machine-to-machine technologies & markets - shift … technologies & markets - shift of...
TRANSCRIPT
1© 2013 J. Alonso-Zarate
Machine-to-Machine Technologies & Markets - Shift of Industries
Mischa Dohler, Chair Professor, King’s College London, UK
Matt Hatton, Director of Machina Research, UK
Jesus Alonso-Zarate, Head of M2M Department, CTTC, Spain
IEEE GLOBECOM 2013
Atlanta, Georgia, USDecember 2013
2© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
1. Introduction to M2M and the IoT [Mischa]
2. M2M Technology Landscape [Jesus]
3. Commercial Issues [Matt]
Overview of Tutorial
3© 2013 J. Alonso-Zarate
Disclaimer
Many third party copyrighted material is reused within this talk under the 'fair use' approach, for sake of educational purpose only, and very limited edition.
As a consequence, the current slide set presentation usage is restricted, and is falling under usual copyrights usage.
Thank you for your understanding!
5© 2013 J. Alonso-Zarate
Internet of Things is all about…Things(Useful)
People
Connectivity
Interoperability
Energy Efficiency
Added Value
Big Data
Business
Privacy and Security
Well-Being
6© 2013 J. Alonso-Zarate
IoT can become a new revolution
http://www.gereports.com/new_industrial_internet_service_technologies_from_ge_could_eliminate_150_billion_in_waste/
9© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
Internet(Open Data)
Crowdsourcing
Sensor Streams(Real Time) Improve Efficiency
Offer New Services
BIG DATAAnalytics
Power Applications
M2M Platforms for the IoT
Machine-to-Machine
Human-to-Machine
Information-to-Machine
DATA
KNW
W
INFO
10© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
Technological Challenges
Device Domain
Network DomainM2M
Communications
Applications Domain
13© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
M2M Prime Business Criteria
Reliability
Availability
Zigbee-like
Bluetooth LE
Low Power WLANProprietary Cellular
Standardized Cellular
Wired M2M
Availability = coverage, roaming, mobility, critical mass in rollout, etc.Reliability = resilience to interference, throughput guarantees, low outages, etc.(Total Cost of Ownership = CAPEX, OPEX.)
16© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
Problems of ZigBee-like Solutions
Interference in ISM No Global Infrastructure
Lack of Interoperability Higher Total Cost
2bn Wifi Devices
WPA2/PSK/TLS/SSL
17© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
Advantages of Low-Power WiFiUbiquitous Infrastructure Vibrant Standard
Interference Management Sound Security
2bn Wifi Devices300 members
NAV Medium Reservation
WPA2/PSK/TLS/SSL
Source: Wireless Broadband Access (WBA), Informa, Nov. 2011
18© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
LP-Wifi vs ZigBee Capillary M2M
[© IEEE, from “Feasibility of Wi-Fi Enabled Sensors for Internet of Things,” by Serbulent Tozlu (2011)
“Low-power Wi-Fi provides a significant improvement over typical Wi-Fi on both latency and energy consumption counts.”“LP-Wifi consumes approx the same as 6LoWPAN for small packets but is much better for large packets.”
10x
22© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
Advantages of Cellular M2MUbiquitous Coverage Mobility & Roaming
Interference Control
23© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
However…
Exabyte = 10^182G 2.5G 3G 3.5G 4G 5G
Means to achieve higher data rates:
More spectrum, more efficient RRM, smaller cells
ITU-R req. for IMT-Advanced
Source: NEC – Andreas Maeder, Feb 2012
24© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
Key Technical Novelties
Cellular Networks have been designed for humans!
Accommodation of M2M requires paradigm shift: There will be a lot of M2M nodes More and more applications are delay-intolerant, mainly control There will be little traffic per node, and mainly in the uplink Nodes need to run autonomously for a long time Automated security & trust mechanisms
… and all this without jeopardizing current cellular services!
25© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
Challenges for Mobile Operators
Lack of M2M experience mobile operators are experts in human-to-human (H2H) M2M is a new market and a mental shift is required
High operational costs the network has to be dimensioned for a number of devices that just transmit few
bits of information from time to time
Low Average Revenue Per User (ARPU) Fragmentation and complexity of applications Lack of standardization (so far) Competition from other (emerging) technologies
Low Power Wide Area (LPWA ) Technologies
26© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
2.2.1M2M in Current Cellular NetworksHow suitable are current technologies for M2M?
27© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
GSM – PHY and MAC Layers
PHY Layer Carrier Frequency: 900 MHz, 1.8 GHz, and others. Simple Power Management:
8 power classes; min 20 mW = 13 dBm (2dB power control steps)
Modulation with Constant envelope (good for PA) PHY Data Rates: 9.6 Kbps Low Complexity
MAC Layer Duplexing: FDD FDMA/TDMA + ALOHA-based access
Traffic Type: Voice, Data, 160 7-bit SMS.
28© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
Beyond GSM – GPRS & EDGE
GPRS = GSM + … … more time slots for users + … adaptive coding schemes
EDGE = GPRS + … … 8PSK modulation scheme
29© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
UMTS – PHY and MAC Layers
PHY Layer Carrier Frequency: 2Ghz, and others. Instantaneous Power Management CDMA Modulation: Variable envelope PHY Data Rates: >100 kbit/s packet switched Medium Complexity
MAC Layer Duplexing: FDD FDMA/CDMA (256 codes) + ALOHA-based access
Traffic type: conversational, streaming, interactive, background.
30© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
LTE & LTE-A LTE (Release 8 and 9)
OFDMA (downlink) + SC-FDMA (uplink) Robust to multipath Flexible spectrum allocation (adjusting number of subcarriers) Efficient receiver implementations Simple MIMO implementation in frequency domain freq. diversity gain
Quicker RTT & throughput Both TDD and FDD duplexing modes Variable bandwidth (1.4 to 20MHz) Spectral Efficiency (x3) Simplified Architecture lower CAPEX and OPEX More User Capacity (x10)
LTE-A (Releases 10-11-12): LTE + new features + M2M support DL: 1Gbps, UL: 500 Mbps.
31© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
Key Limitations of LTE & LTE-AFDD: 2x35MHzFDD: 2x70MHz
TDD: 50MHz
VerizonAT&T
metroPCS
AWS
NTT DoCoMo
TeliaSoneraVodafone
O2…
Refarming and extensions are still to come…
Hong-Kong
China MobileGenius Brand
CSL Ltd…
Digital Dividend
Major TD-LTE Market(incl. India)
Fragmentation & Harmonization of Spectrum is a critical problem!
Source: presentation by Thierry Lestable, Sagemcom, BEFEMTO Winter School, Barcelona, Feb. 2012.
32© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
Key Limitations of LTE & LTE-A Not efficient for small data transmission Scheduled Radio access
Random access and more flexibility
Device cost issues Scalable bandwidth Data rate (overdesigned UE categories) Transmit power (max. 23dBm) Half Duplex operation (simpler device) RF chains with 2 antennas Signal processing accuracy
Overload issues big number of devices High mobility support
Source: IP-FP7-258512 EXALTED D3.1
33© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
2.2.2Standardization Activities
http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Information/WORK_PLAN/Description_Releases/M2M_20130924.zip
34© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
Standards for Cellular M2M Industry has become more active in standardizing M2M:
Because of the market demand Essential for long term development of technology For interoperability of networks Ability to “roam” M2M services over international frontiers
Due to potentially heavy use of M2M devices and thus high loads onto networks, interest from: ETSI TC M2M and recently oneM2M Partnership Project 3GPP (GSM, EDGE GPRS, UMTS, HSPA, LTE) IEEE 802.16 (WiMAX)
36© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
ETSI: Functional Architecture
© ETSI
Core Network:- IP Connectivity- Interconnection with other networks- Roaming with other core networks- Service and Network control
Service Capabilities shared by different applications
Registration, Authentication, Authorization, Management, Provisioning
37© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
Creation of oneM2M Partnership project
Japan
USAChina
Korea
38© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
ETSI Smart Card Platform (2000)
SIM: Subscriber Identity Module more than 4B in circulation Evolution to UICC (Universal Integrated Circuit Card)
CPU, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, I/O. June 2012, 4th Form Factor (nano-SIM , from Apple) Technical Specs TS 102 221 v11.0.0 (2012-06)
http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/102200_102299/102221/11.00.00_60/ts_102221v110000p.pdf
Data of the SIM: ICCID: identifier IMSI Authentication key Location Area Identity User data: Contacts and SMS
Embedded SIMs for M2M
39© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
3GPP: M2M Features
A feature is a system optimization possibility Different requirements different optimizations Offered on a per subscription basis:
Low Mobility Time Controlled Time Tolerant Small Data Transmissions Mobile originated only Infrequent Mobile Terminated MTC Monitoring
Priority Alarm Message (PAM) Secure Connection Location Specific Trigger Infrequent transmission Group Based features
Policing Addressing
42© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
Tools
Math Computer-based Simulators (MATLAB, Ns-3 Simulator)
Cellular (LENA simulator) Capillary Networks (Zigbee-Like, WiFi, etc.)
Testbeds Arduino, WizziMotes, PanStamps, Raspberry Pi,
OpenMAC, WARP, Digi Xbee Modules, etc. Free M2M Platforms in the Cloud
Xybely, Thingspeak, etc.
43© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
2.3.2A Possible M2M Architecture
EXALTED was an FP7 funded IP Project (#258512)
44© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
ICT EXALTEDExpanding LTE for Devices
At A Glance: EXALTED
Expanding LTE for Devices
Project Coordinator Djelal RaoufSagemcom SASTel: +33 (0)1 57 61 20 08Fax: +33 (0)1 57 61 39 09Email: [email protected] website: www.ict-exalted.eu
Partners: Vodafone Group Services Limited (UK), Vodafone Group Services GmbH (DE), Gemalto (FR), Ericsson d.o.o. Serbia (RS), Alcatel-Lucent (DE), Telekom Srbija (RS), Commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux energies alternatives (FR), TST Sistemas S.A. (ES), University of Surrey (UK), Centre Tecnològic de Telecomunicacions de Catalunya (ES), TUD Vodafone Chair (DE), University of Piraeus Research Center (GR), Vidavo SA (GR)
Duration: Sept. 2010 – Feb. 2013Funding scheme: IPTotal Cost: €11mEC Contribution: €7.4m
Contract Number: INFSO-ICT-258512
45© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
LTE-M: Backwards compatible solution
PHY Layer
Use of TDD
Generalized FDM for Uplink (beyond SC-FDMA)
Use of LDPC Codes instead of Turbo Codes
Low-Complexity MIMO
Cooperative Relaying
Some Specific EXALTED Solutions
46© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
Higher Layers:
Optimal scheduling with energy-harvesting
Scheduling for heterogeneous traffic (event-driven or periodic)
Discontinuous Reception (DRX): Duty Cycle
Use of RACH for small data transmission, adding CDMA for
data collision recovery.
Some Specific EXALTED Solutions
47© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
2.3.3High Number of Devices: The access to the network
The Random Access Channel (RACH) of LTE
48© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
Examples of RACH Configuration
1.08 MHz(6 PRBs)
Less resources for data!
49© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
The Procedure
64 Orthogonal Preambles
Not all available for randomaccess
HARQ
LIMITATIONS
Preamble transmissionbased on FS-ALOHA
Preamble Collisions
Collisions in Message 3
Lack of resources for Msg3
http://prezi.com/likwdk7dksmj/ns-3-lte-random-access-procedure/
55© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
RACH Improvements
A. Laya, L. Alonso, J. Alonso-Zarate“Is the Random Access Channel of LTE and LTE-A Suitable for M2M Communications? A Survey of Alternatives”IEEE Tutorials and Survey Communications MagazineSpecial Issue on Machine-to-Machine Communications. Publication Date: January 2014.
56© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
Go away from ALOHA-type access
Contention-Tree Algorithm (CTA)
Distributed Queuing Random Access Protocol (DQRAP)
Performance independent of number of users
Simple operation with two logical queues
One for transmission of successful access requests
One to solve contention
Downlink Control Channel of LTE ideal for implementation
Distributed Queuing as a Solution
J. Alonso-Zárate, E. Kartsakli, A. Cateura, C. Verikoukis, and L. Alonso.“A Near-Optimum Cross-Layered Distributed Queuing Protocol for Wireless LAN,”IEEE Wireless Communication Magazine. Special Issue on MAC protocols for WLAN, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 48-55, February 2008.
58© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
0 20000 40000 60000 80000 1000000.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Dro
p pr
obab
ility
MTC number
HTC MTCMethod 1 Method 2
Impact of MTC onto HTC Dropping probabilities, duty cycle and delay for 30min access case:
© Kan Zheng, Jesus Alonso-Zarate, and Mischa Dohler
61© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
Impact of MTC onto HTC “A Close Examination of Performance and Power Characteristics of 4G LTE
Networks,” by J. Huang, F. Qian, A. Gerber. MobiSYS’12.
LTE
screen
3G
WiFi
62© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
2.3.6Optimizing LTE for Small Data Transmissions
K. Wang, J. Alonso-Zarate, M. Dohler,“Energy-Efficiency of LTE for Small Data Machine-to-Machine Communications,”in proc. of the IEEE ICC 2013, Budapest, Hungary, June 2013.
63© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
0 5 10 15 20 25-10
-5
0
5
10
15
MCS Index
Tran
smit
Pow
er (d
Bm
)
Transport Block Size vs. MCS
65© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
The Optimal MCS
0 5 10 15 20 250
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
MCS Index
Tran
spor
t Blo
ck U
tiliz
atio
n R
ate
(Pac
ket s
ize/
TB
S)
10 bytes packet35 bytes packet60 bytes packet
66© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
The Optimal MCS
0 5 10 15 20 250
1
2
3
4
5
6x 109
MCS Index
Ene
rgy
Effi
cien
cy η
(bits
/Jou
le)
10 bytes packet35 bytes packet60 bytes packet
70© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
An Example:26 November 2013Employees against use of automatic supermarket check-out
71© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
Productivity Paradox
PRODUCTIVITY
AVERAGE WORKER(income)
EMPLOYMENT
Erik Brynjolfsson (director of the MIT Center for Digital Busines) says: “there is no economic law that says that technological progress needs to benefit everybody, or even that it needs to benefit a majority of people. It’s entirely possible for technology to advance, to make the pie bigger, and yet for some people to get a smaller share of that pie.”
http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/high_tech_telecoms_internet/charting_technologys_new_directions_a_conversation_with_mits_erik_brynjolfsson
Agenda
• About Machina Research• What is M2M?• Technology• Management/control• Data analytics• The revenue opportunity
Machina Research 75
About Machina Research
Market/demand side Provider/supply side
• Quantifying the opportunity for M2M – Forecast Database providing 10
year forecasts across 201 countries for 61 application groups
– Sector Reports annually updated reports on our 13 sectors (including Automotive, Healthcare and Utilities)
• Addressing the issues that determine success– Research Notes - 3 per month on
major qualitative issues such as platforms, value chain roles, big data, NFC, and security
– Strategy Reports - covering areas such as Big Data, platforms, modules/devices, CSP best practice, etc.
Advisory Service and Custom Research
76Machina Research
Agenda
• About Machina Research• What is M2M?• Technology• Management/control• Data analytics• The revenue opportunity
Machina Research 78
What is M2M?
Machina Research 79
Our definition: “Connections to remote sensing, monitoring and actuating devices,
together with associated aggregation devices”
An incredibly diverse range of products and services with no consistent definition
M2M: what’s the point?
Machina Research 81
Sealed Air
Big Belly Solar CLEANeCall Helsinki City Transport
Irrigation in SpainGerbercutter Z7
M2M connections will grow from 2 billion in 2011 to 18 billion in 2022
• Machina Research defines M2M as “Connections to remote sensing, monitoring and actuating devices, together with associated aggregation devices”
• Based on this definition there are 2 billion M2M connections today and this will grow to 18 billion in 2022, a CAGR of 22%
Machina Research 82
Global machine-to-machine connections 2011-22Source: Machina Research 2012
Note that we have included in-building network infrastructure within our definition of M2M for this 2012 version of our Global M2M report. As such, devices such as residential modems/ routers are included this year whereas previously they have not been.
Consumer Electronics and Intelligent Buildings will remain top sectors in 2022• No change in the top two
sectors by 2022: o Intelligent Buildings takes
37%, with home automation the biggest application group
o Consumer Electronics close behind with 32%, driven by audio-visual
• Utilities (10%), Automotive (8%), Healthcare (5%) and Smart Cities (4%) are the other big sectors
Machina Research 83
Machine-to-machine connections by sector, 2022Source: Machina Research 2012
Automotive: 1.8 billion connections and USD422 billion revenue in 2022• By 2022 there will be 1.5
billion automotive M2M connections, 540 million Connected Cars and 1 billion aftermarket devices.
• Overall the M2M market in the automotive sector will generate USD282 billion in 2022, up from USD20 billion in 2012.
• Today 66% of the revenue is accounted for by services. By 2022 that will grow to 89%.
Machina Research 84
Machine-to-machine connections and revenue in the Automotive sector, 2012-22Source: Machina Research 2013
Automotive: What the OEMs say…
1. There is a disconnect between mobile and automotive industry lifecycles2. Regulation will be a major driving force3. Built-in versus brought-in connectivity continues to divide OEMs4. Collaborative business models must be developed between operators and OEMs5. The Connected Car will cause an upheaval in the traditional dealership model6. The Connected Car will lead to new types of ownership models being developed7. Autonomous vehicles are not on the immediate agenda for most OEMs8. Payment models for how consumers pay for Connected Car services are still not
yet developed9. Manufacturers remain cautious towards the open app ecosystem10. A connected lifestyle is a given
Machina Research 85
Source: Connected Car Industry Report, 2013 (Telefonica Digital/Machina Research)
During 2013 we conducted a series of in-depth interviews with Auto OEMsfor the Connected Car Leadership Network. These were the top 10 issues…
Agenda
• About Machina Research• What is M2M?• Technology• Management/control• Data analytics• The revenue opportunity
Machina Research 86
Technology: commercial issues
• There are a diverse range of technologies that can support “M2M” connections, including:o PLMN cellular – GSM, CDMA, UMTS, LTE, WiMAX etc.o Low-power wide area networks – SigFox, Weightlesso Short-range – Zigbee, Z-Wave, DSRC, Etherneto Wide-area fixed technologies – DSL, Cableo Other – Mesh, Broadband Powerline, Satellite
• Many solutions incorporate more than one technology
Machina Research 87
Technology: commercial issues
• Technology choice will typically be determined by a trade-off between price and functionality (including availability)
• Price issues will be associated with both the device and the connectivity
• Cellular devices have large associated licensing fees, as well as typically expensive data plans (next slide)
• With cellular, wider networks economics is influencing network sunsetting
• Cellular networks are sunk costs and M2M often doesn’t need to reflect capex here
• Does the revenue opportunity reflect the cost of network deployment?
Machina Research 88
Connectivity: Typical pricing
Small Medium Large
Bundleddata
25MB 50MB 250MB
Price/month
EUR0.98 EUR1.72 EUR3.19
Overagefees/MB
EUR0.16 EUR0.16 EUR0.16
BundledSMS
25 50 100
Machina Research 89
Price plan/month Data limit
Price per MB overage
USD2.00 100KB USD1.50
USD2.50 500KB USD1.50
USD4.00 2MB USD1.50
USD8.00 10MB USD0.75
USD12.00 50MB USD0.75
USD20.00 500MB USD0.05
Sprint M2M pricingSource: Machina Research 2013
Tele2 Estonia PricingSource: Machina Research 2013
Short-range technologies will dominate M2M
• 73% of connections in 2022 will be short range (e.g. in-building PLC, WiFi, Zigbee, Z-Wave), up from 53% at the end of 2011
• Cellular accounts for 2.6 billion connections in 2022, an increase from 146 million at end of 2011o By 2022 3G takes 45% and
4G/LTE 41%, driven by higher bandwidth requirements and need for future-proofing
• MAN is dominated by mesh and powerline for smart metering
Machina Research 90
Global M2M connections 2011-2022 by technologySource: Machina Research 2012
Low Power Wide Area: Our analysis
• Typical LPWA constraints: o Low bandwidth applicationso Applications that are
tolerant of network latency
• Two main analytical stepso Identifying where LPWA can substitute for existing technologieso Identifying where LPWA can unlock new market potential
Machina Research 91
• Typical LPWA benefits:o Low chipset costso Out-of-the-box connectivityo Long battery life
Low Power Wide Area: The opportunity as a substitute technology• Connections suitable for
LPWAo Smart meteringo Wind turbineso Vehicle roadside
assistanceo Household information
deviceso White goodso Clinical remote
monitoringo Construction site
monitoring
• Connections adaptable for LPWAo Usage based insuranceo Assisted livingo Home fitness equipmento Lease, rental, HP, share
car managemento Congestion charging/
road tolls infrastructureo Clinical trial monitoringo Gaming machines &
video gameso Agricultural equipment
Machina Research 92
Low Power Wide Area: Ways it can unlock additional market potential
• Lowering the cost of connectivityo Low cost chipsetso Low cost networks
• Supporting an ‘out of the box’ connected experience
• Enabling an increased battery life• Providing backup connectivity (or simply
more robust connectivity)
Machina Research 93
Low Power Wide Area: Some examples of increased capilliarity• Crop sensing• Alarms of all types• Building automation control panels and
remotes• Parking monitoring• Alarms for the elderly/ infirm• Warehousing/ storage/ distribution• Construction usage and inventory monitoring
Machina Research 94
Low Power Wide Area: The opportunity will be 14.9bn connections by 2022
Machina Research 95
Total LPWA opportunity, 2013-22Source: Machina Research 2013
Total LPWA opportunity, 2022Source: Machina Research 2013
Agenda
• About Machina Research• What is M2M?• Technology• Management/control• Data analytics• The revenue opportunity
Machina Research 96
Management/control
• Driving out complexity and reducing cost in managing M2M will reduce barriers to entry and result in far more M2M connections
• An open model will create more opportunity for innovation and the evolution to the Internet of Things
Machina Research 97
Historical stove-pipe application development was inefficient
• Historically app developers would create from scratch
• 3 elements:o Device functionalityo Application
environmento Application logic
• Platforms have allowed for a much more cost-effective means of deploying…
Machina Research 98
Machina Research 99
M2M Platform Hierarchy of M2MSource: Machina Research 2013
The established platforms hierarchy best supports stovepipe applications
Machina Research 100
Stage Description Comments
1 Reactive information • Devices can be polled for information, or provide information according to a set timetable
2 Proactive information • Devices communicate information as necessary
3 Remotely controllable • Devices can respond to instructions received from remote systems
4 Remotely serviceable • Software upgrades and patches can be remotely applied
5 Intelligent processes • Devices built into intelligent processes
6 Optimised propositions • Use of information to design new products
7 New business models • New revenue streams and changed concept of ‘ownership’
8 The Internet of Things • Publishing information for third parties to incorporate in applications, control commands from diverse sources
Machina Research Hierarchy of M2MSource: Machina Research 2013
Device centric M2M
Process centric M2M
The M2M application environment is evolving
Machina Research 101
The role of M2M/ IoT Application PlatformsSource: Machina Research 2013
M2M/ IoT Application platforms will abstract across this hierarchy
Carrier Communications
M2M/IoT Application Platform
Device/ OS
KORE
Ericsson
Jasper
Wyless
Bosch ThingWorx
Axeda
Digi
ProSyst
SeeControl
EurotechTridium
Device Insight
Kontron
Sierra Wireless
Telit
Wind RiverNetComm
ILS
Stream
SAP
Aeris
XivelyAbo Data
The M2M/ IoT Application Platform space is evolving quicklyThe role of M2M/ IoT Application PlatformsSource: Machina Research 2013
Machina Research 104
Data communities and Subnets of Things will emerge as stepping stones before IoT
M2M Solutions as standalone devices and/or propositions (e.g. vehicle telematics, machine telemetry, etc.)
M2M Solutions as devices and/or propositions within an enterprise or functional solution (e.g. remote diagnostics and maintenance, access control, traffic light management, event ticketing, etc.)
M2M Solutions as devices and/or propositions deployed within a specific industry area and/or sector (e.g. micro-generation in intelligent buildings, smart cities, etc)
M2M Solutions as integrated data shares in a “data community” (i.e. integrated insofar as data from devices across multiple industry sectors are combined for the purposes of analysis)
Intranets of Things
Internet of Things
Subnets of Things
Data Communities and Subnets of ThingsSource: Machina Research 2013
Agenda
• About Machina Research• What is M2M?• Technology• Management/control• Data analytics• The revenue opportunity
Machina Research 105
Success in M2M depends on success in Big Data – it’s part of the ecosystem
Machina Research 106
• Transmission of basic data via a communication network
• The core of what we know today as M2M
• Typically binary
• Actioned data, e.g. fleet management
• Gamification, e.g. Nike+, Microsoft Hohm, Fiat eco:drive
• ‘Nudge’/carrot & stick
• Contextualised data
• Examples: established norms (e.g. average usage), environmental factors (e.g. speed limits)
• Automated action
• More data processing on the end device
• Platooning, intelligent transport systems
Data Information Knowledge Wisdom
M2M is evolving from point solutions
Machina Research 107
Big Data Analytics comprises 5 elements
• Different types and
structures of data accessed
• Different types and
structures of data accessed
• Context within which data is created and managed
• Context within which data is created and managed
• Rate at which data is
delivered & consumed
• Rate at which data is
delivered & consumed
• Amount of data that requires processing
• Amount of data that requires processing
Size Speed
StructureSituation
Machina Research’s Five S’s of Big DataSource: Machina Research 2013
Significance
• What is Big Data? Isn’t it just awhole load more data to beanalysed?
• No. Big Data is the interplay of allfive factors of size, speed,structure, situation andsignificance where ‘significance’ isderived from data throughanalytics
• What distinguishes Big Data fromtraditional Business Intelligence(BI) analysis is the sheer scale andcomplexity of the data as well asthe highlighted immediacy(speed) of using the data forfurther action and/or decision-making
Machina Research 108
Data significance reaches its peak when processed information saves lives directlyData Significance Factor– signifies the predicted importance of the data (in applications) at the data analytics processing stage
DSF-0Potential significance derived from historical, high
volume data analysis - no immediate value from real-time processing or data integrations
DSF-1Significance in trend analysis scenarios – less importance
on real-time processing and no integration with other data sets
DSF-2Significant in trend analysis scenarios – less importance on real-time processing but with integration with other
data sets
DSF-3Significant in real-time analysis scenarios with potential
life saving impacts or high financial or commercial implications without data integrations
DSF-4Significant in real-time analysis scenarios with high
financial or commercial implications through integrated data set analysis
DSF-5Extremely significant in real-time analysis scenarios with
potential immediate life saving impacts through integrated data set analysis
0
1 - 2
1 - 3
2 - 4
3 - 4
5
0 - 1
1 - 2
1 - 3
2 - 5
2 - 4
4 - 5
Priority ImpactAs related to data processing outcomes
Very high
High
High
Medium
Low
Very low
Predictability
Emergency/eCall in Automotive
Equipment Monitoring in Construction
Coronary Heart Disease Monitoring - Healthcare
Smart meter in Utilities
Remotte diagnostics and maintenance – M&SC
HVAC in Intelligent Buildings
In summary, eight factors continue to accelerate the growth of M2M & Big Data
Improved connectivity
Cheaper data plans Cheaper data storage
Cheaper processingCheaper modules
New data processing technology
Greater adoption of M2M + IoT (device
driven growth of Big Data)
Integration with mobile business
process solutions
M2M Big Data
speed cost volume
2G -> 3G -> LTE
Data and bandwidth rates
Ranging from USD$12 to
USD$31
SFA, FFA, M2M, etc.
Hadoop, NoSQL
incl. cloud based solutions
CEP tech changes costs
Tipping points within industries
Machina Research 110
Size and significance of data will be factors determining service provider focus
Emergency / eCall
Emergency / eCall
Audio Visual displays
Audio Visual displays
Securityin Intelligent Buildings
Securityin Intelligent Buildings
“Sig
nific
ance
” of
the
data
Smart meterSmart meter
Vehicle security &
tracking
Vehicle security &
tracking
Approx. size of bubble indicates relative number of connected devices in 2013
Worried well – remote
monitoring
Worried well – remote
monitoring
low
Warehousing & Storage
Warehousing & Storage
Goods monitoring & payments
Goods monitoring & payments
Worried well – personalmonitoring
Worried well – personalmonitoring
Environmentalmonitoring
Environmentalmonitoring
Equipment monitoring in construction
Equipment monitoring in construction
Environment &
Public Safety (CCTV)
Environment &
Public Safety (CCTV)
TelemedicineTelemedicine
Volume of data (per event)low high
DSF-
0DS
F-5
Machina Research 111
Data communities and Subnets of Things will emerge as stepping stones before IoT
M2M Solutions as standalone devices and/or propositions (e.g. vehicle telematics, machine telemetry, etc.)
M2M Solutions as devices and/or propositions within an enterprise or functional solution (e.g. remote diagnostics and maintenance, access control, traffic light management, event ticketing, etc.)
M2M Solutions as devices and/or propositions deployed within a specific industry area and/or sector (e.g. micro-generation in intelligent buildings, smart cities, etc)
M2M Solutions as integrated data shares in a “data community” (i.e. integrated insofar as data from devices across multiple industry sectors are combined for the purposes of analysis)
Intranets of Things
Internet of Things
Subnets of Things
Data Communities and Subnets of ThingsSource: Machina Research 2013
Agenda
• About Machina Research• What is M2M?• Technology• Management/control• Data analytics• The revenue opportunity
Machina Research 112
Revenue forecast metrics
Machina Research 113Definitions are provided in the Supporting Material section below
By 2022, M2M will be a USD 1.2 trillion opportunity
• Total M2M revenue will grow from USD200 billion in 2011 to USD1.2 trillion in 2022, a CAGR of 18%
• Total revenue includes:o device costs where
connectivity is integral to the device
o module costs where devices can optionally have connectivity enabled
o monthly subscription, connectivity and traffic fees
Machina Research 114
Total revenue from machine-to-machine, 2011-22Source: Machina Research 2012
Device and service revenues will comprise the vast majority of the M2M market
Machina Research 115
Composition of Total M2M Revenues, 2022Source: Machina Research 2012
Service revenue will be dominated by service wrap
Machina Research 116
Composition of Total M2M Service Revenues, 2022Source: Machina Research 2012
Composition of Total M2M Connectivity Service Revenues, 2022Source: Machina Research 2012
Simple device count is not representative of sector revenue opportunities
Machina Research 117
Connected devices, cellular connections and revenue by sector, 2022Source: Machina Research 2012
Disruption persists throughout the M2M market
Machina Research 118
• Falling price points
• Competition• Fit-for-M2M• On-device
processing• Licensing fees• Embedded SIM
• More products/ verticalisation
• Global alliances• eUICC/IMSI
swapping• Partnerships• More focus
from CSPs
• Technology rationalisation
• New arrivals • Technology
agnosticism• Standardisation• Pressure to
minimise costs
• Evangelisation of new biz models
• Channels• Privacy &
security• “Big data”
analytics
Modules/ devices Networks Service
providersCustomer/ end
user
Contact me
Matt HattonDirector
[email protected]: +44 7787 577886
Skype: mattyhattonTwitter: @MattyHatton
Machina Research 119
About Machina Research
• The leading research/consulting firm focusing on the emerging opportunity for new connected devices and applications, i.e. M2M
• Supporting our clients througho Machina Research Advisory Service – our multi-client annual subscription
service comprising forecasts, reports and access to the analysts (see below)o Custom Research & Consulting –client-specific research
• We have the most focused research on the M2M field of any analyst firm in the world: we provide the most granular forecasts for the global M2M opportunity, supported by the most robust analysis of market issues and dynamics
• Other coverage areas include NFC, the internet of things and ‘Big Data’ analytics
• The company was founded in 2011 by Matt Hatton and Jim Morrish, two experienced industry analysts and the team has grown substantially since then
Machina Research 121
About Machina Research
Market/demand side Provider/supply side
• Quantifying the opportunity for M2M – Forecast Database providing 10
year forecasts across 201 countries for 61 application groups
– Sector Reports annually updated reports on our 13 sectors (including Automotive, Healthcare and Utilities)
• Addressing the issues that determine success– Research Notes - 3 per month on
major qualitative issues such as platforms, value chain roles, big data, NFC, and security
– Strategy Reports - covering areas such as Big Data, platforms, modules/devices, CSP best practice, etc.
Advisory Service and Custom Research
Machina Research 123
The Advisory Service consists of six elements• The Forecast Database
o The Forecast Database underpins much of the work that we do. It provides comprehensive forecasts of the M2M and mobile broadband market across each of thirteen connectivity sectors, covering 61 application groups in around 200 countries. The forecast covers numbers of connections, traffic and revenue for each of the application groups with splits by technology (2G, 3G, 4G, short range, MAN, fixed WAN and satellite) and a comprehensive breakdown of the revenue opportunity.
• Strategy Reportso 6 Strategy Reports per year. These focus on key strategic issues such as software platforms, Big Data analytics, and device/module
pricing. It also includes our regular Communications Service Provider Benchmarking report. All of the Strategy Reports are accessible through the Research section of this website. Strategy Reports are typically 40-60 pages.
• Sector Reportso 13 Sector Reports per year. Each Sector Report reviews the major drivers and barriers for growth of M2M in a particular vertical
sector (e.g. healthcare, utilities etc) and analyses the key market dynamics, including how MNOs, fixed operators, service providers and vendors might go about identifying and realising addressable opportunities. Each application group is examined individually with case studies and forecast analysis. The associated forecast excel data sheet includes very granular 10 year market forecasts mirroring those in the Forecast Database. Typically Sector Reports are 50-100 pages in length.
• Research Noteso 36 Research Notes per year. These are shorter reports that focus on a specific issue, company or application and examine it in greater
detail. Also, the short-form report can be used to comment on important events as they occur, allowing our analysts to react quickly to a new development and quickly inform our clients of the implications. Research notes are typically 5-6 pages in length.
• Strategy Briefingso An opportunity for direct face-to-face interaction between the client and the Machina Research analysts. Typically a Strategy Briefing
will involve a presentation at the client’s premises on a theme agreed with the client within (or closely related to) the scope of existing research.
• Client Enquiryo Clients also get direct access to our analysts in the form of enquiries about the published materials and associated topics within M2M.
Machina Research 124
The Machina Research Forecast Database
Machina Research 125
• We recognise that M2M is a very diverse market that requires a granular approach
• We have developed detailed M2M forecasts based on our thirteen focus sectors (see left)
• Within each sector there are very different dynamics for each application, so we forecast each of 61 application groups and hundreds of applications separately
Example application: Comprehensive assisted living solutions
Machina Research 127
HouseholdHub
device
Blood pressure monitor
Scales Pulse oximeter
• Machina Research distinguishes between devices and revenue generating units (RGUs)
• There may be multiple RGUs per connections (e.g. applications such as navigation or usage-based insurance running on a car platform)
• Or there may be multiple devices per RGU, as in the example here:o 1 RGUo 4 deviceso 3 short-range connectionso 1 Wide area connection …
• In some cases the hub unit is counted in another category, e.g. a fixed broadband CPE
• Secondary/ backup connections are not counted
The result: an incredibly detailed database of global M2M forecasts used by global clients
• For each application group we forecast:o Connections
• Split by tech (2G, 3G, 4G, short range, MAN, FWAN and satellite)
o Traffic• Split by tech (WWAN, short range,
MAN, FWAN and satellite)o Revenue
• Split by total, MNO addressable, MNO expected and mobile network traffic revenue
• Split by value chain components (see below)
Ten year forecasts (2012-22) including millions of data points
• 201 countries, 6 regions
Machina Research 128
Revenue forecast metrics
Machina Research 129Definitions are provided in the Supporting Material section below
We cover the qualitative aspects of the market through three deliverable types• Strategy Reports
o 6 Strategy Reports per year.o These focus on key strategic issues. In 2013 our Strategy Reports looked at the following topics:
• Software platforms• Big Data analytics• Device/module pricing. • M2M Communications Service Provider Benchmarking
o All of the Strategy Reports are accessible through the Research section of this website. Strategy Reports are typically 40-60 pages.
• Research Noteso 36 Research Notes per year. o These are shorter reports that focus on a specific issue, company or application and examine it in greater detail.
Also, the short-form report can be used to comment on important events as they occur, allowing our analysts to react quickly to a new development and quickly inform our clients of the implications.
o Research notes are typically 5-6 pages in length.• Sector Reports
o 13 Sector Reports per year. o Each Sector Report reviews the major drivers and barriers for growth of M2M in a particular vertical sector (e.g.
healthcare, utilities etc) and analyses the key market dynamics, including how MNOs, fixed operators, service providers and vendors might go about identifying and realising addressable opportunities. Each application group is examined individually with case studies and forecast analysis.
o The associated forecast excel data sheet includes very granular 10 year market forecasts mirroring those in the Forecast Database.
o Typically Sector Reports are 50-100 pages in length.
Machina Research 131
Strategy Reports 2013
• Dec-13 (due) Strategy Report - M2M/IoT platforms o This Strategy Report will examine the evolving landscape for M2M/IoT software platforms. It will examine the changing dynamics as
we evolve from platforms supporting stovepipe vertical applications, to the M2M/IoT application enablement platform. • Dec-13 Strategy Report – M2M devices and modules
o This Strategy Report will focus on the hardware side of M2M solutions, in particular cellular devices. This will include analysis of module/device pricing, and implications of the evolution from 2G to 3G and ultimately LTE. It will also include a forecast for global M2M module shipments by technology.
• Sep-13 Strategy Report - Creating value from data analytics in M2M: the Big Data opportunityo This extensive Strategy Report examines the topic of Big Data and its impact on machine-to-machine (M2M) communications. It is
based on detailed and exhaustive discussions with key relevant stakeholders, supplemented by Machina Research’s extensive understanding of the changing dynamics of the industry.
o The report starts by examining what we mean by the term ‘Big Data’, identifying the right ways to define and measure it, including a look at our own measure of ‘Data Significance Factor’. It then goes on to look at the impact that Big Data will have on M2M, and vice versa, in terms of creating new data sources and justifying new investments in sensor networks. The final two sections focus on the future, looking at the challenges faced in Big Data and how these can be overcome, as well as how Big Data, M2M and the Internet of Things will evolve and merge.
o The report provides invaluable analysis for enterprises seeking to gain an improved understanding and awareness of Big Data, andservice providers looking to identify opportunity areas to develop and improve data processing services for their customers (e.g. IT infrastructure improvements and cloud services).
• Apr-2013 Strategy Report – M2M CSP Benchmarking Reporto Provides Machina Research’s view on the likely long-term success of Communication Service Providers in the M2M market.o In last year’s report Machina Research focused on seven CSPs: AT&T, Deutsche Telekom, Orange, Telefónica, Telenor, Verizon and
Vodafone. This year we include profiles of two additional CSPs that demonstrate some different approaches to addressing the M2M opportunity, specifically Telekom Austria Group M2M and Telia Sonera.
o We analysed the CSPs on six criteria: Pedigree, Platforms, Place, Partnerships, Process, and People. The report includes a 3-6 page profile of each CSP, examining their capabilities in each of the six areas.
Machina Research 132
Research Notes provide invaluable understanding of the market
Date TitleSep-13 M2M Leaderboard: Vodafone extends its lead, AT&T and Deutsche Telekom continue their battle for second placeSep-13 AT&T focuses on M2M/IoT to expand its innovation Foundry initiativeSep-13 Vodafone sells Verizon Wireless stake and maybe opens door for AT&T tie-up: the implications for M2MSep-13 Overcoming the permanent roaming challenge for M2M: Vodafone deal with Datora shows one solution, while AT&T keeps its options openSep-13 In active M2M industry M&A season, US-based solution provider RACO Wireless provides global expansion strategy template with acquisition of Position Logic
Sep-13 Use of remote provisioning in M2M will focus on late binding of long life-span high bandwidth applicationsSep-13 Regulatory compliance and client demand drive MNOs to embrace IMSI swapping/remote provisioning in M2MAug-13 Watch out, here comes the new M2M Apps storeJun-13 On-Ramp, Sigfox and Weightless: a strategic comparison of competing approaches to M2MJun-13 Low Power Wide Area Wireless networks: a potential global market of 15.5 billion M2M connectionsJun-13 Low Power Wide Area Wireless network technologies for M2M: a technical comparison of On-Ramp, Sigfox and WeightlessJun-13 Confronting prospects of waning growth, Axeda adds partners and new capital injection to gain global scale and expand functionalityMay-13 M2M Leaderboard: AT&T snatches second spot from DT as top 4 all grow their expected global market shareMay-13 Addressing diverse M2M opportunities requires a different approach to channelsMay-13 Is there a need for data partners in the M2M ecosystem?Apr-13 Integrating M2M and mobile enterprise applications resources has distinct opportunities and advantagesApr-12 Satellite operators look to build vertical expertise to capitalise on the M2M opportunityApr-12 M2M & Big Data – how to monetise data in the Automotive sectorMar-13 Near field communications could significantly enhance most M2M solutionsMar-13 Smart Home market is ripe for turnkey solutions, although channels remain unclearMar-13 Upgradeable licensing fees for 3G/LTE would remove a lot of friction in M2MMar-13 Global M2M statistics: what does the data tell us? Mar-13 Momentum is building behind usage-based insuranceFeb-13 Not all devices are equally suited to M2M connectivityFeb-13 How MNOs can grow M2M revenue
Machina Research 133
Research Notes published in February-September 2013
136© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
Conclusions
The IoT is around the corner.There is a huge market opportunityMany challenges ahead:
Technology is (almost) here, but must be optimized.• Zero-Power operation • Dense deployments• Long distances• Simplicity
New Business Models are needed.Politicians must push for it (smart cities)Humans in the loop
137© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
IoT World Forum, October 2013 The IoT is nascent, and its value needs to be defined 90% of the business is comprised of start-ups
No single company will build the IoT Major companies will need to find ways to engage with and enable
these builders.
Industrial internet + consumers-facing opportunities. Consumers will be a source of innovation in the IoT.
Arduino, Raspberry Pi, Thingsquare, Libelium’s Cooking Hacks , Smart Citizen Kit, TheThings.io, Electric Imp to Telefonica’s recently announced Thinking Things, and Intel’s Galileo, among others.
The IoT will not rest on one killer app, but on openness and interoperability
Source: http://www.claropartners.com/the-emerging-iot-business-landscape-insights-from-the-iot-world-forum-2/
138© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
Final Take-Away Message
Henry Ford
“If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said…
A FASTER HORSE!”
139© 2013 M. Dohler, M. Hatton, J. Alonso-Zarate
THANKS
Mischa Dohler, King’s College London, [email protected] (@mischadohler )Matt Hatton, Machina Research, [email protected] (@MattyHatton)Jesus Alonso-Zarate, CTTC, [email protected] (@jalonsozarate)