lrec, malta mayapril 20 th, 2010 annotation scheme and gold standard for dutch sentiment-bearing...

LREC, Malta MayApril 20th, 2010

Annotation Scheme and Gold Standard for

Dutch sentiment-bearing Adjectives

Isa Maks and Piek Vossen

Faculty of Arts, VU University Amsterdam


Overview of Presentation

• Annotation scheme for subjectivity and sentiment annotation of (Dutch) Adjectives

• Composition of the Gold Standard

• Results of Human Annotation Task

• Conclusions and Future Work


Sentiment Lexicon

tools for automatic

lexicon building

systems for rich automatic

sentiment analysis and opinion mining

Gold Standard to evaluate

automatically built sentiment lexicons

Guidelines for sentiment and

subjectivity annotation

evaluation

morphology, morfo-syntax, semantics,

usage, etc.

sentiment and subjectivity information

Sentiment Lexicon

Dutch Wordnet

(synsets)

Dutch Reference Lexicon

(lexical units)


Existing Annotation Schemata

• ‘prior’ polarity: positive (good), negative (ugly), neutral (direct), posneg (curious)

• ‘prior’ subjectivity: subjective or objective alarm [emotion] vs. alarm [device]

• annotation at word sense (or synset) level

Wiebe et al. (2004, 2006), Su et al. (2008)

• new: Attitude Holder


Attitude Holder (examples)

• ...there are reports from inside Gaza (AE) that criticize (NEG) Hamas (TOPIC)

• ...the dominant media (AE) vilify (NEG) Hamas (TOPIC) and …. (SW)

• Bush (AE) is angry (NEG) about Obama’s behaviour (TOPIC) ...

• Bush is bad (NEG) for the economy ... (SW)

SW = Speaker or Writer AE = Agent or Experiencer


Values for Attitude Holder Annotation

• SW: speaker’s or writer’s attitude (bad, ugly, beautiful)

• AE: agent’s or experiencer’s attitude ( angry, bent on)

• no-specific attitude holder (water proof, rainy, biological)


burgerlijk (civil) obj - ntr n.r. Burgerlijk huwelijk (civil marriage)

burgerlijk(narrow-minded)

subj SW neg judgment (moral) Zijn buren zijn vreselijk burgerlijk (his neighbours are terribly narrow-minded)

wreed (cruel) subj SW neg judgment (moral) Een wrede despoot (a cruel tyrant)

wreed (fantastic, cool) subj SW pos appreciation Ze rijden daar in vet wrede auto’s rond (they drive around in really cool cars)

gelukkig (happy, satisfied) subj AE pos emotion Bos is gelukkig met Zalms keuze (Bos is happy with Zalm’s choice)

bijziend (myopic) obj - neg descriptive Zo’n 30% van de bevolking is bijziend (30% of the population is myopic)

afkerig (averse) subj AE neg appreciation Hij is afkerig van geld (he is averse of money)

Subjectivity Polarity

Attitude Holder

Semantic CategoryLexical Unit Illustration


a cautious estimate

W.B. is happy with the choice for ..

Bush is angry over Obama's leeking of private conversation .....

They drive around in beautiful cars Bush is bad for the economy ….

water resistant watches

deaf man

civil marriage

Polarity, Subjectivity andAttitude Holder

Subj=subjectivity Obj=objectivityAE= Agent/Experiencer SW=Speaker/Writer No-AH=no attitude holder


Gold Standard Annotation Schema

Summarizing: • annotation at word sense level (instead of word level)

because words may be subjectivity or polarity ambiguous

• annotation of subjectivity (objective vs. subjective), polarity (positive, negative, posneg, neutral) ,

• attitude holder (whose opinion: speaker/writer or agent/experiencer)

Question: How reliable is human annotation with a complex

schema for subjectivity annotation


Data Set Gold Standard

Requirements:• representative of the whole lexicon• relevant to automatic annotation of subjectivity

– inclusion of subjective and objective lexical items – equal distribution of items across the lexicon with regard

to frequency, polysemy and synset size

English• General Inquirer (Stone, 1966), Hatzivassiloglou, V.

et al. (1997), Riloff and Wiebe (2005) , Jijkoun et al. (2008)

• Micro-WNOp (Cerini et al., 2007), Su et al. (2008)


Composition Gold Standard ADJECTIVES

frequency polysemy synsetsize

high 179 129 202

mid 164 239 256

low 266 241 151

609 609 609

3 variants:• 609 lexical units• 512 synsets• 390 words


Inter-annotator resultsPolarity Annotation

Attitude Holder Annotation

Both

86.3% (k=0.80) 87% (k=0.73) 79% (k=0.73)

single-category kappa computation

polarity attitude holder both polarity and attitude holder

overall agreement for 2 annotators


Comparison with Other Studies

word sense level

word level

word level

synset level


Analysis of Disagreements

• OBJ-neg (0.34) vs. SW-neg and OBJ-pos (0.23) vs. SW-pos

kaalhoofdig (bald-headed), oud (old- having lived for a long time) , mute (doofstom), droog (dry), langzaam (slow), zuiver (pure), etc.

• AE-pos vs. SW-negbelust (bent on) - hij is belust op geld (he is bent on money)


human annotations across various lexicon dimensions

agreement decreases when word frequency increases

agreement decreases when polysemy increases

agreement increases when item is a member of a large synset

(65%)


Conclusions

Development of similar annotation schemes and gold standards for nouns and verbs use of the gold standard to test methods and techniques to build a sentiment lexicon for Dutch

We designed a new annotation scheme for polarity, subjectivity and attitude holder annotation and showed that all substantial categories can be reliably annotated by human annotators. We assume that this holds for automatic annotation as well. We aimed at an equal distribution of test items across 3 lexicon dimensions (word frequency, large synset membership and polysemy) relevant to subjectivity and polarity identification; we measured correlations between polarity annotation and each of these lexicon dimensions.

Future Work


Acknowledgements

• The research is part of the project From Text To Political Positions (http://www2.let.vu.nl/oz/cltl/t2pp)

• Funded by the Interfaculty Reseach Institute CAMeRA - VU university Amsterdam

• Gold standard data available at (http:// www2.let.vu.nl/ oz/cltl/t2pp)


Thank you for your attention


obj SW ntr burgerlijk (civil) Burgerlijk huwelijk (civil marriage)

obj SW neg descriptive bijziend (myopic) Zo’n 30% van de bevolking is bijziend (30% of the population is myopic)

subj SW neg judgment (moral) wreed (cruel) Een wrede despoot (a cruel tyrant)

subj SW pos appreciation wreed (fantastic) Ze rijden daar in vet wrede auto’s rond (they drive around in cool cars)

subj SW neg judgment (moral) burgerlijk(narrow-minded)

Zijn buren zijn vreselijk burgerlijk (his neighbours are terribly narrow-minded)

subj AE pos emotion boos (angry) Bos is gelukkig met Zalms keuze (Bos is happy with Zalm’s choice)

subj AE neg appreciation afkerig (averse) Hij is afkerig van geld (he is averse of money)

SubjectivityPolarity

Attitude Holder Semantic Category

Lexical Unit Illustration


Attitude holder: CDA-lijsttrekker

Polarity negative

topic:

linkse coalitie


polarity Subj vs. Obj

Attitude holder

This Study 86%

κ=0.80

87%

κ =0.73

Jijkoun et al.

(2008)

79%

κ =0.66

Andreevskaia et al.(2006)

79%

Su et al.(2009) 89%

κ =0.83

90%

κ =0.79


What is an Opinion or Attitude(Kim, Hovy 2006)

(1) Bush is bad for the economy

(2) Bush is angry about Obama’s behaviour

judgment

emotion -> judgment

sentence1 sentence2

attitude holder Speaker/writer Bush

polarity negative negative

topic Bush (for the economy) Obama’s behaviour


Gold standard distribution

5% 2%

30%

29%

6%

21%

2%

4%

1%

AE-neg

AE-pos

SW-neg

SW-pos

SW-pn

OBJ-ntr

OBJ-neg

OBJ-pos

OBJ-pnAE8%

SW63%

OBJ29%

AE SW OBJ

polarity

attitude holder

polarity and attitude holder

lrec, malta mayapril 20 th, 2010 annotation scheme and gold standard for dutch sentiment-bearing...

Documents

malta mayapril

attitude holder slide

attitude holder annotation

dutch sentiment

attitude holder subj

attitude holder examples

subjectivity obj

sw bush ae