location based services - 123seminarsonly.com...increasing number of mobile phone subscribers,...
TRANSCRIPT
DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY
FACULTY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES
UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN, IBADAN, NIGERIA.
Staff/Postgraduate Seminar
LOCATION BASED SERVICES
being Area Paper
by
ENARUVBE, GLORY OMOFAWHORAN
(76073)
SUPERVISOR: PROF. ‘BOLA AYENI
September 9, 2011.
2 | P a g e
1.0 Introduction
Recent developments in Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) have
brought about an array of applications. These have also changed inter-personal relationships
and interaction between people, places and how business services are conducted. This is more
so as the production and marketing of goods and services are now more information
dependent. The need to transmit information has accelerated due to a deregulated worldwide
market which has increased uncertainty and the competition among places for investment and
jobs. Also, economic activities are now conducted over ever larger distances resulting in the
need for deployment and use of telecommunications systems that has become indispensable
in the contemporary economic landscapes (Warf, 2006).
Townsend, (2007) describe the pervasive deployment of telecommunications
networks as one of the defining characteristics of the late 20th-century cities in the developed
world. These technologies provided versatile channels for public and private social, political,
and economic communications, and helped reshape the geography of many human activities.
Urban sprawl is one way urban form has responded to the new spatial freedoms allowed by
pervasive use of telecommunications.
The 21st century saw the deployment of digital telecommunications and computing
technologies resulting in much greater flexibility and sophistication when compared with the
earlier analogue systems. These technologies are capable of providing greater variety of
services tailored to users needs. Advances in mobile wireless communications, therefore,
have greatly expand the ability to communicate from a wider variety of urban locations. The
mobile phones have significantly revolutionized telecommunication and drastically affected
life style and interaction in modern societies. The voice capabilities of the mobile phones are
currently augmented with data capabilities of increasing speed. The small size mobile
terminals – mobile phones and PDAs – are being integrated and are evolving into smart
phones and communicators, which allows users to access Mobile Internet services and run
applications at any time and in any location (Virrantaus, et al, 2001).
In a recent report, (ITU, 2010) the International Telecommunications Union estimate
that the global number of mobile phone subscribers will be over five billion in 2010 while the
prices of information communication technology (ICT) services continues to fall. This
increasing number of mobile phone subscribers, coupled with their inherent high portability
and personal nature make the mobile phone a veritable tool for the provision of customized
business and social services. They are used for storing and accessing information at any time
wherever the users go. The continuous availability of the device and the emerging capability
of the terminals and/or the mobile network infrastructure to position the terminals on the
earth allow new types of spatio-temporal real-time services that are called Location-Based
Services (LBS). Scholars have defined LBS in diverse manners. Many of the definitions
depend on the perspective and the application to which the services are applied. However,
most of the definitions of LBS can be summarised as information technology (IT) services
that are provided with the current location of the user as a critical consideration and
accessible through a mobile network using a mobile device or the internet through a wireless
network. Many of the functionalities of location based services have been observed to be
extension of those of geographic information system functions. Indeed, as Magon and Shukla
(2001) put it, LBSs involve the integration of GIS, Internet, wireless communication, location
finding techniques and mobile devices. This technology has not only impacted spatial
interactive in space and time, but also access to information. It equally has tremendous
influence on how businesses are conducted.
Miller, (2005) asserts that spatio-temporal interactions are the main drivers of social
and economic systems. Hence, the movement of people, goods and services is an important
3 | P a g e
aspect in the development process of any economy (Somuyiwa, 2010; Akomolafe, et al,
2009; Southworth & Peterson, 2000). The form, capacity as well as the efficiency of the
transport system affects the quality of life of individuals and groups in a society. It also
affects business and services that take place within and between regions in a country. The
pervasive deployment of Information and communication technology infrastructure has
forced most businesses to manage global supply chains (Nagarajan, et al, 2005) as a result of
a more open and competitive modern economy markets. In spite of this, they continue to
respond to customers request within tight time schedules. The availability of real-time
information such as vehicle position and traffic conditions becomes crucial. This information
is now available as a result of the rapid growth in ICTs which provide real-time information
at very low cost (Ichoua, Gendreau, & Potvin, 2007).
Transportation planning and management entails the capture, integration and analysis
of large data sets that relate to spatial features. Geographic information systems (GIS) are
tools for the capture, storage, integration, management, display and dissemination of spatial
data and information. GIS are therefore, able to address complex social, economic and
environmental issues and are also able to address issues related to transportation.
Most issues in transportation planning, analysis and management are however, not
only complex but are also ill-structured and lack clear cut solutions that can meet the needs of
all stakeholders. Decision support systems could therefore assist decision-makers in
interactively synthesising and analysing relevant data to create useful information and
provide a set of feasible alternative solution to semi-structured or ill-structured problems.
These systems, typically involve a large set of feasible alternatives and multiple, conflicting
and incommensurate evaluation criteria (Densham, 1991; Malczewski, 2006). Integration of
LBS and SDSS can therefore, be useful in addressing transport related issues.
This paper therefore, attempts a review of the literature on the integration of SDSS
and ICT application in modelling freight management. Apart from this introduction, the
remainder of the paper is divided into four: section 2 examines the concepts of location based
services in transport modelling; SDSS and ICTs and its application in transport and logistic
management is examined in section 3; section 4 is dedicated to concepts and theories of
transportation research; section 5 identifies knowledge gaps in the application of GIS-Based
SDSS and LBS technologies in addressing transportation problems while section 6 concludes
the paper.
2.0 Definition and issues of LBS.
2.1 Defining LBS
There seems to be no generally accepted definition of location based services in the
literature as scholars have defined it in various ways. Virrantaus, et al, (2001) define LBSs as
services accessible with mobile devices through the mobile network and utilizing the ability
to make use of the location of the terminals. LBS involve the ability to find the geographical
location of mobile device and then provide services based on this location information
(Liutkauskas, et al, 2004; Roongrasamee, et al, 2003; Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC),
2005). Spiekermann, (2004) define LBS as services that integrate mobile device’s location or
position with other attribute information so as to enhance the value of service provision to a
user.
LBSs, as Koeppel, (2000) puts it, are services or applications that extend spatial
information processing or Geographic information capabilities, to end users via the internet
and/or wireless network. OGC, (2005) also describe LBS as wireless-IP services that use
geographic information to serve a mobile user. Kupper, (2005) on the other hand refer to
Location-based Services as IT services for providing information that has been created,
4 | P a g e
compiled, selected, or filtered taking into consideration the current locations of the users or
those of other persons or mobile objects. While Shiode, et al, (2004) see LBS as
geographically-oriented data and information services to users across mobile
telecommunications networks. These services can also be provided in conjunction with other
conventional telecommunication services like telephony and related value added features, for
example, to realize location-based routing of calls or location-based billing.
Reichenbacher, (2005) however, uses a broader term, geoservices, which he refers to
as services meeting any space-related needs. They integrate data and functionality or
processing and are directed towards a defined need. He asserts that the basic geoservices are
derived from fundamental GIS functions: positioning services rendering locations,
geographic search service for any geographic features, geocoding services obtaining
coordinates for relevant POIs or addresses, reverse geocoding service delivering geographic
features for specific coordinates, proximity services that find the nearest POI or POIs for a
position or address, routing services that calculate route and direction instructions, directory
and catalogue services and presentation services. Reichenbacher, (2005) also asserts that
geoservices are targeted at mobile users and are accessible with mobile devices through a
mobile network. These services utilize the ability to make use of the location of the terminals
to provide mobile users with information dependent on their current location. As he puts it,
part of that information may be communicated through maps.
The definitions of Location based services in the literature can be categorised into
three. First, Location base services as the provision of services that are based on the ability to
know the location or position of the mobile terminal (OGC, 2005; Liutkauskas, et al, 2004;
Spiekermann, 2004; Roongrasamee, et al, 2003;Virrantaus, et al, 2001), secondly, location
based services has been defined on the basis of service provisioning by the extension of
geographic information processing and through the internet or some form of wireless protocol
(Kupper, 2005; OGC, 2005; Shiode, et al, 2004; Koeppel, 2000). Thirdly, as services
customised to meet space-related needs of the user based on the present location of the user
(Reichenbacher, 2005).
These definitions seem to be in accordance with Steiniger, et al, (2006) who
illustrated LBS as services achievable through the integration of Web GIS, mobile GIS and
mobile internet technologies and spatial databases (Fig.1). As Steiniger, et al, (2006) have
observed, LBSs are created from New Information and Communication Technologies
(NICTS) such as the mobile telecommunication system and hand held devices, from Internet
and from Geographic Information Systems (GIS) with spatial databases (Shiode, et al, 2004).
Figure 1: LBS as integration of technologies (from Steiniger, et al, 2006)
5 | P a g e
It follows that a common feature of all the definitions of LBS include the application
and/or integration of information communication technology, particularly mobile networks as
well as web-enabled GIS and geographically referenced location information in the provision
of services to mobile consumers. These technologies are also creating complex array of new
spatial patterns through which we view, interact and connect to the world.
2.2 LBS Applications
Typical applications of LBS identified by scholars include navigation services
(Rinner, 2008; Raper, et al, 2007); emergency response services (Erharuyi & Fairbairn, 2003;
Aloudat, 2007) as well as transport and tourism services (Rinner, 2008; Berger, Lahmann &
Lehner, 2003). Raper, et al, (2007) also state that other areas of LBS application including
location-based gaming, assistive technology and location-based health services, are more
recent development.
Additionally, Leung, Burcea & Jacobsen, (2003) have also identified tracking the
location of mobile callers, tracking and dispatching mobile resources, traffic coordination and
way-finding and location-aware advertising. Raper, et al, (2007) in a review of selected
literature on the applications of location-based services noted that LBS have become
influential in some areas of application in the recent past. They identified such areas as
mobile guides and intelligent transport systems (ITS) as areas that are more established while
others such as location-based gaming, assistive technology and location-based health services
are emerging areas.
Kim, (2002), Sarkar, (2007) and Worrall, (1991) note that a large percentage of public
and private decisions are related to some sort of spatial consideration, leaving only a few
areas that are not affected by geographical considerations. Kim, (2002) notes that recent
development in information and communication technologies (ICTs) generate and puts an
unprecedented amount of geographic information of all kinds at a user’s fingertips. He further
states that research needs of LBS are vast and these include applications in the following
areas;
1. Utilization of real-time data in spatio-temporal context in GIS
2. Development of spatio-temporal topology in GIS
3. Development of efficient means to handle large data set for LBS
4. Interoperability among contents providers and interface standardisation for
efficient request-response services
5. Efficient and cost-effective means to collect real-time traffic data
6. Development of alternative theories for utilising population data vis a vis
sample data in GIS
7. Development of heuristic solution algorithms for LBS
Kim, (2002) focused his argument on issues of LBS related to request for transport
routing and navigation. Using statistical notations, he was able to show various ways of
estimating route costs, link travel time and spatio-temporal link travel time. Kim, (2002)
showed route estimating costs in terms of purchasing and stopping costs, time cost, distance
related costs and went on to calculate total costs for shopping and routing. He achieved this
using a node-node adjacency matrix representation of the network. Estimating link travel
time, according to Kim, (2002) depends on whether or not real time traffic data including
volume and speed are available to service brokers or users. In estimating for link travel time
in the absence of real time traffic data, he suggested that three link travel time tables be made.
These include peak-hour link travel time table for weekdays, non peak-hour link travel time
table for weekdays and link travel time table for weekends. You & Kim, (2000) also
demonstrate estimating link travel time with real time traffic data.
6 | P a g e
2.3 Classification of Location based services
Giaglis, et al, (2003) observe that one of the main enablers of LBS proliferation in
recent years was the 1999 mandate of the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
that, by October 2001, emergency services should be able to automatically position any
citizen dialling 911 to within 125 meters in two thirds of cases. The reasoning behind this
mandate is that people who are injured or in some other need do not necessarily know exactly
where they are and hence the emergency services should be able to locate them in an
automatic way so that help can be sent out to them. This has placed a legal obligation on
mobile networks to support location identification provision in their service portfolio. Given
this legal obligation, many network providers have seized the opportunity to design and
implement further mobile location services that will commercially exploit the ability to know
the exact geographical location of a mobile user.
Table 1: Major Classifications of Location Based Services
Though a commonly accepted classification framework for location based services is
lacking in the literature to date (Bauer et al, 2005), Wolfson (2002), however, states that
location based services can be divided into two categories. These are mobile resource
management (MRM) applications and location-aware context delivery services. Mobile
resource management applications, as Wolfson (2002) puts it, use location data combined
with route schedule to track and manage service personnel or transportation systems. A
number of these are commercial applications e.g. systems for mobile workforce management,
automatic vehicle location, fleet management, logistics, transportation management and
support systems. While location-aware context delivery services are services that use location
data to deliver customised information to a mobile user in order to increase relevancy.
Examples of location-aware context delivery services include; delivering accurate driving
directions and instant coupons to customers nearing a store.
Ververidis & Polyzos (2006); Giaglis, et al, (2003) and Bauer, et al, (2005) have
categorised Location based services into six major types (Table 1); tracking (people tracking
and object tracking), navigation (regular routing services and specialised routing services),
information services (interactive information services and regular information services),
communication services (private communication services and business communication
services), entertainment services and transaction services (location based advertising services
and location based billing services). The GSM Association (2003) and Third Generation
Partnership Project (2004) also noted tracking services, which include person tracking, fleet
management and asset management. These services require permanent tracking of the object
of interest in order to detect events that may occur around these objects at any given time.
Location Based Services can be broadly classified as reactive (pull) and proactive
(push) LBSs (Kupper, 2005; Kupper & Treu, 2005; Ververidis & Polyzos, 2006; Virrantaus,
et al, 2001). Reactive LBS is always explicitly activated by the user. The interaction between
LBS and user is roughly as follows: the user first invokes the service and establishes a
service session, either via a mobile device or a desktop PC. He then requests for certain
functions or information, whereupon the service gathers location data (either of himself or of
Types
Categories
Tracking Navigation Information
Services
Entertainment
Services
Communication
Services
Transaction
Services
Mobile resources
Management
√
√
Location-Aware
Content Delivery
√
√
√
√
7 | P a g e
another target person), processes it, and returns the location-dependent result to the user, for
example, a list of nearby restaurants. This request/response cycle may be repeated several
times before the session is finally terminated. Thus, reactive LBS are characterized by a
synchronous interaction pattern between user and service.
Proactive LBSs, on the other hand, are automatically initialized as soon as a
predefined location event occurs, for example, if the user enters, approaches, or leaves a
certain point of interest or if he approaches, meets, or leaves another target. As an example,
consider an electronic tourist guide that notifies tourists via SMS as soon as they approach a
landmark. Thus, proactive services are not explicitly requested by the user, but the interaction
between them happens asynchronously.
In contrast to reactive LBSs, where the user is only located once, proactive LBSs
require to permanently track him in order to detect location events.
2.4 Important Components of Location based services
One of the most obvious and important ingredients behind LBS is positioning
recognized system. According to Kupper, (2005), positioning is the process to obtain the
spatial position of a target. Becker & Durr (2005) identified two basic types of coordinates.
These are geometric and symbolic coordinate formats. Geometric coordinates is as used by
GPS and refers to a point or geometric figure in a multi-dimensional space. The topological
properties of such a space allow the calculation of distances between locations and their
inclusion in other locations. Symbolic coordinates, on the other hand, do not provide any
reasoning about their spatial properties without any additional information. Such coordinates
are available via cell-IDs in cellular networks, such as GSM or wireless LAN, as well as via
other positioning technologies, e.g. radio frequency tags (RFIDs) or infrared (IR) beacons.
Giaglis, et al (2003) assert Location based applications and services are based on
underlying technological capabilities that enable the identification of the location of a mobile
device, thereby making the provision of location base services possible. LBSs utilize an array
of different technologies to provide individualized information to the end user. Four major
elements are required to transmit the highly specified information to the user: the location of
the mobile device, a communication system, GIS data, and a control centre. According to
Magon & Shukla, (2001), the obvious technology needed in providing LBS is getting to
know the location or the position, the geographic data of that location and an application to
process the position information along with the geographic data to provide Location Based
Service. So we could consider the ingredients needed for LBS as Location or positioning,
Geographic data, Control Centre and Communication System (figure 2).
These four required elements have been broadly categorised as enabling and
facilitating technologies (Johnson, 1998). Enabling technologies are the basic technologies
that allow for obtaining location information from a mobile user, while facilitating
technologies refer to complementary technologies that provide the contextual and/or
infrastructural environment within which LBS can be implemented in a value-added fashion.
Johnson, (1998) refers to enabling technologies as the basic technologies that allow for
obtaining location information from a mobile user, while the facilitating technologies are
complementary technologies that provide the contextual and/or infrastructural environment
within which LBSs can be implemented in a value added fashion.
The enabling technologies have further been broadly divided into mobile network
dependent technologies or cellular positioning and mobile network independent technologies
or satellite position (Giaglis, et al, 2003; Steiniger, et al, 2006; Kupper, 2005). Mobile
network dependent/cellular positioning technologies, also referred to as integrated
infrastructure approach (Kupper, 2005), depend on the ability of a mobile device to receive
8 | P a g e
signal from a mobile network covering its area of presence. Such technologies perform better
in densely populated environments where network base stations are closer to each other.
Mobile network dependent location methods include cell identification (Cell-ID) method,
time of arrival (TOA) method, angle of arrival (AOA) method and observed time difference
and enhanced observed time difference (OTD and E-OTD) methods. On the contrary, mobile
network independent /satellite positioning technologies, the stand-alone approach (Kupper,
2005), can provide location information even in the absence of mobile network coverage.
Location methods using this approach are broadly divided into long-ranged and short-ranged
methods. GPS and A-GPS are examples of long-ranged positioning devices. While blue-
tooth, RFID and WLAN are short-ranged positioning devices.
A number of different enabling technologies exist, each with its inherent strengths and
weaknesses. The basic technology assessment criteria refer to coverage range, accuracy
support and application environment (Giaglis, et al, 2003; Jiang & Yao, 2006). This also
depends on a variety of factors that include visibility, line of sight to a base station, handset
location (i.e. indoor or outdoor), terrain, measurement environment (i.e. urban or rural areas),
among others (Gum & Proietti, 2002). A successful LBS technology must meet the position
accuracy requirements determined by the respective service, at the lowest possible cost and
with minimal impact on network and the equipment.
Geographic Data
Control
Centre
Communication
System
Cell ID
TOA
AOA
E-OTD
A-GPS
Transportation and Navigation
Location Based Information
Emergency Services
Other Services
Figure 2 Components of Location Based Services (Source: Magon & Shukla, 2001)
2. 5 Privacy concerns in Location based services Users of IT services are always exposed to the risk that their personal information and
data collected and processed during service usage may be misused by unauthorized parties or
by the service provider itself. The motivation behind this misuse is often to observe and
analyze the user’s behaviour, attitudes, and social situation in order to tailor special offers or
advertisements for him, but sometimes it may also be with criminal intentions (Kupper,
2005). Privacy invasion is considered a very important concern in Location based services.
Privacy protection in location-aware services, as Kaasinen (2003) asserts, is related to the
right to locate a person, use the location, store the location and forward the location. Both
privacy and security concerns could create resistance to LBS adoption (Warrior, et al, 2003;
Kupper, 2005; Zhou, 2011). Kupper (2005) states that LBS privacy concerns are particularly
sensitive as the target’s location information passes many different actors along the LBS
supply chain. Also, the target is passive in that it is automatically tracked by an LBS provider
and related actors during its everyday activities and is often not aware of this fact
permanently. Thirdly, the location information is often regarded as belonging to a category of
high-level information that is desired to be saved more than other personal information e.g.
address, gender and age. LBS privacy concerns may be particularly sensitive as services
allow colleagues, family members or others to have real-time information on the location of
9 | P a g e
individuals. Positioning capability is, however, often used to increase security e.g. tracking of
vehicles carrying valuable cargo and tracking of children. In these applications, location
information provides a compelling value proposition. In both of these examples privacy and
security is only maintained if access to the location information is restricted to authorized
users. How location information will be managed when the positioning capability becomes
ubiquitous is, however, still uncertain (Tilson, et al, 2004). In spite of these concerns, it has
been shown that people are positive towards the location based services as long as they
perceive them to be useful (Barkhuus & Dey, 2003; Kaasinen, 2003).
3.0 SDSS and ICT applications in transport and logistic management
3.1 Spatial Decision Support Systems and Location Based Services
Spatial decision support systems (SDSS) are primarily designed to provide user with a
decision-making platform that enables the analysis of spatial information to be carried out in
a flexible manner (Densham, 1991). These systems can be viewed as spatial analogues of
decision support systems (DSS) developed for business applications.
Gorry & Morton, (1971) integrated Antony’s, (1965) categories of management
activity and Simon’s (1960) description of decision types in arriving at a definition for DSS.
Antony, (1965) described management activities as consisting of strategic planning,
management control and operational control. Simon, (1960) described decision problems as
existing on a continuum from programmed to non-programmed.
Gorry and Morton, (1971) combined Antony, (1965) and Simon, (1960) description of
decisions, and described decision problems as structured, unstructured and semi-structured,
rather than programmed and non-programmed. Similarly, Simon (1960) described the
decision-making process as consisting of three phrases: intelligence, design and choice.
Intelligence is used in the military sense to mean searching the environment for problems,
this implies the need to make a decision. Design involves the development of alternative
ways of solving the problem and choice consists of analysing the alternatives and choosing
one for implementation. Gorry and Morton (1971) define a DSS as a computer system that
dealt with a problem at least some stages of which was semi-structured or unstructured. A
computer system is developed to deal with the structure portion of a DSS problem, but the
judgement of the decision maker is brought to bear on the unstructured or semi-structure part,
hence, constituting a human-machine system.
Gorry and Morton (1971) argued that the characteristics of both information needs
and models differ in a DSS environment, as compared to most organisational information
systems that were in use at that time. Management information systems, such as billing, other
accounting systems, inventory control and the like, require current, accurate data that is
derived primarily from sources internal to the organisation. DSS applications, because many
are strategic in their orientation, tend to require data from outside the organisation, and this
data may be in the form of trends or estimates. The ill-defined nature of information needs in
DSS situations leads to the requirement for different kinds of databases than those for
operational environments. Relational databases and flexible query languages are needed.
Similarly, the ill-structured nature of the decision environment implied the need for flexible,
interactive modelling system, such as those of spreadsheet packages. A DSS as Sprague,
(1980) puts it, is a class of information system that draws on transaction processing systems
and interacts with the other parts of the overall information system to support the decision
making activities of managers and other knowledge workers in the organization.
SDSS are computer tools developed to assist decision-makers resolve complex, ill-
structured spatial problems and provide acceptable solution that addresses conflicting,
multiple spatial objectives. It provides a framework for integrating database management
10 | P a g e
systems with analytical models, graphical interface and tabular report generation capabilities,
and expert knowledge of decision makers. SDSS, therefore address fundamental functional
and modelling issues. Rutledge et al, (2007) assert that a good SDSS will support different
decision making styles and adapt over time to the needs of the particular user through
interactive and iterative processes. An SDSS has the advantage over a non-spatial DSS by
being able to store and manipulate complex spatial data structures, conduct analyses within
the domain of spatial analysis, and provide spatially-explicit output (i.e. maps) and other
reporting tools. This provides a robust framework for exploring resource management issues
by highlighting potential limits to resource use (e.g., only so much land, water, energy, etc.)
and the consequences of different allocation schemes. As Densham (1991) asserts, many of
the complex spatial problems often faced by decision makers, have multiple, conflicting
objectives solution. To be acceptable, a solution needs to be able to reconcile these
conflicting objectives.
SDSS has been applied in various aspects of research in addressing real-world
management problems in the literature. The application areas range from agriculture,
healthcare provision, education, forestry (Chruch, et al, 2000; ), vehicle and fleet
management, mining industry, telecommunication, among many others.
3.2 SDSS and LBS in location analysis While SDSS are usually applied mainly at the planning stage of tasks, LBS is targeted
towards assisting mobile users in making decisions in time and space during the performance
of tasks. Hence, LBS aid spatial interaction by facilitating interaction without the need for a
physical location in space. Janelle & Gillespie (2004) describe this using four interrelated
concepts; time-space convergence, time-space compression, human extensibility and
trackability. This is also related to Hagerstrand, (1975a) fundamental conditions necessary for
any “precise theoretical research” as stated in the concept of time-geography.
Current LBS, however, are limited to non-compensatory filtering and selection
operations (Rinner, 2003; Raubal & Rinner, 2004). Integration of SDSS and LBS will
therefore, be useful in providing managers and users of spatially related services with guided
decision analysis method and processes that can assist in addressing user preferences and
alternatives within a time constraint and also provide the opportunity for possible subtasks
while boosting spatial interaction.
According to Keenan, (1996) the relationship between GIS and SDSS has been
described as one in which GIS are used as generators for specific SDSS. Apart from generic
functionalities, such as spatial database management and map display available in GIS, SDSS
also use specialized decision support tools such as multi-criteria decision making techniques
(Rinner, Raubal, & Spigel, 2005) and are therefore, often developed by the integration of
geographic information systems with appropriate expert knowledge, data and models
(Engelen, & White, 1997).
Location based services provide users of mobile devices with access to GIS
applications, which employ the user’s current location to answer specific spatial queries.
Similar to SDSS, LBS assist users with their spatial decision-making process during the
performance of tasks in space and time. However, SDSS are designed to assist managers and
decision-makers in resolving spatial problems that are usually characterised by multiple,
conflicting and incommensurate evaluation criteria. These problems are normally ill-
structured in nature.
11 | P a g e
3.3 SDSS in Freight Management
Eom, et al, (1998) stated that the transportation industry has been dependent on
decision support systems in their routine operations such as in managing freight, scheduling
vehicles and personnel. The design and implementation of SDSS in transportation research
and applications is widespread in the literature (Borzacchiello, et al, 2008; Kai, 2005;
Arampatzis, et al, 2004; Frank, et al, 2000; Shen and Khoong, 1995). Thill, (2000) edited a
special compilation of geographic information systems in transportation research published
by Elsevier Science Limited. The volume comprises a collection of research work by various
scholars in the field of transportation. It provides an insight into the application of GIS in
transportation studies and shows how GIS has evolved in the field of transportation planning,
analysis and management. Goodchild (1992) notes that GIS has matured from a tool to an
aspect of information technology, and finally to a domain of scientific investigation called
Geographic Information Science. GIS is today regarded as an indispensible tool in
transportation science applications (Spring, 2004).
Because of the important role of transportation in socio-economic development,
scholars have focused a lot of attention on the transport problem analysis using various
perspectives. The range of transport research areas include transportation planning (Shen &
Khoong, 1995; Kai, 2005; Arampatzis, et al, 2004), freight and commodity distribution
modelling (Wisetjindawat, et al, 2006; Powell, Bouzaiene-Ayari & Simao, 2006), passenger
movement (Csiszá, 2003), among many others.
Datta, (2000) classified research in the area of application of operational research in
the transportation problems in developing countries, into three broad classes; planning and
evaluation, distribution; location and scheduling and routing. Datta, (2000) however
concluded that though much have been done in transportation research, not many of the
research have addressed the issues of transportation as it relates specifically to the developing
countries in terms of distribution, technology, infrastructure and management. Like Datta,
(2000), Borzacchiello, et al, (2008) and Goodchild, (2000), also classified research on GIS
and Transportation studies into three broad groups; data representation, analysis and
modelling and applications. Borzacchiello, et al, (2008) however adopted geodatabase,
geomapping and geomodelling framework in their classification of GIS in transportation
research.
Most spatial problems have conflicting objectives and can therefore be addressed
using decision support systems. Eom, et al, (1998) reported a review of decision support
system applications between 1988 and 1994. The review consists of a total of 271 (two
hundred and seventy-one) published applications. Eom, et al (1998) classified DSS
applications into two broad categories; corporate functional management fields; which
include applications in production and operation management. These applications account for
41% of all the published papers reviewed in the research, and other areas; which include
government, military, educational, hospital and healthcare, urban/community planning and
administration.
Frank, et al, (2000) developed a SDSS that attempts to resolve the conflict between
population at risk and efficiency concerns in transporting hazardous materials. The focus of
the research was on risk mitigation through route selection techniques. In achieving this
objective, however, Frank, et al (2000) has to minimize travel time while other criteria; total
population at risk, distance, accident and consequence are constrained. In the process, they
came up with a desktop application capable of handling realistic network data, while offering
12 | P a g e
sophisticated route generating heuristics. The approaches developed are also able to handle
data manipulation, data and solution visualisation, user interfaces as well as optimisation
heuristics.
Integrating technological approach in some aspects of supply chain management can
therefore improve the entire process and help save valuable time in transit. Miller, et al,
(1999) report a GIS-based decision support system for dynamic congestion modelling and
shortest path routing in time-critical logistics. The system predicts network flow at detailed
temporal resolutions and solves for the combined departure time and shortest path required
for a shipment to arrive at its destination by a given deadline. Yi-Hwa, et al, (2001) also
report a GIS-based decision support system for analysis of route choice in congested urban
road network.
In follows that GIS and SDSS is applicable and highly desirable in the planning and
implementation of supply chain management issues
3.4 Freight and Logistics Management in Nigeria
Freight transportation maintains core relations with urban areas since the city is
concomitantly a unit of production, distribution and consumption which requires strategies in
ensuring efficient freight movements (Rodrigue, Comtois, & Slack, 2009). A number of
studies have also been conducted in the area of freight and logistic management in Nigeria.
Apart from Somuyiwa & Adewoye, 2010; Akomolafe, et al, 2009, these have been limited to
the application of traditional quantitative and /or qualitative approach and did not investigate
the impacts of information and communication technologies (ICT) in ameliorating
transportation problems in Nigeria. Okoko (2008) carried out an analysis of the spatial pattern
of urban goods movement in Akure, Ondo state. He employed gravity and linear
programming modelling to obtain predictions on the spatial pattern of urban goods
movement, using time as the impedance factor. Somuyiwa & Dosunmu (2008) using
qualitative and quantitative approach, underscores the need for modal shift from the exclusive
use of road for freight transportation to other modes of transport so as to reduce traffic
congestion experienced in and around the Apapa port in Lagos. In conclusion, Somuyiwa &
Dosunmu (2008) advocate the need for the development of other modes of transport,
particularly, rail and inland water ways to facilitate freight transport between the port and all
the geo-political zones in the country. Fadare & Ayantoyinbo, (2010) also reported a study on
the impacts of road traffic congestion on freight movement in Lagos metropolis. The
identified the effects of traffic congestion on freight movement in the metropolis to include
longer travel time resulting in decrease in vehicle utilisation, decrease fuel efficiency, higher
cost of freight operation, shrink in market coverage and less reliable pick-up and delivery
times for truck operators.
Ogunsanya, (2002) argues that urban traffic congestion in Lagos metropolis is a
symptom of a malfunctioning urban traffic system which can be explained by poor traffic
management, route inadequacy, absence of traffic and transportation planning, upsurge in
urban transport demand, and human misuse of transport infrastructure. Ogunsanya, (2002)
also notes that roadside and on-road parking, roadside trading and total disregard for traffic
regulations by road users are significant human contribution to traffic problem. These factors
are prevalent in most developing countries. The urban traffic situation has substantial
negative impact on urban residents and business transactions. These include loss of time and
restricted accessibility to business and social opportunities in cities.
13 | P a g e
Somuyiwa, (2010) however, investigated the impact of freight flows on the city
logistics in a megacity of developing economy. The focus was on the economic cost of
inefficiency cause by the flow of freight in the metropolis rather than the effect of congestion
on freight (Fadare & Ayantoyinbo, 2010). Somuyiwa, (2010) concludes that there is need for
a more rigorous planning of urban resources in order to minimise congestion caused by
freight movement across the city.
Akomolafe, et al, (2009) demonstrate the use of geospatial technology in enhancing
road monitoring and safety. They generated digital map of major highway in Nigeria to assist
traffic personnel in road safety and monitoring activities. Somuyiwa and Adewoye (2010),
adopting a descriptive approach, however, provided a theoretical background necessary for
effective logistic information system in an industrial outfit.
4.0 Geographical Themes in Location Based Services Studies
4.1 Time-Geography
Time-geography, initially proposed by Hagerstrand (1970), was developed to study
the relationships between human activities and various constraints in space-time context. It
provides a framework for investigating spatial interaction in space and time with time
constraints and assumes that an individual’s activities are limited by various constraints.
Time geography addresses the question of how participating in activity at a given place and
time affects abilities to participate in activities at other places and times (Miller, 2005; Kwan,
2004). Transport and information and communication technologies facilitate activity
participation by improving the efficiency of trading time for space in interaction. Janelle &
Gillespie, (2004) refer to this process as space-time-adjusting processes. As Yu & Shaw,
(2007) put it, Hagerstrand and his colleagues argue that time should not be considered only as
an external factor when we examine human activities. Time, as essential as space, should be
included explicitly in the process of examining human interaction. Treating time as a term
equal to space, the framework adopts a three-dimensional orthogonal coordinate system, with
time as the third dimension added to a two-dimensional spatial plane. The space dimension is
used to measure locational changes of objects, while the time dimension is used to order the
sequence of events and to synchronise human activities.
Hagerstrand’s (1970) formulation of time-geography had three central principles; viz,
that human life is temporally and spatially ordered; that human life has both a physical and
social dimension and that the activities constituting human life are limited by certain
temporal and spatial constraints that condition various individual and group-based
combinations of possible activities. Hagerstrand, (1975a) identified eight fundamental
conditions necessary for any “precise theoretical research”. These conditions are;
i. the indivisibility of the human being
ii. the limited length of each human life
iii. the limited ability of human beings to take part in more than one task at a time
iv. the fact that every task has a duration
v. the fact that movement between points in space consumes time
vi. the limited packing capacity of space
vii. spatial units of any scale must have a limited outer size
viii. the fact that every situation is inevitably rooted in past situations
Time-geography also implies that an individual’s activities in space and time are
conditioned by three types of constraints; capacity constraints, coupling constraints and
14 | P a g e
authority constraints (Hagerstrand, 1970; Guys, 1998). Capacity constraint limits the
activities of the individual through both his own biological make up and also the capacity of
the tools he can command. Coupling constraint arise because it is necessary that individuals,
tools and materials are bound together at given places and at given time. And authority
constraint refers to limitations and control of access. These occur at different levels to
produce hierarchies of accessibility.
Miller, (1999) identified the constraints-oriented approach, attraction-accessibility
measures and benefit measures as three complementary perspectives of measuring
accessibility with respect to rigour. As he puts it, while a constraints-oriented approach treats
each opportunity as equal without distinguishing differences among attractiveness and travel
costs, attraction-accessibility and benefit measures generally do not consider temporal
constraints or the time available for activity participation at locations.
Janelle & Gillespie, (2004) opine that four interrelated time-space concepts; time-
space convergence, time-space compression, human extensibility and trackability, are
fundamental to understanding the coupling between space-time-adjusting technologies and
the processes that eventually shape altered states of regional and community organization.
They stated further that these processes permit the restructuring of human interactions at all
geographic scales and may subvert the usual constraints imposed by distance, spatial
contiguity and temporal continuity.
Time-space convergence as Janelle & Gillespie, (2004) put it is the rate at which
travel time between places declines in response to transport and communication innovation
and investment. Time-space compression on the other hand, implies the accelerating
throughput of events in daily individual life. This leads to intensified pace of existence
whereby people are able to overcome time-space constraints through technology as
information is made available anywhere at any time. The concept of human extensibility
describes how individuals and institutions are able to project their presence and ideas beyond
their immediate locales using technology.
Janelle & Gillespie, (2004) identified two dimensions of the concept of human
extensibility. First is the fact that it present both opportunities and threats simultaneously and
secondly, it afford the individual the opportunity to maintain a multitude of personal
networks almost at will, regardless of their specific location at any point in time.
Trackability has enabled the individual to maintain mobility and connectedness with
others, coupled with flexibility of activity in time and space. This connectedness is facilitated
by such technologies as automobiles, cell phone, personal digital assistance and computers.
These tools also provide a means for tracking in details an individual’s spatial and temporal
interactions.
The concepts advanced by Janelle & Gillespie, (2004) have implications in transport
analysis and management. They can assist in real-time transport monitoring, control and
management.
Two entities are crucial in time geography analysis; these are the space-time path and
the space-time prism (Miller, 2005). The space-time path traces the movement of an object in
space and time. Space-time path tends to convey information about an individual’s activity
space. Ellegard, (1999) argue that everything done in time-geography, which includes “doing
nothing”, is regarded as an activity. This implies that every point in the space-time path is
associated with an activity. More than one activity can equally take place simultaneously
(Shaw & Yu, 2008). Kwan & Lee (2003); Kwan, (2004) demonstrate the use of GIS-based
geo-visualization methods in the description and analysis of human activity patterns in space-
time. In the process, Kwan, (2004) highlighted recent developments in GIS-based geo-
computation and 3-D geo-visualization methods. The space-time path shows the constraints
imposed by activities that occur in specific space and time and the need to consume time
15 | P a g e
when moving between activities. Shaw & Yu, (2008) also demonstrated the ability of space
time GIS for organizing complex activity and interaction data as spatio
an integrated space-time environment. They presented a time
which was the representation of individual activities and interactions as spatio
processes in a hybrid physical-virtual space. Their design was based on a set of extended
time-geographic concepts aimed at accommodating human
communication technologies.
Figure 3: Space-time path and space-time prism. (Adopted from Yu, 2006)
Space-time prism measures the ability to reach locations in space and time given the
location and duration of fixed activities. Space
orthogonal space-time coordinate system formed by the possible locations that an individual
can travel within a given time frame. When it is projected onto a two
result is a potential path area (Yu, 2006; Miller, 2005a)
Space-time stations are locations containing resources required for activities such as
eating, shopping, sleeping, work, etc. if the path is vertical, the person is conducting a
stationary activity. The person
relatively shallow slope indicates that less time is required per unit space when moving. This
implies a more efficient transportation system, which is the goal of most societies.
4.2 Spatial interaction Model
Spatial interaction models are useful in predicting spatial choices reflected in flows of
passengers, freight or information between an origin and a destination. These models are
expressed as transport demand/supply relationships over a geogr
interaction covers a wide variety of movements such as journey to work, migrations, the
market areas of retailing activities, international trade and freight distribution.
The assumption of spatial interaction models is that flows a
attributes of the locations of origins, the attributes of the locations of destination and the
friction of distance between the concenred origins and destinations. The general formular of
the spatial interaction model is;
Where:
Tij is interaction between location i (origin) and location j(destination). Its units of
measurement are varied and can involve people, tons of freight, traffic volume, etc. it
also has to do with time periods e.g. weekly, monthly or yearly.
when moving between activities. Shaw & Yu, (2008) also demonstrated the ability of space
time GIS for organizing complex activity and interaction data as spatio-temporal processes in
time environment. They presented a time-space GIS design, the focus of
which was the representation of individual activities and interactions as spatio
virtual space. Their design was based on a set of extended
geographic concepts aimed at accommodating human activities through information
time prism. (Adopted from Yu, 2006)
time prism measures the ability to reach locations in space and time given the
activities. Space-time prism has also been described as the
time coordinate system formed by the possible locations that an individual
can travel within a given time frame. When it is projected onto a two-dimensional space, the
potential path area (Yu, 2006; Miller, 2005a)
time stations are locations containing resources required for activities such as
eating, shopping, sleeping, work, etc. if the path is vertical, the person is conducting a
is moving among stations, if the path is not vertical. A
relatively shallow slope indicates that less time is required per unit space when moving. This
implies a more efficient transportation system, which is the goal of most societies.
action Model
Spatial interaction models are useful in predicting spatial choices reflected in flows of
passengers, freight or information between an origin and a destination. These models are
expressed as transport demand/supply relationships over a geographical space. Spatial
interaction covers a wide variety of movements such as journey to work, migrations, the
market areas of retailing activities, international trade and freight distribution.
The assumption of spatial interaction models is that flows are functions of the
attributes of the locations of origins, the attributes of the locations of destination and the
friction of distance between the concenred origins and destinations. The general formular of
��� � ����,�, ���
is interaction between location i (origin) and location j(destination). Its units of
measurement are varied and can involve people, tons of freight, traffic volume, etc. it
also has to do with time periods e.g. weekly, monthly or yearly.
when moving between activities. Shaw & Yu, (2008) also demonstrated the ability of space-
temporal processes in
S design, the focus of
which was the representation of individual activities and interactions as spatio-temporal
virtual space. Their design was based on a set of extended
activities through information
time prism measures the ability to reach locations in space and time given the
time prism has also been described as the
time coordinate system formed by the possible locations that an individual
dimensional space, the
time stations are locations containing resources required for activities such as
eating, shopping, sleeping, work, etc. if the path is vertical, the person is conducting a
is moving among stations, if the path is not vertical. A
relatively shallow slope indicates that less time is required per unit space when moving. This
implies a more efficient transportation system, which is the goal of most societies.
Spatial interaction models are useful in predicting spatial choices reflected in flows of
passengers, freight or information between an origin and a destination. These models are
aphical space. Spatial
interaction covers a wide variety of movements such as journey to work, migrations, the
re functions of the
attributes of the locations of origins, the attributes of the locations of destination and the
friction of distance between the concenred origins and destinations. The general formular of
is interaction between location i (origin) and location j(destination). Its units of
measurement are varied and can involve people, tons of freight, traffic volume, etc. it
16 | P a g e
Vi is attributes of the location of origin i. variables often used to express these
attributes are socio-economic in nature e.g population, number of jobs available,
industrial output or gross demestic product.
Wj is attributes of the location of destination j. it also uses soco-economic units of
measurement.
Sij is attributes of seperation between the location of origin i and the location of
destination j. this is also known as friction of distance. Distance, transport costs or
travel time are variables often used in expressing these attributes.
4.2.1 Gravity and Entropy Maximization
Gravity model, based on Newton’s theory of gravity, was one of the first attempts at
addressing movements and flows across space. It computes the number of trips between
origin i and destination j (Tij) as a simple function of the sizes of the origin and destination
(Pi and Pj), and the distance between them (dij) using a scaling factor k.
��� � � � �
���
This formulation then gave way to a more general one that recognizes that the
relationships embedded in the equation above may vary across trips and within the
socioeconomic attributes of zones. Though the gravity model has been described as providing
reasonably accurate estimates of spatial flows, it does not possess any theoretical background
in individual travel behaviour.
Entropy maximization models represent improvement over the gravity model. These
set of models developed by Wilson (1974) resulted in a family of spatial interaction models
such as the production-constraint model, attraction-constraint model and the doubly-
constraint model. The models identify constrainst at the origin and destination zones giving
rise to such concepts as origin constraints models and destination constrained models. They
are referred to as single constrained models. Ayeni, (2000) notes that it is possible to derive
other models by accounting for additional constraints. Entropy maximization model derives
its name from the concept of entropy in thermodynamics or statistical physics and maximizes
a function that is similar to the entropy function in physics. It also owes its current
formulation to information theory which is an off shoot of the broad area of communications
engineering.
4.2.2 Urban Transport Models
The transport problem is prevalent in urban areas, particularly in developing
countries. Traffic congestion, inadequate and often, poorly maintained vehicles and roads are
some ways this problem manifest in cities. Miller, et al, (1999) categorised causes of traffic
congestion into immediate and long-term structural causes. They noted that immediate causes
of urban traffic congestion include; rapid population and job growth in metropolitan areas,
more intensive use of automobiles, failure to build new roads and failure to make drivers bear
the full cost of driving. While long-term structural causes include a desire for low-density
neighbourhoods, firms’ preference for low-density workplaces and travellers’ desire for
private vehicles.
Transportation networks, as Fisher (2003) noted, are flow networks. They are
characteristed by their topology and flow attributes e.g. capacity constraints, path choice and
17 | P a g e
link cost functions. These networks, as Bell & Lida, (1997) state represent the movement of
people, vehicles or goods. Transportation network models have therefore been described as
special types of network problems (Imam, Elsharawy, Gomah, & Samy, 2009).
Fisher,(2003) states that data modelling involves three levels of abstration;
conceptual, logical and physical levels. Transport networks have been widely modelled in the
literature, many of which focuses on transport demand modelling. Gentile & Vigo, (2007)
note that in the case of freight shipment in urban areas, demand generators are the
destinations e.g. shops, warehouses, etc while for passenger transport, the generators are the
origins of the trips. Wang & Cheng (2001) developed a spatio-temporal data model to support
activity-based transport demand modelling in a GIS environment. Kim & Chon, (2005) used
the binary logit model in modelling driver’s route diversion behaviour and real-time traffic
data. They observed that drivers prefer shorter routes in terms of travel time when
considering diversion. Their result also show that on-site information has significant
influence on route diversion behaviour, though non-site information from the media also
affect drivers’decisions. Crocco, et al, (2010) employed an integrated approach in modelling
freight and passengers demand for transportation services. They argue that by using an
integrated approach, aggregate movement could be minimized as goods and passengers travel
using the same vehicle. This, they believe will reduce external costs of mobility (pollution,
congetsion, and other negative externalities).
Puckett, (2009), highlights developments in the network modelling and empirical
freight travel behaviour applications. He noted that in other to improve our understanding of
the determinants of freight travel behaviour, there is need to employ a range of tools and
approaches since most aspects of these problems are inter-related in nature. Puckett, (2009)
advocates an expansion of both scale and scope of freight travel behaviour research that is
centered on policy impacts.
The influence of landuse on transport demand in urban areas is also evident in the
literature (Hunt & Simmonds, 1993; Sivakumar, 2007; Wilson, 1998). This has been
highlighted by Sivakumar, (2007) and Wegener, (2004) who posit that spatial development
determines the need for spatial interaction, or transport, but transport, by the accessibility it
provides, also determines spatial development. Wegener, (2004) states further, however, that
it is difficult to empirically isolate impacts of landuse on transport or vice versa as a result of
other factors that equally changes simultaneously.
The importance of the relationship that exists between landuse and transportation led
to the development of a series of models that are collectively refered to as transport/landuse
models (TLUM) or landuse-transport models (LU-T models). These models have, however
been criticised on the basis of a number of shortcomings e.g. excessive spatial aggregation,
excessive reliance on static equilibrium assumptions among others.
5.0 Research Gaps
The rapid evolution of information and communication technology and its impact on
business and social life cannot be overemphasised. ICT has revolutionised how businesses
are conducted as well as how people in society relate with one another. This impact is felt in
all spheres of human endeavour, transportation therefore, cannot be an exception.
Database is a critical consideration in the design and implementation of SDSS
(Armstrong & Densham, 1990). Similarly, the capture, modelling, maintenance and querying
of location information form a critical aspect of LBSs. The quality of the spatial data
18 | P a g e
employed in any spatial analysis will determine how good the results obtained from such
analysis will turn out to be. The data related to the location therefore, need to be capture in a
manner that enhances the efficiency of service provisioning and management. A number of
issues are inherent in the design of database for the purpose of location-based services. Some
of the more apparent issues in LBS literature include irregular dimension hierarchy,
imprecise location data, and partial containment between dimension values, among many
others. The database forms the foundation in LBS and SDSS applications, appropriate data
model must therefore be selected for application design objectives to be achieved. Apart from
Jensen, et al, (2001) and Jensen, et al, (2004) very little research has been conducted in the
area of database design and implementation as it relates to location-based services. It is
therefore important to further investigation database design issues related to SDSS and LBS
applications
The application of ICTs in transportation analysis and management is data-driven.
This may usually, require importing data from various sources for the creation of spatial
databases. There is no empirical evidence in the literature to show that attempts have been
made to focus on conducting research on specific methodologies for acquiring data relevant
for transport analysis in developing countries in general and Nigeria in particular. The need
for standard databases for managing transportation related issues cannot be over emphasized.
There is need, therefore to consider investigating spatial database design that is able to
specifically address transport management and modelling issues in developing countries.
Increasing urban traffic congestion has resulted in the need for vehicle routing in
urban environment. The vehicle routing problems are usually addressed using travel and
service times. Most of these models presented in the literature are static models assume pre-
defined travel and service times. These travel and services times are usually derived from
shortest path analysis on road networks with known values on each link in the network
(Giaglis, et al, 2004). Such assumptions are usually not realistic in urban areas where traffic
conditions are constantly changing during the day (Fleischmann, Gnutzmann, & Sandvob, 2004).
Technology can, however, be employed in ameliorating urban transport problem by
assisting business managers to predict areas liable to congestion at various periods of the day
and suggest alternative routes and hence improve supply chain and logistic management
while enhancing customer satisfaction. The goal of supply chain management is to
strategically manage the process of acquisition, movement and storage of materials, parts and
finished inventory through the organisation and its marketing channels in ways that current
and future profit is maximized through cost-efficient fulfilment of orders. The goal of an
efficient supply chain management strategy may not simple be to maximise profit, but in the
process, minimise average delivery and/or pick up time. It is therefore important to
investigate how ICT can assist in managing transport related issues in the urban environment.
As Sivakumar, (2007) noted, most of the transport demand models today treat freight
in an aggregate and ad-hoc manner. Therefore, only few studies have been conducted that
attempt to development behaviourally realistic model systems of freight demand that can be
integrated into landuse-transport models. This is as a result of inadequate awareness of the
importance of freight transportation, lack of appropriate data for modelling and complexity of
freight movements into, out of and within cities. More research is therefore required on the
behavioural aspects of freight transportation modelling.
Yu, (2006) states that human activities and spatial interaction largely takes place in
some physical space, with the physical presence or contact of the participants involved.
19 | P a g e
Today, however, with development in information and communication technologies, there
are significant changes in the way human interactions take place. Much of the interaction
today takes place in what has been referred to as virtual space (Adams, 1995; Miller, 2005;
Shaw & Yu, 2008; Yu, 2006;). The implications of virtual interaction pattern of individuals
and groups on travel and route choice behaviour will definitely provide an interesting insight
into our understanding of travel demand.
Though some work has been done on the use of information communication
technology in transportation analysis (Crainic, Gendreau, & Potvin, 2008; Powell,
Bouzaiene-Ayari & Simao, 2007; Wisetjindawat, et al, 2006), none has been reported that
specifically applied an integration of SDSS and LBS in addressing freight management
issues. It will be necessary to investigate how an integration of these technologies can assist
decision makers and field officials in making critical choices, particularly in situations where
time is a major constraint.
6.0 Conclusion
SDSS and LBS are ICT applications that are useful in addressing a number of spatial
problems. While SDSS are designed to assist decision-makers in addressing spatial problems
that are usually unstructured and have conflicting, incommensurate and multiple objective
criteria, LBS are services provided to mobile users taking into cognisance their present
location in space. An integration of these two technologies, therefore, will be useful in
addressing spatial problems that are of particular interest to the modern nomadic man as it
librates him from the constraint imposed by physical space by enabling him work and play in
virtual space.
This paper has therefore attempted to show, through a survey of literature, the
possibility for this type of system in applying SDSS and LBS in systems to address
challenges encountered by transport operators.
Bibliography
Adams, P. (1995). A reconsideration of personal boundaries in space-time. Annals of the Association of
American Geographers , 85 (2), 267-285.
Akomolafe, D., Adekayode, F., Gbadeyan, J., & Ibiyemi, T. (2009). Enhancing road monitoring and safety
through the use of geospatial technology. International Journal of Physical Sciences , 4 (5), 343-348.
Aloudat, A., Michael, K., & Yan, J. (2007). Location-Based Services in Emergency management- from
government to citizens: global case studies. Retrieved April 12, 2011, from University of Wollongong Research
online: http//:ro.uow.edu.au/infopapers/562
Antony, R. (1965). Planning and Control Systems: A framework for analysis. Boston: Havard University
Graduate School of Business Administration .
Arampatzis, G., Kiranoudis, C., Scaloubacas, P., & Assimacopoulos, D. (2004). A GIS-based decision support
system for planning urban transportation policies. European Journal of Operational Research , 152, 465–475.
Armstrong, M., & Densham, P. (1990). Database organization strategies for spatial decision support systems.
INT. J. GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, , 4 (1), 3-20.
Bauer, H., Reichardt, T., & Schüle, A. (2005). USER REQUIREMENTS FOR LOCATION BASED
SERVICES. IADIS International Conference e-Commerce 2005 (pp. 211-218). IADIS.
20 | P a g e
Becker, C., & Durr, F. (2005). On the location models for ubiquitous computing. Pers Ubiquit Comput , 9, 20-
31.
Bell, M., & Lida, Y. (1997). Transportation Network Analysis. Chichester: John Wiley.
Berger, S., Lehmann, H., & Lehner, F. (2003). Location-based services in the tourist industry. Information
technology & Tourism , 5, 243-256.
Borzacchiello, M., Casas, I., Ciuffo, B., & Nijkamp, P. (2008). Geo-ICT in Transportation Science. Retrieved
March 13, 2011, from ftp://zappa.ubvu.vu.nl/20080001.pdf
Church, R., Murray, A., Figueroa, M., & Barber, K. (2000). Support system development for forest ecosystem
management. European Journal of Operational Research , 247-258.
Crainic, T., Gendreau, M., & Potvin, J.-Y. (2008). Intelligent Freight Transportation Systems: Assessment and
the Contribution of Operations Research. Department of Computer Science and Operations Research,
Universite de Montreal,. Montreal, Canada: CIRRELT.
Crocco, F., de Marco, S., Iaquinta, P., & Mongelli, W. (2010). Freight transport in urban areas: an integrated
system of models to stimulate freight demand and passengers demand for purchase trips. International Journal
of Mathematical models and methods in applied csiences , 4 (4), 265-273.
Datta, S. (2000). Applications of Operation Research to the transportation Problems in Developing Countries: A
Review. Global business Review , 1 (1), 113-132.
Densham, P. (1991). Spatial Decision Support Systems. In J. Maguire, M. Goodchild, & D. Rhind (Eds.),
Geographical Information Systems: Principles and Applications. London: longman Publishing Group.
Ellegard, K. (1999). A time-geographical approach to the study of everyday life of individuals- A challenege of
complexity. GeoJournal , 48, 167-175.
Elsevier Science Ltd. (2000). Geographic Information Systems in Transportation Research (1st ed., Vol. 1 & 2).
(J. Thill, Ed.) Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Engelen, G., & White, R. a. (1997). Integrating constrained cellular automata models, GIS and decision support
tools for urban planning and policy making. In H. Timmermans, Decision Support Systems in Urban Planning.
Chapman and Hall.
Eom, S., Lee, S., Kim, E., & Somarajan, C. (1998). A Survey of decision support system applications (1988-
1994. Journal of Operational Research Society , 49, 109-120.
Erharuyi, N., & Fairbairn, D. (2003). Mobile geographic information handling technologies to support disaster
management. Geography , 88 (4), 312-319.
Fadare, S., & Ayantoyinbo, B. (2010). A study of the effects of road traffic congestion on freight movement in
Lagos metropolis. European Journal of Social Sciences , 16 (3), 420-429.
Fisher, M. M. (2003). GIS and Network Analysis. (Hensher D., Button K., H. K., & S. P., Eds.) Pergamon.
Fleischmann, B., Gnutzmann, S., & Sandvob, E. (2004). Dynamic vehicle routing based on on-line traffic
information. Transportation Science , 38 (4), 420-433.
Frank, C., Thill, J.-C., & Batta, R. (2000). Spatial decision support system for hazadous material truck routing.
Transportation Research Part C , 8, 337-359.
Gentile, G., & Vigo, D. (2007). Movement generation and trip distribution for freight demand modelling
applied to city logistic. Roma: Universita di Bologna, Italy.
21 | P a g e
Giaglis, G. M., Kourouthanassis, P., & Tsamakos, A. (2003). Towards a Classification Framework for Mobile
Location Services. In B. E. Mennecke, & T. J. Strader (Eds.), Mobile Commerce (pp. 67-85). Hershey.
Giaglis, G. M., Minis, I., Tatarakis, A., & Zeimpekis, V. (2004). Minimizing Logistics Risk through Real-Time
Vehicle Routing and Mobile Technologies: Research To-Date and Future Trends. International Journal of
Physical Distribution and Logistics Management , 34 (9), 749-764.
Goodchild, M. (1992). Geographic Information Science. International Journal of Geographic Information
Systems , 6, 31-45.
Goodchild, M. (2000). GIS and Transportation: Status and Challenges. Geoinformatica , 4, 127-139.
Gorry, G., & Scott Morton, M. (1971). A framework for management information systems. Sloan Management
Review , 13 (1).
Guy, M. (1998). Methods and Techniques in Human geography. England: Wiley and Sons Ltd.
Hagerstrand, T. (1975a). Space, time and human conditions. In A. Karlquist, L. Lundquist, & F. Snickars (Eds.),
Dynamic allocation of urban space (pp. 3-12). D.C. Heath: Farnborough: Saxon House/Lexington.
Hagerstrand, T. (1970). What about people in regional Science? Papers of the Regional Science Association ,
pp. 7-21.
Hunt, J., & Simmonds, D. (1993). Theory and application of an integrated land-use and transport modelling
framework. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design , 20 (2), 221 – 244.
Ichoua, S., Gendreau, M., & Potvin, J.-Y. (2007). Planned route optimization for real-time vehicle routing. In V.
Zeimpekis, C. Tarantilis, G. Giaglis, & I. Minis (Eds.), Dynamic Fleet Management: Concepts, Systems,
Algorithms & Case Studies (pp. 1-18). Springer.
Imam, T., Elsharawy, G., Gomah, M., & Samy, I. (2009). Solving Transportation Problem Using Object-
Oriented Model. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security , 9 (2), 353-361.
ITU. (2010). Press Release February 23rd, 2010. Geneva. Retrieved September 24, 2010, from International
Telecommunication Union: http://www.itu.int/newsroom/press_releases/2010/08.html
Jacobsen, H.-A. (2004). Middleware for Location-Based Services. In J. Schiller, & A. Voisard, Location-based
Services (pp. 95-127). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Janelle, D., & Gillespie, A. (2004). Space-Time Constructs for Linking Information and Communication
Technologies with Issues in Sustainable Transportation. Transport Reviews , 24 (6), 665-677.
Jensen, C., Friis-Christensen, A., Pedersen, T., Pfoser, D., Saltenis, S., & Tryfona, N. (2001). Location-Based
Services—A Database Perspective. Proc. of the Eighth Scandinavian Research Conference on Geographical
Information Science, (pp. 59-68).
Jensen, C., Kligys, A., Pedersen, B., & Timko, I. (2004). Multidimensional data modeling for location-based
services. The VLDB Journal , 13 (1), 1-21.
Johnson, C. (1998). Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Human Computer interaction with Mobile Devices. In
C. Johnson (Ed.), GIST technical report. University of Glasgow.
Kaasinen, E. (2003). User needs for location-aware mobile services. Perspective in Ubiquitous Computing , 7,
70-79.
Kai, H. (2005). Developing a GIS-based Decision Support System for Transportation System Planning. Paper
submitted to AASHTO GIS-T 2006 Student Paper Contest.
22 | P a g e
Keenan, P. (1996). Using a GIS as a DSS generator. In J. Darzentas, J. S. Darzentas, & T. Spyrou (Eds.),
Perspectives on DSS (pp. 33-40). Aegean, Greece.: University of the Aegean, Greece.
Kim, H., & Chon, K. (2005). Modelling en-route diversion behaviour under on-site traffic information. Journal
of the Eastern Asia Society for transportation Studies , 6, 1833-1843.
Kim, J. (2002). Location-Based services (LBS): An emerging innovative Transport Service Technology and a
research agenda. Annual meetings of European regional Science Association. Dortmund.
Koeppel, I. (2000). What are Location Services?” From a GIS perspective. Retrieved June 17, 2010, from
digitalearth web site : http://www.digitalearth.net.cn/GISFundamentalIssues/LBS-
Location%20Besed%20Service/What%20are%20Location%20Services%20%20From%20a%20GIS%20Perspe
ctive
Kupper, A. (2005). Location-based services: Fundamentals and Operation. London: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Kwan, M.-P. (2004). GIS Methods in Time-Geographic Research: Geocomputation and Geovisualization of
Human Activity Patterns. Geografiska Annaler , 86 B (4), 267-280.
Kwan, M.-P., & Lee, J. (2003). Geovisualisation of human activity patterns using 3D GIS: A time-geographic
approach. In M. Goodchild, & D. Janelle (Eds.), Spatially Integrated Social Science: Examples in Best Practice.
Oxford University Press.
Larsen, A., Madsen, O. B., & Solomon, M. (2007). Classification of dynamic vehicle routing systems. In V.
Zeimpekis, C. Tarantislis, G. Giaglis, & I. Minis (Eds.), Dynamic Fleet management (pp. 17-40). Springer.
Leung, H., Burcea, I., & Jaconsen, H.-A. (2003). Modelling Location-based Services with Subject Spaces.
Retrieved May 6, 2011, from http://www.
Liutkauskas, V., Matulis, D., & Plestys, R. (2004). Location Based Services. Elektronika IR elektrotechnika , 3
(52).
Magon, A., & Shukla, R. (2001). LBS, the Ingredients and the Alternatives. Retrieved December 23, 2010, from
gisdevelopment.net: http://www.gisdevelopment.net/technology/lbs/techlbs006.htm
Malczewski, J. (2006). GIS-Based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. International
Journal of Geographical Information Science , 20 (7), 703-726.
Mallick, M. (2003). Mobile and Wireless Design Essentials. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley Inc.
Miller, H. (1999). Measuring Space-time Accessibility Benefits within Transportation Networks: Basic Theory
and Computational Procedures. Geographical Analysis , 31, 187-212.
Miller, H. (2005). Necessary space-time conditions for human interaction. Environment and planning B:
Planning and design , 32, 381-401.
Miller, H., Yi-Hwa, W., & Ming-chih, H. (1999). GIS-Based dynamic traffic congestion modelling to support
time-critical logistics. Proceedings of the Hawai internation conference on system science. Maui, Hawai: IEEE.
Nagarajan, A., Canessa, E., Nowak, M., Mitchell, W., & White III, C. (2005). Technology in Trucking. In C. W.
Dale Belman (Ed.), Trucking in the age of information (pp. 147-182). Ashgate Publishing Ltd. Burlington VT.
Novaes, A., Burin, P., & Frazzon, E. (2011). Dynamic Vehicle Routing in over congested urban areas. In H.-J.
Kreowski, B. Scholz-Reiter, & K.-D. Thoben (Ed.), 2nd international conference, LDIC 2009 (pp. 49-58).
Bremen, Germany: Springer Verlag.
Ogunsanya, A. (2002). Maker and Breaker of Cities. 59th Inuagural Lecture, University of Ilorin, Nigeria.
23 | P a g e
Okoko, E. (2008). The spatial pattern of urban goods movement in Akure, Nigeria. Pakistan Journal of Social
Sciences , 5 (3), 226-234.
Open Geospatial Consortium. (2005). Open Location Services 1.1.
Powell, W., Bouzaiene-Ayari, B., & Simao, H. (2007). Dynamic Models for freight transportation. In C.
Barnhart, & G. Laporte (Eds.), Transportation, Handbooks of Operations Research and Management science
(Vol. 14, pp. 285-365). Amsterdam, Holland.
Puckett, S. (2009). Improving our understanding of frieght travel decision making: motivations, constraints,
incentives and interactions. International association for travel behavior research. Jaipur, India.
Raper, J., Gartner, G., Karimi, H., & Rizos, C. (2007). Applications of Location-based services: a selected
review. Journal of Location Based services , 1 (2), 89-111.
Raubal, M., & Rinner, C. (2004). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Location based Services. Geoinformatics
2004. University of Gavle, Sweden.
Reichenbacher, T. (2005). Adaptive egocentric maps for mobile users. In L. Meng, A. Zipf, & T. Reichenbacher
(Eds.), Map-Based Mobile Services: Theories, Methods and Implementations (pp. 141-158).
Rinner, C. (2008). Mobile maps and More-extending Location-Based Services with multi-criteria decision
analysis. In L. Meng, A. Zipf, & S. Winter (Eds.), Map-based mobile Services. Lecture notes in Geo-
information and Cartography (pp. 335-349). Berlin: Springer.
Rinner, C. (2003). Web-based Spatial Decision Support: Status and Research Direction. Journal of Geographic
Information and Decision Analysis , 7 (1), 14-31.
Rinner, C., Raubal, M., & Spigel, B. (2005). User Interface Design for Location Based Services. International
Conference on GeoInformatics. Toronto, Canada.
Rodrigue, J.-P., Comtois, C., & Slack, B. (2009). The Geography of Transport Systems, Second Edition. New
York: Routledge.
Roongrasamee, B., Vatcharanporn, E., & Nitin, K. (2003). A Model of Location Based Services for Crime
Control. Retrieved October 12, 2010, from Map Asia Conference:
www.gisdevelopment.net/technology/lbs/ma03217pf.htm
Rutledge, D., McDonald, G., Cameron, M., McBride, G., Poot, J., Scrimgeour, F., et al. (2007). Development of
Spatial Decision Support Systems to Support Long-term, Integrated Planning. In L. a. Oxley (Ed.), MODSIM
2007 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (pp. 308-314). Modelling and Simulation Society of
Australia and New Zealand.
Sarkar, A. (2007). GIS Applications in Logistics: A Literature Review. School of Business, University of
Redlands.
Shaw, S., & Yu, H. (2008). A GIS-based Time-Geography Framework for Spatio-Temporal Analysis of
Individual Activities and Interactions. Third International Specialist Meeting on ICT, Everyday Life and Urban
Change. Bristol, U.K.
Shen, W., & Khoong, C. (1995). A DSS for empty container distribution planning. Decision Support Systems ,
15, 75-82.
Shiode, N., Li, C., Batty, M., Longley, P., & Maguire, D. (2004). The Impact and Penetration of Location-based
Services. In H. Karimi, & A. Hammad (Eds.), Telegeoinformatics: Location-Based Computing and Services (pp.
349-366).
24 | P a g e
Simon, H. (1960). The Science of Management Decision. New York: Harper Brothers.
Sivakumar, A. (2007). Modelling Transport: A synthesis of Transport Modelling Methodologies. Retrieved July
13, 2011, from imperial college.ac.uk: www3.imperial.ac.ik/pls/portallive/docs/1/50669701.pdf
Somuyiwa, A. (2010). Impact of freight flows on city logistics in a megacity of a developing economy. Journal
of Geography and Regional Planning , 3 (2), 29-34.
Somuyiwa, A., & Adewoye, J. (2010). Managing logistics information system: Theoretical underpinning. Asian
Journal of Business Management , 2 (2), 41-47.
Somuyiwa, O., & Dosunmu, A. (2008). Logistic infrastructure and port Development at Apapa Port, Nigeria.
Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences , 5 (9), 953-959.
Southworth, F., & Peterson, B. (2000). Intermodal and international freight network modelling. (J. Thill, Ed.)
Transportation Research part C , 8, 147-166.
Spiekermann. (2004). General aspects of location based services. In J. Schiller, & A. Voisard (Eds.), Location-
Based Services. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Sprague, R. (1980). A framework for the development of Decision Support Systems. MIS Quarterly , 1-26.
Spring, G. (2004). Application of GIS in Transportation. In M. Kutz (Ed.), Handbook of Transportation
Engineering. New York: McCraw-Hill.
Steiniger, S., Neun, M., & Edwardes, A. (2006). Foundations of Location Based Services. Department of
Geography. University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Townsend, A. (2007). Seoul: Birth of a broadband metropolis. Environment and Planning B: Plannimg and
design , 34, 396-413.
Virrantaus, K., Markkulas, J., Garmash, A., & Terziyan, Y. (2001). Developing GIS supported Location-based
services. Proc. of WGIS 2001- first int. workshop on Web geographical information systems, (pp. 423-432).
Tokyo, Japan.
Virrantaus, K., Tirri, H., Veijalainen, J., Markkulas, J., Katanosov, A., Garmash, A., et al. (2001). Developing
GIS-supported Location-based services. 2nd International conference on Web Information Systems Engineering
(WISE'01), (pp. 66-75).
Warf, B. (2006). Geography of Telecommunication. In B. Warf, Encyclopaedia of Human Geography. Sage
Publishers Inc.
Wegener, M. (2004). Overview of landuse transport models. In D. Hensher, & K. Button (Eds.), Transport
Geography and Spatial Systems: Handbook 5 of the Handbook in Transport (pp. 127-146). Kidlington, UK:
Pergamon.
Wilson, A. (1998). Landuse/Transport interaction models: past and future. Journal of transport economics and
policy , 32 (1), 3-26.
Wilson, A. (1974). Urban and Regional Models in Geography and Planning. Chichester, Sussex: John Wiley.
Wisetjindawat, W., Sano, K., Matsumoto, S., & Raothanachonkun, P. (2006). Micro-Simulation model for
freight agents interactions in urban freight movement. 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation research
Board. Washington, D.c.
Worrall, L. (1991). Spatial analysis and spatial policy using geographic information systems. New York:
Belhaven Press.
25 | P a g e
Yi-Hwa, W., Harvey, J., & Ming-chih, H. (2001). A GIS-Based decision support system for analysis of route
choice in congested urban road networks. Journal of Geographical systems , 1-30.
You, J., & Kim, T. (2000). Development and evaluation of a hybrid travel time forecasting model. In J.-C. Thill
(Ed.), Geographic Information Systems in Transportation Research (Vol. 8, pp. 231-256). Oxford, U.K.:
Elsevier Science Ltd.
Yu, H. (2006). Spatio-Temporal GIS design for exploring interactions of human activities. Cartography &
Geographic Information Science , 33 (1), 3-19.
Yu, H., & Shaw, S. (2007). Revisiting Hagerstrands's time-geographic framework for individual activities in the
age of instant access. In H.J.Miller (Ed.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science.