lsst and jdem as complementary probes of dark energy
DESCRIPTION
LSST and JDEM as Complementary Probes of Dark Energy. Tony Tyson, Andy Connolly, Zeljko Ivezic, James Jee, Steve Kahn, Sam Schmidt, Don Sweeney, Dave Wittman, Hu Zhan. JDEM SCG Telecon November 25, 2008. Outline. Science drivers Hardware implementation Systematics Simulations - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
LSST and JDEM as LSST and JDEM as Complementary Probes of Dark Complementary Probes of Dark
EnergyEnergy
JDEM SCG TeleconNovember 25, 2008
Tony Tyson, Andy Connolly, Zeljko Ivezic, James Jee, Steve Kahn, Sam Schmidt, Don Sweeney, Dave Wittman, Hu Zhan
2
OutlineOutline
Science drivers Hardware implementation Systematics Simulations Synergy with JDEM
3
• 4 billion galaxies with redshifts4 billion galaxies with redshifts• Time domain: Time domain: 1 million supernovae1 million supernovae 1 million galaxy lenses1 million galaxy lenses 5 million asteroids5 million asteroids new phenomenanew phenomena
LSST survey of 20,000 sq LSST survey of 20,000 sq degdeg
LSST SurveyLSST Survey
6-band Survey: ugrizy 320–1100 nm Frequent revisits: grizy
Sky area covered: >20,000 deg2 0.2 arcsec / pixel
Each 10 sq.deg field reimaged ~2000 times
Limiting magnitude: 27.6 AB magnitude @5 25 AB mag /visit = 2x15 seconds Photometry precision: 0.005 mag requirement 0.003 mag goal
5
Key LSST Mission: Dark Key LSST Mission: Dark EnergyEnergy
Precision measurements of all dark energy signatures in a single data set. Separately measure geometry and growth of dark matter structure vs cosmic time.
Weak gravitational lensing correlations
(multiple lensing probes!) Baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) Counts of dark matter clusters Supernovae to redshift 0.8
(complementary to JDEM) Probe anisotropy
6
8
9
3200 megapixel camera3200 megapixel camera
10
LSST six color systemLSST six color system
Wavelength (nm)
Re
lati
ve
sy
ste
m t
hro
ug
hp
ut
(%) Includes sensor QE, atmospheric
attenuation, optical transmission functions
11
Wavefront Sensor Layout
Guide Sensors (8 locations)
Wavefront Sensors (4 locations)
3.5 degree Field of View (634 mm diameter)
Curvature Sensor Side View Configuration
Focal plane2d
40 mm
Sci CCD
The LSST Focal PlaneThe LSST Focal Plane
12
LSST reconstruction pipeline simulatorLSST reconstruction pipeline simulator
Perturbations
Get intra and extra focal image intensities.
I1
I2
WCS processing: get the perturbation wavefronts
21
212 1
II
II
zW
0
n
Wedge
oTT
i fAAAx 1)(ix
Get correction vector by solving Normal equation. (A: sensitive matrix, f0: error vector.)
x
* Tools used for simulations and calculations: Zemax Matlab
13
Correct for perturbations due to thermal and mechanical distortions
Each optic has 6 dof (decenter, defocus, three euler angles)
Perturbations are placed on the three mirrors using aZernike expansion to simulate the possible residualcontrol system errors each mirror can have an arbitrary amplitudecode goes up to 5th order polynomials
Perturbation spectrum
e.g. Mirror Defocus
Active opticsActive optics
14
FWHM Allocation & Budget meets SRD FWHM Allocation & Budget meets SRD RequirementsRequirements
Some TelescopeThermal Effects Included
No Explicit Camera AllocationFor Thermal Effects
Margin available
15
The LSST CCD SensorThe LSST CCD Sensor
16 segments/CCD200 CCDs total3200 Total Outputs
16
Flatness metrologyFlatness metrology
17
The LSST site in ChileThe LSST site in Chile
photometriccalibration telescope
18
Seeing distributionSeeing distribution
19
There are 24 LSSTC US Institutional There are 24 LSSTC US Institutional MembersMembers
Brookhaven National Laboratory
California Institute of Technology
Carnegie Mellon University Columbia University Google Inc. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for
Astrophysics Johns Hopkins University Las Cumbres Observatory Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory National Optical Astronomy
Observatory Princeton University Purdue University
Research Corporation Rutgers University Stanford Linear Accelerator
Center Stanford University –KIPAC The Pennsylvania State
University University of Arizona University of California, Davis University of California, Irvine University of Illinois at
Champaign-Urbana University of Pennsylvania University of Pittsburgh University of Washington
Funding: Public-Private Partnership NSF, DOE, PrivateFunding: Public-Private Partnership NSF, DOE, Private
+ IN2P3 in France
20
21
LSST imaging & operations simulationsLSST imaging & operations simulations
Sheared HDF raytraced + perturbation + atmosphere + wind + optics + pixel
LSST Operations, including real weather data: coverage + depth
Performance verification using Subaru imagingPerformance verification using Subaru imaging
Figure : Visits numbers per field for the 10 year simulated survey
22
10-year simulation:10-year simulation: limiting magnitudes per 30s visit in limiting magnitudes per 30s visit in
main surveymain survey1 visit = 2 x 15 sec exposures1 visit = 2 x 15 sec exposures
Opsim5.72 Nov 2008
23
10-year simulation:10-year simulation: number of visits per band in main number of visits per band in main
surveysurvey
Opsim5.72 Nov 2008
24
LSST and Cosmic ShearLSST and Cosmic Shear
Ten redshift bins yield 55 auto and cross spectra
+ higher order
useful rangeuseful rangebaryonsbaryons
25
2-D Baryon Acoustic 2-D Baryon Acoustic OscillationsOscillations
26
LSST Precision on Dark Energy [in DETF LSST Precision on Dark Energy [in DETF language]language]
Combining techniques breaks degeneracies.Combining techniques breaks degeneracies.
Joint analysis of WL & BAO is less affected by the systematicsJoint analysis of WL & BAO is less affected by the systematics
27
Critical IssuesCritical Issues
WL shear reconstruction errors Show control to better than required precision Show control to better than required precision
using existing new facilitiesusing existing new facilities Photometric redshift errors
Develop robust photo-z calibration planDevelop robust photo-z calibration plan Undertake world campaign for spectroscopyUndertake world campaign for spectroscopy ()
Photometry errors Develop and test precision flux calibration Develop and test precision flux calibration
techniquetechnique
28
Residual shear correlationResidual shear correlation
Cosmic shear signalTest of shear systematics: Use faint stars as proxies for galaxies, and calculate the shear-shear correlation after correcting for PSF ellipticity via a different set of stars.
Compare with expected cosmic shear signal.
Conclusion: 200 exposures per sky patch will yield negligible PSF induced shear systematics. Wittman (2005)
Stars
29
HST ACS dataLSST:LSST:
Gold sample:Gold sample:4 billion galaxies 4 billion galaxies i<25 (S/N=25), i<25 (S/N=25), out of 10 billion out of 10 billion detected. detected. 56/sq.arcmin56/sq.arcmin
~40 galaxies~40 galaxiesper sq.arcmin per sq.arcmin used for WLused for WL
30
residual galaxy shear correlationresidual galaxy shear correlation
Simulation of 0.6” seeing.J. Jee 2008
Galaxy residual shear Galaxy residual shear error is shape shot error is shape shot noise dominated.noise dominated.Averages down like Averages down like 1/N fields to the 1/N fields to the systematic floor.systematic floor.
Survey of 20,000 Survey of 20,000 sq.deg will have N ~ sq.deg will have N ~ 2000 fields in each 2000 fields in each red band r, i, z red band r, i, z
Single 10 sq.deg field full depth
31
DM Pipelines
Solar System
Cosmology
Defects
MilkywayExtended Sources
Transients
Base Catalog
All Sky Database
Instance CatalogGeneration
Generate the seed catalog as required for simulation. Includes:
Metadata Size Position
Operation Simulation
Type Variability
Source Image Generation
Color Brightness Proper motion
Introduce shear parameter from cosmology metadata
DM Data base load simulation
Generate per FOV
Photon Propagation
Operation Simulation
Atmosphere
Telescope
Camera
Defects Formatting Generate per Sensor
Calibration Simulation
LSST Sample Images and Catalogs
IMAGE SIMULATIONSIMAGE SIMULATIONS
32
Input catalog for Input catalog for simulationssimulations
Millennium SimulationsKitzbichler and White (2006)
o 6 fields, 1.4x1.4 deg per fieldo 6x106 source per catalogo Based on Croton et al (2006)
and De Lucia and Blaizot (2006) models
o r<26 magnitude limito z<4 redshift limit o BVRIK Johnson and griz SDSSo Estimated u and y passbandso Type and size included
32
33
Photo-z SimulationsPhoto-z Simulations
Abdalla etal. 2008J=23.4 10 sigma
34
35
Calibrating photometric Calibrating photometric redshifts redshifts
Cross-correlation LSS-based techniques can reconstruct the true z distribution of a photo-z bin, even with spectroscopy of only the brightest galaxies at each z.
These techniques meet LSST requirements with easily attainable spectroscopic samples, ~104 galaxies per unit z. Newman 2008
36
Combining four LSST Combining four LSST probesprobes
37
Testing more general DE modelsTesting more general DE models
38
Probe anisotropyProbe anisotropy
39
multiple probes of dark energymultiple probes of dark energy
• WL shear-shear tomography• WL bi-spectrum tomography• Distribution of 250,000 shear peaks• Baryon acoustic oscillations• 1 million SNe Ia, z<1 per year• Low l, 2sky coverage: anisotropy? 3x109 galaxies, 106 SNe• probe growth(z) and d(z) separately• multiply lensed AGNs and SNe
40
JDEM-LSST JDEM-LSST ComplementarityComplementarity
JDEM+LSST in 20,000 sq.deg and in fifty 10 sq.deg deep drilling fields
Estimated cosmological constraints using LSST+JDEM
Optimum strategy for joint DE mission risk reduction
Priorities for max complementarity and cost effectiveness
41
JDEM+LSSTJDEM+LSST
42
JDEM-LSST PrioritiesJDEM-LSST Priorities
1.1. Two IR bands from space. Deep, wide. Helps Two IR bands from space. Deep, wide. Helps photo-z plus lots of astronomy (galaxy evolution, photo-z plus lots of astronomy (galaxy evolution, stellar)stellar)
2.2. JDEM spectroscopic BAO complements LSST 2-D JDEM spectroscopic BAO complements LSST 2-D BAOBAO
3.3. JDEM coverage of same 20,000 sq.deg (see #1) JDEM coverage of same 20,000 sq.deg (see #1)
4.4. Four near IR bands from space, closing the zY Four near IR bands from space, closing the zY gapgap
5.5. JDEM WL coverage of some of LSST’s survey JDEM WL coverage of some of LSST’s survey areaarea
Need quantitative modeling for joint design mission. It will Need quantitative modeling for joint design mission. It will be useful to simulate the increase in FoM for each prioritybe useful to simulate the increase in FoM for each priority
43
extra slides
44
Requirement of integrated 50 galaxies per sq.arcminute: green line in the following plot. The corresponding 10 sigma limiting magnitudes in r and i are: r=25.6 i=25.0 AB mag
45
WL shear power spectrum and statistical WL shear power spectrum and statistical errorserrors
Signal
Noise
SNAP
LSST gastrophysics
LSST: fsky = 0.5, ng = 40 SNAP: fsky = 0.1, ng =100
RMS intrinsic contribution to the shear σ= 0.25 (conservative).
No systematics!
Jain, Jarvis, and Bernstein 2006
46
Trade with depth and systematicsTrade with depth and systematics
LSST only
47
Comparing HST with SubaruComparing HST with Subaru
ACS: 34 min (1 orbit)PSF: 0.1 arcsec (FWHM)
2 arcmin
48
Comparing HST with SubaruComparing HST with Subaru
Suprime-Cam: 20 minPSF: 0.52 arcsec (FWHM)
49
Galaxy ellipticity systematics in the SRDGalaxy ellipticity systematics in the SRD
Specification: The median LSST image (two per visit) must have the median E1, E2, and Ex averaged over the FOV, less than SE3 for 1 arcmin, and less than SE4 for 5 arcmin. No more than EF2 % of images will exceed values of SE5 for 1 arcmin, nor SE6 for 5 arcmin
50
DETF FoM vs Etendue-TimeDETF FoM vs Etendue-Time
CombinedCombinedSeparate DE Probes
JDEM+LSST will be even better