los angeles harbor college...metric ruler b has 0.1-cm subdivisions and an uncertainty of ± 0.05...

14

Upload: others

Post on 05-Aug-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Los Angeles Harbor College...METRIC RULER B has 0.1-cm subdivisions and an uncertainty of ± 0.05 cm. Thus, METRIC RULER B has less uncertainty than METRIC RULER A. The following examples
Page 2: Los Angeles Harbor College...METRIC RULER B has 0.1-cm subdivisions and an uncertainty of ± 0.05 cm. Thus, METRIC RULER B has less uncertainty than METRIC RULER A. The following examples
Page 3: Los Angeles Harbor College...METRIC RULER B has 0.1-cm subdivisions and an uncertainty of ± 0.05 cm. Thus, METRIC RULER B has less uncertainty than METRIC RULER A. The following examples
Page 4: Los Angeles Harbor College...METRIC RULER B has 0.1-cm subdivisions and an uncertainty of ± 0.05 cm. Thus, METRIC RULER B has less uncertainty than METRIC RULER A. The following examples
Page 5: Los Angeles Harbor College...METRIC RULER B has 0.1-cm subdivisions and an uncertainty of ± 0.05 cm. Thus, METRIC RULER B has less uncertainty than METRIC RULER A. The following examples
Page 6: Los Angeles Harbor College...METRIC RULER B has 0.1-cm subdivisions and an uncertainty of ± 0.05 cm. Thus, METRIC RULER B has less uncertainty than METRIC RULER A. The following examples
Page 7: Los Angeles Harbor College...METRIC RULER B has 0.1-cm subdivisions and an uncertainty of ± 0.05 cm. Thus, METRIC RULER B has less uncertainty than METRIC RULER A. The following examples
Page 8: Los Angeles Harbor College...METRIC RULER B has 0.1-cm subdivisions and an uncertainty of ± 0.05 cm. Thus, METRIC RULER B has less uncertainty than METRIC RULER A. The following examples
Page 9: Los Angeles Harbor College...METRIC RULER B has 0.1-cm subdivisions and an uncertainty of ± 0.05 cm. Thus, METRIC RULER B has less uncertainty than METRIC RULER A. The following examples
Page 10: Los Angeles Harbor College...METRIC RULER B has 0.1-cm subdivisions and an uncertainty of ± 0.05 cm. Thus, METRIC RULER B has less uncertainty than METRIC RULER A. The following examples
Page 11: Los Angeles Harbor College...METRIC RULER B has 0.1-cm subdivisions and an uncertainty of ± 0.05 cm. Thus, METRIC RULER B has less uncertainty than METRIC RULER A. The following examples
Page 12: Los Angeles Harbor College...METRIC RULER B has 0.1-cm subdivisions and an uncertainty of ± 0.05 cm. Thus, METRIC RULER B has less uncertainty than METRIC RULER A. The following examples
Page 13: Los Angeles Harbor College...METRIC RULER B has 0.1-cm subdivisions and an uncertainty of ± 0.05 cm. Thus, METRIC RULER B has less uncertainty than METRIC RULER A. The following examples
Page 14: Los Angeles Harbor College...METRIC RULER B has 0.1-cm subdivisions and an uncertainty of ± 0.05 cm. Thus, METRIC RULER B has less uncertainty than METRIC RULER A. The following examples