Longwood University Professional Education Unit

Annual Report 2011

Disposition Assessment Data Comparisons

Average Rating of Dispositions Assessment

Program CF9A CF9B CF9C CF9D CF9E CF9F CF9G CF9H CF9I CF9J CF9K CF9L Target = 5

Art 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Above Standard =4

Biology 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 At standard =3

Elementary 5.0 5.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 5.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 Near Standard = 2

Elem-Middle 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Below Standard=1

ESL 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Middle 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Music 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

PHETE 4.3 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 5.0 5.0 4.7 4.7 5.0 4.7 4.3

LIBMED 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

SPED 4.0 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.5 4.2 4.8 4.8 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.0

UNIT AVERAGE 4.8 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 5.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.8

NCI 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

N=238, Please note your program files for individual reports. Note NCI compared to the Unit. NCI, N=9.

Clinical Experience Diversity Report by Gender

Total by Grade

Class type FEMALE MALE

Collaboration 153 176

Inclusion 567 565

Mainstreamed 1252 1544

Resource 131 139

School Library 51 48

Grand Total 2154 2472

Percentage 47% 53%

N=238,

Clinical Experience Diversity Report Ethnicity

Race/Ethnicity

Class type AMIN ASIAN BLACK HISP MULTIR UNKNOWN WHITE TOTAL

Collaboration 3 3 127 17 10 1 168 329

Inclusion 4 12 441 51 16 4 604 1132

Mainstreamed 32 106 879 135 84 17 1543 2796

Resource 3 17 90 35 4 0 121 270

School Library 1 1 30 16 0 0 51 99

Grand Total 43 139 1567 254 114 22 2487 4626

Percentage 1% 3% 34% 5% 2% 0% 54%

Clinical Experience Diversity Report by SES

Social Economic Status

Class type TOTAL NUM Free/Reduced Lunch

Not on Free/Reduced

Lunch

Collaboration 329 141 188

Inclusion 1132 543 589

Mainstreamed 2796 1050 1746

Resource 270 135 135

School Library 99 8 91

Grand Total 4626 1877 2749

Percentage 41% 59%

Early Clinical Evaluation CF Standard 1 Partnerships and Practicum experience N=312

CF1A CF1B CF1C CF1D CF1E CF1F0%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

40% 38% 34% 39% 36% 42%

CF1- Content Knowledge%3's %2's

Early Clinical Evaluations Conceptual Framework Standard 2

CF2A CF2B CF2C CF2D CF2E0%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

CF 2 - Planning%3's %2's

Early Clinical Evaluation Conceptual Framework Standard 3

CF3A CF3B CF3C CF3D CF3E CF3F0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

CF 3 - Learning Climate%3's %2's

Early Clinical Evaluation Conceptual Framework Standard 4

CF4A CF4B CF4C CF4D CF4E CF4F0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

CF 4 - Implementation/Management%3's %2's

Early Clinical Evaluation Conceptual Framework Standard 5

CF5A CF5B CF5C CF5D CF5E0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

CF 5 - Evaluation/Assessment%3's %2's

Early Clinical Evaluation Conceptual Framework Standard 6

CF6A CF6B CF6C CF6D CF6E0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

CF 6 - Communications%3's %2's

Early Clinical Evaluation Conceptual Framework Standard 7

CF7A CF7B CF7C CF7D0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

CF 7 Technology%3's %2's

Early Clinical Evaluations Conceptual Framework Standard 8

CF1C CF2B CF3C CF3D CF3F CF4D CF5E0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

CF 8 - Diversity %3's %2's

Teacher Survey Responses by Terms for the Unit

Term Overall CF1 Avg. CF2 Avg. CF3 Avg. CF4 Avg. CF5 Avg. CF6Avg. CF7 Avg.Fall 2007 3.09 3.12 3.15 3.21 3.18 3.14 3.19 3.18Spring 08 3.68 3.61 3.68 3.67 3.60 3.60 3.65 3.67Fall 2008 3.59 3.54 3.51 3.57 3.49 3.49 3.32 3.65Spring 09 3.69 3.66 3.69 3.69 3.61 3.62 3.58 3.58Fall 2009 3.64 3.62 3.61 3.67 3.55 3.54 3.50 3.55Spring 2010 3.71 3.71 3.70 3.71 3.58 3.63 3.64 3.58Fall 2010 3.61 3.67 3.63 3.71 3.64 3.61 3.63 3.65Spring 2011 3.64 3.68 3.68 3.69 3.61 3.58 3.64 3.56

Final Clinical Evaluation for the Unit Comparison by Program Area

Conceptual Framework AveragesCF 1 CF2 CF3 CF4 CF5 CF6 CF7 CF8

UNIT 80% 76% 80% 77% 69% 82% 78% 78%NCI 88% 82% 89% 88% 86% 89% 90% 88%ART 89% 71% 91% 80% 68% 96% 89% 81%BUSINESS 97% 84% 93% 90% 80% 100% 100% 91%ELEM 82% 79% 83% 79% 72% 83% 81% 79%ENGLISH 73% 69% 72% 72% 70% 80% 79% 71%ESL 100% 80% 100% 89% 87% 100% 100% 100%HIST/SSE 69% 73% 63% 66% 63% 60% 84% 70%LIBMEDIA 89% 87% 72% 83% 100% 100% 75% 90%MATH 100% 100% 100% 92% 100% 100% 100% 100%MSE 80% 85% 83% 82% 70% 89% 93% 83%MUSIC 90% 85% 96% 90% 76% 96% 84% 88%PHETE 69% 58% 67% 62% 44% 66% 54% 63%SCIENCE 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%SPED 58% 59% 64% 58% 49% 71% 62% 61%THEATRE 100% 100% 100% 100% 93% 100% 100% 100%

Number of responses was 463 for the candidates in the field

Final Clinical Evaluation of NCI

NCI 88% 82% 89% 88% 86% 89% 90% 88%

N = 13

Impact on Student Learning Survey fall Candidates in the Final Clinical Experience Candidates reported on their impact on 1257 candidate responses in the clinical experience . There was a 29% gain from pretest to post test.

PRETEST% POST TEST %0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Impact on Student Learning Overall Average

Teacher Survey Responses 2011 overall average on their rating of the final clinical experience by Conceptual Framework Standard

Average Ratings

CF 1- Content Knowledge 3.67

CF 2 - Planning 3.63

CF 3 - Learning Climate 3.71

CF 4 - Implementation/Management 3.64

CF 5 - Evaluation/Assessment 3.61

CF 6 - Communication 3.63

CF 7 - Technology 3.65

Longwood University Professional Educational Unit Employer Survey2010-2011

Description Percent Response N

Description of District

Rural 68.8% 20

Suburban 27.50% 8

Urban 3.4% 1

Current Position

Superintendent 0.0% 0

Assistant Superintendent 27.50% 8

Personnel Director 51.7% 15

Other 20.6% 6

Professional Educational Unit Employer Survey2010-2011

Over the next 5 years, the top three areas for new employers in your district will be

Secondary teachers 93.1 % 27

Elementary Teachers 62.0% 18

Special Education Teachers

86.2% 25

Counselors 10.3% 3

School Administrators 24.1% 7

Professional Educational Unit Employer Survey2010-2011

Please rate your overall satisfaction with the Longwood Teacher Preparation Program

Very Dissatisfied 0.0% 0

Dissatisfied 0.0% 0

Neutral 0.0% 0

Satisfied 31.0% 9

Very Satisfied 68.8% 20