lattice 2006 tucson, azt.umeda (bnl)1 qcd thermodynamics with n f =2+1 near the continuum limit at...
DESCRIPTION
Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)3 Computers 3.2TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052419/5a4d1b527f8b9ab0599a7ffc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 1
QCD thermodynamics with NQCD thermodynamics with Nff=2+1 near th=2+1 near thee continuum limit at realistic quark masse continuum limit at realistic quark massess
Takashi Umeda (BNL)
for the RBC - Bielefeld Collaboration
Lattice 2006 Tucson AZ 23-28 July 2006
![Page 2: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052419/5a4d1b527f8b9ab0599a7ffc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 2
Motivation & Motivation & ApproachApproach
Choice of quark action Improved Staggered quark action Continuum limit
- Nt = 4, 6, (8) a ⋍ 0.24, 0.17, (0.12) fm
Quantitative study of QCD thermodynamics from first principle calculation (Lattice QCD) Tc, EoS, phase diagram, small μ, etc...
from recent studies, we know these quantities strongly depend on mq & Nf
Our aim is QCD thermodynamics with 2+1 flavor at almost realistic quark masses e.g. pion mass ⋍ 150MeV, kaon mass ⋍ 500MeV
![Page 3: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052419/5a4d1b527f8b9ab0599a7ffc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 3
ComputersComputers
http://www.quark.phy.bnl.gov/~hotqcd3.2
![Page 4: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052419/5a4d1b527f8b9ab0599a7ffc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 4
Choice of Lattice Choice of Lattice ActionAction
gluonic part : Symanzik improvement scheme- remove cut-off effects of O(a2)
- tree level improvement O(g0) fermion part : improved staggered fermion
- remove cut-off effects & improve rotational sym.- improve flavor symmetry by smeared 1-link term
Improved Staggered action : p4fat3 actionKarsch, Heller, Sturm (1999)
fat3
p4
![Page 5: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052419/5a4d1b527f8b9ab0599a7ffc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 5
Properties of the p4-Properties of the p4-action action
The free quark propagator isrotational invariant up to O(p4)
Bulk thermodynamic quantitiesshow drastically reduced cut-offeffects
flavor sym. is also improved by fat link
Dispersion relation pressure in high T limit
![Page 6: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052419/5a4d1b527f8b9ab0599a7ffc/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 6
Contents of this Contents of this talktalk
Motivation and Approach
Choice of lattice action
Critical temperature
- Simulation parameters
- Critical β search
- Scale setting by Static quark potential
- Critical temperature
Spatial string tension
Conclusion
![Page 7: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052419/5a4d1b527f8b9ab0599a7ffc/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 7
Simulation Simulation parametersparameters
T=0 scale setting at βc(Nt)
Critical β search at T > 0
(*) conf. = 0.5 MD traj.
(*) conf. = 5 MD traj. after thermalization
to check ms dependence for Tc
![Page 8: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052419/5a4d1b527f8b9ab0599a7ffc/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 8
Critical Critical ββ search search
chiral condensate:chiral susceptibility:
multi-histogram method (Ferrenberg-Swendson) is used βc are determined by peak positions of the susceptibilities
Transition becomes stronger for smaller light quark masses
83x4
![Page 9: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052419/5a4d1b527f8b9ab0599a7ffc/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 9
Volume dependence of Volume dependence of ββ cc
No large change in peak height & position consistent with crossover transition rather than true transition
![Page 10: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052419/5a4d1b527f8b9ab0599a7ffc/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 10
Uncertainties in Uncertainties in ββ cc
We can find a difference between β l and βL
small difference but statistically significant β l : peak position of χ l
βL : peak position of χL
Statistical error jackknife analysis for peak-position of susceptibility
- the difference is negligible at 163x4 (Ns/Nt=4) - no quark mass dependence- the difference at 163x 6 are taken into account as a systematic error in βc
![Page 11: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052419/5a4d1b527f8b9ab0599a7ffc/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 11
Scale setting at Scale setting at T=0T=0
Lattice scale is determined by a static quark potential V(r)
statistical error jackknife error
systematic errors diff. between V3(r) & V4(r) diff. in various fit range (rmin=0.15-0.3fm, rmax=0.7-0.9fm)
where, rI is the improve dist.
![Page 12: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052419/5a4d1b527f8b9ab0599a7ffc/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 12
ββ & m & mqq dependence of r dependence of r00
RG inspired ansatz with 2-loop beta-function R(β)
The fit result is used
(1) correction for the diff. between βc & simulation β at T=0
(2) convertion of sys. + stat. error in βc to error of r0/a
A = -1.53(11), B = -0.88(20)C = 0.25(10), D = -2.45(10) χ2/dof = 1.2
![Page 13: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052419/5a4d1b527f8b9ab0599a7ffc/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 13
Critical Critical temperaturetemperature
ratio to string tension:ratio to Sommer scale:
( fit form dependence d=1,2 : upper, lower errors)
( d=1.08 from O(4) scaling )
Finally we obtain Tc=192(5)(4)MeV from r0=0.469(7)fm
at phys. point,
Preliminary result
![Page 14: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052419/5a4d1b527f8b9ab0599a7ffc/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 14
Spatial string Spatial string tensiontension
Static quark “potential” from Spatial Wilson loops
(free parameters: c, Λσ)g2(T) is given by the 2-loop RG equation
Important to check theoretical concepts (dim. reduction) at high T
“c” should equal with 3-dim. string tension and should be flavor independent, if dim. reduction works
Numerical simulationfixed
![Page 15: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052419/5a4d1b527f8b9ab0599a7ffc/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 15
Spatial string Spatial string tensiontension
Quenched case: G.Boyd et al. Nucl.Phys.B469(’96)419.
2+1 flavor case:
3“c” is flavor independent within error dim. reduction works well even for T=2Tc
(free parameters: c, Λσ)
![Page 16: Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052419/5a4d1b527f8b9ab0599a7ffc/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZ T.Umeda (BNL) 16
SummarySummary Nf=2+1 simulation with realistic quark mass at Nt=4, 6
critical temperature
Tcr0=0.456(7), (Tc=192(5)(4)MeV from r0=0.469)
- Tcr0 is consistent with previous p4 result difference in Tc mainly comes from physical value of r0
- however, our value is about 10% larger than MILC result MILC collab., Phys. Rev. D71(‘05) 034504. - most systematic uncertainties are taken into account remaining uncertainty is in continuum extrapolation
spatial string tension dimensional reduction works well even for T=2Tc