lecture 7 frequency response
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
1/51
Lecture 7
Frequency Response
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
2/51
Review of CS, CG and CD
Amplifier
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
3/51
Voltage Gain of a CS Amplifier
Interpretation: The resistance at the drain
Divided by the resistance in the source path
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
4/51
Voltage Gain of a CD Amplifier
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
5/51
Voltage Gain of a CG Amplifier
If RS=0 and channel length modulation is ignored, Av is
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
6/51
Resistance into the Drain
Terminal
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
7/51
Resistance into the Source
Terminal
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
8/51
Miller Effect
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
9/51
Millers Theorem
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
10/51
Typical Application of MillersTheorem
Millers theorem is useful when Z appears in
parallel with the main signal (i.e. the amplifier)
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
11/51
Limitation of Millers Theorem
Limitations:
Interaction of poles through R3 and C3.
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
12/51
Association of Poles with Nodes
Each pole is determined by the product of1. Total capacitance seen from each node to ground2. Total resistance seen at the node to ground
Each node in the circuit contributes one pole to the transfer function
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
13/51
Common-Gate Example
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
14/51
CS Stage
Output Impedance
Input Impedance
Nodal Method Miller Approximation
Zx method
Equivalent Circuit Analysis KCL
Dominant pole
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
15/51
High Frequency Model of CS
Stage
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
16/51
CS Trade-Off
L(um) W(um) GDS (uS) CDB (fF) CGD(fF) CGS(fF)
2 5.78 3.613 5.19 1.84 98.16
800n 2.56 3.79 0.915 0.803 17.3
180n 0.86 5.72 0.056 0.273 1.20120n 0.64 9.55 0.029 0.201 0.55
For Same IOUT,
LWGDS(Ro) CDS
Trade-offs in GDS and parasiticcapacitance.
Specs:AV=10Vo,cm=0.6VI(M1)=10 uA
gm=AV/RD
Gmoverid_1=16.67
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
17/51
CS Trade-Off
AV I (uA) L(um) W(um) GDS (uS) CDB (fF) CGD(fF) CGS(fF)
10 10 2 5.78 3.613 5.19 1.84 98.16
15 10 2 32.5 5.33 27.5 10.4 517.8
20 10 2 668.2 6.66 319.6 239.8 6,041.1
For Same IOUT,
LWGDS(Ro) CDS
Difficult to achieve high gain andhigh speed at the same time!
Specs:Vo,cm=0.6Vgm=AV/RD
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
18/51
Output Impedance
Only Valid if Rs is large!
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
19/51
Input Impedance
Exclude CGSHigh frequencyapproximation
(First order model)
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
20/51
Input Impedance (KCL)
Exclude CGSHigh frequencyapproximation
(In parallel with CGS)
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
21/51
Nodal Method(Miller
Approximation)
Numerical example:
RS=50 OhmsL=2.0 umAV=15
fin=4.65 GHzfout=69.9 MHz
517.8 fF 16(10.40fF)
CDB=27.51 fF, RD=60 KOhm
It is importantto identify thehigh impedance node!
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
22/51
Transfer Function
( fi i
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
23/51
Nodal Method(Refined Miller
Approximation)
Resistive(Capacitive)
(If RS is large!)
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
24/51
Equivalent Circuit Analysis
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
25/51
Comparison to Miller
Approximation
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
26/51
Dominant Pole Approximation
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
27/51
Transmission Zero
Transmission Zero
Finding a transmission zero in effective Gm.
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
28/51
Source Follower
(Strong interaction between XY, making it difficult to associateeach pole with each node)
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
29/51
Source Follower
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
30/51
Transmission Zero
= /( + )
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
31/51
Input Impedance
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
32/51
Analysis of Input Impedance
Miller Approximation:Av:
(Negative Resistance)Can be used to oscillators.
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
33/51
Output Impedance
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
34/51
Equivalent Output Impedance
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
35/51
Issues
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
36/51
Common Gate
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
37/51
Cascode
(Gain from A to X)
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
38/51
DC Input Resistance
Will a large Rin increase the miller effect of CS dramatically?
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
39/51
Input Resistance of
Common Gate
Note that ZL is not infinity if RD is replaced bya current source because ZL is in parallelwith CD.
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
40/51
Differential Pair
(Differential Mode)
(Differential Half Circuit)
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
41/51
Differential Pair
(Common-Mode)
W3 is made as largeas possible to minimize VDSAT.
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
42/51
Consequence of Limited CMRR
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
43/51
Differential Pair with High
Impedance Load
AC Ground
(Dominant Pole)
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
44/51
Differential Pair Example
GM=166.19 uSGDS=1.3552 uSRD=90 Kohm
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
45/51
AC analysis
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
46/51
Use the Waveform Calculator
Add voltages to the calculator
Press Eval before you plot
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
47/51
Plot in Magnitude/dB
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
48/51
Transfer Function
3dB Bandwidth: 317.629 MHz
Diff ti l P i ith C t
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
49/51
Differential Pair with Current
Mirror
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
50/51
Small Signal Equivalent Model
(Transmission Zero)
Diff ti l P i ith C t
-
7/28/2019 Lecture 7 Frequency Response
51/51
Differential Pair with Current
Mirror
(Slow Path)
(Fast Path)