linnaeus, ashburner, pok é mon
DESCRIPTION
Linnaeus, Ashburner, Pok é mon. Lincoln D. Stein. Gotta Catch ’em All!. Pok é mon, year 2000 $492 million Pok é mon bubble gum & trading cards 10 million Pok é mon video games sold ($3 billion) $3 billion in toys & other merchandise - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Linnaeus, Ashburner, Pokémon
Lincoln D. Stein
Gotta Catch ’em All!
Pokémon, year 2000– $492 million Pokémon bubble gum & trading cards
– 10 million Pokémon video games sold ($3 billion)
– $3 billion in toys & other merchandise
– Pokémon movie tops cartoon movie of all time ($85 million gross first week)
– 13,000 ft2 retail palace in Rockefeller Center
– Weekly “Pokémon Market Report” on Market Place radio broadcast
Source: The Internet
Pokémon Characteristics
Source: Pokemon Database (http://www.edbydesign.com/pokemon/pokedata.html)
249 characters in Pokémon DatabaseName Element Weight Height Techniques Good
AgainstBad Against
Evolution
Pikachu Electric 13 lb 1’4” Thunder Shock, Growel
Water, Flying
Electric, Grass, Dragon
Thunder Stone
Bulbasaur Poison, Grass
20 lb 3’4” Tackel, Growel
Water Fire, Poison, Flying, Dragon
Normal
Jigglypuff Normal 12 lb 1’ 8” Sing Rock Moon Stone
Venomoth Bug, Poison
28 lb 4’ 11” Tackle, Disable, Leech Life
Grass, Psychic, Bug
Ground, Ghost, Flying
Normal
Pokémon Phylogeny
Small size,SingsGood vs none Bad vs rockMoonstone evolution
Large size, Tackles, GrowelsGood vs waterBad vs flying, poison, dragonNormal evolution
Large sizeTackles, DisablesGood vs grass, psychic, bugBad vs ground, ghost, flyingNormal evolution
Small sizeElectricGood vs water, flyingBad vs electric, grass, dragonThunderstone evolution
Why was Pokémon so Popular?
Similar to previous collectibles fads– Beany babies– Cabbage-patch dolls– Baseball cards
Nearly all children go through collection phases– Rocks, bugs, stamps coins
An innate urge to collect & classify?
Hunter Gatherer Societies Hadza of Tanzania Plant species:
– Recognize 240 wild plant species– Utilize ~100
Animal species:– Recognize 280 wild species– Utilize 200 (including 10 species of bee)
Children aid in foraging– Accompany parents from infancy– Begin foraging themselves at age 3
Source: The Internet
The Collection Urge is our Hunter-Gatherer Brains at Work
Biological Classification Classification systems are foundation of biology
– Aristotle (384-322 BC) Scalae naturae of animals» two-footed versus four-footed; hairy versus feathers; with or without
an outer shell
– Threophrastus (370-285 BC), plant classification» Annual vs perennial and biennial life cycles; superior vs. inferior
ovaries; determinate vs. indeterminate; distinct vs. connate petals.
– Herbalists (divers)» Plant classification based on utility
– Carl Linnaeus (1707-1778)» Familiar Kingdom, Phylum, Order… system & binomial naming» 1st edition of Systema Naturae – 1 volume, 150 species» 10th edition of System Naturae – 7 volumes, 12,000 species
Gene Ontology Consortium (Ashburner, 2000)
Gene products classified along 3 dimensions
6728 process terms 5291 function terms 1122 component terms
13,000 total
What Makes a Good Classification System?
Linnaean Classification of Pigs
– Kingdom Animalia» Phylum Chordata» Class Mammalia
ORDER Artiodactyla: Even-toed ungulates – SUBORDER Suiformes: pigs, hippos Family suidae
Sus scrofa – Wild boarSus babyrousa – Indonesian
pigSus hylochoerus – Giant forest
hog….
– SUBORDER Tylopoda: camels, llamas– SUBORDER Ruminantia: ruminants
Borgean Classification of Pigs those that belong to the Emperor embalmed ones those that are trained suckling pigs mermaids fabulous ones stray dogs those that are included in this classification those that tremble as if they were mad innumerable ones those drawn with a very fine camel’s hair brush others those that have just broken a flower vase those that resemble flies from a distance
Source: Jorge Luis Borges, Funes the Memorius
Making a Good Classification System
Good classification systems are– Easy to use– Reproducible– Discriminatory– Natural– Predictive
Easy to Use
How easy is the system to learn? Can intelligent systems be trained to use it? How many characteristics must be gathered
in order to classify? Simple systems easier than complex ones One characteristic easier than multiple
– Protein similarity vs multiple morphological traits
Reproducible
Given several classifiers (human or artificial), how often will they classify the subject in the same way?
Objective criteria better than subjective ones.
Discriminatory
Classification system should divide the space well
How many divisions?– Can keep hundreds of classes in head (children
w/ Pokémon, Hanza w/edible plants)– Thousands with help from record-keeping.
» Systema naturae
» GO
Natural
Natural vs artificial Pokemon characteristics
– “element,” “evolution,” “height,” “weight,” “good against,” “bad against”
Best classification systems reflect nature The act of classifying reveals the true
nature of the subject
Alchemical Classification of Chemicals
Operation Processes Elements Metals Chemical Arcanum
Process Colors
Process Odors
Calcination Roasting; Conflagration; Reduction; Trituration
Fire (Solve)
Lead Sulfuric Acid (Vitriol)
Black; Magenta
Biting; Brim- stone
Dissolution Dissolving; Corrosion; Cibation; Bain Marie
Water (Solve)
Tin (Pewter) Iron Oxide (rust:action of water on metal)
Light blue; White
Acrid; Vinegary
Separation Sifting; Filtration; Fission; Cutting
Air (Solve)
Iron (Steel) Sodium Carbonate (bubbling)
Red; Orange Rotten Eggs
Conjunction Fixation; Reunion; Amalgamation; Conglomeration
Earth (et or conjunct)
Copper; (Bronze; Brass; Gold)
Sodium Nitrate (union with Life Force)
Green Chlorinic
Fermentation Digestion; Putrefaction; Congelation; Ceration
Sulfur (Coagula)
Mercury (Copper)
Liquor Hepatis (Balsam of the Soul)
Blue- green; Turquoise
Putrid/Perfumed at same time
Distillation Potentizing; Exaltation; Cohobation; Multiplication
Mercury (Coagula)
Silver (Mercury; Antimony)
Black Pulvis Solaris
White; Rainbow
Fresh; After rain smell
Coagulation Sublimation; Projection; Fusion
Salt (Coagula)
Gold (Silver) Red Pulvis Solaris
Violet; Purple Flowery;Heavenly scented
Periodic Table
Morphological Classification of Acute Leukemias
Type Cells Nucleus CytoplasmAcute lymphocytic leumeuka
Of varying size
Irregular, nonhomo-geneous, prominent nucleoli
Scanty, moderately basophilic
Acute myelocytic
leukemia
Large, regular Round to kidney shaped
Scanty, scattered granules and occ. Auer rods
Immunophenotype of Acute Leukemias
Type CD13 HLA-DR
CD5 Ig
Acute lymphocytic leumeuka
B Cell
Subtype - - - +T Cell Subtype - - + -
Acute myelocytic
leukemia+ + - -
Predictive
There are two types of people, those who classify people into two types, and those who don’t.
Classification system should be predictive. Categorize object by one set of criteria
– Does it share other common properties with its group?
Periodic Table
Evaluating Classification Schemes Directly test
– Ease of use» how long does it take to train a new curator?
– Reproducibility» concordance among curators
– Discrimination» are all categories used? How many used more than once?
– Natural» how directly does the system reflect nature?
– Predictive power» correct prediction of properties once an object is classified
Gotta Catch ’em All!
RAS
brca2