life cycle assessment of universitybuildings case studies
TRANSCRIPT
Life Cycle Assessment of University Buildings Case Studies in NTU, SingaporeEnergy Smart, Research & Innovation.
1
Prof Justin Dauwels Ms Priyanka Mehta Mr Shi WenyongMr Chang Chia Chien
Team members:Energy Research Institute @ NTU (ERI@N)1 CleanTech Loop, #06-04 CleanTech One, Singapore 637141Phone: (65) 6592 1786 / 2468 Fax: (65) 6694 6217
* Contents
• NTU Embodied Energy Study• Background Information• Scopes andmethodology
• Results and Findings• Overall material embodied energyresults• Case study on Prefabricated Prevolumetric Volumetric
Construction (PPVC) steel and wooden buildings• Case study on a low energy tropical building
2
1. Product Stage
Life Cycle of Buildings
2. Construction Stage
3. Use Stage
4. End of LifeStageOperational
Energy3
Building life cycle energy is the energy required for the whole life cycle of the building
4
Embodied Energy (EE) vs Operational Energy(OE)
Percentage of EE increases with improved OE efficiency Source: P. Chastas et al. / Building and Environment 105 (2016) 267-282
5
Source: M. Cellura et al. / Energy and Buildings 72 (2014)
Cold climate: Lower Embodied Energy
Hot climate: Higher Embodied Energy
Embodied Energy (EE) vs Operational Energy(OE)
Scopes, methodologies and data sources
6
7
Embodied Energy Study Scopes
Roof
Ceilings
Floors
External Walls
Windows
Internal Walls
8*Excluding foundation, doors, furniture and other minor building materials.
Superstructure is the part of the building above the ground levelExamples:
Study Scope: Superstructure
*
Building Information Modelling (BIM)
9
Material Embodied
Energy/ Embodied
Carbon
MaterialQuantity
Embodied Energy/ Carbon
Coefficients
10
Methodologies and Data Sources
Results and findings
11
Case Study 1:
NTU 22 Case Study Buildings
12
13
Study Scopes include:
• 22 academic buildings (Excluding residential halls)• Only structural system• All life cycle stages• 3 main building materials like concrete, steel and glass• Other building materials like plaster, wood, aluminium
Study Scopes
*
*Accurate as of 24 April 2019
Material6%
Construction0.3%
Transportation1%
Operational90%
Maintenance2.4%
End of Life0.3%
Based on a 40 year lifetime
Average Life Cycle Energy: 12,210 kWh/m2
Average Operational Energy: 11,033 kWh/ m2
Average Embodied Energy: 1177 kWh/ m2
14
* Units are in kWh per Gross Floor Area (GFA)
Overall Results
Material Embodied Energy (EE) (kWh/m2.yr)
*Accurate as of 24 April 201915
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
NTU Buildings
Concrete, Steel and Glass Other materials
Percentage Breakdown of Embodied Energy (EE)
*Accurate as of 24 April 201916
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Material Construction Transportation Maintenance End of Life
*Accurate as of 24 April 201917
Academic Buildings (Operational Energy)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Energy (k
Wh/m
2 . year
)
NTU Buildings
Case Study 2:
NTU PPVC and Wood Buildings
Special Construction Method
18
Steel vs Concrete Timber vs Concrete
19
NTU Nanyang Crescent Halls (Student Residential Halls)
Material: Steel PPVC
NTU Wave Sports Hall
Material: Laminated Timber
Non-conventional Building Materials
20
Prefabricated Prefinished Volumetric Construction
21
22
Benefits and disadvantages of using PPVC
Benefits• Reduce construction time• Minimize noise and dust • Better safety for workers • Greater sustainability (Example: Use of green concrete)
Disadvantages• Require different moulds for different PPVC modules• Transportation: Limited numbers of module per trip• Require storage space for module
Source: https://surbanajurong.com/wp‐content/uploads/2018/08/1.‐PPVC‐Final‐.pdf
Building Material EE in kWh/m2
Without steel recyclingBuilding Material EE in kWh/m2
With steel recycling
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Steel PPVC RC PPVC0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Steel PPVC RC PPVC
*Accurate as of 24 April 201923*RC PPVC contains reinforcement steel
Steel PPVC vs Reinforced Concrete (RC) PPVC
Steel PPVC has lower material embodied energy (Material EE) than RC PPVC when considering recycling
*
86%
14%
Life Cycle Energy (Steel PPVC)
Operational Energy Embodied Energy
83%
17%
Life Cycle Energy (RC PPVC)
Operational Energy Embodied Energy
*Accurate as of 24 April 201924
Steel PPVC vs Reinforced Concrete (RC) PPVC
Building life cycle energy is the energy required for the whole life cycle of the building
25
Timber vs Concrete
NTU Wave Sports Hall
Material: Laminated Timber
NTU Old Sports Hall
Material: Concrete and Brick/Mortar
26
Wood
Laminated Timber Softwood
27
Mainly include • non-renewable fossil fuel consumption• renewable biomass (especially for wood)• non-renewable nuclear• renewable solar/wind/water/geothermal
* For biomass energy, based on UK Inventory Carbon of Energy and Alice et al., energy from biomass could be excluded from EE calculation.
Primary energy of material
*
*Accurate as of 24 April 201928
Source: From various Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) of material, UK Inventory Carbon of Energy
*Primary energy only considered the material stage
EE of Laminated Timber is slightly higher than of concrete
*
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
NTU Timber Sports Hall NTU Concrete Sports Hall
Material Embodied Energy per m2 (kWh/m2)
Concrete Steel Glass Wood Brick and Mortar
*Accurate as of 24 April 201929
Timber vs Concrete
*
30
Benefits of using Wood • Fast installation and construction time (Mass Engineered Timber)
• Better insulator for energy efficiency (than steel/plastic)
• Less waste produced during production and deconstruction
• Waste water production is lower during manufacturing
• Design versatility
Case Study 3:
NTU Low Energy Building (NTU Academic Building North)
31
NTU Academic Building North
32
Study Scopes:
1. Structural System2. Finishes3. Heating, Ventilation
and Air Conditioning System (HVAC)
4. Lighting System5. Plumbing System 6. Fire Sprinkler
System
*
*Accurate as of 24 April 2019
24%
1%3%
61%
9%2%
Material Construction Transportation Operational Maintenance End of Life
33
Overall Life Cycle Energy Breakdown
Material and maintenance EE are the top 2 contributors of EE
*
*Accurate as of 24 April 201934
Material and MaintenanceEmbodied Energy Breakdown
Structural 62%
Finishes21%
HVAC12%
Lighting4%
Plumbing0.5%
Fire Sprinkler0.5%
• Embodied Energy (EE) forms a sizeable percentage of the overall life cycle energy of buildings
• The percentage of EE in tropical buildings and low energy buildings are relatively higher.
• More future EE studies should focus on other types of buildings like residential and commercial buildings.
35
Conclusion
Energy Research Institute @ NTU (ERI@N)1 CleanTech Loop, #06-04 CleanTech One, Singapore 637141Phone: (65) 6592 1786 / 2468 Fax: (65) 6694 6217
For further information please contact:Executive-Director ERI@NEmail: [email protected]
http://erian.ntu.edu.sgThank you!
36