lca lines | volume iii, issue no. 2
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 LCA LINES | Volume III, Issue No. 2
1/21
BIR ISSUANCES FOR THE MONTH OFFEBRUARY
FEBRUARY 2010VOLUME III, ISSUE No. 2
L C AL C AL C A
LINESLINESLINES
Inside this issue:
BIR issuancesfor the monthof February
2
ExpandedSenior Citi-zens Act
7
Anti-Photoand Video Vo-
yeurism Act of2009
12
Free LegalAssistance Actof 2010
13
SEC CIRCU-LAR NO. 680 Series of 2010
14
Jurisprudence 14
JLs Corner 21
determining its net in-
come, the individual part-ner can still claim deduc-tions incurred or paid byhim that contributed to theearning of the income tax-able to him. The followingrules shall govern theclaim of the partners ofdeductions from theirshare in the net income ofthe partnership:
a. If the GPP availed of theitemized deduction in com-
puting its net income, thepartners may still claimitemized deductions fromsaid share, provided,that, in claiming itemizeddeductions, the partneris precluded from claim-ing the same expensesalready claimed by theGPP. In fine, if the GPPclaimed itemized deduc-tions the partners compris-ing it can only claim item-ized deductions which are
in the nature of ordinaryand necessary expensesfor the practice of pro-fession which were notclaimed by the GPP incomputing its net incomeor distributable net in-come during the year.
Hence, if the GPP availedof itemized deductions, the
partners are not allowed to
claim the OSD from theirshare in the net incomebecause the OSD is aproxy for all the items ofdeductions allowed in ar-riving at taxable income.
b. If the GPP avails of OSDin computing its net in-come, the partners com-prising it can no longerclaim further deductionfrom their share in thesaid net income for the
following reasons:
i. The partners distribu-tive share in the GPP istreated as his gross in-come not his grosssales/receipts and the40% OSD allowed toindividuals is specificallymandated to be deductednot from his gross in-come but from his grosssales/ receipts; and
ii. The OSD being inlieu of the itemizeddeductions allowed incomputing taxable in-come as defined underSection 31 of the NIRC, itwill answer for both theitems of deduction al-lowed to the GPP and itspartners.
REVENUE REGULATIONSNO. 2-2010
REVENUE REGULATIONSNO. 2-2010 issued on Feb-ruary 24, 2010 amendsSections 6 and 7 of Reve-nue Regulations No. 16-2008 with respect to thedetermination of the Op-tional Standard Deduction(OSD) of General Profes-sional Partnerships (GPPs)and the partners thereof, as
well as the manner andperiod for making theelection to claim OSD inthe Income Tax Returns.The GPP is not a taxa-
ble entity for Income Taxpurposes since it is onlyacting as a pass - throughentity where its income isultimately taxed to the part-ners comprising it.
In computing taxable in-come defined under Section
31 of the National InternalRevenue Code (NIRC), allexpenses which are ordi-nary and necessary, in-curred or paid for the prac-tice of profession, are al-lowed as deductions. Sincethe taxable income is in thehands of the partner, as arule apart from the expens-es claimed by the GPP in
-
8/12/2019 LCA LINES | Volume III, Issue No. 2
2/21
c. Since one-layer ofIncome Tax is imposedon the income of theGPP and the individualpartners where the lawhad placed the statutoryincidence of the tax inthe hands of the latter,the type of deductionchosen by the GPP mustbe the same type of de-duction that can beavailed of by the part-ners. Accordingly, if theGPP claims itemized de-ductions, all items of de-
duction allowed underSection 34 of the NIRCcan be claimed both atthe level of the GPPand at the level of thepartner in order to de-termine the taxableincome. On the otherhand, should the GPPopt to claim the OSD,the individual partnersare deemed to haveavailed also of the OSDbecause the OSD is in
lieu of the itemized de-ductions that can beclaimed in computingtaxable income.
d. If the partner alsoderives other grossincome from trade,business or practice ofprofession apart anddistinct from his sharein the net income ofthe GPP, the deductionthat he can claim from
his other gross incomewould follow the samededuction availed of fromhis partnership incomeas explained in the fore-going rules.
Provided, however, thatif the GPP opts for theOSD, the individual part-ner may still claim 40%
BIR ISSUANCES
Page 2 L C A LINES
of its gross income fromtrade, business or prac-tice of profession but notto include his share fromthe net income of theGPP.
A taxpayer who electedto avail of the OSD notexceeding 40% of grosssales or gross receipts, incase of an individual taxa-ble under Sections 24(A)and 25(A)(1) of the NIRC,or 40% of gross income,in case of a corporation
subject to tax under Sec-tion 27(A) or 28(A)(1) ofthe NIRC shall signify inhis/its return such inten-tion, otherwise he/it shallbe considered as havingavailed himself of theitemized deductions al-lowed under Section 34of the NIRC. Once theelection to avail of theOSD or itemized deduc-tion is signified in thereturn, it shall be irrev-
ocable for the taxableyear for which the returnis made.
The election to claim ei-ther the OSD or the item-ized deduction for thetaxable year must be sig-nified by checking theappropriate box in theIncome Tax Return filedfor the first quarter of thetaxable year adopted bythe taxpayer. Once the
election is made, thesame type of deductionmust be consistentlyapplied for all the suc-ceeding quarterly re-turns and in the finalIncome Tax Return forthe taxable year. Anytaxpayer who is re-quired but fails to filethe quarterly Income
Tax Return for thefirst quarter shall beconsidered as havingavailed of the itemizeddeductions option for thetaxable year.
An individual taxpayerwho is entitled to andclaimed the OSD shallnot be required to submitwith his tax returnsuch financial state-ments otherwise re-quired under the NIRC.Provided, that, except
when the Commissionerotherwise permits, thesaid individual shall keepsuch records pertainingto his gross sales orgross receipts. In thecase of a corporation,however, said corpora-tion is still required tosubmit its financial state-ments when it files itsannual Income Tax Re-turn and to keep suchrecords pertaining to its
gross income as hereindefined.
REVENUE REGULA-TIONS NO. 3-2010
Issued on February 26,2010 provides the ra-tionale and guidelinesfor the submission ofthe Statement of Man-agement Responsibilitythat shall accompanythe financial statementsthat shall be submittedwith the annual IncomeTax return.
All taxpayers requiredto file Annual Income
Tax Return under theNational Internal Reve-nue Code, as amend-ed, shall be requiredto submit a Statementof Managements Re-sponsibility, as follows:
STATEMENT OF MAN-AGEMENTS RESPONSI-
BIILITY FORANNUAL INCOME TAX
RETURN
The Management of(name of taxpayer) is
responsible for all in-formation and represen-tations contained inthe Annual Income TaxReturn for the yearended (date). Manage-ment is likewise respon-sible for all informationand representations con-tained in the financialstatements accompany-ing the (Annual IncomeTax Return or AnnualInformation Return) cov-
ering the same reportingperiod. Furthermore, theManagement is responsi-ble for all informationand representations con-tained in all the other taxreturns filed for the re-porting period, including,but not limited, to thevalue added tax and/orpercentage tax returns,withholding tax returns,documentary stamp taxreturns, and any and all
other tax returns.In this regard, theManagement affirmsthat the attached au-dited financial state-ments for the yearended (date) and theaccompanying AnnualIncome Tax Return arein accordance with the
-
8/12/2019 LCA LINES | Volume III, Issue No. 2
3/21
____________________(Name of the IndividualTaxpayer/President/Managing Partner)
Signature: ____________________(Name of the Chief Exec-utive Officer or its equiv-alent)
Signature: ____________________(Name of the Chief Fi-nancial Officer or itsequivalent)
In the case of a for-eign corporation withbranch office in thePhilippines, the aboveStatement shall besigned by its local man-ager who is in charge ofits operations.
REVENUE REGULA-
TIONS NO. 4-2010
Issued on February 26,2010 amends RevenueRegulations No. 11-2006relative to the accredita-tion of tax practitioners/agents as a prerequisiteto their practice or repre-sentation before the Bu-reau of Internal Reve-nue.
The Revenue NationalAccreditation Board(RNAB) shall haveoriginal and exclusiveauthority to acceptapplications for accredi-tation of tax agentsand practitioners (TAPs)belonging to GeneralProfessional Partner-ships (GPPs) or incor-
porated entities en-gaged in accounting andtax consultancy, provid-ed that the number ofpracticing TAPs belongingto said GPP or incorpo-rated entity shall ex-ceed ten (10). The Rev-enue Regional Accredita-tion Board (RRAB), onthe other hand, shallhave original and exclu-sive authority to acceptapplications for accredi-tation of individual TAPsand those belonging to
GPPs or incorporatedentities engaged in ac-counting and tax con-sultancy, provided thatthe number of practic-ing TAPs belonging tosuch GPP or incorporatedentity does not exceedten (10).
It shall be the duty ofthe AccreditationBoards to act upon allapplications to practice
before the Bureau of In-ternal Revenue, to insti-tute and provide for theconduct of accreditation,suspension or dis-accreditation proceedingsand to perform such oth-er duties as are neces-sary or appropriate tocarry out their functionsas prescribed by the Sec-retary of Finance, provid-ed that any action ordecision of the RRAB
and RNAB shall befinal and appealableonly to the Commis-sioner.
Individual applicants,GPPs and partners ofGPPs who were alreadyaccredited with the Boardof Accountancy (BOA)and Security and Ex-
Page 3VOLUME III, ISSUE No. 2
BIR ISSUANCES
books and records of(name of taxpayer),complete and correct inall material respects.Management likewiseaffirms that:
(a)the Annual IncomeTax Return has beenprepared in accordancewith the provisions ofthe National InternalRevenue Code, asamended, and pertinenttax regulations andother issuances of the
Department of Financeand the Bureau of Inter-nal Revenue;
(b) Any disparity of fig-ures in the submittedreports arising from thepreparation of financialstatements pursuant tofinancial accountingstandards and thepreparation of the In-come Tax Return pursu-ant to tax accounting
rules has been reportedas reconciling items andmaintained in the com-panys books and rec-ords in accordancewith the requirementsof Revenue RegulationsNo. 8-2007 and otherrelevant issuances; (c)the (name of taxpayer)has filed all applicabletax returns, reports andstatements required tobe filed under Philip-
pine tax laws for thereporting period, andall taxes and otherimpositions shownthereon to be due andpayable have beenpaid for the reportingperiod, except thosecontested in good faith.
Signature:
-
8/12/2019 LCA LINES | Volume III, Issue No. 2
4/21
change Commission(SEC) shall similarly berequired to undergo thevarious processes foraccreditation under theseRegulations and shall nolonger be automaticallyaccredited and issued aBIR Certificate of Accred-itation. For IndividualTax Agents, as an addi-tional minimum qualifica-tion, applicants musthave completed the mini-mum number of hoursof continuing profes-
sional education (CPE)from BIR-accredited CPEproviders for each yearhe practices with theBIR.
The duly accomplishedaccreditation applicationform shall be submit-ted, together with alldocumentary require-ments, with the RRABor RNAB of the placewhere the individual
applicant or general pro-fessional partnership hashis/its principal residenceor place of business,whichever is applicable.Individual applicantsshall submit, togetherwith their duly accom-plished application forms,the following additionaldocuments:
a. Proof of special com-petence in tax matters or
tax practice, to wit:a.1. Certificate of Em-ployment, i.e. meaning-ful experience in taxrelated work;
a.2. Written certifica-tion of CPE units fromBIR-accredited CPEproviders, with com-
BIR ISSUANCES
Page 4 L C A LINES
plete details on thecourse, dates and num-ber of CPE hours takenby the TAP. For thispurpose, the BIR shallprescribe the guidelinesfor the accreditation ofand conduct of trainingby the CPE providers;
Pending the issuance ofthe guidelines by theBIR for the accredita-tion of CPE providers,the applicant shall onlycomply with the require-
ments prescribed in (a) to(c) and (d.1) of Section 5of RR No. 11-2006.
b. A written undertakingunder oath to preserveworking papers withinthe period prescribedunder Section 235 ofthe NIRC of 1997, asamended, and makingthem available to the Bu-reaus authorized repre-sentative/s when required
or directed to do so.For Partners, Directors,Officers or duly authorizedrepresentatives of GeneralProfessional Partnershipsduly registered with theSEC, in addition to thedocumentary require-ments prescribed, thefollowing additional re-quirements shall be sub-mitted:
a. Certification from theBOA if the said Partner,Director, Officer or dulyauthorized representativeis a CPA; and
b. A written undertakingunder oath by the manag-ing partner/director thatthe firm/entity shall fullycooperate with the Bu-
reau by preserving itsworking papers withinthe period prescribedunder Section 235 of theNIRC of 1997, as amend-ed, and making themavailable to the Bureausauthorized representa-tive/s when required ordirected to do so.
Each applicant shall paya non-refundable fee of P1,000.00 upon filing ofapplication for accredita-tion. If the applicant is a
general professionalpartnership, the fee shallbe paid for each partner/s and any other author-ized representative/sthereof. In the case ofincorporated entities en-gaged in the account-ing and tax consultan-cy services, the feeshall be paid by eachof the applicant officer/sor designated repre-sentative/s thereof.
All accredited TAPsshall submit to theRRAB/RNAB on or be-fore the last day ofpayment of annual regis-tration fee the followingdocuments:
a. A list of the engage-ments dealing with anyof the BIR Offices for theprior year; and
b. A list of the CPEhours earned by theaccredited tax agents/practitioners for theprevious year.
The RRAB shall processthe application/s andissue the certificate/sof accreditation of indi-viduals, GPPs and in-
corporated entities withTAPs of 10 or lesspersons, while theRNAB shall process theapplication/s and ap-prove the certificate/s ofaccreditation for individ-uals, GPPs and incorpo-rated entities with TAPsof 11 or more persons.In cases where the indi-viduals, GPPs and incor-porated entities had pre-viously accredited 10 orless TAPs and shall sub-sequently apply for ac-
creditation of additionalTAPs exceeding the 10person threshold, saidapplication shall be filedwith the RNAB, whichshall process the appli-cation/s and issue thecertification/s of accredi-tation.
The RRAB and RNABshall act upon all applica-tions for accreditation byverifying the qualifica-
tions of an applicant,and the completenessof the required docu-mentation. If an appli-cation is determined tobe complete, and theapplicant's qualificationsare found to be inconformity with theprovisions of Section 4of these Regulations,the application shall bestamped "RECEIVED"bearing the date the
completed applicationwas received by theRRAB/RNAB.
In all cases, the RRAB/RNAB shall have the ex-clusive authority to ap-prove/disapprove appli-cations for accreditationfalling within their re-spective jurisdiction,
-
8/12/2019 LCA LINES | Volume III, Issue No. 2
5/21
of the partnerships ac-creditation but only thatof the concerned part-ners accreditation. Thepartnership, however,must notify the RNAB,or the RRAB having
jurisdiction over thepartnership's principalplace of business, ofsuch occurrence andshall surrender to theRNAB/RRAB the con-cerned partner's Certifi-cate of Registration orIdentification Card for
cancellation.The following are addi-tional grounds for sus-pension, cancellation orrevocation of accredita-tion:
a. "Reckless conductwhich is a highly unrea-sonable omission or mis-representation involvingan extreme departurefrom the standards of
ordinary care that apractitioner should ob-serve under the cir-cumstances arisingfrom non-complianceby the taxpayer-clientwith existing provisionsof the Tax Code, itsrules and regulations,including financial ac-counting standards andtax accounting rules.
Reckless conduct onthe part of the tax
agent/practitioner shallbe presumed whenthere is substantial un-derdeclaration of client-taxpayers taxable sales,receipts or income, or asubstantial overstate-ment of its deductions asdefined under Section248 of the Tax Code, asamended, and such dis-
crepancy is discoveredby the Bureau in the con-duct of its enforcementactivities. A pattern ofconduct is a factor thatwill be taken into ac-count in determiningwhether a practitioneracted knowingly, reck-lessly, or through grossincompetence;
b. Failure to comply withthe completion of theCPE; and
c. Consistent failure toindicate the BIR ac-creditation number inthe documents filed withthe BIR.
A petition for Disaccredi-tation/Suspension of anAccredited Tax Agentmay be filed with theRRAB or RNAB having
jurisdiction over the resi-dence or principal placeof business of the ac-
credited tax agentagainst whom the Peti-tion is being filed. Peti-tions found to have beenfiled by fictitious personsor organizations, uponverification by the RRABor RNAB concerned, shallbe dismissed for lack offactual or legal bases.
The RRAB or RNABwith whom a Petitionfor Disaccreditation/
Suspension was filedshall conduct hearing(s)on such Petition, toallow both the Petition-er and the AccreditedTax Agent concerned topresent their side ofthe case. In the con-duct of hearings, aquorum is sufficient toconvene the RRAB or
Page 5VOLUME III, ISSUE No. 2
BIR ISSUANCES
which shall be actedupon within 30 daysfrom receipt of the com-plete application.
Applicants whose appli-cations for accreditationhave been approved bythe RRAB/RNAB shall beissued a Certificate ofAccreditation signed bytheir respective Chair-man. Such Certificateshall be valid for aperiod of 3 years fromthe date of issue, un-
less sooner revoked forcause. For purposes ofeasy identification, theCommissioner of InternalRevenue shall issue anidentification card toeach accredited taxagent or practitioner.
Application for accredita-tion which has been dis-approved by the RRAB/RNAB may be appealed
to the Commissioner. Anadverse decision by theCommissioner may beappealed to the Secre-tary of Finance, whoshall rule on the ap-peal within 60 daysfrom receipt of suchappeal. Failure of theSecretary of Finance torule on the appealwithin the prescribedperiod shall be deemedas approval of the appli-
cation for accreditationof the appellant.
The resignation, retire-ment, death or incapaci-ty of any partner of ageneral professionalpartnership who hasbeen accredited by theRNAB/RNAB shall notresult in the cancellation
RNAB. Upon terminationof the hearing, theRRAB or RNAB shall de-cide by a majority voteof the members presentand voting, whether togrant or deny the Peti-tion.
In cases of disaccredi-tation or suspension,the RRAB or RNABshall issue to the TaxAgent concerned aNotice of Disaccredita-tion/Suspension signed
by its Chairman. Acopy of such Noticeshall be sent to the Pe-titioner. In the eventthat a Petition for Dis-a c c r e d i t a t i o n /Suspension is denied,the RRAB or RNABshall inform both par-ties of such decision,in an official communi-cation signed by itsChairman.
Only those Tax Agents/Practitioners, Partnersor Officers of GeneralProfessional Partner-ships, or Officers or Di-rectors of corporate en-tities engaged in taxpractice who have beenissued Certificate of Ac-creditation or ID cardshall be allowed to rep-resent a taxpayer ortransact business withthe Bureau of Internal
Revenue in representa-tion of a taxpayer forthe purpose(s) definedin these Regulations.
The BIR can refuse totransact official busi-ness with tax practi-tioners who are notaccredited before itand shall require that
-
8/12/2019 LCA LINES | Volume III, Issue No. 2
6/21
certain official state-ments such as returns,financial statements,reports, protests, re-quests for ruling, offi-cial correspondence andother statements, pa-pers or documents filedon behalf of a taxpayerbe signed or certified toby accredited persons,which shall bear the fol-lowing information belowtheir signature:
a. For individuals (CPAs
Members of GPPs, andother)a.1. Taxpayer Identifi-cation Number (TIN);anda.2. Certification of Ac-creditation Number;Date of Issuance, andDate of Expiryb. For members of thePhilippine Bar:a.1. Taxpayer Identifi-cation Number (TIN);a.2. Attorneys Roll
Number; anda.3. Mandatory Continu-ing Legal Education(MCLE) ComplianceNumber.
The RNAB shall keepan up-to-date MasterList of all suspended/d i s a c c r e d i t e d Ta xAgents /Prac t i t ioners .This Master List shallbe posted in the BIRwebsite and/or shall be
published in a newspaperof general circulation inorder that this list shallbe readily available forreference by the public.
Within 60 days, priorto the expiration ofthe accreditation, TaxAgents/ Practitionersmay apply for renewal
BIR ISSUANCES
Page 6 L C A LINES
of their accreditation. -All accredited TAPs,whether engaged in indi-vidual practice, or belong-ing to GPPs or incorpo-rated entities engaged inaccounting and tax con-sultancy, including law-yers engaged in tax prac-tice before the BIR, shallpay the registration fee ofFive Hundred Pesos(P500.00) in the RevenueDistrict Office (RDO) hav-ing jurisdiction over theprincipal place of business
of the individual practi-tioner, GPP or incorpo-rated entity on or beforeJanuary 31 of each year.
All currently accreditedTAPs, whether engagedin individual practice, orbelonging to GPPs orincorporated entitiesengaged in accountingand tax consultancy,including lawyers en-gaged in tax practice be-
fore the BIR, shall pay theregistration fee of P500.00 not later thanMarch 15, 2010. TAPswho have previously beenaccredited but whose ac-creditation has since ex-pired, or those TAPs whostill have not filed theirapplications but havebeen practicing with theBIR are required to filetheir application not laterthan March 15, 2010.
Any TAP who violates anyprovision of RR No. 11-2006 or this Regulationshall, upon conviction foreach act or omission, bepunished by a fine of P1,000.00 or suffer impris-onment of not more than6 months, or both.
REVENUE MEMORAN-DUM CIRCULAR NO. 7
-2010
Publishes the full text ofthe Memorandum ofAgreement (MOA) be-tween the Bureau of In-ternal Revenue (BIR),Land Transportation Of-fice (LTO) and Insurance
Commission (IC) signedon January 20, 2010.
The IC shall perform,host, manage and main-tain the IC COC Gateway(ICG) for recording andmonitoring of all Certifi-cates of Cover (COCs) forCompulsory Third PartyLiability (CTPL) and Mo-tor Car ComprehensiveInsurance coverage. TheIC shall interconnect with
the Enhanced Certificateof Cover Verification Fa-cility (ECOCVF) of theLTO for the subsequentverification phase.
The IC shall require/mandate accredited in-surance companies tosubmit/file COCs pertain-ing to CTPL and Compre-hensive Insurance poli-cies into the ICG. For thispurpose, the IC shall im-
pose administrat ivesanctions upon insurancecompanies, their direc-tors/officers/ agents, forany willful failure or re-fusal to comply with orviolation of the aforesaidrequirement.
The LTO, on the other
hand, shall perform,host, manage and main-tain the ECOCVF for thesubsequent verificationof COCs, and shall inter-connect with the ICG forproper monitoring of col-lection of taxes, fees,and charges due to theBIR.
The BIR shall have ac-cess to the ICG andECOCVF to determineCOC issuances and theamount of taxes due/paid to the government.The BIR shall also haveaccess to the reportsgenerated from the ICGand ECOCVF for purpos-es of industry analysisand tracking.
REVENUE MEMORAN-DUM ORDER NO. 10-
2010
RMO No. 10-2010 pre-scribes the policies andguidelines for the mon-itoring, processing andmaintenance of a data-base of Estate Tax casesrelative to Project Rest inPeace (R.I.P.).
Project R.I.P. is beingimplemented to tap thelarge potential of in-creasing the number ofEstate Tax returns filedand the Estate Taxescollected.
All Revenue District Of-fices shall conduct a pro-
-
8/12/2019 LCA LINES | Volume III, Issue No. 2
7/21
mation shall be required:
a. Name of decedentb. Address of decedentc. Date of deathd. Status of decedent(i.e., Married, single,with children, etc.)e. Name of relative(s)/contact person(s)f. Address of relative
(s)/contact person(s)
All information gatheredshall be submitted to theChief, Audit Information,
Tax Exemption and In-c e n t i v e s D i v i s i o n(AITEID) for centralizeddata warehousing andother processing proce-dures.
The Revenue District Of-ficer (RDO) shall send aNotification Letter to therelative/contact person/residence of the dece-
dent who has been as-certained as a resident orregistered taxpayer ofthe Revenue District Of-fice. All other cases/information gathered onthe decedents who areNOT residents or regis-tered taxpayers of theRevenue District Officeshall be sent to theChief, AITEID. The Chief,AITEID shall ascertainwhich Revenue DistrictOffice has jurisdictionover these cases and
transmit the same tothese RDOs.
The Notification Lettershall advise and remindt h e r e l a t i v e /administrator of the de-cedent of the require-ments and the due datesfor filing of notice ofdeath, the Estate Taxreturn and the payment
Page 7VOLUME III, ISSUE No. 2
BIR ISSUANCES
active and close monitor-ing of potential EstateTax cases by establish-ing linkages with and/or accessing or secur-ing the records of thefollowing:
a. Civil Registersb. Hospitalsc. Memorial Parksd. Cemeteriese. Funeral Parlorsf. Crematoriumsg. Judicial Clerks ofcourts
h. Obituariesi. Life Insurance com-panies and other finan-cial institutions
The Access to Recordsform/letter prescribed inRMO No. 7-2010 shallbe used for requestingfor information from theabove mentioned enti-ties. The following infor-
of the Estate Taxes. Ifthe relative/contact per-son of the decedent failsto file the Estate Taxreturn and pay the Es-tate Tax on the duedate, the RDO shall un-dertake the necessaryaction to determine theestate tax obligation ofthe deceased/decedentand to protect the inter-est of the BIR.
The National Investiga-tion Division shall be
responsible for trackingthe obituaries in thenewspapers of generalcirculation.
EXPANDED SENIOR CITIZENS ACT OF 2010 Republic Act No. 9994
AN ACT GRANTINGADDITIONAL BENE-
FITS AND PRIVILEGESTO SENIOR CITIZENS,FURTHER AMENDING
REPUBLIC ACT NO.7432, AS AMENDED,OTHERWISE KNOWNAS "AN ACT TO MAX-
IMIZE THE CONTRIBU-TION OF SENIOR CITI-
ZENS TO NATIONBUILDING, GRANT
BENEFITS AND SPE-CIAL PRIVILEGES ANDFOR OTHER PURPOS-
ES" "Expanded Senior Citi-
zens Act of 2010."
Section 2 of RepublicAct No. 7432, asamended by RepublicAct No. 9257, ishereby furtheramended to read asfollows:
SEC. 2. Definition ofterms. - For purposes ofthis Act, these terms aredefined as follows:
"(a) Senior citizen orelderly refers to anyresident citizen of thePhilippines at least six-ty (60) years old;
"(b) Geriatrics refer to
the branch of medicalscience devoted to thestudy of the biologicaland physical changesand the diseases of oldage;
"(c) Lodging establish-ment refers to a build-ing, edifice, structure,apartment or houseincluding tourist inn,apartelle, motorist ho-tel, and pension houseengaged in catering,leasing or providingfacilities to transients,tourists or travelers;
"(d) Medical Services refer to hospital ser-vices, professional ser-
vices of physicians andother health care pro-fessionals and diagnos-tics and laboratorytests that the neces-sary for the diagnosisor treatment of an ill-ness or injury;
"(e) Dental services tooral examination,cleaning, permanentand temporary filling,extractions and gumtreatments, restora-tion, replacement orrepositioning of teeth,or alteration of the al-veolar or periodontiumprocess of the maxillaand the mandible thatare necessary for the
-
8/12/2019 LCA LINES | Volume III, Issue No. 2
8/21
Page 8 L C A LINES
diagnosis or treatmentof an illness or injury;
"(f) Nearest survivingrelative refers to thelegal spouse who sur-vives the deceasedsenior citizen: Provid-ed, That where nospouse survives thedecedent, this shall belimited to relatives inthe following order ofdegree of kinship: chil-dren, parents, siblings,grandparents, grand-children, uncles andaunts;
"(g) Home health careservice refers to healthor supportive care pro-vided to the senior citi-zen patient at home bylicensed health careprofessionals to in-clude, but not limitedto, physicians, nurses,midwives, physicaltherapist and caregiv-ers; and
"(h) Indigent seniorcitizen, refers to anyelderly who is frail,sickly or with disability,and without pension orpermanent source ofincome, compensationor financial assistancefrom his/her relativesto support his/herbasic needs, as deter-mined by the Depart-ment of Social Welfareand development(DSWD) in consultationwith the National Coor-dinating and MonitoringBoard."
Section 4 Section 4 ofRepublic Act No. 7432,as amended by RepublicAct No. 9257, is herebyfurther amended to read
as follows:
"SEC. 4. Privileges forthe Senior Citizens. -The senior citizens shallbe entitled to the follow-ing:
"(a) the grant of twentypercent (20%) discountand exemption from thevalue -added tax (VAT),if applicable, on the saleof the following goodsand services from all es-tablishments, for theexclusive use and enjoy-ment or availment of thesenior citizen
"(1) on the purchase ofmedicines, includingthe purchase of influ-enza and pnuemococ-cal vaccines, and suchother essential medicalsupplies, accessoriesand equipment to bedetermined by the De-partment of Health(DOH)."The DOH shall estab-lish guidelines andmechanism of compul-sory rebates in thesharing of burden ofdiscounts among retail-ers, manufacturers anddistributors, taking intoconsideration their re-spective margins;"(2) on the profession-al fees of attendingphysician/s in all pri-vate hospitals, medicalfacilities, outpatientclinics and home healthcare services;"(3) on the profession-al fees of licensed pro-fessional health provid-ing home health careservices as endorsedby private hospitals oremployed throughhome health care em-
ployment agencies;"(4) on medical anddental services, diag-nostic and laboratoryfees in all private hos-pitals, medical facili-ties, outpatient clinics,and home health careservices, in accordancewith the rules and reg-ulations to be issuedby the DOH, in coordi-nation with the Philip-pine Health InsuranceCorporation(PhilHealth);"(5) in actual fare forland transportationtravel in public utilitybuses (PUBs), publicutility jeepneys (PUJs),taxis, Asian utility vehi-cles (AUVs), shuttleservices and publicrailways, includingLight Rail Transit(LRT), Mass Rail Trans-it (MRT), and PhilippineNational Railways(PNR);"(6) in actual transpor-tation fare for domesticair transport servicesand sea shipping ves-sels and the like, basedon the actual fare andadvanced booking;"(7) on the utilizationof services in hotelsand similar lodging es-tablishments, restau-rants and recreationcenters;"(8) on admission feescharged by theaters,cinema houses andconcert halls, circuses,leisure and amuse-ment; and"(9) on funeral andburial services for thedeath of senior citi-zens;
"(b) exemption from thepayment of individual
income taxes of seniorcitizens who are consid-ered to be minimumwage earners in accord-ance with Republic ActNo. 9504;"(c) the grant of a mini-mum of five percent(5%) discount relative tothe monthly utilization ofwater and electricity sup-plied by the public utili-ties: Provided, That theindividual meters for theforegoing utilities areregistered in the name ofthe senior citizen resid-ing therein: Provided,further, That the monthlyconsumption does notexceed one hundred kilo-watt hours (100 kWh) ofelectricity and thirty cu-bic meters (30 m3) ofwater: Provided, further-more, That the privilegeis granted per householdregardless of the numberof senior citizens residingtherein;
"(d) exemption fromtraining fees for socioec-onomic programs;
"(e) free medical anddental services, diagnos-tic and laboratory feessuch as, but not limitedto, x-rays, computerizedtomography scans andblood tests, in all gov-
-
8/12/2019 LCA LINES | Volume III, Issue No. 2
9/21
Page 9 L C A LINES
"(1) an identificationcard issued by the Of-fice of the Senior CitizenAffairs (OSCA) of theplace where the seniorcitizen resides: Provid-ed, That the identifica-tion card issued by theparticular OSCA shall behonored nationwide;"(2) the passport of thesenior citizen con-cerned; and"(3) other documentsthat establish that thesenior citizen is a citizen
of the Republic and is atleast sixty (60) years ofage as further providedin the implementingrules and regulations.
"In the purchase of goodsand services which are onpromotional discount, thesenior citizen can avail ofthe promotional discountor the discount providedherein, whichever is high-er.
"The establishment mayclaim the discounts grant-ed under subsections (a)and (c) of this section astax deduction based onthe cost of the goods soldor services rendered: Pro-vided, That the cost of thediscount shall be allowedas deduction from grossincome for the same taxa-ble year that the discountis granted: Provided, fur-
ther, That the totalamount of the claimed taxdeduction net of VAT, ifapplicable, shall be in-cluded in their gross salesreceipts for tax purposesand shall be subject toproper documentation andto the provisions of theNational Internal Revenue
Code (NICR), asamended."
Section 5 of thesame Act, asamended, is herebyfurther amended toread as follows:
"SEC. 5. Government Assistance. - The gov-ernment shall providethe following:"(a) Employment
"Senior citizens who
have the capacity anddesire to work, or be re-employed, shall be pro-vided information andmatching services toenable them to be pro-ductive members of so-ciety. Terms of employ-ment shall conform withthe provisions of theLabor Code, as amend-ed, and other laws,rules and regulations.
"Private entities that willemploy senior citizensas employees, upon theeffectivity of this Act,shall be entitled to anadditional deductionfrom their gross in-come, equivalent to fif-teen percent (15%) ofthe total amount paidas salaries and wages tosenior citizens, subjectto the provision of Sec-tion 34 of the NIRC, as
amended: Provided,however, That such em-ployment shall continuefor a period of at leastsix (6) months: Provid-ed, further, That theannual income of thesenior citizen does notexceed the latest pov-erty threshold as deter-mined by the National
regularly reviewed toensure their continuingresponsiveness and sus-tainability, and to theextent practicable andfeasible, shall be upgrad-ed to be at par with thecurrent scale enjoyed bythose in actual service;
"(j) to the extent possi-ble, the government maygrant special discounts inspecial programs for sen-ior citizens on purchaseof basic commodities,
subject to the guidelinesto be issued for the pur-pose by the Departmentof Trade and Industry(DTI) and the Depart-ment of Agriculture(DA);
"(k) provision of expresslanes for senior citizensin all commercial andgovernment establish-ments; in the absencethereof, priority shall be
given to them; and"(l) death benefit assis-tance of a minimum ofTwo thousand pesos(P2, 000.00) shall begiven to the nearest sur-viving relative of a de-ceased senior citizenwhich amount shall besubject to adjustmentsdue to inflation in ac-cordance with the guide-lines to be issued by the
DSWD.
"In the availment of theprivileges mentionedabove, the senior citizen,or his/her duly author-ized representative, maysubmit as proof of his/her entitlement theretoany of the following:
ernment facilities, sub- ject to the guidelines tobe issued by the DOH incoordination with thePhilHealth;
"(f) the DOH shall ad-minister free vaccina-tion against the influen-za virus and pneumo-coccal disease for indi-gent senior citizen pa-tients;
"(g) educational assis-tance to senior citizens
to pursue post second-ary, tertiary, post ter-tiary, vocational andtechnical education, aswell as short-termcourses for retooling inboth public and privateschools through provi-sion of scholarships,grants, financial aids,subsidies and other in-centives to qualifiedsenior citizens, includingsupport for books,
learning materials, anduniform allowances, tothe extent feasible: Pro-vided, That senior citi-zens shall meet mini-mum admission require-ments;
"(h) to the extent prac-ticable and feasible, thecontinuance of thesame benefits and privi-leges given by the Gov-ernment Service Insur-
ance System (GSIS),the Social Security Sys-tem (SSS) and the PAG-IBIG, as the case maybe, as are enjoyed bythose in actual service;
"(i) retirement benefitsof retirees from boththe government and theprivate sector shall be
-
8/12/2019 LCA LINES | Volume III, Issue No. 2
10/21
Page 10VOLUME III, ISSUE No. 2
Statistical CoordinationBoard (NSCB) of the Na-tional Economic and De-velopment Authority(NEDA) for that year.
"The Department of La-bor and Employment(DOLE), in coordinationwith other governmentagencies such as, but notlimited to, the Technolo-gy and Livelihood Re-source Center (TLRC)and the Department ofTrade and Industry
(DTI), shall assess, de-sign and implementtraining programs thatwill provide skills andwelfare or livelihood sup-port for senior citizens.
"(b) Education"The Department of Edu-cation (DepED), theTechnical Education andSkills Development Au-thority (TESDA) and theCommission on Higher
Education (CHED), inconsultation with non-governmental organiza-tions (NGOs) and peo-ple's organizations (POs)for senior citizens, shallinstitute programs thatwill ensure access to for-mal and nonformal edu-cation.
"(c) Health"The DOH, in coordina-tion with local govern-
ment units (LGUs), NGOsand POs for senior citi-zens, shall institute anational health programand shall provide an in-tegrated health servicefor senior citizens. Itshall train community-based health workersamong senior citizensand health personnel to
specialize in the geriatriccare and health problemsof senior citizens.
"The national health pro-gram for senior citizensshall, among others, beharmonized with the Na-tional Prevention ofBlindness Program of theDOH."Throughout the country,there shall be estab-lished a "senior citizens'ward" in every govern-ment hospital. This geri-
atric ward shall be forthe exclusive use of sen-ior citizens who are inneed of hospital confine-ment by reason of theirhealth conditions. How-ever, when urgency ofpublic necessity purposesso require, such geriatricward may be used foremergency purposes,after which, such "seniorcitizens' ward" shall bereverted to its nature as
geriatric ward."(d) Social Services"At least fifty percent(50%) discount shall begranted on the consump-tion of electricity, water,and telephone by thesenior citizens centerand residential care/group homes that aregovernment-run or non-stock, non-profit domes-tic corporation organized
and operated primarilyfor the purpose of pro-moting the well-being ofabandoned, neglected,unattached, or homelesssenior citizens, subject tothe guidelines formulatedby the DSWD.
"(1) "self and socialenhancement services"
which provide seniorcitizens opportunitiesfor socializing, organiz-ing, creative expression,and self-improvement;"(2) "after care and fol-low-up services" for citi-zens who are dis-charged from the homesor institutions for theaged, especially thosewho have problems ofreintegration with familyand community, where-in both the senior citi-zens and their families
are provided with coun-seling;"(3) "neighborhood sup-port services" whereinthe community or familymembers provide care-giving services to theirfrail, sick, or bedriddensenior citizens; and"(4) "substitute familycare " in the form ofresidential care or grouphomes for the aban-doned, neglected, unat-
tached or homeless sen-ior citizens and thoseincapable of self-care.
"(e) Housing"The national governmentshall include in its nation-al shelter program thespecial housing needs ofsenior citizens, such asestablishment of housingunits for the elderly.
"(f) Access to Public
Transport"The Department ofTransportation and Com-munications (DOTC) shalldevelop a program to as-sist senior citizens to fullygain access to publictransport facilities.
"(g) Incentive for FosterCare
"The government shallprovide incentives to indi-viduals or nongovernmen-tal institution caring for orestablishing homes, resi-dential communities orretirement villages solelyfor, senior citizens, asfollows:
"(1) realty tax holidayfor the first five (5)years starting from thefirst year of operation;and"(2) priority in the con-struction or mainte-
nance of provincial ormunicipal roads leadingto the aforesaid home,residential communityor retirement village."(h) Additional Govern-ment Assistance"(1) Social Pension"Indigent senior citizensshall be entitled to amonthly stipendamounting to Five hun-dred pesos (Php500.00)to augment the daily
subsistence and othermedical needs of seniorcitizens, subject to areview every two (2)years by Congress, inconsultation with theDSWD."(2) Mandatory Phil-Health Coverage"All indigent senior citi-zens shall be covered bythe national health in-surance program ofPhilHealth. The LGUs
where the indigent sen-ior citizens resides shallallocate the necessaryfunds to ensure the en-rollment of their indi-gent senior citizens inaccordance with thepertinent laws and regu-lations."(3) Social Safety Nets
-
8/12/2019 LCA LINES | Volume III, Issue No. 2
11/21
"Social safety assistanceintended to cushion theeffects of economicsshocks, disasters and ca-lamities shall be availablefor senior citizens. Thesocial safety assistancewhich shall include, butnot limited to, food, medi-cines, and financial assis-tance for domicile repair,shall be sourced from thedisaster/calamity funds ofLGUs where the seniorcitizens reside, subject tothe guidelines to be is-sued by the DSWD."
Section 10 of thesame Act, as amend-ed, is hereby furtheramended to read asfollows:
"SEC. 10. Penalties. - Anyperson who refuses tohonor the senior citizencard issued by this thegovernment or violatesany provision of this Actshall suffer the followingpenalties:
"(a) For the first viola-tion, imprisonment ofnot less than two (2)years but not more thansix (6) years and a fineof not less than Fiftyt h o u s a n d p e s o s(Php50,000.00) but notexceeding One hundredt h o u s a n d p e s o s(Php100,000.00);"(b) For any subsequentviolation, imprisonmentof not less than two (2)years but not more thansix (6) years and a fineof not less than OneHundred thousand pe-sos (Php100,000.00)but not exceeding Twohundred thousand pesos(Php200,000.00); and
Page 11 L C A LINES
"(c) Any person whoabuses the privilegesgranted herein shall bepunished with impris-onment of not lessthan six (6) monthsand a fine of not lessthan Fifty thousandpesos (Php50,000.00)but not more than Onehundred thousand pe-sos (Php100,000.00).
If the offender is a cor-poration, partnership,organization or any simi-lar entity, the officialsthereof directly involvedsuch as the president,general manager, man-aging partner, or suchother officer chargedwith the management ofthe business affairs shallbe liable therefor.
"If the offender is an al-ien or a foreigner, he/she shall be deportedimmediately after serviceof sentence.
"Upon filing of an appro-priate complaint, andafter due notice andhearing, the proper au-thorities may also causethe cancellation or revo-cation of the businesspermit, permit to oper-ate, franchise and othersimilar privileges grantedto any person, establish-ment or business entitythat fails to abide by theprovisions of this Act."
-
8/12/2019 LCA LINES | Volume III, Issue No. 2
12/21
Republic Act No. 9995
AN ACT DEFINING ANDPENALIZING THECRIME OF PHOTO
AND VIDEO VOYEUR-ISM, PRESCRIBING
PENALTIES THEREFOR,AND FOR OTHER PUR-
POSES "Anti-Photo and Video
Voyeurism Act of2009" .
DEFINITION
(a) "Broadcast" means tomake public, by anymeans, a visual imagewith the intent that it beviewed by a person orpersons.(b) "Capture" with respectto an image, means tovideotape, photograph,film, record by anymeans, or broadcast.(c) "Female breast"means any portion of thefemale breast.(d) "Photo or video vo-yeurism" means the act oftaking photo or video cov-erage of a person orgroup of persons perform-ing sexual act or any sim-ilar activity or of capturingan image of the privatearea of a person or per-sons without the latter'sconsent, under circum-stances in which suchperson/s has/have a rea-sonable expectation ofprivacy, or the act of sell-ing, copying, reproducing,broadcasting, sharing,showing or exhibiting thephoto or video coverageor recordings of such sex-ual act or similar activitythrough VCD/DVD, inter-net, cellular phones andsimilar means or devicewithout the written con-sent of the person/s in-
thousand pesos(P100,000.00) but notmore than Five hundredthousand pesos(P500,000.00), or both,at the discretion of thecourt.If the violator is a juridi-cal person, its license orfranchise shall be auto-matically be deemed re-voked and the personsliable shall be the officersthereof including the edi-tor and reporter in thecase of print media, andthe station manager,editor and broadcaster inthe case of a broadcastmedia.If the offender is a publicofficer or employee, or aprofessional, he/she shallbe administratively lia-ble.If the offender is an al-ien, he/she shall be sub-
ject to deportation pro-ceedings after servinghis/her sentence andpayment of fines.
Exemption
Nothing contained in thisAct, however, shall ren-der it unlawful or punish-able for any peace of-ficer, who is authorizedby a written order of thecourt, to use the recordor any copy thereof asevidence in any civil,criminal investigation ortrial of the crime of pho-to or video voyeurism:Provided, That such writ-ten order shall only beissued or granted uponwritten application andthe examination underoath or affirmation of theapplicant and the wit-nesses he/she may pro-duce, and upon showingthat there are reasonable
Page 12 L C A LINES
Republic Act No. 9995
(c) To sell or distribute, orcause to be sold or dis-tributed, such photo orvideo or recording of sex-ual act, whether it be theoriginal copy or reproduc-tion thereof; or(d) To publish or broad-cast, or cause to be pub-lished or broadcast,whether in print or broad-cast media, or show orexhibit the photo or videocoverage or recordings of
such sexual act or anysimilar activity throughVCD/DVD, internet, cellu-lar phones and other simi-lar means or device.The prohibition under par-agraphs (b), (c) and (d)shall apply notwithstand-ing that consent to recordor take photo or videocoverage of the same wasgiven by such person/s.Any person who violatesthis provision shall be lia-
ble for photo or video vo-yeurism as defined here-in.
Penalties The penalty of imprison-ment of not less thanthree (3) years but notmore than seven (7)years and a fine of notless than One hundred
volved, notwithstandingthat consent to record ortake photo or video cov-erage of same was givenby such person's.(e) "Private area of aperson" means the na-ked or undergarmentclad genitals, public ar-ea, buttocks or femalebreast of an individual.(f) "Under circumstancesin which a person has areasonable expectationof privacy" means be-lieve that he/she coulddisrobe in privacy, with-out being concerned thatan image or a privatearea of the person wasbeing captured; or cir-cumstances in which areasonable person wouldbelieve that a privatearea of the person wouldnot be visible to the pub-lic, regardless of whetherthat person is in a publicor private place.
Prohibited Acts (a) To take photo or vid-eo coverage of a personor group of persons per-forming sexual act orany similar activity or tocapture an image of theprivate area of a per-son/s such as the nakedor undergarment cladgenitals, pubic area, but-tocks or female breastwithout the consent ofthe person/s involvedand under circumstancesin which the person/shas/have a reasonableexpectation of privacy;(b) To copy or repro-duce, or to cause to becopied or reproduced,such photo or video orrecording of sexual actor any similar activitywith or without consider-ation;
-
8/12/2019 LCA LINES | Volume III, Issue No. 2
13/21
-
8/12/2019 LCA LINES | Volume III, Issue No. 2
14/21
L C A LINESPage 14
Subject: Rules andRegulations for the
Provision of Micro-AgriLoans
Minimum Criteria toDetermine Banks Ca-
pacity to Offer Micro-Agri Loans
The BSP will review theapplication based on thefollowing basic principles:
1. To ensure that thebanks have the capacityand technical capability tooffer micro-agri loans2. To ensure that the pro-vision of micro-agri loansuphold adequate and ap-propriate risk manage-ment systems and proce-dures as well as the mi-
crofinance best methodol-ogies and technologiesBased on the above prin-
ciples, the BSP may con-sider the banks micro -agri loans as microfinanceloans upon satisfaction ofthe following require-ments:1. The bank must have atrack record of at leasttwo years in implement-ing sustainable micro-finance programs, includ-ing acceptable portfolio-at-risk (PAR) levels as eval-uated against prevailingBSP standards.2. The bank must have anappropriate micro-agriloan product manual to beincluded in the banks mi-crofinance manual as oneof the types of services orproducts offered to pro-
spective clients. Loan/account officers must betrained about the micro-
agri loan product and thatthe details of the programcan be communicatedclearly to the clients.
Appropriate Risk Man-agement
Micro-agri loans shall besubject to the same riskmanagement mechanismsrequired for microfinanceloans including, but notlimited to the following:1. Clients ability to repaybased on cash flow analy-sis and affordability espe-cially the new clients. Theprospective client musthave other sources of in-come sufficient for the
periodic payment of theloan while the loan pro-
ject is not yet generat-
ing income, evaluatedthrough household cashflow analysis2. Adequate loan moni-toring, collection, con-trol, provisioning con-sistent with existingBSP regulations3. The loan product isincluded in the banksmicrofinance manual asone of the types of ser-vices or products of-fered to prospectiveclients4. The micro-agri loansmust have a sub-controlledger.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ISSUANCE
JURISPRUDENCE
PEOPLE OF THE PHIL-IPPINES
vs.MARIANO OFEMIANO
Alias ManingG.R. No. 187155 Feb-
ruary 1, 2010
FACTS: AAA is BBBs
eldest daughter. AAA
lived with BBB and her
lover, Mariano Ofemiano
(Ofemiano), and their
children.
On the very night of
AAAs arrival in Caloocan
City, Ofemiano sexuallymolested her. The sexu-
al molestations contin-
ued almost everyday
thereafter. AAA revealed
to her mother her har-
rowing experience but
the latter dismissed her
report.
AAA visited her aunt and
found the courage to tell
the latter about her or-
deal. Enraged, her aunt
immediately reported the
matter to the authorities.
The Regional Trial Court
(RTC) convicted Ofemiano
of the crime of simple
rape.
The Court of Appeals (CA)
affirmed the decision of
the RTC.
ISSUE: Whether or not
the Court gravely erred in
convicting the Ofemiano
of the crime of rape.
RULING: The Court didnot err in convicting
Ofemiano of the crime of
rape.
The findings of the trial
court on the credibility of
witnesses and their testi-
monies are entitled to the
highest respect. Havingseen and heard the wit-
nesses and observed their
behavior and manner of
testifying, the trial court
is deemed to have been in
a better position to weigh
-
8/12/2019 LCA LINES | Volume III, Issue No. 2
15/21
VOLUME III, ISSUE No. 2 Page 15
the evidence. Thus, the
trial courts evaluation
shall be binding on the
appellate court unless it
is shown that certain
facts of substance and
value have been plainly
overlooked, misunder-
stood, or misapplied.
None of the exceptions is
present in this case.
Jurisprudence holds that
the failure of the victim
to shout for help does
not negate rape. Even
the victims lack of re-
sistance, especially when
intimidated by the of-
fender into submission,
does not signify volun-
tariness or consent. Even
absent any actual force
or intimidation, rape maybe committed if the mal-
efactor has moral as-
cendancy over the vic-
tim. We emphasized
that in rape committed
by a close kin, such as
the victims father, step-
father, uncle, or the
common-law spouse of
her mother, moral influ-
ence or ascendancy sub-
stitutes for violence or
intimidation.
Thus, in this case, it was
understandable for the
victim to have silently
endured the sexual at-
tacks of her mothers live -
in partner. As correctly
observed by the appellate
court, Ofemiano evidently
used his moral ascendan-
cy over the victim to carry
out his bestial desire.
Also, the victims inability
to remember the exact
dates of the rape should
not be taken against her.
The exact time of the
commission of the crime
of rape is not a material
ingredient of this crime.
In this case, the victim
was raped almost every
night for a year by her
mothers live -in partner,
with her mother turning a
deaf ear to her cries forhelp. Under these cir-
cumstances, we could not
expect the victim to recall
her experiences in an ex-
act, detailed, and flawless
testimony. It is sufficient
if the acts complained of
are alleged to have taken
place as near to the actu-
al date at which the of-
fenses are committed as
the information or com-
plaint will permit.
To sustain a conviction for
rape, there must be proof
of the penetration of the
female organ. The testi-
mony of AAA described
with clarity how Ofemi-
ano raped her and suc-
ceeded in forcing himself
on her. As established
by jurisprudence, when
the victims straightfor-
ward testimony is con-
sistent with the physical
finding of penetration,
sufficient basis exists for
concluding that that sex-
ual intercourse did take
place.
BENEDICTA M. SAM-SON and MARCIAL M.
SAMSONvs.
HON. JUDGE GERALD-INE C. FIEL-
MACARAIG, BANK OFTHE PHILIPPINE IS-
LANDS, FAR EASTBANK AND TRUST CO.,
ATTY. JULIA CECILYCOCHING-SOSITO,
and THE REGISTER OFDEEDS FOR MARIKINA
CITY G.R. No. 166356 Feb-
ruary 2, 2010
FACTS: Sometime in
1998, petitioners Bene-dicta M. Samson and
Marcial M. Samson
(Spouses Samson) ob-
tained a loan amounting
to P10,000,000 from Far
East Bank and Trust Co.
(FEBTC). The loan was
secured by a real estate
mortgage over four par-
cels of land located in
Marikina City. When
spouses Samson failed to
comply with the terms of
the loan agreement,
FEBTC filed an application
for extra-judicial foreclo-
sure of the real estate
mortgage with the Office
of the Clerk of Court and
Ex-Officio Sheriff of the
Regional Trial Court (RTC)
of Marikina City. FEBTCs
application was given due
course, and a Notice of
Sheriffs Sale was issued.
The mortgaged real prop-
erties were later sold at
public auction to FEBTC as
the highest bidder, and aCertificate of Sale was
issued in favor of the
bank.
Almost two years later,
spouses Samson, filed a
case for Annulment of
Extra-judicial Foreclosure
and/or Nullification of
Sale and the Certificates
of Title, plus Damages
and with Prayer for a
Temporary Restraining
Order [TRO] and/or Writ
of Preliminary Injunction.
They questioned the va-
-
8/12/2019 LCA LINES | Volume III, Issue No. 2
16/21
Page 16 L C A LINES
lidity of the 29 June
2000 auction sale for
alleged lack of posting
and publication require-
ments.
On 20 December 2002,
the Regional Trial Court
(RTC) of Marikina City,
Branch 192, issued an
Order denying spouses
Samsons application for
TRO and/or Writ of Pre-
liminary Injunction. Six
months later, the RTC
issued an Order dismiss-
ing the complaint for fail-
ure to prosecute for an
unreasonable length of
time.
Spouses Samson filed a
Motion for Reconsidera-tion, but this was denied
by the RTC.
The Court of Appeals
rendered judgment dis-
missing the Petition for
Certiorari. The Motion
for Reconsideration was
likewise denied.
ISSUE: Whether or not
the Court of Appeals
erred in dismissing the
petition for certiorari.
RULING: The appellate
court did not err when it
ruled that the petition for
certiorari was not the
proper remedy.
A writ of certiorari lies
only for an error of juris-
diction. It can be availed
of only if the lower tribu-
nal has acted without or
in excess of jurisdiction,
or with grave abuse of
discretion amounting to
lack or excess of jurisdic-
tion, and if there is no
appeal or any other plain,
speedy, and adequate
remedy in the ordinary
course of law. Where the
error is not one of juris-
diction but an error of law
or fact which is a mistake
of judgment, certiorari isnot available. In such
case, the remedy is ap-
peal.
The remedy to obtain re-
versal or modification of
the judgment on the mer-
its is appeal. This is true
even if the error, or one
of the errors, ascribed to
the court rendering the
judgment is its lack of
jurisdiction over the sub-
ject matter, or the exer-
cise of power in excess
thereof, or grave abuse of
discretion in the findings
of fact or of law set out in
the decision. The availa-
bility of the right to ap-
peal precludes recourse to
the special civil action for
certiorari. The RTC Order
subject of the petition was
a final judgment which
disposed of the case on
the merits; hence, it was
a subject for an ordinary
appeal, not a petition for
certiorari.
Even assuming that certi-
orari may lie, the Court
still cannot grant the in-
stant petition because the
spouses Samson failed to
show that public respond-
ent, in issuing the as-sailed Orders, acted with-
out or in excess of juris-
diction, or gravely abused
her discretion amounting
to lack or excess of juris-
diction. There is no
showing that the RTC
judge issued the Order in
a despotic or arbitrary
manner, or that she was
motivated by passion or
personal hostility against
spouses Samson. Grave
abuse of discretion im-
plies such capricious and
-
8/12/2019 LCA LINES | Volume III, Issue No. 2
17/21
whimsical exercise of
judgment as is equivalent
to lack of jurisdiction or,
in other words, where the
power is exercised in an
arbitrary manner by rea-
son of passion, prejudice,
or personal hostility, and
it must be so patent or
gross as to amount to an
evasion of a positive duty
or to a virtual refusal to
perform the duty enjoined
or to act at all in contem-
plation of law. Such is
wanting in this case.
METROPOLITAN BANKAND TRUST CO. and
SOLIDBANK CORPORA-TION
vs.BERNARDITA H. PEREZ,
represented by herAttorney-in-Fact PA-
TRIA H. PEREZG.R. No. 181842 Feb-
ruary 5, 2010
FACTS : Solidbank Cor-
poration (Solidbank)
forged a lease contract
with Bernardita H. Perez
(Perez), over two parcelsof land located in Bulacan
for a period of 15 years
commencing on January
1, 1998. Solidbank was
to, as it did, construct a
one-storey building spe-
cifically suited for bank
premises.
Solidbank was later ac-
quired by Metropolitan
Bank and Trust Company
(Metrobank), the latter as
the surviving entity.
On September 24, 2002,
Metrobank sent a notice
of termination of the lease
contract effective Sep-
tember 30, 2002. Perez,
objecting to the termina-
tion, filed a complaint for
breach of contract and
damages against Solid-
bank and Metrobank be-
fore the Regional Trial
Court (RTC) which ruled
in its favor.
The Court of Appeals (CA)
affirmed the decision of
the trial court even if Pe-
rez admitted that the fil-
ing fees she paid did not
cover her prayer for unre-
alized income for the en-
suing idle months, for at
the time of filing and pay-
ment, the period that the
building would be idle
could not yet be deter-
mined .
ISSUE: Whether or not
the RTC lacks jurisdictionover the complaint forPerezs failure to pay thecorrect docket fees.
RULING: The RTC did
not lack of jurisdiction
over the complaint for
Perezs failure to pay the
correct docket fees.
In Manchester Develop-
ment Corporation v. Court
of Appeals , the Court held
that a pleading which
does not specify in the
prayer the amount sought
shall not be admitted or
shall be expunged, and
that a court acquires ju-
risdiction only upon pay-
ment of the prescribed
docket fee. This rule wasrelaxed in Sun Insurance
Office, Ltd. v. Asuncion
which was echoed in the
2005 case of Heirs of Ber-
tuldo Hinog v. Melico ,
where the court ruled that
while the payment of pre-
scribed docket fee is a
jurisdictional requirement,
even its non-payment at
the time of filing does not
automatically cause the
dismissal of the case, as
long as the fee is paid
within the applicable
prescriptive or regle-
mentary period , more
so when the party in-
volved demonstrates a
willingness to abide by
the rules prescribing such
payment. Thus, when in-
sufficient filing fees were
initially paid by the
plaintiffs and there was
no intention to defraud
the government , the
Manchester rule does not
apply.
The ensuing months in
which the leased premises
would be rendered vacant
could not be determined
at the time of the filing of
the complaint. It bears
recalling that the building
constructed on Perezs
leased premises was spe-
cifically constructed to
house a bank, hence, the
idle period before another
occupant with like busi-
ness may opt to lease
would be difficult to pro-
ject.
Metrobank raised the is-
sue of jurisdiction onlybefore the appellate court
after it participated in the
proceedings before the
trial court. While lack of
jurisdiction may be raised
at any time, a party may
Page 17VOLUME III, ISSUE No. 2
-
8/12/2019 LCA LINES | Volume III, Issue No. 2
18/21
-
8/12/2019 LCA LINES | Volume III, Issue No. 2
19/21
VOLUME III, ISSUE No. 2 Page 19
SECTION 2. Time tointervene. The motion
to intervene may befiled at any time be-fore rendition of judg-ment by the trialcourt . A copy of thepleading-in-interventionshall be attached to themotion and served onthe original parties.
Simply, intervention is a
procedure by which third
persons, not originally
parties to the suit but
claiming an interest in the
subject matter, come into
the case in order to pro-
tect their right or inter-
pose their claim. Its main
purpose is to settle in one
action and by a single
judgment all conflicting
claims of, or the wholecontroversy among, the
persons involved.
To warrant intervention
under Rule 19 of the
Rules of Court, two requi-
sites must concur: (1) the
movant has a legal inter-
est in the matter in litiga-
tion; and (2) intervention
must not unduly delay or
prejudice the adjudication
of the rights of the par-
ties, nor should the claim
of the intervenor be capa-
ble of being properly de-
cided in a separate pro-
ceeding. The interest,
which entitles one to in-
tervene, must involve the
matter in litigation and of
such direct and immediate
character that the inter-
venor will either gain or
lose by the direct legal
operation and effect of
the judgment.
The Office of the Ombuds-
man is not an appropriate
party to intervene in the
instant case. It must re-
main partial and de-
tached. More importantly,
it must be mindful of its
role as an adjudicator, not
an advocate.
It is an established doc-
trine that judges should
detach themselves from
cases where their deci-
sions are appealed to a
higher court for review.
The raison detre for sucha doctrine is the fact that
judges are not active
combatants in such pro-
ceeding and must leave
the opposing parties to
contend their individual
positions and the appel-
late court to decide the
issues without the judges
active participation.
When judges actively par-
ticipate in the appeal of
their judgment, they, in a
way, cease to be judicial
and have become adver-
sarial instead.
INTEGRATED BAR OFTHE PHILIPPINES
represented by its Na-tional President, Jose
Anselmo I. Cadiz,H. HARRY L. ROQUE,and JOEL RUIZ BU-
TUYANvs.
HONORABLE MANILAMAYOR
JOSE LITO ATIENZA G.R. No. 175241
February 24, 2010
FACTS: The IBP, through
its then National President
Jose Anselmo Cadiz
(Cadiz), filed with the Of-
fice of the City Mayor of
Manila a letter application
for a permit to rally at the
foot of Mendiola Bridge on
June 22, 2006 from 2:30
p.m. to 5:30 p.m. to be
participated in by IBP of-
ficers and members, law
students and multi-
sectoral organizations.
Then Mayor Jose Lito
Atienza (Atienza) issued
a permit dated allowing
the IBP to stage a rallyon given date but indi-
cated therein Plaza Mi-
randa as the venue, in-
stead of Mendiola Bridge,
which permit the IBP re-
ceived on June 19, 2006.
Aggrieved, IBP filed on
June 21, 2006 before the
Court of Appeals (CA) a
petition for certiorari.
The petition having been
unresolved within 24
hours from its filing, IBP
filed before the Supreme
Court (SC) a petition for
certiorari which assailed
the appellate courts in-
action or refusal to re-
solve the petition within
the period provided un-
der the Public Assembly
Act of 1985.
The SC denied the peti-
-
8/12/2019 LCA LINES | Volume III, Issue No. 2
20/21
Section 6 of the
Public Assembly Act
reads:
Section 6. Actionto be taken on the appli-cation -
xxx
(c) If the mayor is of theview that there is immi-nent and grave danger of
a substantive evil war-ranting the denial ormodification of the per-mit, he shall immediatelyinform the applicant whomust be heard on thematter.
xxx
(e) If the mayor or anyofficial acting in his be-half denies the applica-tion or modifies theterms thereof in his per-mit, the applicant maycontest the decision in anappropriate court of law.
(f) In case suit isbrought before the Met-ropolitan Trial Court, theMunicipal Trial Court, theMunicipal Circuit TrialCourt, the Regional TrialCourt, or the Intermedi-ate Appellate Court, itsdecisions may be ap-pealed to the appropriatecourt within forty-eight(48) hours after receiptof the same. No appealbond and record on ap-peal shall be required. Adecision granting suchpermit or modifying it interms satisfactory to theapplicant shall, be imme-diately executory.
(g) All cases filed incourt under this Sectionshall be decided withintwenty-four (24) hours
from date of filing. Casesfiled hereunder shall beimmediately endorsed tothe executive judge for
disposition or, in his ab-sence, to the next inrank.
(h) In all cases, any deci-sion may be appealed tothe Supreme Court.
Telegraphic appeals to befollowed by formal ap-peals are hereby allowed.
In modifying the permit
outright, Atienza gravely
abused his discretion
when he did not immedi-
ately inform the IBP who
should have been heard
first on the matter of his
perceived imminent and
grave danger of a sub-
stantive evil that may
warrant the changing of
the venue. The oppor-
tunity to be heard pre-
cedes the action on the
permit, since the appli-
cant may directly go to
court after an unfavora-
ble action on the permit.
Atienza failed to indicate
how he had arrived atmodifying the terms of
the permit against the
standard of a clear and
present danger test
which, it bears repeating,
is an indispensable con-
dition to such modifica-
tion. Nothing in the is-
sued permit adverts to
an imminent and grave
danger of a substantive
evil, which blank denial
or modification would,
when granted imprimatur
as the appellate court
would have it, render
illusory any judicial scru-
tiny thereof.
Notably, Ateinza failed to
indicate in his Comment
any basis or explanation
for his action. It smacks
of whim and caprice for
Atienza to just impose a
change of venue for an
assembly that was slated
for a specific public
place. It is thus reversi-
ble error for the appel-
late court not to have
found such grave abuse
of discretion and, un-
der specific statutory
provision, not to have
modified the permit in
terms satisfactory to theapplicant.
L C A LINESPage 20
tion for being moot and
academic, denied the
relief that the petition be
heard on the merits in
view of the pendency of
the case with the CA and
denied the motion for
reconsideration.
The rally pushed through
on June 22, 2006 at
Mendiola Bridge.
The Manila Police District
thereupon instituted a
criminal action against
Cadiz for violating the
Public Assembly Act in
staging a rally at a venue
not indicated in the per-
mit.
ISSUE: Whether or not
the CA erred in holding
that the modification of
the venue in IBPs rally
permit does not consti-
tute grave abuse of dis-
cretion.
RULING: The CA erred
in holding that the modi-
fication of the venue in
IBPs rally permit does
not constitute grave
abuse of discretion.
-
8/12/2019 LCA LINES | Volume III, Issue No. 2
21/21
L C A LINESPage 21
LCA Lines FebruaryVolume iii, Issue 2
J L s C O R N E R
A SUDDEN CHANGE OF MIND
My dearest Jessa,
Sweetie of my heart, Ive been so desolate since I brokeoff our engagement. Simply devastated. Wont youplease consider coming back to me? You hold a placein my heart no other woman can fill. I can never marryany other woman quite like you. I need you so much.Wont you forgive me and let us make a new beginning?I love you so.
Yours always and truly,Ben
P.S. Congratulations on you winning the lottery.