learning theories of hb

Upload: osama-alhumisi

Post on 14-Apr-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    1/45

    H U M A N B E H A V I O R

    LISA J. MERLO, PH.D.

    Learning Theories

    http://www.ufl.edu/
  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    2/45

    Objectives

    Understand theory of Classical Conditioning

    Applications to clinical practice

    Understand theory of Operant Conditioning Applications to clinical practice

    Understand theory of Social Learning Applications to clinical practice

    2

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    3/45

    Classical Conditioning

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    4/45

    Learning what events signal:

    Lightning thunder

    Sour-smelling milk bad taste

    Unexpected loud noise startle response

    Chopping onions tears

    The scientific study of simple associations led to thedevelopment of classical conditioning theory

    4

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    5/45

    Ivan Pavlov5

    Russian physiologist studyingthe digestive system

    Studied the role of saliva inthe digestive process

    Developed method to

    measure saliva production

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    6/45

    Salivary Conditioning Apparatus6

    Gave dog food and recorded salivation while it ate

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    7/45

    Pavlovs Saliva Research

    Pavlovs Problem: experienced dogs salivatedbefore the food was presented

    Pavlovs Theory: Some stimulus that precededthe food presentation had acquired capacity toelicit the response of salivation Dogs were exhibiting a simple type of learning

    This type of learning is the foundation forClassical Conditioning

    7

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    8/45

    Pavlovs Experiments

    Pavlov conducted experiments to test his new theoryof learning

    Studied the effect of different stimuli on the behaviorof interest (AKA, response)

    Animals automatically demonstrated the response afterexposure to some stimuli

    Animals did not demonstrate the response after exposure toother stimuli

    Animals could be taught to demonstrate the response tosome stimuli by pairing them with others

    8

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    9/45

    Paradigm of Classical Conditioning

    1st: Select a stimulus that automatically elicits acharacteristic response Stimulus =Unconditioned stimulus (US)

    Response = Unconditioned response (UR) Unconditioned means the stimulus-response connection is

    innate

    2nd: Select a Stimulus for Conditioning (CS) Conditioned Stimulus (CS) Can be any reasonable

    stimulus that does not initially evoke the UR Conditioned means the stimulus-response connection occurs

    only AFTER the conditioning procedure takes place

    9

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    10/45

    Classical Conditioning & Pavlovs Dogs10

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    11/45

    Key Definitions

    Unconditioned Stimulus (US) - stimulus whichnaturally triggers a response [food]

    Unconditioned Response (UR) - unlearned, naturalresponse to the US [salivating]

    Conditioned Stimulus (CS) - previously neutral

    stimulus, which eventually triggers a response [bell]

    Conditioned Response (CR) - learned response to apreviously neutral stimulus [salivating]

    11

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    12/45

    Cognitive Factors Are Ignored12

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    13/45

    Factors Affecting Classical Conditioning

    The CS should be presented BEFORE the US

    The US should follow the CS closely in time

    Short delay = best

    Trace (moderate delay) = more difficult to achieve CR

    Long delay = difficult to achieve CR

    Simultaneous = much weaker conditioning than short delay

    Backward (i.e., US then CS) = usually not effective

    The CS should UNIQUELY predict the US It should provide new information suggesting that the US is

    about to occur

    13

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    14/45

    Higher Ordering Conditioning

    Second Order Conditioning: CR transferred from oneCS to another CS

    Example Food (US) paired with metronome ticking (CS) to establish first-

    order conditioning

    Food (US)

    Salivation (UR) Eventually, ticking (CS) Salivation (CR)

    Ticking (CS) paired with black square (2nd CS) to establish second-order conditioning Black Square Ticking (CS) Salivation (CR) Eventually, black Square (2nd CS) Salivation (CR) --- despite never being

    paired with food (US) Can also be done (less successfully) with 3rd order

    conditioning Key point: US does not always need to be present to establish

    association; Allows more flexibility in learning opportunities

    14

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    15/45

    Second-Order Classical Conditioning15

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    16/45

    Little Albert & Stimulus Generalization16

    Little Albert (11 months) was afraid ofnothing, except a loud sound made bystriking a steel bar. This made him cry.

    By striking the bar at the same time thatAlbert touched a white rat, the fear

    transferred to the white rat (classicalconditioning).

    After 7 combined stimulations (rat + sound),Albert remained greatly disturbed at thesight of a rat, but the fear also spread to

    include: a white rabbit, cotton, wool, a furcoat, a dog, a Santa Clause mask, and theexperimenters hair.

    The fear did not transfer to his woodenblocks or other objects dissimilar to the rat.

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    17/45

    Generalization and Discrimination

    Generalization: Transfer of the effects ofconditioning to similar stimuli In general, the more similar a stimulus is to the training

    stimulus, the greater its capacity to elicit a conditioned

    response

    Discrimination: Subject responds to a newstimulus differently than he responds to an

    established conditioned stimulus

    17

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    18/45

    Extinction

    Conditioning is not necessarily permanent

    Extinction occurs when the CS is presentedrepeatedly without the US (e.g., bell without food)

    CS no longer signals the US, so conditionedresponding gradually diminishes

    But CS-US association is not erased completely

    Spontaneous recovery

    Rapid Reacquisition

    18

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    19/45

    Spontaneous Recovery

    Spontaneous recovery = reappearance of anextinguished response

    Example: following one day of extinction trails (i.e.,presenting CS without US until no CRs are present),the CR will be present again the following day

    Time is a key factor The more time between 1st and 2nd extinction sessions, the

    more spontaneous recovery is observed

    19

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    20/45

    Extinction & Spontaneous Recovery20

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    21/45

    Rapid Reacquisition

    Conditioning phase extinction phase re-conditioning phase (i.e. reacquisition phase)

    Rate of learning is faster the second time

    Continues to get faster with repeated cycles

    21

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    22/45

    Clinical Applications: Classical Conditioning

    Pair unconditioned stimulus with undesirable behaviorto change the response

    E.g., treating nocturnal enuresis with Mower & Mowers Bell &Pad method

    Bell (US)Wake-up and tighten muscles to prevent urination (UR) Bodily sensations before urinating (CS) alarm bell (US)Wake-up

    and tighten muscles to prevent urination (CR)

    Use extinction to reduce unwanted response to

    conditioned stimulus E.g., decreasing fear response to object of phobia with extinction

    Repeatedly present the rat (CS) without the loud noise (US), untilthe CS no longer results in the CR

    22

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    23/45

    Operant Conditioning

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    24/45

    Learning About the Consequences of Behavior

    Operant conditioning = a procedure for studyinghow organisms learn about the consequences of theirown voluntary behavior

    Realization that our ACTIONS (rather thanconditioned stimuli) lead to outcomes results inoperant conditioning

    By operating on your environment, you canproduce a positive or negative consequence

    24

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    25/45

    Edward Lee Thorndike25

    Studied animal intelligence and learning

    Placed a cat in the puzzle box. It wasencourage to escape to reach a scrap of fish

    Thorndike timed how long it took to escape.The cats experimented with different waysto escape the puzzle box and eventuallywould stumble upon the lever which openedthe cage.

    When the cat had escaped, it was put backin the box and timed as it tried to escape.

    In successive trials, the cats would learnthat pressing the lever would have favorableconsequences, so they became increasinglyquick at pressing the lever

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    26/45

    Thorndikes Law of Effect

    If a response to a particular situation is followed by asatisfying or pleasant consequence, it will bestrengthened.

    If a response to a particular situation is followed byan unsatisfying or unpleasant consequence, it will be

    weakened.

    26

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    27/45

    B.F. Skinner

    Original research Rats in Skinner boxes

    Rats rewarded with food pellet forengaging in specific behaviors

    Basic assumption Voluntary responses are strengthened

    or weakened as a result of theirconsequences

    Discriminative Stimulus: thestimulus situation that sets theoccasion for a response to befollowed by reinforcement orpunishment

    27

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    28/45

    Learning the Association28

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    29/45

    Classical vs. Operant Conditioning29

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    30/45

    The Nature of Reinforcement

    Reinforcement = consequences that INCREASEthe likelihood of the behavior occurring again

    Positive reinforcement = a consequence that, whenpresentedafter a behavior, increases the likelihood of thatbehavior occurring again (e.g., getting an ice cream cone as areward for earning an A on a test)

    Negative reinforcement = a consequence that, when removedafter a behavior, increases the likelihood of that behavioroccurring again (e.g., getting out of chores as a reward forearning an A on a test)

    30

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    31/45

    The Nature of Punishment

    Punishment = consequences that DECREASE thelikelihood of a behavior occurring again

    Positive Punishment: a consequence that, when presentedafter a behavior, decreases the likelihood of that behavioroccurring again (e.g., getting a spanking after hitting your littlesister)

    Negative Punishment: a consequences that, when removedafter a behavior, decreases the likelihood of that behavioroccurring again (e.g., getting time out from the fun activityafter hitting your little sister )

    31

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    32/45

    Schedules of Reinforcement

    Schedule of reinforcement = the rule used by theexperimenter to determine when particular responses

    will be enforced (in order to teach the organism that

    its behavior uniquely predicts the consequence) Continuous reinforcement schedule = consequence

    delivered EVERY time behavior occurs

    Partial Reinforcement schedule = consequence deliveredonly some of the time after the response has occurred

    32

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    33/45

    Partial Reinforcement Schedules

    Fixed ratio vs. Variable ratio: (deals with numberof responsesbefore consequence presented)

    Fixed Ratio = the number of responses required for delivery ofthe consequence does not change (is fixed) across trials

    Variable Ratio = the number of responses required for deliveryof the consequence changes (varies) across trials

    Fixed interval vs. Variable interval: (deals withamount of time before consequence presented) Fixed interval = consequence delivered for the first response

    that occurs following an unchanging (fixed) amount of time

    Variable interval = the allotted time before a response willyield a consequence changes (varies) across trials

    33

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    34/45

    Comparing Reinforcement Schedules34

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    35/45

    Variable Ratio Schedule Hardest to Extinguish35

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    36/45

    Effects on Behavior

    Continuous reinforcement fastest acquisition ofresponse (learning); fastest extinction of response(unlearning)

    Fixed ratio

    fast acquisition; fast extinctionVariable ratio consistent acquisition; slowest

    extinction

    Fixed interval quickly learns to adapt behavior to

    timing; fast extinctionVariable interval consistent acquisition; slower

    extinction

    36

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    37/45

    37

    Operant Conditioning Concepts

    Extinction:When a previously reinforced behaviordecreases in frequency, and eventually ceases altogether,because reinforcement is withheld

    Spontaneous recovery:When an extinguished behavior

    reappears without having been reinforced Generalization:When an individual learns to make a

    particular response to a particular stimulus, and thenmakes the same response in a slightly different situation

    Discrimination:When an individual learns to notice theunique aspects of seemingly similar situations, and thusdevelops different ways of responding

    ** Names are the same as classical conditioning, but concepts are slightly different

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    38/45

    Clinical Application: Operant Conditioning

    Implement continuous reinforcement schedule (in order tofacilitate acquisition of desired behavior), then switch tovariable ratio schedule (in order to protect against extinction)

    Parent Training teach parents how to use operant

    principles to shape childrens behavior

    E.g., children with disruptive behavior disorders

    Praise/reward, Token economy, Time Out, Extinction,Punishment, Contingency management

    Exposure / Response Prevention use negativereinforcement to change patients behavior

    E.g., patients with OCD & other anxiety disorders

    38

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    39/45

    Social Learning

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    40/45

    Learning From Others

    Social (Observational) Learning: Occurs when anorganisms responding (learning) is influenced by theobservation of others, who are called models

    Allows organisms to learn, without requiring their own trialand error experiences

    Modeling occurs when an organism imitates the behavior

    of others

    40

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    41/45

    Albert Bandura

    Conducted the Bobo Doll Experiment tostudy vicarious learning

    Showed nursery school children a film thatportrayed a woman striking, punching, and

    kicking a large, inflatable Bobo doll When later placed in a room full of toys

    (including the Bobo doll), many childrenimitated the woman and violently attackedthe doll

    This was more common when childrenviewed a film in which the woman waspraised (e.g., Youre the champion) forattacking Bobo

    41

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    42/45

    The Model and the Imitators42

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    43/45

    Factors Affecting Social Learning

    Models are more effective when they are: Attractive, honest, competent, and have elevated status

    More likely to imitate models who are successful and/orrewarded for their behavior

    Vicarious reinforcement and vicariouspunishment have effects on behavior that parallelThorndikes Law of Effect

    43

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    44/45

    Clinical Applications: Social Learning

    Skills Training Modeling adaptive behavior as a parent, therapist, etc.

    E.g., teach shy children positive social skills

    Vicarious exposure to adaptive behaviors Show videos or models engaging in desired behavior

    E.g., show child with a dog phobia video of similar childrenplaying with dogs and having fun

    Limiting exposure to maladaptive behaviors Prevent children from seeing others engaging in undesired

    behavior

    E.g., censoring TV shows, movies, video games

    44

  • 7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB

    45/45

    L M E R L O @ U F L . E D U

    Questions?45