[lecture notes in mathematics] functional differential equations and approximation of fixed points...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: [Lecture Notes in Mathematics] Functional Differential Equations and Approximation of Fixed Points Volume 730 || The beer barrel theorem](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020618/575096d01a28abbf6bcdea00/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Beer Barrel Theorem
A new proof of the asymptotic
conjecture in fixed point theory
by A. J. Tromba
In a seminar in Bonn during the summer of 1977, H. Peitgen
challenged the author to give an easy proof of the differentiable
case of the classic Schauder conjecture; namely (simply stated)
let T : E~ be a C i map with T 2 compact then T has a fixed point.
The prize was a barrel of beer. This theorem had already been
proved by Nussbaum [21 but involved rather long, technical and
sophisticated methods in fixed point theory. The purpose of this
note is to present a rather simple proof of the Nussbaum result
which uses only the mod 2 degree of Smale introduced in ~31 , and a
transversality result [5~ .
§ I The Mod 2 degree of Smale
Let WcE be an open subset of a Banach space. Let f:W ÷ F be a
continuous proper map (inverse image of compact sets is compact)
such that f:W + F is Fredholm of index zero; i.e. df(x):E + F is
linear Fredholm of index zero. Assume further that O#f(~W). Let
0 be a component of F-f(~W) containing O. By Smale's version of the
Sard theorem there is a regular value yeO for flW. Then the number
of points in f-1(y) will be finite and this number mod 2 is called e
the mod 2 degree of f relative to W and O, and is denoted by
deg2(f,W,O). Smale shows, using cobordism arguments going back to
Pontryagin that this number is independent of the choice of regular
value y60 and is invariant under proper homotopies ft such that for
all t O~ft(~W).
§ 2 Fredholm families and a transversalit~ theorem
Let f:AxW+~ be C i where A is a smooth Banach manifold. We say
that f is a Fredholm famil~, of index zero if for each aeA, fa=f(a, ")
![Page 2: [Lecture Notes in Mathematics] Functional Differential Equations and Approximation of Fixed Points Volume 730 || The beer barrel theorem](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020618/575096d01a28abbf6bcdea00/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
485
is Fredholm of index zero on W. We say that f is a zero proper
family if whenever an+a and fa (Xn)+O, then x n has a convergent n
subsequence.
Definition. If g:W+F is Fredholm of index zero, a zero x0 of g
(g(x0)=O) is said to be non-degenerate if dg(x0) is an isomorphism.
A proof of the following transversality result in case A is
Hilbert can be found in [51 .
Theorem I. Suppose f:A×W+F is a zero proper Fredholm family of -I
index zero and such that for each x£f (O), x=(a,e), the total
derivative df(x):TaA×E÷F is surjecture. Then there exists an open
and dense set AcA such that whenever a¢~ all the zeros of fa are
non-degenerate.
§ 3 Proof of the Schauder conjecture
Theorem 2. Let ~cE be open and convex and let T:~+~ be C l with T 2
compact. Then T has a fixed point.
Remark. By the classic Schauder theorem, T 2 has a compact set of
fixed points .-5;. Nussbaum only had to assume that T is C I on some
neighbourhood of ~_~. The same will be true for our proof, however,
for pedagodical reasons, we shall make no reduction in our hypothesis.
The basic idea of the proof is quite simple. Suppose the fixed
point set ~of T 2 is non-degenerate; i.e. id-d(T2) (x) is an
isomorphism for each xe~. Since T 2 is compact, the map g(x)=x-T2x
is proper Fredholm of index zero and therefore has a finite number
of zeros (which are of course the fixed points of T). Using the
mod 2 degree with W=E and considering the homotopy (Ix)÷x-IT2x for
le[0,1], we see that the mod 2 degree of g is I and consequently T 2
must have an odd number of fixed points. But T acts as a permutation
on this finite set, and each element is of order 2 under T. Since
there are an odd number of fixed points, one of them must have order
I. This is a fixed point of T, and the Schauder conjecture is
proved in this case. In the remainder of the paper, we will show
how to apply theorem I to perturb T so that the fixed points of the
perturbed mapping are non-degenerate.
![Page 3: [Lecture Notes in Mathematics] Functional Differential Equations and Approximation of Fixed Points Volume 730 || The beer barrel theorem](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020618/575096d01a28abbf6bcdea00/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
486
We shall now have the standing assumption that T has no fixed
points~ also without loss of ~enerality we can assume that Oe~.
Let~be the Banach space of C ~ compact maps on E with bounded
differentials; i.e. ~/if sup lldk(x) Ii<~ and let ~be the set of xeE
su lldk(x) il< 1 C I diffeomorphisms G:E~ of the form G=id+k, kc~and x¢{
Then ~ is clearly a C Banach manifold modelled on ~'with the
global chart G ÷ k. Moreover each Ge~{ is properly homotopic to the
identity though diffeomorphisms via the homotopy t ÷ id+tk.
As before, let ,~ denote the compact fixed point set of T 2 and
hence the zero set of fi(x)=x-T2x. -Since ~c~ is compact, there
exist neighbourhoods V • of ~, and U • of I~id in ~ such that both
V"c~ and (GT) (V~)c~ for all G£U ". Thus the double composition (GT) 2
is defined on V ~. Consider the family of mappings f:U~×V~+E defined
by f(G,x)=x-(GT)2x, f need not necessarily be a Fredholm family
but fi=f(I, .) is Fredholm of index zero. It therefore follows from
the implicit function theorem that for each xc~there exists a
splitting of E =El (x)eEz (x), dim E2 (x)< ~, and bounded neighbourhoods
U(x) of IeU ~ and V(x)~V ~ of x such that for GeU(x) there is a local
diffeomorphism YG of a neighbourhood of OEE to V(x) with
(I) fGO~G(Xl,X2) = (XI,0G(Xi,X2))
where (G,XI,X2) + ~G(Xl,X2) and (G,XI,X~) + @G(Xl,X2) are C I
Remark. This normal form has been used by several authors (see e.g.
[13, and [3~).
Since _~is compact, we can find a neighbourhood U of IEU ~ and a
finite number VI,...,V 1 of neighbourhoods covering ~so that for
GCU and xcVjcV • representation (I) holds.
Recall that we are assuming that T has no fixed points from which
it follows that [lT2x-Tx!! ~6>O for all xe~ Therefore we can find
neighbourhoods U of I in ~ and V of ~ such that
(2) IITGTx - Txll > 6/2
for all G£U and x£V.
Consequently, we can assume that neighbourhoods U&U ~ of I and
V--qJVi~V" have been chosen so that with respect to these neighbourhoods
![Page 4: [Lecture Notes in Mathematics] Functional Differential Equations and Approximation of Fixed Points Volume 730 || The beer barrel theorem](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020618/575096d01a28abbf6bcdea00/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
487
representation (I) and inequality (2) holds. Let W be a neighbour-
hood of ~with WcV. From representation (I) it follows that there is
a neighbourhood AcU of I so that for all GeA, O%fG(~W).
By the normal form (I), f:A×W+E is a zero proper Fredholm family of
index zero. Moreover for each GeA, fG is proper and hence has a
mod 2 degree. Since, by construction, each GeA is properly homotopic
to the identity, one can immediately conclude that
deg2 (fG,W,O) = deg2 (fi,W,O). But fI is proper Fredholm of index
zero on all of Q and the zero set of fI is contained in W. Therefore
deg2 (fi,W,O) = deg2 (fi,~,O). Since ~ is convex, the homotopy
(l,x) + x-IT2x is a proper homotopy of fI to the identity introducing
no zeros on 3~. Thus deg2 (fi,~,O) = I = deg2 (fi,W,O).
The next lemma is the main step in the proof of the Schauder conjec-
ture.
Lemma. The family f:AxW÷E has the property that whenever fG(X)=O
the total derivative df(G,x) is surjecture
Proof. By direct computation
df(G,x) [H,h] : h - DG o DT " DG o DTx[h ] TGT (x) GT(x) T(x)
- H(TGTx) - DG o DTeH(Tx) TGT (x)
We know that xEV and that on V
TGTx % Tx for GeA.
So in order to show surjectivity given weE, we must produce an
[H,hj so that df(G,x) [H,h~ = w. Choose h=w and H so that H(Tx)=O
and H(TGTx) = -DGoDToDGODTx(W ) .
This concludes the lemma.
By theorem I, we can conclude that there exists a sequence GnCA,
G n ÷ I such that (GnOT)2 has non-degenerate fixed points in W. By
degree there must be an odd number and by parity GnT has a fixed
point x n. However GnTXn=X n implies that fG (Xn)=O" Since the n
family f is zero proper, we can conclude that x n has a subsequence
converging to zeW. Clearly Tz=z which concludes the proof of the
![Page 5: [Lecture Notes in Mathematics] Functional Differential Equations and Approximation of Fixed Points Volume 730 || The beer barrel theorem](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020618/575096d01a28abbf6bcdea00/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
488
Schauder conjecture.
Remarks. Nussbaum's original proof worked for the case T n compact,
n>2. A slightly more technical argument than that presented here
should also work for this case. It is also clear that these methods
yield a clean proof of the Steinlein mod (p) result [4].
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
K. D. Elworthy and A. J. Tromba; Differential structures and
Fredholm maps on Banach manifolds; Prac. Symp. pure math.,
AMS vol XV, 45-94
R. D. Nussbaum; Some asymptotic fixed point theorems, Trans.
Amer. Math. Soc. vol 171 (1972)', 349-375
S. Smale; An infinite dimensional version of Sard's theorem,
Amer. J. Math., 87 (1965), 861-866
H. Steinlein; A new proof of the (mod p) theorem in asymptotic
fixed point theory, Prac. Symp. on problems in nonlinear
functional analysis, Universit~t Bonn, July 22-26, 1974.
Ber. Geso Math. Datenverarbeitung Bonn, No. 103, 29-42 (1975)
A. J. Tromba; Fredholm vector fields and a transversality
theorem, J. Funct. Anal. vol 23, No. 4 (1976)
A. J. Tromba
Mathematisches Institut
Universit~t Bonn, SFB 72
and
University of California
at
Santa Cruz