leveraging biological robustness to improve engineered systems

32
Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems Michael Mayo, PhD Research Physicist Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Team Environmental Laboratory US Army Engineer Research & Development Center (ERDC) VCU Computer Science Department 9 October 2012

Upload: nasia

Post on 13-Feb-2016

46 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems. Michael Mayo, PhD. Research Physicist Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Team Environmental Laboratory US Army Engineer Research & Development Center (ERDC) VCU Computer Science Department 9 October 2012. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Michael Mayo, PhDResearch Physicist

Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology TeamEnvironmental Laboratory

US Army Engineer Research & Development Center (ERDC)

VCU Computer Science Department9 October 2012

Page 2: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Robustness“The behavior of a system is termed robust if that behavior is qualitatively normal in the face of substantial changes to the system components.”J.W. Little et al., EMBO J. 18, 4299 (1999).

“…the preservation of particular characteristics despite uncertainty in system components.”M.E. Csets and J.C. Doyle Science 295, 1664 (2002).

“…biological circuits are not fine-tuned to exercise their functions only for precise values of their biochemical parameters. Instead, they must be able to function under a range of different parameters.”A. Wagner Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 11775 (2005).

Page 3: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Example – Circadian oscillatorR = mRNA concentration (transcription)P = protein concentration (translation)P’ = post-translational modification (dimerization/phosphorylation)

A. Wagner Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 11775 (2005).

P = fraction of parameter space that yield oscillating solutions.

“Changing parameters at random in a topology with high P is more likely to yield a parameter combination leading to circadian oscillations than in a topology with low P.”

Main Result

In certain topologies, oscillations robust against parameter fluctuations.

Page 4: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Why use mathematical modeling?• Translates the problem into unambiguous language of mathematics.

• Mathematical model is a laboratory to conduct simulated experiments, where it is too expensive or otherwise unethical to acquire experimental data.

• Hypotheses or other “scenarios” (like oscillator topology) can be tested or assessed more easily and rapidly.Drawback: Models are only as good as what go into them.

Page 5: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Case StudyMammalian Gas-

Exchange

Page 6: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Case Study: Mammalian gas-exchange

Branching point at which velocity from convection = 0.

Page 7: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Case Study: Mammalian gas-exchangeM. Mayo et al., Phys. Rev. E 85, 011115 (2012).

Page 8: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Case Study: Mammalian gas-exchangeCayley tree:

Root

Leaves/canopyUsing conservation principles, solve for current entering branch, across the branching point.

Main Idea

M. Mayo et al., Phys. Rev. E 85, 011115 (2012).

Page 9: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Case Study: Mammalian gas-exchangeCurrent into the tree

2r = diameter of branchD = diffusion coefficient of O2 in airC0 = concentration of O2 at entrance to acinar airwaysm = number of branching at each branch point (m=2 in lungs)n = depth of tree/orders of branching pointsL = length of a branchΛ = D/W = exploration length

Page 10: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Case Study: Mammalian gas-exchangeCurrent into the tree

M. M

ayo

et a

l., P

hys.

Rev

. E 8

5, 0

1111

5 (2

012)

.

Page 11: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Case Study: Mammalian gas-exchangeDiffusional screening and current plateaus

M. M

ayo

et a

l., P

hys.

Rev

. E 8

5, 0

1111

5 (2

012)

.

J.S A

ndra

de, J

r. et

al.,

Eur

ophy

s. L

ett.

55, 5

73 (2

001)

.

Page 12: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Case Study: Mammalian gas-exchangeExperimental validation of model predictions

M. Mayo, P. Pfeifer, and C. Hou*. 2012. Reverse engineering the robustness of mammalian lung. Reverse Engineering, ed. A.C. Telea. InTech Publisher, Boston, pp.243-262

Page 13: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Summary• Competition between the O2 transport across the alveolar membranes and its screening from surface sites generates plateaus.

• Plateaus represent regions of maximum insensitivity (i.e. robustness) of the O2 current to “changes” in the Thiele modulus (i.e. changes to D or W, or both).

• Plateaus emerge independent of any feedback loop.

• Experimental values for current lie in the plateau, but next to the “no screening” (NS) regime, providing flexibility of the O2 current to moderate surface “damage.”

Page 14: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Case StudyTeleost Reproductive

Axis

Page 15: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Gonadal (HPG) axis – synthesis and regulation of reproductive the hormones 17β-estradiol (E2) and testosterone (T).

http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/fishboat/fish/images/inland_species/fathead1.jpg

Ovary

Hypothalamus-Pituitary

Liver

FSH/LH

E2/T

VTG

Fecundity

Chemical

Time

Popu

latio

n

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Case Study: Teleost Reproductive Axis

Page 16: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Case Study: Teleost Reproductive Axis

G.T. Ankley et al., Aquat. Toxicol. 92, 168 (2009).

Page 17: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

D.L. Villeneuve et al., Environ. Health Perspect.117, 624 (2009).

Control 2 10 50Fadrozole (ng/ml)

G. Ankley et al., Toxicol. Sci. 67, 121 (2002).

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

THECA

GRANULOSA

T. Habib, M. Mayo, E.J. Perkins et al., (in preparation).

Network inference reveals that Androgen Receptor regulation may lead to compensation of E2 in lower doses.

Page 18: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Case Study: Teleost Reproductive AxisThe conceptual and mathematical model

Built from equations of the type:

outin JJxdtd

][

Creation flux

Elimination flux(i.e. turnover, degradation etc)

M. Mayo et al., (in preparation)

Page 19: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Case Study: Teleost Reproductive AxisM

. May

o et

al.,

(in

prep

arat

ion)

Page 20: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Case Study: Teleost Reproductive AxisMathematical model: relative error to parameter variation

M. Mayo et al., (in preparation)

Page 21: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Case Study: Teleost Reproductive AxisMathematical model: predictive capability

nK/][11~

FAD

K=19.53 nMn=1.75

M. M

ayo

et a

l., (i

n pr

epar

atio

n)

Page 22: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Summary•Relative error analysis reveals that only a few components of HPG axis are “fragile,” but these fragilities are at critical regulation points of the network (i.e. cholesterol transport).

• Compensation arises from feedback through androgen receptor complex, which activates key steroidogenic genes.

• Competition between aromatase creation and sequestration results in long-term robustness of E2 profile when these effects are balanced.

Page 23: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Case StudyCoupling Among Motifs

in Transcriptional Networks

Page 24: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Case Study: Motif Coupling in Gene Networks

R. Milo et al., Science 298, 824 (2002). S. Mangan and U. Alon, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 21, 11980 (2003).

Feed-forward loops are one of the most common three-node motifs, but mostly only studied before in isolation.

Page 25: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Case Study: Motif Coupling in Gene Networks

Sparse connectivity Maximally coupled

Null model

Each link can act as either an activator or an inhibitor of transcriptional activity.

Other work in progress demonstrates that transcription factors play the role of nodes 1,2,4 and 5 justifying the study of coupling among the TFs only.

Page 26: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Case Study: Motif Coupling in Gene NetworksMathematical model

][

/][1

/][

/][11][ deg

ii

j

njij

j

njij

j

njij

ii xkKa

Ka

KrVx

dtd

repressionactivation

Affinity of inhibitor (activator) to repress (induce) transcriptional activity

Degradation rateMaximum transcriptional activity

Parameter space will be searched using a log-uniform distribution with sufficient point density

Page 27: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Case Study: Motif Coupling in Gene Networks

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Experimental design

Black line

Blue lineTiming is measured and correlated with network topology

Page 28: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Case Study: Motif Coupling in Gene Networks

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Experimental designhttp://openwetware.org/wiki/Biomolecular_Breadboards

Feed-forward loops will be constructed experimentally to determine the primary variables that control correlations between robustness and topology.

Page 29: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Connection with Engineered Systems

Page 30: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

http://nice.che.rpi.edu/Research/fuel_cells.htmS. Kjelstrup, M.-O. Coppens, J. G. Phaoroah, and P. Pfeifer, Energy Fuels 24, 5097 (2010).

Page 31: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

AcknowledgementsCase Study: Mammalian gas-exchangeStefan Gheorghiu – Center for Complexity Studies, Bucharest Romania.Peter Pfeifer – Chair and Professor of Physics, University of Missouri.Chen Hou – Associate Professor, Missouri University of Science & Technology.Case Study: Teleost Reproductive AxisEd Perkins – Senior Scientist, Environmental Laboratory ERDC.Karen Watanabe – Associate Professor, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU).Natalia Garcia-Reyero – Associate Research Professor, Mississippi State University.Tanwir Habib – Staff Scientist, Badger Technical Services.Dan Villeneuve – Research Biologist, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Gary Ankley – Senior Scientist, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Case Study: Coupling Among Motifs and Transcriptional NetowrksPreetam Ghosh – Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science, VCU.Vijender Chaitankar, Ahmed Abdelzaher, Bhanu Kishore– Department of Computer Science, VCU.

Page 32: Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Leveraging Biological Robustness to Improve Engineered Systems

Blank