learn to learn languages
Post on 08-Apr-2015
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTIONA further exploration of the validity of teaching methods and materials in foreign language training using English as a bridge language between the Germanic and Romance lnaguage families
Learning to Learn Languagesby Erik Hemming at the land University of Applied Sciences in May 2010
ABSTRACTTwo pilot language courses were organised in the spring of 2010 with one of the learning outcomes being learning to learn languages, a formula that encapsulates two of the EUs 8 key competencies for lifelong learning. Another objective was to use as much as possible of the transferable skills from competence in other languages and human communication in general so-called intercomprehension. In both the courses English was used as a bridge language into a new family of languages. This is possible since English has both Germanic and Romance characteristics. Thirdly new ICT (information and communication technologies) and social and mass media were used as materials, instead of learning materials. A questionnaire was designed to measure the extent to which students were managing their own learning. The didactic design is presented and analysed in comparison with the outcomes in terms of learning to learn and how the students experienced the methods and their freedom to choose what to work with. In general the students were motivated and stayed active which led to improved linguistic and meta-linguistic skills.
1 INTRODUCTION1.1 PURPOSEMy project within the framework of the 7.5-credit distance module The Virtual Classroom at the Stockholm University had the aim of clarifying HOW to train students to take over the responsibility of their own activity and their own learning in two language modules that I taught during the spring term 2010 at the land University of Applied Sciences.
1.2 MATERIALS AND METHODSAdmittedly there was an element of trial and error in my attempts to support/lure/coax my students into a behaviour which is new to many in the school context. However, the required and optional reading included in the The Virtual Classroom module provided a theoretical basis for my course of action in my contacts with the students. Very briefly what I tried was to have the students choose their own activities and to account for them in class and as an Excel sheet. In addition I wanted my students to reflect on their own learning along the lines of the CEFR. The learning of
languages followed the ideas in the Intercomprehension methodology, i.e. that through already known languages and experiences of human communication, we can understand communication in new (related) languages, especially in rich context. The evaluation of the learning was made in a few different ways. First and foremost there was an ongoing dialogue about the activities that I chose and those that the students chose themselves. WE discussed in terms of what was fun, easy, difficult, useful, etc. This way the students got feedback and new ideas from the other students and from me. The time account sheets were checked by me a regular intervals. Some of the activities were shown to the group as examples of favourite activities. In the end of the courses the students submitted an evaluation form, see appendix #1. The aim of that form was to find out to which extent students had become aware of their own learning and its outcomes, and to assess whether it is likely that they will continue with the activities they had sampled during the course, or perhaps with other activities. As for the actual language training, the students made a self-assessment using the CEFR grid (European Union, 2010).
2 LEARNING TO LEARN2.1 ONE OF THE KEY COMPETENCIESThe EU has defined 8 Key Competencies for Lifelong Learning (European Parliament and European Council, 2006). One of them is Learning to Learn1. What is meant by that is open to interpretation, but since the EU is concerned with employability of its citizens, it is quite clear that the kind of learning that is of interest here is conscious, will-driven, goal-oriented learning in our case languages. According to Hofmann (2009) the following attitudes are necessary for a person to be successful in learning to learn, a so-called meta-competence: Self-motivation and endurance in learning, dont give up when you hit a problem Inner willingness for personal development and to change the present situation Self-confidence and self-awareness Positive attitude towards learning
The complete list of Key Competencies: communication in the mother tongue communication in the foreign languages mathematical competence and basic competences in science and technology digital competence learning to learn interpersonal, intercultural and social competences and civic competence entrepreneurship cultural expression
Willingness to support and motivate others in their learning and the ability to search for support from others
The list is a description of an ideal state of an ideal student. The desired learning can not NOT take place if these attitudes are present. It is certainly the task of the teacher and her institution to foster these attitudes and to encourage them once they appear. Are we ready for this? As Hofmann (2009) goes on: it means letting go of control, leaving the responsibility for the learning process with the learner. Facilitators of learning need therefore to develop specifically their competences to follow and support the learning process of learners.
It follows that facilitators of learning should be equipped with the following attitudes (Hofmann, 2009): Authentic willingness to support the learners on their way Genuine trust that a learner knows best his/her own needs Empathy in transparent relationships with learners Awareness of the life-long learning context in which the learning activity takes place
The intercomprehension (IC) methods used in the language courses described here proved to go well with these requirements. Genuine trust that a learner knows best his/her own needs is not easy to fake in a regular course. However, in IC it is proved true all the time, and therefore easier to abide by. As for Empathy in transparent relationships with learners it is also helped by the IC methodologies. The group, not the teacher HAS to produce. The teacher HAS to refrain from giving the right answers too early. Listening is required normally very hard for teachers. 2.2 BUILDING CONFIDENCETo build trust requires empathy. How to show empathy is well-known. One example is to frequently take a one-on-one walk with every student (Schabbauer, 2010). If that is not possible it surely helps if the group is small. In a virtual classroom a few other ways are possible. It is key to see the contributions placed by participants and to do so quickly (Wnnman Toresson, 2006). Replying to contributions can be made in many ways of course. As for communication in general it can be (Metze & Nystrup, 1984):1. 2. 3. 4. Cognitive (knowledge and sense, exchange of exact information) OR affective (feelings and intuition) Expanding (long conversation or dialogue, questions which lead to comprehensive answers) OR limiting (closing the conversation as quickly as possible, short answers, yes/no) Confronting (focus on problems and conflicts) OR concealing (hiding problems and conflicts) Listening (paying attention to what is said and showing that by gestures or answers) OR not listening (not paying attention, indifferent, no eye contact)
If one is to lead group processes, in my case blended learning (both physical and virtual meetings) language courses, it is wise to be aware of the fact that cooperation in learning online usually follows the following steps or phases (Gillberg, 2005): A. The introductory phase where focus is on technical/methodological issues and the teacher instructs B. The group-oriented phase in which the participants get to know each other and the values of the others in which the teacher supports the process C. The independent, knowledge-building phase where the role of the teacher is to challenge the group
2.4 SCAFFOLDINGIt is obvious that the teacher needs to communicate in many different ways, also with different participants. The principle of scaffolding is said to be a way to guide students to ever greater independence from the teacher, in that they integrate the objectives and the methods to reach them in their own behaviour. Scaffolding then does the following (Designing Principles for Creating Effective Web-Based Learning Resources in the Geosciences, 2009): Provides clear directions Clarifies purpose Keeps students on tasks Offers assessment to clarify expectations Points students to worthy sources Reduces uncertainty, surprise and disappointments Delivers efficiency Creates momentum
2.5 TODAYS YOUNG LEARNERSIn order to be realistic the design of the courses need to take into consideration the famous quote from Oblinger and Oblinger (2005) stating that young people today are Digitally literate, highly Internet familiar, connected via networked media, used to immediate responses, preferring experiential learning, highly social, preferring to work in teams,
craving interactivity in image rich environments and having a preference for structure rather than ambiguity.
As will be seen from the following there is much evidence that the Oblingers are right, especially craving interactivity in image rich environments.
3 INTERCOMPREHENSIONIntercomprehension is to use communicative and linguistic competence that one already possesses on a language which one has not studied at all or not very long. This use will produce understanding of meaning thanks to the similarities between languages on many levels. Obvious examples are cognate languages to ones own, such as between Scandinavian languages. Old and new methods teach how to be able to apply similar strategies on languages that are more distant, yet similar in many ways. English is, thanks to its history, a mix of Romance and Germanic elements, which makes it ideal as