legal and ethical issues in assessment ignorance is no defense

22
Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment Ignorance is no defense

Post on 21-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment Ignorance is no defense

Legal and Ethical Issues in AssessmentIgnorance is no defense

Page 2: Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment Ignorance is no defense

Ethics

Page 4: Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment Ignorance is no defense

Invasion of Privacy

• Informed consent• Relevance

Page 5: Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment Ignorance is no defense

Right to Results

• Regardless of scoring mechanism, counselors are responsible to provide appropriate explanations

• Must interpret in terms that client can understand

Page 6: Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment Ignorance is no defense

Least Stigmatizing Label

• If categories are used, must be described precisely

• Sometimes diagnosis is related to treatment and even if counselor is trying to be helpful, it is both illegal and unethical to change a diagnosis

Page 7: Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment Ignorance is no defense

Computerized Assessment

• Ethical issues in the use of computerized assessment

Page 8: Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment Ignorance is no defense

Legal Issues in Assessment

Page 9: Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment Ignorance is no defense

Civil Rights Act of 1991

• Griggs v. Duke Power Company– If instrument has an

adverse or disparate impact, employer must show that hiring procedures are job related

– Brought about stronger focus on validity of employment tests

Page 10: Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment Ignorance is no defense

• Ban on separate norms– U. S. Employment Services

used separate norms for African Americans and Hispanics on GATB

– Act said this is illegal

Page 11: Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment Ignorance is no defense

Policies and Procedures for Processing Complaints of Ethical Violations

• ACA• Consult with colleagues• Clients can charge• Must indicate specific

ethics violated• Due process

Page 12: Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment Ignorance is no defense

Disabilities Acts

• American with Disabilities Act of 1990– Focus on employment and

unemployment testing– Fair measures and

assessment procedures needed

Page 13: Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment Ignorance is no defense

• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997– PL 94-142– Use variety of tools and

strategies, no single procedure, technically sound instruments

– Attend to multicultural issues

Page 14: Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment Ignorance is no defense

Family Rights and Privacy Act of 1974• Student right to privacy• No release of records

without permission• Counseling records kept

in separate locked cabinet and accessible only to the counselor are not considered part of educational record

Page 15: Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment Ignorance is no defense

• Without parental permission kids cannot be given psychological testing or treatment that may reveal information concerning mental and psychological problems potentially embarrassing to student or student’s family

Page 16: Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment Ignorance is no defense

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPPA)• Very complicated• Concerns security and privacy

of health information• State laws take precedence• If involved with third party

payment, HIPPA is involved• Must develop, maintain, and

account for disclosures of private client information for 6 years

Page 17: Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment Ignorance is no defense

Truth in Testing

• New York state• Nadar and SAT• Mandated that if student

asked, copy of questions and correct answers must be provided

• Only CA passed similar legislation

Page 18: Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment Ignorance is no defense

Litigation

Page 19: Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment Ignorance is no defense

Test Bias and Placement

• Issue is use of intelligence tests with African American students because of discrimination

• Larry P. v. Riles (1979)- Judge Peckham bans use of intelligence testing in CA because discriminatory

• PASE v. Hannon (1980)– judge ruled opposite way

• 1992, Judge Peckham lifts ban

Page 20: Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment Ignorance is no defense

Minimum Competency

• Minimum competency – kids graduating from high school and can’t balance check book

• Controversy centers on discrimination

• Debra P. v. Turlington (1981) in FL

Page 21: Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment Ignorance is no defense

– Ruling set precedent about need for relationship between curriculum and minimum competency testing

– If students not taught material covered on test, students’ Constitutional rights (equal protection and due process) are violated

Page 22: Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment Ignorance is no defense

Right to Privacy

• Soroka et al. v. Dayton-Hudson Company (1991)– Target used personality inventory

for employment screening– Court ruled that constitutional

right to privacy and statutory prohibition against improper inquiries and discriminatory conduct was violated by asking about religious beliefs and sexual orientation