letter and word perception: orthographic structure and visual processing in reading

295

Upload: others

Post on 11-Sep-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading
Page 2: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION

Page 3: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

ADVANCES IN

PSYCHOLOGY 4

Editors

G. E. STELMACH

P. A. VROON

NORTH-HOLLAND PUBLISHING COMPANY AMSTERDAM * NEW YORK * OXFORD

Page 4: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION

Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

Dominic W. MASSARO Glen A. TAYLOR

Richard L. VENEZKY James E. JASTRZEMBSKI

Peter A. LUCAS and

Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Individualized Schooling

University of Wisconsin

1980

NORTH-HOLLAND PUBLISHING COMPANY AMSTERDAM * NEW YORK * OXFORD

Page 5: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

Copyright 1980 -The Board of Regentsof the University of Wisconsin System

Copyright is claimed until 1990. Thereafter all portionsof this work covered by this copyright will be in the public domain. Thiswork was developed under agrant from the National Institute of Education, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. However, the content does not necessarily reflect the position or policy of that Agency, and no official endorsement of these

materials should be inferred.

ISBN: 0 444 85493 2

Publishers:

NORTH-HOLLAND PUBLISHING COMPANY AMSTERDAMoNEW YORK. OXFORD

Sole distributors for the U.S.A. and Canada:

5 2 VANDERBILT AVENUE, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10017

ELSEVIER NORTH-HOLLAND, INC.

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publieation Data

Main entry under title:

Letter and vord perception.

(Advances in psychology ; 4) Includes bibliopaphical references and indexes. 1. Reading. 2. Word recognition. 3. English

langupee--Alphabet. 4. Reading, Psychology of. I. M688az.0, Dominic W. 11. Series: Advauces in psychology (Amsterdam) 4. LBlO#O.L47 428.4 80-14350

PRINTED IN THE NETHERLANDS

Page 6: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

?he greatest tliiry intlie W O r K

as dw ish rn is containelCtlierein- excett

CRESCI i A N D E R S O N

Page 7: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

This page intentionally left blank

Page 8: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

... t o c o m p l e t e l y a n a l y z e what w e d o when w e r e a d would a l m o s t b e t h e acme o f a p s y c h o l o g i s t ' s a c h i e v e m e n t s , f o r i t would b e t o d e s c r i b e v e r y many o f t h e most i n t r i c a t e w o r k i n g s o f t h e human mind , a s w e l l a s t o u n r a v e l t h e t a n g l e d s t o r y o f t h e mos t r e m a r k a b l e s p e c i f i c p e r f o r m a n c e t h a t c i v i l i z a t i o n h a s l e a r n e d i n a l l i t s h i s t o r y .

T h e s e words a r e no l e s s a p p r o p r i a t e t o d a y t h a n t h e y were when Edmund Burke Huey c o n f r o n t e d t h e c h a l l e n g e of u n d e r s t a n d i n g r e a d i n g i n 1908 . And a l t h o u g h m o s t l i t e r a t e s o c i e t i e s d e v o t e v a l u a b l e f i n a n c i a l and human r e s o u r c e s t o u n d e r s t a n d i n g r e a d i n g , i t o f t e n seems a s i f w e a r e no n e a r e r t o a c h i e v i n g t h i s g o a l . However, some p r o g r e s s i s a p p a r e n t . I t is g e n e r a l l y a g r e e d t h a t r e a d i n g i n v o l v e s t h e u t i l i z a t i o n of a v a s t r a n g e o f p e r f o r m a n c e s k i l l s a l o n g w i t h t h e a c t i v e a p p l i c a t i o n o f t h e knowledge r e s o u r c e s o f t h e r e a d e r . The g o a l f o r t h e r e s e a r c h e r , i s t o d e s c r i b e e a c h o f t h e s k i l l s and t o e v a l u a t e how knowledge c o n t r i b u t e s t o t h e s k i l l e d p e r f o r m a n c e .

Our r e s e a r c h i n v e s t i g a t e s how knowledge o f t h e o r t h o g r a p h y ( r u l e s o f s p e l l i n g ) is a c t i v e l y engaged i n l e t t e r and word p e r c e p t i o n o f s k i l l e d r e a d e r s . As m i g h t b e e x p e c t e d , o u r r e s e a r c h e n t e r p r i s e had i t s s h a r e o f b o t h s u b s t a n t i v e a d v a n c e s i n o u r u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f b a s i c p s y c h o l o g i c a l p r o c e s s e s and d i s t r a c t i n g g l a n c e s a t some o f t h e m i n d ' s b e w i l d e r i n g i n c o n s i s t e n c i e s . Our g o a l i n t h i s monograph is t o communica te b o t h t h e p r o g r e s s and some o f t h e d i s t r a c t i o n t h a t we

vi i

Preface

Page 9: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

v i i i PREFACE

e x p e r i e n c e d . Because o f t h e d e t a i l e d p r e s e n t a t i o n s o f v a r i o u s d e s c r i p t i o n s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e , t h e ex tended s e r i e s o f e x p e r i m e n t a l s t u d i e s , and t h e f i n e - g r a i n e d a n a l y s e s o f t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n of many d e s c r i p t i o n s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e , piecemeal p u b l i c a t i o n s o f t h i s r e s e a r c h e f f o r t would have been i n a p p r o p r i a t e . T h i s monograph p r o v i d e s t h e c h a l l e n g e of n o t o n l y communicating a p r o t r a c t e d r e s e a r c h e n t e r p r i s e b u t a l s o a n i l l u m i n a t i n g and i n t e r n a l l y - c o n s i s t e n t a c c o u n t o f how r e a d e r s u t i l i z e knowledge o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n l e t t e r and word p e r c e p t i o n . The s u c c e s s o f t h i s work w i l l be e v a l u a t e d by t h e r e s e a r c h e r , and m u s t s t a n d t h e t e s t o f i t s a p p l i c a b i l i t y t o reading i n s t r u c t ion.

Given t h e r e l a t i v e l y l a r g e number of new e x p e r i m e n t a l s t u d i e s t o be r e p o r t e d , w e d e c i d e d t o o m i t t h e unimpor tan t d e t a i l s o f t h e method, p r o c e d u r e , and r e s u l t s i n t h e a c t u a l d i s c u s s i o n o f t h e e x p e r i m e n t s i n Chapter 4 . However, s i n c e t h i s i n f o r m a t i o n is s t i l l of i n t e r e s t t o many p o t e n t i a l r e a d e r s and r e s e a r c h e r s , i t h a s been p laced i n a p p e n d i c e s a t t h e end of Chapter 4 . Each e x p e r i m e n t a l s t u d y i s numbered i n Chapter 4 and i t s appendix is g i v e n t h e same number. By p l a c i n g unnecessary d e t a i l s i n a p p e n d i c e s , i t is e a s i e r t o m a i n t a i n t h e l o g i c a l c o n t i n u i t y i n t h e p r e s e n t a t i o n of t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l s t u d i e s . When n e c e s s a r y , t h e r e a d e r can a lways t u r n d i r e c t l y t o t h e r e l e v a n t appendix f o r a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n .

I n a d d i t i o n , Appendix 5.1 g i v e s t h r e e performance measures f o r each o f o u r 200 s t i m u l u s i t e m s so t h a t t h e i n t e r e s t e d i n v e s t i g a t o r c a n t e s t a d d i t i o n a l d e s c r i p t i o n s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e w i t h t h e s e d a t a . S i n c e s u b l e x i c a l p o s i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e s i n g l e - l e t t e r and bigram c o u n t s a r e i m p o r t a n t components o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e , Appendix 5 . 2 and 5.3 p r e s e n t n o r m a t i v e c o u n t s based on a sample o f roughly o n e m i l l i o n words o f p r i n t e d t e x t . The o n l y c o u n t s c u r r e n t l y a v a i l a b l e i n p r i n t a r e based on a sample o n l y 2 % a s l a r g e . These c o u n t s s h o u l d be v a l u a b l e t o r e s e a r c h e r s and e d u c a t o r s i n t e r e s t e d i n t h e normat ive s t r u c t u r e of Eng 1 i s h o r t h o g r a p h y .

The pr imary o b j e c t i v e of t h i s monograph is t h e p r e s e n t - a t i o n o f our new e m p i r i c a l and t h e o r e t i c a l r e s e a r c h . Because of s p a c e l i m i t a t i o n s , we were unable t o rev iew much o f t h e o t h e r r e l e v a n t r e s e a r c h i n l e t t e r and word p e r c e p t i o n . For rev iews o f t h i s r e s e a r c h , t h e r e a d e r is r e f e r r e d t o A l l p o r t ( 1 9 7 9 ) , Baron ( 1 9 7 8 ) , E s t e s (1977, 1 9 7 8 ) , Gibson and Levin ( 1 9 7 5 ) , Henderson ( 1 9 7 7 ) , Johnson (19771, Krueger ( 1 9 7 5 ) ,

Page 10: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

PREFACE ix

Massa ro ( 1 9 7 5 , 1 9 7 8 , 1 9 7 9 b , i n p r e s s ) , and P o l l a t s e k and Carr ( 1 9 7 9 ) .

T h i s r e s e a r c h i s t h e ou tcome o f c o n t r i b u t i o n s o f f i v e r e l a t i v e l y d i s p a r a t e r e s e a r c h e r s . I n time, t h e need t o u n d e r s t a n d l e t t e r and word p e r c e p t i o n became t h e d r i v i n g , f o r c e and o u r o r i g i n a l b i a s e s and b e l i e f s were e v e n t u a l l y m o d i f i e d by a c t u a l e x p e r i m e n t a t i o n and t h e o r t i c a l tests. I f t h i s c o n t r i b u t i o n b e n e f i t s r e a d i n g r e s e a r c h h a l f a s much a s i t b e n e f i t e d e a c h o f t h e p a r t i c i p a n t s f rom t h e c o l l a b o r a t i v e e f f o r t s , t h e n t h e p r o j e c t c a n b e c o n s i d e r e d t o b e a s u c c e s s .

T h i s r e s e a r c h e f f o r t h a s b e e n s u p p o r t e d by f u n d s from t h e N a t i o n a l I n s t i t u t e o f E d u c a t i o n t o t h e W i s c o n s i n R e s e a r c h and Development C e n t e r f o r I n d i v i d u a l i z e d S c h o o l i n g , U n i v e r s i t y o f W i s c o n s i n , Mad i son , W i s c o n s i n 53706 U . S . A . J a c k Wende and Rod McCoy c o n t r i b u t e d t o t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f t h e c o m p u t e r - c o n t r o l l e d r e s e a r c h f a c i l i t i e s . David K l i t z k e was r e s p o n s i b l e f o r some o f t h e compute r programming, S u s a n C h i c o n e t e s t e d some o f t h e s u b j e c t s . J e n n i f e r A r g e l a n d e r e d i t e d and D o r i s King t y p e d t h e m a n u s c r i p t u s i n g a n o t a l w a y s s t r a i g h t f o r w a r d c o m p u t e r - e d i t i n g s y s t e m . Bob Cavey d r e w t h e many g r a p h s . Don Ander son c o n t r i b u t e d t h e ABC p r i n t .

Page 11: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

This page intentionally left blank

Page 12: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

PREFACE vi i

1. READING AND INFORMATION PROCESSING . . . . . . . . . . 1

An Information Processing Model of Reading 2

2. VISUAL INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1

Early Work 11 Feature Analysis 13 Letter Features 14

3. Orthographic Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

Statistical Redundancy 24 Phonologically Based Descriptions 29 Rule-Governed Regularity 30

Phonological Constraints 30 Scribal Constraints 31 Morphemic Featukes 3 2 Psychological Assumptions 34 Dichotomy Issue 34

An Initial Algorithm for Rule-Governed Regularity 35

4. EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES . 0 . . . . . . m 37

xi

Contents

Page 13: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

xii CONTENTS

M a s s a r o e t a l . 1979 S t u d i e s 38 S t u d y 1: I n i t i a l R e p l i c a t i o n s 47

P r o c e d u r e 47 O r t h o g r a p h i c S t r u c t u r e 49 S i m i l a r i t y E f f e c t s 5 1 T a r g e t - C a t c h D i f f e r e n c e s 55

I n f o r m a t i o n P r o c e s s i n g Model 55 S t u d y 2: P r e c u e V e r s u s P o s t c u e 6 1

O r t h o g r a p h i c S t r u c t u r e 6 3 S i m i l a r i t y E f f e c t s 64 T a r g e t V e r s u s C a t c h T r i a l s 6 5 I n f o r m a t i o n P r o c e s s i n g Model 6 6

O r t h o g r a p h i c S t r u c t u r e 69 S i m i l a r i t y E f f e c t s 70

S t u d y 4 : L i m i t e d Viewing Time 7 1 O r t h o g r a p h i c S t r u c t u r e 7 1 S i m i l a r i t y E f f e c t s 7 2 T a r g e t V e r s u s C a t c h T r i a l s 7 3 D i s c u s s i o n 7 3

S t u d y 3: Mixed-Case 67

S t u d y 5 : Speeded RT T a s k w i t h Good V i s u a l I n f o r m a t i o n 7 3

P r o c e d u r e 7 6 O r t h o g r a p h i c S t r u c t u r e 77

S t u d y 6: Speeded RT Task w i t h Poor V i s u a l I n f o r m a t i o n 7 7

P r o c e d u r e 78 O r t h o g r a p h i c S t r u c t u r e 78

S t u d y 7 : H igh-Accuracy RT Task w i t h P o o r V i s u a l I n f o r m a t i o n 7 9

P r o c e d u r e 79 O r t h o g r a p h i c S t r u c t u r e 79

Summary o f A c c u r a c y and R e a c t i o n

O v e r t J u d g m e n t s 8 1 S t u d y 8 : T y p i c a l i t y R a t i n g s 8 2 S t u d y 9 : P o s i t i o n a l - F r e q u e n c y R a t i n g s 8 5 S t u d y 1 0 : R e g u l a r i t y V e r s u s

Summary of O v e r t J u d g m e n t E x p e r i m e n t s 90

Time E x p e r i m e n t s 8 0

P o s i t i o n a l - F r e q u e n c y J u d g m e n t s 8 7

Page 14: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

CONTENTS xiii

A p p e n d i x 4 . 1 D e t a i l s o f M e t h o d , P r o c e d u r e , a n d R e s u l t s o f S t u d y 1: I n i t i a l R e p l i c a t i o n 9 1

Method 9 1 R e s u l t s 9 4

A p p e n d i x 4.1A R u l e s f o r t h e S e l e c t i o n o f O r t h o g r a p h i c a l l y R e g u l a r a n d I r r e g u l a r S t r i n g s 9 6

A p p e n d i x 4 . 1 8 T h e 200 S t i m u l u s Items Used i n S t u d i e s 1-10 9 7

A p p e n d i x 4 . 2 D e t a i l s o f M e t h o d , P r o c e d u r e , a n d R e s u l t s o f S t u d y 2: P r e c u e V e r s u s P o s t c u e 9 9

Method 9 9 R e s u l t s 1 0 0

A p p e n d i x 4 . 3 D e t a i l s o f M e t h o d , P r o c e d u r e , a n d R e s u l t s o f S t u d y 3: M i x e d - C a s e 1 0 1

Method 0 1 R e s u l t s 1 0 1

A p p e n d i x 4 . 4 D e t a i l s o f M e t h o d , P r o c e d u r e , a n d R e s u l t s o f S t u d y 4: L i m i t e d V i e w i n g T i m e 1 0 3

Method 1 0 3 R e s u l t s 1 0 3

A p p e n d i x 4 . 5 D e t a i l s o f M e t h o d , P r o c e d u r e , a n d R e s u l t s o f S t u d y 5 : S p e e d e d RT T a s k w i t h Good V i s u a l I n f o r m a t i o n 1 0 5

Method 1 0 5 R e s u l t s 1 0 6

A p p e n d i x 4 . 6 D e t a i l s o f M e t h o d , P r o c e d u r e , a n d R e s u l t s o f S t u d y 6 : S p e e d e d RT T a s k w i t h P o o r V i s u a l I n f o r m a t i o n 1 0 8

Method 1 0 8 R e s u l t s 1 0 8

A p p e n d i x 4 . 7 D e t a i l s o f M e t h o d , P r o c e d u r e , a n d R e s u l t s o f S t u d y 7: H i g h - A c c u r a c y RT T a s k w i t h P o o r V i s u a l I n f o r m a t i o n 111

Method 111 R e s u l t s 111

A p p e n d i x 4 . 8 D e t a i l s o f M e t h o d , P r o c e d u r e , a n d R e s u l t s o f S t u d y 8 : T y p i c a l i t y R a t i n g s 113

Method 1 1 3 R e s u l t s 1 1 4

A p p e n d i x 4.8A T h e P s e u d o w o r d s Used i n S t u d y 8 1 1 5

Page 15: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

xiv CONTENTS

Appendix 4.88 Directions for Typicality Ratings Without Words and for Typicality Ratings with

Pseudowords 116 Appendix 4.8C Directions for Typicality Ratings with

Appendix 4.9 Details of Method, Procedure, and Words 117

Results of Study 9: Positi,onal-Frequency Ratings 118 Method 118 Results 118

Appendix 4.9A Directions for Positional-Frequency

Appendix 4.10 Details of Method, Procedure, and Ratings 119

Results of Study 10: Regularity Versus Positional-Frequency Paired-Judgments 120

Method 120 Results 121

Appendix 4.10A Regularity Instructions for

Appendix 4.108 Positional-Frequency Instructions Paired-Judgments 122

for Paired-Judgments 123

5. STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTIONS . . . . . . . Descriptive Measures 125 Type Versus Token Counts 128 Scale of Frequency 130 Position-Sensitive Versus Position

The Most Effective Frequency Measure Frequency Versus Regularity 138 Within Class Analysis 140 Word Frequency 141 Multiple Regression 141 Summary 142

Insensitive Counts 132

. . . . . . . 125

133

Appendix 5.1 Stimulus Items and Results 143 Appendix 5.2 Single-Letter Positional Frequencies 149

Three-letter Words 150 Four-letter Words 152 Five-letter Words 154 Six-letter Words 156 Seven-letter Words 158

Page 16: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

CONTENTS xv

Appendix 5.3 Bigrarn Positional Frequencies 160 Three-letter Words 161 Four-letter Words 172 Five-letter Words 188 Six-letter Words 205 Seven-letter Words 224

6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245

REFERENCES 249 GLOSSARY 263 AUTHOR INDEX 269 SUBJECT INDEX 275

Page 17: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

This page intentionally left blank

Page 18: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 Reading and Information Processing

The p r o c e s s e s by which words a r e r e c o g n i z e d d u r i n g r e a d i n g h a v e c o n c e r n e d p s y c h o l o g i s t s and e d u c a t o r s f o r almost a c e n t u r y . The b a s i c a s s u m p t i o n is t h a t a t h o r o u g h u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t h e p r o c e s s e s i n v o l v e d i n word r e c o g n i t i o n w i l l a f f o r d a m a j o r a d v a n c e i n t h e u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f how p e o p l e r e a d . E v e r y m a j o r t r e a t i s e on r e a d i n g from Huey (1908 /1968) t o G i b s o n and L e v i n ( 1 9 7 5 ) h a s d i s c u s s e d t h i s i s sue a t l e n g t h , b u t g e n e r a l l y h a s c o n c l u d e d , a s d i d Huey ( 1 9 0 8 / 1 9 6 8 , p. 1 0 2 ) , t h a t " i t is v e r y d i f f i c u l t t o d raw f i n a l c o n c l u s i o n s c o n c e r n i n g v i s u a l p e r c e p t i o n i n r e a d i n g . . . ."

R e c e n t l y two d i f f e r e n t p a n e l s wh ich recommended f u n d i n g p r i o r i t i e s i n b a s i c s k i l l s r e s e a r c h t o t h e N a t i o n a l I n s t i t u t e o f E d u c a t i o n a s s i g n e d h i g h p r i o r i t i e s t o s t u d i e s on word r e c o g n i t i o n . C o n s e q u e n t l y , a h i g h p r i o r i t y c u r r e n t l y i s b e i n g g i v e n t o o b t a i n i n g a b e t t e r u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f word r e c o g n i t i o n w i t h s t r e s s on t h e b a s i c s t a g e s of v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n p r o c e s s i n g . I n f o r m a t i o n p r o c e s s i n g d u r i n g r e a d i n g is c u r r e n t l y t h e p r i m a r y c o n c e r n o f many e x p e r i m e n t a l p s y c h o l o g i s t s , and t h e r e f o r e , a n e x p a n d i n g body o f e x p e r i m e n t a l d a t a is b e i n g b r o u g h t t o b e a r on t h e s e q u e s t i o n s . S i n c e word r e c o g n i t i o n f o r m s a b r i d g e be tween v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n p r o c e s s i n g s k i l l s and c o m p r e h e n s i o n , i t is i m p o r t a n t f o r u n d e r s t a n d i n g how t h e two r e l a t e t o e a c h o t h e r .

R e s e a r c h on word r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s e s is s e e n a s h a v i n g a h i g h p o t e n t i a l f o r improv ing r e a d i n g i n s t r u c t i o n . Good and poor r e a d e r s h a v e been shown t o d i f f e r i n p e r f o r m a n c e o n a v a r i e t y o f g e n e r a l t a s k s b u t u n t i l r e c e n t l y , l i t t l e a t t e m p t h a s been made t o e x p l o r e how c h i l d r e n w i t h d i f f e r e n t l e v e l s o f r e a d i n g a b i l i t y m i g h t d i f f e r i n b a s i c word r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s e s . We b e l i e v e t h a t b a s i c word r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s e s ,

Page 19: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

2 CHAPTER 1

once d e f i n e d f o r competent a d u l t r e a d e r s , c a n be used t o a s s e s s word r e c o g n i t i o n a b i l i t i e s of good and poor r e a d e r s i n t h e e l e m e n t a r y g r a d e s . ~f good and poor r e a d e r s u t i l i z e t h e same p r o c e s s e s , b u t d i f f e r i n speed or a c c u r a c y , t h e n r e m e d i a t i o n methods based on common approaches t o r e a d i n g i n s t r u c t i o n would be w a r r a n t e d . However, i f fundamental d i f f e r e n c e s i n v i s u a l r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s e s a r e found, t h e n t o t a l l y d i f f e r e n t remedia l methods would be r e q u i r e d .

The o v e r a l l o b j e c t i v e of t h i s r e s e a r c h p r o j e c t i s t o a s s e s s how t h e r e a d e r ' s h i g h e r - o r d e r knowledge of t h e l a n g u a g e i n t e r a c t s w i t h l o w e r - l e v e l p e r c e p t u a l a n a l y s e s d u r i n g r e a d i n g . The s p e c i f i c q u e s t i o n t h a t is a d d r e s s e d is how t h e r e a d e r ' s a b s t r a c t knowledge a b o u t o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e is combined wi th t h e i n f o r m a t i o n d e r i v e d from v i s u a l f e a t u r a l a n a l y s i s i n word r e c o g n i t i o n . O r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e r e f e r s t o t h e s p e l l i n g c o n s t r a i n t s i n a w r i t t e n l a n g u a g e . There is a c o n s i d e r a b l e amount of p r e d i c t a b i l i t y i n E n g l i s h w r i t i n g , f o r example, and t h e r e a d e r may a c t i v e l y u t i l i z e t h i s i n f o r m a t i o n i n word r e c o g n i t i o n . V i s u a l f e a t u r a l a n a l y s i s r e f e r s t o t h e e v a l u a t i o n of component p r o p e r t i e s of l e t t e r s i n t h e c o u r s e of l e t t e r and word r e c o g n i t i o n . Given e v i d e n c e t h a t bo th of t h e s e s o u r c e s o f i n f o r m a t i o n c o n t r i b u t e t o word r e c o g n i t i o n , t h e g o a l i s t o d e f i n e what i n f o r m a t i o n t h e r e a d e r a c t u a l l y u t i l i z e s (what i n f o r m a t i o n i s p s y c h o l o g i c a l l y r e a l ) and t o d e f i n e how t h e s e s o u r c e s of i n f o r m a t i o n a r e i n t e g r a t e d t o g e t h e r i n r e a d i n g . T h i s r e q u i r e s examinat ion of t h e p s y c h o l o g i c a l r e a l i t y of v a r i o u s d e s c r i p t i o n s of v i s u a l f e a t u r e s , of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e , and of q u a n t i t a t i v e models t h a t d e s c r i b e how v i s u a l f e a t u r e s and o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e a r e i n t e g r a t e d d u r i n g word p e r c e p t i o n and r e c o g n i t i o n .

AN INFORMATION PROCESSING MODEL OF R E A D I N G

E v a l u a t i o n of t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n s of v i s u a l f e a t u r e s and o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e t o word r e c o g n i t i o n r e q u i r e s t h a t we d e s c r i b e i n some d e t a i l t h e p r o c e s s e s involved i n r e a d i n g . The model f o r d e s c r i b i n g t h e s e p r o c e s s e s is p a r t of a more g e n e r a l language p r o c e s s i n g model which has been developed and t e s t e d over t h e p a s t few y e a r s (Massaro, 1975, 1978, 1 9 7 9 a ) . F i g u r e 1.1 p r e s e n t s a s c h e m a t i c r e p r e s e n t a t i o n of t h e s t a g e s of p r o c e s s i n g i n r e a d i n g . A t each s t a g e of p r o c e s s i n g , memory and p r o c e s s components a r e r e p r e s e n t e d . Each memory component ( i n d i c a t e d by a r e c t a n g l e ) c o r r e s p o n d s t o t h e i n f o r m a t i o n a v a i l a b l e a t a p a r t i c u l a r s t a g e of p r o c e s s i n g . Each p r o c e s s

Page 20: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

R E A D I N G AND INFORMATION PROCESSING 3

component ( i n d i c a t e d by a c i r c l e ) c o r r e s p o n d s t o t h e o p e r a t i o n s a p p l i e d t o t h e i n f o r m a t i o n h e l d by t h e memory component. The memory components a r e temporary s t o r a g e s e x c e p t f o r long-term memory which is r e l a t i v e l y permanent a n d , i n a d d i t i o n , supplements t h e i n f o r m a t i o n a t some of t h e p r o c e s s i n g s t a g e s . T h i s model p r o v i d e s a framework from which h y p o t h e s e s a b o u t word r e c o g n i t i o n can be d e r i v e d and t e s t e d .

The t y p i c a l t e x t i n r e a d i n g i s a sequence of l e t t e r s and s p a c e s which conform t o o r t h o g r a p h i c , s y n t a c t i c , and s e m a n t i c c o n s t r a i n t s of t h e w r i t t e n language . The a v e r a g e E n g l i s h r e a d e r b e g i n s a t t h e t o p l e f t - h a n d c o r n e r of t h e page and r e a d s each l i n e from l e f t t o r i g h t . The r e a d e r ' s eye movements a c r o s s a l i n e a r e n o t c o n t i n u o u s b u t occur i n a s e r i e s of s h o r t jumps c a l l e d s a c c a d e s . The f i x a t i o n time between s a c c a d e s is r o u g h l y t e n times l o n g e r t h a n t h e s a c c a d e . The t y p i c a l s a c c a d e of 1 t o 2 d e g r e e s r e q u i r e s 2 0 t o 30 msec, whereas f i x a t i o n t ime a v e r a g e s 250 msec ( S h e b i l s k e , 1975; Woodworth, 1 9 3 8 ) . I n i t i a l p r o c e s s i n g of t h e v i s u a l s t i m u l u s m u s t O C C U K d u r i n g t h e f i x a t i o n time because t h e s t i m u l u s p a t t e r n is b l u r r e d d u r i n g a s a c c a d e and i t s d u r a t i o n is t o o s h o r t f o r s u f f i c i e n t p r o c e s s i n g t o o c c u r . During an eye f i x a t i o n , t h e l i g h t p a t t e r n r e f l e c t e d from l e t t e r s i s t r a n s d u c e d by t h e v i s u a l r e c e p t o r s and a p r o c e s s d e t e c t s and t r a n s m i t s v i s u a l f e a t u r e s t o p r e p e r c e p t u a l v i s u a l s t o r a g e ( s e e F i g u r e 1.1). I n our model, w e c a l l t h i s i n i t i a l p r o c e s s f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n . The f e a t u r e s a r e d e s c r i b e d a s v i s u a l because i t is assumed t h a t t h e r e i s a d i r e c t r e l a t i o n s h i p between t h e s t i m u l u s p r o p e r t i e s of t h e l e t t e r s and

LONG TERM MEMORY

t T

MEMORY MEMORY

F i g u r e 1.1 A s t a g e model of r e a d i n g p r i n t e d t e x t .

Page 21: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

CHAPTER 1

t h e i n f o r m a t i o n i n p r e p e r c e p t u a l v i s u a l s t o r a g e . The p a s s i v e t r a n s d u c t i o n of f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n c o n t r a s t s w i t h t h e a c t i v e c o n s t r u c t i o n of t h e s u b s e q u e n t p r o c e s s i n g s t a g e s . There is no e x a c t one-to-one r e l a t i o n s h i p between t h e i n p u t and o u t p u t of t h e f o l l o w i n g p r o c e s s i n g s t a g e s s i n c e t h e s e l a t e r s t a g e s a c t i v e l y u t i l i z e i n f o r m a t i o n s t o r e d i n long-term memory.

Given t h e se t of v i s u a l f e a t u r e s i n p r e p e r c e p t u a l v i s u a l s t o r a g e , t h e p r i m a r y r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s a t t e m p t s t o t r a n s f o r m t h e s e i s o l a t e d f e a t u r e s i n t o a sequence of l e t t e r s and s p a c e s i n s y n t h e s i z e d v i s u a l memory. To d o t h i s , t h e p r i m a r y r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s can u t i l i z e i n f o r m a t i o n h e l d i n long-term memory which f o r t h e accomplished r e a d e r i n c l u d e s a l i s t of f e a t u r e s f o r each l e t t e r of t h e a l p h a b e t a l o n g w i t h i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t t h e o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e of t h e l a n g u a g e . The p r i m a r y r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s u t i l i z e s both t h e v i s u a l f e a t u r e s i n p r e p e r c e p t u a l s t o r a g e and knowledge of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n i t s s y n t h e s i s of t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g s . The t ime-honored b e l i e f t h a t r e c o g n i t i o n of l e t t e r s t r i n g s becomes p r o g r e s s i v e l y e a s i e r a s t h e s t r i n g s more c l o s e l y approximate words i m p l i e s t h a t r e a d e r s c a p i t a l i z e on t h e p r e s e n c e of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . Recogni t ion u s u a l l y means t h e p r o c e s s of d i s - c r i m i n a t i n g , i d e n t i f y i n g , and c o r r e c t l y o r d e r i n g t h e l e t t e r s of a l e t t e r s t r i n g (Smi th , 1 9 7 1 ) . Given t h i s i n t e r p r e t a t i o n of r e c o g n i t i o n , t h e f a c i l i t a t i n g e f f e c t of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e on l e t t e r - s t r i n g r e c o g n i t i o n m u s t a l m o s t be t r u e by d e f i n i t i o n . Recogni t ion i n v o l v e s a c c e s s i n g knowledge b u i l t up through e x p e r i e n c e . I t is o n l y n a t u r a l t h a t a r e a d e r ' s e x p e r i e n c e w i t h words w i l l g e n e r a l i z e more t o w o r d l i k e t h a n nonwordl ike s t r i n g s . Our g o a l s i n t h i s r e s e a r c h endeavor a r e t o p r o v i d e a b e t t e r u n d e r s t a n d i n g of t h e r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s and t o e v a l u a t e which a s p e c t s of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e t h e r e a d e r knows and u t i l i z e s .

The c e n t r a l assumpt ion a d d r e s s e d h e r e i s t h a t o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n f l u e n c e s p e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n ( p r i m a r y r e c o g n i t i o n i n our m o d e l ) , i n a d d i t i o n t o o t h e r i n f l u e n c e s a t l a t e r s t a g e s of p r o c e s s i n g . We b e l i e v e t h a t o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e a l s o f a c i l i t a t e s p r o c e s s i n g from a p e r c e p t u a l t o a c o n c e p t u a l l e v e l ( s e c o n d a r y r e c o g n i t i o n i n our m o d e l ) . By f o c u s i n g on t h e f a c i l i t a t i n g e f f e c t s of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e on v i s u a l p e r c e p t i o n , w e have a l i g n e d o u r s e l v e s w i t h a t r a d i t i o n over 100 y e a r s o l d concerned w i t h how knowledge i n f l u e n c e s p e r c e p t i o n . James (1890/1950, p. 4 4 4 ) c a p t u r e d t h e s p i r i t of t h e work begun by Wundt w i t h t h e o f t e n quoted s t a t e m e n t , " . . . t h e o n l y t h i n g s which w e commonly s e n a r e t h o s e which w e p r e p e r c e i v e . "

Page 22: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

R E A D I N G AND INFORMATION PROCESSING 5

In our model , t h e p r imary r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s e v a l u a t e s t h e f e a t u r e s i n p r e p e r c e p t u a l v i s u a l s t o r a g e and compares o r matches t h e s e f e a t u r e s t o d e s c r i p t i o n s of p e r c e p t u a l u n i t s i n long-term memory. A p e r c e p t u a l u n i t o r p r o t o t y p e r e p r e s e n t s each of t h e l e t t e r s i n long- te rm memory a s i t would be i d e a l l y r e p r e s e n t e d i n p r e p e r c e p t u a l v i s u a l s t o r a g e . The p r i m a r y r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s s e e k s f o r each l e t t e r p o s i t i o n t h e p e r c e p t u a l p r o t o t y p e t h a t p r o v i d e s t h e b e s t match t o t h e f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n . I t is a t p r imary r e c o g n i t i o n t h a t o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e r e d u c e s u n c e r t a i n t y o r c o n t r i b u t e s i n f o r m a t i o n . The outcome of pr imary r e c o g n i t i o n i s , t h e r e f o r e , t h e j o i n t p r o d u c t of f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n i n p r e p e r c e p t u a l v i s u a l s t o r a g e and knowledge of l e t t e r c o n s t r a i n t s i n long- te rm memory.

S i n c e t h e r e a r e a l i m i t e d number of ways t h a t s e q u e n c e s of l e t t e r s and l e t t e r g r o u p s c a n be assembled t o form E n g l i s h words, knowledge of t h e s e s e q u e n c e s can h e l p t h e r e a d e r t o r e s o l v e t h e l e t t e r s i n s t r i n g s t h a t conform t o t h e l a n g u a g e ( c f . Massaro, 1975, Chapter 7 ) . I t a l s o h a s been h y p o t h e s i z e d t h a t t h i s knowledge c a n a s s i s t t h e r e a d e r i n d e t e r m i n i n g t h e r e l a t i v e p o s i t i o n s of l e t t e r s once t h e y a r e r e c o g n i z e d ( E s t e s , 1975a , 1 9 7 5 b ) . For example, g i v e n t h e l e t t e r s &, knowledge of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e d o e s n o t a l l o w t h e s e l e t t e r s t o be read i n t h e o p p o s i t e o r d e r . However, G e o f f r i o n (1976) found t h a t t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e is n o t dependent on d e t e r m i n i n g t h e r e l a t i v e p o s i t i o n s of l e t t e r s . I n a d d i t i o n , r e c e n t r e s e a r c h by MaSSaKO (1979a) found a l a r g e e f f e c t of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e on l e t t e r r e c o g n i t i o n b u t no e f f e c t on t h e d e t e r m i n a t i o n of r e l a t i v e s p a t i a l p o s i t i o n . I n t h e p r e s e n t r e s e a r c h , t h e e x p e r i m e n t s a r e d e s i g n e d such t h a t any f a c i l i t a t i n g e f f e c t of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e a t p r i m a r y r e c o g n i t i o n m u s t be due t o l e t t e r r e c o g n i t i o n and n o t p o s i t i o n u n c e r t a i n t y .

The p r i m a r y r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s o p e r a t e s on a number of l e t t e r s s i m u l t a n e o u s l y ( i n p a r a l l e l ) . The v i s u a l f e a t u r e s d e t e c t e d a t each s p a t i a l l o c a t i o n d e f i n e a s e t of p o s s i b l e l e t t e r s f o r t h a t p o s i t i o n . The pr imary r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s chooses from t h i s s e t of c a n d i d a t e s t h e l e t t e r a l t e r n a t i v e which h a s t h e b e s t cor respondence i n t e r m s of v i s u a l f e a t u r e s . However, t h e s e l e c t i o n of a b e s t c o r r e s p o n d e n c e can be f a c i l i t a t e d by knowledge of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . The pr imary r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s , t h e r e f o r e , a t t e m p t s t o u t i l i z e bo th t h e f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n i n p r e p e r c e p t u a l s t o r a g e and knowledge a b o u t t h e s t r u c t u r e of l e g a l l a t t e r s t r i n g s . A

c r i t i c a l concern is w i t h t h e i n t e r a c t i o n of t h e s e two s o u r c e s

Page 23: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

CHAPTER 1

of i n f o r m a t i o n ; i n our model , i t is assumed t h a t t h e two s o u r c e s of i n f o r m a t i o n make independent c o n t r i b u t i o n s t o pr imary r e c o g n i t i o n (Massaro, 1973, 1975, 1978, 1979b; Thompson & Massaro, 1 9 7 3 ) .

The p r e s e n t a n a l y s i s of t h e f a c i l i t a t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n l e t t e r r e c o g n i t i o n is i d e n t i c a l i n s p i r i t t o t h e o r i g i n a l a n a l y s i s provided by M i l l e r , Bruner , and Postman ( 1 9 5 4 ) . They observed t h a t t h e number of l e t t e r s c o r r e c t l y r e p o r t e d from a t a c h i s t o s c o p i c e x p o s u r e i n c r e a s e d w i t h i n c r e a s e s i n f a m i l i a r i t y of t h e l e t t e r p a t t e r n . The f a m i l i a r i t y of t h e l e t t e r sequences was v a r i e d by t h e d e g r e e t o which t h e sequence approximated p r i n t e d E n g l i s h (Shannon, 1 9 4 8 ) . U t i l i z i n g t h e t h e o r y of i n f o r m a t i o n developed by Shannon ( 1 9 4 8 ) , however, t h e y observed t h a t t h e number of l e t t e r s r e p o r t e d i s n o t a d i r e c t index of t h e amount of s t i m u l u s i n f o r m a t i o n d e r i v e d from t h e e x p o s u r e i t s e l f s i n c e t h e redundancy of c o n t e x t u a l l y c o n s t r a i n e d s e q u e n c e s is n o t t a k e n i n t o a c c o u n t .

M i l l e r e t a l . (1954) c a l c u l a t e d t h e redundancy o f t h e i r sequences a t e a c h o r d e r of approximat ion t o E n g l i s h u s i n g t h e c o u n t s g i v e n by Shannon (1951) and c o u n t s of t h e i r own. When performance was c o r r e c t e d f o r redundancy, t h e r e was no e f f e c t of f a m i l i a r i t y (see a l s o T u l v i n g , 1 9 6 3 ) . T h i s r e s u l t was i n t e r p r e t e d t o mean t h a t t h e amount o f s t i m u l u s i n f o r m a t i o n r e c e i v e d from t h e e x p o s u r e d i d n o t depend on t h e f a m i l i a r i t y of t h e l e t t e r p a t t e r n . I n te rms of our a n a l y s i s , over two d e c a d e s l a t e r , t h e r e s u l t s c a n be i n t e r p r e t e d t o mean t h a t o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e and v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n c o n t r i b u t e independent s o u r c e s of i n f o r m a t i o n i n r e a d i n g .

The c u r r e n t view was d e v e l o p e d , i n p a r t , on t h e b a s i s o f e x p e r i m e n t s c a r r i e d o u t u s i n g t h e Reicher-Wheeler paradigm i n word r e c o g n i t i o n ( R e i c h e r , 1969; Wheeler , 1970; Thompson &

Massaro, 1 9 7 3 ) . I n t h i s paradigm, s u b j e c t s a r e p r e s e n t e d w i t h e i t h e r a t e s t word o r a s i n g l e t e s t l e t t e r f o r a s h o r t d u r a t i o n fo l lowed immediately by a masking s t i m u l u s and two r e s p o n s e a l t e r n a t i v e s . The r e s p o n s e a l t e r n a t i v e s both s p e l l words i n t h e t e s t word c o n d i t i o n ; f o r example, g i v e n t h e t e s t s t i m u l u s WORD, t h e r e s p o n s e a l t e r n a t i v e s ---g and ---E would be p r e s e n t e d . I n t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g s i n g l e t e s t l e t t e r c o n d i t i o n , - D is p r e s e n t e d and f o l l o w e d by t h e r e s p o n s e a l t e r n a t i v e s g and - K . I n t h e s e s t u d i e s , r e c o g n i t i o n of t h e t e s t word i s a b o u t 1 0 % b e t t e r t h a n r e c o g n i t i o n of t h e t e s t l e t t e r .

Given t h e t w o - a l t e r n a t i v e f o r c e d - c h o i c e c o n t r o l , i t is assumed t h a t t h e r e a d e r u t i l i z e s o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e t o e l i m i n a t e p o s s i b l e a l t e r n a t i v e s d u r i n g t h e p e r c e p t i o n of t h e

Page 24: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

R E A D I N G AND INFORMATION PROCESSING

t e s t d i s p l a y (Thompson & Massaro, 1 9 7 3 ) . A s a n example, p r e s e n t e d w i t h t h e t e s t s t i m u l u s WORD and g i v e n r e c o g n i t i o n of t e s t l e t t e r s WOR and a c u r v i l i n e a r segment of t h e f i n a l l e t t e r , t h e r e a d e r c o u l d narrow down t h e a l t e r n a t i v e s f o r t h e f i n a l l e t t e r t o D , 0 , and Q. I f 0 and Q a r e c o n s i d e r e d t o be o r t h o g r a p h i c a l l y i l l e g a l i n t h e c o n t e x t m, t h e n D r e p r e s e n t s an unambiguous c h o i c e . The r e a d e r w i l l t h e r e f o r e p e r c e i v e t h e word WORD g i v e n j u s t p a r t i a l i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t t h e f i n a l l e t t e r . I f t h e r e a d e r r e c o g n i z e s t h e same c u r v i l i n e a r segment i n t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g s i n g l e t e s t l e t t e r c o n d i t i o n , however , any of t h e t h r e e l e t t e r s ( D , 0 , and Q ) a r e p o s s i b l e and t h e p e r c e p t u a l s y n t h e s i s w i l l r e s u l t i n D o n l y one o u t of t h r e e times. What is c r i t i c a l i n t h i s a n a l y s i s i s t h a t t h e b e t t e r per formance on words compared t o s i n g l e l e t t e r s i s o b t a i n e d even though t h e v i s u a l f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n a v a i l a b l e t o t h e p r i m a r y r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s i s e q u i v a l e n t i n t h e word and l e t t e r c o n d i t i o n s . The o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e of t h e word s imply p r o v i d e s an a d d i t i o n a l b u t independent s o u r c e of i n f o r m a t i o n . The f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n a v a i l a b l e t o t h e r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s d o e s n o t change w i t h changes i n o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . I n t h i s v iew, a l t h o u g h o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e f a c i l i t a t e s word p e r c e p t i o n , i t d o e s n o t modify t h e f e a t u r e a n a l y s i s of t h e p r i n t e d p a t t e r n (Krueger & S h a p i r o , 1979; Massaro, 1 9 7 9 a ) .

As ure have d i s c u s s e d , one r o l e of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e is c o n c e n t r a t e d i n t h e p r i m a r y r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s and s e r v e s t o f a c i l i t a t e t h e r e c o g n i t i o n of i n d i v i d u a l l e t t e r s . I n a d d i t i o n , o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e is f u n c t i o n a l a t l a t e r s t a g e s of p r o c e s s i n g , such a s i t s f a c i l i t a t i n g e f f e c t i n s h o r t - t e r m memory (Massaro , i n p r e s s ) . Baddeley ( 1 9 6 4 ) , f o r example, showed t h a t a w e l l - s t r u c t u r e d s t r i n g of l e t t e r s is e a s i e r t o remember and r e c a l l t h a n a random s t r i n g . Whether o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e f a c i l i t a t e s p e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n i s a more c o n t r o v e r s i a l i s s u e . We assume t h a t i t is u t i l i z e d i n t h e f o l l o w i n g manner. Upon p r e s e n t a t i o n of a l e t t e r s t r i n g , t h e pr imary r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s b e g i n s i n t e g r a t i n g and s y n t h e s i z i n g f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n passed on by f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n t o p r e p e r c e p t u a l v i s u a l s t o r a g e . F e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n i s r e s o l v e d a t d i f f e r e n t r a t e s and t h e r e is some e v i d e n c e t h a t g r o s s f e a t u r e s a r e a v a i l a b l e b e f o r e t h e more d e t a i l e d f e a t u r e s (Massaro & S c h m u l l e r , 1 9 7 5 ) . The p r i m a r y r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s i s f a c e d w i t h a s u c c e s s i o n of p a r t i a l i n f o r m a t i o n s t a t e s . These p a r t i a l v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n s t a t e s a r e supplemented w i t h knowledge a b o u t o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . A s s u m e , f o r example, a n i n i t i a l g h a s been p e r c e i v e d i n a

Page 25: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

8 CHAPTER 1

l e t t e r s t r i n g , and t h e f e a t u r e s a v a i l a b l e f o r t h e n e x t l e t t e r e l i m i n a t e a l l a l t e r n a t i v e s e x c e p t c o r g . The p r i m a r y r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s m i g h t s y n t h e s i z e 5 w i t h o u t w a i t i n g f o r f u r t h e r v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n , s i n c e i n i t i a l the is n o t a c c e p t a b l e w h i l e i n i t i a l the is.

The p r i m a r y r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s t r a n s m i t s a s e q u e n c e o f r e c o g n i z e d l e t t e r s t o s y n t h e s i z e d v i s u a l memory. F i g u r e 1.1 shows h o r t h e s e c o n d a r y r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s t r a n s f o r m s t h i s s y n t h e s i z e d v i s u a l p e r c e p t i n t o m e a n i n g f u l form i n g e n e r a t e d a b s t r a c t memory. We assume s e c o n d a r y r e c o g n i t i o n a t t e m p t s t o c l o s e o f f t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g i n t o a word. The s e c o n d a r y r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s makes t h i s t r a n s f o r m a t i o n by f i n d i n g t h e b e s t ma tch be tween t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g and a word i n t h e l e x i c o n i n l o n g - t e r m memory. Knowledge o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e c a n a l s o c o n t r i b u t e t o s e c o n d a r y r e c o g n i t i o n ; word r e c o g n i t i o n c a n o c c u r w i t h o u t c o m p l e t e r e c o g n i t i o n o f a l l o f t h e component l e t t e r s . G i v e n t h e l e t t e r s & and t h e v i a b l e a l t e r n a t i v e s 1. and t i n f i n a l p o s i t i o n , o n l y J makes a word , and t h e r e f o r e word i d e n t i f i c a t i o n ( l e x i c a l a c c e s s ) c a n b e . a c h i e v e d ( M a s s a r o , 1 9 7 7 ) . Each word i n t h e l e x i c o n c o n t a i n s b o t h p e r c e p t u a l and c o n c e p t u a l c o d e s . The word which is r e c o g n i z e d i s t h e o n e whose p e r c e p t u a l code g i v e s t h e b e s t ma tch and whose c o n c e p t u a l c o d e is mos t a p p r o p r i a t e i n t h a t p a r t i c u l a r c o n t e x t .

G e n e r a t e d a b s t r a c t memory c o r r e s p o n d s t o t h e s h o r t - t e r m o r working memory o f mos t i n f o r m a t i o n p r o c e s s i n g mode l s . I n o u r m o d e l , t h i s memory i s common t o b o t h s p e e c h p e r c e p t i o n and r e a d i n g . Recoding and r e h e a r s a l p r o c e s s e s b u i l d and m a i n t a i n s e m a n t i c and s y n t a c t i c s t r u c t u r e s a t t h e l e v e l o f g e n e r a t e d a b s t r a c t memory. I t i s a l s o p o s s i b l e t o g o from meaning t o a v i s u a l o r a u d i t o r y p e r c e p t i n o u r mode l . The r e c o d i n g o p e r a t i o n c a n t r a n s f o r m t h e meaning o f a c o n c e p t i n t o i ts s u r f a c e s t r u c t u r e i n a n a u d i t o r y o r v i s u a l fo rm.

Two i s sues c o n c e r n i n g l e t t e r and word r e c o g n i t i o n i n r e a d i n g w i l l b e a d d r e s s e d i n t h e p r e s e n t r e s e a r c h . F i r s t , wha t a r e t h e v i s u a l f e a t u r e s o f l e t t e r s u t i l i z e d by t h e p r i m a r y r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s ? Second , how is knowledge o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e p s y c h o l o g i c a l l y r e p r e s e n t e d ? To a d d r e s s t h e s e i s s u e s , a n y s t u d y m u s t b e c o n c e r n e d w i t h how t h e s e s o u r c e s o f i n f o r m a t i o n a r e e v a l u a t e d , i n t e g r a t e d , and combined i n p e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n ( M a s s a r o , 1 9 7 9 b ) . The d i s c u s s i o n o f v i s u a l f e a t u r e s i s p r e s e n t e d i n C h a p t e r 2 and t h e d i s c u s s i o n o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e is p r e s e n t e d i n C h a p t e r 3 . The f o u r t h c h a p t e r f o c u s e s on how t h e r e a d e r u t i l i z e s b o t h s o u r c e s o f i n f o r m a t i o n i n a v a r i e t y o f p e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n and o v e r t

Page 26: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

R E A D I N G AND INFORMATION PROCESSING 9

j udgmen t t asks . T o s u s t a i n t h e l o g i c a l c o n t i n u i t y of t h e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f t h e e x p e r i m e n t s , d e t a i l s o f t h e m e t h o d , p r o c e d u r e , and r e s u l t s a r e p l a c e d i n a p p e n d i c e s a t t h e end of t h e c h a p t e r . The f i f t h c h a p t e r p r e s e n t s a d e t a i l e d e v a l u a t i o n Of t h e p s y c h o l o g i c a l r e a l i t y o f many d e s c r i p t i o n s of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . The d a t a b a s e d e r i v e d from t h e p r e s e n t e x p e r i m e n t s is a l s o p r e s e n t e d t o a l l o w a d d i t i o n a l tests o f o t h e r d e s c r i p t i o n s of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . I n a d d i t i o n , n o r m a t i v e c o u n t s o f l e t t e r and l e t t e r c l u s t e r o c c u r r e n c e s i n t e x t a r e p r e s e n t e d . T h e s e c o u n t s m a k e p o s s i b l e t h e measu remen t o f a v a r i e t y of s t i m u l u s and t e s t i t ems a c c o r d i n g t o a number o f f o r m a l d e s c r i p t i o n s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . The l a s t c h a p t e r s u m m a r i z e s t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n s of t h e p r e s e n t r e s e a r c h . The c e n t r a l c o n c e r n o f t h e e m p i r i c a l and t h e o r e t i c a l work p r e s e n t e d h e r e is t o e v a l u a t e t h e n a t u r e of t h e p r o c e s s e s i n v o l v e d i n l e t t e r and word r e c o g n i t i o n and t o d i s c o v e r how knowledge a b o u t o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e is r e p r e s e n t e d and u t i l i z e d .

Page 27: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

This page intentionally left blank

Page 28: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

2 Visual Information

Most of t h e t r a d i t i o n a l r e s e a r c h r e l e v a n t t o v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n i n r e a d i n g h a s been concerned w i t h t h e l e g i b i l i t y of v a r i o u s t y p e f o n t s and t e x t f o r m a t s . Spencer (1969) summarizes t h i s work i n an a d e q u a t e and i n t e r e s t i n g manner and w e w i l l n o t a t t e m p t t o d u p l i c a t e a d e t a i l e d c o v e r a g e h e r e . A f t e r ment ioning a few g e n e r a l p r i n c i p l e s of t h e l e g i b i l i t y of p r i n t e d t e x t , we w i l l p r o v i d e some d i s c u s s i o n of t h e r o l e of f e a t u r e t h e o r i e s i n d e s c r i b i n g how l e t t e r s a r e r e c o g n i z e d . F i n a l l y , we w i l l e v a l u a t e t h e f u n c t i o n a l p r o p e r t i e s of t h e t y p e f o n t s used i n our e x p e r i m e n t s s i n c e t h i s i n f o r m a t i o n w i l l be n e c e s s a r y i n our s t u d i e s of how v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n and o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e c o n t r i b u t e t o p e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n .

EARLY WORK

Much of t h e e a r l y work r e v e a l e d t h a t l e t t e r s a r e n o t e q u a l l y l e g i b l e . Table 2 . 1 p r e s e n t s t h e rank o r d e r of t h e l e g i b i l i t y of t h e l o w e r c a s e l e t t e r s i n an exper iment by C a t t e l l i n 1885 ( c i t e d i n Anderson & Dearborn , 1952) and an e x p e r i m e n t i n our l a b o r a t o r y some 90 y e a r s l a t e r . Except f o r a few of t h e l e t t e r s s u c h a s 9, 5 , and 1, t h e r e is an i m p r e s s i v e agreement between t h e two s t u d i e s . Both s t u d i e s found t h a t some of t h e most f r e q u e n t l e t t e r s a r e t h e l e a s t l e g i b l e . The h i g h l y f r e q u e n t x-he ight l e t t e r s a , c , e , 0 , and 2 were p o o r l y recognized i n both s t u d i e s . The s i m i l a r s i z e and o v e r a l l shape of t h e s e l e t t e r s c a u s e them t o be c o n f u s a b l e and , t h e r e f o r e , p o o r l y l e g i b l e . C a t t e l l ' s r e s e a r c h ( 1 8 8 5 ) , as w e l l a s more

Page 29: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 2 CHAPTER 2

Table 2 . 1 Rank o r d e r of d i s t i n c t i v e n e s s of lowercase l e t t e r s a c c o r d i n g t o C a t t e l l (1885) and i n t h e p r e s e n t s t u d y .

L e t t e r a b

d e f 9 h i

k 1 m

C

1

C a t t e l l 19

6 25 1

2 2 1 7 2 4

5 23 11

2 1 0

3

P r e s e n t S tudy

2 2 1

19 9

23 1 8

4 6

26 20

7 1 5 11

L e t t e r n

P 4 r S

t

0

U

V

W

X

Y z

Ca t t e l l 18 1 6

I 4

1 5 2 6 1 2

9 1 3

8 2 0 2 1 1 4

P r e s e n t

1 7 2 4

2 8

1 2 2 5 2 1 1 4 1 6 1 0

3 5

1 3

Study

r e c e n t s t u d i e s by Bouma (1971) and o u r s e l v e s , found t h a t t h e s l i m l e t t e r s g, &, 1, I, r , and t were s i m i l a r l y confused f o r one a n o t h e r l e a d i n g t o r e l a t i v e l y poor r e c o g n i t i o n . F i n a l l y , C a t t e l l observed t h a t l e g i b i l i t y i s h i g h l y c o r r e l a t e d w i t h o v e r a l l l e t t e r s i z e ; contemporary s t u d i e s a l s o s u p p o r t t h i s o b s e r v a t i o n .

Tinker (1965) a l s o noted agreement among s t u d i e s of l e t t e r l e g i b i l i t y . H e r e p o r t e d c o r r e l a t i o n s between .48 and .88 a c r o s s s t u d i e s u s i n g , q v a r i e t y of measurement t e c h n i q u e s and t y p e f a c e s . For i n s t a n c e , t h e l e t t e r s 4, m, 2 , g , and w were c o n s i s t e n t l y found t o be h i g h l y l e g i b l e whereas c , e , I, 1, and - n were p o o r l y l e g i b l e . T inker concluded t h a t o v e r a l l s i z e , s i m p l i c i t y of o u t l i n e , and t h e amount of w h i t e s p a c e e n c l o s e d by a l e t t e r a r e i m p o r t a n t d e t e r m i n a n t s of l e g i b i l i t y . We w i l l p r o v i d e a more d e t a i l e d a n a l y s i s of l e t t e r l e g i b i l i t y and l e t t e r c o n f u s i o n s l a t e r i n t h i s c h a p t e r .

Another common o b s e r v a t i o n i n e a r l y r e s e a r c h was t h a t t e x t p r i n t e d i n uppercase l e t t e r s is inore d i f f i c u l t t o read t h a n i ts lowercase e q u i v a l e n t . Lowercase p r i n t may be more f a m i l i a r t h a n uppercase because of d i f f e r e n c e s i n f r e q u e n c y of o c c u r r e n c e . However, a s Spencer (1969) p o i n t s o u t , p r o p o r t i o n a t e l y - s p a c e d p r i n t e d t e x t i n c a p i t a l s o c c u p i e s a b o u t 5 0 % more s p a c e than it d o e s i n l o w e r c a s e . (Uppercase and

Page 30: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

VISUAL INFORMATION I N R E A D I N G 1 3

l o w e r c a s e o c c u p y t h e same amount o f s p a c e i n t y p e w r i t t e n t e x t , a s i n t h e p r e s e n t m o n o g r a p h ) . The r e a d e r m u s t m a i n t a i n a l a r g e r s p a n o f a p p r e h e n s i o n i n t e r m s o f v i s u a l a n g l e i n o r d e r t o r e a d u p p e r c a s e t e x t a t t h e same r a t e a s l o w e r c a s e . G i v e n t h a t a c u i t y f a l l s o f f d r a m a t i c a l l y w i t h e x t e n t i n t o t h e p e r i p h e r a l v i s i o n , i t i s n o t s u r p r i s i n g t h a t l o w e r c a s e t e x t w i l l show a n a d v a n t a g e . I t would b e i n t e r e s t i n g t o compare upper- and l o w e r c a s e t e x t when t h e s i z e o f t h e l e t t e r s is a d j u s t e d t o e q u a t e f o r v i s u a l a n g l e . However, p e r f o r m a n c e may s t i l l be a t a d i s a d v a n t a g e w i t h u p p e r c a s e s i n c e on t h e a v e r a g e , t h e l a r g e r l e t t e r s w i l l b e c l o s e r t o g e t h e r and a l l o w f o r more l a t e r a l i n t e r f e r e n c e ( t h e m u t u a l d e g r a d a t i o n o f t h e p e r c e p t i b i l i t y o f a d j a c e n t l e t t e r s b e c a u s e o f t h e p r o x i m i t y o f t h e i r c o n t o u r s ) . The s i m p l e s t e x p l a n a t i o n is t h a t l o w e r c a s e l e t t e r s may b e s i m p l y more p e r c e p t i b l e t h a n u p p e r c a s e .

J a v a 1 ( c i t e d i n S p e n c e r , 1 9 6 9 ) showed t h a t r e a d i n g is much e a s i e r when t h e t o p h a l f , r a t h e r t h a n t h e b o t t o m h a l f , o f a l i n e o f words is e x p o s e d . I t is n o t c l e a r where t h e v e r t i c a l c e n t e r was d e f i n e d , b u t w e m i g h t assume t h a t i t was i n t h e m i d d l e o f a n x - h e i g h t l e t t e r . I t would b e v a l u a b l e t o d e f i n e t h e p e r c e p t u a l m i d d l e , i . e . , t h e p o i n t a t wh ich r e a d i n g t h e t o p and bo t tom p o r t i o n s o f a l i n e o f p r i n t is e q u a l l y e a s y . C o n s i s t e n t w i t h J a v a l ' s f i n d i n g s , Messmer ( c i t e d i n Huey, 1908 /1968) c o n c l u d e d t h a t a s c e n d i n g l e t t e r s ( e . g . , b, h) a r e " d o m i n a n t " and c o n t r i b u t e more t o word r e c o g n i t i o n t h a n x - h e i g h t ( e . g . , a , 5 ) or d e s c e n d i n g ( e . g . , g, E) l e t t e r s . Z e i t l e r ( c i t e d i n Woodworth, 1 9 3 8 ) a l s o found t h a t i n s h o r t p r e s e n t a t i o n s , a s c e n d i n g and d e s c e n d i n g l e t t e r s were more l i k e l y t o b e p e r c e i v e d ( a l s o see Huey, 1908 /1968 , pp . 7 9 - 8 7 ) . J a v a l ' s i d e a was t h a t a s c e n d i n g l e t t e r s a r e more e a s i l y p e r c e i v e d b e c a u s e t h e e y e t e n d s t o f i x a t e above t h e m i d d l e of t h e l i n e of p r i n t . Huey (1908 /1968 p . 99) r e j e c t e d t h i s p r o p o s a l by c i t i . i g some s t a t i s t i c s showing t h a t a s c e n d i n g l e t t e r s a r e much more f r e q u e n t t h a n d e s c e n d i n g l e t t e r s , and t h e r e f o r e , a word i s s i m p l y l i k e l y t o h a v e more i n f o r m a t i o n above t h a n be low t h e m i d d l e of a l i n e o f p r i n t .

FEATURE ANALYSIS

C o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e t r a d i t i o n o f p s y c h o p h y s i c s , p s y c h o l o g i s t s h a v e been c o n c e r n e d w i t h t h e v i s u a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f t h e s t i m u l u s t h a t a r e f u n c t i o n a l i n l e t t e r and word p e r c e p t i o n . The g o a l o f t h i s work i s t o r e l a t e t h e p h y s i c a l f e a t u r e s o f l e t t e r s and words t o t h e i r p e r c e p t u a l

Page 31: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

CHAPTER 2

r e c o g n i t i o n . The e a r l y workers i n t h i s a r e a i m p l i c i t l y assumed t h a t l e t t e r s were t h e s m a l l e s t u n i t s of v i s i b l e a n a l y s i s . I n t h i s view, l e t t e r s a r e i n d i v i s i b l e u n i t s t h a t can n o t be ana lyzed f u r t h e r t o p r o v i d e a d e s c r i p t i o n of t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p among d i f f e r e n t l e t t e r s . I n t o d a y ' s t e r m i n o l o g y , t h i s view would c o r r e s p o n d t o a t e m p l a t e v i e w of l e t t e r r e c o g n i t i o n . I d e a l l y , t h e r e a d e r would have a t e m p l a t e c o r r e s p o n d i n g t o e a c h of t h e l e t t e r s i n t h e language and p e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n would i n v o l v e f i n d i n g t h e b e s t match between t h e v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n i n t h e l e t t e r and t h e t e m p l a t e i n memory.

Opposing t h e view of l e t t e r s a s i n d i v i s i b l e u n i t s is t h e i d e a of l e t t e r s having a number of d i s t i n c t i v e f e a t u r e s . T h i s i d e a was g e n e r a t e d by work on t h e l i n g u i s t i c d e s c r i p t i o n of speech sounds a b o u t 30 y e a r s ago (Jakobson, F a n t , & H a l l e , 1 9 6 1 ) . Many s t r u c t u r a l l i n g u i s t s a t t h a t t i m e t r e a t e d phonemes a s t h e s m a l l e s t u n i t s of speech . I f phoneme u n i t s a r e i n d i v i s i b l e , t h e n t h e p h y s i c a l o r p e r c e p t u a l r e l a t i o n s h i p between two phonemes is n o t of c e n t r a l i n t e r e s t . Jakobson e t a l . c h a l l e n g e d t h i s p o i n t of view by t r e a t i n g phonemes a s c o n s i s t i n g of a bundle of d i s t i n c t i v e f e a t u r e s . A r e l a t i v e l y s m a l l number of d i s t i n c t i v e f e a t u r e s c h a r a c t e r i z e d each phoneme of t h e language . As an example, Jakobson e t a l . (1961) were a b l e t o u s e j u s t n i n e f e a t u r e s t o d i s t i n g u i s h 28 phonemes i n E n g l i s h . The i d e a of d i s t i n c t i v e f e a t u r e a n a l y s i s a l s o proved p r o d u c t i v e i n d e v e l o p i n g p a t t e r n r e c o g n i t i o n by machine. S e l f r i d g e and N e i s s e r (1960) reviewed t e m p l a t e matching schemes and f e a t u r e a n a l y s i s schemes f o r t h e r e c o g n i t i o n of l e t t e r s . These developments i n l i n g u i s t i c s and a r t i f i c i a l i n t e l l i g e n c e i n f l u e n c e d t h e development of f e a t u r e models of t h e v i s i b l e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of l e t t e r s .

LETTER FEATURES

A v a l u a b l e t e c h n i q u e f o r t h e s t u d y of t h e v i s u a l f e a t u r e s of l e t t e r s i n v o l v e s t h e g e n e r a t i o n of c o n f u s i o n m a t r i c e s . A c o n f u s i o n m a t r i x i n d i c a t e s what l e t t e r s w i l l be seen a s o t h e r l e t t e r s when e r r o r s a r e made. To induce e r r o r s , e i t h e r t h e v i s u a l i n p u t from t h e l e t t e r m u s t be degraded o r t h e p r o c e s s i n g time a v a i l a b l e f o r r e c o g n i t i o n of t h a t l e t t e r m u s t be l i m i t e d . To d e g r a d e l e t t e r s , t h e y have been p r e s e n t e d a t r e l a t i v e l y l a r g e d i s t a n c e s o r i n p e r i p h e r a l v i s i o n . P r o c e s s i n g time is n o t l i m i t e d b u t f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n i s degraded . To l i m i t p r o c e s s i n g t i m e , l e t t e r s have been p r e s e n t e d f o r a s h o r t d u r a t i o n a t a good f igure-ground c o n t r a s t b u t c l o s e l y f o l l o w e d

Page 32: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

VISUAL INFORMATION I N R E A D I N G 1 5

by a masking s t i m u l u s t h a t s e r v e s t o h a l t p r o c e s s i n g . The assumpt ion i n l i m i t i n g p r o c e s s i n g t i m e is t h a t t h e r e a d e r m a k e s an e r r o r because of i n s u f f i c i e n t time t o p r o c e s s c o m p l e t e l y t h e f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n . Of c o u r s e , i t is i m p o r t a n t t o a n a l y z e c o n f u s i o n m a t r i c i e s g e n e r a t e d from both t h e s e methods and t o d e t e r m i n e whether t h e y g i v e s i m i l a r r e s u l t s .

P r i o r t o Bouma's (1971) s t u d y , most contemporary e x p e r i m e n t s s t u d i e d t h e c o n f u s i o n s of uppercase l e t t e r s ( e . g . , Gibson , O s s e r , S c h i f f , & Smith , 1963; Townsend, 1 9 7 1 ) . Bouma u t i l i z e d l o w e r c a s e l e t t e r s of t h e IBM C o u r i e r 1 0 t y p e f a c e shown i n F i g u r e 2 . 1 . Bouma p r e s e n t e d t h e l e t t e r s a t a r e l a t i v e l y l a r g e r e a d i n g d i s t a n c e i n one s t u d y and i n p e r i p h e r a l v i s i o n i n a n o t h e r . The c o n f u s i o n s were v e r y s y s t e m a t i c and a l lowed Bouma t o a s s i g n t h e l e t t e r s t o g r o u p s of l e t t e r s t h a t were c o n f u s a b l e w i t h i n a g r o u p b u t n o t among g r o u p s . The c o n f u s i o n s among l e t t e r s were p r i m a r i l y dependent upon o v e r a l l l e t t e r shape and s i z e . Many of t h e r e c o g n i t i o n c o n f u s i o n s c o u l d be d e s c r i b e d by j u s t t h r e e c l a s s e s of l e t t e r s : s h o r t o r x - h e i g h t l e t t e r s , a s c e n d i n g l e t t e r s ( a s c e n d e r s ) , and d e s c e n d i n g l e t t e r s ( d e s c e n d e r s ) . Given an x - h e i g h t l e t t e r , a r e c o g n i t i o n con- f u s i o n u s u a l l y r e s u l t e d from a n o t h e r x-he ight l e t t e r and s o on. The x - h e i g h t l e t t e r s and a s c e n d e r s c a n a l s o be broken down i n t o s m a l l e r g r o u p s a s i n d i c a t e d i n Table 2 . 2 . Bouma a r g u e s t h a t o v e r a l l l e t t e r shape is a n i m p o r t a n t d e t e r m i n a n t of r e c o g n i t i o n c o n f u s i o n s and i n t r o d u c e s t h e c o n c e p t of e n v e l o p e . The envelope of a l e t t e r i s t h e s m a l l e s t polygon s u r r o u n d i n g a l e t t e r w i t h o u t i n d e n t a t i o n . For example, t h e e n v e l o p e f o r c would be c i r c u l a r , whereas would be e n c l o s e d by a n i n v e r t e d

a c e m n

o r s u

v w x z

b d f h

i k l t

F i g u r e 2 . 1 Lowercase l e t t e r s of t h e IBM C o u r i e r 1 0 t y p e f a c e used by Bouma ( 1 9 7 1 ) .

Page 33: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

16 CHAPTER 2

Table 2 . 2 The seven g r o u p s of c o n f u s a b l e l e t t e r s of t h e IBM C o u r i e r 1 0 t y p e f a c e ( a f t e r Bouma, 1 9 7 1 ) .

1. a s z x 2 . e o c 3. n m u 4 . r v u 5. d h k b 6 . t i l f 7 . g p j y q

t r i a n g l e . These e n v e l o p e s of l e t t e r s a c c o u n t f o r some of t h e c o n f u s i o n e r r o r s . A s an example, t h e g r o u p of c o n f u s a b l e l e t t e r s (a, 2 , z, z) have roughly r e c t a n g u l a r e n v e l o p e s w i t h inner p a r t s .

I n o r d e r t o p r o v i d e an independent a s s e s s m e n t of t h e f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n t h a t i s f u n c t i o n a l i n t h e r e c o g n i t i o n of lowercase l e t t e r s , we c a r r i e d o u t a l e t t e r r e c o g n i t i o n exper iment . F i g u r e 2 . 2 p r e s e n t s a photograph of t h e l e t t e r s a s t h e y appeared i n t h e e x p e r i m e n t . A s i n g l e l e t t e r was p r e s e n t e d on each t r i a l a t a r e l a t i v e l y dim i n t e n s i t y t o keep o v e r a l l

0123456789 : ; ?

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNO PQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmno

pqrstuvwxyz F i g u r e 2 . 2 The s e t of c h a r a c t e r s c u r r e n t l y be ing used i n our

l a b o r a t o r y . The c h a r a c t e r s a r e p l o t t e d a s p o i n t s on an o s c i l l o s c o p e and t h e a v e r a g e c h a r a c t e r is composed of approximate ly 35 p o i n t s .

Page 34: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

VISUAL INFORMATION I N READING 17

a c c u r a c y a t a b o u t 5 0 % . The t e s t l e t t e r was p r e s e n t e d a t t h e f i x a t i o n p o i n t f o r a s h o r t d u r a t i o n and no masking s t i m u l u s was p r e s e n t e d . Three s u b j e c t s c o n t r i b u t e d a t o t a l of 296 o b s e r v a t i o n s f o r e a c h of t h e 26 l e t t e r s of t h e a l p h a b e t . T a b l e 2.3 p r e s e n t s t h e o v e r a l l a c c u r a c y f o r each o f t h e 26 l e t t e r s , t h e f a l s e a l a r m r a t e s , t h e d' v a l u e s , and c o n f u s i o n r e s p o n s e s t h a t o c c u r r e d more t h a n 5% of t h e t i m e t o a g i v e n tes t l e t t e r .

One p o s s i b l e l i m i t a t i o n w i t h t h e s e d a t a and o t h e r s t u d i e s o f t h i s n a t u r e i s t h a t t h e l e t t e r s d i f f e r i n o v e r a l l a c c u r a c y , and t h e r e f o r e , t h e r e is n o t an e q u a l o p p o r t u n i t y f o r c o n f u s i o n s f o r each of t h e l e t t e r s . On t h e o t h e r hand, i t might be a r g u e d t h a t t h e o v e r a l l a c c u r a c y of a g i v e n a l t e r n a t i v e may r e f l e c t how e a s i l y i t is confused w i t h o t h e r l e t t e r s . That is t o s a y , a l e t t e r c o m p l e t e l y d i s s i m i l a r from t h e o t h e r l e t t e r s would g i v e good per formance s i n c e i t w i l l n o t be confused f o r any of t h e a l t e r n a t i v e s . R e g a r d l e s s of which i n t e r p r e t a t i o n is more r e a s o n a b l e , i t might be wor thwhi le t o r e p e a t t h e e x p e r i m e n t w h i l e a d j u s t i n g t h e i n t e n s i t y i n d i v i d u a l l y f o r each l e t t e r t o keep i t s per formance a t 50% c o r r e c t .

The p e r c e n t a g e c o r r e c t i d e n t i f i c a t i o n f o r each of t h e 26 l e t t e r s of t h e a l p h a b e t i n T a b l e 2.3 shows t h a t r e c o g n i t i o n a c c u r a c y ranged w i d e l y . T h i s r e s u l t may r e p r e s e n t a v i s u a l e f f e c t O K a d e c i s i o n e f f e c t . Some l e t t e r s may p r o v i d e more v i s u a l f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n t h a n o t h e r l e t t e r s under t h e same s t i m u l u s c o n d i t i o n s . A l t e r n a t i v e l y , o b s e r v e r s may d e r i v e e q u i v a l e n t amounts of f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n from a l l l e t t e r s b u t may have d e c i s i o n b i a s e s i n t h e i n t e r p r e t a t i o n of t h e f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n . A s a n example, o b s e r v e r s might be b i a s e d t o i n t e r p r e t t h e f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n i n te rms of l e t t e r s t h a t occur more f r e q u e n t l y i n t h e language . The d e c i s i o n i n t e r p r e t a t i o n , however, a p p e a r s t o be i n c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e r e s u l t s . For example, t h e i n f r e q u e n t l e t t e r s 5 , y , and z averaged a b o u t 65% c o r r e c t , whereas t h e f r e q u e n t l e t t e r s e , g, - 0, and 2 averaged a b o u t 35% c o r r e c t . I n c o n t r a s t t o what would be e x p e c t e d from a f r e q u e n c y b i a s , t h e s e l e a s t f r e q u e n t l e t t e r s a r e r e c o g n i z e d much b e t t e r t h a n t h e more f r e q u e n t l e t t e r s . T h i s a n a l y s i s p r o v i d e s s u p p o r t f o r t h e i d e a t h a t d i f f e r e n c e s i n a c c u r a c y a r e due t o d i f f e r e n c e s i n t h e f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n of t h e l e t t e r s . A more d i r e c t measure of v i s u a l r e s o l u t i o n i s t o take a 4' measure a s proposed by t h e t h e o r y of s i g n a l d e t e c t a b i l i t y (Green & Swets , 1966; Massaro &

Schmuller , . 1 9 7 5 ) . Table 2.3 shows t h a t t h e s e d' v a l u e s c o r r e l a t e r a t h e r h i g h l y w i t h t h e p e r c e n t a g e c o r r e c t v a l u e s . Given t h e assumpt ion t h a t t h e d' v a l u e s a r e n o t i n f l u e n c e d by any d i f f e r e n c e s i n d e c i s i o n b i a s e s , t h e r e s u l t s

Page 35: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 8 CHAPTER 2

T a b l e 2 .3 P r o p o r t i o n o f times a l e t t e r was r e c o g n i z e d c o r r e c t l y ( H i t ) a n d was g i v e n as a n i n c o r r e c t r e s p o n s e t o o t h e r l e t t e r s ( F a l s e A l a r m ) ; t h e d'

a l u e ; a n d t h e c o n f u s i o n r e s p o n s e s g r e a t e r t h a n 5 % ( f r o m p r e s e n t s t u d y ) .

L e t t e r H i t F a l s e Ala rm A ' C o n f u s i o n s Greater t h a n 5%

a b

d e f 4 h i

k 1 m n

P 9 r S t

C

j

0

U

V

W

X

Y 7.

. 372

. 7 4 3

.449

.639

.365

.456

. 7 0 3

.662

.277

.412

. 6 5 5

.530

. 6 2 8

.497

. 3 3 1

.730

.649

. 5 9 1

.324

.382

.554

.520

.632

.730

.686

. 5 7 1

.015

.020

.016

. 0 1 1

.017

.0 20

.022

.020

. 0 2 3

.017

. 0 1 4

. 0 2 2

. 0 1 0

. 0 1 3

. 0 1 4

. 0 1 6 , 0 1 0 . 0 2 3 .010 .0 20 . 0 1 0 . 0 1 5 . 0 1 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 1 5 . 0 1 0

1 . 8 5 2 . 7 2 2 .05 2 .64 1 . 7 9 1 . 9 4 2 . 5 6 2 .46 1 . 4 2 1 . 9 2 2 . 6 1 2 .10 2 .66 2 .24 1 . 7 8 2 .78 2 . 7 1 2 .24 1 . 8 7 1 . 7 6 2 .46 2 .16 2 .66 2 .94 2 .67 2 . 5 1

l o c a t e t h e d i f f e r e n c e s i n l e t t e r r e c o g n i t i o n a t a v i s u a l s t a g e o f p r o c e s s i n g .

T a b l e 2 .3 a l s o p r o v i d e s a n i n d e x o f t h e l e t t e r s w h i c h a re c o n f u s e d w i t h o t h e r l e t t e r s i n t h e t a s k . F o r e a c h l e t t e r , a l l c o n f u s i o n s g i v e n f o r t h a t l e t t e r g r e a t e r t h a n 5% o f t h e t i m e a r e p r e s e n t e d . As a n e x a m p l e , g i v e n t h e s t i m u l u s a, s u b j e c t s r e s p o n d e d 1 4 % o f t h e time w i t h t h e a l t e r n a t i v e g a n d 7 % o f t h e time w i t h a l t e r n a t i v e g. T h i s means t h a t t h e l e t t e r a is o f t e n

Page 36: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

VISUAL INFORMATION I N R E A D I N G 1 9

i n t e r p r e t e d a s e . The c o n f u s i o n s a p p e a r t o b e r e l a t i v e l y s y s t e m a t i c and t h e r e f o r e s u g g e s t wh ich f e a t u r e s a r e f u n c t i o n a l i n l e t t e r r e c o g n i t i o n . T a b l e 2 . 4 p r o v i d e s a n a l o g o u s d a t a f rom t h e p e r i p h e r a l - v i e w i n g e x p e r i m e n t c a r r i e d o u t by Bouma on t h e I B M C o u r i e r 1 0 t y p e f a c e . The c o n f u s i o n s w i l l b e u t i l i z e d i n o u r l a t e r work when t h e r e l a t i v e s i m i l a r i t y b e t w e e n l e t t e r s becomes a n i m p o r t a n t q u e s t i o n i n o u r e x p e r i m e n t s .

The l e t t e r c o n f u s i o n s s u g g e s t t h a t o v e r a l l l e t t e r s h a p e i n f o r m a t i o n may b e o b t a i n e d b e f o r e c o m p l e t e l e t t e r p e r c e p t i o n ( r e s o l u t i o n ) . For example , 48% o f t h e e r r o r r e s p o n s e s t o t h e s t i m u l u s 2 were e and 0; t h i s i n d i c a t e s t h a t s u b j e c t s s aw a c i r c u l a r s h a p e on many o f t h e t r i a l s b u t d i d n o t know w h e t h e r t h e l e t t e r was 2 , e , o r 0. T h i s r e s u l t m i g h t b e i n t e r p r e t e d t o mean t h a t t h e o v e r a l l e n v e l o p e o f a l e t t e r is r e s o l v e d b e f o r e d e t a i l s o f i t s component f e a t u r e s . I n d e p e n d e n t l y o f w h e t h e r t h e whole is g r e a t e r t h a n t h e sum o f i t s p a r t s , a g e n e r a l i m p r e s s i o n o f t h e who le ( a l t h o u g h ambiguous ) i s s e e n b e f o r e a l l o f t h e p a r t s . T h a t a l e t t e r ' s e n v e l o p e ( n o pun i n t e n d e d ) becomes a v a i l a b l e b e f o r e i t s d e t a i l s i s a l s o c o n s i s t e n t w i t h f o u r i e r - a n a l y s i s s t u d i e s . T h e r e is e v i d e n c e t h a t i n f o r m a t i o n g i v e n by l o w s p a t i a l f r e q u e n c i e s i s p r o c e s s e d f a s t e r t h a n h i g h s p a t i a l f r e q u e n c y i n f o r m a t i o n ( B r e i t m e y e r & Ganz , 1976 ; B r o a d b e n t , 1 9 7 7 ) . A c c o r d i n g l y , l ow s p a t i a l f r e q u e n c i e s p r o v i d e i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t o v e r a l l s h a p e w h e r e a s h i g h f r e q u e n c y i n f o r m a t i o n r e d u c e s u n c e r t a i n t y a b o u t l e t t e r d e t a i l . E i t h e r l i m i t e d p r o c e s s i n g time o r a r e d u c e d f i g u r e - g r o u n d c o n t r a s t c o u l d a l l o w e n v e l o p e r e s o l u t i o n w i t h o u t c o r r e s p o n d i n g r e s o l u t i o n o f l e t t e r d e t a i l . I n terms o f t h e p r e s e n t a n a l y s i s , t h e r e a d e r w i l l have t o d e c i d e wh ich l e t t e r b e s t f i t s t h e p e r c e i v e d b u t f u z z y e n v e l o p e . For e x a m p l e , r e c o g n i t i o n o f a c i r c u l a r e n v e l o p e w i t h o u t f u r t h e r d e t a i l would b e s u f f i c i e n t t o l i m i t t h e a l t e r n a t i v e s t o t h e t h r e e l e t t e r s 2 , g , a n d 0.

G i v e n t h a t o u r p r i m a r y m o t i v a t i o n is t o s t u d y t h e i n t e r a c t i o n o f l o w e r - l e v e l v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n w i t h h i g h e r - o r d e r knowledge i n l e t t e r r e c o g n i t i o n , we a r e n o t d i r e c t l y c o n c e r n e d w i t h which l e t t e r f e a t u r e s a r e u t i l i z e d i n p e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n . T h e r e a r e now s u f f i c i e n t d a t a c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e i d e a t h a t l e t t e r r e c o g n i t i o n is m e d i a t e d by f e a t u r e s ( M a s s a r o &

S c h m u l l e r , 1 9 7 5 ) . F e a t u r e s a r e n o t l i m i t e d t o s m a l l component p r o p e r t i e s b u t c a n b e r e l a t i v e l y complex r e l a t i o n a l p r o p e r t i e s s u c h a s t h e o v e r a l l c i r c u l a r e n v e l o p e o f t h e l e t t e r s 5, g , a n d - 0. A d d i t i o n a l l y , i n c o n t r a s t t o t h e common a s s u m p t i o n t h a t f e a t u r e s a r e d e t e c t e d i n a n a l l - o r - n o n e m a n n e r , w e p r e f e r t o v i e w t h e f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n p r o c e s s a s c o n t i n u o u s . V i s i b l e f e a t u r e s may b e f u z z y s o t h a t r e c o g n i t i o n c o n s i s t s o f

Page 37: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

20 CHAPTER 2

T a b l e 2 .4 P r o p o r t i o n of times a l e t t e r was r e c o g n i z e d c o r r e c t l y ( H i t ) a n d was g i v e n a s an i n c o r r e c t r e s p o n s e t o o t h e r l e t t e r s ( F a l s e Alarm) ; t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g d' v a l u e ; a n d t h e c o n f u s i o n r e s p o n s e s g r e a t e r t h a n 5% ( f r o m Bouma, 1 9 7 1 ) .

Let ter H i t F a l s e Alarm d' C o n f u s i o n s Greater t h a n 5%

a b

d e f g h i j k 1 m n

P 9 r

t

C

0

S

U

V

W

X

Y Z

. 6 2 0 . 0 5 3

. 6 2 0 . 0 2 4

. 1 9 0 . 0 0 6

. 8 3 0 . 0 1 9

. 3 4 0 . 0 4 5

. 8 1 0 . 0 1 3

. 3 1 0 . 0 1 8

. 8 0 0 . 0 2 8

. 6 9 0 . 0 3 5

. 8 2 0 .008

. 5 1 0 . 0 0 8

. 2 6 0 .007

. 7 9 0 . 0 2 8

. 5 6 0 . 0 2 6

. 5 7 0 . 0 1 7

. 8 4 0 . 0 1 7

. 7 4 0 . 0 1 9

. 5 5 0 . 0 1 5

. 1 0 0 . 0 0 9

. 5 9 0 . 0 1 3 . 5 6 0 .018 . 7 2 0 .016 . 7 0 0 . 0 1 4 . 3 2 0 . 0 0 3 . 5 7 0 . 0 0 3 . 1 2 0 .004

1 . 9 3 2 . 2 9 1 . 6 2 3 . 0 3 1 . 2 9 3 . 1 1 1 . 6 0 2 . 7 6 2 . 3 1 3 . 3 3 2 . 4 6 1 . 8 1 2 .72 2 . 1 0 2 . 3 0 3 . 1 2 2 . 7 1 2 . 3 1 1 . 0 8 2 .46 2 . 2 6 2 . 7 3 2 . 7 3 2 . 2 5 2 . 9 5 1 . 4 6

Page 38: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

VISUAL INFORMATION I N READING 2 1

a s c e r t a i n i n g t h e d e g r e e t o which t h a t f e a t u r e is p r e s e n t o r a b s e n t i n t h e s t i m u l u s . Oden and Massaro (1978) have developed a model of speech p e r c e p t i o n based on t h e i d e a of c o n t i n u o u s a c o u s t i c f e a t u r e s . A s i m i l a r a n a l y s i s would seem t o be a v a l u a b l e c o n t r i b u t i o n i n l e t t e r r e c o g n i t i o n , a l t h o u g h beyond t h e scope of t h e p r e s e n t r e s e a r c h . For i n t e r e s t e d r e a d e r s , Oden (1979) i n i t i a t e d a n e m p i r i c a l and t h e o r e t i c a l s t u d y of f u z z y f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n i n l e t t e r s , and Massaro (1979a) q u a n t i f i e d a model t o a c c o u n t f o r how c o n t i n u o u s f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n of a l e t t e r is i n t e g r a t e d w i t h o r t h o g r a p h i c c o n t e x t i n l e t t e r r e c o g n i t i o n .

Page 39: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

This page intentionally left blank

Page 40: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

3 Orthographic Structure

I n t h i s c h a p t e r we d e s c r i b e t h e fundamenta l p r o p e r t i e s of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e and s p e c u l a t e on how t h e s e p r o p e r t i e s might f a c i l i t a t e l e t t e r and word r e c o g n i t i o n . The g o a l of t h i s d i s c u s s i o n is t o d e r i v e d i f f e r e n t m e t r i c s f o r s c a l i n g t h e o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e of l e t t e r s t r i n g s based upon d i f f e r e n t assumpt ions a b o u t how o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e c o n t r i b u t e s t o r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s e s . The e x p e r i m e n t s p r e s e n t e d i n Chapter 4 a t t e m p t t o e v a l u a t e t h e p s y c h o l o g i c a l r e a l i t y of s e v e r a l of t h e s e measures .

C e n t r a l t o t h e d i s c u s s i o n of t h i s c h a p t e r i s t h e assumpt ion t h a t s k i l l e d r e a d e r s d e r i v e i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t l e g a l o c c u r r e n c e s of l e t t e r s o r l e t t e r s e q u e n c e s from r e p e a t e d e x p o s u r e s t o p r i n t e d words and t h a t t h e y employ t h i s i n f o r m a t i o n t o f a c i l i t a t e word r e c o g n i t i o n i n normal r e a d i n g t a s k s . Our concern h e r e is w i t h both t h e d e s c r i p t i o n of t h e a b s t r a c t e d i n f o r m a t i o n and i ts u t i l i z a t i o n i n t h e r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s . I n t h e d i s c u s s i o n which f o l l o w s w e c o n c e n t r a t e on two broad c a t e g o r i e s of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e : s t a t i s t i c a l redundancy and ru le -governed r e g u l a r i t y . S t a t i s t i c a l redundancy a p p l i e s t o t h o s e measures which can be d e r i v e d s o l e l y from t h e f r e q u e n c y w i t h which l e t t e r s , l e t t e r s e q u e n c e s , and words occur i n n a t u r a l t e x t s . Such measures might be based upon t y p e o r t o k e n c o u n t s . The measures might a p p l y t o l e t t e r s , l e t t e r s e q u e n c e s , o r t o any c l a s s i f i c a t i o n of t h e s e e n t i t i e s ( e . g . , vowel, c o n s o n a n t ) . Rule-governed r e g u l a r i t y a p p l i e s t o t h o s e p r o p e r t i e s o f l e t t e r s and l e t t e r s e q u e n c e s which can be g e n e r a l i z e d from e i t h e r t h e p h o n o l o g i c a l c o n s t r a i n t s of E n g l i s h words o r t h e s c r i b a l c o n v e n t i o n s . The l a t t e r c o n t r o l t h e s e l e c t i o n of l e t t e r s f o r e i t h e r r e p r e s e n t i n g sounds o r marking graphemic , g r a p h o t a c t i c , o r morphologica l

Page 41: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

24 CHAPTER 3

func t io : i s . Rule-governed r e g u l a r i t y u s u a l l y s p e c i f i e s a l e t t e r s t r i n g a s r e g u l a r o r i r r e g u l a r . I n a d d i t i o n , th rough t h e s p e c i f i c a t i o n of r u l e s f o r g e n e r a t i n g l e g a l ( i . e . , E n g l i s h - l i k e ) l e t t e r s t r i n g s , l e v e l s of r e g u l a r i t y c a n be d e f i n e d .

STATISTICAL REDUNDANCY

Ordered a p p r o x i m a t i o n s t o E n g l i s h , based on a l g o r i t h m s proposed by Shannon ( 1 9 4 8 ) , were t h e f i r s t d e s c r i p t i o n s of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e u t i l i z e d by p s y c h o l o g i s t s . Shannon (1948) c r e a t e d a zero-order approximat ion t o E n g l i s h by drawing l e t t e r s w i t h rep lacement from a p o o l of 27 unweighted symbols--the 26 l e t t e r s of t h e a l p h a b e t p l u s a s p a c e . ( I n t h i s a s i n most o t h e r s e q u e n t i a l g e n e r a t i o n t e c h n i q u e s , a n i n i t i a l s p a c e symbol is assumed.) I f t h i s same p r o c e d u r e is employed w i t h symbols t h a t a r e weighted a c c o r d i n g t o t h e i r f r e q u e n c i e s of o c c u r r e n c e i n t e x t s , f i r s t - o r d e r a p p r o x i m a t i o n s r e s u l t .

An n-g o r d e r approximat ion is produced by f i r s t s e l e c t i n g a l e t t e r s t r i n g of l e n g t h n-1. T h i s forms t h e beginning p a r t of t h e new s t r i n g . The t e x t is t h e n scanned f o r t h e f i r s t o c c u r r e n c e of t h i s i n i t i a l s t r i n g . When found, t h e n e x t l e t t e r a f t e r t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g sequence is added t o t h e s t r i n g b e i n g g e n e r a t e d , and a n e w s e a r c h s t r i n g i s c o n s t r u c t e d by d r o p p i n g t h e f i r s t l e t t e r of t h e l a s t s e a r c h s t r i n g and adding t h e l e t t e r j u s t l o c a t e d . T h i s p r o c e d u r e is t h e n r e p e a t e d u n t i l a space o c c u r s o r a d e s i r e d l e n g t h reached . M i l l e r , B r u n e r , and Postman (1954) used t h i s t e c h n i q u e t o g e n e r a t e e i g h t - l e t t e r pseudowords f o r a f u l l - r e p o r t t a s k . T h e i r f o u r t h - o r d e r approximat ions i n c l u d e d items l i k e m o s s i a n t , o n e t i c u l , p r e v e r a l , and f a v o r i a l , a l l q u i t e E n g l i s h - l i k e . Wallach ( 1 9 6 3 ) , on t h e o t h e r hand, t r u n c a t e d two l e t t e r s from each s t r i n g used by Miller e t a l . t h u s o c c a s i o n a l l y p r o d u c i n g a non-English s p e l l i n g ( e . g . , moss ia , l o r i a i ) . Although M i l l e r e t a l . (1954) were p r i m a r i l y concerned w i t h i n f o r m a t i o n t h e o r y , l a t e r e x p e r i m e n t e r s ( e . g . , L e f t o n , S p r a g i n s , & Byrnes, 1973; Mewhort & B e a l , 1977) have advoca ted o r d e r e d a p p r o x i m a t i o n s a s p s y c h o l o g i c a l l y r e l e v a n t d e s c r i p t i o n s of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e .

A major shor tcoming of o r d e r e d a p p r o x i m a t i o n d e s c r i p t i o n s i s t h e i r i n a b i l i t y t o c o n t r o l s t r u c t u r a l v a r i a t i o n s w i t h i n approximat ion l e v e l s . Although any l a r g e g r o u p of s t i m u l i g e n e r a t e d by t h i s t e c h n i q u e w i l l approximate t h e f r e q u e n c i e s of o c c u r r e n c e of E n g l i s h l e t t e r s e q u e n c e s , t h e r e is no m e t r i c

Page 42: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

ORTHOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE 25

i n c o r p o r a t e d i n t o t h e method f o r a s s e s s i n g t h e r e l a t i v e d e g r e e o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e o f s t r i n g s w i t h i n o r d e r c l a s s e s . I n G i l m o r e and E g e t h ( 1 9 7 6 ) , f o r e x a m p l e , z e r o - o r d e r a p p r o x i m a t i o n s t o E n g l i s h w e r e used t o g e n e r a t e wha t t h e a u t h o r s i n t e n d e d t o b e nonwords , wh ich t h e y c o n t r a s t e d w i t h r e a l E n g l i s h words . I f n o o t h e r c r i t e r i a were used t o e v a l u a t e t h e 30 s t r i n g s g e n e r a t e d f o r u s e i n t h e i r e x p e r i m e n t s , t h e r e was a 1 8 % c h a n c e t h a t a t l e a s t o n e r e a l word o c c u r r e d ( b a s e d on t h e a s s u m p t i o n o f 1 , 5 0 0 common f o u r - l e t t e r words i n E n g l i s h ) ; t h e p r o b a b i l i t y t h a t p seudowords o c c u r r e d was c o n s i d e r a b l y h i g h e r .

A s e c o n d s h o r t c o m i n g o f a s t r i c t p s y c h o l o g i c a l a p p l i c a t i o n of t h i s a p p r o a c h i s i t s s t r i c t r e l i a n c e on l e f t - t o - r i g h t g e n e r a t i o n o f l e t t e r s d u r i n g word r e c o g n i t i o n . For e x a m p l e , g i v e n th- and th-ugh a s p a r t i a l l y p e r c e i v e d s i x - l e t t e r s t r i n g s , t h e p r o b a b i l i t i e s o f i d e n t i f y i n g t h e t h i r d l e t t e r i n e a c h would b e t h e same i n t h a t o n l y i n f o r m a t i o n t o t h e l e f t b u t n o t t o t h e r i g h t o f a n y l e t t e r p o s i t i o n i s r e l e v a n t .

To overcome t h e s e d i f f i c u l t i e s , summed b i g r a m and t r i g r a m c o u n t s h a v e been p r o p o s e d a s metr ics . Underwood and S c h u l z ( 1 9 6 8 ) t a b u l a t e d t h e b i g r a m s and t r i g r a m s i n 2 ,090 w o r d s sampled f rom T h o r n d i k e and L o r g e ( 1 9 4 4 ) . S i n c e e a c h s a m p l e word was w e i g h t e d by i t s f r e q u e n c y o f o c c u r r e n c e i n t e x t s , t o k e n - b a s e d b i g r a m and t r i g r a m c o u n t s r e s u l t e d . By summing t h e f r e q u e n c i e s o f a l l t h e b i g r a m s o r t r i g r a m s w i t h i n a l e t t e r s t r i n g , a f a m i l i a r i t y i n d e x c a n b e d e r i v e d . Such a p r o c e d u r e was used by A n i s f e l d ( 1 9 6 4 ) , f o r e x a m p l e , i n r e a n a l y z i n g t h e G i b s o n , P i c k , Osser, and Hammond ( 1 9 6 2 ) s t u d y o f a f u l l r e p o r t o f v i s u a l l y - p r e s e n t e d l e t t e r s t r i n g s v a r y i n g i n p r o n o u n c e a b i l i t y . A c c o r d i n g t o A n i s f e l d ( 1 9 6 4 ) , t h e G i b s o n e t a l . r e s u l t s c o u l d b e a c c o u n t e d f o r a s e a s i l y by d i f f e r e n c e s i n summed b i g r a m c o u n t s a s t h e y c o u l d by t h e s p e l l i n g - t o - s o u n d u n i t s a d v o c a t e d by G i b s o n e t a l . G i b s o n ( 1 9 6 4 ) , i n a r e p l y t o A n i s f e l d ( 1 9 6 4 1 , however , showed t h a t c o r r e l a t i o n s o f summed b i g r a m and summed t r i g r a m c o u n t s w i t h s u b j e c t r e s p o n s e s were low and n o n s i g n i f i c a n t . I n a d d i t i o n , G i b s o n , S h u r c l i f f , and Yonas ( 1 9 7 0 ) found n e i t h e r summed b i g r a m n o r summed t r i g r a m c o u n t s t o b e a n a d e q u a t e p r e d i c t o r o f r e c o g n i t i o n s c o r e s f o r u n p r o n o u n c e a b l e and p r o n o u n c e a b l e l e t t e r s t r i n g s .

G i b s o n e t a l . ( 1 9 7 0 ) d i d n o t p r o v i d e a f a i r t e s t o f t h e f r e q u e n c y m e a s u r e s , however , b e c a u s e t h e c o u n t s were n o t a d j u s t e d f o r word l e n g t h i n a n y r e a s o n a b l e manner . Word l e n g t h a l o n e a c c o u n t e d f o r a b o u t 70% of t h e v a r i a n c e i n t h e r e c a l l s c o r e s ; t h e number o f e r r o r s n a t u r a l l y i n c r e a s e d w i t h i n c r e a s e s i n t h e l e n g t h o f t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g . The s i g n i f i c a n t

Page 43: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

26 CHAPTER 3

c o r r e l a t i o n of p r o n o u n c e a b i l i t y could be due t o t h e s i m p l e f a c t t h a t s h o r t e r words a r e more pronounceable t h a n l o n g e r words. Suppor t ing t h i s i n t e r p r e t a t i o n , Spreen and S c h u l z (1966) found a n e g a t i v e c o r r e l a t i o n of . 8 3 between word l e n g t h and p r o n o u n c e a b i l i t y f o r 329 common nouns. T h e r e f o r e , t h e r e s u l t s of Gibson e t a l . (1962, 1970) r e a l l y d o n o t speak t o t h e issue of p r o n o u n c e a b i l i t y v e r s u s o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e of l e t t e r s t r i n g s when s t r i n g l e n g t h is h e l d c o n s t a n t .

The Underwood and Schulz (1960) t a b l e s p r o v i d e a means f o r d i f f e r e n t i a t i n g f a m i l i a r and u n f a m i l i a r s t r i n g s w i t h i n approximat ion c l a s s e s , b u t s u f f e r from l a c k of a t t e n t i o n t o word l e n g t h o r p o s i t i o n of l e t t e r s w i t h i n a word. A common s u f f i x l i k e -& would h e a v i l y weight a t r i g r a m c o u n t f o r a pseudoword whether i n i n i t i a l o r f i n a l p o s i t i o n a c c o r d i n g t o t h e s e t a b l e s , y e t i n E n g l i s h words t h i s sequence never o c c u r s i n i t i a l l y . I f l e t t e r p o s i t i o n w i t h i n a word i s a p s y c h o l o g i c a l l y r e l e v a n t v a r i a b l e , t h e Underwood and S c h u l z (1960) t a b l e s could n o t be used f o r e x p l o r i n g t h i s f a c t o r .

T h i s shor tcoming h a s been overcome, however, i n t h e Mayzner and T r e s s e l t (1965) and Mayzner, T r e s s e l t , and Wolin (1965a, 1965b) t a b l e s , which g i v e b igram, t r i g r a m , and t e t r a g r a m c o u n t s by word p o s i t i o n and by word l e n g t h f o r words from t h r e e t o seven c h a r a c t e r s i n l e n g t h . Mayzner and T r e s s e l t (1965) a l s o g i v e s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c i e s , which have been used by Mason (1975) t o e x p l o r e d i f f e r e n c e s between good and poor r e a d e r s i n a r e c o g n i t i o n t a s k . Although Mason (1975) confounds ru le -governed o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e w i t h p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y , a s m a l l b u t s i g n i f i c a n t p o s i t i o n a l - f requency e f f e c t remains when t h e s e v a r i a b l e s a r e s e p a r a t e d (Massaro, Venezky, & T a y l o r , 1 9 7 9 ) .

The r e l a t i o n s h i p s among s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y , bigram p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y , and t r i g r a m p o s i t i o n a l f requency have o n l y begun t o be e x p l o r e d . McClelland and J o h n s t o n (1977) observed t h a t a c c u r a c y of r e p o r t of f o u r - l e t t e r i t e m s was s i g n i f i c a n t l y c o r r e l a t e d w i t h summed s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l f requency b u t n o t w i t h bigram p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y . Bouwhuis (1979) found t h a t s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y made a s i g n i f i c a n t c o n t r i b u t i o n t o l e x i c a l d e c i s i o n s a b o u t t h r e e - l e t t e r items. R e a c t i o n times t o words d e c r e a s e d w i t h i n c r e a s e s i n f r e q u e n c y whereas r e a c t i o n times t o pseudowords i n c r e a s e d . S i m i l a r l y , h i g h s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y i n c r e a s e d t h e number of "word" r e s p o n s e s t o both words and pseudowords. These s i g n i f i c a n t c o r r e l a t i o n s were c o n s i d e r a b l y d i m i n i s h e d when bigram p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y was used a s t h e p r e d i c t o r v a r i a b l e . These r e s u l t s imply t h a t t h e power of t h e

Page 44: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

ORTHOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE 27

b i g r a m f r e q u e n c y m e a s u r e ( s e e C h a p t e r 5 ) w i t h o u r s i x - l e t t e r i t ems may n o t g e n e r a l i z e c o m p l e t e l y t o s m a l l e r l e t t e r - s t r i n g l e n g t h s .

I t is p o s s i b l e t o g e n e r a t e l e t t e r s t r i n g s w h i l e i n d e p e n d e n t l y v a r y i n g summed s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y and summed b i g r a m p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y c o u n t s . Wi th some s t r a i n i n g , t h e same c a n b e d o n e f o r summed b i g r a m and summed t r i g r a m c o u n t s . F o r e x a m p l e , nach im h a s ( a c c o r d i n g t o Mayzne r , e t a l . 1 9 6 5 b ) l e g a l b i g r a m s b u t no l e g a l t r i g r a m s . N a t h e r , o n t h e o t h e r h a n d , h a s l e g a l b i g r a m s and l e g a l t r i g r a m s . A l e g a l b ig ram o r a l e g a l t r i g r a m means t h a t t h e s p e l l i n g p a t t e r n o c c u r s w i t h f r e q u e n c i e s a b o v e z e r o i n t h e Mayzner e t a l . t a b l e s . The Mayzner e t a l . t a b l e s m i g h t b e b a s e d o n t o o s m a l l a s a m p l e f o r r e l i a b l e c o u n t s . C o n s e q u e n t l y , we h a v e d e v i s e d t a b l e s f rom t h e Kuce ra and F r a n c i s ( 1 9 6 7 ) m i l l i o n - w o r d l i s t and h a v e u t i l i z e d them i n t h e p r e s e n t p r o j e c t . The d e s c r i p t i o n o f t h e a n a l y s i s and t h e s i n g l e - l e t t e r and b i g r a m t a b l e s a r e g i v e n i n Appendix 5 .2 a n d 5 .3 .

A f u r t h e r i s s u e t h a t n e e d s t o b e c l a r i f i e d is t h e r e l a t i v e i m p o r t a n c e o f t o k e n m e a s u r e s and t y p e m e a s u r e s . Token c o u n t s r e p r e s e n t a summed o c c u r r e n c e f o r some l e t t e r s e q u e n c e , r e g a r d l e s s o f t h e number o f u n i q u e w o r d s wh ich c o n t r i b u t e t o t h i s sum. Type c o u n t s , o n t h e o t h e r h a n d , r e p r e s e n t a sum o f t h e u n i q u e w o r d s i n wh ich a l e t t e r s e q u e n c e o c c u r s , r e g a r d l e s s o f t h e f r e q u e n c i e s o f o c c u r r e n c e o f t h e w o r d s . I n a l l o f t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l work r e p o r t e d s o f a r t h a t used s e q u e n t i a l r e d u n d a n c y m e a s u r e s , t o k e n c o u n t s h a v e b e e n employed . S o l s o and h i s c o l l e a g u e s ( S o l s o , 1 9 7 9 ; S o l s o & K i n g , 1976 ; S o l s o , B a r b u t o , & J u e l , 1979 ; S o l s o , T o p p e r , & Macey, 1 9 7 3 ; T o p p e r , Macey, & S o l s o , 1 9 7 3 ) r e p o r t some t y p e - b a s e d t a b u l a t i o n s b a s e d on t h e Kuce ra and F r a n c i s ( 1 9 6 7 ) word l i s t s b u t no e x p e r i m e n t a l d a t a . However, t h e r e is no a p r i o r i r e a s o n f o r a s s u m i n g t h a t word t o k e n s h a v e g r e a t e r p s y c h o l o g i c a l r e a l i t y t h a n word t y p e s n o r a r e t h e r e e m p i r i c a l d a t a r e l e v a n t t o t h i s q u e s t i o n . We a d d r e s s t h i s i s s u e i n C h a p t e r 5 .

Type-based m e a s u r e s c o u l d b e d e r i v e d from a r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f a n i n t e r n a l l e x i c o n , b u t t o k e n m e a s u r e s a l s o r e q u i r e t h e e x i s t e n c e o f d i s t r i b u t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n i n memory. W h i l e i t is r e a s o n a b l e t o a s sume t h a t some f o r m s o f b o t h t o k e n and t y p e i n f o r m a t i o n m i g h t h a v e p s y c h o l o g i c a l r e a l i t y , how t h e r e a d e r m i g h t a p p l y raw t o k e n m e a s u r e s i n word r e c o g n i t i o n is n o t c o i n p l e t e l y o b v i o u s ( c f . S a v i n , 1 9 6 3 ) . However , some i n t e r e s t i n g a p p r o a c h e s t o u s i n g t o k e n m e a s u r e s embedded w i t h i n t y p e m e a s u r e s h a v e b e e n p r o p o s e d b y Solomon and Pos tman ( 1 9 5 2 ) , S a v i n ( 1 9 6 3 ) , and more r e c e n t l y b y L a n d a u e r and S t r e e t e r

Page 45: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

28 CHAPTER 3

( 1 9 7 3 ) . As a n e x a m p l e , t h e v i a b , l e a l t e r n a t i v e s c o u l d b e na r rowed down t o a l l words c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n and t h e r e a d e r m i g h t c h o o s e t h e m o s t f r e q u e n t word from t h i s s e t .

But w h a t e v e r a p p l i c a t i o n m i g h t b e shown f o r f r e q u e n c y i n f o r m a t i o n i n word r e c o g n i t i o n , t h e s p e c i f i c r o l e o f t h e s e m e a s u r e s h a s y e t t o b e d e t e r m i n e d . I f summed f r e q u e n c y ( t o k e n o r t y p e ) i s p s y c h o l o g i c a l l y r e l e v a n t , t h e n t h e u t i l i z a t i o n o f a measu re l i k e b ig ram f r e q u e n c y would r e q u i r e a max imiz ing p r o c e s s . C o n s i d e r t h e t a s k o f p e r c e i v i n g a f i v e - l e t t e r s t r i n g where t h e v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n a l l o w s a n a c c e p t a b l e r e s o l u t i o n o f a l l l e t t e r s e x c e p t o n e , e . g . , L l L 2 - L 4 L 5 . Assume t h a t no v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n is a v a i l a b l e f o r L 3 . The u s e o f b i g r a m i n f o r m a t i o n r e q u i r e s t h a t L 3 b e s e l e c t e d t o maximize t h e sum o f t h e b ig ram f r e q u e n c i e s o f L 2 L 3 and L 3 L 4 , s e l e c t i n g L 3 f rom a p o o l o f a l l 26 l e t t e r s . I f some v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n i s a v a i l a b l e f o r L 3 , t h e n t h e p o o l O E a v a i l a b l e l e t t e r s m i g h t b e r e s t r i c t e d t o t h o s e t h a t were c o m p a t i b l e w i t h t h e a v a i l a b l e i n f o r m a t i o n b u t o t h e r w i s e t h e s t r a t e g y would b e t h e same. For a t r i g r a m s t r a t e g y , a s i m i l a r p r o c e s s c o u l d b e used b u t w i t h t h e max imiz ing o f t h e combined f r e q u e n c i e s f o r L l L 2 L 3 + L 2 L 3 L 4 + L 3 L 4 L 5 . The c o m p l e x i t y o f t h i s s t r a t e g y d o e s n o t n e c e s s a r i l y make i t s p s y c h o l g i c a l r e l e v a n c e s u s p e c t .

A p o t e n t i a l drawback t o summed s i n g l e - l e t t e r , b i g r a m , and t r i g r a m p o s i t i o n a l c o u n t s , p a r t i c u l a r l y where t o k e n c o u n t s a r e u t i l i z e d , i s t h e d o m i n a t i n g r o l e p l a y e d by a s m a l l g r o u p o f h i g h - f r e q u e n c y words . For t h e f o u r - l e t t e r w o r d s , a s a n example , t h e 37 most f r e q u e n t words o f t h i s l e n g t h a c c o u n t f o r a p p r o x i m a t e l y o n e - h a l f o f a l l t o k e n s o f f o u r - l e t t e r words. T h i s g u a r a n t e e s , o n t h e a v e r a g e , a h i g h , p o s i t i v e c o r r e l a t i o n be tween d i f f e r e n t s t a t i s t i c a l m e a s u r e s . However, low summed s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y s t r i n g s w i l l u s u a l l y b e low i n summed p o s i t i o n a l b i g r a m and t r i g r a m f r e q u e n c y , b u t s t r i n g s h i g h i n summed s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y a r e n o t n e c e s s a r i l y h i g h i n t h e o t h e r two m e a s u r e s .

F u r t h e r m o r e , s i n c e t h e e x t r e m e l y h i g h f r e q u e n c y w o r d s i n E n g l i s h a r e m o s t l y t h r e e , f o u r , and ( t o a l e s s e r d e g r e e ) f i v e l e t t e r s i n l e n g t h , t h e i n f l u e n c e o f t h e h i g h e s t f r e q u e n c y w o r d s n e c e s s a r i l y d e c r e a s e s w i t h i n c r e a s i n g word l e n g t h . T h u s , we would e x p e c t a l o w e r c o r r e l a t i o n be tween b i g r a m and t r i g r a m c o u n t s i n s e v e n - l e t t e r s t r i n g s t h a n i n f o u r - l e t t e r s t r i n g s .

The c e n t r a l l i m i t a t i o n i n f r e q u e n c y - b a s e d s c h e m e s , e v e n when p o s i t i o n and word l e n g t h s a r e o b s e r v e d , i s t h a t t h e y c a n g e n e r a t e pseudowords wh ich v i o l a t e E n g l i s h p h o n o l o g i c a l and s p e l l i n g c o n v e n t i o n s . For e x a m p l e , t h r s m , s t h s e , and w h r s t a r e

Page 46: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

ORTHOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE 29

unpronounceable b u t have r e l a t i v e l y h i g h summed bigram p o s i t i o n a l c o u n t s . These can be c o n t r a s t e d w i t h b i p o n , s l e v y , and d u f i p , which have r e l a t i v e l y low summed bigram p o s i t i o n a l c o u n t s , b u t a r e l e g a l from a ru le -governed s t a n d p o i n t . V i o l a t i o n s can be a v o i d e d , f o r t h e most p a r t , by u s i n g p o s i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e f o u r t h - o r d e r a p p r o x i m a t i o n s which a r e a l s o h i g h i n summed t r i g r a m p o s i t i o n a l c o u n t s .

PHONOLOGICALLY-BASED DESCRIPTIONS

An a l t e r n a t i v e t o s t a t i s t i c a l redundancy h a s been t o u s e t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p between s p e l l i n g and sound ( i . e . , p r o n o u n c e a b i l i t y ) as a d e f i n i n g m e t r i c . Gibson e t a l . (1962) found t h a t l e t t e r s of pronounceable pseudowords were more e a s i l y r e c a l l e d i n a f u l l r e p o r t t h a n were l e t t e r s of unpronounceable nonwords ( e . g . , dink v s . G). The a u t h o r s h y p o t h e s i z e d t h a t t h e o p e r a t i v e u n i t i n word p e r c e p t i o n was n o t t h e l e t t e r ( o r t h e whole w o r d ) , b u t a sequence of l e t t e r s which had an i n v a r i a n t s p e l l i n g - t o - s o u n d r e l a t i o n s h i p . However, Gibson e t a l . (1970) o b t a i n e d t h e same r e s u l t s w i t h c o n g e n i t a l l y d e a f s u b j e c t s , t h e r e b y d e m o n s t r a t i n g t h a t t h e s p e l l i n g - t o - s o u n d r e l a t i o n s h i p c o u l d n o t a l o n e a c c o u n t f o r t h e r e s p o n s e d i f f e r e n c e s . I t is l i k e l y t h a t o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e d i f f e r e n c e s (whether f requency-based o r ru le -governed) were c r i t i c a l .

L e t t e r - s o u n d c o r r e s p o n d e n c e s have a l s o been u t i l i z e d i n word r e c o g n i t i o n models by R u b e n s t e i n , Lewis , and Rubens te in (1971) and by Smith and Spoehr ( 1 9 7 4 ) . However, bo th t h e paradigm employed and t h e assumed u s e of l e t t e r - s o u n d r e l a t i o n s h i p s i n t h e l a t t e r two s t u d i e s d i f f e r e d from t h a t i n Gibson e t a l . ( 1 9 6 2 ) . Both Rubens te in e t a l . (1971) and Smith and Spoehr (1974) assumed t h a t l e t t e r r e c o g n i t i o n o c c u r s on t h e b a s i s of l e t t e r f e a t u r e s ; t h e n sounds a r e a t t a c h e d t o l e t t e r s o r l e t t e r sequenLes and l e x i c a l a c c e s s made on t h e b a s i s o f a p h o n o l o g i c a l u n i t . Gibson e t a l . (1962) assumed t h a t word r e c o g n i t i o n o c c u r r e d on t h e b a s i s of h i g h e r - o r d e r v i s u a l u n i t s which t h e r e a d e r formed through e x p e r i e n c e w i t h l e t t e r - s o u n d t r a n s l a t i o n . The r e l i a b i l i t y o f any o f t h e s e h y p o t h e s e s , when viewed i n r e l a t i o n t o t h e c o m p l e x i t i e s of l e t t e r - s o u n d c o r r e s p o n d e n c e s i s q u e s t i o n a b l e ( c f . Venezky, 1 9 7 0 ) .

Fur thermore , some e m p i r i c a l e v i d e n c e i n d i c a t e s t h a t p h o n o l o g i c a l encoding is n o t n e c e s s a r y f o r l e x i c a l a c c e s s (Kleiman, 1975; Levy, 1978; Massaro, 1978; 1979b; Tzeng, Hung, & Wang, 1 9 7 7 ) . However, even i f p h o n o l o g i c a l t r a n s l a t i o n were shown t o p l a y a r o l e i n word r e c o g n i t i o n , p r o n o u n c e a b i l i t y

Page 47: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

30 CHAPTER 3

a l o n e would s t i l l be i n a d e q u a t e f o r d e s c r i b i n g o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . E n g l i s h s p e l l i n g i s c o n s t r a i n e d by p h o n o l o g i c a l c o n v e n t i o n s f i r s t , b u t a l s o by s c r i b a l c o n v e n t i o n s , which out law c e r t a i n p o s s i b l e b u t pronounceable s p e l l i n g s i n s e l e c t e d c o n t e x t s .

RULE-GOVERNED REGULARITY

Rule-governed r e g u l a r i t y d e s c r i b e s t h e p r e d i c t a b l e s t r u c t u r e of t h e o r t h o g r a p h y i n t e r m s of p h o n o l o g i c a l and s c r i b a l c o n s t r a i n t s . However, a c r i t i c a l f e a t u r e of t h i s d e s c r i p t i o n is t h a t t h e p r e d i c t a b l e s t r u c t u r e of l e t t e r o c c u r r e n c e s is u t i l i z e d w i t h o u t any m e d i a t i o n of t h e spoken language . I n c o n t r a s t t o t h e s p e l l i n g - t o - s o u n d d e s c r i p t i o n of Gibson e t a l . (1962) , Rubens te in e t a l . ( 1 9 7 1 ) , and Smith and Spoehr (1974) , u t i l i z a t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n p e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n is assumed t o occur b e f o r e t h e p r i n t e d p a t t e r n is t r a n s l a t e d t o sound. Although much o f t h e s t r u c t u r e of a w r i t t e n a l p h a b e t i c language n e c e s s a r i l y f o l l o w s i ts phonology, a c c e s s t o t h e phonology i s n o t n e c e s s a r y f o r u t i l i z a t i o n of t h e o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . D i r e c t e v i d e n c e f o r t h i s assumpt ion comes from t h e u t i l i z a t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e by d e a f r e a d e r s (Gibson e t a l . , 1 9 7 0 ) . I n a d d i t i o n , S inger ( i n p r e s s ) found t h a t a p h o n o l o g i c a l r e n d e r i n g of words p r e s e n t e d i n an a r t i f i c i a l a l p h a b e t was n o t n e c e s s a r y f o r l e a r n i n g and u t i l i z i n g o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . I n t h e s e c t i o n s which f o l l o w , both t h e p h o n o l o g i c a l and t h e s c r i b a l c o n s t r a i n t s of E n g l i s h s p e l l i n g s a r e o u t l i n e d .

P h o n o l o g i c a l C o n s t r a i n t s

The pr imary c o n s t r a i n t s on E n g l i s h o r t h o g r a p h y d e r i v e from t h e a l l o w a b l e sequences of sounds i n E n g l i s h words. Thus, / s k / i s an a l l o w a b l e i n i t i a l consonant c l u s t e r and t h e r e f o r e s p e l l i n g s f o r i t e x i s t ( e . g . , e, E, e); on t h e o t h e r hand , /tl/ and / d l / d o n o t occur and never d i d occur i n i t i a l l y i n E n g l i s h words, and t h e r e f o r e no s p e l l i n g f o r t h e s e s e q u e n c e s occur i n E n g l i s h words ( b u t t h e y d o i n T l i n g i t and s e v e r a l o t h e r languages i n which i n i t i a l /tl/ and / d l / a r e l e g a l ) . Compl ica t ing t h i s r e l a t i o n s h i p between sound and s p e l l i n g , however, a r e s e v e r a l f a c t o r s , i n c l u d i n g s c r i b a l p e d a n t r y , which l e a v e u s w i t h s p e l l i n g s f o r (1) sound s e q u e n c e s which once o c c u r r e d , b u t have s i n c e been dropped from t h e language ( e . g . , - W L - , &-, F-), o r f o r ( 2 ) sound sequences t h a t were presumed

Page 48: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

ORTHOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE 31

t o have o c c u r r e d i n t h e language from which a word was borrowed ( e . g . , psychology, p t a r m i g a n , debt). For psychology, t h i s assumpt ion is s u p p o r t a b l e ; f o r p t a r m i g a n i t is c l e a r l y based on m i s t a k e n etymology; and f o r debt (and v a r i o u s o t h e r s ) , i t is o n l y p a r t i a l l y t r u e , i n t h a t /b/ and /t/ o c c u r r e d i n t h e L a t i n a n c e s t o r of debt ( d e b i t u m ) , b u t n o t a s a f i n a l c l u s t e r .

A f u r t h e r c o m p l i c a t i o n is t h e d e v i a t i o n i n s e r i a l o r d e r of s e v e r a l s p e l l i n g s from t h e o r d e r of sounds which t h e y r e p r e s e n t . Chief among t h e s e i s %, a s p e l l i n g which a t l e a s t some E n g l i s h s p e a k e r s have r e t a i n e d a s /hw/, and -& a s i n b o t t l e , e t c . , which s p e l l s ( i n d e l i b e r a t e s p e e c h ) /al/ (&- and -1e - a r e s c r i b a l r e v e r s a l s of e a r l i e r k- and -e).

B u t even w i t h t h e s e d e v i a t i o n s from e x p e c t e d p r a c t i c e , most E n g l i s h sounds a r e r e p r e s e n t e d i n a m o d e r a t e l y r a t i o n a l f a s h i o n i n t h e o r t h o g r a p h y (Venezky, 1 9 7 0 ) . However, s i n c e E n g l i s h p o s s e s s e s more t h a n one p o t e n t i a l s p e l l i n g f o r a l m o s t e v e r y sound, a second s e t of c o n s t r a i n t s , h e r e c a l l e d s c r i b a l c o n s t r a i n t s , e n t e r i n t o ru le -governed o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e .

S c r i b a l C o n s t r a i n t s

To e x p l a i n t h e rudiments of t h e s e c o n s t r a i n t s , some new te rminology is h e l p f u l .

Vowel s p e l l i n g s a r e c l a s s e d a s p r i m a r y ( 2 , g, i f 0 , g, y ) o r s e c o n d a r y (&, 3, ", ", e t c . ) .

Consonant s p e l l i n g s a r e e i t h e r f u n c t i o n a l l y s i m p l e (b, c, - c h , d, e t c . ) o r f u n c t i o n a l l y compound (11, =, 3, *, and 3).

Graphemic c o n s t r a i n t s r e g u l a t e p r i m a r i l y t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n of (1) geminated ( d o u b l e ) l e t t e r s , ( 2 ) u-v-w, and ( 3 ) y-1. F i r s t , u n l i k e S p a n i s h , E n g l i s h r e s i s t s doubled l e t t e r s i n w o r d - i n i t i a l p o s i t i o n , e s p e c i a l l y c o n s o n a n t s . Only a h a n d f u l of e x c e p t i o n s t o t h i s e x i s t s , p r i m a r i l y i n v o l v i n g t h e form 00 ( e . g . , o o d l e s , o o z e ) . I n o t h e r p o s i t i o n s o n l y 1 5 l e t t e r s c a n d o u b l e : t h o s e t h a t d o n ' t ( o r r a r e l y do) a r e 2 , h, A , i, &, g , 2 , y, w, 5 , y. But t h e r e a r e f u r t h e r r e s t r i c t i o n s . With few e x c e p t i o n s , doubled c o n s o n a n t s do n o t occur a f t e r secondary vowels , and i n f i n a l p o s i t i o n o n l y ff, 11, and a r e common. F i n a l l y , t h e d i g r a p h u n i t s a r e n o t a l lowed t o double . For one , - c h , a pseudogeminate (3) was adopted i n e a r l y modern E n g l i s h , a t a b o u t t h e same t i m e t h a t 3 was adopted t o r e p r e s e n t doubled 9 when i t r e p r e s e n t e d / j / . S i m i l a r l y , & was i n v e n t e d f o r d o u b l e k which now o c c u r s o n l y i n i n f l e c t e d forms of trek ( e . g . , t r e k k i n g ) .

A second s e t of graphemic c o n s t r a i n t s r e g u l a t e t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n of 2-y-w and 4-y. From t h e Middle E n g l i s h p e r i o d

Page 49: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

3 2 CHAPTER 3

up t o a b o u t t h e middle of t h e 1 7 t h c e n t u r y , y and v were used i n d i s c r i m i n a t e l y t o r e p r e s e n t / u / and / v / , a l t h o u g h v tended t o be used i n i t i a l l y and 3 e l s e w h e r e . (Accord ing t o P y l e s ( 1 9 6 4 ) , - v was a l s o p r e f e r r e d i n t h e v i c i n i t y of m and n). Digraphs l i k e OJ, when w r i t t e n b e f o r e a vowel might be m i s t a k e n f o r 3; t h e r e f o r e ; was d o u b l e d , and e v e n t u a l l y w r i t t e n y. I n time, 2 i n f i n a l p o s i t i o n as t h e second p a r t of a secondary vowel s p e l l i n g was r e p l a c e d by y, g i v i n g t h e p r e s e n t - d a y a l t e r n a t i o n s -- au/aw, eu/ew, and ou/ow. I n g e n e r a l , t h e w v a r i a n t o c c u r s b e f o r e vowels and i n f i n a l p o s i t i o n ; t h e 3 v a r i a n t o c c u r s e l s e w h e r e . Where 2 would occur a s a p r i m a r y vowel s p e l l i n g i n f i n a l p o s i t i o n , a f i n a l e is added ( e . g . , blue).

For r e a s o n s n o t a l t o g e t h e r c l e a r , b u t r e l a t e d t o t h e ambigui ty of 3-v s p e l l i n g s , y was a l s o e x o r c i s e d from f i n a l p o s i t i o n . But s ince no s i m p l e rep lacement was a v a i l a b l e as was f o r 2 , a n e was added a f t e r t h e l e t t e r , t h u s g i v i n g p r e s e n t - d a y s p e l l i n g s l i k e dove, l o v e , and have, where t h e f i n a l e d o e s n o t mark a f r e e ( l o n g ) vowel p r o n u n c i a t i o n .

S i m i l a r l y , I-y now a l t e r n a t e e x a c t l y a s y and )1! d o , as second e l e m e n t s of a d i g r a p h vowel , t h u s , maid/may, o i l / b o y , and either/-.

Three a d d i t i o n a l f e a t u r e s of E n g l i s h s p e l l i n g which have l i m i t e d u t i l i t y i n s o u n d - t o - s p e l l i n g r u l e s , b u t which a r e i m p o r t a n t f o r t h e r e c o g n i t i o n of r e a l words, a r e d i s c u s s e d b r i e f l y i n t h e f o l l o w i n g s e c t i o n .

Morphemic F e a t u r e s

Morpheme I d e n t i t y . The r e t e n t i o n of morphemic i d e n t i t y a s i n p a i r s l i k e cone /conic i s a n a t u r a l consequence of c o n d i t i o n e d sound change unaccompanied by a c o r r e s p o n d i n g s p e l l i n g change and n o t t h e r e s u l t o f o v e r t s c r i b a l i n t e n t i o n . For t h e most p a r t , however, r e t e n t i o n of morphemic i d e n t i t y is l i m i t e d t o vowels and t h o s e consonant l e t t e r s which a r e s i l e n t i n one form b u t pronounced i n a r e l a t e d one. I n t h e f i r s t c a t e g o r y a r e a l t e r n a t i o n s of t h e form s a n e / s a n i t y and t e l e g r a p h / t e l e g r a p h y ; i n t h e l a t t e r a r e p a i r s a k i n t o s i g n / s i g n a l , bomb/bombard, and hymn/hymnal. Where no s i n g l e s p e l l i n g can s t a n d f o r a p a i r of sounds , c o n s i s t e n t s p e l l i n g of a l lomorphs which d i f f e r by t h o s e sounds is n o t p o s s i b l e . Thus, c o l l i d e / c o l l i s i o n m u s t u t i l i z e d i f f e r e n t s p e l l i n g s f o r /d/ and

I n bound morphemes, s i m i l a r p r o c e s s e s c a n be s e e n a s e x e m p l i f i e d by t h e noun p l u r a l (and t h i r d - p e r s o n s i n g u l a r ) -2 and t h e p a s t t e n s e marker , -3.

/:/.

Page 50: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

ORTHOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE 33

S e p a r a t i o n of homophones. P a r t l y by a c c i d e n t and p a r t l y by o v e r t a t t e n t i o n , E n g l i s h s p e l l i n g h a s t e n d e d t o d i f f e r e n t i a t e homophones w h e r e v e r o r t h o g r a p h i c l i c e n s e would a l l o w . P a i r s l i k e s e a / s e e , b l u e / b l e w , and r i g h t / w r i t e b e l o n g t o t h e a c c i d e n t c a t e g o r y , b u t f o u l / f o w l , p l a i n / p l a n e , and -- s u n / s o n r e s u l t f rom o v e r t s c r i b a l p r a c t i c e (Vachek , 1 9 5 9 , 1 9 7 3 ; on t h e o r t h o g r a p h i c d i s t i n c t i v e n e s s o f homophones, see O l s o n &

K a u s l e r , 1 9 7 1 ) . The two-let ter word ban . S i n c e a t l e a s t t h e time o f Noah

Webs te r and p r o b a b l y b e f o r e , E n g l i s h l e x i c o g r a p h e r s h a v e a v o i d e d e x t e n d i n g t h e r e p e r t o i r e o f t w o - l e t t e r words beyond a small g r o u p o f f u n c t i o n words ( e . g . , &, of, on, if). Two mechanisms were a d o p t e d f o r l e n g t h e n i n g two- le t te r w o r d s wh ich d i d n ' t q u a l i f y f o r i n c l u s i o n i n t h i s g r o u p : d o u b l i n g t h e f i n a l c o n s o n a n t , as i n ebb, add, odd, a n d a, o r a d d i n g a f i n a l - e , ( e . g . , doe, hoe, &, and * ) . The f o r m e r mechanism h a s c r e a t e d u n i q u e f i n a l c o n s o n a n t c l u s t e r s i n t h a t b, fi, 9, and 1 d o n o t d o u b l e i n f i n a l p o s i t i o n i n a n y o t h e r E n g l i s h words .

T h e s e g r a p h e m i c c o n s t r a i n t s h a v e e v o l v e d i n d e p e n d e n t l y o f s o u n d , f o r u n l i k e t h e o r t h o g r a p h i e s o f o t h e r m a j o r l a n g u a g e s , modern E n g l i s h s p e l l i n g p r e s e r v e s c l e a r e v i d e n c e o f n e a r l y 1 , 3 0 0 y e a r s o f sound c h a n g e , s c r i b a l t a m p e r i n g , p a r t i a l r e f o r m s , and f o r e i g n i n t r u s i o n s . T h e r e is a n u n d e r l y i n g p a t t e r n t o t h i s o r t h o g r a p h y , a s d e s c r i b e d i n Venezky ( 1 9 7 0 ) , b u t t h e r e is a l s o a s u b s t a n t i a l m a r g i n a l mess which c a n o n l y i n p a r t be o r g a n i z e d i n t o s u b p a t t e r n s o r j u s t i f i e d by a p p e a l t o s u c h p r i n c i p l e s as t h e o r t h o g r a p h i c s e p a r a t i o n o f homophones ( e . g . , b e l l / b e l l e ) . N e v e r t h e l e s s , p e r m e a t i n g t h e e n t i r e s p e l l i n g s y s t e m f rom o r g a n i z e d c o r e t o t h e most d i s j o i n t o u t e r f r i n g e s is a n i n t e r a c t i o n be tween p h o n o l o g i c a l and v i s u a l f o r c e s wh ich r a n g e s f rom p r o d u c t i v e c o u n t e r p o i n t a s i n s u c h s p e l l i n g s a s c o n e / c o n i c t o t h e d i s s o n a n c e o f s u c h mots n o i r s a s women.

S i n c e no E n g l i s h l a n g u a g e academy e v e r imposed a g r a n d d e s i g n on E n g l i s h s p e l l i n g , wha t g e n e r a l p r i n c i p l e s t h e r e a r e r e s u l t e d from t h e c o n f l u e n c e o f v a r i o u s s c r i b a l t r a d i t i o n s w i t h t h e p e r i o d i c r a v a g e s o f sound c h a n g e unaccompanied b y s p e l l i n g c h a n g e . Y e t a p r i n c i p l e o f s o r t s d o e s emerge from t h e c u r r e n t s y s t e m , v i z . , "Accede t o a l l v i s u a l i n t e r e s t s up t o , b u t n o t beyond , t h e p o i n t where p a s s a g e from s p e l l i n g t o sound is i m p a i r e d . "

Page 51: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

34 CHAPTER 3

P s y c h o l o g i c a l Assumptions

Rule-governed d e s c r i p t i o n s of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e d i f f e r from o t h e r d e f i n i t i o n s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n two a s p e c t s : F i r s t , i n t h e u t i l i z a t i o n of word t y p e s r a t h e r t h a n word t o k e n s , and s e c o n d , i n c l a s s i f y i n g a s r e g u l a r c e r t a i n s p e l l i n g s which d o n o t occur ( y e t ) i n E n g l i s h words and c l a s s i f y i n g a s i r r e g u l a r some t h a t do. The f i r s t d i f f e r e n c e is n o t e s s e n t i a l t o t h e d e f i n i t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e , b u t i t is p r o b a b l y more a r e f l e c t i o n of t h e d i f f e r i n g e p i s t e m o l o g i e s of l i n g u i s t s and p s y c h o l o g i s t s . The second d i f f e r e n c e , however, is c e n t r a l t o t h e c o n c e p t of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e and r e q u i r e s f u r t h e r e x p l i c a t i o n .

The p r i m a r y assumpt ion behind t h e o r t h o g r a p h i c r u l e s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i s t h a t r e a d e r s a b s t r a c t from t h e i r e x p e r i e n c e s w i t h p r i n t e d words t h o s e s p e l l i n g s t h a t a r e p r o d u c t i v e i n present -day E n g l i s h and u s e t h e s e t o f a c i l i t a t e r e c o g n i t i o n . For example, s i l e n t i n i t i a l l e t t e r s , r e g a r d l e s s o f t h e f requency of o c c u r r e n c e o f t h e words i n which t h e y o c c u r , a r e c l a s s i f i e d as i r r e g u l a r s i n c e i t is u n l i k e l y t h a t new words brought i n t o t h e E n g l i s h language would e v e r be s p e l l e d w i t h them. ( S p e l l i n g a n a l o g i e s might p r e s e n t an e x c e p t i o n t o t h i s assumpt ion and c a n n o t be i g n o r e d . However, i t is u n l i k e l y t h a t s i l e n t i n i t i a l s p e l l i n g s would e v e r be w i d e l y e x t e n d e d . )

On t h e o t h e r hand, t h e i n i t i a l s e q u e n c e s E- and e- and t h e f i n a l sequences -eng, -&, and -ofe d o n o t occur i n t h e f i r s t 2 0 , 0 0 0 words i n t h e Thorndike and Lorge ( 1 9 4 4 ) l i s t , y e t t h e y a r e c l a s s i f i e d as o r t h o g r a p h i c a l l y r e g u l a r s i n c e t h e y d o n o t v i o l a t e any p h o n o l o g i c a l o r s c r i b a l p a t t e r n . Thus pseudowords l i k e 9, woach, t r e n g , d e r l , and s t r o f e a r e pronounceable and s t r u c t u r a l l y r e g u l a r , even though t h e y c o n t a i n t r i g r a m s t h a t d o n o t occur i n E n g l i s h words. The p e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n of such s t r i n g s r e l a t i v e t o s i m i l a r pseudowords w i t h h i g h e r summed t r i g r a m c o u n t s is an i s sue t h a t remains t o be i n v e s t i g a t e d .

Dichotomy Issue

Another issue which m e r i t s e m p i r i c a l i n v e s t i g a t i o n c o n c e r n s t h e assumed dichotomous d e t e r m i n a n t s of o r t h o g r a p h i c r e g u l a r i t y . Given t h e two d i f f e r e n t c o n s t r a i n t s on o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e d i s c u s s e d above , w e s h o u l d q u e s t i o n whether o r n o t t h e s c r i b a l and p h o n o l o g i c a l e l e m e n t s a r e s e p a r a t e d p s y c h o l o g i c a l l y . Are, f o r example, i r r e g u l a r s t r i n g s l i k e and c k l i b p r o c e s s e d d i f f e r e n t l y from a n i l l e g a l

Page 52: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

ORTHOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE 35

s t r i n g l i k e t p r i f ? A l l a r e i l l e g a l and non-occurr ing , y e t t h e y d i f f e r i n t y p e o f i l l e g a l i t y . T p r i f c o n t a i n s a n i n i t i a l consonant c l u s t e r t h a t is p h o n o l o g i c a l l y i l l e g a l and t h e r e f o r e s c r i b a l l y non-occurr ing . and c k l i b a r e b o t h p h o n o l o g i c a l l y a c c e p t a b l e , b u t c o n t a i n s c r i b a l l y out lawed f e a t u r e s , v i z . , f i n a l i n and i n i t i a l & i n c k l i b . For example, d o e s t h e p r o b a b i l i t y of c o r r e c t l y i d e n t i f y i n g a t a r g e t l e t t e r depend upon whether i t is i n a p h o n o l o g i c a l l y - i l l e g a l or a s c r i b a l l y - i l l e g a l t e s t s t r i n g ?

AN I N I T I A L ALGORITHM FOR RULE-GOVERNED REGULARITY

The approach t h a t we p r o p o s e , b u t have n o t y e t f u l l y d e v e l o p e d , for r e p r e s e n t i n g t h e d i s p a r a t e p a t t e r n s j u s t d e s c r i b e d is t o c o n s t r u c t a s e t o f g e n e r a t i v e r u l e s which b e g i n by s e l e c t i n g a consonant-vowel-consonant s t r u c t u r e f o r a p h o n o l o g i c a l word. Replacement r u l e s a r e a p p l i e d t o expand l e f t t o r i g h t of e a c h vowel and each c o n s o n a n t u n i t u n t i l a p h o n o l o g i c a l l y l e g a l s t r i n g r e s u l t s . A second s e t of r u l e s t h e n a p p l i e s s o u n d - t o - s p e l l i n g r u l e s t o g e n e r a t e a l e g a l pseudoword (or word) . By r e l a x i n g r u l e s a t v a r i o u s l e v e l s of g e n e r a t i o n , w e c a n t h e n g e n e r a t e l e t t e r s t r i n g s w i t h c o n t r o l l e d i r r e g u l a r i t i e s . For example, by removing t h e p l a c e r e s t r i c t i o n on f i n a l c l u s t e r s of t h e form NASAL + STOP, w e g e n e r a t e unpronounceable f i n a l c l u s t e r s l i k e -9 and -g. On t h e o t h e r hand, a l l o w i n g f i n a l /v/ t o be r e p r e s e n t e d by 1 r a t h e r t h a n a l l o w s s c r i b a l l y i l l e g a l forms l i k e mov and s l a i v . So f a r , a p r e l i m i n a r y s e t of r u l e s f o r g e n e r a t i n g l e g a l m o n o s y l l a b l e s h a s been d e v e l o p e d , drawing on a v a r i e t y o f s o u r c e s ( e . g . , Whorf, 1956; K u r a t h , 1964; Chomsky & Halle, 1968; Venezky, 1 9 7 0 ) . A sample d e r i v a t i o n of a l e g a l pseudoword from t h e s e r u l e s is shown i n Table 3 . 1 .

I n summary, w e have p r e s e n t e d two g e n e r a l a p p r o a c h e s t o d e s c r i b i n g o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e : s t a t i s t i c a l redundancy and ru le -governed r e g u l a r i t y . For t h e f o r m e r , c l a s s m e t r i c s a r e d e r i v e d from f u n c t i o n s on t h e f r e q u e n c i e s w i t h which v a r i o u s s i z e u n i t s occur ( e . g . , summed bigram c o u n t s ) . For t h e l a t t e r c l a s s we have s u g g e s t e d t h a t a comparable metric might be deve loped through a s e t of g e n e r a t i v e r u l e s which c o u l d be v i o l a t e d a t v a r i o u s l e v e l s t o produce nonwords w i t h c o n t r o l l e d d e v i a t i o n s from ru le-governed r e g u l a r i t y .

Page 53: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

36 CHAPTER 3

Table 3.1 Derivation of a legal pseudoword (a).

A. Apply Base Generation Rules

Step

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Rule - Initialize w -----> cvc C/# ------- CC/# -------

> cc > SCL

SCL ------ > s+NASAL NASAL -----> 11. V/else -----> Vf Vf/else ----> vfr Vfr -----> 4 C/-# ----- > cs CS/Vf-# ---- > STOPg STOPg ----- > STOPVg STOPvg ----- > b

Result

#W# # c+v+c # #CC+V+C# # SCL+V+C# #g+NASAL+V+C# #s+"+V+C # #S+"+Vf+C#

tg+n+i+c # #s+E+i+CS#

#s+E+vfr+C#

#s+g+i+STOPg # #s+g+i-+STOPvg# #S+"+i+b#

B. Apply Base-to-Spelling Rules

Step. Rule Result

14 - s/else ----> <s> #<El>*#

15 - n ----> <n> # < sn>i&# 16 - i/-Cs# ---- > <e...e#> #<sne>b<e>#

b ---- > <b> # < snebe># 17 -

------------- (a)Terminal phonological symbols are underlined; terminal spelling symbols occur in wedges, e.g., <a>. A rule of the form x/# ------- > Y is read "Rewrite X as Y when X occurs after juncture ( I ) .'I

Page 54: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

4 Experimental Studies

The r e s e a r c h r e p o r t e d i n t h i s book evolved from a commonality o f i n t e r e s t s among t h e a u t h o r s . These i n t e r e s t s p r i m a r i l y c e n t e r e d around f u r t h e r i n g t h e u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t h e p e r c e p t u a l p r o c e s s e s involved i n word r e c o g n i t i o n and e s p e c i a l l y d e l i n e a t i n g t h e r o l e t h a t o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e p l a y s i n t h e s e p r o c e s s e s . An e x t e n s i o n of an i n t e r e s t i n g s t u d y by Mason (1975) appeared t o be a p r o d u c t i v e way t o a t t a c k t h e problems of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e and p e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n of words. Mason e v a l u a t e d t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n of summed s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y i n a t a r g e t s e a r c h t a s k . Good and poor r e a d e r s i n d i c a t e d whether or n o t a s i x - l e t t e r s t r i n g c o n t a i n e d a prede termined t a r g e t l e t t e r . Good r e a d e r s averaged 6 3 msec f a s t e r f o r s t r i n g s h i g h t h a n f o r s t r i n g s low i n p o s i t i o n a l f requency . We were concerned w i t h two p r i m a r y issues w i t h r e s p e c t t o Mason's r e s u l t s . F i r s t , w e q u e s t i o n e d whether a f r e q u e n c y measure of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e was s u f f i c i e n t t o d e s c r i b e t h e f a c i l i t a t i n g e f f e c t s of s t r u c t u r e on p e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n . A s d i s c u s s e d i n Chapter 3 , a ru le -governed d e s c r i p t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e may b e a more a p p r o p r i a t e r e p r e s e n t a t i o n of t h e r e a d e r ' s knowledge.

Second, Mason's r e s u l t s appeared t o be h i g h l y v a r i a b l e and w e q u e s t i o n e d whether t h e t a r g e t s e a r c h t a s k u s i n g r e a c t i o n time a s a dependent measure r e v e a l s l a r g e e f f e c t s of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . There were a number of r e a s o n s t o s u s p e c t t h e r o b u s t n e s s of t h e e f f e c t i n Mason's s t u d y . S u b j e c t s had o n l y 5 p r a c t i c e t r i a l s and j u s t 7 2 e x p e r i m e n t a l t r i a l s . Each s u b j e c t was t e s t e d on 2 4 words, 24 s t r i n g s h i g h i n p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y , and 2 4 s t r i n g s low i n p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y . Given 1 2 good r e a d e r s , t h e r e were 288 o b s e r v a t i o n s minus e r r o r s c o n t r i b u t i n g t o e a c h e x p e r i m e n t a l

Page 55: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

38 CHAPTER 4

c o n d i t i o n . Mason found t h a t 100 p r a c t i c e t r i a l s i n a f o l l o w u p exper iment reduced t h e a d v a n t a g e of per formance on s t r i n g s h i g h i n summed p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y t o a n a v e r a g e of a b o u t 2 2 msec. S i n c e p r a c t i c e t r i a l s reduced t h e a d v a n t a g e by a b o u t t w o - t h i r d s we f e l t t h a t a r e p l i c a t i o n of Mason's s t u d y w i t h improved methodology was n e c e s s a r y t o d e t e r m i n e t h e r e l i a b i l i t y of h e r r e s u l t s .

MASSARO ET AL. 1979 STUDIES

Massaro, Venezky, and Taylor (1979) r e p l i c a t e d Mason's exper iment u s i n g t h e t a r g e t s e a r c h t a s k w i t h s i x t h - g r a d e s u b j e c t s . To o b t a i n g r e a t e r r e l i a b i l i t y , b o t h t h e number of o b s e r v a t i o n s and t h e number of t e s t s t i m u l i were i n c r e a s e d . Fur thermore , t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g s were n o t o n l y h i g h and low i n p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y b u t a l s o were c o n t r a s t e d a l o n g a n o t h e r dimension which we c a l l e d o r t h o g r a p h i c r e g u l a r i t y . We had n o t y e t deve loped a s y s t e m a t i c ru le -based d e s c r i p t i o n of E n g l i s h o r t h o g r a p h y , b u t we were a b l e t o choose s t r i n g s t h a t appeared t o be r e g u l a r o r i r r e g u l a r . T h e r e f o r e , a l t h o u g h we had no s y s t e m a t i c d e s c r i p t i o n of r e g u l a r i t y , w e f e l t t h a t t h e d e c i s i o n s we made t o choose s t r i n g s t h a t were r e g u l a r and i r r e g u l a r would p r o v i d e a tes t of whether t h e f a c i l i t a t i n g e f f e c t s of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e c o u l d be c o m p l e t e l y accounted f o r by t h e p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y h y p o t h e s i s proposed by Mason.

To c r e a t e t h e t e s t s t i m u l i , Massaro e t a l . (1979) s e l e c t e d f o u r anagrams from each o f 40 s i x - l e t t e r words such t h a t t h e anagrams were e i t h e r h i g h or low i n s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l f requency and e i t h e r r e g u l a r or i r r e g u l a r . The r e s u l t i n g 2 x 2 f a c t o r i a l d e s i g n p r o v i d e s a d i r e c t a s s e s s m e n t of t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n s of f r e q u e n c y and r e g u l a r i t y on l e t t e r - s t r i n g p e r c e p t i o n . Each of t h e s i x t h g r a d e r s began by t a k i n g a w r i t t e n comprehension t e s t . The t a r g e t s e a r c h t a s k was t h e n i n t r o d u c e d by showing t h e s u b j e c t s t h e v i s u a l d i s p l a y and t h e r e s p o n s e p a n e l . To a c q u a i n t t h e s u b j e c t s w i t h t h e r e s p o n s e p r o c e d u r e , t h e y were f i r s t 'given 50 t r i a l s o f responding "yes" and "no" t o t h e words YES and NO p r e s e n t e d on t h e v i s u a l d i s p l a y . Each s u b j e c t pushed t h e " y e s " b u t t o n w i t h h i s or h e r p r e f e r r e d hand. Next , t h e s u b j e c t s r e c e i v e d 50 p r a c t i c e t r i a l s w i t h random l e t t e r s t r i n g s . The s u b j e c t s were asked t o i n d i c a t e whether o r n o t a t a r g e t l e t t e r was p r e s e n t i n t h e six-letter s t r i n g . Each t r i a l began w i t h t h e p r e s e n t a t i o n of t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r f o l l o w e d 800 msec l a t e r by t h e t e s t l e t t e r s t r i n g . The t e s t l e t t e r s t r i n g remained on u n t i l t h e s u b j e c t

Page 56: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 39

responded. S u b j e c t s were i n s t r u c t e d t o respond " y e s " i f t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r appeared a t l e a s t once i n t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g and "no" i f i t d i d n o t a p p e a r . The t a r g e t l e t t e r appeared i n t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g on h a l f of t h e t r i a l s ( t a r g e t t r i a l s ) and d i d n o t appear on t h e o t h e r h a l f ( c a t c h t r i a l s ) . They were t o l d t o respond as a c c u r a t e l y a s p o s s i b l e . The s u b j e c t s were t e s t e d on each of t h e unique 1 6 0 s t i m u l i , once on t a r g e t t r i a l s and once on c a t c h t r i a l s , g i v i n g roughly 8 0 o b s e r v a t i o n s p e r s u b j e c t a t each o f t h e f o u r e x p e r i m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s ( l e s s e r r o r t r i a l s ) .

F i g u r e 4 . 1 g i v e s t h e r e s u l t s from t h i s i n i t i a l e x p e r i m e n t . Although t h e r e a c t i o n times were a b o u t 1 2 msec f a s t e r f o r

R-L I-H

F i g u r e 4 . 1 R e a c t i o n t i m e and p e r c e n t a g e c o r r e c t f o r s i x t h g r a d e r s a s a f u n c t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c r e g u l a r i t y and summed s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y f o r t a r g e t and c a t c h t r i a l s ( f rom Massaro e t a l . , 1 9 7 9 ) (key: p = o r t h o g r a p h i c a l l y r e g u l a r : I = o r t h o g r a p h i c a l l y i r r e g u l a r ; ; = h i g h summed s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y ; & = low summed s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y ) .

Page 57: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

CHAPTER 4

r e g u l a r t h a n f o r i r r e g u l a r s t r i n g s and a b o u t 1 2 msec f a s t e r f o r h i g h t h a n f o r low p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y , n e i t h e r r e s u l t was s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t . These r e s u l t s imply t h a t n e i t h e r p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y nor r e g u l a r i t y c o n t r i b u t e s i g n i f i c a n t l y t o p e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n i n t h e t a r g e t s e a r c h t a sk . One r e a s o n could be t h a t our m a n i p u l a t i o n of p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y and r e g u l a r i t y d i d n o t c a p t u r e t h e knowledge t h a t s u b j e c t s u t i l i z e i n p e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n . A second p o s s i b i l i t y i s t h a t our m a n i p u l a t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e d i d m i r r o r d i f f e r e n c e s i n t h e p s y c h o l o g i c a l r e a l i t y of t h e s e s t r u c t u r e s b u t t h a t t h e t a r g e t s e a r c h t a s k u s i n g r e a c t i o n times is i n s e n s i t i v e t o u t i l i z a t i o n of s t r u c t u r e .

We s u s p e c t e d t h a t t h e s m a l l e f f e c t s i n t h e f i r s t exper iment were p r i m a r i l y due t o t h e t a r g e t s e a r c h t a s k r a t h e r t h a n t o t h e s t r i n g s u t i l i z e d i n t h e e x p e r i m e n t s . T h e r e f o r e , we c a r r i e d o u t two more e x p e r i m e n t s t o c o n t r a s t t h e t a r g e t s e a r c h t a s k u t i l i z i n g r e a c t i o n time (RT) a s a d e p e n d e n t measure w i t h a t a r g e t s e a r c h t a s k u s i n g a c c u r a c y as a d e p e n d e n t measure. We employed c o l l e g e s t u d e n t s r a t h e r t h a n s i x t h g r a d e r s as s u b j e c t s s i n c e t h e y were more r e a d i l y a v a i l a b l e f o r t e s t i n g . One exper iment was a r e p l i c a t i o n of our RT e x p e r i m e n t . The o t h e r , a n a c c u r a c y e x p e r i m e n t , involved a s l i g h t m o d i f i c a t i o n of a more common paradigm used t o s t u d y t h e u t i l i z a t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . I n v a r i a n t s of a Reicher-Wheeler p o s t c u e t a s k (see Chapter l ) , t h e s u b j e c t i s shown a word o r a nonword f o r a b r i e f d u r a t i o n f o l l o w e d by a masking s t i m u l u s . Two a l t e r n a t i v e l e t t e r s a r e t h e n g i v e n and t h e s u b j e c t c h o o s e s which l e t t e r he or s h e t h i n k s was p r e s e n t e d on t h a t t r i a l . I n o r d e r t o make t h i s a c c u r a c y t a s k comparable t o t h e RT t a s k , we modi f ied i t by p r e s e n t i n g j u s t one a l t e r n a t i v e l e t t e r a f t e r t h e masking s t i m u l u s . I n t h i s case t h e s i x - l e t t e r i tem would be p r e s e n t e d f o l l o w e d by a masking s t i m u l u s and t h e n t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r . The t a r g e t l e t t e r would be p r e s e n t i n t h e t e s t item on h a l f o f t h e t r i a l s and n o t p r e s e n t on t h e o t h e r h a l f . The s u b j e c t s would s imply i n d i c a t e whether o r n o t t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r o c c u r r e d i n t h e t e s t l e t t e r s t r i n g . Per formance , i n t e r m s of r e a c t i o n time iri t h e f i r s t e x p e r i m e n t and o v e r a l l a c c u r a c y i n t h e second e x p e r i m e n t , r e f l e c t s how well t h e t e s t s t r i n g s were p e r c e i v e d .

The r e s u l t s of t h e s e two e x p e r i m e n t s a r e shown i n F i g u r e s 4 . 2 and 4 . 3 . I n t h e r e a c t i o n time t a s k , r e a c t i o n times averaged 1 6 msec f a s t e r f o r h i g h t h a n f o r low p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y s t r i n g s . Responses were 9 msec f a s t e r f o r r e g u l a r t h a n f o r i r r e g u l a r s t r i n g s . The a c c u r a c y t a s k showed t h a t r e s p o n s e a c c u r a c y was 5% h i g h e r f o r r e g u l a r t h a n f o r

Page 58: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 41

i r r e g u l a r s t r i n g s and 4 % h i g h e r f o r h i g h t h a n f o r low p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y s t r i n g s . A l l of t h e s e r e s u l t s were s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t . T h e r e f o r e , a l t h o u g h t h e magni tude of t h e e f f e c t s on r e a c t i o n time f o r t h e a d u l t s was o f t h e same o r d e r of magni tude a s t h a t f o r t h e s i x t h g r a d e r s , lower v a r i a n c e among t h e a d u l t s made t h e e f f e c t s s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t . One l i m i t a t i o n a t t h i s s t a g e of t h e r e s e a r c h was t o know whether o r n o t s i x t h g r a d e r s would g i v e s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t a c c u r a c y r e s u l t s i n t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k . However, s i n c e t h i s l a t t e r ' i n f o r m a t i o n was n o t a v a i l a b l e , w e were f a c e d w i t h t h e problem of comparing t h e magni tude of t h e r e a c t i o n t ime r e s u l t w i t h t h e magni tude of t h e a c c u r a c y r e s u l t and r e a l i z e d t h a t i t resembled t h a t o f comparing a p p l e s and o l i v e s .

I f i t is a c c e p t e d t h a t t h e r e a c t i o n t i m e r e s u l t is small ,

750

- 700

v) I - Y

5

%

650

F 2 600

550

k

K K 0 90 0 n

y 100

I I I I

Target 0 Catch

nnnn R-H R-L I-H I -L

F i g u r e 4 . 2 R e a c t i o n time and p e r c e n t a g e c o r r e c t f o r c o l l e g e s t u d e n t s a s a f u n c t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c r e g u l a r i t y and summed s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y f o r t a r g e t and c a t c h t r i a l s ( f rom Massaro e t a l . , 1 9 7 9 ) .

Page 59: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

4 2 CHAPTER 4

t h e n one e x p l a n a t i o n f o r t h e small e f f e c t c o u l d t a k e t h e f o l l o w i n g form. I n t h e r e a c t i o n . t i m e t a s k t h e s u b j e c t was g i v e n t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r b e f o r e t h e t e s t s t r i n g was p r e s e n t e d . S i n c e t h e s u b j e c t s imply was r e q u i r e d t o i n d i c a t e whether or n o t t h e t a r g e t was c o n t a i n e d i n t h e t e s t s t r i n g , h e or s h e may n o t have had t o r e s o l v e c o m p l e t e l y a l l o f t h e l e t t e r s i n t h e s t r i n g b e f o r e a c o r r e c t d e c i s i o n was made. For example, suppose a s u b j e c t is l o o k i n g f o r t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r i n t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g s c o s e , deom, and 9 r e s p e c t i v e l y . I n a l l cases t h e a p p r o p r i a t e r e s p o n s e is no , b u t t h e s u b j e c t may be a b l e t o d e c i d e on t h i s f a s t e r w i t h some of t h e s t r i n g s t h a n w i t h o t h e r s . Cons ider t h e f o l l o w i n g argument . There i s some e v i d e n c e t h a t o v e r a l l l e t t e r shape c a n be r e s o l v e d and made a v a i l a b l e t o l a t e r s t a g e s o f p r o c e s s i n g b e f o r e t h e l e t t e r is

'oo!7----- 90

c---oCatch -

50 - R H R-L I-H I-L

F i g u r e 4 . 3 P e r c e n t a g e c o r r e c t f o r c o l l e g e s t u d e n t s as a f u n c t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c r e g u l a r i t y and summed s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y f o r t a r g e t and c a t c h t r i a l s ( f rom Massaro e t a l . , 1 9 7 9 ) .

Page 60: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 43

T a b l e 4 . 1 The s i x s e t s of l e t t e r s based on t h e s i m i l a r i t y r e s u l t s of Bouma (1971) used by Massaro e t a l . ( 1 9 7 9 ) .

1.

2 .

3 .

4.

5 .

6 .

it Although Bouma's a n a l y s i s i n d i c a t e d t h a t t h e f i r s t s e t c o u l d be f u r t h e r d i v i d e d i n t o two sets c o n s i s t i n g of m , n , u , and r , v , w , t h e s e two s e t s were combined because of t h e i r r e l a t i v e s i m i l a r i t y and t o p r o v i d e more r e l i a b l e d a t a by i n c r e a s i n g t h e number of o b s e r v a t i o n s w i t h i n a s e t .

c o m p l e t e l y r e c o g n i z e d (Bouma, 1971; Massaro & S c h m u l l e r , 1 9 7 5 ) . A t a r g e t s e a r c h t a s k c a n be used t o s t u d y t h e f e a t u r e s n e c e s s a r y f o r r e c o g n i t i o n . N e i s s e r (1963, 1967) f o r example, showed t h a t s u b j e c t s s e a r c h e d f a s t e r f o r an uppercase 2 i n a l i s t of curved l e t t e r s t h a n i n a l i s t of l i n e a r l e t t e r s . T h i s r e s u l t i n d i c a t e s t h a t t h e s u b j e c t s were a b l e t o r e j ec t t h e curved l e t t e r s a s f o i l s more q u i c k l y t h a n t h e l i n e a r l e t t e r s . Applying t h i s a n a l y s i s t o t h e p r e s e n t example, s l i b j e c t s s h o u l d be a b l e t o respond "no" q u i c k l y t o t h e e x t e n t t h a t none of t h e l e t t e r s i n t h e t e s t s t r i n g h a s t h e same o v e r a l l a s c e n d e r shape a s t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r b. T h e r e f o r e , i t w i l l t a k e t h e s u b j e c t l o n g e r t o r e j e c t t h e s t r i n g deih t h a n t o r e j e c t t h e s t r i n g deom. The s t r i n g s h o u l d be r e j e c t e d f a s t e s t o f a l l . To t h e e x t e n t t h e s u b j e c t is a b l e t o u t i l i z e t h i s f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n s t r a t e g y l t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e might be a t t e n u a t e d . T h e r e f o r e , i t was of i n t e r e s t t o s e e t h e e x t e n t t o which s u b j e c t s appeared t o be u s i n g t h i s s t r a t e g y i n

Page 61: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

4 4 CHAPTER 4

t h e r e a c t i o n time and a c c u r a c y tasks . We h y p o t h e s i z e d t h a t t h i s s t r a t e g y would be u t i l i z e d i n t h e r e a c t i o n time b u t n o t t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k . I n t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k , t h e s u b j e c t w i l l r e s o l v e t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g t o t h e d e e p e s t l e v e l p o s s i b l e . I n t h e r e a c t i o n time t a s k , having t h e t a r g e t s p e c i f i e d i n advance and having t h e t e s t l e t t e r s t r i n g v i s i b l e d u r i n g t h e p r o c e s s i n g i n t e r v a l w i l l a l l o w t h e s u b j e c t t o t e r m i n a t e e a r l y on some c a t c h t r i a l s .

To e v a l u a t e t h i s h y p o t h e s i s , t h e l o w e r c a s e l e t t e r s o f t h e a l p h a b e t were grouped i n t o s i x g r o u p s based on t h e s i m i l a r i t y r e s u l t s of Bouma ( 1 9 7 1 ) . T h i s grouping is g i v e n i n T a b l e 4.1. The r e l a t i o n s h i p between each t a r g e t l e t t e r and t e s t s t r i n g was d e f i n e d i n t e r m s of t h e number of n o n t a r g e t l e t t e r s i n t h e s t r i n g t h a t were members of t h e same s e t as t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r .

P

I I 1 1 2 3 5501 ,!,

NUMBER OF SIMILAR NONTARGETS

F i g u r e 4 . 4 R e a c t i o n time i n t h e t a r g e t s e a r c h t a s k a s a f u n c t i o n o f t h e number of s i m i l a r n o n t a r g e t l e t t e r s i n t h e t e s t s t r i n g (from Massaro e t a l . , 1 9 7 9 ) .

Page 62: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 4 5

For example, t h e t e s t s t r i n g l i s v e r would have two l e t t e r s (1 and i-) from t h e same s e t a s t h e l e t t e r t , two (v and LJ from t h e same s e t as u, and none from t h e same set a s 5. F i g u r e s 4.4 and 4.5 g i v e t h i s s i m i l a r i t y a n a l y s i s f o r r e a c t i o n time and a c c u r a c y t a s k s r e s p e c t i v e l y . The r e s u l t s show h i g h l y s i g n i f i c a n t e f f e c t s on c a t c h t r i a l s i n t h e r e a c t i o n time t a s k , s u p p o r t i n g t h e i d e a of a f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n s t r a t e g y i n t h e r e a c t i o n t i m e t a s k .

The number of l e t t e r s i n t h e t e s t s t r i n g having t h e same o v e r a l l shape a s t h e t a r g e t s h o u l d n o t be i m p o r t a n t on t a r g e t t r i a l s i n t h e r e a c t i o n time t a s k s . The t a r g e t l e t t e r m u s t be c o m p l e t e l y r e s o l v e d b e f o r e a " y e s " r e s p o n s e can be made. I f t h e s u b j e c t s s imply responded " y e s " whenever t h e o v e r a l l shape of t h e t a r g e t was p e r c e i v e d , r e c o g n i t i o n e r r o r s would be h i g h l y

I 1 I 1 2 3

NUMBER OF SIMILAR NONTARGETS

F i g u r e 4 .5 P e r c e n t a g e c o r r e c t i n t h e t a r g e t s e a r c h t a sk a s a f u n c t i o n of t h e number of s i m i l a r n o n t a r g e t l e t t e r s i n t h e tes t s t r i n g ( f rom Massaro e t a l . , 1 9 7 9 ) .

Page 63: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

4 6 CHAPTER 4

p r o b a b l e . S i n c e a h i g h a c c u r a c y c r i t e r i o n was e n f o r c e d , we would n o t e x p e c t t h e number of s i m i l a r l y shaped l e t t e r s t o be a c r i t i c a l v a r i a b l e on t a r g e t t r i a l s . A s c a n be s e e n i n F i g u r e 4 . 4 , t h e s i m i l a r i t y v a r i a b l e had no s i g n i f i c a n t e f f e c t on t a r g e t t r i a l s i n t h e r e a c t i o n time e x p e r i m e n t .

I n t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k , per formance on c a t c h t r i a l s tended t o d e c r e a s e w i t h i n c r e a s e s i n t h e number of s i m i l a r n o n t a r g e t l e t t e r s . I n c o n t r a s t , per formance improved somewhat on t a r g e t t r i a l s w i t h i n c r e a s e s i n t h e number of s i m i l a r n o n t a r g e t l e t t e r s . Although t h e s e r e s u l t s were n o t s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t , t h e y show t h a t s i m i l a r i t y may a l s o p l a y a r o l e i n t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k .

Although it is d i f f i c u l t t o compare d i r e c t l y t h e magni tude of t h e e f f e c t s of a c c u r a c y w i t h t h o s e of r e a c t i o n time, t h e s i m i l a r i t y a n a l y s i s makes such a comparison more meaningfu l . The r e a c t i o n time s t u d y i n d i c a t e d s m a l l e f f e c t s of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e r e l a t i v e t o t h e e f f e c t s of s i m i l a r i t y . The a c c u r a c y s t u d y r e v e a l e d l a r g e e f f e c t s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e r e l a t i v e t o s m a l l e f f e c t s of s i m i l a r i t y . C o n t r a s t i n g t h e s e two v a r i a b l e s i n e a c h t a s k might a l l o w a more r e l i a b l e a s s e s s m e n t of t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . From t h i s a n a l y s i s it a p p e a r s t h a t o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e p l a y s a l a r g e r r o l e i n t h e a c c u r a c y s t u d y t h a n it d o e s i n t h e r e a c t i o n time s t u d y . One of t h e p r i m a r y m o t i v a t i o n s of t h e p r e s e n t se t of e x p e r i m e n t s was t o e x p l o r e t h e d i f f e r e n c e s between t h e s e two t a s k s . Of c o u r s e , i t is n o t t h e t a s k s themselves t h a t a r e i n t e r e s t i n g b u t r a t h e r , what t h e y r e v e a l a b o u t t h e p e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n of l e t t e r s t r i n g s .

The f o l l o w i n g s e t of e x p e r i m e n t s was a l s o deemed n e c e s s a r y because of t h e l i m i t a t i o n s i n t h e m a n i p u l a t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n our p r e v i o u s s t u d i e s . Although w e a t t e m p t e d t o choose r e g u l a r and i r r e g u l a r s t r i n g s f o r e a c h l e v e l of h i g h o r low p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y , we were n o t c o n f i d e n t t h a t w e had been c o m p l e t e l y s u c c e s s f u l . I t was d i f f i c u l t t o s e l ec t regular - low p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y items and i r r e g u l a r - h i g h p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y items. T h i s fo l lowed from t h e f a c t t h a t p o s i t i o n a l f requency and our i n t u i t i v e i m p r e s s i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c r e g u l a r i t y might have been h i g h l y c o r r e l a t e d . T h e r e f o r e , we may have i n a d v e r t e n t l y confounded r e g u l a r i t y w i t h p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y i n t h a t t h e h i g h p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y items were more r e g u l a r t h a n t h e low p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y items. I t remained a p o s s i b i l i t y t h a t t h e e f f e c t of p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y would be e l i m i n a t e d i f w e c o u l d f i n d items t h a t were e q u a l l y r e g u l a r f o r h i g h and low p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c i e s . T h e r e f o r e , we r e f i n e d our d e s c r i p t i o n

Page 64: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 47

o f o r t h o g r a p h i c r e g u l a r i t y and c h o s e a new s e t of items on t h e b a s i s o f t h e s e r u l e s f o r t h e p r e s e n t e x p e r i m e n t s . The r u l e s a r e p r e s e n t e d i n Appendix 4 . 1 A .

I n a d d i t i o n t o s e l e c t i n g new items w e a l s o employed word s t i m u l i i n t h e e x p e r i m e n t s . Krueger (1979) s p e c u l a t e d t h a t a much l a r g e r f a c i l i t a t i o n i n t h e t a r g e t s e a r c h t a s k would be found w i t h words t h a n w i t h pseudowords. By i n c l u d i n g w i t h our f o u r c a t e g o r i e s o f m e a n i n g l e s s anagrams t h e words from which t h e y were d e r i v e d , w e c o u l d p r o v i d e a d i r e c t e v a l u a t i o n of t h e f a c i l i t a t i n g e f f e c t s of word s t r u c t u r e r e l a t i v e t o p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y and r e g u l a r i t y . We a l s o saw t h e p o t e n t i a l f o r t e s t i n g a wider r a n g e of formal d e s c r i p t i o n s of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n t h e p r e s e n t e x p e r i m e n t s . A s i n d i c a t e d e a r l i e r , t h e q u a l i t a t i v e t e s t p r o v i d e d by t h e f a c t o r i a l d e s i g n is l i m i t e d . A good d e s c r i p t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e must a l s o d e s c r i b e per formance f o r i n d i v i d u a l l e t t e r s t r i n g s . T h e r e f o r e , we planned t o a n a l y z e per formance a s a f u n c t i o n of i n d i v i d u a l l e t t e r s t r i n g s i n t h e p r e s e n t s t u d i e s . These a n a l y s e s would go s i g n i f i c a n t l y beyond t h e q u a l i t a t i v e compar isons between word, pseudoword, and nonword items of p r e v i o u s s t u d i e s . A second m o t i v a t i o n f o r i n c l u d i n g word items was t h a t any d e s c r i p t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e must n o t be l i m i t e d t o nonword items b u t m u s t a l s o be f u n c t i o n a l f o r word items. I f i n some manner l e x i c a l ( i . e . , word) i d e n t i t y o v e r r u l e s o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e , t h e n t h e l a t t e r would n o t be p s y c h o l o g i c a l l y r e l e v a n t i n r e a d i n g .

T h e r e f o r e t h e f i r s t two e x p e r i m e n t s of t h e p r e s e n t s e t of e x p e r i m e n t s c a n be c o n s i d e r e d t o be a d i r e c t r e p l i c a t i o n of t h e Massaro e t a l . (1979) e x p e r i m e n t s which have j u s t been d e s c r i b e d . However, t h e p r e s e n t e x p e r i m e n t s i n c l u d e d a new s e t o f items a l o n g w i t h t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g word s t i m u l i . I n t h i s s e n s e , t h e e x p e r i m e n t s conform t o t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l framework g i v e n by Sidman (1960) i n t h a t we a r e both r e p l i c a t i n g and e x t e n d i n g p r e v i o u s e x p e r i m e n t s . F i g u r e 4.6 i l l u s t r a t e s t h e f i v e t y p e s of i t e m s used i n a l l o f t h e c u r r e n t e x p e r i m e n t s .

STUDY 1: I N I T I A L REPLICATION

Procedure

Two e x p e r i m e n t s were c a r r i e d o u t w i t h 1 4 s u b j e c t s i n e a c h exper iment . F i g u r e 4 . 7 g i v e s a s c h e m a t i c r e p r e s e n t a t i o n of t h e p r o c e d u r e s f o r t h e a c c u r a c y and RT e x p e r i m e n t s . I n t h e a c c u r a c y e x p e r i m e n t t h e t e s t l e t t e r s t r i n g was p r e s e n t e d f o r a

Page 65: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

48 CHAPTER 4

wrntei ahcger rdnuet (1421)

s h o r t d u r a t i o n fo l lowed immediately by a masking s t i m u l u s . The d u r a t i o n of t h e t e s t item was a d j u s t e d f o r each s u b j e c t i n o r d e r t o o b t a i n an a v e r a g e of 75% c o r r e c t a c r o s s a l l c o n d i t i o n s i n t h e t a s k . The t a r g e t l e t t e r fo l lowed t h e 208 msec masking s t i m u l u s . The s u b j e c t ' s t a s k was t o i n d i c a t e by p r e s s i n g t h e a p p r o p r i a t e b u t t o n whether or n o t t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r was c o n t a i n e d i n t h e t e s t l e t t e r s t r i n g . I n t h e RT e x p e r i m e n t t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r was p r e s e n t e d f o r 500 msec fo l lowed by a 1 sec blank p e r i o d . The t e s t s t r i n g was t h e n p r e s e n t e d and remained on u n t i l t h e s u b j e c t responded " y e s " o r "no" w i t h r e s p e c t t o whether or n o t t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r o c c u r r e d i n t h e t e s t s t r i n g . A r e a s o n a b l e amount o f p r a c t i c e was g i v e n on both tasks . The t e s t items were s i x - l e t t e r s t r i n g s c o n s i s t i n g of 4 0 words and 160 anagrams c r e a t e d by t h e f a c t o r i a l combina t ion of h i g h or

rntewi hreagc edtrnu (526)

low p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y

I winter charge

words I turned I (1293)

Regular

Orthographic Regularity

and r e g u l a r or i r r e g u l a r

Positional Frequency

High Low

triwen trewin chager greach drunet tredun (1438) (540)

I I

F i g u r e 4 . 6 The f i v e t y p e s of i t e m s and examples of e a c h t y p e used i n t h e e x p e r i m e n t s . The number i n e a c h c e l l is t h e a v e r a g e summed s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y f o r t h a t item t y p e (based on t h e Mayzner & T r e s s e l t , 1965, c o u n t s ) .

Page 66: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 49

s t r u c t u r e . On any t r i a l , any of t h e f i v e t y p e s of s t r i n g s c o u l d be p r e s e n t e d a s e i t h e r a c a t c h o r t a r g e t t r i a l . The tes t s t r i n g s a r e p r e s e n t e d i n Appendix 4 . 1 B . The d e t a i l s of t h e method, p r o c e d u r e , and r e s u l t s o f t h e two t a s k s a r e p r e s e n t e d i n Appendix 4 . 1 .

O r t h o g r a p h i c S t r u c t u r e

F i g u r e s 4.8 and 4.9 p r e s e n t t h e r e s u l t s from t h e a c c u r a c y and RT t a s k s as a f u n c t i o n of t h e f i v e classes of items. Performance i n t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k depended g r e a t l y on t h e s t r u c t u r e of t h e t e s t s t r i n g . Words were r e c o g n i z e d 1 2 % more o f t e n t h a n t h e b e s t r e g u l a r h i g h items. The r e g u l a r s t r i n g s were judged 8 % more a c c u r a t e l y t h a n t h e i r r e g u l a r s t r i n g s . Accuracy was 5% h i g h e r f o r h i g h p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y

PRECUE RT

Target Test Letter Display

:-+L I- 500 I 1000 I

POSTCUE ACCURACY

Test Mask Target Letter

F i g u r e 4 . 7 Schemat ic r e p r e s e n t a t i o n s of t h e p r e c u e r e a c t i o n time and p o s t c u e a c c u r a c y e x p e r i m e n t s .

Page 67: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

50 CHAPTER 4

1 I I I

s t r i n g s t h a n f o r low p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y s t r i n g s . A l l of t h e s e r e s u l t s were s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t . The d e t a i l e d r e s u l t s and t h e s t a t i s t i c a l a n a l y s e s are p r e s e n t e d i n Appendix 4 . 1 .

I n t h e RT t a s k , r e a c t i o n times t o words were o n l y 7 msec f a s t e r t h a n r e a c t i o n times t o r e g u l a r - h i g h anagrams. Regular items were judged 2 3 msec f a s t e r t h a n i r r e g u l a r items, whereas h i g h p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y items were responded t o o n l y 4 msec f a s t e r t h a n low p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y items. Only t h e e f f e c t of r e g u l a r i t y was s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t . The d e t a i l e d r e s u l t s and s t a t i s t i c a l a n a l y s e s a r e p r e s e n t e d i n Appendix 4.1.

The h i g h l y s i g n i f i c a n t e f f e c t s of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e on r e s p o n s e a c c u r a c y and t h e r e l a t i v e l y minor , and f o r t h e most p a r t , n o n s i g n i f i c a n t e f f e c t s of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e on r e a c t i o n time p r o v i d e a d i r e c t r e p l i c a t i o n of our p r e v i o u s

50 WORD R-H R-L I-H I-L

F i g u r e 4 . 8 P e r c e n t a g e c o r r e c t a s a f u n c t i o n of d i s p l a y t y p e f o r t a r g e t and c a t c h t r i a l s i n t h e p o s t c u e a c c u r a c y t a s k of S tudy 1.

Page 68: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 5 1

I Y

5

w E 600 I-

P 550-

work. These r e s u l t s u n d e r s c o r e t h e r e l i a b i l i t y of t h e r e g u l a r i t y and p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y e f f e c t s on a c c u r a c y by d e m o n s t r a t i n g a g e n e r a l i z a t i o n t o both a new sample o f s u b j e c t s and a new sample of s t i m u l u s items ( C l a r k , 1 9 7 3 ) . N e i t h e r r e g u l a r i t y nor p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y , however, a p p e a r s t o be s u f f i c i e n t t o a c c o u n t f o r t h e s t r o n g a c c u r a c y a d v a n t a g e found f o r words. The i s sue of whether or n o t o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e r a t h e r t h a n l e x i c a l i d e n t i t y c a n a c c o u n t for t h e word a d v a n t a g e w i l l be d e l a y e d u n t i l a more d e t a i l e d d i s c u s s i o n and e v a l u a t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e is p r e s e n t e d .

-

S i m i l a r i t y E f f e c t s

To t e s t f o r t h e e f f e c t s of s i m i l a r i t y between t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r s o u g h t i n a d i s p l a y and t h e l e t t e r s a c t u a l l y o c c u r r i n g

F i g u r e 4 . 9 R e a c t i o n time and p e r c e n t a g e c o r r e c t a s a f u n c t i o n of d i s p l a y t y p e for t a r g e t and c a t c h t r i a l s i n t h e p r e c u e r e a c t i o n t i m e t a s k o f S tudy 1.

Page 69: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

52 CHAPTER 4

Table 4 . 2 For e a c h o f t h e 26 l e t t e r s i s l i s t e d t h e o t h e r l e t t e r s i n t h e a l p h a b e t t h a t were e r r o n e o u s l y i d e n t i f i e d a s t h a t l e t t e r more t h a n 5% of t h e t i m e (from Bouma, 1 9 7 1 ) .

S i m i l a r S i m i l a r T a r g e t N o n t a r g e t L e t t e r s T a r g e t N o n t a r g e t L e t t e r s

a c , e l m , n , 0 , s , x , z n a , e l s , u , x

C 0 P 4

i . 1, t V W

j 1 W V

k t , x X

Y V

i n t h e d i s p l a y , t h e d a t a were pooled a c r o s s a l l f i v e d i s p l a y t y p e s and r e p a r t i t i o n e d . The b a s i s f o r t h i s r e p a r t i t i o n i n g was t h e c l a s s i f i c a t i o n o f each t r i a l ' s t a r g e t l e t t e r a c c o r d i n g t o which l e t t e r s a r e l i k e l y t o be s e e n a s v e r y s i m i l a r t o t h e t a r g e t . The c l a s s i f i c a t i o n was d e r i v e d from t h e l o w e r c a s e s i n g l e - l e t t e r c o n f u s a b i l i t y s t u d y o f Bouma ( 1 9 7 1 ) shown i n t a b l e 2 . 4 . We counted a n o n t a r g e t l e t t e r a s s i m i l a r t o t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r i f t h e n o n t a r g e t l e t t e r was e r r o n e o u s l y i d e n t i f i e d a s t h e t a r g e t more t h a n 5% of t h e t ime i n Bouma's s t u d y . T a b l e 4 .2 p r e s e n t s t h e s i m i l a r i t y c l a s s i f i c a t i o n a c c o r d i n g t o t h i s a n a l y s i s . For example, g i v e n t h e t a r g e t

Page 70: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 53

l e t t e r &, t h e s i m i l a r n o n t a r g e t l e t t e r s a r e k, E, and - u. T h i s means t h a t t h e s t i m u l u s l e t t e r s k t k, p, a n d 2 were i d e n t i f i e d a s b more t h a n 5% o f t h e t i m e i n Bouma's s t u d y . Each u n i q u e t r i a l i n o u r t a r g e t s e a r c h t a s k was t h e n d e s c r i b e d by t h e number o f n o n t a r g e t l e t t e r s i n t h e d i s p l a y t h a t were s i m i l a r t o t h e t a r g e t a c c o r d i n g t o t h i s c las - s i f i c a t i o n . Rough ly 46 , 3 3 , 1 3 , and 7 % o f e a c h s u b j e c t ' s t r i a l s f e l l i n t o t h e c a t e g o r i e s z e r o , o n e , two , a n d t h r e e s i m i l a r l e t t e r s ( o t h e r t h a n t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r i t s e l f ) , r e s p e c t i v e l y .

F i g u r e s 4.10 and 4 .11 p r e s e n t t h e a c c u r a c y and r e a c t i o n t ime r e s u l t s a s a f u n c t i o n o f t h e number o f s i m i l a r n o n t a r g e t l e t t e r s i n t h e d i s p l a y . T a r g e t v e r s u s c a t c h t r i a l s i s t h e c u r v e p a r a m e t e r i n t h e f i g u r e s . I n t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k , a c c u r a c y i n c r e a s e d w i t h i n c r e a s e s i n t h e number o f s i m i l a r n o n t a r g e t

100

90 k Y 8 80

a

0

B 70

I2 k

60

50

I 1 I I

1 I 1 L 0 1 2 3

NUMBER OF SIMILAR NONTARGETS

F i g u r e 4.10 P e r c e n t a g e c o r r e c t a s a f u n c t i o n o f t h e number o f s i m i l a r n o n t a r g e t l e t t e r s i n t h e t e s t s t r i n g s i n t h e a c c u r a c y e x p e r i m e n t o f S t u d y 1.

Page 71: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

54 CHAPTER 4

l e t t e r s on t a r g e t t r i a l s and d e c r e a s e d on c a t c h t r i a l s . The l a r g e s i m i l a r i t y e f f e c t s i n t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k c o n t r a s t w i t h t h e s m a l l e r e f f e c t s o f Massaro e t a l . shown i n F i g u r e 4 . 5 . The p r e s e n t a n a l y s i s may have provided a more s e n s i t i v e t e s t o f s i m i l a r i t y t h a n t h e Massaro e t a l . a n a l y s i s s i n c e t h e c o n f u s i o n s e t s were computed i n a more p r e c i s e manner. I n p a r t i c u l a r , t h e p r e s e n t a n a l y s i s a l l o w s f o r asymmetr ic c o n f u s i o n s . Although c is c o n s i d e r e d t o b e a s i m i l a r n o n t a r g e t l e t t e r g i v e n t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r d, e , 9, o r 2 , t h e o n l y s i m i l a r n o n t a r g e t l e t t e r f o r t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r i s t h e l e t t e r 0. I n t h e r e a c t i o n t i m e t a s k , r e a c t i o n time i n c r e a s e d w i t h i n c r e a s e s i n t h e number of s i m i l a r t a r g e t l e t t e r s on c a t c h t r i a l s b u t d i d not change much on t a r g e t t r i a l s . T h i s r e s u l t p r o v i d e s a d i r e c t r e p l i c a t i o n o f t h e s i m i l a r i t y a n a l y s i s i n t h e Massaro e t a l . s t u d y shown i n F i g u r e 4.4.

650 700r---

+--+Target 500 t r E l 450 h 1 2 3

NUMBER OF SIMILAR NONTARGETS

F i g u r e 4.11 R e a c t i o n time a s a f u n c t i o n of t h e number o f s i m i l a r n o n t a r g e t l e t t e r s i n t h e t e s t s t r i n g i n t h e r e a c t i o n t i m e exper iment o f S tudy 1.

Page 72: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 55

Targe t -Catch D i f f e r e n c e s

Accuracy was 1 2 % h i g h e r f o r c a t c h t r i a l s t h a n f o r t a r g e t t r i a l s and t h i s e f f e c t i n t e r a c t e d w i t h d i s p l a y t y p e s ( c f . F i g u r e 4 . 8 ) . Reac t ion times were 47 msec s lower f o r c a t c h t r i a l s t h a n f o r t a r g e t t r i a l s ( c f . F i g u r e 4 . 9 ) . The r e s u l t s show t h a t s u b j e c t s i n an a c c u r a c y t a s k tend t o be more a c c u r a t e on c a t c h t r i a l s t h a n on t a r g e t t r i a l s whereas t h e y t e n d t o t a k e l o n g e r on c a t c h t r i a l s i n t h e r e a c t i o n time e x p e r i m e n t . Given t h a t t h e s e r e s u l t s d o n o t come from t h e same e x p e r i m e n t , t h e y c a n n o t be i n t e r p r e t e d i n te rms of a speed a c c u r a c y t r a d e - o f f . However, r e s p o n s e a c c u r a c y i n t h e RT t a s k was a l s o s i g n i f i c a n t l y h i g h e r f o r c a t c h t h a n f o r t a r g e t t r i a l s ( F i g u r e 4.9) and t h i s r e s u l t might a c c o u n t f o r t h e l o n g e r r e a c t i o n times on c a t c h t r i a l s i n t h e r e a c t i o n t i m e t a s k .

A c e n t r a l q u e s t i o n r a i s e d by t h i s s t u d y c o n c e r n s t h e n a t u r e of t h e s i m i l a r i t i e s and t h e d i f f e r e n c e s between a c c u r a c y and r e a c t i o n time paradigms. R e s u l t s from a c c u r a c y and r e a c t i o n time s t u d i e s a r e f r e q u e n t l y r e g a r d e d a s c o n v e r g e n t i n d i c a t i o n s of common p e r c e p t u a l p r o c e s s i n g . S y s t e m a t i c d i f f e r e n c e s between t h e a c c u r a c y and RT e f f e c t s would s u g g e s t t h a t p e r c e p t u a l p r o c e s s e s may n o t be t h e same i n b o t h c a s e s . Thus, two i m p o r t a n t q u e s t i o n s a r e whether o r n o t a c c u r a c y and r e a c t i o n time r e s u l t s can be p r e d i c t e d from a common p r o c e s s i n g model, and i f so , how t h e d i f f e r e n t s t i m u l u s envi ronments of t h e a c c u r a c y and r e a c t i o n time t a s k s c a u s e t h e observed d i f f e r e n c e s i n t h e magnitude of t h e e f f e c t s . The a c c u r a c y and t h e r e a c t i o n time t a s k s w i l l be e v a l u a t e d i n t h e framework of t h e i n f o r m a t i o n p r o c e s s i n g model. I n o r d e r t o b e t t e r unders tand t h e e f f e c t s of t a r g e t and c a t c h t r i a l s and t o b e t t e r e x p l i c a t e our i n t e r p r e t a t i o n of t h e p r o c e s s e s i n t h e a c c u r a c y and r e a c t i o n t i m e t a s k s , we w i l l p r e s e n t an i n f o r m a t i o n p r o c e s s i n g a n a l y s i s of per formance i n t h e a c c u r a c y and r e a c t i o n time t a s k s .

INFORMATION PROCESSING MODEL

With t h e r e g i s t r a t i o n of a l e t t e r s t r i n g a s a n image upon t h e r e t i n a , s e n s o r y t r a n s d u c t i o n b e g i n s . F e a t u r e s a r e e x t r a c t e d s i m u l t a n e o u s l y ( i n p a r a l l e l ) from e a c h l e t t e r p o s i t i o n i n t h e d i s p l a y and a r e e n t e r e d i n t o p r e p e r c e p t u a l v i s u a l s t o r a g e . F e a t u r e e x t r a c t i o n i s a t e m p o r a l l y ex tended p r o c e s s so t h a t t h e c o n t e n t s of p r e p e r c e p t u a l v i s u a l s t o r a g e

Page 73: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

CHAPTER 4

b u i l d up over t ime. Concurren t w i t h t h e e s t a b l i s h m e n t o f t h e new c o n t e n t s of p r e p e r c e p t u a l v i s u a l s t o r a g e , t h e p r i m a r y r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s t r a n s f o r m s t h e c u r r e n t c o n t e n t s of p r e p e r c e p t u a l v i s u a l s t o r a g e i n t o s y n t h e s i z e d v i s u a l memory. The c o n t e n t s of s y n t h e s i z e d v i s u a l memory a r e c o n t i n u a l l y monitored by a d e c i s i o n p r o c e s s which, i n t h e case of t h e precue t a r g e t s e a r c h t a s k , endeavors t o match t h e t a r g e t w i t h t h e f r e s h l y r e s o l v e d and c o n t i n u o u s l y updated l e t t e r s t r i n g i n s y n t h e s i z e d v i s u a l memory, a s i n T u r v e y ' s (1973) c o n c u r r e n t - c o n t i n g e n t model.

To d e r i v e s p e c i f i c p r e d i c t i o n s from t h e model, i t is n e c e s s a r y t o make a few assumpt ions a b o u t t h e p r i m a r y r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s and t h e d e c i s i o n p r o c e s s . Exper imenta l s u p p o r t f o r t h e s e assumpt ions p r e v i o u s l y h a s been d e m o n s t r a t e d (Massaro, 1 9 7 9 a ) . The f i r s t assumpt ion is t h a t knowledge of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e c o n t r i b u t e s a n independent s o u r c e o f knowledge a b o u t t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g . A c c o r d i n g l y , e x p e r i e n c e d r e a d e r s w i l l be b i a s e d t o i n t e r p r e t t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g as one t h a t is o r t h o g r a p h i c a l l y s t r u c t u r e d . T h e r e f o r e , t o t h e e x t e n t t h a t t h e l e t t e r s be ing r e s o l v e d from p r e p e r c e p t u a l v i s u a l s t o r a g e form w e l l - s t r u c t u r e d l e t t e r s e q u e n c e s , t h e y may be r e s o l v e d w i t h fewer f e a t u r e s or b e f o r e a l l f e a t u r e s have been e x t r a c t e d . I n c o n t r a s t , a p o o r l y - s t r u c t u r e d s t r i n g w i l l r e q u i r e n e a r l y comple te f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n f o r r e c o g n i t i o n because o r t h o g r a p h i c knowledge w i l l p r o v i d e no a d d i t i o n a l a s s i s t a n c e . Thus, t h e c o n t e n t s o f s y n t h e s i z e d v i s u a l memory a r e e s t a b l i s h e d by p r i m a r y r e c o g n i t i o n more q u i c k l y and a c c u r a t e l y f o r w e l l - s t r u c t u r e d t h a n f o r p o o r l y - s t r u c t u r e d s t r i n g s .

The second assumpt ion is r e l a t e d t o t h e d e c i s i o n a l g o r i t h m i n t h e t a r g e t s e a r c h t a sk . When t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r is known i n advance, t h e d e c i s i o n p r o c e s s m o n i t o r s t h e c o n t i n u o u s l y emerging c o n t e n t s o f s y n t h e s i z e d v i s u a l memory s e e k i n g a match t o t h e t a r g e t . A l l l e t t e r p o s i t i o n s a r e moni tored i n d e p e n d e n t l y and i n p a r a l l e l . The d e c i s i o n p r o c e s s m a i n t a i n s two c r i t e r i a or d e c i s i o n a x e s , ana logous t o t h e model of memory s e a r c h developed by Atk inson and J u o l a ( 1 9 7 4 ) . Whenever a l e t t e r p o s i t i o n e x c e e d s t h e f i r s t c r i t e r i o n i n resemblance t o t h e t a r g e t , a match is assumed t o have been found, p r o c e s s i n g t e r m i n a t e s , and a p o s i t i v e r e s p o n s e is e x e c u t e d . Whenever a l e t t e r p o s i t i o n is s u f f i c i e n t l y d i s s i m i l a r t o t h e t a r g e t t o exceed t h e second c r i t e r i o n , t h e l e t t e r is c l a s s i f i e d as a f o i l . Let ter p o s i t i o n s t h a t have n o t y e t been r e s o l v e d s u f f i c i e n t l y t o be c l a s s i f i e d a s t a r g e t o r f o i l c o n t i n u e t o be r e s o l v e d u n t i l t h e y c a n be c l a s s i f i e d or u n t i l f u r t h e r

Page 74: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 57

r e s o l u t i o n is n o t p o s s i b l e . When a l l l e t t e r p o s i t i o n s have been c l a s s i f i e d a s f o i l s , a n e g a t i v e r e s p o n s e i s e x e c u t e d .

I f t h e v i s u a l s t i m u l u s i s impoverished s o t h a t f u l l r e s o l u t i o n of a l l l e t t e r p o s i t i o n s is n o t p o s s i b l e , a d e c i s i o n i s f o r c e d when no f u r t h e r r e s o l u t i o n is p o s s i b l e . Given t h a t t h e f u l l y r e s o l v e d o r c l e a r l y " s e e n " l e t t e r s have been c l a s s i f i e d as f o i l s , a g u e s s r e s p o n s e m u s t be e x e c u t e d based upon t h e remain ing "unseen" l e t t e r s . The o b s e r v e r ' s p r o b a b i l i t y o f g u e s s i n g t h a t one of t h e unreso lved l e t t e r s is a t a r g e t is a j o i n t f u n c t i o n of a p r i o r i e x p e c t a t i o n s t h a t any g i v e n l e t t e r w i l l be a t a r g e t and t h e number of u n r e s o l v e d l e t t e r s . These e x p e c t a t i o n s a r e d e r i v e d from i n s t r u c t i o n s and p a s t e x p e r i e n c e .

For t h e p r e c u e RT t a s k , t h e f o l l o w i n g p r e d i c t i o n s a l s o f o l l o w d i r e c t l y from t h e model. D e c i s i o n time is a d i r e c t f u n c t i o n of t h e r e s o l u t i o n t ime of t h e s t i m u l u s s t r i n g and t h e r e f o r e is i n f l u e n c e d by t h e o r t h o g r a p h i c r e d u n d a n c i e s t h a t c a n be e x p l o i t e d i n t h e s t i m u l u s . The t i m e t o c o r r e c t l y i d e n t i f y a t a r g e t i n t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g is a f u n c t i o n s o l e l y of t h e time r e q u i r e d t o r e s o l v e t h e t a r g e t and w i l l , on t h e a v e r a g e , be s h o r t e r t h a n t h e time r e q u i r e d t o e x h a u s t i v e l y c l a s s i f y a l l l e t t e r s a s f o i l s on a c a t c h t r i a l . I d e n t i f i c a t i o n time f o r t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r is i n f l u e n c e d by t h e o r t h o g r a p h i c c o n s t r a i n t s among t h e l e t t e r s i n t h e c a t c h s t r i n g . The emphasis on a c c u r a c y i n t h e RT t a s k d i s p o s e s t h e o b s e r v e r t o m a i n t a i n s t r i c t c r i t e r i a which, f o r t h e most p a r t , p r e c l u d e e r r o r s .

I n a p o s t c u e t a s k , r e c o g n i t i o n and d e c i s i o n p r o c e s s e s a n a l o g o u s t o t h o s e f o r t h e p r e c u e t a s k a r e assumed t o o p e r a t e , e x c e p t t h a t t h e c o n t e n t s of s y n t h e s i z e d v i s u a l memory m u s t be m a i n t a i n e d a w a i t i n g t h e a r r i v a l and r e c o g n i t i o n of t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r . The s t i m u l u s l e t t e r s t r i n g is r e s o l v e d a s f u l l y a s t h e combined v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n and o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e a l l o w and is r e t a i n e d a w a i t i n g p r e s e n t a t i o n of t h e t a r g e t . Once t h e t a r g e t is i d e n t i f i e d , i t is compared w i t h however much of t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g was r e s o l v e d . I f a match is found, a p o s i t i v e r e s p o n s e is e x e c u t e d . Fol lowing t h e argument of Thompson and Massaro ( 1 9 7 3 ) , i t i s assumed t h a t t h e e x a c t f e a t u r a l s i m i l a r i t y of t h e u n r e s o l v e d l e t t e r s t o t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r is n o t d i r e c t l y a v a i l a b l e t o t h e d e c i s i o n p r o c e s s and d o e s n o t i n f l u e n c e t h e g u e s s p r o b a b i l i t y . O r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n f l u e n c e s a c c u r a c y f o r bo th t a r g e t and c a t c h t r i a l s because i t i n f l u e n c e s t h e number of l e t t e r s t h a t a r e a c c u r a t e l y p e r c e i v e d .

I t may seem s u r p r i s i n g t h a t t h e Thompson and Massaro (1973) and t h e Massaro e t a l . (1979) s t u d i e s r e v e a l e d no

Page 75: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

CHAPTER 4

s i g n i f i c a n t e f f e c t s o f l e t t e r s i m i l a r i t y . Even i f f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n is n o t t r a n s m i t t e d t o s y n t h e s i z e d v i s u a l memory we would e x p e c t i n c o r r e c t s y n t h e s e s t o be s i m i l a r t o t h e t e s t l e t t e r . For example, g i v e n t h e t e s t l e t t e r 0, we would e x p e c t t h a t r e c o g n i t i o n e r r o r s w i l l be more l i k e l y t o c o n s i s t of c and - e t h a n I and 2. One f a c t o r t h a t may work a g a i n s t o b s e r v a t i o n of t h i s phenomenon may be t h a t t h e t e s t d i s p l a y was f o l l o w e d by a masking s t i m u l u s i n t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k and t h e r e is now some e v i d e n c e t h a t f e a t u r e s of t h e mask c o n t r i b u t e t o p e r c e p t u a l memory of t h e t e s t (Kallman & Massaro, 1979; Smi th , H a v i l a n d , Reder , Brownel l , & Adams, 1 9 7 6 ) . Given t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n of t h e mask, i n c o r r e c t r e s p o n s e s might be more e a s i l y p r e d i c t e d by t h e f e a t u r e s of t h e mask t h a n t h e f e a t u r e s of t h e t e s t . A second r e a s o n f o r o b s e r v i n g s m a l l s i m i l a r i t y e f f e c t s i n t h e a c c u r a c y s t u d i e s is t h a t t h e a c c u r a c y s t u d i e s w i t h l e t t e r s t r i n g s employ a f o r c e d - c h o i c e r e s p o n s e s i t u a t i o n so t h a t t h o s e few t r i a l s t h a t i n v o l v e i n c o r r e c t p e r c e p t u a l s y n t h e s e s a r e u n l i k e l y t o a g r e e w i t h t h e i n c o r r e c t r e s p o n s e a l t e r n a t i v e . The s y s t e m a t i c l e t t e r c o n f u s i o n s u s u a l l y found i n s i n g l e - l e t t e r r e c o g n i t i o n s t u d i e s c o u l d depend on an open-ended s e t of l e t t e r r e s p o n s e a l t e r n a t i v e s . However, i t is a l s o p o s s i b l e t o o b s e r v e s i g n i f i c a n t s i m i l a r i t y e f f e c t s a s i n t h e p r e s e n t a c c u r a c y s t u d y ( c f . F i g u r e 4 . 1 8 ) . The p a t t e r n of t h e s e r e s u l t s is c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e i d e a t h a t s i m i l a r l e t t e r s may be m i s t a k e n l y i d e n t i f i e d a s t h e t a r g e t . Hence, a c c u r a c y on t a r g e t t r i a l s i n c r e a s e s w i t h t h e number of s i m i l a r l e t t e r s t o t h e t a r g e t i n t h e t e s t s t r i n g , b u t a c c u r a c y on c a t c h t r i a l s d e c r e a s e s a s t h e number of s i m i l a r l e t t e r s t o t h e t a r g e t is i n c r e a s e d .

I t is p o s s i b l e t o q u a n t i f y t h e p r o c e s s i n g model i n o r d e r t o d e s c r i b e t h e q u a n t i t a t i v e r e s u l t s of t h e t a r g e t s e a r c h t a s k . I n an a c c u r a c y t a s k , i t is assumed t h a t t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g is p e r c e i v e d ( i . e . , r e s o l v e d ) a s f u l l y a s p o s s i b l e . R e s o l u t i o n of t h e d i s p l a y i s a d i r e c t f u n c t i o n of b o t h t h e f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n a v a i l a b l e and t h e o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e of t h e t e s t s t r i n g . S i n c e each o f t h e f o u r t y p e s of m e a n i n g l e s s l e t t e r s t r i n g s was composed by making anagrams of a s i x - l e t t e r word, t h e same l e t t e r s were p r e s e n t a c r o s s t h e f i v e d i s p l a y . t y p e s . The f i v e d i s p l a y t y p e s were a l s o p r e s e n t e d a t t h e same i n t e n s i t y and d u r a t i o n s . T h e r e f o r e , t h e f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n may be assumed t o be c o n s t a n t a c r o s s t h e d i s p l a y t y p e s . However, t h e d i s p l a y t y p e s d i f f e r w i t h r e s p e c t t o o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e and t h e s e d i f f e r e n c e s can a c c o u n t f o r t h e performance d i f f e r e n c e s a c r o s s t h e f i v e d i s p l a y t y p e s . T h e r e f o r e , t h e number of l e t t e r s r e s o l v e d , R , w i l l depend on t h e d i s p l a y t y p e .

Page 76: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 59

I t i s n e c e s s a r y t o d e s c r i b e a d e c i s i o n r u l e t h a t a l l o w s t h e s u b j e c t t o s e l e c t a " y e s " o r "no" r e s p o n s e . I t is assumed t h a t i f one of t h e r e s o l v e d l e t t e r s is i d e n t i c a l t o t h e t a r g e t , a " y e s " r e s p o n s e is e x e c u t e d . I f t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r is n o t c o n t a i n e d i n t h e se t of r e s o l v e d l e t t e r s , a " y e s " r e s p o n s e i s a f u n c t i o n of t h e number of u n r e s o l v e d l e t t e r s and t h e r e a d e r ' s e x p e c t a t i o n , E , t h a t some l e t t e r i n t h e s i x - l e t t e r s t r i n g w i l l be i d e n t i c a l t o t h e t a r g e t . S i n c e E i s t h e e x p e c t a t i o n f o r a whole s i x - l e t t e r tes t s t r i n g c o n t a i n i n g t h e t a r g e t , t h e n E/6 is t h e e x p e c t a t i o n t h a t any s i n g l e l e t t e r i n t h e t e s t s t r i n g is i d e n t i c a l t o t h e t a r g e t . The e x p e c t a t i o n v a l u e E would be some f u n c t i o n o f i n s t r u c t i o n s , f e e d b a c k , and how o f t e n t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r is a c t u a l l y s e e n i n t h e t e s t s t r i n g . T h e r e f o r e , t h e p r o b a b i l i t y o f a " y e s " r e s p o n s e t o t h e t a r g e t t r i a l i s g i v e n by Equat ion 1 f o r l e t t e r s t r i n g s of l e n g t h 6.

The l e f t - h a n d term of Equat ion 1 i n d i c a t e s t h a t R - s i x t h s of t h e time one o f t h e r e s o l v e d l e t t e r s w i l l be i d e n t i c a l t o t h e t a r g e t and t h e o b s e r v e r w i l l respond " y e s " w i t h p r o b a b i l i t y one. On t h e remain ing t r i a l s , 1 - R/6, t h e t a r g e t was n o t r e s o l v e d and t h e o b s e r v e r g u e s s e s w i t h p r o b a b i l i t y E /6 weighted by t h e number of u n r e s o l v e d l e t t e r s ( 6 - R ) .

For c a t c h t r i a l s , t h e o b s e r v e r w i l l never f i n d t h e t a r g e t and , t h e r e f o r e , i s i n an i m p e r f e c t knowledge s t a t e u n l e s s h e o r s h e r e s o l v e s a l l of t h e l e t t e r s . T h e r e f o r e , t h e l i k e l i h o o d of a " y e s " r e s p o n s e is s imply t h e o b s e r v e r ' s e x p e c t a t i o n t h a t a g i v e n t e s t l e t t e r is a t a r g e t l e t t e r , E/6, weighted by t h e number of u n r e s o l v e d t a r g e t l e t t e r s , 6 - R:

P(Yes lCatch) = (6 - R ) x (E/6) ( 2 )

Of c o u r s e , t h e l i k e l i h o o d of b e i n g c o r r e c t on c a t c h t r i a l s is t h e complement of Equat ion ( 2 ) :

P(No1Catch) = 1 - [ ( 6 - R ) x ( E / 6 ) ] ( 3 )

The model was a p p l i e d t o t h e r e s u l t s of t h e a c c u r a c y e x p e r i m e n t . The model was f i t t o t h e 1 0 a v e r a g e r e s p o n s e a c c u r a c i e s ( t h e f i v e d i s p l a y t y p e s on t a r g e t p r e s e n t t r i a l s and t h e f i v e d i s p l a y t y p e s on c a t c h o r t a r g e t a b s e n t t r i a l s ) . The f i t was o b t a i n e d u s i n g a l e a s t - s q u a r e s parameter e s t i m a t i o n r o u t i n e ( C h a n d l e r , 1 9 6 9 ) . S i x p a r a m e t e r s were e s t i m a t e d from t h e d a t a : one e x p e c t a t i o n p a r a m e t e r , E , and an e s t i m a t e o f t h e

Page 77: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

60 CHAPTER 4

number of l e t t e r s f u l l y r e s o l v e d , R , f o r e a c h o f t h e f i v e d i s p l a y t y p e s . The o b t a i n e d f i t was q u i t e good; t h e r o o t mean squared d e v i a t i o n was o n l y 1.3%. Although i t is d i f f i c u l t t o a p p r e c i a t e t h e q u a n t i t a t i v e g o o d n e s s - o f - f i t f o r such a model e s t i m a t i n g s i x p a r a m e t e r s f o r 1 0 d a t a p o i n t s , t h e o b t a i n e d parameter v a l u e s n o n e t h e l e s s a r e r e v e a l i n g . The s u b j e c t s were c l e a r l y informed of t h e e q u a l number of t a r g e t and c a t c h t r i a l s i n t h e exper iment and t h e r e f o r e , t h e y s h o u l d have adopted a n E-value o f .5 . However, t h e observed g r e a t e r a c c u r a c y f o r c a t c h t r i a l s would a p p e a r t o s u g g e s t a b i a s toward "no" r e s p o n s e s o r an a p p a r e n t E-value r a t h e r c l o s e t o z e r o . I n f a c t , t h e e s t i m a t e d E-value was . 4 6 s u g g e s t i n g t h a t t h e s u b j e c t s possessed a t most a v e r y s l i g h t b i a s . The s t r o n g imbalance between c a t c h a c c u r a c y and t a r g e t a c c u r a c y i s a l o g i c a l consequence of t h e model even when l i t t l e o r no b i a s is p r e s e n t . Although t h e r e a r e no a p r i o r i v a l u e s o f t h e R p a r a m e t e r s t o which t h e e s t i m a t e s may be compared, t h e o b t a i n e d e s t i m a t e s f o r R p r o v i d e a r e a s o n a b l e s c a l i n g f o r t h e f i v e t y p e s o f items. These v a l u e s a r e shown i n T a b l e 4.3 a s P o s t c u e (S tudy 1) .

While t h e s p e c i f i c a t i o n of a q u a n t i t a t i v e model p r e d i c t i n g r e a c t i o n times is c o n s i d e r a b l y more complex, i t n o n e t h e l e s s s tems d i r e c t l y from t h e above i n f o r m a t i o n p r o c e s s i n g a n a l y s i s . The r e a c t i o n t ime on a t a r g e t t r i a l i s t h e s u m of t h e t i m e needed t o r e s o l v e t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r i n t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g p l u s t h e time needed t o i n i t i a t e and e x e c u t e t h e c o r r e c t r e s p o n s e . The r e s o l u t i o n time f o r t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r i s a f u n c t i o n of i t s v i s u a l p r o p e r t i e s and of t h e o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e o f t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g i n which t h e t a r g e t o c c u r s . S i n c e o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e a f f e c t s t h e t i m e needed t o r e s o l v e t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g , o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e is a parameter of t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n o f t h e r e a c t i o n t i m e s . The expec ted v a l u e of t h i s d i s t r i b u t i o n p l u s a c o n s t a n t g i v e s a v e r a g e RT f o r t a r g e t t r i a l s . (Response i n i t i a t i o n and e x e c u t i o n t i m e is assumed t o be c o n s t a n t o r a t l e a s t d i s t r i b u t e d i n d e p e n d e n t l y o f t h e e f f e c t o f p r i m a r y i n t e r e s t . )

For c a t c h t r i a l s , t h e RT i s t h e sum of a c o n s t a n t time f o r response e x e c u t i o n p l u s t h e maximum time needed t o c l a s s i f y a l l l e t t e r s a s f o i l s . C l a s s i f i c a t i o n t ime is based upon t h e j o i n t d i s t r i b u t i o n o f comple t ion t i m e s f o r e a c h o f t h e f o i l s on t h e n o n t a r g e t t r i a l s . These d i s t r i b u t i o n s have a s p a r a m e t e r s t h e s i m i l a r i t y o f t h e f o i l t o t h e t a r g e t , o t h e r v i s u a l p r o p e r t i e s which a f f e c t t h e o v e r a l l e a s e of r e s o l v i n g t h e f o i l , t h e i n f l u e n c e o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e , and f i n a l l y t h e s u b j e c t ' s c r i t e r i o n f o r a v o i d i n g f a l s e a l a r m s . Having o u t l i n e d t h e model

Page 78: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 6 1

T a b l e 4.3 E s t i m a t e s o f p e r c e p t u a l r e s o l u t i o n ( R ) and a p r i o r i e x p e c t a t i o n ( E ) o f t h e o c c u r r e n c e o f a t a r g e t t r i a l and t h e r o o t mean s q u a r e d (RMS) d e r i v a t i o n s f o r t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k s i n S t u d i e s 1 and 2.

R E RMS ( i n % )

Task Word R-H R-L I - H I - L

5.20 4.40 3.72 3.40 2.98 .459 1 . 2 7

5.22 4.38 3 .56 3 .26 2 .86 . 5 5 0 1 . 7 0

P o s t c u e

( S t u d y 1)

( S t u d y 2 )

P r e c u e

( S t u d y 2 ) 4.87

Combined Da ta 5.08

P o s t c u e P r e c u e

4.29 3 .84 3.85

4.33 3.68 3 . 5 1

3.42 . 8 8 0 1 .67

3.08 2.54

.514

.823

t o t h i s l e v e l o f d e t a i l , w e w i l l p r o c e e d no f u r t h e r . U n l i k e t h e a c c u r a c y model where t h e f i t o f t h e model was e n l i g h t e n i n g a b o u t presumed s u b j e c t b i a s i n t h e t a s k , t h e q u a l i t a t i v e f e a t u r e s o f t h e RT d a t a f o l l o w r a t h e r d i r e c t l y f rom t h e q u a l i t a t i v e d e s c r i p t i o n o f t h i s model . The c o m p l e t i o n o f t h e q u a n t i f i c a t i o n o f t h i s model m i g h t p r o v e a n i n t e r e s t i n g e x e r c i s e b u t would b e u n l i k e l y t o b e e x t r e m e l y r e v e a l i n g , p a r t i c u l a r l y s i n c e t h e e f f e c t s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e were v e r y s m a l l .

STUDY 2: PRECUE VERSUS POSTCUE

Whereas i t is n o t p o s s i b l e t o compare d i r e c t l y t h e m a g n i t u d e o f a c c u r a c y and RT e f f e c t s , t h e d i f f e r e n c e s i n a c c u r a c y b e t w e e n words and i r r e g u l a r - l o w a n a g r a m s i n t h e

Page 79: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

62 CHAPTER 4

a c c u r a c y t a s k was 21%. The d i f f e r e n c e be tween t h e s e same c o n d i t i o n s i n t h e RT t a s k was o n l y 34 msec o r 5 .8% o f t h e a v e r a g e RT o f 581 msec. 3 o e s t h i s r e p r e s e n t a r ea l d i f f e r e n c e i n t h e u t i l i z a t i o n o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n t h e two t a s k s ? I f s o , what p r o p e r t i e s o f t h e t a s k s a l l o w more o f a c o n t r i b u t i o n o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n o n e t a s k t h a n i n t h e o t h e r ?

The o b s e r v a t i o n o f s i g n i f i c a n t a d v a n t a g e s f o r w o r d s and pseudowords o v e r nonwords and s i n g l e l e t t e r s i n t h e p o s t c u e R e i c h e r t a s k ( B a r o n & T h u r s t o n , 1973; R e i c h e r , 1969; Thompson &

Massa ro , 1973 ; W h e e l e r , 1 9 7 0 ) and t h e a b s e n c e o f t h e s e e f f e c t s i n p r e c u e d e t e c t i o n t a s k s ( B j o r k & Estes, 1973 ; E s t e s , B j o r k , &

S k a a r , 1974; M a s s a r o , 1973; Thompson & M a s s a r o , 1 9 7 3 ) h a s l e d t o t h e s u g g e s t i o n t h a t p r e c u i n g p r e c l u d e s t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . The s u b j e c t i n a p r e c u e t a s k p r e s u m a b l y m a t c h e s t h e f e a t u r e s of t h e remembered t a r g e t l e t t e r d i r e c t l y t o t h e f e a t u r e s o f t h e incoming v i s u a l d i s p l a y . T h i s s t r a t e g y p r e c l u d e s u s i n g o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e t o a s s i s t i n r e s o l u t i o n o f t h e d i s p l a y . Thus , o n e h y p o t h e s i s is t h a t p r e c u i n g p r o m o t e s s m a l l e r a d v a n t a g e s f o r s t r u c t u r e d d i s p l a y s . S t u d y 2 t e s t s w h e t h e r a p r e c u e , p e r se , a c c o u n t s f o r d i m i n i s h e d e f f e c t s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . The p o s t c u e a c c u r a c y t a s k o f t h e S t u d y 1 was r e p l i c a t e d i n o n e c o n d i t i o n w h i l e a c o m p a r a b l e p r e c u e a c c u r a c y t a s k was u s e d i n t h e o t h e r c o n d i t i o n . I f p r e c u i n g a l w a y s a l l o w s m a t c h e s t o b e made a t a f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n l e v e l , t h e n t h e e f f e c t s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e s h o u l d b e s e v e r e l y a t t e n u a t e d i n t h e p r e c u e a c c u r a c y t a s k . On t h e o t h e r h a n d , i f t h e d i s p l a y i n t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k i s r e s o l v e d t o t h e f u l l e s t e x t e n t p o s s i b l e and o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e c o n t r i b u t e s t o r e s o l u t i o n , t h e n t h e r e s u l t s f o r p r e c u e and p o s t c u e a c c u r a c y s h o u l d b e c o m p a r a b l e e x c e p t , p e r h a p s , f o r d i f f e r e n t i a l memory l o a d s i n t h e two c o n d i t i o n s .

The t e s t s t r i n g s , a p p a r a t u s , and d i s p l a y s e q u e n c e s were i d e n t i c a l t o t h o s e o f t h e a c c u r a c y e x p e r i m e n t i n S t u d y 1. One h a l f o f t h e s u b j e c t s r e c e i v e d t h e p r e c u e t a s k o n t h e f i r s t d a y and t h e p o s t c u e t a s k o n t h e second d a y ; f o r t h e r e m a i n i n g s u b j e c t s t h i s o r d e r was r e v e r s e d . The p r e c u e t a s k i n v o l v e d t h e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r f o r 500 msec f o l l o w e d by t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g 1 sec l a t e r . The l e t t e r s t r i n g was p r e s e n t e d b e f o r e t h e t a r g e t i n t h e p o s t c u e t a s k . I n b o t h t a s k s t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g was e x p o s e d f o r a s h o r t d u r a t i o n and masked t o g i v e a n a v e r a g e p e r f o r m a n c e o f 75% c o r r e c t . E i g h t e e n s u b j e c t s were t e s t e d i n t h e e x p e r i m e n t . The d e t a i l s o f t h e me thod , p r o c e d u r e , and r e s u l t s a r e p r e s e n t e d i n Appendix 4 .2

Page 80: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION

w n 60

6 3

-

Or t h o g r a p h i c S t r u c t u r e

F i g u r e 4.12 p r e s e n t s p e r c e n t a g e c o r r e c t t a r g e t i d e n t i f i c a t i o n s a s a f u n c t i o n o f t h e f i v e l e v e l s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . The p r e c u e t a s k v e r s u s t h e p o s t c u e t a s k i s t h e c u r v e p a r a m e t e r . A s c a n be s e e n i n t h e f i g u r e , l a r g e e f f e c t s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e were f o u n d i n b o t h t h e p r e c u e and p o s t c u e t a s k s , a l t h o u g h s l i g h t l y l a r g e r e f f e c t s were found i n t h e p o s t c u e t a s k . The p o s t c u e e x p e r i m e n t r e p l i c a t e s t h e p r e v i o u s s t u d y . The p r e c u e r e s u l t s a r e v e r y s i m i l a r t o t h e p o s t c u e r e s u l t s , a l t h o u g h t h e a t t e n t u a t i o n o f t h e o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e e f f e c t s i n t h e p r e c u e t a s k o v e r t h e p o s t c u e t a s k i s s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t .

The p r i m a r y f o c u s o f t h i s e x p e r i m e n t was t o d e t e r m i n e t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p o f p r e c u e a c c u r a c y p e r f o r m a n c e t o p o s t c u e a c c u r a c y

- Postcue - Precue

50 WORD R-H R-L I-H I-L

I

F i g u r e 4 .12 P e r c e n t a g e c o r r e c t a s a f u n c t i o n o f d i s p l a y t y p e i n t h e p r e c u e and p o s t c u e c o n d i t i o n s o f S t u d y 2.

Page 81: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

64 CHAPTER 4

performance. Although t h e i n t e r a c t i o n of t a s k w i t h d i s p l a y c o n d i t i o n s s u g g e s t s a s m a l l e r i n f l u e n c e of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n t h e p r e c u e t h a n p o s t c u e t a s k , t h e r e su l t s a r e s u f f i c i e n t t o r e j e c t t h e h y p o t h e s i s t h a t p r e c u i n g promotes a d r a s t i c r e d u c t i o n i n t h e u s e of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . The e f f e c t s of s t r u c t u r e were v e r y s t r o n g f o r bo th p r e c u e and p o s t c u e , and t h e d i f f e r e n c e between t h e two tasks was s m a l l by comparison.

The observed i n t e r a c t i o n of t a s k w i t h d i s p l a y c o n d i t i o n s probably r e f l e c t s d i f f e r e n t memory r e q u i r e m e n t s f o r t h e two t a s k s . I t is r e a s o n a b l e t o e x p e c t t h a t per formance might be poorer i n a p o s t c u e t a s k because t h e n e c e s s i t y of r e t a i n i n g t h e d i s p l a y u n t i l t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r is p r o c e s s e d c o u l d l e a d t o memory l o s s . I t might f u r t h e r be e x p e c t e d t h a t f o r g e t t i n g would be g r e a t e r f o r t h e more p o o r l y - s t r u c t u r e d d i s p l a y s (Baddeley , 1964). Any d i f f e r e n c e s i n o v e r a l l a c c u r a c y between t h e p o s t c u e t h a n i n p r e c u e t a sks a r e n o t meaningfu l because t h e a d a p t i v e a l g o r i t h m endeavored t o m a i n t a i n o v e r a l l a c c u r a c y a t 7 5 % . I n f a c t , s u b j e c t s r e q u i r e d s i g n i f i c a n t l y l o n g e r e x p o s u r e s i n t h e p o s t c u e t h a n t h e p r e c u e t a s k . The l o n g e r d u r a t i o n s f o r t h e . p o s t c u e t a s k a r e c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e i d e a t h a t f o r g e t t i n g o c c u r r e d t o a g r e a t e r d e g r e e i n t h e p o s t c u e t h a n i n t h e p r e c u e t a s k .

S i m i l a r i t y E f f e c t s

F i g u r e 4.13 g i v e s t h e p e r c e n t a g e of c o r r e c t i d e n t i f i c a t i o n s of t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r a s a f u n c t i o n of t h e number of s i m i l a r n o n t a r g e t s i n t h e t e s t d i s p l a y . S i m i l a r r e s u l t s were observed i n both t h e p r e c u e and p o s t c u e t a s k s . The o v e r a l l a c c u r a c y d i f f e r e n c e s on t a r g e t and c a t c h t r i a l s f o r bo th t a s k s a r e d i s c u s s e d i n t h e n e x t s e c t i o n . Accuracy d e c r e a s e d w i t h i n c r e a s e s i n t h e number of s i m i l a r n o n t a r g e t s on c a t c h t r i a l s b u t remained r e l a t i v e l y c o n s t a n t on t a r g e t t r i a l s . Al though t h e s i m i l a r i t y e f f e c t s a r e s m a l l e r i n magni tude, t h e c a t c h t r i a l s b u t n o t t h e t a r g e t t r i a l s r e p l i c a t e t h e r e s u l t s of t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k i n S tudy 1. The d e c r e a s e i n a c c u r a c y on c a t c h t r i a l s w i t h i n c r e a s e s i n t h e number of s i m i l a r l e t t e r s a p p e a r s t o be a r e l a t i v e l y r e l i a b l e r e s u l t . I n c o n t r a s t , any e f f e c t of s i m i l a r n o n t a r g e t s on t a r g e t t r i a l s a p p e a r s t o be s m a l l e r i n magni tude and l e s s r e l i a b l e .

Page 82: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 65

T a r g e t V e r s u s Catch T r i a l s

F i g u r e 4 . 1 4 p r e s e n t s t h e p e r c e n t a g e of c o r r e c t t a r g e t i d e n t i f i c a t i o n s f o r t a r g e t and c a t c h t r i a l s i n t h e p r e c u e and p o s t c u e a c c u r a c y t a s k s . R e p l i c a t i n g t h e r e s u l t s o f t h e p r e v i o u s s t u d y , o v e r a l l a c c u r a c y was much g r e a t e r on c a t c h t r i a l s t h a n on t a r g e t t r i a l s i n t h e p o s t c u e t a s k . I n c o n t r a s t , per formance on t a r g e t t r i a l s was more a c c u r a t e t h a n on c a t c h t r i a l s i n t h e p r e c u e a c c u r a c y t a sk . These e f f e c t s c a n be d e s c r i b e d by t h e d e c i s i o n r u l e i n t h e model. For a c c u r a c y t a s k s it is assumed t h a t t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g is r e s o l v e d a s f u l l y as p o s s i b l e w i t h t h e a s s i s t a n c e of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . I f none of t h e r e s o l v e d l e t t e r s is t h e t a r g e t , a " y e s " r e s p o n s e is a f u n c t i o n of t h e o b s e r v e r ' s a p r i o r i e x p e c t a t i o n p r o b a b i l i t y t h a t a n u n r e s o l v e d l e t t e r i s a t a r g e t and t h e number of

lJ--- Precue

50 mL 0 1 2 3

NUMBER OF SIMILAR NONTARGETS

F i g u r e 4.13 P e r c e n t a g e c o r r e c t f o r t a r g e t and c a t c h t r i a l s i n ' t h e p r e c u e and p o s t c u e c o n d i t i o n s of S t u d y 2 as a

f u n c t i o n of t h e number of s i m i l a r n o n t a r g e t l e t t e r s i n t h e t e s t s t r i n g .

Page 83: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

66

100

90-

I- 80- y 7 0 -

8 80-

w CJ 50 g 100

CHAPTER 4

I I I I I

Precue

... '.. 0 --...-- .-_______ p .... 0

'.. ... %.

Obs Pre Catch Target

....._...

Postcue

unreso lved l e t t e r s . I n te rms of t h e p r e s e n t model, t h e e x p e c t a t i o n parameter E/6 must have d i f f e r e d f o r t h e p r e c u e and p o s t c u e t a sks .

60-

I n f o r m a t i o n P r o c e s s i n q Model

1 I I I

The model was t e s t e d by f i t t i n g i t t o t h e d a t a o f t h e p r e s e n t exper iment . S i x p a r a m e t e r s were e s t i m a t e d f o r e a c h set of 10 means: one E-value, and a s e p a r a t e R-value f o r e a c h o f t h e f i v e d i s p l a y c o n d i t i o n s , e . g . , word, r e g u l a r - h i g h , e tc . The parameter estimates and t h e i r a s s o c i a t e d root mean squared d e v i a t i o n s a r e shown i n Table 4.3 a s P o s t c u e (S tudy 2 ) and Precue (S tudy 2 ) . The model p r o v i d e s a good d e s c r i p t i o n of t h e r e s u l t s of bo th t a s k s .

F i g u r e 4.14 Observed (Obs) and p r e d i c t e d ( P r e ) p e r c e n t a g e c o r r e c t f o r t a r g e t and c a t c h t r i a l s f o r t h e p r e c u e and p o s t c u e c o n d i t i o n s o f S tudy 2 a s a f u n c t i o n of d i s p l a y t y p e .

Page 84: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 6 7

Not o n l y d o e s t h e f i t of t h e model p r o v i d e s u p p o r t f o r our c o n c e p t u a l i z a t i o n of t h e d e c i s i o n mechanism, b u t t h e parameter v a l u e s a r e meaningfu l . I t is i n t e r e s t i n g t o n o t e t h a t t h e a p p a r e n t b i a s toward "no" r e s p o n s e s i n t h e p o s t c u e t a s k a c t u a l l y r e f l e c t s an a c c u r a t e and unbiased a s s e s s m e n t of t h e e q u a l p r o b a b i l i t y o f t a r g e t and c a t c h t r i a l s . The s u b j e c t s i n t h e p r e c u e t a s k , however, d o e x h i b i t a marked b i a s toward e x p e c t i n g t h e p r e s e n c e of a t a r g e t . Smith e t a l . ( 1 9 7 6 ) have r e p o r t e d s i m i l a r f i n d i n g s i n a precued t a r g e t r e c o g n i t i o n t a sk and s u g g e s t t h a t o b s e r v e r s i n p r e c u e t a s k s may e r r o n e o u s l y i n c o r p o r a t e mask f e a t u r e s i n making t h e i r judgments and t h u s tend t o see t h e t a r g e t i n t h e mask more o f t e n t h a n might be e x p e c t e d . By m a n i p u l a t i n g t h e n a t u r e of t h e m a s k which f o l l o w s t h e d i s p l a y t h e y found a more pronounced e f f e c t when t h e d i s p l a y and mask s h a r e d f e a t u r e s t h a n when t h e y d i d n o t .

Perhaps even more i n t e r e s t i n g t h a n t h e E-parameters were t h e R-values which c o r r e s p o n d t o t h e number of l e t t e r s a c t u a l l y r e s o l v e d f o r each d i s p l a y t y p e . The parameter v a l u e s f o r R a s a f u n c t i o n of d i s p l a y t y p e change s y s t e m a t i c a l l y w i t h o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e a c r o s s both t h e p r e c u e and t h e p o s t c u e exper iments . The l a r g e r e f f e c t of d i s p l a y t y p e f o r t h e p o s t c u e t h a n f o r t h e p r e c u e t a s k is r e f l e c t e d by t h e l a r g e r s p r e a d of t h e R-values f o r t h e p o s t c u e t a s k .

Although t h e i n t e r a c t i o n of d i s p l a y c o n d i t i o n s w i t h t a s k i n t h e p r e s e n t e x p e r i m e n t i m p l i e s t h a t R-values were somewhat d i f f e r e n t i n t h e p r e c u e and p o s t c u e t a s k s , a l l 2 0 d a t a p o i n t s were a l s o f i t w i t h seven p a r a m e t e r s by assuming t h a t a s i n g l e s e t of f i v e R-values and two E-va lues , one f o r p r e c u e and one f o r t h e p o s t c u e , would be s u f f i c i e n t . These p a r a m e t e r s and t h e i r a s s o c i a t e d r o o t mean s q u a r e d d e v i a t i o n s a r e a l s o g i v e n i n Table 4 . 3 a s Combined Data. The p r e d i c t e d r e s u l t s of t h e seven-parameter model a r e shown a l o n g w i t h t h e observed r e s u l t s i n F i g u r e 4.14. The r e a s o n a b l y good d e s c r i p t i o n of t h e r e s u l t shows t h a t t h e combined f i t of t h e two t a s k s is q u i t e a c c e p t a b l e . I n a d d i t i o n , r e d u c i n g t h e number of p a r a m e t e r s from 1 2 t o 7 i n c r e a s e d t h e t o t a l r o o t mean s q u a r e d d e v i a t i o n by less t h a n one p e r c e n t ( f rom 1 . 6 % t o 2 . 5 % ) .

STUDY 3 : MIXED-CASE

The r e s u l t s of t h e comparison between p r e c u e and p o s t c u e t a s k s i n d i c a t e s t h a t p r e c u i n g a l o n e is n o t a s u f f i c i e n t c o n d i t i o n t o c a u s e a d r a s t i c r e d u c t i o n i n t h e use of

Page 85: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

CHAPTER A

o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e , a t l e a s t i n a c c u r a c y tasks . I t s t i l l might be t h e c a s e , however, t h a t p r e c u i n g i n t h e RT t a s k i n which u n l i m i t e d viewing time i n s u r e s t h a t a l l o f t h e f e a t u r e s of t h e d i s p l a y c a n be e x t r a c t e d promotes a f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n s t r a t e g y . The n e x t exper iment a d d r e s s e s t h e issue of whether o r n o t d i s c o u r a g i n g a f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n s t r a t e g y w i l l promote t h e u t i l i z a t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n t h e r e s o l u t i o n of t h e t e s t s t r i n g .

Much o f t h e i n t u i t i v e a p p e a l of t h e f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n s t r a t e g y is t h e i d e a t h a t r e c o g n i t i o n of t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r could O C C U K on t h e b a s i s of o n l y a few f e a t u r e s and w i t h o u t t h e n e c e s s i t y of f u l l y r e s o l v i n g a l l f e a t u r e s o f t h e l e t t e r . The e f f e c t i v e n e s s of t h i s s t r a t e g y would be reduced i f t h e s p e c i f i c v i s u a l c o n f i g u r a t i o n of t h e t a r g e t , and t h u s t h e e x a c t form o f t h e c r i t i c a l f e a t u r e s , c o u l d n o t be p r e d i c t e d . One p r o c e d u r e would be t o have t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g appear i n s e v e r a l d i f f e r e n t f o n t s w i t h t h e f o n t of t h e t a r g e t a p p e a r i n g on a g i v e n tes t t r i a l be ing u n p r e d i c t a b l e . The p r e s e n t e x p e r i m e n t approximated t h i s method by p r e s e n t i n g t h e d i s p l a y s p r i n t e d h a l f i n uppercase l e t t e r s and h a l f i n l o w e r c a s e . Thus, t h e l e t t e r c a s e of t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r was n o t c o m p l e t e l y p r e d i c t a b l e . Whereas it might s t i l l be p o s s i b l e t o d e t e c t f e a t u r e s f o r u p p e r c a s e and lowercase l e t t e r s s i m u l t a n e o u s l y , t h e e x t r a e f f o r t s h o u l d reduce t h e e f f e c t i v e n e s s of t h e f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n s t r a t e g y . T h e r e f o r e , i t is p r e d i c t e d t h a t i f t h e f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n s t r a t e g y i s t h e cause of t h e small e f f e c t o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n a p r e c u e RT t a s k , t h e n a s i g n i f i c a n t l y l a r g e r e f f e c t should be observed i n t h e mixed-case c o n d i t i o n , where t h e e f f e c t i v e n e s s of t h e f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n s t r a t e g y w i l l be d i m i n i s h e d .

T a y l o r , M i l l e r , and J u o l a (1977) have r e p o r t e d t h a t mixing c a s e s d i s r u p t s t h e u t i l i z a t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n word p e r c e p t i o n . The amount of d i s r u p t i o n was found t o be a m o n o t o n i c a l l y i n c r e a s i n g f u n c t i o n of t h e number of t r a n s i t i o n s between c a s e s i n t h e s t r i n g t o be p e r c e i v e d . To minimize t h e d i s r u p t i v e i n f l u e n c e of c a s e t r a n s i t i o n s on t h e u t i l i z a t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c S t K U C t U K e , o n l y a s i n g l e t r a n s i t i o n between t h e t h i r d and f o u r t h l e t t e r s was used i n t h i s exper iment .

The p r o c e d u r e was t h e same as t h e e a r l i e r r e a c t i o n t i m e exper iment w i t h t h e f o l l o w i n g m o d i f i c a t i o n s . The t a r g e t l e t t e r was p r e s e n t e d a t t h e beginning of each t r i a l i n b o t h i t s uppercase and l o w e r c a s e forms. On each t r i a l , t h e t e s t s t r i n g was p r e s e n t e d s o t h a t e i t h e r t h e f i r s t t h r e e l e t t e r s were i n uppercase and t h e l a s t t h r e e l e t t e r s i n lowercase or t h e

Page 86: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 69

- 0

I 750-

I

w z I- 700-

5 I- 8 650-

o p p o s i t e OCCUKKed. The d e t a i l s of t h e method, p r o c e d u r e , and r e s u l t s a r e p r e s e n t e d i n Appendix 4.3.

O r t h o g r a p h i c S t r u c t u r e

F i g u r e 4.15 p r e s e n t s t h e mean r e a c t i o n times i n t h e t a s k a s a f u n c t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . There was o n l y a 7 msec advantage of words over r e g u l a r - h i g h pseudowords. The 30 msec advantage of r e g u l a r o v e r i r r e g u l a r s t r i n g s was s i g n i f i c a n t a s was t h e 1 4 msec a d v a n t a g e of s t r i n g s h i g h i n p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y r e l a t i v e t o s t r i n g s low i n p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y .

By mixing t h e c a s e s of t h e l e t t e r s i n t h e p r e s e n t s t u d y , t h e o v e r a l l e f f e c t of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n c r e a s e d from 34 msec i n t h e r e a c t i o n t i m e exper iment o f Study 1 t o 5 1 msec i n

800, , I 1 I I

F i g u r e 4.15

0 Catch

I-H I-L

R e a c t i o n time and p e r c e n t a g e c o r r e c t a s of d i s p l a y t y p e i n S tudy 3: Nixed-Case

a f u n c t i o n

Page 87: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

70 CHAPTER 4

t h e p r e s e n t mixed-case r e a c t i o n t i m e s t u d y . Mixing t h e c a s e s i n c r e a s e d t h e o v e r a l l r e a c t i o n t i m e by a b o u t 120 msec. I t i s , t h e r e f o r e , n e c e s s a r y t o ask whether t h e 17 msec i n c r e a s e f o r t h e e f f e c t o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e is meaningfu l . I f w e c a n assume t h a t t h e 120 msec i n c r e a s e i n RTs t o mixed-case d i s p l a y s r e p r e s e n t s t h e a d d i t i o n a l v i s u a l p r o c e s s i n g r e q u i r e d , t h e n t h e 17 msec i n c r e a s e i n o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e e f f e c t s may p r o v i d e a meaningfu l e v a l u a t i o n of t h e i n f l u e n c e of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n t h e RT t a s k . The i n c r e a s e i n t h e e f f e c t o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e r e l a t i v e t o t h e a d d i t i o n a l v i s u a l p r o c e s s i n g r e q u i r e d is 1 4 % . Even 1 4 % , however, may b e a n u n d e r e s t i m a t e of t h e s i z e of t h e e f f e c t o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e s i n c e t h e a d d i t i o n a l 120 msec of p r o c e s s i n g r e q u i r e d by mixed-case s t i m u l i may i n c l u d e a d d i t i o n a l t ime needed f o r t h e comparison p r o c e s s when t h e t a r g e t c a n occur i n e i t h e r uppercase o r l o w e r c a s e .

S i m i l a r i t y E f f e c t s

I f mixing t h e c a s e s a t t e n u a t e d t h e f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n s t r a t e g y t h e n w e would e x p e c t a d e c r e a s e i n t h e e f f e c t s o f t h e number of s i m i l a r n o n t a r g e t l e t t e r s i n t h e d i s p l a y on c a t c h t r i a l s . The s i m i l a r i t y a n a l y s e s a r e c o m p l i c a t e d by t h e m i x t u r e o f upper- and l o w e r c a s e s i n t h e s t r i n g . Because t h e c o n f u s i o n s e t s were d e r i v e d from c o n f u s i o n s o f lowercase l e t t e r s , a p p l i c a t i o n of these c o n f u s i o n s e t s t o t h e d a t a w i t h o u t r e g a r d t o l e t t e r c a s e s would n o t be a p p r o p r i a t e . T h e r e f o r e , a r e s t r i c t e d s i m i l a r i t y a n a l y s i s was done by examining o n l y t h e lowercase l e t t e r s i n t h e d i s p l a y s t r i n g s . When t h i s was done , t h e r e were o n l y two v i a b l e s i m i l a r i t y c a t e g o r i e s : z e r o and one s i m i l a r l e t t e r s . For t a r g e t t r i a l s t h e means were 658 and 658 msec f o r t h e zero and one c a t e g o r i e s r e s p e c t i v e l y . For c a t c h t r i a l s t h e s e means were 731 and 756 msec. These r e s u l t s r e p l i c a t e t h e RT t a s k i n S tudy 1; RTs f o r c a t c h t r i a l s b u t n o t t a r g e t t r i a l s i n c r e a s e w i t h t h e number of s i m i l a r n o n t a r g e t s i n t h e t e s t s t r i n g . Based on t h e s i m i l a r i t y a n a l y s e s , mixing t h e c a s e s d i d n o t appear t o a t t e n t u a t e t h e f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n s t r a t e g y . The exper iment p r o v i d e s mixed e v i d e n c e f o r t h e h y p o t h e s i s t h a t a f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n s t r a t e g y o c c u r s i n precue RT t a s k s . The e f f e c t o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e was i n c r e a s e d somewhat by mixing t h e c a s e s and i t might have been concluded t h a t use of a f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n s t r a t e g y was prec luded and more use made of o r t h o g r a p h i c con tex t . However, t h e f a i l u r e t o a t t e n u a t e s i m i l a r i t y e f f e c t s p r e c l u d e s any f i r m c o n c l u s i o n a b o u t t h e f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n s t r a t e g y . E i t h e r t h e s u b j e c t s

Page 88: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 7 1

p e r s i s t e d i n t h e now more d i f f i c u l t t a s k of l o o k i n g f o r f e a t u r e matches i n t w o - l e t t e r cases o r f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n is n o t t h e c o r r e c t e x p l a n a t i o n f o r t h e r e s u l t s of e i t h e r of t h e two e x p e r i m e n t s .

STUDY 4 : LIMITED V I E W I N G TIME

I n a n o t h e r a t t e m p t t o d i s c o u r a g e t h e f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n s t r a t e g y , s u b j e c t s were not g i v e n u n l i m i t e d viewing t i m e i n t h e r e a c t i o n time t a s k of t h e p r e s e n t e x p e r i m e n t . I n t h e RT t a s k ( S t u d i e s 1 and 3 ) , t h e s u b j e c t s were g i v e n u n l i m i t e d time and hence a l l of t h e v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n n e c e s s a r y f o r d e t a i l e d p e r c e p t u a l r e s o l u t i o n o f t h e s t i m u l u s d i s p l a y s . I n t h e a c c u r a c y task ( S t u d i e s 1 and 2 ) , viewing time was s h o r t e n e d so t h a t v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n was i n a d e q u a t e t o c l e a r l y r e s o l v e a l l of t h e d i s p l a y . D e c i s i o n s a t a f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n l e v e l may depend on t h e c e r t a i n t y t h a t a l l t h e v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n w i l l be r e s o l v e d . I f so , l i m i t i n g viewing time i n t h e RT t a s k s h o u l d i n c r e a s e t h e s i z e of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e e f f e c t s . S tudy 4 t e s t e d t h i s h y p o t h e s i s by g i v i n g t h e s u b j e c t s t h e d i s p l a y f o r a l i m i t e d time. However, i t was n o t p o s s i b l e t o l i m i t v iewing time a s s e v e r e l y a s i n t h e p r e v i o u s a c c u r a c y t a s k s and s t i l l m a i n t a i n e r r o r r a t e s low enough t o p e r m i t meaningfu l i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f RTs . S tudy 4 was a h y b r i d ; v iewing time was s h o r t e n e d and e r r o r r a t e s a l lowed t o r i s e b u t n e i t h e r was t a k e n t o e x t r e m e s .

The s t i m u l i and a p p a r a t u s were t h e same a s i n t h e r e a c t i o n time e x p e r i m e n t o f S tudy 1. Rather t h a n l e a v i n g t h e s t i m u l u s d i s p l a y on u n t i l t h e s u b j e c t responded, t h e d i s p l a y was p r e s e n t e d f o r o n l y 2 0 0 msec and fo l lowed immedia te ly by a masking s t i m u l u s . On t h e b a s i s of t h e p i l o t work, t h i s d u r a t i o n was chosen because i t n o t o n l y l i m i t e d viewing time b u t a l s o gave t h e s u b j e c t s u f f i c i e n t v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n t o respond r e a s o n a b l y a c c u r a t e l y . S i x t e e n s u b j e c t s were chosen from t h e same p o p u l a t i o n a s t h e e a r l i e r s t u d i e s . A l l o t h e r d e t a i l s a r e g i v e n i n Appendix 4 . 4 .

Or t h o g r a p h i c S t r u c t u r e

F i g u r e 4.16 p r e s e n t s t h e r e a c t i o n time f o r c o r r e c t r e s p o n s e s as a f u n c t i o n o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . A s can be seen i n t h e f i g u r e , no e f f e c t s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e were observed . Although o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e d i d n o t have a s i g n i f i c a n t e f f e c t on r e a c t i o n time, i t d i d a f f e c t

Page 89: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 2 CHAPTER 4

0 0

a c c u r a c y . The small d i f f e r e n c e s i n a c c u r a c y as a f u n c t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e were found t o be s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t . By l i m i t i n g t h e d i s p l a y d u r a t i o n , i t a p p e a r s t h a t t h e e x p e r i m e n t b e g i n s t o approximate a n a c c u r a c y e x p e r i m e n t , and t h e s m a l l e r e f f e c t s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e c a n s i m p l y be a t t r i b u t e d t o t h e o v e r a l l h i g h l e v e l of per formance .

S i m i l a r i t y E f f e c t s

Although a c c u r a c y v a r i e d s l i g h t l y w i t h d i f f e r e n c e s i n o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e , t h e r e were no s i g n i f i c a n t changes i n a c c u r a c y as a f u n c t i o n of t h e number of s i m i l a r n o n t a r g e t s i n t h e t e s t d i s p l a y . I n c o n t r a s t , t h e RTs c o n t i n u e d t o r e v e a l t h e c o n s i s t e n t f i n d i n g t h a t RTs on c a t c h t r i a l s i n c r e a s e d w i t h i n c r e a s e s i n t h e number of s i m i l a r n o n t a r g e t s whereas RTs on t a r g e t t r i a l s showed no e f f e c t . A c c o r d i n g l y , t h e r e s u l t s show

7001 1 I I I

F i g u r e 4 . 1 6 R e a c t i o n t i m e and p e r c e n t a g e c o r r e c t a s a f u n c t i o n of d i s p l a y t y p e i n S tudy 4 : Limi ted Viewing Time.

Page 90: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 7 3

t h a t an o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e e f f e c t i n terms of r e s p o n s e a c c u r a c y c a n c o e x i s t w i t h a s i m i l a r i t y e f f e c t on RT. T h i s r e s u l t r e v e a l s t h a t a f e a t u r a l d e t e c t i o n s t r a t e g y a s indexed by s i g n i f i c a n t s i m i l a r i t y e f f e c t s d o e s n o t p r e c l u d e a s i g n i f i c a n t c o n t r i b u t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . I t a p p e a r s t h a t o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e e f f e c t s can be found i n both a c c u r a c y and RT measures , b u t t h a t RT e f f e c t s a r e n o t a s r e l i a b l e o r s e n s i t i v e a s a c c u r a c y e f f e c t s .

T a r g e t V e r s u s Catch T r i a l s

T a r g e t t r i a l s ( 5 6 3 msec) were responded t o more q u i c k l y t h a n c a t c h t r i a l s ( 6 3 5 msec) whereas t h e r e was no s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e between t h e two k i n d s of t r i a l s i n t e r m s o f r e s p o n s e a c c u r a c y .

D i s c u s s i o n

The r e s u l t s d i s c o n f i r m t h e h y p o t h e s i s t h a t l i m i t i n g viewing time might i n c r e a s e t h e i n f l u e n c e of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e on RT. R e a c t i o n times were found t o be uni form o v e r c o n d i t i o n s . However, t h e p a t t e r n of e r r o r r a t e s r e f l e c t e d t h e i n f l u e n c e of s t r u c t u r e . L i m i t i n g v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n c l e a r l y h a s a n i n f l u e n c e on a c c u r a c y , and t h i s i n f l u e n c e is modulated by t h e p r e s e n c e of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . A s f o r t h e u n u s u a l l y uniform RTs, t h e y might r e f l e c t t h e s u b j e c t s having e s t a b l i s h e d and m a i n t a i n e d a se l f - imposed r e s p o n s e d e a d l i n e . T h e r e f o r e , any e f f e c t o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e would be r e f l e c t e d o n l y on per formance a c c u r a c y .

STUDY 5 : SPEEDED RT TASK WITH GOOD VISUAL INFORMATION

Study 5 t e s t s between two h y p o t h e s e s of t h e d i f f e r e n c e s i n t h e s e n s i t i v i t y o f t h e a c c u r a c y and RT t a s k s t o o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . According t o t h e f i r s t h y p o t h e s i s , t h e d i f f e r e n c e between t h e a c c u r a c y and RT t a s k s c o u l d be due t o a t r a d e - o f f between t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n of s t i m u l u s i n f o r m a t i o n and o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n t h e t a s k . There is abundant s t i m u l u s i n f o r m a t i o n i n t h e RT t a s k , and t h e r e f o r e , t h e r e may be v e r y l i t t l e o p p o r t u n i t y f o r knowledge a b o u t o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e t o c o n t r i b u t e t o per formance . I n t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k , on t h e o t h e r hand, t h e s t i m u l u s i n f o r m a t i o n is i n a d e q u a t e and c o n s e q u e n t l y , t h e r e i s c o n s i d e r a b l e o p p o r t u n i t y f o r

Page 91: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

74 CHAPTER 4

o r t h o g r a p h i c knowledge t o e x e r t an i n f l u e n c e . T h i s e x p l a n a t i o n i s c l e a r l y d i f f e r e n t from t h e f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n s t r a t e g y d i s c u s s e d e a r l i e r . I n t h e c a s e of a f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n s t r a t e g y , t h e r e is a n o p p o r t u n i t y f o r o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e t o e x e r t an i n f l u e n c e b u t a d e c i s i o n a b o u t t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g is made w i t h o u t u t i l i z i n g t h e s t r u c t u r e . By c o n t r a s t , i n t h e c a s e of a t r a d e - o f f between v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n and o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e , t h e comple te v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n p r e c l u d e s a c o n t r i b u t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e .

Evidence f o r t h e t r a d e - o f f between t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n s of s t i m u l u s i n f o r m a t i o n and knowledge comes from a number of RT e x p e r i m e n t s t h a t have i n d e p e n d e n t l y v a r i e d s t i m u l u s q u a l i t y and knowledge ( c . f . , Meyer, S c h v a n e v e l d t , & Ruddy, 1 9 7 5 ) . M a S S a K O ,

J o n e s , Lipscomb, and Scholz ( 1 9 7 8 ) , f o r example, had s u b j e c t s name a word a s q u i c k l y a s p o s s i b l e . The word was e i t h e r p r e s e n t e d u p r i g h t or was r o t a t e d 1 8 0 d e g r e e s i n t h e p i c t u r e p l a n e . The word was preceded by a word "b lank" or by a c a t e g o r y pr ime, which was t h e s u p e r o r d i n a t e c a t e g o r y name of t h e t e s t word. Pr iming w i t h t h e c a t e g o r y name i s t h e advance knowledge i n t h e task and it might b e e x p e c t e d t o f a c i l i t a t e p r o c e s s i n g of t h e t e s t word. T h e r e f o r e , RTs s h o u l d be f a s t e r on primed t h a n unprimed t r i a l s . Of c o u r s e , r o t a t i n g t h e t e s t words s h o u l d slow down t h e naming r e s p o n s e s i n c e t h e s t i m u l u s i n f o r m a t i o n is degraded; we a r e n o t used t o s e e i n g and r e a d i n g r o t a t e d t e x t . The r e s u l t s showed t h a t pr iming had a n o n s i g n i f i c a n t 7 msec f a c i l i t a t i o n when t h e words were p r e s e n t e d u p r i g h t b u t a s i g n i f i c a n t 1 2 1 msec e f f e c t when words were r o t a t e d 1 8 0 d e g r e e s . S i m i l a r r e s u l t s were found i n a l e x i c a l d e c i s i o n t a s k . With a good q u a l i t y t e s t d i s p l a y , p r iming had e s s e n t i a l l y no e f f e c t : g i v e n a poor q u a l i t y d i s p l a y , advance knowledge f a c i l i t a t e d per formance . I n t h e p r e s e n t e x p e r i m e n t s , g i v e n a good q u a l i t y d i s p l a y i n t h e RT t a s k , o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e had a small e f f e c t ; w i t h a poor q u a l i t y d i s p l a y i n t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k , o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e had a l a r g e e f f e c t .

The second h y p o t h e s i s is t h a t t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i s s i m i l a r i n t h e a c c u r a c y and RT t a s k s b u t t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k a l l o w s a more d i r e c t measure of t h e s i z e of t h i s c o n t r i b u t i o n . I n t h e RT t a s k where t h e v i s u a l d i s p l a y i s c l e a r l y v i s i b l e and viewing time u n l i m i t e d , t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g is r e s o l v e d v e r y q u i c k l y and t h e time t o r e s o l v e t h e l e t t e r s may be s m a l l r e l a t i v e t o t h e times f o r t h e remain ing p r o c e s s e s of s e a r c h , compar ison , d e c i s i o n , and r e s p o n s e s e l e c t i o n . Thus, t h e f a c i l i t a t i n g e f f e c t o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e might be l a r g e i n terms of t h e time s a v i n g s f o r

Page 92: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 75

v i s u a l r e s o l u t i o n , b u t s m a l l r e l a t i v e t o t h e o v e r a l l RT. For example, a 20 msec e f f e c t of s t r u c t u r e when v i s u a l r e s o l u t i o n t a k e s 100 msec w i t h o u t any c o n t r i b u t i o n of s t r u c t u r e would expand a 500 msec RT by o n l y 4 % . Even though t h i s 20% e f f e c t on v i s u a l r e s o l u t i o n is i m p o r t a n t , i t would appear s m a l l r e l a t i v e t o t h e o v e r a l l RT. By c o n t r a s t , t h e v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n i n t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k is l i m i t e d and e r r o r s a r e a d i r e c t consequence of l i m i t a t i o n s i n v i s u a l r e s o l u t i o n . Accord ingly , a f a c i l i t a t i o n of v i s u a l r e s o l u t i o n w i l l be more d i r e c t l y r e f l e c t e d i n a n improvement i n t a s k ac- c u r a c y . According t o t h i s h y p o t h e s i s , even though o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e c o n t r i b u t e s r o u g h l y t h e same a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n i n both t h e RT and a c c u r a c y t a s k s , t h e s i z e of RT e f f e c t w i l l appear s m a l l r e l a t i v e t o t h e a c c u r a c y e f f e c t .

I n o r d e r t o t e s t between t h e s e two h y p o t h e s e s , a n exper iment was c a r r i e d o u t i n which t h e r e a d e r would have good q u a l i t y v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n b u t a c c u r a c y r a t h e r t h a n RT would be t h e p r i m a r y dependent v a r i a b l e . ~f t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e is i n v e r s e l y r e l a t e d t o t h e q u a l i t y of t h e v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n a s p r e d i c t e d by t h e t r a d e - o f f h y p o t h e s i s , t h e n a v e r y s m a l l e f f e c t of s t r u c t u r e s h o u l d be a p p a r e n t on a c c u r a c y . However, i f t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n of s t r u c t u r e is independent of t h e q u a l i t y of t h e v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n and a c c u r a c y i s s imply a more d i r e c t measure , t h e n t h e t y p i c a l l a r g e e f f e c t s of s t r u c t u r e on a c c u r a c y s h o u l d be o b s e r v e d . Given t h a t a c c u r a c y is now t i e d t o 75% c o r r e c t , i t s h o u l d be a more d i r e c t index of t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n of s t r u c t u r e . T h e r e f o r e , t h e p r e s e n t e x p e r i m e n t p r o v i d e s a t e s t between t h e two h y p o t h e s e s w i t h o u t having t o compare a c c u r a c y e f f e c t s t o RT e f f e c t s . A m o d i f i c a t i o n of a speed-accuracy t r a d e - o f f paradigm which r e q u i r e s a speeded r e a c t i o n i n s y n c h r o n i z a t i o n w i t h a s i g n a l e v e n t (Reed, 1973) was used t o keep a v e r a g e per formance a t 75% c o r r e c t . The s u b j e c t s were g i v e n t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r fo l lowed by t h e d i s p l a y and were r e q u i r e d t o respond a s n e a r l y i n synchrony w i t h t h e o f f s e t of t h e d i s p l a y a s p o s s i b l e . Using a n a d a p t i v e a l g o r i t h m , a d i s p l a y d u r a t i o n was c a l c u l a t e d t o keep t h e s u b j e c t ' s o v e r a l l a c c u r a c y a t 75%. Because t h e d u r a t i o n of t h e d i s p l a y averaged around 500 msec, i t seems S a f e t o assume t h a t t h e s u b j e c t s have good q u a l i t y s t i m u l u s i n f o r m a t i o n . T h e r e f o r e , t h e t r a d e - o f f h y p o t h e s i s p r e d i c t s no e f f e c t of s t r u c t u r e whereas t h e h y p o t h e s i s t h a t a c c u r a c y i s a more d i r e c t measure t h a n RT p r e d i c t s a l a r g e e f f e c t O f

s t ruc ture .

Page 93: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

76 CHAPTER 4

Procedure

Eleven s t u d e n t s , s e l e c t e d from t h e same p o p u l a t i o n as t h o s e i n t h e e a r l i e r e x p e r i m e n t s , were t e s t e d on a s i n g l e day. A t a r g e t l e t t e r was p r e s e n t e d f o r 5 0 0 msec and fo l lowed by t h e t e s t d i s p l a y a f t e r an i n t e r v a l of 2 5 0 msec. The t e s t d i s p l a y d u r a t i o n was modi f ied e v e r y 20 t r i a l s t h r o u g h o u t t h e e x p e r i m e n t t o keep o v e r a l l per formance a t 75% c o r r e c t . S u b j e c t s were i n s t r u c t e d t o respond as c l o s e t o t h e s t i m u l u s o f f s e t as p o s s i b l e and t h e y were g i v e n feedback on t h i s t a s k a f t e r e a c h b lock of 2 0 t r i a l s . E s s e n t i a l l y , s u b j e c t s s imply l e a r n e d t o m a i n t a i n a p a r t i c u l a r r e s p o n s e time, n o t t o respond t o t h e o f f s e t of t h e d i s p l a y i t s e l f . None of t h e s u b j e c t s had any d i f f i c u l t y w i t h t h i s t a s k . D e t a i l s o f t h e method, p r o c e d u r e , and r e s u l t s a r e g i v e n i n Appendix 4.5.

550 -

500 -

450 -

0 Catch kB0lh ~

8 0 70

WORD R-H R-L I-H I-L

F i g u r e 4.17 R e a c t i o n time and p e r c e n t a g e c o r r e c t as a f u n c t i o n o f d i s p l a y t y p e i n S tudy 5: Speeded RT Task w i t h Good V i s u a l I n f o r m a t i o n .

Page 94: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 77

O r t h o g r a p h i c S t r u c t u r e

F i g u r e 4.17 p r e s e n t s t h e c o r r e c t r e a c t i o n times and r e s p o n s e a c c u r a c y a s a f u n c t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e ; t a r g e t and c a t c h t r i a l s a r e p l o t t e d s e p a r a t e l y . There was a 1 5 msec e f f e c t of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e on c o r r e c t r e a c t i o n times and a 1 . 9 % e f f e c t on a c c u r a c y . T h e r e f o r e , no s t r o n g e f f e c t of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e on e i t h e r RT o r a c c u r a c y was p r e s e n t . T h i s r e s u l t is c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e t r a d e - o f f h y p o t h e s i s whereby t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e is i n v e r s e l y r e l a t e d t o t h e q u a l i t y of t h e v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n i n t h e t e s t s t r i n g .

STUDY 6: SPEEDED RT TASK WITH POOR VISUAL INFORMATION

The speeded RT t a sk i n S tudy 5 p r o v i d e d e v i d e n c e t h a t t h e a c c u r a c y t a sk may g i v e l a r g e r e f f e c t s t h a n d o e s t h e RT t a s k because of t h e p o o r e r q u a l i t y o f t h e v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n i n t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k . A c c o r d i n g l y , g i v i n g good q u a l i t y i n f o r m a t i o n i n t h e speeded RT t a s k shows no e f f e c t of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e on r e s p o n s e a c c u r a c y . Before a c c e p t i n g t h i s c o n c l u s i o n , i t is i m p o r t a n t t o v e r i f y whether t h e speed-accuracy paradigm t h a t was used is i t s e l f s e n s i t i v e t o o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . I t could be t h e c a s e t h a t t h e p e r c e p t u a l s t a g e g o e s t o c o m p l e t i o n i n a l l c o n d i t i o n s and t h a t e r r o r s are s imply a f u n c t i o n of l a t e r s t a g e s such a s r e s p o n s e s e l e c t i o n . Any small d i f f e r e n c e s i n c o m p l e t i o n times of t h e p e r c e p t u a l s t a g e as a f u n c t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e may n o t s i g n i f i c a n t l y i n f l u e n c e t h e a c c u r a c y o f l a t e r s t a g e s of p r o c e s s i n g , and t h e r e f o r e , t h e d i f f e r e n c e s i n t h e p e r c e p t u a l s t a g e would n o t be r e f l e c t e d i n e i t h e r r e s p o n s e a c c u r a c y o r r e a c t i o n t i m e . To t e s t t h e s s n s i t i v i t y o f t h e speeded R T t a s k , i t is n e c e s s a r y t o r e p l i c a t e t h e t a s k w i t h poor q u a l i t y i n f o r m a t i o n . I f t h e t a s k is s e n s i t i v e and t h e e f f e c t of s t r u c t u r e is i n v e r s e l y r e l a t e d t o s t i m u l u s q u a l i t y , t h e n s i g n i f i c a n t e f f e c t s s h o u l d be found. I f t h e t a s k i s i n s e n s i t i v e t o t h e p e r c e p t u a l s t a g e , however, no e f f e c t of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e should be observed .

A s d i s c u s s e d p r e v i o u s l y , MaSSaL-0 e t a l . (1978) degraded t h e q u a l i t y o f test s t r i n g s by r o t a t i n g them 180 d e g r e e s i n t h e p i c t u r e p l a n e . Fol lowing t h i s approach , t h e speeded RT t a sk was r e p l i c a t e d w i t h t h e test s t r i n g s r o t a t e d i n t h e same manner. Given t h a t r o t a t i o n l o w e r s t h e q u a l i t y of t h e v i s u a l

Page 95: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

78 CHAPTER 4

650

600

550

i n f o r m a t i o n , a n e f f e c t of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e s h o u l d be observed i f t h e speeded RT t a s k i s s e n s i t i v e t o p e r c e p t u a l d i f f e r e n c e s due t o t h e o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . I f t h e t a s k i t s e l f is i n s e n s i t i v e t h e n no e f f e c t s of s t r u c t u r e s h o u l d be observed .

-

-

-

Procedure

The speeded RT t a s k i n S tudy 5 was r e p l i c a t e d e x a c t l y w i t h a new g r o u p of s t u d e n t s e x c e p t t h a t t h e t e s t s t r i n g s were r o t a t e d 18B d e g r e e s i n t h e p i c t u r e p l a n e r a t h e r t h a n p r e s e n t e d u p r i g h t . The t a r g e t l e t t e r was s t i l l p r e s e n t e d u p r i g h t . The d e t a i l s of t h e method, p r o c e d u r e , and r e s u l t s a r e p r e s e n t e d i n Appendix 4.6.

Or t h o g r a p h i c S t r u c t u r e

F i g u r e 4.18 p r e s e n t s t h e c o r r e c t r e a c t i o n times and accuracy performance. There was a 7 msec e f f e c t of s t r u c t u r e

700 - Catch

*------*Target

,-” a\.\. -.-./- -m

--

0 Catch

O m 8 WORD R-H R-L I-H I-L

F i g u r e 4.18 Reac t ion time and p e r c e n t a g e c o r r e c t as a f u n c t i o n of d i s p l a y t y p e i n S tudy 6 : Speeded RT Task w i t h Poor V i s u a l I n f o r m a t i o n .

Page 96: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 79

on c o r r e c t r e a c t i o n times and a 1 . 7 % e f f e c t on r e s p o n s e a c c u r a c y . The r e s u l t s o f t h i s e x p e r i m e n t a r e a d i r e c t r e p l i c a t i o n of t h o s e i n t h e p r e v i o u s speeded RT t a s k and t h e r e f o r e p r o v i d e s t r o n g e v i d e n c e f o r t h e i d e a t h a t t h e speeded RT t a s k is i n s e n s i t i v e t o p e r c e p t u a l d i f f e r e n c e s due t o t h e o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . Before t h i s c o n c l u s i o n is a c c e p t e d , however, i t w i l l be n e c e s s a r y t o v e r i f y t h a t o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e e f f e c t s d o occur w i t h r o t a t e d t e s t s t r i n g s i n o t h e r t a s k s . I n o r d e r t o have a d i r e c t l y a n a l o g o u s s i t u a t i o n t o t h e speeded RT t a s k s , t h e t a s k m u s t keep t h e t e s t s t r i n g i n view d u r i n g t h e p r o c e s s i n g p e r i o d . T h e r e f o r e , h i g h a c c u r a c y i s t o be e x p e c t e d and RT m u s t be t h e d e p e n d e n t measure.

STUDY 7 : HIGH-ACCURACY RT TASK WITH POOR VISUAL INFORMATION

Procedure

To v e r i f y t h a t o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e e f f e c t s d o o c c u r w i t h r o t a t e d t e s t s t r i n g s , t h e h igh-accuracy r e a c t i o n t i m e exper iment o f S t u d i e s 1 and 3 was r e p l i c a t e d b u t u s i n g r o t a t e d r a t h e r t h a n u p r i g h t t e s t s t r i n g s . An u p r i g h t t a r g e t l e t t e r was p r e s e n t e d fo l lowed by a r o t a t e d t e s t s t r i n g which remained i n view u n t i l t h e l a s t of up t o f o u r s u b j e c t s responded. S u b j e c t s performed a s q u i c k l y a s p o s s i b l e w h i l e m a i n t a i n i n g h i g h a c c u r a c y . The d e t a i l s o f t h e method, p r o c e d u r e , and r e s u l t s a r e p r e s e n t e d i n Appendix 4 . 7 .

O r t h o g r a p h i c S t r u c t u r e

R e a c t i o n t i m e s g e n e r a l l y i n c r e a s e d from words t o t h e i r r e g u l a r - l o w s t r i n g s . F i g u r e 4.19 shows t h a t o v e r a l l e f f e c t was 3 2 msec, which is h i g h l y s i m i l a r t o t h e e f f e c t s of s t r u c t u r e on normal ly p r e s e n t e d s t r i n g s ( c f . F i g u r e 4 . 9 ) . T h i s r e s u l t shows t h a t s t r u c t u r e e f f e c t s d o occur w i t h r o t a t e d s t i m u l i b u t t h a t t h e y a r e n o t l a r g e r t h a n t h e s t r u c t u r e e f f e c t s observed w i t h u p r i g h t s t i m u l i . The i d e a t h a t a t r a d e - o f f e x i s t s between s t i m u l u s q u a l i t y and o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e is n o t s u p p o r t e d by t h e s e r e s u l t s . I t a p p e a r s t h a t bo th a c c u r a c y t a s k s and h igh-accuracy RT t a s k s c a n r e v e a l o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e e f f e c t s b u t t h a t t h e speeded RT t a s k d o e s n o t .

Page 97: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

80 CHAPTER 4

SUMMARY OF ACCURACY AND REACTION TIME EXPERIMENTS

These e x p e r i m e n t s t e n d t o s u p p o r t t h e i d e a t h a t p e r c e p t u a l r e s o l u t i o n of a l e t t e r s t r i n g i s f a c i l i t a t e d t o t h e d e g r e e t h e l e t t e r s i n t h e s t r i n g a r e w e l l - s t r u c t u r e d . Both a c c u r a c y t a sks w i t h l i m i t e d s t i m u l u s i n f o r m a t i o n and h i g h a c c u r a c y RT t a s k s w i t h comple te s t i m u l u s i n f o r m a t i o n appear t o be s e n s i t i v e t o t h e e f f e c t s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . However, t h e magni tude of t h e RT e f f e c t a p p e a r s s m a l l e r because of t h e r e l a t i v e l y l a r g e o v e r a l l RT due t o t h e p r o c e s s i n g time r e q u i r e d f o r o t h e r t h a n v i s u a l p r o c e s s i n g s t a g e s i n t h e RT t a s k . I n c o n t r a s t , a v e r a g e per formance i n t h e a c c u r a c y task i s t i t r a t e d t o remain a t 75% c o r r e c t and t h i s p e r c e n t a g e measure is i n f l u e n c e d a l m o s t c o m p l e t e l y by t h e v i s u a l p r o c e s s i n g s t a g e s . The p o s t hoc e v a l u a t i o n of v a r i o u s measures of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n

H E-I F i g u r e 4.19 R e a c t i o n time and p e r c e n t a g e c o r r e c t a s a f u n c t i o n

of d i s p l a y t y p e i n S tudy 7 : High-accuracy RT Task w i t h Poor V i s u a l I n f o r m a t i o n .

Page 98: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 8 1

Chapter 5 w i l l a l l o w a more d i r e c t a s s e s s m e n t o f t h e s e n s i t i v i t y of per formance i n t h e RT and a c c u r a c y t a s k s .

A second i m p o r t a n t c o n t r i b u t i o n t o per formance is t h e f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n c o n t a i n e d i n t h e v i s u a l d i s p l a y . Performance i n b o t h t h e a c c u r a c y and RT t a s k is s e n s i t i v e t o t h e v i s u a l s i m i l a r i t y o f t h e t e s t l e t t e r s t o t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r . Performance on c a t c h t r i a l s is d i s r u p t e d t o t h e e x t e n t t h a t t h e t e s t d i s p l a y c o n t a i n s n o n t a r g e t l e t t e r s t h a t a re s i m i l a r t o t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r . Performance on t a r g e t t r i a l s is n o t s i g n i f i c a n t l y a f f e c t e d s i n c e p r o c e s s i n g i s p r i m a r i l y a f u n c t i o n of t a r g e t l e t t e r p r o c e s s i n g time. However, t h e r e was some h i n t t h a t s i m i l a r n o n t a r g e t s may be i n c o r r e c t l y confused f o r t h e t a r g e t on t a r g e t t r i a l s and, t h e r e f o r e , lead t o a c o r r e c t r e s p o n s e even though t h e t a r g e t i t s e l f was n o t r e c o g n i z e d on t h a t t r i a l .

I n c o n c l u s i o n , b o t h t h e a c c u r a c y and h i g h a c c u r a c y RT t a sks appear t o o f f e r good measures o f t h e u t i l i z a t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n v i s u a l p r o c e s s i n g . The speeded RT t a s k d o e s n o t r e v e a l e f f e c t s of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . B e f o r e e v a l u a t i n g s p e c i f i c d e s c r i p t i o n s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e , some r a t i n g e x p e r i m e n t s were c a r r i e d o u t t o a s s e s s t o what e x t e n t knowledge of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e is c o n s c i o u s l y a v a i l a b l e and c a n be r e p o r t e d .

OVERT JUDGMENTS

Whereas t h e a c c u r a c y and RT e x p e r i m e n t s imply t h a t v i s u a l r e c o g n i t i o n is s e n s i t i v e t o t h e p r e s e n c e of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e , i t is a l s o of i n t e r e s t t o d e t e r m i n e t o what e x t e n t s u b j e c t s a r e aware of t h i s knowledge. For t h i s p u r p o s e , s e v e r a l o v e r t judgment e x p e r i m e n t s were conducted . The same 200 s t i m u l u s items i n Appendix 4 . 1 B were p r e s e n t e d t o n a t i v e E n g l i s h s p e a k i n g c o l l e g e s t u d e n t s and judgments i n t h e form of r a t i n g s and p a i r e d judgments were o b t a i n e d . Answers t o t h e f o l l o w i n g q u e s t i o n s were s o u g h t . Could t h e r a t e r s r e l i a b l y a s s i g n r a t i n g s of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e t o t h e i t e m s ? Would t h e d imens ions u t i l i z e d by t h e r a t e r s d i s c r i m i n a t e t h e items a long our r e g u l a r i t y d imens ion , by p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y , or both? Would t h e r a t i n g s a s s i g n e d t o t h e items show any meaningfu l r e l a t i o n s h i p t o t h e i r p e r c e p t u a l a c c u r a c y and r e a c t i o n time r e s u l t s found i n t h e p r e v i o u s e x p e r i m e n t s ?

Page 99: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

8 2 CHAPTER 4

STUDY 8: TYPICALITY RATINGS

Three sets of r a t i n g s were o b t a i n e d . I n t h e f i r s t one o n l y t h e 160 meaningless anagrams were r a t e d . I n t h e s e c o n d , t h e words were t r a n s f o r m e d i n t o t h e most r e g u l a r pseudowords p o s s i b l e by t h e s u b s t i t u t i o n of a s i n g l e l e t t e r and t h e s e pseudowords were r a t e d a l o n g w i t h t h e anagrams. I n t h e t h i r d , t h e words themselves were i n c l u d e d a l o n g w i t h t h e anagrams. These t h r e e p r o c e d u r e s were used t o o b t a i n t h e most r e l i a b l e r a t i n g s p o s s i b l e and t o d e t e r m i n e how a l t e r a t i o n s i n t h e t o t a l set of items r a t e d a f f e c t e d t h e r a t i n g s o f t h e anagrams. A l l t h r e e r a t i n g s were o b t a i n e d under n e a r l y i d e n t i c a l i n s t r u c t i o n s which asked t h e r a t e r s t o b a s e t h e i r judgments on t h e s i m i l a r i t y o f t h e items t o E n g l i s h words where s i m i l a r i t y was d e f i n e d a s t y p i c a l i t y of E n g l i s h s p e l l i n g . Beyond t h e s e g e n e r a l i n s t r u c t i o n s , no s p e c i f i c a t t e m p t s were made t o i l l u s t r a t e e i t h e r s p e c i f i c r e g u l a r i t y r u l e s o r p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y c o n s t r a i n t s .

S u b j e c t s were asked t o r a t e how much t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g s look l i k e E n g l i s h words. The r a t i n g scale went from "most l i k e Engl i sh" t o " l e a s t l i k e E n g l i s h " on a s c a l e from 10 t o 1. C o l l e g e s t u d e n t s r a t e d t h e items i n one o f t h r e e c o n d i t i o n s . Seventy s u b j e c t s r a t e d o n l y t h e 160 anagrams. S i x t y - f i v e s u b j e c t s r a t e d t h e 160 anagrams p l u s 40 pseudowords which were d e r i v e d by m i s s p e l l i n g one l e t t e r i n each of t h e 40 word s t i m u l i . S i x t y - t h r e e s u b j e c t s r a t e d t h e 160 anagrams and t h e 40 words. S u b j e c t s were urged n o t t o a d o p t s t r a t e g i e s of t r y i n g t o see t h e items a s s i m i l a r t o s p e c i f i c words. Those s u b j e c t s t h a t r e c e i v e d a c t u a l words were t o l d t o d i s r e g a r d t h e s e m a n t i c c o n t e n t of t h e words and s i m p l y judge them on t h e b a s i s of t h e i r s i m i l a r i t y t o E n g l i s h s p e l l i n g . The method, p r o c e d u r e , and d e t a i l e d r e su l t s a r e p r e s e n t e d i n Appendix 4.8.

F i g u r e 4.20 shows t h e a v e r a g e r a t i n g s f o r t h e items f o r each of t h e t h r e e g r o u p s of s u b j e c t s . The r a t i n g s a s s i g n e d t o t h e 160 anagrams were v e r y s t a b l e a c r o s s t h e t h r e e r a t i n g c o n t e x t s . The s i x c o r r e l a t i o n s between a l l p o s s i b l e p a i r s of r a t i n g s a c r o s s t h e t h r e e c o n t e x t s were a l l .97. T h i s r e s u l t d e m o n s t r a t e s t h a t t h e r a t i n g s of t h e anagrams were n o t i n f l u e n c e d by t h e p r e s e n c e of a c t u a l words i n t h e sample of items t o be r a t e d . The f i g u r e a l s o shows t h a t t h e r a t i n g s were p r i m a r i l y de te rmined by t h e r e g u l a r i t y of t h e items r a t h e r t h a n by p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y . Although t h e e f f e c t of p o s i t i o n a l f requency was s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t , t h e r e s u l t s show t h a t

Page 100: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 8 3

r e g u l a r i t y produced a b o u t s e v e n times t h e e f f e c t t h a t p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y d i d .

The r e s u l t s i n d i c a t e t h a t when s u b j e c t s a r e asked t o r a t e items on t h e b a s i s of t h e s i m i l a r i t y t o E n g l i s h s p e l l i n g , t h e y t e n d t o e v a l u a t e t h e items i n terms o f n o t i o n s of r e g u l a r i t y r a t h e r t h a n i n t e r m s o f t h e p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y of t h e items. As c a n be s e e n i n t h e f i g u r e , t h e words were r a t e d a s more t y p i c a l t h a n even t h e r e g u l a r - h i g h anagrams. Even t h e pseudowords c r e a t e d by m i s s p e l l i n g t h e words by a s i n g l e l e t t e r produced h i g h e r r a t i n g s t h a n t h e r e g u l a r anagrams. T h i s r e s u l t means t h a t t h e word s t i m u l i and t h e i r m i s s p e l l i n g s were e i t h e r more t y p i c a l a c c o r d i n g t o t h e s u b j e c t ' s n o t i o n of E n g l i s h s p e l l i n g or t h a t t h e l e x i c a l c o n t e n t o f t h e words and p o s s i b l y t h e i r m i s s p e l l i n g s c o u l d n o t be ignored i n making t h e judgment .

If t h e r a t i n g s and t h e t a r g e t s e a r c h e x p e r i m e n t s are measur ing t h e same knowledge of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e , t h e n a

WORD R-H R-L I-H I-L

F i g u r e 4 . 2 0 R a t i n g s from 10 (most l i k e E n g l i s h ) t o 1 ( l e a s t l i k e E n g l i s h ) as a f u n c t i o n of d i s p l a y t y p e i n S tudy 8 : T y p i c a l i t y R a t i n g s .

Page 101: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

8 4 CHAPTER 4

c l o s e r e l a t i o n s h i p between t h e r a t i n g s and t h e RT and a c c u r a c y measures of t h e p r e v i o u s e x p e r i m e n t s s h o u l d be observed . Accord ingly , we examined t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p between t h e s e r a t i n g s and t h e p e r c e p t u a l per formance d a t a c o l l e c t e d i n S t u d i e s 1, 2 , and 3. Average RTs were o b t a i n e d f o r e a c h o f t h e 280 s t i m u l u s i t e m s by a v e r a g i n g t h e c o r r e c t r e s p o n s e RTs f o r t a r g e t and c a t c h t r i a l s from t h e r e a c t i o n time e x p e r i m e n t of Study 1 and t h e mixed-case exper iment o f S tudy 3. T h i s provided a n a v e r a g e RT f o r e a c h i tem based on a p p r o x i m a t e l y 204 o b s e r v a t i o n s . S i m i l a r l y , a n a v e r a g e a c c u r a c y was found f o r each item based on t h e t a r g e t and c a t c h t r i a l s f o r t h e s u b j e c t s i n t h e a c c u r a c y e x p e r i m e n t of S tudy 1 and t h e p r e c u e v e r s u s p o s t c u e exper iment of S tudy 2. The a v e r a g e a c c u r a c y o f e a c h item was based on 150 o b s e r v a t i o n s .

C o r r e l a t i o n s between t h e t h r e e r a t i n g s , a v e r a g e RT, and a v e r a g e a c c u r a c y a r e shown i n Table 4 . 4 . Two t h i n g s may be observed i n Table 4 . 4 . F i r s t , t h e c o r r e l a t i o n between t h e a c c u r a c i e s and RTs of a l l items was .56. T h e r e f o r e , d e s p i t e t h e magnitude of t h e observed d i f f e r e n c e s between RT and a c c u r a c y measures, b o t h e x p e r i m e n t a l p r o c e d u r e s appear t o r e v e a l a common p r o c e s s i n g component. T h i s w i l l become even more e v i d e n t i n t h e - c o r r e l a t i o n a l a n a l y s e s ( t o be d i s c u s s e d i n Chapter 5) which d e m o n s t r a t e t h a t b o t h item a c c u r a c y and RT tend t o show s i m i l a r c o r r e l a t i o n s w i t h v a r i o u s measures o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e .

The c o r r e l a t i o n s between item a c c u r a c y , RT, and t h e r a t i n g s a r e i l l u m i n a t i n g . C o r r e l a t i o n s between t h e two p e r c e p t u a l measures and t h e r a t i n g s a r e q u i t e h i g h . The p e r c e p t u a l measures and t h e r a t i n g s s h a r e 31% t o 53% common v a r i a n c e . Whereas t h e knowledge s t r u c t u r e s tapped by t h e r a t i n g p r o c e d u r e s need n o t n e c e s s a r i l y r e l a t e t o t h e knowledge s t r u c t u r e i n f e r r e d from t h e p e r c e p t u a l t a s k s , i t is e n c o u r a g i n g t o o b s e r v e t h a t t h e r e d o e s appear t o be a l a w f u l cor respondence . I t would appear t h a t what one knows a b o u t o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e n o t o n l y i n f l u e n c e s p e r c e p t i o n b u t a l s o i s amenable t o i n t e r r o g a t i o n by c o n s c i o u s p r o c e s s e s . A second encouraging a s p e c t of t h i s o b s e r v a t i o n is t h a t r a t i n g t a s k s and p e r c e p t u a l t a s k s may be regarded as converg ing measures o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . I f bo th t a p a common d a t a base of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e knowledge, t h e n w e can r e f i n e our unders tanding of t h i s knowledge s o u r c e by means of r a t i n g t a s k s as well a s p e r c e p t u a l t a sks . For t h e c o r r e l a t i o n a l a n a l y s e s i n Chapter 5 , i t e m a c c u r a c i e s , R T s , and r a t i n g s a r e e a c h r e g a r d e d

Page 102: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 85

Table 4 . 4 C o r r e l a t i o n s among a v e r a g e a c c u r a c y , a v e r a g e RT, and t h e t h r e e r e g u l a r i t y r a t i n g s f o r t h e 200 s t i m u l u s i tems .

(1) ( 2 ) ( 3 ) ( 4 ) ( 5 )

(1) Average a c c u r a c y --

( 2 ) Average RT -.56 --

( 3 ) R a t i n g w i t h o u t words .58* -.56* --

( 4 ) R a t i n g w i t h pseudowords .72 -.61 .97 --

( 5 ) R a t i n g w i t h words .73 -.60 .97 .97 --

* C o r r e l a t i o n based on t h e 160 anagrams o n l y , a l l o t h e r c o r r e l a t i o n s based on a l l 200 s t i m u l u s items.

as r e l a t e d c o l l a t e r a l dependent measures p o t e n t i a l l y r e v e a l i n g a common o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e component.

STUDY 9: POSITIONAL-FREQUENCY RATINGS

The r a t i n g s o f S tudy 8 i n d i c a t e t h a t s u b j e c t s , when g i v e n r e l a t i v e l y n e u t r a l i n s t r u c t i o n s , b a s e t h e i r r a t i n g s more on r e g u l a r i t y t h a n on p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y . B e f o r e we can c o n c l u d e t h a t t h e r e a d e r ' s c o n s c i o u s knowledge is b e s t r e p r e s e n t e d by r e g u l a r i t y , i t is n e c e s s a r y t o d e t e r m i n e whether s u b j e c t s c a n be i n s t r u c t e d t o respond on t h e b a s i s of p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y i n f o r m a t i o n . A c c o r d i n g l y , t h e r a t i n g exper iment w i t h o n l y 160 anagrams was r e p l i c a t e d b u t now t h e s u b j e c t s were g i v e n s p e c i f i c p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y i n s t r u c t i o n s . The i n s t r u c t i o n s e x p l a i n e d t h e c o n c e p t of p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y a l o n g w i t h r e l e v a n t examples and t o l d t h e s u b j e c t s t o r a t e t h e i t e m s e x p l i c i t l y on t h i s b a s i s . The e x a c t i n s t r u c t i o n s ,

Page 103: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

86 CHAPTER 4

9 -

8 -

7 -

6 -

6 5 -

a 4 -

3 -

2 -

method, and p r o c e d u r e a r e g i v e n i n t h e Appendix 4 . 9 . Except f o r t h e i n s t r u c t i o n s , t h e p r o c e d u r e r e p l i c a t e d t h e p r e v i o u s r a t i n g exper iment t h a t gave i n s t r u c t i o n s w i t h r e s p e c t t o t y p i c a l i t y o f E n g l i s h s p e l l i n g . The r e s u l t s and d e t a i l e d a n a l y s e s a r e g i v e n i n Appendix 4 . 9 .

F i g u r e 4 . 2 1 g i v e s t h e r e s u l t s o f t h i s e x p e r i m e n t s t r e s s i n g p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c i e s a l o n g w i t h t h e r e s u l t s of t h e p r e v i o u s exper iment s t r e s s i n g t y p i c a l i t y . The r e s u l t s show t h a t t h e r a t i n g r e s p o n s e s were v e r y s i m i l a r w i t h both s e t s o f i n s t r u c t i o n s . However, p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y d i d m a k e more of a c o n t r i b u t i o n w i t h p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y i n s t r u c t i o n s t h a n w i t h t y p i c a l i t y i n s t r u c t i o n s . O v e r a l l , s u b j e c t s tended t o r a t e h i g h p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y items a s s l i g h t l y h i g h e r t h a n low p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y items t o a g r e a t e r d e g r e e w i t h p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y i n s t r u c t i o n s t h a n w i t h t y p i c a l i t y i n s t r u c t i o n s . Also , t h e e f f e c t of r e g u l a r i t y on t h e judgments

1-

I I 1 I I

TLPblfiY , .. " ... D-.-..O Poeltlonal Frequency

F i g u r e 4 . 2 1 R a t i n g s from 1 0 (most l i k e E n g l i s h ) t o 1 ( l e a s t l i k e E n g l i s h ) as a f u n c t i o n of d i s p l a y t y p e f o r t y p i c a l i t y i n s t r u c t i o n s (S tudy 8 ) and p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y i n s t r u c t i o n s (S tudy 9 ) .

Page 104: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 87

was s l i g h t l y a t t e n t u a t e d w i t h p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y i n s t r u c t i o n s r e l a t i v e t o t y p i c a l i t y i n s t r u c t i o n s .

The r a t i n g e x p e r i m e n t s i n d i c a t e t h a t o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n terms of r e g u l a r i t y a p p e a r s t o be more c o n s c i o u s l y a v a i l a b l e t h a n s t r u c t u r e i n t e r m s of p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y . S u b j e c t s t e n d t o r a t e r e g u l a r items a s most l i k e E n g l i s h and i r r e g u l a r items as l e a s t l i k e E n g l i s h r e g a r d l e s s of whether t h e y were g i v e n t y p i c a l i t y i n s t r u c t i o n s O K p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y i n s t r u c t i o n s . One l i m i t a t i o n i n t h e r a t i n g e x p e r i m e n t s may b e t h a t s u b j e c t s tend t o r a t e t h e items on t h e b a s i s of r e g u l a r i t y r e g a r d l e s s of t h e i n s t r u c t i o n s t h a t a r e g i v e n . T h e r e f o r e , a more d i r e c t index of t h e p s y c h o l o g i c a l r e a l i t y o f t h e s e two c o n c e p t s a s d e s c r i p t i o n s of o r t h o g r a p h i c S t r u c t u r e s h o u l d be o b t a i n e d .

STUDY l a : REGULARITY VERSUS POSITIONAL-FREQUENCY JUDGMENTS

I n o r d e r t o o b t a i n a more d i r e c t index of o r t h o g r a p h i c S t r u c t u r e , p r e c i s e r e g u l a r i t y i n s t r u c t i o n s were c o n t r a s t e d w i t h p r e c i s e p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y i n s t r u c t i o n s . I t e m s from e a c h of t h e f o u r t y p e s of 160 anagrams were p a i r e d w i t h each o t h e r such t h a t items of one t y p e were p a i r e d w i t h items of t h e same t y p e o r w i t h items of t h e o t h e r t y p e s . Some s u b j e c t s were g i v e n p a i r s of items and asked t o p i c k t h e i t e m from each p a i r t h a t was most r e g u l a r . Other s u b j e c t s were g i v e n t h e same p a i r s and asked t o p i c k t h e i tem t h a t was h i g h e s t i n t e r m s of p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y . The i n s t r u c t i o n s , method, pKOCedUKe, and r e s u l t s a r e g i v e n i n Appendix 4.10. T h i s exper iment a l lowed a d i r e c t a s s e s s m e n t of t h e r e l a t i v e weight c a r r i e d by o r t h o g r a p h i c r e g u l a r i t y and p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y i n t h e r e a d e r ' s e v a l u a t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . The judgments of t h e s e two g r o u p s of s u b j e c t s were t a b u l a t e d a s t h e p r o p o r t i o n of times t h e y c h o s e an item from one c a t e g o r y when it was p a i r e d w i t h a n item from a n o t h e r c a t e g o r y . These r e s u l t s a r e p r e s e n t e d a s T a b l e 4 . 5 where t h e c e l l s of t h e t a b l e g i v e t h e p r o p o r t i o n of times an i t e m from t h e column c a t e g o r y was s e l e c t e d when p a i r e d w i t h an item from t h e T O W c a t e g o r y .

Before d i s c u s s i n g t h e a c t u a l r e s u l t s i n Table 4 .5 , i t is i n s t r u c t i v e t o h y p o t h e s i z e how t h i s t a b l e s h o u l d have t u r n e d o u t i f t h e s u b j e c t s i n t h e two c o n d i t i o n s had a comple te knowledge o f r e g u l a r i t y and p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y and had a p p l i e d t h i s knowledge i n accordance w i t h t h e i n s t r u c t i o n s . Whenever t h e two items d i f f e r e d on t h e d imens ion r e l e v a n t f o r

Page 105: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

88 CHAPTER 4

Table 4.5 Paired-judgment preferences for the 200 stimuli under regularity and positional-frequency instructions. Cells represent proportion of times the column item was chosen over the row item. The numbers in parentheses give the hypothetical outcomes assuming that the subject had knowledge of both dimensions and followed instructions.

Regularity Instructions

R- H R- L I-H I-L

R- H .475 (.5)

R- L ,693 .445 (.5) C.5)

I-H .910 .a77 .523 (1.0) (1.0) (.5)

I-L .938 .908 .509 .518 11.0) (1.0) (.5) ( . 5 )

Positional Frequency Instructions

R- H R- L I-H I-L

R- H .527 (.5)

R- L .704 .488 (1.0) (.5)

I - H .866 .740 .525 (-5) (.0) (.5)

I-L .953 .a95 .687 .494 (1.0) (.5) (1.0) (.5)

Page 106: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

EXPERIMENTS ON LETTER AND WORD PERCEPTION 89

Table 4.6 Chi -square f o r t h e two p r e d i c t e d outcomes a g a i n s t t h e observed outcomes f o r t h e two i n s t r u c t i o n c o n d i t i o n s i n s t u d y 10 .

P r e d i c t e d Outcome

P o s i t i o n a l I n s t r u c t i o n s R e g u l a r i t y Frequency

R e g u l a r i t y 93.63 1561.26

P o s i t i o n a l Frequency 258.90 1367.50

t h e judgment , t h e s u b j e c t s s h o u l d have a lways chosen t h e " c o r r e c t item," on t h a t d i m e n s i o n , i . e . , t h e one t h a t was more r e g u l a r or t h e one t h a t was h i g h e r i n p o s i t i o n a l f requency . Whenever t h e two items were a t e q u i v a l e n t l e v e l s on t h e r e l e v a n t d imens ion , t h e s u b j e c t s s h o u l d have chosen i n d i f f e r e n t l y between them. These " p e r f e c t " h y p o t h e t i c a l outcomes a r e a l s o shown i n Table 4.5.

Comparing t h e two p a n e l s o f Table 4.5 we o b s e r v e t h a t f o r bo th sets of i n s t r u c t i o n s , s u b j e c t s made c h o i c e s more c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e a p p l i c a t i o n of r e g u l a r i t y t h a n w i t h t h e a p p l i c a t i o n of p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y . I n o r d e r t o assess how w e l l t h e r e su l t s conformed t o what would be e x p e c t e d from p e r f e c t knowledge and u t i l i z a t i o n of r e g u l a r i t y o r p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y , t h e two p r e d i c t e d outcomes were compared w i t h t h e ac tua l outcomes under b o t h i n s t r u c t i o n c o n d i t i o n s . Table 4.6 g i v e s t h e Chi -square v a l u e s f o r compar isons of t h e two p r e d i c t e d outcomes a g a i n s t t h e observed outcomes f o r b o t h i n s t r u c t i o n c o n d i t i o n s . The value 's s u p p o r t t h e i n t e r p r e t a t i o n t h a t t h e s u b j e c t s ' performance is more a d e q u a t e l y d e s c r i b e d by r e g u l a r i t y t h a n p o s i t i o n a l f requency . However, though s u b j e c t s appear t o be u s i n g m o s t l y r e g u l a r i t y a s a b a s i s of t h e i r r a t i n g s , i n n e i t h e r c a s e d i d t h e r a t i n g s i n d i c a t e t h a t o n l y r e g u l a r i t y was u s e d . I f we compare t h e two p a n e l s of Table 4.5 t o each o t h e r , we s e e t h a t t h e r e was a n a d d i t i o n a l c o n t r i b u t i o n of p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y when s u b j e c t s were e x p l i c i t l y i n s t r u c t e d t o b a s e t h e i r judgments on f r e q u e n c y . E v i d e n t l y , s u b j e c t s c a n modify t h e i r judgments s l i g h t l y when g i v e n e x p l i c i t i n s t r u c t i o n s t o a t t e n d t o p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y .

Page 107: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

CHAPTER 4

SUMMARY OF OVERT JUDGMENT EXPERIMENTS

The e x p e r i m e n t s s u p p o r t t h e i d e a t h a t knowledge of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e is c o n s c i o u s l y a v a i l a b l e and c a p a b l e of r e p o r t . S u b j e c t s a re r e l a t i v e l y good a t a s s i g n i n g r a t i n g s on t h e b a s i s of ru le -governed r e g u l a r i t y b u t r e l a t i v e l y poor a t r a t i n g items on t h e b a s i s of s t a t i s t i c a l redun- dancy. S i m i l a r l y , choos ing which of a p a i r of items i s more r e g u l a r is r e l a t i v e l y e a s y whereas c h o o s i n g which is more f r e q u e n t is n e a r l y i m p o s s i b l e . The p o s t hoc c o r r e l a t i o n s i n Chapter 5 w i l l a l l o w a more d i r e c t and b r o a d e r a s s e s s m e n t of t h e n a t u r e of t h e knowledge u t i l i z e d i n o v e r t judgments of l e t t e r s t r i n g s .

Page 108: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 4 . 1 9 1

Appendix 4 . 1

D e t a i l s o f Method, P r o c e d u r e , and R e s u l t s o f S tudy 1: I n i t i a l R e p l i c a t i o n

Method

S u b j e c t s . One g r o u p of 1 4 I n t r o d u c t o r y Psychology s t u d e n t s p a r t i c i p a t e d i n t h e p o s t c u e a c c u r a c y t a s k f o r an t,t,>-, a day on each o f 2 c o n s e c u t i v e d a y s . The d a t a from t h r c a d d i t i o n a l sub jec t s were l o s t due t o computer sys tem f , i i l u r . S i x o t h e r s u b j e c t s were t e s t e d b u t t h e i r d a t a were n o t i n c l i r l e d because of i n a d m i s s i b l e o v e r a l l a c c u r a c y . Another g r o u p o f 14 IntKOdUCtOKy Psychology s t u d e n t s p a r t i c i p a t e d f o r a n hour e a c h day on 2 c o n s e c u t i v e d a y s i n t h e p r e c u e RT t a s k . A l l s u b j e c t s i n b o t h t a s k s passed a p r e l i m i n a r y v i s i o n t e s t e s t a b l i s h i n g a t l e a s t 20/40 a c u i t y f o r bo th e y e s . A l l s u b j e c t s were awarded r e s e a r c h p a r t i c i p a t i o n c r e d i t toward t h e i r psychology g r a d e .

S t i m u l i . A l i s t i n g of t h e 100 h i g h e s t and 108 l o w e s t summed s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y anagrams were o b t a i n e d f o r s e v e r a l hundred common s i x - l e t t e r words selected from t h e Kucera and F r a n c i s (1967) word l i s t . The l i s t i n g s o f t h e anagrams were produced by a computer program which g e n e r a t e d a l l 720 p o s s i b l e p e r m u t a t i o n s f o r each s i x - l e t t e r word. The p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y f o r each p e r m u t a t i o n was computed from t h e Mayzner and T r e s s e l t (1965) s i n g l e - l e t t e r c o u n t s f o r s i x - l e t t e r words by summing t h e p o s i t i o n - d e p e n d e n t f r e q u e n c y for e a c h l e t t e r . Words w i t h r e p e a t e d l e t t e r s were n o t used. From t h e 720 anagrams f o r e a c h s i x - l e t t e r word, two were chosen w i t h h i g h - p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c i e s and two were chosen w i t h l o w - p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c i e s . Wi th in e a c h f r e q u e n c y p a i r , one member was o r t h o g r a p h i c a l l y r e g u l a r ahd t h e o t h e r o r t h o g r a p h i c a l l y i r r e g u l a r . The r u l e s used f o r j u d g i n g r e g u l a r i t y a r e l i s t e d i n Appendix 4 . 1 A . L i s t e d i n Appendix 4 . 1 8 a r e t h e 200 s t i m u l u s i t ems-- the 40 words and t h e 4 anagrams of each word. One-hundred twenty p r a c t i c e s t i m u l i were g e n e r a t e d from 2 4 a d d i t i o n a l words. These i t e m s were n o t a s e v e n l y matched f o r r e g u l a r i t y and p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y a s t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l i t e m s and a few c o n t a i n e d r e p e a t e d l e t t e r s .

Two o c c u r r e n c e s of each o f t h e 120 p r a c t i c e s t i m u l i were randomized f o r e a c h s u b j e c t ' s p r a c t i c e sequence and two o c c u r r e n c e s of e a c h of t h e 200 e x p e r i m e n t a l s t i m u l i were randomized f o r e a c h s u b j e c t ' s e x p e r i m e n t a l sequence . One o c c u r r e n c e was t e s t e d a s a t a r g e t t r i a l and one a s a c a t c h

Page 109: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

92 CHAPTER 4

t r i a l . On t a r g e t t r i a l s . t h e l e t t e r was s e l e c t e d randomly w i t h rep lacement from t h e s i x l e t t e r s i n t h e t e s t s t r i n g . For c a t c h t r i a l s , a t a r g e t was s e l e c t e d randomly from t h e s e t of 26 l e t t e r s weighted by t h e i r p r o b a b i l i t y o f o c c u r r e n c e i n t h e s t i m u l u s s e t . If t h e s e l e c t e d l e t t e r was p r e s e n t i n t h e d i s p l a y s t r i n g , a d d i t i o n a l drawings w i t h rep lacement were made u n t i l a n a p p r o p r i a t e t a r g e t l e t t e r was s e l e c t e d . The l e t t e r s 1, k, 9, 5 , and 2 d i d n o t o c c u r i n t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l s t i m u l u s s t r i n g s and t h e r e f o r e were never t e s t e d .

The d i s p l a y s were p r e s e n t e d on a Beehive model v i d e o computer t e r m i n a l under t h e c o n t r o l o f a H a r r i s DC6024/5 computer . Hardware m o d i f i c a t i o n s p e r m i t t e d t h e t e r m i n a l ' s v i d e o t o be t u r n e d on and o f f wi th program-generated c o n t r o l s i g n a l s . The d i s p l a y s t r i n g s were loaded i n t o t h e memory b u f f e r of t h e t e r m i n a l w i t h t h e v i d e o o f f and t h e n t h e v i d e o was t u r n e d on f o r t h e a p p r o p r i a t e e x p o s u r e d u r a t i o n . The Beehive employs a P4, b lue-whi te phosphor which d e c a y s t o . l% of maximum luminance w i t h i n 32 msec. The exper iment was conducted i n a p a r t i a l l y darkened room t o enhance image c o n t r a s t .

A l l s i n g l e - l e t t e r t a r g e t and l e t t e r - s t r i n g t e s t d i s p l a y s were p r e s e n t e d i n l o w e r c a s e l e t t e r s . The Beehive u s e s a 5 x 7 d o t m a t r i x , 2.5 mm wide x 5 mm h i g h , A t t h e a v e r a g e s u b j e c t ' s viewing d i s t a n c e of a p p r o x i m a t e l y 38 cm, t h e s i x - l e t t e r s t r i n g s subtended a h o r i z o n t a l v i s u a l a n g l e of 2.25 d e g r e e s and a v e r t i c a l v i s u a l a n g l e of .75 d e g r e e . The d i s p l a y s were p r e s e n t e d i n t h e upper c e n t e r of t h e s c r e e n . The s i n g l e - l e t t e r t a r g e t was p o s i t i o n e d t o a p p e a r t h r e e c h a r a c t e r p o s i t i o n s t o t h e l e f t of t h e s t r i n g d i s p l a y , a h o r i z o n t a l v i s u a l a n g l e s e p a r a t i o n of .75 d e g r e e . To a c h i e v e a r a p i d and c o n t r o l l e d p r e s e n t a t i o n r a t e , t h e e n t i r e d i s p l a y sequence f o r a n item was d i s p l a y e d b e n e a t h a c a r d b o a r d mask a f f i x e d t o t h e f a c e of t h e c a t h o d e r a y t u b e ( C R T ) . A r e c t a n g u l a r window i n t h e mask s e r v e d a s a f i x a t i o n box and p e r m i t t e d o n l y t h e d e s i r e d p o r t i o n of t h e d i s p l a y t o be o b s e r v e d .

-___ Procedure . The s u b j e c t s i n t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k were informed t h a t t h e exposure d u r a t i o n would be b r i e f and would be a d j u s t e d d u r i n g t h e s e s s i o n t o m a i n t a i n a n a c c u r a c y o f 75%. A

t r i a l began w i t h t h e p r e s e n t a t i o n of t h e s i x - l e t t e r s t i m u l u s s t r i n g f o r a b r i e f d u r a t i o n . A f t e r t h e a p p r o p r i a t e e x p o s u r e d u r a t i o n , t h e d i s p l a y was s c r o l l e d upward on t h e CRT r e p l a c i n g t h e s t r i n g w i t h a masking s t i m u l u s c o n s i s t i n g of s i x u p p e r c a s e - Xs. The masking s t i m u l u s was p r e s e n t e d f o r 208 msec t h e n s c r o l l e d a g a i n t o p r e s e n t t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r . The t a r g e t l e t t e r remained i n view u n t i l t h e s u b j e c t responded, a t which t i m e t h e

% p a r a t u s .

Page 110: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 4 . 1 93

d i s p l a y was t e r m i n a t e d and a 500 msec i n t e r t r i a l i n t e r v a l begun.

The e x p o s u r e d u r a t i o n of t h e t e s t s t r i n g was i n d i v i d u a l l y d e t e r m i n e d f o r each s u b j e c t d u r i n g t h e p r a c t i c e t r i a l s . Because of t h e 60 Hz r e f r e s h r a t e o f t h e CRT one r e f r e s h c y c l e (16.7 msec) was chosen a s t h e b a s i c t i m e u n i t . The number of c y c l e s needed t o a c h i e v e a n o v e r a l l a c c u r a c y l e v e l of 75% was d e t e r m i n e d o n - l i n e u s i n g a v e r s i o n of t h e a d a p t i v e PEST a l g o r i t h m ( T a y l o r & Creelman, 1 9 6 7 ) . Exposure d u r a t i o n was n o t changed d u r i n g t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l t r i a l s . The i n i t i a l e x p o s u r e d u r a t i o n was 20 c y c l e s (334 msec) f o r a l l s u b j e c t s . The r a n g e of e x p o s u r e s needed by t h e 1 4 s u b j e c t s f o r 75% a c c u r a c y was 1 t o 1 2 c y c l e s w i t h a median e x p o s u r e d u r a t i o n o f 3 c y c l e s (50 msec).

The s u b j e c t s i n t h e RT t a s k were i n s t r u c t e d t o respond a s r a p i d l y and a s a c c u r a t e l y a s p o s s i b l e . A l l s u b j e c t s were a l s o t o l d t h a t one-ha l f o f t h e t r i a l s would be t a r g e t t r i a l s and one-ha l f would be c a t c h t r i a l s . The d i s p l a y sequence was a l t e r e d t o accommodate t h e p r e c u i n g . A t r i a l began w i t h t h e p r e s e n t a t i o n of t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r a t t h e l e f t of t h e f i x a t i o n window f o r 500 msec. The t a r g e t l e t t e r was t h e n t e r m i n a t e d and 1 sec l a t e r t h e s t i m u l u s s t r i n g was d i s p l a y e d . The s t i m u l u s remained i n view u n t i l t h e s u b j e c t responded, a t which time t h e d i s p l a y was t e r m i n a t e d and a 500 msec i n t e r v a l begun. A masking f i e l d was n o t used .

To a c q u a i n t s u b j e c t s i n b o t h t h e a c c u r a c y and RT t a s k s w i t h t h e r e s p o n s e p r o c e d u r e and v i s u a l d i s p l a y , e a c h d a y ' s s e s s i o n began w i t h 10 t r i a l s c o n s i s t i n g of o n l y t h e word YES o r NO i n s t e a d of t h e d i s p l a y s t r i n g . No t a r g e t l e t t e r was p r e s e n t e d . The s u b j e c t s p r e s s e d t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g l y l a b e l e d r e s p o n s e b u t t o n s . The YES r e s p o n s e was a s s i g n e d t o e a c h s u b j e c t ' s p r e f e r r e d hand ( r i g h t hand f o r 9 of t h e 1 4 s u b j e c t s i n t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k ; 13 o f t h e 1 4 s u b j e c t s i n t h e RT t a s k ) .

The "yes-no" t r i a l s were fo l lowed by t h e 240 p r a c t i c e t r i a l s and t h e 400 e x p e r i m e n t a l t r i a l s . The p r a c t i c e t r i a l s were d i v i d e d i n t o f o u r 60 t r i a l b l o c k s and t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l t r i a l s were d i v i d e d i n t o f i v e 8 0 - t r i a l b l o c k s . A t t h e end of each b lock t h e s u b j e c t was g i v e n an o p p o r t u n i t y t o r e s t and r e c e i v e d feedback i n t h e form of a p e r c e n t c o r r e c t s c o r e o r RT and e r r o r r a t e , a s a p p r o p r i a t e , for t h e p r e c e d i n g b l o c k . A l l s u b j e c t s were t e s t e d i n two such s e s s i o n s s c h e d u l e d on c o n s e c u t i v e d a y s .

Page 111: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

94 CHAPTER 4

Re s u l t s

O r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . Analyses o f v a r i a n c e were c a r r i e d o u t on t h e a v e r a g e p e r c e n t a g e c o r r e c t f o r e a c h s u b j e c t f o r e a c h of t h e 5 d i s p l a y t y p e s and t a r g e t v e r s u s c a t c h t r i a l s . For t h e accuracy t a s k , t h e main e f f e c t of d i s p l a y t y p e was s i g n i f i c a n t , - F ( 4 , 52) = 82.56, E < .001, and t h e d i f f e r e n c e s among t h e s e c o n d i t i o n s were t e s t e d w i t h s p e c i f i c c o n t r a s t s . Accuracy f o r words was 12% g r e a t e r t h a n f o r t h e b e s t pseudoword items ( r e g u l a r - h i g h ) , E (1, 52) = 40.54, E < .001. Three o r t h o g o n a l c o n t r a s t s ana logous t o a 2 x 2 a n a l y s i s o f v a r i a n c e f o r t h e f o u r nonword d i s p l a y t y p e s r e v e a l e d t h a t t h e r e g u l a r s t r i n g s were judged 8% more a c c u r a t e l y t h a n i r r e g u l a r s t r i n g s , E (1, 52) = 7.05, E < .01. High p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y s t r i n g s were judged 5% more a c c u r a t e l y t h a n low p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y s t r i n g s , E (1, 52) = 7.05, E < .01. The i n t e r a c t i o n of p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y and r e g u l a r i t y was n o t s i g n i f i c a n t , 2 (1, 52) = 3.20, p > .05.

For t h e RT a n a l y s i s , RTs f o r i n c o r r e c t t r i a l s and c o r r e c t t r i a l RTs which exceeded 2 sec ( l e s s t h a n .2% o f t h e d a t a ) were exc luded from t h e a n a l y s e s l e a v i n g a p p r o x i m a t e l y 76 o f 80 p o s s i b l e o b s e r v a t i o n s p e r c e l l . For t h e RT d a t a , t h e r e was a l s o a s i g n i f i c a n t main e f f e c t of d i s p l a y t y p e , 1 ( 4 , 52) = 17.16, E < .001. T h i s main e f f e c t was examined w i t h t h e same s e t of s p e c i f i c c o n t r a s t s . The 7 msec advantage f o r words o v e r r e g u l a r - h i g h pseudowords was n o t s i g n i f i c a n t , E (1, 52) = 2.01, E > .10. Regular items were judged 23 msec f a s t e r t h a n i r r e g u l a r items, a s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e , E (1, 52) = 9.54, E < .005. N e i t h e r t h e 4 msec d i f f e r e n c e between h i g h and low p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y nor t h e i n t e r a c t i o n of r e g u l a r i t y and p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y were s i g n i f i c a n t , b o t h Es < 1. E r r o r p e r c e n t a g e s were a n a l y z e d s i m i l a r l y t o t h e RTs. The main e f f e c t of d i s p l a y t y p e was n o t s i g n i f i c a n t , E ( 4 , 52) = 1.13.

S i m i l a r i t y a n a l y s e s . To t e s t f o r t h e e f f e c t s of s i m i l a r i t y between t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r and t h e l e t t e r s i n t h e d i s p l a y , t h e d a t a were f i r s t pooled a c r o s s d i s p l a y t y p e s . Each t r i a l ' s t a r g e t l e t t e r was c l a s s i f i e d a c c o r d i n g t o which l e t t e r s i n t h e d i s p l a y were l i k e l y t o be s e e n as v e r y s i m i l a r t o t h e t a r g e t . The c l a s s i f i c a t i o n was d e r i v e d from t h e l o w e r c a s e s i n g l e - l e t t e r c o n f u s a b i l i t y s t u d y p u b l i s h e d by Bouma ( 1 9 7 1 ) . A l e t t e r was counted a s s i m i l a r t o t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r i f t h e l e t t e r was e r r o n e o u s l y i d e n t i f i e d a s t h e t a r g e t more t h a n 5% o f t h e time. Table 4 . 2 p r e s e n t s t h e c l a s s i f i c a t i o n a c c o r d i n g t o t h i s a n a l y s i s . Each t r i a l was t h e n c l a s s i f i e d by t h e number o f n o n t a r g e t l e t t e r s i n t h e d i s p l a y t h a t were s imilar t o t h e

Page 112: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 4 . 1 95

t a r g e t a c c o r d i n g t o t h i s c r i t e r i o n . Roughly 46 , 33 , 1 3 , and 1 % of e a c h s u b j e c t ' s t r i a l s f e l l i n t o t h e c a t e g o r i e s z e r o , o n e , two, and t h r e e s i m i l a r l e t t e r s ( o t h e r t h a n t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r i t s e l f ) , r e s p e c t i v e l y .

For t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k d a t a , t h e e f f e c t of number s i m i l a r l e t t e r s was s i g n i f i c a n t . ( 3 , 39) = 7.14, p < .001. Accuracy on t a r g e t t r i a l s i n c r e a s e d some w i t h i n c r e a s e s i n t h e number of s i m i l a r l e t t e r s , whereas a c c u r a c y on c a t c h t r i a l s d e c r e a s e d s i g n i f i c a n t l y w i t h i n c r e a s e s i n t h e number of s imilar l e t t e r s , - F ( 3 , 39) = 22.28, p < .001.

For t h e RT t a s k , i n c r e a s i n g t h e number of s i m i l a r l e t t e r s produced a s i g n i f i c a n t i n c r e a s e i n RT, E ( 3 , 39) = 4.41 < .01. The i n c r e a s e was c l e a r l y l a r g e r on c a t c h t r i a l s t h a n t a r g e t t r i a l s , E ( 3 , 39) = 3.13, p < .05.

T a r g e t - c a t c h d i f f e r e n c e s . For t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k , a c c u r a c y was g r e a t e r f o r c a t c h t r i a l s ( 8 4 % ) t h a n f o r t a r g e t t r i a l s ( 7 2 % ) . E (1, 13) = 19.65, p < .001, and t h i s e f f e c t i n t e r a c t e d w i t h d i s p l a y t y p e s , ( 4 , 52) = 8.14 , < .001. O r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e had a g r e a t e r e f f e c t on t a r g e t t h a n c a t c h t r i a l s . For t h e RT t a s k , t h e r e was a d i f f e r e n c e between t a r g e t and c a t c h t r i a l s . Catch t r i a l s were 47 msec s lower t h a n t a r g e t t r i a l s , E (1, 13) = 42.55, p < .001. However, t h i s e f f e c t d i d n o t i n t e r a c t w i t h d i s p l a y t y p e , 1 ( 4 , 52) = 1.49. T a r g e t - c a t c h d i f f e r e n c e s were a l s o r e f l e c t e d i n t h e e r r o r r a t e s i n t h e RT t a sk . T a r g e t t r i a l s e x p e r i e n c e d more e r r o r s ( 6 . 8 % ) t h a n d i d c a t c h t r i a l s ( 3 . 3 % ) , E (1, 13) = 29.88, p < .0001. There was no i n t e r a c t i o n w i t h d i s p l a y t y p e , E ( 4 , 52) = 1 . 2 4 .

Page 113: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

96 CHAPTER 4

Appendix 4 . 1 A

Rules f o r t h e S e l e c t i o n of O r t h o g r a p h i c a l l y Regular and I r r e g u l a r S t r i n g s

These ru les were d e r i v e d by e x t e n d i n g t h e r u l e s g i v e n i n Venezky ( 1 9 7 0 ) , Venezky and Massaro (1979) , and Massaro e t a l . ( 1 9 7 9 ) . Among a l l p o s s i b l e anagrams of a word, a l e t t e r s t r i n g was regarded as o r t h o g r a p h i c a l l y i r r e g u l a r i f i t c o n t a i n e d a t l e a s t one of t h e f o l l o w i n g s p e l l i n g s :

a. p h o n o l o g i c a l l y i l l e g a l ( i n E n g l i s h ) i n i t i a l or f i n a l c l u s t e r ( e . g . , t l f ies , i a s G ) .

b. o r t h o g r a p h i c a l l y i l l e g a l s p e l l i n g for a n i n i t i a l or f i n a l consonant or consonant c l u s t e r ( e . g . , k e a g c , t l e r a v ) .

c. an i l l e g a l vowel s p e l l i n g ( e . g . , p r s a e d , n m t E ) . d . a p h o n o l o g i c a l l y i l l e g a l media l c l u s t e r ( e . g . , ilmpes,

L e t t e r s t r i n g s were regarded as r e g u l a r i f t h e y were p h o n o l o g i c a l l y l e g a l and c o n t a i n e d common vowel and c o n s o n a n t s p e l l i n g s .

i G s a ) .

Page 114: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 4 . 1 8 9 7

Appendix 4 . 1 B

The 200 S t i m u l u s Items Used i n S t u d i e s 1 - 1 0

The items l i s t e d a r e i n columns a c c o r d i n g t o t y p e , where W = word; R-H = r e g u l a r - l o w ; I-H = i r r e g u l a r - h i g h ; R-L = regular - low; and I - L = i r r e g u l a r - l o w . Each row c o n t a i n s a word and t h e f o u r anagrams g e n e r a t e d from i t .

R- H R-L I-H I - L - - Word

a c t i o n amount answer b a r e l y be long b r e a t h b r i d g e c h a r g e d o u b l e famous f i n g e r g a r d e n g a t h e r g l a n c e h a r d l y i t s e l f lawyer l o n g e r mas ter modern

c a i n o t mauton swaner b l a y e r g o b l e n t h a b e r begr i d c h a g e r bodule foamus f er i n g nagred t h a g e r c a l e n g hyr a l d s i f l e t w e r a l y l o g r e n t a m e r dormen

o n i c a t otanum erswan

g l e n o b t h e r a b g r e d i b g r e a c h e d o l u b osafum g r e f i n g r e d a n g r e a t h g l e c a n h y d r a 1 f l e s i t l y e r aw g l e r o n s t e r a m drenom

bye K a1

a i o c n t auotnm wnraes l b r a e y lnboeg b h r t e a i e r b g d ahcge r l eoubd uaomf s r f n i e g a rnged h r t a e g l c n a e g yr a h l d t l f ies rwlaey g l n o e r mr taes oermnd

i c n t o a nmtaou rnwesa r b l e y a e b g n l o r t b e h a e b r g d i h r e a g c obdeul ofmsua e f n g r i e d n r g a g r h e t a e c l n g a r d l h y a e f l s t i e y r lwa e g n r l o emr t s a rmedno

Page 115: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

98 CHAPTER 4

APPENDIX 4 . 1 8 (COnt.)

Word

mother namely n e a r l y p e r m i t p l a y e r p o e t r y p u r e l y r e a s o n remain r e s u l t shared s i m p l e s i n g l e s p r e a d s t a r e d s t r e a m t r a v e l t r i a l s t u r n e d w i n t e r

R- H -

thomer manely l a r e n y p r ime t r a p l e y p e t o r y y u l p e r s a r o n e r amine s u r t e l s h r e a d p imsel s n i g e l p r ased s a r t e d t rames v a r t l e s a r t il d r u n e t t r iwen

R- L -

therom lyeman n y e l a r t r e p i m l y e r a p t y e r o p r y e l u p e r o s a n amer i n t r e s u l d r e a s h ems1 i p g l e s i n d r e s a p d r e s a t t resam t r e v a l t r i s a l t r e d u n t r e w i n

I-H -

mroteh lmnaey l r n a e y tmr i e p p l r aey y p t o e r l p y u e r s n a o e r mr a i e n l r t u e s s r d a e h i l m p e s i l g n e s p r saed s r t a e d m t r a e s a v r l e t i a s t l r r d n u e t w r n t e i

I -L -

hretmo emnyla enyr l a r t p e i m e p y l r a e r y t p o e r p l y u r n s e o a rniema e l s r t u h s r e d a l s e p m i n g l e s i d s e p r a d t s e r a e s r t m a t l e r a v i r l t s a e d t r n u r n t e w i

Page 116: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 4.2 99

Append ix 4 . 2

D e t a i l s o f Method, P r o c e d u r e , and R e s u l t s o f S t u d y 2 : P r e c u e v e r s u s P o s t c u e

Method

S u b j e c t s . E i g h t e e n I n t r o d u c t o r y P s y c h o l o g y s t u d e n t s , 8 ma le and 1 0 f e m a l e , p a r t i c i p a t e d f o r a n h o u r e a c h d a y o n 2 c o n s e c u t i v e d a y s and r e c e i v e d r e s e a r c h p a r t i c i p a t i o n c r e d i t t o w a r d t h e i r p s y c h o l o g y g r a d e . The d a t a f rom a n a d d i t i o n a l 1 2 s t u d e n t s was l o s t d u e t o m a c h i n e m a l f u n c t i o n s and i n a d m i s s i b l e o v e r a l l a c c u r a c y . A l l s u b j e c t s p a s s e d a p r e l i m i n a r y v i s i o n t e s t e s t a b l i s h i n g a t l e a s t 20/40 a c u i t y f o r b o t h e y e s . None o f t h e s u b j e c t s had s e r v e d i n a n y o f o u r p r e v i o u s e x p e r i m e n t s . ~- S t i m u l i and a p p a r a t u s . The s t i m u l i , a p p a r a t u s , and

d i s p l a y s e q u e n c e f o r t h e p o s t c u e t a s k were i d e n t i c a l t o t h o s e o f t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k o f S t u d y 1 d e s c r i b e d i n Appendix 4 .1 . Fo r t h e p r e c u e t a s k , a t r i a l began w i t h t h e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r a t t h e l e f t o f t h e f i x a t i o n window f o r 500 msec. The t a r g e t l e t t e r was t h e n t e r m i n a t e d and 1 sec l a t e r t h e s t r i n g was d i s p l a y e d f o r t h e a p p r o p r i a t e e x p o s u r e d u r a t i o n . A f t e r d i s p l a y i n g t h e s t i m u l u s s t r i n g , t h e mask ing s t i m u l u s was s c r o l l e d i n t o v i e w and r ema ined on t h e s c r e e n u n t i l t h e s u b j e c t r e s p o n d e d . The r a n g e o f e x p o s u r e d u r a t i o n s used f o r t h e p r e c u e t a s k was 1 t o 8 c y c l e s w i t h a med ian o f 2 c y c l e s . F o r t h e p o s t c u e t a s k t h e r a n g e was 2 t o 11 c y c l e s w i t h a med ian o f 3 c y c l e s .

P r o c e d u r e . H a l f t h e s u b j e c t s r e c e i v e d t h e p r e c u e t a s k t h e f i r s t d a y and t h e p o s t c u e t a s k t h e s e c o n d day . Fo r t h e r e m a i n i n g s u b j e c t s t h i s o r d e r was r e v e r s e d . Each d a y t h e a p p r o p r i a t e t a s k was e x p l a i n e d t o t h e s u b j e c t and p e r f o r m a n c e a c c u r a c y was s t r e s s e d . S u b j e c t s were t o l d t h a t o n e - h a l f o f t h e t r i a l s would b e t a r g e t and o n e - h a l f would b e c a t c h t r i a l s . A s i n S t u d y 1, t h e tes t s e q u e n c e c o n s i s t e d o f 1 0 "yes-no" t r i a l s , 4 6 0 - t r i a l p r a c t i c e b l o c k s d u r i n g wh ich e x p o s u r e was a d j u s t e d w i t h t h e a d a p t i v e a l g o r i t h m , and ,5 8 0 - t r i a l e x p e r i m e n t a l b l o c k s d u r i n g wh ich t h e e x p o s u r e r ema ined c o n s t a n t . A l l s u b j e c t s r e s p o n d e d " y e s " t o t a r g e t t r i a l s w i t h t h e i r p r e f e r r e d hand ( r i g h t hand f o r 1 7 o f t h e 1 8 s u b j e c t s ) .

Page 117: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

100 CHAPTER 4

Re s u l ts

O r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . An a n a l y s i s o f v a r i a n c e was computed from t h e s u b j e c t s ' mean a c c u r a c i e s f o r t h e 2 x 2 x 5 c o m b i n a t i o n s o f t y p e o f t a s k ( p r e c u e v e r s u s p o s t c u e ) , t r i a l t y p e ( t a r g e t v e r s u s c a t c h ) , and d i s p l a y c o n d i t i o n ( w o r d , r e g u l a r - h i g h , r e g u l a r - l o w , i r r e g u l a r - h i g h , a n d i r r e g u l a r - l o w ) . The ma in e f f e c t o f d i s p l a y t y p e was s i g n i f i c a n t , E ( 4 , 6 8 ) = 63 .57 , E < .001, a n d p l a n n e d c o m p a r i s o n s were p e r f o r m e d a s i n S t u d y 1. Words were j u d g e d 8 % more a c c u r a t e l y t h a n t h e r e g u l a r - h i g h p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y nonwords , E (1, 6 8 ) = 34.88, E < .001. F o r t h e anagram d i s p l a y t y p e s , r e g u l a r s t r i n g s were j u d g e d 6 % more a c c u r a t e l y t h a n i r r e g u l a r s t r i n g s , (1, 6 8 ) = 42.01, E < .001. High p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y s t r i n g s were j p d g e d 5 % more a c c u r a t e l y t h a n low p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y s t r i n g s , E (1, 68) = 30.63, E < .001. R e g u l a r i t y and p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y d i d n o t i n t e r a c t , E (1, 6 8 ) = 1.71, p > .15. The i n t e r a c t i o n o f t y p e o f t a s k w i t h d i s p l a y c o n d i t i o n was s i g n i f i c a n t , E ( 4 , 6 8 ) = 2 .99 , p < .024. The o v e r a l l e f f e c t s o f s t r u c t u r e were g r e a t e r i n t h e p o s t c u e t h a n t h e p r e c u e t a s k . A l t h o u g h a c c u r a c y f o r i r r e g u l a r - l o w p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y was e q u i v a l e n t i n t h e two t a s k s , t h e t r e n d s d i v e r g e d s t e a d i l y w i t h i n c r e a s i n g s t r u c t u r e s o t h a t a c c u r a c y f o r words was 6% g r e a t e r i n t h e p o s t c u e t h a n t h e p r e c u e t a s k . No o t h e r i n t e r a c t i o n s a p p r o a c h e d s i g n i f i c a n c e .

S i m i l a r i t y a n a l y s e s . A p o s t hoc s i m i l a r i t y a n a l y s i s was pe r fo rmed a s i n t h e p r e v i o u s e x p e r i m e n t . The a n a l y s i s o f v a r i a n c e i n c l u d e d a s f a c t o r s t h e t y p e o f t a s k , t h e t y p e o f t r i a l ( t a r g e t v e r s u s c a t c h ) , and t h e number o f s i m i l a r l e t t e r s . T h e r e was a ma in e f f e c t o f t h e number o f s i m i l a r l e t t e r s , z ( 3 , 51) = 2 .86 , E < . 0 5 , and a s i g n i f i c a n t i n t e r a c t i o n w i t h c a t c h and t a r g e t t r i a l s , 1 ( 3 , 5 1 ) = 3 .58 , p < .025. R e l a t i v e t o t h e p r e v i o u s a c c u r a c y e x p e r i m e n t shown i n F i g u r e 4.10, t h e p r e s e n t r e s u l t s shown i n F i g u r e 4.13 r e v e a l e d much s m a l l e r d e c r e a s e s o n c a t c h t r i a l s and l i t t l e c h a n g e on t a r g e t t r i a l s w i t h i n c r e a s e s i n t h e number o f s i m i l a r l e t t e r s . The same r e s u l t s were o b s e r v e d i n t h e p r e c u e and p o s t c u e t a s k s .

T a r g e t v e r s u s c a t c h t r i a l s . N e i t h e r t h e main e f f e c t o f t y p e o f t a s k ( p r e c u e v e r s u s p o s t c u e ) n o r t r i a l t y p e ( t a r g e t v e r s u s c a t c h ) was s i g n i f i c a n t ( b o t h Es < 1 ) ; however , t h e i r i n t e r a c t i o n was s i g n i f i c a n t , (1,17) = 8 . 6 3 , E < .009. I t i s a p p a r e n t from F i g u r e 4.14 t h a t s u b j e c t s were more a c c u r a t e on t a r g e t t h a n c a t c h t r i a l s i n t h e p r e c u e c o n d i t i o n , w h e r e a s t h i s b i a s was r e v e r s e d i n t h e p o s t c u e t a s k .

Page 118: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 4.3 1 0 1

Appendix 4.3

D e t a i l s of t h e Method, P r o c e d u r e , and R e s u l t s of S tudy 3: Mixed-Case

Method

S u b j e c t s . E i g h t e e n I n t r o d u c t o r y Psychology s t u d e n t s , 3 male and 1 5 f e m a l e s , p a r t i c i p a t e d f o r an hour each day on 2 c o n s e c u t i v e d a y s and r e c e i v e d r e s e a r c h p a r t i c i p a t i o n c r e d i t . One a d d i t i o n a l s u b j e c t was l o s t f o r f a i l u r e t o complete t h e e x p e r i m e n t . A l l s u b j e c t s passed a p r e l i m i n a r y v i s i o n t e s t w i t h a t l e a s t 20/40 a c u i t y f o r bo th e y e s and no s u b j e c t had s e r v e d i n p r e v i o u s e x p e r i m e n t s .

S t i m u l i , a p p a r a t u s , p r o c e d u r e . The p r o c e d u r e and a p p a r a t u s were t h e same as i n t h e RT t a s k of S tudy 1 w i t h t h e f o l l o w i n g m o d i f i c a t i o n s . The t a r g e t l e t t e r p r e s e n t e d a t t h e beginning of each t r i a l was d i s p l a y e d i n both i t s u p p e r c a s e and l o w e r c a s e forms t o remind t h e s u b j e c t t h a t e i t h e r form might be p r e s e n t i n t h e s t i m u l u s d i s p l a y . These two l e t t e r s were shown f o r 500 msec f o l l o w e d by a 1 sec b lank i n t e r v a l and were c e n t e r e d a t what would be s e r i a l p o s i t i o n s 3 and 4 i n t h e s t i m u l u s d i s p l a y . The l e t t e r s t r i n g was t h e n d i s p l a y e d u n t i l t h e s u b j e c t responded. For a randomly s e l e c t e d one-ha l f of a l l t r i a l s , t h e f i r s t t h r e e l e t t e r s of t h e s t i m u l u s s t r i n g were p r e s e n t e d i n uppercase and t h e l a s t t h r e e l e t t e r s i n lowercase . For t h e remain ing t r i a l s t h i s o r d e r of c a s e s was r e v e r s e d .

A s i n t h e p r e v i o u s e x p e r i m e n t s , t h e s u b j e c t s s e r v e d i n two 1-hour s e s s i o n s on c o n s e c u t i v e d a y s . Each s e s s i o n c o n s i s t e d of 1 0 "yes-no" warm-up t r i a l s , 240 p r a c t i c e t r i a l s , and 400 e x p e r i m e n t a l t r i a l s . The i n s t r u c t i o n s t o t h e s u b j e c t s emphasized speed and a c c u r a c y of responding and encouraged s u b j e c t s t o t r y t o " r e a d " each d i s p l a y a s a whole a s t h e most e f f e c t i v e means of making f a s t and a c c u r a t e judgments ( J o h n s t o n & McClel land, 1 9 7 4 ) .

R e s u l t s

O r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . The s u b j e c t s ' mean RTs f o r t h e 10 combina t ions of t y p e of t r i a l ( t a r g e t and c a t c h ) and d i s p l a y t y p e (word, r e g u l a r - h i g h , r e g u l a r - l o w , i r r e g u l a r - h i g h , and i r r e g u l a r - l o w ) were a n a l y z e d . I n c o r r e c t t r i a l RTs and c o r r e c t t r i a l R T s exceeding 2 sec were e x c l u d e d . The e r r o r r a t e s v a r i e d between 1 . 0 % and 8 . 9 % . To d e t e r m i n e i f t h i s v a r i a b i l i t y i n

Page 119: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 0 2 CHAPTER 4

e r r o r r a t e was a f f e c t i n g RT t r e n d s , t h e s u b j e c t s were ranked on e r r o r r a t e and d i v i d e d i n t o two g r o u p s ; t h e n i n e s u b j e c t s w i t h t h e l o w e s t e r r o r r a t e s formed one g r o u p and t h e remain ing s u b j e c t s t h e o t h e r . The a v e r a g e RT f o r t h e s u b j e c t s w i t h lower e r r o r r a t e s was 647 msec, whereas f o r t h e h i g h e r e r r o r r a t e s u b j e c t s , t h e mean RT was 756 msec, E (1, 16) = 3.47, p < .078. Grouping d i d n o t i n t e r a c t w i t h any o t h e r f a c t o r i n t h e a n a l y s i s .

The s i g n i f i c a n t main e f f e c t f o r d i s p l a y t y p e , E ( 4 , 64) =

65.23, p < .001, was a n a l y z e d i n t e r m s of t h e same compar isons examined i n t h e p r e v i o u s e x p e r i m e n t s . The 7 msec d i f f e r e n c e between words and r e g u l a r - h i g h pseudowords was n o t s i g n i f i c a n t , - F < 1. The compar isons among t h e anagrams r e v e a l e d t h a t t h e 30 msec d i f f e r e n c e between r e g u l a r and i r r e g u l a r anagrams was s i g n i f i c a n t , ( 1, 64) = 33.50, < .001. Also t h e 1 4 msec d i f f e r e n c e between h i g h and low p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y items was s i g n i f i c a n t , E (1, 64) = 8.09, < .006. The i n t e r a c t i o n of r e g u l a r i t y w i t h p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y was n o t s i g n i f i c a n t , E < 1.

An a n a l y s i s of v a r i a n c e was c a l c u l a t e d on e r r o r r a t e s . T h e d i s p l a y t y p e main e f f e c t , E ( 4 , 68) = 2.86, p < .030, and t h e i n t e r a c t i o n of d i s p l a y t y p e w i t h t r i a l ( t a r g e t v e r s u s c a t c h ) , E ( 4 , 6 8 ) = 2.98, p < .025, were b o t h s i g n i f i c a n t . Although t h e t r e n d d o e s n o t seem t o be p a r t i c u l a r l y meaningfu l , t h e s o u r c e of t h e s e two e f f e c t s is t h e somewhat g r e a t e r e r r o r r a t e f o r t h e i r r e g u l a r i t e m s on t a r g e t t r i a l s .

S i m i l a r i t y a n a l y s e s . A r e s t r i c t e d s i m i l a r i t y a n a l y s i s was done on o n l y t h e l o w e r c a s e l e t t e r s i n t h e d i s p l a y s t r i n g s . Reac t ion times i n c r e a s e d 2 4 msec on c a t c h t r i a l s and d i d n o t change on t a r g e t t r i a l s wi th i n c r e a s e s from z e r o t o one s i m i l a r l e t t e r s , E (1, 1 7 ) = 5.84 , p < .05.

T a r g e t v e r s u s c a t c h t r i a l s . A s i n t h e p r e v i o u s RT t a s k , t a r g e t t r i a l s were judged more q u i c k l y (660 msec) t h a n were c a t c h t r i a l s (743 m s e c ) , E (1, 1 6 ) = 65.23, p < .001. Type of t r i a l d i d n o t i n t e r a c t w i t h t y p e of l e t t e r s t r i n g .

For t h e e r r o r d a t a , c a t c h t r i a l s ( 9 7 . 1 % ) were s i g n i f i c a n t l y more a c c u r a t e t h a n t a r g e t t r i a l s ( 9 3 . 8 % ) a s i n t h e RT d a t a of Study 1, 1 (1, 1 7 ) = 33.81, p < .001. However, t r i a l t y p e d i d i n t e r a c t w i t h d i s p l a y t y p e a s noted above.

Page 120: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 4 . 4 103

Appendix 4 . 4

D e t a i l s of Method, P r o c e d u r e , and R e s u l t s o f S tudy 4 : L imi ted Viewing T i m e

S u b j e c t s . S i x t e e n I n t r o d u c t o r y Psychology s t u d e n t s , 8 males and 8 f e m a l e s , were t e s t e d f o r a s i n g l e 90-minute s e s s i o n and r e c e i v e d r e s e a r c h p a r t i c i p a t i o n c r e d i t . A s i n t h e p r e v i o u s e x p e r i m e n t s , a l l s u b j e c t s were t e s t e d f o r v i s u a l a c u i t y of a t l e a s t 20/40, a l l responded w i t h t h e i r p r e f e r r e d hand ( r i g h t hand f o r 1 5 of t h e 1 6 ) , and no s u b j e c t had p a r t i c i p a t e d i n t h e e a r l i e r e x p e r i m e n t s .

Procedure . The s t i m u l i and a p p a r a t u s were t h e same a s t h e p r e v i o u s e x p e r i m e n t s . An e x p e r i m e n t a l t r i a l began w i t h t h e p r e s e n t a t i o n of t h e lowercase t a r g e t l e t t e r p o s i t i o n e d w i t h i n t h e viewing r e c t a n g l e a t d i s p l a y s e r i a l p o s i t i o n 4 f o r 500 msec. A 1 sec b lank i n t e r v a l f o l l o w e d and t h e n t h e s t i m u l u s s t r i n g i n l o w e r c a s e was p r e s e n t e d f o r 200 msec. The s t i m u l u s was s c r o l l e d upward and r e p l a c e d by s i x uppercase Xs which s e r v e d a s a mask and remained i n view u n t i l t h e s u b j e c t responded. Fol lowing t h e s u b j e c t ' s r e s p o n s e t h e r e was a 500 msec i n t e r t r i a l i n t e r v a l .

The t e s t i n g s e s s i o n f o r e a c h s u b j e c t c o n s i s t e d of 10 "yes-no" warm-up t r i a l s , 240 p r a c t i c e t r i a l s , and 2 4 0 0 - t r i a l e x p e r i m e n t a l s e s s i o n s . A s i n a l l p r e v i o u s e x p e r i m e n t s , t r i a l s were grouped i n t o 80 t r i a l b l o c k s . Between b l o c k s s u b j e c t s were g i v e n a minute o r two of r e s t and feedback i n t h e form of a mean RT e r r o r p e r c e n t a g e f o r t h e b l o c k . A 5 minute r e s t was g i v e n between t h e two e x p e r i m e n t a l s e s s i o n s .

The s u b j e c t s were t o l d t h a t h a l f t h e t r i a l s would be t a r g e t t r i a l s and h a l f would be c a t c h t r i a l s . They were a l s o informed t h a t t h e s t i m u l u s d i s p l a y would be b r i e f and t h a t t h e y would have t o r e a d i t c a r e f u l l y . Speed and a c c u r a c y of responding were emphasized.

O r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . A s i n t h e p r e v i o u s RT s t u d i e s , t h e s u b j e c t s ' mean RT f o r each c e l l of t h e d e s i g n , e x c l u d i n g i n c o r r e c t t r i a l RTs and c o r r e c t RTs exceeding 2 s e c , were a n a l y z e d . The s u b j e c t s ' e r r o r r a t e s v a r i e d between 4.5% and 1 1 . 9 % , which is h i g h e r t h a n normal ly d e s i r e d f o r RT t a s k s . For

Page 121: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

104 CHAPTER 4

t h i s r e a s o n , s u b j e c t s were a g a i n r a n k e d by e r r o r r a t e and d i v i d e d i n t o low and h i g h e r r o r r a t e g r o u p s . An a n a l y s i s o f v a r i a n c e i n d i c a t e d no e f f e c t o f g r o u p i n g t h e s u b j e c t s by e r r o r r a t e ( a l l F s < 1 ) . The a n a l y s e s o f t h e RT d a t a i n d i c a t e d no e f f e c t o f d i s p l a y t y p e , E ( 4 , 56 ) = 1 .27 . Only t h e d i s p l a y t y p e by t r i a l t y p e i n t e r a c t i o n was s i g n i f i c a n t . The n a t u r e o f t h i s i n t e r a c t i o n may b e s e e n i n F i g u r e 4.16. T a r g e t and c a t c h R T s a p p e a r t o t r a d e - o f f a c r o s s d i s p l a y t y p e s . T h i s p a t t e r n i s i n d i c a t i v e o f a s h i f t i n b i a s , o r a t l e a s t c o n f i d e n c e , a c r o s s t h e d i s p l a y t y p e s . A s s u b j e c t s become more r e l u c t a n t ( s l o w e r ) t o r e s p o n d " y e s " t h e y become more w i l l i n g ( f a s t e r ) t o r e s p o n d "no." For t h e mos t p a r t , t h i s p a t t e r n o f d e c r e a s i n g c o n f i d e n c e c o i n c i d e s w i t h t h e d e c l i n e i n o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e wh ich is a r e a s o n a b l e r e a c t i o n t o d i s p l a y s t h a t a r e more d i f f i c u l t t o r e s o l v e .

An a n a l y s i s o f t h e e r r o r d a t a r e v e a l e d o n l y a ma in e f f e c t o f d i s p l a y t y p e , E ( 4 , 6 0 ) = 6 .79 , E < .001. T h i s d i s p l a y t y p e main e f f e c t was examined w i t h t h e u s u a l s e t o f c o n t r a s t s . The d i f f e r e n c e i n e r r o r r a t e be tween words and r e g u l a r - h i g h i t ems was t o o s m a l l t o b e s i g n i f i c a n t , b u t t h e 1.8% d i f f e r e n c e be tween words and t h e a v e r a g e o f t h e r e g u l a r items was s i g n i f i c a n t , (1 .60 ) = 6 . 4 2 , p < -013 . The e r r o r r a t e was 1.7% s m a l l e r f o r r e g u l a r t h a n i r r e g u l a r items, ( 1 , 6 0 ) = 8 . 5 9 , E < .005. N e i t h e r t h e p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y e f f e c t ( e r r o r r a t e d i f f e r e n c e o f o n l y 0 . 4 % , 1 < 1) n o r t h e i n t e r a c t i o n o f r e g u l a r i t y w i t h t h e p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y were s i g n i f i c a n t , (1, 6 0 ) = 1 .30 .

S i m i l a r i t y a n a l y s e s . Fo r r e s p o n s e a c c u r a c y , t h e number o f s i m i l a r n o n t a r g e t l e t t e r s had no e f f e c t o n e i t h e r t a r g e t o r c a t c h t r i a l s , 2 ' s > .1. For RTs, t h e e f f e c t o f t h e number o f s i m i l a r n o n t a r g e t l e t t e r s had no e f f e c t o n t a r g e t t r i a l s and a l a r g e e f f e c t o n c a t c h t r i a l s , 1 ( 3 , 4 5 ) = 1 4 . 2 4 , E < .001. RTs i n c r e a s e d o n l y 1 msec on t a r g e t t r i a l s and 67 msec on c a t c h t r i a l s w i t h i n c r e a s e s f rom z e r o t o t h r e e s i m i l a r l e t t e r s .

T a r g e t - c a t c h d i f f e r e n c e s . A s i n t h e p r e v i o u s p o s t c u e RT e x p e r i m e n t s t h e r e was a ma in e f f e c t o f t r i a l t y p e , E (1, 1 4 ) = 26 .62 , E < . 001 , w i t h t a r g e t t r i a l s ( 5 6 3 msec) b e i n g r e s p o n d e d t o more q u i c k l y t h a n c a t c h t r i a l s ( 6 3 5 msec). T h e r e was a l s o t h e i n t e r a c t i o n o f t r i a l t y p e w i t h d i s p l a y t y p e d i s c u s s e d above. For t h e e r r o r d a t a , t h e r e was n e i t h e r a s i g n i f i c a n t main e f f e c t o f t r i a l t y p e , E (1, 1 5 ) = 1 . 9 5 , n o r a s i g n i f i c a n t i n t e r a c t i o n w i t h d i s p l a y t y p e , E < 1.

Page 122: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 4 . 5 105

Appendix 4.5

D e t a i l s of Method, P r o c e d u r e , and R e s u l t s of S tudy 5: Speeded RT Task w i t h Good V i s u a l I n f o r m a t i o n

Method

S u b j e c t s . E leven I n t r o d u c t o r y Psychology s t u d e n t s , 10 female and 1 male , were t e s t e d f o r a s i n g l e 1-hour s e s s i o n and r e c e i v e d r e s e a r c h p a r t i c i p a t i o n c r e d i t . S u b j e c t s were t e s t e d i n f o u r g r o u p s ; t h r e e g r o u p s w i t h t h r e e p a r t i c i p a n t s and one w i t h two. A l l s u b j e c t s responded w i t h t h e i r p r e f e r r e d hand ( r i g h t hand f o r 9 of t h e 11). No s u b j e c t had p a r t i c i p a t e d i n an e a r l i e r e x p e r i m e n t .

Appara tus 4 s t i m u l i . The s t i m u l i were t h e same a s i n t h e p r e v i o u s e x p e r i m e n t s . The v i s u a l d i s p l a y s were g e n e r a t e d by a DEC LSI-11 computer under s o f t w a r e c o n t r o l and p r e s e n t e d on T e k t r o n i x Monitor 604 o s c i l l o s c o p e s ( T a y l o r , K l i t z k e , &

MaSSaKO, 1 9 7 8 ) . These m o n i t o r s employ a P31 phosphor w i t h a decay t o .l% of s t i m u l a t e d luminance w i t h i n 3 2 msec. The a l p h a b e t c o n s i s t e d of l o w e r c a s e n o n s e r i f e d l e t t e r s r e s e m b l i n g t h e t y p e f o n t U n i v e r s 55. For a n o b s e r v e r s e a t e d c o m f o r t a b l y a t a n e x p e r i m e n t a l s t a t i o n , t h e s i x - l e t t e r d i s p l a y s subtended a b o u t 1 . 9 d e g r e e of v i s u a l a n g l e h o r i z o n t a l l y and t h e d i s t a n c e from t h e t o p of a n a s c e n d e r t o t h e bot tom of a d e s c e n d e r was a b o u t . 4 d e g r e e . T h i s computer ized l a b o r a t o r y f a c i l i t y p e r m i t t e d t h e t e s t i n g of up t o f o u r s u b j e c t s i n p a r a l l e l . Each s u b j e c t r e c e i v e d t h e same v i s u a l d i s p l a y on h i s o r her d i s p l a y m o n i t o r , and t h e computer c o l l e c t e d i n d i v i d u a l s u b j e c t ' s r e s p o n s e s .

Procedure . The e x p e r i m e n t a l p r o c e d u r e was a r e s p o n s e - s i g n a l method (Reed, 1973) i n which t h e s u b j e c t e n d e a v o r s t o respond i n synchrony w i t h a s i g n a l which, i n t h i s c a s e , was t h e o f f s e t of t h e s t i m u l u s d i s p l a y s t r i n g . The e x a c t p r o c e d u r e was a s f o l l o w s . A t r i a l began w i t h t h e p r e s e n t a t i o n of a s i n g l e f i x a t i o n p o i n t i n t h e c e n t e r of t h e s c r e e n . A f t e r 250 msec t h e f i x a t i o n p o i n t was r e p l a c e d by t h e t e s t l e t t e r f o r 500 msec. The f i x a t i o n p o i n t r e t u r n e d f o r 250 msec f o l l o w e d by t h e d i s p l a y s t r i n g . The d i s p l a y was i n i t i a l l y p r e s e n t e d f o r 550 msec w i t h t h i s v a l u e r e v i s e d e v e r y 2 0 t h t r i a l t o a c h i e v e a n o v e r a l l a c c u r a c y o f 75% f o r t h e g r o u p of s u b j e c t s be ing t e s t e d . The t r i a l t e r m i n a t e d when a l l s u b j e c t s responded o r , i n t h e e v e n t t h a t a s u b j e c t f a i l e d t o r e s p o n d , a t t h e end of 4 sec. A 500 msec i n t e r t r i a l i n t e r v a l was g i v e n . A t t h e end o f e v e r y 20

Page 123: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

106 CHAPTER 4

t r i a l s , each s u b j e c t was g i v e n feedback a b o u t h i s o r h e r performance i n t h e f o l l o w i n g manne'r. A t t r i a l t e r m i n a t i o n t h e word FEEDBACK was p r e s e n t e d a t t h e c e n t e r of t h e s c r e e n f o r 1 s e c . One-half second l a t e r two columns of numbers appeared on t h e s c r e e n , a s u b j e c t number and t h e s u b j e c t ' s a v e r a g e d e v i a t i o n from t h e d i s p l a y s t r i n g o f f s e t t o t h e r e s p o n s e i n msec. A n e g a t i v e d e v i a t i o n i n d i c a t e d an a v e r a g e r e s p o n s e p r i o r t o t h e d i s p l a y o f f s e t : a p o s i t i v e d e v i a t i o n i n d i c a t e d t h a t t h e a v e r a g e r e s p o n s e f e l l a f t e r t h e d i s p l a y o f f s e t . Each s u b j e c t ' s number was C l e a r l y p o s t e d a t h i s o r h e r s u b j e c t s t a t i o n t o f a c i l i t a t e remembering which feedback s c o r e was a p p r o p r i a t e . The feedback s c o r e s were v i s i b l e f o r 2.5 sec a f t e r which came t h e normal h a l f second i n t e r t r i a l i n t e r v a l . The s u b j e c t s ' i n s t r u c t i o n s a c q u a i n t e d them w i t h t h e t a s k and t h e g e n e r a l t y p e s of s t i m u l u s i t e m s . I t was s t r e s s e d t h a t t h e s u b j e c t s were t o be a s a c c u r a t e a s p o s s i b l e and y e t respond a s n e a r l y i n synchrony w i t h t h e s i g n a l a s p o s s i b l e . They were t o l d how t h e y would r e c e i v e feedback and a g a i n i t was s t r e s s e d t h a t t h e y s h o u l d endeavor t o m a i n t a i n a z e r o feedback s c o r e . A l l s u b j e c t s r e c e i v e d 120 p r a c t i c e t r i a l s fo l lowed by two e x p e r i m e n t a l s e s s i o n s of 400 t r i a l s each. A s h o r t r e s t b reak was g i v e n between t h e two e x p e r i m e n t a l s e s s i o n s .

A l l s u b j e c t s became a d e p t a t t h e t a s k by t h e end of t h e p r a c t i c e t r i a l s o r e a r l y i n t h e f i r s t e x p e r i m e n t a l s e s s i o n so t h a t t h e d i s p l a y o f f s e t t imes were r e a s o n a b l y s t a b l e t h r o u g h o u t t h e two s e s s i o n s . Average d i s p l a y o f f s e t times f o r t h e f o u r groups of s u b j e c t s were a s f o l l o w s : 4 1 2 , 634, 485, and 505 msec.

R e s u l t s

S e p a r a t e a n a l y s e s were made of t h e mean a c c u r a c i e s and t h e mean R T s f o r bo th c o r r e c t and i n c o r r e c t t r i a l s . For t h e a c c u r a c y d a t a t h e r e were no s i g n i f i c a n t e f f e c t s ( a l l Fs < 1) .

The a n a l y s i s of v a r i a n c e f o r t h e R T s inc luded t r i a l t y p e , d i s p l a y c o n d i t i o n , and c o r r e c t n e s s of t h e r e s p o n s e as f a c t o r s . There were s i g n i f i c a n t e f f e c t s of t y p e of t r i a l , (1, 10) =

8.04, < .017; c o r r e c t n e s s of r e s p o n s e , r (1, 1 0 ) = 19.99 , < .001; and t h e i n t e r a c t i o n of t h e s e two f a c t o r s , (1, 1 0 34.32, < .001. These e f f e c t s were a r e s u l t of s i g n i f i c a n t l y s lower c o r r e c t c a t c h t r i a l r e s p o n s e s seen F i g u r e 4.17. Although we observed t h e normal RT advantage c o r r e c t t a r g e t t r i a l s over c o r r e c t c a t c h t r i a l s , t h e i n c o r t a r g e t and i n c o r r e c t c a t c h t r i a l s n e a r l y c o i n c i d e d w i t h

- - t h e

i n f o r e c t t h e

Page 124: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 4.5 107

c o r r e c t t a r g e t t r i a l r e s p o n s e s . The main e f f e c t o f d i s p l a y t y p e , ( 4 , 40) = 3.17, p < .023, and t h e i n t e r a c t i o n of d i s p l a y t y p e w i t h c o r r e c t n e s s of r e s p o n s e and t y p e of t r i a l , ( 4 , 4 0 ) = 3.25, < .021, were s i g n i f i c a n t . Mean RT i n c r e a s e d from 477 msec f o r words t o 492 msec f o r i r r e g u l a r - l o w nonwords.

Page 125: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

108 CHAPTER 4

Appendix 4.6

D e t a i l s of Method, P r o c e d u r e , and R e s u l t s of Study 6: Speeded RT T a s k w i t h Poor V i s u a l I n f o r m a t i o n

Method

S u b j e c t s . T h i r t e e n I n t r o d u c t o r y Psychology s t u d e n t v o l u n t e e r s p a r t i c i p a t e d as s u b j e c t s ; t h e d a t a of two were l o s t due t o a computer m a l f u n c t i o n . A l l s u b j e c t s were n a t i v e E n g l i s h s p e a k e r s , had normal or cor rec ted- to-normal v i s i o n , had n o t p a r t i c i p a t e d i n any of t h e o t h e r e x p e r i m e n t s , were r igh t -handed , and r e c e i v e d some c r e d i t toward t h e i r c o u r s e g r a d e f o r p a r t i c i p a t i n g .

M a t e r i a l s , a p p a r a t u s , p r o c e d u r e . The s t i m u l i and a p p a r a t u s were t h e same as i n S tudy 5 and a r e d e s c r i b e d i n Appendix 4.5. The i m p o r t a n t d i f f e r e n c e i n t h e p r e s e n t exper iment is t h a t t h e comple te t e s t l e t t e r s t r i n g was r o t a t e d 180 d e g r e e s i n t h e p i c t u r e p l a n e . R o t a t i n g t h e comple te t e s t s t r i n g r a t h e r t h a n t h e i n d i v i d u a l l e t t e r s s e p a r a t e l y c r e a t e s a d i s p l a y much e a s i e r t o read ( K o l e r s , 1 9 7 0 ) . The i n i t i a l d i s p l a y d u r a t i o n was l e n g t h e n e d t o 700 msec. The t a r g e t l e t t e r was s t i l l p r e s e n t e d u p r i g h t . S u b j e c t s responded " y e s " w i t h t h e i r dominant hand.

R e s u l t s

The means among l e t t e r - s t r i n g t y p e s i n d i c a t e d a 1.1% advantage of words over t h e b e s t pseudowords ( r e g u l a r - h i g h ) and a 1 .6% advantage of words o v e r a l l t y p e s of nonwords. Accuracy f o r r e g u l a r nonwords was 0.2% b e t t e r t h a n f o r i r r e g u l a r nonwords. Nonwords of h igh p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y had a 0 .5% advantage over nonwords of low p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y . A s might be e x p e c t e d from d i f f e r e n c e s t h i s s m a l l , t h e a n a l y s i s o f v a r i a n c e i n d i c a t e d no e f f e c t of l e t t e r - s t r i n g t y p e s , E < 1. Fur thermore , t h e r e was no d i f f e r e n c e between t a r g e t and c a t c h t r i a l s , E < 1, and no i n t e r a c t i o n , < 1.

The a c c u r a c y r e s u l t s of t h e p r e s e n t e x p e r i m e n t c a n be compared t o t h o s e of S tudy 5 w i t h u p r i g h t l e t t e r s t r i n g s . T h i s a n a l y s i s i n d i c a t e d no d i f f e r e n c e s of any kind between t h e two e x p e r i m e n t s ( f o r u p r i g h t - r o t a t e d , (1, 2 1 ) = 0.14; f o r t a r g e t - c a t c h , (1, 2 1 ) = 1.18; f o r t h e u p r i g h t - r o t a t e d x t a r g e t - c a t c h i n t e r a c t i o n , 1 (1, 21) = 0.07; f o r t h e l e t t e r - s t r i n g t y p e s , E ( 4 , 84) = 0.92; f o r t h e u p r i g h t - r o t a t e d x l e t t e r - s t r i n g i n t e r a c t i o n , ( 4 , 84) = 0.09; f o r t h e

Page 126: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 4.6 109

t a r g e t - c a t c h x l e t t e r - s t r i n g i n t e r a c t i o n , 1 ( 4 , 8 4 ) = 1 .27 ; and f o r t h e th ree -way i n t e r a c t i o n , ( 4 , 8 4 ) = 0 . 2 3 ) .

An e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e r e a c t i o n t imes i n t h e r o t a t e d e x p e r i m e n t r e v e a l e d r e s u l t s s i m i l a r t o t h o s e o f t h e a c c u r a c y d a t a . Means were c a l c u l a t e d on c o r r e c t r e a c t i o n t imes t h a t d i d n o t exceed 2 , 0 0 0 msec ( 0 . 2 5 % e x c e e d e d ) . Words were a c t u a l l y r e s p o n d e d t o 9 msec s l o w e r t h a n r e g u l a r - h i g h nonwords . R e a c t i o n t imes were 9 msec l o n g e r f o r i r r e g u l a r nonwords t h a n f o r r e g u l a r nonwords and 8 msec l o n g e r f o r nonwords o f l ow r a t h e r t h a n o f h i g h p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y .

The a n a l y s i s o f v a r i a n c e i n d i c a t e d s i g n i f i c a n t l y l o n g e r r e a c t i o n t imes f o r c a t c h t r i a l s a s compared t o t a r g e t t r i a l s , - F (1, 11) = 46 .73 , p < - 0 0 1 , b u t no e f f e c t o f t y p e s , 2 ( 4 , 44 ) = 2.43, p < . 05 , a n d no i n t e r a c t = 1 . 6 0 , p < .l.

The r e a c t i o n t imes f o r t h e r o t a t e d l e t t e r were compared t o t h o s e f o r t h e u p r i g h t l e t t e r a v e r a g e r e a c t i o n t ime f o r r o t a t e d l e t t e r s t r i n g s l o n g e r t h a n f o r u p r i g h t l e t t e r s t r i n g s , F (1, 21

1 e t te r - s t r i ng o n , 1 ( 4 , 44 )

s t r i n g s a l s o s t r i n g s . The was 104 msec = 26 .94 , p < -

.001. C a t c h t r i a l s t o o k 66 msec l o n g e r t h a n t a r g e t t r i a l s , 1 (1, 2 1 ) = 75.84, p < . 001 , b u t t h i s d i d n o t i n t e r a c t w i t h w h e t h e r t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g s were r o t a t e d , (1, 2 1 ) = 1 . 2 6 . T h e r e was a n o v e r a l l d i f f e r e n c e o f l e t t e r - s t r i n g t y p e s , - F ( 4 , 8 4 ) = 5 . 7 7 , p < .001. L e t t e r - s t r i n g t y p e s d i d n o t i n t e r a c t w i t h t h e o t h e r f a c t o r s : w i t h r o t a t i o n , ( 4 , 8 4 ) =

0.49; w i t h t a r g e t - c a t c h t r i a l s , 1 ( 4 , 8 4 ) = 1 .18 ; a n d f o r t h e t h r e e - w a y i n t e r a c t i o n , E ( 4 , 8 4 ) = 1 .18 .

To examine d i f f e r e n c e s among d i s p l a y d u r a t i o n s , t h e d i s p l a y d u r a t i o n s f o r e a c h o f t h e 40 s e t s o f 20 t r i a l s were g r o u p e d i n t o 4 b l o c k s o f 10 s e t s e a c h . Each o f t h e c o n s e c u t i v e 4 b l o c k s t h u s r e p r e s e n t e d 1 0 d i s p l a y d u r a t i o n s f o r 1 0 s e t s o f 20 t r i a l s . An a n a l y s i s o f v a r i a n c e i n d i c a t e d no d i f f e r e n c e s among b l o c k s , ( 3 , 33 ) = 0 .67 , b u t d i d i n d i c a t e a d i f f e r e n c e among t h e 10 s e t s w i t h i n a b l o c k , E ( 9 , 9 9 ) = 4.25, 2 < . 001 , and a b l o c k by s e t i n t e r a c t i o n , E ( 2 7 , 297) = 2 . 2 1 , E < .005. These e f f e c t s r e f l e c t t h e o p e r a t i o n o f b o t h p r a c t i c e and f a t i g u e . I n i t i a l l y t h e d i s p l a y d u r a t i o n s d e c r e a s e d w i t h e x p e r i e n c e , b u t t h e n i n c r e a s e d toward t h e end o f t h e f i r s t 200 t r i a l s . F o l l o w i n g a b r e a k b e t w e e n h a l v e s o f t h e e x p e r i m e n t , d i s p l a y t i m e s a g a i n d e c r e a s e d u n t i l l a t e i n t h e s e c o n d h a l f o f t h e e x p e r i m e n t .

Page 127: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

110 CHAPTER 4

The d i s p l a y d u r a t i o n s a l s o were compared between t h e u p r i g h t and r o t a t e d e x p e r i m e n t s . Although t h e a v e r a g e d i s p l a y d u r a t i o n was 498 msec f o r u p r i g h t p r e s e n t a t i o n and 556 msec f o r r o t a t e d p r e s e n t a t i o n , t h e e f f e c t was n o t s i g n i f i c a n t , (1, 2 1 ) = 2.64, nor was t h e r e an e f f e c t of t h e b l o c k s of 10 d i s p l a y d u r a t i o n s , E ( 3 , 63) = 1 . 5 6 , and t h e two f a c t o r s a l s o d i d n o t i n t e r a c t , E ( 3 , 63) = 2.53. There were , however, d i f f e r e n c e s among i n d i v i d u a l d i s p l a y d u r a t i o n s , ( 9 , 189) = 2.05, E < .05 , and d i s p l a y d u r a t i o n s i n t e r a c t e d w i t h e v e r y t h i n g e l se : w i t h u p r i g h t - r o t a t e d l e t t e r s t r i n g s , E ( 9 , 189) = 4.65, E < .001; w i t h b l o c k s , F ( 2 7 , 567) = 1.63 , p < .05 ; and i n a three-way i n t e r a c t i o n , (27 , 567) = 1 . 6 9 , E < .05. These i n t e r a c t i o n s r e f l e c t t h e s l i g h t f a t i g u e f a c t o r in t h e r o t a t e d e x p e r i m e n t and t h e absence of such i n t h e u p r i g h t e x p e r i m e n t . For t h e u p r i g h t s t i m u l i , t h e d i s p l a y d u r a t i o n s c o n t i n u e d t o d e c r e a s e t h r o u g h o u t t h e exper iment .

Page 128: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 4.7 111

Appendix 4.7

D e t a i l s of Method, P r o c e d u r e , and R e s u l t s o f S tudy 7: High-Accuracy RT Task w i t h Poor V i s u a l I n f o r m a t i o n

Twelve s u b j e c t s were used and met t h e same c o n s t r a i n t s a s i n t h e speeded RT t a s k i n S tudy 6 (Appendix 4 . 6 ) . The same r o t a t e d s t i m u l i a l s o were used w i t h t h e f o l l o w i n g p r o c e d u r a l d i f f e r e n c e s . A t r i a l c o n s i s t e d of a 250 msec f i x a t i o n p o i n t fo l lowed by an u p r i g h t l e t t e r which was p r e s e n t e d f o r 5 0 0 msec a t t h e f i x a t i o n p o i n t and t h e n t h e r o t a t e d l e t t e r s t r i n g . The l e t t e r s t r i n g remained on t h e s c r e e n u n t i l t h e l a s t s u b j e c t ( u p t o f o u r a t a time) responded.

R e s u l t s

Means were c a l c u l a t e d f o r c o r r e c t r e a c t i o n times t h a t d i d n o t exceed 2,000 msec ( 1 . 4 % e x c e e d e d ) . R e a c t i o n times g e n e r a l l y i n c r e a s e d from words t o t h e i r r e g u l a r - l o w nonwords, - F ( 4 , 4 4 ) = 6 . 4 7 , E < .081. Regular -h igh nonwords a v e r a g e d 6 msec l o n g e r t h a n words, i r r e g u l a r nonwords r e s u l t e d i n r e a c t i o n times t h a t were 1 6 msec l o n g e r t h a n r e g u l a r nonwords, and nonwords of low p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y r e s u l t e d i n r e a c t i o n times t h a t were 18 msec l o n g e r t h a t nonwords of h igh p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y . The a v e r a g e r e a c t i o n times f o r c a t c h t r i a l s was 110 msec l o n g e r t h a n f o r t a r g e t t r i a l s , F (1, 11) = 1610.10, p < .001, b u t t h i s d i d n o t i n t e r a c t w i t h l e t t e r - s t r i n g t y p e s , 1 ( 4 ,

D i f f e r e n c e s between l e t t e r s t r i n g s were f u r t h e r examined by o r t h o g o n a l c o n t r a s t s . The d i f f e r e n c e between words and a l l nonwords was s i g n i f i c a n t , t ( 4 4 ) = 3 . 1 8 , p < .005, a s was t h e d i f f e r e n c e between r e g u l a r and i r r e g u l a r nonwords, t ( 4 4 ) =

1 . 6 8 3 , p = .05. However, t h e d i f f e r e n c e between nonwords of h igh and low p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y was n o t s i g n i f i c a n t , t ( 4 4 ) = 0 .94 . S i m i l a r l y , a Newman-Kuels t e s t i n d i c a t e d t h a t t h e 6 msec d i f f e r e n c e between words and t h e b e s t pseudowords ( r e g u l a r - h i g h ) was n o t s i g n i f i c a n t , p > .10.

A comparison of r e a c t i o n times between t h e i n i t i a l r e p l i c a t i o n e x p e r i m e n t u s i n g u p r i g h t s t i m u l i and t h e p r e s e n t s t u d y i n d i c a t e d t h a t r e a c t i o n times f o r r o t a t e d s t i m u l i averaged 2 7 9 msec l o n g e r t h a n f o r u p r i g h t s t i m u l i , (1, 2 4 ) = 4 2 . 3 5 , 2 < .0Ol. The d i f f e r e n c e between c a t c h and t a r g e t

4 4 ) = 0 .79 .

Page 129: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 1 2 CHAPTER 4

t r i a l s was s i g n i f i c a n t , F (1, 24) = 1 5 3 . 4 4 , p < . 001 , a s was t h e t r i a l t y p e x r o t a t e d - u p r i g h t i n t e r a c t i o n , (1, 24) = 23.68, 2 < -001 . D i f f e r e n c e s be tween l e t t e r s t r i n g s were s i g n i f i c a n t , E ( 4 , 9 6 ) = 20.12, 2 < . 001 , b u t l e t t e r s t r i n g s d i d n o t i n t e r a c t w i t h a n y t h i n g : w i t h r o t a t e d - u p r i g h t , ( 4 , 9 6 ) = 0 .53 ; w i t h t a r g e t - c a t c h , E ( 4 , 9 6 ) = 0 . 5 3 ; and f o r t h e th ree -way i n t e r a c t i o n , ( 4 , 9 6 ) = 1.60.

Page 130: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 4.8 113

Appendix 4.8

D e t a i l s of Method, P r o c e d u r e , and R e s u l t s o f S tudy 8 : T y p i c a l i t y R a t i n g s

The o v e r t judgment e x p e r i m e n t s c o n s i s t e d of a s k i n g s u b j e c t s t o make c o n s c i o u s judgments a b o u t t h e t e s t items. Three sets of r a t i n g judgments were o b t a i n e d under s i m i l a r i n s t r u c t i o n s and a r e d e s c r i b e d h e r e a s " T y p i c a l i t y R a t i n g s . " A f o u r t h r a t i n g was o b t a i n e d i n S tudy 9 under e x p l i c i t i n s t r u c t i o n s a s t o t h e n a t u r e of p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y and is d e s c r i b e d a s " P o s i t i o n a l - F r e q u e n c y R a t i n g s . " A f i n a l s e t of judgments i n S tudy 10 were o b t a i n e d by a "Paired-Judgment" p r o c e d u r e .

Method

R a t i n g Forms. Three r a t i n g forms were p r e p a r e d . The f i r s t form employed t h e 160 anagrams; t h e second form employed t h e 160 anagrams p l u s 40 pseudowords d e r i v e d from t h e o r i g i n a l words by t h e s u b s t i t u t i o n of a s i n g l e l e t t e r ; and t h e t h i r d form used t h e e n t i r e 200 s t i m u l u s s t r i n g s i n c l u d i n g t h e o r i g i n a l words. ( S e e Appendix 4 . 1 8 f o r t h e 40 words and t h e i r 160 anagrams; see Appendix 4.8A f o r t h e o n e - l e t t e r s u b s t i t u t i o n pseudowords) . Each l i s t was randomized and p r i n t e d w i t h 20 l e t t e r s t r i n g s p e r page. The s t r i n g s were typed i n l o w e r c a s e w i t h f i v e u n d e r s c o r e s typed t o t h e r i g h t of e a c h s t r i n g a s a s p a c e f o r w r i t i n g t h e s t r i n g ' s r a t i n g . The r a t i n g s c a l e t o be used was reproduced a t t h e t o p o f each page a s f o l l o w s :

"Most l i k e E n g l i s h 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 L e a s t l i k e E n g l i s h . "

The f o u r or f i v e p a g e s compr is ing each l i s t were assembled i n random o r d e r i n t o b o o k l e t s . Each b o o k l e t was p r e p a r e d w i t h an a p p r o p r i a t e s h e e t of i n s t r u c t i o n s . These i n s t r u c t i o n s a r e reproduced i n Appendix 4.8B, and 4.8C.

S u b j e c t s . One hundred n i n e t y - e i g h t I n t r o d u c t o r y Psychology s t u d e n t s f i l l e d o u t one of t h r e e r a t i n g forms. The r a t e r s p a r t i c i p a t e d i n g r o u p s of 8 t o 1 2 p e r s o n s and r e c e i v e d r e s e a r c h p a r t i c i p a t i o n c r e d i t . The f i r s t 70 s u b j e c t s r a t e d t h e f i r s t form which c o n t a i n e d o n l y t h e 160 anagrams. The n e x t 65 s u b j e c t s f i l l e d o u t t h e second form which i n c l u d e d t h e 160 anagrams and t h e o n e - l e t t e r s u b s t i t u t i o n pseudowords made from t h e words. The f i n a l 63 s u b j e c t s r a t e d t h e t h i r d form which

Page 131: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 1 4 CHAPTER 4

c o n t a i n e d t h e o r i g i n a l s e t o f 200 s t i m u l u s i tems ( i . e . , t h e 160 anagrams and t h e 40 w o r d s ) . Each s u b j e c t worked a t h i s o r h e r own s p e e d , and on t h e a v e r a g e , t o o k 1 5 t o 2 5 m i n u t e s t o r a t e t h e i tems.

-- P r o c e d u r e . - Each s e s s i o n began w i t h t h e e x p e r i m e n t e r r e a d i n g t h e i n s t r u c t i o n s w h i l e t h e s u b j e c t f o l l o w e d a l o n g . The f o r m a l i n s t r u c t i o n s were s u p p l e m e n t e d w i t h v e r b a l i n s t r u c t i o n s s t r e s s i n g " s i m i l a r i t y t o E n g l i s h s p e l l i n g " a s t h e p r i m a r y r a t i n g c r i t e r i o n . S u b j e c t s were u r g e d n o t t o a d o p t s t r a t e g i e s o f r a t i n g r e g u l a r i t y o n t h e b a s i s o f b e i n g a b l e t o t r a n s f o r m a s t r i n g i n t o a word t h r o u g h l e t t e r a d d i t i o n s , d e l e t i o n s , s u b s t i t u t i o n s , o r by making anagrams . The r a t e r s who r e c e i v e d t h e l i s t c o n t a i n i n g a c t u a l words were a l s o a s k e d t o d i s r e g a r d t h e s e m a n t i c c o n t e n t o f t h e words t o t h e f u l l e s t e x t e n t p o s s i b l e . F i n a l l y , t h e r e l a t i v e n a t u r e o f t h e s c a l e was s t r e s s e d . I t was i n d i c a t e d t h a t t h e p s y c h o l o g i c a l s c a l e s h o u l d s p a n t h e p r e s e n t e d s e t o f i tems and a l l 1 0 s c a l e v a l u e s s h o u l d be u s e d .

R e s u l t s

Average r a t i n g s were t a b u l a t e d b o t h w i t h i n s u b j e c t s and a c r o s s s u b j e c t s . For t h e w i t h i n s u b j e c t t a b u l a t i o n s , t h e s u b j e c t ' s r a t i n g s f o r t h e 40 s t i m u l i i n e a c h c a t e g o r y were a v e r a g e d . For t h e item a n a l y s e s , a n a v e r a g e f o r e a c h item was o b t a i n e d by a v e r a g i n g t h e r a t i n g s a s s i g n e d by e a c h s u b j e c t . T h e s e d a t a p e r m i t t e d a n a l y s e s t o d e t e r m i n e i f t h e r a t i n g s ' r e l i a b i l i t y r e f l e c t e d d i f f e r e n c e s i n mean r a t i n g s f o r t h e 4 o r 5 c a t e g o r i e s o f s t i m u l i . S i x one-way a n a l y s e s o f v a r i a n c e were computed f o r a l l p a i r w i s e c o m p a r i s o n s among t h e t h r e e i n s t r u c t i o n c o n d i t i o n s ; t h r e e a n a l y s e s were b a s e d on s u b j e c t s a s t h e s a m p l i n g v a r i a b l e and t h r e e were b a s e d on items a s t h e s a m p l i n g v a r i a b l e . The mean r a t i n g s were s o r e l i a b l e t h a t e r r o r v a r i a n c e s were u n i f o r m l y s m a l l i n a l l s i x a n a l y s e s ( s t a n d a r d e r r o r o f e s t i m a t e is t h e r a n g e o f .04 t o .68 s c a l e u n i t s f o r a l l s i x a n a l y s e s ) . With s u c h s m a l l e r r o r v a r i a n c e s , a l l p a i r w i s e d i f f e r e n c e s be tween c a t e g o r y means were r e l i a b l e a t t h e . 05 l e v e l .

Page 132: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

A P P E N D I X 4.8A 115

Appendix 4.8A

The Pseudowords used i n S t u d y 8.

Word Pseudoword

a c t i o n amount answer b a r e l y belong b r e a t h b r i d g e c h a r g e d o u b l e famous f i n g e r g a r d e n g a t h e r g l a n c e h a r d l y i t s e l f 1 awye r l o n g e r m a s t e r modern

a p t i o n amaunt onswer p a r e l y be lang b r e e t h bradge c h u r g e g o u b l e vamous v i n g e r g u r d e n g i t h e r g l u n c e h e r d l y i t s o l f rawyer ronger moster madern

Word Pseudoword -

mother namely n e a r l y perm i t p l a y e r p o e t r y p u r e l y r e a s o n remain r e s u l t s h a r e d s imp1 e s i n g l e s p r e a d s t a r e d s t r e a m t r a v e l t r i a l s t u r n e d w i n t e r

mather nomely mear ly permat p l a d e r b o e t r y b u r e l y l e a s o n remoin r e s i l t s h a r e t sumple f i n g l e s p r e e d s t u r e d s t reem t r o v e 1 t r e a l s t a r n e d wunter

Page 133: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

116 CHAPTER 4

Appendix 4.88

D i r e c t i o n s f o r T y p i c a l i t y R a t i n g s W i t h o u t Words and f o r T y p i c a l i t y R a t i n g s With Pseudowords

On t h e p a g e s wh ich f o l l o w a r e l e t t e r s t r i n g s made up t o l o o k l i k e E n g l i s h words . None of t h e s t r i n g s , however , is a n E n g l i s h word. Your t a s k is t o r a t e e a c h o n e o n a s c a l e o f 1 t o 1 0 a c c o r d i n g t o how much i t l o o k s l i k e a r e a l E n g l i s h word. S t r i n g s which a r e e x t r e m e l y c l o s e s h o u l d b e g i v e n h i g h r a t i n g s , w h i l e s t r i n g s which a r e n o t v e r y c l o s e s h o u l d b e g i v e n low r a t i n g s . S i n c e no r e a l words a r e i n c l u d e d , t h e h i g h e s t p o s s i b l e r a t i n g (10) s h o u l d b e g i v e n t o s t r i n g s wh ich you f e e l a r e mos t l i k e E n g l i s h words . S i m i l a r l y , a r a t i n g o f 1 s h o u l d be g i v e n t o t h e s t r i n g wh ich a r e l e a s t l i k e E n g l i s h words. The s t r i n g s h a v e b e e n s e l e c t e d t o r e p r e s e n t a l l p o s s i b l e l e v e l s o f s i m i l a r i t y t o E n g l i s h w i t h r o u g h l y e q u a l numbers a t e a c h l e v e l .

Skim o v e r t h e s t r i n g s on t h e f i r s t p a g e b e f o r e you b e g i n r a t i n g s o you h a v e a n i d e a o f t h e i r r a n g e o f v a r i a t i o n . T h e r e a r e 160(200) s t r i n g s i n a l l , d i v i d e d r andomly a c r o s s 4(5) p a g e s , s o e a c h page s h o u l d have r o u g h l y t h e same v a r i a t i o n a s a n y . o t h e r . You s h o u l d work a t a f a i r l y q u i c k and e v e n p a c e a l t h o u g h t h e r e is no t ime l i m i t .

Page 134: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 4 . 8 C 117

Appendix 4.8C

D i r e c t i o n s f o r T y p i c a l i t y R a t i n g s w i t h Words

On t h e pages which f o l l o w a r e l e t t e r s t r i n g s made up t o be s p e l l e d l i k e E n g l i s h words. Some of t h e s t r i n g s a r e , i n f a c t , E n g l i s h words, whereas o t h e r s t r i n g s a r e n o t E n g l i s h words. Independent of t h e meaning of t h e words, however, your t a s k is t o r a t e e a c h one on a sca le of 1 t o 10 a c c o r d i n g t o how much it is s p e l l e d l i k e t y p i c a l E n g l i s h s p e l l i n g . S t r i n g s which a r e e x t r e m e l y c l o s e s h o u l d be g i v e n h i g h r a t i n g s , w h i l e s t r i n g s which a r e n o t v e r y c l o s e s h o u l d be g i v e n low r a t i n g s . The h i g h e s t p o s s i b l e r a t i n g ( 1 0 ) s h o u l d be g i v e n t o s t r i n g s which you f e e l a r e s p e l l e d most l i k e E n g l i s h . S i m i l a r l y , a r a t i n g of 1 s h o u l d be g i v e n t o t h e s t r i n g s which a r e s p e l l e d l e a s t l i k e E n g l i s h . The s t r i n g s hae been s e l e c t e d t o r e p r e s e n t a l l p o s s i b l e l e v e l s of s i m i l a r i t y t o E n g l i s h s p e l l i n g w i t h r o u g h l y e q u a l numbers a t each l e v e l .

Skim o v e r t h e s t r i n g s on t h e f i r s t p a g e s b e f o r e you b e g i n r a t i n g so you have a n i d e a of t h e i r range of v a r i a t i o n . There a r e 200 s t r i n g s i n a l l , d i v i d e d randomly a c r o s s 5 p a g e s , s o each page s h o u l d have roughly t h e same v a r i a t i o n a s any o t h e r . You should work a t a f a i r l y q u i c k and even pace a l t h o u g h t h e r e is no time l i m i t .

Page 135: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

118 CHAPTER 4

Appendix 4 . 9

The Method, P r o c e d u r e , and R e s u l t s of S tudy 9: P o s i t i o n a l - F r e q u e n c y R a t i n g s

Method

Rat ing forms were c o n s t r u c t e d by g e n e r a t i n g f r e s h c o p i e s of t h e form from Study 8 employing t h e 160 anagrams. E x p l i c i t p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y i n s t r u c t i o n s ( r e p r o d u c e d i n Appendix 4.9A) were s u b s t i t u t e d for t h e p r e v i o u s i n s t r u c t i o n s and t h e s c a l e a t t h e t o p o f each page was modi f ied t o r e a d :

"Most f r e q u e n t 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 L e a s t f r e q u e n t . "

A s b e f o r e , s u b j e c t s were t e s t e d i n small g r o u p s of 8 t o 1 0 ; t h e formal i n s t r u c t i o n s were read fo l lowed by v e r b a l emphas is of t h e s a l i e n t p o i n t s o f t h e i n s t r u c t i o n s ; and s u b j e c t s were g i v e n u n l i m i t e d time a l t h o u g h t h e y u s u a l l y completed t h e form i n 1 5 t o 25 minutes . F o r t y - n i n e I n t r o d u c t o r y Psychology s t u d e n t s r a t e d t h i s form.

R e s u l t s

As i n S tudy 8 , a v e r a g e r a t i n g s were t a b u l a t e d by l e t t e r - s t r i n g t y p e f o r each s u b j e c t and f o r e a c h s t i m u l u s item a c r o s s s u b j e c t s . Two a n a l y s e s o f v a r i a n c e were computed on t h e s e d a t a and, a s i n t h e p r e v i o u s r a t i n g s , a l l p o s s i b l e p a i r w i s e comparisons of t h e f o u r anagram c a t e g o r i e s were s i g n i f i c a n t .

Page 136: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 4.9A 119

Appendix 4.9A

D i r e c t i o n s f o r P o s i t i o n a l - F r e q u e n c y R a t i n g s

I t is a r e l a t i v e l y s i m p l e m a t t e r t o d e t e r m i n e t h e f r e q u e n c y w i t h which t h e d i f f e r e n t l e t t e r s of t h e a l p h a b e t a r e used a t v a r i o u s l o c a t i o n s i n words. I t is a n o t h e r m a t t e r t o d e t e r m i n e i f p e o p l e a r e aware of t h i s " p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y . " On t h e p a g e s which f o l l o w a r e l e t t e r s t r i n g s d e r i v e d by anagramming common E n g l i s h s i x - l e t t e r words. I n some i n s t a n c e s t h e l e t t e r s have been moved t o t h e p o s i t i o n s t h e y most commonly occupy i n s i x - l e t t e r words ( h i g h f requency p o s i t i o n s ) and i n some i n s t a n c e s t h e y have been moved t o l o c a t i o n s t h a t t h e y v e r y i n f r e q u e n t l y occupy i n s i x - l e t t e r words ( low f r e q u e n c y p o s i t i o n s ) . Your t a s k is t o r a t e each s t r i n g on a s c a l e of 1 t o 10 a c c o r d i n g t o how much you b e l i e v e t h a t t h e l e t t e r s i n t h e s t r i n g occupy t h e i r most f r e q u e n t p o s i t i o n s . The h i g h e s t p o s s i b l e r a t i n g ( 1 0 ) s h o u l d be g i v e n t o t h e s t r i n g s whose l e t t e r s a r e i n t h e i r most f r e q u e n t p o s i t i o n s . The l o w e s t r a t i n g (1) s h o u l d be g i v e n t o s t r i n g s whose l e t t e r s a r e i n t h e i r l e a s t f r e q u e n t p o s i t i o n s . The s t r i n g s have been c o n s t r u c t e d s o t h a t some s t r i n g s have a l l t h e i r l e t t e r s i n t h e i r most f r e q u e n t p o s i t i o n s , some s t r i n g s have t h e i r l e t t e r s i n t h e i r l e a s t f r e q u e n t p o s i t i o n s , and t h e remain ing s t r i n g s have l e t t e r s a t a l l v a r i o u s p o s i t i o n s of g r e a t e r o r l e s s e r f r e q u e n c y . Thus you s h o u l d f i n d s t r i n g s a p p r o p r i a t e t o a l l 10 l e v e l s of t h e s c a l e w i t h r o u g h l y e q u a l numbers a t each l e v e l .

Skim over t h e s t r i n g s on t h e f i r s t page b e f o r e you b e g i n r a t i n g so you have an i d e a of t h e i r r a n g e of v a r i a t i o n . There a r e 160 s t r i n g s i n a l l , d i v i d e d randomly a c r o s s f o u r p a g e s , s o each page s h o u l d have roughly t h e same v a r i a t i o n a s any o t h e r . You s h o u l d work a t a f a i r l y q u i c k and even pace even though t h e r e is no time l i m i t .

Page 137: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 2 0 CHAPTER 4

Appendix 4.10

D e t a i l s of Method, P r o c e d u r e , and R e s u l t s o f S tudy 10: R e g u l a r i t y v e r s u s P o s i t i o n a l - F r e q u e n c y Pa i red-Judgments

Method

Response forms. The pa i red- judgment forms were p r e p a r e d by f i r s t p a r t i t i o n i n g e a c h of t h e f o u r c a t e g o r i e s of anagrams i n t o f o u r randomly s e l e c t e d s u b s e t s o f 1 0 items e a c h . E i g h t y p a i r s were produced by p a i r i n g t h e 160 anagrams as f o l l o w s : One 10-i tem s u b s e t from each c a t e g o r y was matched t o a 10-i tem s u b s e t from a n o t h e r c a t e g o r y and t h e members of t h e s u b s e t p a i r e d o f f producing between c a t e g o r y p a i r s . T h i s l e f t one 10-i tem s u b s e t w i t h i n each c a t e g o r y whose members were p a i r e d w i t h each o t h e r t o form f i v e w i t h i n c a t e g o r y p a i r s . A t o t a l l i s t of 320 p a i r s was formed by per forming t h i s matching p r o c e d u r e f o u r times, r o t a t i n g t h e mating of t h e s u b s e t s w i t h i n each c a t e g o r y t o a c h i e v e a c o m p l e t e l y c o u n t e r b a l a n c e d l i s t where e v e r y i t e m was p a i r e d once w i t h a member of e v e r y o t h e r c a t e g o r y and once w i t h a member of i t s own c a t e g o r y . E i g h t such t o t a l l y d i f f e r e n t l i s t s were c o n s t r u c t e d and item b a l a n c i n g ( r i g h t - h a n d p a i r member v e r s u s l e f t - h a n d p a i r member) was randomized. The t o t a l e f f e c t was t o e n s u r e t h a t e v e r y item had a n e q u a l o p p o r t u n i t y t o be p a i r e d w i t h any o t h e r item.

Once c o n s t r u c t e d , t h e l i s t s were p r i n t e d w i t h 80 p a i r s p e r page. Each b o o k l e t was p r e f a c e d w i t h a s e t of i n s t r u c t i o n s which e i t h e r gave a d e t a i l e d d e s c r i p t i o n of r e g u l a r i t y o r p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y . I n both c a s e s , a p p r o p r i a t e examples were i n c l u d e d . The " r e g u l a r i t y " i n s t r u c t i o n s g r o u p chose t h e most r e g u l a r of each p a i r whereas t h e " p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y ' ' i n s t r u c t i o n s g r o u p c h o s e t h e member w i t h t h e h i g h e s t p o s i t i o n a l f requency .

S u b j e c t s . F o r t y - e i g h t I n t r o d u c t o r y Psychology s t u d e n t s completed t h e pa i red- judgment t a s k . Of t h e s e r a t e r s , 2 2 r e c e i v e d " r e g u l a r i t y " i n s t r u c t i o n s and 26 r e c e i v e d " p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y " i n s t r u c t i o n s . A l l s u b j e c t s r e c e i v e d r e s e a r c h p a r t i c i p a t i o n c r e d i t a s recompense.

Procedure . A s i n t h e p r e v i o u s r a t i n g s t u d i e s , s u b j e c t s were t e s t e d i n g r o u p s of 1 0 t o 15 and g i v e n u n l i m i t e d time t o complete t h e form. D u e t o t h e somewhat l e n g t h i e r form, s u b j e c t s took 20 t o 30 m i n u t e s t o comple te t h e form. Approximately one-half of t h e g r o u p s r e c e i v e d e x p l i c i t r e g u l a r i t y i n s t r u c t o n s (see Appendix 4.10A) , which d e s c r i b e d

Page 138: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 4.10 1 2 1

l e t t e r sequence r e g u l a r i t y , and r e q u i r e d t h a t t h e more r e g u l a r member of each p a i r be chosen . The remain ing g r o u p s r e c e i v e d e x p l i c i t p o s i t i o n a l - f r e q u e n c y i n s t r u c t i o n s ( s e e Appendix 4 . 1 0 B ) which d e s c r i b e d s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y and r e q u i r e d t h a t t h e member of each p a i r w i t h t h e h i g h e r o v e r a l l p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y be chosen . A l l s u b j e c t s w i t h i n a g r o u p r e c e i v e d t h e same i n s t r u c t i o n s .

R e s u l t s

The p r o p o r t i o n s of times t h a t i t e m s from a n anagram c a t e g o r y were chosen over items from t h e same c a t e g o r y o r d i f f e r e n t c a t e g o r i e s a r e shown i n T a b l e 4.5. Table 4 .5 g i v e s t h e p r o p o r t i o n of times an i t e m from t h e column c a t e g o r y was s e l e c t e d when p a i r e d w i t h an i tem from t h e row c a t e g o r y . Comparing t h e two p a n e l s of Table 4.5 w e o b s e r v e t h a t s u b j e c t s i n b o t h i n s t r u c t e d c o n d i t i o n s made c h o i c e s more c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e a p p l i c a t i o n of r e g u l a r i t y t h a n w i t h t h e a p p l i c a t i o n of p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y a l t h o u g h both observed t a b l e s d i f f e r from t h e h y p o t h e s i z e d " p e r f e c t " outcome. Comparing t h e two p a n e l s of Table 4 .5 t o e a c h o t h e r , we see e v i d e n c e a g a i n t h a t s u b j e c t s c a n modify t h e i r judgments s l i g h t l y when g i v e n e x p l i c i t i n s t r u c t i o n s t o a t t e n d t o p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y .

Page 139: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

122 CHAPTER 4

Appendix 4.10A

R e g u l a r i t y I n s t r u c t i o n s f o r Paired-Judgments

Our r e s e a r c h is d i r e c t e d a t d i s c o v e r i n g what it is we know a b o u t E n g l i s h words t h a t a l l o w s u s t o l o o k a t m e a n i n g l e s s s t r i n g s of l e t t e r s and judge how much t h e y resemble words. I n t r y i n g t o unders tand t h e s t r u c t u r e p r e s e n t i n words, we have focused on an i m p o r t a n t component p r o p e r t y - - r e g u l a r i t y o f l e t t e r sequencing . For example, t h e r e a r e many c o n s o n a n t sequences which begin words ( e . g . , @, a, e, th, e, e tc . ) and which end words ( e . g . , 9, el =, *, e t c . ) . There a r e common vowel sequences a s w e l l ( e . g . , 00, 9, G, sf e t c . ) . F i n a l l y , . t h e r e is r e g u l a r i t y i n how t h e s e c o n s o n a n t s and vowel g r o u p i n g s a r e t h e m s e l v e s sequenced w i t h i n words.

On t h e pages which f o l l o w a r e 320 p a i r s of m e a n i n g l e s s s i x - l e t t e r s t r i n g s which have been c o n s t r u c t e d t o v a r y a l o n g t h i s d imens ion of l e t t e r sequence r e g u l a r i t y . That is , some s t r i n g s p r e s e r v e normal l e t t e r sequencing w h i l e o t h e r s v i o l a t e normal sequencing t o a l e s s e r or g r e a t e r d e g r e e . The o b j e c t of t h i s e x p e r i m e n t is t o d e t e r m i n e t h e e x t e n t o f your knowledge by having you se lec t t h e more r e g u l a r s t r i n g i n each p a i r . You a r e t o e v a l u a t e b o t h members o f each p a i r and choose t h e one t h a t is more p e r m i s s i b l e i n te rms of r e g u l a r i t y of l e t t e r sequencing .

Before you b e g i n , s k i m o v e r t h e p a i r s on t h e f i r s t page t o g e t a f e e l f o r t h e t a s k . Once you b e g i n , t r y t o work a t a f a i r l y s t e a d y pace and n o t d w e l l t o o long on t h e p a i r s you f i n d d i f f i c u l t . You m u s t make a c h o i c e f o r each p a i r , g u e s s i n g i f n e c e s s a r y . Have you any q u e s t i o n s ?

Page 140: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 4.10B 123

Appendix 4.10B

P o s i t i o n a l - F r e q u e n c y I n s t r u c t i o n s f o r Pa i red-Judgments

Our r e s e a r c h is d i r e c t e d a t d i s c o v e r i n g what it is we know a b o u t E n g l i s h words t h a t a l l o w s u s t o look a t m e a n i n g l e s s s t r i n g s of l e t t e r s and judge how much t h e y resemble words. I n t r y i n g t o u n d e r s t a n d t h e s t r u c t u r e p r e s e n t i n words, w e have focused on an i m p o r t a n t component p r o p e r t y - - l e t t e r f r e q u e n c y . I n d i v i d u a l l e t t e r s and g r o u p s o f l e t t e r s occur w i t h v a r y i n g f r e q u e n c y a t d i f f e r e n t p o s i t i o n s w i t h i n words. For example, you can p r o b a b l y t h i n k o f words t h a t end i n fi and words t h a t end i n y, b u t fi is 10 t i m e s more f r e q u e n t t h a n y i n f i n a l p o s i t i o n . L i k e w i s e , 9 and & both occur a t t h e beginning of words, b u t is 50 times as f r e q u e n t i n i n i t i a l p o s i t i o n . I n g e n e r a l , c o n s o n a n t s a r e more f r e q u e n t t h a n vowels a t word i n i t i a l and word f i n a l p o s i t i o n s w i t h t h e e x c e p t i o n of f i n a l e , and s o on.

On t h e p a g e s which f o l l o w a r e 320 p a i r s of m e a n i n g l e s s s i x - l e t t e r s t r i n g s which have been c o n s t r u c t e d t o v a r y a l o n g t h e d imens ion of l e t t e r f r e q u e n c y by p o s i t i o n . That i s , some s t r i n g s have been c r e a t e d by p l a c i n g each l e t t e r i n i t s most f r e q u e n t p o s i t i o n i n s i x - l e t t e r E n g l i s h words. O t h e r s have t h e i r l e t t e r s p l a c e d i n l e s s f r e q u e n t p o s i t i o n s and s t i l l o t h e r s have t h e i r l e t t e r s i n t h e i r l e a s t f r e q u e n t p o s i t i o n s .

The o b j e c t of t h i s e x p e r i m e n t is t o d e t e r m i n e how w e l l you c a n judge when l e t t e r s a r e i n t h e i r most f r e q u e n t p o s i t i o n s . You a r e t o e v a l u a t e both members of each p a i r and choose t h e more " f r e q u e n t " of t h e two, e . g . , t h e s t r i n g which a p p e a r s t o have more of i ts l e t t e r s i n t h e i r more f r e q u e n t p o s i t i o n s .

Before you b e g i n , s k i m over t h e p a i r s on t h e f i r s t page t o g e t a f e e l f o r t h e t a s k . Once you b e g i n , t r y t o work a t a f a i r l y s t e a d y pace and n o t t o d w e l l t o o long on t h e p a i r s you f i n d d i f f i c u l t . You m u s t make a c h o i c e f o r e a c h p a i r , g u e s s i n g i f n e c e s s a r y . Have you any q u e s t i o n s ?

Page 141: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

This page intentionally left blank

Page 142: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

5 Structural Descriptions

To p r o v i d e a more d e t a i l e d a n a l y s i s of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e e f f e c t s , we conducted p o s t hoc c o r r e l a t i o n a l a n a l y s e s of t h e p e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n and o v e r t judgment d a t a r e p o r t e d i n Chapter 4 . The independent v a r i a b l e s were based upon v a r i o u s f r e q u e n c y and r e g u l a r i t y measures . Even though f i r m c o n c l u s i o n s might n o t be r e a c h e d , we f e l t t h a t our sample of items was s u f f i c i e n t l y l a r g e and s u f f i c i e n t l y r e p r e s e n t a t i v e t h a t t h e s e c o r r e l a t i o n a l a n a l y s e s c o u l d p r o v i d e v a l i d i n d i c a t i o n s of which measures might w a r r a n t f u r t h e r t h e o r e t i c a l and e m p i r i c a l examinat ion .

Three dependent measures were d e r i v e d from t h e e x p e r i m e n t s r e p o r t e d i n Chapter 4 f o r each o f t h e 200 s t i m u l u s items, i . e . , t h e 40 words and t h e i r 4 anagrams. The f i r s t measure was t h e mean a c c u r a c y f o r each i tem averaged a c r o s s a l l t r i a l o c c u r r e n c e s i n t h e p o s t c u e a c c u r a c y exper iment of S tudy 1: I n i t i a l R e p l i c a t i o n and t h e precue and p o s t c u e e x p e r i m e n t s of S tudy 2: P r e c u e v e r s u s P o s t c u e . A c o r r e s p o n d i n g r e a c t i o n time (RT) measure was d e r i v e d by a v e r a g i n g t h e RTs f o r a l l t r i a l o c c u r r e n c e s o f each item i n t h e r e a c t i o n time e x p e r i m e n t s of S tudy 1: I n i t i a l R e p l i c a t i o n and Study 3 : Mixed-Case. The t h i r d measure was t h e a v e r a g e r a t i n g s from one of t h e r a t i n g e x p e r i m e n t s i n S tudy 8: T y p i c a l i t y R a t i n g s . The e x p e r i m e n t was t h e one i n which t h e words t h e m s e l v e s were r a t e d a l o n g w i t h t h e 160 anagrams. Each of t h e 200 s t i m u l u s items a l o n g w i t h i t s r e s p e c t i v e a c c u r a c y , r e a c t i o n t i m e , and r a t i n g i s p r e s e n t e d i n Appendix 5.1.

As d i s c u s s e d i n Chapter 3 , a l a r g e number of measures of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e based upon c o u n t s of l e t t e r , “-gram, and word f r e q u e n c i e s may be computed. Q u a n t i t a t i v e measures based upon o r t h o g r a p h i c r u l e s a r e less r e a d i l y c o n s t r u c t e d . Although

Page 143: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

126 CHAPTER 5

we d e v i s e d and t e s t e d one measure of r e g u l a r i t y based upon t h e r u l e s o u t l i n e d i n Chapter 3 , w e c o n c e n t r a t e d upon f r e q u e n c y measures and q u e s t i o n s r e l a t e d t o t h e i r c o n s t r u c t i o n . The s p e c i f i c issues were a s f o l l o w s . Should f r e q u e n c y c o u n t s be based upon c o u n t s of word t y p e s o r word t o k e n s ? What f r e q u e n c y s c a l e g i v e s t h e most p r e d i c t i v e index of per formance , raw f requency o r some t r a n s f o r m e d f requency s c a l e such as l o g f requency? Is p o s i t i o n a l dependency, i . e . , whether t h e c o u n t s p r e s e r v e p o s i t i o n of t h e "-gram i n t h e sampled word, a n i m p o r t a n t f a c t o r ? What "-gram u n i t g i v e s t h e most powerfu l measure: s i n g l e - l e t t e r , b igram, o r t r i g r a m c o u n t s ? What is t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n of l e x i c a l s t a t u s and word f r e q u e n c y t o performance? And f i n a l l y , what method of combining t h e f r e q u e n c i e s of t h e components of a l e t t e r s t r i n g p r o v i d e t h e b e s t o v e r a l l index of i ts s t r u c t u r e ? These q u e s t i o n s w i l l be d i s c u s s e d i n t h e f o l l o w i n g s e c t i o n s .

DESCRIPTIVE MEASURES

The s o u r c e of a l l our f requency measures is a word c o r p u s sampled by Kucera and F r a n c i s ( 1 9 6 7 ) . T h i s c o r p u s c o n s i s t e d of 500 samples o f a p p r o x i m a t e l y 2,000 words e a c h s e l e c t e d from 1 5 c a t e g o r i e s . A d e s c r i p t i o n of t h e c o r p u s , i t s s e l e c t i o n , and i t s p r o c e s s i n g a r e p r e s e n t e d by Kucera and F r a n c i s . We o b t a i n e d a magnet ic t a p e of t h e word c o u n t produced from t h e c o r p u s ( i . e . , t h e "Rank L i s t " i n t h e Kucera and F r a n c i s monograph). The words were s o r t e d i n t o 10 l i s t s c o n s i s t i n g of 1- t o 1 0 - l e t t e r words r e s p e c t i v e l y . Words l o n g e r t h a n 10 c h a r a c t e r s were d e l e t e d a s were items c o n t a i n i n g numbers, p u n c t u a t i o n , o r s p e c i a l c o d i n g s f o r c a p i t a l i z a t i o n s , f o r e i g n a l p h a b e t s , and unusual g r a p h i c f e a t u r e s o r symbols. T h i s r e s u l t e d i n 10 l i s t s of words, one f o r each l e t t e r l e n g t h . These word l ists formed t h e b a s i s f o r c o u n t s of s i n g l e l e t t e r s , b igrams, and t r i g r a m s .

T a b l e s were p r e p a r e d by c o u n t i n g t h e o c c u r r e n c e of each - n-gram a t t h e p o s i t i o n it o c c u r r e d i n words o f a g i v e n l e n g t h . Two c o u n t s were o t a i n e d . One was a t y p e c o u n t based upon t h e number of word t y p e s t h a t c o n t a i n e d a g i v e n E-gram, and t h e o t h e r was a token c o u n t based upon t h e t o t a l number of o c c u r r e n c e s of t h e word c o n t a i n i n g t h e "-gram. A p o s i t i o n - i n s e n s i t i v e c o u n t ( b u t s t i l l word l e n g t h d e p e n d e n t ) was a l s o o b t a i n e d f o r each "-gram by summing a c r o s s t h e

Page 144: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

ORTHOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE AND R E C O G N I T I O N 1 2 7

p o s i t i o n - d e p e n d e n t c o u n t s . B e c a u s e Kuce ra and F r a n c i s m a i n t a i n e d a f a i t h f u l c o u n t o f t h e a c t u a l g r a p h i c p a t t e r n s found i n t h e c o r p u s , t h e i r l i s t c o n t a i n s r a r e w o r d s , t y p o g r a p h i c e r r o r s , f o r e i g n p e r s o n and p l a c e names, and o t h e r i d e o s y n c r a t i c i t ems . To l i m i t t h e i m p a c t o f s u c h items on o u r t a b u l a t i o n s , c u t - o f f l i m i t s were e s t a b l i s h e d f o r b o t h word f r e q u e n c y and number o f s a m p l e s . The c u t - o f f s were a minimum c o u n t o f a t l e a s t o n e o c c u r r e n c e i n t h r e e o f t h e 500 s a m p l e s . Thus , u n u s u a l words and u s a g e s , r e g a r d l e s s o f t h e i r f r e q u e n c y , were i g n o r e d u n l e s s t h e y o c c u r r e d i n t h r e e o r more s e p a r a t e s a m p l e s . I n t h i s way, w o r d s w i t h t h e minimum f r e q u e n c y o f t h r e e were c o u n t e d o n l y i f t h e y o c c u r r e d o n c e i n e a c h o f t h r e e s a m p l e s . A l t h o u g h t h i s l i m i t was a r b i t r a r y , i n s p e c t i o n o f t h e word l i s t i n t h e low f r e q u e n c y r a n g e i n d i c a t e d t h a t t h e s e were r e a s o n a b l e c u t - o f f s . The s i n g l e - l e t t e r t o k e n c o u n t s f o r word l e n g t h s 3 t h r o u g h 7 and t h e b i g r a m t o k e n c o u n t s f o r word l e n g t h s 3 t h r o u g h 7 a r e p r e s e n t e d a s A p p e n d i c e s 5 .2 and 5 . 3 , r e s p e c t i v e 1 y .

A l l o f t h e f r e q u e n c y m e a s u r e s t h a t w i l l b e d i s c u s s e d were d e r i v e d from t h e s e t a b l e s w i t h two e x c e p t i o n s , word f r e q u e n c y and E n g l i s h n e s s . The f r e q u e n c i e s o f t h e 40 w o r d s were t a k e n d i r e c t l y f rom t h e Kucera and F r a n c i s c o u n t . E n g l i s h n e s s is a m e a s u r e p r o p o s e d b y T r a v e r s and O l i v i e r ( 1 9 7 8 ) and was computed from t a b l e s s u p p l i e d t o u s by t h e a u t h o r s . E n g l i s h n e s s is a c o n t i n u e d p r o d u c t o f ;-gram p r o b a b i l i t i e s e s t i m a t e d t o t h e l e v e l o f t h i r d - o r d e r t r a n s i t i o n a l p r o b a b i l i t i e s . The f o r m u l a f o r s i x - l e t t e r words o r l e t t e r s t r i n g s i s a s f o l l o w s :

E n g l i s h n e s s (#LlL2L3L4L5L6#) =

- l o g [P(L11#)*P(L2l#Ll)*P(L3lLlL2)* P(L41L2L3)*P(L51L3L4)*P(L61L4L5)1 ( 4 )

where # r e p r e s e n t s a s p a c e and L i is t h e l e t t e r a t p o s i t i o n i . The term P ( L k l L ( k - Z ) L ( k - l ) ) i s e s t i m a t e d by t h e r a t i o o f t h e t r i g r a m f r e q u e n c y o f L ( k - Z ) L ( k - l ) L k t o t h e b i g r a m f r e q u e n c y L ( k - Z ) L ( k - l ) . I t s h o u l d b e n o t e d t h a t t h e s e f r e q u e n c y e s t i m a t e s a r e n o t p o s i t i o n s e n s i t i v e e x c e p t i n a s much a s t h e y a r e t i e d t o i n i t i a l p o s i t i o n o c c u r r e n c e s , i . e . , t h e i n i t i a l t r i g r a m # L 1 L 2 and i n i t i a l b i g r a m # L 1 . The c o u n t s a r e a l s o n o t w o r d - l e n g t h s p e c i f i c . The i n i t i a l term P ( L i l # ) i n t h e f o r m u l a is a c t u a l l y t h e f r e q u e n c y o f t h e i n i t i a l l e t t e r a s i t o c c u r s i n t h e f i r s t p o s i t i o n i n words o f a n y l e n g t h . The r a t i o n a l e f o r examin ing t h i s measure is t o p r o v i d e a c o m p a r i s o n t o t h e o t h e r f r e q u e n c y m e a s u r e s we w i l l examine . T r a v e r s and O l i v i e r ( 1 9 7 8 ) p r o v i d e d some e v i d e n c e t h a t t h e m e a s u r e had success i n

Page 145: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

128 CHAPTER 5

d e s c r i b i n g performance i n a f u l l r e p o r t o f s h o r t p r e s e n t a t i o n s of l e t t e r s t r i n g s .

Our r e g u l a r i t y measure c o n s i s t e d of a c o u n t of t h e number of i r r e g u l a r i t i e s c o n t a i n e d i n each of t h e 2 0 0 s t i m u l u s items. T h e e x a c t r u l e s f o r t h e i r r e g u l a r i t y c o u n t a r e g i v e n i n T a b l e 5 .1 . An i r r e g u l a r i t y was counted f o r e a c h v i o l a t i o n of c e r t a i n s c r i b a l c o n s t r a i n t s , f o r each i m p e r m i s s i b l e vowel c l u s t e r and f o r each i m p o s s i b l e consonant c l u s t e r when c o n s i d e r e d a s p a r t of a monosyl lab le . The items were t r e a t e d a s m o n o s y l l a b l e s because a n a p p r o p r i a t e s y l l a b i c a t i o n is d i f f i c u l t t o impose on nonsense s t r i n g s . Without r i g i d c r i t e r i a , judgments f o r some anagrams would be u n r e a s o n a b l y a r b i t r a r y . Thus, we c h o s e t o t r e a t a l l s t r i n g s a s monosyl lab ic even though t h i s r e q u i r e d c l a s s i f i c a t i o n of some two s y l l a b l e words as c o n t a i n i n g i r r e g u l a r i t i e s a t s y l l a b l e b o u n d a r i e s . The c o u n t s of i r r e g u l a r i t i e s f o r e a c h of t h e items o f e a c h of t h e f i v e s t i m u l u s c a t e g o r i e s a r e shown i n Appendix 5.1.

TYPE VERSUS TOKEN COUNTS

The f i r s t g e n e r a l i ssue i n d e r i v i n g a f r e q u e n c y measure is whether t y p e c o u n t s or t o k e n c o u n t s a r e most a p p r o p r i a t e . C e r t a i n l y , t h e two methods of c o u n t i n g w i l l produce f requency measures t h a t have some d e g r e e of c o r r e l a t i o n . Even though it is p r o b a b l y p o s s i b l e t o f i n d o c c u r r e n c e s of “-grams o c c u r r i n g i n o n l y a small number of e x t r e m e l y f r e q u e n t words and o t h e r E-grams o c c u r r i n g i n many i n f r e q u e n t word t y p e s , on t h e a v e r a g e t h e g r e a t e r t h e t y p e count t h e g r e a t e r t h e t o k e n c o u n t . Only by examining s i t u a t i o n s where t h e two measures a r e r e l a t i v e l y u n c o r r e l a t e d can t h e importance of t h e two approaches be measured. T h u s , i f our items e x h i b i t a s t r o n g c o r r e l a t i o n between type- and token-based measures l i t t l e c a n be d e t e r m i n e d from our d a t a t o s u p p o r t one over t h e o t h e r . A t t h e same time, i f our sample is r e p r e s e n t a t i v e of a wide range of l e t t e r s t r i n g s and t h e two approaches a r e h i g h l y c o r r e l a t e d , t h e q u e s t i o n may be of no p r a c t i c a l s i g n i f i c a n c e . I n any s i t u a t i o n where such a measure would be u s e f u l , e i t h e r might be used w i t h e s s e n t i a l l y i d e n t i c a l e f f e c t .

We found t h a t t h e c o r r e l a t i o n s between comparable t y p e measures and token measures f o r our sample were v e r y h i g h . Measures based on s i n g l e l e t t e r s , b igrams, and t r i g r a m s ,

Page 146: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

ORTHOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE AND RECOGNITION 129

Table 5 . 1 The r u l e s f o r t h e i r r e g u l a r i t y c o u n t of t h e 2 0 0 s t i m u l u s i t e m s

1.

2 .

3 .

4 .

5.

6.

7.

8.

Segment s t r i n g i n t o vowel and consonant s u b s t r i n g s . T rea t f i n a l -& a s i f i t were -9. T r e a t between vowels as a ( l e g a l ) consonant .

For each consonant s t r i n g , d e t e r m i n e minimal number of vowels which m u s t be i n s e r t e d t o make t h e s t r i n g pronounceable . I n i t i a l consonant c l u s t e r s m u s t be l e g a l i n i n i t i a l p o s i t i o n . F i n a l consonant c l u s t e r s m u s t be l e g a l i n f i n a l p o s i t i o n , i n c l u d i n g t h o s e f o l l o w e d by f i n a l - e . Medial c o n s o n a n t c l u s t e r s m u s t be l e g a l i n i n i t i a l p o s i t i o n .

Rate e a c h r e s u l t i n g c o n s o n a n t s u b s t r i n g f o r p o s i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e s c r i b a l r e g u l a r i t y ( c o u n t one f o r e a c h i r r e g u l a r s u b s t r i n g ) .

For each vowel s u b s t r i n g , d e t e r m i n e minimal number of c o n s o n a n t s which m u s t be i n s e r t e d t o c r e a t e s c r i b a l l y r e g u l a r sequences . Mark a s i r r e g u l a r i l l e g a l i n i t i a l and f i n a l vowel s u b s t r i n g s .

Count number of i n s e r t e d vowels and c o n s o n a n t s , p l u s number of s c r i b a l l y i r r e g u l a r consonant and vowel s u b s t r i n g s . T h i s y i e l d s an i r r e g u l a r i t y index .

The vowel s t r i n g s ", E, s, and (among more o b v i o u s c a s e s ) would be i l l e g a l vowel s t r i n g s . y would be i l l e g a l a s a vowel i n i n i t i a l p o s i t i o n and i, 2 , a, E, and 9 would be i l l e g a l i n f i n a l p o s t i o n . is l e g a l a s is y a s a s i n g l e , n o n - i n i t i a l vowel.

- h i s n o t a l lowed i n f i n a l p o s i t i o n u n l e s s preceded by c , 9, Or S .

y and y between vowels a r e t o be counted a s c o n s o n a n t s .

Page 147: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 3 0 CHAPTER 5

both p o s i t i o n s e n s i t i v e and p o s i t i o n i n s e n s i t i v e , c o r r e l a t e d between . 8 4 and .99. With such h igh c o r r e l a t i o n s no meaningfu l d i s c r i m i n a t i o n can be made between t h e two approaches . F i g u r e 5 .1 shows some 5-gram c o r r e l a t i o n s based on t y p e and t o k e n c o u n t s : t h e two s e t s of c o u n t s g i v e h i g h l y s i m i l a r c o r r e l a t i o n s . For t h i s r e a s o n , u n l e s s o t h e r w i s e s t a t e d , we w i l l d i s c u s s o n l y measures based on t o k e n c o u n t s i n t h e remainder of t h i s c h a p t e r .

SCALE OF FREQUENCY

T h i s a n a l y s i s c o n c e r n s t h e f requency s c a l e t o be chosen i n computing f requency measures . While t h e e f f e c t s of f r e q u e n c y

Accuracy

0 Bigram Trigram B

I I I

LINEAR LOG LINEAR LOC

TYPE TOKEN

F i g u r e 5 . 1 C o r r e l a t i o n s of a c c u r a c y and r e a c t i o n times a s a f u n c t i o n of l i n e a r o r l o g and t y p e o r t o k e n p o s i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e s i n g l e - l e t t e r , b igram, and t r i g r a m c o u n t s .

Page 148: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

ORTHOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE AND RECOGNITION 1 3 1

seem t o be p s y c h o l o g i c a l l y r e a l , i t is n o t n e c e s s a r y t h a t t h e m e n t a l r e p r e s e n t a t i o n s o f f r e q u e n c y d i r e c t l y r e f l e c t t h e f r e q u e n c y o f o b j e c t i v e c o u n t s . One a l t e r n a t i v e s c a l e t h a t h a s b e e n s u c c e s s f u l i n o t h e r r e s e a r c h i s a l o g a r i t h m i c ( b a s e 10) s c a l e . Not o n l y a r e t h e r e some d a t a t o s u g g e s t t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f a l o g a r i t h m i c r e p r e s e n t a t i o n (Solomon 6, Pos tman , 1952 ; T a y l o r , 1977 ; T r a v e r s & O l i v i e r , 1 9 7 8 ) , b u t a l s o a l o g a r i t h m i c r e p r e s e n t a t i o n is c o n s i s t e n t w i t h r e c e n t s t u d i e s o f number r e p r e s e n t a t i o n ( S h e p a r d , 1 9 7 8 ) and w i t h many o t h e r p s y c h o l o g i c a l s c a l e s . T h e r e f o r e , w e computed a l l o f o u r f r e q u e n c y m e a s u r e s b a s e d upon b o t h r e g u l a r l i n e a r f r e q u e n c i e s and l o g f r e q u e n c i e s . F o r t h e s e m e a s u r e s , and a l l t r a n s f o r m e d s c a l e s ( t o b e d i s c u s s e d ) , l i n e a r - f r e q u e n c y t a b l e s f o r t h e p o s i t i o n - d e p e n d e n t "-grams were n o t r e s c a l e d b e f o r e m e a s u r e s were computed f o r a n y i tem. T h e r e f o r e , t h e two s e t s o f m e a s u r e s b e i n g c o r r e l a t e d were s u m s o f p o s i t i o n - d e p e n d e n t s i n g l e l e t t e r s , b i g r a m s , and t r i g r a m s d e r i v e d from e i t h e r l i n e a r - f r e q u e n c y o r l o g - f r e q u e n c y t a b l e s . I n n e a r l y e v e r y i n s t a n c e t h e l o g - f r e q u e n c y m e a s u r e was more h i g h l y c o r r e l a t e d w i t h t h e p e r f o r m a n c e m e a s u r e t h a n was l i n e a r f r e q u e n c y ( s e e , f o r e x a m p l e , F i g u r e 5 . 1 ) .

A l t h o u g h l o g f r e q u e n c i e s , f o r p u r p o s e s o f d e s c r i b i n g t h e e f f e c t s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e on r e c o g n i t i o n p e r f o r m a n c e , were b e t t e r t h a n l i n e a r f r e q u e n c i e s , w e were a l s o i n t e r e s t e d i n compar ing t h e l o g s c a l e w i t h o t h e r t r a n s f o r m a t i o n s o f t h e l i n e a r f r e q e n c i e s . For t h i s i n v e s t i g a t i o n , w e c h o s e o u r b e s t f r e q u e n c y m e a s u r e , summed t o k e n p o s i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e b i g r a m s , and a p p l i e d a r a n g e o f t r a n s f o r m a t i o n s t o i t . A power f u n c t i o n o f t h e form

X y = a (5)

g a v e v a r i o u s s c a l e s d e p e n d i n g on t h e v a l u e o f t h e e x p o n e n t x . E x p o n e n t s o f 0 . 8 , 0 . 7 , 0 . 5 , 0 . 2 , and 0 . 1 were s e l e c t e d . The 0 .2 e x p o n e n t a p p r o x i m a t e s t h e l o g f u n c t i o n v e r y c l o s e l y i n t h e r a n g e o f f r e q u e n c y v a l u e s r e p r e s e n t e d by o u r s t i m l u i . The l a r g e r e x p o n e n t s y i e l d e d v a l u e s i n t e r m e d i a t e be tween t h o s e o f t h e l i n e a r and l o g s c a l e s w h i l e t h e 0 . 1 e x p o n e n t p roduced v a l u e s more e x t r e m e t h a n t h e l o g f u n c t i o n . The c o r r e l a t i o n b e t w e e n t h e s e b i g r a m m e a s u r e s and t h r e e p e r f o r m a n c e m e a s u r e s g rew m o n o t o n i c a l l y f rom t h e l i n e a r s c a l e m e a s u r e t o t h e l o g and 0.2 e x p o n e n t power f u n c t i o n where c o r r e l a t i o n s peaked and t h e n f e l l f o r ' t h e more e x t r e m e 0.1 e x p o n e n t power f u n c t i o n . The c o r r e l a t i o n s be tween a v e r a g e a c c u r a c y and t h e s e b i g r a m m e a s u r e s were . 6 3 f o r t h e l i n e a r s c a l e ; .77 f o r t h e l o g s c a l e ; and .68,

Page 149: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

132 CHAPTER 5

.70, .74 , .77 , .75 f o r exponents of 0 . 8 , 0 .7 , 0 . 5 , 0 .2 , and 0 . 1 r e s p e c t i v e l y . These d a t a i n d i c a t e t h a t i f f requency measures a r e u t i l i z e d by t h e r e a d e r , t h e y appear t o be computed on l o g f r e q u e n c i e s , and so o n l y log- f requency measures w i l l be d i s c u s s e d f u r t h e r .

POSITION-SENSITIVE VERSUS POSITION-INSENSITIVE COUNTS

There have been many a t t e m p t s t o d e r i v e a measure of p e r c e p t a b i l i t y based upon p o s i t i o n - i n s e n s i t i v e f r e q u e n c y c o u n t s (Gibson 1964; Gibson, e t a l . , 1970; Postman & Conger, 1954; Spoehr & Smith , 1 9 7 5 ) . These a t t e m p t s have t y p i c a l l y shown t h a t c o u n t s t h a t accumula te f r e q u e n c i e s w i t h o u t r e g a r d t o p o s i t i o n g i v e i n a d e q u a t e measures . On t h e o t h e r hand, p o s i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e measures have r e c e i v e d some s u p p o r t as y i e l d i n g b e t t e r measures (Gibson e t a l . , 1970; Mason, 1975, McClelland & J o h n s t o n , 1 9 7 7 ) . We compared t h e two t y p e s of measures a g a i n s t our d a t a . Table 5 .2 shows t h e c o r r e l a t i o n s between t h e t h r e e per formance measures w i t h s i n g l e - l e t t e r , b igram, and t r i g r a m c o u n t s d e r i v e d from both p o s i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e and p o s i t i o n - i n s e n s i t i v e c o u n t s . The s t r i k i n g d i f f e r e n c e i n t h i s t a b l e is between t h e two d i f f e r e n t s i n g l e - l e t t e r measures . A s noted by e a r l i e r r e s e a r c h e r s ( e . g . , Postman & Conger, 1 9 5 4 ) , o v e r a l l l e t t e r f r e q u e n c y w i t h o u t r e g a r d t o p o s i t i o n i s n o t a v e r y powerfu l p r e d i c t o r of r e c o g n i t i o n performance. By c o n t r a s t , a p o s i t i o n - d e p e n d e n t s i n g l e - l e t t e r measure is a l m o s t a s powerfu l a s p o s i t i o n - i n s e n s i t i v e b igrams and t r i g r a m s f o r d e s c r i b i n g a c c u r a c y and RT. I t s h o u l d be noted t h a t p o s i t i o n - i n s e n s i t i v e c o u n t s d o b e t t e r a s t h e =-gram's l e n g t h i n c r e a s e s . For "-grams of a g i v e n l e n g t h , p o s i t i o n dependence seems t o l e a d t o a b e t t e r index of s t r u c t u r e a l t h o u g h t h e advantage is e s s e n t i a l l y e l i m i n a t e d f o r t r i g r a m c o u n t s . The a p p a r e n t s u p e r i o r i t y of p o s i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e bigrams over p o s i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e t r i g r a m s w i l l be d i s c u s s e d n e x t . For t h e remainder of t h e s e a n a l y s e s , p o s i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e c o u n t s w i l l be used.

Page 150: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

ORTHOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE A N D RECOGNITION 1 3 3

T a b l e 5 .2 C o r r e l a t i o n s be tween t h e t h r e e d e p e n d e n t m e a s u r e s and summed l o g f r e q u e n c y c o u n t s , b o t h p o s i t i o n d e p e n d e n t and p o s i t i o n i n d e p e n d e n t .

!&pe o f F r e q u e n c y Measure Dependen t M e a s u r e s

RT R a t i n q A c c u r a c y - P o s i t i o n I n d e p e n d e n t

S i n g l e L e t t e r . 2 0 - . 3 6 . 0 4

Bigram . 5 9 - .55 . 7 3

T r i g r a m . 6 8 - .57 . 8 4

P o s i t i o n Dependen t

S i n g l e L e t t e r . 6 2

Bigram . 7 7

T r i g r am . 7 5

- .48 . 4 5

- . 6 4 . 8 3

- . 5 4 . 8 0

THE MOST EFFECTIVE FREQUENCY MEASURE

We h a v e n o t e d t h a t summed p o s i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e l o g b i g r a m f r e q u e n c i e s had t h e h i g h e s t c o r r e l a t i o n s w i t h our t h r e e p e r f o r m a n c e m e a s u r e s . T h i s measure, i n f a c t , had t h e h i g h e s t c o r r e l a t i o n s o f a n y of t h e a l m o s t 5 0 f o r m s o f f r e q u e n c y m e a s u r e s t h a t w e examined . Fo r e x a m p l e , p o s i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e s i n g l e l e t t e r s a c c o u n t f o r a n a v e r a g e o f 2 9 % o f t h e v a r i a n c e i n o u r t h r e e p e r f o r m a n c e m e a s u r e s , w h i l e p o s i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e b i g r a m s a c c o u n t f o r 5 7 % . A l t h o u g h it m i g h t b e e x p e c t e d t h a t l a r g e r !-grams s h o u l d n a t u r a l l y c a p t u r e more o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e t h a n s m a l l e r E-grams, we o b s e r v e d t h a t p o s i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e b i g r a m c o u n t s o f s e v e r a l k i n d s ( d i s c u s s e d be low) were b e t t e r t h a n c o m p a r a b l e f r e q u e n c y m e a s u r e s b a s e d

Page 151: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 3 4 CHAPTER 5

upon t r i g r a m s . I t is p o s s i b l e t o h y p o t h e s i z e s e v e r a l r e a s o n s why t h i s s h o u l d be t h e c a s e . F i r s t , t h e sampling e r r o r i n t h e t r i g r a m t a b l e s may be l a r g e enough r e l a t i v e t o t h e sampling e r r o r i n t h e bigram t a b l e s t o a c c o u n t f o r t h e e f f e c t . The rough e q u i v a l e n c e between p o s i t ion- independent and p o s i t i o n - d e p e n d e n t t r i g r a m c o u n t s might have r e s u l t e d from a t r a d e - o f f between t h e a d v a n t a g e of p o s i t i o n s e n s i t i v i t y and t h e l a r g e r e r r o r v a r i a n c e f o r p o s i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e c o u n t s . Second, t r i g r a m s s imply may have reached a p o i n t of d i m i n i s h i n g r e t u r n s . With b igrams a c c o u n t i n g f o r 5 7 % of t h e v a r i a n c e , t h e r e s imply may be no room f o r n o t i c e a b l e improvements w i t h l a r g e r "-gram measures . F i n a l l y , i t c o u l d be t h a t bigram c o u n t s a r e more r e p r e s e n t a t i v e of t h e r e a d e r ' s knowledge and u t i l i z a t i o n of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . We w i l l r e t u r n t o t h i s q u e s t i o n i n a l a t e r s e c t i o n of t h i s c h a p t e r .

The measures t h a t have been d i s c u s s e d were based upon t h e s u m of t h e f r e q u e n c i e s f o r t h e component "-grams i n a l e t t e r s t r i n g . E n g l i s h n e s s was d e s c r i b e d a s a p r o d u c t of f r e q u e n c y r a t i o s and would appear t o p r o v i d e an i n t e r e s t i n g comparison i n te rms of how a f r e q u e n c y measure s h o u l d be computed from component "-gram f r e q u e n c i e s . The o b s e r v a t i o n t h a t l o g f requency i s a b e t t e r s c a l e narrows t h e d i s t a n c e between E n g l i s h n e s s and summed "-gram measures s i n c e E n g l i s h n e s s is computed a s t h e s u m o f t h e l o g a r i t h m s of f requency r a t i o s . I n a c t u a l compar ison , E n g l i s h n e s s proved t o be a l e s s powerfu l measure t h a n t h e p o s i t i o n - d e p e n d e n t bigram measure. I t c o r r e l a t e d - . 6 5 w i t h a v e r a g e a c c u r a c y , . 4 7 w i t h a v e r a g e RT, and - . a 2 w i t h t h e r a t i n g s .

I t o c c u r r e d t o u s t h a t t h e n o r m a l i z a t i o n p r o c e s s of d i v i d i n g a t r i g r a m f r e q u e n c y by t h e t o t a l f requency o f a l l r e l a t e d t r i g r a m s might have t h e p o t e n t i a l f o r producing an e x t r e m e l y powerfu l measure. That is e s s e n t i a l l y what E n g l i s h n e s s does e x c e p t t h a t it is based upon p o s i t i o n - i n s e n s i t i v e c o u n t s . T h i s would make p a r t i c u l a r l y good t h e o r e t i c a l s e n s e i n t h e case where p a r t i a l v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n was a v a i l a b l e and was used t o r e s o l v e O K e s t i m a t e unknown l e t t e r s . For example, i f some t r i g r a m xyz is c o n s i d e r e d a t some p o i n t i n a l e t t e r s t r i n g , t h e p r e d i c t a b i l i t y of z g i v e n t h e p r e c e e d i n g l e t t e r s xy is a f u n c t i o n of t h e f r e q u e n c y of xyz r e l a t i v e t o t h e t o t a l f r e q u e n c y of a l l t r i g r a m s xy-, where t h e f i n a l l e t t e r r a n g e s over t h e e n t i r e a l p h a b e t and t a k e s on a l l a c t u a l l y o c c u r r i n g v a l u e s . Of c o u r s e , c o n s t r a i n t s need n o t work o n l y f o r w a r d , t h e r a t i o s xyz/x-z and xyz/-yz a r e a l s o of i n t e r e s t . Analogously, r a t i o s of p a r t i c u l a r bigrams xy t o t h e g e n e r a l bigram s u m s x- and -y c a n be computed.

Page 152: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

ORTHOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE AND R E C O G N I T I O N 1 3 5

T a b l e 5.3 C o r r e l a t i o n s between t h e per formance measures and summed bigram, E n g l i s h n e s s , and c o n s t r a i n t - r a t i o measures a l l based on l o g word-token f r e q u e n c i e s .

Frequency Measure Performance Measure

RT R a t i n g Accuracy -

Summed Bigrams .77 - .64 . 8 5

E n g l i s h n e s s - .65 .47 - . 8 2

X Y d X Y - .75 - .55 . 8 1

X Y z/x-z . 7 4 -. 56 . 8 2

X Y 4 - Y . 7 4 - .54 .80

XY/X- .76 - .64 . 8 6

XY1-Y .75 - .64 . 8 5

These f i v e c o n s t r a i n t r a t i o s s u g g e s t f i v e p o t e n t i a l l y i n t e r e s t i n g measures d e r i v e d by summing t h e f o u r t r i g r a m c o n s t r a i n t r a t i o s o r f i v e bigram c o n s t r a i n t r a t i o s f o r our s i x - l e t t e r s t r i n g s . Again, t h e measures were computed a s r a t i o s of l i n e a r f r e q u e n c i e s and a s r a t i o s of l o g f r e q u e n c i e s . The c o u n t s c o u l d be based on word-type f r e q u e n c i e s o r word-token f r e q u e n c i e s . I n t h i s c a s e , y e t a n o t h e r t y p e f r e q u e n c y i s p o s s i b l e , l e t t e r - t y p e f r e q u e n c y . L e t t e r - t y p e f r e q u e n c y i s s imply t h e number of l e t t e r s t h a t a c t u a l l y occur i n t h e f r e e v a r i a b l e p o s i t i o n . Thus, a t r i g r a m of t h e form s-r might c o n s i s t of a f a m i l y of e i g h t o r n i n e t r i g r a m s w h i l e q-i h a s o n l y a s i n g l e p o s s i b l e member. L e t t e r - t y p e f r e q u e n c y was t a k e n a s t h e r e c i p r o c a l number of t r i g r a m s i n a f a m i l y o r z e r o i f t h e f a m i l y h a s no n a t u r a l l y o c c u r r i n g member, i . e . , a l l i l l e g a l t r i g r a m s . A s i m i l a r l e t t e r - t y p e measure was c o n s t r u c t e d f o r b igrams. I n a l l , t h e r e were 3 0 measures computed from c o n s t r a i n t r a t i o s ( f i v e k i n d s of r a t i o s x two f r e q u e n c y s c a l e s x t h r e e k i n d s o f t y p e and t o k e n c o u n t s ) .

Page 153: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

136 CHAPTER 5

The r e s u l t s f o r t h e s e c o n s t r a i n t - r a t i o measures m i r r o r e d t h e r e s u l t s f o r t h e s i m p l e summed fi-gram f r e q u e n c i e s . R a t i o s o f l o g f r e q u e n c i e s c o n s i s t e n t l y gave h i g h e r c o r r e l a t i o n s t h a n r a t i o s o f l i n e a r f r e q u e n c i e s . Word-token f r e q u e n c i e s and word-type f r e q u e n c i e s were n e a r l y i n d i s t i n g u i s h a b l e i n terms o f t h e i r c o r r e l a t i o n s w i t h t h e per formance measures ; t h e s e f requency measures c o r r e l a t e d w i t h each o t h e r a t .90 o r h i g h e r . L e t t e r - t y p e f r e q u e n c i e s c o r r e l a t e d s l i g h t l y less h i g h l y w i t h word-type and word-token f requency measures b u t a l s o d i d n o t c o r r e l a t e a s h i g h l y w i t h t h e performance measures . F i n a l l y , t h e bigram r a t i o measures gave s l i g h t l y h i g h e r c o r r e l a t i o n s wi th t h e performance measures t h a n d i d t h e t r i g r a m r a t i o s . A

r e p r e s e n t a t i v e sample of t h e s e measures i s shown i n T a b l e 5 .3 . C o r r e l a t i o n s among t h e f r e q u e n c y measures were q u i t e h i g h . The t h r e e t r i g r a m measures shown i n Table 5 . 3 c o r r e l a t e d w i t h e a c h

.a -

.6 -

.4 -

H . 2 -

B d . o - K K 0 -.2 - 0

-.4 - -.6 - - . 8 - o Blgram

x Trlgram

-1.0 I I I I I I I 1 2 3 4 5 6

SERIAL POSITION

F i g u r e 5 .2 C o r r e l a t i o n s o f a c c u r a c y and r e a c t i o n t i m e s w i t h s i n g l e - l e t t e r , b igram, and t r i g r a m f r e q u e n c i e s a s a f u n c t i o n of t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e s e r i a l p o s i t i o n s i n t h e s i x - l e t t e r s t r i n g s .

Page 154: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

ORTHOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE AND RECOGNITION 137

o t h e r .98 or h i g h e r . L ikewise , t h e two bigram c o n s t r a i n t - r a t i o measures c o r r e l a t e d . 9 9 w i t h e a c h o t h e r . Given t h e u n i f o r m l y h igh c o r r e l a t i o n s between a l l t h e c o n s t r a i n t - r a t i o measures , i t i s i m p o s s i b l e t o d i s c r i m i n a t e among them. Fur thermore , t h e s e r a t i o s d o n o t a c c o u n t f o r any more v a r i a n c e t h a n t h e c o m p u t a t i o n a l l y s i m p l e r summed l o g bigram measure. For t h e s e r e a s o n s , t h e summed l o g bigram measure is t o be p r e f e r r e d over t h e c o n s t r a i n t r a t i o s .

Having found t h a t computing more complex measures was no more e f f e c t i v e t h a n summing t h e component bigrams of a l e t t e r s t r i n g , w e i n v e s t i g a t e d a s i m p l e r measure. We examined t h e c o r r e l a t i o n s of t h e f r e q u e n c i e s of each of t h e component - n-grams w i t h t h e per formance measures . Thus, t h e r e were s i x c o r r e l a t i o n s f o r s i n g l e - l e t t e r f r e q u e n c i e s , f i v e f o r bigram f r e q u e n c i e s , and f o u r f o r t r i g r a m f r e q u e n c i e s w i t h each

.3 t

.2 - 0

8 .l- o” 0

g 40-

30-

20 -

- 6

-6

- 4

K

- 6

SERIAL POSITION

F i g u r e 5 . 3 V a r i a n c e s of s i n g l e - l e t t e r and bigram o c c u r r e n c e s a long w i t h t h e i r observed c o r r e l a t i o n s w i t h a c c u r a c y measures a t t h e r e s p e c t i v e s e r i a l p o s i t i o n s i n t h e s i x - l e t t e r s t r i n g s .

Page 155: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

138 CHAPTER 5

p e r f o r m a n c e m e a s u r e . F i g u r e 5.2 p r e s e n t s t h e r e s u l t s o f t h i s a n a l y s i s . A l t h o u g h some o f t h e i n d i v i d u a l "-grams d i d n e a r l y a s we l l a s t h e summed m e a s u r e s , no s i n g l e "-gram u n i t had a s h i g h a c o r r e l a t i o n a s i ts c o r r e s p o n d i n g summed m e a s u r e . I t i s a p p a r e n t f rom t h e f i g u r e t h a t t h e end l e t t e r p o s i t i o n s were t h e mos t i m p o r t a n t , b u t a s t h e 3-gram l e n g t h i n c r e a s e d t h e p o s i t i o n a l d i f f e r e n c e s w e re d i m i n i s h e d .

F i g u r e 5.2 shows t h a t t h e d e g r e e t o wh ich a p a r t i c u l a r - n-gram p r e d i c t s p e r f o r m a n c e is c r i t i c a l l y d e p e n d e n t o n i t s s e r i a l p o s i t i o n , e s p e c i a l l y f o r t h e s i n g l e - l e t t e r and t o some e x t e n t t h e b i g r a m c o u n t s . I n o r d e r t o e v a l u a t e w h e t h e r t h i s e f f e c t i s d u e t o t h e i n f o r m a t i o n a l c o n s t r a i n t s i n t h e s t i m u l i t h e m s e l v e s , w e d e r i v e d a m e a s u r e a f r e d u n d a n c y o r p r e d i c t a b i l i t y f o r e a c h s e r i a l p o s i t i o n . The v a r i a n c e o f l e t t e r o c c u r r e n c e s a t e a c h s e r i a l p o s i t i o n was computed b a s e d on t h e t a b l e o f f r e q u e n c i e s g i v e n i n Appendix 5 . 2 a n d 5.3. H igh v a r i a n c e s o c c u r t o t h e e x t e n t t h a t some l e t t e r s o c c u r more o f t e n t h a n o t h e r s . T h e s e v a r i a n c e m e a s u r e s f o r t h e s i n g l e - l e t t e r and b ig ram c o u n t s a r e shown i n F i g u r e 5.3. A s m i g h t b e e x p e c t e d from p h o n o l o g i c a l and s c r i b a l c o n s t r a i n t s , l e t t e r s a r e much more p r e d i c t a b l e i n i n i t i a l and f i n a l p o s i t i o n s t h a n i n t h e m i d d l e o f s i x - l e t t e r words. A l s o p r e s e n t e d i n F i g u r e 5 . 3 a r e t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g c o r r e l a t i o n s w i t h t h e a c c u r a c y m e a s u r e . The v a r i a n c e and c o r r e l a t i o n m e a s u r e s a r e h i g h l y c o r r e l a t e d f o r s i n g l e - l e t t e r c o u n t s which means t h a t s u b j e c t s e x p l o i t r e d u n d a n c y d i r e c t l y t o t h e d e g r e e t h a t i t i s p r e s e n t . A l though t h i s c o r r e s p o n d e n c e m i g h t b e e x p e c t e d t o o c c u r n e c e s s a r i l y , t h e b ig ram r e s u l t s a r g u e t h e o p p o s i t e . A l t h o u g h t h e v a r i a n c e m e a s u r e s a r e r o u g h l y s i m i l a r f o r t h e f i r s t t h r e e s e r i a l p o s i t i o n s , t h e c o r r e l a t i o n s a r e much h i g h e r f o r t h e f i r s t two p o s i t i o n s t h a n f o r t h e t h i r d . I n a d d i t i o n , a l t h o u g h t h e f i n a l b ig ram is much more p r e d i c t a b l e t h a n t h e p e n u l t i m a t e b i g r a m , t h e c o r r e l a t i o n s d o n o t d i f f e r by much.

FREQUENCY VERSUS R E G U L A R I T Y

A m a j o r c o n c e r n o f t h e p r e s e n t r e s e a r c h h a s b e e n t o compare f r e q u e n c y w i t h r u l e - g o v e r n e d r e g u l a r i t y a s i n d i c e s o f s t r u c t u r e . We have d i s c u s s e d i n C h a p t e r 3 t h e form of e x p e r i m e n t a t i o n t h a t w i l l need t o b e c o n d u c t e d t o f u r t h e r d i f f e r e n t i a t e t h e s e two i n d i c e s . We h a v e p r e s e n t e d e v i d e n c e i n

Page 156: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

ORTHOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE AND RECOGNITION 139

Chapter 4 t h a t r e g u l a r i t y i s a t l e a s t a s i m p o r t a n t f o r p e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n and more i m p o r t a n t f o r o v e r t judgments a s is s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y . I n t h e p r e s e n t c h a p t e r , w e have shown t h a t s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y is a good measure b u t t h a t bigram p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y i s a b e t t e r measure. W e have examined s e v e r a l d imens ions of t h e f r e q u e n c y domain and p r e s e n t e d s e v e r a l f i n d i n g s a b o u t f r e q u e n c y measures . T h i s i n v e s t i g a t i o n of t h e q u a n t i t a t i v e a s p e c t s of f r e q u e n c y measures was r e l a t i v e l y d i r e c t and s t r a i g h t f o r w a r d .

A comparable i n v e s t i g a t i o n i s n o t p o s s i b l e f o r r e g u l a r i t y . We have made o n l y a v e r y modest s t a r t . A s an i n i t i a l e f f o r t t o q u a n t i f y r e g u l a r i t y , w e computed a s i m p l e c o u n t of o r t h o g r a p h i c i r r e g u l a r i t i e s based upon our p r e l i m i n a r y a t t e m p t a t a grammar of o r t h o g r a p h y ( s e e Table 5 . 1 ) . The r e s u l t d o e s r a t h e r w e l l i n c o r r e l a t i n g w i t h per formance measures b u t is n o t s u f f i c i e n t l y deve loped t o a l l o w f o r a d e c i s i v e comparison w i t h bigram f r e q u e n c y . The r e g u l a r i t y c o u n t c o r r e l a t e d .57 w i t h a v e r a g e a c c u r a c y , - . 53 w i t h a v e r a g e RT, and .85 w i t h t h e r a t i n g s . Although t h e s e c o r r e l a t i o n s w i t h t h e two r e c o g n i t i o n measures a r e q u i t e modest i n comparison w i t h t h e f r e q u e n c y measures d e s c r i b e d i n t h i s c h a p t e r , t h e c o r r e l a t i o n w i t h r a t i n g s i s comparable w i t h t h e b e s t f r e q u e n c y measure. While we h e s i t a t e t o draw s t r o n g c o n c l u s i o n s , i t would appear t h a t t h e r e is p o t e n t i a l f o r d e v e l o p i n g n o t o n l y r e f i n e d ru le -governed measures b u t a l s o q u a n t i t a t i v e l y u s e f u l s t r u c t u r e i n d i c e s based upon t h e s e r u l e s .

One major problem w i t h d i s t i n g u i s h i n g between f r e q u e n c y and r e g u l a r i t y measures of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e is t h a t t h e s e two measures a r e n a t u r a l l y c o r r e l a t e d i n t h e w r i t t e n language . I t is p o s s i b l e t o u n t a n g l e t h e s e measures a s we d i d i n t h e p r e s e n t s t u d i e s . However, by i n d e p e n d e n t l y v a r y i n g s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y and r e g u l a r i t y , we a c t u a l l y c r e a t e d l e t t e r s t r i n g s t h a t v a r i e d s y s t e m a t i c a l l y w i t h bigram f r e q u e n c y . Our r e g u l a r s t r i n g s were h i g h e r i n bigram f r e q u e n c y t h a n t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g i r r e g u l a r s t r i n g s . T h e r e f o r e , r e g u l a r i t y and p o s i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e l o g bigram f r e q u e n c y c o r r e l a t e d . 7 5 9 i n our l i s t of 2 a 8 t e s t i t e m s . I n f u t u r e e x p e r i m e n t s , w e p l a n t o i n d e p e n d e n t l y v a r y t h e s e two measures of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n p e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n and o v e r t judgment e x p e r i m e n t s .

Page 157: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

140 CHAPTER 5

W I T H I N CLASS ANALYSIS

A l l of t h e a n a l y s e s p r e s e n t e d s o f a r i n t h i s c h a p t e r have examined c o r r e l a t i o n s between measures computed f o r t h e items a c r o s s t h e f i v e c l a s s e s of s t i m u l u s s t r i n g s . Whereas i t is v e r y i m p o r t a n t t o e x p l a i n t h i s between c l a s s v a r i a n c e , i t is e q u a l l y i m p o r t a n t t o examine how w e l l s e v e r a l measures of o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e e x p l a i n t h e v a r i a n c e w i t h i n e a c h c l a s s . To do t h i s , t h e c o r r e l a t i o n a l a n a l y s e s were r e p e a t e d s e p a r a t e l y f o r t h e words and t h e r e g u l a r - h i g h , r e g u l a r - l o w , i r r e g u l a r - h i g h , and i r r e g u l a r - l o w anagram c l a s s e s . F i g u r e 5 . 4 p r e s e n t s t h e c o r r e l a t i o n s f o r t h e t h r e e p o s i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e l o g

'":

.4

-.6

-.8 c

3 Bigram x Trigram

Reaction Time

-1.0 WORDS R-H R-L I-H I-L

F i g u r e 5 . 4 C o r r e l a t i o n s of a c c u r a c y and r e a c t i o n times a s a f u n c t i o n of s i n g l e - l e t t e r , b igram, and t r i g r a m f r e q u e n c i e s f o r each o f t h e f i v e - l e t t e r s t r i n g t y p e s .

Page 158: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

ORTHOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE A N D RECOGNITION 1 4 1

n-gram c o u n t s w i t h t h e a c c u r a c y and RT p e r f o r m a n c e m e a s u r e s . A s c a n be s e e n i n t h e f i g u r e , t h e m o s t s i g n i f i c a n t r e s u l t is t h e r e l a t i v e l y p o o r c o r r e l a t i o n s o f p e r f o r m a n c e w i t h t r i g r a m f r e q u e n c i e s . S i n g l e l e t t e r and b i g r a m f r e q u e n c i e s d o a b o u t e q u a l l y w e l l o v e r a l l . F i n a l l y , a l l c o r r e l a t i o n s f o r t h e word RT d a t a were c l o s e t o z e r o . T h i s l a t t e r r e s u l t m i g h t i n d i c a t e t h a t l e x i c a l s t a t u s makes a u n i q u e c o n t r i b u t i o n i n t h e RT t a s k a t t e n u a t i n g t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . F u t u r e r e s e a r c h w i l l b e n e c e s s a r y t o a d d r e s s t h i s i s s u e .

WORD FREQUENCY

An a d d i t i o n a l m e a s u r e o f i n t e r e s t i s word f r e q u e n c y . Word f r e q u e n c y h a s shown t o b e a good p r e d i c t o r o f word r e c o g n i t i o n ( B r o a d b e n t , 1 9 6 7 ) . Log word f r e q u e n c y c o r r e l a t e s .64 w i t h a v e r a g e a c c u r a c y a n d .62 w i t h r a t i n g s ; h o w e v e r , f o r j u s t t h e word i t e m s t h e c o r r e l a t i o n s a r e - .27 and -.11 r e s p e c t i v e l y . T h i s means t h a t word f r e q u e n c y c a n n o t b e d i r e c t l y r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e e f f e c t s o f o r t h o g r a p h y s i n c e much h i g h e r c o r r e l a t i o n s s h o u l d h a v e b e e n s e e n i n t h e c l a s s o f words . I n f a c t , a dummy v a r i a b l e a s s i g n i n g t h e v a l u e 1 t o a l l words and 0 t o a l l nonwords c o r r e l a t e s . 6 6 w i t h a v e r a g e a c c u r a c y a n d .63 w i t h r a t i n g s . Log word f r e q u e n c y c o r r e l a t e s .52 a n d .78 w i t h p o s i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e l o g b i g r a m and t r i g r a m f r e q u e n c i e s r e s p e c t i v e l y i n o u r s e t o f 200 i tems. T h e r e f o r e , l e x i c a l s t a t u s i t s e l f a p p e a r s t o c o n t r i b u t e v e r y l i t t l e beyond wha t c a n b e a c c o u n t e d f o r b y s u b l e x i c a l o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e .

YULTI P L E REGRESS1 ON

A s e r i e s o f m u l t i p l e r e g r e s s i o n a n a l y s e s were c a r r i e d o u t t o see how much o f t h e v a r i a n c e o f e a c h o f t h e d e p e n d e n t m e a s u r e s c o u l d b e a c c o u n t e d f o r b y some c o m b i n a t i o n o f d e s c r i p t i v e m e a s u r e s . F o r r e s p o n s e a c c u r a c y , l o g b i g r a m f r e q u e n c y , l o g word f r e q u e n c y , a n d l o g s i n g l e - l e t t e r f r e q u e n c y a c c o u n t e d f o r a t o t a l o f 68% o f t h e v a r i a n c e . No o t h e r d e s c r i p t i v e v a r i a b l e improved o n t h e 4 0 % o f t h e RT v a r i a n c e a c c o u n t e d f o r by l o g b i g r a m f r e q u e n c y . F i n a l l y , 88% o f t h e

Page 159: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 4 2 CHAPTER 5

v a r i a n c e o f t h e r a t i n g j u d g m e n t s was a c c o u n t e d f o r by r e g u l a r i t y c o u n t , l o g t r i g r a m f r e q u e n c y , and l o g word f r e q u e n c y . These r e s u l t s show t h a t t h e knowledge o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e r e v e a l e d by a n o v e r t j udgmen t t a s k d o e s n o t r e v e a l i t s e l f t o t h e same d e g r e e i n p e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n t a s k s . T h i s r e s u l t is n o t u n r e a s o n a b l e c o n s i d e r i n g t h e a d d i t i o n a l v i s u a l p r o c e s s i n g r e q u i r e m e n t s i n t h e p e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n t a s k s . I n a d d i t i o n , t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k a l l o w s a s i g n i f i c a n t l y l a r g e r c o n t r i b u t i o n o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e t h a n d o e s t h e RT t a s k . The r e a s o n f o r t h i s d i f f e r e n c e a p p e a r s t o b e d u e t o t h e r e l a t i v e l y s m a l l c o n t r i b u t i o n o f v i s u a l p r o c e s s i n g t o t h e RT m e a s u r e compared t o t h e r e l a t i v e l y l a r g e c o n t r i b u t i o n o f v i s u a l p r o c e s s i n g t o t h e a c c u r a c y m e a s u r e ( s e e C h a p t e r 4 ) .

SUMMARY

The p o s t hoc c o r r e l a t i o n s were r e a s o n a b l y s u c c e s s f u l i n i l l u m i n a t i n g t h e r o l e o f a number o f v a r i a b l e s r e l e v a n t t o m e a s u r e s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . Type and t o k e n c o u n t s were e q u a l l y good m e a s u r e s f o r o u r s t i m u l u s i t ems , w h e r e a s l o g c o u n t s were s i g n i f i c a n t l y b e t t e r t h a n l i n e a r c o u n t s . P o s i t i o n s e n s i t i v i t y i s c r i t i c a l , e s p e c i a l l y f o r s m a l l e r !-gram c o u n t s . F i n a l l y , p o s i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e l o g b ig ram f r e q u e n c y a p p e a r e d t o b e t h e mos t e f f e c t i v e m e a s u r e , a l t h o u g h t h e r e a p p e a r s t o b e some p o t e n t i a l f o r d e v e l o p i n g a n e q u a l l y good r e g u l a r i t y m e a s u r e .

Page 160: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

A P P E N D I X 5 .1 143

Append ix 5 .1

S t i m u l u s Items and R e s u l t s

Each o f t h e 2 0 0 s t i m u l u s items and i t s r e s p e c t i v e a v e r a g e p e r c e n t a g e a c c u r a c y (Acc) , a v e r a g e RT, ave r . age r a t i n g , summed p o s i t i o n - se n s i t i v e l o g s i ng le- 1 e t t e r f r e q u e n c y , summed PO s- i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e l o g b i g ram f r e q u e n c y , summed p o s i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e l o g t r i g r a m f r e q u e n c y , l o g word f r e q u e n c y , and number o f i r r e g u l a r i t i e s .

Page 161: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 4 4

WORDS

a c t i o n amount answer b a r e l y b e l o n g b r e a t h b r i d g e c h a r g e d o u b l e famous f i n g e r g a r d e n g a t h e r g l a n c e h a r d l y i t s e l f l a w y e r l o n g e r m a s t e r modern mothe r namely n e a r l y p e r m i t p l a y e r p o e t r y p u r e l y r e a s o n remain r e s u l t s h a r e d s imp1 e s i n g l e s p r e a d s t a r e d s t r e a m t r a v e l t r i a l s t u r n e d w i n t e r

Acc %

8 1 7 7 8 9 8 9 8 9 8 6 9 4 8 6 9 2 8 9 9 2 9 3 8 9 8 7 8 9 7 9 8 6 9 4 9 3 9 3 9 3 90 8 9 8 3 9 5 9 3 9 2 8 5 8 5 8 6 9 3 9 1 9 1 9 1 9 5 8 9 85 8 2 8 5 9 1

RT R a t i n g msec

644 6 56 6 4 4 6 3 5 6 0 3 6 2 9 6 5 4 6 4 2 6 2 1 6 3 9 6 5 3 6 1 9 6 7 3 637 6 6 1 6 3 7 646 6 2 7 6 2 7 6 1 6 6 1 0 6 6 2 6 2 0 590 6 1 9 6 4 2 6 0 7 605 6 3 8 6 3 6 6 4 0 6 2 2 6 3 2 6 1 1 6 7 2 6 1 6 6 2 2 6 2 3 6 7 5 6 2 1

8.8 9.3 8.2 9.3 9.5 9.3 8.9 9.4 8.9 8.9 9.5 9.7 9.4 9.3 9.4 9.2 8.7 9.6 9.7 9.5 9.5 9.4 9.3 9.6 9.6 9.2 9 .1 9 . 1 9 .5 9.7 9.4 9.4 9.2 9.2 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.2 9.3 9.7

CHAPTER 5

S i n g l e Bigram T r i g r a m Le t t e r

22.33 15.26 21.83 14.12 22.10 14 .08 23.30 1 5 . 6 3 22 .76 1 5 . 1 2 21.48 1 3 . 5 6 21.94 13 .05 22.28 1 4 . 5 1 22.13 13.56 22.05 13 .34 22.80 15.58 22 .75 14 .26 22.87 1 5 . 9 1 21.77 13 .70 22.49 14.87 21.03 1 3 . 6 3 21.60 12 .50 22.96 15.67 23.55 1 6 . 5 6 22.33 1 4 . 4 0 2 3 . 3 1 16 .47 22.53 14.84 22.52 14.76 22.52 14 .16 21 .85 1 4 . 6 1 22.80 12 .36 23.03 15 .85 22.46 15.60 22.19 1 4 . 4 2 23.02 14.56 23.55 15.92 22.94 1 5 . 0 1 23.02 14.58 22.60 1 3 . 4 2 23.44 16 .32 21.94 1 4 . 1 9 21.87 1 3 . 5 1 22.53 12 .64 23.42 15 .57 2 3 . 1 1 16.34

10.98 9.67 8.87 9.59 7 .99 8.36 8.58 9 . 6 1 7 .94 8.56 9 .78 9 .04

10.23 8.94 9 .06

1 0 . 2 5 6.99

10.20 10.54

9.64 1 1 . 1 0

8 .22 9 .47 9 . 0 1 9.47 8.09 9.33

1 0 . 7 6 9.15 9.74 9.74

10.78 9.30 8.78

10.10 9 .85 8.53 7.07

1 0 . 7 4

Word F r e q .

2.46 2 .24 2 .18 1.49 1.57 1.72 1.99 2.09 1 .75 1.95 1.60 1.78 1.30 1 .60 2.03 2.48 1 . 6 3 2.29 1 .86 2.30 2.33 1.52 2.15 1.89 1 . 7 1 1.94 1 .48 2.38 1.97 2.39 1 .60 2 . 2 1 2.24 1.92 1.78 1 . 7 1 1 .79 1 .59 2 . 5 1

10.32 1 . 9 2

# o f 1 r r .

1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0

0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

Page 162: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5.1

REGULAR-HIGH

1 4 5

c a i n o t mau ton s w a n e r b l a y e r g o b l e n t h a b e r b e g r i d c h a g e r b o d u l e foamus f e r i n g n a g r e d t h a g e r c a l e n g h y r a l d s i f l e t w e r a l y l o q r e n t a s m e r dormen t home K

m a n e l v l a r e n y p r i m e t r a p l e v p e t o r y y u l p e r s a r o n e r a m i n e s u r t e l s h r e a d p i m s e l s n i g e l p r a s e d s a r t e d t r a m e s v a r t l e s a r t i l d r u n e t t r i w e n

ACC

%

8 2 70 81 8 1 8 1 7 8 7 8 8 6 7 7 74 8 3 8 3 7 2 77 6 9 7 2 8 1 7 9 77 8 7 8 7 87 79 8 1 88 89 74 8 3 8 2 8 2 7 9 8 1 8 1 8 7 9 1 8 0 79 70 8 1 7 2

RT R a t i n g msec

6 4 5 620 615 666 638 6 37 640 673 6 7 3 670 617 659 612 659 677 640 649 604 648 625 654 639 656 629 634 6 4 5 662 6 3 5 6 0 5 610 675 6 4 1 604 639 622 582 638 672 636 672

6 .5 7 .5 7 .6 8.0 8 .6 7 .6 7.8 8 . 3 8 . 0 7 . 3 7 .7 7.0 7 .7 5.6 6.6 7.7 5.7 7 .4 7 .3 8 . 2 7 .3 8 .4 7 .2 8.0 7 .7 7 .3 8.0 7 .8 8 .2 7 .3 9 . 2 7 .7 6.8 8.4 8 . 4 8 . 3 7 .2 7 . 3 6 . 8 6.6

S i n g l e L e t t e r

22.69 22.49 22 .25 21.79 21.94 22 .42 22 .27 22.90 22 .78 21 .80 23.22 22.66 22.70 22.85 21 .84 23 .06 22.87 22.53 22 .92 22 .92 22.68 22.96 23.15 22.64 22.49 23.13 21 .17 23 .83 23 .29 23 .43 23 .19 22.48 22 .42 23 .18 24.44 22.80 22 .95 22 .85 22.49 21.90

Biqram T r i g r a m

13 .74 13 .54 13 .40 1 3 . 7 8 1 3 . 3 5 1 4 . 9 5 12 .89 15 .27 13 .92 10 .39 15 .85 13 .74 1 5 . 2 9 15 .50

9 .21 1 2 . 6 9 13 .87 12 .07 13 .94 14 .56 15 .54 1 5 . 3 3 14 .18 13 .97 11 .86 1 4 . 1 2 10 .87 1 4 . 6 3 14 .84 14 .64 13 .92 11 .77 12 .58 15 .33 16 .02 1 4 . 1 1 1 5 . 0 1 12 .89 13 .05 11 .54

4 .38 2 .28 5 .50 8 . 1 4 3 .60 5 .14 3.96 7 .54 2 .63 0 .00 9 . 7 3 4.75 6 .39 6 .17 3 .10 5 .33 3.36 3 .89 3 .87 6 .00 8 . 4 1 8 .76 5 .68 4 .78 2 .62 5 .36 5.09 6.14 8 . 4 2 5 . 2 3 7 .94 2 .36 1 .34 6 .16 6 .87 7 .74

3.90 2 .81 1.90

8 .74

Word # o f FKeq. I K K .

0 . 00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0.00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 1 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 1 0 .00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0 .00 0 0 .00 1 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 1 0 .00 0 0.00 1 0 .00 1 0 .00 0 0 .00 0

Page 163: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 4 6 CHAPTER 5

REGULAR-LOW

AC C

%

o n i c a t 7 1 otanum 59

e r s w a n 7 1 b y e r a l 7 7 g l e n o b 7 9 t h e r a b 7 5 g r e d i b 6 6 g r e a c h 6 8 e d o l u b 6 8 osa fum 5 3 g r e f i n 8 1 g r e d a n 8 5 g r e a t h 8 3 g l e c a n 8 1 h y d r a 1 7 2 f l e s i t 7 1 l y e r a w 7 3 g l e r o n 8 0 s t e r a m 7 9 drenom 7 5 t he rom 8 0 lyeman 6 6 n y e l a r 7 7 t r e p i m 7 3 l y e r a p 7 5 t y e r o p 7 2 r y e l u p 7 3 e r o s a n 7 3 a m e r i n 7 7 t r e s u l 7 4 d r e a s h 7 3 ' e m s l i p 7 3 g l e s i n 7 1 d r e s a p 7 5 d r e s a t 8 7 t r e s a m 7 6 t r e v a l 8 4 t r i s a l 7 1 t r e d u n 7 2 t r e w i n 7 9

RT R a t i n g msec

637 6 .5 6 6 8 6.9 675 6.0 6 6 7 4.8 6 6 0 7.3 6 6 6 7.0 6 7 2 5.9 6 4 8 8.7 6 7 9 5.3 6 6 9 4.4 6 3 3 7.0 6 5 3 7.0 6 0 1 8 .1 6 4 8 6.5 6 5 4 7.6 6 2 1 7.6 6 9 0 6.8 6 2 1 8.0 6 2 6 7.6 6 2 7 7 . 1 6 5 8 7.6 6 9 3 8.1 6 5 6 5.3 6 4 5 7.2 7 0 2 5.9 6 4 7 5.3 6 8 4 6 . 1 6 2 1 6.9 6 3 8 7.0 6 3 6 6.9 6 8 6 7.9 638 6.7 6 3 2 7 . 1 6 5 2 6.8 6 4 7 6.3 6 3 5 7.0 6 6 3 8 . 1 608 7 . 1 6 4 1 7.7 6 5 1 7.3

S i n g l e Le t t e r

20.84 20.12 21 .01 20.60 19 .23 19.48 18.96 21.03 17.97 1 8 . 4 1 20.20 21.13 21.00 20.67 19.92 21.38 19.87 21.27 21 .21 21.10 21.07 20.53 20.64

20.67 19 .08 19.29 18.59 21.72 20.78 20.74 21.211 18.97 20.90 19.73 21.54 20.79 20.78 21.33 20.99 20.91

Bigram T r i q r a m

1 0 . 3 1 0.60 12.46 2.65

8 .35 0.00 8.29 1.20 9.63 1.74 9.68 3.39

10.13 5.34 13.62 5.69

4.79 0.00 5.98 0 .00

12.27 4.80 13.02 4.13 1 3 . 6 6 8 . 1 1 1 0 . 8 6 0.00

6.68 1.20 11 .58 1.00

6.87 0.00 1 2 . 3 2 2.12 11.08 2.84 1 2 . 9 3 3.93 12.72 3.39

9.64 2.16 7.45 1.95

10 .67 1.74 6.47 0.00 7.49 0.00 4.56 0.00

11.75 1.08 11.53 1.26 11.28 2.22 1 2 . 2 9 6.56

6.56 1.32 11 .50 2.71

9.52 2.48 1 1 . 2 1 2.48 11.26 2.52 1 1 . 9 1 1.74 13 .45 4.13

9.29 3.55 10.96 2.34

Word # o f F r e q . I r r .

0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.00 1

0.00 0 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0

Page 164: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

A P P E N D I X 5.1

I R R E G U L A R - H I G H

1 4 7

a i o c n t auotnm wnraes l b r a e y lnboeg b h r t e a i e r b g d a h c g e r leoubd uaomf s r f n i e g a rnged h r t a e g l c n a e q y r a h l d t l f i es rwlaey g l n o e r m r t a e s oermnd mroteh lmnaey l r n a e y t m r i e p p l r a e y y p t o e r l p y u e r s n a o e r mra ien l r t u e s s r d a e h i lmpes i l g n e s p r s a e d s r t a e d m t r a e s a v r l e t i a s t l r r d n u e t w r n t e i

Acc %

6 3 69 7 0 8 1 6 5 7 5 66 7 1 7 6 6 1 7 0 8 4 7 0 6 7 6 1 68 7 3 7 8 7 6 7 1 8 2 7 0 69 68 8 4 7 0 6 8 7 5 7 5 7 1 6 7 7 4 68 8 5 8 6 7 2 7 4 8 1 7 5 6 3

RT Rat ing msec

6 5 6 6 5 2 6 6 6 6 9 9 6 9 2 6 6 4 7 2 8 674 6 9 1 6 9 8 6 5 6 6 6 3 6 6 3 675 6 8 1 6 6 4 688 6 6 2 657 650 660 7 0 5 6 4 8 6 6 2 573 6 9 2 6 7 1 6 4 5 6 1 2 6 5 6 680 635 6 5 8 6 2 3 6 7 5 6 4 7 6 5 6 6 5 0 7 1 2 6 9 6

3 . 1 3.7 2.4 3.0 2 . 1 1.5 2.3 3.0 2.5 2.0 2.2 3.8 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.1 2.9 2.3 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.6 3.0 4.3 3.4 2.0 2 . 1 3.8 4.5 3.3 2.2 2.3 4.4 2.6 2 .1 2.4

S i n g l e L e t t e r

22.36 22.07 22.93 21.76 21.87 22.22 21.96 22.64 21.38 20.03 22.21 22.98 22.50 22.06 21.14 22.89 21.52 22.42 23.27 22.62 22.84 21.74 22.70 20.72 22.96 21.13 21.70 2 3 . 4 1 23.27 23.34 22.36 22.08 22.00 23.25 23.75 23.20 21 .71 22.67 21.74 20.67

Biqram Trigram

7.20 5.49 8.58 7.90 4.07 9.43 5.31 5.86

10.15 3 . 6 1 5.60

14 .28 5.98 3.46 9.17

10.79 6.14 9 .15 9.56

10 .37 8.68 5.91 7.39 7 . 8 1 8.90 8.56 6.44 5.96

11 .40 1 1 . 2 6

4.32 11 .74

8.80 9.44 9.92

10 .13 10 .12

9.07 7.91

11.47

0.00 1 .49 1.18 1 .18 0.60 1.59 1.32 2.73 0.00 0.00 1.83 6 .08 0.00 0.00 1.34 3.30 0.00 0.00 0 .00 2.30 2.53 0.00 0 .00 2 . 3 1 1.18 0.70 0.00 1.56 1.97 2.42 0.00 3.47 3.72 0.00 0.00 2 .82 3.63 4.33 0.00 2.76

Word # of FKeq.

0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .a0 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

i K K .

2 3 3 2 3 4 3 2 2 4 2 1 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 3

Page 165: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 4 8

IRREGULAR-LOW

CHAPTER 5

i c n t o a nmtaou rnwesa r b l e y a e b g n l o r t b e h a e b r g d i h r e a g c o b d e u l o fmsua e f n q r i e d n r g a g r h e t a e c l n q a r d l h y a e f l s t i e y r l w a e g n r l o emrtsa rmedno h r e t m o emnyla e n y r l a r t p e i m e p y l r a e r v t p o e r p l v u r n s e o a rn i ema e l s r t u h s r e d a l s e p m i n g l e s i d s e p r a d t s e r a e s r t m a t l e r a v i r l t s a e d t r n u

AC c %

6 2 55 6 5 6 7 6 9 7 2 5 8 6 8 7 3 6 2 7 1 6 7 7 7 6 5 5 3 6 6 6 7 6 7 6 6 7 1 6 9 7 3 7 8 67 7 0 7 1 66 6 3 6 9 7 1 7 5 6 9 6 5 8 2 7 7 7 4 67 7 0 7 1

RT R a t i n g msec

6 8 3 7 0 7 7 0 4 7 2 8 6 7 0 7 3 6 6 9 7 6 4 6 6 9 2 7 1 0 6 9 7 6 9 8 6 5 5 7 38 7 4 3 7 0 7 7 0 7 655 6 2 9 6 4 4 6 3 3 6 9 5 6 7 7 6 5 2 6 7 0 6 59 6 6 6 6 4 8 6 5 6 6 6 4 6 5 6 6 7 2 6 6 2 6 6 5 6 6 8 6 8 1 6 8 0 655 6 5 6

2.0 2.1 2.2 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.0 2.4 4.6 2.5 2.1 2.4 3.2 2.6 1.8 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.3 3.1 2.4 4.5 3.0 2.4 3.1 3.2 2.8 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.8 2.4 3.6 2.4 3.4 2.4 2.8 2.1

S i n g l e Le t t e r

20.38 19.06 20.26 18.96 19.04 19.78 18.09 20.49 19 .15 18.80 18.98 19.25 20.07 20.09 18.53 18.72 1 8 . 5 3 19 .24 20.19 19.48 19.84 19.05 20.20 20.65 19 .56 19.23 18.37 21.08 20.44 19.52 19.90 18.23 18 .25 19 .81 21.03 20.06 17.70 20.53 19.12

6.29 2.62 6.02 2.98 5.08 3.45 4.46 7.66 8.15 6.02 6.80

6.05 9 . 1 1 5.10 0.00 7.60 4.09 6 .11 4.25 3.88 5.25 4.15 8 .91 4.62 3.29 5.59 3.54 5.96 8.26 4.51 7.92 4.49 5.28 5.25

10.08 7.24 6.34 3.39 4.93

0.48 0.00 1.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.37 0.00 0.00 1.36

0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 . 5 1 0.48 0.00 0.70 0.00 2.00 0.00

5.92 0.00 1.28 0.00 0.00

Word # o f F r e q .

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 c1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

I r r .

3 4 3 2 4 3 3 2 1 3 3 4 2 2 4 2 4 4 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 4 3 3 2 2 3 4 2 4 3

Page 166: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5.2 149

Append ix 5.2

S i n g l e - L e t t e r P o s i t i o n a l F r e q u e n c i e s (Token C o u n t s ) A c c o r d i n g t o S e r i a l P o s i t i o n and Word Leng th f o r Words

3 t o 7 L e t t e r s i n L e n g t h .

I n s t r u c t i o n s f o r Us ing F r e q u e n c y T a b l e s

The w o r d s u s e d t o o b t a i n t h e s i n g l e - l e t t e r f r e q u e n c i e s came from t h e Kuce ra and F r a n c i s ( 1 9 6 7 ) word c o u n t . Words which had a Kuce ra and F r a n c i s c o u n t o f a t l e a s t t h r e e and which a p p e a r e d i n a t l e a s t t h r e e d i f f e r e n t s ampled t e x t s were s e l e c t e d . They were t h e n s e p a r a t e d f o r e a c h word l e n g t h . T h e s e c o u n t s were m u l t i p l i e d b y t h e f r e q u e n c y o f e a c h o f t h e words s o t h a t t h e s i n g l e - l e t t e r f r e q u e n c i e s o f t h e t a b l e s a r e b a s e d on t o k e n r a t h e r t h a n t y p e c o u n t s ( see C h a p t e r 1 ) . T h i s s e l e c t i o n p r o c e d u r e y i e l d e d t h e f o l l o w i n g number of word t o k e n s f o r e a c h word l e n g t h : 210990, 153315 , 102699 , 76295, 68894 f o r 3 t h r o u g h 7 l e t t e r words , r e s p e c t i v e l y .

The number o f t imes e a c h l e t t e r o f t h e a l p h a b e t o c c u r r e d i n e a c h l e t t e r p o s i t i o n o f t h e words was c o u n t e d . T h e s e t o t a l s , a l o n g w i t h t h e i r s u m , a r e p r e s e n t e d i n t h e t a b l e s a s t h e f i r s t row o f numbers f o r e a c h l e t t e r . Thus , f o r e x a m p l e , f o r s i x - l e t t e r w o r d s , t h e l e t t e r 5 o c c u r r e d i n t h e s i x t h l e t t e r p o s i t i o n 231 t imes and o c c u r r e d i n a l l p o s i t i o n s a t o t a l o f 3 ,804 t imes . Below e a c h o f t h e f r e q u e n c i e s i s t h e b a s e 10 l o g a r i t h m o f t h e f r e q u e n c y c o u n t .

I t s h o u l d b e n o t e d t h a t f o r some s i n g l e l e t t e r s , t h e f r e q u e n c y o f o c c u r r e n c e is z e r o i n some p o s i t i o n s . The l o g a r i t h m o f z e r o is u n d e f i n e d , b u t f o r t h e p u r p o s e s o f t h e t a b l e s was s e t e q u a l t o z e r o .

Page 167: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

150 C H A P T E R 5

S I N G L E L E T T E R F R E Q U E N C I E S F O R WORDS OF L E T T E R LENGTH 3

L E T T E R P O S I T I O N 1ST

A 39519 4.597

B 5902 3 .771

C 2466 3.392

D 2301 3 .362

E 760 2 .881

F 10988 4 .041

G 1967 3.294

H 21515 4 .333

I 2009 3 .303

J 515 2.712

K 182 2.260

L 1604 3 .205

M 4180 3 .621

2ND

28085 4 .448

3 .477

379 2.579

142 2 .152 11050 4 .043

644 2.809

498 2 .697 7 5 5 1 1 4.878 13084 4.117

0 0 .000

62 1 .792

3766 3.576

1 5 1 .176

3RD

2 2 1 2.344

364 2 . 5 6 1

1 8 6 2.270 37652 4 .576 82860 4.918

639 2 .806

790 2 .898

1 6 1 .204

7 . 845

0 0 .000

150 2.176

3192 3.504

3108 3 .492

SUM

67825 4 .831

6269 3.797

3 0 3 1 3.482 40095 4 .603 94670 4 .976 1 2 2 7 1 4 .089

3255 3 .513 97042 4.987 15100 4 .179

515 2.712

394 2 .595

8562 3 .933

7303 3.864

Page 168: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

A P P E N D I X 5.2 151

S I N G L E L E T T E R F R E Q U E N C I E S FOR WORDS O F L E T T E R LENGTH 3

N

0

P

Q

R

s

T

U

V

W

X

Y

z

L E T T E R P O S I T I O N 1ST 2ND

7865 3.896 8900 3.949

1227 3.089

11 1.041

864 2.937 6354

3.803

73207 4.865

592 2.772

93 1.968

14079 4.149

0 0.000

3855 3.586

35 1.544

33973 4.531 23643 4.374

27 1.431

0 0.000

5591 3.747

736 2.867

1937 3.287

9472 3.976

41 1.613

2199 3.342

6 .778

126 2.100

0 0.000

3RD

6169 3.790 4829 3.684

474 2.676

0 0.000

16036 4.205 22017 4.343

16145 4.208

3307 3.519

73 1.863

5380 3.731

671 2.827

6704 3.825

0 0.000

SUM

48007 4.681 37372 4.573

1728 3.238

11 1.041

22491 4.352 29107 4.464

91289 4.960

13371 4.126

207 2.316

21658 4.336

677 2.831

111685 4.029

35 1.544

Page 169: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 5 2 CHAPTER 5

SINGLE LETTER FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 4

LETTER POSITION 1ST

A 3077 3 .488

B 7266 3 .861

C 4530 3.656

D 4614 3 .664

E 3714 3.570

F 10556 4 . 0 2 3

G 3091 3 .490

H 9784 3 .991

I 2191 3 .341

J 2051 3 .312

K 2252 3 .353

L 7898 3 .898

M 10777 4 .032

2N D

26766 4 .428

244 2 .387

90 1 . 9 5 4

393 2.594 20802 4 .318

0 0 .000

1 2 8 2 .107 29988 4 .477 22145 4 .345

0 0 .000

8 5 1 . 9 2 9

2843 3 .454

50 1 .699

3RD

20259 4 .307

253 2 .403

6697 3 .826

2462 3 .391 21789 4 .338

1 6 4 8 3 .215

1 1 6 9 3 .068

376 2 . 5 7 5

9 6 6 1 3 .985

0 0 .000

3066 3 .487 1 1 2 2 5 4.050

6902 3 . 8 3 9

4TH

9 5 3 2 .979

301 2 .479

54 1 . 7 3 2 1 0 1 2 9 4 .006 32881 4 .517

528 2 .723

1 3 5 1 3 .131 1 2 3 2 2 4 .091

3 5 1 . 5 4 4

0 0 .000

5572 3 .746

7346 3 . 8 6 6

8373 3 . 9 2 3

SUM

51055 4 .708

8064 3 .907 1 1 3 7 1 4 .056 1 7 5 9 8 4 .245 79186 4 .899 1 2 7 2 4 4 .105

5739 3 .759 52470 4 .720 34032 4 .532

2051 3 .312 1 0 9 7 5 4.040 29312 4 .467 26102 4 .417

Page 170: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 .2

SINGLE LETTER FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 4

LETTER POSITION 1ST

N 2119 3 .326

0 4261 3 .630

P 3518 3 .546

Q 1 5 1 .176

R 3075 3 .488

S 1 0 8 1 5 4.034

T 30636 4 .486

U 1340 3 .127

V 1308 3 .117

W 22367 4.350

X 0 0 .000

Y 1996 3 .300

2 64 1 . 8 0 6

2N D

5 7 5 3 3.760 24056 4 .381

978 2 .990

0 0 .000

6514 3 .814

742 2.870

563 2 . 7 5 1

7042 3 .848

2843 3.454

555 2 .744

62 1 . 7 9 2

673 2.828

0 0 .000

3RD

8 2 6 5 3 .917 10798 4 .033

1040 3 .017

0 0 .000 13598 4 .133 1 0 0 9 1 4 .004 1 2 2 5 1 4 .088

2751 3 .439

5723 3 .758

1 5 2 6 3 .184

470 2.672

998 2.999

305 2.484

4TH

1 4 2 5 6 4 .154

3158 3 .499

1 7 1 5 3 .234

3 . 477 5335

3 .727 11497 4 .061 24894 4 .396

38 1 . 5 8 0

0 0 .000

2163 3 . 3 3 5

7 7 1 . 8 8 6 1 0 2 1 4 4 .009

1 2 0 2 .079

SUM

30393 4 .483 42273 4 . 6 2 6

7 2 5 1 3 .860

1 8 1 . 2 5 5 28522 4 .455 33145 4 .520 68344 4 .835 1 1 1 7 1 4 .048

9874 3 .994 2661 1 4 . 4 2 5

6 0 9 2 . 7 8 5 1 3 8 8 1 4 .142

489 2 .689

1 5 3

Page 171: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 5 4 CHAPTER 5

SINGLE LETTER FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 5

LETTER POSITION

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

1ST

7359 3 .867

5264 3 .721

6416 3 .807

2379 3 .376

2189 3 .340

5614 3 .749

3565 3 .552

3348 3 .525

917 2 .962

525 2.720

618 2 .791

4187 3 .622

2ND

1 0 4 5 5 4 .019

2151 3 . 3 3 3

556 2 .745

6 2 5 2 .796

9 7 0 9 3 .987

1 5 1 8 3 .181

700 2 .845 1 8 8 0 8 4 .274

9 8 2 1 3 .992

0 0 .000

8 5 1 . 9 2 9

4783 3 .680

M 4220 1 3 5 7 3 .625 3 . 1 3 3 3 .323

3RD

1 2 3 0 6 4 .090

8 2 6 2 .917

9 3 8 2 .972

2681 3 .428 1484 5 4 .172

3 14 2 .497

3796 3 .579

1 7 4 0 3 .241 13572 4 .133

2 9 1 2 .464

1 1 8 2 3 .073

2801 3 .447

2103

4TH

5563 3 .745

4 38 2 .641

8 3 3 2 3 .921

2860 3 . 4 5 6 18479 4 .267

447 2 .650

1 4 7 5 3 . 1 6 9

2465 3.392

683 2 3 .835

0 0 .000

1 2 4 2 3 .094 1 1 7 0 8 4 .068

1 6 4 1 3 .215

5TH

5 2 3 2 .719

3 6 1 . 5 5 6

582 2 .765 1 1 8 4 5 4.074 21152 4 .325

493 2 .693

3349 3 .525

7039 3 .848

7 5 1 . 8 7 5

0 0 .000

2195 3 .341

4948 3 .694

404 2 .606

SUM

36206 4 .559

8 7 1 5 3 .940 1 6 8 2 4 4 .226 20390 4 .309 66374 4 .822

8386 3 .924 1 2 8 8 5 4 .110 33400 4.524 31217 4 .494

8 1 6 2 .912

5322 3 .726 28427 4 .454

9 7 2 5 3 . 9 8 8

Page 172: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 . 2 1 5 5

SINGLE LETTER FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 5

LETTER POSITION 1ST

N 2336 3 .368

0 3064 3 .486

P 4418 3 .645

Q 515 2 .712

R 3036 3 .482

S 11526 4 .062

T 1 4 0 4 3 4 . 1 4 7

U 2038 3 .309

V 938 2 .972

W 12634 4 .102

X 0 0 .000

Y 1547 3 .189

2 3 .477

2ND

2899 3 .462 18464 4 .266

1255 3 .099

1 1 5 2 . 0 6 1

7818

959 2 .982

5756 3 .760

3058 3 .485

687 2 .837

682 2 .834

1 5 1 2.179

287 2 .458

0 0 .000

3 .893

3RD

4331 3 .637 1 0 6 1 2 4 .026

1 0 4 6 3 .020

0 0 .000

8 5 2 3 3 .931

2106 3 .323

4727 3 .675

9278 3 .967

2979 3 .474

755 2.878

364 2 . 5 6 1

4 57 2 .660

1 2 6 2 .100

4TH

8 5 1 3 3 .930

2682 3 .428

8 7 9 2 .944

0 0 .000

9276 3 .967

8 1 0 8 3 .909

6054 3 .782

3139 3 . 4 9 7

1 2 3 9 3 .093

1 1 2 1 3 .050

7 . 845

1 0 2 2 .009

9 7 1 . 9 8 7

5TH

5318 3 .726

4 8 1 2 .682

7 4 7 2 .873

0 0 .000 1 1 7 9 1 4 .072 15072 4 .178 1 1 0 9 8 4 . 0 4 5

8 .90 3

9 . 954

395 2 .597

1 5 9 2 . 2 0 1

4977 3 .697

3 .477

SUM

23397 4.369 35303 4 .548

8 3 4 5 3 .921

6 30 2.799 40444 4 .607 37771 4 * 577 41678 4 .620 1 7 5 2 1 4.244

5852 3.767 15587 4 .193

681 2 .833

7370 3.867

229 2.360

Page 173: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 5 6 CHAPTER 5

SINGLE LETTER FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 6

LETTER POSITION 1ST

A 5 5 2 9 3 . 7 4 3

B 5 1 1 6 3 .709

C 6 2 3 7 3 . 7 9 5

D 3 1 4 6 3 . 4 9 8

E 3 3 1 3 3 .520

F 3 9 5 3 3 * 597

G 1 7 1 2 3 . 2 3 4

H 2310 3 .364

I 1 6 6 8 3 . 2 2 2

J 5 4 1 2 . 7 3 3

K 2 2 5 2 .352

L 3918 3 . 5 9 3

M 4718 3 . 6 7 4

2ND

1 1 0 5 7 4 .044

284 2 . 4 5 3

1 7 5 3 3 .244

294 2 .468 1 4 3 0 8 4 . 1 5 6

90 3 2 .956

2 1 1 2 . 3 2 4

4 4 9 8 3 . 6 5 3

7 3 9 6 3 .869

0 0 .000

7 3 1 . 8 6 3

3 0 2 8 3 . 4 8 1

5 4 8 2 . 7 3 9

3RD

6 0 8 1 3 .784

1 1 0 2 3 . 0 4 2

3 7 6 5 3 .576

1 6 4 8 3 . 2 1 7

3 5 4 8 3 .550

2424 3 . 3 8 5

1 7 4 6 3 . 2 4 2

1 2 9 2 3 . 1 1 1

4374 3 . 6 4 1

1 4 0 2 . 1 4 6

7 3 2 2 . 8 5 5

4 4 1 7 3 . 6 4 5

3 9 1 2 3 . 5 9 2

4TH

4 2 2 6 3 .626

1 2 8 6 3 . 1 0 9

1 4 9 4 3 . 1 7 4

2 6 3 8 3 . 4 2 1

7 6 1 9 3 . 8 8 2

347 2 .540

2500 3 .398

2784 3 . 4 4 5 1 0 6 7 6 4 . 8 2 8

0 0 .000

2 0 0 2 3 . 3 0 1

3 4 4 8 3 .538

2 1 4 3 3 . 3 3 1

5TH

3 2 5 7 3 . 5 1 3

7 9 1 . 8 9 8

3384 3 . 5 2 9

1 2 8 4 3 . 1 0 9 2 3 1 1 1 4 .364

5 7 1 . 7 5 6

2 4 2 5 3 . 3 8 5

1 0 9 6 3 . 0 4 0

2 9 0 9 3 . 4 6 4

B 0 . 0 0 0

5 4 1 2 . 7 3 3

8 7 2 1 3 . 9 4 1

1 2 9 7 3 . 1 1 3

6TH

4 4 9 2 . 6 5 2

4 0 1 . 6 0 2

7 4 3 2 . 8 7 1 1 3 4 7 3 4 . 1 2 9 1 2 4 7 1 4 . 0 9 6

5 9 3 2 . 7 7 3

3784 3 . 5 7 8

2 5 3 1 3 . 4 0 3

4 5 1 . 6 5 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 3 1 2 .364

2 7 7 1 3 . 4 4 3

9 8 0 2 . 9 9 1

SUM

3 0 5 9 9 4 .486

7 9 0 7 3 . 8 9 8 1 7 3 7 6 4 .240 2 2 4 8 3 4 . 3 5 2 6 4 3 7 0 4 .809

8 2 7 7 3 . 9 1 8 1 2 3 7 8 4 . 0 9 3 1 4 5 1 1 4 . 1 6 2 2 7 0 6 8 4 . 4 3 2

6 8 1 2 . 8 3 3

3804 3 . 5 8 0 2 6 3 0 3 4 .420 1 3 5 9 8 4 . 1 3 3

Page 174: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 .2 1 5 7

SINGLE LETTER FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 6

LETTER POSITION 1ST

N 2043 3 .310

0 1398 3 .146

P 5827 3 .765

Q 70 1 . 8 4 5

R 4276 3 . 6 3 1

S 1 1 4 2 3 4 .058

T 3929 3 .594

U 1079 3 .033

V 1 0 7 3 3 . 0 3 1

W 2645 3 .422

X 0 0 .000

Y 140 2 .146

z 6 .778

2ND

3306 3 .519 10986 4.041

1154 3.062

1 6 6 2 .220

4923 3.692

862 2 .936

3427 3 .535

5252 3.720

1 8 3 2.262

308 2 .489

710 2 .851

665 2 .823

0 0 .000

3RD

4535 3 .657

6 7 1 5 3.827

1 3 9 8 3 .146

9 1 1 .959

9119 3.960

4710 3 .673

7 5 3 1 3 .877

2800 3 .447

1 6 0 6 3 .206

1 3 8 2 3 . 1 4 1

1 5 4 2 .188

999 3.000

74 1 .869

4TH

4451 3 .648

5 9 2 5 3 .773

2401 3 .380

6 4 1 . 8 0 6

3680 3 .566

2784 3 .445

7658 3 .884

5928 3 .773

984 2 .993

772 2 .888

1 3 1 .114

3 50 2 .544

1 2 2 2 .086

5TH

8 0 0 5 3 . 9 0 3

5 2 2 1 3 .718

786 2 .895

0 0 .000

6 1 8 8 3 . 7 9 2

2717 3 .434

3149 3 .498

1 0 2 7 3 .012

364 2 .561

1 1 0 2 . 0 4 1

3 . 477 4 94

2 .694 70

1 . 8 4 5

6TH

5286 3 .723

172 2 .236

1 0 9 2 .037

0 0 .000

8147 3 . 9 1 1 1 0 9 0 4 4 .038

6979 3 .844

6 1 1 . 7 8 5

0 0 .000

670 2 .826

3 1 1 . 4 9 1

5 8 2 5 3 .765

0 0 .000

S U M

27626 4 . 4 4 1 30417 4 .483 1 1 6 7 5 4 .067

391 2 .592 3 6 3 3 3 4 .560 33400 4 . 5 2 4 32673 4 .514 16147 4 .208

4210 3 .624

5887 3 .770

9 1 1 2 .960

8 4 7 3 3 .928

272 2 .435

Page 175: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

158 CHAPTER 5

SINGLE LETTER FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 7

LETTER POSITION 1ST

A 4796 3 . 6 8 1

B 4147 3 .618

C 7268 3 .861

D 2846 3 .454

E 3068 3 .487

F 3548 3.550

G 1982 3 .297

H 3232 3 .509

I 1268 3 .103

J 471 2 .673

K 532 2 .726

L 1990 3 .299

M 3649 3 .562

2ND

6979 3 .844

407 2.610

946 2 .976

372 2 .571 1 5 6 5 5 4 .195

6 2 3 2 .794

663 2 .822

3963 3 .598

6 5 7 1 3 .818

0 0 .000

48 1 . 6 8 1

2524 3 .402

9 1 7 2 .962

3RD

7 3 5 3 3.866

690 2.839

3977 3.600

1 1 6 8 3 .067

4768 3 .678

1 1 6 2 3 . 0 6 5

1 4 9 3 3 .174

5 0 1 2 .700

4053 3 .608

1 6 7 2 .223

69 1 .839

3526 3 .547

2 9 2 3 3 .466

4TH

4582 3 .661

1 3 5 7 3 .133

2 9 2 1 3 .466

2263 3 .355

6532 3 . 8 1 5

8 5 9 2 .934

1564 3 .194

2243 3 .351

6 0 3 1 3 .780

2 54 2 .405

1280 3 .107

4545 3 .658

1730 3 .238

5TH

5253 3.720

6 1 1 2.786

1 7 3 5 3 .239

1 2 0 2 3.080 1 0 0 7 3 4 .003

4 58 2 .661

1 8 0 3 3 .256

2874 3 .458 1 5 1 1 5 4 .179

0 0 .000

524 2 .719

3125 3 .495

983 2 .993

6TH

5036 3.702

8 5 1 .929

2707 3.432

2059 3.314 1 6 8 3 5 4 .226

1 3 2 2 .121

2323 3 . 3 6 6

1 0 3 5 3 . 0 1 5

1 7 3 5 3 .239

0 0 .000

1 3 7 2 .137

4 4 3 3 3 .647

656 2 .817

7TH

567 2.754

1 9 1 . 2 7 9

3 55 2 .550

8884 3 .949

9106 3 .959

769 2.886

7 2 1 5 3 .858

1 6 4 4 3 .216

1 8 1 . 2 5 5

0 0 .000

1 2 0 2 .079

3830 3 .583

1 4 7 8 3 .170 4 .091

SUM

34566 4 .539

7316 3 .864 1 9 9 0 9 4 .299 18794 4 .274 66037 4 . 8 2 0

7 5 5 1 3 .878 1 7 0 4 3 4 .232 15492 4.190 34791 4 . 5 4 1

8 9 2 2 .950

2710 3 .433 23973 4 .380 1 2 3 3 6

Page 176: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 .2

SINGLE LETTER FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 7

LETTER POSITION 1ST

N 1 6 2 8 3 .212

0 1460 3 .164

3 .783 Q 358

2 .554 R 3726

3 .571 S 8092

3 .908 T 3 7 3 1

3 .572 U 603

2 .780 V 1 0 4 3

3 .018 W 3289

3 .517 X 0

0 .000 Y 9 3

1 .968 2 7

.845

e 6067

2N D

3150 3 .498

8667 3 .938

1 2 1 1 3 . 0 8 3

1 1 3 2 .053

6 9 9 1 3 .845

558 2 .747

1976 3 .296

4693 3 .671

386 2 .587

1 6 1 2 .207

954 2 .980

366 2 . 5 6 3

0 0 .000

3RD

5166 3 . 7 1 3

5792 3 . 7 6 3

2154 3 .333

1 9 9 2.299

8487 3 .929

4162 3 .619

5538 3 . 7 4 3

2573 3.410

1 4 2 1 3 . 1 5 3

764 2 .883

314 2.497

392 2 .593

8 2 1 .914

4TH

3785 3 .578

2962 3 .472

2655 3 .424

26 1 .415

4046 3 .607

4055 3 .608

8 7 5 5 3.942

3082 3 .489

1 4 4 2 3 .159

1544 3 .189

0 0 .000

304 2 .483

77 1 .886

5TH 6TH

3401 1 1 6 2 3 3 . 5 3 2 4 . 0 6 5

5046 2700 3 .703 3 .431

994 576 2 .997 2 .760

2 3 0 1 . 3 6 2 0 .000

4 7 9 1 6193 3 .680 3 .792

1 2 2 4 4 2 3 3 3 .088 3 .627

4 2 1 5 3466 3 .625 3 .540

3862 1840 3 .587 3 .265

1 1 0 6 6 2 9 3 .044 2 .799

269 2 54 2 .430 2 .405

3 1 38 1 . 4 9 1 1 . 5 8 0

1 1 6 66 2 .064 1 .820

6 0 1 0 3 1 .778 2 .013

7TH

4650 3 .667

210 2 .322

1 3 8 2 .140

0 0 .000

4948 3 .694 1 2 0 5 4 4 .081

6324 3 .801

3 .477

0 0 .000

1 1 6 2 .064

1 1 4 2 .057

6 3 3 2 3 . 8 0 2

0 0 .000

1 5 9

SUM

3 3 4 0 3 4 .524 26837 4 .429 1 3 7 9 5 4 .140

719 2 .857 39182 4 .593 34378 4 .536 34005 4 .532 1 6 6 5 6 4 .222

6027 3 .780

6397 3 . 8 0 6

1 4 5 1 3 .162

7669 3 .885

329 2 .517

Page 177: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

160 CHAPTER 5

Appendix 5 . 3

Bigram P o s i t i o n a l F r e q u e n c i e s (Token C o u n t s ) Accord ing t o S e r i a l P o s i t i o n and Word L e n g t h f o r Words

3 t o 7 L e t t e r s i n L e n g t h .

I n s t r u c t i o n s f o r u s i n g f r e q u e n c y t a b l e s

T h e s e c o u n t s were b a s e d on t h e same word t o k e n s a s were t h e s i n g l e - l e t t e r c o u n t s i n Appendix 5 . 2 . I n t h i s c a s e , however , e a c h word was b r o k e n down i n t o i t s b ig ram componen t s ( i . e . , b a t t l e - - - - > &, at, E, g , k) and t h e f r e q u e n c y o f o c c u r r e n c e o f e a c h o f t h e b i g r a m s was t a b u l a t e d f o r e a c h word l e n g t h . Fo r example , f o r s i x - l e t t e r w o r d s , t h e b i g r a m 9 o c c u r r e d a s t h e i n i t i a l b ig ram 1 8 5 t imes, a s t h e s e c o n d b ig ram 160 t imes, a s t h e t h i r d b i g r a m 1 4 8 t imes , e t c . N o t i c e t h a t 3 n e v e r o c c u r r e d a s t h e s i x t h b ig ram. A l s o n o t i c e t h a t t h e b ig ram do n e v e r o c c u r r e d a t a l l . A b i g r a m which d i d n o t o c c u r a t l e a s t o n c e f o r words o f a g i v e n l e n g t h was o m i t t e d from t h e l i s t i n g i n t h e t a b l e s .

I t s h o u l d b e n o t e d t h a t f o r some b i g r a m s , t h e f r e q u e n c y o f o c c u r r e n c e is z e r o i n some p o s i t i o n s . The l o g a r i t h m o f z e r o i s u n d e f i n e d , b u t f o r t h e p u r p o s e s o f t h e t a b l e s was se t e q u a l t o z e r o .

Page 178: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5.2 1 6 1

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 3

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

AB 3 .477

AC 298 2.474

AD 9 8 1 .991

AF 5 .699

AG 473 2.675

A1 424 2.627

AK 0 0.000

AL 3008 3.478

AM 1 5 1.176

AN 3 0 2 3 2 4.480

A 0 0 0 .000

AP 1 8 1 . 2 5 5

AR 4736 3 .675

AS 1 4 4 2.158

A T 1 6 1 . 2 0 4

AU 25 1 . 3 9 8

AV 1 3 1 . 1 1 4

AW 5 .699

AX 6 .778

AY B 0.000

BA 348

2ND

1 2 1 .079

0 0 .000

5378 3 . 7 3 1

0 0 .000

7 5 1 . 8 7 5

0 0 .000

1 5 1 .176

3 3 1 .519

1 2 2 2 .086

3316 3 .521

24 1 . 3 8 0

9 8 1 . 9 9 1

1 3 2 4 3 .122

1 2 3 6 4 4 .092

414 2 .617

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 1 3 2.853

226 2 .354

3 9 7 1 3 .599

' 0 2 .542 0 .000

SUM

1 5 1.176

298 2.474

5476 3.738

5 .699

548 2.739

424 2.627

1 5 1.176

3 0 4 1 3.483

1 3 7 2.137

33548 4.526

24 1.380

1 1 6 2.064

6 0 6 0 3.782

1 2 5 0 8 4.097

4 30 2.633

2 5 1 .398

1 3 1 .114

7 1 8 2.856

2 3 2 2.365

3 9 7 1 3.599

348 2.542

Page 179: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 6 2 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 3

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

BE 1 9 4 2 . 2 8 8

BI 492 2 . 6 9 2

BO 367 2 . 5 6 5

BU 4 5 0 1 3 . 6 5 3

C A 2108 3 .324

CE 0 0 .000

co 7 3 1 . 8 6 3

C R 48 1 . 6 8 1

CT 0 0 .000

CU 237 2 . 3 7 5

CY 0

DA 7 4 0 2 .869

DD 0 0 .000

DE 44 1 . 6 4 3

D I 1 1 5 2 3 . 0 6 1

DO 1 3 5 2 .130

DR 7 3 1 . 8 6 3

DS 0 0 . 0 0 0

DU 1 5 7 2 .196

EA 9 0 1 . 9 5 4

E B 0 0 .000

0 . 0 0 0

2 N D

3 . h77 0

0 . 0 0 0 0

0 .000 0

0 .000 0

0 . 0 0 0 6 0

1 . 7 7 8 0

0 . 0 0 0 0

0 . 0 0 0 307

2 .487 0

0 . 0 0 0 1 2

1 . 0 7 9 0

0 .000 1 3 2

2 . 1 2 1 0

0 . 0 0 0 0

0 . 0 0 0 0

0 .000 0

0 . 0 0 0 1 0

1 . 0 0 0 0

0 . 0 0 0 1 2 6

2 . 1 0 0 26

1 . 4 1 5

SUM

1 9 7 2 .294

492 2 .692

367 2 . 5 6 5

4 5 0 1 3 . 6 5 3

2 1 0 8 3 . 3 2 4

6 0 1 . 7 7 8

1 3 1 . 8 6 3

4 8 1 . 6 8 1

3 07 2 . 4 8 7

2 37 2 . 3 7 5

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

7 4 0 2 .869

1 3 2 2 . 1 2 1

4 4 1 . 6 4 3

1 1 5 2 3 . 0 6 1

1 3 5 2 .130

7 3 1 . 8 6 3

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

1 5 7 2 .196

2 1 6 2 .334

2 6 1 . 4 1 5

Page 180: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

A P P E N D I X 5.2 1 6 3

B I G R A M F R E Q U E N C I E S F O R WORDS O F L E T T E R LENGTH 3

B I G R A M P O S I T I O N 1 S T

EC 0 0 .000

E D 0 0.000

E E 0 0.000

EG 25 1.398

E I 0 0.000

E L 3 .477

EM 0 0 .000

EN 410 2 .613

E O 0 0.000

E P 0 0.000

E R 30 1 . 4 7 7

E S 3 . 4 7 1

E T 58 1.763

EV 1 9 1.279

EW 0 0.000

EX 0 0.000

EY 1 2 2 2.086

FA 505 2.703

F E 679 2.832

FF 0 0.000

F I 1 6 1 2.207

2 N D

3 6 1.556

513 2.710

8 4 5 2.927

69 1 . 8 3 9

7 .845

1 6 1 . 2 0 4

8 ,903

1 0 8 3 3 .035

7 .845

1 3 1.114

3408 3 .532

1 5 5 2.190

2243 3 . 3 5 1

3 3 1 . 5 1 9

2262 3.354

9 7 1 . 9 8 7

1 0 3 2 .013

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

6 3 9 2.805

0 0.000

SUM

3 6 1.556

513 2.710

8 4 5 2.927

9 4 1.973

7 .845

1 9 1 . 2 7 9

8 .903

1 4 9 3 3.174

7 .845

1 3 1.114

3438 3.536

1 5 8 2.199

2 3 0 1 3 .362

5 2 1 .716

2262 3 .354

9 7 1 . 9 8 1

225 2.352

505 2.703

679 2.832

6 3 9 2.806

1 6 1 2.207

Page 181: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 6 4 C H A P T E R 5

B I G R A M F R E Q U E N C I E S F O R WORDS O F L E T T E R L E N G T H 3

B I G R A M P O S I T I O N 1ST

FL 5 1 1.708

FO 9 5 3 5 3.979

FT 0 0.000

FU 57 1.756

G A 1 5 4 2.188

G E 7 8 1 2.893

GG 0 0.000

G I 27 1 . 4 3 1

GO 8 1 9 2.913

GU 1 8 6 2 .270

HA 7 6 9 4 3.886

HE 3078 3.488

H I 9 7 4 7 3.989

HO 9 7 0 2.987

HU 26 1 .415

H Y 0 0.000

I A 0 0.000

I C 57 1 . 7 5 6

I D 0 0.000

I E 0 0 .000

I G 0 0.000

2ND

0 0.000

0 0.000

5 .699

0 0.000

0 0.000

2 27 2.356

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

0 0.000

259 2.413

0 0.000

0 0.000

7 2 8 3 0 4 .862

0 0.000

2252 3.353

0 0.000

429 2.632

48 1 .681

8 .903

1 3 0 1 3.114

1 6 9 2.228

455 2.658

SUM

5 1 1.708

9 5 3 5 3.979

5 .699

5 7 1 .756

1 5 4 2.188

1 0 0 8 3.003

1 2 1 .079

27 1 . 4 3 1

1 0 7 8 3.033

1 8 6 2.270

7 6 9 4 3.886

7 5 9 0 8 4 .880

9 7 4 7 3.989

3 2 2 2 3.508

26 1 .415

4 29 2.632

4 8 1 .681

6 5 1.813

1 3 0 1 3.114

1 6 9 2 .228

455 2.658

Page 182: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5.2 1 6 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 3

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

IK 4 .602

IL 39 1 . 5 9 1

IM 0 0.000

IN 36 1 . 5 5 6

I 0 6 .778

IP 0 0 .000

IR 0 0.000

IS 0 0.000

IT 1858 3 .269

IV 9 .954

IX 0 0.000

J A 77 1.886

J E 63 1 . 7 9 9

JI 36 1 . 5 5 6

J O 3 3 3 2 .522

JU 6 .778

KA 2 1 1.322

KE 1 0 0 2 .000

KI 6 1 1 .785

KY 0 0 .000

LA 4 9 1 2 .691

2ND

0 0.000

9 3 1 .968

2 7 4 1 3 .438

1 6 8 2 .225

4 .602

88 1 . 9 4 4

352 2,547

6997 3.845

413 2.616

0 0 .000

247 2.393

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

4 .602

0 0 .000

58 1 . 7 6 3

1 7 1.230

SUM

4 .602

1 3 2 2 . 1 2 1

2 7 4 1 3.438

204 2.310

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

8 8 1 .944

352 2.547

6997 3 .845

2 2 7 1 3.356

9 .954

247 2.393

7 7 1 .886

63 1 .799

36 1 .556

333 2.522

6 .778

2 1 1.322

1 fl4 2.017

6 1 1 .785

58 1.763

508 2.706

Page 183: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 6 6 C H A P T E R 5

BIGRAM F R E Q U E N C I E S F O R WORDS OF L E T T E R LENGTH 3

B I G R A M P O S I T I O N 1ST

LD 0 0.000

L E 6 1 8 2 .791

L I 1 1 3 2.053

L L 0 0 .000

LM 0 0.000

L O 377 2 .576

L T 5 .699

LU 0 0.000

L Y 0 0.000

MA 2690 3.430

ME 8 9 5 2.952

M I 1 3 1.114

MO 1 6 1 .204

MR 534 2.728

MU 3 2 1 .505

MY 0 0.000

NA 1 7 1 .230,

NC 0 0.000

ND 0 0 .000

N E 1 6 6 9 3.222

N I 3 ,477

2 N D

6 6 0 2.820

0 0.000

0 0.000

3040 3 .483

3 . 4 1 1

0 0.000

0 0 .000

8 .903

3 8 1.580

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

1 5 1 .176

0 0.000

20 1 . 3 0 1

29265 4.466

3 2 9 2 3.517

0 0.000

SUM

6 6 0 2.820

6 1 8 2 .791

1 1 3 2.053

3040 3.483

3 .417

377 2.576

5 .699

8 .903

3 8 1 . 5 8 0

2690 3 .430

8 9 5 2.952

1 3 1 . 1 1 4

1 6 1.204

534 2.728

32 1 .505

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

1 7 1 . 2 3 0

20 1 . 3 0 1

2 9 2 6 5 4.466

4 9 6 1 3.696

3 .477

Page 184: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5.2 1 6 7

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 3

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

NK 0 0.000

NN 0 0.000

NO 6 1 6 1 3.790

NT 0 0 .000

NU 1 5 1 . 1 7 6

NY 0 0.000

OA 1 5 1 . 1 7 6

OB 0 0 .000

oc 24 1 .380

OD 44 1 . 6 4 3

OE 0 0.000

OF 6 3 9 2 .806

OG 0 0 . 0 0 0

01 93 1 .968

OL 6 6 0 2 .820

OM 0 0 . 0 0 0

ON 3292 3 . 5 1 7

00 0 0 . 0 0 0

OP 0 0 .000

OR 3 .477

0s 0 0 .000

2ND

7 . 8 4 5

38 1 . 5 8 0

0 0.000

6 .778

0 0 .000

1 3 4 5 3 .129

0 0.000

307 2.487

2 3 1 .362

3 57 2 .553

8 1 1.908

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 1 4 2.057

0 0.000

1 0 1.000

6 6 1 .820

3 0 6 2 .486

2 .926

230 2 .362

9 6 8 4 3.986

5 2 1 . 7 1 6

a 4 4

SUM

7 .845

3 8 1 . 5 8 0

6 1 6 1 3.790

6 .778

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

1 3 4 5 3.129

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

3 07 2 .487

47 1 . 6 7 2

4 0 1 2 .603

8 1 1 . 9 0 8

639 2.806

1 1 4 2.057

93 1.968

6 7 0

6 6

3 5 9 8 3.556

8 4 4 2 .926

230 2 .362

9 6 8 7 3 .986

52 1 . 7 1 6

2.826

1 . 8 2 0

Page 185: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 6 8 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 3

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

OT 0 0.000

ou 3348 3.525

ov 0 0 .000

OW 7 8 2 2.893

ox 0 0 .000

OY 0 0.000

PA 253 2.403

PE 400 2 .602

PI 7 5 1 .875

PO 40 1 . 6 0 2

PR 22 1 . 3 4 2

PT 0 0.000

PU 437 2 .640

PY 0 0.000

QU 11 1 . 0 4 1

RA 2 1 2 2.326

RC 0 0.000

RE 248 2.394

RI 3 9 1 . 5 9 1

RM 0 0.000

RO 1 2 1 2.083

2 N D

5397 3.732

3 2 9 9 3.518

40 1 .602

2405 3 .381

1 0 1 2.004

327 2.515

0 0 .000

3 .477

0 0 .000

0 0.000

0 0.000

1 5 1 .176

0 0.000

9 . 9 5 4

0 0.000

30 1.477

4 1 1 . 6 1 3

4 3 9 6 3.643

0 0 .000

9 4 1.973

1 6 1.204

SUM

5 3 9 7 3.732

6 6 4 7 3 .823

4 0 1 .602

3187 3.503

1 0 1 2 .004

3 27 2.515

253 2.403

403 2.605

7 5 1 .875

40 1.602

2 2 1 . 3 4 2

1 5 1 .176

437 2.640

9 . 9 5 4

11 1 . 0 4 1

2 4 2 2.384

4 1 1 . 6 1 3

4644 3.667

3 9 1 . 5 9 1

9 4 1.973

1 3 7 2.137

Page 186: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5.2 1 6 9

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 3

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

RS 0 0 .000

RT 0 0 .000

RU 240 2.380

RY 4 .602

S A 1 1 9 4 3.077

SE 1 4 1 4 3.150

3 .458

SI 439 2.642

SK 58 1 . 7 6 3

SL 5 .699

SO 1 8 5 2.267

SP 9 .954

ss 0 0.000

ST 0 0.000

SU 1 7 8 2 .250

TA 2 4 1 2.382

TC 0 0.000

TD 0 0 .000

TE 208 2.318

TH 69983 4 .845

TI 8 2 1 . 9 1 4

sn 2872

2N D

5 3 9 2.732

208 2.318

0 0.000

267 2.427

0 0.000

589 2.770

11 1 . 0 4 1

0 0.000

1 2 8 2.107

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0 .000

5 .699

3 .477

0 0.000

0 0.000

5 8 1.763

5 .699

1 6 1.204

0 0.000

0 0 .000

SUM

5 39 2.732

208 2.318

240 2.380

2 7 1 2.433

1194 3.077

2003 3 .302

2883 3.460

439 2.642

1 8 6 2.270

5 .699

1 8 5 2.267

9 - 9 5 4

5 .699

3 .477

1 7 8 2.250

2 4 1 2.382

5 8 1 . 7 6 3

5 .699

224 2.350 6 9 9 8 3 4.845

8 2 1 .914

Page 187: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

170 C H A P T E R 5

BIGRAM F R E Q U E N C I E S F O R WORDS O F L E T T E R LENGTH 3

BIGRAM P O S I T I O N 1ST

TO 1125 3.051

TR 140 2.146

TS 0 0.000

TU 16 1.204

TW 1412 3.150

UB 0 0.000

UD 0 0.000

UE 0 0.000

UG 0 0.000

UH 0 0.000

U M 0 0.000

UN 3 .477

uo 0 0.000

UP 0 0.000

UR 0 0.000

U S 589 2.770

U T 0 0.000

UY 0 0 * 000

VA 32 1.505

VE 0 0.000

V I 52 1.716

2N D

0 0.000

0 0.000 1858

3.269 0

0.000 0

0.000 19

1.279 41

1.613 166

2.220 65

1.813 5

,699 74

1.869 486

2.687 11

1.041 45

1.653 1268 103 37

568 134 853 121 083

0 0.000

32 1.505

0 0.000

S U M

1125 3.051

140 2.146 1858

3.269 16

1.204 1412

3.150 19

1.279 41

1.613 166

2.220 65

1.813 5

.699 74

1.869 489

2.689 11

1.041 45

1.653 1268

3.103 626

2.797 7134

3.853 121

2.083 32

1.505 32

1.505 52

1.716

Page 188: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5.2 1 7 1

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 3

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

vo 9 . 9 5 4

VY 0 0 . 0 0 0

WA 1 1 2 0 3 4 . 0 4 9

WE 6 4 1 . 8 0 6

WH 2 6 5 6 3 . 4 2 4

WI 7 5 1 . 8 7 5

WN 0 0 . 0 0 0

wo 7 6 1 . 8 8 1

W R 5 . 6 9 9

XE 0 0 . 0 0 0

YE 5 6 9 2 . 7 5 5

YO 3 2 8 6 3 . 5 1 7

ZE 2 6 1 . 4 1 5

zo 9 . 9 5 4

2 N D

0 0 . 0 0 0

9 . 9 5 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 7 2 2 .888

1 4 1 2 3 .150

0 0 . 0 0 0

6 . 7 7 8

1 2 6 2 . 1 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

SUM

9 . 9 5 4

9 . 9 5 4

1 1 2 0 3 4 . 0 4 9

7 9 1 . 8 9 8

2 6 5 6 3 .424

7 5 1 . 8 7 5

7 7 2 2 . 8 8 8

1 4 8 8 3 . 1 7 3

5 . 6 9 9

6 . 7 7 8

6 9 5 2 . 8 4 2

3 2 8 6 3 .517

2 6 1 . 4 1 5

9 . 9 5 4

Page 189: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

172 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 4

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

AB 236 2.373

AC 65 1.813

AD 54 1.732

AF 0 0.000

AG 69 1.839

AH 0 0.000

A1 62 1.792

AK 10 1.000

AL 1127 3.052

AM 33 1.519

AN 98 1.991

A0 0 0.000

AP 4 .602

AQ 0 0.000

AR 660 2.820

AS 62 1.792

AT 47 1.672

AU 44 1.643

AV 0 0.000

AW 461 2.664

AX 45 1.653

2ND

70 1.845 3085

3.489 1210

3.083 82

1.914 178

2.250 0

0.000 3156

3.499 1569

3.196 1667

3.222 1958

3.292 2519

3.401 64

1.806 124

2.093 0

0.000 2197

3.342 2345

3.370 988

2.995 51

1.708 4415

3.645 158

2.199 16

3RD

33 1.519

0 0.000 1191

3.076 28

1.447 39

1.591 31

1.491 0

0.000 55

1.740 593

2.773 231

2.364 2390

3.378 0

0.000 95

1.978 3

.477 1427

3.154 52

1.716 13013 4.114

0 0.000

0 0.000

74 1.869

0

SUM

339 2.530 3150

3.498 2455

3.390 110

2.041 286

2.456 31

1.491 3218

3.508 1634

3.213 3381

3.530 2222

3.347 5007

3.700 64

1.806 223

2.348 3

.477 4284 3.632 2459

3.391 14048 4.148

95 1.978 4415

3.645 693

2.841 61 ~-

1.204 0.000 1.785

Page 190: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5.2

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 4

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

AY 0 0.000

AZ 0 0.000

BA 1 5 7 9 3.198

BE 3186 3.503

BI 214 2.330

BL 217 2.336

BO 1 8 0 3 3.256

BR 1 4 1.146

BS 0 0.000

B T 0 0.000

BU 244 2.387

BY 9 .954

CA 1 8 3 7 3.264

CE 223 2.348

C H 7 3 1 . 8 6 3

CI 400 2.602

CK 0 0.000

CL 279 2.446

CO 1 5 1 4 3.180

CR 56 1.748

C T 0 0.000

2ND

7 6 3 2.883

1 5 1 2.179

0 0 .000

28 1 .447

0 0.000

216 2.334

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0.000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

1 5 1 .176

0 0.000

1 4 1 .146

1 3 1.114

0 0 .000

0 0.000

0 0.000

9 .954

39 1 . 5 9 1

3RD

1 0 0 4 3 .002

0 0.000

47 1 .672

4 8 1 . 6 8 1

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

8 3 1 .919

1 3 1.114

0 0 .000

6 2 1 .792

0 0 .000

1 1 9 6 3.078

3267 3.514

0 0.000

1 7 0 6 3.232

0 0.000

2 1 1.322

0 0.000

4 58 2 . 6 6 1

SUM

1 7 6 7 3 .247

1 5 1 2.179

1 6 2 6 3 . 2 1 1

3 2 6 2 3 .513

214 2.330

433 2.636

1 8 0 3 3 .256

1 4 1 . 1 4 6

8 3 1 .919

1 3 1 . 1 1 4

244 2.387

7 1 1 . 8 5 1

1 8 5 2 3.268

1 4 1 9 3.152

3 3 5 4 3.526

413 2 .616

1 7 0 6 3 .232

2 7 9 2.446

1 5 3 5 3 .186

6 5 1 . 8 1 3

497 2.696

1 7 3

Page 191: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

174 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 4

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

CU 148 2.170

CY 0 0.000

DA 1004 3.002

DD 0 0.000

DE 717 2.856

DG 0 0.000

DI 268 2.428

DL 0 0.000

DN 0 0.000

DO 2146 3.332

DR 238 2.377

DS 0 0.005

DU 234 2.369

DY 7 .845

E A 1296 3.113

EB 0 0.000

EC 10 1.000

ED 90 1.954

EE 0 0.050

EF 0 0.000

EG 35 1.544

2ND

0 0.000

0 0.000

44 1.643

24 1.380

204 2.310

78 1.892

0 0.000

19 1.279

3 .477

21 1.322

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.050

0 0.000 3589

3.555 13

1.114 119

2.076 16

1.204 5115

3.709 487

2.688 6 7

1.826

3RD

0 0.000

49 1.690

0 0.000

0 0.000 1851

3.267 3

.477 0

0.000 0

0.000 0

0.000 3

.477 0

0.000 204

2.310 0

0.000 401

2.603 529

2.723 0

0.000 0

0.000 1414

3.150 371

2.569 41

1.613 0

0.000

SUM

148 2.170

49 1.690 1048

3.020 24

1.380 2772

3.443 81

1.908 268

2.428 19

1.279 3

.477 2170

3.336 238

2.377 204

2.310 234

2.369 408

2.611 5414

3.734 13

1.114 129

2.111 1520

3.182 5486

3.739 528

2.723 102

2.009

Page 192: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5.2

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 4

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

EI 0 0.000

EK 0 0 .000

EL 1 7 6 2.246

EM 1 0 1 .000

EN 7 3 1 . 8 6 3

EO 0 0 . 0 0 0

EP 1 8 1 . 2 5 5

ER 3 .477

ES 0 0.000

ET 0 0.000

EU 0 0 .000

EV 1 5 8 8 3 . 2 0 1

EW 0 0 . 0 0 0

EX 7 .845

EY 4 0 8 2 . 6 1 1

FA 1 3 9 0 3.143

FE 1 2 3 3 3 . 0 9 1

FF 0 0 .000

FI 1 4 8 0 3 .170

FL 2 4 2 2.384

FO 1 2 0 4 3 . 0 8 1

2ND

46 1 .663

0 0.000

2 5 1 2 3 .400

0 0.000

1 1 5 8 3 .064

1 9 1 . 2 7 9

238 2.377

5130 3 .710

1 4 5 0 3 .161

1 8 6 2.270

0 0.000

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

1 5 9 2 . 2 0 1

454 2.657

34 1 . 5 3 1

0 0.000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0.000

3 R D

0 0.000

3 4 4 2.537

276 2 . 4 4 1

2 1 4 9 3 .332

8 0 3 7 3 .905

0 0 . 0 0 0

534 2 .728

1 6 4 6 3 .216

1 3 9 4 3 .144

567 2.754

5 .699

0 0 .000

8 0 3 2.905

3 4 1 . 5 3 1

3 6 4 5 3 .562

6 .778

1 0 2 1 3 .009

5 .699

0 0 .000

0 8 .000

0 0.000

SUM

4 6 1 . 6 6 3

3 4 4 2 .537

2 9 6 4 3.472

2 1 5 9 3 .334

9 2 6 8 3 . 9 6 7

19 1 .279

7 9 0 2 .898

6 7 7 9 3 . 8 3 1

2 8 4 4 3 .454

7 5 3 2 .877

5 .699

1 5 9 8 3.204

9 6 2 2 .983

4 9 5 2 .695

4 0 8 7 3 . 6 1 1

1 3 9 6 3.145

2 2 5 4 3 .353

5 . 6 9 9

1 4 8 0 3 .170

2 4 2 2 .384

1 2 0 4 3 .081

1 7 5

Page 193: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 7 6 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 4

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

FR 4662 3.669

FT 0 0.000

FU 3 4 5 2.538

FY 0 0 .000

GA 5 8 3 2.766

GE 1 0 3 2 .013

GG 0 0 .000

GH 0 0 .000

GI

GL

GN

2

1

0

3 GO

GR

6 4 7 8 1 1

6 1 7 8 5

0 0 0 0

296 1 1 3

292 2.465

GS 0 D . O O O

GU 1 0 9 2.037

HA 5393 3.732

HE 2247 3 .352

HI 658 2.818

HN 0 0.000

HO 1 2 7 6 3.106

HR 0 0.000

2 N D

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0.000

0 0.000

69 1 . 8 3 9

35 1 .544

0 0.000

0 0.000

2 1 1 . 3 2 2

0 0.000

3 .477

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

1 4 3 1 7 4 .156

9 1 52 3.962

5500 3 .740

0 0 .000

6 4 8 2.812

1 0 1.000

3RD

0 0 .000

6 0 1 2.779

0 0.000

7 .845

1 3 1 .114

304 2 .483

0 0.000

517 2.713

0 0.000

0 PI. 0 0 0

9 4 1 . 9 7 3

0 0 .000

0 0.000

2 4 1 2.382

0 0.000

0 0.000

4 .602

0 0 .000

362 2.559

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

0 0.000

SUM

4662 3.669

6 0 1 2.779

3 4 5 2.538

7 .845

5 9 6 2.775

476 2.678

35 1.544

517 2.713

6 4 7 2 . 8 1 1

8 2 1.914

9 4 1 .973

1 2 9 9 3.114

292 2.465

2 4 1 2.382

1 0 9 2.037

1 9 7 1 0 4.295

1 1 4 0 3 4.057

6158 3.789

362 2.559

1 9 3 4 3.286

1 0 1 .000

Page 194: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 . 2

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 4

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

H U 201 2 .303

HY 9 . 954

I A 0 0.000

I B 0 0 .000

I C 0 0 .000

I D 2 2 1 2 .344

I E 0 0 .000

I F 0 0 .000

I G 3 .477

I K 0 0 .000

I L 9 - 9 5 4

I M 0 0 .000

I N 1 8 3 1 3 . 2 6 3

I 0 1 3 1 . 1 1 4

I P 0 0 .000

I R 46 1 . 6 6 3

I S 5 . 699

I T 59 1 . 7 7 1

IV 4 .602

I Z 0 0 .000

J A 261 2 .417

2ND

361 2 .558

0 0 .000

2 1 1 .322

11 1 . 0 4 1

447 2 .650

666 2 .823

433 2 .636

999 3 .000

6 3 1 2 . 8 0 0

1 4 2 6 3 .154

3093 3 .490

1 6 4 9 3 .217

2217 3 .346

30 1 . 4 7 7

1 3 4 2 .127

687 2 .837

839 2 .924

7847 3 .895

877 2 .943

1 3 8 2 .140

0 0 .000

3RD

0 0 .008

0 0 .000

44 1 . 6 4 3

0 0 .000

28 1 .447

2205 3 .359

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

4 27 2 .630

7 3 1 .863

698 2 .844

47 1 . 6 7 2

2 54 2 .405

292 2 .465

5199 3 .716

309 2 .490

0 0 .000

5 .699

0 0 .000

SUM

562 2 .750

9 .954

6 5 1 . 8 1 3

11 1 . 0 4 1

4 7 5 2 .677

3172 3 . 5 0 1

4 3 3 2 .636

999 3 .000

634 2 .802

1 4 2 6 3 .154

3529 3 .548

1 7 2 2 3 .236

4746 3 .676

9 0 1 . 9 5 4

388 2 .589

1 0 2 5 3 . 0 1 1

6 0 4 3 3 . 7 8 1

8 2 1 5 3 .915

8 8 1 2 .945

1 4 3 2 . 1 5 5

2 6 1 2 .417

1 7 7

Page 195: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 7 8 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 4

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

J E 9 7 1 . 9 8 7

JI 7 . 8 4 5

J O 5 3 9 2 . 7 3 2

J U 1 1 4 7 3 . 0 6 0

K A 48 1 . 6 8 1

K E 5 2 8 2 . 7 2 3

K I 5 2 9 2 . 7 2 3

KL 0 0 . 0 0 0

K N 1 1 3 6 3 . 0 5 5

K O 11 1 . 0 4 1

KS 0 0 .000

LA 1 6 5 4 3 . 2 1 9

LB 0 0 .000

LD 0 0 .000

LE 1 2 2 8 3 .089

LF 0 0 .000

LG 0 0 . 0 0 0

L I 2835 3 . 4 5 3

LK 0 0 . 0 0 0

LL 0 0 . 0 0 0

LM 0 0 . 0 0 0

2ND

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

20 1 . 3 0 1

0 0 .000

6 2 1 . 7 9 2

3 . 4 7 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

6 6 3 2 . 8 2 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 . 4 7 7 118

2 . 0 7 2 0

0 . 0 0 0 6

.778 7 9

1 . 8 9 8 0

0 .000 1 8

1 . 2 5 5 0

0 . 0 0 0

3RD

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 0 4 8 3 .484

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

1 8 1 . 2 5 5

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

7 . 8 4 5 1 2 6 4

3 . 1 0 2 8 6 6

2 .938 3 8 8

2 . 5 8 9 0

0 . 0 0 0 0

0 . 0 0 0 3 6 5

2 .562 5 3 7 9

3 . 7 3 1 1 5 7

2 . 1 9 6

SUM

9 7 1 . 9 8 7

7 . 8 4 5

5 3 9 2 . 7 3 2

1 1 4 7 3 .060

6 8 1 . 8 3 3

3 5 7 6 3 . 5 5 3

5 9 1 2 . 7 7 2

3 . 4 7 7 1 1 3 6

3 . 0 5 5 11

1 . 0 4 1 1 8

1 . 2 5 5 2327

3 .367 7

. 8 4 5 1 2 6 7

3 . 1 0 3 2 2 1 2

3 . 3 4 5 3 8 8

2 .589 6

. 7 7 8 2914

3 .464 365

2 .562 5 3 9 7

3 .732 1 5 7

2 .196

Page 196: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5.2

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 4

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

LO 2032 3.308

LP 0 0.000

LS 0 0.000

LT 0 0.000

LU 144 2.158

LV 0 0.000

LY 5 .699

MA 3631 3.560

MB 0 0.000

ME 504 2.702

MI 895 2.952

MM 0 0.000

MN 0 0.000

MO 3751 3.574

MP 0 0.000

MS 0 0.000

MU 1961 3.292

MY 35 1.544

NA 350 2.544

NC 0 0.000

ND 0 0.000

2N D

2 54 2.405

0 0.000 1245

3.095 4

.602 449

2.652 4

.602 0

0.000 0

0.000 0

0.000 19

1.279 14

1.146 10

1.000 0

0.000 0

0.000 0

0.000 0

0.000 7

.845 0

0.000 12

1.079 539

2.732 102

2.009

3RD

11 1.041

316 2.500

24 1.380

508 2.706

0 0.000

0 0.000 1930

3.286 54

1.732 82

1.914 6252

3.796 0

0.000 0

0.000 43

1.633 0

0.000 178

2.250 161

2.207 0

0.000 132

2.121 10

1.000 10

1.000 2140

3.330

SUM

2297 3.361

316 2.500 1269

3.103 512

2.709 593

2.773 4

.602 1935

3.287 3685

3.566 82

1.914 6775

3.831 909

2.959 10

1.000 43

1.633 3751

3.574 178

2.250 161

2.207 1968

167 2.223

372 2.571

549 2.740 2242

3.351

3.294

179

Page 197: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 8 0 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 4

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

NE 1 1 9 6 3.078

NG 0 0.000

NI 1 8 1 2.258

NK 0 0.000

NL 0 0 .000

NN 0 0.000

NO 330 2.519

NS 0 0.000

NT 0 0 .000

N U 6 2 1.792

NV 0 0.000

NY 0 0.000

OA 1 3 1 .114

OB 8 .903

oc 0 0.000

OD 28 1.447

OE 0 0.000

OF 0 0 .000

OG 0 0.000

OH 3 8 1.580

01 2 5

2 N D

5 5 2 2.742

0 0.000

1 1 3 2.053

0 0.000

1 7 4 7 3.242

49 1 .690

7 5 5 2.878

0 0.000

1 8 7 7 3.273

0 0.000

7 .845

0 0.808

608 2.784

8 1 1.908

1 2 3 2.090

3 9 5 2.597

746 2.873

67 1 .826

7 8 1.892

362 2.559

1 8 9 1 .398 2.276

3 R D

1 7 0 1 3 .231

1 2 4 5 3.095

0 0.000

3 0 8 2 .489

0 0.000

2 5 1 .398

7 .845

304 2.483

1 3 4 9 3 .130

5 .699

0 0.000

1 1 6 1 3.065

0 0 .000

4 ,602

1 0 1.000

1 0 5 3 3.022

1 4 1.146

63 1.799

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

SUM

3 4 4 9 3.538

1 2 4 5 3 .095

294 2.468

3 08 2.489

1 7 4 7 3.242

74 1.869

1 0 9 2 3.038

304 2.483

3226 3.509

67 1.826

7 .845

1 1 6 1 3.065

6 2 1 2.793

9 3 1.968

1 3 3 2.124

1 4 7 6 3.169

7 6 0 2 .881

1 3 0 2.114

7 8 1.892

400 2.602

214 2.330

Page 198: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

A P P E N D I X 5.2

BIGRAM F R E Q U E N C I E S FOR WORDS OF L E T T E R LENGTH 4

BIGRAM P O S I T I O N 1ST

OK 23 1 .362

OL 6 .778

OM 0 0.000

ON 2 4 2 2 3.384

00 0 0.000

OP 3 2 2 2 .508

OR 27 1 . 4 3 1

0s 0 0.000

OT 3 .477

ou 27 1 . 4 3 1

OV 1 2 5 1 3 .097

ow 58 1 . 7 6 3

ox 1 0 1.000

OY 0 0.000

P A 1 6 3 8 3 .214

P E 1 0 4 2.017

PH 65 1 . 8 1 3

P I 269 2.430

PL 560 2.748

PO 6 6 6 2 .823

P R 3 0 1.477

2 N D

3 9 1 . 5 9 1

1 3 6 3 3 .134

2934 3.467

1 8 5 4 3 .268

3703 3.569

330 2.519

4755 3,677

2065 3.315

9 9 3 2.997

1 5 8 2 3.199

410 2.613

1 2 0 9 3.082

0 0 .000

1 7 0 2.230

28 1 .447

332 2 . 5 2 1

0 0 .000

3 4 1 . 5 3 1

0 0 .000

552 2.742

0 0.000

3 R D

1 0 7 0 3.029

267 2.427

4952 3 .695

867 2.938

0 0 .000

302 2.480

4 5 1 2.654

6 4 1 .806

373 2.572

1 4 1.146

0 0.000

1 2 8 6 3 .109

5 .699

3 .477

40 1 . 6 0 2

558 2.747

0 0.000

0 0 .000

0 0.000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

S U M

1 1 3 2 3 .054

1 6 3 6 3 .214

7 8 8 6 3 .897

5 1 4 3 3 . 7 1 1

3 7 0 3 3 .569

9 54 2 .980

5233 3 .719

2 1 2 9 3.328

1 3 6 9 3.136

1 6 2 3 3.210

1 6 6 1 3.220

2 5 5 3 3 .407

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

1 7 3 2.238

1 7 0 6 3 .232

9 9 4 2.997

6 5 1 . 8 1 3

3 0 3 2 . 4 8 1

5 6 0 2 .748

1 2 1 8 3 .086

3 0 1 . 4 7 7

181

Page 199: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 8 2 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 4

BIGRAM POSITION 1 S T 2ND

PS 0 0 0 .000 0 .000

PT 0 0 0 .000 0 .000

PU 1 8 6 3 2 2 .270 1 . 5 0 5

PY 0 0 0 .000 0 .000

QU 1 5 0 1 .176 0 .000

RA 5 6 1 273 2 .749 2 .436

RB 0 0 0 .000 0 .000

RC 0 1 3 0 .000 1 . 1 1 4

RD 0 0 0 .000 0 .000

RE 706 8 6 0 2 .849 2.934

RF 0 0 0 .000 0 .000

RG 0 2 1 0 .000 1 .322

R I 424 1 7 6 2 .627 2 .246

RK 0 0 0 .000 0 .000

RL 0 0 0 .000 0 .000

RM 0 253 0 .000 2 .403

R N 0 0 0 .000 0 .000

RO 1 1 6 2 4586 3 . 0 6 5 3 .661

RP 0 0 0 .000 0 .000

R R 0 0 0 .000 0 .000

RS 0 0 0 .000 0 .000

3RD SUM

1 6 4 1 6 4 2 .215 2 . 2 1 5

240 240 2 .380 2.380

0 218 0 .000 2 .338

38 38 1 . 5 8 0 1 .580

0 1 5 0 .000 1 . 1 7 6

1 9 8 5 3 1 . 2 7 9 2 .931

27 27 1 . 4 3 1 1 . 4 3 1

0 1 3 0 .000 1 .114

747 747 2 .873 2 .873

7 3 7 5 8 9 4 1 3 . 8 6 8 3 .951

3 3 .477 .477

0 2 1 0 .000 1 . 3 2 2

6 606 .778 2 .782 1 4 7 5 1 4 7 5

3 .169 3 .169 283 283

2 .452 2 .452 792 1 0 4 5

2 .899 3 .019 5 5 5 5 5 5

2 .744 2 .744

1 . 8 8 1 3 .765 7 6 5824

1 3 1 3 1 .114 1 .114

22 22 1 . 3 4 2 1 . 3 4 2

280 288 2 .459 2 .459

Page 200: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5.2

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 4

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

RT 0 0.000

RU 2 2 2 2.346

RX 0 0.000

RY 0 0 .000

SA 3 2 1 1 3.507

sc 1 5 1 . 1 7 6

SE 1 1 6 0 3.064

SH 6 2 8 2.798

SI 8 3 7 2.923

SK 5 2 1 .716

SL 1 6 6 2.220

SM 7 .845

SN 7 1 1 . 8 5 1

SO 2387 3 .378

SP 1 3 9 2.143

ss 0 0 .000

S T 448 2 . 6 5 1

SU 1 6 6 5 3 .221

sw 29 1 .462

SY 0 0.000

TA 1 0 2 2 3 .009

2ND

6 6 1.820

266 2.425

0 0.000

0 0 .000

0 0.000

0 0 .000

6 7 5 2.829

0 0 .000

44 1 . 6 4 3

1 8 1 .255

5 .699

0 0 .000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

1 5 9 2 . 2 0 1

3 R D

8 4 5 2.927

1 4 1.146

8 .903

1 0 5 0 3 .021

0 0.000

6 .778

1 0 5 7 3.024

342 2.534

0 0.900

2 32 2.365

0 0 .000

0 0.000

0 0.000

1 0 8 0 3.033

3 .477

1 0 9 2 3 .038

6087 3.784

0 0.000

0 0 .000

1 9 2 2.283

173 2.238

SUM

9 1 1 2.960

5 0 2 2 . 7 0 1

8 . 9 0 3

1 0 5 0 3 . 0 2 1

3 2 1 1 3.507

2 1 1 .322

2 8 9 2 3 .461

9 7 0 2.987

8 8 1 2 .945

3 0 2 2 .480

1 7 1 2 .233

7 . 8 4 5

7 1 1 . 8 5 1

3467 3 .540

1 4 2 2 .152

1 0 9 2 3 .038

6 5 3 5 3.815

1 6 6 5 3 . 2 2 1

2 9 1 . 4 6 2

1 9 2 2.283

1 3 5 4 3 .132

1 8 3

Page 201: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 8 4 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 4

B I G R A M POSITION 1ST

TC 0 0 .000

TE 6 9 3 2 . 8 4 1

TH 24777 4 . 3 9 4

T I 1 8 1 8 3 .260

TO 1 3 8 4 3 . 1 4 1

TR 4 5 3 2 . 6 5 6

TS 0 0 . 0 0 0

TT 0 0 .000

TU 282 2 .450

TW 7 . 8 4 5

TY 200 2 . 3 0 1

U A 0 0 . 0 0 0

U B 0 0 .000

uc 0 0 . 0 0 0

U D 0 0 . 0 0 0

U E 0 0 . 0 0 0

OF 0 0 .000

UG 2 1 1 . 3 2 2

U I 0 0 .000

U K 0 0 .000

U L 0 0 . 0 0 0

2ND

5 . 6 9 9

2 1 9 2 . 3 4 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

1 6 3 2 .212

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 . 6 0 2

3 , 4 1 7

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 8 1 . 4 4 7

7 8 1 . 8 9 2

2 3 6 6 3 .374

4 6 1 . 6 6 3

26 1 . 4 1 5

5 . 6 9 9

7 5 1 . 8 7 5

8 6 1 . 9 3 4

1 4 1 . 1 4 6

5 6 1 2 .749

3RD

0 0 . 0 0 0

9 9 0 2 . 9 9 6

8 1 6 5 3 .912

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 9 0 3 3 . 2 7 9

0 0 .000

5 3 6 2 . 7 2 9

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

472 2 . 6 7 4

0 0 .000

1 4 8 2 . 1 7 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 3 1 . 3 6 2

3 8 9 2 .590

0 0 . 0 0 0

6 4 1 . 8 0 6

0 0 .000

3 . 4 7 7

9 4 1 . 9 7 3

SUM

5 . 6 9 9 1 9 0 2

3 .279 3 2 9 4 2 4 .518

1 8 2 8 3 . 2 6 2

3450 3 . 5 3 8

4 5 3 2 .656

536 2 . 7 2 9

1 6 1 . 2 0 4

2 8 5 2 . 4 5 5

7 . 8 4 5 6 7 2

2 . 8 2 7 2 8

1 . 4 4 7 2 2 6

2 .354 2 3 6 6

3 . 3 7 4 6 9

1 . 8 3 9 4 1 5

2 .618 5

. 6 9 9 1 6 0

2 . 2 0 4 8 6

1 . 9 3 4 1 7

1 . 2 3 0 6 5 5

2 . 8 1 6

Page 202: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5.2

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 4

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

UM 0 0.000

UN 1 2 2 2.086

UP 495 2.695

UR 2 1 1 .322

US 6 7 5 2.829

UT 6 .778

ux 0 0 .000

UY 0 0.000

uz 0 0.000

VA 1 0 9 2 .037

VD 0 0 .000

VE 8 5 7 2.933

VI 252 2 . 4 0 1

vo 9 0 1 .954

VY 0 0.000

W A 1 1 1 7 3 .048

W D 0

W E 5289 3.723

W H 4407 3.644

WI 1 0 3 2 8 4.014

WK 0 0.000

9 . 0 0 0

2ND

8 9 1 . 9 4 9

447 2.650

1 4 1.146

8 0 1 2.904

2147 3.332

2 1 2 2 .326

0 0 .000

3 1 1 .491

1 6 1.204

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

0 0 .000

2759 3 . 4 4 1

7 2 1 .857

0 0 .000

0 0.000

470 2.672

0 0 .000

50 1 . 6 9 9

0 0 .000

2 2 1 . 3 4 2

0 0.000

3RD

1 9 1.279

1 6 1 .204

20 1 . 3 0 1

1 4 9 7 3 .175

387 2.588

6 1 1 . 7 8 5

30 1 . 4 7 7

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

4 .602

4 .602

5 6 6 1 3.753

0 0.000

0 0.000

54 1 . 7 3 2

4 . 6 0 2

3 .477

1 2 1.079

0 0.000

0 0 .000

1 4 1.146

SUM

1 0 8 2.033

5 8 5 2.767

5 2 9 2 .723

2 3 1 9 3 .365

3 2 0 9 3 .506

279 2 .446

3 0 1 . 4 7 7

3 1 1 . 4 9 1

1 6 1.204

1 2 5 2 .097

4 . 6 0 2

9 2 7 7 3.967

3 2 4 2 . 5 1 1

9 0 1 .954

5 4 1 . 7 3 2

1 5 9 1 3 .202

3 .477

5 3 5 1 3.728

4407 3.644

1 0 3 5 0 4 .015

1 4 1 . 1 4 6

1 8 5

Page 203: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 8 6 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 4

BIGRAM POSITION 1 S T

WL 0 0 000

WN 0 0 000

WO 214 3 084

WR 1 2 1 .079

ws 0 0 .000

XE 0 0 .000

X I 0 0 .000

XT 0 0 .000

Y A 69 1 .839

Y D 0 0 .000

Y E 694 2 .841

YM 0 0 .000

Y N 0 0 .000

Y O 1227 3 .089

YP 0 0 .000

Y R 0 0 .000

YS 0 0 .000

YT 0 0 .000

YU 6 .I78

ZE 37 1 .568

2 1 1 6 1 .204

2ND

0 0 .000

1 3 1 .114

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

1 7 1 . 2 3 0

4 5 1 . 6 5 3

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

415 2 .618

9 .954

5 .699

0 0 .000

200 2 .301

9 , 9 5 4

0 0 .000

3 5 1 . 5 4 4

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

3RD

27 1 . 4 3 1

1 1 6 9 3 .068

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

297 2 .473

0 0 .000

1 6 1 . 2 0 4

4 54 2 .657

0 0 .000

5 . 699

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

989 2 .995

4 . 602

0 0 .000

1 6 3 2 .212

1 3 1 .114

SUM

27 1 . 4 3 1

1 1 8 2 3 .073

1214 3 .084

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

297 2 .473

1 7 1 . 2 3 0

6 1 1 . 7 8 5

454 2 .657

6 9 1 .839

5 .699 1 1 0 9

3 .045 9

.954 5

.699 1 2 2 7

3 .089 200

2 . 3 0 1 9

, 9 5 4 989

2 .995 39

1 . 5 9 1 6

200 2 .301

29 1 . 4 6 2

, 7 7 8

Page 204: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5.2 187

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 4

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST 2ND 3RD SUM

ZO 11 0 0 11 1.041 0.000 0.000 1.041

ZY 0 0 14 14 0.000 0.000 1.146 1.146

z z 0 0 115 115 0.000 0.000 2.061 2.061

Page 205: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 8 8 C H A P T E R 5

BIGRAM F R E Q U E N C I E S FOR WORDS OF L E T T E R LENGTH 5

BIGRAM P O S I T I O N 1 S T 2 N D 3 RD 4TH SUM

AA 7 .845

A B 2 1 5 1 3 .333

AC 1 0 9 2.037

AD 308 2.489

A F 1 0 7 0 3 .029

AG 6 8 6 2.836

AH 1 0 9 2 .037

A 1 45 1 . 6 5 3

AJ 0 0.000

AK 0 0.000

A L 8 7 5 2.942

AM 3 9 6 2.598

AN 1 7 6 2.246

A 0 0 0.000

AP 204 2.310

AR 410 2.613

A S 489 2.689

A T 69 1.839

0 0.000

438 2 . 6 4 1

3 0 9 2.490

2 37 2.375

5 .699

2 4 1 2 .382

4 .602

5 8 1 2.764

247 2.393

6 4 4 2.809

8 1 0 2.908

362 2 .559

9 9 4 2.997

0 0.000

384 2.584

1 9 3 4 3.286

884 2 .946

1 4 4 9 3 .161

1 0 1 .000

3 .477

1 6 2 5 3 .211

5 4 1 2.733

1 7 1 2.233

3 1 5 2.498

0 0.000

1 0 8 8 3.037

0 0.000

1 2 0 2 .079

1 0 6 6 3.028

3 0 5 2 .484

1 3 1 2 3.118

1 7 1 .230

1 2 2 2.086

2670 3 .427

1 0 4 1 3 .017

1 2 6 0 3 .100

0 0.000

0 0.000

1 4 1 . 1 4 6

2 8 5 2 .455

3 .477

0 0.000

26 1 .415

7 .845

0 0 .000

225 2.352

1 6 1 6 3.208

111 2.045

1 2 2 8 3.089

0 0.000

3 2 1 .505

394 2.595

468 2 .670

7 3 6 2.867

1 7 1 .230

2 5 9 2 3.414

2057 3.313

1 3 7 1 3.137

1 2 4 9 3 .097

1 2 4 2 3 .094

1 3 9 2.143

1 7 2 1 3.236

247 2.393

9 8 9 2.995

4367 3.640

1 1 7 4 3.070

3 7 1 0 3.569

1 7 1 . 2 3 0

7 4 2 2.870

5408 3.733

2 8 8 2 3 .460

3 5 1 4 3.546

AU 8 274 8 0 290 .903 2.438 .903 0.000 2.462

AV 6 2 3 3 2 4 1 6 0 8 1 0 1.792 2 .521 2.619 0 .000 2.908

AW 1 8 5 1 2 9 8 1 5 310 2.267 1 . 0 7 9 1 . 9 9 1 1 . 1 7 6 2 .491

Page 206: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5.2

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 5

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

AX 0 0.000

AY 0 0.000

A2 0 0.000

BA 745 2.872

BB 0 0.000

BE 1556 3.192

BI 269 2.430

BL 654 2.816

BO 668 2.825

BR 984 2.993

BS 0 0.000

BT 0 0.000

BU 372 2.571

BY 16 1.204

CA 731 2.864

cc 0 0.000

CE 121 2.083

CH 925 2.966

CI 161 2.207

CK 0 0.000

CL 1097 3.040

2ND

65 1.813 211

2.324

38 1.580

0 0.000

7 .845

0 0.000

7 .845

0 0.000

2115 3.325

0 0.000

0 0.000

b7 0.000

18 1.255

4 .602 86

1.934

43 1.633

146 2.164

3 .477

7 .845

0 0.000

0 0.000

3RD

0 0.000

74 1.869

44 1.643

61 1.785

60 1.778 144

2.158

77 1.886

287 2.458

162 2.210

3 .477

0 0.000

12 1.079

20 1.301

0 0.000

337 2.528

0 0.000

187 2.272

3 .477

12 1.079 112

2.049 81

4TH SUM

19 84 1.279 1.924 384 669

2.584 2.825

0 82 0.000 1.914

0 806 0.000 2.906

0 67 0.000 1.826 161 1861

2.207 3.270

21 374 1.322 2.573

0 94 1 0.d00 2.974

4 2949 .602 3.470

0 987 0.000 2.994

80 80 1.903 1.903

114 126 2.057 2.100

0 410 0.000 2.613

58 78 1.763 1.892

0 1154 0.c100 3.062

0 43 0.000 1.633 2712 3166 3.433 3.501

4479 5410 3.651 3.733

0 180 0.000 2.255 1000 1112 3.000 3.046

0 1178 1.908 0.000 3.071

189

Page 207: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

190 C H A P T E R 5

BIGRAM F R E Q U E N C I E S FOR WORDS OF L E T T E R LENGTH 5

BIGRAM P O S I T I O N 1ST

CO 2783 3.445

C R 457 2 .660

cs 0 0 .000

C T 0 0.000

CU 1 1 3 2.053

CY 28 1.447

DA 4 1 2 2 .615

DD 0 0.000

DE 5 2 2 2.718

DG 0 0.000

D I 1 1 2 2.049

DL 0 0.000

DM 0 0.000

DO 450 2.653

OR 7 7 5 2.889

D S 0 0 .000

DT 0 0.000

DU 5 2 1 . 7 1 6

DW 11 1 . 0 4 1

DY 45 1 . 6 5 3

EA 573 2.758

2ND

1 3 4 2.127

8 2 1.914

0 0.000

4 2 1 . 6 2 3

1 3 1.114

0 0.000

50 1.699

2 1 1 2.324

208 2.318

4 4 1 .643

11 1 . 0 4 1

7 . 8 4 5

3 7 1.568

2 1 1 . 3 2 2

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

2 5 1 .398

11 1 . 0 4 1

0 0.000

3 8 6 5 3.587

3 R D

1 8 1 . 2 5 5

0 0.000

0 0.000

1 0 0 2.000

88 1.944

0 0 .000

3 2 1 2 .507

3 4 1 . 5 3 1

1 8 1 4 3.259

1 4 3 2 .155

225 2.352

5 9 1 . 7 7 1

0 0 .000

30 1.477

9 .954

1 9 1 .279

1 4 1 . 1 4 6

1 3 1 . 1 1 4

0 FI. 0 0 0

0 0.000

2 0 8 2 3.318

4TH

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

7 .845

8 7 1 .940

0 0.000

47 1 .672

5 .699

0 0.000

5 58 2.747

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0 .000

0 0.000

11 1 . 0 4 1

0 0.000

1 7 3 6 3.240

0 0.000

3 .477

0 0.000

547 2 .738

1 2 1.079

S U M

2 9 3 5 3 .468

5 3 9 2 .732

7 .845

2 29 2.360

214 2.330

7 5 1 .875

7 8 8 2.897

245 2.389

3 1 0 2 3 .492

1 8 7 2.272

3 4 8 2.542

66 1 .820

37 1.568

5 1 2 2 .709

7 84 2 .894

1 7 5 5 3 .244

1 4 1 .146

9 3 1 .968

2 2 1 .342

592 2 .772

6 5 3 2 3 .815

Page 208: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 . 2

B I G R A M FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 5

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

EB 0 0 .000

EC 0 0 . 0 0 0

E D 8 9 1 . 9 4 9

E E 0 0 .000

EF 0 0 .000

EG 1 4 1 . 1 4 6

E H 0 0 .000

E I 104 2 .017

E K 0 0 .000

E L 77 1 . 8 8 6

EM 64 1 . 8 0 6

E N 303 2 . 4 8 1

EO 0 0 .000

EP 6 . 778

E Q 90 1 . 9 5 4

E R 79 1 . 8 9 8

ES 3 1 1 . 4 9 1

ET 11 1 . 0 4 1

E U 0 0 .000

EV 597 2 . 7 7 6

EW 0 0 .000

2ND

44 1 . 6 4 3

18 1 . 2 5 5

4 1 1 . 6 1 3

8 8 3 2.946

27 1 . 4 3 1

628 2 .798

5 . 699

7 6 3 2 .883

0 0 .000

474 2 .676

3 1 1 . 4 9 1

6 8 5 2 .836

0 0 .000

1 2 3 2 .090

0 0 .000

494 2 .694

1 6 6 2 .220

1 2 8 2 .107

0 0 .000

1 0 8 8 3 .031

1 5 1 2 .179

3RD

4 . 602

2 6 1 2 .417

237 2 .375

930 2 .968

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

1 8 1 . 2 5 5

0 0 .000

2688 3 .429

1 5 1 2 .179

490 2 .690

589 2 .770

486 2.687

0 0 .000

216 2 .334

0 0 .000

4347 3 .638

2095 3 . 3 2 1

1 7 8 2 .250

9 .954

3 . 477

5 1 1 .708

4TH

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

2 8 2 5 3 . 4 5 1

6 6 5 2 .823

210 2 .322

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

9 5 9 7 8 752 8 7 6

1 9 279 686 227

3 . 477

1 2 6 2 .100

0 0 . 0 0 0

7346 3 . 8 6 6

3937 3 . 5 9 5

297 2 .473

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

7 1 1 . 8 5 1

SUM

4 8 1 . 6 8 1

279 2 .446

3192 3 .504

2478 3 .394

247 2 .393

660 2 .820

5 . 6 9 9 3555

3 . 5 5 1 246

2 .391 1 7 9 3

3 .254 7 0 3

2 .847 3160

3 .500 3

. 477 471

2 . 6 7 3 9 0

1 . 9 5 4 1 2 2 6 6 4 .089

6229 3 .794

614 2 .788

9 .9 54 1 6 8 8

3 .227 273

2 .436

1 9 1

Page 209: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 9 2 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 5

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST 2N D

EX 151 8 9 2 .179 1 . 9 4 9

EY 0 6 0 .000 . 7 7 8

FA 6 2 8 0 2 . 7 9 8 0 . 0 0 0

FE 2 4 5 0 2 .389 0 . 0 0 0

FF 0 8 0 0 . 0 0 0 1 . 9 0 3

F I 2400 0 3 . 3 8 0 0 .000

FL 3 9 5 0 2 .597 0 . 0 0 0

FO 1 1 7 1 0 3 .069 0 . 0 0 0

FR 5 4 1 0 2 . 7 3 3 0 .000

FS 0 0 0 .000 0 .000

FT 0 1 4 3 8 0 .000 3 . 1 5 8

FU 234 0 2 .369 0 .000

GA 1 6 0 5 7 8 2 .204 2 . 7 6 2

G E 3 44 .477 1 . 6 4 3

G G 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

G H 1 5 0 1 . 1 7 6 0 .000

G I 6 6 5 4 2 . 8 2 3 .602

G L 2 0 1 0 2 . 3 0 3 0 .000

GM 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

GN 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0.000

G O 5 2 1 9 2 . 7 1 7 .954

3RD

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 1 2 2 . 0 4 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

6 3 1 . 7 9 9

0 0 .000

El 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 2 2 2 . 0 8 6

1 7 1 . 2 3 0

4 56 2 . 6 5 9

290 2 .462

1 8 1 . 2 5 5

2 4 1 3 3 . 3 8 3

1 6 2 2 .210

5 6 1 . 7 4 8

4 . 6 0 2

6 8 1 . 8 3 3

6 9 1 . 8 3 9

4TH

9 3 1 . 9 6 8

3 4 2 2 . 5 3 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

8 4 1 . 9 2 4

1 8 9 2 . 2 7 6

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

1 6 2 2 . 2 1 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 0 4 0 3 . 0 1 7

3 . 4 7 7

1 3 8 2 . 1 4 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 . 8 4 5

7 2 1 . 8 5 7

SUM

3 3 3 2 . 5 2 2

3 4 8 2 . 5 4 2

6 2 8 2 .798

4 4 1 2 . 6 4 4

2 6 9 2 . 4 3 0

2 4 0 0 3 . 3 8 0

4 5 8 2 . 6 6 1

1 1 7 1 3 . 0 6 9

5 4 1 2 . 7 3 3

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

1 7 2 2 3 . 2 3 6

2 5 1 2 . 4 0 0

1 1 9 4 3 .077

1 3 7 7 3 . 1 3 9

2 1 1 . 3 2 2

2 5 6 6 3 . 4 0 9

8 3 1 2 . 9 2 0

2 57 2 . 4 1 0

4 . 6 0 2

7 5 1 . 8 7 5

6 7 1 2 . 8 2 7

Page 210: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 .2

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 5

B I G R A M POSITION 1ST

G R 1 7 6 3 3 . 2 4 6

GS 0 0 . 0 0 0

G U 2 3 3 2 .367

G Y 4 . 6 0 2

HA 6 1 1 2 . 7 8 6

H E 8 2 3 2 . 9 1 5

H I 1 0 5 2 . 0 2 1

H N 0 0 . 0 0 0

H O 1 4 0 4 3 . 1 4 7

H R 0 0 . 0 0 0

HS 0 0 . 0 0 0

HT 0 0 . 0 0 0

H U 399 2 . 6 0 1

H Y 6 . 7 7 8

I A 0 0 . 0 0 0

IB 0 0 . 0 0 0

IC 0 0 . 0 0 0

I D 2 1 1 2 . 3 2 4

I E 0 0 . 0 0 0

I F 0 0 . 0 0 0

I G 0 0 . 0 0 0

2ND

5 1 1 . 7 0 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 4 1 . 1 4 6

9 2 4 2 . 9 6 6

8 5 0 7 3 . 9 3 0

6 2 0 9 3 . 7 9 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 4 2 1 3 .384

7 1 3 2 . 8 5 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

27 1 . 4 3 1

7 , 8 4 5

8 7 1 . 9 4 0

9 3 1 . 9 6 8

1 9 1 . 2 7 9

2 57 2 . 4 1 0

534 2 . 7 2 8

1 8 0 2 . 2 5 5

2468 3 . 3 9 2

3RD

1 4 9 2 . 1 7 3

0 0 .000

111 2 . 0 4 5

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

1 7 1 7 3 . 2 3 5

4 . 6 0 2

6 . 7 7 8

8 . 9 0 3

5 . 6 9 9

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 4 4 2 . 1 5 8

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

4 2 4 5 3 . 6 2 8

2 2 9 2 . 3 6 0

594 2 . 7 7 4

1 9 9 2 . 2 9 9

26 1 . 4 1 5

4TH

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 9 2 2 . 2 8 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 3 1 . 3 6 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

11 1 . 0 4 1

5 . 6 9 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 . 6 0 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 8 1 . 4 4 7

2 4 1 3 3 . 3 8 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 . 6 0 2

1 2 3 2 . 0 9 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

5 5 5 2 . 7 5 2

3 3 3 2 . 5 2 2

1 1 2 2 . 0 4 9

2 7 1 . 4 3 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

SUM

1 9 6 3 3 . 2 9 3

1 9 2 2 . 2 8 3

344 2 . 5 3 7

4 1 1 . 6 1 3

1 5 3 5 3 .186 1 1 0 5 8 4 . 0 4 4

6 3 2 3 3 . 8 0 1

6 . 7 7 8 3 8 3 7

3 . 5 8 4 7 1 8

2 . 8 5 6 2 8

1 . 4 4 7 2 4 1 3

3 . 3 8 3 4 2 6

2 . 6 2 9 1 7

1 . 2 3 0 3 54

2 . 5 4 9 1 0 5

2 . 0 2 1 4 8 2 9

3 . 6 8 4 1 0 3 0

3 . 0 1 3 1 2 4 0

3 . 0 9 3 4 06

2 . 6 0 9 2494

3 . 3 9 7

1 9 3

Page 211: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

194 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 5

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

I1 0 0.000

IK 0 0.000

IL 0 0.000

IM 131 2.117

IN 228 2.358

I0 8 .903

IP 0 0.000

IR 47 1.672

IS 169 2.228

IT 106 2.025

IV 17 1.230

IX 0 0.000

I2 0 0.000

JA 142 2.152

JE 86 1.934

JI 11 1.041

JO 155 2.190

JU 131 2.117

KA 27 1.431

KE 21 1.322

KI 68

2N D

0 0.000

82 1.914

535 2.728

438 2.641

1401 3.146

24 1.380

26 1.415

1914 3.282

2 26 2.354

264 2.422

1053 3.022

196 2.292

24 1.380

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

82 1.833 1.914

3RD

0 0.000

20 1.301

2279 3.358

91 1.959

3331 3.523

255 2.407

92 1.964

325 2.512

305 2.484

1217 3.085 174

2.241

0 0.000

34 1.531

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

291 2.464

0 0.000

0 0.000

1151 3.061

5 .699

4TH

4 .602

0 0.000

722 2.859

98 1.991

1090 3.037

156 2.193

34 1.531

2752 3.440

447 2.650

339 2.530

0 0.000

30 1.477

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

3 58 2.554

0 0.000

SUM

4 .602 102

2.009

3536 3.549

7 58 2.880

6050 3.782

443 2.646

152 2.182

5038 3.702

1147 3.060 1926 3.285

1244 3.095

226 2.354

58 1.763

142 2.152

86 1.934

11 1.041

446 2.649

131 2.117

27 1.431

1530 3.185

155 2.190

Page 212: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 . 2

B I G R A M FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 5

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

KL 0 0 . 0 0 0

K N 490 2 .690

KO 1 2 1 . 0 7 9

KS 0 0 .000

K U 0 0 . 0 0 0

K Y 0 0 .000

LA 1 1 1 9 3.049

L B 0 0 . 0 0 0

LC 0 0 .000

L D 0 0 . 0 0 0

LE 1 0 6 3 3 . 0 2 7

LF 0 0 .000

LG 0 0 . 0 0 0

LH 0 0 . 0 0 0

L I 9 5 8 2 . 9 8 1

L K 0 0.0063

L L 1 0 1 . 0 0 0

LM 0 0 .000

L O 8 7 8 2 . 9 4 3

LP 0 0 * 000

LS 0 0 .000

2N D

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 . 4 7 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 9 7 5 3 . 2 9 6

1 6 1 . 2 0 4

5 . 6 9 9

1 0 8 2 . 0 3 3

574 2 . 7 5 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0.6300

2 8 8 2 . 4 5 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 2 1 2 . 0 8 3

6 - 7 7 8 1 4 6 1

3 . 1 6 5 0

0 . 0 0 0 4

.602

3RD

8 . 9 0 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 8 1 . 2 5 5

1 1 3 2 . 0 5 3

3 .477

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 9 1 . 6 9 0

7 3 1 2 . 8 6 4

8 . 9 0 3

5 . 6 9 9

5 . 6 9 9

2 3 2 2 . 3 6 5

6 5 1 . 8 1 3

789 2 . 8 9 7

39 1 . 5 9 1

405 2 . 6 0 7

5 3 1 . 7 2 4

38 1 . 5 8 0

4TH SUM

0 8 0 . 0 0 0 . 9 0 3

0 490 0 . 0 0 0 2 . 6 9 0

0 1 2 0 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 7 9

8 1 2 8 1 2 2 .910 2 . 9 1 0

0 3 0 . 0 0 0 . 4 7 7

7 2 9 0 1 . 8 5 7 1 . 9 5 4

2 8 3 2 3 5 1 . 4 4 7 3 . 5 1 0

0 1 9 0 . 0 0 0 1 . 2 7 9

0 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 6 9 9

5 7 1 5 5 8 7 2 3 . 7 5 7 3 . 7 6 9

1 8 3 7 4 2 0 5 3 . 2 6 4 3 .624

1 2 2 0 1 . 0 7 9 1 . 3 0 1

0 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 6 9 9

0 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 6 9 9

0 1 4 7 8 0 . 0 0 0 3 . 1 7 0

3 6 8 . 4 7 7 1 . 8 3 3 1 8 0 6 2 7 2 6

3 . 2 5 7 3 . 4 3 6 19 6 4

1 . 2 7 9 1 . 8 0 6 1 0 2 7 5 4

1 . 0 0 0 3 . 4 4 0 4 5 7

. 6 0 2 1 . 7 5 6 1 0 0 6 1 0 4 8

3 . 0 0 3 3 . 0 2 0

1 9 5

Page 213: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 9 6 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 5

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

LT 0 0 . 0 0 0

LU 111 2 . 0 4 5

L V 0 0 .000

LY 4 8 1 . 6 8 1

MA 9 7 8 2 .990

MB 0 0 .000

ME 6 5 0 2 . 8 1 3

M I 1 1 0 9 3 . 0 4 5

ML 0 0 .000

M M 0 0 . 0 0 0

MN 0 0 . 0 0 0

MO 1 2 3 6 3 . 0 9 2

MP 0 0 . 0 0 0

YS 0 0 . 0 0 0

MU 2 4 1 2 . 3 8 2

MY 6 . 7 7 8

N A 2 8 1 2 . 4 4 9

NC 0 0 .000

ND 0 0 .000

N E 1 0 2 5 3 . 0 1 1

NG 0 0 . 0 0 0

2ND

24 1 . 3 8 0

1 9 1 2 . 2 8 1

6 . 7 7 8

4 . 6 0 2

6 9 3 2 . 8 4 1

0 0 .000

3 4 1 . 5 3 1

1 1 5 2 . 0 6 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

416 2 .619

9 6 1 . 9 8 2

0 0 .000

3 . 4 7 7

0 0 .000

6 1 1 . 7 8 5

6 2 1 . 7 9 2

9 2 2 2 . 9 6 5

1 4 4 2 . 1 5 8

1 6 2 2 .210

3RD

4 0 1 . 6 0 2

200 2 . 3 0 1

2 6 1 . 4 1 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

5 8 1 2 .764

44 1 . 6 4 3

1 1 6 2 3 . 0 6 5

1 0 5 2 . 0 2 1

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

46 1 . 6 6 3

6 . 7 7 8

1 0 7 2 . 0 2 9

3 6 1 . 5 5 6

0 0 .000

4 . 6 0 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 7 8 2 .250

9 6 6 2 . 9 8 5

7 5 1 2 . 8 7 6

8 6 1 2 . 9 3 5

370 2 . 5 6 8

4TH

2 1 3 2 .328

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 0 5 5 3 . 0 2 3

6 7 1 . 8 2 6

27 1 . 4 3 1

2 8 3 2 .452

22 1 . 3 4 2

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

27 1 . 4 3 1

1 0 9 8 3 . 0 4 1

0 0 .000

1 1 7 2 . 0 6 8

1 0 1 2 . 0 0 4

0 0 .000

1 3 3 1 3 .124

607 2 .783

3346 3 .525

SUM

2 7 1 2 . 4 4 2

5 0 2 2 . 7 0 1

3 2 1 . 5 0 5

1 1 0 7 3 . 0 4 4

2 3 1 9 3 . 3 6 5

7 1 1 . 8 5 1

2 1 2 9 3 . 3 2 8

1 3 5 1 3 . 1 3 1

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

4 6 1 . 6 6 3

6 . 7 7 8 1 7 5 9

3 . 2 4 5 1 5 9

2 . 2 0 1 1 0 9 8

3 . 0 4 1 2 4 8

2 . 3 9 4 1 2 3

2 . 0 9 0 6 2 1

2 . 7 9 3 1 0 2 8

3 .012 3004

3 . 4 7 8 2637

3 . 4 2 1 3 8 7 8

3 . 5 8 9

Page 214: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 .2

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 5

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

NI 4 6 7 2 . 6 6 9

NJ 0 0 . 0 0 0

NK 0 0 . 0 0 0

NL 0 0 . 0 0 0

NN 0 0 . 0 0 0

NO 5 4 6 2 . 7 3 7

NP 0 0 . 0 0 0

NR 0 0 . 0 0 0

NS 0 0 . 0 0 0

N T 0 0 . 0 0 0

NU 1 7 1 . 2 3 0

NX 0 0 . 0 0 0

NY 0 0 . 0 0 0

OA 3 . 4 7 7

OB 0 0 .000

oc 7 7 1 . 8 8 6

OD 1 7 1 . 2 3 0

OE 0 0 . 0 0 0

OF 4 4 8 2 . 6 5 1

OG 0 0 . 0 0 0

OH 0 0 . 0 0 0

2 N D

4 4 1 2 .644

4 4 1 . 6 4 3

8 . 9 0 3

4 . 6 0 2

5 8 1 . 7 6 3

3 7 0 2 . 5 6 8

2 0 1 . 3 0 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 8 1 . 5 8 0

5 6 5 2 . 7 5 2

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

5 7 3 2 . 7 5 8

1 0 8 2 .033

4 0 0 2 . 6 0 2

4 1 9 2 . 6 2 2

1 1 4 2 . 0 5 7

5 . 5 9 9

6 1 1 . 7 8 5

9 . 9 5 4

3 R D

5 3 1 . 7 2 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 1 3 2 . 0 5 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 1 3 2 . 0 5 3

1 5 2 2 .182

0 0 .000

9 9 1 . 9 9 6

34fJ 2 . 5 3 1

3 1 3 2 . 4 9 6

2 2 1 . 3 4 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 0 5 2. fJ21

2 3 1 . 3 6 2

2 9 5 2 . 4 7 0

2 5 9 2 .413

4 4 1 . 6 4 3

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

4TH

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 1 1 2 . 8 5 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

6

3 8 1 . 5 8 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

8 1 9 2 . 9 1 3

1 4 0 3 3 . 1 4 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

9 . 9 5 4

1 4 2 2 . 1 5 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 . 4 7 7

3 6 1 2 . 5 5 8

11 1 . 0 4 1

4 5 1 . 6 5 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

. 7 i a

SUM

9 6 1 2 . 9 8 3

4 4 1 . 6 4 3

8 3 2 2 . 9 2 0

4 . 6 0 2

1 7 7 2 . 2 4 8

1 1 0 6 3 . 0 4 4

2 0 1 . 3 0 1

9 9 1 . 9 9 6

1 1 9 7 3 . 0 7 8

2 2 8 1 3 . 3 5 8

3 9 1 . 5 9 1

9 .9 5 4

1 4 2 2 . 1 5 2

6 8 1 2 . 8 3 3

1 3 1 2 . 1 1 7

7 7 5 2 . 8 8 9

1 0 5 6 3 . 0 2 4

1 6 9 2 . 2 2 8

5 1 3 2 . 7 1 0

6 1 1 . 7 8 5

9 . 9 5 4

1 9 7

Page 215: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

1 9 8 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 5

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

01 3 . 4 7 7

OK 0 0 .000

O L 9 8 1 . 9 9 1

OM 0 0 . 0 0 0

ON 5 3 1 . 7 2 4

00 0 0 .000

OP 6 3 1 . 7 9 9

OR 404 2 . 6 0 6

0s 9 . 9 5 4

OT 1 7 0 2 3 . 2 3 1

O U 1 0 5 2 . 0 2 1

ov 11 1 . 0 4 1

OW 7 1 1 . 8 5 1

ox 0 0 . 0 0 0

OY 0 0 . 0 0 0

0 2 0 0 .000

PA 8 3 8 2 . 9 2 3

PE 3 1 8 2 . 5 0 2

PH 1 4 3 2 . 1 5 5

P I 297 2 . 4 7 3

PL 1 1 1 7 3 . 0 4 8

2ND

1 3 0 6 3 . 1 1 6

50 1 . 6 9 9

4 8 9 2 .689

7 7 5 2 . 8 8 9

8 2 0 2 . 9 1 4

6 6 3 2 . 8 2 2

1 0 9 2 . 0 3 7

2 7 2 6 3 .436

2 7 9 2 . 4 4 6

6 6 3 2 . 8 2 2

7 6 4 9 3 .884

500 2 . 6 9 9

5 8 1 2 . 7 6 4

1 4 1 . 1 4 6

94 1 . 9 7 3

5 7 1 . 7 5 6

3 0 1 2 .479

446 2 . 6 4 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 1 1 . 8 5 1

3 0 1 . 4 7 7

3 RD

6 9 1 . 8 3 9

4 1 1 2 . 6 1 4

3 7 3 2 . 5 7 2

9 9 1 . 9 9 6

1 4 7 5 3 .169

7 2 4 2 . 8 6 0

1 2 9 2 . 1 1 1

7 59 2 .880

1 6 1 9 3 . 2 0 9

4 29 2 . 6 3 2

2 3 4 2 3 . 3 7 0

4 4 9 2 . 6 5 2

972 2 . 9 8 8

7 . 8 4 5

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

4 . 6 0 2

52 1 . 7 1 6

5 0 1 2 . 7 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 2 1 . 8 5 7

1 4 6 2 . 1 6 4

4TH

0 0 . 0 0 0

6 3 1 . 7 9 9

8 . 9 0 3

4 6 1 . 6 6 3

3 9 6 2 . 5 9 8

3 . 4 7 7

2 5 1 . 3 9 8

1 2 4 3 3 . 0 9 4

2 8 1 . 4 4 7

8 8 1 . 9 4 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

9 . 9 5 4

309 2 . 4 9 0

0 0 .000

44 1 . 6 4 3

0 0 .000

5 . 6 9 9

1 3 4 2 . 1 2 7

3 9 1 . 5 9 1

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

SUM

1 3 7 8 3 . 1 3 9

524 2 . 7 1 9

9 6 8 2 . 9 8 6

9 2 0 2 . 9 6 4

2 7 4 4 3 . 4 3 8

1 3 9 0 3 . 1 4 3

3 2 6 2 . 5 1 3

5 1 3 2 3 . 7 1 0

1 9 3 5 3 . 2 8 7

2 8 8 2 3 . 4 6 0 1 0 0 9 6 4 . 0 0 4

9 6 9 2 . 9 8 6

1 9 3 3 3 . 2 8 6

2 1 1 . 3 2 2

1 4 8 2 . 1 7 0

6 1 1 . 7 8 5

1 1 9 6 3 . 0 7 8

1 3 9 9 3 . 1 4 6

1 8 2 2 . 2 6 0

440 2 . 6 4 3

1 2 9 3 3 . 1 1 2

Page 216: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5.2

B I G R A M FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 5

B I G R A M POSITION 1ST

PO 1 0 2 8 3 . 0 1 2

PP 0 0 .000

PR 6 1 5 2 .789

PS 0 0 .000

PT 0 0 . 0 0 0

PU 6 2 1 . 7 9 2

PY 0 0 . 0 0 0

QU 5 1 5 2 . 7 1 2

R A 7 2 5 2 .860

R B 0 0 . 0 0 0

RC 0 0 . 0 0 0

RD 0 0 . 0 0 0

R E 486 2 .687

RF 0 0 . 0 0 0

RG 0 0 . 0 0 0

RH 1 0 8 2 . 0 3 3

R I 9 6 9 2 . 9 8 6

RK 0 0 . 0 0 0

R L 0 0 . 0 0 0

RM 0 0 . 0 0 0

R N 0 0 . 0 0 0

2ND

1 5 1 2 .179

1 3 7 2 . 1 3 7

9 8 1 . 9 9 1

1 4 1 . 1 4 6

4 . 6 0 2

3 . 4 7 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 1 5 2 . 0 6 1

1 2 7 8 3 .107

5 8 1 . 7 6 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

376 2 . 5 7 5

1 9 0 6 3 . 2 8 0

0 0 .000

8 4 1 . 9 2 4

0 0 .000

1 5 0 8 3 . 1 7 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

6 4 1 . 8 0 6

2 3 1 . 3 6 2

3RD

2 5 1 . 3 9 8

1 0 3 2 . 0 1 3

0 0 .000

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

1 1 7 2 . 0 6 8

20 1 . 3 0 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

292 2 . 4 6 5

1 7 1 . 2 3 0

419 2 . 6 2 2

482 2 . 6 8 3

1 0 5 8 3 . 0 2 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

404 2 . 6 0 6

0 0 .000

2 5 5 2 .407

1 9 9 2 . 2 9 9

1 3 1 9 3 . 1 2 0

408 2 . 6 1 1

9 0 1 . 9 5 4

4TH

4 . 6 0 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 9 1 2 . 6 9 1

1 0 8 2 . 0 3 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

9 8 1 . 9 9 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 2 3 2 . 0 9 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

8 2 4 2 . 9 1 6

4 1 5 7 3 . 6 1 9

7 . 8 4 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 6 1 . 2 0 4

9 1 1 . 9 5 9

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

7 1 1 . 8 5 1

1 1 6 2 .064

SUM

1 2 0 8 3 . 0 8 2

240 2 . 3 8 0

7 1 3 2 . 8 5 3

5 1 5 2 . 7 1 2

2 2 9 2 . 3 6 0

8 5 1 . 9 2 9

9 8 1 . 9 9 1

6 3 0 2 . 7 9 9

2 4 1 8 3 . 3 8 3

7 5 1 . 8 7 5

4 1 9 2 . 6 2 2

1 6 8 2 3 . 2 2 6

7 6 0 7 3 . 8 8 1

7 . 8 4 5

4 8 8 2 . 6 8 8

1 0 8 2 . 0 3 3

2 7 4 8 3 . 4 3 9

290 2 . 4 6 2

1 3 3 1 3 . 1 2 4

5 4 3 2 . 7 3 5

2 29 2 . 3 6 0

1 9 9

Page 217: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

200 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 5

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

RO 548 2 .739

RP 0 0 .000

RR 0 0 .000

RS 0 0 .000

RT 0 0 .000

RU 200 2 .301

RV 0 0 .000

RY 0 0 .000

SA 375 2 .574

SC 370 2 .568

SE 9 4 3 2 .975

SH 1 6 5 5 3 .219

SI 1 0 2 5 3 .011

SK 8 5 1 .929

SL 254 2 .405

SM 766 2 .884

SN 6 1 1 . 7 8 5

S O 750

SP 8 9 6 2 .952

SQ 25 1 . 3 9 8

SS 0 0 .000

2 .875

2ND

1 9 2 6 3 .285

0 0 .000

6 4 1 . 8 0 6

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

512 2 .709

0 0 .000

1 9 1 .279

24 1 . 3 8 0

9 . 954

6 . 7 7 8

6 . 778

222 2 .346

398 2 .600

7 . 8 4 5

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

3RD 4TH

1 3 1 1 1 5 2 .117 2 .061

1 0 9 7 2 2 .037 1 . 8 5 7

362 0 2 .559 0 .000

1 7 1 8 1 4 1 6 3 .235 3 .151

1 0 2 8 997 3 .012 2 .999

6 1 5 1 . 7 8 5 .699

1 7 1 0 2 .233 0 .000

0 1254 0 .000 3 .098

5 5 6 1 . 7 4 0 .778

7 0 . 8 4 5 0 .000

519 4720 2 . 7 1 5 3 .674

0 289 0 .000 2 .461

700 0 2 .845 0 .000

5 1 7 1 . 7 0 8 .845

6 0 . 778 0 .000

0 3 0 .000 .477

0 0 0 .000 0 .000

3 1 7 1 . 4 9 1 . 8 4 5

5 2 5 .699 1 . 3 9 8

0 0 0 .000 0 .000

1 9 1 1 7 787 2 .281 1 .230 2 .896

SUM

2720 3 . 4 3 5

1 8 1 2 .258

4 26 2 .629

3134 3 .496

2025 3 .306

7 7 8 2 .891

1 7 1 2 .233

1 2 7 3 3 . 1 0 5

460 2 . 6 6 3

386 2 .587

6 1 8 8 3 .792

1 9 5 0 3 .290

1 9 4 7 3 .289

541 2 .733

267 2 .427

769 2 .886

6 1 1 . 7 8 5

788 2 .897

926 2 .967

2 5 1 .398

9 9 5 2 .998

Page 218: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

A P P E N D I X 5.2 2 0 1

B I G R A M F R E Q U E N C I E S F O R WORDS O F L E T T E R LENGTH 5

B I G R A M P O S I T I O N 1ST 2 N D 3 R D 4 T H SUM

ST

su

sw

S Y

T A

T C

T D

T E

T H

T I

T L

T O

3855 3 .586

1 5 6 2.193

3 0 6 2 .486

4 .602

8 0 9 2.908

0 0.000

0 0 .000

6 2 4 2 .795

9 6 6 9 3.985

517 2 .713

0 0.000

8 7 0 2 .940

0 499 0 .000 2.698

9 6 216 1.982 2.334

0 0 0 .000 0 .000

0 0 0.000 0 .000

1 5 5 1 362 3 . 1 9 1 2.559

0 2 68 0 .000 2.428

0 3 0.000 .477

372 3129 2 .571 3.495

1 7 1 3 44 3.234 1 .643

8 56 5 9 1 2.932 2.772

1 2 8 1 1.079 1.908

7 6 4 9 8 2.883 1 . 9 9 1

2 2 3 6 3.349

0 0.000

0 0.000

28 1.447

5 0 1 . 6 9 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

2 1 0 4 3.323

2068 3 .316

0 0.000

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 6 1 . 5 5 6

6 5 9 0 3 .819

4 6 8 2 .670

3 0 6 2.486

3 2 1 . 5 0 5

2772 3.443

268 2.428

3 - 4 7 7

6 2 2 9 3.794

1 3 4 9 4 4 .130

1 9 6 4 3 .293

93 1 .968

1 7 6 8 3 .247

T R 1 2 1 2 6 0 8 5 0 1 3 5 7 3 .084 1 .778 1.929 0 . 0 0 0 3.133

TS 0 0 0 1 1 7 3 1 1 7 3 0 .080 0.000 0.000 3 .069 3 .069

TT 0 29 58 2 9 1 1 6 0 .000 1 . 4 6 2 1 . 7 6 3 1 .462 2.064

T U 1 0 9 3 0 1 8 0 4 1 8 2.037 2.479 .903 0 .000 2 . 6 2 1

TW 1 0 9 0 0 0 1 0 9 2 .037 0.000 0 .000 0 . 0 Q 0 2 .037

T Y 1 2 4 9 8 0 5 9 1 8 1 3 2.093 1 . 9 9 1 0.00B 2.772 2 .910

T Z 0 0 0 3 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 .000 0 .000 .477 .477

UA 0 5 1 2 1 1 0 2 6 2 0 .000 1 . 7 0 8 2.324 0 .000 2 .418

UB 0 6 2 1 3 8 9 2 0 9 0.000 1.792 2.140 . 9 5 4 2 .320

Page 219: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

202 C H A P T E R 5

BIGRAM F R E Q U E N C I E S FOR WORDS OF L E T T E R LENGTH 5

BIGRAM P O S I T I O N 1 S T

uc 0 0.000

UD 0 0.000

UE 0 0 .000

UF 0 0.000

UG 0 0.000

U I 0 0 .000

U L 5 .699

U M 0 0.000

UN 1 5 8 8 3 . 2 0 1

00 0 0 .000

U P 8 6 1 . 9 3 4

UR 8 5 1 .929

US 2 6 1 2.417

UT 1 3 1.114

u x 0 0 .000

u z 0 0 .000

VA '262 2.418

V E 7 0 1 . 8 4 5

V I 294 2.468

VO 3 0 9 2.490

VY 3 .477

2N D

4 9 1.690

1 1 0 2 . 0 4 1

1 6 1 2.207

0 0.000

1 0 8 2.033

7 7 3 2 .888

3 0 1 2 .479

384 2.584

283 2.452

2 1 1 . 3 2 2

28 1 . 4 4 7

3 5 1 2 .545

304 2 .483

6 5 1 . 8 1 3

0 0.000

7 .845

1 4 1.146

583 2 .766

9 .954

8 1 1.908

0 0.000

3 R D

2 2 5 2.352

268 2.428

6 6 1.820

4 4 1 .643

1 7 6 2.246

1 2 9 2 . 1 1 1

4 4 4 2 3.648

57 1 .756

1 5 4 1 3 .188

0 0.000

0 0 .000

463 2.666

9 0 2 2 .955

6 1 6 2.790

0 0.000

0 0.000

5 1 1.708

2 5 7 0 3 .410

2 77 2.442

8 1 1 . 9 0 8

0 0.000

4 T H

0 0.000

1 0 8 2.033

4 2 5 2.628

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0 .000

1 7 1.230

3 7 1 .568

5 1 1 . 7 0 8

0 0.000

402 2.604

5 6 1 . 7 4 8

1 5 0 2.176

1 8 7 6 3.273

8 .903

0 0.000

0 0.000

1 1 2 5 3 . 0 5 1

0 0.000

0 0 .000

1 1 4 2.057

SUM

274 2.438

4 8 6 2.687

6 5 2 2.814

4 4 1 .643

284 2 .453

9 0 2 2 .955

4 7 6 5 3 .678

478 2.679

3463 3 .539

2 1 1 .322

516 2.713

9 5 5 2.980

1 6 1 7 3.209

2 5 7 0 3.410

8 .903

7 . 8 4 5

327 2.515

4 3 4 8 3.638

580 2 .763

2 .673

1 1 7 2 .068

4 i i

Page 220: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 . 2

B I G R A M FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 5

B I G R A M POSITION 1ST

WA 9 6 1 2 . 9 8 3

WD 0 0 . 0 0 0

WE 2 0 1 2 . 3 0 3

WF 0 0 .000

WH 6 1 8 4 3 . 7 9 1

W I 207 2 . 3 1 6

WL 0 0 . 0 0 0

WN 0 0 . 0 0 0

WO 4632 3 . 6 6 6

WR 446 2 . 6 4 9

ws 0 0 . 0 0 0

wu 0 0 . 0 0 0

WY 3 . 4 7 7

X A 0 0 . 0 0 0

X E 0 0 . 0 0 0

X I 0 0 . 0 0 0

xo 0 0 . 0 0 0

XT 0 0 . 0 0 0

X Y 0 0 . 0 0 0

Y A 6 8 1 . 8 3 3

Y B 0 0 . 0 0 0

2ND

1 6 5 2 . 2 1 7

0 0 .000

1 7 2 2 .236

1 7 1 . 2 3 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 7 8 2 .250

0 0 .000

6 7 1 . 8 2 6

3 5 1 . 5 4 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

48 1 . 6 8 1

0 0 .000

27 1 . 4 3 1

11 1 . 0 4 1

6 3 1 . 7 9 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

50 1 . 6 9 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 . 4 7 7

0 0 , 0 0 0

3RD

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 . 8 4 5

569 2 . 7 5 5

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

6 8 1 . 8 3 3

3 8 1 . 5 8 0

7 3 1 . 8 6 3

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 4 1 . 8 6 9

2 1 1 2 . 3 2 4

3 . 4 7 7

2 5 1 . 3 9 8

5 1 1 . 7 0 8

0 0 .000

7 8 1 . 8 9 2

1 3 4 2 . 1 2 7

4TH

0 0 . 0 0 0

53 1 . 7 2 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

7 3 8 2 .868

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 1 1 2 . 4 9 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 . 6 0 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 .845

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

SUM

1 1 2 6 3 . 0 5 2

6 0 1 . 7 7 8

9 4 2 2 . 9 7 4

1 7 1 . 2 3 0

6 1 8 4 3 . 7 9 1

4 5 3 2 . 6 5 6

5 3 1 . 7 2 4

8 7 8 2 . 9 4 3

4667 3 . 6 6 9

446 2 . 6 4 9

3 1 1 2 . 4 9 3

4 8 1 . 6 8 1

7 . 8 4 5 101

2 .004 2 2 2

2 . 3 4 6 6 6

1 . 8 2 0 2 5

1 . 3 9 8 1 0 1

2 . 0 0 4 7

. 8 4 5 1 4 9

2 . 1 7 3 1 3 4

2 . 1 2 7

2 0 3

Page 221: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

204 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 5

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

Y C 0 0 . 0 0 0

Y D 0 0 .000

Y E 9 5 2 2 . 9 7 9

Y I 3 5 1 . 5 4 4

Y L 0 0 . 0 0 0

YM 0 0 . 0 0 0

Y N 0 0 .000

Y O 492 2 .692

YP 0 0 .000

Y R 0 0 .000

YS 0 0 . 0 0 0

YT 0 0 . 0 0 0

Z A 0 0 . 0 0 0

Z E 0 0 . 0 0 0

Z I 0 0 . 0 0 0

Z O 3 . 4 7 7

Z Y 0 0 . 0 0 0

Z Z 0 0 . 0 0 0

2N D

24 1 . 3 8 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

18 1 . 8 9 2

11 1 . 0 4 1

6 . 7 7 8

0 0.000

0 0 .000

1 2 3 2 . 0 9 0

3 6 1 . 5 5 6

0 0 . 0 0 0

6 . 7 7 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

3RD

2 1 1 . 3 2 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 5 1 . 5 4 4

5 . 6 9 9

1 1 3 2 . 0 5 3

3 . 4 7 7

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

3 8 1 . 5 8 0

1 4 1 . 1 4 6

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 . 6 0 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

8 4 1 . 9 2 4

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

4TH

0 0 .000

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

18 1 . 2 5 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 4 1 . 8 6 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 . 4 7 7

4 8 1 . 6 8 1

0 0 . 0 0 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 6 1 . 6 6 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

SUM

4 5 1 . 6 5 3

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

987 2 . 9 9 4

1 1 8 2 .012

1 2 4 2 . 0 9 3

9 . 9 5 4

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

5 4 8 2 . 7 3 9

1 3 7 2 . 1 3 7

3 6 1 . 5 5 6

7 8 1 . 8 9 2

6 . 7 7 8

3 . 4 1 7

1 3 2 2 . 1 2 1

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

18 1 . 2 5 5

4 6 1 . 6 6 3

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

Page 222: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 . 2

B I G R A M FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 6

B I G R A M POSITION 1ST

AA 0 0 . 0 0 0

A B 1 7 0 2 . 2 3 0

AC 9 6 7 2 . 9 8 5

AD 1 4 1 2 . 1 4 9

A E 8 . 9 0 3

AF 232 2 . 3 6 5

AG 1 9 2 2 . 2 8 3

AH 0 0 . 0 0 0

A 1 1 2 1 . 0 7 9

A J 0 0 . 0 0 0

AK 0 0 . 0 0 0

A L 1 0 9 4 3 . 0 3 9

AM 2 0 2 2 . 3 0 5

A N 604 2 . 7 8 1

AP 1 8 5 2 . 2 6 7

AQ 0 0 . 0 0 0

A R 9 0 6 2 .957

AS 344 2 . 5 3 7

AT 2 5 3 2 . 4 0 3

AU 1 3 9 2 . 1 4 3

AV 49 1 . 6 9 0

2N D

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 2 2 2 . 0 8 6

406 2 . 6 0 9

1 3 1 2 . 1 1 7

6 . 7 7 8

6 4 1 . 8 0 6

1 0 2 2 . 0 0 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

494 2 . 6 9 4

3 . 4 7 7

470 2 .672

1 4 3 0 3 . 1 5 5

7 4 3 2 . 8 7 1

1 3 7 7 3 . 1 3 9

1 6 0 2 . 2 0 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 8 3 0 3 .262

7 1 5 2 . 8 5 4

1 9 5 0 3 .290

3 6 8 2 . 5 6 6

3 8 8 2 . 5 8 9

3RD

0 0 .000

1 4 0 2 .146

332 2 . 5 2 1

3 6 3 2 .560

0 0 . 0 0 0

11 1 . 0 4 1

2 2 1 2 . 3 4 4

22 1 . 3 4 2

324 2 . 5 1 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 0 3 2 . 0 1 3

472 2 . 6 7 4

8 5 1 . 9 2 9

8 9 5 2 . 9 5 2

1 4 8 2 . 1 7 0

6 . 7 7 8

8 6 5 2 . 9 3 7

4 37 2 , 6 4 0

9 67 2 . 9 8 5

9 6 1 . 9 8 2

2 5 7 2 . 4 1 0

4TH

7 . 8 4 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

277 2 . 4 4 2

1 6 7 2 . 2 2 3

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

0 0 .000

1 5 6 2 .193

0 0 . 0 0 0

462 2 . 6 6 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 6 1 . 6 6 3

2 7 0 2 . 4 3 1

3 1 6 2 .500

4 9 1 2 . 6 9 1

7 1 1 . 8 5 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

9 3 3 2 . 9 7 0

151 2 . 1 7 9

370 2 . 5 6 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 3 1 . 1 1 4

5TH

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 . 6 0 2

1 8 5 2 . 2 6 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

1 5 5 8 3 . 1 9 3

8 3 1 . 9 1 9

3 1 0 2 .491

4 . 6 0 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 7 8 2 . 4 4 4

220 2 . 3 4 2

1 9 3 2 . 2 8 6

57 1 . 7 5 6

0 fl.000

SUM

7 . 8 4 5

432 2 . 6 3 5

1 9 8 6 3 . 2 9 8

987 2 .994

29 1 . 4 6 2

3 07 2 .487

6 7 1 2 . 8 2 7

22 1 . 3 4 2

1 2 9 2 3 . 1 1 1

3 . 4 7 7

6 2 9 2 .799

4 8 2 4 3 . 6 8 3

1 4 2 9 3 .155

3 6 7 7 3 .565

568 2.754

6 . 7 7 8 4 8 1 2

3 . 6 8 2 1 8 6 7

3 . 2 7 1 3 7 3 3

3 . 5 7 2 660

2 . 8 2 0 7 0 7

2 . 8 4 9

2 0 5

Page 223: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

2 06 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 6

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

AW 3 1 1 . 4 9 1

AX 0 0 . 0 0 0

AY 0 0 . 0 0 0

AZ 0 0 .000

BA 376 2 . 5 7 5

BB 0 0 . 0 0 0

B E 3 0 2 2 3 .480

B I 1 2 1 2 . 0 8 3

B J 0 0 .000

BL 1 0 1 2 . 0 0 4

BM 0 0 . 0 0 0

BO 5 3 5 2 .728

BR 5 3 3 2 .727

BS 0 0 . 0 0 0

BT 0 0 . 0 0 0

BU 4 2 5 2 .628

BW 0 0 .000

BY 3 . 4 7 7

CA 1 4 6 8 3 . 1 5 7

cc 0 0 .000

CE 320 2 . 5 0 5

2N D

6 2 1 . 7 9 2

9 . 9 5 4

200 2 . 3 0 1

2 7 1 . 4 3 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 . 8 4 5

0 0.000

6 8 1 . 8 3 3

3 . 4 7 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 5 1 . 3 9 8

6 9 1 . 8 3 9

58 1 . 7 6 3

4 2 1 . 6 2 3

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 6 1 . 5 5 6

1 6 7 2 . 2 2 3

44 1 . 6 4 3

3RD

11 1 . 0 4 1

3 . 4 7 7

2 8 2 2 . 4 5 0

4 1 1 . 6 1 3

5 3 1 . 7 2 4

8 5 1 . 9 2 9

1 5 5 2 .190

1 0 6 2 . 0 2 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

490 2 .690

1 8 1 . 2 5 5

92 1 . 9 6 4

3 3 1 . 5 1 9

8 . 9 0 3

3 1 1 . 4 9 1

24 1 . 3 8 0

7 . 8 4 5

0 0 .000

436 2 . 6 3 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

5 6 7 2 .754

4TH 5TH

3 1 0 . 4 7 7 1 . 0 0 0

3 20 . 4 7 7 1 . 3 0 1

472 3 2 5 2 . 6 7 4 2 . 5 1 2

3 0 . 4 7 7 0 . 0 0 0

5 8 0 1 . 7 6 3 0 . 0 0 0

8 0 . 9 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 7 5 5 3

2.884 . 4 7 7 2 1 0

1 . 3 2 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 0

0 .000 0 . 0 0 0 266 0

2 . 4 2 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 0

0 . 0 0 0 0 .000 1 5 2 0

2 . 1 8 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 0

0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 1 6

0 .000 1 . 2 0 4 1 6 0

1 . 2 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0

0 .000 0 . 0 0 0 0 0

0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 6 0

0 . 0 0 0 1 . 7 7 8 1 1 5 4 5

2 .064 1 . 6 5 3 4 0

. 6 0 2 0 . 0 0 0 9 2 9 1 2 6 7

2 . 9 6 8 3 . 1 0 3

SUM

1 1 7 2 .068

3 5 1 . 5 4 4

1 2 7 9 3 . 1 0 7

7 1 1 . 8 5 1

4 87 2 . 6 8 8

9 3 1 . 9 6 8

3 9 5 2 3 . 5 9 7

2 4 8 2 .394

6 8 1 . 8 3 3

8 6 0 2 . 9 3 4

1 8 1 . 2 5 5

8 0 4 2 . 9 0 5

6 3 5 2 . 8 0 3

8 2 1 . 9 1 4

8 9 1 . 9 4 9

4 6 1 2 . 6 6 4

7 . 8 4 5

5 3 1 . 7 9 9

2 1 0 1 3 . 3 2 2

1 7 1 2 . 2 3 3

3 1 2 7 3 . 4 9 5

Page 224: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5.2

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 6

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

CH 1371 3.137

CI 177 2.248

CK 0 0.000

CL 438 2.641

CN 0 0.000

CO 2059 3.314

CR 311 2.493

cs 0 0.000

CT 0 0.000

cu 83 1.919

CY 10 1.000

DA 329 2.517

DD 0 0.000

DE 1235 3.092

DF 0 0.000

DG 0 0.000

DH 0 0.000

DI 392 2.593

DJ 0 0.000

DL 0 0.000

DM 0 0.000

2N D

546 2.737

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

35 1.544

370 2.568

0 0.000

555 2.144

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

22 1.342

16 1.204

0 0.000

5 .699

4 .602

87 1.940

16 1.204

0 0.000

10 1.000

3RD

174 2.241

538 2.731

468 2.670

23 1.362

15 1.176

998 2.999 119

2.076

0 0.000

297 2.473

130 2.114

0 0.000

19 1.279

310 2.491

604 2.781

3 .477

123 2.090

0 0.000

379 2.579

0 0.000

0 0.000

3 .477

4TH

13 1.114

46 1.663

186 2.270

102 2.009

0 0.000

60 1.778

0 0.000

0 0.000

5 .699

33 1.519

0 0.000

2 54 2.405

0 0.000

1285 3.109

0 0.000

105 2.021

8 .903

101 2.004

0 0.000 469

2.671

0 0.000

5TH

779 2.892

0 0.000

167 2.223

0 0.000

0 0.000

27 1.431

0 0.000

51 1.708

761 2.881

0 0.000

287 2.458

45 1.653

0 0.000

460 2.663

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

SUM

2883 3.460 761

2.881

821 2.914

563 2.751

15 1.176 3179 3.502

800 2.903

51 1.708

1618 3.209

246 2.391

297 2.473

647 2.811

332 2.521

3600 3.556

3 .477

233 2.367

12 1.079

959 2.982

16 1.204 469

2.671

13 1.114

207

Page 225: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

208 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 6

B I G R A M POSITION 1ST

DN 0 0 .000

DO 2 9 3 2 .467

DR 236 2 . 3 7 3

D S 0 0 . 0 0 0

DT 0 0 .000

DU 6 4 9 2 .812

DV 0 0 . 0 0 0

DW 1 2 1 . 0 7 9

DY 0 0 .000

E A 2 3 1 2 . 3 6 4

E B 0 0 . 0 0 0

EC 1 5 1 . 1 7 6

E D 1 3 4 2 . 1 2 7

E E 0 0 . 0 0 0

EF 3 5 8 2 . 5 5 4

EG 0 0 .000

E H 0 0 . 0 0 0

E I 3 4 4 2 .537

E J 0 0 . 0 0 0

E K 0 0 . 0 0 0

E L 8 9 1 . 9 4 9

2N D

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 3 1 . 3 6 2

6 6 1 . 8 2 0

4 5 1 . 6 5 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 8 7 5 3 . 2 7 3

7 4 1 . 8 6 9

1 6 3 8 3 . 2 1 4

1 3 1 2 . 1 1 7

7 7 7 2 . 8 9 0

1 1 8 0 3 .072

4 28 2 . 6 3 1

304 2 . 4 8 3

1 9 6 2 .292

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

586 2 .768

3RD

20 1 . 3 0 1

8 . 9 0 3

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

5 6 1 . 7 4 8

5 . 6 9 9

a 8 1 . 9 4 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

0 0 .000

410 2 . 6 1 3

11 1 . 0 4 1

1 0 9 2 . 0 3 7

282 2 . 4 5 0

274 2 . 4 3 8

8 5 1 . 9 2 9

11 1 . 0 4 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

111 2 . 0 4 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

24 1 . 3 8 0

1 6 3 2 . 2 1 2

4TH 5TH

0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

3 9 8 0 2 . 6 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

11 0 1 . 0 4 1 0 . 0 0 0

3 5 3 5 . 4 7 7 2 . 7 2 8

0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0

4 0 . 6 0 2 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 0 .000 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

0 234 0 . 0 0 0 2 . 3 6 9

5 9 3 6 2 . 7 7 3 . 7 7 8

8 0 . 9 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 7 4 3 0

2 . 8 7 1 0 .000 3 5 8 5 8 5

1 . 9 2 9 3 . 9 3 4 7 0 3 224

2 . 8 4 7 2 . 3 5 0 6 1 3 0

. 7 7 8 2 . 1 1 4 3 0

. 4 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0

0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 3 1 3

. 4 7 7 1 . 1 1 4 0 0

0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 1 8 5

1 . 2 5 5 . 6 9 9 1 5 0 9 3 2 5

3 .179 2 . 5 1 2

SUM

20 1 . 3 0 1

6 9 9 2 . 8 4 4

262 2 . 4 1 8

594 2 . 7 7 4

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

7 6 4 2 .883

66 1 . 8 2 0

7 2 1 . 8 5 7

234 2 . 3 6 9

3 1 1 5 3 . 4 9 3

9 3 1 . 9 6 8

2505 3 .399

9 2 1 7 3 . 9 6 5

1 9 7 8 3 .296

1 7 5 9 3 . 2 4 5

442 2 . 6 4 5

304 2 . 4 8 3

6 5 7 2 .824

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

47 1 . 6 7 2

2 6 7 2 3 .427

Page 226: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 .2

B I G R A M FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 6

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

EM 62 1 . 7 9 2

E N 886 2 .947

E O 0 0 .000

EP 0 0 .000

E Q 2 3 1 . 3 6 2

E R 7 3 1 . 8 6 3

ES 1 4 4 2 .158

ET 32 1 . 5 0 5

E U 1 4 3 2 .155

EV 1 2 6 2 .100

EW 0 0 .000

E X 649 2 .812

E Y 4 . 602

E Z 0 0 .000

FA 997 2 .999

FE 1 6 5 2 .217

FF 0 0 .000

F I 8 0 3 2 .905

FL 218 2 .338

FO 926 2 .967

FR 573 2 .758

2ND

685 2 .836

936 2 . 9 7 1

976 2 .989

3 4 3 2 .535

0 0 .000

1 5 5 1 3 .191

769

1 0 7 1 3.030

9 .954

312 2 .494

1 7 7 2 .248

97 1 . 9 8 7

1 8 3 2 .262

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

7 9 1 2.898

0 0 .000

1 0 1 .000

0 0 .000

1 0 2 2 .009

2 .886

3RD

360 2 .556

8 0 3 2 .905

1 2 9 2 .111

7 6 1 . 8 8 1

0 0 .000

2 52 2 .401

8 2 1 . 9 1 4

2 53 2 .403

0 0 .000

6 3 1 . 7 9 9

3 3 1 . 5 1 9

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

7 . 845

0 0 .000

57 1 .756

434 2 .637

1 6 2 2 .210

301 2 .479

3 1 1 . 4 9 1

1 2 5 6 3 .099

52 1 . 7 1 6

4TH

4 8 1 . 6 8 1

1 2 7 4 3 .105

3 .477

314 2 .497

0 0 .000

1 4 6 1 3 .165

6 0 1 2 .779

1 3 0 2 .114

3 2 1 . 5 0 5

28 1 . 4 4 7

24 1 . 3 8 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

3 3 1 . 5 1 9

0 0 .000

1 8 5 2 .267

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

5 1 1 . 7 0 8

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

5TH

4 3 5 2 .638

1 0 9 9 3 . 0 4 1

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

3 5 1 . 5 4 4

0 0 .000

6964 3 .843

3 7 3 5 3 .572

1164 3 .066

4 . 6 0 2

0 0 .000

8 7 1 . 9 4 0

4 . 602

284 2 . 4 5 3

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

6 . 778

9 .9 54

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

S U M

1590 3 . 2 0 1

4998 3 . 6 9 9

1 1 2 0 3 .049

7 6 8 2 .885

2 3 1 . 3 6 2 1 0 3 0 1 4 .013

5 3 3 1 3 .727

2650 3 . 4 2 3

1 8 8 2 .274

529 2 . 7 2 3

3 2 1 2 .507

760 2 .881

478 2 .679

3 3 1 . 5 1 9

1054 3 . 0 2 3

790 2 .898

974 2 .989

1 1 5 5 3 . 0 6 3

271 2 .433

2182 3 . 3 3 9

727 2 .862

209

Page 227: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

210 CHAPTER 5

B I G R A M FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 6

B I G R A M POSITION 1ST

FS 0 0 .000

FT 0 0 .000

FU 271 2 .433

FY 0 0 .000

G A 1 9 6 2 .292

G E 322 2 .508

G G 0 0 .000

G H 1 6 1 . 2 0 4

G I 1 3 8 2 .140

G L 8 8 1 . 9 4 4

GM 0 0 .000

G N 0 0 .000

G O 1 1 9 2 .076

G R 6 6 1 2 .820

GS 0 0 .000

GT 0 0 .000

G U 1 7 2 2 .236

GY 0 0 .000

H A 834 2 .921

H E 493 2 .693

H I 316

2ND 3RD 4TH

0 9 0 0 .000 .954 0 .000

0 9 9 26 0 .000 1 . 9 9 6 1 . 4 1 5

0 2 3 6 1 0 .000 1 . 3 6 2 1 . 7 8 5

0 0 0 0 .000 0 .000 0 .000

0 1 2 9 8 6 0 .000 2 .111 1 . 9 3 4

1 0 0 1 2 4 1 8 5 1 2 .000 2 .093 3 .022

0 1 1 7 0 0 .000 2 .068 0 .000

0 544 722 0 .000 2 .736 2 .859

0 226 1 5 0 0 .000 2 .354 2 .176

0 11 205 0 .000 1 . 0 4 1 2 .312

0 0 4 0 .000 0 .000 .602

1 9 1 2 4 0 1 . 2 7 9 2 .093 0 .000

0 36 3 3 0 .000 1 . 5 5 6 1 .519

9 2 1 3 4 2 3 1 . 9 6 4 2 . 1 2 7 1 . 3 6 2

0 0 0 0 .000 0 .000 0 .000

0 0 1 1 6 0 .000 0 .000 2 .064

0 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 .000 2 .479 2 . 0 4 1

0 0 0 0 .000 0 .000 0 .000

8 4 8 3 4 29 2 .928 1 . 5 3 1 1 .462

328 399 1 7 3 9 2 .516 2 . 6 0 1 3 .240

586 287 370

5TH

2 3 1 . 3 6 2

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

1 9 1 . 2 7 9

0 0 .000

844 2 .926

0 0 .000

872 2 .941

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

1 3 2 2 .121

3 .477

0 0 .000

462 2 . 6 6 5

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

1 1 2 2 .049

18 1 . 2 5 5

1 7 1 . 2 3 0

0

SUM

32 1 . 5 0 5

1 2 5 2 .097

355 2 . 5 5 0

1 9 1 . 2 7 9

4 1 1 2 .614

2441 3 .388

1 1 7 2 .068

2154 3 .333

514 2 .711

304 2 .483

4 . 6 0 2

2 7 5 2 .439

1 9 1 2 .281

9 1 0 2 .959

462 2 . 6 6 5

1 1 6 2 .064

583 2 .766

1 1 2 2 .049

1 7 6 3 3 .246

2976 3.474

1 5 5 9 2 .500 2 .768 2 .458 2 .568 0 . 0 0 0 3 .193

Page 228: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 . 2

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 6

BIGRAM POSITION 1 S T

HL 0 0 . 0 0 0

HM 0 0 . 0 0 0

HN 0 0 . 0 0 0

HO 4 6 3 2 . 6 6 6

HR 0 0 . 0 0 0

HS 0 0 . 0 0 0

HT 0 0 . 0 0 0

HU 204 2 . 3 1 0

HW 0 0 . 0 0 0

HY 0 0 .000

IA 0 0 . 0 0 0

IB 0 0 . 0 0 0

IC 3 . 4 7 7

I D 1 6 1 . 2 0 4

IE 0 0 . 0 0 0

IF 0 0 . 0 0 0

IG 1 9 1 . 2 7 9

I1 0 0 .000

IK 0 0 . 0 0 0

IL 0 0 . 0 0 0

IM 1 3 8 2 . 1 4 0

2 N D

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 9 9 1 3 .299

3 6 1 2 .558

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 5 9 2.555

3 . 4 7 7

22 1 . 3 4 2

5 6 1 . 7 4 8

4 3 1 . 6 3 3

284 2 . 4 5 3

322 2 . 5 0 8

2 5 3 2 . 4 0 3

1 0 0 2 . 0 0 0

8 7 0 2 . 9 4 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 6 9 2 . 2 2 8

5 4 8 2 . 7 3 9

4 2 1 2 . 6 2 4

3RD

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

4 3 1 . 6 3 3

524 2 . 7 1 9

5 . 6 9 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

4 3 1 . 6 3 3

2 5 1 . 3 9 8

1 6 9 2 . 2 2 8

1 9 5 2 .290

2 0 3 2 . 3 0 7

3 2 1 . 5 0 5

452 2 . 6 6 5

7 . 8 4 5

0 0 .000

346 2 . 5 3 9

1 0 7 2 . 0 2 9

4TH

9 9 1 . 9 9 6

7 . 8 4 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 4 1 2 . 3 8 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

244

5 5 1 . 7 4 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

5 3 5 2 . 7 2 8

0 0 .000

1 0 6 0 3 . 0 2 5

3 4 8 2 . 5 4 2

1 0 4 7 3 .020

3 5 1 . 5 4 4

1 3 2 2 . 1 2 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

92 1 . 9 6 4

570 2 . 7 5 6

9 7 1 . 9 8 7

2 . 3 8 7

5TH SUM

0 9 9 0 . 0 0 0 1 . 9 9 6

2 2 29 1 . 3 4 2 1 . 4 6 2

0 4 3 0 . 0 0 0 1 . 6 3 3

0 3 2 1 9 0 . 0 0 0 3 . 5 0 8

0 3 6 6 0 . 0 0 0 2 . 5 6 3

2 7 3 2 7 3 2 . 4 3 6 2 . 4 3 6

7 0 3 9 4 7 2 . 8 4 7 2 . 9 7 6

0 6 1 8 0 . 0 0 0 2 . 7 9 1

0 3 0 . 0 0 0 . 4 7 7

6 3 8 5 1 . 7 9 9 1 . 9 2 9

9 9 7 3 3 1 . 9 9 6 2 . 8 6 5

0 6 8 0 . 0 0 0 1 . 8 3 3

7 3 9 2 2 5 5 2 . 8 6 9 3 . 3 5 3

1 6 8 1 0 4 9 2 . 2 2 5 3 . 0 2 1

4 6 1 5 4 9 1 . 6 6 3 3 .190

0 1 6 7 0 . 0 0 0 2 . 2 2 3

8 1 4 9 1 . 9 0 3 3 . 1 7 3

1 6 2 3 1 . 2 0 4 1 . 3 6 2

0 2 6 1 0 . 0 0 0 2 .417

1 4 2 1 6 0 6 2 . 1 5 2 3 .206

2 7 7 9 0 1 . 4 3 1 2 . 8 9 8

2 1 1

Page 229: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

212 C H A P T E R 5

BIGRAM F R E Q U E N C I E S F O R WORDS O F L E T T E R LENGTH 6

BIGRAM P O S I T I O N 1ST

I N 8 7 3 2 . 9 4 1

I0 0 0.000

I P 0 0.000

IQ 0 0.000

I R 1 7 1 . 2 3 0

I S 298 2 .474

I T 3 0 4 2.483

I U 0 0.000

I V 0 0.000

I X 0 0.000

I 2 0 0.00Q

J A 5 0 1.699

J E 1 1 9 2.076

J O 1 7 6 2.246

J U 1 9 6 2.292

KA 3 1 1 . 4 9 1

KE 6 .778

K I 1 5 2 2.182

KL 0 0 .000

KN 25 1.398

KO 11 1 . 0 4 1

2 N D

8 2 8 2.918

1 8 1.255

29 1.462

9 1 1.959

389 2.590

8 0 0 2.903

1 7 5 7 3.245

0 0 .000

394 2.595

2 1 1.322

3 .477

0 0.000

0 0 .000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

1 6 1 .204

57 1 .756

0 0.000

0 0 .000

0 0.000

3 RD

9 1 6 2 .962

3 6 1 .556

5 .699

58 1 .763

3 2 5 2.512

3 9 2 2.593

9 0 1 2 .955

0 0 .000

1 2 2 2 .086

0 0 .000

3 0 1 .477

0 0.000

8 4 1 . 9 2 4

1 3 1 . 1 1 4

43 1 . 6 3 3

0 0.000

1 7 6 2.246

543 2 .735

7 .845

0 0 .000

6 .778

4 T H

4190 3.622

1 1 0 0 3 .041

33 1 .519

0 0.000

406 2.609

480 2.681

235 2 .371

1 0 8 2.033

208 2.318

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0 .000

1 9 2 7 3.285

1 2 1 .079

42 1.623

0 0.000

7 .845

5 T H

9 1 5 2 .961

3 1 1 .491

3 4 1 . 5 3 1

0 0.000

7 3 1 .863

1 6 7 2.223

444 2.647

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0 .000

0 0.000

0 0 .000

2 2 1 .342

1 2 7 2.104

0 0.000

Q 0.000

0 0 .000

0 0.000

SUM.

7 7 2 2 3.888

1 1 8 5 3.074

1 0 1 2.004

1 4 9 2.173

1 2 1 0 3.083

2137 3.330

3 6 4 1 3.561

1 0 8 2.033

7 2 4 2.860

2 1 1 . 3 2 2

33 1 .519

50 1 .699

203 2.307

1 8 9 2.276

239 2.378

53 1.724

2252 3 .353

7 6 4 2.883

49 1.690

25 1.398

24 1.380

Page 230: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5.2

B I G R A M FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 6

B I G R A M POSITION 1ST

KS 0 0 .000

K U 0 0 .000

K Y 0 0 . 0 0 0

LA 5 1 8 2.714

L B 0 0 .000

L D 0 0 .000

L E 7 1 8 2.856

LF 0 0 * 0 0 0

LG 0 0 .000

L I 1 6 0 5 3 . 2 0 5

LK 0 0 .000

L L 0 0 .000

LM 0 0 . 0 0 0

L N 0 0 .000

L O 9 7 8 2 . 9 9 0

LP 0 0 . 0 0 0

LS 0 0 . 0 0 0

LT 0 0 . 0 0 0

L U 8 1 1 . 9 0 8

LV 0 0 . 0 0 0

LW 0 0 . 0 0 0

2ND

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

9 1 4 2 . 9 6 1

47 1 . 6 7 2

28 1 . 4 4 7

210 2 . 3 2 2

52 1 . 7 1 6

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 7 3 2 . 2 3 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 8 1 . 8 9 2

432 2 . 6 3 5

0 0 .000

536 2 . 7 2 9

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

57 1 . 7 5 6

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 58 2 . 6 6 1

3RD

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 2 1 2 . 5 0 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 8 9 2 . 2 7 6

316 2 .500

0 0 .000

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

7 7 3 2 . 8 8 8

234 2 . 3 6 9

1 4 7 1 3 .168

1 1 7 2 . 0 6 8

11 1 . 0 4 1

1 9 3 2 .286

7 9 1 . 8 9 8

7 8 1 . 8 9 2

1 4 4 2 . 1 5 8

4 1 3 2 . 6 1 6

6 8 1 . 8 3 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

4TH

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 4 1 . 1 4 6

0 0 .000

1 5 5 2 . 1 9 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

9 3 1 . 9 6 8

1 6 3 5 3 . 2 1 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

5 7 7 2 . 7 6 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 9 1 2 . 5 9 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 4 2 2 . 5 3 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 9 4 2 . 2 8 8

4 . 6 0 2

5 3 1 . 7 2 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

5TH

3 6 0 2 . 5 5 6

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 2 1 . 5 0 5

1 9 1 . 2 7 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 0 0 4 3 . 0 0 2

3 4 9 9 3 . 5 4 4

4 5 4 2 . 6 5 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

81 1 . 9 0 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 3 1 . 1 1 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

500 2 . 6 9 9

2 59 2 . 4 1 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

S U M

3 6 0 2 . 5 5 6

1 4 1 . 1 4 6

3 2 1 . 5 0 5

1 9 2 7 3 . 2 8 5

47 1 . 6 7 2

1 3 1 4 3 . 1 1 9

6 3 7 8 3 . 8 0 5

5 0 6 2 . 7 0 4

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

3 1 2 8 3 . 4 9 5

234 2 . 3 6 9

2 0 2 1 3 . 3 0 6

5 4 9 2 . 7 4 0

11 1 . 0 4 1

2062 3 .314

7 9 1 . 8 9 8

5 7 8 2 . 7 6 2

597 2 . 1 7 6

5 5 5 2 . 7 4 4

1 2 1 2 . 0 8 3

458 2 . 6 6 1

2 1 3

Page 231: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

214 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 6

BIGRAM POSITION ~~~

1ST

LY 1 8 1 . 2 5 5

MA 1 4 9 3 3 .174

MB 0 0 .000

ME 8 0 1 2 .904

MI 436 2 .639

ML 0 0 .000

M M 0 0 .000

MN 0 0 .000

MO 1637 3 .214

MP 0 0 .000

MS 0 0 .000

MT 0 0 .000

M U 215 2 .332

MY 1 3 6 2.134

NA 512 2 .709

N B 0 0 .000

NC 0 0 .000

N D 0 0 .000

N E 519 2 .715

NF 0 0 .000

N G 0 0 .000

2ND

4 3 1 .633

48 1 . 6 8 1

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

27 1 . 4 3 1

8 5 1 . 9 2 9

0 0 .000

5 .699

0 0 .000

223 2 .348

1 3 5 2 .130

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

9 . 954

4 . 6 0 2

1 1 3 2 .053

4 . 602

216 2 .334

297 2 .473

1 2 8 2 .107

3 5 1.544

1 0 7 2 .029

3RD

0 0 .000

346 2 .539

788 2 .897

420 2 .623

6 1 3 2 .787

7 . 8 4 5

433 2 .636

1 9 1 .279

7 07 2 .849

532 2 .726

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

3 7 1 . 5 6 8

0 0 .000

1 9 3 2 .286

0 0 .000

1 5 7 2 .196

717 2 .856

236 2 .373

6 . 778 7 7 3

2 .888

4TH

4 . 602

540 2.732

1 2 1 .079

988 2 .995

1 9 4 2.288

7 9 1 . 8 9 8

0 0 .000

9 .954

248 2 .394

3 2 1 . 5 0 5

6 . 778

28 1 .447

7 . 845

0 0 .000

6 6 1 . 8 2 0

0 0 .000

544 2 .736

284 2 .453

1 3 6 2 3 .134

0 0 .000

765 2 .884

5TH

2892 3 .461

28 1 .447

0 0 .000

1 0 2 2 3 .009

7 . 845

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

1 0 5 2 .021

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

1 2 0 2 .079

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

5 1 1 .708

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

2237 3 .350

447 2.650

0 0 .000

3776 3 .577

SUM

2957 3 .471

2455 3 .390

812 2 .910

3258 3 .513

1 3 3 5 3 .125

8 6 1 . 9 3 4

4 38 2 .641

1 3 3 2 .124

281 5 3 .449

699 2 .844

1 3 6 2 .134

28 1 . 4 4 7

268 2 .428

1 5 5 2 .190

9 3 5 2 . 9 7 1

4 . 602

917 2 .962

3535 3 .548

2692 3 .430

4 1 1 . 6 1 3

5 4 2 1 3 .734

Page 232: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5.2

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 6

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

NI 68 1.833

NJ 0 0.000

NK 0 0.000

NL 0 0.000

NM 0 0.000

NN 0 0.000

NO 450 2.653

NP 0 0.000

NR 0 0.000

NS 0 0.000

NT 0 0.000

NU 494 2.694

NV 0 0.000

NW 0 0.000

NY 0 0.000

NZ 0 0.000

OA 0 0.000

OB 114 2.057

oc 46 1.663

OD 3 .477

OE 0 0.000

2N D

673 2.828

43 1.633

10 1.000

165 2.217

0 0.000

113 2.053

430 2.633

9 .954

25 1.398

445 2.648

231 2.364

3 .477

35 1.544

12 1.079

206 2.314

6 .778

131 2.117

214 2.330

624 2.795 4 36

2.639 119

2.076

3RD

380 2.580

0 0.000

72 1.857

6 .778

3 .477

582 2.765

72 1.857

0 0.000

22 1.342

118 2.072

955 2.980

176 2.246

51 1.708

4 .602

12 1.079

0 0.000

28 1.447

7 .845

67 1.826

71 1.851

0 0.000

4TH

71 1.851

0 0.000

100 2.000

75 1.875

0 0.000

67 1.826

286 2.456

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

7 51 2.876

63 1.799

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

17 1.230

116 2.064

0 0.000

3 .477 123

2.090 32

1.505

5TH

9 .954

0 0.000

5 .699

0 0.000

0 Q.OOO

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

3 07 2.487

1086 3.036

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

87 1.940

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000 4 07

2.610 12

1.079

SUM

1201 3.080

43 1.633

187 2.272

246 2.391

3 .477

762 2.882

1238 3.093

9 .954

47 1.672

870 2.940

3023 3.480

736 2.867

86 1.934

16 1.204

305 2.484

23 1.362

275 2.439

335 2.525 740

2.869 1040

3.017 163

2.212

215

Page 233: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

216 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 6

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

OF 313 2 .496

OG 0 0 .000

OH 0 0 .000

01 0 0 .000

OK 0 0 .000

OL 2 1 1 . 3 2 2

OM 0 0 .000

ON 8 . 9 0 3

00 0 0 .000

OP 1 9 7 2.294

OR 1 7 8 2 .250

0s 0 0 .000

OT 323 2 .509

ou 8 2 1 . 9 1 4

ov 8 . 9 0 3

OW 38 1 .580

ox 6 1 1 . 7 8 5

OY 6 . 778

0 2 0 0 .000

PA 8 4 9 2 .929

PE 1450 3 .161

2ND

1 2 5 2 .097

9 . 954

30 1 .477

314 2 .497

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

1 1 8 9 3 .075

7 8 1 2 .893

8 4 9 2 .929

592 2 .772

1 0 4 2 .017

1 5 2 3 3 . 1 8 3

428 2 . 6 3 1

8 5 3 2 . 9 3 1

1 6 0 6 3 .206

407 2 .610

598 2 .777

0 0 .000

26 1 . 4 1 5

1 8 1 . 2 5 5

44 1 . 6 4 3

278 2 .444

3 RD

28 1 .447

7 . 845

0 0 .000

1 1 6 2 .064

5 3 1 2 .725

1 1 4 2 .057

1 7 9 2 . 2 5 3

1 0 5 2 . 0 2 1

1 9 3 2 .286

1 0 0 7 3 .003

392 2 .593

2 68 2 .428

72 1 . 8 5 7

2869 3 .458

1 3 0 2 .114

504 2 .702

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

27 1 . 4 3 1

1 2 7 2 .104

5 1 1 2 .708

4TH

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

30 1 . 4 7 7

39 1 . 5 9 1

8 5 1 . 9 2 9

4 8 1 2 .682

1 0 3 0 3 . 0 1 3

526 2 .721

1 7 1 2 .233

2101 3 .322

8 0 3 2 . 9 0 5

1 0 7 2 .029

1 2 3 2 .090

62 1 . 7 9 2

8 3 1 .919

0 0 .000

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

639 2 .806

STH

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

598 2 .777

223 2 .348

2267 3 . 3 5 5

0 0 .000

22 1 . 3 4 2

762 2 .882

3 5 1 . 5 4 4

288 2 .459

0 0 .000

0 0.000

5 7 3 2 .758

3 . 477

3 1 1 . 4 9 1

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

1 9 7 2 .294

SUM

466 2 .668

1 6 1 . 2 0 4

3 0 1 .477

460 2 .663

580 2 . 7 6 3

2007 3 .303

1 6 6 4 3 . 2 2 1

4259 3 .629

1 3 1 1 3 .118

1 5 0 1 3 .176

4956 3 .695

1 5 3 4 3 .186

1 6 4 3 3 .216

4680 3 .670

607 2 .783

1 7 9 6 3 .254

6 4 1 . 8 0 6

7 3 1 . 8 6 3

4 5 1 . 6 5 3

1 0 2 0 3 .009

3075 3 .488

Page 234: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 . 2

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 6

B I G R A M POSITION 1ST

PH 1 0 8 2 . 0 3 3

P I 3 1 3 2 . 4 9 6

PK 0 0 . 0 0 0

PL 6 8 8 2 . 8 3 8

PO 1 0 7 5 3 . 0 3 1

PP 0 0 .000

PR 6 1 0 2 . 7 8 5

PS 7 . 8 4 5

PT 0 0 . 0 0 0

PU 7 2 7 2 . 8 6 2

PW 0 0 .000

PY 0 0 . 0 0 0

Qu 7 0 1 . 8 4 5

RA 8 1 7 2 . 9 1 2

RB 0 0 . 0 0 0

RC 0 0 . 0 0 0

RD 0 0 . 0 0 0

R E 2 6 4 3 3 .422

RG 47 0 . 0 0 0

RH 30 1 . 4 7 7

R I 312 2 .494

2ND

3 5 1 . 5 4 4

1 9 3 2 . 2 8 6

6 . 7 7 8

3 . 4 7 7

1 0 1 2 . 0 0 4

1 9 5 2 . 2 9 0

239 2 . 3 7 8

11 1 . 0 4 1

22 1 . 3 4 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

27 1 . 4 3 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 6 6 2 .220

674 2 . 8 2 9

9 . 9 5 4

2 1 1 . 3 2 2

7 3 1 . 8 6 3

7 0 9 2 . 8 5 1

9 1 1 . 9 5 9

0 0 .000

1 2 3 1 3 .090

3RD

9 . 9 5 4

1 5 6 2 . 1 9 3

3 . 4 7 7

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

2 3 3 2 . 3 6 7

2 9 8 2 . 4 7 4

6 . 7 7 8

7 . 8 4 5

1 9 1 . 2 7 9

1 7 1 . 2 3 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

9 1 1 . 9 5 9

269 2 . 4 3 0

1 3 2 2 . 1 2 1

404 2 . 6 0 6

360 2 . 5 5 6

1 4 3 6 3 . 1 5 7

417 2 .620

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 7 5 6 3 . 2 4 5

4TH

15 1 . 1 7 6

5 2 1 . 7 1 6

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 5 6 4 3 . 1 9 4

46 1 . 6 6 3

3 . 4 7 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 . 8 4 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 5 1 . 8 7 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

6 4 1 . 8 0 6

4 1 1 . 6 1 3

44 1 . 6 4 3

5 2 8 2 . 7 2 3

1 1 8 2 . 0 7 2

9 0 9 2 . 9 5 9

3 8 1 2 . 5 8 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 6 8 2 . 4 2 8

5TH

5 5 1 . 7 4 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 1 1 2 . 3 2 4

2 9 8 2 . 4 7 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 5 1 . 3 9 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

40 1 . 6 0 2

40 1 . 6 0 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

8 7 5 2 . 9 4 2

2 3 6 4 3 . 3 7 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

S U M

2 2 2 2 .346

7 1 4 2 .854

9 . 9 5 4 2 267

3 . 3 5 5 1 4 5 5

3 . 1 6 3 496

2 . 6 9 5 8 5 5

2 . 9 3 2 243

2 .386 3 39

2 . 5 3 0 8 1 9

2 . 9 1 3 27

1 . 4 3 1 2 5

1 . 3 9 8 3 9 1

2 .592 1 8 4 1

3 . 2 6 5 2 2 5

2 . 3 5 2 9 5 3

2 .979 1 4 2 6

3.154 8 0 6 1

3.906 8 8 9

2 . 9 4 9 3 0

1 . 4 7 7 3 5 6 7

3 . 5 5 2

2 1 7

Page 235: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

2 1 8 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 6

B I G R A M POSITION 1ST

RK 0 0 .000

RL 0 0 .000

RM 0 0 . 0 0 0

RN 0 0 . 0 0 0

R O 254 2 . 4 0 5

RP 0 0 .000

R R 0 0 . 0 0 0

RS 0 0 .000

RT 0 0 .000

RU 220 2 . 3 4 2

RV 0 0 . 0 0 0

RY 0 0 .000

SA 530 2 . 7 2 4

SC 7 2 2 2 . 8 5 9

SD 0 0 .000

SE 1 8 4 6 3 .266

SH 1 4 6 4 3 . 1 6 6

S I 8 3 6 2 . 9 2 2

SK 7 3 1 . 8 6 3

SL 2 9 1 2 .464

SM 1 4 6

2ND

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

3 0 1 . 4 7 7

1 5 2 0 3 .182

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 0 0 2 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 5 4 2 . 1 8 8

8 5 1 . 9 2 9

4 . 6 0 2

207 2 . 3 1 6

11 1 . 0 4 1

7 4 1 . 8 6 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

5 8 1 . 7 6 3

6 . 7 7 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

6 7 1 . 8 2 6

1 9 6 2 .292

0

3RD

5 4 2 2 . 7 3 4

1 4 0 2 . 1 4 6

7 4 5 2 .872

5 6 1 2 . 7 4 9

9 5 3 2 .979

5 0 1 . 6 9 9

3 1 1 2 . 4 9 3

340 2 . 5 3 1

2 8 6 2 . 4 5 6

1 2 4 2 . 0 9 3

2 9 3 2 . 4 6 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 5 1 . 5 4 4

220 2 . 3 4 2

4 4 1 . 6 4 3

6 7 7 2 . 8 3 1

2 7 6 2 . 4 4 1

8 9 7 2 . 9 5 3

2 5 1 . 3 9 8

3 . 4 7 7

3 4 2 . 1 6 4 0 .000 1 . 5 3 1

4TH

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

237 2 . 3 7 5

1 4 1 . 1 4 6

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

1 9 9 2 . 2 9 9

0 0 .000

4 2 1 . 6 2 3

489 2 . 6 8 9

3 6 3 2 .560

2 2 1 . 3 4 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

6 1 1 . 7 8 5

4 . 6 0 2

0 0 .000

1 3 8 4 3 . 1 4 1

3 . 4 7 7

2 2 8 2 . 3 5 8

4 5 1 . 6 5 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 3 1 . 1 1 4

5TH

44 1 . 6 4 3

0 0 .000

49 1 . 6 9 0

3 9 9 2 . 6 0 1

3 2 1 . 5 0 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 2 0 0 3 . 0 7 9

6 0 2 2 . 7 8 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

5 4 3 2 . 7 3 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

8 1 9 2 . 9 1 3

1 8 8 2 . 2 7 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 3 1 . 1 1 4

SUM

6 0 1 2 . 7 7 9

377 2 . 5 7 6

8 2 3 2 . 9 1 5

1 0 0 0 3 . 0 0 0

2958 3 . 4 7 1

5 0 1 . 6 9 9

4 5 3 2 . 6 5 6

2 0 2 9 3 . 3 0 7

1 4 0 5 3 . 1 4 8

4 5 1 2 . 6 5 4

2 9 7 2 . 4 7 3

7 5 0 2 . 8 7 5

6 3 7 2 . 8 0 4

1 0 2 0 3 . 0 0 9

44 1 . 6 4 3

4784 3 . 6 8 0

1 9 3 7 3 .287

1 9 6 1 3 . 2 9 2

210 2 . 3 2 2

490 2 . 6 9 0

2 0 6 2 . 3 1 4

Page 236: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5.2

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 6

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

SN 36 1.556

SO 886 2.947

SP 698 2.844

SQ 143 2.155

SR 0 0.000

ss 0 0.000

ST 2484 3.395

SU 704 2.848

sw 83 1.919

SY 481 2.682

TA 519 2.715

TC 0 0.000

TE 203 2.307

TF 0 0.000

TH 1419 3.152

TI 145 2.161

TL 0 0.000

TM 0 0.000

TO 508 2.706

TP 0 0.000

TR 614 2.788

2ND

0 0.000

0 0.000

56 1.748

0 0.000

15 1.176

313 2.496

59 1.771

0 0.000

0 0.000

7 .845

1251 3.097

0 0.000

57 1.756

0 0.000

363 2.560

31 1.491

0 0.0011

7 .845

202 2.305

0 0.000

807 2.948

3RD

0 0.000

25 1.398

21 1.322

0 0.000

0 0.000

562 2.750

1132 3.054

6 07 2.783

152 2.182

0 0.000

416 2.619

0 0.000

505 2.703

16 1.204

1739 3.240

1352 3.131

50 1.699

0 0.000

74 1.869

35 1.544

63 1.799

4TH

0 0.000

817 2.912

0 0.000

0 0.000

3 .477

0 0.000

142 2.152

84 1.924

0 0.000

0 0.000

142 2.152

76 1.881

4357 3.639

0 0.000

335 2.525

197 2.294

1462 3.165

0 B.000

685 2.836

0 0.000

130 2.114

5TH

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

565 2.752

1104 3.043

0 0.000

0 0.000

28 1.447

38 1.580

0 0.000

380 2.580

0 0.000

637 2.804

0 0.000

0 0.000

0 0.000

54 1.732

0 0.000

0 0.000

SUM

36 1.556

1728 3.238

775 2.889

143 2.155

18 1.255

1440 3.158

4921 3.692

1395 3.145

235 2.371

516 2.713

2366 3.374

76 1.881

5502 3.741

16 1.204

4493 3.653

1725 3.237

1512 3.180

7 .a45

1523 3.183

35 1.544 1694 3.229

219

Page 237: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

220 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 6

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

TS 0 0 .000

TT 0 0 .000

TU 370 2 .568

TW 1 4 4 2 .158

TY 7 .845

UA 0 0 .000

UB 0 0 .000

uc 0 0 .000

UD 0 0 .000

U E 0 0 .000

UF 0 0 .000

UG 0 0 .000

U I 0 0 .000

U L 0 0 .000

U M 0 0 .000

O N 874 2 .942

uo 0 0 .000

UP 74 1 . 8 6 9

UR 3 1 1 . 4 9 1

us 6 9 1 . 8 3 9

UT 3 1 1 . 4 9 1

2ND

304 2 .483

1 9 9 2 .299

1 8 3 2 .013

0 0 .000

2 3 1 . 3 6 2

44 1 . 6 4 3

577 2 .761

52 1 . 7 1 6

203 2 .307

9 6 1 .982

5 9 1 . 7 7 1

1 3 4 2 .127

1 3 3 2 .124

209 2 .320

7 59 2 .880

3 3 3 2 .522

3 1 1 . 4 9 1

1 8 8 2 .274

1544 3 .189

316 2 .500

492 2 .692

3RD

5 8 1 . 7 6 3

2414 3 . 3 8 3

809 2 .908

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

1 7 5 2 .243

8 2 1 . 9 1 4

29 1 . 4 6 2

7 3 1 . 8 6 3

5 . 699

4 . 602

316 2 .500

44 1 . 6 4 3

47 1 . 6 7 2

4 0 1 .602

352 2 .547

0 0 .000

1 5 0 2 .176

1 0 8 6 3 .036

356 2 . 5 5 1

4 1 1 . 6 1 3

4TH

0 0 .000

118 2 .072

148 2 .170

0 0 .000

8 . 903

374 2 .573

7 . 845

1 4 5 2 .161

54 1 . 7 3 2

394 2 .595

4 . 602 8 8 3

2 .946 48

1 . 6 8 1 1 1 4 5

3 .059 3 1 1

2 .493 934

2 .970 43

1 . 6 3 3 1 6 2

2 .210 1 0 7 8

3 .033 1 7 7

2 .248 1 4 9

2 .173

5TH

1 2 5 6 3 .099

5 . 699

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

779 2 .892

4 . 602

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

4 . 6 0 2

3 4 3 2 . 5 3 5

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

6 4 1 . 8 0 6

1 2 8 2 .107

4 . 602

0 0 .000

1 4 1 . 1 4 6

6 2 1 . 7 9 2

338 2 .529

62 1 . 7 9 2

SUM

1 6 1 8 3 .209

2736 3 .437

1 4 3 0 3 .155

1 4 4 2 .158

817 2 . 9 1 2

597 2 .776

666 2 . 8 2 3

226 2 .354

334 2 .524

8 3 8 2 .923

67 1 . 8 2 6

1 3 3 3 3 .125

225 2 .352

1 4 6 5 3 . 1 6 6

1 2 3 8 3 .093

2497 3 .397

7 4 1 . 8 6 9

588 2 .769

3801 3 .580

1 2 5 6 3 .099

7 7 5 2 .889

Page 238: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 .2

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 6

B I G R A M POSITION 1ST

u u 0 0 . 0 0 0

ux 0 0 .000

UY 0 0 . 0 0 0

uz 0 0 . 0 0 0

VA 3 8 3 2 . 5 8 3

VE 1 2 3 2 . 0 9 0

V I 3 0 9 2 . 4 9 0

VO 2 5 1 2 . 4 0 0

vu 7 . 8 4 5

WA 8 9 8 2 . 9 5 3

WB 0 0 .000

WD 0 0 . 0 0 0

WE 2 2 6 2 .354

WH 9 0 1 . 9 5 4

W I 9 1 0 2 . 9 5 9

WL 0 0 .000

WM 0 0 .000

WN 0 0 . 0 0 0

WO 3 4 1 2 .533

WR 1 8 0 2 . 2 5 5

ws 0 0 .000

2ND

0 0 .000

27 1 . 4 3 1

3 5 1 . 5 4 4

20 1 . 3 0 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 6 3 2 . 2 1 2

0 0 .000

20 1 . 3 0 1

0 0 .000

3 6 1 . 5 5 6

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

1 4 7 2 . 1 6 7

4 . 6 0 2

7 9 1 . 8 9 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

38 1 . 5 8 0

4 . 6 0 2

0 0 .000

0 0.000

3RD

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

48 1 . 6 8 1

322 2 . 5 0 8

1 1 8 5 3 . 0 7 4

5 1 1 . 7 0 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 0 3 9 3 . 0 1 7

16 1 . 2 0 4

2 8 1 . 4 4 7

1 4 5 2 . 1 6 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

8 7 1 . 9 4 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

5 . 6 9 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 . 4 7 7

4TH

2 0 1 . 3 0 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 9 1 . 2 7 9

9 2 9 2 . 9 6 8

1 3 1 . 1 1 4

2 3 1 . 3 6 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

6 5 1 . 8 1 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

4 1 8 2 . 6 2 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 . 8 4 5

1 1 5 2 . 0 6 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

5TH

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 . 6 0 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 7 1 . 2 3 0

3 4 7 2 . 5 4 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

8 . 9 0 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 . 4 7 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

51 1 . 7 0 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 8 1 . 6 8 1

SUM

20 1 . 3 0 1

3 1 1 . 4 9 1

3 5 544

20 3 0 1 467 6 6 9 884

3 .275 1 5 0 7

3.178 3 4 5

2 .538 7

, 8 4 5 2 0 3 8

3 . 3 0 9 1 6

1 . 2 0 4 4 8

1 . 6 8 1 9 3 6

2 . 9 7 1 94

1 . 9 7 3 1 0 8 3

3 . 0 3 5 1 1 8

2 . 0 7 2 1 0

1 . 0 0 0 9 4

1 . 9 7 3 3 4 5

2 . 5 3 8 1 8 0

2 . 2 5 5 51

1 . 7 0 8

221

Page 239: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

2 2 2 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 6

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

WT 0 0 .000

WY 0 0 . 0 0 0

XA 0 0 .000

xc 0 0 . 0 0 0

X E 0 0 . 0 0 0

XF 0 0 . 0 0 0

X I 0 0 .000

XL 0 0 . 0 0 0

xo 0 0 .000

XP 0 0 . 0 0 0

XT 0 0 .000

xu 0 0 .000

X Y 0 0 .000

YA 26 1 . 4 1 5

YC 0 0 . 0 0 0

Y D 0 a . O O O

Y E 8 9 1 . 9 4 9

YG 0 0 .000

Y H 0 0 . 0 0 0

Y I 7 . 8 4 5

Y L 0 0 . 0 0 0

2ND

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

2 7 6 2 . 4 4 1

5 . 6 9 9

1 8 1 . 2 5 5

4 2 1 . 6 2 3

0 0 .000

11 1 . 0 4 1

1 6 9 2 .228

1 4 6 2 . 1 6 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 3 1 . 6 3 3

0 0 .000

7 . 8 4 5

5 . 6 9 9

4 . 6 0 2

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

3RD

6 . 7 7 8

4 3 1 . 6 3 3

9 . 9 5 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

49 1 . 6 9 0

6 . 7 7 8

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

8 0 1 . 9 0 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 7 1 . 2 3 0

7 . 8 4 5

6 - 7 7 8

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

4 3 1 . 6 3 3

20 1 . 3 0 1

4 3 5 2 .638

49 1 . 6 9 0

4TH

1 5 5 2 . 1 9 0

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 3 1 . 1 1 4

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 3 2 2 . 5 2 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

5TH

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

3 . 4 7 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

SUM

1 6 1 2 .207

4 3 1 . 6 3 3

9 . 9 5 4

2 7 6 2 . 4 4 1

18 1 . 2 5 5

1 8 1 . 2 5 5

9 1 1 . 9 5 9

6 . 7 7 8

11 1 . 0 4 1

1 6 9 2 . 2 2 8

1 5 6 2 . 1 9 3

8 0 1 . 9 0 3

4 6 1 . 6 6 3

4 3 1 . 6 3 3

1 4 1 . 1 4 6

11 1 . 0 4 1

440 2 . 6 4 3

4 3 1 . 6 3 3

20 1 . 3 0 1

442 2 . 6 4 5

49 1 . 6 9 0

Page 240: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 .2

B I G R A M FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 6

BIGRAM POSITION ~~

1ST

Y M 0 0 .000

Y N 0 0 . 0 0 0

Y O 18 1 . 2 5 5

YP 0 0 . 0 0 0

Y R 0 0 . 0 0 0

YS 0 0 . 0 0 0

YT 0 0 . 0 0 0

YW 0 0 . 0 0 0

Z A 0 0 . 0 0 0

Z E 0 0 . 0 0 0

Z I 0 0 . 0 0 0

Z L 0 0 . 0 0 0

20 6 . 7 7 8

Z Y 0 0 . 0 0 0

z z 0 0 . 0 0 0

2N D

54 1 . 7 3 2

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

22 1 . 3 4 2

5 5 1 2 . 7 4 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

3RD

9 .954

0 0 . 0 0 0

326 2 . 5 1 3

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

2 6 1 . 4 1 5

46 1 . 6 6 3

2 2 1 . 3 4 2

11 1 . 0 4 1

11 1 . 0 4 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

6 . 7 7 8

24 1 . 3 8 0

4TH

6 . 7 7 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 3 1 . 8 6 3

8 . 9 0 3

24 1 . 3 8 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

17 1 . 2 3 0

5TH

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 . 6 0 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

8 . 9 0 3

482 2 . 6 8 3

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 7 1 . 2 3 0

4 7 1 . 6 7 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

6 . 7 7 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

S U M

6 9 1 . 8 3 9

1 6 1 . 2 0 4

3 56 2 . 5 5 1

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

3 0 1 . 4 7 7

1 0 3 3 3 .014

26 1 . 4 1 5

46 1 . 6 6 3

3 9 1 . 5 9 1

1 3 1 2 .117

1 9 1 . 2 7 9

24 1 . 3 8 0

6 . 7 7 8

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

4 1 1 . 6 1 3

2 2 3

Page 241: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

224 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 7

B I G R A M POSITION ~~~

1ST

AB 1 7 8 2 .250

AC 356 2 . 5 5 1

AD 285 2 .455

AE 0 0 .000

AF 1 5 0 2 .176

AG 629 2 .799

A H 0 0 .000

A 1 34 1 . 5 3 1

A J 0 0 .000

AK 0 0.000

A L 439 2 .642

AM 315 2.498

AN 1162 3 .065

A0 0 0 .800

AP 253 2 .403

AQ 1 4 1 . 1 4 6

A R 304 2 .483

AS 238 2 .377

AT 1 8 9 2 .276

AU 44 1 . 6 4 3

AV 157 2.196

2ND

1 0 1 2 .004

5 2 1 2 .717

8 7 1 . 9 4 0

4 . 602

5 .699

6 6 1 .820

0 0 .000

433 2.636

3 .477

4 . 602

574 2 .759

7 8 1 . 8 9 2

740 2 .869

4 . 6 0 2

465 2 .667

0 0 .000

1 9 3 6 3 .287

480 2 .681

972 2 .988

1 2 5 2 .097

8 0 1 . 9 0 3

3 RD

6 4 1 . 8 0 6

543 2 .735

593 2 .773

0 0 .000

81 1 .908

1 7 5 2 .243

0 0 .000

8 3 8 2 .923

0 0 .000

40 1 .602

652 2 .814

4 59 2 .662

894 2 . 9 5 1

5 . 699

232 2 . 3 6 5

4 . 602 1 1 6 0

3 .064 5 5 5

2 .744 477

2 .679 3

.477 2 58

2 .412

4TH

1 6 6 2 .220

6 5 1 . 8 1 3

1 8 0 2 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

200 2 .301

6 . 778

270 2 .431

0 0 .000

67 1 . 8 2 6

650 2 .813

8 9 1 . 9 4 9

582 2 .765

0 0 .000

67 1 . 8 2 6

0 0 .000

365 2 .562

111 2 .045

8 5 3 2 . 9 3 1

9 0 8 2 .958

2 1 1 . 3 2 2

5TH

5 .699

432 2 .635

328 2 .516

11 1 . 0 4 1

0 0 .000

6 3 5 2 .803

0 0 .000

6 6 1 2 .820

0 0 .000

40 1 . 6 0 2

1 8 5 2 .267

40 1 . 6 0 2

1 0 8 6 3 . 0 3 6

0 0 .000

3 1 9 2 .504

0 0 .000

9 5 3 2 .979

1 3 8 2 .140

393 2 .594

5 .699

4 . 602

6TH

0 0 .000

5 . 699

1 8 0 2 . 2 5 5

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

3 . 477

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

3015 3 .479

561 2 .749

352 2 .547

0 0 .000

4 . 602

0 0 .000

547 2 .738

8 2 1 . 9 1 4

32 1 . 5 0 5

3 . 477

0 0 .000

SUM

514 2 .711

1 9 2 2 3 .284

1 5 7 3 3 .197

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

236 2 .373

1 7 0 8 3 .232

6 . 778 2236

3 .349 3

.477 151

2 .179 5515

3 . 7 4 2 1 5 4 2

3 .188 4816

3 .683 9

. 954 1 3 4 0

3 .127 18

1 . 2 5 5 5265

3 . 7 2 1 1604

3 .205 2916

3 . 4 6 5 1 0 8 8

3 .037 520

2 .716

Page 242: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 . 2

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 7

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

AW 49 1 . 6 9 0

AX 0 0 . 0 0 0

AY 0 0 . 0 0 0

A2 0 0 . 0 0 0

BA 3 0 8 2 . 4 8 9

BB 0 0 . 0 0 0

BD 0 0 . 0 0 0

BE 2 4 1 3 3 . 3 8 3

BI 1 5 0 2 . 1 7 6

BJ 0 0 . 0 0 0

BL 1 8 2 2 . 2 6 0

BO 1 9 5 2 . 2 9 0

BR 7 0 2 2 .846

BS 0 0 .000

BT 0 0 . 0 0 0

BU 1 9 7 2 . 2 9 4

BV 0 0 . 0 0 0

BY 0 0 . 0 0 0

CA 8 1 3 2 . 9 1 0

cc 0 0 . 0 0 0

CE 7 8 2 2 . 8 9 3

2N D

26 1 . 4 1 5

1 0 1 2 . 0 0 4

1 5 4 2 . 1 8 8

20 1 . 3 0 1

1 7 1 . 2 3 0

0 0 .000

6 . 7 7 8

1 3 1 . 1 1 4

7 9 1 . 8 9 8

6 5 1 . 8 1 3

2 1 1 . 3 2 2

8 . 9 0 3

11 1 . 0 4 1

9 5 1 . 9 7 8

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

9 2 1 . 9 6 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 5 1 . 6 5 3

1 5 7 2 . 1 9 6

26 1 . 4 1 5

3RD

8 5 1 . 9 2 9

0 0 .000

202 2 . 3 0 5

3 3 1 . 5 1 9

50 1 . 6 9 9

6 3 1 . 7 9 9

8 . 9 0 3

1 7 7 2 .248

4 3 1 . 6 3 3

1 6 1 2 . 2 0 7

8 . 9 0 3

1 4 1 . 1 4 6

1 2 7 2 . 1 0 4

8 . 9 0 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 1 1 . 4 9 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 * 0 0 0

1 0 5 9 3 . 0 2 5

1 0 8 2 . 0 3 3

1 5 3 2 . 1 8 5

4TH

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

17 1 . 2 3 0

3 5 1 . 5 4 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 7 5 2 . 2 4 3

2 3 1 . 3 6 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

5 0 2 2 . 7 0 1

7 3 1 . 8 6 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 9 7 2 . 5 9 9

9 8 1 . 9 9 1

4 . 6 0 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

9 . 9 5 4

7 6 1 . 8 8 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 1 9 2 . 0 7 6

Q 0 . 0 0 0

7 1 1 2 . 8 5 2

5TH

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 8 1 . 2 5 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 . 4 7 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

1 8 8 2 . 2 7 4

3 3 1 . 5 1 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 6 4 2 . 5 6 1

1 7 1 . 2 3 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

Q 0 . 0 0 0

6 . 7 7 8

5 1 6 2 . 7 1 3

24 1 . 3 8 0

5 3 5 2 . 7 2 8

6TH SUM

0 1 7 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 . 2 3 0

0 1 1 8 0 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 7 2

2 5 2 6 6 1 2 . 4 0 1 2 . 8 2 0

0 5 3 0 . 0 0 0 1 . 7 2 4

0 5 5 3 0 . 0 0 0 2 . 7 4 3

0 8 6 0 . 0 0 0 1 . 9 3 4

0 1 4 0 . 0 0 0 1 . 1 4 6

7 3300 . 8 4 5 3 . 5 1 9

0 3 7 8 0 . 0 0 0 2 . 5 7 7

0 226 0 . 0 0 0 2 . 3 5 4

0 9 7 2 0 . 0 0 0 2 . 9 8 8

0 332 0 .000 2 . 5 2 1

0 8 4 4 0 . 0 0 0 2 . 9 2 6

1 8 1 2 1 1 . 2 5 5 2 . 0 8 3

0 9 0 . 0 0 0 . 9 5 4

0 304 0 . 0 0 0 2 . 4 8 3

0 9 2 0 . 0 0 0 1 . 9 6 4

6 0 6 6 1 . 7 7 8 1 . 8 2 0

1 9 4 2746 2 . 2 8 8 3 . 4 3 9

0 289 0 .000 2 . 4 6 1

1 2 9 1 3498 3 . 1 1 1 3 . 5 4 4

2 2 5

Page 243: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

2 2 6 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 7

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

CH 1 0 7 5 3 . 0 3 1

C I 9 4 1 . 9 7 3

CK 0 0 . 0 0 0

C L 7 4 8 2 . 8 7 4

CN 0 0 . 0 0 0

CO 2 9 8 3 3 . 4 7 5

CQ 0 0 .000

C R 4 1 3 2 .616

CS 0 0 .000

CT 0 0 .000

cu 344 2 .537

CY 1 6 1 . 2 0 4

DA 1 4 0 2 .146

D B 0 0 .000

DC 0 0 . 0 0 0

DD 0 0 . 0 0 0

DE 1 5 4 6 3 .189

DF 0 0 . 0 0 0

DG 0 0 . 0 0 0

DH 0 0 .000

D I 517 2 . 7 1 3

2N D

267 2 .427

1 3 1 2 .117

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 0 1 2 .004

27 1 . 4 3 1

56 1 . 7 4 8

6 . 7 7 8

1 2 5 2 . 0 9 7

5 . 6 9 9

0 0 .000

1 8 1 . 2 5 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

8 1 1 . 9 0 8

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

5 . 6 9 9

6 3 1 . 7 9 9

3RD

2 0 2 2 . 3 0 5

554 2 .744

307 2 . 4 8 7

2 9 3 2 .467

3 . 4 7 7

372 2 . 5 7 1

8 . 9 0 3

4 9 1 . 6 9 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 1 9 2 .857

1 4 5 2 . 1 6 1

5 . 6 9 9

3 . 4 7 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

9 8 1 . 9 9 1

3 8 5 2 . 5 8 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

37 1 . 5 6 8

7 . 8 4 5

2 8 5 2 . 4 5 5

4TH

7 1 8 2 . 8 5 6

5 1 3 2 .710

304 2 . 4 8 3

7 2 1 . 8 5 7

0 0 . 8 0 0

1 5 6 2 . 1 9 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 34 2 . 3 6 9

9 4 1 . 9 7 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

40 1 . 6 0 2

9 . 9 5 4

4 . 6 0 2

1 3 1 . 1 1 4

5 0 2 2 . 7 0 1

1 8 1 . 2 5 5

4 1 1 . 6 1 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 0 0 4 3 . 0 0 2

5TH

3 2 1 . 5 0 5

1 3 9 2 . 1 4 3

2 2 1 . 3 4 2

1 2 7 2 . 1 0 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

340 2 . 5 3 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

9 6 1 . 9 8 2

3 . 4 7 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 2 7 2 .862

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

5 . 6 9 9

6TH

7 8 1 . 8 9 2

0 0.000

3 2 1 . 5 0 5

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

27 1 . 4 3 1

(1 0.000

0 0 .000

1 0 3 2 . 0 1 3

9 1 1 2 .960

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 1 1 . 8 5 1

46 1 . 6 6 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

6 2 9 2 . 7 9 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

SUM

2 3 7 2 3 . 3 7 5

1 4 3 1 3 . 1 5 6

6 6 5 2 . 8 2 3

1 2 4 0 3 . 0 9 3

3 . 4 7 7 3 6 3 9

3 . 5 6 1 3 5

1 . 5 4 4 5 1 8

2 . 7 1 4 1 0 9

2 .037 2329

3 . 3 6 7 5 8 8

2 . 7 6 9 9 2

1 . 9 6 4 3 4 3

2 . 5 3 5 1 2

1 . 0 7 9 4

. 6 0 2 1 9 2

2 . 2 8 3 3 7 9 9

3 . 5 8 0 18

1 . 2 5 5 7 8

1 . 8 9 2 1 2

1 . 0 7 9 1 8 7 4

3 . 2 7 3

Page 244: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 . 2

B I G R A M FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 7

B I G R A M POSITION 1 S T

D J 0 0 . 0 0 0

DL 0 0 . 0 0 0

DM 0 0 . 0 0 0

D N 0 0 . 0 0 0

DO 218 2 . 3 3 8

DR 372 2 . 5 7 1

DS 0 0 . 0 0 0

DT 0 0 . 0 0 0

DU 3 2 1 . 5 0 5

DV 0 0 . 0 0 0

DW 0 0 . 0 0 0

DY 2 1 1 . 3 2 2

E A 2 3 1 2 . 3 6 4

E B 0 0 . 0 0 0

EC 8 5 1 . 9 2 9

E D 7 0 1 . 8 4 5

E E 0 0 . 0 0 0

EF 236 2 . 3 7 3

E G 0 0 . 0 0 0

E H 0 0 . 0 0 0

E I 0 0 . 0 0 0

2ND

6 .778

0 0 . 0 0 0

20 1 . 3 0 1

0 0 .000

4 5 1 . 6 5 3

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 . 8 4 5

1 1 0 2 . 0 4 1

3 . 4 7 7

4 . 6 0 2 2239

3 . 3 5 0 28

1 . 4 4 7 1 7 5 3

3 . 2 4 4 6 1 4

2 . 7 8 8 560

2 . 7 4 8 3 8 6

2 . 5 8 7 2 6 1

2 . 4 1 7 4 8

1 . 6 8 1 2 4 3

2 . 3 8 6

3 R D

0 0 .000

20 1 . 3 0 1

0 0 .000

11 1 . 0 4 1

3 5 1 . 5 4 4

1 2 9 2 . 1 1 1

5 . 6 9 9

4 . 6 0 2

1 3 8 2 . 1 4 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

11 1 . 0 4 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

9 3 4 2 . 9 7 0

4 . 6 0 2

4 54 2 . 6 5 7

6B 1 . 7 7 8

226 2 . 3 5 4

8 . 9 0 3

1 8 1 . 2 5 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

28 1 . 4 4 7

4TH

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 8 1 . 8 9 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 . 6 0 2

1 1 6 2 . 0 6 4

1 7 8 2 . 2 5 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 5 1 2 . 4 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

5 . 6 9 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

6 8 3 2 . 8 3 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 3 6 2 . 5 2 6

1 5 9 2 . 2 0 1

1 0 5 2 . 8 2 1

2 0 3 2 . 3 0 7

3 2 1 . 5 0 5

7 2 1 . 8 5 7

2 5 1 2 . 4 0 0

5TH

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 3 6 2 .134

1 3 1 . 1 1 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 9 9 2 . 2 9 9

5 . 6 9 9

0 (jl. 0 0 0

7 . 8 4 5

11 1 . 0 4 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 6 4 2 . 5 6 1

52 1 . 7 1 6

6 40 2 . 8 0 6

2 1 0 2 . 3 2 2

9 1 9 2 . 9 6 3

2 3 1 . 3 6 2

267 2 . 4 2 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 5 1 . 5 4 4

6TH

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 . 8 4 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

8 67 2 .938

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

510 2 .708

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 7 6 0 3 .890

2 8 1 . 4 4 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 2 7

SUM

6 . 7 7 8

234 2 . 3 6 9

3 3 1 . 5 1 9

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

6 2 0 2 .792

684 2 . 8 3 5

8 7 2 2 . 9 4 1

11 1 . 0 4 1

439 2 . 6 4 2

1 1 0 2 . 0 4 1

1 9 1 . 2 7 9

5 3 5 2 . 7 2 8

4 4 5 1 3 . 6 4 8

84 1 . 9 2 4

3268 3 . 5 1 4

8 8 7 3 3 . 9 4 8

1 8 3 8 3 . 2 6 4

8 56 2 . 9 3 2

5 7 8 2 . 7 6 2

1 2 0 2 . 0 7 9

5 57 2 . 7 4 6

Page 245: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

228 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 7

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

E J 0 0 .000

EK 0 0 .000

E L 1 3 9 2 .143

EM 1 6 8 2 .225

E N 747 2 .873

E O 0 0.000

EP 1 2 1 .079

E Q 7 0 1 . 8 4 5

E R 37 1 .568

ES 4 5 1 . 6 5 3

ET . 58 1 . 7 6 3

E U 0 0 .000

EV 205 2 .312

EW 0 0 .000

E X 954 2 .980

EY 11 1 . 0 4 1

E Z 0 0 .000

FA 674 2 .829

FE 554 2 .744

FF 0 0 .000

F I 707 2 .849

2N D

11 1 . 0 4 1

0 0 .000

8 6 9 2 .939

696 2 .843

1 7 5 1 3 .243

9 7 1 .987

265 2 .423

1 3 5 2 .130

1 9 8 5 3 .298

1 2 1 4 3.084

1 5 5 7 3 .192

50 1 .699

766 2 .884

48 1 . 6 8 1

57 1 . 8 2 6

1 2 1 .079

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

5 9 5 2 .775

0 0 .000

3 RD

0 0 .000

7 4 1 .869

372 2 .571

1 6 7 2 .223

291 2 .464

0 0 .000

1 7 5 2 .243

0 0 .000

7 6 1 2 .881

574 2 .759

476 2 .678

0 0 .000

111 2 . 0 4 5

3 2 1 . 5 0 5

0 0 .000

3 .477

0 0 .000

9 5 1 .978

4 0 3 2 . 6 0 5

59 1 . 7 7 1

2 3 1 2 .364

4TH

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

200 2 . 3 0 1

1 4 6 2 .164

1 1 5 9 3.064

1 2 3 2 .090

20 1 . 3 0 1

0 0 .000

2156 3 .334

59 1 . 7 7 1

1 4 7 2 .167

1 0 1 .000

6 2 1 2 .793

47 1 .672

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

3 .477

3 18 2 .502

94 1 . 9 7 3

1 0 1 2 .004

98 1 . 9 9 1

5TH

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

1 0 0 7 3 . 0 0 3

270 2 .431

1 5 0 5 3 .178

27 1 . 4 3 1

8 5 1 . 9 2 9

0 0 .000

2492 3 .397

1 1 0 0 3 .041

6 9 3 2 .841

36 1 . 5 5 6

264 2 .422

9 .954

38 1 . 5 8 0

26 1 . 4 1 5

11 1 . 0 4 1

7 . 8 4 5

1 7 1 . 2 3 0

0 0 .000

1 6 6 2 .220

6TH

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

1 2 7 2 .104

3 1 3 2 .496

1 2 0 5 3 .081

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

4146 3 .618

2944 3 .469

9 6 1 . 9 8 2

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

4 . 602

9 1 1 . 9 5 9

1 2 1 2 . 0 8 3

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

20 1 . 3 0 1

0 0 .000

SUM

11 1 . 0 4 1

74 1 . 8 6 9

2714 3 .434

1760 3 .246

6 6 5 8 3 . 8 2 3

2 47 2 .393

557 2 .746

2 0 5 2 .312 11577 4 .064

5936 3 .773

3027 3 . 4 8 1

9 6 1 .982

1 9 6 7 3 .294

1 4 0 2 .146

1150 3 .061

1 7 3 2 . 2 3 8

1 4 1 . 1 4 6

1094 3 .039

1 0 6 8 3 .029

7 7 5 2 .889

1 2 0 2 3 .080

Page 246: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 . 2

B I G R A M FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 7

B I G R A M POSITION 1 S T

FL 206 2 . 3 1 4

FO 6 6 8 2 . 8 2 5

FR 4 2 1 2 . 6 2 4

FS 0 0 . 0 0 0

FT 0 0 . 0 0 0

FU 318 2 . 5 0 2

FW 0 0 . 0 0 0

FY 0 0 . 0 0 0

GA 1 5 7 2 . 1 9 6

G D 0 0 . 0 0 0

G E 9 1 0 2 . 9 5 9

G G 0 0 . 0 0 0

G H 6 . 7 7 8

G I 1 5 1 . 1 7 6

G L 1 1 7 2 . 0 6 8

GM 0 0 . 0 0 0

G N 4 . 6 0 2

G O 25 1 . 3 9 8

G R 7 0 8 2 . 8 5 0

GS 0 0 . 0 0 0

GT 0 0 . 0 0 0

2ND

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

28 1 . 4 4 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

6 2 6 2 . 7 9 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 . 4 7 7

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

34 1 . 5 3 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

3RD

29 1 . 4 6 2

161 2 . 2 0 7

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

7 6 1 . 8 8 1

9 8 1 . 9 9 1

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 0 7 2 . 0 2 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

8 9 1 . 9 4 9

1 4 4 2 .158

2 2 1 2 .344

1 2 0 2 . 0 7 9

3 6 1 2 . 5 5 8

1 9 1 . 2 7 9

7 1 1 . 8 5 1

0 0 .000

94 1 . 9 7 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

4TH

1 9 1 . 2 7 9

1 3 7 2 . 1 3 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

5 5 1 . 7 4 0

19 1 . 2 7 9

18 1 . 2 5 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 7 1 . 6 7 2

26 1 .415

4 2 9 2 . 6 3 2

4 3 1 . 6 3 3

1 6 1 2 .207

327 2 . 5 1 5

5 6 1 . 7 4 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 . 6 0 2

4 1 6 2 . 6 1 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 4 1 . 5 3 1

5TH

7 2 1 . 8 5 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

8 . 9 0 3

1 8 8 2 . 2 7 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 8 1 . 2 5 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 6 8 2 . 8 8 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

9 07 2 . 9 5 8

46 1 . 6 6 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 1 1 . 6 1 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 11.000

4 . 6 0 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

6TH

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 3 1 . 3 6 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

8 9 1 . 9 4 9

2 1 1 . 3 2 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

9 2 7 2 .967

0 0 . 0 0 0

974 2 . 9 8 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 5 8 2 . 1 9 9

1 0 6 2 . 0 2 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 0 2 2 . 0 0 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 2 9

S U M

3 2 6 2 . 5 1 3

9 6 6 2 . 9 8 5

459 2 . 6 6 2

2 3 1 . 3 6 2

1 3 9 2 . 1 4 3

6 2 3 2 . 7 9 4

1 8 1 . 2 5 5

8 9 1 . 9 4 9

9 7 6 2 .989

2 5 1 . 4 1 5

3 1 2 3 3 . 4 9 5

1 8 7 2 . 2 7 2

2269 3 .356

5 1 1 2 . 7 0 8

5 3 4 2 .728

1 9 1 . 2 7 9

3 0 8 2 . 4 8 9

1 3 5 2 . 1 3 0

1 2 1 8 3 . 0 8 6

1 0 6 2 . 0 2 5

3 4 1 . 5 3 1

Page 247: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

230 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 7

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

GU 40 1 . 6 0 2

G Y 0 0 . 0 0 0

H A 4 2 7 2 . 6 3 0

H E 5 0 5 2 . 7 0 3

HF 0 0 . 0 0 0

H I 1 0 3 3 3 .014

H L 0 0 . 0 0 0

HM 0 0 . 0 0 0

H N 0 0 .000

H O 8 6 3 2 .936

HR 0 0 .000

HS 0 0 . 0 0 0

HT 0 0 .000

H U 4 0 1 2 . 6 0 3

HW 0 0 . 0 0 0

HY 3 . 4 7 7

I A 0 0 . 0 0 0

I B 0 0 . 0 0 0

I C 0 0 . 0 0 0

I D 1 7 1 . 2 3 0

I E 0 0 . 0 0 0

2ND

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

8 8 4 2 .946

7 8 1 2 . 8 9 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 8 5 2 . 5 8 5

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 6 1 2 . 8 8 1

1 0 5 3 3 .022

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

27 1 . 4 3 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 2 1 . 8 5 7

5 5 1 . 7 4 0

2 0 3 2 .307

526 2 . 7 2 1

57 1 . 7 5 6

4 1 1 . 6 1 3

3RD

2 6 7 2 . 4 2 1

0 0 .000

6 7 1 . 8 2 6

1 9 1 . 2 7 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 4 8 2 .170

9 . 9 5 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 4 1 . 5 3 1

217 2 .336

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 . 8 4 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

40 1 . 6 0 2

2 8 8 2 . 4 5 9

1 0 8 2 . 0 3 3

446 2 . 6 4 9

4TH

2 1 1 . 3 2 2

0 0 .000

3 9 7 2 .599

1 5 5 2 . 1 9 0

9 . 9 5 4

7 3 1 2 .864

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 9 4 2 . 9 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 1 7 2 . 0 6 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 0 1 . 6 0 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 9 1 . 8 9 8

8 5 1 . 9 2 9

8 8 8 2 . 9 4 8

4 3 2 2 . 6 3 5

8 5 3 2 . 9 3 1

5TH

1 9 1 . 2 7 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 2 1 . 5 0 5

2568 3 . 4 1 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

56 1 . 7 4 8

5 8 1 . 7 6 3

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

8 5 1 . 9 2 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

6 0 1 . 7 7 8

3 . 4 7 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 1 9 2 . 8 5 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 9 4 2 . 9 0 0

4 9 8 2 . 6 9 7

1 3 2 3 3 .122

6TH

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 5 1 . 5 4 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 2 1 . 5 0 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

26 1 . 4 1 5

9 0 7 2 . 9 5 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 0 1 . 8 4 5

7 6 1 . 8 8 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

350 2 . 5 4 4

4 9 1 . 6 9 0

6 9 1 . 8 3 9

SUM

3 4 7 2 . 5 4 0

3 5 1 . 5 4 4

1 8 0 7 3 . 2 5 7

4 0 6 0 3 . 6 0 9

9 . 9 5 4 2 3 5 3

3 . 3 7 2 6 7

1 . 8 2 6 1 2

1 . 0 7 9 3 4

1 . 5 3 1 2 7 2 0

3 . 4 3 5 1 0 5 3

3 . 0 2 2 2 6

1 . 4 1 5 1 0 8 4

3 . 0 3 5 4 38

2 . 6 4 1 40

1 . 6 0 2 1 4 5

2 . 1 6 1 9 2 9

2 . 9 6 8 3 2 8

2 . 5 1 6 2846

3 . 4 5 4 1 1 6 1

3 . 0 6 5 2 7 3 2

3 .436

Page 248: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5.2

B I G R A M FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 7

B I G R A M POSITION 1ST

I F 0 0 . 0 0 0

I G 34 1 . 5 3 1

I K 0 0 . 0 0 0

I L 32 1 . 5 0 5

I M 2 4 9 2 . 3 9 6

I N 8 2 5 2 . 9 1 6

I 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

I P 0 0 . 0 0 0

I Q 0 0 . 0 0 0

I R 18 1 . 2 5 5

I S 42 1 . 6 2 3

I T 5 1 1 . 7 0 8

I U 0 0 . 0 0 0

I V 0 0 .000

I X 0 0 . 0 0 0

I 2 0 0 . 0 0 0

J A 111 2 . 0 4 5

J E 1 9 1 . 2 7 9

J O 1 3 0 2 . 1 1 4

J U 2 1 1 2 .324

K A 2 1 1 . 3 2 2

2ND

9 0 1 . 9 5 4

489 2 . 6 8 9

3 . 4 7 7

7 9 1 2 . 8 9 8

8 9 9 2 . 9 5 4

1 0 6 8 3 . 0 2 9

6 7 1 . 8 2 6

1 6 1 . 2 0 4

6 .778

1 6 2 2 . 2 1 0

9 2 7 2 . 9 6 7

957 2 . 9 8 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 1 7 2 . 0 6 8

7 5 1 . 8 7 5

22 1 . 3 4 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

3RD

1 2 6 2 . 1 0 0

9 8 1 . 9 9 1

0 0 .000

429 2 . 6 3 2

280 2 .447

538 2 . 7 3 1

24 1 . 3 8 0

1 0 0 2 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

8 0 1 . 9 0 3

1 9 2 2 . 2 8 3

9 7 6 2 .989

22 1 . 3 4 2

2 9 1 2 . 4 6 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

3 . 4 7 7

7 6 1 . 8 8 1

6 2 1 . 7 9 2

26 1 . 4 1 5

4 . 6 0 2

4TH 5TH 6TH

3 8 9 3 0 1 . 5 8 0 1 . 9 6 8 0 . 0 0 0

1 9 5 161 0 2 . 2 9 0 2 . 2 0 7 0 . 0 0 0

20 1 9 7 1 . 3 0 1 1 . 2 7 9 . 8 4 5

2 0 1 3 9 3 1 2 6 2 . 3 0 3 2 . 5 9 4 2 . 1 0 0

2 5 2 5 2 1 9 2 . 4 0 1 1 . 7 1 6 1 . 2 7 9

9 4 1 7 7 8 7 5 8 2 2 . 9 7 4 3 . 8 9 1 2 .834

9 3 3 1 3 5 1 6 2 . 9 7 0 3 . 1 3 1 . 7 7 8

1 0 4 39 1 . 0 0 0 . 6 0 2 1 . 5 9 1

1 2 0 0 1 . 0 7 9 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

1 6 6 264 2 1 2 . 2 2 0 2 . 4 2 2 1 . 3 2 2

220 7 0 4 47 2 . 3 4 2 2 . 8 4 8 1 . 6 7 2

4 1 9 6 3 6 2 3 5 2 . 6 2 2 2 . 8 0 3 2 . 3 7 1

0 4 8 0 0 . 0 0 0 1 . 6 8 1 0 . 0 0 0

2 1 6 1 9 0 0 2 . 3 3 4 2 . 2 7 9 0 . 0 0 0

1 4 0 9 1 . 1 4 6 0 . 0 0 0 . 9 5 4

5 7 1 . 7 5 6

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 54 2 . 4 0 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 0 1 . 3 0 1

7 9 0 1 . 8 9 8 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 0 .000 0 . 0 0 0

2 3 1

SUM

347 2 . 5 4 0

977 2 . 9 9 0

4 9 1 . 6 9 0

1 9 7 2 3 . 2 9 5

1 7 5 1 3 . 2 4 3 1 1 8 4 1 4 . 0 7 3

2 3 8 1 3 . 3 7 7

1 6 9 2 . 2 2 8

18 1 . 2 5 5

7 1 1 2 . 8 5 2

2 1 3 2 3 . 3 2 9

3274 3 . 5 1 5

7 0 1 . 8 4 5

8 1 4 2 . 9 1 1

9 8 1 . 9 9 1

1 7 3 2 . 2 3 8

1 1 4 2 . 0 5 7

349 2 . 5 4 3

1 9 2 2 . 2 8 3

237 2 . 3 7 5

4 5 1 . 6 5 3

Page 249: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

232 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 7

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

K E 2 1 3 2 . 3 2 8

K I 1 8 3 2 .262

KL 0 0 .000

K M 0 0 .000

K N 1 0 4 2 .017

K O 0 0 .000

KP 0 0 .000

K R 11 1 . 0 4 1

KS 0 0 .000

K U 0 0 .000

KW 0 0 .000

K Y 0 0 .000

LA 3 1 2 2 . 4 9 4

L B 0 0 .000

LC 0 0 . 0 0 0

L D 0 0 . 0 0 0

L E 7 0 6

LF 0 0 . 0 0 0

LG 0 0 . 0 0 0

L H 0 0 . 0 0 0

L I 497 2 . 6 9 6

2 .849

2ND

0 0 .000

4 3 1 . 6 3 3

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

5 . 6 9 9

8 9 0 2 . 9 4 9

0 0 .000

1 3 1 . 1 1 4

1 3 1 . 1 1 4

429 2 . 6 3 2

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 1 9 2 . 3 4 0

3RD

3 . 4 7 7

4 . 6 0 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 7 1 . 6 7 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

11 1 . 0 4 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 4 1 2 . 5 3 3

3 . 4 7 7

7 3 1 . 8 6 3

1 3 5 2 . 1 3 0

2 2 6 2 . 3 5 4

88 1 . 9 4 4

2 1 1 . 3 2 2

1 4 1 . 1 4 6

3 7 8 2 . 5 7 7

4TH 5TH

2 7 6 3 94 2 . 4 4 1 2 . 5 9 5

8 9 8 0 2 . 9 5 3 0 . 0 0 0

3 1 2 7 . 4 7 7 2 . 1 0 4

7 0

0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

1 5 0 1 . 1 7 6 0 . 0 0 0

1 6 0 1 . 2 0 4 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

3 9 0 1 . 5 9 1 0 . 0 0 0

0 3 0 . 0 0 0 . 4 7 7

6 0 . 7 7 8 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

. a 4 5 0 . 0 0 0

5 2 5 4 6 5 2 . 7 2 0 2 . 6 6 7

0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

7 1 0 1 . 8 5 1 0 . 0 0 0

6 6 1 1 4 7 8 2 .820 3 . 1 7 0

5 0 . 6 9 9 0 . 0 0 0

0 9 0 . 0 0 0 . 9 5 4

0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

2 3 8 0 7 3 3 . 3 7 7 1 . 8 6 3

6TH SUM

5 6 9 4 2 1 . 7 4 8 2 . 9 7 4

0 1 1 2 8 0 . 0 0 0 3 . 0 5 2

0 1 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 . 1 1 4

0 7 0 . 0 0 0 . 8 4 5

0 1 5 1 0 . 0 0 0 2 . 1 7 9

0 1 5 0 . 0 0 0 1 . 1 7 6

0 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 1 . 2 0 4

0 11 0 . 0 0 0 1 . 0 4 1

81 1 2 0 1 . 9 0 8 2 . 0 7 9

0 3 0 . 0 0 0 . 4 7 7

0 1 7 0 . 0 0 0 1 . 2 3 0

0 5 0 . 0 0 0 . 6 9 9

5 9 2 5 9 2 1 . 7 7 1 3 . 4 1 4

0 3 0 . 0 0 0 . 4 7 7

0 8 6 0 . 0 0 0 1 . 9 3 4

1 8 2 37 1 . 2 5 5 2 . 3 7 5

9 9 3 4 4 9 3 2 .997 3 . 6 5 3

7 3 3 8 2 6 2 . 8 6 5 2 . 9 1 7

0 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 1 . 4 7 7

0 1 4 0 . 0 0 0 1 . 1 4 6

9 3 5 5 6 . 9 5 4 3 . 5 5 1

Page 250: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 . 2 2 3 3

B I G R A M FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 7

B I G R A M POSITION 1ST

LK 0 0 . 0 0 0

L L 0 0 . 0 0 0

LM 0 0 .000

L N 0 0 . 0 0 0

L O 429 2 . 6 3 2

LP 0 0 . 0 0 0

L R 0 0 . 0 0 0

LS 0 0 . 0 0 0

LT 0 0 . 0 0 0

LU 39 1 . 5 9 1

LV 0 0 . 0 0 0

LW 0 0 . 0 0 0

LY 7 . 8 4 5

MA 9 0 1 2 . 9 5 5

MB 0 0 . 0 0 0

ME 1 2 2 2 3 . 0 8 7

MF 0 0 . 0 0 0

M I 8 3 3 2 . 9 2 1

ML 0 0 . 0 0 0

M M 0 0 . 0 0 0

MN 0 0 . 0 0 0

2ND

0 0 .000

1 3 3 2 . 1 2 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 2 5 2 . 6 2 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 7 3 2 . 4 3 6

0 0 .000

22 1 . 3 4 2

8 7 1 . 9 4 0

4 . 6 0 2

0 0 .000

1 6 1 . 2 0 4

213 2 . 3 2 8

3 0 1 . 4 7 7

2 7 3 2 . 4 3 6

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 8 1 . 8 9 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 9 1 . 2 7 9

0 0 .000

3RD 4TH 5TH 6TH

1 5 4 7 0 0 2 . 1 8 8 . 8 4 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

1 5 2 8 2 0 9 5 6 9 1 1 0 3 .184 2 . 3 2 0 2 . 7 5 5 2 . 0 4 1

4 0 0 7 - 6 0 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 8 4 5

2 5 0 0 47 1 . 3 9 8 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 1 . 6 7 2

2 2 5 2 8 8 1 1 3 1 6 2 .352 2 .459 2 . 0 5 3 1 . 2 0 4

7 6 0 0 0 1 . 8 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 3 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 1 . 5 4 4 0 .000

1 3 0 253 484 1 . 1 1 4 0 . 0 0 0 1 . 3 0 1 2 . 6 8 5

1 0 7 1 3 3 292 3 3 2 .029 2 . 1 2 4 2 . 4 6 5 1 . 5 1 9

9 2 214 27 0 1 . 9 6 4 2 . 3 3 0 1 . 4 3 1 0 .000

1 3 1 6 44 0 1 . 1 1 4 1 . 2 0 4 1 . 6 4 3 0 . 0 0 0

5 1 9 0 0 . 6 9 9 1 . 2 7 9 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

5 1 7 0 1 9 2 4 . 6 9 9 1 . 2 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 3 . 2 8 4

235 4 4 0 1 6 2 5 8 2 . 3 7 1 2 . 6 4 3 2 . 2 1 0 1 . 7 6 3

5 6 1 1 1 4 7 0 2 . 7 4 9 2 . 0 5 7 . 8 4 5 0 . 0 0 0

2 5 1 2 4 1 4 4 2 246 2 . 4 0 0 2 . 3 8 2 2 . 6 4 5 2 .391

4 3 4 0 0 1 . 6 3 3 . 6 0 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 .000

306 2 9 7 3 5 0 2 . 4 8 6 2 . 4 7 3 1 . 5 4 4 0 . 0 0 0

5 11 0 0 . 6 9 9 1 . 0 4 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

1 7 7 3 8 2 5 0 2 . 2 4 8 1 . 5 8 0 1 . 3 9 8 0 . 0 0 0

0 7 3 6 1 3 0 . 0 0 0 . 8 4 5 1 . 5 5 6 1 . 1 1 4

S U M

1 6 1 2 . 2 0 7

2 5 4 9 3 . 4 0 6

11 1 . 0 4 1

7 2 1 . 8 5 7

1 4 9 6 3 . 1 7 5

7 6 1 . 8 8 1

3 0 8 2 . 4 8 9

5 1 7 2 . 7 1 3

587 2 . 7 6 9

4 59 2 . 6 6 2

7 7 1 . 8 8 6

24 1 . 3 8 0

1 9 6 9 3 . 2 9 4

2009 3 . 3 0 3

7 1 2 2 . 8 5 2

2 6 7 5 3 . 4 2 7

47 1 . 6 7 2

1 5 4 9 3 .190

1 6 1 . 2 0 4

2 59 2 . 4 1 3

56 1 . 7 4 8

Page 251: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

234 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 7

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

M O 471 2 , 6 7 3

MP 0 0 .000

MR 0 0 .000

MS 0 0 .000

MU 1 8 0 2 . 2 5 5

MY 42 1 . 6 2 3

NA 358 2 .554

N B 0 0 .000

N C 0 0 .000

N D 0 0 .000

N E 394 2 .595

NF 0 0 .000

N G 0 0 .000

N H 0 0 .000

N I 3 .477

N J 0 0 .000

N K 0 0 .000

N L 0 0 .000

NM 0 0 .000

N N 0 0 .000

N O 5 8 5 2 .767

2ND

90 1 . 9 5 4

1 9 7 2 .294

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

1 7 1 .230

0 0 .000

1 3 1 2 .117

3 . 477

1 9 5 2 .290

1 2 7 2 .104

38 1 .580

3 6 1 .556

498 2 .697

50 1 . 6 9 9

220 2 .342

77 1 .886

47 1 . 6 7 2

7 . 8 4 5

9 .954

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

782 2 . 8 9 3

3RD

1 3 6 2 .134

6 0 2 2 .780

4 . 602 6 0 3

2 .780 0

0 .000 0

0 .000 476

2 .678 0

0 .000 448

2 .651 596

2 .775 7 1 8

2 .856 5 5

1 .740 3 29

2 .517 6

. 7 7 8 1 9 3

2 .286 0

0 .000 1 1 5

2 . 0 6 1 3

. 477 4

. 6 0 2 373

2 .572 1 5 0

2 .176

4TH

1 4 5 2 .161

348 2 .542

0 0 .000

8 . 9 0 3

7 7 1 . 8 8 6

0 0 .000

8 1 1 . 9 0 8

1 3 1 .114

228 2.358

244 2 .387

4 24 2 .627

2 5 1 .398

309 2 .490

0 0 .000

1 2 3 1 3 .090

0 0 .000

7 3 1 . 8 6 3

3 5 1 . 5 4 4

0 0 .000

1 4 9 2 .173

1 4 2 2 . 1 5 2

5TH

0 0 .000

1 1 7 2 .068

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

1 5 9 2 . 2 0 1

0 0 .000

9 2 1 .964

0 0 .000

509 2 .707

450 2 .653

638 2 .805

0 0 .000

230 2 .362

0 0 .000

8 7 1 . 9 4 0

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

2 1 1 . 3 2 2

0 0 .000

3 2 1 . 5 0 5

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

6TH S U M

0 8 4 2 0 .000 2 . 9 2 5

0 1 2 6 4 0 .000 3 . 1 0 2

0 4 0 .000 . 6 0 2

227 8 3 8 2 .356 2 . 9 2 3

0 4 3 3 0 .000 2 .636

1 1 2 1 5 4 2 . 0 4 9 2 .188

38 1 1 7 6 1 . 5 8 0 3 .070

0 1 6 0 .000 1 . 2 0 4

0 1 3 8 0 0 .000 3 .140

530 1 9 4 7 2 .724 3 .289

502 2714 2 .701 3 .434

0 1 1 6 0 .000 2 .064

7212 8578 3 .858 3 . 9 3 3

0 56 0 .000 1 . 7 4 8

9 1 7 4 3 .954 3 . 2 4 1

0 7 7 0 .000 1 . 8 8 6

0 2 3 5 0 .000 2 . 3 7 1

0 6 6 0 .000 1 .820

0 1 3 0 .000 1 . 1 1 4

0 559 0 .000 2 .755

1 0 1 6 7 9 1 . 0 0 0 3 .225

Page 252: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 . 2

B I G R A M FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 7

B I G R A M POSITION 1 S T

NQ 0 0 . 0 0 0

N R 0 0 . 0 0 0

NS 0 0 . 0 0 0

NT 0 0 . 0 0 0

N U 288 2 . 4 5 9

NV 0 0 . 0 0 0

N X 0 0 . 0 0 0

NY 0 0 . 0 0 0

N Z 0 0 . 0 0 0

OA 0 0 . 0 0 0

OB 229 2 . 3 6 0

oc 5 1 1 . 7 0 8

OD 0 0 . 0 0 0

O E 0 0 . 0 0 0

OF 237 2 . 3 7 5

OG 0 0 . 0 0 0

O H 0 0 . 0 0 0

01 0 0 . 0 0 0

OJ 0 0 . 0 0 0

O K 0 0 . 0 0 0

OL 7 . 8 4 5

2ND

2 8 1 . 4 4 7

3 .477

3 57 2 . 5 5 3

242 2 . 3 8 4

6 9 1 . 8 3 9

8 8 1 . 9 4 4

7 1 1 . 8 5 1

46 1 . 6 6 3

11 1 . 0 4 1

1 3 0 2 .114

8 7 1 . 9 4 0

460 2 . 6 6 3

4 3 1 . 6 3 3

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

39 1 . 5 9 1

3 4 1 . 5 3 1

1 1 5 2 . 0 6 1

5 . 6 9 9

0 0 .000

8 8 8 2 . 9 4 8

3 RD

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

2 38 2 . 3 7 7

1 1 1 0 3 . 0 4 5

2 9 3 2 . 4 6 7

29 1 . 4 6 2

0 0 .000

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

47 1 . 6 7 2

318 2 . 5 0 2

295 2 . 4 7 0

1 8 5 2 .267

22 1 . 3 4 2

4 8 1 . 6 8 1

3 9 9 2 . 6 0 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

37 1 . 5 6 8

9 3 1 . 9 6 8

230 2 . 3 6 2

1 6 2 2 . 2 1 0

4TH

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

8 9 1 . 9 4 9

7 3 2 2 . 8 6 5

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

5 1 1 . 7 0 8

5 . 6 9 9

1 4 1 . 1 4 6

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 . 8 4 5

9 . 9 5 4

1 3 1 . 1 1 4

2 7 1 . 4 3 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

24 1 . 3 8 0

7 0 1 . 8 4 5

5TH

0 0 . 0 0 0

6 . 7 7 8 9 4 6

2 . 9 7 6 3 3 2

2 . 5 2 1 4 2

1 . 6 2 3 0

0 . 0 0 0 0

0 . 0 0 0 3

. 4 7 7 3

. 4 7 7 0

0 . 0 0 0 0

0 . 0 0 0 8

. 9 0 3 2 4 9

2 . 3 9 6 5 8

1 . 7 6 3 0

0 . 0 0 a 2 9

1 . 4 6 2 0

0 . 0 0 0 8 0

1 . 9 0 3 0

0 . 0 0 0 3

. 4 7 7 3 2 9

2 . 5 1 7

6T9

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 1 9 7 3 . 0 7 8

1 6 5 3 3 . 2 1 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

5 . 6 9 9

467 2 . 6 6 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 5 1 . 3 9 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 6 1 . 2 0 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 6 1 . 5 5 6

264 2 . 4 2 2

2 3 5

SUM

3 8 1 . 5 8 0

1 9 1 . 2 7 9

2 8 2 7 3 . 4 5 1

4069 3 . 6 0 9

7 0 2 2 . 8 4 6

1 1 7 2 . 0 6 8

7 6 1 . 8 8 1

526 2 . 7 2 1

1 4 1 . 1 4 6

1 8 9 2 . 2 7 6

6 8 5 2 . 8 3 6

8 1 9 2 . 9 1 3

516 2 . 7 1 3

8 0 1 . 9 0 3

3 0 8 2 . 4 8 9

476 2 . 6 7 8

47 1 . 6 7 2

2 59 2 . 4 1 3

9 8 1 9 9 1

2 9 3 2 4 6 7

7 2 0 3 236

Page 253: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

2 36 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 7

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH 5TH 6TH

OM 25 1 .398

ON 5 . 699

00 0 0 .000

OP 3 3 1 2 .520

OQ 0 0 .000

OR 200 2 .301

0s 0 0 .000

OT 0 0 .000

ou 3 4 3 2 .535

ov 24 1 . 3 8 0

ow 0 0 .000

ox 0 0 .000

OY 8 . 9 0 3

PA 949 2 .977

PD 0 0 .000

PE 810 2.908

PF 0 0 .000

PG 0 0 .000

PH 57 1 .756

P I 317 2 .501

PK 0 0 .000

942 2.974

1 0 4 4 3 .019

356 2 .551

1 4 0 2 .146

0 0 .000

1 3 3 7 3 .126

99 1 . 9 9 6

704 2 .848

1 3 4 8 3 .130

1 6 4 2 .215

6 8 1 2 .833

0 0 .000

5 1 1 . 7 0 8

59 1 . 7 7 1

3 .477

508 2 .706

0 0 .000

3 .477

4 . 602

1 6 0 2 .204

0 0.000

1 3 3 2 .124

1 4 3 2 .155

5 5 1 . 7 4 0

379 2 .579

0 0 .000

274 2 .438

1 8 7 2 , 2 7 2

1 0 2 3 3 .010

1 1 0 8 3 .045

238 2 .377

413 2 .616

0 0 .000

3 . 477

7 9 1 .898

0 0 .000

3 79 2 .579

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

3 .477

2 6 5 2 .423

7 . 845

1 2 5 2.097

1 5 0 2 .176

208 2 .318

2 1 1 . 3 2 2

11 1 . 0 4 1

526 2 .721

1 1 5 2 . 0 6 1

8 2 1 . 9 1 4

1 1 0 1 3 .042

2 29 2 .360

98 1 . 9 9 1

0 0 .000

64 1 .806

4 03 2 .605

0 0 .000

2 6 3 2 .420

29 1 . 4 6 2

0 0 .000

40 1 . 6 0 2

382 2 .582

0 0 .000

1 9 4 2 .288

92 5 2 .966

1 5 3 2 .185

6 . 778

0 0 .000

1 1 0 5 3 . 0 4 3

278 2 .444

57 1 . 7 5 6

1 2 6 1 3 .101

5 3 1 . 7 2 4

2 4 5 2 .389

0 0 .000

1 3 1 .114

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

571 2 .757

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

2 3 1 . 3 6 2

0 0 .000

229 2 .360

1664 3 .221

0 0 .000

8 9 1 . 9 4 9

0 0 .000

1 9 5 2 .290

0 0 .000

1 3 1 . 1 1 4

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

1 1 2 2 .049

9 . 954

4 8 1 . 6 8 1

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

22 1 . 3 4 2

0 0 .000

0 0.000

SUM

1 6 4 8 3 . 2 1 7

3 9 3 1 3 .595

772 2 .888

966 2 . 9 8 5

11 1 . 0 4 1

3637 3 . 5 6 1

6 7 9 2 .832

1 8 7 9 3 .274

5161 3 .713

7 08 2 .850

1 5 4 9 3 .190

9 .954

1 8 7 2 .272

1490 3 .173

3 . 477 2531

3 .403 29

1 . 4 6 2 3

. 477 1 2 6

2 .100 1 1 4 7

3 .060 7

. 8 4 5

Page 254: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 . 2

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 7

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

PL 468 2 . 6 7 0

PM 0 0 . 0 0 0

PO 412 2 . 6 1 5

PP 0 0 . 0 0 0

PR 2 7 3 0 3 . 4 3 6

PS 3 . 4 7 7

PT 0 0 . 0 0 0

PU 3 2 1 2 .507

PW 0 0 . 0 0 0

PY 0 0 . 0 0 0

QU 358 2 . 5 5 4

R A 3 1 1 2 . 4 9 3

RB 0 0 . 0 0 0

RC 0 0 . 0 0 0

RD 0 0 . 0 0 0

R E 2 7 8 1 3 .444

RF 0 0 . 0 0 0

RG 0 0 . 0 0 0

R H 1 2 1 . 0 7 9

R I 1 1 8 2 . 0 7 2

RK 0 0 . 0 0 0

2N D

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

5 1 1 . 7 0 8

294 2 . 4 6 8

5 1 1 . 7 0 8

3 . 4 7 7

G3 1 . 7 9 9

6 . 7 7 8

6 . 7 7 8

0 0 .000

1 1 3 2 . 0 5 3

7 7 4 2 .889

5 . 6 9 9

8 . 9 0 3

9 3 1 . 9 6 8

1 4 6 3 3 . 1 6 5

0 0 .000

6 3 1 . 7 9 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 4 5 7 3 . 1 6 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

3RD

3 6 1 2 . 5 5 8

0 0 .000

2 2 3 2 .348

397 2 .599

1 6 6 2 .220

5 . 6 9 9

1 4 1 2 . 1 4 9

1 2 8 2 .107

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 9 9 2 .299

280 2 .447

5 0 1 . 6 9 9

1 7 3 2 .238

1 0 2 2 . 0 0 9

8 7 0 2 . 9 4 0

340 2 . 5 3 1

2 1 2 2 . 3 2 6

307 2 . 4 8 7

8 5 8 2 . 9 3 3

3 5 0 2 . 5 4 4

4TH

2 8 9 2 . 4 6 1

6 .77 8

5 8 5 2 . 7 6 7

4 3 7 2 . 6 4 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

1 6 0 2 . 2 0 4

4 6 1 . 6 6 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 6 1 . 4 1 5

4 5 6 2 . 6 5 9

8 . 9 0 3

9 9 1 . 9 9 6

3 7 1 . 5 6 8

6 6 1 2 . 8 2 0

1 3 1 . 1 1 4

1 8 3 2 . 2 6 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

12c15 3 . 0 8 1

7 . 8 4 5

5TH

3 49 2 . 5 4 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 6 1 . 4 1 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 9 1 . 2 7 9

6 . 7 7 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 3 1 . 3 6 2

2 0 5 9 3 . 3 1 4

1 8 1 . 2 5 5

4 1 1 . 6 1 3

1 9 0 2 . 2 7 9

1 2 1 9 3 .086

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 8 1 . 2 5 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 4 1 . 8 6 9

5 3 1 . 7 2 4

6TH

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 1 3 2 . 4 9 6

2 0 3 2 .307

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

3 8 1 . 5 8 0

0 0 .000

3 2 1 . 5 0 5

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

0 0 .000

317 2 .501

1 0 8 7 3 .036

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 9 1 . 5 9 1

2 3 7

SUM

1 4 6 7 3 . 1 6 6

6 . 7 7 8 1 2 7 1

3 . 1 0 4 1 1 5 4

3 . 0 6 2 2 9 4 7

3 . 4 6 9 358

2 . 5 5 4 5 7 3

2 . 7 5 8 5 0 1

2 . 7 0 0 6

. 7 7 8 3 8

1 . 5 8 0 7 1 9

2 .857 3 9 1 2

3 . 5 9 2 9 6

1 . 9 8 2 3 2 1

2 . 5 0 7 7 3 9

2 . 8 6 9 8 0 8 1

3 .907 3 5 3

2 .548 476

2 . 6 7 8 3 1 9

2 . 5 0 4 3 7 1 2

3 . 5 7 0 4 4 9

2 . 6 5 2

Page 255: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

238 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 7

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

R L 0 0 . 0 0 0

RM 0 0 .000

RN 0 0 . 0 0 0

RO 247 2 . 3 9 3

RP 0 0 .000

RQ 0 0 . 0 0 0

RR 0 0 . 0 0 0

RS 0 0 . 0 0 0

RT 0 0 . 0 0 0

RU 257 2 . 4 1 0

RV 0 0 . 0 0 0

RW 0 0 . 0 0 0

RY 0 0 . 0 0 0

S A 1 6 3 2 . 2 1 2

S B 0 0 . 0 0 0

sc 454 2 .657

SD 0 0 . 0 0 0

SE 1 6 5 5 3 . 2 1 9

SF 0 0 . 0 0 0

SH 554 2 .744

S I 569 2 . 7 5 5

2ND

40 1 . 6 0 2

3 . 4 7 7

0 0 .000

2 6 4 0 3 . 4 2 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

111 2 . 0 4 5

3 . 4 7 7

1 2 3 2 .090

1 8 2 2 . 2 6 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

26 1 . 4 1 5

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

22 1 . 3 4 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 7 1 . 2 3 0

0 0 .000

2 3 1 . 3 6 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

3RD

1 9 9 2 .299

3 7 2 2 . 5 7 1

494 2 . 6 9 4

1 0 4 7 3 .020

2 0 7 2 . 3 1 6

4 . 6 0 2

6 3 0 2 . 7 9 9

4 59 2 . 6 6 2

8 4 2 2 . 9 2 5

5 . 6 9 9

5 0 2 2 . 7 0 1

1 4 2 2 . 1 5 2

42 1 . 6 2 3

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

1 3 1 2 . 1 1 7

1 0 4 2 . 0 1 7

3 . 4 7 7

2 4 1 2 .382

0 0 . 0 0 0

204 2 .310

416 2 .619

4TH

1 8 3 2 . 2 6 2

9 0 1 . 9 5 4

2 2 2 2 . 3 4 5

2 8 9 2 . 4 6 1

4 1 1 . 5 1 3

0 0 .000

52 1 . 7 1 6

8 6 1 . 9 3 4

3 7 3 2 . 5 7 2

2 3 1 . 3 6 2

3 . 4 7 7

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 2 8 2 . 1 0 7

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

5 9 1 . 7 7 1

1 2 8 3 3 .108

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 8 9 2 . 2 7 6

1 1 5 4 3 . 0 6 2

5TH

2 1 9 2 . 3 4 0

2 0 1 . 3 0 1

4 5 1 . 6 5 3

3 0 2 2 . 4 8 0

6 . 7 7 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 . 8 4 5

5 3 1 . 7 2 4

3 8 8 2 . 5 8 9

5 . 6 9 9

7 4 1 . 8 6 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 8 1 . 2 5 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

7 7 7 2 . 8 9 0

1 6 1 . 2 0 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

5 8 1 . 8 3 3

6TH

0 0 .000

1 0 9 2 .037

4 50 2 . 6 5 3

4 . 6 0 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

2 2 9 9 3 . 3 6 2

3 56 2 . 5 5 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 4 8 5 3 . 1 7 2

5 . 6 9 9

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 8 3 2 3 . 2 6 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 5 5 2 .658

0 0 . 0 0 0

SUM

6 4 1 2 .807

594 2 . 7 7 4

1 2 1 1 3 . 0 8 3

4 5 2 9 3 . 6 5 6

254 2 . 4 0 5

4 . 6 0 2

8 0 0 2 . 9 0 3

2 9 0 0 3 . 4 6 2

2 0 8 2 3 . 3 1 8

472 2 .674

5 7 9 2 . 7 6 3

1 5 7 2 . 1 9 6

1 5 5 3 3 . 1 9 1

329 2 . 5 1 7

1 3 1 2 . 1 1 7

580 2 . 7 6 3

6 2 1 . 7 9 2

5 8 0 5 3 . 7 6 4

1 6 1 . 2 0 4

1 4 2 5 3 . 1 5 4

2207 3 . 3 4 4

Page 256: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5.2

B I G R A M FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 7

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

SK 48 1 . 6 8 1

SL 1 8 6 2 . 2 7 0

SM 1 6 0 2 . 2 0 4

SN 56 1 . 7 4 8

S O 6 6 5 2 . 8 2 3

S P 586 2 . 7 6 8

SQ 29 1 . 4 6 2

S R 0 0 . 0 0 0

SS 0 0 . 0 0 0

ST 1 5 8 6 3 . 2 0 0

SU 1 1 2 4 3 . 0 5 1

sw 84 1 . 9 2 4

SY 1 7 3 2 . 2 3 8

TA 2 0 3 2 . 3 0 7

TB 0 0 . 0 0 0

TC 0 0 .000

TD 0 0 . 0 0 0

TE 374 2 .573

TF 0 0 . 0 0 0

TG 0 0 .000

TH 1 8 1 3 3 . 2 5 8

2ND

0 0 .000

30 1 . 4 7 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

8 . 9 0 3

7 0 1 . 8 4 5

3 . 4 7 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 6 8 2 . 2 2 5

8 . 9 0 3

206 2 .314

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 . 4 7 7

584 2 . 7 6 6

0 0 .000

4 . 6 0 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 6 1 2 . 2 0 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 8 1 . 5 8 0

3RD

3 . 4 7 7

1 4 1 . 1 4 6

5 . 6 9 9

0 0 .000

2 9 1 . 4 6 2

4 1 5 2 . 6 1 8

0 0 .000

5 .699

6 66 2 . 8 2 3

1 5 5 0 3 . 1 9 0

317 2 .501

44 1 . 6 4 3

0 0 .000

214 2 . 3 3 0

3 . 4 7 7

312 2 . 4 9 4

27 1 . 4 3 1

426 2 . 6 2 9

3 . 4 7 7

4 . 6 0 2 1 2 4 2

3 . 0 9 4

4TH

2 2 1 . 3 4 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 . 6 0 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 9 0 2 . 4 6 2

2Y 1 . 4 6 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 2 6 2 . 5 1 3

3 3 8 2 . 5 2 9

2 3 3 2 .367

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

8 2 6 2 . 9 1 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 4 1 2 3 . 1 5 0

3 . 4 7 7

8 . 9 0 3 1 6 7 5

3 . 2 2 4

5TH

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 . 6 0 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 7 0 2 . 2 3 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

31 1 . 4 9 1

1 4 0 2 . 1 4 6

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 6 7 2 . 2 2 3

0 0 .000

3 5 1 . 5 4 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

2777 3 . 4 4 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

9 6 1 . 9 8 2

6TH

6 . 7 7 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

30 1 . 4 7 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 7 1 . 2 3 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

6 4 4 2 . 8 0 9

1 2 0 4 3 . 0 8 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

40 1 . 6 0 2

3 5 1 . 5 4 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

5 9 5 2 . 7 7 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 1 5 2 . 0 6 1

2 3 9

SUM

7 9 1 . 8 9 8

234 2 . 3 6 9

1 9 9 2 . 2 9 9

5 6 1 . 7 4 8

1 1 7 9 3 . 0 7 2

1 1 0 0 3 . 0 4 1

3 2 1 . 5 0 5

5 . 6 9 9 1 8 3 5

3 . 2 6 4 4 8 2 6

3 . 6 8 4 1 8 8 0

3 . 2 7 4 1 2 8

2 . 1 0 7 2 1 6

2 . 3 3 4 2 0 2 9

3 .307 3

. 4 7 7 3 5 1

2 . 5 4 5 27

1 . 4 3 1 5 7 4 5

3 .759 6

. I 7 8 1 2

1 . 0 7 9 4 9 7 9

3 . 6 9 7

Page 257: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

240 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 7

B I G R A M POSITION 1ST

TI 62 1 .792

TL 0 0 .000

TN 0 0 .000

TO 283 2 .452

TP 0 0 .000

TR 693 2 .841

TS 7 . 845

TT 0 0 .000

TU 1 9 2 2 .283

TW 28 1 . 4 4 7

TY 7 6 1 . 8 8 1

U A 0 0.000

U B 0 0 .000

'JC 0 0 .000

O D 0 0 .000

U E 0 0 .000

UF 0 0 .000

UG 0 0 .000

U I 0 0 .000

U K 0 0 .000

U L 0 0 .000

2N D

6 8 1 . 8 3 3

3 5 1 .544

0 0 .000

297 2 .473

0 0 .000

278 2 .444

0 0 .000

1 7 7 2 .248

3 3 1 2 .520

0 0 .000

3 .477

204 2 .310

233 2 .367

269 2 .430

44 1 . 6 4 3

8 3 1 . 9 1 9

40 1 . 6 0 2

7 1 1 . 8 5 1

217 2 .336

4 . 602

1 3 8 2 .140

3RD

7 7 3 2 .888

57 1 .756

36 1 .556

6 4 1 . 8 0 6

8 . 9 0 3

1 7 6 2 .246

210 2 .322

1 0 0 7 3 .003

203 2 .307

7 7 3 2 .888

0 0 .000

294 2 .468

29 1 . 4 6 2

1 1 2 2 .049

3 37 2 .528

42 1 . 6 2 3

8 . 9 0 3

127 2 .104

1 9 1 . 2 7 9

0 0 .000

2 8 1 . 4 4 7

4TH

2558 3 . 4 0 8

1 0 8 2 . 0 3 3

46 1 . 6 6 3

6 3 3 2 .801

0 0 .000

484 2 . 6 8 5

0 0 .000

244 2.387

747 2 .873

11 1 . 0 4 1

0 0 .000

57 1 .756

1 4 2 2 .152

1 0 5 2 . 0 2 1

1 5 1 . 1 7 6

7 1 1 . 8 5 1

0 0 .000

7 8 3 2 .894

214 2 .330

0 0 .000

490 2 .690

5TH

97 1 .987

378 2 .577

0 0 .000

246 2 .391

0 0 .000

390 2 . 5 9 1

0 0 .000

1 9 1 . 2 7 9

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

1 0 2 2 .009

0 0 .000

224 2 .350

1 3 4 2 .127

107 2 .029

0 0 .000

974 2 .989

57 1 . 7 5 6

0 0 .000

9 5 1 . 9 7 8

6TH

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

1 7 1 . 2 3 0

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

1 6 7 8 3 . 2 2 5

1 6 1 .204

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

1 0 1 0 3 .004

0 0 .000

4 . 6 0 2

0 0 .000

5 .699

-77 1 . 8 8 6

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

1 8 8 2 .274

SUM

3558 3 .551

578 2 .762

82 1 . 9 1 4

1 5 4 0 3 .188

8 . 9 0 3 2021

3 .306 1 8 9 5

3 .278 1 4 6 3

3 .165 1 4 8 3

3 . 1 7 1 8 1 2

2 .910 1 0 8 9

3 .037 6 57

2 .818 408

2 .611 710

2 .851 5 3 5

2 .728 380

2 .580 48

1 . 6 8 1 1 9 5 5

3 .291 507

2 .705 4

. 602 9 3 9

2 .973

Page 258: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 . 2

B I G R A M FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 7

BIGRAM POSITION 1ST

UM 0 0 . 0 0 0

U N 247 2 . 3 9 3

uo 0 0 . 0 0 0

UP 29 1 . 4 6 2

U R 1 2 1 . 0 7 9

US 2 2 3 2 . 3 4 8

UT 9 2 1 . 9 6 4

U Z 0 0 . 0 0 0

VA 374 2 . 5 7 3

VE 1 9 6 2 .292

V I 409 2 . 6 1 2

vo 6 0 1 . 7 7 8

vu 4 . 6 0 2

WA 498 2 . 6 9 7

WB 0 0 . 0 0 0

WD 0 0 . 0 0 0

WE 5 5 9 2 .747

WF 0 0 . 0 0 0

WH 446 2 . 6 4 9

W I 1 0 1 8 3 . 0 0 8

WK 0 0 .000

2 N D

216 2 . 3 3 4

481 2 . 6 8 2

3 . 4 7 7

337 2 . 5 2 8

1 1 8 5 3 . 0 7 4

6 3 1 2 . 8 0 0

5 0 8 2 . 7 0 6

29 1 . 4 6 2

5 . 6 9 9

2 9 8 2 .474

5 6 1 . 7 4 8

27 1 . 4 3 1

0 0 .000

4 4 1 . 6 4 3

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

3 2 1 . 5 0 5

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 3 1 . 6 3 3

11 1 . 0 4 1

3 RD

29 1 . 4 6 2

8 1 2 2 .910

0 0 .000

3 4 1 . 5 3 1

3 1 3 2 .496

2 9 1 2 .464

9 8 1 . 9 9 1

0 0 .000

1 3 0 2 . 1 1 4

7 9 0 2 . 8 9 8

3 5 8 2 . 5 5 4

1 4 3 2 . 1 5 5

0 0 .000

7 7 1 . 8 8 6

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

11 1 . 0 4 1

576 2 . 7 6 0

0 0 .000

29 1 . 4 6 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

4TH

2 1 2 2 . 3 2 6

1 2 0 2 . 0 7 9

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

5 . 6 9 9

444 2 . 6 4 7

1 5 6 2 . 1 9 3

2 5 8 2 . 4 1 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 7 8 2 .444

2 4 5 2 . 3 8 9

8 9 2 2 . 9 5 0

2 7 1 . 4 3 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 6 9 2 . 2 2 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 2 1 . 5 0 5

8 6 7 2 . 9 3 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

377 2 . 5 7 6

0 0 . 0 0 0

5TH

3 0 1 . 4 7 7

1 6 2 2 . 2 1 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 3 1 . 1 1 4

9 3 6 2 . 9 7 1

9 3 3 2 . 9 7 0

9 5 1 . 9 7 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

8 0 1 . 9 0 3

1 0 2 6 3 . 0 1 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 3 6 2 . 1 3 4

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 2 9 2 . 1 1 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

6TH

207 2 . 3 1 6

2 3 1 . 3 6 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

6 . 7 7 8

3 9 1 . 5 9 1

664 2 . 8 2 2

6 2 7 2 . 7 9 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

6 2 9 2 .799

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 4 1

SUM

6 9 4 2 . 8 4 1

1 8 4 5 3 . 2 6 6

1 3 1 . 1 1 4

4 24 2 . 6 2 7

2 9 2 9 3 . 4 6 7

2898 3 . 4 6 2

1 6 7 8 3 . 2 2 5

29 1 . 4 6 2

8 6 7 2 . 9 3 8

3184 3 . 5 0 3

1 7 1 5 3 . 2 3 4

2 57 2 . 4 1 0

4 . 6 0 2

9 2 4 2 . 9 6 6

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

4 3 1 . 6 3 3

2 1 6 3 3 . 3 3 5

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

4 7 5 2 . 6 7 7

1 4 3 8 3 . 1 5 8

11 1 . 0 4 1

Page 259: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

242 CHAPTER 5

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 7

BIGRAM POSITION 1 S T

WL 0 0 .000

WM 0 0 .000

WN 0 0 .000

WO 3 8 9 2 . 5 9 0

WP 0 0 . 0 0 0

WR 370 2 .568

ws 0 0 . 0 0 0

WY 9 . 9 5 4

X A 0 0 . 0 0 0

xc 0 0 . 0 0 0

X E 0 0 . 0 0 0

XH 0 0 . 0 0 0

X I 0 0 . 0 0 0

XP 0 0 . 0 0 0

XT 0 0 . 0 0 0

xw 0 0 . 0 0 0

YA 2 8 1 . 4 4 7

YB 0 0 .000

YC 0 0 . 0 0 0

Y E 9 . 9 5 4

YF 0 0 .000

2ND

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 1 1 . 3 2 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

4 3 5 2 . 6 3 8

4 9 1 . 6 9 0

20 1 . 3 0 1

3 2 1 . 5 0 5

40 1 . 6 0 2

298 2 . 4 7 4

8 0 1 . 9 0 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

11 1 . 0 4 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

3RD

3 . 4 7 7

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

27 1 . 4 3 1

4 . 6 0 2

4 . 6 0 2

2 3 1 . 3 6 2

8 . 9 0 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0.00(1

0 0 .000

177 2 .248

0 0 .000

1 1 8 2 .072

11 1 . 0 4 1

3 2 1 . 5 0 5

81 1 . 9 0 8

11 1 . 0 4 1

4 . 6 0 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

4TH

3 1 1 . 4 9 1

3 . 4 7 7

2 1 1 . 3 2 2

44 1 . 6 4 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

5 . 6 9 9

6 4 1 . 8 0 6

3 . 4 7 7

5TH

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 . 6 0 2

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 1 1 . 4 9 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

9 9 1 . 9 9 6

0 0 . 0 0 0

6TH

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

5 6 1 . 7 4 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 9 8 2 . 2 9 7

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 8 1 . 5 8 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

6 . 7 7 8

0 0 . 0 0 0

SUM

3 4 1 . 5 3 1

3 . 4 7 7

81 1 . 9 0 8

4 54 2 . 6 5 7

27 1 . 4 3 1

374 2 . 5 7 3

2 0 2 2 . 3 0 5

3 2 1 . 5 0 5

4 4 3 2 . 6 4 6

4 9 1 . 6 9 0

5 1 1 . 7 0 8

32 1 . 5 0 5

2 1 7 2 . 3 3 6

298 2 . 4 7 4

2 36 2 . 3 7 3

11 1 . 0 4 1

6 0 1 . 7 7 8

8 1 1 . 9 0 8

1 6 1 . 2 0 4

1 9 3 2 . 2 8 6

3 . 4 7 7

Page 260: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

APPENDIX 5 . 2

BIGRAM FREQUENCIES FOR WORDS OF LETTER LENGTH 7

B I G R A M POSITION 1 S T

YG 0 0 . 0 0 0

Y H 0 0 .000

Y I 1 2 1 . 0 7 9

Y L 0 0 . 0 0 0

YM 0 0 . 0 0 0

Y N 0 0 . 0 0 0

Y O 44 1 . 6 4 3

YP 0 0 . 0 0 0

YR 0 0 . 0 0 0

YS 0 0 . 0 0 0

YT 0 0 . 0 0 0

YW 0 0 . 0 0 0

Y Z 0 0 . 0 0 0

Z A 0 0 . 0 0 0

Z E 7 .84 5

Z I 0 0 . 0 0 0

Z L 0 0 . 0 0 0

z o 0 0 . 0 0 0

z u 0 0 . 0 0 0

Z Y 0 0 . 0 0 0

z z 0 0 . 0 0 0

2ND

3 . 4 1 7

0 0 .000

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

4 1 1 . 6 1 3

3 3 1 . 5 1 9

9 . 9 5 4

7 2 1 . 8 5 7

1 8 1 . 2 5 5

1 7 9 2 . 2 5 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 . Q 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

3RD

0 0 . 0 0 0

8 . 9 0 3

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

8 1 1 . 9 0 8

1 3 1 . 1 1 4

0 0 .000

3 .477

54 1 . 7 3 2

4 5 1 . 6 5 3

3 1 1 . 4 9 1

1 7 1 . 2 3 0

0 0 .000

32 1 . 5 0 5

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

11 1 . 0 4 1

29 1 . 4 6 2

4TH

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 9 4 2 .288

0 0 . 0 0 0

11 1 . 0 4 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

27 1 . 4 3 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 9 1 . 5 9 1

2 3 1 . 3 6 2

9 - 9 5 4

6 . I 7 8

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

5TH

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

7 . 8 4 5

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

3 3 1 . 5 1 9

0 0 .000

0 0 . 0 0 0

27 1 . 4 3 1

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

6TH

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

3 . 4 7 7

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

57 1 . 7 5 6

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 .000

3 . 4 7 7

1 0 0 2 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

0 0 . 0 0 0

2 4 3

SUM

3 . 4 7 7

8 . 9 0 3

2 0 6 2 . 3 1 4

1 2 1 . 0 7 9

1 3 6 2 . 1 3 4

46 1 . 6 6 3

5 3 1 . 7 2 4

7 5 1 . 8 7 5

7 2 1 . 8 5 7

2 8 8 2 . 4 5 9

5 8 1 . 7 6 3

1 7 1 . 2 3 0

1 0 1 . 0 0 0

3 5 1 . 5 4 4

1 5 0 2 . 1 7 6

3 9 1 . 5 9 1

2 3 1 . 3 6 2

36 1 . 5 5 6

6 . I 1 8

11 1 . 0 4 1

29 1 . 4 6 2

Page 261: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

This page intentionally left blank

Page 262: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

6 Summary and Conclusion

The g o a l o f t h i s r e s e a r c h p r o j e c t was t o e v a l u a t e how t h e r e a d e r ' s h i g h e r - o r d e r knowledge a b o u t o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n t e r a c t s w i t h f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n d u r i n g t h e p r o c e s s i n g o f l e t t e r s and w o r d s . The r e s e a r c h was c a r r i e d o u t u t i l i z i n g a g e n e r a l i n f o r m a t i o n p r o c e s s i n g mode l , which p r o v i d e d a f o r m a l f ramework f rom which h y p o t h e s e s c o u l d b e d e r i v e d and t e s t e d . The model a l o n g w i t h s u p p o r t i n g e v i d e n c e was d e s c r i b e d i n C h a p t e r 1. S i n c e t h e s t u d y o f v i s u a l p r o c e s s i n g i n r e a d i n g r e q u i r e s a n e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e v i s u a l f e a t u r e s t h a t a r e f u n c t i o n a l d u r i n g r e a d i n g , t h e d i s c u s s i o n i n C h a p t e r 2 d e s c r i b e d t h o s e f e a t u r e s u t i l i z e d i n t h e r e c o g n i t i o n o f l o w e r c a s e l e t t e r s . U n d e r s t a n d i n g f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n p r o v e d u s e f u l i n a c c o u n t i n g f o r some o f t h e f i n d i n g s i n t h e p e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n t a s k s d e s c r i b e d i n C h a p t e r 4 . The s i g n i f i c a n t f i n d i n g was t h a t t h e s e a r c h f o r a t a r g e t l e t t e r was c r i t i c a l l y d e p e n d e n t o n t h e f e a t u r a l s i m i l a r i t y b e t w e e n t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r and t h e l e t t e r s i n t h e t e s t s t r i n g .

The f u n d a m e n t a l p r o p e r t i e s o f t h e o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e o f E n g l i s h were d e s c r i b e d i n C h a p t e r 3. We d i s t i n g u i s h e d two b r o a d c a t e g o r i e s o f d e s c r i p t i o n s . The f i r s t was d e r i v e d f rom s t a t i s t i c a l - r e d u n d a n c y m e a s u r e s b a s e d o n t h e f r e q u e n c y w i t h wh ich l e t t e r s , l e t t e r s e q u e n c e s , and words o c c u r i n n a t u r a l t e x t s . The s e c o n d c a t e g o r y , r u l e - g o v e r n e d r e g u l a r i t y , was b a s e d o n p h o n o l o g i c a l c o n s t r a i n t s o f E n g l i s h and s c r i b a l c o n v e n t i o n s g o v e r n i n g t h e s p e l l i n g o f E n g l i s h . A l s o i n c l u d e d i n C h a p t e r 3 was a b r i e f r e v i e w o f p r e v i o u s s t u d i e s o f o r t h o g r a p h y .

I n C h a p t e r 4 , w e examined t h e p s y c h o l o g i c a l r e a l i t y o f v a r i o u s d e s c r i p t i o n s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n p e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n t a s k s and o v e r t j u d g m e n t t a s k s . The r e c o g n i t i o n

Page 263: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

2 4 6 CHAPTER 6

t a s k s a s s e s s e d t h e d e g r e e t o which knowledge o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e is u t i l i z e d i n word p e r c e p t i o n , and t h e o v e r t j udgmen t t a s k s a s s e s s e d t h e d e g r e e - t o wh ich t h i s knowledge is c o n s c i o u s l y a v a i l a b l e .

G i v e n o u r p r e v i o u s r e s u l t s (Massa ro e t a l . , 1 9 7 9 ) , we had r e a s o n t o s u s p e c t d i f f e r e n c e s be tween r e a c t i o n time t a s k s and a c c u r a c y t a s k s i n terms o f t h e i r s e n s i t i v i t i e s t o t h e u t i l i z a t i o n o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . We b e g a n w i t h a d i r e c t c o m p a r i s o n be tween t h e s e two t a s k s , w h i l e s i m u l t a n e o u s l y c o n t r a s t i n g a r u l e - g o v e r n e d m e a s u r e and a s t a t i s t i c a l - r e d u n d a n - c y m e a s u r e o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . Rep1 i c a t i n g o u r p r e v i o u s work, w e found h i g h l y s i g n i f i c a n t e f f e c t s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k and r e l a t i v e l y s m a l l , a n d somet imes n o n s i g n i f i c a n t , e f f e c t s i n t h e r e a c t i o n time t a s k . The n e x t s i x e x p e r i m e n t s a s s e s s e d wha t a s p e c t s o f t h e two t a s k s a c c o u n t e d f o r t h e d i f f e r e n c e s t h a t were o b s e r v e d . We e v a l u a t e d t h e i n f l u e n c e s o f p r e s e n t i n g t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r b e f o r e o r a f t e r t h e t e s t d i s p l a y , t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n o f a f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n s t r a t e g y , t h e r o l e o f l i m i t e d s t i m u l u s i n f o r m a t i o n , and t h e s e n s i t i v i t y o f s p e e d e d r e a c t i o n - t i m e e x p e r i m e n t s . The r e a s o n t h a t t h e m a g n i t u d e o f t h e e f f e c t a p p e a r s s m a l l e r f o r a h i g h a c c u r a c y r e a c t i o n - t i m e m e a s u r e is t h a t t h e d i f f e r e n c e s i n v i s u a l p r o c e s s i n g time a r e s m a l l r e l a t i v e t o t h e o v e r a l l r e a c t i o n time t o c o m p l e t e t h e t a s k . I n c o n t r a s t , t h e s t i m u l u s p a r a m e t e r s a r e m o d i f i e d i n t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k t o k e e p a v e r a g e p e r f o r m a n c e a t 7 5 % c o r r e c t ; a n y d i f f e r e n c e s i n a c c u r a c y a r e t h e n i n f l u e n c e d a l m o s t c o m p l e t e l y by v i s u a l p r o c e s s i n g . S u p p o r t i n g t h i s i n t e r p r e t a t i o n , t h e p o s t hoc e v a l u a t i o n o f v a r i o u s m e a s u r e s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e r e v e a l e d r e a s o n a b l y good c o r r e l a t i o n s w i t h r e a c t i o n t ime b u t much h i g h e r c o r r e l a t i o n s w i t h a c c u r a c y .

To p r o v i d e a q u a n t i t a t i v e d e s c r i p t i o n o f t a s k a c c u r a c y , we f o r m a l i z e d t h e i n f o r m a t i o n p r o c e s s i n g model d e v e l o p e d i n C h a p t e r 1. T h i s model a l l o w s a f o r m a l d e s c r i p t i o n o f t h e f a c i l i t a t i v e e f f e c t o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e o n b o t h r e a c t i o n time and t a s k a c c u r a c y . The b a s i c a s s u m p t i o n o f t h e model i s t h a t knowledge o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e c o n t r i b u t e s a n i n d e p e n d e n t s o u r c e o f i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g . C o n s e q u e n t l y , f e w e r v i s u a l f e a t u r e s a r e n e c e s s a r y t o r e s o l v e w e l l - s t r u c t u r e d s t r i n g s t h a n t o r e s o l v e p o o r l y - s t r u c t u r e d s t r i n g s . The model was a p p l i e d t o t h e t a r g e t s e a r c h t a s k by f o r m a l i z i n g a d e c i s i o n a l g o r i t h m assumed t o b e used by t h e s u b j e c t when f a c e d w i t h p a r t i a l i n f o r m a t i o n . The model p r o v i d e d a good q u a n t i t a t i v e d e s c r i p t i o n o f t h e r e s u l t s from t h e a c c u r a c y t a s k . The p a r a m e t e r s o f t h e model were

Page 264: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 247

p s y c h o l o g i c a l l y m e a n i n g f u l and t h e p a r a m e t e r v a l u e s c o r r e s p o n d i n g t o t h e number o f l e t t e r s s e e n i n t h e test s t r i n g s p r o v i d e d a q u a n t i t a t i v e measure o f t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . A c c o r d i n g t o t h e m o d e l , o u r r e a d e r s were a b l e t o r e c o g n i z e two a d d i t i o n a l l e t t e r s i n we 1 1-st r uc t u r ed s t r i n g s compared t o poo r l y - s t r uc t u r e d s t r i n g s . T h i s i s a s u b s t a n t i a l e f f e c t c o n s i d e r i n g t h a t two l e t t e r s r e p r e s e n t o n e - t h i r d o f t h e s i x - l e t t e r t e s t s t r i n g .

We a l s o c a r r i e d o u t a s e r i e s o f o v e r t j u d g m e n t e x p e r i m e n t s t o assess which d e s c r i p t i o n s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e a r e c o n s c i o u s l y a v a i l a b l e . We a s k e d w h e t h e r s u b j e c t s c o u l d r e l i a b l y a s s i g n r a t i n g s o f how much a l e t t e r s t r i n g r e s e m b l e s w r i t t e n E n g l i s h o n t h e b a s i s o f t h e t y p i c a l i t y o f t h e l e t t e r s e q u e n c i n g i n t h e t e s t s t r i n g s . I n a d d i t i o n , o t h e r s u b j e c t s were a s k e d t o d i s c r i m i n a t e t h e i tems o n t h e b a s i s o f r u l e - g o v e r n e d r e g u l a r i t y o r o n t h e b a s i s o f s t a t i s t i c a l r e d u n d a n c y . S u b j e c t s ' j u d g m e n t s were more a c c u r a t e l y d e s c r i b e d b y r u l e - g o v e r n e d r e g u l a r i t y t h a n by s t a t i s t i c a l r edun- d a n c y . F i n a l l y , t h e r a t i n g s o f t h e i n d i v i d u a l items c o r r e l a t e d q u i t e s t r o n g l y w i t h t h e i r a c c u r a c i e s and r e a c t i o n t imes i n t h e t a r g e t s e a r c h t a s k .

The f a c t o r i a l d e s i g n o f our e x p e r i m e n t s c o n t r a s t e d j u s t o n e m e a s u r e o f r u l e - g o v e r n e d r e g u l a r i t y w i t h o n e m e a s u r e o f s t a t i s t i c a l r e d u n d a n c y . T h e r e f o r e , w e c o n d u c t e d a l a r g e number o f p o s t h o c c o r r e l a t i o n a l a n a l y s e s t o e v a l u a t e a w i d e r a n g e o f m e a s u r e s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e . The d e p e n d e n t m e a s u r e s were t h e r e a c t i o n t imes , a c c u r a c y , and r a t i n g r e s p o n s e s t o e a c h o f 200 t e s t i tems . p o s i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e l o g b ig ram f r e q u e n c y p r o v i d e d t h e b e s t d e s c r i p t i o n o f p e r f o r m a n c e on t h e i n d i v i d u a l t e s t i tems . However, o u r r u l e - b a s e d r e g u l a r i t y m e a s u r e a l s o p r o v i d e d a v e r y good d e s c r i p t i o n . I n f a c t , o u r r e g u l a r i t y m e a s u r e c o r r e l a t e d v e r y h i g h l y w i t h t h e b e s t f r e q u e n c y - b a s e d m e a s u r e . T h e r e f o r e , we w e r e n o t s u c c e s s f u l i n c h o o s i n g b e t w e e n r u l e - g o v e r n e d r e g u l a r i t y and s t a t i s t i c a l r e d u n d a n c y i n t h e s e e x p e r i m e n t s .

We were a l s o a b l e t o e v a l u a t e t h e m o s t a p p r o p r i a t e m e a s u r e s f o r a s t a t i s t i c a l - r e d u n d a n c y d e s c r i p t i o n . We o b t a i n e d i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t t h e u t i l i t y o f t y p e v e r s u s t o k e n c o u n t s , t h e a p p r o p r i a t e s c a l e f o r d e s c r i b i n g f r e q u e n c y o f o c c u r r e n c e , p o s i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e v e r s u s p o s i t i o n - i n s e n s i t i v e c o u n t s o f l e t t e r o c c u r r e n c e s , t h e r o l e o f word f r e q u e n c y , and t h e r e l a t i v e c o n t r i b u t i o n s o f v a r i o u s s e r i a l p o s i t i o n s i n d e t e r m i n i n g t h e o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e o f a n item.

What c o n c l u s i o n s c a n b e r e a c h e d and wha t a r e t h e i m p l i c a t i o n s f o r f u t u r e r e s e a r c h and c l a s s r o o m

Page 265: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

2 4 8 CHAPTER 6

p r a c t i c e ? A l t h o u g h we were n o t s u c c e s s f u l i n c h o o s i n g be tween r u l e - g o v e r n e d r e g u l a r i t y and s t a t i s t i c a l r e d u n d a n c y i n t h e s e e x p e r i m e n t s , a d d i t i o n a l e x p e r i m e n t s m i g h t b e s u c c e s s f u l . G i v e n t h e b e s t s t a t i s t i c a l - r e d u n d a n c y m e a s u r e , i t s h o u l d b e p o s s i b l e t o d e v e l o p a new se t o f t e s t i tems t o c o n t r a s t t h i s m e a s u r e w i t h a r u l e - g o v e r n e d r e g u l a r i t y m e a s u r e . We p l a n t o f o l l o w t h e l o g i c o f t h e p r e s e n t s t u d i e s by c o n t r a s t i n g l o g b ig ram f r e q u e n c y and r e g u l a r i t y m e a s u r e s i n t a r g e t s e a r c h and o v e r t j udgmen t t a s k s . A l t h o u g h t h e s e two m e a s u r e s a r e h i g h l y c o r r e l a t e d , i t s h o u l d b e p o s s i b l e t o d i s t i n g u i s h be tween them. G i v e n t h e r e s u l t s , i t w i l l s t i l l b e n e c e s s a r y t o c a r r y o u t p o s t hoc c o r r e l a t i o n s t o d e t e r m i n e i f some o t h e r m e a s u r e m i g h t p r o v i d e e v e n a b e t t e r d e s c r i p t i o n . T h i s r e s e a r c h h a s t h e p r o m i s e o f l e a d i n g t o t h e d e s c r i p t i o n t h a t b e s t r e f l e c t s t h e knowledge o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e used i n t h e c o u r s e o f no rma l r e a d i n g .

A r r i v i n g a t a good d e s c r i p t i o n o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e s h o u l d b e b e n e f i c i a l i n t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f r e a d i n g i n s t r u c t i o n . G i v e n t h a t t h e u t i l i z a t i o n o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i s a n i m p o r t a n t component i n l e t t e r and word r e c o g n i t i o n , i n s t r u c t i o n a l m a t e r i a l s s h o u l d b e d e s i g n e d t o f a c i l i t a t e c h i l d r e n ' s u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t h i s s t r u c t u r e . C u r r e n t p h o n i c s p rograms a d d r e s s o n l y t h e c o r r e s p o n d e n c e s be tween s p e l l i n g and s o u n d , n o t t h e c o n s t r a i n t s i n E n g l i s h o r t h o g r a p h y . Y a s s a r o and T a y l o r ( 1 9 7 9 ) s k e t c h a s e r i e s o f c l a s s r o o m games t h a t m i g h t b e employed t o t e a c h c h i l d r e n common l e t t e r p a t t e r n s and t h e l o c a t i o n s i n words t h e s e l e t t e r p a t t e r n s a r e m o s t l i k e l y t o b e found . D e l i n e a t i n g t h e b e s t d e s c r i p t i o n o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e m i g h t f a c i l i t a t e t h e t e a c h i n g and l e a r n i n g o f t h i s s t r u c t u r e .

Page 266: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

A l l p o r t , A . Word r e c o g n i t i o n i n r e a d i n g ( T u t o r i a l p a p e r ) . I n P. A. K o l e r s , M . W r o l s t a d , & H . Bouma ( E d s . ) , P r o c e s s i n g -~ o f v i s i b l e l a n g u a g e r. N e w York: Plenum, 1979.

A n d e r s o n , I . H . , & D e a r b o r n , W . F. The p s y c h o l o g y of t e a c h i n g r e a d i n g . N e w York: Ronald P r e s s , 1952.

A n i s f e l d , M. A. A comment on "The r o l e o f grapheme-phoneme c o r r e s p o n d e n c e i n t h e p e r c e p t i o n o f words." American ~- J o u r n a l o f P s y c h o l o g y , 1 9 6 4 , 11, 320-326.

A t k i n s o n , R . C . , & J u o l a , J . F. S e a r c h and d e c i s i o n p r o c e s s e s i n r e c o g n i t i o n memory. I n D. H . K r a n t z , R . C. A t k i n s o n , R . D. L u c e , & P. S u p p e s ( E d s . ) , Con tempora ry d e v e l o p m e n t s - i n m a t h e m a t i c a l p s y c h o l o g y . San F r a n c i s c o : Freeman, 1974 .

B a d d e l e y , A. D . I m m e d i a t e memory and t h e " p e r c e p t i o n " o f l e t t e r s e q u e n c e s . Q u a r t e r l y J o u r n a l o f E x p e r i m e n t a l P s y c h o l o g y , 1 9 6 4 , 16, 364-367.

Ba ron , J . The word s u p e r i o r i t y e f f e c t . I n W . K . E s t e s ( E d . ) , Handbook of l e a r n i n g and c o g n i t i v e p r o c e s s e s ( V o l . 6 ) . H i l l s d a l e , N . J . : E r lbaum, 1978 .

B a r o n , J . , & T h u r s t o n , I . An a n a l y s i s o f t h e w o r d - s u p e r i o r i t y e f f e c t . C o g n i t i v e P s y c h o l o g y , 1 9 7 3 , 4, 207-228.

249

References

Page 267: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

250 REFERENCES

B j o r k , E. L . , & Es tes , W. K . L e t t e r i d e n t i f i c a t i o n i n r e l a t i o n t o l i n g u i s t i c c o n t e x t and masking c o n d i t i o n s . Memory and C o g n i t i o n , 1973 , l, 217-223.

Bouma, H . V i s u a l r e c o g n i t i o n o f i s o l a t e d l o w e r - c a s e l e t t e r s . V i s i o n R e s e a r c h , 1 9 7 1 , 11, 459-474.

Bouwhuis, D. G . V i s u a l r e c o g n i t i o n o f words . U n p u b l i s h e d d o c t o r a l d i s s e r t a t i o n , K a t h o l i e k e U n i v e r s i t e i t , N i jmegen , H o l l a n d , 1979.

B r e i t m e y e r , B. G . , & Ganz , L. I m p l i c a t i o n s o f s u s t a i n e d and t r a n s i e n t c h a n n e l s f o r t h e o r i e s o f v i s u a l p a t t e r n m a s k i n g , s a c c a d i c s u p p r e s s i o n and i n f o r m a t i o n p r o c e s s i n g . P s y c h o l o g i c a l Review, 1 9 7 6 , 83, 1-36.

B r o a d b e n t , D. E . Word- f r equency e f f e c t and r e s p o n s e b i a s . P s y c h o l o g i c a l Review, 1 9 6 7 , 2, 1-15.

B r o a d b e n t , D. E . The h i d d e n p r e a t t e n t i v e p r o c e s s e s . American P s y c h o l o g i s t , 1 9 7 7 , 32, 109-118.

C a t t e l l , J . M . Ueber d i e Z e i t d e r Erkennung und Bennenung von S c h r i f t z e i c h e n , B i l d e r n und Fa rben . P h i l o s o p h i s c h e S t u d i e n , 1885 , 2 , 635-650.

C h a n d l e r , J . P . S u b r o u t i n e STEPIT--Finds l o c a l minima o f a smooth f u n c t i o n o f s e v e r a l p a r a m e t e r s . B e h a v i o r a l S c i e n c e , 1969 , 14, 81-82.

Chomsky, N . , & H a l l e , M . The sound p a t t e r n o f E n g l i s h . N e w York: H a r p e r & Row, 1968 .

C l a r k , H . H. The l a n g u a g e - a s - f i x e d - e f f e c t - f a l l a c y : A c r i t i q u e o f l a n g u a g e s t a t i s t i c s i n p s y c h o l o g i c a l r e s e a r c h . J o u r n a l o f V e r b a l L e a r n i n g and V e r b a l B e h a v i o r , 1 9 7 3 , 1 2 , 335-359. -~

Es tes , W. K . The l o c u s of i n f e r e n t i a l and p e r c e p t u a l p r o c e s s e s i n l e t t e r i d e n t i f i c a t i o n . J o u r n a l o f E x p e r i m e n t a l P s y c h o l o g y : G e n e r a l , 1 9 7 5 , 184, 122-145. ( a )

Page 268: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

REFERENCES 251

Es t e s , W. K . Memory, p e r c e p t i o n , and d e c i s i o n i n l e t t e r i d e n t i f i c a t i o n . I n R. L. S o l s o (Ed.) , I n f o r m a t i o n p r o c e s i n q c o g n i t i o n : The L o y o l a Symposium. H i l l s d a l e , N.J.: Er lbaum, 1975. ( b )

E s t e s , W. K . On t h e i n t e r a c t i o n o f p e r c e p t i o n and memory i n r e a d i n g . I n D. LaBerge & S. J. S a m u e l s ( E d s . ) , B a s i c p r o c e s s e s r e a d i n g : P e r c e p t i o n and Comprehens ion . H i l l s d a l e , N . J . : E r lbaum, 1977 .

Es t e s , W . K . P e r c e p t u a l p r o c e s s i n g i n l e t t e r r e c o g n i t i o n and r e a d i n g . I n E . C . C a r t e r e t t e & M . P. F r i edman ( E d s . ) , Handbook of p e r c e p t i o n : P e r c e p t u a l p r o c e s s i n g ("01. 9 ) . New York: Academic p r e s s , 1978 .

Es t e s , W . K . , Bjork, E . L . , & S k a a r , E . D e t e c t i o n o f s i n g l e l e t t e r s and l e t t e r s i n words w i t h c h a n g i n g v e r s u s unchang ing mask c h a r a c t e r s . B u l l e t i n o f t h e Psychonomic S o c i e t y , 1 9 7 4 , 2 , 201-203.

G e o f f r i o n , L. D. P o s i t i o n a l u n c e r t a i n t y i n l a t e r a l mask ing and t h e p e r c e p t u a l s u p e r i o r i t y of words . P e r c e p t i o n and P s y c h o p h y s i c s , 1 9 7 6 , g ( 3 ) , 273-278.

G i b s o n , E . J . On t h e p e r c e p t i o n o f words . American J o u r n a l o f P s y c h o l o g y , 1 9 6 4 , 11, 667-669.

G i b s o n , E . J . , & L e v i n , H . The p s y c h o l o g y o f r e a d i n g . Cambr idge : MIT P r e s s , 1975 .

G i b s o n , E . J . , O s s e r , H . , S c h i f f , W . , & S m i t h , J. An a n a l y s i s o f c r i t i c a l f e a t u r e s o f l e t t e r s , t e s t e d by a c o n f u s i o n m a t r i x . I n F i n a l r e p o r t on a b a s i c r e s e a r c h p rogram 0" r e a d i n g ( C o o p e r a t i v e R e s e a r c h P r o j e c t No. 6 3 9 ) . I t h a c a , N . Y . : C o r n e l l U n i v e r s i t y and U.S. O f f i c e o f E d u c a t i o n , 1963.

G i b s o n , E . J . , P i c k , A . , Osser , H . , & Hammond, M. The r o l e o f grapheme-phoneme c o r r e s p o n d e n c e i n t h e p e r c e p t i o n o f words. American J o u r n a l o f P s y c h o l o g y , 1 9 6 2 , 11, 554-570.

Page 269: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

252 REFERENCES

G i b s o n , E . J . , S h u r c l i f f , A . , & Yonas, A. A u t i l i z a t i o n o f s p e l l i n g p a t t e r n s used by d e a f and h e a r i n g s u b j e c t s . I n H . L e v i n and J . P . W i l l i a m s ( E d s . ) , B a s i c s t u d i e s on - r e a d i n g . N e w York: B a s i c Books, 1970 .

G i l m o r e , G . C . , & E g e t h , H. E . When a r e nonwords e a s y t o s e e ? _- Memory and C o g n i t i o n , 1976 , 4, 519-524.

G r e e n , D. M . , & S w e t s , J . A. S i g n a l d e t e c t i o n t h e o r y and p y c h o p h y s i c s . N e w York: W i l e y , 1966 .

Hender son , L. Word r e c o g n i t i o n . I n N. S. S u t h e r l a n d ( E d . ) , T u t o r i a l _- e s s a y s i n p s y c h o l o g y ( V o l . 1 ) . H i l l s d a l e , N . J . : E r lbaum, 1977.

Huey, E . B . Ge p ~ y c h o l o g y and pedagogy of r e a d i n g . Cambr idge , Mass.: MIT P r e s s , 1968 . ( O r i g i n a l l y p u b l i s h e d , N e w York: Macmi l l an , 1908 . )

J a k o b s o n , R . , F a n t , C . G . M . , & H a l l e , M . P r e l i m i n a r i e s to speech E a l - y s i s : The d i s t i n c t i v e f e a t u r e s and t h e i r _- c o r r e l a t e s . ___ Cambr idge , Mass.: MIT P r e s s , 1961.

James, W. P r i n c i p l e s o f p s y c h o l o g y . N e w York: Dover P a p e r b a c k , 1950. ( O r i g i n a l l y p u b l i s h e d , H o l t , 1890.)

J o h n s o n , N . F. A p a t t e r n - u n i t model o f word i d e n t i f i c a t i o n . I n D. LaBerge & S. J. Samue l s ( E d s . ) , - B a s i c p r o c e s s e s i n r e a d i n g : P e r c e p t i o n c o m p r e h e n s i o n . H i l l s d a l e , N . J . : E r lbaum, 1977.

J o h n s t o n , J . C . , & M c C l e l l a n d , J. L . P e r c e p t i o n o f l e t t e r s i n words : Seek n o t and ye s h a l l f i n d . S c i e n c e , 1 9 7 4 , 184, 1192-1194.

Ka l lman , H . J . , & Massa ro , D. W . S i m i l a r i t y e f f e c t s i n backward r e c o g n i t i o n m a s k i n g . # J o u r n a l o f E x p e r i m e n t a l P s y c h o l o g y : Human P e r c e p t i o n and P e r f o r m a n c e , 1 9 7 9 , 2 , - 110-1 28.

Page 270: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

REFERENCES 253

Kle iman , G . M . S p e e c h r e c o d i n g i n r e a d i n g . J o u r n a l o f V e r b a l L e a r n i n g and V e r b a l B e h a v i o r , 1 9 7 5 , 2, 323-340.

K o l e r s , P. A. T h r e e s t a g e s o f r e a d i n g . I n H. L e v i n & J . P. W i l l i a m s ( E d s . ) , B a s i c s t u d i e s on r e a d i n g . N e w York: B a s i c Books , 1970 .

K r u e g e r , L . E . F a m i l i a r i t y e f f e c t s i n v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n p r o c e s s i n g . P s y c h o l o g i c a l B u l l e t i n , 1 9 7 5 , 82, 949-974.

K r u e g e r , L . E. F e a t u r e s v e r s u s r edundancy : Comments o n M a s s a r o , Venezky , and T a y l o r ' s " O r t h o g r a p h i c r e g u l a r i t y , p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y , and v i s u a l p r o c e s s i n g o f l e t t e r s t r i n g s . " J o u r n a l o f E x p e r i m e n t a l P s y c h o l o g y : G e n e r a l , 1979 , 188, 125-130.

K r u e g e r , L . E . , & S h a p i r o , R. G . L e t t e r d e t e c t i o n w i t h r a p i d s e r i a l v i s u a l p r e s e n t a t i o n : E v i d e n c e a g a i n s t word s u p e r i o r i t y a t f e a t u r e e x t r a c t i o n . J o u r n a l o f E x p e r i m e n t a l P s y c h o l o g y : Human P e r c e p t i o n P e r f o r m a n c e , 1979 , 5 , 657-673.

K u c e r a , H . , & F r a n c i s , W. N. C o m p u t a t i o n a l a n a l y s i s of p r e s e n t - d a y American E n g l i s h . P r o v i d e n c e : Brown U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1967 .

K u r a t h , H . A p h o n o l o g y and p r o s o d y o f Modern E n g l i s h . Ann A r b o r , Mich igan : U n i v e r s i t y o f M i c h i g a n P r e s s , 1964.

L a n d a u e r , T. K . , & S t r e e t e r , L. A. S t r u c t u r a l d i f f e r e n c e s be tween common and r a r e words : F a i l u r e o f e q u i v a l e n c e a s s u m p t i o n s f o r t h e o r i e s o f word r e c o g n i t i o n . J o u r n a l o f V e r b a l L e a r n i n g and V e r b a l B e h a v i o r , 1 9 7 3 , 12, 119-131.

L e f t o n , L. A . , S p r a g i n s , A. B . , & B y r n e s , J . E n g l i s h o r t h o g r a p h y : R e l a t i o n t o r e a d i n g e x p e r i e n c e . B u l l e t i n of t h e Psychonomic S o c i e t y , 1 9 7 3 , 2 , 281-282.

Levy, B . A. S p e e c h a n a l y s i s d u r i n g s e n t e n c e p r o c e s s i n g : Read ing and l i s t e n i n g . V i s i b l e Language , 1 9 7 8 , 12, 81-101.

Page 271: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

254 REFERENCES

Mason, M . Reading a b i l i t y and l e t t e r s e a r c h time: E f f e c t s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e d e f i n e d by s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y . 1 9 7 5 , 184,

Massa ro , D. W . J o u r n a l o f ~-

Massa ro , D. W.

____ J o u r n a l o f E x p e r i m e n t a l P s y c h o l o g y : G e n e r a l , 146-166.

P e r c e p t i o n o f l e t t e r s , w o r d s , and nonwords. E x p e r i m e n t a l P s y c h o l o g y , 1 9 7 3 , 188, 349-353.

P r i m a r y and s e c o n d a r y r e c o g n i t i o n i n r e a d i n g . I n D. W. Massaro (Ed . ) , U n d e r s t a n d i n g l a n g u a g e : An i n f o r m a t i o n p r o c e s s i n g a n a l y s i s o f s p e e c h p e r c e p t i o n , r e a d i n g , and p s y c h o l i n g u i s t i c s . N e w York: Academic P r e s s , 1975 .

Massa ro , D. W. Read ing and l i s t e n i n g ( T e c h n i c a l R e p o r t No. 423) . Madison: W i s c o n s i n R e s e a r c h and Development C e n t e r f o r I n d i v i d u a l i z e d S c h o o l i n g , December 1977 .

Massa ro , D. W. A s t a g e model o f r e a d i n g and l i s t e n i n g . V i s i b l e Language , 1 9 7 8 , 12, 3-26.

Y a s s a r o , D . W . L e t t e r i n f o r m a t i o n and o r t h o g r a p h i c c o n t e x t i n word p e r c e p t i o n . J o u r n a l o f E x p e r i m e n t a l P s y c h o l o g y : Human P e r c e p t i o n P e r f o r m a n c e , 1 9 7 9 , 5 , 595-609. ( a )

Massa ro , D. W. Reading and l i s t e n i n g ( T u t o r i a l p a p e r ) . I n P. A. K o l e r s , M . W r o l s t a d , & H . Bouma. ( E d s . ) , P r o c e s s i n q -___ o f v i s i b l e l a n g u a g e I . N e w York: Plenum, 1979 ( b ) .

Massa ro , D. W. How d o e s o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e f a c i l i t a t e r e a d i n g ? I n R. L . Venezky & J . F. Kavanagh ( E d s . ) , O r t h o g r a p h y , r e a d i n g , and d y s l e x i a . B a l t i m o r e : U n i v e r s i t y P a r k P r e s s , i n p r e s s .

Massa ro , D. W . , J o n e s , R. D . , Lipscomb, C . , & S c h o l z , R. R o l e o f p r i o r knowledge on naming and l e x i c a l d e c i s i o n s w i t h good and poor s t i m u l u s i n f o r m a t i o n . J o u r n a l o f E x p e r i m e n t a l P s y c h o l o g y : Human L e a r n i n g and Memory, 1 9 7 8 , - 4 , 498-512.

Page 272: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

REFERENCES 255

M a s s a r o , D. W . , & S c h m u l l e r , J . V i s u a l f e a t u r e s , p e r c e p t u a l s t o r a g e , and p r o c e s s i n g time i n r e a d i n g . I n D . W. Massa ro ( E d . ) , U n d e r s t a n d i n g l a n g u a g e : An i n f o r m a t i o n p r o c e s s i n g a n a l y s i s o f s p e e c h p e r c e p t i o n , r e a d i n g , and p s y c h o l i n g u i s t i c s . N e w York: Academic P r e s s , 1975.

M a s s a r o , D. W . , & T a y l o r , G . A. Read ing a b i l i t y and t h e u t i l i z a t i o n o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e i n r e a d i n g . ( T e c h n i c a l R e p o r t No. 5 1 5 ) . Madison: W i s c o n s i n R e s e a r c h and Development C e n t e r f o r I n d i v i d u a l i z e d S c h o o l i n g , J u l y 1979.

Massa ro , D. W . , Venezky , R . L.,, & T a y l o r , G . A. O r t h o g r a p h i c r e g u l a r i t y , p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y , and v i s u a l p r o c e s s i n g o f 1 e t t e r s t r i ng s . J o u r n a l o f Expe r imen t a l Psycho l o g y : G e n e r a l , 1 9 7 9 , 188, 107-124.

Mayzner , M . S . , & T r e s s e l t , M . E . T a b l e s o f s i n g l e - l e t t e r and d i g r a m f r e q u e n c y c o u n t s f o r v a r i o u s w o r d - l e n g t h and l e t t e r -po s i t i o n combi na t i o n s . S u p p l e m e n t s , 1 9 6 5 , I, 13-32.

P s yc honom i c Monog r a p h

Mayzner , M . S . , T r e s s e l t , Y . E . , & W o l i n , B. R. T a b l e s o f t e t r a g r a m f r e q u e n c y c o u n t s f o r v a r i o u s w o r d - l e n g t h and l e t t e r -pos i t i o n comb i n a t i o n s . S u p p l e m e n t s , 1 9 6 5 , I, 79-143. ( a )

P s yc honom i c Monog r a p h

Mayzner , M . S . , T r e s s e l t , M . E . , & Wol in , B. R. T a b l e s o f t r i g r a m f r e q u e n c y c o u n t s f o r v a r i o u s w o r d - l e n g t h and l e t t e r - p o s i t i o n c o m b i n a t i o n s . Psychonomic Monographic S u p p l e m e n t s , 1 9 6 5 , I, 33-78. ( b )

M c C l e l l a n d , J . L . , & J o h n s t o n , J . C. The r o l e o f f a m i l i a r u n i t s i n p e r c e p t i o n o f words and nonwords. P e r c e p t i o n & P s y c h o p h y s i c s , 1977 , 12, 249-261.

Yewhort , D. J . K . , & B e a l , A. L. Mechanisms of word i d e n t i f i c a t i o n . J o u r n a l o f E x p e r i m e n t a l P s y c h o l o g y : Human P e r c e p t i o n and P e r f o r m a n c e , 1 9 7 7 , 2 , 629-640.

Page 273: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

256 REFERENCES

Meyer, D. E . , S c h v a n e v e l d t , R. W . , & Ruddy, M . G . L o c i of c o n t e x t u a l e f f e c t s i n v i s u a l word r e c o g n i t i o n . I n P. R a b b i t ( E d . ) , !+tention and_ p e r f o r m a n c e v. N e w York: Academic P r e s s , 1975 .

M i l l e r , G . A . , B r u n e r , J . S . , & Pos tman , L . F a m i l i a r i t y o f l e t t e r s e q u e n c e s and t a c h i s t o s c o p i c i d e n t i f i c a t i o n . J o u r n a l o f G e n e r a l P s y c h o l o g y , 1 9 5 4 , x, 129-139. - ~-

N e i s s e r , U. D e c i s i o n t i m e w i t h o u t r e a c t i o n time: E x p e r i m e n t s i n v i s u a l s c a n n i n g . American J o u r n a l o f P s y c h o l o g y , 1 9 6 3 , - 7 6 , 376-385.

N e i s s e r , U. C o g n i t i v e p s y c h o l o g y . N e w York: A p p l e t o n C e n t u r y C r o f t s , 1967 .

Oden, G . C . A f u z z y l o g i c a l model o f l e t t e r i d e n t i f i c a t i o n . _- J o u r n a l _ _ _ o f E x p e r i m e n t a l P s y c h o l o g y : Human P e r c e p t i o n P e r f o r m a n c e , 1979 , 2 , 336-352. -- ~

Oden, G . C . , & Massa ro , D. W. I n t e g r a t i o n o f f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n i n s p e e c h p e r c e p t i o n . P s y c h o l o g i c a l Rev iew, 1 9 7 8 , c ( 3 ) , 172-191.

O l s o n , G . A . , & K a u s l e r , D . H . O r t h o g r a p h i c d i s t i n c t i v e n e s s o f homophones. B e h a v i o r R e s e a r c h Methods and - I n s t r u m e n t a t i o n , 1 9 7 1 , 2, 298-299.

P o l l a t s e k , A . , & C a r r , T. H . Ru le -gove rned and w h o l i s t i c e n c o d i n g p r o c e s s e s i n word p e r c e p t i o n . I n P. A . K o l e r s , M . W r o l s t a d , & H . Bouma ( E d s . ) , P r o c e s s i n g o f v i s i b l e _ _ l a n g u a g e I . N e w York: Plenum, 1979 .

Pos tman , L . , & Conger , B. V e r b a l h a b i t s and t h e v i s u a l r e c o g n i t i o n o f words . S c i e n c e , 1 9 5 4 , 119, 671-673.

P y l e s , T. The o r i g i n s and d e v e l o p m e n t o f t h e E n g l i s h l a n g u a g e . N e w York: H a r c o u r t , B r a c e , & J o v a n o v i c h , 1964.

Reed, A. V . S p e e d - a c c u r a c y t r a d e - o f f i n r e c o g n i t i o n memory, -~ S c i e n c e , 1973 , gl, 574-576.

Page 274: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

REFERENCES 2 51

R e i c h e r , G . M . P e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n a s a f u n c t i o n of m e a n i n g f u l n e s s o f s t i m u l u s m a t e r i a l . J o u r n a l o f E x p e r i m e n t a l P s y c h o l o g y , 1 9 6 9 , fi, 275-280.

R u b e n s t e i n , H . , L e w i s , S. S . , & R u b e n s t e i n , M. A. E v i d e n c e f o r phonemic r e c o d i n g i n v i s u a l word r e c o g n i t i o n . J o u r n a l o f V e r b a l L e a r n i n g and V e r b a l B e h a v i o r , 1 9 7 1 , 1pI, 645-657.

S a v i n , H. B. Word- f r equency e f f e c t s and e r r o r s i n t he p e r c e p t i o n o f s p e e c h . J o u r n a l o f t h e A c o u s t i c a l S o c i e t y o f Amer ica , 1 9 6 3 , 35, 200-206, -~

S e l f r i d g e , 0. G . , & Neisser , U. P a t t e r n r e c o g n i t i o n by mach ine . S c i e n t i f i c Amer ican , Augus t 1 9 6 0 , ' = , 60-68.

Shannon , C . E. A m a t h e m a t i c a l t h e o r y o f communica t ion . System T e c h n i c a l J o u r n a l , 1 9 4 8 , 21, 379-423; 623-656.

Shannon , C. E. P r e d i c t i o n and e n t r o p y o f p r i n t e d E n g l i s h . B e l l Sys t em T e c h n i c a l J o u r n a l , 1 9 5 1 , 30, 50-64.

S h e b i l s k e , W. Read ing e y e movements f rom an i n f o r m a t i o n p r o c e s s i n g p o i n t o f v i e w . I n D. W. Massa ro (Ed . ) , U n d e r s t a n d i n g m e : i n f o r m a t i o n p r o c e s s i n g a n a l y s i s o f s p e e c h p e r c e p t i o n , r e a d i n g , fi p s y c h o l i n g u i s t i c s . N e w York: Academic P r e s s , 1975 .

S h e p a r d , R. N . , & P o d g o r n y , P. C o g n i t i v e p r o c e s s e s t h a t r e s e m b l e p e r c e p t u a l p r o c e s s e s . I n W. K . Es tes (Ed.) , Handbook of l e a r n i n g c o g n i t i v e p r o c e s s e s : Human i n f o r m a t i o n p r o c e s s i n g (Vo l . 5 ) . H i l l s d a l e , N . J . : E r lbaum, 1978 .

Sidman, M. T a c t i c s o f s c i e n t i f i c r e s e a r c h : E v a l u a t i n g e x p e r i m e n t a l d a t a i n p s y c h o l o g y : N e w York: B a s i c b o o k s , 1960.

S i n g e r , M . H . The p r i m a c y o f v i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n i n t h e a n a l y s i s o f l e t t e r s t r i n g s . P e r c e p t i o n and P s y c h o p h y s i c s , i n p r e s s .

Page 275: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

2 58 REFERENCES

S m i t h , E . E., H a v i l a n d , S. E . , Reder , L. M . , B r o w n e l l , H . , and Adams, N. When p r e p a r a t i o n f a i l s : D i s r u p t i v e e f f e c t s o f p r i o r i n f o r m a t i o n on p e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n . J o u r n a l o f E x p e r i m e n t a l P s y c h o l o g y : Human P e r c e p t i o n and P e r f o r m a n c e , 1 9 7 6 , 2 , 151-161.

S m i t h , E . E . , & S p o e h r , K . T. The p e r c e p t i o n o f p r i n t e d E n g l i s h : A t h e o r e t i c a l p e r s p e c t i v e . I n B . H. K a n t o w i t z

p e r f o r m a n c e and c o g n i t i o n . Po tomac , Md.: E r lbaum, 1974 .

S m i t h , F. U n d e r s t a n d i n g r e a d i n g . N e w York: H o l t , 1971.

Solomon, R. L . , & Pos tman , L. F r e q u e n c y o f u s a g e a s a d e t e r m i n a n t o f r e c o g n i t i o n t h r e s h o l d s f o r words. J o u r n a l - o f E x p e r i m e n t a l P s y c h o l o g y , 1952 , 9, 195-201.

Solso, R . L . P o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y and v e r s a t i l i t y o f l e t t e r s f o r s i x - , s e v e n - , and e i g h t - l e t t e r E n g l i s h words . B e h a v i o r R e s e a r c h Methods & I n s t r u m e n t a t i o n , 1 9 7 9 , - 11, 355-358.

S o l s o , R . L . , B a r b u t o , P. F., ti J u e l , C . L . Bigram and t r i g r a m f r e q u e n c i e s and v e r s a t i l i t i e s i n t h e E n g l i s h l a n g u a g e . B e h a v i o r R e s e a r c h Methods & I n s t r u m e n t a t i o n , 1 9 7 9 , g ( 5 ) , 475-484.

Solso, R. L . , & K i n g , J . F. F r e q u e n c y and v e r s a t i l i t y o f l e t t e r s i n t h e E n g l i s h l a n g u a g e . B e h a v i o r R e s e a r c h Methods I n s t r u m e n t a t i o n , 1976 , 8, 283-286.

Solso, R. L . , T o p p e r , G . E . , & Macey, W . H. Anagram s o l u t i o n a s a f u n c t i o n o f b i g r a m v e r s a t i l i t y . J o u r n a l o f E x p e r i m e n t a l Psycholo_qy, 1 9 7 3 , 188, 259-262.

S p e n c e r , H . The v i s i b l e word. N e w York: H a s t i n g s , 1969 .

S p o e h r , K . T . , & S m i t h , E . E . The r o l e o f o r t h o g r a p h i c and p h o n o t a c t i c r u l e s i n p e r c e i v i n g l e t t e r p a t t e r n s . J o u r n a l - o f E x p e r i m e n t a l P s y c h o l o g y : Human P e r c e p t i o n _ and P e r f o r m a n c e , 1975 , 1, 21-34.

Page 276: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

REFERENCES 259

S p r e e n , O . , & S c h u l z , R. W. P a r a m e t e r s o f a b s t r a c t i o n , m e a n i n g f u l n e s s , and p r o n o u n c e a b i l i t y f o r 329 nouns. J o u r n a l o f V e r b a l L e a r n i n g and V e r b a l B e h a v i o r , 1966 , 5 , 459-468.

Tay lo r . , G . A. The c o n t r i b u t i o n o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e to t h e p e r c e p t i o n o f l e t t e r s t r i n g s . U n p u b l i s h e d d o c t o r a l d i s s e r t a t i o n , U n i v e r s i t y o f K a n s a s , 1977.

T a y l o r , G . A . , K l i t z k e , D . , & M a s s a r o , D. W . A v i s u a l d i s p l a y s y s t e m f o r r e a d i n g and v i s u a l p e r c e p t i o n r e s e a r c h . B e h a v i o r R e s e a r c h Methods & I n s t r u m e n t a t i o n , 1978 , 2, 148-153.

T a y l o r , G. A . , M i l l e r , T. J . , & J u o l a , J . F. I s o l a t i n g v i s u a l u n i t s i n t h e p e r c e p t i o n o f words and nonwords. P e r c e p t i o n and P s y c h o p h y s i c s , 1 9 7 7 , 21, 377-386.

T a y l o r , M . M . & C r e e l m a n , C . 0. PEST: E f f i c i e n t e s t i m a t e s o f p r o b a b i l i t y f u n c t i o n s . J o u r n a l o f t h e A c o u s t i c a l S o c i e t y -~ o f A m e r i c a , 1 9 6 7 , 41, 782-757.

Thompson, M . C . , & M a s s a r o , D. W. V i s u a l i n f o r m a t i o n and r e d u n d a n c y i n r e a d i n g . J o u r n a l o f E x p e r i m e n t a l P s y c h o l o g y , 1 9 7 3 , 98, 49-54.

T h o r n d i k e , E . L . , & L o r g e , I . The t e a c h e r ' s workbook o f 3 0 , 0 0 0 words . N e w York: Bureau o f P u b l i c a t i o n s , T e a c h e r s C o l l e g e , Columbia U n i v e r s i t y , 1944 .

T i n k e r , M . A . B a s e s f o r e f f e c t i v e r e a d i n g . M i n n e a p o l i s : U n i v e r s i t y o f M i n n e s o t a P res s , 1965 .

Townsend, J . T . T h e o r e t i c a l a n a l y s i s o f a n a l p h a b e t i c c o n f u s i o n m a t r i x . P e r c e p t i o n P s y c h o p h y s i c s , 1971 , 2 , 40-50.

T o p p e r , G. E . , Macey, W . H . , & S o l s o , R. L . Rigram v e r s a t i l i t y and b i g r a m f r e q u e n c y . B e h a v i o r R e s e a r c h Methods & I n s t r u m e n t a t i o n , 1 9 7 3 , 5 , 51-53.

Page 277: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

260 REFERENCES

T r a v e r s , J. R. , & O l i v s t a t i s t i ca 1 "Eng 1 i d e n t i f i c a t i o n . 523-538.

e r r D. G . P r o n o u n c e a b i l i t y and s h n e s s " a s d e t e r m i n a n t s o f l e t t e r m e r i c a n J o u r n a l o f P s y c h o l o g y , 1 9 7 8 , 91,

T u l v i n g , E . F a m i l i a r i t y o f l e t t e r - s e q u e n c e s and t a c h i s t o s c o p i c i d e n t i f i c a t i o n . American J o u r n a l o f P s y c h o l o g y , 1 9 6 3 , 76, 143-144.

T u r v e y , M . T. On p e r i p h e r a l and c e n t r a l p r o c e s s e s i n v i s i o n : I n f e r e n c e s f rom a n i n f o r m a t i o n p r o c e s s i n g a n a l y s i s o f masking w i t h p a t t e r n e d s t i m u l i . P s y c h o l o g i c a l Review, 1 9 7 3 , E, 1-52.

Tzeng , 0. J . L. , Hung, D. L . , & Wang, W. S-Y. Speech r e c o d i n g i n r e a d i n g C h i n e s e c h a r a c t e r s . J o u r n a l o f E x p e r i m e n t a l P s y c h o l o g y : Human L e a r n i n g and Memory, 1 9 7 7 , 2 , 621-630.

Underwood, B. J . , & S c h u l z , R . W. M e a n i n g f u l n e s s and v e r b a l l e a r n i n g N e w York: Academic P r e s s , L i p p i n c o t t , 1960.

Vachek, J. Two c h a p t e r s on w r i t t e n E n g l i s h . Brno S t u d i e s i n Eng 1 i s h 7 9 59 , 1 , 7- 3 8.

Vachek, J. W r i t t e n l a n g u a g e . The Hague: Mouton, 1973 .

Venezky, R. L. The s t r u c t u r e of E n g l i s h o r t h o g r a p h y . The Hague: Mouton, 1970 .

Venezky, R. L . , & Massa ro , D. W. The r o l e of o r t h o g r a p h i c r e g u l a r i t y on word r e c o g n i t i o n . I n L. R e s n i c k & P. Weaver ( E d s . ) , Theory p r a c t i c e o f e a r l y r e a d i n g . H i l l s d a l e , N . J . : Er lbaum, 1979.

W a l l a c h , M. A. P e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n of a p p r o x i m a t i o n s t o E n g l i s h i n r e l a t i o n t o s p e l l i n g a c h i e v e m e n t . J o u r n a l o f E d u c a t i o n a l P s y c h o l o g y , 1 9 6 3 , 2, 57-62.

W h e e l e r , D. D. P r o c e s s e s i n word r e c o g n i t i o n . C o g n i t i v e P s y c h o l o g y , 1970 , 59-85.

Page 278: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

REFERENCES 2 6 1

Whorf , B . L. L i n g u i s t i c s a s a n e x a c t s c i e n c e . I n J . B. C a r r o l l ( E d . ) , Language, t h o u g h t , and r e a l i t y . Cambr idge , Mass.: The MIT P r e s s , 1956 .

Woodworth, R . S. E x p e r i m e n t a l p s y c h o l o g y . N e w York: H o l t , 1938.

Page 279: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

This page intentionally left blank

Page 280: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

Glossary

a c c u r a c y t a s k : a t a s k i n wh ich a c c u r a c y i s t h e p r i m a r y d e p e n d e n t m e a s u r e ; i n t h e t a r g e t s e a r c h t a s k , a v e r a g e p e r f o r m a n c e i s m a i n t a i n e d a t 7 5 % c o r r e c t by a d j u s t i n g t h e d u r a t i o n o f t h e t e s t s t r i n g a n d / o r t h e p r o c e s s i n g t ime a v a i l a b l e .

anagram: a p e r m u t a t i o n o f t h e l e t t e r s c o m p r i s i n g a word.

b ig ram: a t w o - l e t t e r c l u s t e r .

c a t c h t r i a l : a t r i a l d u r i n g which t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r d o e s n o t -- a p p e a r i n t h e t e s t s t r i n g .

f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n : a p r o c e s s wh ich a n s w e r s t h e q u e s t i o n o f w h e t h e r o r n o t a p a r t i c u l a r f e a t u r e is p r e s e n t a n d / o r p r o v i d e s i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t t h e d e g r e e t o wh ich t h e f e a t u r e i s p r e s e n t .

f o u r i e r a n a l y s i s : t h e d e s c r i p t i o n o f a v i s u a l d i s p l a y i n t e rms o f i n t e n s i t y and f r e q u e n c y o f component s i n e waves.

f u l l r e p o r t : g i v e n a d i s p l a y o f i t ems , s u b j e c t s a r e a s k e d t o r e p o r t a l l o f t h e i tems i n t h e d i s p l a y .

g e n e r a t e d a b s t r a c t memory: m o d a l i t y - f r e e ( a b s t r a c t ) s t o r a g e , a n a l o g o u s t o s h o r t - t e r m memory.

g r a p h e m i c c o n s t r a i n t s : s ee s c r i b a l c o n s t r a i n t s .

2 6 3

Page 281: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

264 G L O S S A R Y

high s p a t i a l f r e q u e n c i e s : t h e h i g h f r e q u e n c i e s o f a f o u r i e r a n a l y s e s o f a v i s u a l d i s p l a y .

homophones: d i f f e r e n t words t h a t a r e p ronounced i d e n t i c a l l y , s u c h a s r i g h t / w r i t e .

i n f o r m a t i o n : s o u r c e o f knowledge a v a i l a b l e t o t h e r e a d e r ; f o r e x a m p l e , t h e f e a t u r a l i n f o r m a t i o n i n p r e p e r c e p t u a l s t o r a g e o r t h e r e a d e r ' s memory o f l e t t e r p a t t e r n s i n t h e l a n g u a g e .

l e x i c o n : s t o r a g e o f p e r c e p t u a l and c o n c e p t u a l c o d e s o f w o r d s i n l o n g - t e r m memory; e a c h word h a s p e r c e p t u a l c o d e s s u c h a s t h e sound and v i s u a l p a t t e r n o f t h e word and c o n c e p t u a l c o d e s s u c h a s i t s mean ing .

l ong- t e rm memory: r e l a t i v e l y pe rmanen t s t o r e o f knowledge i n t e r m o f c o d e s , r u l e s , and p r o c e d u r e s ( s c h e m a t a ) .

- l o w s p a t i a l f r e q u e n c i e s : t h e low f r e q u e n c i e s o f a f o u r i e r a n a l y s i s o f a v i s u a l d i s p l a y .

morpheme i d e n t i t y : r e t e n t i o n o f s p e l l i n g s i m i l a r i t y o f s e m a n t i c a l l y - r e l a t e d w o r d s , s u c h a s c o n e / c o n i c .

nonword: a l e t t e r s t r i n g t h a t d o e s n o t s p e l l a word; s o m e t i m e s used t o mean t h a t t h e l e t t e r s t r i n g a l s o d o e s not confo rm t o s t a n d a r d E n g l i s h s p e l l i n g , i . e . , i t v i o l a t e s E n g l i s h o r t h o g r a p h y .

o r t h o g r a p h i c r e g u l a r i t y : d e s c r i p t i o n o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e b a s e d upon r u l e s and g e n e r a l i z a t i o n s a b o u t t h e o b s e r v e d p a t t e r n s o f E n g l i s h o r t h o g r a p h y ; a l s o r e f e r r e d t o a s r u l e - b a s e d d e s c r i p t i o n .

o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e : t h e s p e l l i n g c o n s t r a i n t s i n a w r i t t e n l a n g u a g e ; i n E n g l i s h , f o r example , g i v e n i n a n i n i t i a l p o s i t i o n , r is more l i k e l y t o f o l l o w t h a n 2.

o v e r t j u d g m e n t s : j u d g m e n t s a b o u t t h e s p e l l i n g o f l e t t e r s t r i n g s ; s t u d i e d t o a s s e s s what knowledge o f o r t h o g r a p h y is c o n s c i o u s l y a v a i l a b l e and c a p a b l e o f r e p o r t .

p a r a l l e l p r o c e s s i n g : when i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t two o r more i tems is p r o c e s s e d s i m u l t a n e o u s l y .

Page 282: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

GLOSSARY 2 6 5

perceptual recognition: see primary recognition.

phonological constraints: the constraints on English orthography that derive from the allowable sequences of sounds in English words.

positional frequency: see position-sensitive measure.

position-dependent measure: see position-sensitive measure.

position-independent measure: see position-insensitive measure.

position-insensitive measure: a statistical-redundancy description of orthographic structure which counts letter sequences on the bases of occurrence in words of specific lengths without regard to position of occurrence; also referred to as position-independent measure.

position-sensitive measure: a statistical-redundancy descrip- tion of orthographic structure which counts letter sequences on the basis of occurrence in specific positions in words of specific lengths; also referred to as position-dependent measure or positional-frequency.

postcue: when a target letter follows a test string.

precue: when a target letter precedes a test string.

preperceptual visual storage: holds features passed on by feature detection for roughly one quarter of a second.

primary recognition: joint evaluation and integration of the features in preperceptual storage and knowledge of orthographic structure in long-term memory; the outcome is a synthesized percept; also referred to as perceptual recog n i t ion.

probabilistic description: see statistical redundancy.

pseudoword: a nonword that conforms to English spelling.

reaction time (RT) task: task in which reaction time is the primary dependent measure; in the high-accuracy target search task, for example, accuracy is kept near perfect by

Page 283: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

266 GLOSSARY

k e e p i n g t h e t e s t s t r i n g p r e s e n t d u r i n g t h e r e s p o n s e i n t e r v a l .

r e g u l a r i t y : see o r t h o g r a p h i c r e g u l a r i t y . r u l e -based d e s c r i p t i o n : see o r t h o g r a p h i c r e g u l a r i t y . s c r i b a l c o n s t r a i n t s : t h e c o n s t r a i n t s i n t h e s e l e c t i o n o f

l e t t e r s f o r e i t h e r r e p r e s e n t i n g s o u n d s o r m a r k i n g g r a p h e m i c , g r a p h o t a c t i c , o r m o r p h o l o g i c a l f u n c t i o n s ; a l s o r e f e r r e d t o a s g r a p h e m i c c o n s t r a i n t s .

s e c o n d a r y r e c o g n i t i o n : t r a n s f o r m s v i s u a l p e r c e p t h e l d i n s y n t h e s i z e d memory i n t o meaning h e l d i n g e n e r a t e d a b s t r a c t memory.

s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y : t h e f r e q u e n c y w i t h wh ich a l e t t e r o c c u r s i n a s p e c i f i c p o s i t i o n i n words o f a s p e c i f i c l e n g t h i n a s a m p l e o f t e x t .

s p e e d e d fl task: s u b j e c t s a r e i n s t r u c t e d t o r e s p o n d more q u i c k l y t h a n t h e time needed f o r h i g h a c c u r a c y ; i n t h e t a r g e t s e a r c h t a s k , s u b j e c t s l e a r n t o r e s p o n d i n s y n c h r o n y w i t h a n e x t e r n a l s i g n a l whose r e l a t i v e o n s e t i s a d j u s t e d t o k e e p p e r f o r m a n c e a t 7 5 % c o r r e c t ; b o t h a c c u r a c y and RT a r e e v a l u a t e d a s d e p e n d e n t m e a s u r e s .

s t a t i s t i c a l r edundancy : c a t e g o r y o f d e s c r i p t i o n s o f o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e d e r i v e d from c o u n t s o f l e t t e r s o r l e t t e r s e q u e n c e s o c c u r r i n g i n t h e w r i t t e n l a n g u a g e ; a l s o c a l l e d p r o b a b i l i s t i c d e s c r i p t i o n .

~ _ _ _ summed c o u n t s : t h e sum o f i n d i v i d u a l f r e q u e n c i e s o f t h e l e t t e r s o r l e t t e r c l u s t e r s i n a l e t t e r s t r i n g .

s y n t h e s i z e d v i s u a l memory: h o l d s p e r c e p t u a l o u t c o m e s o f p r i m a r y r e c o g n i t i o n p r o c e s s .

t a r g e t l e t t e r : i n t h e t a r g e t s e a r c h t a s k , t h e l e t t e r whose p r e s e n c e o r a b s e n c e i n t h e t e s t s t r i n g o f l e t t e r s m u s t b e r e p o r t e d .

t a r g e t s e a r c h t a s k : t h e s u b j e c t i s g i v e n a t a r g e t l e t t e r and t h e t a s k i s t o i n d i c a t e w h e t h e r o r n o t t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r

- ~ -

is c o n t a i n e d i n a t e s t s t r i n g o f l e t t e r s .

Page 284: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

GLOSSARY 267

- t e s t s t r i n g : i n t h e t a r g e t s e a r c h t a s k , t h e l e t t e r s t h a t m u s t be e v a l u a t e d i n te rms of p r e s e n c e o r a b s e n c e of t h e t a r g e t l e t t e r .

t o k e n c o u n t : a c o u n t based on t h e number of t o t a l o c c u r r e n c e s of an i tem; f o r example, t h e t o t a l number o f o c c u r r e n c e s of a l l words c o n t a i n i n g a p a r t i c u l a r l e t t e r .

--

t r i g r a m : a t h r e e - l e t t e r c l u s t e r .

*e count : a c o u n t based on t h e number o f un ique o c c u r r e n c e s o f an i tem; f o r example, t h e number of un ique words c o n t a i n i n g a p a r t i c u l a r l e t t e r .

Page 285: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

This page intentionally left blank

Page 286: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

Author Index A

Adams, N., 5 8 , 67 A l l p o r t , A., viii A n d e r s o n , I . H., 1 1 - 1 2 A n i s f e l d , M . A . , 25 A t k i n s o n , R. C . , 56

B

B a d d e l e y , A . D . , 7 , 64 B a r b u t o , P . F . , 27 B a r o n , J , , viii, 6 2 B e a l , A. L . , 2 4 B j o r k , E . L . , 62

Bouwhuis , D . , G . 26 B r e i t m e y e r , B . G., 1 9 B r o a d b e n t , D. E . , 1 9 , 1 4 1 , B r o w n e l l , H . , 5 8 , 67 B r u n e r , J. S., 6 , 2 4 B y r n e s , J . , 2 4

Bouma, H., 1 2 , 15-16 , 43-45, 52-53

C

C a r r , T. H . , ix

C h a n d l e r , J . P . , 59 Chomsky, N . , 35 C l a r k , H . H . , 51

C a t t e l l , J . M., 1 1 - 1 2

269

Page 287: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

270 AUTHOR I N D E X

Conger , B. , 132 C r e e l m a n , C . D . , 93

D

D e a r b o r n , W. F. , 11-12

E

E g e t h , H . E . , 25 Es t e s , W. R . , v i i i , 5 , 6 2

F

F a n t , C. G . M . , 1 4 F r a n c i s , W. N., 26-27, 126-127, 149

G

Ganz , L . , 1 9 G e o f f r i o n , L. D . , 5 G i b s o n , E . J . , v i i i , 1, 15 , 25 , 29-38, 32 G i l m o r e , G . C . , 25 Green, D. M . , 1 7

H

H a l l e , M . , 1 4 Hammond, M., 25 , 29-30 H a v i l a n d , S . E . , 58 , 67 H e n d e r s o n , L . , v i i i Huey, E . B . , 1, 1 3 Hung, D. L . , 29

J

J a k o b s o n , ' R. , 1 4 J o h n s o n , N . F. , v i i i J o h n s t o n , J. C . , 26 , 1 0 1 , 132 J o n e s , R. D . , 7 4 , 77-18

J u o l a , J. F. , 56, 68 J u e l , C. L.r 27

Page 288: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

AUTHOR INDEX

K

2 7 1

Kallrnan, H. J . , 5 8 K a u s l e r , D. H., 3 3

King, J. F . , 2 7 K l i t z k e , D . , 1 0 5 Kleiman, G. M . , 2 9 K o l e r s , P . A., 1 0 8 Krueger , L. E . , v i i i , 7, 4 7 Kucera, H., 2 6 - 2 7 , 1 2 6 - 1 2 7 , 1 4 9 Kurath , H., 3 5

L

Landauer , T. K . , 2 7 - 2 8 L e f t o n , L. A., 24

Levin , H., viii, 1 Levy, B. A . , 2 9

Lewis, S. S., 2 9 - 3 0 Lipscomb, c . , 7 4 , 7 7 - 7 8 Lorge, I . , 2 5

M

Macey, W. H., 2 7 Mason, M . , 2 6 , 3 7 - 3 8 , 1 3 2 Massaro, D. W.,ix, 2, 5-8, 1 7 , 19, 21, 2 6 , 2 9 ,

3 8 - 4 7 , 4 3 , 56 -58 , 6 2 , 7 4 , 7 7 - 7 8 , 9 6 , 1 0 5 ,

2 4 6 , 2 4 8 Mayzner, M . S . , 26, 4 8 , 9 1 McClel land, J . L . , 2 6 , 1 0 1 , 1 3 2

Meyer, D. E . , 7 4 , M i l l e r , G. A., 6 , 2 4 M i l l e r , T. J . , 6 8

Newhort, D, J . , 24

N

N e i s s e r , U . , 1 4 , 4 3

0

Oden, G . C . , 2 1 , O l i v i e r , D. G . , 1 2 7 - 1 2 8 , 1 3 1 O l s e n , G. A . , 3 3

Page 289: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

272 AUTHOR INDEX

Osser, H . , 1 5 , 2 5 , 29-30

P

P i c k , A . , 25 , 29-30 P o d g o r n y , P., 1 3 1 P o l l a t s e k , A . , ix P o s t m a n , L . , 6 , 24 , 27-28, 131-132 P y l e s , T. , 32

R

R e d e r , L. M . , 5 8 , 67 Reed , A. V., 7 5 , 1 0 5 R e i c h e r , G. M., 6 , 6 2 R u b e n s t e i n , H . , 29-30 R u b e n s t e i n , M . A . , 29-30 Ruddy, M . G., 74

S

S a v i n , H. B . , 27-28 S c h i f f , W., 15 S c h m u l l e r , J., 7 , 1 7 , 1 9 , 43 S c h o l z , R. , 7 4 , 77-78 S c h u l z , R. W., 25-26 S c h v a n d e v e l d t , R. W . , 74 S e l f r i d g e , 0. G., 1 4 Shannon , C. E., 6 , 24 S h a p i r o , R . G., 7, 47 S h e b i l s k e , W. , 3 S h e p a r d , R. N., 1 3 1 S h u r c l i f f , A . , 25-26, 29-30, 132 S idman , M., 47 S k a a r , E., 6 2 S m i t h , E. E., 4 , 29-30, 5 8 , 6 7 , 132 S m i t h , J., 15 Solomon, R. L . , 27-28, 1 3 1 S o l s o , R. L., 27 S p e n c e r , H . , 11-13 S p o e h r , R. T., 132 S p r a g i n s , A. B., 2 4 S p r e e n , O., 26 S t r e e t e r , L. A . , 27-28 S w e t s , J. A . , 1 7

Page 290: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

AUTHOR I N D E X

T

27 3

T a y l o r , G . A . , 26, 38-47 , 57-58, 68 , 9 3 , 1 0 5 , 1 3 1 , 2 4 8

T h o m p s o n , M . C . , 6, 57-58 , 6 2 T h o r n d i k e , L. L . , 2 5 T h u r s t o n , I . , 6 2 T i n k e r , M. A . , 11 T o w n s e n d , J. T . , 15 T o p p e r , G . E . , 27 T r a v e r s , J . R . , 1 2 7 - 1 2 8 , 1 3 1 T r e s s e l t , M. E . , 26, 48, 9 1 T u l v i n g , E . , 6 T u r v e y , M . T . , 56 T z e n g , 0. J . L . , 2 9

U

U n d e r w o o d , 8. J . , 25-26

V

V a c h e k , J . , 3 3 V e n e z k y , R . L . , 26, 29, 31, 33 , 35 , 38-47, 57-58, 9 6

W

W a l l a c h , M . A . , 24 Wang, W. S-Y., 2 9 W h e e l e r , D. D . , 6, 6 2 W h o r f , B . L . , 35 Wol in , B. R . , 26 W o o d w o r t h , R. S., 3

Y

Yonas, A . , 25-26, 29-30, 1 3 2

Page 291: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

This page intentionally left blank

Page 292: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

Subject Index

A

a c c u r a c y t a s k , 40 ,47 -48 , 56-61, 246-247 a n a g r a m , 3 8 a w a r e n e s s , 81

B

b i g r a m , 25-29 b i g r a m c o u n t s ,

c

c a t c h t r i a l , 39 c l a s s r o o m p r a c t

60-244

c e , 779 c o n f u s i o n m a t r i c e s , 14-15 c o n s o n a n t s p e l l i n g , 31-32

D

d e c i s i o n , 17-18 , 5 6 , 57 d ' m e a s u r e , 17-18

E

E n g l i s h n e s s , 127-128 e n v e l o p e , 15-16, 1 9

275

Page 293: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

276 S U B J E C T I N D E X

F

f e a t u r e a n a l y s i s , 2 , 13-14 f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n , 3-4 , 19-21 f e a t u r e d e t e c t i o n s t r a t e g y , 43-46, 6 8 , 71-73 f e a t u r e s , 3 , 5 , 1 4 , 14 -21 f o u r i e r a n a l y s i s , 1 9 f r e q u e n c y s c a l e , 130-132 f u l l r e p o r t , 6 , 24-25

G

g e n e r a t e d a b s t r a c t memory, 8

H

h i g h s p a t i a l f r e q u e n c i e s , 1 9 homophones , 3 3

i n f o r m a t i o n , 2 , 73-74 i n f o r m a t i o n p r o c e s s i n g m o d e l , 1-8, 55-62, 66-67

K

knowledge , 2 , 74

L

l e g i b i l i t y of t e x t , 11-13 l e t t e r - s o u n d c o r r e s p o n d e n c e s , 29-30 l e x i c o n , 8 l i n g i u s t , 34 long- t e rm memory, 3 , 8 low s p a t i a l f r e q u e n c i e s , 1 9

M

mask ing s t i m u l u s , 6 , 1 5 , 1 7 , 40 memory, 2-3 morpheme i d e n t i t y , 32 morphemic f e a t u r e s , 32-33

Page 294: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

SUBJECT INDEX

N

nonword , 25

277

o r d e r e d a p p r o x i m a t i o n s t o E n g l i s h , 24-25 o r t h o g r a p h i c r e g u l a r i t y , 38 o r t h o g r a p h i c s t r u c t u r e , 2 , 4-9, 23-36 , 245 o v e r t j u d g m e n t s , 81 -90 , 247

P

p a r a l l e l p r o c e s s i n g , 5 , 56 p a i r e d j u d g m e n t s , 81, 87 -89 , 120-123 p e r c e p t u a l r e c o g n i t i o n , 8 p e r c e p t u a l u n i t , 5 p e r i p h e r a l v i s i o n , 1 3 , 1 5 , 1 9 p h o n o l o g i c a l c o n s t r a i n t s , 30-31 p h o n o l o g i c a l l y - b a s e d d e s c r i p t i o n s , 29-30 p o s i t i o n - i n s e n s i t i v e m e a s u r e , 1 3 2 p o s i t i o n - s e n s i t i v e m e a s u r e , 132 p o s t c u e , 47-48, 62-66 p r e c u e , 47-48 , 62-66 p r e p e r c e p t u a l v i s u a l s t o r a g e , 3-4, 56 p r i m a r y r e c o g n i t i o n , 4-5, 7 -8 , 56 p r i m i n g , 74 p r o c e s s , 2-3 p r o c e s s i n g t ime, 1 4 p s e u d o w o r d s , 24 , 82-85 , 115 p s y c h o l o g i s t s , 34

R

r a t i n g s , 81, 81 -87 , 113-119 r e a c t i o n - t i m e t a s k , 37-38 , 47-48 , 68-61 , 246-247 r e a d i n g , 1-2 r e a d i n g i n s t r u c t i o n , 1 - 2 , 247-248 r e c o d i n g , 8 r e d u n d a n c y , 6 r e h e a r s a l , 8 R e i c h e r - W h e e l e r p a r a d i g m , 6-7 , 40 r u l e - b a s e d d e s c r i p t i o n , 23-24 , 30-36, 3 8 , 9 6 , 1 2 9 , 247 r u l e - g o v e r n e d r e g u l a r i t y , 23-24, 30-36, 38 , 9 6 , 1 2 9 , 247

Page 295: Letter and Word Perception: Orthographic Structure and Visual Processing in Reading

278 SUBJECT INDEX

S

s a c c a d e s , 3 s c r i b a l c o n s t r a i n t s , 31-32 s e c o n d a r y r e c o g n i t i o n , 4 , 8 s h o r t- t e rm memo r y , 7-8 s i m i l a r i t y , 43-46 , 51-54 , 64-65, 72-73 s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y , 3 7 , 48 s i n g l e - l e t t e r p o s i t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y c o u n t s , 149-159 s p e e d - a c c u r a c y p a r a d i g m , 7 5 s p e e d e d RT t a s k , 75-82 s t a g e o f p r o c e s s i n g , 2-3 s t a t i s t i c a l r e d u n d a n c y , 23-29, 247 s t i m u l u s items, 97-98, 143-148 summed c o u n t s , 37 s y n t h e s i z e d v i s u a l memory, 8 , 56

T

t a r g e t l e t t e r , 37-39 t a r g e t s e a r c h t a s k , 3 7 , 37-81 t a r g e t t r i a l , 39 t e m p l a t e , 1 4 t e s t s t r i n g , 37-39 t o k e n c o u n t , 27-28, 128-130 t r i g ram , 27 t y p e c o u n t , 27-28, 128-130

V

vowel s p e l l i n g s , 31-32

w

word f r e q u e n c y , 1 4 1 word r e c o g n i t i o n , 1 -2 , 4