local single sky implementation lssip 2017 - lithuania...in july 2016, lithuanian ansp se “oro...

Level 1 - Implementation Overview

Local Single Sky ImPlementation LSSIP 2017 - LITHUANIA

EUROCONTROL

LSSIP Year 2017 Lithuania Released Issue

Document Title LSSIP Year 2017 for Lithuania

Infocentre Reference 18/02/26/27

Date of Edition 30/03/2018

LSSIP Focal Point Kazimieras Jakas ‐ [email protected]

LSSIP Contact Person Frédéric Rooseleer ‐ [email protected]

Status Released

Intended for Agency Stakeholders

Available in http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

Reference Documents

LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

LSSIP Guidance Material http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

Master Plan Level 3 – Plan Edition 2017

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european‐atm‐master‐plan‐level‐3‐implementation‐plan

Master Plan Level 3 – Report Year 2016

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european‐atm‐master‐plan‐level‐3‐implementation‐report

European ATM Portal https://www.eatmportal.eu and http://www.atmmasterplan.eu/

STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor

Acronyms and abbreviations http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries

National AIP http://www.ans.lt/en/oni/aip‐istraukos‐copy

FAB Performance Plan http://www.balticfab.eu/uploads/files/dir5/9_0.php


APPROVAL SHEET

The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2017 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan – Edition 2017 (also known as the ESSIP Plan).

MIL Authorities are unable to sign for this edition of the LSSIP


CONTENTS

1. National ATM Environment ............................................................. 6 Geographical Scope .............................................................................................6 1.1. National Stakeholders .........................................................................................8 1.2.

2. Traffic and Capacity ....................................................................... 20 Evolution of traffic in Lithuania ........................................................................ 20 2.1. Vilnius ACC ........................................................................................................ 21 2.2.

3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions ............. 24

4. Implementation Projects ............................................................... 25 National projects .............................................................................................. 25 4.1. FAB projects ..................................................................................................... 27 4.2. Regional projects .............................................................................................. 28 4.3.

5. Cooperation activities .................................................................... 29 FAB Co‐ordination ............................................................................................ 29 5.1. Regional cooperation ....................................................................................... 29 5.2.

6. Implementation Objectives Progress ............................................. 32 State View......................................................................................................... 32 6.1. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ................................................ 39 6.2.

Annexes

LSSIP Year 2017 Lithuania 1 Released Issue

Executive Summary

National ATM Context

The most important goals of Lithuania in ATM are timely implementation of the appropriate objectives of European ATM Master Plan and execution of Baltic FAB Implementation Strategy in efficient manner. On 26th July 2016, SE “Oro navigacija” (Lithuania) and Baltic FAB partner PANSA (Poland) signed an Agreement for the implementation of a state‐of‐the‐art ATM system with INDRA SISTEMAS S. A. company. This Agreement was a first significant step to become a Member of iTEC alliance. Earlier on 8th March 2016, during World ATM Congress at Madrid, Air Navigation Service Providers AVINOR (Norway), SE “Oro navigacija” and PANSA (Poland) signed a Letter of Intent to join the European iTEC alliance. In 2017 PANSA and SE “Oro navigacija” officially joined the European iTEC Alliance.

The establishment of FAB in the joint airspace of Poland and Lithuania is a first step to bring about improvements in Air Navigation Services (ANS) in aforesaid region. Moreover, it is expected that further opportunities and measures giving considerable benefits will be achieved in cooperation with all the neighbouring countries, while providing the potential to Poland and Lithuania to act as a bridge between the EU and non‐EU members to the East. First significant step towards this direction is implementation of Free Route Airspace above FL 095 in Lithuania, which was accomplished in December 2016.

Lithuania’s Performance targets are established in the 2015‐2019 Baltic FAB Performance Plan. This plan and all targets provided in were fully adopted by the European Commission and approved by COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2015/348 of 2 March 2015. Moreover, Baltic FAB council made an influential decision by the end of 2016 – approved the Strategy on further Baltic FAB steps till 2025.

In July 2016, Lithuanian ANSP SE “Oro navigacija” together with B4 Consortium partners (ANSPs of Slovak Republic (LPS SR), Czech Republic (ANS CR) and Poland (PANSA)) became members of SESAR Joint Undertaking, and from 1st October 2016 have started their participation in SESAR 2020 programme.

Traffic and Capacity

2017

Traffic in Lithuania increased by 5.8% during Summer 2017 (May to October), when compared to Summer 2016.

The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2016. The peak 1 hour demand was 62 and the peak 3 hour demand was 53 during the measured period. The EUROCONTROL Seven‐Year forecast predicts an average annual traffic growth between 0.2% and 4.4% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 2.2%.

The average en‐route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2017.

2018‐2022

The EUROCONTROL Seven‐Year forecast predicts an average annual traffic growth between 0.2% and 4.4% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 2.2%.


The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the pre‐SESAR and PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter 6.1.2 ‐ PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest except AOP14, ATC02.9, ATC18 and NAV12 are considered pre‐SESAR. The four aforementioned objectives are neither pre‐SESAR nor PCP and will be part of an overall future indicator covering the SESAR 1 phase.

Note that two objectives – AOM19.1 and FCM05 – are considered as both part of the pre‐SESAR and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases.

The objectives declared ‘Achieved’ in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition 2011‐2015) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State.

Pre‐SESAR Implementation

2010 2019

73%

PCP Implementation

2015 2023

30%

Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase

The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the pre‐SESAR and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph.

n/a

77%

Pre‐SESAR

62% 67%

90%

2%

72%

Pre‐SESAR

Pre‐SESAR

Pre‐SESAR

PCP

PCP

PCP

PCP

Optimised ATM Network Services

Advanced Air Traffic Services High Performing

Airport Operations

22%

Enabling Aviation Infrastructure


ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation

The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs both for Block 0. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is explained in Chapter 6.1.3.

Block 0

2010 2018

74%

ATM Deployment Outlook

● State objec ves

Deployed in 2016‐2017: ‐ Free Route Airspace [AOM21.2] 100% progress ‐ Interactive Rolling NOP [FCM05] 100% progress ‐ Surveillance Performance & Interoperability [ITY‐SPI] 100% progress ‐ RNAV 1 for TMA Operations [NAV03.1] 100% progress

‐ Aeronautical Information [ITY‐ADQ] 68% progress ‐ eTOD [INF07] 65% progress ‐ OAT and GAT handling [AOM13.1] 54% progress ‐ AMHS [COM10] 44% progress ‐ ASM Tools [AOM19.1] 32% progress ‐ STAM Phase 2 [FCM04.2] 16% progress

‐ Ground‐Based Safety Nets [ATC02.8] 57% progress ‐ 8,33 kHz below FL195 [ITY‐AGVCS2] 56% progress ‐ Coordination and transfer [ATC17] 40% progress ‐ MTCD & CORA [ATC12.1] 38% progress ‐ Aircraft Identification [ITY‐ACID] 30% progress ‐ APV Procedures [NAV10] 30% progress ‐ Data Link [ITY‐AGDL] 28% progress ‐ Voice over IP [COM11] 10% progress

‐ Multi Sector Planning En‐route [ATC18] % progress

‐ ASM/ATFCM process [AOM19.3] 5% progress ‐ Real‐Time Airspace Data [AOM19.2] 0% progress ‐ NewPENS [COM12] 0% progress ‐ Traffic Complexity [FCM06] 0% progress

By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+


● Airport objec ves ‐ EYVI ‐ Vilnius Airport

Deployed in 2016‐2017:

‐ Collaborative Env. Mgt. [ENV02] 70% progress ‐ Airport CDM [AOP05] 69% progress

‐ CCOs [ENV03] 20% progress

‐ Remote Tower [AOP14] % progress

By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+


Introduction

The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3) / LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2017, together with plans for the next years.

Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players ‐ civil and military ‐ and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided;

Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level;

Chapter 3 provides a set of conclusions extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2016 which are relevant to the State/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those conclusions and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those conclusions;

Chapter 4 provides the main Implementation Projects (at national, FAB and regional level) which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. Level 1 document covers high level list of the projects showing the applicable links. All other details like description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas provided by the State per each project are available in Level 2 document;

Chapter 5 deals with other cooperation activities beyond Implementation Projects. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and also all other regional initiatives which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned;

Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the high‐level information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.

Level 1 document is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition 2017. In addition it covers detailed description of the Implementation Projects for the State as extracted from the LSSIP Data Base.

The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.


1. National ATM Environment

Geographical Scope 1.1.

International Membership

Lithuania is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:

Organisation Since

ECAC June 1992

EUROCONTROL 01 September 2006

European Union 01 May 2004

EASA 01 May 2004

ICAO 08 January 1992

NATO 29 March 2004

ITU December 1991

Geographical description of the FIR(s)

The geographical scope of this document addresses the Vilnius Flight Information Region (FIR)/Upper Airspace Information Region (UIR), which encompasses the airspace delineated in the ICAO European Regional Air Navigation Plan (EUR/ANP), extending from the ground and it is without an upper limit.

The U/FIR adjoins Riga FIR to the north, Minsk FIR to the east and south, Kaliningrad FIR to the south‐west, Warsaw FIR to the south‐west and Malmö/Stockholm FIRs to the west.

Minsk (Belarus) and Kaliningrad (Russian Federation) are not members of ECAC.

The Control Area (CTA/UTA) covers the geographical limits of the Vilnius U/FIR from FL‐95 up to FL‐660.


Military

There are no military control zones.

There is one military (available also for civil domestic and international flights) aerodrome at Šiauliai (EYSA)

(Air base), with associated traffic information zone from ground level up to 4500 FT MSL.

There is an established, but not permanently reserved military airspace in Lithuania.

Airspace Classification and Organisation

On 27 November 2003 Lithuania implemented the AOM09 objective as required by EUROCONTROL. The airspace classification is presented on the figure below.

FIR: GND – FL 95 class of airspace G, FL 95 – FL 195 class of airspace C

CTA: FL 95 – FL 195 class of airspace C

UIR: FL 195 – FL 660 class of airspace C, above FL 660 class of airspace G

UTA: FL 195 – FL 660 class of airspace C


National Stakeholders 1.2.

The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Lithuania are the following:

‐ The Ministry of Transport and Communications is the Regulatory Authority;

‐ Lithuanian Civil Aviation Administration (CAA) is the National Supervisory Authority;

‐ SE “Oro navigacija”, the Air Navigation Service provider in Lithuania;

‐ The Military are under the authority of the Ministry of Defence;

‐ Vilnius, Kaunas and Palanga airports (operated by SE “Lithuanian Airports”) . Civil International airports in Lithuania;

‐ Lithuanian Hydro Meteorological Services under the Ministry of Environment.


Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below.

Civil Regulator(s)

General Information

Civil Aviation in Lithuania is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport and Communications. The different national entities having regulatory, oversight and administrative responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below.

Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis

Rule‐making Government,

MoT&C and CAA

Law on Aviation, Chapter II

Government – Airspace usage and organization, National civil aviation security programme; Rules of the air (all drafts must be prepared by CAA in cooperation with Commander of Armed Forces)

MoT&C – Air Traffic Services rules

CAA – involved into preparation of all documents above and other necessary and appropriate supporting rules not covered by the mentioned bodies.

Safety Oversight Lithuanian CAA Law on Aviation

May 13 of 2005 MoT Minister order Nr. 3‐233 on SES regulations implementation warranty

ANSP Certification rules (new edition) approved by CAA director order Nr. 4R‐166 on 2014‐11‐28 (TAR, 2014‐12‐01, Nr. 18268)


Enforcement actions in case of non‐compliance with safety regulatory requirements

CAA Law on Aviation

ANSP Certification rules approved by CAA director order Nr. 4R‐231 on 2012‐09‐26 (last update on 2017‐02‐22, by CAA director order No. 4R‐31

Airspace MoT&C and MoD / Lithuanian CAA and ON

Law on Aviation,

Rules on organization of airspace,

Airspace classification scheme,

Rules on reservation of airspace in Republic of Lithuania (for additional explanation see “Rulemaking” above).

Economic MoT&C / Lithuanian CAA Regulations of the MoT; Regulations of the SE “Oro navigacija” approved by the MoT, Law on aviation (in regard of air navigation charges), meanwhile oversight functions are taken by the CAA according to the Rules on certification of ANSPs.

Environment MoT&C / Lithuanian CAA Law on Noise Management, 10.26.2004 No.IX‐2499, last amendment 2013‐07‐02;

The Order of the Minister of Transport & Communications of the Republic of Lithuania and the Minister of Environment of the Republic of Lithuania, 03.23.2007, No. 3‐96/D1‐171 regarding approval of Regulations on limitation of the operation for civil subsonic jet aeroplanes in aerodromes of the Republic of Lithuania, published in the newspaper “State Gazette” No.44‐1692.

The Order of the Minister of Transport & Communications of the Republic of Lithuania and the Minister of Environment of the Republic of Lithuania, 16.08.2004 No.3‐432/D1‐432 Regarding approval and implementation of regulations on aircraft noise limitations

Security MoT&C and MoD / Lithuanian CAA

National civil aviation security programme, 10 November 2010 Government decision No. 1613‐7 (amended on 28 January 2015 by Government decision No. 35 ).

Accident investigation Ministry of Justice Regulation of Investigation of civil aircraft accidents and incidents, 31 December 2015 approved by Minister of Justice order No. 1R‐388;

Regulation of Investigation, report and classification of aircraft accidents and incidents, 15 January 2002 approved by the Minister of Transport & Communications order No. 3‐25 (amended on 28 October 2010 by the Minister of Transport & Communications order No. 3‐25).

Rule‐making activities / responsibilities

Following the “Law on Aviation” approved on 17 October 2000, Article 6 Civil Aviation Administration:

1. CAA, within its competence, implements the strategy of civil aviation development and submits proposals to

the Ministry of Transport and Communications while preparing the civil aviation development programmes.

2. CAA, when applicable, in consultation with the Commander of the Armed Forces, decides on civil aviation

requirements for the implementation of this Law and executes the State supervision of civil aviation, including

ground facilities and services provided for aviation.


3. CAA organizes implementation of the National Civil Aviation Security Programme and issue licenses,

certificates and exercises other functions authorised by legal acts.

By Article 14 of “Law on aviation “CAA is also responsible for:

‐ development in co‐operation with the Commander of the Armed Forces of Airspace

organization and Rules of the Air of the Republic of Lithuania and submitting for the approval by the

Government of the Republic of Lithuania;

‐ the provision of proposals, made in co‐operation with the Commander of the Armed Forces,

to the Minister for Transport and Communication to designate particular parts of the airspace as prohibited or

restricted for civil aviation or as danger areas subjected to special procedures.

The National Supervisory Authority, as per SES Service Provision Regulation is described in Part Legislation

Implementation.

CAA Lithuania

Following the decision of the Lithuanian Government (Resolution No. 1280 of 27 October 2000), the State enterprise “The Directorate of Civil Aviation of the Republic of Lithuania” was reorganized to harmonize the structure and functions of the national regulatory bodies and service providers. The Civil Aviation Administration was set up on 2 July 2001 as the result of this reorganization. According to the statements of the “Law on Aviation of the Republic of Lithuania” CAA is a budgetary institution financed from the State budget and deductions from the charges for air navigation services and use of airports. The amount of deductions from the airport charges was determined by the Government of the Republic of Lithuania, the amount of the deductions from air navigation charges is equal to the amount of supervision costs of ANSP’s (ref. to the Resolution of the Government No 96 of 22 January 2002 with the latest adjustment of 21‐11‐2007).

Civil Aviation Administration is under the Ministry of Transport and Communication responsibility and organisationally separated from Air Navigation Service Provider SE “Oro navigacija”. The CAA structure is presented in Annex B of this document.

CAA functions:

‐ Within competence delegated, implementation of the strategy of the state civil aviation development

‐ Definition of the civil aviation requirements in the cases outlined by the Law on Aviation of the Republic of Lithuania

‐ State oversight of civil aviation

‐ Accomplishment of the national civil aviation security programme.

Main activities of CAA Lithuania:

‐ On the basis of ICAO standards and recommendations, EU requirements, to ensure the oversight of flight safety and aviation security in Lithuania


Annual Report published: Y In accordance with requirements of Article 15 of the Regulation (EU) 1034/2011 and ANSP Certification rules approved by CAA director order Nr. 4R‐231 on 2012‐09‐26 (last update on 2017‐02‐22, by CAA director order No. 4R‐31 CAA annually (by 10 April of each calendar year) submit to MoT&C “Annual ANSPs on‐going safety oversight report”.

Recent report for 2016 can be found on http://www.caa.lt/get_file.php?file=YVdTVW5HcWhacDJmbm1CZlk1Tmt4V3lhWjJWdHlHJTJCbVlORnVrV09lYUtKdXFKVmpZNVZva1phYVpsNWxuR25ZWjJodHBtYlpiSmxsMEc2Wmw1aGxrMmVkbTZobW4yS2NsMmhubzJlZFpjVnJxNXVxYWR0cW5HREdjbDlsbUdlVlo1YVZZMnFmbGwlMkJmcG1DUGxaWm16V1dsYnB0djEybG1ZdHRwbG1TZWFxQnJtcGluWldGb2xwJTJCaVlaeHFsWmlXYW02YlptMlhjbVZrMUhDVWFKdGtiMnRubVdSaVkyWm1uVmxpbldWUVpJUmxyR2lYYTlseW5tWFRhYU5qVlpXa2JxZVduV2FYbUtxZG9tQ2xaYUptMDVtc2FGWm54V3VyWXNWcG81bWdsWlZ3bnNpb2FwTm9YcGVwbHBSb2xtaWZtWFJ1

For the implementation of the strategic objectives, CAA creates and improves the system of flight safety and aviation security, which incorporates:

‐ drafting and approval of standards, requirements and regulations;

‐ implementation of standards, requirements and regulations;

‐ control over compliance of standards, requirements and regulations;

‐ improvement of standards, requirements and regulations.

By 13 May 2005 Order No 3‐233 of Ministry of Transport & Communication on Implementation of SES regulation in Republic of Lithuania CAA Lithuania was nominated as National Supervisory Authority. CAA of Lithuania is responsible for certification of ANSPs and their on‐going compliance oversight.

Organisational structure is on: http://www.caa.lt/index.php?3367914758

The CAA Lithuania’s organisation chart is in the Annex B.

Further information is available on the following web‐sites for:

Lithuanian Ministry of Transport and Communications: http://www.sumin.lt

CAA Lithuania: http://www.caa.lt


SE “Oro navigacija”, the Air Navigation Service provider in Lithuania

Services provided

Governance: State owned enterprise Ownership: Independent, 100% State owned enterprise, under the supervision of the Ministry of Transport and Communications

Services provided Y/N Comment

ATC en‐route Y

ATC approach Y

ATC Aerodrome(s) Y

AIS Y

CNS Y

MET Y *Data from the Lithuanian Hydro‐Meteorological Service Provider

ATCO training Y SE “Oro navigacija” and Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Antanas Gustaitis' Aviation Institute

Others

Additional information:

Provision of services in other State(s):

N At the moment SE “Oro navigacija” do not provide any kind of ANS services in other states

Annual Report published: Y http://www.ans.lt/media/cms_page_media/494/Annual%20Report%202016.pdf This is the annual report covering yearly activities of the ANSP

Additional information is available on the SE “Oro navigacija” website: http://www.ans.lt

The SE “Oro navigacija” organisation chart is in the Annex B.

ATC systems in use

Main ANSP part of any technology alliance1 Y iTEC members since March 2017

FDPS & SDPS

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: EUROCAT‐X (THALES)

With the reference EC regulation No. 552/2004 Annex I this system performs: airspace management; air traffic flow management; air traffic services; flight data processing systems; surveillance processing systems; human‐machine interface. ground‐ground communication; aeronautical information services; meteorological information processing and display.

Upgrade2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? Was not planned for 2016

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? System Replacement is foreseen in 2019

1Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))


ATC Unit Vilnius ACC

Vilnius APP+TWR

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: AirCon 2100 (Indra System)

With the reference EC regulation No. 552/2004 Annex I this system performs: airspace management; air traffic flow management; air traffic services; flight data processing systems; surveillance processing systems; human‐machine interface; ground‐ground communication; aeronautical information services; meteorological information processing and display.

Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? No plans at the moment to upgrade this system till the decommissioning foreseen

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? 2021

ATC Unit Palanga APP+TWR

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: AirCon 2100 (Indra System)*

With the reference EC regulation No. 552/2004 Annex I this system performs: airspace management; air traffic flow management; air traffic services; flight data processing systems; surveillance processing systems; human‐machine interface; ground‐ground communication; aeronautical information services; meteorological information processing and display.

Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? No plans at the moment to upgrade this system

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? At the moment the exact decommissioning date is not foreseen

ATC Unit Šiauliai APP+TWR

* Owner of ATC system in Šiauliai is MIL, but this system operationally for ATC used by SE “Oro navigacija” air

traffic controllers.

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: ALS 2.1 (CS SOFT)

With the reference EC regulation No. 552/2004 Annex I this system performs: airspace management; air traffic flow management; air traffic services; flight data processing systems; surveillance processing systems; human‐machine interface; ground‐to‐ground communication; aeronautical information services; meteorological information processing and display.

Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? No plans at the moment to upgrade this system till the decommissioning foreseen

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? 2019 (not finally confirmed yet)

ATC Unit Kaunas APP+TWR


ATC Units

The ATC units in the Lithuania airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following:

ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks

En‐route TMA

VILNIUS ACC 3 Vilnius UTA + CTA

(Class C) 1 or 2 or 3 – on demand, depending on

traffic density

Vilnius APP 1 Vilnius TMA

Collocated with TWR

Connected to ATC systems (i.e. FDP and radar tracker)

Palanga APP 1 Palanga TMA

Collocated with TWR


Kaunas APP 1 Kaunas TMA

Collocated with TWR


Šiauliai TWR 1 Šiauliai TMA & CTR TWR provides also APP functions. New ATC system installed as from 2014

Airports

General information

Civil International airports in Lithuania (Vilnius, Kaunas and Palanga) are operated by State‐owned enterprises under the supervision of the Ministry of Transport and Communications.

The Resolution No 1355 dated 28th October 2004 of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania approved Šiauliai Airport as military, granting the right to use it for international civil air transport.

SE “Lithuanian Airports” is responsible for management of the full area covered by Vilnius, Kaunas and Palanga airports; including the safety and security of all operations in these areas.

Vilnius International Airport is the major airport in Lithuania.


Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP

Referring to the List of Airports in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2017 – Annex 2, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those Objectives. So the following airports are covered in this LSSIP: Vilnius International Airport (EYVI) participate in this LSSIP implementation, and additionally for some Objectives Airports of Palanga (EYPA) and Kaunas (EYKA).

Vilnius International Airport is not in the mandatory part of APT list. It has subscribed itself to the following ATM Master Plan Level 3 objectives: AOP04.1; AOP04.2 and AOP05. It is involved in ENV01 (completed) and ENV02 (late) implementation activities.

The EUROCONTROL Public Airport Corner also provides information for the following airport(s): https://ext.eurocontrol.int/airport_corner_public/EYVI

Military Authorities

The Military are under the authority of the Ministry of Defence. Regulations that affect the military are prepared and agreed in cooperation with the Ministry of Transport and Communications and the Ministry of Defence

According to the Law on Aviation, the Lithuanian CAA has an authorisation to promulgate legally binding acts. In the cases of co‐operation with air force (such as the airspace structure, organisation of military and civil flights, etc.), the regulations shall be drafted together with the Armed Forces (Air Force Headquarters) and approved by the Government of the Republic of Lithuania.

The Flight Safety Department of the Armed Forces supervises the implementation of military regulations, certification and investigation of military aviation accidents and licensing of military personnel.

There is an established, but not permanently reserved airspace for military purposes in Lithuania. In peacetime the air traffic control is delegated to the civil ANS provider SE “Oro navigacija” that provides air traffic services to GAT.

Lithuania joined NATO on 29th March 2004. A formal LoA signed among the three Baltic States and CC Air HQ Ramstein defines the responsibilities, coordination and control procedures for NATO air policing flights in the Lithuanian Airspace. NATO air policing aircraft for training purposes fly in Temporarily Segregated Areas.


Regulatory role

Regulatory framework and rule‐making

Oversight

OAT GAT

OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions?

Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions?

N/A

Level of such legal provision: Aviation Law Level of such legal provision: Aviation Law

Authority signing such legal provision: The Parliament and the President

Authority signing such legal provision: The Parliament and the President

These provisions cover: These provisions cover:

Rules of the Air for OAT Y

Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT NA

OAT/GAT Co‐ordination Y OAT/GAT Co‐ordination Y

ATCO Training NA ATCO Training NA

ATCO Licensing NA ATCO Licensing NA

ANSP Certification NA ANSP Certification NA

ANSP Supervision Y ANSP Supervision NA

Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability NA

Aircrew Licensing Y

Additional Information: Additional Information:

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

National AIP Y National AIP NA

National Military AIP N National Military AIP NA

EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP NA

Other: N Other: NA

OAT GAT

National oversight body for OAT: Flight Safety Department (Military authority within the Ministry of Defence).

NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: There is only one Civil NSA; Military do not provide service to GAT.

Additional information: Additional information:


Service Provision role

Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified?

N/A If YES, since: N/A Duration of the Certificate:

N/A

Certificate issued by: N/A If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations?

N/A

Additional Information: Military do not provide ATS to Civil flights.

User role

OAT GAT

Services Provided: Services Provided:

En‐Route Y CRC En‐Route N

Approach/TMA N Approach/TMA N

Airfield/TWR/GND N Airfield/TWR/GND N

AIS Y AIS Y

MET Y MET Y

SAR Y Together with ARCC* SAR Y

TSA/TRA monitoring Y Lithuanian Air Force/CRC FIS N

Other: N Other: N

Additional Information: *ARCC Aeronautical Rescue Coordination Centre. Civil / Military coordination centre in ON, search and rescue provided by Military

Additional Information: Military OAT flights are controlled by CRC, military GAT flights are controlled by SE “Oro navigacija”

IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly?

OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y

If Military fly OAT‐IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:

Free Routing Y Within specific corridors only N/A

Within the regular (GAT) national route network N/A Under radar control Y

Within a special OAT route system N/A Under radar advisory service Y

If Military fly GAT‐IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements:

No special arrangements N Exemption from Route Charges N

Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures N Provision of ATC in UHF N

CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 Y Mode S Y ACAS Y

Others:


Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)

Military in Lithuania applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y

FUA Level 1 implemented: Y

FUA Level 2 implemented: Y

Note: The AMC functions are conducted by the SE “Oro navigacija” ATM division. NM and neighbouring States are informed according to the respective LoAs.


2. Traffic and Capacity

Evolution of traffic in Lithuania 2.1.

2017

Traffic in Lithuania increased by 5.8% during Summer 2017 (May to October), when compared to Summer 2016.

2018‐2022

The EUROCONTROL Seven‐Year forecast predicts an average annual traffic growth between 0.2% and 4.4% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 2.2%.

0

50.000

100.000

150.000

200.000

250.000

300.000

350.000

400.000

2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F

IFR

flig

hts

Lithuania - Annual IFR Movements

IFR movements - Actuals

IFR movements - Baseline forecast

IFR movements - High forecast

IFR movements - Low forecast A = ActualF = Forecast

2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 FH 5.8% 5.9% 4.8% 4.5% 3.3% 3.3% 3.2%B 6.0% 1.2% 0.2% 5.3% 3.8% 2.1% 2.0% 1.5% 1.7% 1.7%L 4.8% 1.8% -0.5% 0.2% -0.3% 0.0% 0.0%

ECAC B 1.7% 1.6% 2.8% 4.5% 2.8% 2.1% 1.9% 1.5% 1.7% 1.7%

EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2017)IFR flights yearly growth

Lithuania


Vilnius ACC 2.2.

Traffic and en‐route ATFM delays 2013‐2022

Performance summer 2017

Traffic Evolution 2017 Capacity Baseline En‐route Delay (min/flight) ‐ Summer

Capacity gap Ref value Actual

+6.4 % 77 (0%) 0.02 0.00 No

The average en‐route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2017.

Capacity Plan Sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments

Gradual Full Implementation of FRA within Baltic FAB No

Maximum configuration: 3 sectors Yes 3 sectors were opened

Summer 2017 performance assessment

The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2016. The peak 1 hour demand was 62 and the peak 3 hour demand was 53 during the measured period.

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Peak Day Traffic 738 804 776 763 818

Summer Traffic 633 672 664 675 718

Yearly Traffic* 566 598 599 607 653

Summer Traffic Forecast 737 755 771 783 796

High Traffic Forecast - Summer 754 788 822 855 894

Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 723 724 726 727 732

Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

En

rou

te D

ela

y (m

inu

tes

pe

r fli

gh

t)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rag

e)

EYVCACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

*From 01/01/2017 to 31/10/2017


Planning Period 2018‐2022

The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.

Summer Capacity Plan

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Free Route Airspace Gradual Full Implementation of FRA within

Baltic FAB

Airspace Management Advanced FUA

Airport & TMA Network Integration

Cooperative Traffic Management

Airspace

Procedures

Staffing

Technical New ATM System implementation in

Vilnius ACC

Capacity

Significant Events New ACC building

Max sectors 3 3 3 3 3

Planned Annual Capacity Increase Sufficient capacity to meet demand

Reference profile Annual % Increase 0% 0% N/A N/A N/A

Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile

Sufficient capacity to meet demand N/A N/A N/A

Annual Reference Value (min) 0.04 0.04 N/A N/A N/A

Summer reference value (min) 0.04 0.04 N/A N/A N/A

Additional information

H 77 0% 77 0%

Ref. 77 0% 77 0%

L 77 0% 77 0%

Open 77 0% 77 0%

C/R 77 0% 77 0%

ACC2017

baseline 2018 2019

Capacity ProfilesProfiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)

EYVC 77


0

1

2

3

400:00

02:00

04:00

06:00

08:00

10:00

12:00

14:00

16:00

18:00

20:00

22:00

Sectors available ‐ Summer 2018 ‐WD

0

1

2

3

4

00:00

02:00

04:00

06:00

08:00

10:00

12:00

14:00

16:00

18:00

20:00

22:00

Sectors available ‐ Summer 2018 ‐WE

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

2018‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 77 77

Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 77 77

Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 77 77

Capacity Profile ‐ High 77 77

Capacity Profile ‐ Low 77 77

Capacity Baseline 77 77

2018 ‐ 2022 Plan 77 77 77 77 77

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Cap

acity profile (movements per hour)

EYVCCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios


3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions

Conclusions issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2016 applicable to Lithuania for all items that require corrective actions and improvements.

Conclusion Applicable to VERY GOOD PROGRESS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF BOTH FREE ROUTE AND DIRECT

ROUTING.

THIS MOMENTUM SHOULD BE KEPT AND SUPPORTED BY ALL INVOLVED STAKEHOLDERS.

(page 14 of the Report)

All State that are

implementing

AOM21.1 and

AOM21.2

State’s action planned for this conclusion: YES Description of the planned action: Free route airspace (FRA) services are fully available in Vilnius FIR.

Conclusion Applicable to ADQ IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AS THEY

CAN IMPACT ON SWIM IMPLEMENTATION. (page 25 of the Report) All States + EC

State’s action planned for this conclusion: YES Description of the planned action: its planned that ADQ implementation will be done until mid‐2018. The

impact on SWIM implementation is not assessed/determined.


4. Implementation Projects

National projects 4.1.

The main national projects currently ongoing in Lithuania are depicted in the table below:

Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: ATM MP Links:

ACC and administration building

(WP I.1; Capex 1)

ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT) 2015‐2019 (at the latest)

Project is in the implementation stage. The full implementation of the project is planned by 2018 Q2 according to SE Oro navigacija Strategic Business plan for 2018‐2022.

‐

DLS Implementation Project ‐ Path 1 ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT) 2017‐2018 The implementation plan is confirmed in 2017. Implementation started in 2018 March. The communication part of DLS (SITA service) planned to be finished by 2018 November. Full CPDLC operations depends on new ATC system implementation progress.

‐

DLS Implementation Project ‐ Path 2 ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT) 2017‐2020 SE “Oro navigacija” participates in WP 5 “Definition of an European Common DLS Governance”

‐

Installation of AFTN/AMHS system in the new ACC

(WP IV.1; L‐ATM/CNS‐01‐I/V‐V; Capex 4)

ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT) 2015‐2019 Planned 2015–2019. Project is in the development stage. Implementation is planned in SE “Oro navigacija” Strategic Business plan for 2018‐2022.

L3: COM10, COM11



Installation of new ATC equipment in Kaunas Aerodrome Control Center (Replacement) (WP I.2; Capex 7)

ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT) Preliminary planned for 2019

The implementation of a project is not confirmed. The status of the project depends on SE “Oro navigacija” remote tower technology development. In case it is decided to implement remote tower technology, this project will be canceled.

L3: AOP14

Installation of new ATC system in the new ACC (WP.I.2.; L‐ATM/CNS‐01‐I/V‐V; Capex 2)

ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT) 2015‐2019 Project is in the development stage. Implementation is planned till 2019 according to SE "Oro navigacija" Strategic Business plan for 2018‐2022.

L3: ATC02.8, ATC12.1, COM11, COM12, ITY‐ACID, ITY‐ADQ, ITY‐AGDL, ITY‐AGVCS2

Installation of voice communication system in the new ACC (Replacement)

(WP IV.2; L‐ATM/CNS‐01‐I/V‐V; Capex 3)

ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT) 2018‐2019 Planned 2018–2019. Project is in the development stage. Implementation is planned in SE “Oro navigacija” Strategic Business plan for 2018‐2022.

L3: COM10, COM11

Modernization of A‐SMGCS in Vilnius (Overhaul)

(WP II.1; L‐CNS‐03/1‐I/V‐V; Capex 6 )

ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT) 2015‐2018 Project is in the implementation stage. The full deployment of project is expected by the end of 2018.

L3: AOP04.2, ITY‐SPI


FAB projects 4.2.

Based on the outcomes of the Baltic FAB Implementation Programme Closing Report dated November 29 2016, majority of the projects presented in the previous versions of the LSSIP document were closed due to their completion. In case of Establishment of a Free Route Airspace within Baltic FAB (previous PROJECT 1.2) ‐ as the outcome of Baltic FAB Implementation Programme Closing Report: Implementation phase is completed and project will be executed further as ANSPs FRA projects and presented as the national project. Currently, Baltic FAB States, Lithuania and Poland, conduct three main projects – presented below that are enlisted in the Action Plan according to the updated Baltic FAB Development Strategy 2025.


Enhancement of inter‐FAB cooperation and cooperation with non‐EU countries

(PROJECT 3.1)

Lithuanian CAA (LT),

Mil. Authority (PL),

Military Authority (LT), ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT),

PANSA (PL), Reg. Authority (PL)

Continuous activity Outcome Baltic FAB Implementation Programme Closing Report dd 29 November 2016: Implementation phase closed – Baltic FAB ANSPs will continue to seek for further possibilities of common actions in international environment in accordance with Baltic FAB Development Strategy. Project is a continuous activity.

L3: AOM21.2, ATC02.8, ATC07.1, ATC12.1, ATC15.1, ATC15.2, ATC17



Local Traffic Complexity Management Lithuanian Airports (LT), Mil. Authority (PL),

Military Authority (LT), ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT),

PANSA (PL),

PPL ‐ Warszawa Airport (PL)

2018‐2022 Planned In accordance with the PCP IR (EU 716/2014) and the Deployment Programme, ATM Functionality # 4 (Network Collaborative Management), including the Project Family 4.4.2 (Traffic Complexity tools), is required to be deployed in the European Air Traffic Management Network (EATMN). Also, in the subsequent versions of the Deployment Programme, as concerns the Project Family 4.4.2, PANSA/Poland and Oro Navigacija/Lithuania have been indicated as investment gaps, meaning, that the Traffic Complexity tools are still required to be deployed by PANSA/Poland and Oro Navigacija/Lithuania.

L3: ATC12.1

iTEC/Convergence of ATM systems in the Baltic FAB ACCs and Cross Borders Service provision with Joint Contingency Service Provision

ORO NAVIGACIJA (LT),

PANSA (PL)

2013‐2022 Outcome Baltic FAB Implementation Programme Closing Report dd 29 November 2016: Implementation phase closed – technical solution agreed, public procurement announced, contracts signed, implementation procedure started.

L3: ATC02.8, ATC12.1, ATC17, ITY‐AGDL, ITY‐AGVCS2, ITY‐FMTP

Regional projects 4.3.

No regional project is reported.


5. Cooperation activities

FAB Co‐ordination 5.1.

The Polish ANSP PANSA and Lithuanian SE “Oro navigacija” have been applying provisions of the Single European Sky initiative consistently. We began our active participation in the multi‐annual SESAR 2020 Programme coordinated by the European Union and continued our successful collaboration in the Baltic Functional Airspace Block. Based on the outcomes of the Baltic FAB Implementation Programme Closing Report dated November 29 2016, majority of the projects presented in the previous versions of the LSSIP document were closed due to their completion. Currently, Baltic FAB States, Lithuania and Poland, conduct three main projects. Projects are being a part of the Action Plan to the Baltic FAB Development Strategy 2025.

Regional cooperation 5.2.

Regional cooperation initiatives

B4 Consortium

B4 Consortium was set up formally on 8 September 2014 by:

‐ PANSA, Polish ANSP

‐ ANS CR, the Czech Republic ANSP

‐ LPS SR, š.p., the Slovak Republic ANSP

‐ SE “Oro navigacija”, Lithuanian ANSP

representing small and medium‐sized European Air Navigation Service Providers and their 3rd linked parties from research (universities, research centres, consultancy) and industry (equipment manufacturers) community.

PANSA (Poland) and SE “Oro navigacija” (Lithuania) compose Baltic FAB. ANS CR (Czech Republic) and LPS (Slovakia) belongs to neighbouring FAB CE. All 4 ANSPs are the members of GATE ONE. B4 Consortium is a member of A6 Alliance on SESAR 2020 Programme content. With the entry of the SESAR 2020 Programme into the execution phase, B4 Members have started to perform their activities within the framework of selected SESAR 2020 Projects, according to the Grant Agreements that were signed at the turn of 2016 and 2017. The activities under execution include, among the others, the research activities as well as works related to the development of prototypes of new operational and technological solutions. As part of the project activities, B4 Members also perform their organisational roles in the projects. The most important one is leadership in two SESAR Solutions: PJ.02‐06 Improved access into secondary airports in LVC and PJ.06‐02 Management of Performance Based Free Routing in Lower Airspace.


In February 2017, preparation of comprehensive Consortium Agreement was concluded. The signed Agreement establishes the principles of cooperation between the consortium members, the governance structure of the consortium and defines the responsibilities of members and the principles related to intellectual property rights.

A6 Alliance

The “A6 Alliance” was set up informally in 2007 between the ANSPs interested in accession to SJU membership, i.e.: ‐ ENAIRE, the Spanish ANSP; ‐ DFS, the German ANSP; ‐ DSNA, the French ANSP; ‐ ENAV, the Italian ANSP; ‐ NATS, the British ANSP; ‐ NORACON, (the NORth European and Austrian CONsortium). After the successful cooperation for accession to SJU membership, it was decided to formalize the A6 Alliance through a Memorandum of Cooperation which was concluded in June 2011. The aim of the cooperation and coordination between the 6 parties was to provide customer value through improving the ATM performance at a European Network Level and increasing the pace of delivering the Single European Sky. The main areas of cooperation relate to general fields of mutual interest (e.g. best practice, harmonized strategy etc.), the SESAR R&D phase and SESAR deployment phase. The governance of the A6 Alliance is ensured by a Steering Board composed of CEOs which meets on a quarterly basis and is supported by a Strategy Board composed of senior managers. An R&D Working Group and a Deployment Working Group organize co‐operation at expert level. The A6 Alliance quickly became an important player and a key stakeholder of the Single European Sky and has made significant and remarkable contributions to the SESAR JU, for example on the occasion of the ATM Master Plan Updates (editions 2012 and 2015). PANSA became then a full member of the A6 Alliance, which also developed a close partnership with the COOPANS ANSPs, and a strong relationship with the A4 (Airlines) and the SDAG (airports) which has resulted in the setup of an industry led consortium (SESAR Deployment Alliance (SDA)). On December, 5th 2014, the European Commission tasked the SDA with the setup of the SESAR Deployment Manager, thus strengthening its legitimacy in actively contributing to SESAR deployment. This partnership between ANSPs led to the formal integration of COOPANS into the A6 Alliance for SESAR Deployment Manager activities in 2015 and, strengthened by its wide membership, the A6 Alliance members has been able since then to provide significant support either in logistics or in human resources to the SESAR Deployment Manager. The A6 Alliance leads European‐wide technical activities validated and co‐funded by the EC for their consistency with the SES framework. Through the EC Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) financial program, successive proposals and actions driven by the SESAR Deployment Manager allowed significant contributions to ATM industry implementation projects within SESAR Common Projects deployment priority (currently only Pilot Common Project – PCP). Moreover, in the context of SESAR2020, the B4 Consortium joined the A6 Alliance in 2015 and, after having been associated through an agreement established with A6 Alliance in order to authorize exchanges between their experts in the domain of R&D, Skyguide became by the end 2017 a full member of A6 through an ad‐hoc consortium agreement with DSNA.


Finally the A6, associated for the purpose to ROMATSA (Romanian ANSP) and HungaroControl (Hungarian ANSP) and in cooperation with its A4 and SDAG partners, prepared in 2017 the establishment of SDA consortium into an AISBL that became effective on 01/01/2018, for the benefit of the whole ATM industry and their end customers. Both PANSA and SE “Oro navigacija” participated in SESAR Joint Undertaking, SESAR Deployment Manager and

initiatives financed by INEA.

Gate One

Gate One is a bottom up regional ANSP initiative established in 2013. The purpose of the coordination platform, is to promote the efficiency of European Air Traffic Management through enhanced cooperation among the participating service providers, as well as to ensure a more powerful and coordinated advocacy of the region in the European decision‐making processes.

Gate One covers 3 existing Functional Airspace Blocks – FABs (Baltic FAB, Danube FAB and FAB CE) and 2 non‐EU Flight Information regions (Belgrade and Skopje)

The members of the Gate One initiative, which is one of the largest regional ANSP platforms in Europe, agreed to play a more active role to explore potential for future inter‐FAB cooperation.

The airspace between the Baltic Sea and the Black Sea is one of the most important gateways of the European continent: this region handles air traffic in the directions of North and South, East and West, sustaining links between the central and Nordic countries of the European Union as well as with the continent of Asia and the region of the Middle East.

The actual developments of the European Air Traffic Management industry point towards the assumption that the air navigation service providers of the region, operating under similar conditions, can only be efficient in attaining their interests in case they create a closer cooperation in the coordination of strategic issues (and the operative issues being meaningful at the regional level). Furthermore, they need to strive towards representing a consolidated position concerning common technical and economic issues affecting the region and vital to the Union‐wide picture of the Air Traffic Management.

European iTEC (Interoperability Through European Collaboration) Alliance

European iTEC Alliance was founded in 2007 by three ANSPs: DFS (Germany), ENAIRE (Spain) and NATS (UK) with Indra as a technology partner. Later on, in 2011, LVNL (Netherlands) joined iTEC Alliance followed by Avinor (Norway) in 2016.

The Lithuanian ANSP SE “Oro navigacija” and the Polish ANSP PANSA officially joined the European iTEC alliance in 2017.

iTEC Alliance provides a platform for synergies and thus cost reductions, helping to realise the vision of a Single European Sky (SES) with greater efficiencies and service standards for Europe’s airspace users. The goal of the collaboration is to develop a high‐end air traffic management system for busy and complex airspace that meets the SESAR requirements and enables significant steps forward in productivity. The members of the iTEC alliance can benefit from sharing of best practices, reduced operational expenditures by sharing development costs and risks, enabling accelerated deployment of enhanced systems and future operational concepts.


16; 36%

13; 30%

3; 7%

7; 16%

4; 9%

1; 2% Completed

Ongoing

Planned

Late

No Plan

Not Applicable

Missing Data

Undefined

6. Implementation Objectives Progress

State View 6.1.

Overall Objective Implementation

Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives

The overall situation in the implementation Objectives is described below.

In general, the Objective implementation progress in Lithuania is quite smooth.

As we see from the above chart 36 % of the objectives are completed and 30 % are ongoing.

There are no implementation plans for 9 % objectives (3 “Active objectives” and 1 “Local objective”). Nevertheless, the local business needs and/or updated guidelines/specifications/requirements for implementation of these objectives (ATC02.9, FCM08, NAV03.2, NAV12) are being always monitored.

The implementation of AOM 19.2 is planned by 31/12/2021. What is more, Lithuanian stakeholders show a huge interest of implementing new “Local objectives” ‐ AOP14 (expected implementation after 2020) and ATC18.

Some concerns are dealt with objectives described below:

1) ITY‐ADQ: certain delays in activities of all stakeholders are identified as this objective requires close cooperation between them. It is planned to receive the significant part of dataset until the end of MAY 2018. This exact dataset will fulfil the requirements for whole dataset. It is expected that this objective will probably be completed until the end of 2018;


2) delays are foreseen in implementation of Airport related objectives AOP05 and ENV02. It should be noted, that Vilnius International Airport is not part of the applicable airport list, and has subscribed itself to the ENV02 and AOP05. Delay in implementation of these objectives will have no impact to Network operations. The implementation of CDM is delayed due to some technical difficulties and higher security level requirements. It is expected to be further implemented in 2020. ENV02 strategic actions between SE “Oro navigacija” and SE “Lithuanian airports” are in consideration status.

3) objectives ATC02.8 and ATC17 are/will be slightly delayed due to new ATM system installation. What is more, these processes are dependent on new ACC building status;

4) “Late” status is expected for FCM06 as the TCT implementation will be carried out within FAB context. Key milestones between SE “Oro navigacija” and PANSA are determinded and implementation of TCT (if the application form is confirmed by SDM) in Vilnius FIR is foreseen on 01/01/2022. Fully completed objective is expected (FAB context) until 31/12/2022;

5) delay for NAV10 is expected as the studies of APV/BARO procedures establishment in Palanga (EYPA) are ongoing. Implementation is foreseen until 31/12/2019.

For the time being, no major risk is identified in next few years in term of delays and completeness of other Implementation Objectives.


Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature

Note: The detailed table of links between Implementation Objectives and SESAR Key Features is available in Annex C.

Legend:

## % = Expected completion / % Progress = Implementation Objective timeline (different colour per KF)

100% = Objective completed = Completion beyond Implementation Objective timeline


<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling

54%

AOM19.1 (PCP) ASM Support Tools to Support AFUA 32%

AOM19.2 (PCP) ASM Management of Real‐Time Airspace Data 0%

AOM19.3 (PCP) Full rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing

5%

FCM01 Enhanced Tactical Flow Management Services 100%

FCM03 Collaborative Flight Planning 100%

FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1

n/a

FCM04.2 (PCP) STAM Phase 2 16%

FCM05 (PCP) Interactive Rolling NOP 100%

FCM06 (PCP) Traffic Complexity Assessment 0%


Advanced Air Traffic Services

<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

AOM21.1 (PCP) Direct Routing 100%

AOM21.2 (PCP) Free Route Airspace 100%

AOP14 Remote Tower Services Local objective

EYVI ‐ Vilnius Airport 0%

ATC02.2 STCA En‐Route 100%

ATC02.8 Ground‐Based Safety Nets 57%

ATC02.9 Enhanced STCA for TMAs 0%

‐

ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures

EYVI ‐ Vilnius Airport (Outside Applicability Area)

n/a

ATC12.1 Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring

38%

ATC15.1 Information Exchange with En‐route in Support of AMAN

n/a

ATC15.2 (PCP) Arrival Management Extended to En‐route Airspace

n/a

ATC16 ACAS II Compliant with TCAS II Change 7.1 100%

ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer

40%

ATC18 Multi Sector Planning En‐route ‐ 1P2T Local objective 0%

ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations


ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations Local objective


ITY‐COTR Ground‐Ground Automated Co‐ordination Processes

100%

NAV03.1 RNAV 1 in TMA Operations 100%

NAV03.2 (PCP) RNP 1 in TMA Operations 0%

‐

NAV10 APV procedures 30%

NAV12 Optimised Low‐Level IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft

Local objective 0%

‐


High Performing Airport Operations

<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

AOP04.1 A‐SMGCS Level 1


AOP04.2 A‐SMGCS Level 2


AOP05 Airport CDM


AOP10 (PCP) Time‐Based Separation


n/a

AOP11 (PCP) Initial Airport Operations Plan


n/a

AOP12 (PCP) Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with ATC Clearances Monitoring


n/a

AOP13 (PCP) Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing


n/a

ENV02 Collaborative Environmental Management


SAF11 Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions

100%



<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS 44%

COM11 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) 10%

COM12 (PCP) NewPENS 0%

FCM08 (PCP) Extended Flight Plan 0%

‐

INF04 Integrated Briefing 100%

INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) 65%

ITY‐ACID Aircraft Identification 30%

ITY‐ADQ Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information

68%

ITY‐AGDL Initial ATC Air‐Ground Data Link Services 28%

ITY‐AGVCS2 8,33 kHz Air‐Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195

56%

ITY‐FMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol 100%

ITY‐SPI Surveillance Performance and Interoperability 100%


ICAO ASBU Implementation

The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle.

These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2017 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/59 (European Air Navigation Planning Group).

Legend:

= Completed (during 2017 or before)

= Missing planning date

= Progress achieved in 2017 = Not applicable

<16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

B0‐APTA Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance

100%

65%

B0‐SURF Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (A‐SMGCS Level 1‐2)

100%

B0‐FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through Ground‐Ground Integration

100%

80%

B0‐DATM Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management

100%

84%

B0‐ACAS ACAS Improvements 100%

B0‐SNET Increased Effectiveness of Ground‐Based Safety Nets

100%

28%

B0‐ACDM Improved Airport Operations through 100%

69%

B0‐RSEQ Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN)

B0‐FRTO Improved Operations through Enhanced En‐Route Trajectories

100%

77%

B0‐NOPS Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network‐Wide view

100%

B0‐ASUR Initial capability for ground surveillance 100%

B0‐CDO Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO)

100%

B0‐TBO Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application of Data Link En‐Route

100%

28%


Detailed Objectives Implementation progress 6.2.

Note: The detailed table of applicability area for the Implementation Objectives is available in Annex C.

Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code:

Completed No Plan

Ongoing Not Applicable

Planned Missing Data

Late

Main Objectives

AOM13.1

Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

54% Ongoing

‐

Lithuania has relatively small Air Forces. As a consequence, 3 Baltic States applied for NATO to take over airspace defence and sovereignty infringement prevention functions. From 2004 Air Policing mission is took place in the region, formal LoA between NATO and 3 Baltic States was signed. This LoA establishes the handling of OAT and defines roles of and responsibilities allocation between Civil ATCs and Military Control Units. Some elements of EUROAT, namely: Air Traffic Control, Communication, Standard Military Formation, ARES Internal / External flight separation, Crossing of ARES are reflected in the LoA. There are also some provisions in National legislation considering NATO flights, LLF and Speed limitations. Implementation of this objective (AOM13.1) is included in National and Baltic FAB stakeholders Business plans. The decision of ‐to go‐ or ‐not to go‐ will be taken in due time. Eurocontrol will be informed respectively with requirements of EUROAT Annex 1 Chapter The main focus on 2017 for all the stakeholders was a cooperation to amend Aviation law, which is still pending for governments approval. By the end of 2018 its expected that national rules,procedures, regulations according to EUROAT will be met

31/12/2018

REG (By:12/2018)

Military Authority

Regarding NATO Air Policy functions in the three Baltic States, agreement between Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and NATO HQ have been signed effective from 21 June 2004 and amended in 2016. The LoA establishes the handling of OAT and define roles and responsibilities of Civil ATC and Military ACU (Air Control Unit). The Coordination Agreement between SE 'Oro navigacija' and Lithuanian Air forces is force since 2007 (last time amended in 2016).

‐ 40%

Ongoing

31/12/2018


Lithuanian CAA

National regulation is enacted. 1. New LoA between NATO and the 3 Baltic States approved and became effective from 22 December 2014(. Last Update on 1 August 2015) 2. Airspace organization Rules (AoR) approved by LR Government on 17‐03‐2004 (last amendment in 12 Nov 2015 7 Nov 2013). 3. To apply Commission Regulation (EC) No 2150/2005 Article 4 (3) Coordination group of Flexible Use of Airspace was established on 04‐12‐2015.

‐ 40%

Ongoing

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2018)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

The handling of Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) is harmonised in special activities areas. (Ref. to REG Comment above)

‐ 45% Ongoing

31/12/2018

MIL (By:12/2018)

Military Authority

Regarding NATO Air Policy functions in the three Baltic States, agreement between Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and NATO HQ have been signed effective from 21 June 2004 and amended in 2016. The LoA establishes the handling of OAT and define roles and responsibilities of Civil ATC and Military ACU (Air Control Unit). The Coordination Agreement between SE 'Oro navigacija' and Lithuanian Air forces is force since 2007 (last time amended in 2016).

‐ 70%

Ongoing

31/12/2018

AOM19.1 (PCP)

ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced FUA (AFUA) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

32% Ongoing

‐

As from 12 Nov 2015 CDR1 routes within Vilnius FIR/UIR were established.The civil controllers provide service to all flights in the airspace at the exception of TSAs. Activity within TSAs is subject to advance information. FUA procedures for the booking of all TSAs are well established (according to the appropriate LoAs), and are managed by the SE Oro navigacija ATM division, performing AMC functions as well. All necessary information is published in AIP.

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2018)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

As from 12 Nov 2015 CDR1 routes within Vilnius FIR/UIR were established. The civil controllers provide service to all flights in the airspace at the exception of TSAs. Activity within TSAs is subject to advance information. FUA procedures for the booking of all TSAs are well established (according to the appropriate LoAs) and are managed by the SE "Oro navigacija" ATM division, which conducts AMC functions. FRA above FL 95 is implemented as from 10 Dec 2015

‐ 32%

Ongoing

31/12/2018


AOM19.2 (PCP)

ASM Management of Real‐Time Airspace Data Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

0% Planned

‐

The implementation of enhanced Airspace Management (ASM) by automated exchange services of ASM data during the tactical phase is included SE "Oro navigacija". Strategic Business Plan for 2018‐2022. Implementation period 2018‐2021.

31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

The implementation of enhanced Airspace Management (ASM) by automated exchange services of ASM data during the tactical phase is included SE "Oro navigacija". Strategic Business Plan for 2018‐2022. Implementation period 2018‐2021.

‐ 0%

Planned

31/12/2021

AOM19.3 (PCP)

Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

5% Ongoing

‐

The implementation of full rolling ASM/ATFCM process is included SE "Oro navigacija" Strategic Business Plan for 2018‐2022. Implementation period 2018‐2021.

31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

The implementation of full rolling ASM/ATFCM process is included SE "Oro navigacija" Strategic Business Plan for 2018‐2022. Implementation period 2018‐2021.

‐ 5% Ongoing

31/12/2021

AOM21.1 (PCP)

Direct Routing Timescales: Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017

100% Completed

‐

FRA above FL 245 became operational as from 10/12/2015 and above FL 095 became operational as from 08/12/2016 in Vilnius FIR, "... During FRA operations AOs may plan user‐preferred routes by means of DCT or via existing ATS route network or a combination of the two." (LT AIP ENR‐1.10‐7)

10/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2017)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

FRA above FL 245 became operational as from 10/12/2015 and above FL 095 became operational as from 08/12/2016 in Vilnius FIR, "... During FRA operations AOs may plan user‐preferred routes by means of DCT or via existing ATS route network or a combination of the two." (LT AIP ENR‐1.10‐7)

‐ 100%

Completed

10/12/2015


AOM21.2 (PCP)

Free Route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

100% Completed

‐

First step of FRA implementation namely Direct Routing (Ref to AOM21.1) was completed in 10/12/2015. In the context of Vilnius FIR Free Route Airspace services are already fully available for air traffic operators.

31/12/2017

ASP (By:12/2021)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

First step of FRA implementation namely Direct Routing (Ref to AOM21.1) was completed in 10/12/2015. In the context of Vilnius FIR Free Route Airspace services are already fully available for air traffic operators.

Establishment of a Free

Route Airspace

within Baltic FAB

100%

Completed

31/12/2017

AOP04.1

Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A‐SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011

100% Completed

EYVI ‐ Vilnius Airport

Originally this objective was not applicable to Vilnius Airport; Lithuania stepped in only in 2010. Business plans of both Oro Navigacija and Vilnius Airport are harmonised. A surface movement RADAR is installed and operational. The installation of a dependent surveillance system is completed. Certification and "go‐live" of A‐SMGSC level 2 system was performed in 2013.

31/12/2012

REG (By:12/2010)

Lithuanian CAA

Appropriate actions (verification of technical documentation, safety assessment documents etc.) are taken by the regulator in due time. Appropriate procedures are published in LT AIP look for AIC: A 016/2013 http://www.ans.lt/static/aviation_data/aic/lt/ey_circ_2013_a_016_lt.pdf.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2012

ASP (By:12/2011)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

According to the SE "Oro navigacija" Business Plans for 2012‐2016 and 2013‐2017 an A‐SMGCS Level 2 system was successfully implemented and appropriate certificate was issued by NSA/CAA in 04/2013.

‐ 100%

Completed

30/09/2012

APO (By:12/2010)

VILNIUS International Airport

The A‐SMGCS level 2 systems successfully installed Vilnius Airport.

‐ 100% Completed

30/09/2012


AOP04.2

Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017

100% Completed


Originally this objective was not applicable to Vilnius Airport; Lithuania stepped in only in 2010. Business plans of both Oro Navigacija and Vilnius Airport are harmonised. A surface movement RADAR is installed and operational. The installation of a dependent surveillance system is completed. Certification and "go‐live" of A‐SMGSC level 2 systems was performed in 2013.

31/12/2013

ASP (By:12/2017)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

According to the SE "Oro navigacija" Business Plans for 2012‐2016 and 2013‐2017 an A‐SMGCS Level 2 system was successfully implemented and appropriate certificate was issued by NSA/CAA in 04/2013.

Modernization of A‐SMGCS in Vilnius

(Overhaul)

100%

Completed

31/12/2013

APO (By:12/2017)


The A‐SMGCS level 2 systems successfully installed Vilnius Airport.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2011

AOP05

Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A‐CDM) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

69% Late


Budget for A‐CDM implementation was planned according to organisations respective Business plans for (2017‐2019, 2017‐2021). Implementation started; the users and safety committees were also dealing with CDM. Agreed set of CDM elements was partly implemented by the 2rd quarter 2017. Due to lack of potential operational benefits and higher security level requirements further project implementation postponed till 2020.

31/12/2019

ASP (By:12/2016)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

Implementation started; the users and safety committees are also dealing with CDM. Implementation of CDM is foreseen in 2018‐2022 (and subsequent) SE "Oro navigacija" Strategic Business plan. As the implementation processes are postponed, the procedures/methodology for measuring airport performance and results are postponed as well.

‐ 68%

Late

31/12/2019

APO (By:12/2016)


Budget for A‐CDM implementation was planned according to organisations respective Business plans for (2017‐2019, 2017‐2021). Implementation started; the users and safety committees were also dealing with CDM. Agreed set of CDM elements was partly implemented by the 2rd quarter 2017. Due to lack of potentional operational benefits further project implementation postponed till 2020.

‐ 69%

Late

31/12/2019


AOP10 (PCP)

Time‐Based Separation Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable


Any of Lithuanian international airports is in the scope of this task ‐

REG (By:12/2023)

ASP (By:12/2023)

AOP11 (PCP)

Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable


DP2015 refers to the list of airports in PCP 2.2.1/2.2.2 and Vilnius International airport is not on that list.

‐

ASP (By:12/2021)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

‐ ‐ % Not

Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2021)

AOP12 (PCP)

Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable


‐ Vilnius International Airport is not in the applicability area. ‐

ASP (By:12/2020)

Lithuanian Airports

‐ ‐ % Not

Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2020)


AOP13 (PCP)

Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable


‐ ‐

REG (By:12/2023)

Lithuanian CAA

‐ ‐ % Not

Applicable

‐

ASP (By:12/2023)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

According to Annex 1 of Regulation (EU) No 716/2014 on the establishment of the Pilot Common Project and European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation view 2016 Annex E, Lithuania is not in the applicability area.

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

ATC02.8

Ground‐Based Safety Nets Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

57% Late

‐

Area Proximity Warning, Minimum Safe Altitude Warning and Approach Path Monitor ‐ level 1 is implemented. SE "Oro navigacija" plans to implement requirements of this objective in new ATM system (foreseen implementation date 2019) in accordance with ATM Master plan FOC.

31/12/2019

ASP (By:12/2016)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

Planned in SE "Oro navigacija" Business Plan 2018‐2022 in range with the new ATC system procurement and implementation. The full functionality of the Approach Path Monitor will be operational by the end of 2019 with implementation of the new ATC system. Progress "late" because of procurement and implementation procedures.

Installation of new ATC system in

the new ACC / Safety Nets

Level II (Replaceme

nt)

57%

Late

31/12/2019

ATC02.9

Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020

0% No Plan

‐

At the moment Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) system for TMAs is not planned as the traffic load level in Lithuanian TMAs is not high enough. The research for the local need will be done if needed.

‐

ASP (By:12/2020)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

At the moment Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) system for TMAs is not planned as the traffic load level in Lithuanian TMAs is not so high. The research for the local need will be done during 2018.

‐ 0%

No Plan

‐


ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable


For the time being neither Lithuania's airport nor TMAs are in the list of the selected for AMAN implementation ones . Taking into account the forecast of traffic growth within the LSSIP time frame, no need to implement this Objective has been identified yet. Nevertheless within the scope of two currently conducted Feasibility Study and CBA studies on Implementation of Free‐Route Concept and AMAN to En‐route (phase I) deployment the operational need for AMAN is under investigation.

‐

ASP (By:12/2019)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

Taking into account the forecast traffic levels over the LSSIP time frame, no need to implement this Objective has been identified. Nevertheless within the frame of 2 planned from 2013 Feasibility Study and CBA studies on Implementation of Free‐Route Concept and AMAN to En‐route (phase I) deployment needs will be investigated.

iTEC/Convergence of ATM

systems in the Baltic FAB ACCs and Cross Borders Service provision with Joint

Contingency Service Provision

%

Not Applicable

‐


ATC12.1

Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

38% Ongoing

‐

Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring is planned to be implemented in the new ATC system, planned to be procured, implemented and put into operation before FOC.

31/12/2019

ASP (By:12/2021)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring is planned to be implemented in the new ATC system, planned to be procured, implemented and put into operation till 2019.

Controllers ATC

supporting monitoring

tools assessments and upgrade / Installation of new ATC system in

the new ACC /




38%

Ongoing

31/12/2019


ATC15.1

Information Exchange with En‐route in Support of AMAN (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable

‐

Lithuanian airports are not in the scope of this task. Local need is always monitored. ‐

ASP (By:12/2017)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

Safety assessment and Cost Benefit Analysis and Feasibility Studies are planned to be performed first, in range with FS on Free‐route Concept implementation.




%

Not Applicable

‐

ATC15.2 (PCP)

Arrival Management Extended to En‐route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023

% Not

Applicable

‐

Outside of scope of applicability area. ‐

ASP (By:12/2023)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

Outside the scope of applicability area. ‐ % Not

Applicable

‐


ATC17

Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

40% Late

‐

Electronic Dialogue means are planned to be implemented and deployed in 3 steps. Plans are coordinated at Regional and bilateral basis, documented. ATC system manufacturers are communicated and aware. October 2012 ‐ 1st step is coordinated and synchronized with Latvia/LGS and Belarus/BAN during the Regional Meeting. Coordination and synchronization of OLDI implementation for Kaliningrad is done. As Poland PANSA ATC system is operational since December 2013, the short term mutual efforts and activities are subject for further synchronization. This task is late because of long standing procurement procedures (new facilities for new ATC equipment).

31/12/2019

ASP (By:12/2018)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

Electronic Dialogue means are planned to be implemented and deployed in 3 steps. Plans are coordinated at Regional and bilateral basis, documented. October 2012 ‐ 1st step is coordinated and synchronized with Latvia/LGS and Belarus/BAN during the Regional Meeting. Coordination and synchronization of OLDI implementation for Kaliningrad is done. New ATC system, planned to be procured and put into operations before FOC will be capable to support electronic dialogue procedure in Transfer of communication process using OLDI messages (from the list containing ROF, COF, TIM, HOP, MAS and SDM). Development and deployment are synchronized at FAB level (Ref. Project 2.2. of Baltic FAB Implementation Program).




40%

Late

31/12/2019

COM10

Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

44% Ongoing

‐

The basic AMHS capability is implemented and in operational use since 03/09/2012 Extended ATS AMHS capability is introduced into the SE Oro navigacija Strategic business plan for 2018‐2022 and consequently for RP2 reflected in Baltic FAB Performance plan 2015‐2019.

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2018)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

The AMHS basic capability system is implemented, including Gateway to AFTN facility. AMHS/X.400 connection between Oro navigacija COM center in Vilnius and COM center of PANSA in Warsaw has been established in September 2009, connection between COM center in Vilnius and COM center in Riga is in operation since December 2014. Extended ATS MHS capability is introduced into the SE Oro navigacija Strategic business plan for 2018‐2022 and consequently for RP2 reflected in Baltic FAB Performance plan 2015‐2019.

Installation of

AFTN/AMHS system in

the new ACC / Installation of voice

communication system in the new

ACC (Replaceme

nt)

44%

Ongoing

31/12/2018


COM11

Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020

10% Ongoing

‐

SE 'Oro navigacija" network infrastructure, covering all the data interchange needs within Vilnius FIR, is for the time being ready for VoIP utilization for ATM purposes. It is foreseen in SE "Oro navigacija" strategic Business Plan 2018‐2022.

01/01/2019

ASP (By:12/2020)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

SE 'Oro navigacija" network infrastructure, covering all the data interchange needs for ATM purposes within Vilnius FIR, is already deployed and available for VoIP implementation.

Installation of

AFTN/AMHS system in

the new ACC / Installation of new ATC system in

the new ACC / Installation of voice

communication system in the new

ACC (Replaceme

nt)

10%

Ongoing

01/01/2019

COM12 (PCP)

New Pan‐European Network Service (NewPENS) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability (Other stakeholders): 31/12/2024

0% Ongoing

‐

Updated amendment was signed in 2017 4Q to continue the use of PENS till 30th November 2019. Common Procurement Agreement (CPA) of NewPENS was signed in 2017 2Q. Communication services which will be needed from NewPENS have been identified. It is planned to sign NewPENS contract from 2019 Q4 till 2020 Q1. We expect fully operative NewPENS by 31/12/2024.

31/12/2024

ASP (By:12/2024)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

Updated amendment was signed in 2017 4Q to continue the use of PENS till 30th November 2019. Common Procurement Agreement (CPA) of NewPENS was signed in 2017 2Q. Communication services which will be needed from NewPENS have been identified. It is planned to sign NewPENS contract from 2019 Q4 till 2020 Q1. We expect fully operative NewPENS by 31/12/2024.


the new ACC

0%

Ongoing

31/12/2024

APO (By:12/2024)

Lithuanian Airports

‐ ‐ 0% No Plan

‐


ENV01

Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013

100% Completed


CDO is implemented as traffic density allows 24 hours to all flights. Note: At national level CDO is already implemented at Kaunas and Palanga airports as well.

31/12/2010

ASP (By:12/2013)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

SE "Oro navigacija" reviewed the approach procedures. The CDO is implemented in Vilnius to all flights as of 16 December 2010. Appropriate information published in the AIP. Note: At national level CDO is already implemented at Kaunas and Palanga airports as well.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2010

APO (By:12/2013)


CDO is implemented as traffic density allows 24 hours to all flights.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2010

ENV02

Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

70% Late


The Vilnius Airport and the service provider have an environmental conscience. The implementation of CEM measures is included into 2018‐2022 SE ORO NAVIGACIJA Strategic Business Plan, APO has strategic plan and actions on environmental vision

31/12/2019

ASP (By:12/2016)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

The International Vilnius Airport and the service provider have an environmental conscience. The implementation of CEM measures is included into 2018‐2022 SE ORO NAVIGACIJA Strategic Business Plan.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2016

APO (By:12/2016)


A shared environmental vision for the airport has been agreed by all core Stakeholders the main priority mitigation measures addressed so far are: ‐ Noise track adherence procedure established; ‐ Noise abatement procedures published; ‐ Airfield fuel and emissions reduction published; ‐ Joint support for airport growth plans ; ‐ Company's environmental policy is approved and published on official Vilnius airport website; Vilnius International Airport as from 31/03/2016 obtained Carbon accreditation for Level1

‐ 55%

Late

31/12/2019


FCM03

Collaborative Flight Planning Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017

100% Completed

‐

The operational ATC system at Vilnius ACC (i.e. EUROCAT X) supports FCM SLOAs requirements. Collaborative flight planning is implemented and fully operational

31/08/2015

ASP (By:12/2017)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

The operational ATC system at Vilnius ACC (i.e. EUROCAT X) supports FCM SLOAs requirements. Collaborative flight planning is fully operational

‐ 100% Completed

31/08/2015

FCM04.1

Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) ‐ Phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not

Applicable

‐

Outside applicability area. ‐

ASP (By:10/2017)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

‐ ‐ % Not

Applicable

‐

FCM04.2 (PCP)

Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) ‐ Phase 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

16% Ongoing

‐

STAM procedures will be implemented together with Poland (FAB partner) to improve cooperation between adjacent countries and increase operational capacity.

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2021)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

STAM procedures will be implemented together with Poland (FAB partner) to improve cooperation between adjacent countries and increase operational capacity.

‐ 16% Ongoing

31/12/2018


FCM05 (PCP)

Interactive Rolling NOP Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

100% Completed

‐

ATFCM for interaction with NOP are in place. When new tool will be developed and deployed by EUROCONTROL (n‐CONECT programme) then new procedures and respective training for staff will be performed.

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2021)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

ATFCM for interaction with NOP are in place. When new tool will be developed and deployed by EUROCONTROL (n‐CONECT programme) then new procedures and respective training for staff will be performed.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2016

APO (By:12/2021)

Lithuanian Airports

As it is stated in AOP11 ‐ The data sharing between the Airport Operations Plan and the Network Operations Plan is addressed by objective FCM05. AOP11 is not applicable to Lithuania airports.

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐

FCM06 (PCP)

Traffic Complexity Assessment Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

0% Late

‐

The request application form for Traffic Complexity Tool is already sent to SDM together with Baltic FAB partner PANSA. The key milestones are determined in terms of Baltic FAB context. Expected implementation date for Vilnius TCT by 01/01/2022. It is planned, that TCT will be fully operative in Baltic FAB by 31/12/2022 The application form has been not confirmed by SDM yet. If the application form is confirmed we will probably be late for 1 year.

01/01/2022

ASP (By:12/2021)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

The request application form for Traffic Complexity Tool is already sent to SDM together with Baltic FAB partner PANSA. The key milestones are determined in terms of Baltic FAB context. Expected implementation date for Vilnius TCT by 01/01/2022. It is planned, that TCT will be fully operative in Baltic FAB by 31/12/2022

‐ 0%

Late

01/01/2022

FCM08 (PCP)

Extended Flight Plan Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

0% No Plan

‐

Point of contact for SE "Oro navigacija" is appointed and waiting for guidelines / specifications to be drafted by EUROCONTROL. Procedures are still not foreseen to be implemented according to SE "Oro navigacija" Strategic Business Plan 2018‐2022.

‐

ASP (By:12/2021)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

Point of contact for SE "Oro navigacija" is appointed and waiting for guidelines / specifications to be drafted by EUROCONTROL. Procedures are still not foreseen to be implemented according to SE "Oro navigacija" Strategic Business Plan 2018‐2022.

‐ 0%

No Plan

‐


INF07

Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 31/05/2018

65% Ongoing

‐

ICAO Annex 15 and its requirements concerning TOD and eTOD are transposed in National legislation as from 5 of April 2012 (approved by the CAA director order No. 4R‐89). TOD implementation coordination performed in scope of Working Group (which includes all stakeholders concerned) established by CAA director order No 4R‐86 on 2 April 2012 (amended by CAA director order No 4R‐26 on 7 February 2014) which also monitor the implementation of National plan for AIS‐AIM transition and harmonized ADQ requirements implementation.

31/05/2018

REG (By:05/2018)

Lithuanian CAA

ICAO Annex 15 and its requirements concerning TOD and eTOD are transposed in National legislation as from 5 of April 2012 (approved by the CAA director order No. 4R‐89). TOD implementation coordination performed in scope of Working Group (which includes all stakeholders concerned) established by CAA director order No 4R‐86 on 2 April 2012 (amended by CAA director order No 4R‐26 on 7 February 2014) which also monitor the implementation of National plan for AIS‐AIM transition and harmonized ADQ requirements implementation.

Coordinated AIS

provision within Baltic

FAB

60%

Ongoing

31/05/2018

ASP (By:05/2018)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

eTOD data provision included in SLoAs signed between AISP, GIS (Geodetic Information Service) and International Airports. Collection, management and provision of TOD requirements implementation is in progress.

Coordinated AIS


FAB

70%

Ongoing

31/05/2018

APO (By:05/2018)

Lithuanian Airports

eTOD data provision included in SLoAs signed between AISP and GIS, International Airports. If situation will require, additional plans will be issued.

‐ 70% Ongoing

31/05/2018

ITY‐ACID

Aircraft Identification Timescales: Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020

30% Ongoing

‐

The appropriate objectives and measures concerning implementation of requirements of Regulation 1206/2011 and Regulation 1207/2011 are introduced in the Enterprise Strategic Business Plan for 2018‐2022

31/12/2019

ASP (By:01/2020)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

The appropriate objectives and measures concerning implementation of requirements of Regulation 1206/2011 and Regulation 1207/2011 are introduced in the Enterprise Strategic Business Plan for 2018‐2022


the new ACC

30%

Ongoing

31/12/2019


ITY‐ADQ

Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information Timescales: Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017

68% Late

‐

For the timely and harmonized ICAO Roadmap for transition from AIS to AIM and Commission Regulation (EU) 73/2010 (ADQ) requirements implementation in Lithuania, the National plan for AIS‐AIM transition and harmonized ADQ requirements implementation was developed and approved in 2012. Lithuania identified initial list of stakeholders impacted by the ADQ regulation and conducted an awareness campaign on new requirements. Some parts of ADQ regulation are represented in the Aeronautical information services providing rules approved on 5 of April 2012 by CAA director order No. 4R‐89 with amendments (transposition of ICAO Annex 15 including amendment 39). Legislation change process for full implementation of ADQ requirements is in progress, technological and management updates are foreseen.

31/05/2018

REG (By:06/2017)

Lithuanian CAA

For the timely and harmonized ICAO Roadmap for transition from AIS to AIM and Commission Regulation (EU) 73/2010 (ADQ) requirements implementation in Lithuania, the National plan for AIS‐AIM transition and harmonized ADQ requirements implementation was approved by CAA Director order No. 4R‐33 on 7 February 2012. Task Force (including all parties concerned) was established on CAA Director order No. 4R‐86 on 2 April 2012 (amended by CAA director order No 4R‐26 on 7 February 2014).

Coordinated AIS


FAB / Optimization of MET service provision model

within Baltic FAB

70%

Late

31/05/2018

ASP (By:06/2017)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

Basing on National plan for AIS‐AIM transition and harmonized ADQ requirements implementation and SE "Oro navigacija" AIS/AIM Transition plan in force since 2010, appropriate detailed planning and activities were launched and conducted in due time to ensure implementation of foreseen steps as required.

Coordinated AIS


FAB / Installation of new ATC system in

the new ACC /

Optimization of MET service provision model

within Baltic FAB

71%

Late

31/05/2018

APO (By:06/2017)

Lithuanian Airports

Adequate activities as required by National plan are initiated and the process is ongoing.

‐ 62% Late

31/05/2018


ITY‐AGDL

Initial ATC Air‐Ground Data Link Services Timescales: Entry into force: 06/02/2009 ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020

28% Ongoing

‐

Lithuania: the COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/310 of 26 February 2015 amended Regulation (EC) No 29/2009 laying down requirements on data link services for the single European sky so the implementation of AGDL capabilities in the current ATC system in Vilnius ACC became not relevant in terms of CAPEX and OPEX. Initially planned implementation of Interim solution via deploying a transitional stand‐alone system in support to the current ATC system to operate AGDL services postponed by 2018 after publication of amended regulation. The new ATC system, planned to be installed by 2019, will be capable to operate data link services. Common application for AGDL funding through CEF 2016 call was prepared by SDM and provided to INEA.

31/12/2019

REG (By:02/2018)

Lithuanian CAA

Lithuania: the COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/310 of 26 February 2015 amended Regulation (EC) No 29/2009 laying down requirements on data link services for the single European sky so the implementation of AGDL capabilities in the current ATC system in Vilnius ACC became not relevant in terms of CAPEX and OPEX. Initially planned implementation of Interim solution via deploying a transitional stand‐alone system in support to the current ATC system to operate AGDL services postponed by 2018 after publication of amended regulation. It is planned, that the new ATC system, capable to operate data link services, would be installed by 2019. CAA agreed on the technical specifications and requirements for the new future ATM/ANS system concept that includes implementation of the data link services.

ASM/ATFCM Cooperation within Baltic

FAB

0%

Late

31/12/2019

ASP (By:02/2018)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

Lithuania: the implementation of full AGDL capabilities in the current ATC system in Vilnius ACC, operational since 2006, was assessed too expensive taking into account the fact that Vilnius ACC has never generated any delays and has sufficient capacity and controller's workload gains, as well as the fact that only 24% of traffic crossing Vilnius FIR can use AGDL services. Having in mind provisions of REGULATION (EU) 2015/310 of 26 February 2015 amended Regulation (EC) No 29/2009 ORO Navigacija made the decision to deploy an interim solution ‐ transitional stand‐alone system in support to the current ATC system to operate AGDL services by 2016 and to implement the full AGDL capability solution in the new ATC system by 2019. Depends on new ACC system implementation (planned to be fully deployed by 31/12/2019). Common application for AGDL funding through CEF 2016 call was prepared by SDM and provided to INEA. Approval from CAA on the technical specifications and requirements for the future ATM/ANS system concept that includes implementation of the data link services is received.

ASM/ATFCM Cooperation within Baltic

FAB / Installation of new ATC system in

the new ACC

25%

Late

31/12/2019


MIL (By:01/2019)

Military Authority

Military equipped new State aircraft entered into service from 1 January 2014 with data link capability

‐ 100% Completed

01/01/2014

ITY‐AGVCS2

8,33 kHz Air‐Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 Timescales: Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020

56% Ongoing

‐

8,33 kHz capability (in biggest part radio stations in use) installed and operational. 8,33 kHz frequencies separation in Lithuania's aviation sector will be introduced (and apropriatelly published in AIP) when it will be necessary in terms of operational needs.

31/12/2019

REG (By:12/2018)

Lithuanian CAA

CAA performing the conformity assessment of purchase and implementation of CNS equipment taking measures to verify what CNS equipment satisfies ICAO, ES, EUROCONTROL and Lithuanian standards. This statement is in national legislation and verification of compliance are insured during Annual On‐going Safety Oversight Program, which is updated each calendar year. Appropriate measures are taken concerning aircraft equipage with radios having the 8,33 kHz channel spacing capability.

‐ 50%

Ongoing

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2018)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

8,33 kHz capability (in biggest part radio stations in use) installed and operational. 8,33 kHz frequencies separation in Lithuania's aviation sector will be introduced (and appropriately published in AIP) when it will be necessary in terms of operational needs


the new ACC

78%

Ongoing

31/12/2018

Military Authority

MIL provide COM services only in Military‐Civil Siauliai aerodrome. MIL ground radios already have 8,33 kHz capability. Operationally 8,33 kHz frequencies separation will be introduced when it will be necessary.

‐ 71%

Late

31/12/2019

MIL (By:12/2020)

Military Authority

State aircraft (MIL) and ground radios already have 8,33 kHz capability. Operationally 8,33 kHz frequencies separation will be introduced when it will be necessary.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2014

APO (By:12/2018)

Lithuanian Airports

Implementation of 8,33 kHz spacing requirements in Lithuania's International Airports will be considered in Entitie's Business plans for 2018‐2022. This is considered as Low Key activities for this particular Obj.

‐ 10%

No Plan

‐

Military Authority

‐ ‐ 3% Ongoing

31/12/2018


ITY‐FMTP

Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014

100% Completed

‐

The ATC system is modified to exchange data via FMTP. Communication infrastructure to support FMTP is in place. All the relevant agreements are signed before 20/04/2011with the ANSP's of adjacent states which has to comply with EC Regulations. Tested and in operational use with Kaliningrad ACC and Riga ACC.

31/12/2011

ASP (By:12/2014)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

SE "Oro navigacija" was ready to use flight transfer and coordination data exchange based on FMTP before the target date as 4th of April 2011: the ATC system modified to exchange data via FMTP. Communication infrastructure to support FMTP was in place. Formal agreements on usage of IPv6 are signed with Latvia's and Poland's ANSPs were signed before the target date. Moreover, SE "Oro navigacija" is ready for immediate transition to IPv6 if needed.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2011

MIL (By:12/2014)

Military Authority

Military do not provide ATC services. ‐ % Not

Applicable

‐


ITY‐SPI

Surveillance Performance and Interoperability Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 EHS and ADS‐B Out in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 ELS in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020

100% Completed

‐

Surveillance data from all existing radars are ready to be transmitted to the neighbouring air navigation service provider via network infrastructure in ASTERIX (range of Cat. ‐ subject for agreement). The existing ATC system is able to generate surveillance data in Cat. 062 to be used in other systems for non‐ATC purposes.

29/03/2016

REG (By:02/2015)

Lithuanian CAA

Safety Oversight of parts of surveillance chain mentioned in Regulation (EU) No 1207/2011 Article 3(6) and constituted of: (b) ground‐based surveillance systems, their constituents and associated procedures; (c) surveillance data processing systems, their constituents and associated procedures; (d) ground‐to‐ground communications systems used for distribution of surveillance data, their constituents and associated procedures; are covered now by On‐going Safety Oversight programme performed by NSA/CAA Lithuania. Scope of this Ongoing Safety Oversight established in related SES legislation (Regulation (EU) 1035/2011, Regulation (EC) No 552/2004, etc.). Verification of requirements of Regulation (EU) 1207/2011 was introduced in On‐going Safety Oversight programme and certified ANSPs Annual on‐going safety oversight plan as from 2013.

‐ 100%

Completed

29/03/2016

ASP (By:02/2015)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

Surveillance data from 3 radars are ready to be transmitted to the neighboring air navigation service provider via network infrastructure in ASTERIX (range of Cat. ‐ subject for agreement).The existing ATC system is able to generate surveillance data in Cat. 062 to be used in other systems for non‐ ATC purposes. SLAs for radar data provision between SE “Oro navigacija” and Latvian ANSP LGS was signed on 3 November 2014. SLAs for radar data provision between SE “Oro navigacija” and PANSA was signed on 4 May 2016. New SLA for Vilnius, Kaunas and Palanga radar data provision in ASTERIX format from SE “Oro navigacija” to military surveillance system was signed on 17 January 2017.

Modernization of A‐SMGCS in Vilnius

(Overhaul)

100%

Completed

31/01/2014

MIL (By:06/2020)

Military Authority

Surveillance data from 3 civil radars are received to military surveillance system in ASTERIX format. There is already data from one military radar transmitted to the civil ANSP for ATS purposes. This radar is appropriately certified by CAA.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2015


NAV03.1

RNAV 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023

100% Completed

‐

The Arrival and Departure RNAV 1 procedures in place are based on GNSS at Vilnius, Palanga, and Kaunas International airports. For the short term, no need to implement this Objective for En‐route has been identified. The ground DME/DME infrastructure in Vilnius TMA is fully implemented

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2023)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

The Arrival and Departure RNAV 1 procedures in place are based on GNSS at Vilnius, Palanga, and Kaunas (additionally DME/DME at Vilnius) International airports. Status ‐ Completed

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2016

NAV03.2 (PCP)

RNP 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023

0% No Plan

‐

Any of Lithuanian airport is included in the section 1.2.1 of the Annex of the PCP Regulation. At the moment, there is no need to implement RNP 1 procedures and systems. However local business needs will be monitored.

‐

ASP (By:12/2023)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

‐ ‐ 0% No Plan

‐


NAV10

APV Procedures Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

30% Late

‐

Modern and reliable ILSs are available on both runway ends at Vilnius and Kaunas airports; and one ILS at Palanga Airport with operational life time beyond 2016. Nevertheless Feasibility and CBA studies are launched to identify where APV procedures should be developed (according to National PBN implementation plan). The possibility to establish APV/SBAS procedures at Palanga Airport are overlooked with PANSA (Baltic FAB partner). The target date of APV/SBAS procedures establishment at Palanga Airport is 31/12/2019.

31/12/2019

REG (By:04/2016)

Lithuanian CAA

Procedure PR‐10 "Issue of the special permissions" approved by CAA director order No. 17R‐12 on 9 April 2015 to implement Regulation (EU) 965/2012 Annex V PART‐SPA. New issue was published on 29 July 2016 by CAA director order No. 17R‐22. CAA director approved Lithuanian state PBN plan in January 2017. Plan consists in the implementation of RNAV and RNP procedures required by ICAO 37 11 assembly resolution and NAV 10, also the plan was focused on the SESAR JU and future EC regulations.

‐ 100%

Completed

29/07/2016

ASP (By:12/2016)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

To contribute to the implementation of EATM Master Plan OI steps AOM‐0602 and AOM‐0603, the feasibility and CBA studies to identify runways where APV should be introduced, launched in 2012 and completed by 04/2016. Three International airports (Vilnius, Kaunas, Planaga) have the RNAV 1 (GNSS and additionally DME/DME in Vilnius) Instrumental approach in operation. It could be upgraded to the APV/Baro as well as APV/SBAS based on FS and CBA studies mentioned above. Due to it National PBN Implementation plan was signed by Lithuanian REG CAA and SE "Oro Navigacija" 25/01/2017. At the moment there is a plan to upgrade Palanga Airport only.

‐ 7%

Late

31/12/2019


SAF11

Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018

100% Completed

‐

Implementing Eurocontrol ESP+, EASA EASP requirements CAA Lithuania by director order No. 4R‐84 approved an "CAA Safety Plan for 2014‐2017". All the measures related to the improvement of runway safety by preventing runway excursions and entities responsible are foreseen in this plan. CAA as supervisor will verify effectiveness of implementation of respective parts of EAPPRE by stakeholders.

31/12/2015

REG (By:01/2018)

Lithuanian CAA

Implementing Eurocontrol ESP+, EASA EASP requirements CAA Lithuania by director order No. 4R‐84 approved an "CAA Safety Plan for 2014‐2017". All the measures related to the improvement of runway safety by preventing runway excursions and entities responsible are foreseen in this plan.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2014)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

Applicable measures of the Action plan (EAPPRE) were respectively implemented in 2014.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2014

APO (By:12/2014)

Military Authority

Applicable measures of the Action plan, Parts 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 reflected in SE Int. Vilnius Airport Strategic Business Plan for 2015‐2018. Aerodrome is fully certified against ICAO Annex 14 requirements. MIL do not provide ATS. Safety Team in Siauliai airport established. Aerodrome fully compliant with requirements of ICAO Annex 14 vol. 1 (regularly audited by CAA). ANSP is civil and appropriately certified.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2014


‐ ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2014


Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring

ATC02.2

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) ‐ level 2 for en‐route operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013

100% Completed

‐

STCA level 2 is operational. The ATC system functionality is compliant to EUROCONTROL STCA Level 2 requirements, procedures are developed, approved and ATCOs are trained.

31/01/2013

ASP (By:01/2013)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

Assessment of all ATC operational systems within Vilnius FIR including contingency ATC system against the EUROCONTROL specification for STCA level 2 was performed. All required actions and measures were introduced to achieve full compliance.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/01/2013

ATC16

Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015

100% Completed

‐

CAA performs all the appropriate actions including organization of extended awareness campaign. Initial training is performed, refreshing training is performed on regular basis for all personnel concerned. All the necessary further actions will be performed by SE Oro navigacija" in range with CAA actions. Military transport aircrafts which are currently in use are ACAS II equipped

31/01/2015

REG (By:12/2015)

Lithuanian CAA

CAA performs all the appropriate actions including organization of extended awareness campaign. Amendment to Rules of the Air concerning Regulation 1332/2011 was adopted by 2012‐03‐14 Government decision No. 290 (Zin. 2012, Nr. 34‐1629) Neither additional nor specific actions are needed to be performed and/or planned.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/01/2015

ASP (By:03/2012)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

Awareness compaign is performed. Initial training is completed, refreshing training is performed on regular basis for all personnel concerned. All the necessary further actions will be performed in range with CAA actions.




100%

Completed

31/03/2012

MIL (By:12/2015)

Military Authority

Military transport aircrafts which are currently in use are ACAS II equipped

‐ 100% Completed

31/01/2015


FCM01

Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006

100% Completed

‐

Services are in use, functionality was deployed on 13th of April, 2011. New SLA with CFMU was signed in February 2011.

31/12/2011

ASP (By:07/2014)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

Full implementation of the SLOAs of this objective is completed. The ATC system is upgraded, functionality is deployed on 13th of April, 2011

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2011

INF04

Implement integrated briefing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/2002 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012

100% Completed

‐

The Lithuanian self‐briefing project completed in 2013. The integrated briefing project is implemented. Correlation with EAD in Vilnius airport is completed. Level 4 is achieved in accordance with the Guidance material (Integrated Briefing High Level Concept Document). PIB and Complemented Meteo Information could be gathered at one terminal.

30/06/2012

ASP (By:12/2012)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

The Lithuanian self‐briefing project completed in 2013. The integrated briefing project is implemented. Correlation with EAD in Vilnius airport is completed. Correlation with in other airports (Kaunas, Siauliai and Palanga) EAD will be completed in 1st quarter 2014. Meteo modal has been integrated on application level, however data are not yet cross‐linked.

‐ 100%

Completed

30/06/2012


ITY‐COTR

Implementation of ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes Timescales: Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012

100% Completed

‐

This function was implemented together with ATC Eurocat X system as a constituent, which was installed and approved to operation by CAA in 2005. Certificate was renewed in November 2012. All the required facilities were delivered in due time and requested functionalities are in place. LoA with adjacent Centres (namely Latvia, and Belarus) are updated. From October 2014 with Kaliningrad ACC is in operational use. Data‐Link related OLDI messages are planned to be implemented.

28/02/2015

ASP (By:12/2012)

ORO NAVIGACIJA

SE "Oro navigacija" has implemented the consolidated project on ICAO FPL2012 model implementation and OLDI enhancement Phased approach to implement OLDI 4.2 is applied: ‐ by the 31 December 2012 for Basic functionalities ‐ implemented, fully operational with Latvian LGS and Belarus BAN; ‐ by the end of 2015 for agreed on Regional basis (for planning coordination purposes) and on bilateral ‐ with the neighboring ATC Units (for deployment purposes) appropriate sets of "Dialog OLDI" and "Transfer of Communication" Basic messages as required by Regulation will be exchanged with PANSA once all Basic OLDI messages from Pegasus‐21 system is available.

Optimization of

ATM/CNS technical

infrastructure within Baltic FAB

100%

Completed

28/02/2015

MIL (By:12/2012)

Military Authority

Military do not provide ATS. Nevertheless, all appropriate ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes are operational between Civil and Military units.

‐ %

Not Applicable

‐


Local Objectives

Note: Local Objectives are addressing solutions that are considered beneficial for specific operating environments, therefore for which a clear widespread commitment has not been expressed yet. They are characterised with no deadline and voluntary applicability area.

AOP14 Remote Tower Services Applicability and timescale: Local

% Planned


SE ORO NAVIGACIJA is participating in the ATM research project of the Remote Tower Services for the multiple aerodromes under SESAR2020 programme. This project will last till the end of 2019. Internally the task force has been established to evaluate the possibilities of the remote tower services provision of Lithuanian international airports (EYPA, EYSA, EYKA, EYVI). SE ORO NAVIGACIJA could start the implementation of the remote tower services provision after 2020.

31/12/2022

ATC18 Multi‐Sector Planning En‐route ‐ 1P2T Applicability and timescale: Local

% Planned

‐

The concept of MSP will be reviewed and analysed for further actions of implementation during 2018. Note: the date indicates the possibility to have this objective implemented.

31/12/2020

ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local

20% Ongoing


At the moment 4 out of 18 SID in Vilnius TMA are approved for full Continuous Climb Operations. Other SID routes are partially approved for CCO (GND up to FL80) As per National PBN Implementation Plan (25/01/2017) the full establishment of CCO operations at EYVI expected till the end of 2020.

31/12/2020

NAV12 Optimised Low‐Level IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft Applicability and timescale: Local

% No Plan

‐

Due to low traffic load in all Lithuanian TMAs, there is no need to establish optimised Low‐Level IFR Routes for Rotorcraft at the moment.

‐


ANNEXES

ANNEX A ‐ Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process

LSSIP Co‐ordination

LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name

LSSIP National Focal Point for Lithuania SE “Oro navigacija” Mr. Kazimieras JAKAS

LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA CAA/NSA Mr. Rytis DUBICKAS

LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP SE “Oro navigacija” Mrs. Vilma DELTUVAITĖ

LSSIP Focal Point for Airport SE “Lithuanian Airports” Vilnius branch

Mr. Tautvydas BUTKUS

LSSIP Focal Point for Military Lithuanian Air Force HQ Major Juozas JANUŠKEVIČIUS

EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support

Function Directorate Name

LSSIP Contact Person for Lithuania DPS/PEPR Frédéric ROOSELEER


Implementation Objectives

Implementation Objective

EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator

EUROCONTROL Objective Owners

National Stakeholder Specialist

AOM13.1 A. DYBOWSKA O. MROWICKI/ C. LUCCIOLI Rytis DUBICKAS Juozas JANUŠKEVIČIUS Rimantas RUDNICKAS

AOM19.1 O. ALFARO G. ACAMPORA /

O. MROWICKI

Oleg SKIBICKIJ Virginijus ŽIKAS Ramūnas STUNDŽIA


O. MROWICKI

Oleg SKIBICKIJ Virginijus ŽIKAS Ramūnas STUNDŽIA


O. MROWICKI

Oleg SKIBICKIJ Virginijus ŽIKAS Ramūnas STUNDŽIA Rasa ŠIUPIENYTĖ

AOM21.1 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN Nerijus MALECKAS

AOM21.2 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN Nerijus MALECKAS

AOP04.1 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM

Tautvydas BUTKUS Jurij BERSENEV Saulius PAULAUSKAS Ligita JUŠKIENĖ Liudas MAŠNAUSKAS Tomas TAMAŠAUSKAS

AOP04.2 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM

Tautvydas BUTKUS Rytis DUBICKAS Ligita JUŠKIENĖ Liudas MAŠNAUSKAS Tomas TAMAŠAUSKAS

AOP05 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE Tautvydas BUTKUS Ligita JUŠKIENĖ Tomas TAMAŠAUSKAS

AOP10 F. ROOSELEER R. GRAHAM

AOP11 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE

AOP12 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM

AOP13 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM

AOP14 A. DYBOWSKA R. GRAHAM / G. ASSIRE Tomas TAMAŠAUSKAS

ATC02.8 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI Nerijus MALECKAS

ATC02.9 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI Nerijus MALECKAS

ATC07.1 L. DELL’ORTO pending Ligita JUŠKIENĖ

ATC12.1 L. DELL’ORTO pending Nerijus MALECKAS

ATC15.1 L. DELL’ORTO pending Nerijus MALECKAS

ATC15.2 L. DELL’ORTO P. HOP Nerijus MALECKAS

ATC17 L. DELL’ORTO S. MORTON Nerijus MALECKAS

ATC18 L. DELL’ORTO I. PENDACHANSKI Nerijus MALECKAS

COM10 J. PINTO Y. EYUBOGLU Algirdas PAUKŠTĖ Mindaugas RUDOKAS Andrius LIUKPETRIS


COM11 J. PINTO L. POPESCU Algirdas PAUKŠTĖ Mindaugas RUDOKAS Andrius LIUKPETRIS

COM12 J. PINTO W. JANSSENS Tautvydas BUTKUS Tomas TAMAŠAUSKAS Andrius LIUKPETRIS

ENV01 B. HILL D. BRAIN Tautvydas BUTKUS Oleg SKIBICKIJ

ENV02 B. HILL S. MAHONY Tautvydas BUTKUS Virginijus ŽIKAS Tomas TAMAŠAUSKAS

ENV03 A‐P. FRANGOLHO D. BRAIN Oleg SKIBICKIJ

FCM03 O. CIOARA C. BOUMAN/I. PENDACHANSKI

Rasa ŠIUPIENYTĖ Andrius LIUKPETRIS

FCM04.1 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI

FCM04.2 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI Rasa ŠIUPIENYTĖ Andrius LIUKPETRIS

FCM05 O. CIOARA I. MENDES VIDEIRA/I. PENDACHANSKI

Rasa ŠIUPIENYTĖ Andrius LIUKPETRIS

FCM06 F. ROOSELEER P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI Rasa ŠIUPIENYTĖ Andrius LIUKPETRIS

FCM08 O. CIOARA K. BREIVIK/I. PENDACHANSKI Rasa ŠIUPIENYTĖ Andrius LIUKPETRIS

INF07 A‐P. FRANGOLHO A. PETROVSKY Tautvydas BUTKUS Eglė GAIDELYTĖ Virginijus STEPONAVIČIUS

ITY‐ACID O. CIOARA pending Mindaugas RUDOKAS

ITY‐ADQ A‐P. FRANGOLHO M. UNTERREINER Tautvydas BUTKUS Eglė GAIDELYTĖ Virginijus STEPONAVIČIUS

ITY‐AGDL B. HILL D. ISAAC

Jurij BERSENEV Mindaugas RUDOKAS Audrius JONAVIČIUS Juozas JANUŠKEVIČIUS

ATY‐AGVCS2 B. HILL J. POUZET

Tautvydas BUTKUS Rytis DUBICKAS Ramūnas STUNDŽIA Algirdas PAUKŠTĖ Mindaugas RUDOKAS Audrius JONAVIČIUS Juozas JANUŠKEVIČIUS

ITY‐FMTP O. ALFARO L. POPESCU Mindaugas RUDOKAS

ITY‐SPI O. CIOARA M. BORELY

Jurij BERSENEV Mindaugas RUDOKAS Audrius JONAVIČIUS Juozas JANUŠKEVIČIUS

NAV03.1 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC Oleg SKIBICKIJ Remigijus MALINAUSKAS

NAV03.2 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC

NAV10 I. MARCETIC R. FARNWORTH Jurij BERSENEV

Oleg SKIBICKIJ

NAV12 I. MARCETIC B. RABILLER / F. RIQUET

SAF11 F. ROOSELEER

pending Tautvydas BUTKUS Saulius PAULAUSKAS Jonas CHADASEVICIUS Tautvydas BUTKUS Juozas JANUŠKEVIČIUS


ANNEX B ‐ National Stakeholders Organisation charts

Lithuanian CAA


Organisational structure of the State Enterprise “Oro navigacija”


Organisational structure of Military Authorities


Organisational structure of State Enterprise Lithuanian Airports


ANNEX C – Implementation Objectives’ Applicability

Objective SESAR

Key Feature

ICAO ASBU

B0 European ATM Masterplan Level 3 Applicability area

AOM13.1

‐ All ECAC States except Albania, Latvia, Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC and

Moldova.

AOM19.1

B0‐FRTO All ECAC States except Armenia, FYROM, Malta, Luxembourg, and

Moldova

AOM19.2

‐ All ECAC States except Armenia, Luxembourg and Moldova

AOM19.3

‐ All ECAC States except Armenia, Luxembourg and Moldova

AOM21.1

B0‐FRTO 25 ECAC States

AOM21.2

‐ All ECAC States except Azerbaijan, Belgium, Luxembourg and the

Netherlands

AOP04.1

B0‐SURF 25 PCP airports, 22 non‐PCP airports

AOP04.2

B0‐SURF 25 PCP airports, 22 non‐PCP airports

AOP05

B0‐ACDM 25 PCP airports, 21 non‐PCP airports

AOP10

‐ 16 PCP Airports

AOP11

‐ 24 PCP airports, 15 non‐PCP airports

AOP12

‐ 25 PCP airports

AOP13

‐ 25 PCP airports

AOP14

‐ Local: Low to medium complexity aerodromes, subject to local needs

ATC02.2 B0‐SNET Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable all ECAC States that did

not yet implement it

ATC02.8

B0‐SNET All ECAC States except the Netherlands

ATC02.9

B0‐SNET TMAs, according to local business needs

ATC07.1

B0‐RSEQ 23 PCP Airports, 8 non‐PCP airports

ATC12.1

‐ All ECAC States except Luxembourg

ATC15.1

B0‐RSEQ

EU States except Cyprus, Greece, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Slovak

Republic, Slovenia. Plus: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Maastricht UAC,

Norway, Switzerland, Turkey

ATC15.2

‐ ACCs within the extended AMAN horizon, including those adjacent to

TMAs serving/associated to PCP airports

ATC16 B0‐ACAS Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that

did not yet implement it

ATC17

B0‐FICE All ECAC States except Ireland, Slovak Republic and Ukraine

ATC18

‐ Local: Subject to local needs and complexity

COM10

‐ All ECAC States

COM11

‐ All ECAC States


COM12

‐

‐ Area 1 (ANSPs signatories of the NewPENS Common Procurement

Agreement): 33 ANSPs

‐ Area 2 (Other stakeholders): Stakeholders from all ECAC States not part

of Area 1

ENV01

B0‐CDO 59 Airports

ENV02

‐ 47 Airports

ENV03

B0‐CCO Local: Aerodromes subject to local needs and complexity

FCM01 B0‐NOPS Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that


FCM03

B0‐NOPS All ECAC States

FCM04.1

B0‐NOPS Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Poland,

Spain, Switzerland

FCM04.2

B0‐NOPS All EU+ States

FCM05

B0‐NOPS All ECAC States except Armenia, FYROM, Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC

and Moldova

FCM06

B0‐NOPS All EU+ States

FCM07

‐ All EU+ States

FCM08

‐ All ECAC States

FCM09

‐ All ECAC States

INF04 B0‐DATM Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that


INF07

‐ All ECAC States except Maastricht UAC

INF08.1

‐ All EU+ States

INF08.2

‐ All EU+ States

ITY‐ACID

‐ All EU+ States

ITY‐ADQ

B0‐DATM All EU+ States except FYROM, Georgia and Maastricht UAC

ITY‐AGDL

B0‐TBO All EU+ States except Georgia, Luxembourg and Netherlands

ITY‐AGVCS2

‐ All EU+ States except Georgia and Moldova

ITY‐COTR B0‐FICE Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable all EU+ States that did

not yet implement it

ITY‐FMTP

B0‐FICE All ECAC States

ITY‐SPI

B0‐ASUR All EU+ States

NAV03.1

B0‐CDO,

B0‐CCO All ECAC States except Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC and Slovak Republic

NAV03.2

‐ Mandatory for TMAs listed in section 1.2.1 of the Annex of the PCP

Regulation. For all other ECAC TMAs, according to local business needs

NAV10

B0‐APTA All ECAC States except Maastricht UAC

NAV12

‐ Local: TMAs subject to local needs and complexity

SAF11

‐ All ECAC States except Malta


Legend:

Objective’s link to SESAR Key Feature:


High Performing Airport Operations

Advanced Air Traffic Services



ANNEX D ‐ Glossary of Abbreviations

This Annex mostly shows only the Abbreviations that are specific to the LSSIP Lithuania.

Other general abbreviations are in the Acronyms and Abbreviations document in http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries

Term Description

ATMAS ATM (civil‐military) Integration project in Lithuania

BAN Baltic ATSO Network

DPS Data Processing Systems

LCAA Lithuanian Civil Aviation Administration (regulator)

ON SE “Oro navigacija”(Lithuanian ANS provider)

SITA Societe Internationale des Communications Aeronautiques