literacy processes dr. linda wedwick & dr. darci j. harland

19
Literacy Processes Dr. Linda Wedwick & Dr. Darci J. Harland

Upload: evan-howard

Post on 13-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Literacy Processes Dr. Linda Wedwick & Dr. Darci J. Harland

Literacy Processes

Dr. Linda Wedwick &

Dr. Darci J. Harland

Page 2: Literacy Processes Dr. Linda Wedwick & Dr. Darci J. Harland

Underlying Principles

Reading is a language process in a written language system

Receptive Expressive

Listening Speaking

Reading Writing

Page 3: Literacy Processes Dr. Linda Wedwick & Dr. Darci J. Harland

Constructive, Interactive Model

Page 4: Literacy Processes Dr. Linda Wedwick & Dr. Darci J. Harland

Schema Theory

Schema theory helps to explain how a reader’s background knowledge and experiences contribute to his/her understanding of what is read.

A schema is a generalized mental model which is used to organize memory, to focus attention, to interpret experience, and to codify actions.

Grow, Gerald O. (1996). "Serving the Strategic Reader: Reader Response Theory and Its Implications for the Teaching of Writing," an expanded version of a paper presented to the Qualitative Division of the Association for Educators in Journalism and Mass Communication. Atlanta, August, 1994. Available on-line at: <http://www.longleaf.net/ggrow>.

Page 5: Literacy Processes Dr. Linda Wedwick & Dr. Darci J. Harland

How Schema affects meaning Schema arise in response to situations (e.g., the

schema for starting your car comes to mind when you insert the key).

Schema shape perceptions (in the dark it is easy to mistake a bush for a bear).

Schema provide context and vocabulary for interpreting what we read. (A student moving from writing class to typography class shifts the interpretation of the word "lead" from "opening paragraph" to "spacing between lines of type.“)

Grow, Gerald O. (1996). "Serving the Strategic Reader: Reader Response Theory and Its Implications for the Teaching of Writing," an expanded version of a paper presented to the Qualitative Division of the Association for Educators in Journalism and Mass Communication. Atlanta, August, 1994. Available on-line at: <http://www.longleaf.net/ggrow>.

Page 6: Literacy Processes Dr. Linda Wedwick & Dr. Darci J. Harland

Constructing Meaning

Each reader brings a unique set of schema to a text, which means no two readers will construct the exact same meaning from what is read.

This does not mean that there are no shared meanings. However, shared meaning constitutes a smaller percentage than individual meaning.

Page 7: Literacy Processes Dr. Linda Wedwick & Dr. Darci J. Harland

Comprehension/Context

"A reader comprehends a message when he/she is able to bring to mind a schema that gives a good account of the objects and events described in the message."

In some cases, this use of "schema" is what we commonly refer to as "context."

Grow, Gerald O. (1996). "Serving the Strategic Reader: Reader Response Theory and Its Implications for the Teaching of Writing," an expanded version of a paper presented to the Qualitative Division of the Association for Educators in Journalism and Mass Communication. Atlanta, August, 1994. Available on-line at: <http://www.longleaf.net/ggrow>.

Page 8: Literacy Processes Dr. Linda Wedwick & Dr. Darci J. Harland

Context

To understand even simple words (charge, fast, strike, roll), you must first know which schema to instantiate them into (i.e., what content to interpret them in). For example, contrast the meaning of "check" in the schemas for

• "eating out,"

• "paying bills,"

• "making a list," and

• "playing chess."

Grow, Gerald O. (1996). "Serving the Strategic Reader: Reader Response Theory and Its Implications for the Teaching of Writing," an expanded version of a paper presented to the Qualitative Division of the Association for Educators in Journalism and Mass Communication. Atlanta, August, 1994. Available on-line at: <http://www.longleaf.net/ggrow>.

Page 9: Literacy Processes Dr. Linda Wedwick & Dr. Darci J. Harland

The Interaction

Language Cueing Systems• Graphophonics

• Syntactic

• Semantic

• Pragmatics

Reading Strategies• Initiate, sample, and

select

• Predict and infer

• Confirm, disconfirm, and correct

• Integrate

• Terminating

Page 10: Literacy Processes Dr. Linda Wedwick & Dr. Darci J. Harland

Reading Strategies

In their transaction with authors of varied texts on varied subjects, readers of all ages use the same reading strategies:• Initiate, sample

• Predict

• Confirm, disconfirm, and correct

• Integrate

• Terminate

Page 11: Literacy Processes Dr. Linda Wedwick & Dr. Darci J. Harland

Initiating and Sampling

Instead of focusing on individual graphic items such as letters and words, readers sample and select.

The first one or two letters are typically the most important graphic cues for readers.

Within context, beginning letters, then final letters and word length, often provide readers with enough information to predict the word.

Page 12: Literacy Processes Dr. Linda Wedwick & Dr. Darci J. Harland

Predicting

As readers sample and select information, they also predict and infer on the basis of knowledge they already have and information they select from the text.

It is not clear where one strategy ends and the other begins or if they occur simultaneously.

Page 13: Literacy Processes Dr. Linda Wedwick & Dr. Darci J. Harland

Confirm, Disconfirm, and Correct

If the prediction is appropriate, readers confirm their predictions and continue to read.

If readers’ predictions are not confirmed by the subsequent text, they disconfirm and pursue a variety of options to create meaningful text.

Page 14: Literacy Processes Dr. Linda Wedwick & Dr. Darci J. Harland

Integrate

The integration of the reader’s existing knowledge with information provided by the author in the written text results in the construction of meaning, the goal of reading.

Page 15: Literacy Processes Dr. Linda Wedwick & Dr. Darci J. Harland

What readers need

First & last letters are most important Consonants are more important than vowels Words are easier to remember than letters

only Phrases are easier to remember than words Sentences are easier to remember than

words/phrases

Page 16: Literacy Processes Dr. Linda Wedwick & Dr. Darci J. Harland

The Reading Process

Readers use several language systems, reading strategies, and schema to construct knowledge when they read.

Proficient readers employ these systems automatically.

Struggling readers lack schema and/or are not employing one or more of the language systems and reading strategies.

Page 17: Literacy Processes Dr. Linda Wedwick & Dr. Darci J. Harland

Underlying Principles

Readers come to this language process with• Knowledge of how language works

• Knowledge of how texts works

• Knowledge of how the world works

The same knowledge of language and reading which readers use to read accurately also causes them to make miscues

Page 18: Literacy Processes Dr. Linda Wedwick & Dr. Darci J. Harland

Miscues not Errors

A reader’s observed response (OR) does not match the expected response (ER).

Reading is cued by a reader’s language and personal experience.

Miscuing is not simply random, uncontrolled behavior.

Every reader miscues. Emphasis is on the quality of the miscue and

with the strategies readers use.

Page 19: Literacy Processes Dr. Linda Wedwick & Dr. Darci J. Harland

Referenceshttp://www.kent.k12.wa.us/curriculum/writing/elem_writing/Bib/WritingProcess.htm

Grow, Gerald O. (1996). "Serving the Strategic Reader: Reader Response Theory and Its Implications for the Teaching of Writing," an expanded version of a paper presented to the Qualitative Division of the Association for Educators in Journalism and Mass Communication. Atlanta, August, 1994. Available on-line at: <http://www.longleaf.net/ggrow>.

http://www.csuohio.edu/writingcenter/writproc.html

Kucer, S. (2005). Dimensions of Literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Grow, Gerald O. (1996). "Serving the Strategic Reader: Reader Response Theory and Its Implications for the Teaching of Writing," an expanded version of a paper presented to the Qualitative Division of the Association for Educators in Journalism and Mass Communication. Atlanta, August, 1994. Available on-line at: <http://www.longleaf.net/ggrow>.