lepton universality tests in kaon decays at na62
DESCRIPTION
Lepton Universality Tests in Kaon Decays at NA62. Francesca Bucci, INFN Sezione di Firenze o n behalf of the NA62 Collaboration. The XIth International Conference on Heavy Quarks and Leptons June 11-15, 2012, Prague , Czech Republic. Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Lepton Universality Tests in Kaon Decays at NA62
Francesca Bucci, INFN Sezione di Firenzeon behalf of the NA62 Collaboration
The XIth International Conference onHeavy Quarks and Leptons
June 11-15, 2012, Prague, Czech Republic
F. Bucci 2
Introduction
Precise measurements of FCNC processes in the B sector have severely restricted the parameters space of new-physics (NP) models
Experiments at the LHC have started a direct exploration of the physics in the TeV range
In this scenario, the study of Lepton Flavor Universality (LFU) in kaon decays is equally interesting and fully complementary to search for NP effects
Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2012, 13 June
F. Bucci 3
K+l+ Sensitivity to New Physics Leptonic kaon decays within the SM are mediated by a charged current at
tree level
The natural size of the non-standard contributions depends on the particular BSM scenario
In Models with 2 Higgs Doublet (2HDM-II including SUSY) sizable charged Higgs (H) exchange contributions
obstructed by hadronic uncertainties (fK )
Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2012, 13 June
222
222
||18
)lK( usKK
llKF VfMMMMG
40 tanβGeV, 50010 3
HSM
M
F. Bucci 4
RK=(K→e)/(K→m) in the SM
In the ratio RK =(K→e/K→m) hadronic uncertainties cancel The SM prediction of RK has reached <0.1% precision
dRK is the correction due to the Inner Bremsstrahlung part of the radiative K →eg process
Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2012, 13 June
5corr. rad.K
2
2μ
2K
2e
2K
2
μ
eSMK 10001.0477.21R
R
mmmm
mm d
[V. Cirigliano and I. Rosell Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 231801]
helicity suppression factor
F. Bucci
Radiative K→eg Decays In K→eg (Ke2g), g can be produced via internal bremsstrahlung (IB) or
direct-emission, the latter being dependent on the hadronic structure (SD)
RK is defined to be inclusive of the IB, ignoring however the SD contributions To compare data with SM prediction the SD contribution must be carefully
estimated and subtracted.
Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2012, 13 June 5
K±
e±
e
gIB
K±
e±
e
gSD
6
RK beyond the SM Charged Higgs bosons (H) appearing in any model with two Higgs doublets
(including SUSY case) can contribute at tree level
Such contribution does not affect the ratio RK
LFV couplings, present at one loop level, can contribute to RKSM at the % level
Limited by recent Bs m+m- measurement
2
2
22
SM
βtan1lK
lK
H
K
su
s
mm
mmm
βtan1RR 62
13
2
e
τ
4
H
KSMK
LFVK m
mmm
[A. Masiero, P.Paradisi, R. Petronzio Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 0011701]
slepton mixing[Fonseca, Romão, Teixiera, arXiv:1250.1411]
F. Bucci 7
The NA62 Experiment
The NA62 Collaboration:Birmingham, Bratislava, Bristol, CERN, Dubna, Fairfax, Ferrara, Florence, Frascati, Glasgow, Liverpool, Louvain, Mainz, Merced, Moscow, Naples, Perugia, Pisa, Prague, Protvino, Rome I, Rome II, San Luis Potosì, SLAC, Sofia, TurinHeavy Quarks and Leptons 2012, 13 June
NA62 (RK)
2007-2008: Ke2 ,K
m2 data taking
after the long CERN accelerators shutdown
NA62 (K++ )
2007-2013: design & construction
2014 ? : K++ data taking
F. Bucci 8
NA62 (RK) Detector Primary SPS protons (400 GeV/c) 1.81012 /SPS spillUnseparated secondary positive and/or negative hadronic beam (p=74.01.4 GeV/c)Composition: K () = 5% (63 %)K decaying in vacuum tank 18%
Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2012, 13 June
Main subdetectors: LKr electromagnetic calorimeter: sE/E = (3.2/√E 9.0/E 0.42)% (E in GeV) sx =sy = (4.2/ √E + 0.6)mm (E in GeV)
Hodoscope: Fast trigger for charged particle and timing for the event (st 150ps)
Magnetic spectrometer:sp/p = (0.48 0.009 p)% (p in GeV/c)
Helium filled tank
Magnet
beam
F. Bucci 9
NA62 (RK) Data Taking
Data taking: 4 months in 2007 2 weeks in 2008 (used for systematics studies)
Data samples: K+, K- samples with different background conditions : with lead wall (Pb), without lead wall (noPb) (see next)
K+ (noPb), K+ (Pb), K- (noPb), K- (Pb)Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2012, 13 June
The data taking strategy has been optimized to measure the two main backgrounds in the Ke2 sample: Beam halo muons Km2 decays with a muon misidentified as an electron
F. Bucci 10
Measurement Strategy Ke2, Km2 collected simultaneously:
No dependence on K flux measurement; Cancellation of several systematic effects in the ratio at first order
MC simulations used to a limited extent: Acceptance correction and the geometrical parts of the acceptances for most bkg
processes PID, trigger, read out efficiencies and muon halo bkg are measured directly
from data Analysis performed in bins of the reconstructed lepton momentum
Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2012, 13 June
LKReeeB
eBeK fKKAf
KKAfKNKNKNKN
DR 11
22
22
22
22
mmm
mm
# signal events
# background events acceptance
measured PID efficiency
LKr trigger efficiency
LKr readout efficiency
downscaling factor of Km2
F. Bucci 11
Trigger LogicMinimum bias (high efficiency, but low purity) trigger configuration used
Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2012, 13 June
Ke2 condition: Q1ELKr 1Trk Km2condition: Q11Trk/D, downscaling factor D=150
F. Bucci 12
Ke2 vs Km2 Selection Geometry
One reconstructed charged track 13 < p < 65 [GeV/c] Geometrical acceptance cut Cut on K decay vertex position Photon veto using LKr
Kinematics Missing mass: Mmiss
2(l)=(PK-Pl)2
Sufficient Ke2/Km2 separation up to 30 GeV/c
Particle ID (ELKR/pspectr) e : (0.9 to 0.95) < E/p < 1.1 m : E/p < 0.85m suppression in e sample: 106
Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2012, 13 June
F. Bucci 13
Km2 Background in Ke2 SampleMuon ‘catastrophic’ energy loss in or in front of the LKr is the largest bkg source
The probability of mis-identify a muon as an electron Pme 310-6 (and momentum dependent)
Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2012, 13 June
m
e
Measurement of Pme on data To avoid electron contamination from muon
decay (10-4) a 9.2 X0 thick lead wall covering 18% of the acceptance was installed between the HOD planes for 50% of the run time
Km2 candidates : track traversing Pb, p>30GeV/c, E/p>0.95 (positron contamination < 10-8)
Pme is modified by the Pb wall due to: ionization losses in Pb (low p) bremsstrahlung in Pb (high p)
F. Bucci 14
Muon Misidentification
The correction fPb= Pme/ PmePb evaluated with a dedicated Geant4-based simulation
Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2012, 13 June
MC precisiondPme
/Pme = 10%
MC precisiondfPb/fPb = 2%
Pme Pb (Pb wall installed) vs momentum Correction for Pb: fPb = Pme / Pme
Pb
Result : B/(S+B) = (5.640.20)%
F. Bucci 15
Muon halo background measured on the data K+ (K- ) only sample used to measure muon halo background in K- (K+ ) sample
Control samples normalized to the data in the Mmiss2 region populated mainly
by beam halo events (-0.3 < Mmiss2 < - 0.1 (GeV/c2)2 )
Strongly depends on decay vertex position and track momentum
Regions delimited by solid line are excluded Probability to reconstruct a Ke2
candidate due to a decay of an opposite sign kaon has been taken into account
Muon Halo Background in Ke2 SampleThe muon sweeping system was optimized for the positive beam
z vertex (m)
Ke2- (noPb)
p e- (G
eV/c
)
Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2012, 13 June
p e+ (G
eV/c
)
z vertex (m)
Ke2+ (noPb)
Result : B/(S+B) = (2.110.09)%
F. Bucci 16
K±→e± g Background in Ke2 Sample
SD contribution of the K±→e± g decays must be carefully estimated and subtracted
Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2012, 13 June
The SD+ (positive photon helicity) component peaks at high electron momentum in the K rest frame and is therefore kinematically similar to the Ke2 decay
SD- decays and the interference between the IB and SD processes are negligible
The SD+ background contribution has been estimated by using MC simulation based on the measured K±→e±g (SD+) differential decay rate
E e (M
eV)
Eg (MeV)
SD+
SD-
IB
[J. Bijnens, G. Colangelo, G. Ecker, J. Gasser, arXiv:hep-ph/9411311]
[F. Ambrosino et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 65 (2010) 703]
Result : B/(S+B) = (2.600.11)%
F. Bucci 17
Ke2 Sample
145,958 K±e ± candidates
B/(B+S) = (10.950.27)%
e± ID efficiency = (99.28 0.05)%
Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2012, 13 June
Ke2 candidates
F. Bucci 18
Ke2 BackgroundKe2 candidates and backgrounds in momentum bins
Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2012, 13 June
Decay B/(S+B)K± m± (5.64 ± 0.20)%K± m± (m e) (0.26 ± 0.03)%
K± e±g (SD+) (2.60 ± 0.11)%
K± 0De± (0.18 ± 0.09)%
K± ±0D (0.12 ± 0.06)%
Wrong sign K (0.04 ± 0.02)%Beam halo (2.11 ± 0.09)%Total (10.95 ± 0.27)%
K+ (noPb)
F. Bucci 19
Km2 Sample and BackgroundThe only significant background source in the Km2 sample is the beam halo
Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2012, 13 June
42.817 106 K±m ± candidates (collecting with downscaling factor D=150)
B/(S+B) = (0.50 ± 0.01)%
K+ (noPb)
F. Bucci 20
NA62 Result (full data set)Fit over 40 RK measurements (4 data samples 10 momentum bins)
including correlations: c2/ndf=47/39
Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2012, 13 June
RK=(2.488 ± 0.007stat ±0.007syst ) x 10-5=(2.488 ± 0.010) x10-5
21
Uncertainties on RK
Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2012, 13 June
Source dRK 105
Statistical 0.007
Km2 background 0.004
K±e ±g (SD+) background 0.002
K±0e ±, K±0 backgrounds 0.003
Muon halo background 0.002
Matter composition in the spectrometer 0.003
Acceptance correction 0.002
Spectrometer alignment 0.001
Electron identification efficiency 0.001
1-track trigger efficiency 0.001
LKr readout inefficiency 0.001
Total Systematic 0.007
Total 0.010
F. Bucci 22
RK World Average
For non-tiny values of 13
the sensitivity to H± in RK is strong
Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2012, 13 June
July 2011 world average : RK= (2.488 ± 0.009) 10-5 (dRK/RK= 0.4%)
PDG 2010 (KLOE result): RK= (2.493 ± 0.031) 10-5 (dRK/RK= 1.3%)
b sg
B→t [HFAG 2010]Rm23 [Eur. Phys. J. C 69 (2010) 399 ]b→sg [HFAG 2010]
F. Bucci 23
Future Prospects
NA62 (K++) data taking foreseen in 2014after the long CERN accelerators shutdown
Hermetic veto (large-angle and small-angle veto counters) will strongly decrease the Ke2g background.
Beam spectrometer (beam tracker plus Cherenkov beam tagger) will allow time correlation between kaons and decay products. Beam halo background expected to be reduced to negligible level.
Required statistical uncertainty 0.05%1 month of data taking sufficient for such RK measurement
Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2012, 13 June
F. Bucci 24
Conclusions
The analysis of the full data sample taken by NA62 is completed The measured value is RK=(2.488 ± 0.010) x10-5, reaching a record level of
accuracy of 0.4% The combined experimental accuracy has improved by an order of
magnitude since 2008, but is still an order of magnitude bigger than the SM prediction precision
Excellent prospects for future measurements of RK within the NA62 experimental program
Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2012, 13 June