lc–ms/ms strategies for therapeutic proteins · public considerations for lc-ms/ms quantification...

24
Public LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS Johannes Stanta PhD Scientific Manager, Bioanalysis EBF Focus Workshop – June 2017 Copyright © 2017 Covance. All Rights Reserved

Upload: others

Post on 03-Nov-2019

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS

Johannes Stanta PhDScientific Manager, BioanalysisEBF Focus Workshop – June 2017

Copyright © 2017 Covance. All Rights Reserved

Page 2: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

Presentation Overview

► A brief introduction to LC-MS/MS quantification of proteins and the aims of our work

► Presentation of strategies for LC-MS/MS quantification of therapeutic proteins

► Case study: Affibody® technology► ADA effects on LC-MS assays

► Case study: Herceptin®

LC–MS/MS strategies for therapeutic Proteins2

Page 3: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples

Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic digestion… …. but beyond that everyone does it differently!

Considerations

What digestion approach:Guanidine/urea denaturation and overnight digestion?Detergent denaturation and facilitated digestion?Microwave or methanol assisted digestion?Immobilised Trypsin?

To reduce or not to reduce?Do we really need to reduce/alkylate?

Sample pre-treatment:Direct digestion of plasma?Protein precipitation or size exclusion?Protein A/G mediated extraction of antibodies?Bespoke ultra-selective immunoaffinity cleanup?

Post-digestion analysis:Additional cleanup after digestion?Conventional reversed phase LC-MS/MSNanoflow, ion-mobility, …Which tryptic peptide do we choose?

LC–MS/MS strategies for therapeutic Proteins3

Page 4: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

Introduction

► LC-MS/MS can provide complementary data to ligand binding assays as well as offering merits as a standalone bioanalytical approach

► We wanted an approach that was cost effective, sensitive, quick/easy to develop, no requirement for analyte-specific reagents, and high throughput for use with conventional UHPLC-MS/MS instrumentation

LC–MS/MS strategies for therapeutic Proteins4

AB Sciex API5000™ and Waters Acquity™

Image: Covance

Page 5: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

5

Affibody® molecule fusion protein

Affibody® technology

Two 6 kDa units linked by 5 kDa albumin binding domain (ABD)

Copyright © 2017 Covance.

LC–MS/MS strategies for therapeutic Proteins Albumin

Page 6: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

6

MS infusion

Strategy One: Intact protein analysis

Copyright © 2017 Covance.

LC–MS/MS strategies for therapeutic Proteins

+Q1: 17 MCA scans from Sample 1 (TuneSampleID) of MT20150112131503.wiff (Turbo Spray) Max. 1.6e7 cps.

600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200m/z, Da

0.0

1.0e6

2.0e6

3.0e6

4.0e6

5.0e6

6.0e6

7.0e6

8.0e6

9.0e6

1.0e7

1.1e7

1.2e7

1.3e7

1.4e7

1.5e7

1.6e7

Inte

nsi

ty,

cps

1166.5

1244.11097.91037.0

1332.9

982.6

1865.5

910.9

1435.3933.4

1138.2

1554.8

889.01695.9

2072.3782.2

759.3 2079.5848.8 1043.1 1114.2 1193.5668.2 974.3

1878.1908.7838.8 1010.9717.8 811.3 1067.6 1188.0644.0 1285.51085.5874.4 1007.7 1560.0825.7 2093.41206.0749.8612.6 1707.41266.7 1392.6 1517.41291.4 2114.21408.9 1893.81908.41590.3 1789.4 1987.6

Page 7: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

XIC of +MRM (9 pairs): 1431.800/86.200 Da ID: Lysozyme A from Sample 18 (8314846 Chrom150116 BEH300 C18) of 8314846 Chrom1501... Max. 4.1e4 cps.

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0Time, min

0.0

2.0e4

4.0e4

6.0e4

8.0e4

1.0e5

1.2e5

1.4e5

1.6e5

1.8e5

2.0e5

2.2e5

2.4e5

2.6e5

2.8e5

3.0e5

3.2e5

Inte

nsi

ty,

cps

3.10

3.07

LC–MS/MS strategies for therapeutic Proteins7

CSH C18 Column 300Å

Intact protein chromatography

1 µg/mL just about achievable

Copyright © 2017 Covance.

Page 8: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

Strategy Two: Plasma Digestion

15 µL plasma + 40 µL of 100 µg/mL chicken lysozyme

Load all into the SMART Digest™ tubes

Perform SPE (Waters Oasis® HLB)

LC-MS/MS (Sciex API 5000™, Waters Acquity®)Phenomenex Kinetex® XB-C18 1.7 µm column

Water/acetonitrile phases + formic acid

Total extraction time <5.5 hours per 96x sample run

Two hour digestion at 70ºC

Add 175 µL supplied digestion buffer and mix briefly

Eliminates salts and undigested proteins

Evaporative concentration and reconstitution

(Generic protein internal standard)

LC–MS/MS strategies for therapeutic Proteins8

Page 9: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

► Several peptides from variable region predicted

► After optimisation three of these gave desirable analytical performance

► Peptide with best signal/noise chosen

Affibody® molecule signature peptide method

LC–MS/MS strategies for therapeutic Proteins9

+Q1: 25 MCA scans from Sample 1 (TuneSampleID) of MT20150113124452.wiff (Turbo Spray) Max. 1.1e8 cps.

400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100m/z, Da

0.00

5.00e6

1.00e7

1.50e7

2.00e7

2.50e7

3.00e7

3.50e7

4.00e7

4.50e7

5.00e7

5.50e7

6.00e7

6.50e7

7.00e7

7.50e7

8.00e7

8.50e7

9.00e7

9.50e7

1.00e8

1.05e81.08e8

Inte

nsi

ty,

cps

592.6473.8

888.1

828.8

940.1

417.8

501.3

861.7753.6 941.0

613.3573.7 679.3488.6 553.2

646.6 919.2565.5437.2 745.7586.6471.7 627.3 662.5531.6 847.7 1018.3454.4 762.7426.6 971.1558.6 640.1495.3 951.1815.7523.8 872.8450.6 882.4784.6612.3 988.8680.6580.7 700.3407.0 983.3759.6540.5 1062.81009.8839.6

Copyright © 2017 Covance.

Copyright © 2017 Covance.

Page 10: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

Method Validation in Monkey plasma (Whole plasma digestion, Affibody® molecule, 1 – 1000 µg/mL)4 precision and accuracy runs with selectivity and stability tests

► Six individual lots of matrix at LQC: <12.3% bias

► Haemolysed LQC and HQC samples: acceptable

► Stability samples acceptable:• 24 hour on ice• 2 hour at RT• 4x freeze-thaws• 102 hours for extracts

LC–MS/MS strategies for therapeutic Proteins10

LLOQ LQC MQC HQCMean Concentration (µg/mL) 1.01 3.13 53.1 839Inter-run RSD (%) 10.6 8.8 6.8 8.7Inter-run %Bias 1.0 4.3 6.2 4.9n 18 23 24 24

Data generated at Covance

Page 11: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

Method Validation in Monkey plasma (Whole plasma digestion, Affibody® molecule)

LLOQ (1 µg/mL)

Matrix blank(No peak)

Retention time 4.76 min

Retention time 4.33 min

Surrogate peptide of Lysozyme (ISTD)

LC–MS/MS strategies for therapeutic Proteins11

Copyright © 2017 Covance.

Copyright © 2017 Covance.

Page 12: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

SMART Digest™ Method Validation (Affibody® molecule, 20 – 10,000 ng/mL human serum, Lysozyme ISTD)

5 precision and accuracy runs with selectivity and stability tests

► Six individual lots of matrix at LoQC: <14.2% bias

► Haemolysed and lipidaemic LQC and HQC samples: acceptable► Stability samples acceptable:

• 19 hours room temp (plasma)• 2 hours room temp and refrigerated (blood)• 4x freeze-thaws

LC–MS/MS strategies for therapeutic Proteins12

LLOQ LQC MQC HQCMean Concentration (ng/mL) 20.3 59.8 710 8070Inter-run RSD (%) 17.0 8.6 8.2 7.0Inter-run %Bias 1.5 -0.3 1.4 0.9n 23 30 30 30Data generated at Covance

Page 13: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

Human Method Validation (SMART Digest™, Affibody® molecule)

LLOQ (20 ng/mL)

Lysozyme surrogate peptide (ISTD)

Retention time 4.51 min

Retention time 4.11 minutes

LC–MS/MS strategies for therapeutic Proteins13

Copyright © 2017 Covance.

Page 14: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

LC–MS/MS strategies for therapeutic Proteins14

20 – 10,000 ng/mL

Clinical Assay for Ph1 and Ph2a

Ø Lysozyme Internal standard

Ø ~1700 samples analysed

Issues: Ø LLOQ robustness

Ø ChromatographyØ Response drift

SIL IS peptide for more robust methodØ synthetic peptide with Leucine-D10Ø 9 AA flanking on each side.

Page 15: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

Human Method Validation (SMART Digest™, Affibody® molecule)

LLOQ (20 ng/mL)

SIL IS peptide (ISTD)

Retention time 4.59 min

Retention time 4.71 min

LC–MS/MS strategies for therapeutic Proteins15

Copyright © 2017 Covance.

Page 16: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

Conclusions

LC–MS/MS strategies for therapeutic Proteins16

► Whole plasma/serum digestion can work very well when you have a selective peptide

► More robust assay with SIL IS

► Better selectivity/sensitivity could be achieved using immunoaffinity cleanup

Page 17: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

WHAT ABOUT ANTI-DRUG-ANTIBODY EFFECTS (ADA)?

Herceptin® case study

Page 18: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

►Common assumption that LC-MS/MS assays will always measure total (free, soluble target-bound and ADA-bound)

►How can we test this? ►Does it need to be validated?►Case Study

Anti-Herceptin® rabbit polyclonal antibody (pADA)Anti-Herceptin® human monoclonal antibody (mADA)

Was investigated for the following validated assays:(1) Ligand binding assay(2) Whole serum digestion LC-MS/MS method

LC–MS/MS strategies for therapeutic Proteins18

Page 19: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

Impact on Ligand Binding Assay

What effect does these

levels of ADA have on our LC-MS/MS

assay?

LC–MS/MS strategies for therapeutic Proteins19

Ewles, M, Mannu R, Fox C, Stanta J et al., Bioanalysis (2016) 8(24), 2565–2579

Copyright © 2017 Covance.

Copyright © 2017 Covance.

Page 20: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

Sample Preparation

LC–MS/MS strategies for therapeutic Proteins20

SampleHerceptin®

to ADA ratio

ADA typeLigandBinding Assay

Wholeserum digest and LC-MSMS

Whole serumdigestion (DMSO)

LQC (0.3 µg/mL)

1:0 Accurate Accurate Accurate

1:533 Polyclonal No response Inaccurate(-65%) Accurate

1:133 Monoclonal No response Accurate Accurate

HQC (80 µg/mL)

1:0 Accurate Accurate Accurate

1:2 Polyclonal Inaccurate (-20 – -40%) Accurate Accurate

2:1 Monoclonal Inaccurate (-20 – -40%) Accurate Accurate

Ewles, M, Mannu R, Fox C, Stanta J et al., Bioanalysis (2016) 8(24), 2565–2579

Page 21: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

Results Using LC-MS/MS Assays

Using WHOLE SERUM DIGESTION approach

► No impact of mADA on quantification► Where the polyclonal antibody is present at high molar excess there

is serious negative bias on the LC-MS/MS assay► Hence: LC-MS/MS assays can be affected by ADA effect!

LC–MS/MS strategies for therapeutic Proteins21

Page 22: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

Clinical Relevance

► Polyclonal antibody used raised in rabbit to Fab fragment► Therefore significant amount of antibody unique to variable region

therefore could mimic a true ADA response in clinical samples► What might be going on here??? (hypothesis…)

YADA Target mAb (variable region

protected from trypsin)

Immobilised Trypsin

LC–MS/MS strategies for therapeutic Proteins22

Copyright © 2017 Covance.

Page 23: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

Strategies investigated to dissociate Herceptin® ADA prior to digestion

► Denaturation with DMSO – Solves the problem!• Impact of anti-Herceptin® polyclonal antibody eliminated• DMSO improved selectivity/sensitivity of whole plasma digestion• Work ongoing to assess ADA effects on protein G enrichment

LC–MS/MS strategies for therapeutic Proteins23

A Resolution to Ensure Total Therapeutic mAb Quantification

Conclusions

► We have shown that for LC-MS/MS, an anti-drug-antibody effect can result in an underestimation of the total drug even when digesting whole plasma/serum.

► However careful optimisation can overcome this

Page 24: LC–MS/MS STRATEGIES FOR THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS · Public Considerations for LC-MS/MS Quantification of Proteins in Biological Samples Most bioanalytical strategies are based on tryptic

Public

Acknowledgements

►Matthew Ewles: Covance Bioanalytical, Harrogate ►David Firth, James Duffy, Len Bell, Sian Estdale:

Covance Biopharm CMC, Harrogate (research collaborators)

►Chris Fox, Graeme Evans: Covance Bioanalytical Services (Immunochemistry), Harrogate (ligand binding assay data)

►Joachim Feldwisch and everyone at Affibody

Covance Inc., headquartered in Princeton, NJ, USA, is the drug development business of Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LabCorp). COVANCE is a registered trademark and the marketing name for Covance Inc. and its subsidiaries around the world.

LC–MS/MS strategies for therapeutic Proteins24