lynn ditullio presentation at ssc energy workshop 4-8-2010

Upload: mapc-data-services

Post on 30-May-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010

    1/18

    University of Massachusetts

    Wind Energy Center

    Wind Turbine Siting Issues

    Presented at the:

    MAPC South Shore Coalition

    Renewable Energy Workshop

    April 8, 2010

    Lynn B. Di Tullio

    University of Massachusetts

    Wind Energy Center

  • 8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010

    2/18

    University of Massachusetts

    Wind Energy Center

    Permitting Wind - Siting Issues

    Visual:

    Aesthetic impact

    Shadow flicker

    Sound

    Ice Shed

    Avian

  • 8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010

    3/18

    University of Massachusetts

    Wind Energy Center

    Permitting Wind - Siting ImpactsVisual:

    Aesthetic -provide photo visualizations from key points

    Flicker - have flicker study done, allow for mitigation if

    necessary

    Sound - have sound study done from key vantage points (bettermodels, instruments, and standards are evolving)

    Ice Shed - usually not an issue, but

    Avian - desktop and onsite review usually required

  • 8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010

    4/18

    University of Massachusetts

    Wind Energy Center

    Sources of Technical Assistance:Sources of Technical Assistance: Model bylaw for small and large wind energy:Model bylaw for small and large wind energy:

    http://www.mass.gov/Eoeea/docs/doer/gca/gc-model-wind-bylaw-mar-10-

    2009.pdf

    Steven Clarke,Steven Clarke, Director of Wind Energy Development,Director of Wind Energy Development,DOER, 617-626-1049DOER, 617-626-1049

    University of Massachusetts Wind Energy Center (fundedUniversity of Massachusetts Wind Energy Center (funded

    through MRET-CEC)through MRET-CEC)

    Advice on standards, latestAdvice on standards, latest studies:studies: setback, flicker,setback, flicker,icing, noiseicing, noise

    NEWEEP (New England Wind Energy Education Project)NEWEEP (New England Wind Energy Education Project)

    upcomingupcoming webinarswebinars and conferenceand conference

    Consultants (funded by CEC if town project)Consultants (funded by CEC if town project)

  • 8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010

    5/18

    University of Massachusetts

    Wind Energy Center

    Other Resources:Other Resources:

    Siting standards by other states:Siting standards by other states:www.nationalwind.org/assets/publications/Siting_Factsheets.pdf

    Acoustic Ecology Institute Special Report:Acoustic Ecology Institute Special Report:WindWind

    Energy Noise ImpactsEnergy Noise Impactswww.acousticecology.org/srwind.html

    National Wind Coordinating Collaborative ReportsNational Wind Coordinating Collaborative Reportswww.nationalwind.org

  • 8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010

    6/18

    University of Massachusetts

    Wind Energy Center

    Statewide standards coming:Statewide standards coming:

    If Siting Reform bill passes, Energy FacilitiesIf Siting Reform bill passes, Energy Facilities

    Siting Board to develop statewide wind sitingSiting Board to develop statewide wind siting

    standards within 6 months, taking into accountstandards within 6 months, taking into account

    noise impacts on residents, safety setbacks,noise impacts on residents, safety setbacks,

    environmentally sensitive areas, rare speciesenvironmentally sensitive areas, rare species

    Provides a statewide, coherent approachProvides a statewide, coherent approach

    Regional planning commissions can developRegional planning commissions can develop

    their own standardstheir own standards

  • 8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010

    7/18

    University of Massachusetts

    Wind Energy Center

    Problems that Wind Energy Siting ReformProblems that Wind Energy Siting Reformis intended to address:is intended to address:

    Developers want clear and predictable siting

    standards MA requires too many permits issued by too

    many entities with many opportunities for appeal

    MA has one-stop permitting, but only >100 MW.

    = discrimination against renewable facilities Other states have much lower thresholds, e.g., VT

    (0); CT (1), NH (5) Maine (20 Acres)

  • 8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010

    8/18

    University of Massachusetts

    Wind Energy Center

    Wind Energy Siting Reform:Wind Energy Siting Reform:

    Clear standards - as protective as, but not

    necessarily identical to, existing law

    Applies to wind projects 2 MW or larger One-stop permitting at local and state level

    Appeal to court, if municipality rejects project

    (as currently) Appeal to state EFS board, if others object to

    municipalitys approval (and then, only one

    appeal of EFSB decision - to highest court)

  • 8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010

    9/18

    University of Massachusetts

    Wind Energy Center

    Wind Energy Siting Reform:Wind Energy Siting Reform:

    High wind communities create wind energy

    permitting boards,: members of planning

    board, con-comm, and ZBA

    One-stop board applies all local bylaws, and

    can waive provisions

    Muni and Fish & Game reps on EFS board

    Provides some financial benefits to towns

  • 8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010

    10/18

    University of Massachusetts

    Wind Energy Center

    Predicted Results ofPredicted Results ofSiting Reform:Siting Reform:

    Wind facilities sited in appropriate

    locations with appropriate safeguards

    and mitigation

    Permitting timeline reduced from 5+

    years to between 1-1.5 years

    Appeals reduced from 5+ years to 1year

  • 8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010

    11/18

    University of Massachusetts

    Wind Energy Center

    Permitting Wind - Regional Experiences

  • 8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010

    12/18

    University of Massachusetts

    Wind Energy Center

    Permitting Wind Turbines- Medford 100 kW turbine on 40m tower, 200 feet from McGlynn School

    Operating since Jan. 09: 10% of electricity - $25,000/year

    City of Medford and Medford Clean Energy Committee

    Key: Understand public outreach-everyone has to play a role -major effort, starting with big meeting for public within 500 ofproperty edge

    Planning Office and the Mayor took the lead; project fit

    No wind bylaw - went through ZBA

    Funding: the easy way! A $250,000 grant from the Large Onsite Renewables Initiative of the

    Massachusetts Renewable Energy Trust (MRET)

    A $200,000 appropriation made through the 2008 MA Energy Bill A $100,000 grant from the Mass Energy Consumers Alliance

    Ongoing matching grant funds through the MRET Clean Energy Choice(aka GreenUp) program.

  • 8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010

    13/18

    University of Massachusetts

    Wind Energy Center

    Permitting Wind Turbines- Fox Island, Maine 4.5 MW project - three GE 1.5 MW turbines

    Operating since Nov. 09 - meeting expectations

    Community-owned - Fox Islands Electrical Cooperative servesVinalhaven & North Haven ($0.28/kWh over CMP cable)

    Expected to meet total electric power load; cut bills day 1 Original ordinance designed to be restrictive for outside

    developers; made it hard for this project so was changed (!)

    1,500 feet to nearest residence; some neighbors bothered bynoise

    Sound data being gathered- seems to be in compliance with45 dBA limit

    Issue and potential mitigation will be submitted for Coop todecide

  • 8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010

    14/18

    University of Massachusetts

    Wind Energy Center

    Permitting Wind Turbines- Freedom, Maine 4.5 MW project - three GE 1.5 MW turbines

    Operating since Nov. 08 - happy with production

    Privately owned (Jay Cashman/Competitive Energy Services)

    Permitting took years

    When applied, town asked for time to draft wind ordinance

    After ordinance in place, developer applied Project approved, appealed, lost on appeal

    Then town threw out ordinance (!)

    Developer began again

    Project permitted with no wind ordinance in place

    1,000 feet to nearest residence; neighbors bothered by noise and

    flicker (videos on YouTube) Now: state model ordinance, Went from relatively easy to way

    too difficult-

    Many town ordinances effectively ban wind- small projects cant be donegeographically/financially

    Example: 1 mile setback, no flicker at intersections

  • 8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010

    15/18

    University of Massachusetts

    Wind Energy Center

    Vertical Axis Wind Turbines Advantages

    Generator at ground level

    Braking options

    Disadvantages

    Less efficient--especiallythe Savonius (bucket) type

    Complex vibration modes

    More joints that fail Guyed towers

    Lower installed height-lesswind near the ground

  • 8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010

    16/18

    University of Massachusetts

    Wind Energy Center

    Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines Advantages

    More efficient (especially with pitchcontrol and variable speed

    More economic due to less materialneeded per delivered unit of energy.

    Simpler designs--fewer failuremodes.

    Disadvantages Installation of rotor-tough!

    Climbing for repairs--tiring!

    Turning into the wind--yaw drivesand gyroscopic forces

    Gravitational loads lead to fatigue

  • 8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010

    17/18

    University of Massachusetts

    Wind Energy Center

    What Works? Vertical vs. Horizontal

    Horizontal is more economical--general result of intensecompetition of the 1980s.

    Higher failure rates for vertical axis machines due togreater complexity

    Roof-mounting vs. Tower mounting:

    Tower is much more effective: results of the recent UKWarwick Wind Trials

    Major problem: turbulence from roofs loweraerodynamic efficiency, vibration from turbines bothersoccupants, loads from the turbines stress buildingstructures.

  • 8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010

    18/18

    University of Massachusetts

    Wind Energy Center

    The UK Warwick Wind Trials(www.warwickwindtrials.org.uk/2.html)

    23 HAWT roof mounted wind turbines, Oct. 2007

    Wind resource on most urban roof tops is very

    small due to surrounding clutter High-rise buildings in exposed locations may have aviable wind resource

    Energy production in this study was trivially small

    High turbulence

    Extremely low capacity factor: ~ 4%

    The key issue with roof-mounted wind turbines is usually windresource, not technology!

    There is no technology silver bullet for a low wind resource