lecture 21: ecological restoration: nature vs....
TRANSCRIPT
Lecture 21: Ecological Restoration: Nature vs. Artifact
• Elliot’s argument: Restorations as “counterfeits”
• Katz’s argument: Restorations as “artifacts”
• Critique of Katz
Friday, December 6, 2013
Topics
• Elliot’s argument: Restorations as “counterfeits”
• Katz’s argument: Restorations as “artifacts”
• Critique of Katz
Friday, December 6, 2013
Nature vs. Artifact• Elliot, Robert. 1982. ‘Faking Nature’. Inquiry 25: 81-93
• Katz, Eric. 1992. ‘The Big Lie: Human Restoration of Nature’. Research in Philosophy and Technology 12: 231-241
• Both Elliot and Katz believe that a “restored” ecosystem will never possess the value of the original, and, in some cases, it may simply denigrate it further
Friday, December 6, 2013
Critics of Restoration
• Elliot, Robert. 1982. ‘Faking Nature’. Inquiry 25: 81-93
• Analogy between restored ecosystem and art forgery
Friday, December 6, 2013
Starry NightVan Gogh
1889
Friday, December 6, 2013
Starry NightVan Gogh
1889
PerfectReplica
Friday, December 6, 2013
Starry NightVan Gogh
1889
PerfectReplica
Friday, December 6, 2013
Disney Wilderness Lodge
Friday, December 6, 2013
Critics of Restoration
• Elliot, Robert. 1982. ‘Faking Nature’. Inquiry 25: 81-93
• The value of a natural landscape is not only in the features that are immediately visible to us, but rather, in its continuity with the past and its freedom from human manipulation
• No matter how ‘perfect’ a restoration, the value of the original nature can’t be recovered
Friday, December 6, 2013
Topics
• Elliot’s argument: Restorations as “counterfeits”
• Katz’s argument: Restorations as “artifacts”
• Critique of Katz
Friday, December 6, 2013
Critics of Restoration
• Katz, Eric. 1992. ‘The Big Lie: Human Restoration of Nature’. Research in Philosophy and Technology 12: 231-241
• “Nature restoration” is a contradiction in terms
Natural System Artifact
Human Manipulation
Friday, December 6, 2013
ConservationBiology
RestorationEcology
EnvironmentalManagement
Conservation and Restoration
Merely protecting habitats Artificially changing habitats
Friday, December 6, 2013
Katz on Restoration
• “Natural individuals were not designed for a purpose. They lack intrinsic functions, making them different from human-created artifacts.”
Katz, E. 1992. “The Big Lie: Human Restoration of Nature”. Research in Philosophy and Technology 12:231-241, p. 235.
Friday, December 6, 2013
Katz on Restoration
• “As Andrew Brennan has argued, natural entities have no ‘intrinsic functions,’ as he calls them, for they were not the result of design. They were not created for a particular purpose; they have no set manner of use.”
Katz, E. 1992. “The Big Lie: Human Restoration of Nature”. Research in Philosophy and Technology 12:231-241, p. 235.
Friday, December 6, 2013
Katz on Restoration
• “Although we often speak as if natural individuals (for example, predators) have roles to play [functions to perform] in ecosystemic well-being (the maintenance of optimum population levels), this kind of talk is either metaphorical or fallacious. No one created or designed the mountain lion as a regulator of the deer population.”
Katz, E. 1992. “The Big Lie: Human Restoration of Nature”. Research in Philosophy and Technology 12:231-241, p. 235.
Friday, December 6, 2013
Concept of Function in Katz
• The concept of function plays a dual role:
• Tells us what is philosophically distinctive about artifacts
• Explains how the realms of artifact and nature are mutually exclusive
Friday, December 6, 2013
Katz on Restoration• “But once we begin to redesign
natural systems and processes, once we begin to create restored natural environments, we impose our anthropocentric purposes on areas that exist outside human society...Depending on the adequacy of our technology, these restored and redesigned natural areas will appear more or less natural, but they will never be natural - they will be anthropocentrically designed human artifacts. ”
Katz, E. 1992. “The Big Lie: Human Restoration of Nature”. Research in Philosophy and Technology 12:231-241, p. 235.
Friday, December 6, 2013
Topics
• Elliot’s argument: Restorations as “counterfeits”
• Katz’s argument: Restorations as “artifacts”
• Critique of Katz
Friday, December 6, 2013
Two problems
1. Just because something is the product of intention, that doesn’t mean it’s merely an ‘artifact’.
• Babies
• Friendships
• Show poodles and fighting dogs
Friday, December 6, 2013
Two problems
2. Even if a restored ecosystem is just an ‘artifact’, does that mean its worthless, or that it has less value than the natural ecosystem?
• My wedding ring
• A thriving ecosystem that can harbor diversity seems better than a destroyed one that can’t.
Friday, December 6, 2013
ConservationBiology
RestorationEcology
EnvironmentalManagement
Conservation and Restoration
Merely protecting habitats Artificially changing habitats
Friday, December 6, 2013
Conservation and Restoration
• This view is theoretically problematic as well as counterproductive.
• Theoretically, it relies on a questionable ‘dualism’ between human action and the natural processes (or ‘nature’ and ‘artifact’).
• Practically, it would rob environmental planners of crucial tools for meeting challenges. Mid-October 2010; Bay Jimmy, Louisiana
Friday, December 6, 2013