has not violated the NCTE Regulations (clause 8(11) of NCTE Regulations, 2009), they have given prior intimation to NRC, before shifting to new location. Hence the said address is mentioned in the NCTE Website as KOT, P.O. Chunahan, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh 175027 under recognised Institutions details in Himachal Pradesh.; d) it was not agreed that institution had not informed the NRC about the changes in location. They did receive two letters ( of B.Ed. and J.B.T.) with regard to inspection of institution u/s 17 (1), dt. 16 Aug. 2009 on the address Blooms College, above State Bank of Patiala, Bhojpur, Sundernagar, Dist. Mandi, H.P. as they had intimated the Post office regarding change in address, they were redirected to their present address. They never missed any correspondence from NRC till date. Hence, allegation against them regarding refusal to get the inspection of the institution is completely denied. Inspection was earlier conducted u/s 17 on 18-08-2009 and as a result of inspection, NRC vide letter dt 15-7-2010 continued recognition to the institution. But after 4 months of their letter, they received a phone call from anonymous person to hold the inspection the very next day. While enquiring he was not sure that under which section he would inspect the college. Neither they got any letter from NRC about the schedule of inspection nor any information to this regard was displayed on its website. When they called up NRC, it was told that there was no such intimation in the office. Therefore they refused for inspection at that time. NCTE may in future if necessary may inspect their institution with prior intimation and necessary fee will be paid by them. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that (a) NRC vide their orders dt 03-07-2003 granted recognition for B.Ed course in the rented premises at ‘ Above State Bank of Patiala, Bhojpur, Sundernagar, Mandi, H.P.; (b) the appellant submitted application for JBT course on 21-01-2004 in the rented premises at ‘Troat, P.O. Kanaid, Sundernagar, Mandi, H.P’. Inspection for JBT course u/s 15 was conducted at their premises. However NRC granted recognition for JBT course at the earlier rented premises i.e. Above State Bank of Patiala, Bhojpur; (c) the appellant claimed that they informed NRC by letter dated 20-5-2004 about shifting of the institution from ‘ above State Bank of Patiala, Bhojpur, Mandi’ to another rented premises at ‘Troat, P.O. Kanaid, Sundernagar, Mandi’ and by letter dated 23-06-2006 about shifting of the institution from latter rented premises (Troat, P.O. Kanaid) to its own premises at Kot, P.O. Chunahan Tehsil-Sadar, Distt Mandi. But the two letters are not available in NRC’s files; (d) NRC caused inspection of the institution u/s 17 of the NCTE Act on 18-08-2009. The visiting team inter-alia mentioned that application has already been submitted for change of address on 23-06-2006. It was not clear from the inspection reports about the address / location of the institution which was inspected by them. However, NRC on the basis of the inspection reports extended recognition to the institution for B.Ed and JBT courses vide letter dated 15-7-2010 at the address-Above State Bank of Patiala, Sunder Nagar, Mandi. By referring to this letter, the institution would have brought to the notice of NRC about the changed location of the institution, but it did not do so; (e) NRC received a complaint that the institution had been running multiple courses and the

available infrastructure and instructional facilities were inadequate. On the basis of this complaint NRC caused inspection of the institution u/s 17 of the NCTE Act on 2-11-2010. NRC after issuing show cause notice, withdrew recognition of the institution. (f) the Council further noted that as per NCTE regulations permission of the NRC, NCTE is mandatory for shifting of the premises. NRC has not yet given permission for shifting of the institution to its own premises., There is a complaint against the institution subsequent to the inspection u/s 17 in the 2009. AND WHEREAS in the light of provisions under clause 8(11) of Regulations, 2009 primarily and also complaint leveled against the institution, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to remand the case to NRC for causing inspection of the institution at its own premises and take further decision thereafter. The institution shall pay the requisite fee and furnish other requisite information for inspection of its own premises as per Regulations. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to remand the case to NRC for causing inspection of the institution at its own premises and take further decision thereafter. The institution shall pay the requisite fee and submit other information for inspection of its own premises. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Blooms College of Education, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The President, Blooms College of Education, Kot, PO.- Chunahan,, Mandi - 175027, Himachal Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, 20/198, Kaveri Path, Mansarover Nagar, Near Mansarover Stadium, Mansarover, Jaipur - 302020, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Holy Mother College of Education, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh dated 31/07/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP1416/D.EL.Ed/AP/2012-13/44139 dated 23/07/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the ground “Out of total built-up area of 24939 sq.ft. available, 1054 sq.ft of built-up area is covered with Asbestos sheet roof, which is not permissible as per NCTE Regulations. The management also has admitted the same in its reply dt. 22/06/2012”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Holy Mother College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 06/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Dr. B. Bhoopal Reddy, Secretary and Ch. Janga Reddy, Member, Holy Mother College of Education, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 19-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that as per approved building plan and building completion certificate, there were two blocks - main block consisted of ground floor, first floor and second floor with a total built-up area of 23885.76 sq.ft. with RCC roof, and another block with asbestos covered roof consisting of 1054 sq.ft. only, which is away and not connected with the main building. The block with asbestos covered roof is not assigned for any purpose of the institution and is meant for the housing of watchmen, servants and parking purpose. AND WHEREAS the Council taking into consideration the submission made by the appellant and perusing the building plan, building completion certificate and VTR noted that the main building RCC roof has adequate built up area for the proposed course. the Council, therefore, concluded that there was adequate justification to accept the appeal and remand the matter to SRC for further processing as per Regulations. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and remand the case to the SRC for further processing as per Regulations.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Holy Mother College of Education, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary/Correspondance, Holy Mother College of Education, 340/2, 341/1, 351/3, 352/3, Sate Deed, 7-107, Balapur, Hyderabad, , Rangareddy - 500005, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Islamiah College of Education, Vellore, Tamilnadu dated 06/08/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP566/B.ED/TN/2011-12/44327 dated 26/07/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “ As per encumbrance certificate submitted, land is on lease basis, which is not permissible as per NCTE Regulations 2009. As per 8(7) (i) Regulations 2009, No institution shall be granted recognition under these Regulations unless the institution or society sponsoring the institution is in possession of required land on the date application. The land free from all encumbrances could be either on ownership basis or on lease from Govt. or Govt. institutions for a period of not less than 30 years. In cases where under relevant State or Union Territory laws the maximum permissible lease period is less than 30 years, the State Govt. or Union Territory Administration law shall prevail. However, no building shall be taken on lease for running any teacher training course. 2) The institution has not submitted valid minority certificate issued by the competent authority from the State Govt. as B.Ed. is banned in the State of Tamilnadu”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Islamiah College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 17/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Dr. Syed Shahabudden, Director and Shri. C. Rafi Ahmed, Executive Officer, Islamiah College of Education, Vellore, Tamilnadu presented the case of the appellant institution on 19-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that as the appellant had changed the name of educational agency, namely, Vaniyambadi Mohammedan Educational Society to Vaniyambadi Muslim Educational Society in the year 2006 and a resolution had been passed for the change of this name and the same was registered the District Registrar of Societies, Vellore on 31-01-2016. Thus it is evident that both the Vaniyambadi Mohammedan Educational Society and Vaniyambadi Muslim Educational Society are one and the same and all the properties which were registered in the name of Vaniyambadi Mohammedan Educational Society is owned by Vaniyambadi Muslim Educational Society from 31-01-2006 onwards. The Appellant had also sent a letter dated 02-07-2012 addressed to the Regional Committee which was acknowledged by them stating that under Section 11 of the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act 1975 Vaniyambadi Muslim Educational Society automatically becomes the owner of the land and this change of name shall not affect any right or obligation of the Society or of any

member thereof or render defective any legal proceedings touching or concerning any property, right or claim of the Registered Society. It was also informed to the Regional Committee that the undisputed and unquestionable owner of the land in T.S.No. 7 is Vaniyambadi Muslim Educational society which is the Educational agency which administers the Appellant's college. The land and building at T.S. No. 8 was also in possession of the trust, which had been given on lease to Islamic Industrial training Institute. The Sy.Nos T.S. Nos 7 & 8 are adjacent to each other. The Appellant further stated that as far as the minority status is concerned, the Society is run by Muslims and all the members of the Society belong to minority muslim community and the educational agency administers the following institutions, namely, a) Islamiah Elementary School (Aided) since 1901 b) Islamiah Boys Higher Secondary School (Aided) since 1905 c) Islamiah Girls Higher Secondary School (Aided) since 1957 d) Islamiah Industrial Training Centre functioning from 1984 e) Islamiah college for Men (Aided ) since 1919 and f) Islamiah Women's Arts and Science College functioning from 1997. Admittedly, the Government of Tamil Nadu has recognized all the aforesaid institutions as Muslim Minority institutions within the meaning of Article 30 of the Constitution of India. As such, it could not be disputed that the Appellant institution which is run by the very same educational agency is muslim minority institution within the meaning of Article 30 of the Constitution of India. Further, the Government of Tamil Nadu had also issued orders permitting opening of new B.Ed Colleges in the State of Tamil Nadu by non minority educational agencies. AND WHEREAS the Council noted from the submission made by the appellant that the trust was in possession of 1.94 acre of land at new T.S. No.7 and non-encumbrance certificate has been issued by the Registration Dept for the period from 01-01-1987 to 30-07-2012. The land at T.S. No.7 was meant for the proposed institution. The society gave on lease 36, 362 sq. mt of RCC building at T.S. No. 8 to Islamiah Industrial Training Centre, which is one of their patronized institution. The certificate of encumbrance on property submitted to SRC mentioning that the land was on lease pertained to Sy.No. 8 ( new T.S.No 8). The society is registered as vaniyambadi Muslim Educational Society and has been running several institutions for the welfare of the Muslim Minority. the Council, therefore, concluded that there was adequate ground to remand the case to the SRC for further processing as per Regulations. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to remand the case to the SRC for further processing as per Regulations.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Islamiah College of Education, Vellore, Tamilnadu to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.

(R. Jaya)

Member Secretary 1. The General Secretary, Islamiah College of Education, Vaniyambadi Muslim Educational Society, New Town, Vaniyambadi,, Vellore - 635752, Tamilnadu 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Tamilnadu, Chennai.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Lakshya College of Advance Education, Bijnor, Uttar Pradesh dated 06/08/2012 is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/NRCAPP-926/200 Meeting/2012/24816 dated 03/07/2012 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the grounds “show cause notice was issued stating that notarized copy of CLU issued under clause 143 on 11/03/2011 under the U.P. Land Act has not been submitted yet. Notarized copy of the Khataun in lieu of CLU is not acceptable although it refers to the CLU dated 11/03/2011. The revised building plan is not approved by the Competent Authority, although it now mentions land details as Khasra Number 237”. The institution did not submit reply of show cause notice. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Lakshya College of Advance Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 06/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Rajpal Singh, Manager, Lakshya College of Advance Education, Bijnor, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 19-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that (a) "Manager/Secretary of Lakshya Development Welfare Society" or "Principal/Correspondent, Lakshya College of Advance Education" or any other authority of College or Society never received the show cause letter mentioned in the refusal order. It is to be noted that Post Office Bagwara, Village - Bagwara, Tehsil/Taluka - Dharmpur, Town/City - Seohara, District - Bijnor, State - UP is the concerned post office and it has certified that "No post has been received from NCTE, Jaipur from 01/04/2011 to 30/06/2012". Attached is the copy of post office confirmation letter. The College couldn't rectify deficiencies as show cause letter was never received, hence college is attaching required documents for deficiencies mentioned in Rejection Order. (b) With regard to refusal ground number one the appellant is producing notarized copy of the CLU issued under clause 143 of U.P. Land Act by Sub District Magistrate. As required College is submitting revised Building plan, mentioning Khasra No. 237 and the plan approved by P.W.D. (Competent Authority for building plan approvals). AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the appellant claimed that he had not received show cause notice dated 2-12-2011 of NRC and hence he could not submit reply. The appellant in the appeal produced notarized copy of ‘CLU’ issued u/s 143 of

the Land Revenue Act of U.P. and building plan approved by PWD office. In view of the above, the Council concluded that there was adequate justification to remand the case to the NRC for considering the reply to the notice and for taking further decision thereafter. The institution is directed to furnish the reply to the show cause notice grounds mentioned in the refusal order to the NRC for consideration. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to remand the case to the NRC for considering the reply to the notice and for taking further decision thereafter. The institution is directed to furnish the reply to the grounds of the show cause notice mentioned in the refusal order to the NRC for consideration. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Lakshya College of Advance Education, Bijnor, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, Lakshya College of Advance Education, Plot No. 00154, Street No. Bagwara, Village- Bagwara, PO.- Bagwara, Tehsil/Taluka- Dhampur, Town/City- Seohara,, Bijnor - 246745, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, 20/198, Kaveri Path, Mansarover Nagar, Near Mansarover Stadium, Mansarover, Jaipur - 302020, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Maharaja Aggarsain College of Education, Bathinda, Punjab dated 06/08/2012 is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/NRCAPP-626/199th meeting/2012/22693 dated 13/06/2012 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the grounds “Maharaja Agrasen College of Education already runs B.Ed (One Unit :- 100 seats) programme. The building map does not mention Khasra no. on the map. 2). The size of multipurpose hall as shown in the map is of only 1218 sqft which does not meet the requirement of NCTE Norms of 2000 sqft area. 3) As per building plan the College has built-up area of only 2414 sq m which does not fulfil the NCTE Norms for B.Ed. and D.El.Ed. Courses”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Maharaja Aggarsain College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 07/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Naresh Aggarwal, General Secretary and Shri. Varinder Kumar, Office supdt Maharaja Aggarsain College of Education, Bathinda, Punjab presented the case of the appellant institution on 19-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that Maharaja Aggarsain Trust Jai Singhwala Distt. Bathinda had applied to NRC, for grant of recognition for D.El.Ed course in addition to existing B.Ed. course. The NRC, has rejected the application on the wrong grounds i.e. the khasra no. is not mentioned on building map, the size of multipurpose hall is 1218 sq. ft. and the built up area is only of 2414 sq m. In this regard it is submitted that the NRC has considered the wrong document for processing their application for D.El.Ed. course. It has considered the map and infrastructure details which were submitted at the time of B.Ed. recognition in 2005. But they have already submitted the map containing the khasra Nos. The area of the multipurpose hall is more than 2000 sq.ft. and the built up area is also more than 3000 sq.mtr. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that (a) the appellant in reply to the deficiency letter inter-alia submitted a copy of the building plan approved on 20-12-2005, by Chief Town Planner which mentioned 18050 sq.ft. of built up area on ground and first floors. It did not mention Kh. No. of land ; (b) NRC after considering the reply to deficiency letter, issued show cause notice on 21-06-2011 informing the institution that “the building plan submitted is not approved by the competent authority. The total built up area available for the college as per building plan is 18050 sq.ft., whereas the institution has mentioned in its application the area available for the course as 3251 sq.mts; (c) the

appellant in reply submitted layout plan of the college building on 3 separate sheets of building plan for ground, first and second floor. This plan mentioning Kh.No. 565, 566, 572 and 573, was approved by Sarpanch on 26-12-2006 and it mentioned 26974.8 sq.ft of total built up area on 3 floors of the building as against the requirement of 32292 sq.ft. (3000 sq.mt), as per NCTE norms for the existing B.Ed course and the proposed D.El.Ed course. Therefore NRC was justified in refusing the recognition; (d) Now the appellant in the appeal produced altogether a different building plan, which mentioned a total built up area of 32125 sq.ft. on 3 floors of a building and size of multipurpose hall as 3222 sq.ft. As per the dimensions of length (70 sq.ft) and width (35 ft) of the hall, mentioned in the plan, the area of multipurpose hall comes to 2450 sq.ft. Further the appellant had been submitting different building plans at various points of time, mentioning different built up areas resulting in confusion. The copy of the building completion certificate enclosed to the appeal is undated and not issued by a competent authority. This certificate is incomplete as it does not indicate the type of roofing. In these circumstances the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected and NRC order dated 13-06-2012 is confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The General Secretary, Maharaja Aggarsain College of Education, 565 (19-11) 566/1 (23-9) 572/3, Maharaja Aggarsain Trust Regd, NA, Jai Singh Wala, Bathinda,, Bathinda - 151001, Punjab 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, 20/198, Kaveri Path, Mansarover Nagar, Near Mansarover Stadium, Mansarover, Jaipur - 302020, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Punjab, Chandigarh.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of New Montessori Educational Society, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh dated 30/07/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP1639/D.El.Ed/AP/2011-12/43174 dated 27/06/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the grounds “The institution has submitted lease deed on survey number 317, dt. 17-01-2012, where the building is constructed for the proposed course, which is after the date of on-line application submitted. This is not permissible as per NCTE regulations 2009. As per regulations, lease deed is not permissible & the registration of land should be on or before the date of on-line application submission. 2) In the Building Plan, land details and built up area not given/mentioned 3) Building completion certificate from competent Govt. authorized engineer in a proper format is not submitted. In the BCC submitted, Sy.No. and Location is not mentioned. 4) BCC format is filled by hand and is in individual’s name. 5) Proceedings from the Revenue divisional office stating that the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the purpose of educational institution is not submitted. Proceedings from the revenue divisional office submitted is in individual’s name”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, New Montessori Educational Society (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 06/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. V. Rama Mohan Reddy, Correspondent and Shri. T. Raja Sekar Reddy, Official Administrator, New Montessori Educational Society, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 19-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the society has taken land on lease from V. Rama Mohan Reddy. Land Registration on ownership basis in favour of the institution shall be done after getting the recognition; building plan mentioning land and built up area details is now produced in the appeal; building completion certificate from competent Govt. authorized Engineer in a proper format is now submitted. In the column No. 4 of the certificate submitted, Sy.No. and Location is mentioned ; proceedings from the Revenue divisional office stating that the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the purpose of educational institution is submitted. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that in the building completion certificate submitted to SRC Sy.No. and location of the building was mentioned; the appellant also submitted to SRC the proceeding of Revenue Divisional office.

AND WHEREAS the Council however noted that as per clause 8(7)(i) of NCTE Regulations 2009, No institution shall be granted recognition unless the institution or the trust/society sponsoring it is in possession of land at the time of application on ownership basis or long term lease from Govt/Govt institution. In the appellant’s case the land was on lease from private party, hence it was not eligible for grant of recognition; in the building plan submitted to SRC, land and built up area details were not mentioned. the Council therefore concluded that there was no justification to accept the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected and SRC order dated 27-06-2012 is confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The President, New Montessori Educational Society, 3/646, New Montessori Educational Society, 3/646, Gorantla, Gorantla, Gorantla,, Anantapur - 515231, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Shri Shankar Shiv Mahavidyalaya, Firozabad, Uttar Pradesh dated 06/08/2012 is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/NRCAPP-1710/200 Meeting/2012/26174 dated 23/07/2012 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the ground that a reply to the show couse notice was not submitted. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shri Shankar Shiv Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 06/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Virendra Pal Singh, Manager, Shri Shankar Shiv Mahavidyalaya, Firozabad, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 19-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the Institute had submitted replies to all the letters and show cause notice issued by the NRC-NCTE-Jaipur by hand. Further in support of the submission of the reply to the Show Cause Notice dated 06-06-2012 he has shown a receipt for submission of the reply in the office of the NRC-NCTE Jaipur which shows receiving on 15-06-2012 by hand. Proof to this effect was enclosed with the appeal and has been shown at the time consideration of the appeal. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the appellant has submitted a reply to the show cause notice issued by the office of the NRC-NCTE Jaipur within the prescribed time limit, which is available in the file. AND WHEREAS in view of the above position, the Council concluded that there was adequate justification to accept the appeal and remand the case to the NRC for considering the reply of the institution and taking further necessaryaction. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate justification to remand the case to the NRC for considering the reply of the institution and taking further appropriate action in the matter.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Shri Shankar Shiv Mahavidyalaya, Firozabad, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, Shri Shankar Shiv Mahavidyalaya, Gautam Niwas Infront Jain Temple Etha Road, Tundla,, Firozabad - 283204, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, 20/198, Kaveri Path, Mansarover Nagar, Near Mansarover Stadium, Mansarover, Jaipur - 302020, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Sri Balaji Venkateshwara Swamy College of Elementary Education, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh dated 03/08/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP1715/D.EL.ED/AP/2011-12/43160 dated 27/06/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the grounds that approved blue print of the building plan issued by competent civil authority and original building completion certificate from competent Govt. Engineer are not submitted”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Sri Balaji Venkateshwara Swamy College of Elementary Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 07/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Sri Harish, Representative, Sri Balaji Venkateshwara Swamy College of Elementary Education, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 19-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the appellant submitted on 29-02-2012 a blueprint of the building plan approved by the civil authorities and a building completion certificate issued by the Executive Engineer, R&B, Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distt. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that in the file there is a blue print of a building plan approved by Asst. Executive Engineer and Dy. Executive Engineer, R&B Medchal and also the Executive Officer, Gram Panchayat, Keshawaram and two building completion certificates-one signed by the Asst Executive Engineer and Dy-Executive Engineer and another by the Panchayat Secretary, GP, Keshawaram containing identical details. on being pointed out by the SRC that in the building completion certificate an individual was shown as the owner of the building, the appellant submitted a revised building completion certificate dated 14-05-2012 showing the same details but indicating that P.Janardhan Reddy Memorial Education Society of which Shri V. Pavan Kumar is the General Secretary is the owner of the building. This revised certificate is signed by the Panchayat Secretary, GP Keshawaram. AND WHEREAS the Council after considering all aspects of the matter concluded that since the appellant has furnished a satisfactory reply to the grounds mentioned in the refusal order, the appeal deserved to be accepted and the matter remanded to the SRC for further processing as per the Regulations.

AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate justification to remand the case to the SRC for further processing as per the NCTE regulations. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Sri Balaji Venkateshwara Swamy College of Elementary Education, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The General Secretary, Sri Balaji Venkateshwara Swamy College of Elementary Education, 81/2, 2461, 81, Keshavaram, Shamirpet, Shamirpet,, Rangareddy - 500078, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Trinity College of Elelmentary Teacher Education , Karimnagar, Andhra Pradesh dated 06/08/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP841/D.EL.ED/AP/2011-12/43288 dated 29/06/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the grounds (1) “In the approved blue print of building plan submitted, total earmarked area for the exiting and proposed course is not mentioned. In the building plan as mentioned, built up area for proposed D.El.Ed course 887.30 it is very less as per regulation. As per regulation minimum 1500Sq.mts is required. 2) In the building completion certificate submitted, built up area course wise is not mentioned /given. In the building completion certificate col no. 9 two courses mentioned. 3) The management is running B.Ed course and proposes to run D.Ed in the same building”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Trinity College of Elelmentary Teacher Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 06/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri D. Manohal Reddy, Secretary and M. Nagarajn, A.O., Trinity College of Elelmentary Teacher Education , Karimnagar, Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 19-09-2012. In the appeal and in the course of personal presentation it has been submitted that according to the approved building plan and the bilding completion certificate, the total area of the buiding is 3422.91 sq. mts; there is more than required space for starting D.El.Ed course as per NCTE norms; a revised building completion certificate with details of area for B. Ed and D.Ed courses i.e. 1741 sq mts for B.Ed and 1681.91 sq. mts for D.El.Ed. courses is furnished; and the NCTE norms mention that the management can run B.Ed and D.El.Ed courses by providing required infrastructure and other facilities and 3000 sq.mts. of built-up area is enough to run B.Ed and D.ElEd courses.Regarding the built-up area of 887.30 sq.mts. earlier marked for D.El.Ed course in the building plan, the appellant submitted that the indicated area of 887.30 sq mts covered only class rooms and labs leaving some rooms for common use such as computer lab, library, physical education room etc. AND WHEREAS in view of the above position, the Council concluded that the appeal deserved to be accepted and the matter remanded to SRC for further processing as per the Regulations.

AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate justification to remand the case to the SRC for further processing as per the NCTE regulations. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Trinity College of Elelmentary Teacher Education , Karimnagar, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary/Correspondance, Trinity College of Elelmentary Teacher Education , Kasulapally, D Manohar Reddy, Station Road, Peddapalli,, Karimnagar - 505172, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Carmel Teacher Training Institute, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh dated 03/08/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP946/D.EL.ED/AP/2012-13/44143 dated 23/07/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the ground that the certified copy of the land documents from Govt. Authority is registered in favour of the Society on 29/09/2011, which is after the submission of on-line application, which is not permissible as per NCTE Regulations 2009. As per Regulations of NCTE, the land should be registered on or before the date of on-line application submission”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Carmel Teacher Training Institute (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 07/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri T. Ebenezer Sastry, Correspondent and B. Vasanth Kumar, Admin officer, Carmel Teacher Training Institute, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 19-09-2012.In the appeal and in the course of personal presentation it has been submitted that the appellant commenced the process of sending application on line on 28-09-2011 itself but the transfer of the land was got registered on 29-09-2011. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the on line application indicates that it was filed at 9-53 P.M. on 28-09-2011 and the transfer of the land in the name of Carmel Ministries took place just on the following day itself. the Council felt that it is a minor technical difference of just one day. In these circumstances, the Council concluded that the appeal deserved to be accepted and the matter remanded to the SRC for further processing as per Regulations. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate justification to remand the case to the SRC for further processing as per the NCTE regulations.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Carmel Teacher Training Institute, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Correspondent, Carmel Teacher Training Institute, 55/4B, 58/1B, Sale Deed, 55/4B, 58/1B, Chodimella, Eluru, , West Godavari - 534002, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of KDBM College, Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh dated 22/08/2012 is against the Order No. WRC/WRCAPP1152/167/MP/2012/93818 dated 06/08/2012 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.E.C.Ed course on the grounds that the institution has submitted experience certificate of the principal of a college which was not recognized for the greater part of the period in question”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, KDBM College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 23/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Anand Tyagi, Secretary and Neshar Ahmad, Admn. Officer, KDBM College, Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 19-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the appellant was not aware about the recognition status of the institution whose experience certificate was produced; the Society again appointed a new Principal approved by the Selection Committee; the Society has spent a huge amount on purchase of land, construction of building and acquiring of other infrastructure facilities and if the recognition is not given the Society will have to bear irreparable loss. AND WHEREAS in view of the position explained by the appellant, the Council concluded that the appeal deserved to be accepted and the matter remanded to the WRC to consider the action taken by the institution and decide thereafter. The appellant institution should send all the relevant information regarding the appointment of a new principal to the WRC. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate justification to remand the case to the NRC for considering the action taken by the institution and taking a decision thereafter. The appellant institution should send all the relevant information to the WRC. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of KDBM College, Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh to the WRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.

(R. Jaya)

Member Secretary 1. The Secretary, KDBM College, 2294/1, 2294/216,Educational/Residential, 10, Sironj, Sironj,, Vidisha - 464228, Madhya Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of KDBM College, Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh dated 22/08/2012 is against the Order No. WRC/WRCAPP1152/167/MP/2012/93818 dated 06/08/2012 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.E.C.Ed course on the grounds that the institution has submitted experience certificate of the principal of a college which was not recognized for the greater part of the period in question”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, KDBM College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 23/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Anand Tyagi, Secretary and Neshar Ahmad, Admn. Officer, KDBM College, Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 19-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the appellant was not aware about the recognition status of the institution whose experience certificate was produced; the Society again appointed a new Principal approved by the Selection Committee; the Society has spent a huge amount on purchase of land, construction of building and acquiring of other infrastructure facilities and if the recognition is not given the Society will have to bear irreparable loss. AND WHEREAS in view of the position explained by the appellant, the Council concluded that the appeal deserved to be accepted and the matter remanded to the WRC to consider the action taken by the institution and decide thereafter. The appellant institution should send all the relevant information regarding the appointment of a new principal to the WRC. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate justification to remand the case to the NRC for considering the action taken by the institution and taking a decision thereafter. The appellant institution should send all the relevant information to the WRC.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of KDBM College, Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh to the WRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, KDBM College, 2294/1, 2294/216,Educational/Residential, 10, Sironj, Sironj,, Vidisha - 464228, Madhya Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.


Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002

10/10/2012

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Matha Teacher Training Institute, Sivaganga, Tamilnadu dated 16/08/2012 is against the Order No. APS02606/D.T.ED/TN/2012-13/42996 dated 25/06/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.T.Ed course on the grounds “Sale deed of land document submitted is in individual’s name, which is not permissible as per NCTE norms. 2) Original building completion certificate from competent Govt. authorized engineer is not submitted. 3) The management has not submitted certificate from the Govt. affiliating body to the effect that no other programme is being conducted by the institution in the same building/campus, alongwith the existing earmarked courses. 4) Salary is not paid as per Central/State/Govt./UGC to the staff members and consolidated salary is being paid to the staff members”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Matha Teacher Training Institute (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 23/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS the appellant institution, that is, Matha Teacher Training Institute, Sivaganga, Tamilnadu presented their case on 19-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that Matha Teacher Training Institute (MTTI) and Mataha College of Teacher Education (MCTE) come under the Matha Memorial Education Trust. We have all the infrastructure facilities to conduct the D.T.Ed. (Diploma in Teacher Education) programme with an annual intake of 100 students and B.Ed. (Bachelor of Education) with an annual intake of 100 students. For this Trust, Mr. P. Jayakumar functions as Managing Trustee, Mrs. Jeyapackiam as Secretary and Dr. J. George Immanuel Arockiadass as Trustee. We informed NCTE, Bangalore vide our letter dated 21/09/2007 that both Matha TTI and MCTE stand in the total extent of 17.56 acres (71062 sq.meter) of land. Out of 17.56 acres (71062 sq.meter), an extent of 13.52 acres (54713 sq.meter) has been registered in the name of Matha Teacher Training Institute and Matha Memorial Education Trust (MMET) and the remaining 4.04 acres (16349 sq.meter), in the name of the Managing Trustee Mr. P. Jeyakumar, the Chairman. The said 4.04 acres were converted into name of Matha Memorial Education Trust and used for MTTI. Copies of Land document pertaining to this 17.56 acres (71062 sq.meter) translated into English and endorsed by the Notary Public were duly submitted to NCTE on 21/09/2007 as supporting document. Herewith we enclose the copies of land ducment for your kind refence. Reference No.1 In

addition to this, the Govt. Tahsildar who is the local authority while issuing the land utilization certificate No. B1/8286/07 dated 20/09/2007 categorically certified that the entire land of 17.56 acres are used fully by MTTI and MCTE. Herewith we enclose a copy of the certificate for your kind reference. Reference No.2 According to the NCTE website that carries the 'Norms and standards for the Elementary Teacher Education program to Diploma in Education' clearly mentions in its appendix 2 (5.1 infrastructure) that 3500 sq. meter is the required extent of land for the usage of Teacher Training Institute and B.Ed., college. But MTTI and MCTE have total extent of 13.52 acres (54713 sq.meters) of land in their title deed which is more than the norms fixed by NCTE. And therefore, the question of title deed stands in the individual name does not arise at all. ; We submitted the original building completion certificate given by competent Govt. authorized Engineer to National Council for Teacher Education, SRC, Bangalore on 16/03/2012. He was the authorized engineer by the Govt. of Tamilnadu to assess building completion and to issue structural soundness certificate for public buildings. (Proof for the authenticity and competency of the Engineer who issued the certificate is enclosed-Proceedings of the Dist. Collector of Sivagangai Dist. D.Dis. H2. 12026/05 dated 18/07/2005). Herewith we enclose the proceedings of the district collector for your kind reference. Reference No.3 ; We requested Director of Teacher Education Research and Training, Chennai in our letter dated 16/03/2012 to send a letter to National Council for Teacher Education, SRC, Bangalore, that no other programme is being conducted by the institution in the same building/campus. A copy of the letter was submitted to the National Council for Teacher Education, Bangalore on 16/03/2012 for information. Immediately Director of Teacher Education Research and Training, Chennai appointed the Principal of DIET, Kalaiyarkoil as an inspector to inspect the building. The inspector inspected building on 31/05/2012 and sent his report to Directorate of Teacher Education Research and Training, Chennai on 01/06/2012. Meanwhile, we directly met the Joint Director of Teacher Education Research and Training, Chennai two times. The Joint Director informed us that they would send the said certificate directly to National Council for Teacher Education, Southern Regional Committee, Bangalore. In this regard, we have already submitted the following three documents to National Council for Teacher Education, Bangalore on 16/03/2012. Besides these, the Tahsildar, Manamadurai, Govt. of Tamilnadu, issued a certificate in his reference Roc. No. B1/8286/07 dated: 20/09/2007 that the entire campus area of the land is used for Teacher Education programme only. The Tamilnadu Govt. approved engineer issued building stability certificate. Based on this stability certificate, the Tahsildar of Manamadurai personally inspected and issued the building license. The licence No. is K.Dis.A2/6682/2011 dated: 07/12/2011. In that building license it is certified that the entire building is used only for teacher education programmes, and their class rooms, library and laboratories purpose. The above said three documents clearly indicate that no other programme is being conducted by the institution in the same building/campus. Herewith we enclose a copy of the above said certificates for your kind reference. (Enclosure No: 4 for land untilization certificate; Enclosure No: 5 for building stability certificate and Enclosure No: 6 for building license). The above said three documents clearly indicate that no other programme is being conducted by the institution in the same building/campus. ; MTTI is a self-financed and minority Teacher Training Institute. It functions in the most backward area of Tamilnadu. We collect very

less fee from the students. Majority of the students are unable to pay even this less fee. Besides, we extend fee concession to poor and rural students. Therefore, previously we paid consolidated pay to the staff. From May 2012 we pay staff salary as per the State Govt. scale of pay. Herewith we enclose the salary details for your kind reference. Reference No.7. We pray, sir, to kindly drop off recognition withdrawal decision immediately and issue permanent recognition order to conduct both Diploma in Teacher Education and Bachelor of Education with an annual intake of 100 students for each course every year from 2012-2013. AND WHEREAS after examining the documents produced by the appellant, the Council noted that (i) English translation of the sale deeds submitted with the appeal show that the land is registered in favour of the Society. But the documents submitted to SRC show that the land is registered in favour of an individual, who happens to be the managing trustee of the Society. The institution submitted that the translator committed a mistake which has now been rectified. AND WHEREAS in the original Tamil version, name of the Society appears first and the name of individual afterwards. However, the status of the land needs to be reconfirmed from the original sale deed in Tamil. (ii) The institution has submitted land utilization certificate from Tahsildar, Building Completion certificate from a Government empanelled Engineer, who has been authorized by the District Collector to issue structural soundness certificate. It needs to be ascertained whether the person is authorized to issued Building Completion certificate also. (iii) The institution has submitted that it is running both D.T.Ed and B.Ed programmes, which is permissible under NCTE norms. The DTERT Tamil Nadu has certified that no programme other than the teacher education programmes is being run by the institution. (iv) The institution has admitted that in view of inadequate resources from tuition fee from students, they had been paying consolidated salary to staff. However, they have started paying salaries as per norms from the month of May, 2012, that is before the date of inspection and withdrawal order, for which documentary evidence has been submitted. In view of the above, the Council concluded that there was enough ground to remand the matter to SRC for re-verification of land documents (Original Tamil Version) and authorization of the empanelled Engineer to issue Building Completion certificate. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to remand the case to the SRC for taking necessary action as indicated above. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Matha Teacher Training Institute, Sivaganga, Tamilnadu to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Correspondent, Matha Teacher Training Institute, Matha Teacher Training Institute, Vaanpuram, Manamadurai, Sivagangai, , Sivaganga - 630606, Tamilnadu 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Tamilnadu, Chennai.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Mother Theresa College of B.Ed., Khammam, Andhra Pradesh dated 09/08/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP1198/B.ED/AP/2011-12/43166 dated 27/06/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds that the institution has not submitted valid minority certificate issued by the competent authority from the Sate Govt. as B.Ed. is banned in the State of Andhra Pradesh and the institution has applied with the same society’s name for two courses, viz;(i) SRCAPP1198 and (ii) SRCAPP1181 for academic session 2012-13 in the same District. Applying for more than one course in the same Sy.No. 20/45 and same location is not permissible as per NCTE Regulations 2009”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Mother Theresa College of B.Ed. (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 16/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri T. Prabhakar, Secretary and D.Subramanyam, Admin officer, Mother Theresa College of B.Ed., Khammam, Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 19-09-2012. In the appeal and in the course of personal presentation it has been submitted that they had already applied for minority status and got the certificate issued on 02-08-2012 and they have also written to the SRC on 15-05-2012 withdrawing their application No. SRCAPP1181 for the second college. AND WHEREAS in view of the above position the Council concluded that the appeal deserved to be accepted and the matter remanded to SRC for further processing of the other application as per the Regulations. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate justification to remand the case to the SRC for further processing as per the NCTE regulations.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Mother Theresa College of B.Ed., Khammam, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, Mother Theresa College of B.Ed., 50/45, Savior Educational Society, Gandhinagar, Bhadrachalam, , Khammam - 507111, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Mother Theresa College of Teacher Education, Khammam, Andhra Pradesh dated 09/08/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP1160/D.EL.ED/SRCAPP1134/D.EL.ED/AP/2012-13/43765 dated 18/07/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the ground that the “same Society has applied for two courses viz; 1) SRCAPP1160 & 2) SRCAPP1134 for academic session 2012-13 in the same district. Applying for more than one course in the same session is not permissible as per NCTE regulations 2009. The reply to the show cause notice is not satisfactory and convincing”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Mother Theresa College of Teacher Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 16/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri T. Prabhakar, Secretary and D. Subramanyam, Admin Officer, Mother Theresa College of Teacher Education, Khammam, Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 19-09-2012. In the appeal and in the course of personal presentation, it has been submitted that they have written to the SRC on 17-05-2012 withdrawing their application No SRCAPP1134 for the second college. AND WHEREAS in view of the above position the Council concluded that the appeal deserved to be accepted and the matter remanded to the SRC for further processing of the other application as per the Regulations. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate justification to remand the case to the SRC for further processing as per the NCTE regulations

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Mother Theresa College of Teacher Education, Khammam, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, Mother Theresa College of Teacher Education, 20/45, Sunmerges Educational Society, Gandhinagar, Bhadrachalam,, Khammam - 507111, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of National College of Education, Salem, Tamilnadu dated 06/08/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP832/B.ED/TN/2011-12/44172 dated 23/07/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds that in the Encumbrance certificate submitted, the extent of land area is not given/mentioned; the institution has not submitted valid minority certificate issued by the competent authority from the State Govt. as B.Ed is banned in the State of Tamilnadu; and the multipurpose hall size is less than NCTE Regulations”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, National College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 14/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri S. Kadhar Hyder Khan,Chairman and J.Thargavelon, Member, National College of Education, Salem, Tamilnadu presented the case of the appellant institution on 19-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that in the encumbrance certificate the area of land is mentioned and a notarized English version thereof has been enclosed; their trust itself is registered as a minority trust; they have applied to the Secretary, Higher Education Deptt., Govt. of Tamil Nadu for minority certificate and the State Govt. is giving the minority certificate only for the running institutions and they will submit the same after getting it; and they have added some extra area to the multipurpose hall which has 187 sqm. (i.e. 2013 sq. ft) now. AND WHEREAS the Council taking note of the above submissions of the appellant concluded that the appeal deserved to be accepted and the matter remanded to the SRC for further processing as per the Regulations. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate justification to remand the case to the SRC for further processing as per the NCTE regulations.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of National College of Education, Salem, Tamilnadu to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Chairman, National College of Education, 886,-555/4, Ayyampudur, Salem,, Salem - 636303, Tamilnadu 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Tamilnadu, Chennai.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Pt. Heera Lal Chhaviraj Kunwari Mahavidyalay, Pratapgarh, Uttar Pradesh dated 22/08/2012 is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/NRCAPP-982/201ST MEETING/2012/28500 dated 06/08/2012 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the ground that the institution has not submitted reply of the Show Cause Notice dated 21/12/2011”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Pt. Heera Lal Chhaviraj Kunwari Mahavidyalay (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 23/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Abhishek Tiwari, Chairman and Subhash Chandre Tiwari,Member, Pt. Heera Lal Chhaviraj Kunwari Mahavidyalay, Pratapgarh, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 19-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation, the appellant, while claiming that the show cause notice was not served to him, has given replies to the grounds mentioned in the show cause notice, which were reflected in the refusal order. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the show cause notice and the final refusal order were sent by the NRC at the same address of the Society but the appellant has taken the stand that the show cause notice was not served to him. In the normal course the Society should have received the show cause. the Council further noted that the NRC has refused recognition solely on the ground of non-receipt of reply to the show cause notice. In the appeal the appellant has furnished replies to all the grounds mentioned in the show cause notice. the Council felt that in the interests of natural justice, the matter deserved to be remanded to the NRC for consideration of the reply and to examine the matter on merit. The appellant is directed to send his reply to the NRC. AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was justification to remand the matter to NRC for consideration of the reply and to take decision thereafter as per regulations.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Pt. Heera Lal Chhaviraj Kunwari Mahavidyalay, Pratapgarh, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Manager, Pt. Heera Lal Chhaviraj Kunwari Mahavidyalay, Plot No. 1566 GHA, Village/City- Antu Dehat, Tehsil- Sadar,, Pratapgarh - 230501, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, 20/198, Kaveri Path, Mansarover Nagar, Near Mansarover Stadium, Mansarover, Jaipur - 302020, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of S. J. Mahavidyalaya, Kanpur Nagar, Uttar Pradesh dated 14/08/2012 is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/NRCAPP-144/200th MEETING/2012/25119 dated 05/07/2012 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the grounds “Application for D.El.Ed. course has been submitted by the institution on 26/10/2009, the date of commencement of the B.Ed. course is 25/09/2009. Hence, the institution had not completed three academic session of B.Ed. course on 26/10/2009. Therefore as per clause 8(3) of NCTE Regulations, 2009 the application of the institution for D.El.Ed. course remains closed”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, S. J. Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 16/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Puneet Katiyar, Staff Member, S. J. Mahavidyalaya, Kanpur Nagar, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 19-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that (a) application for D.El.Ed course was submitted on 26-10-2009. Letter of Deficiency was issued by NRC on 8-2-2012. All the deficiencies were removed by the college vide letter dated 8-2-2010 except that three academic sessions have not been completed of running B.Ed course. Due to this deficiency NRC vide order dated 10-5-2010 refused recognition; (b) aggrieved by the decision of NRC the appellant approached Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad in W.P. No. 66084/2010 and the Court vide order dated 22-11-2010 disposed of the petition observing that “ However as soon as 3 years are completed the application already made by the petitioner and not considered on the ground that period of three years as provided under the Rules have not been completed, therefore, no orders can be passed. In such circumstances it is provided that immediately after completion of three years as soon as the petitioner institution send a reminder to that effect, the application already made will be considered strictly in accordance with the Rules and Regulation of NCTE”; (c) subsequent to the Court directions the appellant sent a reminder to NRC on 30-11-2011 and thereafter NRC asked the institution vide letter dated 16-05-2012 to submit a certificate from the affiliating university that three academic sessions of B.Ed course have been completed. The appellant submitted reply to the NRC stating that recognition to the institution for B.Ed course was given by NRC vide order dated 31-12-2008 from the academic session 2008-09, affiliation was given by Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj University,

Kanpur from session 2008-09, examinations of B.Ed course for the academic sessions i.e. 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 were completed, 2011-12 examinations shall commence from 17th May 2012 and 2012-13 session counseling is starting from 01-06-2012 and therefore the institution has completed 3 academic sessions of B.Ed course. With the reply he sent a certificate from the affiliating university mentioning the examination schedule w.e.f. the session 2008-09. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that (a) subsequent to the court directions the appellant reminded NRC that the institution has completed 3 academic sessions of B.Ed course and requested for consideration of their D.El.Ed application in the light of Court directions; (b) NRC asked the appellant vide letter dated 16-05-2012 to submit a certificate from the affiliating university mentioning that 3 academic sessions of B.Ed course have been completed for further consideration of their application of D.El.Ed course strictly in accordance with the NCTE Rules and Regulations, 2009. The appellant vide his reply dated NIL received in NRC office on 08-06-2012 stated that examinations for the session 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11 were completed and 4th session (2011-12) examination shall commence from 01-06-2012. He submitted with his reply a letter dated 08-05-2012 from the affiliating university mentioning that the college is running B.Ed programme from 2008-09; a copy of the schedule of exam for the session 2011-12 and university’s letter dated 18-05-2012 mentioning the counseling schedule for the session 2012-13. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the NRC has not considered the case strictly in accordance with the directions of the Hon’ble High Court and taking into account the clarifications furnished by the appellant about completion of three academic sessions and refused recognition merely on the ground that the institution has not completed three academic sessions of B.Ed on 26-10-2009, which ground has become redundant after the Court’s direction. The NRC should obtain further information required, if any, and process the proposal on merits. the Council therefore concluded that the appeal deserved to be accepted and the matter remanded to the NRC for further processing as per NCTE Regulations. AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate justification to remand the matter to the NRC for further processing as per NCTE Regulations. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of S. J. Mahavidyalaya, Kanpur Nagar, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Chairman, S. J. Mahavidyalaya, 261, 262, 266, 267, 708, 272, Ramaipur, 261, 262, 266, 267, 708, 272, Ramaipur, Kanpur Nagar,, Kanpur Nagar - 209214, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, 20/198, Kaveri Path, Mansarover Nagar, Near Mansarover Stadium, Mansarover, Jaipur - 302020, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Siddhu College of Education D.Ed., Nalgonda, Andhra Pradesh dated 23/08/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP1099/D.E.C.ED/AP/2011-12/43298 dated 29/06/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.E.C.Ed course on the grounds “Certified copy of the land documents from Govt. Authority is not submitted. Land is not registered in the name of the Society/institution on the date of on-line application. The institution has submitted sale deed dt. 18/02/2011 subsequent to the date of application, which is not permissible as per NCTE Regulations 2009. The land should be registered on or before on-line application as stipulated in the regulations. 2) The course applied by the institution is for D.E.C.Ed. whereas the name of the institution is read as `Siddhu College of Education D.Ed. Change of course from D.E.C.Ed to D.El.Ed. is not permissible as per Regulations at a later date. 3) Proceedings of Revenue Divisional Officer not submitted for conversion of land from agricultural to educational purposes. 4) Proof of completion of 3 academic sessions for B.Ed course being run by the institution is not submitted”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Siddhu College of Education D.Ed. (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 23/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. P. Srinivas Reddy, Secretary, Siddhu College of Education D.Ed., Nalgonda, Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 19-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that (a) due to Telangana agitation, registration of land was not done at the time of application and it was got registered on 18-02-2012 in the name of society; (b) inadvertently they clicked on D.E.C.Ed. course while registering the ‘online’ application , but in the hard copy of the application and every other transaction made by the appellant with SRC, the name of D.Ed. course and Siddhu College of Education D.El.Ed was mentioned; (c) they were not given sufficient time to submit the conversion certificate; (d) they submitted for five years affiliation orders for five years-four years from Osmania University and one from Mahatma Gandhi University. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that (a) the appellant institution while registering `online’ application inadvertently clicked on D.E.C.Ed. (course), though they intended for grant of recognition of D.El.Ed. course. In the forwarding letter dated 30-09-2011, hard copy of the application and the documents sent therewith like – undertaking, affidavit, the appellant mentioned the name of course as D.Ed. course. The institution

vide letters dated 23-02-2012, 27-03-2012 and 13-05-2012 requested for consideration of their proposal for starting D.El.Ed. course. In the light of correspondence made by the appellant for consideration of their application for D.El.Ed. course and also in the light of the fact that the NCTE Regulations, 2009 do not specifically prohibit alteration of the course while the application is under process. Therefore the application may be processed for D.El.Ed. course; (b) the institution had been running B.Ed. since 2005 and it had already completed 3 academic sessions of B.Ed. course; (c) as per proceedings of revenue Divisional Office, Nalgonda, 30 guntas (3000 Sq.mt.) land had been converted for non-agriculture purpose. AND WHEREAS the Council further observed that the appellant made representation to the State Govt. saying that due to Sakala Janula Samme, they failed to register the land before the date of submission of application and that led to rejection of their application by the SRC. The State Government of Andhra Pradesh has forwarded a letter dated 14.8.2012 recommending relaxation in NCTE Regulations relating to registration of land prior to the date of applications owing to the Telangana Strike. This recommendation was placed before the NCTE Committee in its 19th meeting held on 10th September 2012 and the Council relaxed the concerned provision of the Regulations pertaining to the date of the registration of the land documents. in view of the above, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to remand the case to the SRC for processing of the application for D.El.Ed. course as per Regulations. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to remand the case to the SRC for processing of the application for D.El.Ed. course as per Regulations. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Siddhu College of Education D.Ed., Nalgonda, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary/Correspondance, Siddhu College of Education D.Ed., 207, Pasya Srinivas Reddy, Huzurnagar, Huzurnagar,, Nalgonda - 508204, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Sri Sai Sirisha Elementary Teacher Education, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh dated 16/08/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAPP1368/D.EL.Ed/AP/2012-13/43659 dated 10/07/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the grounds “Registered land documents from sub-registrar is not submitted. 2) Building plan shows Sy.Nos 117/18, 118/3B, 4B, 16 for which land documents are submitted. 3) Non-encumbrance certificate and land usage certificate are not submitted for Sy.Nos. where the institution/building is proposed. 4) Building completion certificate from competent Govt. Engineer for proposed D.El.Ed. course is not submitted. 5) Land usage certificate is submitted for "Sri Sai Sirisha College of Education", But LUC for "Sri Sai Sirisha Elementary Teacher Education" which is given in on-line application, is not submitted”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Sri Sai Sirisha Elementary Teacher Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 23/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Ch. Dhilleswar Rao, Director and Shri. K. Renukeswar Rao, Member, Sri Sai Sirisha Elementary Teacher Education, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 19-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that (a) the certified copies of the land documents (7 registered sale deeds) issued by the Sub-Registrar, have been submitted to the Regional Director, NCTE, Southern Regional Committee alongwith letter dated 30/09/2011 of the appellant, which are acknowledged to have been received in their office. (The xerox copies of the said documents are submitted herewith for ready reference). SRC stated in show cause notice dated 15/05/2012 that the survey numbers of the land documents do not tally with the land usage certificate etc. Thus, it showed that the land documents were submitted to the SRC and the same were verified; (b) the building is constructed on 62 cents of land in survey Nos. 117/1, 2, 6 and 7 only, whereas the entire land to the extent of Acre 5-54 1/2 cents owned by the institution was in various survey numbers. The building plan approved by the Gram Panchayat in PR No. 216 dated 18/08/2011 showed that the construction was proposed in the said survey Nos. 117/1, 2, 6 and 7 only; (c) that the land use certificate dated 30/01/2009 issued by the Tehasildar, Vajrapukotturu Mandal, Srikakulam District contained the survey Nos. 117/1, 2, 6 and 7 in which the institution / building was proposed. Thus, the land usage certificate is issued for the survey numbers where the institution’s building

was proposed, as also for the other survey numbers. The Encumbrance Certificate also has been obtained for the survey nos. 117/1, 2, 6 and 7 in which the institution / building is proposed, as also for the other survey numbers in the aforesaid acre. 5-54 1/2 cents of land owned by the institution. (The copies of the Land Use Certificate and the Encumbrance Certificate are submitted herewith for ready reference); (d) that the building completion certificate dated 10/05/2012 issued by the Asst. Executive Engineer, Panchayat Raj Dept., Vajrapukotturu Mandal, Srikakulam District was submitted alongwith letter dated 02/06/2012 of the appellant in office of the Regional Director on 04/06/2012, which was acknowledged to have been received by office (copy of the said certificate is submitted herewith for ready reference); (e) that both the institutions are under the management "Sri Satyanarayana Educational Society and Service Organization". The building of both the institutions is constructed on the same land for which the land use certificate is submitted. It is further clarified that the building for "Sri Sai Sirisha Elementary Teacher Education" is being constructed on the existing building of "Sri Sai Sirisha College of Education. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that (a) the appellant alongwith the hard copy of the application, which was received by SRC on 30-09-2011 submitted copies of land documents attested by the Secretary and Correspondent of the Society only. As claimed by him in the appeal, he did not submit certified copies of registered land documents issued by Sub-Registrar Office to the SRC at any point of time; (b) the building plan submitted alongwith the application was titled for Sri Sai Sirisha College of Education and Sri Sai Sirisha Elementary teacher education and it mentioned Sy.Nos. 117/1to7, 14,15 and 118/2B,3B,4B,16B and 118/17, while the plan submitted in reply to the show cause notice mentioned Sy.No.117/1,2,6&7. The appellant had submitted copies of land document (not certified copies) for all the Sy.Nos; (c) proceedings of the Revenue Divisional Office, Tekkali dated 2-01-2012 mentioned that 0.62 cents in Sy.No. 117/1,2,6&7 in Garudabhadra village had been converted for non-agriculture purpose. The building completion certificate dated 10-05-2012 mentioned 2531.20 Sq.mt. of built-up area on ground plus 3 floors of a building on the land at Sy.Nos. 117/1,2,6&7. The land area available at the Sy.No.117/1,2,6&7 (as admitted by the appellant) was only 62 cents (2508 Sq.mt) as against the requirement of 3000 Sq.mt. for the existing B.Ed. course and the proposed D.El.Ed. course as per NCTE norms. Further the builtup area of 2531.20 Sq.mt. available (as per building completion certificate) was also inadequate for the existing B.Ed. course and the proposed D.El.Ed. course because as per norms 3000 Sq.mt. built-up area is required. the Council taking all aspects of matter into consideration concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected and SRC order dated 10-07-2012 is confirmed.



1. The Secretary/Correspondance, Sri Sai Sirisha Elementary Teacher Education, 117/2,-,-, Garudabhadra, Vajrapukotturu, Vajrapukotturu,, Srikakulam - 532222, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Vaishnavi College of Elementary Education, Medak, Andhra Pradesh dated 14/08/2012 is against the Order No. SRCAP1665/D.El.Ed/AP/2011-12/43205 dated 27/06/2012 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the ground “the institution has submitted reply to the show cause notice after the stipulated time of 21 days period. The reply of the institution was received on 21-05-2012 i.e. after 24(twenty four) days from the date of issue of the show cause notice dated 27-04-2011”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Vaishnavi College of Elementary Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 22/08/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Prakash, Vice-President, Vaishnavi College of Elementary Education, Medak, Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 19-09-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that they applied for D.El.Ed course at SRC, Bangalore duly submitting all the required documents; in compliance with letter dt 29-12-2011, they removed all deficiencies and submitted reply on 29-02-2012; thereafter SRC issued show cause notice on 27-4-2012. In that notice seven deficiencies were shown, it reached them on 3-5-2012 at 5 p.m. They submitted the reply to the show cause notice on 21-05-2012, i.e. within 18 days from the date of receipt of the notice. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the SRC issued show cause notice dated 27-04-2012 to the institution calling for a written representation within 21 days from the date of issue. The institution’s reply dt. 17-05-2012 to the notice was received by the SRC on 21-05-2012. the Council also noted that while the delay in receipt of reply was only of 3 days, it was available for consideration in the meeting of the SRC held on 29-31st May 2012. AND WHEREAS taking all aspects of matter into consideration, the Council concluded that the appeal deserved to be accepted and the matter remanded to SRC for consideration of show cause notice reply and for taking further decision thereafter. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and remand the case

to the SRC for consideration of show cause notice reply and for taking further decision thereafter. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Vaishnavi College of Elementary Education, Medak, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, Vaishnavi College of Elementary Education, 19-54/6A/1 Narsapur, Medak,, Medak - 502313, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, Jnana Bharathi Campus Road, Nagarabhavi, Opp. National Law School, Bangalore - 560 072. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.


Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002

10/10/2012

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Donyi Polo B.Ed. College, Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh dated 10/05/2012 is against the Order No. ERC/7-131.8(i).90/2012/10952 dated 29/03/2012 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the ground that the land is on lease basis from a private party”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Donyi Polo B.Ed. College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 14/05/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Takar Jamoh, Executive Director and Mrs. P. Jamoh, Chairperson , Donyi Polo B.Ed. College, Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18-08-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the land belongs to Shri Kangir Jamoh, who is the Chief Patron of Donyi Polo B.Ed. College, and he is willing to donate the said land at plot no. CP/L/4/79(pt) for the use of the college after the approval from NCTE, vide meeting held on 26th Oct., 2011 at the Society's office (Annexure-1). After learning that the application has been rejected, Shri Kangir Jamoh, has made an Affidavit in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Naharlagun bearing Affidavit no. 798 dated 09/05/2012, stating that the land would be transferred in the name of "Donyi Polo B.Ed. College". (Annexure-2) and some more time should be given for the transfer. AND WHEREAS in the course of personal presentation, the appellant gave a letter in which it has been mentioned that in continuation of the Affidavit, final transfer of the land was affected through a gift deed registered on 02-08-2012. The appellant further submitted that Itanagar, the capital of Arunachal Pradesh does not have a B. Ed College and there is an urgent need to establish such a College to meet the demand for trained teachers. The appellant further informed the Council that he has approached the State Govt. requesting them to recommend the case of their institution to NCTE for recognition. AND WHEREAS the appellant further brought to the notice of the Council that the Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Directorate of Higher and Technical Education has written a letter dated 24-08-2012 to the Chairperson, NCTE (i) confirming the conversion of the lease of the same plot bearing allotment No. CP/4/79 (pt) in the name of “Donyi Polo

B.Ed college, Itanagar” into a Gift deed bearing No.B-1-110 dated 02-08-2012 and (ii) recommending consideration of the appellant institution for grant of recognition by the NCTE in view of the need for a teacher training institute at Itanagar. the Council however noted that the State Govt., by their letter dated 24-08-2012 did not seek for relaxation of clause 8(7)(i) of Regulations, 2009 by the Chairperson , NCTE and also did not address to any constraints caused in registering the land in favour of the institution on or before the date of submission of the application for grant of recognition.. As per clause 8(7)(i) of Regulations, ‘no institution shall be granted recognition unless the institution or the trust sponsoring it, is in possession of land on ownership basis or on lease from Govt as on the date of submission of application. In the instant case, the land was on lease basis from private party and hence it was not eligible for grant of recognition. the Council, therefore concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected and ERC order dated 29-03-2012 is confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Executive Director, Donyi Polo B.Ed. College, Plot No.- CP/L/4/79 (pt), PO- ltanagar,Tehsil/Taluka- Bank Tinali, Town/City- ltanagar,, Papum Pare - 791111, Arunachal Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar - 751 012. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Usmani Public School , Lakhimpur Kheri, Uttar Pradesh dated is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/NRCAPP-1319/198th Meeting/2012/20724 14/05/2012 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the grounds “ 1) The society applied for D.El.Ed. and B.Ed. courses on September, 29 and 30 respectively. The society has concealed the fact that it has already applied for B.Ed. course in its application for D.El.Ed. course. 2) The society has submitted same building plan on the same land for these courses. 3) The reply of the society with regard to show cause notice for D.El.Ed. course has not been found satisfactory, same is true with regard to B.Ed. course. 4) As per clause 8(2) of NCTE Regulations, 2009 in the first instance an institution shall be considered for grant of recognition of only one course for the basic unit as prescribed in the norms and standards for the particular teacher education programme. 5) Hence application of the society for D.El.Ed. course cannot be entertained and therefore grant of recognition for D.El.Ed. course is refused under clause 8(2). 6) On the basis of the adverse report of the visiting team with regard to D.El.Ed. course and unsatisfactory reply of the institution to the show cause notice, the recognition for D.El.Ed. course is refused”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Usmani Public School (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 07/06/2012 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri R. A. Usmani, Manager and Shri. Tej Lal Nisad, Member, Usmani Public School , Lakhimpur Kheri, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 16-08-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the Society is a minority institution. It had applied for both the courses for the welfare and imparting education to minority people; the society owns sufficient land and building for running both the courses; NRC also refused recognition to B.Ed course vide order dated 14-05-2012 on the same grounds as that of D.El.Ed. course and the appellant was not interested in preferring appeal for B.Ed. course. In the light of provisions under Clause8(2) of Regulations 2009, the appellant is interested in pursuing the D.El.Ed. course application, hence their appeal for D.El.Ed. course be considered positively. To this effect the appellant produced a letter dated 16-08-2012 of President of the Trust.

AND WHEREAS the Council noted from the submission made by the appellant that the institution made two applications for grant of recognition of B.Ed and D.El. Ed courses. NRC rejected both the applications on the similar grounds. The trust is interested in pursuing one application only and that is for D.El Ed course in the light of provisions of clause 8(2) of NCTE regulations. So, the Council decided to consider the appeal in respect of D.El.Ed course. AND WHEREAS the Council further observed that a) the visiting team in their report dated 26/27-01-2012 inter-alia mentioned that “The building is not enough to cater to the needs of the proposed programmes and have no distinctly well-defined resource rooms, administrative rooms, and separate art & craft, music, health and Phy.Edn room etc; not a single book in library is meant for small children like-Children’s literature, story-books, fictions and magazines etc. class rooms and psychology resource centre was of 105 sq.ft only; library room was only of 98 sq.ft; construction of Ist floor of the building was not completed.; (b) Clause 8(10) of NCTE Regulations 2009 stipulates that the building of the institution shall be complete in the form of a permanent structure and equipped with necessary amenities and fulfilling all such requirements as prescribed in the norms and standards. It was evident from the VTR that the institution did not fulfill the said clause of Regulations. In the light of VT observation the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was no ground to accept the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected and NRC order dated 14-05-2012 is confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Manager, Usmani Public School , Village and Amp. Post Mahewaganj, Lakhimpur,, Lakhimpur Kheri - 262701, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, 20/198, Kaveri Path, Mansarover Nagar, Near Mansarover Stadium, Mansarover, Jaipur - 302020, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

latest appeal order - ncte

Documents