lepton fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 august 2010. intro & selections reference current ttbar selections...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb
26 August 2010
![Page 2: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Intro & Selections
• Reference current ttbar selections– New: Mt < 25
• Electrons: endcap alignment correction for data, no Δη
• Data & Monte Carlo samples listed at the end
2
![Page 3: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
W contribution to QCD Fake Rates
• We want to measure the rate of fake leptons from QCD in data
• Leptonic W decays will contribute to some extent– We have so far required low MET ( tcmet < 20 GeV )
to reduce the contribution from W– We now require low transverse mass also ( Mt < 25 )
• What effect does the presence of W have on the fake rate?
3
![Page 4: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Electron Fake Rates in Monte Carlo
QCD_Pt30 OnlyQCD_Pt30 + Weν
V1 Fake Rate V3 Fake RateV2 Fake Rate
Presence of W does not dominate Fake Rate - W contribution introduces some bias - QCD prevails 4
( No cuts on MET or Mt )
![Page 5: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Muon Fake Rates in Monte Carlo
W contribution suppressed by requiring low MET and Mt - We have been requiring tcmet < 20, we now require Mt < 25 also - W domination delayed by ~10 GeV in Pt - underlying QCD Fake Rate unaffected
InclusiveMu15 + Wmunu
InclusiveMu15 + Wmunu - tcmet< 20 AND Mt < 25
InclusiveMu15
InclusiveMu15- tcmet< 20 AND Mt < 25
5
Fake Rate Dominated by W
![Page 6: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Muon Fake Rates – Comparison of Data and Monte Carlo
W evident in Data also - Good data / MC agreement - W starts to dominate above ~ 35 GeV
How do we estimate the fake rate for Pt > 35 where W is irreducible? - Simply use the fake rate from the 30-35 GeV Pt bin for Pt > 35 GeV - QCD background peaks at low Pt and QCD FR is somewhat flat - Alternatively, use fake rate from b tagged jets
Data ( HLT_Mu9 AND 15 GeV Offline Jet )MC InclusiveMu15 + WmunuMC InclusiveMu15
Luminosity ~ 840 / nb
6
![Page 7: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Fake Rates - Jet vs. Lepton Triggered
• Lepton fake rates have so far been determined from jet triggered ( HLT_Jet15U ) samples– Then require offline lepton away from jet trigger
• Jet triggers are now heavily prescaled– HLT_Jet15U prescale is now 200 ( 4.1 v3 at 3.5x1030 )
• Alternatively, can derive fake rates from lepton triggered samples ( Mu9, Ele10_LW_L1R )– Then apply threshold to offline jet away from lepton
• Lepton & Jet triggers should give the same result – Lepton triggers offer more statistics
7
![Page 8: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Electron Fake Rates in DataComparison of Jet & Lepton Triggers
Luminosity ~ 840 / nb
HLT_Jet15UHLT_Ele10_LW_L1RAND 15 GeV Offline Jet
Jet & Lepton Triggered Fake Rates are Comparable - Lepton Triggered samples offer higher statistics
V1 Fake Rate V3 Fake RateV2 Fake Rate
8
![Page 9: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Muon Fake Rates in DataComparison of Jet & Lepton Triggers
Luminosity ~ 840 / nb
HLT_Jet15U
HLT_Mu9 AND15 GeV Offline Jet
Jet & Lepton Triggered Fake Rates Agree Before Run 137000 - Difference after run 137000 not yet understood - Lepton triggered samples offer higher statistics
9
Runs before 137000All Runs
![Page 10: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Jet Threshold Dependence of Lepton Fake Rates
• Systematic errors are estimated by measuring the dependence of the fake rate on the jet threshold
• Comparison of lepton triggered fake rates with different offline jet pt thresholds are shown on the following slides
10
![Page 11: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Muon Fake Rates in DataDependence on Jet Threshold
Luminosity ~ 840 / nb
Systematics ~ 50%Isolation relaxed ( 0.15 to 0.40 ) in the muon fake rate denominator
11
HLT_Mu9
5 GeV 15 GeV 30 GeV 50 GeV
![Page 12: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Electron Fake Rates in DataDependence on Jet Threshold
Luminosity ~ 840 / nb
12
HLT_Ele10_LW_L1R 5 GeV 15 GeV 30 GeV 50 GeV
Systematics ~ 50%V2 fake rate ( which does not relax isolation) shows least dependence on jet threshold
V1 Fake Rate V3 Fake RateV2 Fake Rate
![Page 13: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Summary• Leptons from W decay pollute QCD fake rates
– Results in tolerable bias for electrons– Muon fake rate is dominated by W above ~ 35 GeV in
spite of requiring low MET and Mt. • Solution: Extend fake rate from lower Pt or require b tagged jets
• Fake rates derived from lepton triggers offer more statistics than those from jet triggers
• Jet Threshold– Systematics ~ 50%
13
![Page 14: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Samples• /InclusiveMu15/Spring10-START3X_V26_S09-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO• /QCD_Pt30/Spring10-START3X_V26_S09-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO • /Wenu/Spring10-START3X_V26_S09-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO• /Wmunu/Spring10-START3X_V26_S09-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO
• /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-SD_EG-Jun14thSkim_v1/RECO• /EG/Run2010A-Jun14thReReco_v1/RECO• /EG/Run2010A-Jul16thReReco-v2/RECO• /EG/Run2010A-PromptReco-v4/RECO
• /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-SD_Mu-Jun14thSkim_v1/RECO• /Mu/Run2010A-Jun14thReReco_v1/RECO• /Mu/Run2010A-Jul16thReReco-v1/RECO• /Mu/Run2010A-PromptReco-v4/RECO
• /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-SD_JetMETTau-Jun14thSkim_v1/RECO• /JetMETTau/Run2010A-Jun14thReReco_v2/RECO• /JetMETTau/Run2010A-Jul16thReReco-v1/RECO• /JetMETTau/Run2010A-PromptReco-v4/RECO
14
![Page 15: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Backup Slides
15
![Page 16: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Runs < 137000 Runs > 137000 Runs < 139000
Runs > 139000 Runs < 141000
Runs > 141000 Runs < 143000
Run Dependence of Muon Fake Rate
All Runs Runs > 136500HLT_15u
HLT_Mu9 AND 15 GeV Offline Jet
Discrepancy between Jet & Lepton triggered FR for runs>137000 not understood
![Page 17: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Difference between Jet15U and Muon triggers at high PT?
• This was also seen earlier in the summer• The most likely explanation was that of a run
dependence– Jet15U samples the very earliest runs– Muon triggers are uniform
• We need to verify this again by making the same plots as the previous page but broken up in run periods
• Slide from this summer are in backup (as a reminder of what we had then)
17
![Page 18: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Slide circulated in an emai message by Claudio on 10 July 2010
18
![Page 19: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Slide circulated in an emai message by Claudio on 10 July 2010
19
![Page 20: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Slide circulated in an emai message by Claudio on 10 July 2010
20
![Page 21: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Electron Fake Rates in Monte Carlo
QCD_Pt30 OnlyWeν OnlyQCD_Pt30 + Weν
Numerator & Denominator Pt distributions
Num V2 DenV1 Den V3 Den
Fake Rates
QCD_Pt30 OnlyQCD_Pt30 + Weν
V1 Fake Rate V3 Fake RateV2 Fake Rate
Presence of W does not dominate Fake Rate at high Pt 21
![Page 22: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Muon Fake Rates in Monte Carlo
W dominates Fake Rate above ~ 25 GeV
InclusiveMu15 + WmunuInclusiveMu15Wmunu
Fake Rate DenominatorNumerator
22
![Page 23: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Muon Fake Rates – Comparison of Data and Monte Carlo
W evident in Data also- Good agreement between data and Monte Carlo - W starts to dominate above ~ 35 GeV
Data ( HLT_Mu9 AND 15 GeV Offline Jet )InclusiveMu15 + WmunuInclusiveMu15Wmunu
Luminosity ~ 840 / nb
Fake Rate DenominatorNumerator
W Supression:- tcmet< 20 - Mt < 25
23
![Page 24: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Muon Fake Rates in DataDependence on Muon Trigger
Luminosity ~ 840 / nb
Fake Rate stable for different Muon triggers
W Supression:- tcmet< 20 - Mt < 25
24
![Page 25: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Electron Fake Rates in DataComparison of 10 & 15 GeV Lepton Triggers
Luminosity ~ 840 / nb
HLT_Ele10_LW_L1RHLT_Ele15_LW_L1R
W Supression: tcmet< 20, Mt < 25
V1 Fake Rate V3 Fake RateV2 Fake Rate
25Electron 10 & 15 triggers are comparable
![Page 26: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Electron Fake Rates in DataComparison of 10 GeV Lepton Triggers
Luminosity ~ 840 / nb
HLT_Ele10_LW_L1RHLT_Ele10_SW_L1RHLT_Ele10_LW_EleId_L1RHLT_Ele10_SW_EleId_L1RW Supression: tcmet< 20, Mt < 25
V1 Fake Rate V3 Fake RateV2 Fake Rate
26Trigger ID increases V1 & V2 Fake Rates
Trigger ID cancels out in V3.
V1 & V2 have no offline ID. Trigger IDdecreases the denominator, increasing the Fake Rate
![Page 27: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Electron Fake Rates in DataComparison of 15 GeV Lepton Triggers
Luminosity ~ 840 / nb
HLT_Ele15_LW_L1RHLT_Ele15_SW_L1RHLT_Ele15_SW_EleId_L1RHLT_Ele15_LW_CaloEleId_L1RW Supression: tcmet< 20, Mt < 25
V1 Fake Rate V3 Fake RateV2 Fake Rate
27Trigger ID increases V1 & V2 Fake Rates
![Page 28: Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections Reference current ttbar selections – New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cef5503460f949bd73e/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Electron Selections• ttbar: Tight Electron Selections
– Pt > 10– SC Et > 10– |η| < 2.5– ECAL Seeded– Spike Removal– VBTF 90 ID
• Data corrected for Endcap alignment• dEta cut removed
– d0 < 400 – Iso< 0.15– No muon with dR of 0.10– Conversion Rejection
• Hit Pattern• Dist < 002• Dcottheta< 002
• Loose Electron Selections– d0 removed for V1, V2, V3– V1: V2 AND V3– V2: Electron ID removed– V3: Isolation relaxed to 0.40 28