m s&t trategic o - ndia - tennessee valley chapter...

15
Presented to: THE SPACE AND MISSILE DEFENSE WORKING GROUP Presented by: DR. MICHAEL S. RICHMAN ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, MISSILE DEVELOPMENT WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT & INTEGRATION DIRECTORATE AVIATION & MISSILE RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT & ENGINEERING CENTER M ISSILE S&T S TRATEGIC O VERVIEW 29 JUNE 2017 Distribution Statement A - Approved for Public Release - Distribution Unlimited. Review completed by AMRDEC Public Affairs Office 2017. Control number PR2914

Upload: hathien

Post on 03-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Presented to:THE SPACE AND MISSILE DEFENSE

WORKING GROUP

Presented by:

DR. MICHAEL S. RICHMANASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, MISSILE DEVELOPMENTWEAPONS DEVELOPMENT & INTEGRATION DIRECTORATE

AVIATION & MISSILE RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT & ENGINEERING CENTER

MISSILE S&T STRATEGIC OVERVIEW

29 JUNE 2017

Distribution Statement A - Approved for Public Release - Distribution Unlimited. Review completed by AMRDEC Public Affairs Office 2017. Control number PR2914

2 AMRDEC PR2914

Lethality Portfolio Overview

LETHALITY PORTFOLIO

FIRESUPPORT

WEAPONSENABLERS

CLOSECOMBAT

AIRDEFENSE

• Missile Core Competencies

• Simulation• Studies

• LC-TERM• TCG• LBASM

• NG CCM/PSLM• LMAMS

Enhancements• MMT• MSET/SMAM

• LowER-AD• JMAC• CUAS at

the TE• MSHORAD

INVESTMENT AREAS

• Energetic Materials

• Warheads• Propulsion• Guidance• Seekers

• Artillery• Rockets• Mortars

• Soldier /Squad Weapons

• Ground Vehicle Weapons

• Air Launched Weapons

• Directed Energy• Counter UAS/CM• Counter RAM• Radars

MISSILE S&T MAJOR PROGRAMS BY LETHALITY PORTFOLIO TIER 2 EFFORTS

3 FileName.pptx

Missile S&TCapability Areas

Proponent for 6.2 programs that are deemed too immature to transition to one of the four capability areas, are pervasive across two or more of the capability areas, or are core competencies

PERVASIVE TECHNOLOGY

FIRE SUPPORT

GROUND TACTICAL(CLOSE COMBAT)

AVIATION MISSILES

Defend the force and selected geopolitical assets from aerial attack, missile attack and surveillance• Point Defense• Area Defense• Platform Defense

AIR DEFENSE

Direct fire and precision weapons, supported by indirect

fire, air-delivered fires, and nonlethal engagement means to decide the outcome of battles and engagements

Destroy, neutralize, or suppress the enemy by cannon, rocket, and missile fire and to help integrate firesupport assets into combined arms operations

Find, fix, and destroy the enemy through fire and

maneuver; and to provide combat, combat service and combat service

support in coordinated operations as an integral member of the combined arms team

4 FileName.pptx

AMRDEC Technology Area Leads

PROPULSION

SENSOR

DATALINK & COMMUNICATION

LAUNCHER

MATERIALS & STRUCTURES

WARHEAD/FUZE NAVIGATION SYSTEMS

RELIABILITY/MAINTAINABILITY

MISSILE ELECTRONICSGUIDANCE

MODEL & SIMULATION

CONTROL SYSTEMS

AERODYNAMICS

LETHALITY

POWER

RADARCYBER

AFFORDABILITY /MANUFACTURINGTECHNOLOGY

5 FileName.pptx

Foundational Documents– Strategic Drivers –

• LRRDPP-GC• PAWG• G3/5/7 “Oklahoma” chart• POM 19 Guidance• “Third Offset”

• SPAR• LIRA• PEO 30-yr roadmaps

• Army Warfighter Challenges

• Army 6+1 Priorities– Future Vertical Lift– Advanced Protection– Cross Domain Fires– Combat Vehicles– Robotics– Expeditionary Mission Command/Cyber– + Soldier/Team Performance Overmatch

• DASA(R&T) Strategy• Lethality Portfolio Strategy

6 FileName.pptx

The Army has called upon S&T to focus on maturing technology, reducing program risk, developing prototypes that can be used to better define requirements and conducting

experimentation with Soldiers to refine new operational concepts.

Missile S&TStrategic Areas of Emphasis

THE ARMY’S FOCUSED INVESTMENTSMORE LETHAL, EXPEDITIONARY, AND AGILE, WITH GREATER CAPABILITY TO CONDUCT

DECENTRALIZED, DISTRIBUTED, AND INTEGRATED OPERATIONS

MISSILE S&T AREAS OF EMPHASIS:• Long Range Fires

• Air Defense

• Lethality Overmatch

• New and Novel Approaches to Traditional Missions

• Lower Cost Systems

• Lighter Weight and Reduced Logistics

• Cyber Protective Technologies

7 FileName.pptx

AMRDEC-MI Focus

STRATEGY IS TO SUPPORT DOD STRATEGIC GUIDANCE ANDMAINTAIN CORE COMPETENCIES IN WEAPON ENABLERS FOR THE FUTURE

• AMRDEC Missile POM 17-21 investments are heavily focused in support of Air Defense and Precision Long Range Fires.

• Must maintain core competencies in weapon enablers component technology development.

• Must maintain minimal investment to support leap ahead technology investments in Aviation weapons and Ground Tactical technology transitions.

Enhancing the Army’s capacity to overwhelm the challenges of A2/AD

through relentless joint and combined arms maneuver to defeat emerging

regional and global peer adversaries.

Ref: POM 17

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

Distribution Percent by Capability Area

Air Defense Fire Support Ground Tactical Aviation

8 FileName.pptx

AMRDEC Missile S&T Enterprise

CUAS AT THE TACTICAL EDGEMANEUVER AIR

DEFENSETECHNOLOGIES

TAIL CONTROLLED GMLRS (TCG) TECHINSERTION

LONG RANGEMANEUVERABLE

FIRES

NEXT GENERATIONAIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE

PRECISION SHOULDERLAUNCHED MISSILE

(PSLM)NEXT GENERATION

CLOSE COMBAT MISSILE(S)SINGLE MULTI-MISSION

ATTACK MISSILE (SMAM)

DIGITAL ARRAYRADAR TESTBED

(DART)

LOW-COST EXTENDED-RANGE AIR DEFENSE

(LOWER AD)

LOW-COST TACTICALEXTENDED RANGE

MISSILE (LC-TERM)LAND-BASED ANTI-SHIP

MISSILE (LBASM)

CURRENT/POM (FY19-23)* FUTURE (FY24 -50)CAPABILITY AREA

MULTIPLESIMULTANEOUSENGAGEMENT

TECHNOLOGIES (MSET)

LMAMS ENHANCEMENTS

GMLRS LITE

* Transition

NEXT GENERATIONLOWER TIER MISSILE

TECHNOLOGIES

MODULAR MISSILE TECHNOLOGIESOPEN SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE

ROCKET PROPELLED AND DROP/GLIDE

MULTI-ROLE SMALL GUIDED MISSILE(MRSGM)

9 FileName.pptx

Missile S&TCapability Areas

Proponent for 6.2 programs that are deemed too immature to transition to one of the four capability areas, are pervasive across two or more of the capability areas, or are core competencies

PERVASIVE TECHNOLOGY

FIRE SUPPORT

GROUND TACTICAL(CLOSE COMBAT)

AVIATION MISSILES

Defend the force and selected geopolitical assets from aerial attack, missile attack and surveillance• Point Defense• Area Defense• Platform Defense

AIR DEFENSE

Direct fire and precision weapons, supported by indirect

fire, air-delivered fires, and nonlethal engagement means to decide the outcome of battles and engagements

Destroy, neutralize, or suppress the enemy by cannon, rocket, and missile fire and to help integrate firesupport assets into combined arms operations

Find, fix, and destroy the enemy through fire and

maneuver; and to provide combat, combat service and combat service

support in coordinated operations as an integral member of the combined arms team

10 FileName.pptx

SYSTEM OVERVIEWS & GOALS

Air Defense Capability Area

NEAR-TERM SYSTEMS

FAR-TERM SYSTEMS

DIGITAL ARRAY RADAR TESTBED(DART)LOW-COST EXTENDED-RANGE AIR DEFENSE (LOWER-AD)

MID-TERM SYSTEMS

CUAS AT THE TACTICAL EDGE

AIR DEFENSE CAPABILITY AREA PORTFOLIO BALANCING NEAR-TERM REQUIREMENTS WITH FUTURE VISION AND INNOVATION

Emerging Threats, Short Range

MANEUVER FORCE AIR DEFENSE TECHNOLOGIES NEXT GENERATION LOWER TIER MISSILE TECHNOLOGIES

Advanced Threats, Extended Range, 360 Degree Protection

Linking PORs with MAFIA for UAS Defense Below the Brigade

Advanced Radar Laboratory for Future Multi-Mission Sensors

Medium-Range Interceptor for Cruise Missile and UAS Threats, Complimenting Patriot as a Low Cost Alternative in an A2/AD Environment

11 FileName.pptx

Factors Driving Air DefenseS&T Investment

FOCUSED ON CROSS DOMAIN AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE AND ADVANCED PROTECTION

Air Defense S&T is responding with cutting edge technology to

current & emerging threats, capability gaps, U.S. doctrine, and

needs of our warfighters.

Cro

ss D

omai

n Fi

res

Adv

ance

d Pr

otec

tion

Limited capacity of air defense systems to counter the potential overmatch of near-peer adversaries.

“Our perceived inability to achieve a power projection over-match, or an over-match in operations, clearly undermine, we think, our ability to deter potential adversaries. And we simply cannot allow that to happen.”-- Deputy Secretary of Defense Bob Work, Third

U.S. Offset Strategy, January 2015

Limited capability to sense, engage, and destroy RAM, TBM, cruise missiles, and aerial threats throughout 360 degrees.

“The sophistication of new maneuverable re-entry vehicles (MARVs) would require missile defenses that can strike attacking missiles during the boost phase of a ballistic flight.” -- AFCEA Signal Magazine, June 2014

Limited detection and engagement ranges to defend against UASs.

"Just a few years ago, we were critseriously behind in this area [UAS]. As of today, I think we have almost caught up.”… Russia had reached the level of top world armies in drone manufacturing.”

-- Russian Deputy Defense Minister Yury Boriso, January 2015

“To prevent enemy overmatch, the Army must develop new capabilities while anticipating enemy efforts to emulate or disrupt those capabilities.” -- Army Operating Concept

SUPPORT FOR EXISTING AND EMERGINGU.S. WARFIGHTING DOCTRINE

12 FileName.pptx

Air Defense Capability AreaKey Enabling Technologies

LOWER COST• Missile Components• Advanced MaterialsMINIATURIZATION• Miniaturized Navigation Technology for Stressing Flight Environments• Sensor TechnologyPERFORMANCE IN HIGH CLUTTER ENVIRONMENTS• Higher Detection Ranges• Accurate Aim Point SelectionPERFORMANCE IN NETWORKED ENVIRONMENTS• Advanced Fire Control• Cyber SecurityMAXIMIZE RANGE & MANEUVERABILITY• Minimize Mass• Provide Scalable EffectsMODELING & SIMULATION• Emerging Threats• Complex Engagements

13 FileName.pptx

AMRDEC S&T Initiationand Transition to PEO MS

CRITICAL COMPONENT TECHNOLOGY MATURATION

USER NEEDS, CAPABILITY GAPS

CDDDraftCDD

EXPERIMENTATION and TESTING in RELEVANT

ENVIRONMENT

Establish PM (MDA)Program Funding

PM Acquisition StrategyRequirements/KPPs

A B CMateriel Solution Analysis

Technology Maturation and Risk

Reduction

Engineering and

Manufacturing Development

Materiel Development

DecisionPDR

ICD

Feasible

Achievable

InitiateS&T

Program

Gaps/ThreatsPM Need

InformRequirements

and AoA

Inform Specs,Affordability and

CONOPS

TRL6Technology Dev Strategy

6.3 Major S&T Program Defined6.2 Technology Development

SYSTEM ANALYSIS/ CONCEPT

DEVELOPMENT

S&T CAL and PM Collaboration

• User Needs• Technology Opportunities• Resources

Need to Collaborate

Earlier and Often

14 FileName.pptx

MISSILE S&T

Missile S&T EnterpriseUNCLASSIFIED // FOUO

15 AMRDEC PR2914

AMRDEC Web Sitewww.amrdec.army.mil

Facebookwww.facebook.com/rdecom.amrdec

YouTubewww.youtube.com/user/AMRDEC

Twitter@usarmyamrdec

Public [email protected]