magmatic ni-cu-pge deposits...cryptic craton margin ni-cu-(pge) deposits in the highly-mineralized...
TRANSCRIPT
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE
Mineralization in
Canada
CM Lesher1 and MG Houlé1,2 1Laurentian University, Goodman School of Mines, Sudbury
2Geological Suruvey of Canada, Québec
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Overview Ni-Cu-PGE mineralization in Canada is associated
with a wide range of ages, parental magma
compositions, geologic settings, host unit
geometries, and tectonic settings
Archean deposits (Abitibi, McFauld’s Lake) are
generally higher grade, but smaller
Proterozoic deposits (Sudbury, Raglan,
Thompson, Voisey’s Bay, Grenville) are generally
lower grade, but can be very large
Phanerozoic deposits (Wellgreen, Turnagain, Giant
Mascot) are generally small and most are
subeconomic
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
< 5
5-20
20-50
50-100
100-200
200-500
500-20000
Contained Ni (kt)
Canadian Ni-Cu-(PGE) Endowment
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Raglan Lesher 2007 GAC-MDD Spec Publ 5
gabbro
m$
gabbro
m$
Ccp
Pn
Po
Mag
(Ol)
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Thompson
Hosted by
(or located near)
UM sills that are
localized in S-
rich parts of the
Pipe Formation
Layton-Matthews et al. 2007 GAC-MDD Spec Publ 5
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Thompson
Chr Ol
Ccp Pn
Po
Chr
Layton-Matthews et al. 2007 GAC-MDD Spec Publ 5
Disseminated
Ni-Rich Sediments
Breccia
Ore
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Dumont
Sciorentino et al. 2015 Econ Geol
1 Po-Pn-(Ccp)
2 Pn
3 Pn-Aw
4 Pn-Hz-Aw
5 Hz-Aw incre
asin
g
mo
dif
icati
on
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Lynn Lake L. Hulbert GSC
dunite-pyroxenite-norite-
gabbro pipes
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé after Hulbert 2002 GSC
Wellgreen www.welgreenplatinum.com
WS506-153/386-390’
2.76% Cu, 1.16% Ni
2.01 ppm Pt, 3.38 ppm Pd
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé after Hulbert 2002 GSC
Turnagain
Nixon et al. 2015 GSC TGI4
dunite
hornblendite >
< wehrlite
clinopyroxenite >
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Grade-Tonnage Distribution
Resource (Kt)
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10,000
Jaireth Geo Sci Aust
Thompson
deposits are
larger
Probably a
reflection of
low magma:
sulfide ratio
(R factor)
100
80
60
40
20
0
Quantile
Deposits in
Abitibi are similar
to deposits in
Eastern Goldfields and
Southern Cross (WA)
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Province/Domai
n
Examples
Age
Superior Shebandoan ON, Alexo-Dundonald, Langmuir-Redstone, Montcalm ON
Dumont, Marbridge QC
Eagle’s Nest-Eagle 2-AT12 ON
Thierry-Norton L ON
Mayville-Maskwa MB
2.7 Ga
Rae Ferguson Lake NU 2.7 Ga
Snowbird
Tectonic Zone
Nickel King NU
Axis Lake SK 1.9 Ga
Hearne Rankin Inlet NU 2.7 Ga
La Ronge
La Ronge
Rottenstone
Namew Lake MB
Lynn Lake MB
Rottenstone-Nemeiben SK
1.9 Ga
Circum-Superior Thompson MB
Raglan, Expo Ungava-Méquillon QC
Hopes Advance, Retty Lake, Blue Lake QC
1.9 Ga
Province/Domain I
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Province/
Domain
Examples
Age
Southern Shakespeare ON 2.4 Ga
Sudbury ON 1.85 Ga
Nain Voisey’s Bay NL 1.33 Ga
Grenville Limerick ON
Lac Edouard, Renzy QC
1.4-1.2 Ga
Mid-Contient Rift Marathon ON
Great Lakes ON
1.1 Ga
Appalachian St Stephen NL 421-410 Ma
(Devonian)
Wrangell Wellgreen YK 232 Ma
(U Triassic)
Yukon-Tanana Turnagain BC 190 Ma
(Jurassic)
Coast Plutonic Giant Mascot BC
Cogburn BC
93 Ma
(L Cretaceous)
Province/Domain II
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Eons Eras0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Ma
AR
CH
EA
N
PR
EC
AM
BR
IAN
PR
OT
ER
OZ
OIC
PH
AN
ER
OZ
OIC
EOARCHEAN
PALEOARCHEAN
MESOARCHEAN
NEOARCHEAN
PALEO
PROTEROZOIC
MESO
PROTEROZOIC
NEO
PROTEROZOIC
PALEOZOIC
MESOZOIC
CENOZOIC
Abitibi-Wawa belt (ca. 2720-2710 Ma)
Lac des Iles (ca. 2689 Ma) Quetico intrusions (ca. 2690 Ma)
Lac Gayot (ca. 2880 Ma)
Circum-Superior (TNB - ca. 1881 Ma, CSB - ca. 1882 Ma, LBT - ca. 1884 Ma)
Turnagain (ca. 190 Ma)
Giant Mascot (ca. 93 Ma)
Wellgreen (ca. 232 Ma)
St. Stephen (ca. 421-410 Ma)
La Bostonnais Complex - Grenville (ca. 1390 Ma)
Sudbury Igneous Complex (ca. 1850 Ma)
East Bull Lake Suite (ca. 2490-2475 Ma)
Shakespeare - Nipissing Intrusive Suite (ca. 2217 Ma)
Voisey’s Bay - Nain Plutonic Suite (ca. 1334 Ma)
Muskox - Mackenzie magmatism (ca. 1270 Ma)
Coldwell / Thunder - Mid Continent Rift (ca. 1108 Ma)
Adamson River - Prince Albert Group (ca. 2970 Ma)
Lynn Lake (ca. 1870 Ma)
Ring of Fire - Bird River - BUOGE (ca. 2742-2734 Ma)
Baikie Showing - Florence Lake belt (ca. 3000 Ma)
Deposit Associations
Komatiite-associated
Gabbro-associated
Flood basalt-related
Impact-related
Orogenic-related
Ages
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Cumulus
Phases
Parental
Magma
Canadian
Examples
Other
Examples
Ol high-Mg
kom
Alexo-Dundonald, Langmuir-Redstone,
Dumont, Marbridge, Sothman
Kambalda, Mt Keith,
Perseverance
Ol-Chr low-Mg
kom
Birchtree, Bucko,
Manibridge, Thompson
Ol-Chr-Cpx kom
basalt
Raglan
Expo Ungava-Méquillon
Ol-Chr-Cpx-
Plag flood basalt Wellgreen, Canalask Noril’sk
Ol-Chr-Opx-Cpx contaminated
kom
Namew Lake
Eagle’s Nest, Eagle Two, AT-12
Ol-Opx-Cpx
Ol-Cpx-Plag ferropicrite
Jinchuan
Pechenga
Ol-Plag high-Al basalt Voisey’s Bay
Ol-Cpx-Hb-
Phlog
ankaramite
(hydrous
picrite)
Turnagain
Ol-Opx-Hb contaminated
ankaramite? Giant Mascot, Cogburn
Opx-Plag Qtz diorite Sudbury
Cumulus Assemblages
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Ore Compositions
Sudbury, Raglan, and
Thompson exhibit patterns
consistent with magmas
derived from from
peridotitic (normal
asthenospheric) mantle
Voiseys Bay exhibits a
pattern consistent with a
magma derived from
pyroxenitic (metasomatized)
mantle
data from Naldrett 2004 Springer
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
Pd Cu Pt Rh Ru Ni Ir Co
Me
tal/P
rim
itiv
e M
an
tle
Noril'sk Sudbury Duluth
Thompson Mt Keith Kambalda
Perseverance Raglan
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
Pd Cu Pt Rh Ru Ni Ir Co
Meta
l/P
rim
itiv
e M
antle
Raglan Jinchuan
Pechenga Voisey's Bay
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Tectonic Settings Divergent Margin
Continental Rift: Alexo-Dundonald, Langmuir-Redstone-
Sothman, Wellgreen
Rifted continental margin: Expo-Méquillon, Raglan,
Sudbury*, Thompson, Labrador Trough, Voisey’s Bay
Convergent Margin: Turnagain, Giant Mascot
Suprasubduction?
Local extension?
Post-orogenic?
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Tectonic Settings
Mid-OceanRidge
RiftedArc
BackArc
OceanicIsland
RiftedMargin
ContinentalRift
Acoje(Philippines)
Krsaste(Albania)
JinchuanPechengaSudburyRaglan
ThompsonVoisey’s Bay
DuluthKambaldaMt KeithNoril'sk
ZimbabweAbitibi
Oxford-StullAbitibi?
Oxford-Stull?
AguablancaKotalahti-VammalaRåna & Vakkerlien
Selebi-Phikwe and TatiSally MalayWrangeliaQueticoGrenville
None Known
ConvergentMargin
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
1.9 Ga Circum-Superior Belt
Baragar & Scoates 1987 Geol Soc Spec Publ 33
TNB
Raglan
Sudbury
Location of
Sudbury is
coincidental,
but the
emplacement of
Ni-Cu-PGE
protores in
Nipissing and
East Bull Lake
suite intrusions
at 2.4 and 2.2
Ga was not!
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Preferential Location along Craton Margins
History
First noticed by Newmont and Inco in the 1960s
Defined by Baragar & Scoates in late 1980s
Used by WMC in the 1990s
Concept
Craton keels impede
intrusion of magma
High-flux magmatism
is “steered” toward
craton margins
(Kerrich et al. 2005
Econ Geol 100th Anniv Vol)
from Begg et al. 2010 Econ Geol
A
SCLM
SCLM
crust
(paleo)craton margin
marginal basin
crustB
1
1
2
2
34
34
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Snowbird Tectonic Zone
Mahan & Williams in press Geology
NK
NK: Nickel King
AL: Axis Lake
AL
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Cryptic Craton Margin Ni-Cu-(PGE)
deposits in the
highly-mineralized
Kalgoorlie Terrane
(e.g., Kambalda-
Perseverance-Mt
Keith) formed along
the margin between
two cratons
Sm-Nd and Lu-Hf
isotopic data
needed to better
understand the
structure of our
cratons and their
SCLM roots
Map of Yilgarn Block showing Nd
isotope model ages of grantitic
plutons (Champion & Cassidy 2007
Geosci Aust) and location of highly-
mineralized Kalgoorlie Terrane
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Geological Settings
Impact melt
sheet (Sudbury)
Volcanic (Alexo, Langmuir, Raglan)
Subvolcanic (Dumont, Eagle’s Nest, Expo Ungava,
Mequillon, Sothman, Thompson, Wellgreen)
Plutonic (Giant Mascot, Turnagain, Voisey’s Bay)
Jinchuan
DuluthPechengaMt Keith-Perseverance
Voisey’s Bay
ThompsonKabangaAguablanca
Alexo/Kambalda/Raglan
Deep Crust
Shallow Crust Noril’sk-
Talnakh
Sudbury
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Lava/Magma Channelization Lava channels: Raglan
Channelized sheet flows: Alexo
Channelized feeder sills: Sothman, Thompson
Feeders: Lynn Lake, Eagle’s Nest, Méquillon,
Voisey’s Bay
Giant Mascot and Turnagain occur in composite
plutons/intrusions that have been proposed to be
emplaced as mushes (i.e., not flow-through systems
like high sulfide systems), which may be why they are
low grade
Sudbury occurs in an impact melt sheet
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Asthenospheric Mantle
Langmuir ores
Langmuir BIF
Windarra ores
Windarra BIF
Kambalda ores
Tasuiak gneiss
Eastern Deeps
Kambalda sediments
Raglan ores
Raglan semi-pelites
Alexo ores
Thompson BIF
Thompson ores
Jinchuan ores
Alexo FW andesite
Duluth ores
Duluth sediments
Noril'sk economic Noril'sk uneconomic
Noril'sk barren
Nebo-Babel ores
Hart ores
Hart BIF (all facies)
Enderbitic gneiss
Ovoid
VTT and BBS
Discovery Hill
Reid Brook Zone
Fortaleza de Minas ores
Phoenix-
Selkirk ores
Phikwe-Phokoje-
Dikoloti ores
-18 -12 -6 0 6 12 18 24
d34S
Sulfur Sources
Voisey’s Bay
Raglan
Thompson
Alexo
Langmuir
Hart
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Geological Model: Sulfide-Rich Deposits
Channelized parts of dynamic mafic-ultramafic magma
systems that provide heat to incorporate S from country rocks
and provide high magma:sulfide ratio (R factor)
Thermomechanical erosion of S-bearing country rocks,
normally at or near the same stratigraphic level
Upgrading of sulfide xenomelts PGE>Cu>Ni
Canadian Examples: Abitibi, Eagle’s Nest, Raglan, Thompson,
Voisey’s Bay
Other Examples: Jinchuan, Kamblada, Perseverance,
Noril’sk, Pechenga
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Geological Model: Sulfide-Rich Deposits
Contamination and Metal Depletion in a
Dynamic Volcanic Ore-Forming System
Silicatexenomelt
Magma
Xenolith Sulfidexenomelt
Os-richmaficresidue?
Re & Os mobilized?
Unconsolidatedsulfidic interflowsediment
strong recrystallization
sulfide-out
country rock
graphite-out
Fe-Ni-Cu-(PGE)
sulfide meltS C
Thermo-mechanicalerosion
Contaminated,metal-depleted
lava
Uncontaminated,sulfide-undersaturatedmagma
Contaminatedsample
Xenovolatiles
Wholesale melting, incongruent melting, devolatilization, andcontact metamorphismof country rocks
Olivine
Lesher et al. 2001 Can Min
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Geological Model: Sulfide-Rich Deposits
Lesher et al. 2001 Can Min
Decoupling of Lithophile and Chalcophile Components in and Thermal Aureole aroundMineralized Undifferentiated CumulateFeeder Sills in the Ospwagan Group
Misciblexenomelt
Xenolith?
'skarn'
carbonate-out
country rock
sulfide-out
sulfide meltSC
Thick partial/incongruent meltingcontact metamorphic profile(expected but not observed)
Immiscible sulfide
Contaminated
magma
Sulfide faciesiron-formation
Contaminated, fractionated, S-saturated CE depleted derivative magmalower Mg# HILE>MILENb/Nb* < 1 less +ve eNdmore +ve g Os
Uncontaminated, unfractionated, S-undersaturatedCE undepletedparental magma higher Mg# HILE<MILENb/Nb* ~ 1 eNd > 0g Os ~ 0
Mineralized undifferentiatedcumulate feeder sill
dunite
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Geological Model: Sulfide-Poor Deposits
Magma contains enough S to generate low-grade
disseminated sulfides ± alloys via cotectic Ol-Sul
accumulation
Serpentinization may upgrade lower tenor magmatic Po-
Pn-(Ccp) assemblages to higher tenor pentlandite (FeNi)9S8,
heazlewoodite Ni3S2, and awaruite Ni3Fe bearing assemblages
Beware of resource estimates reporting total Ni rather than
sulfide-alloy Ni, as significant amounts of unrecoverable Ni may
be housed in silicates and oxides
Canadian Examples: Dumont, Turnagain
Other Examples: Mt Keith
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Geological Model: Sulfide-Poor Deposits
Facies changes in dacite
result in different degrees
of thermomechanical
erosion
Ol-(Sul) cumulates form
in zones of high magma flux
Fiorentini et al. 2007 Econ Geol
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Most Alaskan Complexes are deficient in sulfide because of
the elevated fO2 conditions in hydrated magmas generated
in the suprasubduction zone environments (e.g., Thakatura
et al. 2008 JGSI)
At high fO2 (>QFM+2), up to 10x more S may be dissolved
as sulfate (Jugo 2009 Geology)
Local enrichment in PGE alloys may occur in local
reducing environments during chromite crystallization
(Finnigan et al. 2008 J Pet)
Erosion of these generates characteristic placer
mineralization
Canadian Examples: Giant Mascot, Turnagain
Other Examples: Urals
Geological Model: Low-Sulfide Alaskan Complexes
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Geological Model: High-Sulfide Alaskan Complexes
Requires assimilation of C-bearing country rocks to reduce
the fO2 of the magma and exsolve sulfide
Country rocks may also contribute S, resulting in a
spectrum from S contents depending on the
contaminant(s)
Early assimilation of S (prior to significant Ol crystallization)
generates Ni-Co-IPGE-rich, Cu-PPGE-poor sulfides
Late assimilation of S (after significant Ol crystallization)
generates Ni-Co-IPGE-poor, Cu-PPGE-rich sulfides
Canadian Examples: Samuels Lake (Quetico)?
Other Examples: Duke Island, Salt Chuck, Union Bay
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé Thakatura 2009 PhD Indiana U, Thakatura et al. 2008 JSG India; Thakatura et al. 2014 Econ Geol
Geological Model: High-Sulfide Alaskan Complexes
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Geological Model: High-Sulfide Alaskan Complexes
Thakatura 2009 PhD Indiana U, Thakatura et al. 2008 JSG India; Thakatura et al. 2014 Econ Geol
SGS Open House – Dec 2015 – Lesher & Houlé
Most Favourable Ingredients Source of large amounts of sulfide-undersaturated
magma over a short time period: mantle plumes appear to
be most favourable, but do not appear to be essential
Craton margins and/or crustal-scale faults: needed to
focus magma migration, but may not necessarily be nearby
Environment of emplacement containing an external
source of S (sediments, volcanics, or VMS mineralization)
essential for high-sulfide deposits
High-flow, dynamic environment: lava channel or magma
conduit to facilitate thermomechanical
erosion/devolatilization, high metal tenors, and/or
mobilization of sulfides
Favourable site for ore deposition: depending on fluid
dynamics of lava/magma emplacement