laurie brown, university of canberra: how strong are the links between lifestyle and dementia?...
DESCRIPTION
Laurie Brown, Research Director, NATSEM, University of Canberra delivered this presentation at the 2014 National Dementia Congress. The event examined dementia case studies and the latest innovations from across the whole dementia pathway, from diagnosis to end of life, focusing on the theme of "Making Dementia Care Transformation Happen Today. For more information on the annual event, please visit the conference website: http://www.healthcareconferences.com.au/dementiacongress2014TRANSCRIPT
THE LINKS BETWEEN LIFESTYLE AND DEMENTIA
Professor Laurie Brown
National Dementia Congress, 20 February 2014,
Melbourne
• Provide an overview of key risk factors and understanding the difficulties in measuring and interpreting risk
• Look at impact of smoking, physical activity and BMI on risk of dementia
• Look at impact of trends in midlife BMI on dementia in latelife
• Consider the association of dementia with diabetes
AIM-OUTLINE
3
Background
• Number of Australians with dementia is expected to more than double by 2030 as is the cost of providing care.
• Population ageing is often considered the most important factor determining the occurrence of dementia in the future
• Projections of dementia cases are therefore often based solely on the projected age composition of the population.
● from under 200,000 persons in the year 2000, to over 300,000 by the early 2020s, and rising to approximately 500,000 in the 2030s
4
Background cont.
• Emerging evidence for the role of modifiable risk factors in dementia - reduce the disease burden by reducing risk, delaying onset and/or by early intervention to modify disease progression.
• As more intervention options become available, policy makers will need decision-support tools that allow them to evaluate and compare the likely health and economic outcomes of these strategies to identify the most cost effective approaches at a population level.
Development of a computer model that simulates the health and economic impacts of dementia prevention strategies.
• DCRC – Early Diagnosis & Prevention
• DYNOPTA
• Alzheimer’s Australia
• Literature – epidemiological studies
Background – The Evidence Base
Protective Factors Risk Factors Cognitively stimulating activities (across the lifespan)
Age
Regular physical activity Genetic factors e.g. Apolipoprotein E
status, Down syndrome
Higher engagement in leisure/social activities
Family history
Higher education Under & overweight, obesity
Light-moderate alcohol intake
Cardiovascular risk factors e.g. smoking, hypertension, elevated cholesterol, high intake of saturated fat
Diet e.g. Fish intake Diabetes, stroke, heart disease
Traumatic brain injury
Depressive symptoms
Background – Risk (and Protective) Factors
• Barnes et al (2013) estimated that 13% of AD cases are potentially attributable to physical inactivity
• High levels of physical activity were associated with a 38% lower risk of cognitive decline in older people and low to moderate levels of physical activity with 35% lower risk of cognitive decline, compared to those who were sedentary (Sofi et al, 2011)
• A 28% reduced risk of any dementia and 45% reduced risk of AD for those in the highest physical activity category compared to the lowest (Hamer & Chida, 2009)
• Exercising at least twice a week at midlife was associated with a 52% reduced risk of dementia at age 65-79 years (Rovio et al, 2005)
Example - Dementia & Physical Activity
• Changing list
• Modifiable
• Beneficial at a population level – not necessarily so for each individual
• All types of dementia (Alzheimer’s disease ~ 60%, vascular dementia ~
20%)
• Reduce the risk of dementia and/or delay onset
• Selection effects e.g. alcohol drinkers
• Non-linear effects e.g. U-shaped relationship for alcohol or BMI
• Mid vs late life e.g. obesity, chol
• Interactions e.g. lifestyle with APOE, joint distributions
Background – Understanding Risk (and Protective) Factors
• Build brain reserve (allowing normal cognitive function to continue for longer)
• Reduce protein accumulations
• Effects on brain health – reducing inflammation, increasing brain blood flow, growth of new neurons and synapses
• Benefits for other health factors related to cognitive functioning – vascular conditions, diabetes and depression.
MECHANISMS
• To develop a cell-based cohort (dynamic-longitudinal) model to project the impact of modifying risk factors on dementia at a population level
• Process
● Collect data (often cross-sectional available)
● Create synthetic (5yr age-sex) cohorts & generate projections
● Get risk estimates for dementia
● Model trends in risk factors
● Project future risk factor profile in age-sex cohorts
● Estimate proportions of older people having a history of midlife or latelife risk factor (X)
● Model dementia numbers by risk factor categories
NATSEM (DCRC-EDP) Dementia Prevention Model
PREVALENCE OF DEMENTIA
12
Ageing of Australia's Population (next 45 years)
Australia 2006
Male Female
200000 100000 0 100000 200000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100+
Australia 2051
Male Female
200000 100000 0 100000 200000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100+
13
Age-specific Prevalence Rates of Selected Risk
Factors
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%45-4
9
50-5
4
55-5
9
60-6
4
65-6
9
70-7
4
75-7
9
80-8
4
85+
45-4
9
50-5
4
55-5
9
60-6
4
65-6
9
70-7
4
75-7
9
80-8
4
85+
Male Female
Ever smoked
BMI>=30
Sedentary
14
Relative Risk of Dementia
• Ever smoked vs never smoked 1.140
• Obese vs non-obese 2.296
• Sedentary vs active ` 1.693
15
Projected Numbers of People Living With Dementia Considering Ageing Only
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 2046 2051
Nu
mb
er
of p
ers
on
s w
ith
de
me
ntia
Male
Female
16
Impact of Reducing Smoking
-4.0%
-3.0%
-2.0%
-1.0%
0.0%
2006
2011
2016
2021
2026
2031
2036
2041
2046
2051
Per
cent diff
ern
ce c
om
pare
d to
'agein
g o
nly
' scenario
Ageing only
Smoking drops 2.5%
every 5 years
Smoking drops 5% every
5 years
Smoking drops 10% every
5 years
17
Impact of Obesity
-7%
-6%
-5%
-4%
-3%
-2%
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
2006
2011
2016
2021
2026
2031
2036
2041
2046
2051
Per
cent diff
ern
ce c
om
pare
d to
'agein
g o
nly
' scenario
Ageing only
Obesity rises 2.5% every
5 years
Obesity drops 5% every 5
years
Obesity drops 10% every
5 years
18
Impact of Promoting Physical Activity
-20.0%
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%2006
2011
2016
2021
2026
2031
2036
2041
2046
2051
Per
cent diff
ern
ce c
om
pare
d to
'agein
g o
nly
' scenario
Ageing only
Physical inactivity rises
2.5% every 5 years
Physical inactivity drops
5% every 5 years
Physical inactivity drops
10% every 5 years
19
Impact of Midlife Obesity on Dementia Prevalence
• Risk of dementia 1.64x for midlife obesity and 1.26x for midlife overweight versus midlife normal weight (Low BMI in midlife compared with normal BMI - 1.96 risk of developing AD) (Anstey et al 2011)
• Use dynamic modelling to project future proportions and numbers of older people with a history of a given BMI status at their midlife
• Model impact of midlife BMI on dementia in older population
● Compare ageing only and BMI factored ‘what-if’ projections
Prevalence of Dementia by BMI Status
20
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89 90+ 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89 90+
Male Female
prev_normal prev_obese prev_overwt prev_underwt prev_total
Estimated Historical and Predicted Prevalence of BMIs at 50 years of age
21
Male Female
● ‘Obs’ = estimated historical data.
Male
Female
Male
Female
Percentage of Older Persons who were Obese at Midlife
Projected Prevalence of Dementia with and without factoring midlife BMI profile
In 2050, there will be 14% more people aged 65 years and over living with dementia than that estimated on the basis of demographic ageing only.
Impact of Changing Prevalence of Midlife Obesity
• Persons with Type 2 diabetes exhibited significantly increased risk of all dementia RR = 1.66, and risk of AD was also elevated for men, RR = 2.27 and for women, RR = 1.37 (population based cohort study in Rochester, Minnesota)(Leibson, 1997)
• A meta-analysis found diabetes was associated with a 47% increased risk of any dementia, a 39% increased risk of AD, and a 138% increased risk of VaD (Lu, 2009)
• 2% of cases of AD could be attributed to diabetes (Barnes & Yaffe, 2011)
• Prevention of diabetes could reduce the incidence of mild cognitive impairment and dementia by 5% (Ritchie et al, 2010)
Dementia and Diabetes
Decomposition of the Projected Diabetic Population – Ageing vs Lifestyle Factors
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
2007 2052 2052
Base Case
Number of Diabetics
Millions
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
2007 2052 2052
Base Case
Prevalence of Diabetics
Prevalence
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
2007 2052 2052
Base Case
Number of Pre-Diabetics
Millions
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
2007 2052 2052
Base Case
Prevalence of Pre-Diabetics
Prevalence
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
2007 2052 2052
Ageing Population
Base Case
Number of Diabetics
Millions
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
2007 2052 2052
Ageing Population
Base Case
Prevalence of Diabetics
Prevalence
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
2007 2052 2052
Ageing Population
Base Case
Number of Pre-Diabetics
Millions
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
2007 2052 2052
Ageing Population
Base Case
Prevalence of Pre-Diabetics
Prevalence
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
2007 2052 2052
Lifestyle Factors
Ageing Population
Base Case
Number of Diabetics
Millions
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
2007 2052 2052
Lifestyle Factors
Ageing Population
Base Case
Prevalence of Diabetics
Prevalence
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
2007 2052 2052
Lifestyle Factors
Ageing Population
Base Case
Number of Pre-Diabetics
Millions
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
2007 2052 2052
Lifestyle Factors
Ageing Population
Base Case
Prevalence of Pre-Diabetics
Prevalence
The Comparative Contributors to the Projected Diabetic Population
2007 2052 % of Increase
Pre-Diabetes
Base 2,573.307
Ageing Population 1,592.681 63.61%
Lifestyle Factors 911.215 36.39%
Total 2,573.307 5,077.203
Diabetes
Base 1,186.434
Ageing Population 1,061.649 60.34%
Lifestyle Factors 697.767 39.66%
Total 1,186.434 2,945.851
28
Conclusions
• Despite the significant health and cost burden associated with dementia, there is a major gap in our knowledge about future impacts and the role prevention strategies might play in reducing these.
• Need to better understand the role and impact of modifiable risk factors
• Dementia (and Diabetes) simulation models provide an new and different evidence base for informing health policy.
• K. J. Anstey, N. Cherbuin, M. Budge and J. Young (2011) Body mass index in midlife and late-life as a risk factor for dementia: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. obesity reviews (2011) 12, e426–e437, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00825.x
• Barnes DE, Yaffe K. (2011) The projected effect of risk factor reduction on Alzheimer’s disease prevalence. Lancet Neurol, 10(9):819-828.
• Hamer M, Chida Y. (2009) Physical activity and risk of neurodegenerative disease: a systematic review of prospective studies. Psychol Med, 39:3-11.
• C. L Leibson, W. A. Rocca, V. A. Hanson, R. Cha, E. Kokmen, P. C. O'Brien, and P. J. Palumbo (1997) Risk of Dementia among Persons with Diabetes Mellitus: A Population-based Cohort Study American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 145, No. 4
• Lu F-P, et al. Diabetes and the risk of multi-system aging phenotypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2009, 4(1): e4144. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004144.
• Ritchie K, et al. Designing prevention programmes to reduce incidence of dementia: prospective cohort study of modifiable risk factors. BMJ, 2010, 341:c3885. doi:10.1136/bmj.c3885
• Rovio S, et al. (2005) Leisure-time physical activity at midlife and the risk of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol, 4:705-711.
• Sofi F, et al. (2011) Physical activity and risk of cognitive decline: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Intern Med, 269:107-117.
• Farrow, M & O’Connor, E (2012). Targeting Brain, Body and Heart For Cognitive Health and Dementia Prevention-Current Evidence and Future Directions, Paper 29, Alzheimer’s Australia.
References