lecture notes on wind tunnel testing

Upload: viperous-pramod

Post on 16-Oct-2015

64 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

wind tunnel

TRANSCRIPT

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    1/277

    1

    C0NTENTS

    Page

    Introduction 1

    Chapter - 1 Wind Tunnel 10

    1.1 Introduction 10

    1.2 Wind Tunnel Classification 101.2.1 The Type of Test Section 10

    1.2.2 The Type of Return Circuit 11

    1.2.3 The Speed of Flow in the Test Section 12

    1.3 Types of Wind Tunnels 131.3.1 Subsonic Wind Tunnels 13

    1.3.2 Transonic Tunnel 15

    1.3.3 Supersonic Tunnel 161.3.4 Hypersonic Tunnel 17

    1.3.5 Full Scale Tunnel 18

    1.3.6 Compressed Air Tunnel 19

    1.3.7 Other Tunnels 19

    Chapter - 2 Wind Tunnel Intrumentation 20

    2.1 Introduction 202.2 Pick-up or Transducer 21

    2.2.1 Variable Resistance Transducer 21

    2.2.1.1 The Wheatstone Bridge Principle 25

    2.2.1.2 Summing Circuit 252.2.1.3 Differencing Circuit 28

    2.2.2 Variable Capacitance Transducer 29

    2.2.3 Variable Reluctance Transducer 302.2.4 Piezoelectric Transducer 31

    2.3 Signal Conditioner 32

    2.3.1 Signal conditioner for Variable Resistance Transducer 332.3.1.1 Excitation Supply 33

    2.3.1.2 Bridge Balance 33

    2.3.1.3 Shunt Calibration 34

    2.3.1.4 Signal Amplification 35

    2.3.2 Signal Conditioner for Variable Capacitance Transducer 362.3.3 Signal Conditioner for Variable Reluctance Transducer 37

    2.3.4 Signal Conditioner for Piezoelectric Transducer 38

    2.4 Data Acquisition System 392.4.1 Analog System 40

    2.4.2 Digital System 41

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    2/277

    2

    Chapter - 3 Tunnel Characteristics 43

    3.1 Introduction 43

    3.2 Air Speed Calibration 433.3 Determination of Velocity Variation in Test Section 47

    3.4 Determination of Angular Flow Variation in Test Section 49

    3.5 Turbulence Level 503.5.1 Drag Sphere 503.5.2 Pressure Sphere 51

    Chapter - 4 Flow Visualisation 544.1 Introduction 54

    4.2 Incompressible Flow Visualisation Techniques 54

    4.2.1 Smoke Method 54

    4.2.2 Tuft Method 564.2.3 Oil Flow Method 57

    4.2.4 Evaporation Method 57

    4.3 Compressible Flow Visualisation Techniques 584.3.1 Shadowgraph Method 58

    4.3.2 Schlieren Method 58

    4.3.3 Interferometer Method 59

    `Chapter - 5 Pressure Measurement by Mechanical Device 60

    5.1 Introduction 60

    5.2 Measurement of Cp 615.2.1 Without PreCalibration of the Tunnel 61

    5.2.2 With PreCalibration of the Tunnel 63

    5.3 Pressure Distribution on Circular Cylinder Model 63

    5.4 Pressure Distribution on Elliptical Cylinder Model 675.5 Pressure Distribution on Spherical Model 70

    Chapter - 6 Force and Moment Measurement by Mechanical Balance 726.1 Introduction 72

    6.2 Calibration 72

    6.3 Measurements of Forces and Moments 786.4 Evaluation of the Tare and Interference Drag 80

    6.4.1 Evaluation of the Tare and Interference Drag Separately 81

    6.4.2 Evaluation of the Sum of the Tare and Interference Drag 82

    Chapter - 7 Pressure Measurement by Transducer 847.1 Introduction 84

    7.2 Time Response 86

    7.3 Pressure Scanning 867.4 Measurement of Cp 89

    7.4.1 With PreCalibration of Tunnel 89

    7.4.2 Without PreCalibration of Tunnel 89

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    3/277

    3

    Chapter - 8 Force and Moment Measurement by Internal (Sting) Balance 91

    8.1 Introduction 91

    8.2 Measurement of Lift 928.3 Measurement of Pitching Moment 95

    8.4 Simultaneous Measurement of Lift and Pitching Moment 98

    8.5 Other Forces and Moments 1008.6 Interactions Effect 1038.7 Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Measurement 104

    8.7.1 Surface Preparation and Bonding of Strain Gauges 104

    8.7.2 Noise Suppression 1068.7.3 Thermal Effect 108

    8.7.4 Optimising Excitation Level 111

    Chapter - 9 Force and Moment Measurement by External Balance 1149.1 Introduction 114

    9.2 General Description 114

    9.3 Operation 1179.4 Calibration 118

    9.5 Wind Tunnel Testing 123

    Chapter - 10 Wind Tunnel Boundary Corrections (2D Flow) 12410.1 Introduction 124

    10.2 Horizontal Buoyancy 125

    10.3 Solid Blocking 12810.4 Wake Blocking 130

    10.5 Streamline Curvature Effect 133

    10.6 Summary of TwoDimensional Boundary Corrections 135

    Chapter - 11 Wind Tunnel Boundary Corrections (3D Flow) 138

    11.1 Introduction 138

    11.2 Horizontal Buoyancy 13811.3 Solid Blocking 139

    11.4 Wake Blocking 140

    11.5 Streamline Curvature Effect 14011.6 Downwash Effect 142

    11.7 Summary of Three-Dimensional Boundary Corrections 143

    Chapter - 12 Drag Measurement on 2D Circular Cylindrical Body 144

    12.1 Introduction 14412.2 Drag by Pressure Distribution on the Cylindrical Surface 145

    12.3 Drag by Measuring Distribution in the wake of the Cylinder 149

    12.4 Drag by Direct Weighing 153

    Chapter - 13 Flow about an Aerofoil Section 156

    13.1 Introduction 15613.2 Formulation of the Problem 157

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    4/277

    4

    13.3 Solution 159

    13.3.1 Exact analytical Solution 159

    13.3.2 Approximate Solution 15913.3.3 Exact Numerical Solution 160

    13.4 Lanearised Theory 160

    13.4.1 Thickness Effect 16113.4.2 Camber Effect 16113.5 Exact Numerical Method (Panel Method) 163

    13.6 Overall Aerodynamic Characteristics 166

    13.6.1 Lift, Drag and Pitching Moment Coefficient 16713.6.2 Location of Aerodynamic Centre 171

    13.6.3 Location of Centre of Pressure 171

    13.7 Wind Tunnel Testing 172

    Chapter14 Measurement of Laminar Boundary Layer 177

    14.1 Introduction 177

    14.2 Boundary Layer Parameters 17814.2.1 Displacement Thickness (s*) 179

    14.2.2 Other Parameters 180

    14.3 Laminar Boundary Layer in Zero Pressure Gradient 183

    14.3.1 Theoretical Calculation 18314.3.2 Wind Tunnel Testing 184

    14.4 Laminar Boundary Layer in Favourable Pressure Gradient 188

    14.4.1 Theoretical Calculation 18914.4.2 Wind Tunnel Testing 190

    14.5 Laminar Boundary Layer in Adverse Pressure Gradient 192

    Chapter - 15 Measurement of Turbulent Boundary Layer 19415.1 Introduction 194

    15.2 Structure of Turbulent Boundary Layer 194

    15.3 Log Law Relation 19615.4 Power Law Relations 197

    15.5 Wind Tunnel Testing 199

    Chapter - 16 Flow about Rectangular and Swept Wings 202

    16.1 Introduction 202

    16.2 Theory 205

    16.3 Prandtls Lifting Line Theory 206

    16.4 Vortex Lattice Method 20816.5 Wind Tunnel Testing 210

    16.5.1 Measurement of Pressure Distribution 210

    16.5.2 Measurement of Overall Forces and Moments Using Balance 215

    Chapter - 17 Flow about a Slender Delta Wing 217

    17.1 Introduction 21717.2 Slender Wings in Attached Flow 217

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    5/277

    5

    17.3 Slender Wings in Separated Flow 219

    17.4 Wind Tunnel Testing 221

    17.4.1 Measurement of Pressure Distribution 22117.4.2 Measurement of Overall Forces and Moments 223

    Chapter - 18 Flow about Composite Wings 22418.1 Introduction 22418.2 Straked Configuration 225

    18.3 Canard Configuration 228

    Chapter - 19 Drag Measurement of Sphere 231

    19.1 Introduction 231

    Chapter - 20 Supersonic Aerodynamics 23520.1 Introduction 235

    20.2 Shock Visualisation 237

    20.3 Run Time of Tunnel 23820.4 Determination of Mach Number 241

    20.4.1 By using Area-Local Mach Number Relation 241

    20.4.2 By Static Pressure Measurement on the Wall of the Test Section 242

    20.4.3 By using Rayleigh-Pitot Formula 24220.4.4 By using --M Relation (Shock Wave over a Wedge) 243

    20.5 Variation of Mach Number along the Axis of Divergent Section of C-D

    Nozzle 24420.6 Variation of Mach Number along Diffuser Axis 245

    20.7 Determination of the Exit Velocity 246

    Appendix1 Notations 252

    Appendix2 Note on Units 253

    Appendix3 List of Facilities 255

    Appendix4 2100 System : Strain Gage Conditioner and Amplifier System 256

    References 281

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    6/277

    6

    INTRODUCTION

    The basic aim of aerodynamics is to obtain the flow quantities (especially, pressure

    distribution and skin friction) about a body immersed in fluid. Very often, the interest is

    limited only to obtain the overall forces and moments acting on the body.

    There are two main ways these quantities can be found; theoretically and experimentally.

    Both the procedures have their relative advantages and disadvantages and have acted and

    are going to act as supplementary to each other in foreseeable future

    The limitation of theoretical methods basically stems from the fact that the governing

    equation of real fluid about a body the Navier-Stokes equation can not, in general, be

    solved theoretically. The theoretical methods are usually based on some simplified formof this equation. With the assumption of inviscid (infinite Reynolds Number) and

    incompressible (zero Mach number) flow, i.e., the ideal flow, the Navier Stokes equation

    can simplified to Laplaces equation. The solution of this ideal flow, because of the above

    simplification, differs from the experimental results. Efforts are then made to employ

    some corrections due to the effects of viscosity and compressibility.

    Even with simplification of inviscid incompressible flow, it is not easy to solve the

    problem. For a few simple configurations, exact analytic solutions exist (Chap. 5).

    Configurations of arbitrary shape are not amenable to analytic methods and demand

    numerical solution. In the early days, a variety of approximate numerical methods were

    developed. Examples are the different variants of linearised theory by Munk, Weber etc.

    for aerofoil problems, Prandtls lifting line theory, Multhopps lifting surface theory,

    Jones slender wing theory etc. for wing problems. With the advent of high speed digital

    computers, more sophisticated exact numerical methods (Panel method) have been

    developed. A variety of computer based theoretical schemes are also developed for

    effecting the corrections due to viscosity and compressibility to these solutions.

    Alternatively, attempts have been made to develop Euler as well as Navier-Stokes codes

    with or without turbulence modeling.

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    7/277

    7

    It is almost certainly the case thathowever sophisticated these theoretical methods may

    eventually become the engineer will always wish to validate his design, prior to

    manufacture, by means of physical experiment. In this respect, in aircraft industry, the

    wind-tunnel experimentation will always play the superior role of the two.

    Wind-tunnel testing, like the theoretical calculations, has its own deficiencies and

    difficulties. Broadly speaking these are : the high capital and running cost associated with

    a wind tunnel, the expenses, elapsed time and skill needed in manufacturing accurate

    scale models, the difficulty in obtaining the adequate data (forces, pressure distribution

    etc.), the difficulty of interrogating this data.

    Students of aeronautical engineering are well aware of the fact that the forces and

    moments etc. experienced in flight on an aircraft depends primarily on two non-

    dimensional parameters : Reynolds number and Mach number. Reynolds number

    expresses the relative contributions of inertia and friction forces in the motion of the

    fluid. The Mach number is the ratio of the flight speed and the speed of sound. In general

    it can be stated that only a full scale model operating at full scale speed can give a totally

    correct simulation of a real aircraft in flight. However, because of power conservation

    problem (specially for high-speed flow) the wind-tunnel model is generally constructed at

    a much smaller scale than the real aircraft. This in itself presents numerous difficulties

    associated with the acquisition of sufficiently detailed data on such a small model.However a more serious problem arises in simultaneously recreating the Mach number

    and Reynolds number experienced in flight.

    If the working medium and its temperature are the same in the wind-tunnel as in full-

    scale flight in the atmosphere, then proper matching of the Mach numbers requires the air

    speeds to be the same in both cases. If this is not achieved, then at Mach numbers of

    interest of most aircrafts, the effects of compressibility will be different between the

    wind-tunnel and flight.

    On the other hand, if the speeds are kept same for Mach number simulation, the Reynolds

    number in the wind-tunnel will be reduced (proportional to the geometric scale of model)

    relative to the real aircraft. Clearly, if the wind-tunnel speed is increased to approach

    full-scale Reynolds number then the Mach number will be incorrectly simulated.

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    8/277

    8

    Now many vital phenomena depend strongly on the Reynolds number and these include :

    development of boundary layer, transition from laminar to turbulent boundary layer,

    separation of boundary layer, vortex formation at high angle of attack etc. If the Reynolds

    number is not matched properly, viscosity will be incorrectly simulated.

    Numerous technological approaches have been proposed to overcome such difficulties.

    One of these consists of modifying the properties of working medium and in particular

    working at very low temperature or at high pressure. These approaches, in turn, present

    other difficulties. However, since the present study is restricted to low speed regime

    where compressibility effects are negligible, matching of both parameters is not

    necessary and simulation of Reynolds number alone is sufficient.

    The other difficulties associated with wind tunnel testing arise from the fact that the flow

    conditions inside the tunnel are not exactly the same as those in the free air. Primarily, the

    air in the tunnel is considered to be more turbulent than the free air this turbulence being

    produced in the tunnel by propeller, vibrations of the tunnel walls etc. This consequently

    increases the effective Reynolds number of the tunnel (Section 3.5). Excessive turbulence

    makes the test data unreliable and difficult to interpret.

    Secondly, the wind-tunnel model experiences spurious constraint effects due to wind-

    tunnel walls (chapter 10 and 11) which will be absent in free air. These extraneous forces

    must be calculated and subtracted out. These forces arise from two sources. Due toformation and growth of boundary layer in the test section, the effective area is

    progressively reduced resulting in increase of velocity and decrease of static pressure

    downstream. This variation of static pressure produces a drag force known as horizontal

    buoyancy. Again, the presence of a model in the test section reduces the area through

    which air flows. This blockage caused by the model and its wake effectively increases

    the average air speed in the vicinity of the model than they would be in free air, thereby

    increasing all forces and moments at a given angle of attack.

    Thirdly, the model in a tunnel is usually installed by some supports which in turn affect

    the flow. The effect of this supports (the so-called Tare and Interference effects,

    section 6.4) need to be calculated carefully and eliminated from observed values.

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    9/277

    9

    The procedure involved in wind-tunnel testing may now be summarized. The prerequisite

    of any experimental work is the calibration and evaluation of the tunnel (Chapter 3)

    itself. The wind-tunnel must be pre-calibrated to give the velocity of air flow during any

    testing (since it is not practical to measure the velocity by pitot-static tube while the

    model is in tunnel). The flow characteristics of the tunnel must be ascertained by

    measuring the variation of velocity (static pressure) in the test section, flow angularity

    and the turbulence level of the tunnel.

    Wind-tunnel testing, then, involves model making, installation of model in the tunnel and

    measuring forces, moments, pressure distribution etc. the forces and moments may be

    obtained by any of the three methods :

    a) Measuring the actual forces and moments with wind-tunnel balanceb) Measuring the effects that the model has on the airstream by wake survey (profile

    drag, section 12.2)

    c) Measuring the pressure distribution over the model by means of orificesconnected to manometer and integrating the pressure distribution over the model

    surface.

    The data acquired is then to be corrected for the tunnel boundary and support effects.

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    10/277

    10

    Chapter 1

    WIND-TUNNEL

    1.1 Introduction :The wind-tunnel is one of the most important facilities available for experimental work in

    aerodynamics. Its purpose is to provide a region of controlled airflow into which models

    can be inserted. This region is termed the working section or test section. For aeronautical

    work, the flow in the test section should ideally be perfectly uniform in speed, direction

    and vorticity. Such perfection can never be achieved in practice and the quality of a wind-

    tunnel is related to the closeness to which the airflow in the test section approaches the

    ideal.

    1.2 Wind Tunnel Classification :Wind-tunnels are usually classified according to the three main criteria :

    i) the type of test sectionii) the type of return circuitiii) the speed of flow in the test section

    1.2.1 The type of test section:The cross sectional form of a test section may be square, rectangle, octagonal, circular or

    elliptic. Again, it can be closed or open. A closed test section is one which is completely

    enclosed within solid walls, the airflow therefore being constrained by these walls. An

    open test section is one which is not enclosed within solid walls (Fig. 1.1). Because the

    flow is not constrained, it usually tends to expand, partly due to pressure difference and

    partly due to mixing between the air in the test section and that outside. To allow for thisexpansion, the downstream part of the tunnel is bell-mouthed.

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    11/277

    11

    Figure 1.1 Open test section

    Comparing these two types of test section, the closed type has the following advantages :

    a) greater efficiency (i.e. reduced power losses)b) better control of air flowc) no loss of aird) less noise

    On the other hand, the open type of test section allows easier access to the model and

    easier visual study of the flow.

    1.2.2 The type of return circuitA wind tunnel may either be open-circuit or closed-circuit tunnel. The open circuit tunnel

    which is open at the both ends has no guided return of the air (Fig. 1.2). After the air

    leaves the tunnel it circulates by devious paths back to intake.

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    12/277

    12

    Figure 1.2 Open circuit tunnel

    The closed circuit tunnel has, as the name implies, a continuous path for the air (Fig. 1.3).

    The whole circuit, except possibly the test section, is enclosed.

    1.2.3 The speed of flow in the test section:Five categories of speed are usually recognized :

    a)

    low speed (up to about 60 or 70 m/s)b) high speed subsonic (but Mach number less than 0.9)c) transonic (Mach number between 0.9 and 1.2)d) supersonic (Mach number between 1.2 and 5)e) hypersonic (Mach number greater than 5)

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    13/277

    13

    Figure 1.3 Close circuit tunnel

    The first two categories, low speed and high speed subsonic, are often taken together as

    subsonic tunnels.

    1.3 Types of Wind Tunnel :

    1.3.1 Subsonic Wind Tunnel :The simplest kind of subsonic tunnel consists of a tube, open at both ends, along which

    the air is propelled. The propulsion is usually provided by a fan downstream of the test

    section (a fan upstream would create excessive turbulence in the working section. Fig. 1.2

    represents a tunnel of this type.

    The following description relates to Fig. 1.2. The mouth is shaped to guide the air

    smoothly into the tunnel; flow separation here would give excessive turbulence and non-

    uniformity in velocity in the test section.

    To make the flow parallel and more uniform in speed and top give a little time for

    turbulence to decay, the mouth is followed by a settling chamber. The settling chamber

    usually includes a honeycomb and wire-mesh screens.

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    14/277

    14

    A honeycomb is a coarse mesh made of thin, broad plates set edgewise to the flow. It has

    two purposes. First, it helps to guide the air to flow parallel to the tunnel axis. Second, if

    there are any large eddies in the incoming flow, the honeycomb cuts them into smaller

    ones which can decay more rapidly than would the original larger ones.

    The mesh-screens are fitted to reduce non-uniformities in flow speeds. A typical

    installation might have one or two. The effects of screens on dynamic pressure variation

    in the test section is shown in Fig. 1.4. The screen also serves to reduce the turbulence

    level of the tunnel.

    Figure 1.4 Effect of screen

    The contraction followed by the settling chamber improves the quality of flow in the test

    section. The air flows from the mouth of the tunnel at low speed into a comparatively

    short settling chamber with a honeycomb and mesh screens. It is then accelerated rapidly

    in the contraction. The contraction reduces turbulence and also non-uniformities in flow

    speed and direction.

    The test section is followed by a divergent duct, the diffuser. The divergence results in a

    corresponding reduction in the flow speed, which has two principle effects. Firstly, it

    enables an increased fan efficiency to be achieved. Secondly, the reduction in dynamic

    pressure leads to reduced power losses at the exit from the tunnel in the laboratory.

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    15/277

    15

    Leaving the diffuser, the air enters the laboratory, along which it flows slowly back to the

    mouth of the tunnel.

    A typical tunnel will have a working section of about 1 meter square and an overall

    length of some 5 to 7 meters. The speed in the test section, will be controllable, upto

    about 30 m/s.

    1.3.2 Transonic Tunnel:The main special feature of a transonic wind-tunnel is its test section. In this, test section

    walls are neither open nor closed but a combination of both. The walls usually have

    perforation or streamwise slots. The reason is as follows :

    If, as an Fig. 1.5 an aerofoil is being tested in a transonic flow, shock waves occur. If the

    walls were solid these shockwaves would be reflected from them and would impinge on

    the model. The flow over the model would therefore be very different from that in free

    flight and the test would be invalid.

    If the test section were open, there would be a boundary between the jet and the

    surrounding atmosphere; the shock (compression) waves would be reflected from this

    boundary as expansion (rarefaction) waves. These would impinge on the model, so again

    the test would be invalidated.

    Figure 1.5 Reflection of shock wave

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    16/277

    16

    If the walls are perforated or slotted (i.e., the test section is partly opened and partly

    closed), the reflections are mixtures of compression waves and rarefaction waves and so,

    depending on the degree of perforation, these tend to cancel each other out. The flow

    over the model therefore approximates more closely to that in free flight.

    1.3.3 Supersonic Wind Tunnel:The simplest form of supersonic wind-tunnel is the blow-down type (Fig. 1.6). It consists

    of a convergent-divergent duct whose upstream end is connected to a tank filled with

    compressed air. The downstream end is usually open to the atmosphere. The air in the

    tank then discharges through the duct. This means, of course, that the pressure in the tank

    fall continuously, and therefore a reducing valve is fitted to maintain a constant pressure

    at the inlet of the duct. The duration of each test run is necessarily limited with this type

    of tunnel.

    The blow-down type of tunnel is relatively cheap. In particular, a relatively low-powered

    pump can be used to pressurize the tank taking, of course, a correspondingly long time to

    do so. The power expanded in driving the tunnel during a test is many times greater than

    the power of the pump.

    The test section of this type of tunnel is followed by a convergent-divergent duct. It can

    be shown that if the pressure ratio between the two ends of a convergent-divergent ductexceeds 1.892, the flow is sonic (M=1) at the throat and supersonic downstream. A plane

    downstream of the throat can therefore be used as a test section in which the flow is

    supersonic.

    Figure 1.6 Supersonic wind tunnel

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    17/277

    17

    The Mach number at the test section will depend only on the cross-sectional areas at the

    throat and the test section.

    3

    2.

    6

    51

    M

    MA

    A ST (1.1)

    This shows that the test section Mach number is determined solely by the shape of the

    tunnel (provided the pressure ratio is sufficient to maintain supersonic flow through the

    test section). Because of this supersonic tunnels frequently consist of a basic frame to

    which various liners can be fitted. Each liner gives a unique area ratio and therefore a

    unique Mach number in the test section. The shapes of some different liners for various

    Mach number are illustrated in Fig. 1.7.

    Figure 1.7 Shapes of liners

    1.3.4 Hypersonic Wind Tunnel :The main special feature of hypersonic wind tunnel is that provision must be made for

    preheating the air before entering the tunnel.

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    18/277

    18

    By suitable design of lines i.e. providing the large area ratio AT*S/ A*for generating high

    Mach number, the Mach number in the test section of a supersonic wind-tunnel may be

    increased to hypersonic regime. But another consequence of expanding air to high speed,

    namely its change in temperature, becomes limiting criterion. The equation for the

    temperature ratio along a streamline originating in a region where the flow is at rest with

    temperature T0 and terminating where the temperature is T is given by

    51

    20 M

    T

    T (1.2)

    For M = 10, this equation gives T =T0/21. Now if T0be the absolute temperature 228k

    then the wind temperature in the test section will be 13.5K. This is well below the

    temperature where air becomes liquid. Thus a limiting Mach number in the test section

    would be one at which air remains gaseous.

    The obvious choice for increasing this limiting Mach number is not preheat the air to be

    used in the tunnel to such an extent that the very low temperature in the test section is not

    realized. Another choice is to use a gas which has very much lower condensation

    temperature than air, e.g. helium. The majority of hypersonic tunnels, however use the

    preheating method. The preheating of air may be done by heating the reservoir air or

    alternatively to allow the air to pass through a heat exchanger as it leaves the reservoir to

    enter the working section.

    Apart from these wind tunnels, other types of wind tunnels are also designed and

    fabricated. The effort to simulate both Mach number and Reynolds number of free flight

    in wind-tunnel has resulted in development of two types of tunnels :

    1. Full Scale Tunnel2. Compressed Air Tunnel

    1.3.5 Full Scale Tunnel :The Full Scale Tunnel is capable of testing actual aircrafts of moderate size under near

    flight condition. The wind tunnel, developed at Langley Field, U.S.A., attains wind

    velocities up to 53m/s with an open jet 18m wide and 9m high. Apart from providing a

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    19/277

    19

    total simulation of Mach number and Reynolds number, such wind tunnels also serve a

    useful purpose in giving a correlation between flight and small model tests.

    1.3.6 Compressed Air Tunnel :The use of high pressure and therefore a high density in the test section can help to

    achieve full scale Reynolds number with relatively small and low speeds. Some tunnels

    are therefore completely enclosed in a large tank which can be pumped up to several

    times atmospheric pressures. Such tunnels are termed compressed air tunnels.

    It is worth mentioning that high pressure is no cure-all for getting a high Reynolds

    number since model strength may be a limiting factor.

    1.3.7 Other Tunnels :There are also other types of tunnels built for various purposes. Some of these tunnels

    are:

    Smoke tunnel : For flow visualization

    Spin Tunnel : For studying spin recovery

    Low Turbulence tunnel : For testing at high Reynolds number

    Stability Tunnel : For studying dynamic stabilityGust Tunnel : For studying effects of gust on models

    V/STOL : For studying V/STOL configurations

    Ice Tunnel : For studying formation and removal of ice on models

    subjected to icing condition.

    Automobile Wind Tunnel : For testing full scale automobiles.

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    20/277

    20

    Chapter 2

    WIND TUNNEL INSTRUMENTATION

    2.1 IntroductionInstrumentation plays an important role in wind tunnel testing. The accuracy of

    experimental results depends not only on the quality of the tunnel but also on the

    performance of he measuring equipments.

    The quantities which are frequently measured in wind tunnel testing are generally

    pressure distribution and over all forces and moments acting on a model. Velocity, in

    general, can be calculated from the pressure and hence need not be measured. However,in some cases velocity itself (for example, fluctuating velocity components in turbulent

    flow) may be of importance and need to be measured. Also, measurement of skin friction

    may be necessary in some experiments.

    Measuring instruments may, broadly, be classified as two types: mechanical and

    electronic. Examples of mechanical type of instruments are the liquid-level manometers

    for pressure measurement and wind-tunnel mechanical balances for measurement of

    overall forces and moments. Such instruments lack the first response, capability of

    measuring high and low values and amenability to automation required for unsteady or

    short-duration high speed tunnel.

    All these limitations may be overcome in electronic instrumentation system. An

    electronic system usually consist of:

    a) pick-up or transducerb) signal conditionerc) data acquisition system

    The pick-up or transducer receives the physical quantity (pressure/force) under

    measurement and delivers a proportional electrical signal to the signal conditioner. Here

    the signal is amplified, filtered or otherwise modified to a format acceptable to the data

    acquisition system. The data acquisition system may be a simple indicating meter, an

    oscilloscope or a chart recorder for visual display. Alternatively, it may be a magnetic

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    21/277

    21

    tape recorder for temporary or permanent storage of data or a digital computer for data

    manipulation or process control.

    2.2 Pick-up or Transducer:

    A transducer may be defined as a device which provides an electrical output signal for a

    physical quantity (pressure/force), whether or not auxiliary energy is required. Many

    other physical parameters (such as heat, light, intensity, humidity) may also be converted

    into electrical energy by means of transducers. Transducers used in wind tunnel testing

    may be classified according to the electrical principles involved, as follows:

    1) Variable resistance transducer (resistance strain gauge)2) Variable capacitance transducer3) Variable reluctance transducer4) Piezoelectric transducer

    Of all these transducers, resistance strain gauge, because of its unique set of operational

    characteristics, has dominated in transducer field for the past twenty years.

    2.2.1 Variable Resistance Transducer:The strain gauge is an example of variable resistance transducer that converts a physical

    quantity into a change of resistance. A strain gauge is a thin, wafer-like device that can beattached (bonded) to a variety of materials. Metallic strain gauges are manufactured from

    small diameter resistance wire such as constantan, or etched from thin foil sheets (Fig.

    2.1). For simultaneous measurement of strain in more than one direction, two-element or

    three-element rosettes are used. The resistance of the wire or metal foil changes with

    length as the material to which the gauge is attached undergoes tension or compression.

    In a gauge diaphragm pressure transducer, strain gauges are directly bonded on the

    diaphragm while in a sting balance used for force measurement, strain gauges are bonded

    on he sting (Fig. 2.2). While the load is applied, the resistances of the strain gauges

    increase or decrease, depending on nature of stress (tensile or compression). The

    sensitivity of a strain gauge is described in terms of characteristics called the gauge

    factor, G, defined as the unit change in resistance per unit change in length

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    22/277

    22

    Or, G = (RR) (L/L) (2.1)

    where G = Gauge factor

    R = Gauge resistance

    R = change in gauge resistance

    L = normal length (unstressed condition)

    L = change in length.

    The term L/L is the strain , so that equation (2.1) may be written as

    G = (RR) (2.2)

    Where = strain in the lateral direction.

    Figure 2.1 Strain gauges (a: wire, b: foil)

    The resistance R of a wire of length L can be calculated by using the expression for the

    resistance of conductor of uniform cross-section.

    2

    4d

    L

    area

    lengthR

    (2.3)

    Where = specific resistance of conductor material

    L = length of the conductor

    d diameter of the conductor

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    23/277

    23

    Figure 2.2 Sting balance

    Tension on the conductor causes an increase L in its length and a decrease d in its

    diameter. The resistance of the conductor then changes to

    ddd

    LLL

    dd

    LLRR

    214

    1.

    4.

    22

    (2.4)

    Equation (2.4) may be simplified by using Poissons ratio, , defined as a ratio of strain

    in lateral direction to strain in axial direction. Therefore,

    LLdd (2.5)

    Substituting equation (2.5) in equation (2.4) gives

    )21(

    1

    4 2 LL

    LL

    d

    LRR

    LLLLR 211

    LLR 211 [neglecting higher order term]

    The gauge factor can now be obtained as

    21/ LLRRG (2.6)

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    24/277

    24

    Poissons ratio for most metals vary from 0.25 to 0.5 and the gauge factor is then of the

    order of 1.5 to 2.0. For strain-gauge application, a high sensitivity is very desirable. A

    large gauge factor means a relatively large resistance change which can be more easily

    measured than a small resistance change. Semi-conductor gauges are now developed,

    which have gauge factor of the order of 120.

    The semi-conductor strain gauges are however neither so practical nor so widely used as

    the conventional metallic gauges in general purpose, high accuracy transducers. It is

    worth nothing that semi-conductor gauges were originally considered advantageous

    because of their high output. This has less importance today because the same

    semiconductor technology which created the type of gauge has also created smaller and

    less expensive amplifiers high gain for use with conventional strain gauges.

    Conventional metallic strain gauges are generally of four types : Constantan, Karma,

    Isoelastic and platinum-tungsten. Constantan, a copper nickel alloy, of gauge factor 2.0 is

    the most popular alloy for transducer gauges. It possesses an exceptional linearity over a

    wide strain range and is readily manufactured. It is also easily solderable. Its primary

    limitation in precision applications is a slow irreversible drift in grid resistance when

    exposed to temperature above 75C. Because the drift rate increases exponentially with

    temperature, Constantan is not recommended for transducers operating continuously at

    high temperature.Karma (gauge factor 2.1) is a nickel-chromium alloy used in a variety of modified forms

    for strain sensing. Like Constantan it displays extremely good linearity over a wide strain

    range. It has greater resistivity than Constantan making higher grid resistance feasible. A

    major advantage is its improved resistive stability, particularly at high temperature.

    Isoelastic alloy offers exceptionally good fatigue life and a gauge factor 3.1, about 50%

    higher than Constantan or Karma alloys. It has limited use in transducers because of its

    poor zero stability with temperature variation. Because of its good fatigue life, it is

    normally used for dynamic measurements.

    Platinum-tungsten alloys, like Isoelastic, find their primary use in dynamic transducer

    applications. With a gauge factor approximately two times greater than Constantan and

    Karma, and with very good fatigue life, platinum-tungsten gauges are used almost

    exclusively in fatiguerated dynamic transducers.

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    25/277

    25

    2.2.1.1The Wheatstone Bridge Principle :The change in resistance due to applied load can be converted into a change in voltage by

    the Wheatstone bridge circuit. Two types of Wheatstone bridge circuits are possible :

    summing circuit and differencing circuit. Generally, in wind tunnel testing,

    differencing circuit is used for measuring moment.

    2.2.1.2Summing Circuit :In the summing circuit, resistance undergoing tension and compression are connected in

    opposite sides of the Wheatstone bridge. Four unstressed strain gauges R1, R2, R3, R4are

    connected to form a Wheatstone bridge in summing circuit is shown in Fig. 2.3.

    The current passing through the resistance R1 and R3is I13 where

    31

    13RR

    VI

    (2.7)

    Similarly, the current passing through resistances R4and R2is I42 where

    24

    42RR

    VI

    (2.8)

    Figure 2.3 Summing circuit

    The voltage at A is therefore,

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    26/277

    26

    1

    31

    113 .RRR

    VVRIVVA

    The voltage at B is,

    424

    442 .RRR

    V

    VRIVVB

    The voltage across A and B is,

    4

    21

    1

    31

    RRR

    VVR

    RR

    VVVVVV BAAB

    31

    1

    4

    4

    2 RR

    R

    R

    RV

    42312143

    RRRR

    RRRR

    V

    or, 4231

    2143

    RRRR

    RRRRVV

    (2.9)

    Now, the output voltage V will be exactly zero, if

    (1) 02143 RRRR or,2

    4

    3

    1

    R

    R

    R

    R

    or, (2) RRRRR 4321 (say)

    no matter what the input voltage V may be.

    If any of the resistance changes due to applied load, the output voltage V will change.

    Provision may be made to change only one resistance (quarter active bridge) or two

    resistance (half active bridge) or three resistance (three-quarter bridge) or all four

    resistances (fully-active bridge).

    For the fully active bridge (Fig. 2.2), the output voltage due to applied load is calculated

    in a simple manner. The resistance R1 and R2 are subjected to compression and will

    therefore have a decrease in resistance value while resistance R4 and R3 will have a

    increase in resistance.

    The changed values of the resistances may be written as

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    27/277

    27

    RRR

    RRR

    RRR

    3

    2

    1

    RRR 4 (2.10)

    RR , are the changes in resistances due to changes in strain at positions 1 and 2 (Fig.

    2.2).

    Substituting the values in equation (9) yields

    RRRRRRRR

    RRRRRRRR

    V

    V

    )(

    ))((

    22422

    RRR

    RRRR

    r

    RRR

    4

    2

    R

    RR

    2

    (2.11)

    If the strain gauges are bounded very close to each other, it can be assumed

    RRR

    and the equation (2.11) is reduced to

    24

    4

    R

    RR

    V

    V

    or,R

    R

    V

    V (2.12)

    The equation shows a linear relationship. However, for quarter-bridge and half bridge a

    non linearity appears in the expression for output voltage. For example, if only R4 is

    active (quarter-bridge) and the other three resistance are passive (not bonded on the

    sting), the expression for output voltage is

    RRR

    V

    V

    4 (2.13)

    For a half-bridge (taking only R4 and R3active)

    RRR

    V

    V

    2 (neglecting higher order terms) (2.14)

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    28/277

    28

    Similarly, for a three-quarter bridge (taking R4, R3and R2 )

    RRR

    V

    V

    4

    3 (2.15)

    Because of the linearity in relationship, fully-active bridge is usually used in

    measurement techniques. It also has another advantage compared to others i.e. the

    temperature compensation effect. In a fully active bridge, all resistances have same

    temperature (neglecting the thermal e.m.f. effect) while in other bridges, the temperature

    of active gauges may be different from those of the passive gauges which will cause a

    change in resistance values resulting in further non-linearities.

    2.2.1.3 Differencing Circuit :

    The arrangement of resistance in the Wheatstone bridge in differencing circuit is shown

    in Fig. 2.4. Using the similar procedure, the output voltage V in this circuit is obtained

    as

    Figure 2.4 Differencing circuit

    34213142

    RRRR

    RRRR

    V

    V

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    29/277

    29

    =

    RRRRRRRRRRRRRR

    2.2

    (

    224

    2

    RRR

    RRR

    24

    2

    R

    RRR

    [neglecting 2RR with respect to 4R2]

    R

    RR

    2

    (2.16)

    If the strain gauges are pasted close to each other, the output voltage will be virtually zero

    since Rwill be almost equal to R.

    2.2.2 Variable Capacitance Transducer :The capacitance of parallel-plate capacitor is given by

    )(.. 0 faradsd

    AkC

    Where A = area of each plate (m2)

    d distance between the plates (m)

    0= 9.85 10-12 (F/m)

    k dielectric constant

    Since the capacitance is inversely proportional to the spacing of the parallel plates, d, any

    variation in d causes a corresponding variation in the capacitance. This principle is

    applied in the variable capacitance pressure transducer (Fig. 2.5). A pressure, applied to a

    diaphragm that functions as one plate of a simple capacitor changes the distance between

    the diaphragm and the static plate. The resulting change in capacitance can be measured

    with an AC bridge but it is usually measured with an oscillator circuit. The transducer, as

    a part of the oscillatory circuit, causes a change in the frequency of the oscillator. This

    change in frequency is a measure of the magnitude of the pressure applied.

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    30/277

    30

    Figure 2.5 Variable capacitance transducer

    2.2.3 Variable Reluctance Transducer :Such transducers employ magnetic diaphragms as sensing element (Fig. 2.6). When a

    differential pressure deflects the magnetic diaphragm, the air gaps (initially about 0.025

    mm) also changes differentially and so does the reluctance. The two coils are connected

    on a two-active arm bridge so that an output proportional to pressure is obtained.

    Figure 2.6 Variable reluctance transducer

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    31/277

    31

    Another type of variable reluctance transducer is based on linear variable differential

    transformer (LVDT). The LVDT is a three-coil device with a movable magnetic core

    (Fig. 2.7). Two outer coils are connected in opposition so that induced voltages are 180

    out of phase with each other. When the armature is centered, these voltages are equal in

    magnitude giving zero output. The pressure activates the diaphragm and when it moves

    the magnetic fluxes are unbalanced to produce an output proportional to the pressure

    applied.

    Figure 2.7 Linear variable differential transducer

    2.2.4 Piezoelectric Transducer:The Greek word piezo means to squeeze. The piezoelectric effect is appropriately

    described as generating electricity by squeezing crystals. This type of sensor is self-

    generating, that is, it does not require external electrical power as do the variable

    resistance or variable reluctance sensors.

    A piezoelectric transducer is illustrated schematically in Fig. 2.8. The sensitivity can be

    enhanced at the expense of resonant frequency by stacking a series of elements together

    with the appropriate electrical connection.

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    32/277

    32

    Figure 2.8 Schematic diagram of piezoelectric transducer

    A variety of piezoelectric materials are used, with quartz being most popular. Although

    piezo-electric transducers may be used for near static pressure measurements, they are

    more frequently employed for transient measurement.

    2.3 Signal Conditioner:Signal originating from the transducer is fed to the signal conditioner in which it is

    transformed into a form acceptable to the data acquisition system. Broadly speaking, the

    signal conditioner provides circuitry for amplification, noise suppression, filtering,

    excitation, zeroing, ranging, calibration and impedance matching. Because the operating

    principles of the different transducers are different, a variety of signal conditioners have

    been developed. The different types of signal conditioner for different transducers are

    outlined below.

    2.3.1 Signal conditioner for Variable Resistance Transducer :The signal conditioner usually provides supporting circuitry for resistance strain gauge

    transducer. Usually, the equipment is able to accept quarter-bridge, half-bridge and full-

    bridge by providing appropriate dummy gauges. The circuitry usually provides excitation

    power, balancing circuits, calibration elements, signal amplification etc.

    2.3.1.1Excitation Supply :Normally DC excitation is used for resistance strain gauge transducer. Although AC

    excitation can be used, the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. The accuracy of an

    AC system is not as good as that of DC system. Also the noise rejection near the carrier

    frequency is poor. Earlier DC amplifier circuit was based on the chopper principle in

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    33/277

    33

    which the DC is first converted to AC and then amplified and later converted to DC.

    Such a DC amplifier is fairly expensive. However, with the advent IC chips, DC

    amplifiers are no longer more costly than AC system.

    However, the DC power supplied must have high stability. To achieve this, the power

    supply should be isolated from all other common lines and from the AC power line. In

    the other words, it should have a very low coupling to the power line and to the ground.

    2.3.1.2Bridge Balance :The Wheatstone bridge circuit should ideally have zero voltage output under no load

    condition, equation (2.9). However, because of normal gauge-to gauge resistance

    variations and additional resistance changes during gauge installation, the bridge circuit is

    usually in a resistively unbalanced state when first connected. It is advantageous to have

    a balancing network to nullify any residual signal.

    Figure 2.9 Parallel balance network

    The most common arrangement uses a shunt on one side of the bridge as shown in Fig.

    2.9, the fixed resistor in the potentiometer wiper lead being used to omit the loading

    effect on the active arms of the bridge.

    If all the resistance strain gauges are of exact equal values, the voltage at A and B will be

    0.5 V and the output V will be zero. In this hypothetical case, the potentiometer wiper

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    34/277

    34

    lead will be at the center (position C) and the voltage there will also be 0.5 V and

    therefore there will be no current through R4.

    However, if due to any of reasons mentioned above, the output V is not zero, the voltage

    at A is then either higher or lower than the voltage at B. in either case, bridge can be

    balanced by moving the wiper lead downward (C2) or upward (C1) respectively.

    The range of the balance network is given by

    44R

    R

    V

    V

    if R4>>R

    where V is the maximum out-ofbalance (zero offset) that can be nullified. The range

    can be extended by decreasing the value of R4. However, R4 can not be decreased

    indefinitely because it will then have loading effect on the power supply. Usually, to limit

    the loading effect, R4 is many times higher than R (of the order of 75 kto 100 k).

    2.3.1.3Shunt Calibration :Usually, in all signal conditioners, shunt resistors are provided across the arms connected

    to balance network. The shunt resistor, when connected, can usually accommodate a

    0.4% change of resistance of the arm shunted. This actually amounts to simulating 2000

    strain on the arm shunted as shown in Fig. 2.10. From equation (2.2), = (R/R)/G. For

    R = 120 , G = 2.0, R = 0.48, becomes 0.002 or 2000.

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    35/277

    35

    Figure 2.10 Shunt calibration

    2.3.1.4Signal Amplification :

    Signal amplification is the major function of a signal conditioner. Usually, the output

    voltage V (equations 2.12, 2.16) of a wheatstone bridge circuits is of the order of

    microvolts since the change in resistance is usually of the order of 105

    to 106

    ohms.

    Such a weak signal may not be accepted by the data indicator or recording system

    (although microvoltmeters are now available) and therefore the signal originating from

    transducer need to be amplified.

    Signal requirements for amplifier are quite stringent. These include impedance matching

    with the data indicator or recording device, high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), low drift

    (change in output voltage with time is called drift) etc.

    With low impedance devices such as resistance strain gauges, no special problems arise

    in the operational mode. A fairly conventional voltage amplifier with an input impedance

    of 100kor greater in suitable for use with the data indicator system (such as DVM) or

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    36/277

    36

    C.R.O. For bridge circuits in which neither output terminal is grounded, a differential

    amplifier is needed. Such amplifiers offer good common mode rejection characteristics.

    The philosophy underlying noise cancellation is outlined in Fig. 2.11.

    Figure 2.11 Noise cancellation by amplifier common-mode rejection

    If the common mode rejection ratio is of the order of 105,

    the noise that appears at the

    output terminal is largely eliminated. Such transducers have the ability to handle direct

    coupled signals, the D.C. drift being less than 10Vhour after allowing one hour warm-

    up. Low drift rates are fairly difficult to achieve and the cost of D.C. amplifier with this

    sort of performance is comparatively high.

    2.3.2 Signal Conditioner for Variable Capacitance Transducer :A number of signal conditioner is available based on the following schemes

    i) D.C. polarization as the input circuit for an amplifier.ii) An A.C. bridge circuit for use with and amplitude modulation system.iii) A frequency modulating oscillator circuit.iv) A pulse modulating circuit.

    The D.C. polarization circuit, the simplest of these, is described here. It is effected by the

    circuit shown in Fig. 2.12. in which C represents the capacitance of the transducer

    together with that of the connecting cable and any stray parallel capacitance. The

    polarizing voltage V is usually a few hundred volts. If it is assumed that the capacitance

    C can be represented by a constant portion C0plus a sinusoidally varying part C1sinwt,

    then

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    37/277

    37

    C = C0 + C1 sinwt

    If C1

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    38/277

    38

    amplified by an A.C. amplifier and demodulated. It is then filtered to remove any ripple

    from the carrier wave.

    Figure 2.13 Carrier wave amplifier system

    2.3.4 Signal Conditioner for Piezo-electric Transducer :Piezo-electric transducers are self-generating; they do not require an external source of

    energy. However, using them poses some special problem. In order to measure the charge

    separation which occurs when the piezo-electric material is mechanically strained, a

    measured circuit must be connected to it. The measuring circuit draws some current so

    that the charge, Q, leaks away. To minimize this leakage, the input impedance of the

    circuit must be made very large. Early approaches to this problem involved the use of

    valve voltmeters. The input impedance of such valves are very high so that negligible

    current is drawn less than 10-12

    Amp. Used in a simple voltage amplification circuit, Fig.

    2.14, the output signal is function of cable capacitance CC, and any stray capacitance CS

    between the input and ground as well as on the range- setting capacitor C1

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    39/277

    39

    Figure 2.14 Voltage amplifier

    Thus,CS CCCC

    mQV

    10

    This strong dependence on cable and stray capacitance is circumvented by using a

    charge-amplifier. This is an operational amplifier, in which the high input impedance is

    retained but strong negative capacitive feedback is employed as shown in Fig. 2.15.

    For such an arrangement, the output voltage V is given by

    inF CmmCQ

    V111

    If the open loop gainm, of the amplifier is very large (m > 50000), the output becomes

    FC

    QV

    Thus a voltage proportional to charge Q is produced.

    Figure 2.15 Charge amplifier

    2.4 Data Acquisition System :Data acquisition systems are used to measure, indicate and/or record signals originating

    from transducers and signal conditioning process. Such systems can be categorized into

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    40/277

    40

    two major classes : analog system and digital system. The type of data acquisition

    system, whether analog or digital, depends largely on the intended use of the recorded

    input data. In general, analog systems are used when wide bandwidth is required or when

    lower accuracy can be tolerated. Digital systems are used when the physical process

    being monitored is slowly varying (narrow bandwidth) and when high accuracy and low

    pre-channel cost is required. Digital data acquisition systems are in general more

    complex than analog systems both in terms of instrumentation involved and the volume

    and complexity of input data they can handle.

    2.4.1 Analog SystemAn analog system may be defined as continuous function such as a plot of voltage versus

    load (Fig. 2.16) or displacement versus pressure. Examples of the analog systems are the

    analog panel meter, CRO, strip-chart recorder, X-y plotter etc.

    Figure 2.16 Analog system

    A complete analog instrumentation system used in wind tunnel testing may consist of

    some or all of the following elements :

    a) Transducers: for translating physical parameters into electric signal.b) Signal Conditioners: for amplifying, modifying etc. of these signals.

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    41/277

    41

    c) Visual Display Devices: for continuous monitoring of the input signals. Thesedevices may include single or multi-channel CRO, storage CRO, panel meter,

    numerical display and so on.

    d) Graphic Recordings Instruments: for obtaining permanent records. Theseinstruments include strip chart recorder to provide continuous records on paper

    charts, X-y plotter, ultraviolet recorders etc.

    e) Magnetic Tape Instruments: for acquiring data, preserving their originalelectrical form and reproducing them at a later data for more detailed analysis.

    2.4.2 Digital System :Digital systems handle information in digital form. A digital quantity may consist of a

    number of discrete and discontinuous pulses (Fig. 2.17) which contains information about

    the magnitude or nature of quantity. Digital system may consist of digital panel meter,

    data-logger, computer etc. It is worth noting that if a digital system is employed, an

    analog-to-digital (A/D) converter must be used before since the output signal from the

    signal conditioner is in analog form.

    Figure 2.17 Digital system

    A complete digital instrumentation system may include some or all of the following

    elements (Fig. 2.18).

    a) Transducers: for translating physical parameters into electrical signals.b) Signals Conditioners: for amplifying, modifying, etc. of these signal.

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    42/277

    42

    c) Scanner or Multiplexer: for sequentially connecting multiple analog signals toone measuring/recording system.

    d) Signal Converter: translates the analog signal to a form acceptable by analog-to-digital converter. An example of signal converter is an amplifier for amplifying

    log-level voltages generating by strain gauges.

    e) Analog to Digital (A/D) converter: converts the analog voltage to its equivalentdigital form.

    f) Digital Recorder: records digital information on punched cards, perforatedpaper tape, magnetic tape, or a combination of these systems.

    g) Auxiliary Equipment: this section contains instruments for systemprogramming functions and digital data processing. These functions may be

    performed by individual instruments or by a digital computer.

    Figure 2.18 Complete digital instrumentation system

    Transd-

    ucer

    Signal

    Condit-

    ioner

    Scanner/

    Multiple-

    xer

    Signal

    Conver

    -ter

    A/D

    Conver

    -ter

    Digital

    Record-

    er

    Auxiliary Equipment

    and

    System Programming

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    43/277

    43

    Chapter 3

    TUNNEL CHARACTERISTICS

    3.1 Introduction :Once a wind tunnel is designed and constructed, the primary task is to calibrate and

    evaluate the tunnel characteristics in terms of uniformity in wind speed and direction, and

    also level of turbulence. A wind tunnel can be considered to have good characteristics if

    the flow in the test section has uniform speed, no angular variation in direction and low

    level of turbulence. Four tests are generally necessary for calibrating and evaluating a

    tunnel. These are:

    1. Air speed calibration.2. Determination of velocity variation in the test section.3. Determination of angular flow variation in the test section.4. Determination of turbulence level.

    3.2 Air Speed Calibration :In any experiment, the wind tunnel flow speed (or dynamic pressure) must be known for

    calculation of flow quantities. However, it is not desirable top insert a pitot-static tube inthe tunnel in the presence of a model. This is because of two reasons; firstly, the tube will

    interfere with the model and secondly the tube will not read true owing to the effect of

    model on it. It is therefore necessary to determine the airflow speed during an experiment

    without using the pitot-static tube. This is possible by a prior calibration of a wind tunnel

    manometer with respect to air speed.

    The pitot-static tube (Fig.3.1) at station J is considered. If P0be the total pressure, pjbe

    the static pressure and UJ be the oncoming flow speed at the test section, then from

    Bernoullis equation

    2

    02

    1JJ UpP

    or, JJ PPU 02 (3.1)

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    44/277

    44

    Figure 3.1 Calibration of wind tunnel manometer

    The pitot-static tube is connected to manometer M1which shows a difference in water-

    level of hJ , then

    ghPP JwaterJ 0

    The manometer M1is inclined at an angle of 600,

    gSinhPP JWaterJ 0

    0 60 (3.2)

    From equation (3.1) and (3.2)

    gSinhU JWaterJ 0602 (3.3)

    The air flow speed at test section can now be calculated from equation (3.3)

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    45/277

    45

    The calibration of flow speed UJ or dynamic pressure

    2

    2

    1JJ Uq can now be

    calibrated with the help of another manometer M2 . Applying Bernoullis equation at L

    and S stations gives

    22

    2

    1

    2

    1SSLL UpUp

    or, SSLL qpqp where q is the dynamic pressure.

    If the pressure drop between S and L stations due to friction is considered, total head at L

    will be slightly smaller by an amount (say qSK1where K1is he loss coefficient), then

    1kqqpqp SSSLL

    or, LSSL qkqpp 11

    Applying equations of continuity between stations L and S

    LLSS UAUA ; SLSL UAAU

    Therefore, 211 LSSSL AAkqpp (3.4)

    Applying equation of continuity between S and J

    JJSS UAUA ; JSJS UAAU

    or, JSJS qAAq 2

    Putting in equation (3.4)

    212

    1 LSJSJSL AAkqAApp

    jqk2

    or, 2kppq SLJ where k2 is a constant.

    Now, if another manometer M2 is connected to stations L and S, then

    ghpp LSwaterSL

    or, 2kghq LSwaterJ

    LSkh (3.5)

    where k is a constant.

    Equation (3.5) shows that the free stream dynamic pressure is linearly proportional to the

    pressure difference in terms of manometer water level difference hLS. Free stream speed

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    46/277

    46

    (U) at station J Is also therefore directly related to pressure difference (in terms of h LS )

    between two points L and S.

    The lows peed wind tunnel (LSWT) in the department can be run at 11 different speed

    setting. For 11 different speeds a table can be made concerning free stream speed Cat

    station J and hLS, as shown in Table 3.1.

    Table 3.1. : Calibration of tunnel speed

    No. of runs hJ (cm) qJ (N/m ) Uat J (m/s) hLS(cm)

    1.

    2.

    3.

    -

    -

    11.

    Calibration graphs (Fig. 3.2) can now be made in terms of qvs hLS and Uvs hLS. Using

    these graphs velocity or dynamic pressure in any subsequent experiment can be obtained

    simply from hLS (without using pitot-static tube).

    q U

    (N/m2) (m/s)

    hLS (cm) hLS (cm)

    Figure 3.2 calibration graphs

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    47/277

    47

    3.3 Determination of Velocity variation in test section :Velocity in the test section, even in the absence of model, is not uniform either in

    horizontal or vertical direction. Owing to the effects of viscosity, the velocity near the

    tunnel wall will be slower than the velocity on the centerline and velocity at downstream

    will be greater than at upstream. To achieve uniformity of speed various means like using

    guide vanes, breathers or screens are used.

    To check uniformity of speed in vertical direction velocity at different vertical positions

    (for example, points 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, in Fig. 3.3) can be measured by pitot-static tube.

    Velocity at these points for a particular tunnel speed setting can be obtained from

    ghU water 060sin2 (3.6)

    Tunnel Roof

    0 5 Test Section

    Exit 0 4 Entrance

    0 0 0 3 0 0

    5

    4 3

    2

    1

    0 2

    0 1

    Tunnel Floor

    Figure 3.3 Velocity measurement at five vertical and five horizontal positions

    Velocity in the wind tunnel varies in longitudinal directions (i.e. along the axis of the test

    section) because of viscous effects. As the flow progresses towards the exit, the boundary

    layer is thickened resulting in an effective reduction of area, increase in velocity and

    decrease in static pressure. Because of the decrease of static pressure there is tendency of

    the model to be drawn downstream. This creates a drag force acting on the body, termed

    horizontal buoyancy (chapter 10, 11), which is to be calculated and subtracted in any drag

    measurement experiment.

    Velocities (dynamic pressure) at different points along the tunnel center line (1, 2

    ,3, 4

    ,

    5 in Fig. 3.3) can be measured using the pitot-static tube as before. Subtraction of

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    48/277

    48

    dynamic pressure from total pressure (atmospheric pressure) will give static pressure at

    these points.

    A table can now made for calculation of velocity variation in vertical and horizontal

    directions as shown below.

    Table 3.2: Calculation of velocity at 9 points

    Stations y cm h cm Um/s Stations x cm h cm Um/s p (N/m )

    1. 1.

    2. 2.

    3. 3.

    4. 4.

    5. 5.

    U U (m/s)

    (m/s) p (N/m2)

    Height from floor, Distance along tunnel

    y (cm) Centerline, x (cm)

    Figure 3.4 Velocity variation in vertical and horizontal direction

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    49/277

    49

    Velocity variation with tunnel height (y) and velocity and static pressure variation with

    distance along tunnel center line (x) can now be plotted (Fig. 3.4). Static pressure

    gradient (p/x) should be calculated and noted.

    3.4 Determination of Angular Flow Variation in the Test Section :Due to defectiveness in design and construction, the flow in the test section may not be

    horizontal. It is therefore necessary to know whether such angularity in flow exists and if

    it exists then to measure it so as to allow compensations due to this angularity of flow.

    The angular variation in the flow can be checked by using a spherical yawhead as shown

    in Fig. 3.5. The yawhead has two smooth orifices usually 900apart on the forward face of

    a sphere. Obviously, if they are exactly placed, they will read equal pressure when the

    flow is directed along the axis of the yawhead. If the pressure at the two points a and b

    are not equal then it will indicate that the flow is inclined at an angle. This angle of yaw

    may then be determined by simply rotating the yawhead till the pressures at these points

    become equal. The angle of rotation of yawhead is then the angle of yaw of the flow. A

    similar procedure can be adopted for measuring yaw in the horizontal plane by measuring

    pressure at two other points aand bin the horizontal plane again 900apart.

    Figure 3.5 Spherical yawhead

    An alternative way of measuring yaw angle is to fix yawhead in tunnel and to determine

    the flow angularity by reading the pressure difference between two orifices and

    comparing with a previous calibration of the yawhead.

    It is believed that accurate testing can not be done if the variation in angle is greater than

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    50/277

    50

    5.0 degree. The larger angles of yaw distorts the span load excessively.

    Unfortunately, the variation of flow angle across the jet may change with the tunnel

    speed. If such a change is noted, a testing speed must be selected and the guide and anti-

    twist vanes should be adjusted to give smooth flow at that speed.

    3.5 Turbulence Level :The flow conditions inside the wind tunnel are not exactly same as those in free air. The

    flow inside the tunnel is more turbulent than the free air because of the effects of the

    propeller, the guide vanes and the vibrations of tunnel walls. This discrepancy in the

    turbulence level results in disagreement of tests made in the wind-tunnel and in the free

    air at the same Reynolds number. By the same reasoning, tests made in different tunnels

    at the same Reynolds number may not agree. A correction factor is therefore necessary

    for compensating the turbulence created in the tunnel.

    It is found that the flow pattern in the tunnel at a given Reynolds number corresponds

    closely to the flow pattern in the free air at a higher Reynolds number. The increase ratio

    is called the turbulence factor and the effective Reynolds number RNeof the tunnel can

    be obtained from the calculated Reynolds number using the turbulence factor of the

    tunnel from

    RNTFRNe (3.7)

    The turbulence may be found with a sphere in two ways :

    a) Drag sphereb) Pressure sphere

    3.5.1 Drag Sphere :The drag coefficient of sphere is affected greatly by change in velocity. Contrary to the

    laymans guess, CD for a sphere decrease with increasing airspeed since the result ofearlier transition to turbulent flow is that the air sticks longer to the surface of the sphere.

    This action decreases form or pressure drag, yielding a lower total drag coefficient.

    Obviously, the Reynolds number at which the transition occurs at a given point on the

    sphere is a function of the turbulence already present in the air and hence the drag

    coefficient of a sphere can be used to measure turbulence . The method is to measure the

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    51/277

    51

    drag, D, for a small sphere 15 or 20 cm in diameter, at many tunnel speeds. After

    subtracting the horizontal buoyancy drag DB the drag coefficient may be computed

    from

    22 42

    1

    Ud

    DD

    C B

    D

    (3.8)

    Figure 3.6 Variation of CDwith Reynolds Number

    The sphere drag coefficient is then plotted against the calculated Reynolds number, RN

    (Fig.3.6). The Reynolds number at which the drag coefficient equals 0.30 is noted and

    termed the critical Reynolds number, RNC. The above particular value of the drag

    coefficient occurs in free air at RN = 385000, so it follows that the turbulence factor may

    be given by

    TF = 385000/RNC (3.9)

    Once the turbulence factor (TF) is obtained from equation (3.9), the effective Reynolds

    number, RNe,can now be calculated from equation (3.7).

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    52/277

    52

    3.5.2 Pressure Sphere :An alternative method (which will be used) of measuring turbulence makes use of

    pressure sphere. No force tests are necessary and the difficulty of finding the support

    drag is eliminated. The pressure sphere has an orifice at the front stagnation point and

    four more interconnected and equally spaced orifices at

    0

    2

    122 from the theoretical rear

    stagnation point (Fig.3.7).

    Figure 3.7 Pressure Sphere

    A lead from the front orifices is connected across a manometer to the lead from the four

    rear orifices. After the pressure difference due to the static longitudinal pressure gradient

    is subtracted, the resultant pressure difference, p for each Reynolds number is divided

    by the dynamic pressure for the appropriate Reynolds number, and the quotient is plotted

    against Reynolds number (Fig. 3.8). It has been found that the pressure difference p/q

    is 1.22 when the sphere drag coefficient is 0.30 and hence this value of p/qdetermines

    the critical Reynolds number RNC. Once the turbulence factor is determined, the

    turbulence factor may then be determined, as before, from equation (3.9).

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    53/277

    53

    Figure 3.8 Variation of p/q with Reynolds number

    This experiment is carried out on a sphere of diameter 20 cm. The following table may be

    made for plotting p/q vs Reynolds number.

    Table 3.3 : Experimental measurement of turbulence factor

    No.of

    Runs

    hLS

    (cm)

    U from Fig.

    1.2 b (m/sec)

    qfrom

    Fig.1.2 a

    (N/m2)

    hj

    (cm)

    p

    = hjwg.sin600

    (N/m2)

    p/q RN

    = UD/

    1.

    2.

    3.

    -

    11.

    Turbulence factor usually varies from 1.0 to 3.0. Values above 1.4 indicate that the tunnel

    has too much turbulence for reliable testing. Low turbulence factor is necessary for the

    test data to be reliable.

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    54/277

    54

    Chapter 4

    FLOW VISUALISATION

    4.1 Introduction :Flow visualization techniques are a means of obtaining the qualitative pattern of the flow

    about a body. Flows encountered in engineering application are often complex in nature.

    Such techniques of flow visualization helps in obtaining a better understanding of the

    flow characteristics. Many a times suitable mathematical methods have been developed

    for a particular flow problem based on such qualitative studies.

    Flow visualisation techniques can be classified as follows :

    Flow visualisation techniques

    Incompressible flow Compressible flow

    Entire flow field Only on model Flow pattern Shock visualisation

    1. Smoke 1. Tuft 1. Oil flow 1. Shadowgraph2. Tuft on wire mesh 2. Oil flow 2. Interferometer

    3. Evaporation 3. Schlieren

    4.2 Incompressible Flow Visualisation Techniques :

    4.2.1 Smoke Method :Flow visualisation with smoke is achieved in a smoke tunnel with a facility to emit

    cleaned smoke in streamer form (Fig. 4.1). Smoke is generated by burning kerosene or

    paraffin. Particular care is needed in introducing the smoke in the tunnel by a blower

    without disturbing the flow in the tunnel. This smoke follows the air flow and makes the

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    55/277

    55

    flow pattern visible. Smoke tunnels are usually low-velocity tunnels and most of them

    have two dimensional test sections. Such tunnels are usually open circuit type to prevent

    accumulation of smoke in the tunnel. The walls of test section are made of glass so that

    the flow can observed (Fig. 4.2) and/or photographed.

    Figure 4.1 Smoke Tunnel

    Figure 4.2 Flow separation at high angle of incidence

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    56/277

    56

    4.2.2 Tuft Method :Tufts are simplest and most often used. A large number of silk tuft are pasted at one end

    on the surface of the wing. The length of each tuft is taken about 2 cm. The most rapid

    method of installing the tufts is to attach them about every one inch to the tape and

    pasting the tape on the model (Fig. 4.3). To obtain clear photography the model is usually

    painted black while the tufts used are white. Since the open ended tufts align with the

    flow the general direction of he tufts indicate the direction of the flow on the surface of

    the body. Motion of tufts usually means that the flow in the boundary layer has become

    turbulent. Violent motion or tendency a tendency to lift from the surface and point

    upstream indicates separation.

    If the tufts are to be used to examine the entire flow field they may be supported on wires

    on a mesh installed inside the tunnel. Complete grids of wires normal to the flow can be

    fixed in the tunnel behind a wing model. Tufts attached on one end on the mesh junctions

    will align with the flow direction and show up trailing vortices.

    Figure 4.3 Visualisation of flow over a straked wing by tuft method

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    57/277

    57

    4.2.3 Oil Flow Method :In this method the model is pasted with a semi-liquid mixture of mobil oil and grease

    and a dye. The dye taken for this purpose is a chemical known as Rhodamin B. When the

    model is installed in the tunnel, the air flow spreads the mixture along the streamlines so

    that after the tunnel has been stopped the flow pattern remains. The process requires

    about 30 minutes of continuous air flow in the tunnel. The model is thereafter removed

    from the tunnel and the flow pattern (Fig. 4.4) can be examined afterwards under

    ultraviolet light.

    An alternative approach is to mix mobil oil and titanium dioxide (dye) and paste on the

    model. In this case the mixture gets dried up in a few minutes and the flow pattern can be

    observed without using ultraviolet light. Care must be taken so that the oil does not

    follow machining marks on the surface.

    Figure 4.4 Visualisation of flow over a straked wing by oil flow method

    4.2.4 Evaporation Method :Napthaline may be dissolved in acetone and pasted on a model. When the tunnel runs

    naphthalene evaporated quickly from the turbulent portion making that portion white. If

    the model is painted black, transition from laminar to turbulent flow can be observed

    easily.

    Among the incompressible flow visualization techniques it may to be noted that tuft, oil

    flow and evaporation method gives pattern of flow on the surface of the model only while

    the smoke method (and tuft on mesh screen) gives the picture of the entire flow field.

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    58/277

    58

    Among the compressible flow visualization techniques, only the oil flow method,

    described in section 4.2.3, can be used. Other methods are not suitable because of the

    high speed involved.

    4.3 Compressible Flow Visualisation Techniques :

    4.3.1 Shadowgraph Method :A parallel beam of light is produced by a point source. It is passed through a converging

    lens and then through the working section. Since the flow in the working section is

    compressible, refraction of light rays through the compressible medium will be different.

    The screen will be illuminated where rays have converged. Shock waves then appear on

    the screen as two adjacent bands, one dark and one light, corresponding to the sudden

    increase in density gradient at the front of the shock and the sudden decrease in gradient

    at the rear.

    Figure 4.5 Shadowgraph picture of flow about a sphere

    4.3.2 Schlieren Method :Schlieren method is most widely used. It is sensitive to density changes whereas

    shadowgraph method is sensitive to change in density gradient. The light rays passing

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    59/277

    59

    through the varying density area (test section) will be deflected. The screen will be

    illuminated or darkened depending on the deflection of the light beam. This method is

    described in details in chapter 20.

    4.3.3 Interferometer Method :A direct response to density changes is given by the interferometer which depends on the

    interference fringes formed on the recombination of two light rays from the same source

    which have taken different times to make the journey.

    If the two path lengths are same, interference fringes may be produced. The light paths

    are adjusted with no airflow disturbance to produce a uniform and parallel set of

    interference fringes on screen giving uniform illumination. When the tunnel is run with

    model installed, fringe spacing will change by an amount proportional to the phase

    change by the disturbance at any point which is in turn proportional to the change of fluid

    density integrated along the light path. If the interferometer is pre-calibrated, it will give

    absolute values of density.

    Figure 4.6 Schematic diagram of the interferometer system

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    60/277

    60

    Chapter 5

    PRESSURE MEASUREMENT BY MECHANICAL DEVICE

    5.1 Introduction :Pressure, at different points on the surface of model, can be obtained by drilling holes on

    the surface and connecting tubes from these points to a mechanical device like a multi-

    tube liquid level manometer (Fig. 5.1). liquid levels, which are initially in the same level,

    undergo changes in height proportional to the pressure applied and pressure at different

    points in the surface can be calculated from the heights of the columns.

    Figure 5.1 Liquid level manometer

    Multi-tube, indicated schematically in Fig. 5.1 may be used in vertical position. For

    increased sensitivity the manometer may be inclined at various angles in which readings

    are multiplied by appropriate factors. Also, in stead of water, liquid of specific gravity

    less than 1.0 may be used.

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    61/277

    61

    The reservoir for manometer liquid is usually mounted on a vertical rod at a height which

    is adjustable. It is recommended that the reservoir be normally left open to atmospheric

    pressures. Pressures p1, p2, p3,.are then gauge pressures i.e., pressures relative to

    atmospheric datum. Pressure relative to some other chosen datum may be obtained by

    connecting the reservoir and one manometer tube to the required datum.

    Manometers are generally graduated so that height of liquid level may be read in cm and

    the pressure is calculated from the height of the liquid column in the relevant tube. Some

    manometers are graduated directly in N/m2or in millibar (1mb = 100 N/m

    2).

    5.2 Measurement of Cp :Pressure is usually expressed in non-dimensional form as pressure coefficient Cp . by

    definition Cp is given by

    2

    2

    1

    U

    ppCp

    (5.1)

    Using a liquid-level manometer as shown in Fig. 5.1, pressure coefficient Cp can be

    obtained in two ways depending on whether the tunnel is precalibrated or not.

    5.2.1 Without Pre-Calibration of the Tunnel :If the tunnel is not pre-calibrated to give U, two holes are to be drilled on the walls of

    the settling chamber and the test section and directly connected to the manometer in

    addition to connecting pressure port of the configuration.

    Now, by Bernoullis theorem,

    SPUpP 2

    02

    1

    where PS is the settling chamber pressure.

    Or, ppU S2

    21

    If the manometer is graduated in N/m2,(p - p) and (PS - p) can be obtained directly in

    units of N/m2and Cpcan be obtained as the ratio of the two given by

    pP

    ppC

    S

    p (5.2)

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    62/277

    62

    Non-dimensional pressure coefficient is thus obtained simply as a ratio of pressure

    differences and value of Uis not needed. If Uis needed (e.g., to calculate Reynolds

    number) Ucan be obtained in a simple manner by assuming no frictional loss between

    settling chamber and test section.

    Under this assumption, Ucan be obtained as

    pPU S2 (5.3)

    If the manometer is graduated to give height of liquid column, Cpcan be obtained as ratio

    of column heights as shown below.

    ghhpp liquid

    and hhppU SliquidS 2

    2

    1

    Where,

    hS = height of column in the tube connected to settling chamber.

    h = height of the water column in the tube connected to the pressure port on the

    configuration where pressure is being measured.

    h= height of the column in the tube connected to test section

    This gives ,

    pP

    pp

    CS

    p

    hhg

    hhg

    Sliquid

    liquid

    hh

    hh

    S

    (5.4)

    Cp is then obtained as ratio of height difference of liquid columns.

    By assuming zero frictional loss between settling chamber and test section U can be

    obtained as

    pPU S2

    ghhSliquid 2 (5.5)

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    63/277

    63

    5.2.2 With Pre-Calibration of the Tunnel :If the tunnel is pre-calibrated to give U, pressure coefficient can be derived in terms of

    U.

    22

    2

    1

    2

    1

    U

    ghh

    UppC liquidp

    If the manometer is inclined at 600, then

    2

    0

    2

    1

    60sin

    U

    ghhC

    liquid

    p

    If the liquid is water, height is graduated in cm and density of air is taken as 1.225 kg/m3,

    then

    2225.12

    1

    866.081.91000

    U

    hhCp

    270.138 Uhh (5.6)

    Experimental measurement of pressure distribution on a few simple models are described

    in the following sections. In all models several holes are drilled on the surface and

    connected to the multi-tube manometer. Pressure distribution can then be obtained from

    equation (5.4) or (5.6) depending on whether the tunnel is pre-calibrated or not. These

    models include :

    a) Circular cylinder modelb) Elliptical cylinder modelc) Spherical model

    5.3

    Pressure Distribution on Circular Cylinder Model :Exact analytical solutions are available for limited cases of direct potential flow

    problems. The problem of two dimensional flow about a cylindrical body is one of such

    problems. For steady, inviscid, incompressible irrotational flow, for which the governing

    equation is Laplaces equation, the non lifting two dimensional flow about a cylindrical

  • 5/26/2018 Lecture Notes on Wind Tunnel Testing

    64/277

    64

    body can be simulated by placing a doublet in uniform flow. The total velocity at any

    point P (Fig. 5.2) is obtained as

    sin2 Uqt (5.7)

    Figure 5.2 Circular cylinder in uniform flow

    The pressure distribution can be obtained from Be