learning using virtual worlds

Learning using Virtual Worlds

http://www.flickr.com/photos/rebecca_ashbourne/2880794104/

Saturday, 13 September 2014

The big question?Saturday, 13 September 2014

Virtual World Watch

#wnaef(What Next After Eduserv Funding)


Brief history

• First snapshot: end of 2006-07 academic year...

• ...unexpected interest.

• Seven snapshots to date.

• Presentations; Flickr group; a few articles and papers.

• Difficult without data from the community.

• Jolly good fun.http://www.flickr.com/photos/rooreynolds/493792832/


Though not smooth sailing

• Ongoing experiment, dithering, in “best dissemination”:- Andy: A Wiki!- Pete: XHTML!- John: Podcasts!

• Data collection tricky; “Find” (forthcoming presentation).

• Trying to stay neutral and objective about a fiercely polarising, hyped and dismissed technology.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/rooreynolds/493812509/


Virtual World Watch through 2010

• More “stuff” on website.

• Presentations.

• VWW book.

(Core work) snapshots:

• #8: March 15th

• #9: June 20th

• #10: December 12th

http://www.flickr.com/photos/andypowe11/1142157793/


Trends

• Core group of UK practitioners (you the audience!) has grown steadily, though not rapidly.

• Several universities e.g. Edinburgh, Open, Leicester using virtual worlds for several years.

• Much development is still voluntary, some internally funded, some externally.

• A gradual movement from ‘building things’ to ‘using things’.

• US take-up of virtual worlds in education is happening much quicker than in the UK.


University of Texas

https://blogs.secondlife.com/community/learninginworld


UK subject areas where VWs are used

• Nursing and medical training.

• Biosciences.

• Midwifery and maternity.

• Languages (especially Spanish).

• Criminology and forensics.

• Art and design.

• Computer science.http://www.flickr.com/photos/kattanhurnung/4115602444/


Virtual worldsThe Good, the Bad and the Ferdinand


“You start with a box...”


Tutorial, Learning Team, University of Nottingham


Do your own thing

• Huge control over the environment you and the students are in.

• You are the admin.

• Participate and share.

• (Though not that much control over the students - but good thing?)

• You have total choice over how you represent yourself.


Choose your mode of communication

• Text

• IM

• Voice

• Video

• Audio

• Gestures

• ... and record


Looking for the comms silver bullet

“For me, and I say this with a certain amount of hindsight, the most valuable and fun experiences in Second Life were those associated with meetings and events (particularly hybrid RL/SL events).

Yet, as a platform for collaboration and communication, SL sucks in many respects. This is partly a personal view, but I know from having stood up in meetings and said this that others agree with me, voice destroys the immersive aspects of SL yet chat is hopeless for most kinds of serious conversation.”

http://artfossett.blogspot.com/2009_06_01_archive.html


http://www.flickr.com/photos/garyhayes/sets/72157607567112139/

It’s not just Second Life, you know...


“It’s just sex sex sex...”

Yes, there’s “sex” in virtual worlds.

•We know this. Boring.

•It’s in all aspects of life.

•Obsession with some people about sex in all media (jealous?).

•It can be avoided - if you want to avoid it.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/avastar/380075372/


Obsession with accesses, users

• Does it really matter how many people ‘use’ a virtual world, or are logged in at the same time?

• This room (RL) is empty for most of any 24 hours. Is it therefore useless?

• What really matters:- is it viable for learning?- what resources are needed- re-use- assessing learning usability- curriculum ‘fit’

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrfrans/2298355950/


http://www.flickr.com/photos/raftwetjewell/2598601770/


“Just do it” (as Nike say)

“If it works, then use it. If it doesn’t work,

then use something else. Easy! You Brits

like to drink tea and whine and argue

about everything, don’t you?”

Discussion of Second Life amongst Michigan academics, December 2009.


...and the Ferdinand?

Typical UK academic Second Life practitioner:

•Outspoken.

•Keen to share stuff created in virtual worlds.

•Not averse to trying other, non-SL virtual worlds.

•Provides opinionated, readable content for snapshots (thanks).

http://twitter.com/FrancinoF


Search


Universities and colleges

(Depends how you count them)

•“122” universities. Sort of.

•Many more colleges.

•Other institutions somewhere in between.

•Degrees, vocational ...

•Overseas universities with colleges here.

http://www.scit.wlv.ac.uk/ukinfo/


Needle in a (virtual) haystack


University search (educational)


More search unhappiness

http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2010/01/17/whatever-happened-to-second-life-your-reaction/


Comparing (badly) with web search

“Can you imagine if our web browsers

sent us around the Internet with the

same dysfunctional mob randomness

as the current method of finding stuff

in Second Life?”

Jeremy Kemp, SLED mailing list, Saturday December 19th, 2009


Finding “stuff” is (sometimes) easier


Research


Who needs research results?

• Researchers, for their careers.

• Mass media, for mangling into news stories.

• Funding bodies, to see the results of what they have funded.

• Universities, to get more money.

• Virtual World companies, to get evidence that their product is useful in education.

• Practitioners, needing:- validity that VWs are a useful technology in learning- comparisons with other technologies for learning- information on how best to use VWs


Types of research ‘output’ include:

• Peer-reviewed papers - now a substantial amount, but of extremely variable quality.

• Blogs.

• Media articles.

• YouTube and Flickr.

• Workshops and Conferences.

• ‘Stuff’ built in-world(s).http://www.flickr.com/photos/ravenelle/461959468/


But how to test?

• Near impossible to test quantitatively (unless you know different?)

• Subject areas using VWs difficult to test. Who wants to be the midwife in the ‘control group’ for birth trials?

• Many of the skills acquired in using VWs are not curriculum based e.g. collaborative work, visualisation.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/adamraoof/3512627144/


Example of data capture

“Students’ and tutors’ personal experience of using

SL for teaching and learning and their engagement

with SL-tivities were captured by semi-structured

interviews, chat logs and researchers’ notes of

observations at each SL session.”

Final report, JISC-funded MOOSE project: http://www.le.ac.uk/beyonddistance/moose/


Open Habitat conclusions regular...

Overall the project was a successful exploration of the use of MUVEs for teaching and learning. Some aspects worked smoothly:

•The use of OpenSim.

•Using Second Life as a place for Art and Design students to be creative.

•Using Second Life to give a strong sense of social presence for the Philosophy students. One commented:

“Second Life is particularly useful in creating shared spaces where people feel more a part of the tutorial/discussion environment.”


...and the downsides

Other aspects were more problematic:

•The need for students to learn relatively quickly how to operate at a basic level within Second Life.

•The practical working-out of close collaboration in Second Life.

•The use of Second Life to discuss complex aspects of philosophy using a seminar format.

•The lack of non-verbal cues in Second Life and generic problems with using text chat.


Trite, over-simplified, VWW thoughts

1. Yes, Virtual Worlds can be useful in some, specific, subject areas and applications. The academic community is slowly working out what those are, and also where it’s not useful.

2.There’s a bunch of non-curriculum applications in academia e.g. communicating with remote PhD students, attending events without leaving home.

3.But there’s a cost (tho’ isn’t there for all technologies?) - a large one - in terms of time, effort, dedication required.

4.For a number of reasons, VWs are not widely accepted. Don’t expect universal love for doing this. Keep calm and modify avatars. Producing good evidence helps.


“What next” predictions


In the short term (1)

• Second Life, Open Sim and related will be around for a while yet. 6.5 years and counting; that’s a *long* time ...

• More virtual worlds will appear. Some will stay. Some will fail. Much as has happened over the last few years.

• Other virtual worlds will struggle to stay head-to-head with SL (and compatible worlds) when it comes to education; due to the amount of momentum.

• (Inevitably) rising travel costs will mean SL and similar platforms used more for academic distance events and collaboration.


In the short term (2)

• Some people will try it and not be comfortable, or find a use for it. Some will hear negative stuff about it and not try it. (Shrug) so ... it’s like other technologies?

• More academics, often volunteers, will find more niche/narrow subject areas that virtual worlds are suited towards. However, much less use for broader subject applications.

• Virtual World developments in UK academia less affected by funding cuts as so much of it is voluntary anyway (that’s both a good and a bad thing).

• Information and research will continue to dribble out in a fragmented manner.


In the long term...

How the hell should I know?

(Look, did any of you honestly predict that Twitter would have academics mass-sending 140 character tweets? Hmm?)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/benleto/3378813255/


Your experience ... and how it relates to virtual world use in the future

• Geoff Barker-Read, University of Leeds

• Andy Beggan, University of Nottingham

• Simon Bignell, University of Derby

• Manuel Frutos-Perez, University of the West of England

• Annabeth Robinson, Leeds College of Art

• Kathryn Trinder, Glasgow Caledonian University


learning using virtual worlds

Education