lynn ditullio presentation at ssc energy workshop 4-8-2010
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010
1/18
University of Massachusetts
Wind Energy Center
Wind Turbine Siting Issues
Presented at the:
MAPC South Shore Coalition
Renewable Energy Workshop
April 8, 2010
Lynn B. Di Tullio
University of Massachusetts
Wind Energy Center
-
8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010
2/18
University of Massachusetts
Wind Energy Center
Permitting Wind - Siting Issues
Visual:
Aesthetic impact
Shadow flicker
Sound
Ice Shed
Avian
-
8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010
3/18
University of Massachusetts
Wind Energy Center
Permitting Wind - Siting ImpactsVisual:
Aesthetic -provide photo visualizations from key points
Flicker - have flicker study done, allow for mitigation if
necessary
Sound - have sound study done from key vantage points (bettermodels, instruments, and standards are evolving)
Ice Shed - usually not an issue, but
Avian - desktop and onsite review usually required
-
8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010
4/18
University of Massachusetts
Wind Energy Center
Sources of Technical Assistance:Sources of Technical Assistance: Model bylaw for small and large wind energy:Model bylaw for small and large wind energy:
http://www.mass.gov/Eoeea/docs/doer/gca/gc-model-wind-bylaw-mar-10-
2009.pdf
Steven Clarke,Steven Clarke, Director of Wind Energy Development,Director of Wind Energy Development,DOER, 617-626-1049DOER, 617-626-1049
University of Massachusetts Wind Energy Center (fundedUniversity of Massachusetts Wind Energy Center (funded
through MRET-CEC)through MRET-CEC)
Advice on standards, latestAdvice on standards, latest studies:studies: setback, flicker,setback, flicker,icing, noiseicing, noise
NEWEEP (New England Wind Energy Education Project)NEWEEP (New England Wind Energy Education Project)
upcomingupcoming webinarswebinars and conferenceand conference
Consultants (funded by CEC if town project)Consultants (funded by CEC if town project)
-
8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010
5/18
University of Massachusetts
Wind Energy Center
Other Resources:Other Resources:
Siting standards by other states:Siting standards by other states:www.nationalwind.org/assets/publications/Siting_Factsheets.pdf
Acoustic Ecology Institute Special Report:Acoustic Ecology Institute Special Report:WindWind
Energy Noise ImpactsEnergy Noise Impactswww.acousticecology.org/srwind.html
National Wind Coordinating Collaborative ReportsNational Wind Coordinating Collaborative Reportswww.nationalwind.org
-
8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010
6/18
University of Massachusetts
Wind Energy Center
Statewide standards coming:Statewide standards coming:
If Siting Reform bill passes, Energy FacilitiesIf Siting Reform bill passes, Energy Facilities
Siting Board to develop statewide wind sitingSiting Board to develop statewide wind siting
standards within 6 months, taking into accountstandards within 6 months, taking into account
noise impacts on residents, safety setbacks,noise impacts on residents, safety setbacks,
environmentally sensitive areas, rare speciesenvironmentally sensitive areas, rare species
Provides a statewide, coherent approachProvides a statewide, coherent approach
Regional planning commissions can developRegional planning commissions can develop
their own standardstheir own standards
-
8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010
7/18
University of Massachusetts
Wind Energy Center
Problems that Wind Energy Siting ReformProblems that Wind Energy Siting Reformis intended to address:is intended to address:
Developers want clear and predictable siting
standards MA requires too many permits issued by too
many entities with many opportunities for appeal
MA has one-stop permitting, but only >100 MW.
= discrimination against renewable facilities Other states have much lower thresholds, e.g., VT
(0); CT (1), NH (5) Maine (20 Acres)
-
8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010
8/18
University of Massachusetts
Wind Energy Center
Wind Energy Siting Reform:Wind Energy Siting Reform:
Clear standards - as protective as, but not
necessarily identical to, existing law
Applies to wind projects 2 MW or larger One-stop permitting at local and state level
Appeal to court, if municipality rejects project
(as currently) Appeal to state EFS board, if others object to
municipalitys approval (and then, only one
appeal of EFSB decision - to highest court)
-
8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010
9/18
University of Massachusetts
Wind Energy Center
Wind Energy Siting Reform:Wind Energy Siting Reform:
High wind communities create wind energy
permitting boards,: members of planning
board, con-comm, and ZBA
One-stop board applies all local bylaws, and
can waive provisions
Muni and Fish & Game reps on EFS board
Provides some financial benefits to towns
-
8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010
10/18
University of Massachusetts
Wind Energy Center
Predicted Results ofPredicted Results ofSiting Reform:Siting Reform:
Wind facilities sited in appropriate
locations with appropriate safeguards
and mitigation
Permitting timeline reduced from 5+
years to between 1-1.5 years
Appeals reduced from 5+ years to 1year
-
8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010
11/18
University of Massachusetts
Wind Energy Center
Permitting Wind - Regional Experiences
-
8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010
12/18
University of Massachusetts
Wind Energy Center
Permitting Wind Turbines- Medford 100 kW turbine on 40m tower, 200 feet from McGlynn School
Operating since Jan. 09: 10% of electricity - $25,000/year
City of Medford and Medford Clean Energy Committee
Key: Understand public outreach-everyone has to play a role -major effort, starting with big meeting for public within 500 ofproperty edge
Planning Office and the Mayor took the lead; project fit
No wind bylaw - went through ZBA
Funding: the easy way! A $250,000 grant from the Large Onsite Renewables Initiative of the
Massachusetts Renewable Energy Trust (MRET)
A $200,000 appropriation made through the 2008 MA Energy Bill A $100,000 grant from the Mass Energy Consumers Alliance
Ongoing matching grant funds through the MRET Clean Energy Choice(aka GreenUp) program.
-
8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010
13/18
University of Massachusetts
Wind Energy Center
Permitting Wind Turbines- Fox Island, Maine 4.5 MW project - three GE 1.5 MW turbines
Operating since Nov. 09 - meeting expectations
Community-owned - Fox Islands Electrical Cooperative servesVinalhaven & North Haven ($0.28/kWh over CMP cable)
Expected to meet total electric power load; cut bills day 1 Original ordinance designed to be restrictive for outside
developers; made it hard for this project so was changed (!)
1,500 feet to nearest residence; some neighbors bothered bynoise
Sound data being gathered- seems to be in compliance with45 dBA limit
Issue and potential mitigation will be submitted for Coop todecide
-
8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010
14/18
University of Massachusetts
Wind Energy Center
Permitting Wind Turbines- Freedom, Maine 4.5 MW project - three GE 1.5 MW turbines
Operating since Nov. 08 - happy with production
Privately owned (Jay Cashman/Competitive Energy Services)
Permitting took years
When applied, town asked for time to draft wind ordinance
After ordinance in place, developer applied Project approved, appealed, lost on appeal
Then town threw out ordinance (!)
Developer began again
Project permitted with no wind ordinance in place
1,000 feet to nearest residence; neighbors bothered by noise and
flicker (videos on YouTube) Now: state model ordinance, Went from relatively easy to way
too difficult-
Many town ordinances effectively ban wind- small projects cant be donegeographically/financially
Example: 1 mile setback, no flicker at intersections
-
8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010
15/18
University of Massachusetts
Wind Energy Center
Vertical Axis Wind Turbines Advantages
Generator at ground level
Braking options
Disadvantages
Less efficient--especiallythe Savonius (bucket) type
Complex vibration modes
More joints that fail Guyed towers
Lower installed height-lesswind near the ground
-
8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010
16/18
University of Massachusetts
Wind Energy Center
Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines Advantages
More efficient (especially with pitchcontrol and variable speed
More economic due to less materialneeded per delivered unit of energy.
Simpler designs--fewer failuremodes.
Disadvantages Installation of rotor-tough!
Climbing for repairs--tiring!
Turning into the wind--yaw drivesand gyroscopic forces
Gravitational loads lead to fatigue
-
8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010
17/18
University of Massachusetts
Wind Energy Center
What Works? Vertical vs. Horizontal
Horizontal is more economical--general result of intensecompetition of the 1980s.
Higher failure rates for vertical axis machines due togreater complexity
Roof-mounting vs. Tower mounting:
Tower is much more effective: results of the recent UKWarwick Wind Trials
Major problem: turbulence from roofs loweraerodynamic efficiency, vibration from turbines bothersoccupants, loads from the turbines stress buildingstructures.
-
8/9/2019 Lynn Ditullio presentation at SSC Energy Workshop 4-8-2010
18/18
University of Massachusetts
Wind Energy Center
The UK Warwick Wind Trials(www.warwickwindtrials.org.uk/2.html)
23 HAWT roof mounted wind turbines, Oct. 2007
Wind resource on most urban roof tops is very
small due to surrounding clutter High-rise buildings in exposed locations may have aviable wind resource
Energy production in this study was trivially small
High turbulence
Extremely low capacity factor: ~ 4%
The key issue with roof-mounted wind turbines is usually windresource, not technology!
There is no technology silver bullet for a low wind resource