learning theories of hb
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
1/45
H U M A N B E H A V I O R
LISA J. MERLO, PH.D.
Learning Theories
http://www.ufl.edu/ -
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
2/45
Objectives
Understand theory of Classical Conditioning
Applications to clinical practice
Understand theory of Operant Conditioning Applications to clinical practice
Understand theory of Social Learning Applications to clinical practice
2
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
3/45
Classical Conditioning
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
4/45
Learning what events signal:
Lightning thunder
Sour-smelling milk bad taste
Unexpected loud noise startle response
Chopping onions tears
The scientific study of simple associations led to thedevelopment of classical conditioning theory
4
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
5/45
Ivan Pavlov5
Russian physiologist studyingthe digestive system
Studied the role of saliva inthe digestive process
Developed method to
measure saliva production
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
6/45
Salivary Conditioning Apparatus6
Gave dog food and recorded salivation while it ate
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
7/45
Pavlovs Saliva Research
Pavlovs Problem: experienced dogs salivatedbefore the food was presented
Pavlovs Theory: Some stimulus that precededthe food presentation had acquired capacity toelicit the response of salivation Dogs were exhibiting a simple type of learning
This type of learning is the foundation forClassical Conditioning
7
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
8/45
Pavlovs Experiments
Pavlov conducted experiments to test his new theoryof learning
Studied the effect of different stimuli on the behaviorof interest (AKA, response)
Animals automatically demonstrated the response afterexposure to some stimuli
Animals did not demonstrate the response after exposure toother stimuli
Animals could be taught to demonstrate the response tosome stimuli by pairing them with others
8
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
9/45
Paradigm of Classical Conditioning
1st: Select a stimulus that automatically elicits acharacteristic response Stimulus =Unconditioned stimulus (US)
Response = Unconditioned response (UR) Unconditioned means the stimulus-response connection is
innate
2nd: Select a Stimulus for Conditioning (CS) Conditioned Stimulus (CS) Can be any reasonable
stimulus that does not initially evoke the UR Conditioned means the stimulus-response connection occurs
only AFTER the conditioning procedure takes place
9
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
10/45
Classical Conditioning & Pavlovs Dogs10
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
11/45
Key Definitions
Unconditioned Stimulus (US) - stimulus whichnaturally triggers a response [food]
Unconditioned Response (UR) - unlearned, naturalresponse to the US [salivating]
Conditioned Stimulus (CS) - previously neutral
stimulus, which eventually triggers a response [bell]
Conditioned Response (CR) - learned response to apreviously neutral stimulus [salivating]
11
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
12/45
Cognitive Factors Are Ignored12
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
13/45
Factors Affecting Classical Conditioning
The CS should be presented BEFORE the US
The US should follow the CS closely in time
Short delay = best
Trace (moderate delay) = more difficult to achieve CR
Long delay = difficult to achieve CR
Simultaneous = much weaker conditioning than short delay
Backward (i.e., US then CS) = usually not effective
The CS should UNIQUELY predict the US It should provide new information suggesting that the US is
about to occur
13
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
14/45
Higher Ordering Conditioning
Second Order Conditioning: CR transferred from oneCS to another CS
Example Food (US) paired with metronome ticking (CS) to establish first-
order conditioning
Food (US)
Salivation (UR) Eventually, ticking (CS) Salivation (CR)
Ticking (CS) paired with black square (2nd CS) to establish second-order conditioning Black Square Ticking (CS) Salivation (CR) Eventually, black Square (2nd CS) Salivation (CR) --- despite never being
paired with food (US) Can also be done (less successfully) with 3rd order
conditioning Key point: US does not always need to be present to establish
association; Allows more flexibility in learning opportunities
14
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
15/45
Second-Order Classical Conditioning15
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
16/45
Little Albert & Stimulus Generalization16
Little Albert (11 months) was afraid ofnothing, except a loud sound made bystriking a steel bar. This made him cry.
By striking the bar at the same time thatAlbert touched a white rat, the fear
transferred to the white rat (classicalconditioning).
After 7 combined stimulations (rat + sound),Albert remained greatly disturbed at thesight of a rat, but the fear also spread to
include: a white rabbit, cotton, wool, a furcoat, a dog, a Santa Clause mask, and theexperimenters hair.
The fear did not transfer to his woodenblocks or other objects dissimilar to the rat.
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
17/45
Generalization and Discrimination
Generalization: Transfer of the effects ofconditioning to similar stimuli In general, the more similar a stimulus is to the training
stimulus, the greater its capacity to elicit a conditioned
response
Discrimination: Subject responds to a newstimulus differently than he responds to an
established conditioned stimulus
17
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
18/45
Extinction
Conditioning is not necessarily permanent
Extinction occurs when the CS is presentedrepeatedly without the US (e.g., bell without food)
CS no longer signals the US, so conditionedresponding gradually diminishes
But CS-US association is not erased completely
Spontaneous recovery
Rapid Reacquisition
18
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
19/45
Spontaneous Recovery
Spontaneous recovery = reappearance of anextinguished response
Example: following one day of extinction trails (i.e.,presenting CS without US until no CRs are present),the CR will be present again the following day
Time is a key factor The more time between 1st and 2nd extinction sessions, the
more spontaneous recovery is observed
19
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
20/45
Extinction & Spontaneous Recovery20
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
21/45
Rapid Reacquisition
Conditioning phase extinction phase re-conditioning phase (i.e. reacquisition phase)
Rate of learning is faster the second time
Continues to get faster with repeated cycles
21
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
22/45
Clinical Applications: Classical Conditioning
Pair unconditioned stimulus with undesirable behaviorto change the response
E.g., treating nocturnal enuresis with Mower & Mowers Bell &Pad method
Bell (US)Wake-up and tighten muscles to prevent urination (UR) Bodily sensations before urinating (CS) alarm bell (US)Wake-up
and tighten muscles to prevent urination (CR)
Use extinction to reduce unwanted response to
conditioned stimulus E.g., decreasing fear response to object of phobia with extinction
Repeatedly present the rat (CS) without the loud noise (US), untilthe CS no longer results in the CR
22
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
23/45
Operant Conditioning
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
24/45
Learning About the Consequences of Behavior
Operant conditioning = a procedure for studyinghow organisms learn about the consequences of theirown voluntary behavior
Realization that our ACTIONS (rather thanconditioned stimuli) lead to outcomes results inoperant conditioning
By operating on your environment, you canproduce a positive or negative consequence
24
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
25/45
Edward Lee Thorndike25
Studied animal intelligence and learning
Placed a cat in the puzzle box. It wasencourage to escape to reach a scrap of fish
Thorndike timed how long it took to escape.The cats experimented with different waysto escape the puzzle box and eventuallywould stumble upon the lever which openedthe cage.
When the cat had escaped, it was put backin the box and timed as it tried to escape.
In successive trials, the cats would learnthat pressing the lever would have favorableconsequences, so they became increasinglyquick at pressing the lever
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
26/45
Thorndikes Law of Effect
If a response to a particular situation is followed by asatisfying or pleasant consequence, it will bestrengthened.
If a response to a particular situation is followed byan unsatisfying or unpleasant consequence, it will be
weakened.
26
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
27/45
B.F. Skinner
Original research Rats in Skinner boxes
Rats rewarded with food pellet forengaging in specific behaviors
Basic assumption Voluntary responses are strengthened
or weakened as a result of theirconsequences
Discriminative Stimulus: thestimulus situation that sets theoccasion for a response to befollowed by reinforcement orpunishment
27
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
28/45
Learning the Association28
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
29/45
Classical vs. Operant Conditioning29
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
30/45
The Nature of Reinforcement
Reinforcement = consequences that INCREASEthe likelihood of the behavior occurring again
Positive reinforcement = a consequence that, whenpresentedafter a behavior, increases the likelihood of thatbehavior occurring again (e.g., getting an ice cream cone as areward for earning an A on a test)
Negative reinforcement = a consequence that, when removedafter a behavior, increases the likelihood of that behavioroccurring again (e.g., getting out of chores as a reward forearning an A on a test)
30
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
31/45
The Nature of Punishment
Punishment = consequences that DECREASE thelikelihood of a behavior occurring again
Positive Punishment: a consequence that, when presentedafter a behavior, decreases the likelihood of that behavioroccurring again (e.g., getting a spanking after hitting your littlesister)
Negative Punishment: a consequences that, when removedafter a behavior, decreases the likelihood of that behavioroccurring again (e.g., getting time out from the fun activityafter hitting your little sister )
31
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
32/45
Schedules of Reinforcement
Schedule of reinforcement = the rule used by theexperimenter to determine when particular responses
will be enforced (in order to teach the organism that
its behavior uniquely predicts the consequence) Continuous reinforcement schedule = consequence
delivered EVERY time behavior occurs
Partial Reinforcement schedule = consequence deliveredonly some of the time after the response has occurred
32
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
33/45
Partial Reinforcement Schedules
Fixed ratio vs. Variable ratio: (deals with numberof responsesbefore consequence presented)
Fixed Ratio = the number of responses required for delivery ofthe consequence does not change (is fixed) across trials
Variable Ratio = the number of responses required for deliveryof the consequence changes (varies) across trials
Fixed interval vs. Variable interval: (deals withamount of time before consequence presented) Fixed interval = consequence delivered for the first response
that occurs following an unchanging (fixed) amount of time
Variable interval = the allotted time before a response willyield a consequence changes (varies) across trials
33
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
34/45
Comparing Reinforcement Schedules34
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
35/45
Variable Ratio Schedule Hardest to Extinguish35
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
36/45
Effects on Behavior
Continuous reinforcement fastest acquisition ofresponse (learning); fastest extinction of response(unlearning)
Fixed ratio
fast acquisition; fast extinctionVariable ratio consistent acquisition; slowest
extinction
Fixed interval quickly learns to adapt behavior to
timing; fast extinctionVariable interval consistent acquisition; slower
extinction
36
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
37/45
37
Operant Conditioning Concepts
Extinction:When a previously reinforced behaviordecreases in frequency, and eventually ceases altogether,because reinforcement is withheld
Spontaneous recovery:When an extinguished behavior
reappears without having been reinforced Generalization:When an individual learns to make a
particular response to a particular stimulus, and thenmakes the same response in a slightly different situation
Discrimination:When an individual learns to notice theunique aspects of seemingly similar situations, and thusdevelops different ways of responding
** Names are the same as classical conditioning, but concepts are slightly different
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
38/45
Clinical Application: Operant Conditioning
Implement continuous reinforcement schedule (in order tofacilitate acquisition of desired behavior), then switch tovariable ratio schedule (in order to protect against extinction)
Parent Training teach parents how to use operant
principles to shape childrens behavior
E.g., children with disruptive behavior disorders
Praise/reward, Token economy, Time Out, Extinction,Punishment, Contingency management
Exposure / Response Prevention use negativereinforcement to change patients behavior
E.g., patients with OCD & other anxiety disorders
38
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
39/45
Social Learning
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
40/45
Learning From Others
Social (Observational) Learning: Occurs when anorganisms responding (learning) is influenced by theobservation of others, who are called models
Allows organisms to learn, without requiring their own trialand error experiences
Modeling occurs when an organism imitates the behavior
of others
40
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
41/45
Albert Bandura
Conducted the Bobo Doll Experiment tostudy vicarious learning
Showed nursery school children a film thatportrayed a woman striking, punching, and
kicking a large, inflatable Bobo doll When later placed in a room full of toys
(including the Bobo doll), many childrenimitated the woman and violently attackedthe doll
This was more common when childrenviewed a film in which the woman waspraised (e.g., Youre the champion) forattacking Bobo
41
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
42/45
The Model and the Imitators42
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
43/45
Factors Affecting Social Learning
Models are more effective when they are: Attractive, honest, competent, and have elevated status
More likely to imitate models who are successful and/orrewarded for their behavior
Vicarious reinforcement and vicariouspunishment have effects on behavior that parallelThorndikes Law of Effect
43
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
44/45
Clinical Applications: Social Learning
Skills Training Modeling adaptive behavior as a parent, therapist, etc.
E.g., teach shy children positive social skills
Vicarious exposure to adaptive behaviors Show videos or models engaging in desired behavior
E.g., show child with a dog phobia video of similar childrenplaying with dogs and having fun
Limiting exposure to maladaptive behaviors Prevent children from seeing others engaging in undesired
behavior
E.g., censoring TV shows, movies, video games
44
-
7/30/2019 Learning Theories of HB
45/45
L M E R L O @ U F L . E D U
Questions?45