liquid sorption behavior of superabsorbent fiber based nonwoven media
TRANSCRIPT
Fibers and Polymers 2013, Vol.14, No.7, 1165-1171
1165
Liquid Sorption Behavior of Superabsorbent Fiber Based Nonwoven Media
Dipayan Das*, R. S. Rengasamy, and Mritunjay Kumar
Department of Textile Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi-110016, India
(Received July 4, 2012; Revised October 2, 2012; Accepted December 23, 2012)
Abstract: Nonwovens are widely used as liquid absorbent media. Currently, superabsorbent fibers are used in nonwovens formaking them less bulky yet very effective in absorbing liquids. In this work, a series of nonwovens were prepared by randommixing and layer-wise combining of superabsorbent fibers with fibers of different cross-sectional geometries. Thesenonwovens were studied for their liquid absorption behavior by using gravimetric testing absorption system. It was observedthat in case of random mixing, the increase in weight fraction of superabsorbent fibers led to a tremendous increase in liquidsorption capacity and liquid sorption rate. When mixed randomly with superabsorbent fibers, the finer fibers exhibited bettersorption characteristics than the coarser fibers, but the non-circular fibers displayed poorer sorption characteristics than thecircular ones. In case of layer-wise combining, better sorption characteristics were obtained when the liquid was firstchallenged by the polypropylene fiber side as compared to that by superabsorbent fiber side. The superabsorbent fibers andthe circular polypropylene fibers, when combined layer-wise, resulted in higher sorption capacity but lower sorption rate thanthose when mixed randomly.
Keywords: Superabsorbent fiber, Deep-grooved fiber, Trilobal fiber, Nonwovens, Sorption capacity, Sorption rate
Introduction
Nonwovens are widely used as liquid absorbent media.
Baby diapers, sanitary napkins, and adult incontinence pads
are the excellent examples of the usage of nonwovens as
liquid absorbent media. The performance of nonwoven
absorbent media is determined by their liquid sorption
behavior, which is characterized by the capacity of liquid
sorption and the rate of liquid sorption. The liquid sorption
behavior of nonwoven absorbent media has been reported by
many researchers [1-19]. Earlier, cellulosic fiber based
nonwovens were used as liquid absorbent media, however,
their liquid sorption characteristics were found to be limited.
The synthetic fibers such as polyester and polypropylene,
either mixed with cellulosic fibers or finished with hydrophilic
chemicals, were also widely used. To improve the liquid
sorption characteristics, the synthetic fibers of different
cross-sectional sizes and shapes were tried. However, the
role of fiber cross-sectional size on the liquid sorption
behavior of nonwovens was found to be contradictory. In
one research work [13], it was observed that the coarser
fibers resulted in higher sorption capacity and higher rate of
sorption. But, in another research work [14], it was found
that the finer fibers resulted in higher sorption capacity and
higher rate of sorption. The effect of fiber cross-sectional
shape on the liquid sorption characteristics of nonwovens
was also examined. The deeply-grooved fiber cross-sections
were found to enhance the sorption capacity and sorption
rate to a remarkable extent [13-15]. Apart from fiber
characteristics, the properties of the test liquids such as
density, viscosity, and surface tension were found to play a
decisive role in determining the liquid sorption behavior of
nonwovens. The structure of the nonwovens was also found
to play a very important role in determining their liquid
sorption behavior. The important structural characteristics
include volumetric porosity and cross-sectional size and
shape of the capillaries. The latter, in turn, depends on the
cross sectional size, shape, and aggregate pattern of the
fibers used to prepare nonwovens [7-9,17,18].
Currently, superabsorbent fibers are used in nonwovens
for making the liquid absorbent products less bulky yet
effective in absorbing liquids. In this case, the liquid transports
to the interfiber pore space by capillary action and to the
superabsorbent fiber by diffusion. As a result, the liquid
sorption capacity of the nonwovens increases tremendously.
However, diffusion of the liquid into the superabsorbent
fibers reduces the pore space on account of extensive
swelling of the fibers and hence decreases the rate of liquid
absorption [20]. Gel blocking occurs when extensive swelling
of the superabsorbent causes closure of the wicking channels
such that further liquid transport is prevented. Hence, a
higher amount of superabsorbent fibers does not necessarily
result in better liquid sorption behavior, especially in term of
liquid sorption rate. Today’s research has revealed that there
is a need to invent novel composite nonwoven structures by
useful combination of “normal plus “super absorbent materials
so as to achieve enhanced liquid sorption behavior. It is thus
often said that the design of absorbent products must be
carefully considered for maximum performance.
In this work, a series of nonwoven absorbent media was
developed by combining superabsorbent fibers with fibers of
different cross-sections by means of random mixing and
layer-wise combining. The cross-section of the fibers was
differed with respect to their size and shape. The liquid
sorption behavior of the nonwovens was evaluated by means
of gravimetric absorption testing system (GATS). The*Corresponding author: [email protected]
DOI 10.1007/s12221-013-1165-5
1166 Fibers and Polymers 2013, Vol.14, No.7 Dipayan Das et al.
random mixing of fibers was compared to the layer-wise
combining of fibers with respect to the liquid sorption
characteristics of the nonwovens.
Materials and Methods
Fiber Materials
In this work, superabsorbent fibers (SAF) of 51 mm length
and 10 den fineness were used. The superabsorbent fibers
were procured from Technical Absorbents, UK through
Business Coordinating House, India. The fibers were prepared
by using three different monomers namely, acrylic acid,
methylacrylate, and a small quantity of special acrylate/
methylacrylate monomer and employing a patented process.
In this process, acrylic acid was partially neutralized to the
sodium salt of acrylic acid and the cross-links between
polymer chains were formed as ester groups by reaction
between the acid groups in acrylic acid and the special
acrylate/methylacrylate monomer. The density of the super-
absorbent fibers, as reported by the manufacturer, was taken
as 1.4 g/cm3. Besides superabsorbent fibers, polypropylene
fibers of two different finenesses (2.5 den and 6 den) but of
same length (51 mm) and same cross-sectional shape (circular)
were used. The density of the polypropylene fibers was
taken as 0.91 g/cm3. Further, polyester fibers of two different
cross-sectional shapes (trilobal and deep-grooved) but of
Table 1. Physical characteristics of fibers
Fiber Length (mm) Fineness (den) Density (g/cm3) Diameter (µm) Shape
Polypropylene 512.5
0.9119.72
Circular6 30.55
Polyester 51 6 1.38 24.81Trilobal
Deep-grooved
Superabsorbent 51 10 1.40 31.80 Circular
Table 2. Details of nonwovens prepared by random mixing of fibers
Percentage of fibers in the blend Structural characteristics Sorption characteristics
Polypropylene Polyester SAF Basis weight
(g/m2)
Thickness
(mm)
Density
(g/cm3)
Sorption
capacity (g/g)
Sorption rate
(g/g·s)2.5 den 6 den Trilobal Deep-grooved 10 den
100 0 0 0 0 127.22 2.47 0.0515 18.56 0.1764
90 0 0 0 10 108.93 2.29 0.0476 24.38 0.2082
80 0 0 0 20 120.46 2.38 0.0506 27.58 0.2792
70 0 0 0 30 125.59 2.39 0.0525 29.59 0.3370
60 0 0 0 40 109.56 2.12 0.0517 36.79 0.3728
50 0 0 0 50 103.64 1.89 0.0548 44.61 0.4761
0 100 0 0 0 147.30 3.13 0.0471 15.89 0.0852
0 90 0 0 10 144.80 3.02 0.0479 20.83 0.1699
0 80 0 0 20 125.40 2.76 0.0454 27.49 0.2541
0 70 0 0 30 133.90 2.76 0.0485 31.62 0.3249
0 60 0 0 40 163.40 3.05 0.0536 34.08 0.3629
0 50 0 0 50 163.70 3.16 0.0518 39.39 0.4342
0 0 100 0 0 191.56 3.37 0.0568 9.79 0.0472
0 0 90 0 10 193.29 3.25 0.0595 18.73 0.0701
0 0 80 0 20 190.72 3.36 0.0568 22.45 0.0891
0 0 70 0 30 192.14 3.24 0.0593 24.60 0.1038
0 0 60 0 40 235.37 3.81 0.0618 27.20 0.1056
0 0 50 0 50 221.64 3.65 0.0607 31.94 0.1248
0 0 0 100 0 163.40 3.16 0.0517 10.41 0.0510
0 0 0 90 10 166.75 3.41 0.0489 19.47 0.1315
0 0 0 80 20 180.96 3.36 0.0539 22.90 0.2356
0 0 0 70 30 182.70 3.42 0.0534 24.45 0.2515
0 0 0 60 40 187.07 3.30 0.0567 27.33 0.2877
0 0 0 50 50 150.40 2.43 0.0619 30.63 0.3976
Superabsorbent Fiber Nonwoven Fibers and Polymers 2013, Vol.14, No.7 1167
same length (51 mm) and same fineness (6 den) were used.
The density of the polyester fibers was taken as 1.38 g/cm3.
The physical characteristics of the fibers including their
equivalent diameters are reported in Table 1. The equivalent
diameter (d) of the fibers was calculated from the following
formula, , where t denotes fiber fineness and ρ
indicates fiber density.
Development of Nonwovens
A laboratory-based needle-punching line was used for
preparation of nonwoven materials. The line was comprised
of opening and mixing machine, roller carding machine,
cross-lapping machine, and needle-punching machine. The
superabsorbent fibers were randomly mixed with polypropylene
fibers of different finenesses or polyester fibers of different
cross-sectional shapes, each at six different blend ratios (0/
100, 10/90, 20/80, 30/70, 40/60, 50/50). The details of these
mixings are mentioned in Table 2. While preparing the
aforesaid nonwoven materials, the machine and process
parameters were kept constant. The punch density during
needle-punching was kept at 120 punches per cm2 and the
advancement per stroke was maintained at 7.5 mm. Another
set of nonwoven materials were prepared by layer-wise
combining of superabsorbent fibers and polypropylene fibers of
different finenesses at a blend ratio of 50/50. The details of
these materials are mentioned in Table 3.
Testing of Nonwovens
The randomly-mixed fiber nonwovens and layer-wise-
combined fiber nonwovens were tested for their basis weight
by using a standard weighing balance and thickness by using
a digital thickness tester. Each of the nonwoven materials
was tested ten times and the average of ten readings is
mentioned in Table 2 and Table 3. The density of the
nonwovens was calculated by dividing their basis weight by
their thickness. The density of the nonwovens was found to
be practically same. The nonwovens were further tested for
their liquid absorption behavior by employing gravimetric
absorption testing system (GATS) and distilled water as a
test liquid. This test was replicated three times on each
material. The liquid sorption capacity of the nonwovens was
determined by the ratio of amount of liquid absorbed at the
end of the test to the dry weight of the nonwoven. The test
was ended when the liquid was found to come out of the
nonwoven, indicating that it was unable to absorb liquid any
more. The higher value of liquid sorption capacity was
indicative of higher amount of liquid absorbed by the
nonwoven material. The liquid sorption rate was determined
by the slope in the initial phase of the test. The higher value
of liquid sorption rate was an indication of faster absorption
of the liquid by the nonwoven material.
Results and Discussion
Liquid Sorption Capacity of Randomly-Mixed Fiber
Nonwovens
The liquid sorption capacity of the nonwovens prepared
by random mixing of superabsorbent fibers and polypropylene
fibers of different finenesses or polyester fibers of different
shapes are reported in Table 2. Figure 1 displays the effect of
addition of superabsorbent fibers on the liquid sorption
capacity of the nonwovens for different fiber finenesses. It
can be observed that the liquid sorption capacity of all the
nonwoven materials was increased with an increase in the
amount of superabsorbent fibers. This can be understood as
a natural consequence of extraordinarily high liquid sorption
d 4t/πρ=
Table 3. Details of nonwovens prepared by layer-wise combining of fibers and their comparison with randomly-mixed fiber nonwovens
MaterialBasis weight
(g/m2)
Thickness
(mm)
Density
(g/cm3)
Sorption
capacity (g/g)
Sorption rate
(g/g·s)
Nonwoven prepared by layer-wise combining of superabsorbent
fibers and polypropylene fibers of 2.5 den fineness at 50/50 blend
ratio (PP side)
115.98 2.21 0.0525 65.41 0.3347
Nonwoven prepared by layer-wise combining of superabsorbent
fibers and polypropylene fibers of 2.5 den fineness at 50/50 blend
ratio (SAF side)
115.98 2.21 0.0525 58.22 0.1800
Nonwoven prepared by layer-wise combining of superabsorbent
fibers and polypropylene fibers of 6 den fineness at 50/50 blend ratio
(PP side)
148.00 2.73 0.0542 50.29 0.2575
Nonwoven prepared by layer-wise combining of superabsorbent
fibers and polypropylene fibers of 6 den fineness at 50/50 blend ratio
(SAF side)
148.00 2.73 0.0542 49.23 0.1386
Nonwoven prepared by random mixing of superabsorbent fibers and
polypropylene fibers of 2.5 den fineness at 50/50 blend ratio
103.64 1.89 0.0548 44.61 0.4761
Nonwoven prepared by random mixing of superabsorbent fibers and
polypropylene fibers of 6 den fineness at 50/50 blend ratio
163.70 3.16 0.0518 39.39 0.4342
1168 Fibers and Polymers 2013, Vol.14, No.7 Dipayan Das et al.
by the superabsorbent fibers. The addition of finer fibers in
the blend was found to generally result in higher liquid
sorption capacity as compared to that of coarser fibers. This
can be ascribed due to the fact that the finer fibers resulted in
creation of smaller pores, which would develop higher
capillary pressure, leading to higher amount of liquid wicked
through the porous structure. Further, the liquid sorption
capacity of the nonwovens prepared from the blends of
superabsorbent and trilobal polyester fibers was found
practically the same as that of the nonwovens prepared from
the blends of superabsorbent and deep-grooved polyester
fibers. Evidently, the random mixing of circular fibers with
superabsorbent fibers resulted in higher liquid sorption
capacity as compared to the random mixing of trilobal or
deep-grooved fibers with superabsorbent fibers.
In order to examine the effect of fiber fineness and the
amount of superabsorbent fibers on the liquid sorption capacity
of nonwovens, a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of
the experimental data was performed. The experimental data
included liquid sorption capacity of twelve nonwoven
Figure 1. Plot of liquid sorption capacity of nonwovens prepared
by random mixing of superabsorbent fibers and polypropylene
fibers of different finenesses or polyester fibers of different
shapes.
Table 4a. ANOVA for sorption capacity of nonwovens prepared by random mixing of superabsorbent fibers and polypropylene fibers of
different finenesses
Source Sum of squares Degree of freedom Mean sum of squares F-value Probability>F-value
Fiber fineness 41.18 1 41.18 9.45 0.0052
Amount of superabsorbent fibers 1900.36 5 380.071 87.25 0
Fiber fineness×
Amount of superabsorbent fibers
73.71 5 14.742 3.38 0.0187
Error 104.54 24 4.356
Total 2119.78 35
Table 4b. ANOVA for sorption capacity of nonwovens prepared by random mixing of superabsorbent fibers and polyester fibers of different
shapes
Source Sum of squares Degree of freedom Mean sum of squares F-value Probability>F-value
Fiber shape 0.72 1 0.724 0.2 0.6549
Amount of superabsorbent fibers 1621.96 5 324.391 91.7 0
Fiber shape×
Amount of superabsorbent fibers
23.91 5 4.783 1.35 0.2770
Error 84.9 24 3.538
Total 1731.5 35
Table 4c. ANOVA for sorption rate of nonwovens prepared by random mixing of superabsorbent fibers and polypropylene fibers of different
finenesses
Source Sum of squares Degree of freedom Mean sum of squares F-value Probability>F-value
Fiber fineness 0.01195 1 0.01195 10.24 0.0038
Amount of superabsorbent fibers 0.41463 5 0.08293 71.07 0
Fiber fineness×
Superabsorbent fibers
0.01882 5 0.00376 3.23 0.0228
Error 0.02801 24 0.00117
Total 0.47341 35
Superabsorbent Fiber Nonwoven Fibers and Polymers 2013, Vol.14, No.7 1169
materials, each with three replicates, prepared by blending of
superabsorbent fibers and polypropylene fibers of two
different finenesses (2.5 den and 6 den) at six different blend
ratios. The results are displayed in Table 4(a). The fineness
of fibers, amount of superabsorbent fibers in the blend, and
their interaction were found to be statistically significant at a
significance level of 0.05. In this case, the amount of
superabsorbent fibers in the blend contributed maximum to
the total variability in the data (89.65 %), followed by the
interaction between the fineness of fibers and the amount of
superabsorbent fibers (3.48 %) and the fineness of fibers
(1.94 %). In a similar way, a two-way analysis of variance
was carried out to examine the effect of fiber cross-sectional
shape and percentage of superabsorbent fibers on the capacity
of liquid sorption. Here, the experimental data included
liquid sorption capacity of twelve nonwoven materials, each
with three replicates, prepared by blending of superabsorbent
fibers and polyester fibers of two different shapes (trilobal
and deep-grooved) at six different blend ratios. The results
are reported in Table 4(b). It can be observed that the amount
of superabsorbent fibers in the blend was found to be
statistically significant at a significance level of 0.05, but the
shape of fiber cross-section and its interaction with the
amount of superabsorbent fibers in the blend were not found
to be significant. In this case, the amount of superabsorbent
fibers in the blend contributed maximum to the total
variability in the data (93.67 %), followed by the interaction
between the shape of fiber cross-section and the amount of
superabsorbent fibers in the blend (1.38 %) and the shape of
fiber cross-section (0.04 %).
Liquid Sorption Rate of Randomly-Mixed Fiber Non-
wovens
The liquid sorption rate of the nonwovens prepared by
random mixing of superabsorbent fibers and polypropylene
fibers of different finenesses or polyester fibers of different
shapes are reported in Table 2. Figure 2 displays the effect of
addition of superabsorbent fibers in the nonwovens on the
liquid sorption rate for different fiber shapes. It can be seen
that the rate of liquid sorption of all the nonwoven materials
was increased with the increase in the amount of superabsorbent
fibers. This observation was however not in agreement to
that reported by Gupta and Hong [20]. They prepared a set
of air-laid and needle-bonded nonwoven materials by
randomly mixing superabsorbent and polyester fibers at
different blend ratios and tested their liquid sorption
behavior. They observed that the liquid sorption rate of the
nonwovens was decreased with an increase in the amount of
superabsorbent fibers. Further, it can be observed from
Figure 2 that the nonwovens made up of blends of finer
polypropylene fibers and superabsorbent fibers showed
higher liquid sorption rate as compared to the nonwovens
prepared from mixing of coarser polypropylene fibers and
superabsorbent fibers. Furthermore, the addition of trilobal
fibers showed a slight increase in the liquid sorption rate, but
a remarkable increase in the liquid sorption rate was
obtained with the addition of deep-grooved fibers. Clearly,
the random mixing of circular fibers with superabsorbent
fibers resulted in higher liquid sorption rate as compared to
the random mixing of deep-grooved or trilobal fibers with
superabsorbent fibers.
In order to further analyze the effect of fiber fineness and
percentage of superabsorbent fibers on the liquid sorption
rate, a two-way analysis of variance of the experimental data
was carried out. The experimental data included liquid
Table 4d. ANOVA for sorption rate of nonwovens prepared by random mixing of superabsorbent fibers and polyester fibers of different shapes
Source Sum of squares Degree of freedom Mean sum of squares F-value Probability>F-value
Fiber shape 0.72469 1 0.72469 644.15 0
Amount of superabsorbent fibers 0.67208 5 0.13442 119.48 0
Fiber shape×
Amount of superabsorbent fibers
0.82105 5 0.16421 145.96 0
Error 0.027 24 0.00113
Total 2.24482 35
Figure 2. Plot of liquid sorption rate of nonwovens prepared by
random mixing of superabsorbent fibers and polypropylene fibers
of different finenesses or polyester fibers of different shapes.
1170 Fibers and Polymers 2013, Vol.14, No.7 Dipayan Das et al.
sorption rate of twelve nonwoven materials, each with three
replicates, prepared by blending of superabsorbent fibers
and polypropylene fibers of two different finenesses (2.5 den
and 6 den) at six different blend ratios. The results are shown
in Table 4(c). It can be observed that the fineness of fibers,
amount of superabsorbent fibers in the blend, and their
interaction were found to be statistically significant at a level
of significance of 0.05. In this case, the amount of
superabsorbent fibers in the blend contributed maximum to
the total variability in the data (87.58 %), followed by the
interaction between fineness of fibers and amount of
superabsorbent fibers in the blend (3.98 %) and the fineness
of fibers (2.52 %). Similarly, a two-way analysis of variance
was performed to examine the effects of fiber cross-sectional
shape and percentage of superabsorbent fibers on the rate of
liquid sorption. Here, the experimental data included liquid
sorption rate of twelve nonwoven materials, each with three
replicates, prepared by blending of superabsorbent fibers
and polyester fibers of two different shapes (trilobal and
deep-grooved) at six different blend ratios. The results are
displayed in Table 4(d). It can be observed that the shape of
fiber cross-section, amount of superabsorbent fibers in the
blend, and their interaction were statistically significant at
0.05 level of significance. In this case, the interaction between
shape of fiber cross-section and amount of superabsorbent
fibers in the blend contributed maximum to the total variability in
the data (36.58 %), followed by the shape of fiber cross-
sections (32.28 %) and the amount of superabsorbent fibers
in the blend (29.94 %).
Liquid Sorption Characteristics of Layer-Wise-Combined
Fiber Nonwovens
The liquid sorption characteristics of the nonwoven materials
prepared by layer-wise combining of superabsorbent fibers
and polypropylene fibers of 2.5 den or 6 den fineness at a
blend ratio of 50/50 are reported in Table 3. These characteristics
were compared to those of the nonwovens prepared by
random mixing of superabsorbent fibers and polypropylene
fibers of 2.5 den or 6 den fineness at a blend ratio of 50/50.
They are also reported in Table 3. It can be observed that the
nonwoven prepared by layer-wise combining of superabsorbent
fibers and polypropylene fibers of 2.5 den fineness at 50/50
blend ratio exhibited higher liquid sorption capacity and
higher liquid sorption rate than the nonwoven prepared by
layer-wise combining of superabsorbent fibers and poly-
propylene fibers of 6 den fineness at 50/50 blend ratio,
regardless of whether the liquid was first challenged by the
polypropylene side or the superabsorbent fiber side. This can
be explained by the effect of fiber fineness on the liquid
sorption characteristics. Further, better sorption characteristics
were obtained when the liquid was challenged by the
polypropylene fiber side as compared to when the liquid was
challenged by the superabsorbent fiber side. In the case of
the former, the liquid first got absorbed by the inter-fiber
pores and then diffused into the superabsorbent fibers. But,
in the case of the latter, the liquid first diffused into the
superabsorbent fibers, which resulted in tremendous swelling
of the fibers, offering high resistance to the liquid to be reach
to the inter-fiber pores. Furthermore, the layer-wise combining
of superabsorbent fibers and polypropylene fibers resulted in
higher sorption capacity but lower sorption rate than the
random mixing of superabsorbent fibers and polypropylene
fibers at same blend ratio, irrespective of the fineness of
polypropylene fibers.
Conclusion
The nonwovens prepared by layer-wise combining of
superabsorbent and polypropylene fibers were found to
absorb higher amount of liquid and at a faster rate as
compared to the nonwovens prepared by random mixing of
superabsorbent and polypropylene fibers. In case of layer-
wise combining of superabsorbent and polypropylene fibers,
better sorption characteristics were obtained when the liquid
was first challenged by the polypropylene fiber side as
compared to when the liquid was first challenged by the
superabsorbent fiber side. Better sorption characteristics were
obtained when the polypropylene fibers were finer. In the
case of random mixing of superabsorbent and polypropylene
or polyester fibers, an increase in weight fraction of
superabsorbent fibers led to tremendous increase in their
liquid sorption capacity as well as liquid sorption rate. When
mixed randomly with superabsorbent fibers, the finer fibers
exhibited higher sorption capacity and higher sorption rate
than the coarser fibers, but the non-circular fibers displayed
poorer sorption characteristics than the circular fibers. The
nonwovens prepared by random mixing of equal proportion
of superabsorbent fibers and circular polypropylene fibers of
2.5 den fineness resulted in highest sorption capacity and
highest sorption rate among all the nonwovens prepared by
random mixing of fibers.
Acknowledgements
The authors are very much thankful to Business Coordination
House, India and The Nonwovens Institute of the North
Carolina State University, USA for supplying superabsorbent
fibers and deep-grooved fibers, respectively for this research
work.
References
1. E. Kissa, Text. Res. J., 66, 660 (1996).
2. E. Coskuntuna, A. J. Fowler, and S. B. Warner, Text. Res.
J., 77, 256 (2007).
3. P. R. Harnett and P. N. Mehta, Text. Res. J., 54, 471 (1984).
4. K. Kurematsu and M. Koishi, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 101,
37 (1984).
Superabsorbent Fiber Nonwoven Fibers and Polymers 2013, Vol.14, No.7 1171
5. L. Zhu, A. Perwulez, M. Lewandowski, and C. Campagne,
J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 102, 387 (2006).
6. T. Kawase, S. Sekoguchi, T. Fuj, and M. Minagawa, Text.
Res. J., 56, 409 (1986).
7. P. K. Chatterjee and B. S. Gupta, “Absorbent Technology”,
Elsevier, The Netherlands, 2002.
8. Y. L. Hsieh, Text. Res. J., 65, 299 (1995).
9. N. Mao, Text. Res. J., 79, 1358 (2009).
10. A. V. Dedov, Fiber Chem., 41, 248 (2009).
11. N. Pan and W. Zhong, Text. Prog., 38, 1 (2006).
12. W. A. Haile and B. M. Phillips, Tappi J., 78, 139 (1995).
13. G. Callegari, I. Tyomkin, K. G. Kornev, A. V. Neimark, and
Y. L. Hsieh, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 353, 290 (2011).
14. C. J. Sun, M. C. Suen, H .E. Chen, and C. C. Chen, Text.
Res. J., 79, 59 (2009).
15. S. Debnath and M. Madhusoothanan, J. Ind. Text., 39, 215
(2010).
16. X. Chen, P. Vromen, M. Lewandowski, A. Perwuelz, and
Y. Zhang, Text. Res. J., 79, 1364 (2009).
17. R. S. Rengasamy, D. Das, and C. Prabhakaran, J. Hazard.
Mat., 186, 526 (2011).
18. B. S. Gupta, Tappi J., 71, 147 (1988).
19. S. Jaganathan, H. V. Tafreshi, and B. Pourdeyhimi, J.
Colloid Interf. Sci., 326, 166 (2008).
20. B. S. Gupta and C. J. Hong, “Proc. TAPPI Nonwovens
Conference”, p.59, TAPPI Press, Atlanta, GA, 1993.