ligo observational results
TRANSCRIPT
LIGOG06019900Z
LIGO Observational Results
Patrick BradyUniversity of WisconsinMilwaukee
on behalf of
LIGO Scientific Collaboration
08/30/2006 TEV II, August 2006 2LIGOG06019900Z
LIGO Science Goals Direct verification of two dramatic predictions of
Einstein’s general relativity: gravitational waves & black holes
Physics & Astronomy– Detailed tests of properties of gravitational waves
including speed, polarization, graviton mass, .....– Probe strong field gravity near black holes & in early
universe– Probe the neutron star equation of state– Performing routine astronomical observations
LIGO provides a new window on the Universe
08/30/2006 TEV II, August 2006 3LIGOG06019900Z
Astrophysical Sources of Gravitational Waves
Bursts– Supernovae: Neutron star birth,
tumbling and/or convection– Cosmic strings, black hole
mergers, .....– Coincident EM observations– Surprises!
Stochastic background– Big bang & early universe– Background of gravitational
wave bursts
08/30/2006 TEV II, August 2006 4LIGOG06019900Z
Search Method: Timefrequency decompositions
Noise event: triggers and spectrogram
Simulated injection in hardware
Requires coincidence between at leasttwo interferometers & detailed examinationof instrumental & environmental behavior
08/30/2006 TEV II, August 2006 5LIGOG06019900Z
Detection Efficiency Evaluate efficiency by adding simulated GW
bursts to the data.– Example waveform
Central Frequency
Dete
ctio
n Ef
ficie
ncy
S4
S5 sensitivity: minimum detectable in band energy in GW– EGW > 1 M
⊙ @ 75 Mpc
– EGW > 0.05 M⊙ @ 15 Mpc (Virgo cluster)
08/30/2006 TEV II, August 2006 6LIGOG06019900Z
S2
S1
S4 projected
Excluded 90% CL
S5 projected
Rate
Lim
it (e
vent
s/da
y)
Upper Limits No GW bursts detected through S4
– set limit on rate vs signal strength.
Lower amplitude limits from lower detector noise
Lower rate limits from
longer observation
times
08/30/2006 TEV II, August 2006 7LIGOG06019900Z
Triggered Searches Follow up astronomical triggers, particularly gammaray
bursts54 GRB
tests
S2/S3/S4 result
– Compare results with time shift background estimate
No loud signals seen Look for cumulative effect
– Use binomial test to compare to uniform distribution
No significant difference from expectation
08/30/2006 TEV II, August 2006 8LIGOG06019900Z
Astrophysical Sources of Gravitational Waves
Bursts– Neutron star birth, tumbling
and/or convection– Cosmic strings, black hole
mergers, .....– Coincident EM observations– Surprises!
Stochastic background– Big bang & early universe– Background of gravitational
wave bursts
08/30/2006 TEV II, August 2006 9LIGOG06019900Z
Signals from the Early Universe
cosmic gravitationalwave background (1022s)
cosmic microwave background (10+12s)
Cosmological GWs in the LIGO band (100 Hz) today were produced 1022s after the big bang.
Their detection would be very interesting!
08/30/2006 TEV II, August 2006 10LIGOG06019900Z
Y = df -
x 1*(f) g(f)WGW(f)
N f 3P1(f)P2(f) x 2(f)
Procedure
detector noise spectra
Test ΩGW(f) = Ωα(f/100Hz)α. Most sensitivity from 50150 Hz band (LHOLLO).
“Overlap Reduction Function”(determined by network geometry)
frequency (Hz)
γ(f)
Search: crosscorrelate datastreams x1, x2. Optimal
statistic Y for allsky search is:
08/30/2006 TEV II, August 2006 11LIGOG06019900Z
16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2 4 6 8
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Log (f [Hz])
Log(Ω
0)
18 10
Inflation
Slowroll
Cosmic strings
Prebig bang model
EW or SUSY Phase transition
Cyclic model
CMB
PulsarTiming
BB Nucleosynthesis
Initial LIGO, 1 yr dataExpected Sensitivity
~ 4x106
Advanced LIGO, 1 yr dataExpected Sensitivity
~ 1x109
LIGO S1: Ω0 < 44
PRD 69 122004 (2004)
LIGO S3: Ω0 < 8.4x104
PRL 95 221101 (2005)
Predictions and Limits
H0 = 72 km/s/Mpc
08/30/2006 TEV II, August 2006 12LIGOG06019900Z
Astrophysical sources of gravitational waves
Compact binaries– Black holes & neutron stars– Inspiral and merger– Probe internal structure,
populations, & spacetime geometry Spinning neutron stars
– Isolated neutron stars with mountains or wobbles
– Lowmass xray binaries– Probe internal structure and
populations
08/30/2006 TEV II, August 2006 13LIGOG06019900Z
Gravitational waves from compact binaries
LIGO is sensitive to gravitational waves from binary systems with neutron stars & black holes– Waveforms depend on masses and spins.
08/30/2006 TEV II, August 2006 14LIGOG06019900Z
Target Sources
0.1 1 3 10
0.1
Component Mass, M⊙
1
3
10
Com
pone
nt M
ass,
M⊙
PBHS2 – S5
BNS S1 – S5
BBH: S2 – S5Ringdown: S4 – S5
Coincidence with burst search
NS/BHspin important
S3 – S5
Binary Black Hole– Theory estimates
upper bound of 1/year for LIGO during S5
Binary Neutron Star– Theory estimates
upper bound of 1/3 year for LIGO during S5
08/30/2006 TEV II, August 2006 15LIGOG06019900Z
Binary Neutron Starscu
mul
ative
num
ber o
f eve
nts
signaltonoise ratio squared
S2 Observational Result
Phys. Rev. D. 72, 082001 (2005)
S3 search complete– Under internal review– 0.09 yr of data– ~3 MilkyWay like
galaxies S4 search complete
– Under internal review– 0.05 yr of data– ~24 MilkyWay like
galaxies
Rate < 47 per year perMilkyWaylike galaxy;
0.04 yr data, 1.27 MilkyWays
08/30/2006 TEV II, August 2006 16LIGOG06019900Z
Horizon distance– Distance to 1.4+1.4 Msun
optimally oriented & located binary at SNR=8
Binary Neutron StarsS5 Search
First three months of S5 data is analyzed
S2 Horizon Distance
1.5 Mpc
H1: 25 Mpc
L1: 21 Mpc
H2: 10 Mpc
08/30/2006 TEV II, August 2006 17LIGOG06019900Z
Binary Black Holes
signaltonoise ratio squared
Rate < 38 per year perMilkyWaylike galaxy
S2 Observational Result
Phys. Rev. D. 73, 062001 (2006)
S3 search complete– Under internal review– 0.09 yr of data– 5 MilkyWay like galaxies
for 5+5 Msuns S4 search complete
– Under internal review– 0.05 yr of data– 150 MilkyWay like
galaxies for 5+5 Msuns
Log|
cum
. no.
of e
vent
s |
08/30/2006 TEV II, August 2006 18LIGOG06019900Z
Binary Black HolesS5 Search
Image: R. Powell
binary black holehorizon distance
3 months of S5 analyzed Horizon distance versus
mass for BBHAverage over run
130Mpc
1 sigma variation
binary neutron star horizon distance
08/30/2006 TEV II, August 2006 19LIGOG06019900Z
Astrophysical sources of gravitational waves
Compact binaries– Black holes & neutron stars– Inspiral and merger– Probe internal structure,
populations, & spacetime geometry Spinning neutron stars
– Isolated neutron stars with mountains or wobbles
– Lowmass xray binaries– Probe internal structure and
populations
04/11/2006 APS Meeting, April 2006 20LIGOG06019900Z
Search for waves from known pulsars
S2 Results reported inPhysical Review Letters 94 181103 (2005)
Pulsars for which the ephemeris is known from EM observations
In S2– 28 known isolated
pulsars targeted Spindown limit
– assume all angular momentum radiated to GW
Frequency (Hz)Gra
vitat
iona
lwav
e am
plitu
de
~2x1024
04/11/2006 APS Meeting, April 2006 21LIGOG06019900Z
Known pulsarsS5 preliminary
32 known isolated, 44 in binaries, 30 in globular clusters
Lowest ellipticity upper limit:PSR J21243358
(fgw = 405.6Hz, r = 0.25kpc) ellipticity = 4.0x107
Frequency (Hz)
Gra
vitat
iona
lwav
e am
plitu
de
~2x1025
04/11/2006 APS Meeting, April 2006 22LIGOG06019900Z
Einstein@Home Matchedfiltering for
continuous GWs Allsky, allfrequency
search is computationally limited
Aiming at detection, not upper limits
Public outreach distributed computing
To participate, sign up at http://www.physics2005.org
S3 results:– No evidence of pulsars
S4 search– Postprocessing underway
04/11/2006 APS Meeting, April 2006 23LIGOG06019900Z
Conclusions LIGO results are starting
to come out Have presented only a
few results in this talk Other ongoing activities:
– Stochastic: directional search, suppressing correlated noise for H1H2; S4 L1ALLEGRO (bar detector) search
Continuous waves: known pulsars in xray binaries; deep area searches; coherent longtime searches
Compact binaries: ringdown searches; inspiralmergerringdown; shorthard GRBs.
Bursts: galactic center search; cosmic string search; targeted supernova searches