learning organization: a case study of nakhonthon hospital

8/10/2019 Learning Organization: A Case Study of Nakhonthon Hospital.

1/9

[646]

4 ()

23 ..2557

:

Learning Organization: A Case Study of Nakhonthon Hospital.

* . **Paksiri Ae-nihon and Dr.Chotima Kaewkong

1) 2) 3) 277 (StratifiedRandom Sampling) .980

.05

1) ( X =3.979, S.D.= .546)

(X =3.779, S.D.= .511) 2) (t=4.222, p= .006) (F=6.587, p= .000) (t= -4.446, p= .000) .05 3) .05(r=.751, p=.000)

:

* () .; E-mail: [email protected]

** .; E-mail: [email protected]


2/9

423 ..2557

[647]

Abstract

The purposes of this research were 1) to study staffs leadership level and learning organization

level of Nakhonthon Hospital, 2) to compare Nakhonthon Hospital learning organization level classified by

personal factors, 3) to study the relationship between staffs leadership and Nakhonthon Hospitals

learning organization. The stratified random sampling technique was used in this study. The samples

consisted of 277 staffmembers of Nakhonthon Hospital. The data were collected by a questionnaire with

Cronbachs alpha coefficient of .980. The statistics used to analyze the data were percentage, mean,

standard deviation, t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Pearson product moment correlation

coefficient with the level of statistical significance at .05.

The results showed that1) both staffs leadership (X

=3.979, S.D.= .546) and learning organization(X =3.779, S.D.= .511) were at a high level, 2) staffs with different personal factors such as sex (t=.523, p=.601) ,age (t=4.222, p= .006) , monthly income (F=6.587, p= 000) and position (t= -4.446, p= 000) hadsignificantly different opinions on Nakhonthon Hospitals learning organization, 3) staffs leadership

significantly correlated with Nakhonthon Hospitals learning organization in positive direction (r=.751, p=.000).

Key word: Learning Organization


3/9

423 ..2557

[648]

(Learning Organization)

1.

2.

3.

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 1.

2. 3. 4. 5.

9.


4/9

423 ..2557

[649]

899 ( ..2556)

Taro Yamane (1973) (e) 5% 95% 277 (Simple Random Sampling)

1 (Secondary data)

2 (Primary data)

.. 2557 .. 2557

(Frequency) (Percentage) (Mean)(Standard Deviation) t-test ( Pearson Product Moment CorrelationCoefficient) (One way Analysis of Variance) F-test 0.05

224

80.87 53 19.13 28 78 28.16 170 61.37 145 52.35 20,001 113 40.79 249 89.89 3 84 30.32 205 74.01


5/9

423 ..2557

[650]

1

(n=277)

X S.D.

4.157 .608

3.812 .655

3.916 .651

3.979 .546

1

(X =4.157,S.D.= .608)

(X =3.916, S.D.= .651)

(X =3.812, S.D.= .655)

2

(n=277)

X S.D. 1. 3.748 .588 2. 3.815 .531

3. 3.874 .559

4. 3.714 .574

5. 3.798 .661

3.779 .511

2

(X =3.779,S.D.= .511)

(X =3.874,S.D.= .559) (X =3.815, S.D.= .531)

(X =3.714, S.D.= .574)


6/9

423 ..2557

[651]

3

(n=277)

df SS MS F P-value

3 3.195 1.065 4.222 .006*

273 68.854 .252

276 72.048

2 .015 .007 .028 .972

274 72.033 .263

276 72.048

2 1.453 .727 2.820 .061

274 70.595 .258

276 72.048

3 4.863 1.621 6.587 .000*

273 67.185 .246

276 72.048

3 1.376 .459 1.771 .153

273 70.673 .259

276 72.048

3 2.236 .745 2.914 .051

273 69.812 .256

276 72.048

* .05


7/9

423 ..2557

[652]

4

(n=277)

X S.D. t P-value

53 3.812 .551 .523 .601

224 3.771 .502

/ / /

28 3.385 .396 -4.446 .000*

249 3.823 .504

* .05 3 (t=4.222, p= .006) (F=6.587,p= .000) .05

4 (t= -4.446, p= .000) .05

5

(n=277)

r P-value

.702* .000 .736* .000

.620* .000 .659* .000

.628* .000 .751* .000

* .05 5

.05(P=.000) (r=.751)


8/9

423 ..2557

[653]

1) 2) .05 3) .05

1)

(2542)

(2542)

2)

10,001 15,000 15,001 20,000


9/9

423 ..2557

[654]

3)

(2549)

. (2542). . .

. (2542). . . (2542).

. ,.

. (2542). :. .

.(2549,1 -). 12:(.. )..

learning organization: a case study of nakhonthon hospital

Documents