lecture # 5 cassandra paul physics 7a summer session ii 2008
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Lecture # 5 Cassandra Paul Physics 7A Summer Session II 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cb05503460f949754ad/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Lecture # 5
Cassandra PaulPhysics 7A
Summer Session II 2008
![Page 2: Lecture # 5 Cassandra Paul Physics 7A Summer Session II 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cb05503460f949754ad/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
• Quickly discuss ‘the race’• Ideal gases• What is Lennard-Jones/Pair-wise potential?• Particle Model of Bond Energy
![Page 3: Lecture # 5 Cassandra Paul Physics 7A Summer Session II 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cb05503460f949754ad/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The ‘Race’ Explained….
![Page 4: Lecture # 5 Cassandra Paul Physics 7A Summer Session II 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cb05503460f949754ad/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
M1M1
m1m1
Case 1
Case 2M2
m2
+d
-d
KEtransSpeed
PEgravityHeight
KEtransSpeed
PEgravityHeight
½ M1 (vf2-0) +M1g(hf-0)+ ½ m1 (vf
2-0) +m1g(hf-0)=0
½ M1 vf2 +M1g(-d)+ ½ m1vf
2 + m1g(d)=0
(M1+m1)½vf2 + (m1-M1)gd =0
Combining PE and KE terms
PE’s are the same for both systems (mass difference is the same)
So KE’s must be the same for both systems
But… M+m is bigger for case 1, therefore: vf must be smaller to make up for it!
M1 M2 m2m1
![Page 5: Lecture # 5 Cassandra Paul Physics 7A Summer Session II 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cb05503460f949754ad/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Ideal Gas
• In Intro Chemistry we always dealt with ‘Ideal’ gasses. What does that actually mean?
• Ideal gases:– Have no intermolecular forces– Have perfectly elastic collisions with each other
(and the sides of containers)
![Page 6: Lecture # 5 Cassandra Paul Physics 7A Summer Session II 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cb05503460f949754ad/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Like Billiards or Jezzball
![Page 7: Lecture # 5 Cassandra Paul Physics 7A Summer Session II 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cb05503460f949754ad/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
What was the point of the N2 Activity?
• What did we calculate?• Spacing of atoms is about 10σ.• At what point of the pair-wise potential do
atoms/molecules have zero PE and Zero force?• 3σ!• What do we take away from this?• The ideal gas approximation is useful for gases!
![Page 8: Lecture # 5 Cassandra Paul Physics 7A Summer Session II 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cb05503460f949754ad/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Intro Particle Model of Matter
A graphical representation of the energies associated with particles
![Page 9: Lecture # 5 Cassandra Paul Physics 7A Summer Session II 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cb05503460f949754ad/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Lennard-Jones (pair-wise) potential
![Page 10: Lecture # 5 Cassandra Paul Physics 7A Summer Session II 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cb05503460f949754ad/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
We know the shape… but what exactly is this a graph of?
A. The potential energy of one atom with respect to a system of particles.
B. The potential energy of a system (many particles)C. The potential energy of one particle with respect
to another particleD. The total energy of one particle with respect to a
system of atomsE. The total energy of one atom with respect to
another
![Page 11: Lecture # 5 Cassandra Paul Physics 7A Summer Session II 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cb05503460f949754ad/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Remember the Anchor
But Cassandra when is one particle ever ‘anchored’ in space?
But Cassandra when is one particle ever ‘anchored’ in space?
Good question! It’snot, but our graphis always drawn with respect to oneparticle at the origin,even if the origin is moving
![Page 12: Lecture # 5 Cassandra Paul Physics 7A Summer Session II 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cb05503460f949754ad/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Energy
r (atomic diameters)
r
is the atomic diameter
ro
is the well depth ro is the equilibrium separation
Potential Energy between two atomsPotential Energy between two atoms“pair-wise potential” a.k.a. Lennard-Jones Potential“pair-wise potential” a.k.a. Lennard-Jones Potential
pair-wise
~ 10-21 J
~ 10-10m = 1Å
Do not need to memorize
![Page 13: Lecture # 5 Cassandra Paul Physics 7A Summer Session II 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cb05503460f949754ad/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Forces and the Potential
Repulsive Attractive
Force = -d(PE)/dx
Or, negative change in y over change in x
Force has a magnitude of slope,and the direction ofdecreasing PE!
![Page 14: Lecture # 5 Cassandra Paul Physics 7A Summer Session II 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cb05503460f949754ad/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
If the curve only tells us about PE, how do we find KE and Etot?
![Page 15: Lecture # 5 Cassandra Paul Physics 7A Summer Session II 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cb05503460f949754ad/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Let’s do a closed system…
![Page 16: Lecture # 5 Cassandra Paul Physics 7A Summer Session II 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cb05503460f949754ad/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Etot
Etot = KE + PE
-3ε = KE + -3ε
-3ε = KE + -4ε
KE = 0
KE = 1ε
-3ε = KE + -7ε KE = 4ε
-3ε = KE + -8ε KE = 5ε
-3ε = KE + -7ε KE = 4ε
-3ε = KE + -4ε KE = 1ε
-3ε = KE + -1ε KE = -1ε
KE can’t be negative!!!!!
![Page 17: Lecture # 5 Cassandra Paul Physics 7A Summer Session II 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cb05503460f949754ad/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Etot
Turning Points
Where the Etot intersects thePE curve, there are ‘turning Points.’
The particle oscilates between These two points.
![Page 18: Lecture # 5 Cassandra Paul Physics 7A Summer Session II 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cb05503460f949754ad/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
How much work does it take to move one particle from rest at equilibrium (1.12σ), to 3σ
with a minute (negligible but non zero) velocity?
A. 1εB. 3εC. -1εD. 2.88σE. Impossible
to tell
i f
![Page 19: Lecture # 5 Cassandra Paul Physics 7A Summer Session II 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cb05503460f949754ad/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Same idea as before:
Initial: at 1.12σ, v=0PE + KE = Etot-1ε + 0 = -1ε• Now what?Is this a closed system?NO! Adding energy:Final: at 3σ, v~0• So new Etot = 0Must add 1ε to get there.
![Page 20: Lecture # 5 Cassandra Paul Physics 7A Summer Session II 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cb05503460f949754ad/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
OK let’s draw an Energy System Diagram:
PEpair-wise
System: Two Particles, one bondInitial: v=0, r=1.12σFinal: v~0 r=3σ
Wait! We don’t have an equation for PE pair-wise!
It’s ok, we have something better… a graph!
Work
ΔPE = Work
PEf – PEi = Work
0ε – (-1ε) = Work Work = 1ε
EnergyAdded
i
f
![Page 21: Lecture # 5 Cassandra Paul Physics 7A Summer Session II 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cb05503460f949754ad/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
DL sections
• Swapno: 11:00AM Everson Section 1• Amandeep: 11:00AM Roesller Section 2• Yi: 1:40PM Everson Section 3• Chun-Yen: 1:40PM Roesller Section 4