lecture 4: ethernet and wireless local area networks
TRANSCRIPT
Ethernet and WirelessLocal Area Networks
2
History of Ethernet Standards
Ethernet The dominant wired LAN technology today
Only “competitor” is wireless LANs (which actually are supplementary)
The IEEE 802 Committee LAN standards development is done primarily by the
Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
IEEE created the 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee for LAN standards (the 802 Committee)
3
History of Ethernet Standards
The 802 Committee creates working groups for specific types of standards
802.1 for general standards
802.3 for Ethernet standardsThe terms 802.3 and Ethernet are interchangeable
802.11 for wireless LAN standards
802.16 for WiMax wireless metropolitan area network standards
4
Ethernet Physical Layer Standards
UTP PhysicalLayer
Standards
MediumRequired
MaximumRun
LengthSpeed
100BASE-TX 4-pair Category 5 or higher100 meters100 Mbps
1000BASE-T(GigabitEthernet)
4-pair Category 5 or higher100 meters1,000 Mbps
10BASE-T 4-pair Category 3 or higher100 meters10 Mbps
100BASE-TX dominates access links today.
Although 1000BASE-T is growing in access links today
5
Fiber PhysicalLayer
Standards
Medium850 nm light (inexpensive)
Multimode fiber
MaximumRun
Length
Speed
1000BASE-SX 275 m1 Gbps
1000BASE-SX 500 m1 Gbps
1000BASE-SX 220 m1 Gbps
1000BASE-SX 550 m1 Gbps
Ethernet Physical Layer Standards
62.5microns
160MHz-km
62.5 200
50 400
50 500
The 1000BASE-SX standard dominates trunk links today.
Carriers use 1310 and 1550 nm light and single-mode fiber.
6
Gigabit Ethernet
10 Gbps Ethernet usage is small but growing Several 10 Gbps 10GBASE-x fiber standards are
defined, but none is dominant
Copper is cheaper than fiber but cannot go as far
100 Gbps has been selected as the next Ethernet speed Chosen over 40 Gbps
100 Gbps Ethernet standards development is just getting underway
7
Data Link Using Multiple Switches
OriginalSignal
ReceivedSignal
ReceivedSignal
ReceivedSignalRegenerated
SignalRegenerated
Signal
UTP UTP62.5/125Multimode Fiber
100BASE-TX(100 m maximum)
Physical Link
100BASE-TX(100 m maximum)
Physical Link
1000BASE-SX(220 m maximum)
Physical Link
Each trunk line along the way has a distance limit
8
Multi-Switch Ethernet LAN Architecture
Switch 2 (root switch)
Switch 1 Switch 3
Port 5 on Switch 1to Port 3 on Switch 2
Port 7 on Switch 2to Port 4 on Switch 3
C3-2D-55-3B-A9-4FSwitch 2, Port 5
A1-44-D5-1F-AA-4CSwitch 1, Port 2
D4-55-C4-B6-9FSwitch 3, Port 2
B2-CD-13-5B-E4-65Switch 1, Port 7
E5-BB-47-21-D3-56Switch 3, Port 6
9
Single Point of Failure in a Switch Hierarchy
No CommunicationNo Communication
Switch 1
Switch 2
Switch 3
Switch Fails
A1-44-D5-1F-AA-4C
B2-CD-13-5B-E4-65
C3-2D-55-3B-A9-4F
D4-47-55-C4-B6-9F
E5-BB-47-21-D3-56
10
Hierarchy Implications
Single possible path between stations.
Makes switching tables very simple because there is only one possible row for each address. Find the row, send the frame out the indicated port. Very fast, so minimizes switching cost.
Creates the potential for single points of failure.
Low cost is responsible for Ethernet’s LAN dominance.
Port Station 2 A1-44-D5-1F-AA-4C7 B2-CD-13-5B-E4-655 E5-BB-47-21-D3-56
11
Switch Operation in Ethernet
Today, Switches Dominate in Ethernet A frame comes in one port
The switch looks up the frame’s destination MAC address in the switching table
The switch sends the frame out a single port
Only two ports are tied up
Other conversations can take place on other port pairs simultaneously
12
Ethernet 802.3 10Base2
Ethernet 10Base2
To NextStation
T-Connector to Link NIC to next segments
NIC
13
Ethernet 802.3 10Base2
Ethernet 10Base2
BNC connector
T-connectorTo nextstation
14
Client A
Client B
Client C
Server D Server E
Serverbroadcast
Virtual LAN with Ethernet Switches
Server broadcasting without VLANS
Frame is BroadcastGoes to all other stationsCreates congestion
15
Virtual LAN with Ethernet Switches
Server multicasting with VLANS
Client Aon VLAN1
Client Bon VLAN2
Client Con VLAN1
Server Don VLAN2
Serverbroadcast
With VLANs,broadcasts go to a
server’s VLAN clients; less latency
Multicasting (some), not Broadcasting (all)
NONO
Server Eon VLAN1
16
Handling Momentary Traffic Peaks with Overprovisioning and Priority
Traffic
Network capacity
Momentary traffic peak:Congestion and latency
Time
Momentary traffic peak:Congestion and latency
Momentary traffic peaks usually last fraction of a second;They occasionally exceed the network’s capacity.
When they do, frames will be delayed, even dropped.
17
Handling Momentary Traffic Peaks with Overprovisioning and Priority
Traffic
Overprovisioned network capacity Momentary peak:No congestion
Time
Overprovisioned traffic capacity in Ethernet
Overprovisioning:Build high capacity than will rarely if ever be exceeded.This wastes capacity. But cheaper than using priority.
18
Handling Momentary Traffic Peaks with Overprovisioning and Priority
Traffic
Network capacity
Momentarypeak
Time
Priority in Ethernet
High-priority traffic goesLow-priority waits
Priority: During momentary peaks, give priority totraffic that is intolerant of delay, such as voice.
No need to overprovision, but expensive to implement.Ongoing management is very expensive.
19
Routed LAN with Ethernet Subnets
If a routed LAN links multiple Ethernet switched
networks, the switched networks are called subnets
Wireless LANs
21
Local Wireless Technologies
802.11 Wireless LANs (Wi-Fi)
Today, mostly speeds of tens of megabits per second with distances of 30 to 100 meters or more
Can serve many users in a home or office
Increasingly,100 Mbps to 600 Mbps with 802.11n
Organizations can provide coverage throughout a building or a university campus by installing many access points
22
802.11 Wireless LANs (WLANs)
Wireless hosts connectby radio to access pointsWireless hosts connect
by radio to access points
Transmission speed: up to 300 Mbps but usually 10 Mbps to 100 Mbps.Distances between station and access point: 300 to 100 meters.
Transmission speed: up to 300 Mbps but usually 10 Mbps to 100 Mbps.Distances between station and access point: 300 to 100 meters.
23
Wireless Access Points and NICs
24
Typical 802.11 Wireless LAN Operation with Wireless Access Points
802.11 uses a different frame format than 802.3
The access point translatesbetween the two frame formats
However, the packet goes all theway between the two hosts
25
Hosts and Access Points Transmit in a Single Channel
The access point and all the hosts it serverstransmit in a single channel
If two devices transmit at the same time,their signals will collide, becoming unreasonable
Media access control (MAC) methodsgovern when a device may transmit;
It only lets one device transmit at a time
26
Media Access Control (MAC)
MAC methods govern when devices transmit so that only one station or the access point can transmit at a time
To control access (transmission), two methods can be used
CSMA/CA+ACK (mandatory)
RTS/CTS (optional unless 802.11b and g stations share an 802.11g access point)
27
CSMA/CA+ACK in 802.11 Wireless LANs
CSMA/CA (Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance) Sender listens for traffic
1. If there is traffic, waits 2. If there is no traffic:
2a. If there has been no traffic for less than the critical time value, waits a random amount of time, then returns to Step 1.
2b, If there has been no traffic for more than the critical value for time, sends without waiting
This avoids collision that would result if hosts could transmit as soon as one host finishes transmitting
28
CSMA/CA + ACK in 802.11 Wireless LANs
ACK (Acknowledgement)
Receiver immediately sends back an acknowledgement; no waiting because ACKs have highest priority.
If sender does not receive the acknowledgement, retransmits the frame using CSMA/CA.
802.11 with CSMA/CA+ACK is a reliable protocol!
29
Request to Send/Clear to Send
30
Specific 802.11 Wireless LAN Standards
Characteristic 802.11
802.11a 802.11b 802.11g 802.11g with
802.11b
802.11n
Rated Speed 2 Mbps
54 Mbps
11 Mbps
54 Mbps
Not Speci-
fied
100 Mbps to
300 MbpsActual Throughput, 3 m
1 Mbps
25 Mbps
6 Mbps 25 Mbps
12 Mbps
Closer to rated speed than
earlier standards
Actual Throughput, 30 m
? 12 Mbps
6 Mbps 20 Mbps
11 Mbps
High at longer
distances
31
Specific 802.11 Wireless LAN Standards
Characteristic 802.11 802.11a 802.11b 802.11g 802.11g with
802.11b
802.11n
Unlicensed Band
2.4 GHz
5 GHz
2.4 GHz
2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz
2.4 GHz and
5 GHzRemarks Dead
and gone
Little market accep-tance
Bloomed briefly
Today’s dominant 802.11
standard
Get rid of old
802.11b
equip.
Greater speed and
distance
32
Specific 802.11 Wireless LAN Standards
802.11g Most popular 802.11 standard today
54 Mbps rated speed with much slower throughput
Generally sufficient for Web browsing
Inexpensive
All access points support it
33
802.11n
Under development
Rated speeds of 100 Mbps to 600 Mbps
Will operate in both the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands
May use twice current bandwidth per channel (~20 MHz) to roughly double speed
Currently a draft standard
A bit of overkill for most users
34
Bluetooth Personal Area Networks (PANs)
Bluetooth is standardized by a consortium
Connect devices on or near a single user’s desk PC, Printer, PDA, Laptop, Cellphone
Connect devices on or near a single user’s body Laptop, Printer, PDA, Cellphone
The goal is cable elimination
35
Bluetooth PANs
There may be multiple PANs in an area May overlap
PANs are called piconets
36
Bluetooth PAN Operation
File synchronization
Client PCslave
Notebookmaster
Printer slavePrinting
Call through companyphone System
Cellphonemaster
Telephone slave
Piconet 1
Piconet 2
Note: Printeris in bothpiconets;Slave has
two masters.
37
802.11 versus Bluetooth PANs
Focus
Speed
802.11 Bluetooth
Large WLANs Personal Area Network
11 Mbps to 54 MbpsIn both directions
722 kbps with backchannel of 56 kbps.
May increase.
Distance100 meters for 802.11b(but shorter in reality)
Even shorter of 802.11a
Numberof devices in
an area
Limited in practice onlyby bandwidth and traffic
Only 10 piconets,each with8 devicesmaximum
10 meters.May increase
38
802.11 versus Bluetooth PANs
Scalability
Cost
Battery Drain
802.11 Bluetooth
Good through havingmultiple access points
Poor(but may get
access points)
Probably higher Probably Lower
Higher Lower
Profiles No Yes
Profiles allow specific products to work together. Different profiles for printing, cordless telephones, headsets, etc. Must be implemented on both master and slave.
39
Bluetooth PANS
Trends
Bluetooth Alliance is enhancing Bluetooth
The next version of Bluetooth is likely to grow to use ultrawideband transmission
This should raise speed to 100 Mbps (or more)
Transmission distance will remain limited to 10 meters
Good for distributing television within a house
40
Emerging Local Wireless Technologies
In mesh wireless networks, the access points do all routingThere is no need for a wired network
The 802.11s standard for mesh networking is under developmentThis P2P networking needs high density of devices
In mesh wireless networks, the access points do all routingThere is no need for a wired network
The 802.11s standard for mesh networking is under developmentThis P2P networking needs high density of devices
41
Emerging Local Wireless Technologies
Can be focused electronically to give better receptionCan be focused electronically to give better reception
42
Emerging Local Wireless Technologies
Ultrawideband (UWB)
Uses channels that are several gigahertz wide
Each UWB channel spans multiple frequency bands
Low power per hertz to avoid interference with other services
Wide bandwidth gives very high speeds
But limited to short distance and ideal for video networking at home
Wireless USB provides 480 Mbps up to 3 meters, 110 Mbps up to 10 meters
43
Emerging Local Wireless Technologies
ZigBee for almost-always-off sensor networks
Very low speeds (250 kbps maximum)
Very long battery life (months or years)
At the other end of the performance spectrum from UWB
44
Emerging Local Wireless Technologies
RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) Tags Like UPC tags but readable remotely
In most cases, the radio signal from the reader provides power for the RFID tag
The RFID tag uses this power to send information about itself
Battery-operated RFID tags can send farther and send more information
30-500 KHz, short distances, for supermarket scanning and inventory control
850-950 MHz, large distances, higher speed, for automated toll collection
45
Emerging Local Wireless Technologies
Software-Defined Radio
Can implement multiple wireless protocols
No need to have separate radio circuits for each protocol
Reduces the cost of multi-protocol devices