loeb & loeb adds value ©2013 loeb & loeb llp us & china patent differences mip china...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
LOEB & LOEB Adds Value©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP
US & China Patent DifferencesMIP China Forum Conference
May 2, 2013
![Page 2: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
SIPO Overview
SIPO – State Intellectual Property Office– Similar to USPTO– Government agency
– Exam patent applications
– Grant patents
Local branches of SIPO– Adjudicate patent disputes– Enforce judicial decisions in jurisdiction– Appeals to People’s Courts– Some Supreme People’s Courts on coasts with patent expertise
The IP tribunal of the Supreme People’s Court is responsible for judicial interpretations of Chinese Patent Law and its Implementing Regulations.
![Page 3: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
USPTO Overview
USPTO– Exam patent applications– Grant patents
The USPTO does not adjudicate disputes– Federal courts are responsible for adjudicating patent disputes, enforcing
judgments, and hearing appeals
![Page 4: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Types of Chinese Patents
In China patent types include:– Invention patents– Utility model patents– Design patents
Invention patents– New technological developments
– Products, method, improvements thereon
– 20 year term from date of application Utility and Design
– 10 year term
![Page 5: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Types of US Patents
US Utility patents – 20 years from date of application and encompass:– Machines– Human made products– Compositions of matter– Processing methods
US Design – 14 years from date of application
![Page 6: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
China Utility Patents
China Utility patents– Have no counterpart in US law– There are no provisional patents in China
There are some similarities, which include:– Examiner review for formalities– If Examiner deems okay, patent in a year shorter term of 10 years
Have the ability to file an invention patent, which abandons the utility patent, but does not get priority date of invention patent
![Page 7: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Scope of Coverage
Scope of coverage– In the US, is virtually unlimited– Both, novel, inventive and useful
![Page 8: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
China patent practice
No continuation practice
No best mode
China – strict exclusions– Scientific discoveries
– Rules and methods of mental activities
– Methods for diagnosis or treatment of diseases
– Animal and plant varieties (not including the processes used in producing the products)
– Substances obtained by means of nuclear transformation
![Page 9: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Novelty
Novelty
– Concept – show your idea, gauge interest before spending the money on a patent application
In the US – one year form date of public use, offer to sell of publication of invention
In China – no prior disclosure except in limited circumstance
![Page 10: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
How to File in China
How to file in China?– File in China directly
– Domestic priority: 12 months for invention or utility
– File in the United States first– Then within 12 months file either PCT or file in China
– File PCT application designating China– 30 months to from first priority date– Can extend 2 months with a fee
![Page 11: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Revise Specification
Edit down– Reduce translation costs ($50-100 per page)
– More accurate translation
– Speed examination
– No best mode requirement
– Provide a list of prior art – let Examiner determine
Do not describe specific embodiments (limiting)
– Claim elements should be in all the embodiments and most drawings
Do not have to have all claimed element in drawings
Do not describe advantages (limiting)
– Enablement standard is lower
![Page 12: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Revise Claims
One independent claim (else restriction)
Consider claiming the advantage over the cited art (Jepson)
Directly cover infringer (contributory is difficult)
– Limited discovery
– Direct witness examination
Multiple dependent claims are fine
Reduce number
– Can get expensive
![Page 13: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
China Applications in the US
Remove all references to “The Invention”– Coverage may only be to the one invention
Reduce summary– Remove problem/solution
– Shrink disclosure
Reduce abstract
Problem – solution approach may limit claims
Add more embodiments to avoid being limited to one
Claims– Remove all multiple dependencies
– Add more claim types (CRM, SYSTEM, METHOD)
– Numbering is OK, but not necessary
– Narrative claims should be converted
![Page 14: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Sample claim
Hydraulic piston with replaceable seal rings
– Outer casing housing a plurality of seal rings
– Seals against reciprocating and/or rotating polished rod to allow motion of the rod while maintaining fluid pressure
– Two part construction allows for replacement of seal rings
![Page 15: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Narrative claim
A sealing apparatus for a reciprocating polished rod comprising a seal having a
plurality of seal rings disposed between a first bushing and a second bushing, the seal
and the two bushings being placed within a channel in a body to which a cap is
releasably attached, such that upon connection of the cap to the body opposing mating
surfaces on the body and the cap compress the seal against the reciprocating polished
rod.
![Page 16: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Functional Apparatus Claim
A sealing apparatus for a reciprocating polished rod, comprising:
– a body for receiving the polished rod; and
– a seal for preventing leakage of a fluid alongside the polished rod by radial pressure of a plurality of seal rings that are compressed between a first bushing and a second bushing within the body when a cap is threaded onto one end of the body.
![Page 17: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Outline Form Claim
A sealing apparatus for a reciprocating polished rod, comprising:
– a body having a first end, a second end, a channel for receiving the polished rod, and a first mating surface formed on an interior surface of the body, wherein the first end is adapted for engagement with a well;
– a first bushing disposed within the channel and engaging the first mating surface;
– a plurality of seals disposed within the channel adjacent the first bushing;
– a second bushing disposed adjacent the plurality of seals; and
– a cap having an aperture for receiving the polished rod and defining a second mating surface, the cap being removably engaged with the second end of the body such that the second mating surface engages the second bushing.
![Page 18: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
First to File
The Chinese Patent Law requires that patent applications directed to inventions made in china by Chinese entities or individuals must be filed first in China before any patent applications can be filed on the invention in foreign countries.
![Page 19: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Re-Issue
In the US, a re-issue is used to address errors that occurred without deceptive intent– Claiming less than entitled
In China, there is nothing similar
![Page 20: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Examination in China
First step: formality examination
– If OK, publish in 18 months from filing
Second step: examination
– Have to request within 3 years of filing or priority date, or else it is deemed withdrawn
– Can request an examination early for free
![Page 21: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Examination in the US
First step: formalities– If OK, publish in 18 months
Second Step: examination– Occurs automatically
– Added to the queue
– Can be moved up by paying a fee or by special circumstance
![Page 22: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Disclosure Requirements
In the US:– Enablement
– Best mode
– Written description
In China:– Similar, no best mode
![Page 23: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Enforcement in China
Administrative– Faster, less expensive
– No damages
– Limited injunctions
Judicial– Slower, more expensive
– Can get damages and injunctions
![Page 24: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Administrative - China
Local IP offices, customs offices and the police
Local IP
– Infringement, mediation, false representations
Customs
– Control importation and exportation of infringing items
Police – stop criminal activities
![Page 25: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Administrative – Start an Action?
Report to local IP office
Request an administrative investigation
– Work with police and conduct the administrative or seizure detain products
– If infringement established, remedies can be enforced (no damages)
![Page 26: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Judicial Enforcement in China
Civil and criminal
Trial – intermediate People’s Courts in capital city of each province
Appeals – high People’s Courts of the province
Supreme Court – discretion of court
![Page 27: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Invalidity – First at SIPO
Patent Re-Examination board at SIPO
File lawsuit to challenge ruling of board
The Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court is the court that has jurisdiction over the Patent Re-Examination Board, and all cases against the Board must be filed with the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court.
![Page 28: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013105/56649cb75503460f9497cf05/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Severe Infringement
Severe infringement – Criminal
– Prison and fines
Damages
– China – Insignificant
– Lost profits or benefits gained
– Royalty easier – get 1 to 3 times
– Still hard - $625 to $62,500 maximum