"leveraging test data to enhance quality and yield for 2.5d/3d manufacturing"

10
Leveraging Test Data to Enhance Quality and Yield to Ensure Cost Effective Execution for 2.5D/3D (3D-IC) Manufacturing Yaacov De Russo, Director of Business Development, Optimal+

Upload: optimalplus

Post on 29-Jul-2015

1.180 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: "Leveraging Test Data to Enhance Quality and Yield for 2.5D/3D Manufacturing"

Leveraging Test Data to Enhance Quality and Yield to Ensure Cost

Effective Execution for 2.5D/3D (3D-IC) Manufacturing

Yaacov De Russo, Director of Business Development, Optimal+

Page 2: "Leveraging Test Data to Enhance Quality and Yield for 2.5D/3D Manufacturing"

3D-IC Cost, Quality & Yield on Multiple Fronts

Process Technology

• Improve TSV

process

• Improve bonding

• Improve wafer

thinning

• Reduce process

costs

Design & Testability

• EDA for 3D-IC

• DFT / DFR

• BIST

• KGD/I/S

• Repair &

Redundancy

ATE

• Increase utilization

• Test time reduction

• Higher site count

• Reduce CapEx per

site

Test Data

• New test insertions

• Tight quality grade

• Screening & Pairing

• Cross supply-chain

correlation

• Internal & External

suppliers

• Traceability

• Online action

Source: IMEC 2013

Page 3: "Leveraging Test Data to Enhance Quality and Yield for 2.5D/3D Manufacturing"

Infrastructure For Leveraging 3D-IC Test Data

Wafers Test SLT RMA

E-Test S1 S2 FT1 FT2 SLT

Parametric Data

Test “Metadata”

Virtual Test Data

Facility/Area

Test Operation

Au

gm

en

ted

Data

Data integration

Correlate, Predict, Improve

A comprehensive & integrated data infrastructure is needed to

enhance 3D-IC yield, quality and cost performance

Page 4: "Leveraging Test Data to Enhance Quality and Yield for 2.5D/3D Manufacturing"

Is “Good Die” Good Enough For 3D-IC ?

• Yield of each Die/Component has critical impact on 3D-IC compound yield

• However, it is not fully maximized because important data is not leveraged!

Missing attributed data Augmented data

• Parametric data is not enough!

• Test “metadata”: Wafer geography, tester variation, repair, re-test, setup configuration..

• Virtual Test (non native tests)

Limited integration of data Limits the ability to correlate between operations

• Different operations => test tools, data structure

• Distinct facilities/areas => data transfer

• Different/External suppliers => raw data visibility, formats, structure, availability

Traditional pass/fail binning fails to reflect the underlying “grey” of die quality

• Distribution of parametric and metadata values

• Quality Index to grade good die: based on cross-operation, cross-data correlation

Page 5: "Leveraging Test Data to Enhance Quality and Yield for 2.5D/3D Manufacturing"

Multiple “Good” Dice can create problematic combinations: Stack Failure

and/or Performance

• Bin-1 Dice may not be good enough! Bin-1 on a Grayscale is needed.

• Dice incompatibility within specific Parameter

• Dice incompatibility between Parameters and Augmented test data

• Dice interdependencies correlation

• Dice pairing not fully Optimal

Repair rate

X+Y+Z

Tool variations

Tester

Var

Geography

GDBN

Leakage

Power

Speed

Good Dice Good 3D-IC Stack ?

Para

metr

ic T

est

Data

Test

Meta

data

Vir

tual Test

Data

Page 6: "Leveraging Test Data to Enhance Quality and Yield for 2.5D/3D Manufacturing"

Advanced Analysis & Execution

• Comprehensive:

• Cross-Area / Operation

• Die / Component

• Parameters / Augmented data

• Adaptive algorithms for

Screening and Pairing

• Real-Time / Online action

• Bin Grade

• Bin Switch

Repair rate

X+Y+Z

Tool variations

Tester

Var

Geography

GDBN

Leakage

Power

Speed

Good Dice Good 3D-IC Stack ? (cont.)

Para

metr

ic T

est

Data

Test

Meta

data

Vir

tual Test

Data

Page 7: "Leveraging Test Data to Enhance Quality and Yield for 2.5D/3D Manufacturing"

Optimal+ 3D-IC Example

A three way correlation analysis between die performance, package and die

wafer history (DNA), so we can predict the package performance prior to stacking

based on the dice DNA

Correlate C

orr

ela

te

Die

3D-IC Package

Page 8: "Leveraging Test Data to Enhance Quality and Yield for 2.5D/3D Manufacturing"

3D-IC Quality Management Challenge

Requires traceability of every component

– ID and process history

• Not every component has ID

– External supplier (heterogeneous) traceability is a challenge

Requires end-to-end data integration

– Closed loop for root cause analysis, operational monitoring and actions

– RMA and Recall management to the die level

– Quality accountability

Requires integration platform

– Test data infrastructure

– Business processes allowing necessary visibility between 3D-IC supply-chain parties

– A neutral party facilitating 3D-IC test data integration and execution

Page 9: "Leveraging Test Data to Enhance Quality and Yield for 2.5D/3D Manufacturing"

Summary

Augmented Test Data and Cross-Area/Operation infrastructure are

being leveraged to maximize Quality and Yield for 3D-IC manufacturing

• Enhanced Screening of “good” Die

• Enhanced Pairing of “good” Dice

• Quality management: RMA, Recall, Accountability

A supply-chain Integration Platform is necessary to comprehend and

leverage 3D-IC test data

Page 10: "Leveraging Test Data to Enhance Quality and Yield for 2.5D/3D Manufacturing"

Thank You!

For more information please visit www.optimalplus.com