legal ethics - st. louis paralegals association - june 2017

35
Legal Ethics Michael Downey Downey Law Group LLC

Upload: downey-law-group-llc

Post on 29-Jan-2018

51 views

Category:

Law


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

LegalEthics

MichaelDowneyDowneyLawGroupLLC

Page 2: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

BasicsofProfessionalLiability

2

Negligence Breach ofFiduciaryDuty LegalMalpractice

Duty Fiduciaryrelationship Attorney-clientrelationship

Breach Breach(offiduciaryduty)

Breach(of dutyowedclient)

Causation Causation Causation

Damages Damages Damages

Page 3: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

3

5/10/17

5

9

LegalInnovations

10

Page 4: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

BreachofFiduciaryDuty

4

Page 5: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

ElementsofBreachofFiduciaryDuty

Whethercharacterizedasbreachoffiduciarydutyorconstructivefraud,theelementsofsuchaclaimare:(1) anattorney-clientrelationship(2) breachofafiduciaryobligationbytheattorney(3) proximatecausation(4) damages totheclient(5) nootherrecognizedtortencompassesthefacts

alleged

Klemmev.Best,941S.W.2d493,496(Mo.1997)”

5

Page 6: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

LawyerasFiduciary

Principal(Client)

Agent(Lawyer)

Page 7: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

FiduciaryDutiesOwedtoClientsLoyalty

Confidentiality

SafekeepingPropertyIndependentJudgment

Communication

Candor

Page 8: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

LegalMalpractice

8

Page 9: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

ElementsofLegalMalpracticeThefouressential elements ofa legalmalpractice actionare:’(1) thatanattorney-clientrelationshipexisted;(2) that[theattorney]actednegligentlyorinbreach ofcontract;(3) thatsuchactsweretheproximatecauseofthe[client's]

damages;(4) thatbutfor[theattorney's]conductthe[client]wouldhave

beensuccessful intheprosecutionof[the][underlying]claim.'"

Boatrightv.Shaw,804S.W.2d795,796(Mo.App.E.D.1990)

9

Page 10: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

FormationofClient-LawyerRelationship

Arelationshipofclientandlawyerariseswhen:1. apersonmanifeststoalawyertheperson’sintent

thatthelawyerprovidelegalservices fortheperson;andeither(a) thelawyermanifeststothepersonconsenttodoso;or(b) thelawyerfailstomanifestlackofconsenttodoso,and

thelawyerknowsorreasonablyshouldknowthatthepersonreasonablyreliesonthelawyertoprovidetheservices;or

2. atribunalwithpowertodosoappointsthelawyertoprovidetheservices.

10

Page 11: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

“TrialWithinaTrial”

• Not “Didthelawyerdosomethingwrong?”but

• “Didlawyerdosomethingwrongthatcausedyoutolose?”

11

Page 12: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

12

11.3

8.9

8.8

8.6

6.7

6.6

5.9

5.4

5.3

5

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

FailuretoKnow/ApplyLaw

PlanningError

InadequateDisc/Investigation

FailuretoFileDocuments/NoDeadline

FailuretoCalendar

FailuretoKnowDeadline

Procrastination

FailuretoObtainClientConsent

ConflictofInterest

Fraud

10MostCommonLegalMalpracticeErrorAllegations

Source:ABAStandingCommitteeonLawyers’ProfessionalLiability

Page 13: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

13

Page 14: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

14

Page 15: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

Duty=EthicsRules(?)

15

Page 16: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

Missouri Supreme Court

Board of LawExaminers The Missouri Bar Attorney Discipline

SystemJudicial

Commission

MissouriOrganizationalChart

16

Page 17: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

EthicsRulesinMalpracticeCasesMissouriRule4Scope[7]–

ViolationofaRuleshouldnot itselfgiverisetoacauseofactionagainstalawyernorshoulditcreateanypresumptioninsuchacasethatalegaldutyhasbeenbreached....TheRulesaredesignedtoprovideguidancetolawyersandtoprovideastructureforregulatingconductthroughdisciplinaryagencies.Theyarenotdesignedtobeabasisforcivilliability.…ThefactthataRuleisajustbasisforalawyer'sself-assessment,orforsanctioningalawyerundertheadministrationofadisciplinaryauthority,doesnotimplythatanantagonistinacollateralproceedingortransactionhasstandingtoseekenforcementoftheRule.Accordingly,nothingintheRulesshouldbedeemedtoaugmentanysubstantivelegaldutyoflawyersortheextra-disciplinaryconsequences ofviolatingsuchaduty.

17

Page 18: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

StructureoftheEthicsRules4-1.X Client-lawyerrelationship(18rules)4-2.XCounselor(3rules)4-3.XAdvocate(9rules)4-4.XTransactionswithPersonsOtherthanClients(4rules)4-5.X LawFirmsandAssociations(7rules)4-6.XPublicService(5rules)4-7.X InformationaboutLegalServices(6rules)4-8.X MaintainingtheIntegrityoftheProfession(5rules)

Page 19: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

EthicalObligationstoClients

4-1.1– competence4-1.3– diligence4-1.4– communication4-1.6– confidentiality4-1.7to4-1.12– loyalty(noconflicts)4-1.15– safeguardpropertyandmoney

19

Page 20: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

LegalMalpracticev.BreachofFiduciaryDuty

• Legalmalpractice– breachofdutyofcompetence(4-1.3)ordiligence(4-1.3)

• Breachoffiduciaryduty– breachofanotherfiduciaryobligation(suchasthoseinRules4-1.2and4-1.4through4-1.18)

20

Page 21: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

Competence– Rule4-1.1

“Alawyershallprovidecompetentrepresentationtoaclient.Competentrepresentationrequiresthelegalknowledge,skill,thoroughness andpreparationreasonablynecessaryfortherepresentation.”

21

Page 22: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

KeepingClientInformed– Rule4-1.4(a)

Alawyershall:(1) keeptheclientreasonablyinformedaboutthe

statusofthematter;(2) promptlycomplywithreasonablerequestsfor

information;and(3) consultwiththeclientaboutanyrelevantlimitation

onthelawyer’sconductwhenthelawyerknowstheclientexpectsassistancenotpermittedbytheRulesofProfessionalConductorotherlaw.

22

Page 23: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

Confidentiality– Rule4-1.6(a)

Alawyershallnotrevealinformationrelatingtotherepresentationofaclient unlesstheclientgivesinformedconsent,thedisclosureisimpliedlyauthorizedinordertocarryouttherepresentationorthedisclosureispermittedbyparagraph(b).

Page 24: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

“Informationrelatingtotherepresentationofaclient...” Rule4-1.6

Client

Court Filings

Real Estate Records

Newspaper

Depositions

Pleadings

Opposing Party

Lawyer

Page 25: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

(Anticipated)Rule4-1.6(c)

ProtectionofConfidences.

Model Rule1.6(c):"Alawyershallmakereasonableeffortstopreventtheinadvertentorunauthorizeddisclosureof,orunauthorizedaccessto,informationrelatingtotherepresentationofaclient."

25

Page 26: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

WhatAre"Reasonable"Precautions

26

Page 27: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

EvaluationofSafeguardsFactorstobeconsideredindeterminingthereasonablenessofthelawyer’seffortsinclude,butarenotlimitedto,

– thesensitivityoftheinformation– thelikelihoodofdisclosureifadditionalsafeguardsarenot

employed– thecostofemployingadditionalsafeguards– thedifficultyofimplementingthesafeguards (and)– theextenttowhichthesafeguardsadverselyaffectthelawyer’s

abilitytorepresentclients(e.g.,bymakingadeviceorimportantpieceofsoftwareexcessivelydifficulttouse)

27

Page 28: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

Conflicts(Loyalty&Confidentiality)Rule4-1.7(a)Exceptasprovidedinparagraph(b),alawyershallnotrepresentaclientiftherepresentationinvolvesaconcurrentconflictofinterest.Aconcurrentconflictofinterestexistsif:

(1) therepresentationofoneclientwillbedirectlyadversetoanotherclient;or

(2) thereisasignificantriskthattherepresentationofoneormoreclientswillbemateriallylimitedbythelawyer'sresponsibilitiestoanotherclient,aformerclientorathirdpersonorbyapersonalinterestofthelawyer.

Page 29: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

Rule4-8.4

Itisprofessionalmisconductforalawyerto:(a) violateorattempttoviolatetheRulesof

ProfessionalConduct,knowinglyassistorinduceanothertodoso,ordosothroughtheactsofanother ...

29

Page 30: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

DutytoSupervise– Rule4-5.3Withrespecttoanonlawyeremployedorretainedbyorassociatedwithalawyer:

(a) apartner,andalawyerwhoindividuallyortogetherwithotherlawyerspossessescomparablemanagerialauthorityinalawfirmshallmakereasonableeffortstoensurethatthefirmhasineffectmeasures givingreasonableassurancethattheperson’sconductiscompatiblewiththeprofessionalobligationsofthelawyer;

(b) alawyerhavingdirectsupervisoryauthorityoverthenonlawyershallmakereasonableefforts toensurethattheperson’sconductiscompatiblewiththeprofessionalobligationsofthelawyer;and...

30

Page 31: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

DutytoSupervise– Rule4-5.3Withrespecttoanonlawyeremployedorretainedbyorassociatedwithalawyer:...(a)(b)

(c) alawyershallberesponsible forconductofsuchapersonthatwouldbeaviolationoftheRulesofProfessionalConductifengagedinbyalawyerif:(1) thelawyerorders or,withtheknowledgeofthespecific

conduct,ratifies theconductinvolved;or(2) thelawyerisapartnerorhascomparablemanagerial

authority inthelawfirminwhichthepersonisemployed,orhasdirectsupervisoryauthorityovertheperson,andknowsoftheconductatatimewhenitsconsequencescanbeavoidedormitigatedbutfailstotakereasonableremedialaction.

31

Page 32: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

Levelsof(Formal)Discipline• Disbarment• Suspension– Indefinite(IL/MO)orspecificperiod(IL)

• StayedSuspension• Probation• Reprimand(IL"Censure")

– Public– Private

32

Page 33: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

Other"Discipline"

• Admonition(MO)orReprimand(IL)– Temporary– Lesspublic– Oftensomelevelofchoice

• Diversion

33

Page 34: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

ProblemswithDiscipline• Disciplinesystemmayemployvolunteerlawyers• Manytypesofconductexcluded

– Feedisputes– Incivility

• Disciplinedlawyersaredisproportionatelysoloorsmallfirmpractitionersandminorities

• Clientsreportmostmisconduct,butmanytypesofproblemsescapeclientnotice

• Lackofinformationgiventocomplainant/client• Mostdisciplineispunitive,notrehabilitative

34

Page 35: Legal Ethics - St. Louis Paralegals Association - June 2017

MichaelDowneyDowneyLawGroupLLC

(314)961-6644(844)961-6644tollfree

[email protected]

ThankYou