m34- hypothesis testing 1 department of ism, university of alabama, 1992-2003 homework chp 11. use...
TRANSCRIPT
M34- Hypothesis Testing 1 Department of ISM, University of Alabama, 1992-2003
Homework
Chp 11. Use equations on formula sheet. Page 417 # 5, 6, 8. (Use CI to make a decision).
Page 441 # 47, 49, 50. (Use CI to make . . . .)
Chp 15, Read 633 bottom, 634 middle.
Page 636 # 50 (Do part c to answer part b.)
# 51. (Do part c to answer part b.)
# 53, 54 (Review)
# 47, 48. (Give answer for p-value
(see answer to 47 ibob) in relation to the -level.)
M34- Hypothesis Testing 2 Department of ISM, University of Alabama, 1992-2003
Hypothesis Testing
M34- Hypothesis Testing 3 Department of ISM, University of Alabama, 1992-2003
Lesson Objectives
Understand the “types of errors” in decision making.
Know what the -level means.
Learn how to use “p-values” andconfidence intervals for decisionmaking.
M34- Hypothesis Testing 4 Department of ISM, University of Alabama, 1992-2003
Court case
Hypothesis:Hypothesis: Defendant is Defendant is innocentinnocent..Alternative:Alternative: Defendant is Defendant is guiltyguilty..
Decisions: Based on the sample data.
Reject Innocence
Reject Innocence
Declare“Guilty”“Guilty”Declare“Guilty”“Guilty”
PersonPersongoes togoes to
jail!jail!
PersonPersongoes togoes to
jail!jail!
Do not Reject Innocence
Do not Reject Innocence
Declare“Not “Not
Guilty” Guilty”
Declare“Not “Not
Guilty” Guilty”
PersonPerson goes goes
free!free!
PersonPerson goes goes
free!free!
M34- Hypothesis Testing 5 Department of ISM, University of Alabama, 1992-2003
Type I: Sending an innocent person to jail.
Type I: Sending an innocent person to jail.
Type II: Letting a guilty person go free.Type II: Letting a guilty person go free.
= level of risk deemed reasonablefor the occurrence of a Type I error.
= the point of “reasonable doubt.”
Types of Errors in a court case
M34- Hypothesis Testing 6 Department of ISM, University of Alabama, 1992-2003
Types of Errors, in general
Type I: Concluding that the hypothesized parameter value is wrong, but in reality it is correct.
Type I: Concluding that the hypothesized parameter value is wrong, but in reality it is correct.
Type II: Not concluding that the hypothesized parameter value is wrong, but in reality it is incorrect.
Type II: Not concluding that the hypothesized parameter value is wrong, but in reality it is incorrect.
= level of risk, chosen by the user,for allowing a Type I error to occur.
= risk for making Type II error.
Net weight of potato chip bagsshould be 16.00 oz.
An FDA inspector will take a random sample of 36 bags. If the net weight is too low, the chip company will be fined substantially.
From the FDA perspective, what would the Type I and Type IIerrors be (in words)?
Potato Chip Inspection by FDA
M34- Hypothesis Testing 8 Department of ISM, University of Alabama, 1992-2003
Type I: Penalizing the potato chip company when in reality they were NOT cheating the consumer.
Type I: Penalizing the potato chip company when in reality they were NOT cheating the consumer.
Type II: Not detecting that the potato chip company was cheating the consumers, when in reality theywere.
Type II: Not detecting that the potato chip company was cheating the consumers, when in reality theywere.
Potato Chips; types of errors
Which is more serious, from the FDA’s perspective?
M34- Hypothesis Testing 9 Department of ISM, University of Alabama, 1992-2003
Chose an -level that considersthe consequences of the Type I and Type II errors.
and are inversely related;as one goes up, the other goes down, but NOT by equal amounts.
Selecting an -level
M34- Hypothesis Testing 10 Department of ISM, University of Alabama, 1992-2003
Reject the hypothesized value if:
1. it is outside the confidence interval.
2. the p-value is less than the user specified -level. (p-value < -level)
3. the calculated test statistic valueis in the “critical region.”
Statistical Inference Methods:
Three methods; each should give the same result.Three methods; each should give the same result.
M34- Hypothesis Testing 11 Department of ISM, University of Alabama, 1992-2003
Decisions are based on
the datathe data.Wrong decisions are the result
of chance,
not mistakes.
(1- )100% Confidence Interval Method
Two tailed test;“Is the mean something other than 40.0?”
One tail test;“Is the mean something greater than 40.0?” or “Is the mean something less than 40.0?”
Hypothesized mean: 40.0
Result:Result: EachEach tail has the tail has the full full -level. -level. Use only ONEUse only ONE tailtail for making a decision. for making a decision.
.05.05 .95.95
.10.10 .90.90
.01.01 .99.99
.05.05 .90.90
.10.10 .80.80
.01.01 .98.98
DesiredDesired -level:-level:
Size ofSize ofCI to use: CI to use:
1 -
1 - 2
Result:Result: Each tail has half of Each tail has half of . .
M34- Hypothesis Testing 13 Department of ISM, University of Alabama, 1992-2003
p-Value Method
The probability of observing a future statistic value that is as big or more extreme, in the direction(s) of interest, than the value we just observed,assuming that the hypothesized value is the correct parameter.
Calculate p-value using the most appropriate distribution.Calculate p-value using the most appropriate distribution.
Decision rule:Decision rule: If p-value < If p-value < -level,-level, reject the hypothesized value. reject the hypothesized value.
M34- Hypothesis Testing 14 Department of ISM, University of Alabama, 1992-2003
X = 42.6
-4.0 -3.0 -2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
40 X42.6
Hypo. mean: 40.0,p-Value:
-4.0 -3.0 -2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
40 X
-4.0 -3.0 -2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
40 X
37.4
42.6
42.6
Two tailed test;“Is the mean something other than 40.0?”
Upper tail test;“Is the mean something greater than 40.0?”
Lower tail test;“Is the mean something less than 40.0?”
p-value / 2
p-value
p-value
p-value / 2
2.62.6
M34- Hypothesis Testing 15 Department of ISM, University of Alabama, 1992-2003
Sample results:X = 43.0s = 7.2
-4.0 -3.0 -2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
0 Z1.50
.4332
Z = 43.0 – 40.0 2.0
= 1.50
.5000
.0668
40 X43.0
X X
~ N( ?, 8.0)16
~ N( ?, 2.0)
XnX
Hypothesized mean: 40.0.Adjust machine if it’s offin either direction.
More extreme Also
more extreme
-1.50
p-value = .0668 •2 = .1336
than 3.0 unitsthan 3.0 units
Problem 1, using p-Value
What distributionshould be used?
Pick = .05
(p-value =.1336) > ( =.05); do not reject 40.0.
M34- Hypothesis Testing 16 Department of ISM, University of Alabama, 1992-2003
Sample results:X = 43.0s = 7.2
X X
~ N( ?, 8.0)16
~ N( ?, 2.0)
XnX
Hypothesized mean: 40.0.Adjust machine if it’s offin either direction.
Problem 1 with Confidence Interval
What distributionshould be used?
Pick = .05
40.0 falls inside the C.I.; do not reject 40.0.
X ± Z/2 n
43.0 ± 1.96 2.043.0 ± 4.92
(38.08, 47.92)
M34- Hypothesis Testing 17 Department of ISM, University of Alabama, 1992-2003
Sample results:X = 36.4s = 7.2
-4.0 -3.0 -2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
0 t
t = 36.4 – 40.0 7.2 / 4
= -2.00
40 X36.4
X X
~ N( ?, ?)16
~ N( ?, ?)
XnX
Hypothesized mean: 40.0.FDA will fine companyif the mean is lower.
More extreme
-2.00
p-value = ..
than 3.6 units below.
Problem 2, using p-Value
From the t-table . . . .
From Excel,
.0320.0320
more than .025,more than .025,less than .050.less than .050.
What distributionshould be used?
(p-value =.0320) < (-level = .05); reject 40.0.
Pick = .05
M34- Hypothesis Testing 18 Department of ISM, University of Alabama, 1992-2003
Sample results:X = 36.4s = 7.2
X X
~ N( ?, ?)16
~ N( ?, ?)
XnX
Hypothesized mean: 40.0.FDA will fine companyif the mean is lower.
What distributionshould be used?
40.0 falls outside the C.I.; reject 40.0.
Pick = .05
X ± t, 15 sn
(33.245, 39.555)
36.4 ± 3.1554
36.4 ± 1.753 7.2
16
Problem 2 with Confidence Interval
M34- Hypothesis Testing 19 Department of ISM, University of Alabama, 1992-2003
Two people in different rooms. “A” is shown one of five cards, selected
randomly. “A” transmits his thoughts. “B” selects the card he thinks is being
sent to him, and records it The process is repeated 20 times;
the cards are shuffled each time.
Does a person have ESP?
Experiment:
X = a count of the number correct.X ~Bino(n=20, =.20)
M34- Hypothesis Testing 20 Department of ISM, University of Alabama, 1992-2003
X = a count of the number correct.X ~Bino(n=20, =.20) = n = 4.0 (Cannot use Normal approx.)
Data: “B” got 9 out 20 correct.Does “B” do better than guessing?
Hypothesized value: = .20,
p-value = P(X >= 9)= 1 – P(X <= 8)= 1 – .9900
= .0100 0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20X
P(X
= x
)Use Table A.2
-level =
Bino(20, 0.20)Use Binomial Dist.
.05.05
Reject .20; she does better!
M34- Hypothesis Testing 21 Department of ISM, University of Alabama, 1992-2003
The end